|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24250A0542024-09-0606 September 2024 LRA - Requests for Additional Information - Set 1 - Email from Brian Harris to Adam Peck ML24250A0502024-09-0606 September 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Diablo Canyon Revision to Technical Specification 5.5.16 for Permanent Extension of Type a and Type C Leak Rate Test Frequencies ML24235A2032024-08-22022 August 2024 OEDO-24-00083 - 10 CFR 2.206 - Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 Seismic - Final Determination e-mail - EPID L-2024-CRS-0000 ML24205A0622024-07-23023 July 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Diablo Canyon Request for Approval to Extend the Alternative for Use of Full Structural Weld Overlay ML24187A1382024-07-0202 July 2024 License Renewal Environmental Review: Summary of June 27 Clarification Call Regarding Pg&Es Response to RCI AQN-3 ML24184C0422024-07-0202 July 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information Diablo Canyon 50.69 risk-informed Categorization ML24149A0832024-05-28028 May 2024 Acceptance Review: Diablo Canyon Request for Alternative Security Measures and Exemption for the Early Warning System ML24145A0612024-05-22022 May 2024 Written Limited Appearance Statement of Doris Nassiry ML24136A1622024-05-15015 May 2024 OEDO-24-00083 (E-Mail) 10 CFR 2.206 - Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Seismic - Initial Assessment ML24134A1872024-05-10010 May 2024 Written Limited Appearance Statement of Charlene M. Woodcock ML24134A1902024-05-10010 May 2024 Written Limited Appearance Statement of Shelley Hamilton ML24122C6702024-04-29029 April 2024 Request from NRC Review of a Draft EA for an Exemption for the Limerick Generating Station ML24095A3172024-04-0404 April 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Diablo Canyon Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Pressure and Temperature Limits Report ML24088A2382024-03-28028 March 2024 10 CFR 2.206 - Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 OEDO-24-00083 - Screen-in e-mail L-2024-CRS-0000 ML24058A1032024-03-0808 March 2024 OEDO-23-00350-NRR - Initial Assessment - 10 CFR 2.206 Petition from Mothers for Peace and Friends of the Earth Regarding Diablo Canyon ML24071A1762024-03-0707 March 2024 Email - (External Sender) NRC Proceeding on Diablo Canyon 50-275 and 50-323 LR-2 ML24067A0902024-03-0505 March 2024 Email to Diane Curran from the Office of the Secretary, Assistant for Rulemaking and Adjudications, Russell Chazell ML24067A0892024-03-0505 March 2024 Email Response from Diane Curran to Office of the Secretary, Assistant for Rulemaking and Adjudications, Russell Chazell ML24067A0882024-03-0404 March 2024 Email Hearing Request from San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, Friends of the Earth, and Environmental Working Group ML24060A0022024-02-28028 February 2024 (External Sender) Pre-Sub Mittal EWS Participants List E-mail ML24045A1972024-02-0606 February 2024 Tribal Consultation Request ML24033A3062024-02-0101 February 2024 Dcisc 2-1-2024 Email: Comments by Mr. Bruce Severance at This Mornings Public Meeting Re Scope of Review for DCPP License Extension ML23334A0912023-11-30030 November 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Diablo Canyon 1 and 2 - Audit Questions for License Amendment Associated with TSTF-505, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4b ML23335A1012023-11-0606 November 2023 OEDO-23-00350-NRR - Screen-in Email - 10 CFR 2.206 Petition from Mothers for Peace and Change.Org Regarding Diablo Canyon ML23306A0422023-11-0202 November 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Diablo Canyon Request to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, risk-informed Categorization and Treatment of SSCs ML23230A0702023-08-18018 August 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Diablo Canyon Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times RITSTF Initiative 4b ML23165A2702023-06-14014 June 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Diablo Canyon Revision to the Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Program Withdrawal Schedule ML23157A2392023-06-0505 June 2023 Limited Appearance Statement from Nina Babiarz in the Matter of the Diablo Canyon ISFSI License Renewal Application ML23096A1792023-04-0606 April 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information Diablo Canyon Exemption Request Regarding Senior Reactor Operator License Application ML23094A1032023-04-0404 April 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Diablo Canyon Exemption Request Regarding Senior Reactor Operator License Application ML23076A0932023-03-16016 March 2023 16-2023 Email - Estimate of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Tons ML23067A0202023-03-0808 March 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis Review ML23046A1042023-02-13013 February 2023 Transmittal Email, Diane Curran to Gibson, 2/13/23, Filing of Formal Opposition to PG&E Exemption Request ML23046A1132023-02-13013 February 2023 Transmittal Email, Paul Bessette to Gibson, 2/13/23, Filing of Formal Opposition to PG&E Exemption Request ML23052A2042023-01-10010 January 2023 E-mail from Paul Bessette Dated 01/10/2023 Regarding Diablo Canyon ML22326A1632022-11-21021 November 2022 Licensee Comment Email on Post-Shutdown Emergency Plan Amendment ML22266A0012022-09-22022 September 2022 (External Sender) E-Mail Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Total Amount of Spent Nuclear Fuel Stored in Tons ML22241A1142022-08-29029 August 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Diablo Canyon Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-569, Revision of Response Time Testing Definitions ML22194A8872022-07-11011 July 2022 September 2022 Emergency Preparedness Exercise Inspection - Request for Information Email ML22187A2652022-07-0606 July 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information: Diablo Canyon Exemption Request for Part 73 force-on-force Training Due to COVID-19 ML22105A0702022-04-15015 April 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Diablo Canyon Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF 577, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections ML22090A0832022-03-31031 March 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Diablo Canyon Request for Approval of a Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program ML22089A1672022-03-29029 March 2022 Email - Acknowledgement of NRC Receipt of Diablo Canyon ISFSI Renewal Application ML22087A0412022-03-25025 March 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Diablo Canyon Request for Approval of Alternative Security Measures for Early Warning System ML22061A2192022-03-0202 March 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - Diablo Canyon Proposed Changes to Emergency Plan for post-shutdown and Permanently Defueled Condition ML21323A0652021-11-19019 November 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Diablo Canyon Revision of Emergency Plan for post-shutdown Condition ML21264A6722021-09-21021 September 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Revised Schedule: Diablo Canyon Request to Revise Technical Specification to Reflect the Permanent Cessation of Reactor Operation ML21215A3432021-08-0303 August 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - Diablo Canyon Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating to Support Diesel Fuel Oil Transfer System Component Planned Maintenance ML21188A0382021-07-0707 July 2021 (External_Sender) DCPP Draft Emergency LAR - Asw ML21189A0662021-07-0707 July 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Additional Draft Request for Additional Information - Diablo Canyon Emergency Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.7.8, Auxiliary Saltwater (Asw) System 2024-09-06
[Table view] Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML24108A0532024-02-29029 February 2024 Comment (51) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24056A0012024-02-24024 February 2024 Comment (50) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24055A0042024-02-24024 February 2024 Comment (49) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24055A0032024-02-24024 February 2024 Comment (48) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24054A1102024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (40) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24058A0052024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (5) of Tony Brown on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 an ML24058A0062024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (6) of Nelson Chloe on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 ML24054A8512024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (46) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24055A0022024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (47) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24058A0042024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (4) of David Bender on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 ML24054A0872024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (38) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24054A8502024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (45) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24054A4442024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (41) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24058A0072024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (7) of Kermit Kubitz on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 ML24054A8492024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (44) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24054A0172024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (37) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24054A0162024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (36) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24054A8482024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (43) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24054A0902024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (39) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24054A4592024-02-23023 February 2024 Comment (42) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24054A0012024-02-22022 February 2024 Comment (31) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24054A0052024-02-22022 February 2024 Comment (35) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24073A0022024-02-22022 February 2024 Comment (8) of Kenneth S. Petersen and Craig H. Piercy on Behalf of American Nuclear Society on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon, Units 1 ML24054A0002024-02-22022 February 2024 Comment (30) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24054A0022024-02-22022 February 2024 Comment (32) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24053A4162024-02-22022 February 2024 Comment (29) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24053A4152024-02-22022 February 2024 Comment (28) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24054A0032024-02-22022 February 2024 Comment (33) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24054A0042024-02-22022 February 2024 Comment (34) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24052A3622024-02-21021 February 2024 Comment (24) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24052A3632024-02-21021 February 2024 Comment (25) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24053A0192024-02-21021 February 2024 Comment (26) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24053A1432024-02-21021 February 2024 Comment (3) of Mila Vujovich-LaBarre on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 ML24053A0222024-02-21021 February 2024 Comment (27) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24051A1052024-02-20020 February 2024 Comment (23) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24050A0102024-02-19019 February 2024 Comment (22) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24050A0032024-02-18018 February 2024 Comment (20) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24050A0042024-02-18018 February 2024 Comment (21) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24046A0222024-02-15015 February 2024 Comment (17) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24047A0982024-02-15015 February 2024 Comment (19) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24108A0542024-02-15015 February 2024 Comment (52) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24047A0972024-02-15015 February 2024 Comment (18) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24046A0792024-02-14014 February 2024 Comment (2) of Anonymous on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 ML24046A0212024-02-14014 February 2024 Comment (16) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24043A1402024-02-12012 February 2024 Comment (15) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24042A0022024-02-11011 February 2024 Comment (14) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24041A0012024-02-0909 February 2024 Comment (13) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24040A0002024-02-0808 February 2024 Comment (9) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24040A0032024-02-0808 February 2024 Comment (12) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24040A0022024-02-0808 February 2024 Comment (11) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping 2024-02-09
[Table view] |
Text
Mend jola, Doris From: Sent: To:
Subject:
Attachments:
john stephens <stephens2@earthlink.net>
Monday, August 24, 2015 6:55 PM Wentzel, Michael[External_Sender]
Environmental affects of Diablo Canyo WHY DIABLO Canyon 's ONCE THROUGH COOLING SYSTEM SHOULD BE CONSIDERED.docx Hello Michael. I'm attaching the statement that I would have liked to present at the August 5th meeting, but ,of coarse, couldn't in 3 minutes. I srudied once through cooling at the power plant in Redondo beach, from 1974 through 1996 and this work has continued to the present5.
I know of no better data concerning the affects of once through cooling on a fish assemblage than our 41 year study. See Attachment.
John Stephens, Emeritus professor, Occidental college.......
- LJ..... 7"I CC:)2, w,,~SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM -03 Add= 1i" 1 WHY DIABLO CANYON'S ONCE THROUGH COOLING SYSTEM SHOULD BE CONSIDERED "STATE OF THE ART" I am a marine biologist (an ichthyologist) retired ( 1996) after 38 years of teaching and research.
During that time, I spent more than 20 years examining the affects of once through cooling at the Redondo Beach (King Harbor) steam electric generating facility, on the adjacent fish assemblage affected by the intake and hot water discharge.
Both temperature change and entrapment/entrainment were examined.
In this study, we monitored monthly the volume of plankton and number by species of fish larvae in the adjacent water column. We examined the recruitment of larval fishes to the adjacent rocky reefs and the abundance of juvenile, subadult, and adult fishes by quarterly diver counts on 5-7 transect areas. At the same time we monitored the fish assemblage in a kelp bed site, three miles to the south at Palos Verdes, with transects taken at the same depths as those in King harbor. We considered this site, as a control comparison.
Additionally, we followed the fish entrapment for a number of years, including entrapment during heat treatments.
We also examined the affects of chlorination on some of these species. This field study is still going on (41st year) carried out by my replacement and has produce more than twenty papers. I have listed a number of these papers for your interest at the end of this statement.
In general, the fish assemblage surrounding the once through cooling system has remained abundant and diverse, when compared to that of the Palos Verdes kelp bed which is considered an important natural habitat, and the larval entrainment doesn't appear to have an effect on the fishes of the assemblage.
This, though the assemblage has changed due to the transition from a cold PDO to a warm one, as well as due to El Nino events, habitat destruction from storms, and breakwater modification, etc.I have not been a strong supporter on nuclear power plants though I helped develop the fish return system that functioned at SONGS unit 2 before it was shut down. I am a fan of adequate electrical power and not of carbon producing hydrocarbon plants. The U. S.electrical grid is not ready to loose California's last functioning nuclear plant, which produces abundant carbon free energy. Coastal power plants do kill many fish larvae and a limited number of entrapped fishes but we see no evidence of an effect upon th.e local fish assemblage.
The once through cooling system at Diablo is unique, I believe for California.
Both the intake and the discharge are in the intertidal zone, not in the subtidal.
A large number of intertidal fishes are small benthic species, rarely swimming in the water column and thus not subject to entrapment.
Entrapment of fishes generally occurs at night when a fishes rheotactic sense is marginal and entrapped fish are largely active schooling nocturnal species. (Queenfish, white croakers,, anchovies etc).Further, the entrance to the intake was designed for three units and only two were built so that the opening is relatively large and thus produces a slower incurrent.
Unfortunately, I know of no data concerning entrapment of fishes at Diablo or any study of entrapment at this site. However, entrapment, even in large subtidal intakes is rarely considered significant as opposed to the affects of recreational and commercial fishing. At King Harbor, thee daily entrapment was much less than the take by any active fishing vessel. Entrainment of plankton and larvae does kill lots of larval fishes and planktonic organisms.
I have examined the larval fish data taken by Tenera in over ten years of meter net samples near the intake. Eleven of the top 20 larvae entrained are intertidal species. Of the 9 remaining, anchovies, white croakers and one species group of rockfish rank in the top group, anchovy larvae are abundant in most coastal inshore waters (including my work at Redondo beach), though they are more abundant during cold PDO's.Almost all of the top twenty species show considerable annual fluctuation with no obvious trend. Further, most oceanic or subtidal species of larvae that are taken in the intertidal would be unlikely to survive their settlement into this shallow highly competitive environment.
Remember that fishes produce huge numbers of larvae, often greater than 1,000,O00eggs/female because >99% will not survive predation, random drift or starvation. (which is the evolutionary pressure for production of so many). The loss to intakes has not been found to be significant.
In order to document such an effect, assemblage populations would have to be shown to be declining due to lack of recruitment caused by power plant entrainment.
All fish populations have large annual fluctuations and it is highly unlikely that any of these fluctuations could be ascribed to entrainment as fish larvae on the Pacific coast rarely return to their parental population.
Suggested, no hard data has shown even a short term affect. A recent report to the California Energy Commission on the King harbor Ichthyoplankton (2008) shows that if the data is plotted from 1974 to 2008, there has been a "steady "decrease in plankton abundance, yet no correlation between entrainment and this decline was discovered.
The major decrease occurred in the late 19 70's when the cool PDO ended. If we ignore the cool PDO data, the overall decrease disappears.
No increase has been seen since the plant went largely offline in around 2010.There has never been any long term effect demonstrated for a Pacific coast fish species from open coastal larval entrainment.
The geological and oceanographic conditions in the eastern Pacific can not be compared to those of the Western Atlantic where the fish populations are often dependent on large embayments (sunken river mouths) for some stage in the life history and required annual migrations which increase vulnerability to entrapment or entrainment.
Even there, marine entrainment has not been shown to be a long term problem.Hot water discharge is benign for most local mobile fish species which simply move to appropriate thermal conditions..
As a biologist, the thought of a discharge through the intertidal, a wonderfully rich biological habitat, seemed insane. I observed it while lecturing to the plant scientists on fish thermal preference prior to the plants initial operation.
Such a flow would certainly drive off motile organisms, including fish, and kill sedentary flora and fauna. Fishes driven from their preferred habitat are certainly more vulnerable to predation.
With the initial start up of the plant, this happened.
However, only a relatively small area of intertidal is strongly affected and even the worst impinged areas have been recolonized by tolerant species. When the plant is closed, this change should be reversed in several years. Fishes detect water temperature and avoid those that are harmful. The warm water rises quickly to the surface as the water deepens and is rapidly cooled, though the shallow discharge cove has certainly been significantly warmed. Some fishes that normally are known to be common south of Point Conception have taken advantage of this small area and live here happily. Many fish larvae from the warmer southern California environment drift north of the Point Conception faunal barrier, but few are able to survive or reproduce here. The Diablo warmer temperatures may be a harbinger of what will occur as sea water temperatures rise with global warming. What exists here today, due to once through cooling at Diablo is likely to be more prevalent in the future. Again, at King Harbor in Southern California, a number of tropical species have been observed living in the warm discharge water including broomtail groupers, and the Cortez Chub. This appears to have little effect upon the indigenous species and they usually disappear after an unusually cold winter.The once through cooling system at Diablo does not show a negative affect on the local fish species and because of its' intertidal intake and discharge is highly unlikely to in the future. Any change due to water warming should rapidly disappear once the plant is taken off line and conditions return to the then current status. Compared to the terrestrial effect of cooling towers, which also would require water for cooling, and could produce local weather changes, the present once through cooling system is the system of preference.
Literature of interst by Date..Terry, C. B. and J. S. Stephens, Jr. 1976. A study of the orientation of selected embio tocid fishes to depth and shifting vertical temperature gradients Bull S. California Acad Sci75>170-183.
Stephens, J. S. Jr and K. Zerba 1981. Factors affecting fish diversity on a temperate reef. Environmental Biol. Fishes 6:111-12 1.Shrode, J. B., K. Zerba, and J. SA. Stephens Jr 1982. Ecological significance of temperature tolerance and preference in some inshore California species. Amer.Fish. Soc. 11" 1:45-5 1.Shrode, J. B., L. P. Purcell, amnd J. S. Stephens Jr. 1983. Ontogeny of thermal preference in four species of viviparous fishes (Embiotocidae).
EWnvir. Biol. Fish.9:71-76.Stephens, J. S. Jr., P. A Morris, K. Zerba, andM. S. Love 1984. Factors affecting fish diversity on a temperate reeflI: the fish assemblage at Palos verdes Kpoint, 1974-1981. Envir. Biol. Fish. 11:259-275.
Stephens, J. S. Jr, G. Jordan, P0. A. Morris,M.M.
Singer, and G. McGowen 1986. Can we relate larval fish abundance to recruitment or population stability?
A preliminary analysis of recruitment to a temperate rocky reef. CalCOFI 27: 67-83.Stephens, J. S. Jr., J. E. Hose, and M. S. Love 1988. Fish assemblages as indicators of environmental change in nearshore environments.
In Soule and Kleppel eds.Maroine oragnisms as indicators.
Chap. 5:91-1054.
Springer-Verllag Hollbrook, S.J., M. J. Kingsford, R. J. Schmitt, and J. S. Stephens Jr. 1994. Spatial and temporal patterns in assemblages of temperate reef fishes. Amzer. Zool. 34:4563-475.Pondella, D. J. and J. S. Stephens Jr. 1994. Factors affecting the anbunfance of juvenile fish specieson a temperate artificial reef. Bull. Mar. Sci 55:1216-1223.
Hollbrook, S. J., Schmitt, and J. S. Stephens 1997. Ecological Applications 7(4) 1997: 1299-13 10.Bond, A. B., J. S. Stephens Jr., D. J. Pondella, M. J. Allen, and M. Helvey 1999. A method for estimating marine habitat valuesbased on fish guilds, with a comparison between sites in Southern California.
Bull. Mar. Sci. 64(2); 219-2432.Stephens, J. S. Jr., and D. J. Pondella I1 2002. Larval productivity on a mature artificial reef.- the ichthyoplankton of King Harbor, CA. OICES Jo. Mar. 8ci.59:51-58.
Stephens, J. S. Jr., R. J. Larson, and D. J. Pondella II. (2006) Rocky reefs and kelp beds, Chapter 9: 227252 pp-in Allen, L. G., D. P. Pondella II, and M. H. Horn.eds (2006), The ecology of Marine fishes, California and adjacent waters U. C. Ptress: 660;pp.M.H.Horn and J. S. Stephens, Jr. (2006) Climate change and overexploitation, Chapter 25 :621-635 in Allen, L. G., D. J. Pondella, and M. H. Horn ibid.Pondella, D. J., J. P. Williams, and E. F. Miller (2008) The ichthyoplaNKTON OF KING HAKRBOR, REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 1974-2008.
PIERT FINAL RPT.TO THE CALIFONRIA John S. Stephens, Jr. PhD James Irvine Professor of Environmental Biology Emeritus and founder, Director Emeritus, Vantuna Research Group, Occidental College, Los Angeles. Present address Arroyo Grande, Ca. 93420