ML20070V101

From kanterella
Revision as of 06:18, 31 May 2023 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-261/82-41.Corrective Actions:Secondary Chemistry Monitoring Program Modified & Administrative Instruction 11.6 Re Freeze Protection Sys Revised
ML20070V101
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/03/1983
From: Starkey R
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20070V100 List:
References
RSEP-83-153, NUDOCS 8302150014
Download: ML20070V101 (3)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

CD&L Carolina Power & Light Company m-MMauwm H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT POST OFFICE BOX 790 llARTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29550 $

FEB0 31983 i Robinson File No: 13510E Serial: RSEP/83-153  !

(.-

Mr. James P. O'Reilly 9 ~

Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

~

Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET No. 50-261 LICENSE NO. DPR-23 RESPONSE TO NRC INSPECTION REPORT 82-41

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

Carolina Power and Light Company (CP&L) has received and reviewed the subject report and provides the following response.

A. Severity Level V Violation (LER-82-41-06-SC5)

License Condition Paragraph 3.G requires that a secondary water chemistry monitoring program be established and implemented which includes procedures identifying corrective actions required to return secondary chemistry to its normal band following an out of control band condition.

Contrary to the above, as of December 2, 1982, procedures had not been established which define the corrective actions required for commen potential out of control band secondary chemistry events.

Response

1. Admission or N nial of the Alleged Violation.

Carolina Powc; and Light Company acknowledges the alleged violation.

2. Reason for the Violation.

Chemistry Procedure CP-1, Chemistry Monitoring Program, was implemented as a direct result of the interpretation of the requirement in paragraph 3.G of the Operating License. However, in discussion with the NRC, it has been concluded that procedures, in addition to CP-1, describing specific detailed corrective actions are necessary to meet the intent of paragraph 3.G of the Operating License.

83o215oo14 sao210 , q' ,nc ut rdPM__

PDR ADOCK 05o00261 O PDR

Letter" to Mr. J. P. O' Reilly

. Serial: RSEP/83-153 Page 2

3. Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and Results Achieved.

The procedures that will be required to resolve the concern of this violation are under development. Additional guidance given to the appropriate technician should be adequate to ensure secondary chemistry corrective actions will be taken prior to the implementation of the procedure.

4. Corrective Steps Which Will be Taken to Avoid Further Violations.

Secondary Chemistry Corrective Action procedures will be fully implemented by June 1, 1983.

5. Date When Full Compliance Will be Achieved.

Full compliance will be achieved by June 1,1983.

) B. Severity Level IV Violation (LER-82-41-04-SC4) 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion 16 requires that measures shall be established ,

to assure that significant conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified and corrected, including determination of the cause of the con-dition and action to prevent recurrence. This requirement is implemented by Corporate Quality Assurance Program Section 15 and Plant Administrative Instructions 12 and 15 concerning licensee event reporting. Licensee Event Report 81-34 documented corrective action to prevent recurrence of inopera-bility of safety-related equipment due to inadequate freeze protection maintenance controls.

Contrary to the above, as of November 18, 1982, adequate corrective actions to prevent recurrence had not been implemented in that maintenance work on freeze protection circuitry was performed without using the required equipment controls of Administrative Instruction 11.6.

Response

1. Admission or Denial of the Alleged Violation.

Carolina Power and Light Company acknowledges the alleged violation.

?. . Reason for the Alleged Violation.

As the corrective action to LER-81-34, a memorandum discussing the required use of the Local Clearance and Test Requests (LCTRs) procedure on freeze pro-

, tection circuits was issued to maintenance personnel. However, this

! information was not discussed with the Plant operators. Prior to LER-81-34, work on freeze protection circuitry was normally performed without a LCTR.

! When the maintenance technicians requested a LCTR for work nn freeze protection following the LER-81-34 response, he was advised by the more experienced operator that a LCTR was not necessary for the work. The operator's position was followed.

t

[

. . - _ _ = _ .._

i .

' letter' to Mr. J. P. O'Reilly j . Serial: RSEP/83-153 Page 3

3. Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and Results Achieved.

LCTRs are now used on-freeze protection circuitry. The Operations Shift Foremen have been directed to issue LCTRs on all work that de-energizes freeze protection. It has been re-emphasized to all appropriate main-tenance personnel that a LCTR is required for work on freeze protection circuitry. A revision to Administrative Instruction 11.6, use of LCTRs, was approved on January 28, 1983, to include the freeze protection system as operational systems that require the use of LCTRs.

4. Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violation.

The above revision to AI-11.6 will be reviewed by appropriate operations and maintenance personnel. A follow-up audit program on LER responses has been initiated to ensure that the stated corrective actions are in I

fact implemented.

5. Date When Full Compliance Will be Achieved.

Full compliance has been achieved with the use of LCTRs on all freeze protection circuits. The above revision to AI-11.6 will be reviewed by the appropriate personnel by March 31, 1983.

If you have any questions concerning this response, please contact my staff or me.

Very truly yours,

!U R. B. Starkey, Jr.

. General Manager H. B. Robinson S. E. Plant

, CLW:FMG:JMC/th cc: R. C. DeYoung i

i

. , _ - - , , - _. , . - ,