ML20134F169: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 21: Line 21:
9c5 chestertarook Doulevard A Unit of PECO Energy                                            Wayne, PA 19087 5691 January 30,1997 Docket No. 50-278 License No. DPR-56 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Center Washington, DC 20555 4
9c5 chestertarook Doulevard A Unit of PECO Energy                                            Wayne, PA 19087 5691 January 30,1997 Docket No. 50-278 License No. DPR-56 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Center Washington, DC 20555 4
Subject          Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Unit 3 Evaluation of the PBAPS, Unit 3 Core Shroud Dear Sir.
Subject          Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Unit 3 Evaluation of the PBAPS, Unit 3 Core Shroud Dear Sir.
f The purpose of this letter is to clarify our evaluation of the core shroud at the Peach Bottom              I Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Unit 3. In our letter dated November 3,1995 (G. A.
f The purpose of this letter is to clarify our evaluation of the core shroud at the Peach Bottom              I Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Unit 3. In our {{letter dated|date=November 3, 1995|text=letter dated November 3,1995}} (G. A.
Hunger, Jr. (PECO Energy Company) to USNRC), PECO Energy Company provided a i
Hunger, Jr. (PECO Energy Company) to USNRC), PECO Energy Company provided a i
summary of core shroud inspection results for the inspection of the PBAPS, Unit 3 core shroud which was performed during the PBAPS, Unit 3 tenth refueling outage (3R10, i    September,1995). These inspectior)s were performed in accordance with Generic Letter 94-03, dated August 24,1994 ("Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking of Core Shrouds in Boiling Water Reactors"). As discussed in the summary portion of the November 3,1995 letter, the results of the inspections and evaluations concluded that the condition of the PBAPS, Unit 3 shroud, projected through a minimum of the next two operating cycles, will support the required safety margins. In your letter dated January 29,1996 (J. W. Shea (USNRC) to G. A. Hunger, Jr. (PECO Energy Company)), you provided a safety evaluation for our response to Generic Letter 94-03 for PBAPS, Unit 3. This letter stated that the PBAPS, Unit 3 core shroud is acceptable and that the licensee's evaluation results justify omration of PBAPS, Unit 3 for the next operating cycle. For the upcoming PBAPS, Unit 3 e eventh refueling outage (3R11, currently scheduled to begin in the late September or early October,1997 time frame), the PBAPS, Unit 3 core shroud is not scheduled for weld examination. This schedule is supported by the BWRVIP reinspection guidance
summary of core shroud inspection results for the inspection of the PBAPS, Unit 3 core shroud which was performed during the PBAPS, Unit 3 tenth refueling outage (3R10, i    September,1995). These inspectior)s were performed in accordance with Generic Letter 94-03, dated August 24,1994 ("Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking of Core Shrouds in Boiling Water Reactors"). As discussed in the summary portion of the {{letter dated|date=November 3, 1995|text=November 3,1995 letter}}, the results of the inspections and evaluations concluded that the condition of the PBAPS, Unit 3 shroud, projected through a minimum of the next two operating cycles, will support the required safety margins. In your {{letter dated|date=January 29, 1996|text=letter dated January 29,1996}} (J. W. Shea (USNRC) to G. A. Hunger, Jr. (PECO Energy Company)), you provided a safety evaluation for our response to Generic Letter 94-03 for PBAPS, Unit 3. This letter stated that the PBAPS, Unit 3 core shroud is acceptable and that the licensee's evaluation results justify omration of PBAPS, Unit 3 for the next operating cycle. For the upcoming PBAPS, Unit 3 e eventh refueling outage (3R11, currently scheduled to begin in the late September or early October,1997 time frame), the PBAPS, Unit 3 core shroud is not scheduled for weld examination. This schedule is supported by the BWRVIP reinspection guidance
(" Guidelines For Reinspection Of BWR Core Shrouds," BWRVIP-07, dated February                              {r 1996). The PBAPS, Unit 3 core shroud has been evaluated to be within the required safety margins for a minimum of the next two operating cycles (until 3R12, currently scheduled to                  l begin September,1999) as discussed in our November 3,1995 letter.
(" Guidelines For Reinspection Of BWR Core Shrouds," BWRVIP-07, dated February                              {r 1996). The PBAPS, Unit 3 core shroud has been evaluated to be within the required safety margins for a minimum of the next two operating cycles (until 3R12, currently scheduled to                  l begin September,1999) as discussed in our {{letter dated|date=November 3, 1995|text=November 3,1995 letter}}.
{
{
If you have any questions, please contact us.                                                              l l
If you have any questions, please contact us.                                                              l l

Latest revision as of 16:59, 14 December 2021

Clarifies Evaluation of Core Shroud at Pbaps,Per GL 94-03
ML20134F169
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/30/1997
From: Hunger G
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
GL-94-03, GL-94-3, NUDOCS 9702070303
Download: ML20134F169 (2)


Text

Ct:; tion Support Department

. _.=i -

(. y GL 94-03 PECO NUCLEAR nm%c--

9c5 chestertarook Doulevard A Unit of PECO Energy Wayne, PA 19087 5691 January 30,1997 Docket No. 50-278 License No. DPR-56 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Center Washington, DC 20555 4

Subject Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Unit 3 Evaluation of the PBAPS, Unit 3 Core Shroud Dear Sir.

f The purpose of this letter is to clarify our evaluation of the core shroud at the Peach Bottom I Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Unit 3. In our letter dated November 3,1995 (G. A.

Hunger, Jr. (PECO Energy Company) to USNRC), PECO Energy Company provided a i

summary of core shroud inspection results for the inspection of the PBAPS, Unit 3 core shroud which was performed during the PBAPS, Unit 3 tenth refueling outage (3R10, i September,1995). These inspectior)s were performed in accordance with Generic Letter 94-03, dated August 24,1994 ("Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking of Core Shrouds in Boiling Water Reactors"). As discussed in the summary portion of the November 3,1995 letter, the results of the inspections and evaluations concluded that the condition of the PBAPS, Unit 3 shroud, projected through a minimum of the next two operating cycles, will support the required safety margins. In your letter dated January 29,1996 (J. W. Shea (USNRC) to G. A. Hunger, Jr. (PECO Energy Company)), you provided a safety evaluation for our response to Generic Letter 94-03 for PBAPS, Unit 3. This letter stated that the PBAPS, Unit 3 core shroud is acceptable and that the licensee's evaluation results justify omration of PBAPS, Unit 3 for the next operating cycle. For the upcoming PBAPS, Unit 3 e eventh refueling outage (3R11, currently scheduled to begin in the late September or early October,1997 time frame), the PBAPS, Unit 3 core shroud is not scheduled for weld examination. This schedule is supported by the BWRVIP reinspection guidance

(" Guidelines For Reinspection Of BWR Core Shrouds," BWRVIP-07, dated February {r 1996). The PBAPS, Unit 3 core shroud has been evaluated to be within the required safety margins for a minimum of the next two operating cycles (until 3R12, currently scheduled to l begin September,1999) as discussed in our November 3,1995 letter.

{

If you have any questions, please contact us. l l

Very truly yours, l l

4. d. Aya} .  ;

G. A. Hunger, Jr.,

Director hC\(

i l

I Licensing Section  !

l 9702070303 970130  !

PDR ADOCK 0500027R i p PDR

a January 30,1997 Page 2 cc: H. J. Miller, Administrator, Region I, USNRC '

W. L. Schmidt, USNRC Senior Resident inspector, PBAPS a:ehroud3r11 1

I I

i

- _ ,