ML19345F262: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 76: Line 76:
* Nuclear power has not proven to be the cheap source of energy that was promised, but instead even after receiviog immense subsidies for research and from tax loophofes is threatening to make electricity unalforcable for many consumers. The cost of Limerick nas skyrocketed from an ::rtgtnal p-ojection of S760 yntillon to a current estimate of
* Nuclear power has not proven to be the cheap source of energy that was promised, but instead even after receiviog immense subsidies for research and from tax loophofes is threatening to make electricity unalforcable for many consumers. The cost of Limerick nas skyrocketed from an ::rtgtnal p-ojection of S760 yntillon to a current estimate of
             $3. 2 bt!! ton.
             $3. 2 bt!! ton.
             'The alternatives to nuclear power are readtly availablu. Cat scrvation, by making our I;ulldings, industries, and transportation system mere eilic:ent, can save far more en-
             'The alternatives to nuclear power are readtly availablu. Cat scrvation, by making our I;ulldings, industries, and transportation system mere eilic:ent, can save far more en-ergy than nuclear power will provide. A gradual transition to renew.ule enerdy sources much as solar energy la feasible and economical.
;
ergy than nuclear power will provide. A gradual transition to renew.ule enerdy sources much as solar energy la feasible and economical.
We call for:
We call for:
1.) AN IMMEDIATE IIALT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLAN
1.) AN IMMEDIATE IIALT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLAN

Latest revision as of 05:03, 18 February 2020

Opposes Facility Const.Sample Page of Circulated Petition Encl
ML19345F262
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/05/1981
From: Benson E, Rosenberg A
CITIZEN ACTION IN THE NORTHEAST
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8102170070
Download: ML19345F262 (3)


Text

- - -_ . . -. ._ .

, a l

1 Citizen _Actkm in the WorthEast .

~

.1 .

C.A.N.E. 1411 Princeton Ave.

~

795-7825. Philade!phia, PA 19111 MFoO * *

,s PJR RdK

\ S **Y \

t .

DOCKET NUMBER l Harold Denton t"1 PROD. & UTIL FAC.. . ..$...

l 47.S. Nuclear Regulatory I FEB g,ge y y ,$k b g fg" Washington D.C. 20555 "

g g,g i ff g,... 2==:e

/

Dear Mr. Denten:

M Febraury 5, 1981 i

We mer.bers of Citizen Action in the Northeast are opposed to the Limerick Nuclear Power Plants now being built at Limerick Pa.

I in Mentgomery County- just 21 :.iles west of Philadelphia. 'I'he *.imerick .

Faaetors are the closest plants to a major city, under construction g eg anywhere in the U.S. To site nuclear plants in such a densely pop-j r yo ulated area as Philadelphia is extremely unsafe. I n addition, we f I k are shocked to know that absolutely no amergency or evacuation pla L-s-

k. #'

2f g/

have been considered or drawn up. We read about nuclear accidents, l

'0 ,

[

spills and leaks alrest.every day. We have heard that N,R.C. emergency' planning hearings around high population density sites will be held later this year. Due to the great interest Philadelphians have shown in the nuclear enercy question, evidencad by these petitions, we feel w~ u ~ s ..

strongly that one of the above mentioned hearings should be~ 1,n, Ehiladelphia.

C.A.N.E. believes in alternat:.ve sources of energy. Solar, windpower systems, hyd::celectric power , recycling and conservation.

, ,g Further, a Dow ".f.dland study indicates that "co-generation" industrial wacte heat, could repla ce the ecivilent of 50 large nuclear rea:ters psd . ..:

( 8102170070 ~

6'fl l

e

,- w .

CitizertAction in .the Northeast ~

C.A.N.E.

~

. 1411 Princeton Ave.

l25-7825. Philadelphia, PA 19111 l

S22-8960 .

by 1985. We =ust be ever mindful that Pennsylvania is a large coal state. Coal as energy was pushed aside because oil was cheaper.

This is no longer true. Even adding in the cost of " scrubbing" coal to rid our environment of pollutents, coal is less expensive than l than oil today. There can be no plausible excuse no to follow these directic..s when we consider the possibility of many new industries that would provide more technicians and laborers than nuclear plants.

Foremost in this proposal is the fact that this direction obviates the danger of nuclear meltdowns , nuclear waste and storage of the same, We are sending you these 2400 signatures on our petition to indicate to you that we Are not alone in our viewpoint, but in fact joined by citizens all over Northeast Philadelphia.

We are also sendino V:ia letter and petitions in relation to a pending court case, if your response is going to take over a week

. please contact us.

Anne Rosenberg 215-673-4633 Thank you, Esther Benson 215-329-5626 '

O

' b $t Z O~~, _

T XC: Co:=tissioner Bradford \

A Co:=tissioner Hendrie Cc==issioner Golinsky Energy Committee Chairpersons Chairmen Aherne Darrell Eisenhutt Congress:.an Charles Dougherty

- - , . - - , - . . - . . , -, , , ,., - m ,e ---,,e,-. ..,- , , - - - , - - , - -

w e (i o JT *.aw a Stop the LimerickNuclearPlants Pt.iladelphta Electric Co. (PECO) :s constructing two nuclear plants at Lt[nerick, Pa. 21

i. tiles from Philadelpnia. These reactors are the cleoest under construction to a major

,4[mlation center in the entire United State s.

Recognizing that:

'There are many dangers and ur. knowns associated with'the production of nuclear power and the nuclear fuel cycle. including low-level radLation, nuchsar wastes, decommisstorang (oliutting down) of nuclear plants, cad catastrophic acetdents. Although reactor operators are required to prepare evacuation plans, it la well known thJt in event of a major nuclear acetdent it woulJ be imposetble to evacuste the population of Philadelphia and the surround-Ing coantice. Due to the federal Price-Andersou Act, PECO would be exempt from most of the financial responsibtitty if there was an acetdent at Limer ick, leaving the victims with-out insurance coverage.

  • Nuclear power has not proven to be the cheap source of energy that was promised, but instead even after receiviog immense subsidies for research and from tax loophofes is threatening to make electricity unalforcable for many consumers. The cost of Limerick nas skyrocketed from an ::rtgtnal p-ojection of S760 yntillon to a current estimate of

$3. 2 bt!! ton.

'The alternatives to nuclear power are readtly availablu. Cat scrvation, by making our I;ulldings, industries, and transportation system mere eilic:ent, can save far more en-ergy than nuclear power will provide. A gradual transition to renew.ule enerdy sources much as solar energy la feasible and economical.

We call for:

1.) AN IMMEDIATE IIALT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLAN

  • 2.) INSrlTVTION OF PLANS FQ1 RELIANCE ON CONSERV ATION AND RENEWABLE EN-ERGY SOLTtCES IN THE DELAWARE VALLEY. FULL iiEhEFITS DURING Tf!E TRANS-TrION, RETRAINING, AND NEW .iODS FOll WOttKERS DISP 1. ACED BY TIIE CONTrnUC-TION HALT.

NAME ADDRESS & ZIP TTLEPHONE

( i Gmu 3m Cuuo (2 lAtei hjr s.,v' f 0 h*')~/'J~.2 Mn%Cmw

  • g su L.ojwB 7 > 2 - 7 >H

\ ddd, # $31 da.cn p m m cc

~ $ /4/l k'"* &} ?d > ~ O V93

( 1/Lh/ n i , f juL GL - ir ,? - e~ ;

W

,,/#7S k U D 4? Q ld e 4J _

N [ @

f.

Ob Y J!b ] 041%$

,/$ r.  % N S !bfs /

pl (?Q 3 (h/n W

't STOF LIMGICM CAhTITMGN in apuz.m ored by Conmusj.cr Action it. t!.i CTd.7.ut (CAh*.

Philadel;hta. Pa. 19111 (215-725 'id:5) and the Keverune Allm c' l } 411 S.

000 Princeton St., Ptuladelphia, Pa. 101(3 (215-3F1-5254).

4eth St.,

l l lD 9*D *D W l

,w e J d lh. d k o l

l