ML19347C379: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-.      ._                                    -          -          - .              .      . .                _.
{{#Wiki_filter:-.      ._                                    -          -          - .              .      . .                _.
        ,
1 GULF STATES                      UTILITIES              COMPANY j                    20$*08 *:CE SCe 295'
,    ,
* 9EaGVCN?    *E*-5  '''24 4ae4 ecos 7;a ese.asa3                                                                                !
        ''
4 August 20, 1980 RBG - 8369 J                                                            File Nos. G9.5, G15.4.1 i
1 GULF STATES                      UTILITIES              COMPANY
;              Mr. W. C. Seidle, Chief Reactor Construction & Engineering
  <
j                    20$*08 *:CE SCe 295'
* 9EaGVCN?    *E*-5  '''24
.                                                                                                                                            .
4ae4 ecos 7;a ese.asa3                                                                                !
4 August 20, 1980
.
RBG - 8369 J                                                            File Nos. G9.5, G15.4.1
!.
:
i
;              Mr. W. C. Seidle, Chief
,
Reactor Construction & Engineering
,                  Support Branch i              U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,                  Support Branch i              U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
:              Region IV j              611 Ryan Plaza Drive
:              Region IV j              611 Ryan Plaza Drive Suite 1000                                                                                          ,
,
Suite 1000                                                                                          ,
j              Arlington, TX      76011
j              Arlington, TX      76011
:
;
;
,


==Dear Mr. Seidle:==
==Dear Mr. Seidle:==
Line 50: Line 32:
;                                    Docket No. 50-458/Rpt. 80-06 i
;                                    Docket No. 50-458/Rpt. 80-06 i
4 i                    This letter respcnds to the item of noncompliance and the l              deviation contained in I&E Report No. 50-458/80-06.                This in-spection at the River Bend construction site was conducted by Mr. A.B. Beach and other members of your staff during the periods June 9-10, June 24-27, and June 30-July 3, 1980, of c:tivities authorized by the NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-145 for River Bend Unit No. 1.
4 i                    This letter respcnds to the item of noncompliance and the l              deviation contained in I&E Report No. 50-458/80-06.                This in-spection at the River Bend construction site was conducted by Mr. A.B. Beach and other members of your staff during the periods June 9-10, June 24-27, and June 30-July 3, 1980, of c:tivities authorized by the NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-145 for River Bend Unit No. 1.
.
We trust that the enclosed response satisfactorily answers the
We trust that the enclosed response satisfactorily answers the
!              concerns raised in your report.              We shall be glad to discuss any further points that you may have.
!              concerns raised in your report.              We shall be glad to discuss any further points that you may have.
'
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
'
: h.      E E. L. Draper, Jr.          dbi                                                  l Vice President - Technology ELD /WJR/mb t
: h.      E E. L. Draper, Jr.          dbi                                                  l Vice President - Technology ELD /WJR/mb t
i Attachments i
i Attachments i
8.0.1017 0W7
8.0.1017 0W7
    ,                            ,        , ,,          .,    ,                            . . - -  , . , _ , . . .    , , , - , - - - .


        - _ . ...                        _-    -    -      - -        .-                    -              ._ -_        .-
i ATTACHMENT I j  .~                                                                                                                            !
:
RESP 0NSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION                                                              j A Failure to Follow Procedures for the Identification of Training Needs j            Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 requires that activities 4            affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented procedures of a type appropriate to the circumstances, and shall be accomplished in accord-ance with these procedures.
                                                                                                                                  !
'
i
          ,
ATTACHMENT I j  .~                                                                                                                            !
'
RESP 0NSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION                                                              j A Failure to Follow Procedures for the Identification of Training Needs j            Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 requires that activities 4            affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented procedures of a type
'
appropriate to the circumstances, and shall be accomplished in accord-ance with these procedures.
l, 1            Stone and Webster Training Procedure CMM-9.1, " Construction Training j            Program," requires, in Section 5.5, that each supervisor be responsible j            for identifying construction training needs to the Construction Training
l, 1            Stone and Webster Training Procedure CMM-9.1, " Construction Training j            Program," requires, in Section 5.5, that each supervisor be responsible j            for identifying construction training needs to the Construction Training
!            Supervisor.
!            Supervisor.
!
!            Contrary to the above:
!            Contrary to the above:
i i            On June 26, 1980, the IE inspector was informed by the licensee and
i i            On June 26, 1980, the IE inspector was informed by the licensee and
Line 81: Line 49:
;
;
}            This is an infraction.
}            This is an infraction.
                                                                                                                            '
l i
l i
J            GSU Response to Infraction A i
J            GSU Response to Infraction A i
Line 89: Line 56:
;                  mation was used in the development of the Computerized Training i                Record System (CTRS). The' Computerized Training Record System j                  (CTRS) was implemented on July 25, 1980. All training records have been entered into the program and reports have been issued j                  to provide an effective way to identify individual training needs.
;                  mation was used in the development of the Computerized Training i                Record System (CTRS). The' Computerized Training Record System j                  (CTRS) was implemented on July 25, 1980. All training records have been entered into the program and reports have been issued j                  to provide an effective way to identify individual training needs.
<            Corrective Action taken to prevent further noncompliance:                                                            ,
<            Corrective Action taken to prevent further noncompliance:                                                            ,
!
  !                CTRS system will be updated on a. weekly basis and the Construction
  !                CTRS system will be updated on a. weekly basis and the Construction
;                  Training department will maintain listings of those personnel who
;                  Training department will maintain listings of those personnel who
]
]
received training on safety related activities. This information i                  will be provided to the discipline supervisors.
received training on safety related activities. This information i                  will be provided to the discipline supervisors.
1 l                  Stone & Webster is in the process of developing a detailed schedule for the required craft training for safety related work as outlined in CSI 1.0.21. It is anticipated that the detailed schedule will
1 l                  Stone & Webster is in the process of developing a detailed schedule for the required craft training for safety related work as outlined in CSI 1.0.21. It is anticipated that the detailed schedule will be completed by the end of September, 1980.
,
be completed by the end of September, 1980.
.
Date when full compliance will be achieved:
Date when full compliance will be achieved:
(                  Full compliance to this infraction was achieved July 25, 1980, with the implementation of the CTRS Program.
(                  Full compliance to this infraction was achieved July 25, 1980, with the implementation of the CTRS Program.
;
;
,
i
i
                                                         , _ ~    . , . ,    , _ - . - - - - . - , - - - . ,-, - ~ , - - -      -
                                                         , _ ~    . , . ,    , _ - . - - - - . - , - - - . ,-, - ~ , - - -      -


  ._ . .      .-              .__.  . _ . . .            -._ - -      . _ -    _ --  --    .-      ..        . -        -
ATTACHMENT II RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF DEVIATION A    Use of Air-Entrainment Admixture in Category I Concrete The River Bend PSAR, in Section 3.8.4.6, requires that all concrete l                      used in seismic Category I structures shall contain an air-entraining agent in an amount sufficient to satisfy ACI 301-72, Table 3.4,
ATTACHMENT II
                *
          .-
RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF DEVIATION A    Use of Air-Entrainment Admixture in Category I Concrete
,
The River Bend PSAR, in Section 3.8.4.6, requires that all concrete l                      used in seismic Category I structures shall contain an air-entraining agent in an amount sufficient to satisfy ACI 301-72, Table 3.4,
                       " Total Air Content for Various Size of Coarse Aggregate for Normal Weight Concrete." For concrete mixes using #57 coarse aggregate, the total air content limits would be 3.5% - 6.5%.
                       " Total Air Content for Various Size of Coarse Aggregate for Normal Weight Concrete." For concrete mixes using #57 coarse aggregate, the total air content limits would be 3.5% - 6.5%.
,
Contrary to the above:
Contrary to the above:
!
l                      Stone and Webster Specification 210.350, " Specification for Mixing and Delivering Concrete," deletes the minimum total air content l
l                      Stone and Webster Specification 210.350, " Specification for Mixing and Delivering Concrete," deletes the minimum total air content l
requirement in seismic Category I structures for structures below
requirement in seismic Category I structures for structures below the frost line and interior walls above the frost line. In a review of placement records covering seismic Category I structures, at least sixteen (16) of the total air content values were below 3.5%.                  (Total air content values for placement ABI-M-79E5 were as low as 1.9%.)
'
Thus, the specification requirement appears to deviate from the PSAR commitment to the total air content values in Tc' ale 3.4 of ACI 301-72.
the frost line and interior walls above the frost line. In a review of placement records covering seismic Category I structures, at least sixteen (16) of the total air content values were below 3.5%.                  (Total air content values for placement ABI-M-79E5 were as low as 1.9%.)
Thus, the specification requirement appears to deviate from the PSAR
                                                                                                                          '
commitment to the total air content values in Tc' ale 3.4 of ACI 301-72.
l This is a deviation.
l This is a deviation.
GSU RESPONSE TO DEVIATION A Action taken and results achieved:
GSU RESPONSE TO DEVIATION A Action taken and results achieved:
The intent of the PSAR commitment to ACI 301-72, Table 3.4, is that the table be used in conjunction with the clarifying text contained in ACI 301-72, Section 3.4, subsection 3.4.1.
The intent of the PSAR commitment to ACI 301-72, Table 3.4, is that the table be used in conjunction with the clarifying text contained in ACI 301-72, Section 3.4, subsection 3.4.1.
This subsection requires air-entrainment to improve durability in concrete, which will be subject to potentially destructive
This subsection requires air-entrainment to improve durability in concrete, which will be subject to potentially destructive exposure, i.e.:              freezing and thawing. The above reference placements were structures that will not be subject to those potentially destructive exposures.
'
exposure, i.e.:              freezing and thawing. The above reference placements were structures that will not be subject to those potentially destructive exposures.
It is recognized that the text of the PSAR should be appropriately clarified to indicate the use of Section 3.4 of ACI 301 42. Such a clarification is under review at this time. In addition, Stone and Webster Site Engineering has directed, in Inter-office Memorandum dated July 18, 1980, that efforts be made to place all concrete closer to the mix design air content range in order to improve workability and placeability.
It is recognized that the text of the PSAR should be appropriately clarified to indicate the use of Section 3.4 of ACI 301 42. Such a clarification is under review at this time. In addition, Stone and Webster Site Engineering has directed, in Inter-office Memorandum dated July 18, 1980, that efforts be made to place all concrete closer to the mix design air content range in order to improve workability and placeability.
Corrective Action taken to prevent further deviation:
Corrective Action taken to prevent further deviation:
Line 135: Line 83:
1                                                                                                                                    \
1                                                                                                                                    \
PSAR clarification will be completed by first of September, 1980.                                      l l
PSAR clarification will be completed by first of September, 1980.                                      l l
l
l I
:
I
!
I I
         ,        . - - . -.          ,        ~  - . .-                      ,-      ,    , -    . - . . , . , -      . , -  -}}
         ,        . - - . -.          ,        ~  - . .-                      ,-      ,    , -    . - . . , . , -      . , -  -}}

Revision as of 01:48, 31 January 2020

Responds to NRC 800728 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-458/80-06.Corrective Actions:Computerized Training Record Sys Has Been Implemented & PSAR Concrete Oxygen Content Specs Clarified
ML19347C379
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/20/1980
From: Draper E
GULF STATES UTILITIES CO.
To: Seidle W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML19347C378 List:
References
RBG-8369, NUDOCS 8010170477
Download: ML19347C379 (3)


Text

-. ._ - - - . . . . _.

1 GULF STATES UTILITIES COMPANY j 20$*08 *:CE SCe 295'

  • 9EaGVCN? *E*-5 24 4ae4 ecos 7;a ese.asa3  !

4 August 20, 1980 RBG - 8369 J File Nos. G9.5, G15.4.1 i

Mr. W. C. Seidle, Chief Reactor Construction & Engineering

, Support Branch i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Region IV j 611 Ryan Plaza Drive Suite 1000 ,

j Arlington, TX 76011

Dear Mr. Seidle:

i 5 River Bend Station - Unit 1 j Refer to: RIV

Docket No. 50-458/Rpt. 80-06 i

4 i This letter respcnds to the item of noncompliance and the l deviation contained in I&E Report No. 50-458/80-06. This in-spection at the River Bend construction site was conducted by Mr. A.B. Beach and other members of your staff during the periods June 9-10, June 24-27, and June 30-July 3, 1980, of c:tivities authorized by the NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-145 for River Bend Unit No. 1.

We trust that the enclosed response satisfactorily answers the

! concerns raised in your report. We shall be glad to discuss any further points that you may have.

Sincerely,

h. E E. L. Draper, Jr. dbi l Vice President - Technology ELD /WJR/mb t

i Attachments i

8.0.1017 0W7

i ATTACHMENT I j .~  !

RESP 0NSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION j A Failure to Follow Procedures for the Identification of Training Needs j Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 requires that activities 4 affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented procedures of a type appropriate to the circumstances, and shall be accomplished in accord-ance with these procedures.

l, 1 Stone and Webster Training Procedure CMM-9.1, " Construction Training j Program," requires, in Section 5.5, that each supervisor be responsible j for identifying construction training needs to the Construction Training

! Supervisor.

! Contrary to the above:

i i On June 26, 1980, the IE inspector was informed by the licensee and

] contractor personnel that supervisors were not identifying training ,

i needs to the Construction Training Supervisor.

} This is an infraction.

l i

J GSU Response to Infraction A i

l Action taken and results achieved:

l l S&W Procedure CMM-9.1 has been superceded by CSI 1.0.21 which requires that the _Coastruction Training Staff conduct a training j needs survey with the discipline supervisors and department

! heads. This survey has been completed and the resulting infor-

mation was used in the development of the Computerized Training i Record System (CTRS). The' Computerized Training Record System j (CTRS) was implemented on July 25, 1980. All training records have been entered into the program and reports have been issued j to provide an effective way to identify individual training needs.

< Corrective Action taken to prevent further noncompliance: ,

! CTRS system will be updated on a. weekly basis and the Construction

Training department will maintain listings of those personnel who

]

received training on safety related activities. This information i will be provided to the discipline supervisors.

1 l Stone & Webster is in the process of developing a detailed schedule for the required craft training for safety related work as outlined in CSI 1.0.21. It is anticipated that the detailed schedule will be completed by the end of September, 1980.

Date when full compliance will be achieved:

( Full compliance to this infraction was achieved July 25, 1980, with the implementation of the CTRS Program.

i

, _ ~ . , . , , _ - . - - - - . - , - - - . ,-, - ~ , - - - -

ATTACHMENT II RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF DEVIATION A Use of Air-Entrainment Admixture in Category I Concrete The River Bend PSAR, in Section 3.8.4.6, requires that all concrete l used in seismic Category I structures shall contain an air-entraining agent in an amount sufficient to satisfy ACI 301-72, Table 3.4,

" Total Air Content for Various Size of Coarse Aggregate for Normal Weight Concrete." For concrete mixes using #57 coarse aggregate, the total air content limits would be 3.5% - 6.5%.

Contrary to the above:

l Stone and Webster Specification 210.350, " Specification for Mixing and Delivering Concrete," deletes the minimum total air content l

requirement in seismic Category I structures for structures below the frost line and interior walls above the frost line. In a review of placement records covering seismic Category I structures, at least sixteen (16) of the total air content values were below 3.5%. (Total air content values for placement ABI-M-79E5 were as low as 1.9%.)

Thus, the specification requirement appears to deviate from the PSAR commitment to the total air content values in Tc' ale 3.4 of ACI 301-72.

l This is a deviation.

GSU RESPONSE TO DEVIATION A Action taken and results achieved:

The intent of the PSAR commitment to ACI 301-72, Table 3.4, is that the table be used in conjunction with the clarifying text contained in ACI 301-72, Section 3.4, subsection 3.4.1.

This subsection requires air-entrainment to improve durability in concrete, which will be subject to potentially destructive exposure, i.e.: freezing and thawing. The above reference placements were structures that will not be subject to those potentially destructive exposures.

It is recognized that the text of the PSAR should be appropriately clarified to indicate the use of Section 3.4 of ACI 301 42. Such a clarification is under review at this time. In addition, Stone and Webster Site Engineering has directed, in Inter-office Memorandum dated July 18, 1980, that efforts be made to place all concrete closer to the mix design air content range in order to improve workability and placeability.

Corrective Action taken to prevent further deviation:

No additional action required.

l l Date when full compliance will be achieved:

1 \

PSAR clarification will be completed by first of September, 1980. l l

l I

I

, . - - . -. , ~ - . .- ,- , , - . - . . , . , - . , - -