ML20237B008: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20237B008
| number = ML20237B008
| issue date = 08/10/1998
| issue date = 08/10/1998
| title = Responds to 980608 Ltr Re DOE Agreement That Unc Should Develop Plan to Address Residual Contamination at 71 Shelton Ave,Formerly Identified as Bldgs 3H & 6H for Activities Previously Authorized by NRC License SNM-386
| title = Responds to Re DOE Agreement That Unc Should Develop Plan to Address Residual Contamination at 71 Shelton Ave,Formerly Identified as Bldgs 3H & 6H for Activities Previously Authorized by NRC License SNM-386
| author name = Miller M
| author name = Miller M
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 9808170302
| document report number = NUDOCS 9808170302
| title reference date = 06-08-1998
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
Line 31: Line 32:
==Dear Mr. Bonito:==
==Dear Mr. Bonito:==


This letter responds to your letter dated June 8,1998, regarding the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) agreement that UNC should develop a plan to address the residual contamination at 71 Shelton Avenue, formerly identified as Buildings 3H and SH, for activities previously authorized by NRC License No. SNM-386, last held by United Nuclear Corporation.
This letter responds to your {{letter dated|date=June 8, 1998|text=letter dated June 8,1998}}, regarding the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) agreement that UNC should develop a plan to address the residual contamination at 71 Shelton Avenue, formerly identified as Buildings 3H and SH, for activities previously authorized by NRC License No. SNM-386, last held by United Nuclear Corporation.
As detailed in our NRC Inspection Report No. 070-00371/96-001, dated July 26,1996, and
As detailed in our NRC Inspection Report No. 070-00371/96-001, dated July 26,1996, and
;              again in our letter to you dated April 16,1998, we requested that you provide to the NRC a plan                                                                  ,
;              again in our letter to you dated April 16,1998, we requested that you provide to the NRC a plan                                                                  ,
to further charactenze and ultimately remediate, if necessary, the areas with enriched uranium .                                                                '
to further charactenze and ultimately remediate, if necessary, the areas with enriched uranium .                                                                '
Ll
Ll
!              above 30 picocuries/ gram of soil or sediments. By your June 8,1998 letter, you indicated that you will proceed with site characterization using NUREG/CR-5849 es guidance, and should any L              remediation be necessary, that UNC requests to use the Option 1 criteria delineated in the j              NRC's Branch Technical Position for " Disposal or Onsite Storage of Thorium or Uranium t
!              above 30 picocuries/ gram of soil or sediments. By your {{letter dated|date=June 8, 1998|text=June 8,1998 letter}}, you indicated that you will proceed with site characterization using NUREG/CR-5849 es guidance, and should any L              remediation be necessary, that UNC requests to use the Option 1 criteria delineated in the j              NRC's Branch Technical Position for " Disposal or Onsite Storage of Thorium or Uranium t
Wasten from Past Operations," dated October 23,1981. We are in agreement that, at this particu;.r site, you may use a concentration of 30 pCi/g as an acceptable release enterion for enriched uranium, and that NUREG/CR-5849 provides acceptable guidance for demonstrating that this criterion will be met.
Wasten from Past Operations," dated October 23,1981. We are in agreement that, at this particu;.r site, you may use a concentration of 30 pCi/g as an acceptable release enterion for enriched uranium, and that NUREG/CR-5849 provides acceptable guidance for demonstrating that this criterion will be met.
E Based on our recent discussions, we understand that additional information regarding a plan will L              be submitted within a few weeks. We appreciate your cooperation to resolve this matter.
E Based on our recent discussions, we understand that additional information regarding a plan will L              be submitted within a few weeks. We appreciate your cooperation to resolve this matter.

Latest revision as of 17:48, 19 March 2021

Responds to Re DOE Agreement That Unc Should Develop Plan to Address Residual Contamination at 71 Shelton Ave,Formerly Identified as Bldgs 3H & 6H for Activities Previously Authorized by NRC License SNM-386
ML20237B008
Person / Time
Site: 07000371
Issue date: 08/10/1998
From: Mark Miller
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Bonito R
UNITED NUCLEAR CORP. (SUBS. OF UNC, INC.)
References
NUDOCS 9808170302
Download: ML20237B008 (2)
v • d • e


Text

,

w., -..

p p

l I=

l I

August 10,1998 l ' Robert F. Bonito General Manager for Operations ~

l' UNC Naval Products .

i P. O.: Box 981 Uncasville, . 06382-0981-

SUBJECT:

71 SHELTON AVENUE, NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT '

l

Dear Mr. Bonito:

This letter responds to your letter dated June 8,1998, regarding the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) agreement that UNC should develop a plan to address the residual contamination at 71 Shelton Avenue, formerly identified as Buildings 3H and SH, for activities previously authorized by NRC License No. SNM-386, last held by United Nuclear Corporation.

As detailed in our NRC Inspection Report No. 070-00371/96-001, dated July 26,1996, and

again in our letter to you dated April 16,1998, we requested that you provide to the NRC a plan ,

to further charactenze and ultimately remediate, if necessary, the areas with enriched uranium . '

Ll

! above 30 picocuries/ gram of soil or sediments. By your June 8,1998 letter, you indicated that you will proceed with site characterization using NUREG/CR-5849 es guidance, and should any L remediation be necessary, that UNC requests to use the Option 1 criteria delineated in the j NRC's Branch Technical Position for " Disposal or Onsite Storage of Thorium or Uranium t

Wasten from Past Operations," dated October 23,1981. We are in agreement that, at this particu;.r site, you may use a concentration of 30 pCi/g as an acceptable release enterion for enriched uranium, and that NUREG/CR-5849 provides acceptable guidance for demonstrating that this criterion will be met.

E Based on our recent discussions, we understand that additional information regarding a plan will L be submitted within a few weeks. We appreciate your cooperation to resolve this matter.

l l Sincerely, i

, OriginalsignedbyMarieniiller \

Marie Miller

\D Senior Health Physicist i Decommissioning and Laboratory Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety j j

Docket No.: 070-00371 (Retired) i

- License No.: SNM-368 (Terminated) )

l

-cc: State of Connecticut i l

( I f 9908170302 980810 l l PDR ADOCK 07000371 l CU/ e- n ,

i i l C PDR I L--------_------------_----------_---------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------

t R. Bonito - 2 UNC Naval Products Distribution:

Region i Docket Room (with concurrences)

J. Parrott, NMSS PUBLIC Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC) i DOCUMENT NAME: G:DNMSDOCWORK\MISCLTR\LUNCNAVA.LP flLL% . j l

To sessive e sepy of thle sleeumont,inalloets h the bes: 'C' = Copy w/o ottsch/enet "E" = Copy w/ ettech/enci 'N' = No copy OFFICE DNMS/RI d$ DNMS/RI - l RC/ ORA /Rl_i _ _ l C- l  !

l NAME MMiller /#7/2r MRoberts hA Ck BFewelfMO ,fftdb.

l. DATE 08/08/98 08/lp/98 08W/98 N.M64c) 08V/98 i

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY i

,

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20237B008&oldid=3222194"