ML20209A369: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML20209A369 | |||
| issue date = 11/01/1988 | |||
| title = Insp Rept 50-333/88-25 on 881011-14.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Status of Previously Identified Open Items & Adequacy of Licensee Response in Resolving Issues | |||
| author name = Anderson C, Lara J, Paolino R | |||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) | |||
| addressee name = | |||
| addressee affiliation = | |||
| docket = 05000333 | |||
| license number = | |||
| contact person = | |||
| document report number = 50-333-88-25, NUDOCS 8811290553 | |||
| package number = ML20206K801 | |||
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS | |||
| page count = 9 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[see also::IR 05000333/1988025]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ _ _ | |||
. . . | |||
. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
1 | |||
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
REGION I | |||
Report No. 50-333/88-25 , | |||
Docket No. 50-333 | |||
! | |||
License No. DPR-59 Priority -- Category C | |||
Licensee: Power Authority of State of New York | |||
P.O. Box 41 | |||
Scriba, New York | |||
Facility Name: James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant (JAFNPP) | |||
Inspection At: Scriba, New York ; | |||
Inspection Conducted: October 11-14, 1988 | |||
Inspectors: (f. / o f/ If | |||
R. J/ Pao ino, Senior Reactor Engineer, PPS/EB ' date | |||
Ok0 $( T bater | |||
JF Lara, Reat or Engineer, PPS/i[B | |||
/ | |||
date | |||
H | |||
, | |||
Approved by: b h ff | |||
C.J.Nnderson, Chief.PlantSystemsSection, date . | |||
EB/ ORS | |||
Inspection Summayr : Inspection on October 11-14, 1988 (Inspection Report | |||
No. 50-33T/aF25) ; | |||
! | |||
Areas Inspected: Announced inspection by regional personnel to review status ' | |||
oT previously identtfled open items and determine adequacy of licensee | |||
response in resolving each issue. | |||
Results: The inspector determined that the licensee has satisfactorily I | |||
responded to the open items. Eighteen previously identified open items have | |||
been closed. | |||
- | |||
, | |||
During the inspection, one violation was identified involving unqualified ; | |||
Okonite splices in Limitorque 12MOV-15 located in the drywell. | |||
l | |||
i | |||
! | |||
i | |||
' | |||
' | |||
ss. L3 | |||
t | |||
FDi j | |||
' | |||
Q | |||
-x _ ___ ~ _ .,_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - . . . . _ _ __ _ _ . . _ . - - _, ._. | |||
_ _ _ _ _ - _ | |||
* .. | |||
. | |||
- | |||
. | |||
DETAILS | |||
1. Persons Contacted | |||
1.1 New York Power Authority (NYPA) | |||
R. Baker, Maintenance Superintendent | |||
*R. Converse, Resident Manger | |||
*W. Fernandez, Superintendent of Power | |||
H. N. Keith, I&C Superintendent | |||
*J. M. Lazarus, Associate Plant Engineer | |||
*K D. Moody, Plant Engineer II | |||
*R. L. Patch, Quality Assurance Superintendent | |||
*0. Ruddy, Senior Plant Engineer | |||
G. Tasick, Quality Assurance Supervisor | |||
*V. M. Walz, Technical Service Supervisor | |||
1.2 Nuclear __ Regulatory Commission | |||
*A. J. Luptak, Senior Resident Inspector | |||
*R. A. Plasse Resident Inspector | |||
* Denotes personnel present at exit meeting of October 14, 1938, | |||
2. Purpose | |||
The purpose of this inspection was to review the status of previously | |||
identified items and to determine the adequacy of the licensee's corrective | |||
action in resolving each issue. | |||
3. Status of previously Identified Items | |||
(Closed) Unresolved Item 85-16-02 pertaining to cable pull tension for | |||
cables installed per plant modifTeation F1-82-053. The NRC concern was | |||
that the cable pull tension does not exceed the maximum allowed for the | |||
smallest cable being pulled. | |||
The NRC inspector reviewed licensee cable 5, I tension calculations No. 005 | |||
for Modification F1-82-053. The NRC inspector determined the licensee had | |||
not exceeded the maximum pulling tension for any of the installed cables. | |||
This item is closed. | |||
(Closed) Unresolved Item 85-_16-01 pertaining to engineering justification | |||
on use of 1 inch spfice seal length for Raychem splices. The NRC inspector | |||
reviewed licensee splice installation drawings (F1-82-53-119) in effect at | |||
the time which specified the 1 inch overlap. Data to support the 1 inch | |||
splice seal length was developed by licensee contract personnel in Report | |||
__ __ _-_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
. . | |||
. | |||
. | |||
3 ! | |||
r | |||
Nos. PEI-TR-82-4-2A dated May 24, 1985 and PEI-TR-860300-01 dated May 9, | |||
1986. Current test data (Wyle Report No. 17859-02P dated March 1987) | |||
indicates Raychem splice seal overlap of less than 1 inch to be acceptable. | |||
! | |||
This item is closed. ! | |||
r | |||
(Closed)_ Unresolved Item 86-14-03 pertaining to installation procedure { | |||
requirements for installing Okonite electrical splices. Licensee l' | |||
procedure No. IS-E-OS Revision 1 dated February 4, 1987 was revised to | |||
clarify application of insulating tape to conform to the qualifted ! | |||
configuration. The requirements for four layers of tape has been ! | |||
clarified to read two half-lapped layers of tape for the T-95 (red) and - | |||
T-35 (black) tape. One half-lapped layer is defined as two layers total. | |||
This item is closed. ! | |||
i | |||
(Closed) Unresolved Item 87-14-01 pertaining to EQ Maintenance and ; | |||
Surveiflance Procedures. | |||
l | |||
At the time of the EQ inspection, licensee EQ Maintenance and | |||
Surveillance Procedures were in draft form awaiting review and approval. i | |||
: | |||
The licensee's review has been completed and the procedures have been ! | |||
approved for use by the Plant Operating Review Committee (PORC). i | |||
i | |||
The NRC inspector reviewed several procedures verifying cuistence of ! | |||
EQ Maintenance / Surveillance procedures. ' | |||
This item is closed. | |||
! | |||
(Closed) Violation 87-14-03 pertaining to generic EQ file deficiencies l | |||
involving missing documents / data necessary in determining qualification l | |||
of electrical equipment subject to 10 CFR 50.49 requirements. | |||
[ | |||
The Itcensee has developed and issued a new procedure (EDP-28) entitled f | |||
"Review of Plant Specific Qualification Report." The procedure requires i | |||
written documentation of the review, qualification and acceptance of EQ l | |||
files in accordance with a checklist which documents the detatis of the l | |||
file review and verification. The checklist includes acceptance criteria, I | |||
similarity analysis as well as other pertinent qualification attributes. i | |||
Fifty percent of the licensee files have been revised in accordance with i | |||
procedure E0P-28. The remaining EQ files are scheduled for completion by j | |||
mid-1939. l | |||
l | |||
This item is closed. I | |||
i | |||
r | |||
i | |||
(; | |||
i | |||
__ ___-__ -__ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
. _ . _ _ - | |||
. . | |||
. | |||
- | |||
. | |||
4 | |||
(Closed) Violation 87-14-04 pertaining to the qualification of Brand-Rex | |||
Cable (Model T;7600). | |||
The licensee has revised the Brand-Rex EQ file 231 to include the | |||
environmental qualification report No. QDR-6.18 Revision 1, dated 1987 | |||
which addresses qualification of the Brand-Rex cable (Model T-7600) in | |||
the environmental conditions of the steam tunnel. The report also | |||
compares the qualified T-7506 insulating materials with the T-7600 cable. | |||
This item is closed. | |||
(Closed)_ Violation 87-14-05 pertaining to the use of Cerro KXL-760 cable | |||
l for generic instrument cable application. | |||
The licensee has revised the Cerro KXL-760 EQ file to ine:.de the | |||
"Qualification and Review Package" 00R 6.2 Volumes I, II, and III dattd | |||
; 1987 on Rockbestos (Cerro) Firewall III and Pyro-Trol III cable. | |||
1 | |||
The NRC inspector also reviewed licensee analysis of cable circuitry | |||
performance (ETR 2062-1 Revision 1) dated July 17, 1987 which evaluated | |||
l total combined inaccuracy affects for the entire instrument loop for each | |||
I instrument in the EQ program. The analysis included the accuracy effects | |||
of all applicable cables and determined that the cables were capable of | |||
maintaining acceptable instrument accuracy performance during applicable | |||
postulated design basis accidents. | |||
This item is closed. | |||
l | |||
Closed) Unresolved Item 87-14-06 pertaining to generic use of BIW XLPE | |||
{ibTe (modell Tb78-l 066) in H KB/LOCA instrument applications with peak | |||
~ ~ | |||
c | |||
accident temperatures of 285'F and peak pressure of 23.5 psia. The | |||
licensee's BIW XLPE EQ Cable file No. 212 5as been revised to reflect the | |||
licensees review and evaluation (ITS-87-0434) of October 21, 1987 which | |||
determined that the BIW XLPE cable (model 14538-H-006) is only used in | |||
non-EQ applications except for six instrueents which have been | |||
reclassified as Category !! and III. The licensee has deleted this cable | |||
from the EQ program and all applicable procedures, instructions have been | |||
revised accordingly. | |||
T'.is item is closed. | |||
LCl_osed) Unresolved Item 87-14-07 pertaining to the seneric use of Eaton | |||
cables inside the primary containment. The EQ file SCEV sheet indicates | |||
, | |||
the Ecton cables are qualified for generic application inside primary | |||
I | |||
containment. Note 2 of the SCEW sheet indicates cables are in a mild | |||
emvironment. Licensee review and evaluation confirm cable is used in a | |||
m 11d environment only. The cable has been removed from the EQ program | |||
i | |||
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
. . | |||
. | |||
. | |||
- | |||
. | |||
5 | |||
s | |||
and all applicable doc.uments have been revised by the licensee to reflect | |||
the limited use of the Eaton cable. | |||
This item is closed. | |||
(Closed) Unresolved item 87-14-08 pertaining to Ro.emount Model 1153 | |||
Series B transmitters (fQ file NO. 276) used to detect and initiate an | |||
isolation signal in the event of a Main Steam Line Break (MSLB). | |||
The EQ file review contained several deficiencies which the licensee | |||
committed to address in the next file revision. The revisions to the EQ | |||
file include: | |||
* The results of the tssts performed on type "P" transmitters be added | |||
or summarized in the Patel Reporc PEI-TR-82-4-25 since the type "R" | |||
transmitter (installed at JAFNPP) test performed was not a full | |||
sequential type test as defined in IEEE std.323-1974. | |||
* File did not have sufficient justification to support qualification | |||
of Rosemont model 1153 Series B transmitter at 350*F. However, the | |||
Rosemont Model 11538 is qualified to 265'F which envelops the | |||
highest specified temperature for locations where these types are | |||
installed. | |||
* Inconsistency on qualified life corrected to show a qualified life | |||
of 40 years provided that the 0-rings are replaced each time the | |||
cover is removed. The inspector verified licensee revisions to the | |||
EQ files. | |||
This item is closed. | |||
[ Closed)Unresolveditem 87-14-09 pertaining to the qualification of | |||
Magnetrols Level $ witches supplied with internal wiring manufactured by | |||
Rockbestos. | |||
To establish qualification of the Rockbestos internal wiring, the | |||
Rockbestos Report No. 1806 is referenced. However, the NRC determined | |||
the concerns of Information Notice 84-44 were not addressed. The | |||
licensee committed to revise the EQ file No. 267 to reflect the new | |||
Rockbeston Reports. The inspector verified that the new Rockbestos | |||
Report JAF EQ Reference 205b, Revision 1 "Plant Specific Qualification | |||
Report for Rockbestos Firewall III and Pyro-Tral III" was included in | |||
Patel's Evaluation Report (PEI-TR-82-4-25) of the Magnetrol Level Switch. | |||
This item is closed. | |||
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - __ | |||
s | |||
. , | |||
, | |||
- | |||
l | |||
- | |||
i . | |||
l 6 ! | |||
; | |||
! | |||
. . | |||
. | |||
" | |||
(Closed) Unresolved Item 87-14-10 pertaining to the missing functional l | |||
tests which were not performed during LOCA Testtag of the Thomas and l | |||
; Betts Terminal lugs. The licensee does not take credit for insulating . | |||
j capabilities provided by the Tefiel sections of these connectors in any l | |||
of the installations. Instead, the required dielectric strength is ' | |||
] provided by properly installed and qualified terminal boards and l | |||
< | |||
insulated splices. This resolution to tne Franklin TER concern was ! | |||
J | |||
determined to be acceptable but was not ircluded in the Thomas & Betts EQ [ | |||
. file No. 261. The NRC inspector reviewed the revised EQ file verifying > | |||
j the addition of the above information. | |||
' | |||
l | |||
This item is closed. l | |||
. | |||
l (Closed)UnresolvedItem 87-14-13 pertaining to MCC's ;usceptible to water ! | |||
l impingement resulting from steam condensations on equipment located above ! | |||
1 | |||
' | |||
the MCC's. ' | |||
\ | |||
The licensee reported two LER's (LER 86-12 and 86-21) involving water ! | |||
; which was either sprayed or drained onto Motor Controi Centers (MCC) and l | |||
j caused shorting of safety-related circuits. ; | |||
; | |||
' | |||
The long term corrective action by the licensee was a design change to j | |||
l increase the MCC's water tight integrity. : | |||
i | |||
! | |||
{ The inspector verified that the licensee has modified (no F1-86-061) the t | |||
8 | |||
" | |||
MCC's by installing drfp shields and door gaskets for protection against ! | |||
water spray. Licensee evaluation determined that the direct water spray l | |||
l 15 not part of the postulated DBA. The worst case documented in the EQ i | |||
file is 100*4 relative humidity. | |||
{ | |||
! | |||
R | |||
This item is closed. | |||
i | |||
I (Closed) Unresolved ll em 87-14-14 pertaining to the thermal aging | |||
; | |||
evaluation based on different materials of construction for the General | |||
Atomic Radiation Monitor cable / connector. | |||
The material used in the Conax electrical penetration assembly was I | |||
1 identified as tetrachloroethylene (TFE), whereas the material in tne I | |||
] amph2nol connector was cross-linked polystyrene, | |||
4 | |||
f | |||
i | |||
] The licensee provided additional thermai aging data to demonstrate the ! | |||
suitability of the Amphenol connector at Fitzpatrick. The NRC inspector | |||
' | |||
I | |||
reviewed the General Atomic Radiation Monitor EQ file No. 262 verifying I | |||
addition of thermal aging data on Amphenol connectors. l | |||
. | |||
1 | |||
! This item is closed, t | |||
1 | |||
k | |||
j t | |||
; i | |||
l ! | |||
: i | |||
! | |||
! | |||
' | |||
, | |||
--- __- _ . - . , . , - - _ , - | |||
. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
- | |||
. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
- | |||
7 | |||
(Closed) Violation 87-14-16 pertaining to the thermal aping analysis used | |||
in qualifications of AAA-Solenoid valves besed on the assumption that the | |||
solenoid coil was similar in construction to the Limitorque Motor. | |||
New thermal aging data was developed to qualify the solenoid coil | |||
configuration. | |||
All applicable documentation (QDR 35.4) has been revised to reflect new | |||
data which demonstrates qualification for the JAF site. | |||
1 | |||
This item is closed. | |||
(Closedj_V,folation 87-14-18 pertaining to generic use of Cerro KXL-510 | |||
cable in the primary containment and missing insulation refistance | |||
measurements. In p eparing a justification for continued operation, the | |||
, licensee determined that all plant cables associated with the instruments | |||
i identified in the EQ Master List WCAP10-1-11 using the Cerro KXL-510 | |||
' | |||
; compound are used only as thermocouple extension wires. The licensee | |||
committed to establish qualifiability of the Cerro KXL-510 cable for | |||
specific applicacion in the plant and ensure controls are in place to | |||
limit use of this cable. | |||
The NRC inspector reviewed the revised EQ file QDR 6.8 which demonstrates | |||
the qualification of these cables. The QDR also indicates that there is | |||
no equipment serviced by these cables in the containment which require | |||
environmental qualification. | |||
The cable usage review confirms that only the thernocouple extension wire | |||
used ina Cerro KXL-510. | |||
This item is closed. | |||
(ClosedlUnresolvedItem 87-21-05 pertaining to potential effects of two | |||
missing 0-ring seals on the acceptability status of level switches | |||
23LS-91A&B, located in the crescent area to nitigate an in-containment | |||
sr.all break LOCA. | |||
The licensee determined the seals do not provide a safety function and | |||
have been removed from the EQ pregram (ref. JTS-87-0418 Revision 1). The | |||
switches are in an area where the only potential environmental change | |||
wculd be a small change in air temperature but a significant increase in | |||
radiation. The switches are not required for any HELB accident in the | |||
Reactor Building. The licensee concludes that the omission of 0-ring | |||
seals in the level switches does not impair the function of any component | |||
important to safety during an postulated Reactor Bailding HELB. | |||
This item is closed. | |||
i . , | |||
, | |||
. | |||
a | |||
8 | |||
i | |||
t | |||
(Closed) Violation 86-04-02 pertaining to the licensee identification and j | |||
replacement of unqualified torque svlitches and limit switches in the | |||
recirculation systems discharge and discharge by pass valves. The | |||
licensee determined the torque switc5 and the limit switch contained | |||
insulation which did not meet primary containment environmental ! | |||
requirements. Test reports reference in the EQ files did not provide an i | |||
adequate basis for qualification to 00R Guidelines. ! | |||
The licensee replaced the unqualified components in Limitorque valve ! | |||
Nos, 02 MOV-53 A, B, C, and D with components qualified to NUREG-0588 and ! | |||
filed a Licensee Event Report (LER) No. 87-007. : | |||
l | |||
This items is closed. | |||
l | |||
4 Physical Inspection ' | |||
The inspectors examined three Limitorque installations in the drywell. i | |||
Items examined include Limitorque Valve Nos. 02 MOV-53A & B and 12 MOV-15 ! | |||
located at elevation 300'-0". The valve operator 12 MOV-15 is one of ! | |||
three new units installed during this outage. [ | |||
The inspectors examined internal wiring, T-drain installation, splices ! | |||
and general installed configuration and orientation. | |||
In one of the valves, No. 12 MOV-15 the inspector noted that the splice | |||
configuration did not corroly with installation requirements for a | |||
qualified splice. Procedure IS-E-03 Revision 1, paragraph H i.11 requires | |||
two half-lapped layers of the T-95 (red) tape and two half-lapped layers ; | |||
of the T-35 (black) tape over the T-95 (red) tape. ; | |||
i | |||
The T-95 (red) tape was visible at the end of the splice configuration. I | |||
Visual observatien of the half-lapped layers indicate much less overlay ! | |||
(1/8-1/4 inch) than the required 3/8-1/2 inch half-lapped layers (as f | |||
determined by width of tape). ! | |||
L | |||
Licensee personnel present during this inspection acknowladge the [ | |||
finding. Further discussions with the licensee indicate contract personnel [ | |||
installing the Limitorque may have made the splice. Records indicate the i | |||
splice was inspected and accepted by quality control inspection, j | |||
The NRC inspector expressed concern over the control of work performed by ! | |||
contract personnel, The licenste comitted to examine other similar ! | |||
installaticns made during this outage. The plant is presently shut down i | |||
and does not present a sa'ety hazard. i | |||
i | |||
This ite'n is a violation of 10 CFR 50.49 requirement for maintaining the : | |||
qualified status of EQ equipment (50-333/83-25-01). ! | |||
[ | |||
. | |||
- - - | |||
- .. _ .. - - - - - - | |||
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
, . . . , | |||
. | |||
F | |||
9 | |||
i | |||
5. Exit Meetino | |||
! | |||
The inspector met with licensee personnel (denoted in Oetills, paragraph l | |||
1) at the conclusion of the inspection on October 14, 1988, The ! | |||
inspector summarized the scope of the inspection and the inspection | |||
findings. At no time during the inspection was written rnaterial given to | |||
the licensee. | |||
: | |||
! | |||
> | |||
, | |||
? | |||
i | |||
i I | |||
i { | |||
! | |||
i | |||
, | |||
I | |||
i l | |||
, t | |||
2 | |||
1 | |||
1 | |||
? | |||
I | |||
-! I | |||
4 : | |||
l | |||
: | |||
" | |||
! | |||
i | |||
i | |||
l ! | |||
a | |||
' | |||
f | |||
i i | |||
' | |||
t | |||
$ | |||
i | |||
' | |||
) | |||
: | |||
1 | |||
' | |||
i | |||
! | |||
i | |||
! | |||
i | |||
' | |||
. _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ , . _ _ | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 12:17, 19 December 2021
ML20209A369 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | FitzPatrick |
Issue date: | 11/01/1988 |
From: | Anderson C, Julio Lara, Paolino R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML20206K801 | List: |
References | |
50-333-88-25, NUDOCS 8811290553 | |
Download: ML20209A369 (9) | |
See also: IR 05000333/1988025
Text
_ - _ _ _
. . .
.
.
.
1
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No. 50-333/88-25 ,
Docket No. 50-333
!
License No. DPR-59 Priority -- Category C
Licensee: Power Authority of State of New York
P.O. Box 41
Scriba, New York
Facility Name: James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant (JAFNPP)
Inspection At: Scriba, New York ;
Inspection Conducted: October 11-14, 1988
Inspectors: (f. / o f/ If
R. J/ Pao ino, Senior Reactor Engineer, PPS/EB ' date
Ok0 $( T bater
JF Lara, Reat or Engineer, PPS/i[B
/
date
H
,
Approved by: b h ff
C.J.Nnderson, Chief.PlantSystemsSection, date .
EB/ ORS
Inspection Summayr : Inspection on October 11-14, 1988 (Inspection Report
No. 50-33T/aF25) ;
!
Areas Inspected: Announced inspection by regional personnel to review status '
oT previously identtfled open items and determine adequacy of licensee
response in resolving each issue.
Results: The inspector determined that the licensee has satisfactorily I
responded to the open items. Eighteen previously identified open items have
been closed.
-
,
During the inspection, one violation was identified involving unqualified ;
Okonite splices in Limitorque 12MOV-15 located in the drywell.
l
i
!
i
'
'
ss. L3
t
FDi j
'
Q
-x _ ___ ~ _ .,_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - . . . . _ _ __ _ _ . . _ . - - _, ._.
_ _ _ _ _ - _
- ..
.
-
.
DETAILS
1. Persons Contacted
1.1 New York Power Authority (NYPA)
R. Baker, Maintenance Superintendent
- R. Converse, Resident Manger
- W. Fernandez, Superintendent of Power
H. N. Keith, I&C Superintendent
- J. M. Lazarus, Associate Plant Engineer
- K D. Moody, Plant Engineer II
- R. L. Patch, Quality Assurance Superintendent
- 0. Ruddy, Senior Plant Engineer
G. Tasick, Quality Assurance Supervisor
- V. M. Walz, Technical Service Supervisor
1.2 Nuclear __ Regulatory Commission
- A. J. Luptak, Senior Resident Inspector
- R. A. Plasse Resident Inspector
- Denotes personnel present at exit meeting of October 14, 1938,
2. Purpose
The purpose of this inspection was to review the status of previously
identified items and to determine the adequacy of the licensee's corrective
action in resolving each issue.
3. Status of previously Identified Items
(Closed) Unresolved Item 85-16-02 pertaining to cable pull tension for
cables installed per plant modifTeation F1-82-053. The NRC concern was
that the cable pull tension does not exceed the maximum allowed for the
smallest cable being pulled.
The NRC inspector reviewed licensee cable 5, I tension calculations No. 005
for Modification F1-82-053. The NRC inspector determined the licensee had
not exceeded the maximum pulling tension for any of the installed cables.
This item is closed.
(Closed) Unresolved Item 85-_16-01 pertaining to engineering justification
on use of 1 inch spfice seal length for Raychem splices. The NRC inspector
reviewed licensee splice installation drawings (F1-82-53-119) in effect at
the time which specified the 1 inch overlap. Data to support the 1 inch
splice seal length was developed by licensee contract personnel in Report
__ __ _-_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. .
.
.
3 !
r
Nos. PEI-TR-82-4-2A dated May 24, 1985 and PEI-TR-860300-01 dated May 9,
1986. Current test data (Wyle Report No. 17859-02P dated March 1987)
indicates Raychem splice seal overlap of less than 1 inch to be acceptable.
!
This item is closed. !
r
(Closed)_ Unresolved Item 86-14-03 pertaining to installation procedure {
requirements for installing Okonite electrical splices. Licensee l'
procedure No. IS-E-OS Revision 1 dated February 4, 1987 was revised to
clarify application of insulating tape to conform to the qualifted !
configuration. The requirements for four layers of tape has been !
clarified to read two half-lapped layers of tape for the T-95 (red) and -
T-35 (black) tape. One half-lapped layer is defined as two layers total.
This item is closed. !
i
(Closed) Unresolved Item 87-14-01 pertaining to EQ Maintenance and ;
Surveiflance Procedures.
l
At the time of the EQ inspection, licensee EQ Maintenance and
Surveillance Procedures were in draft form awaiting review and approval. i
The licensee's review has been completed and the procedures have been !
approved for use by the Plant Operating Review Committee (PORC). i
i
The NRC inspector reviewed several procedures verifying cuistence of !
EQ Maintenance / Surveillance procedures. '
This item is closed.
!
(Closed) Violation 87-14-03 pertaining to generic EQ file deficiencies l
involving missing documents / data necessary in determining qualification l
of electrical equipment subject to 10 CFR 50.49 requirements.
[
The Itcensee has developed and issued a new procedure (EDP-28) entitled f
"Review of Plant Specific Qualification Report." The procedure requires i
written documentation of the review, qualification and acceptance of EQ l
files in accordance with a checklist which documents the detatis of the l
file review and verification. The checklist includes acceptance criteria, I
similarity analysis as well as other pertinent qualification attributes. i
Fifty percent of the licensee files have been revised in accordance with i
procedure E0P-28. The remaining EQ files are scheduled for completion by j
mid-1939. l
l
This item is closed. I
i
r
i
(;
i
__ ___-__ -__ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
. _ . _ _ -
. .
.
-
.
4
(Closed) Violation 87-14-04 pertaining to the qualification of Brand-Rex
Cable (Model T;7600).
The licensee has revised the Brand-Rex EQ file 231 to include the
environmental qualification report No. QDR-6.18 Revision 1, dated 1987
which addresses qualification of the Brand-Rex cable (Model T-7600) in
the environmental conditions of the steam tunnel. The report also
compares the qualified T-7506 insulating materials with the T-7600 cable.
This item is closed.
(Closed)_ Violation 87-14-05 pertaining to the use of Cerro KXL-760 cable
l for generic instrument cable application.
The licensee has revised the Cerro KXL-760 EQ file to ine:.de the
"Qualification and Review Package" 00R 6.2 Volumes I, II, and III dattd
- 1987 on Rockbestos (Cerro) Firewall III and Pyro-Trol III cable.
1
The NRC inspector also reviewed licensee analysis of cable circuitry
performance (ETR 2062-1 Revision 1) dated July 17, 1987 which evaluated
l total combined inaccuracy affects for the entire instrument loop for each
I instrument in the EQ program. The analysis included the accuracy effects
of all applicable cables and determined that the cables were capable of
maintaining acceptable instrument accuracy performance during applicable
postulated design basis accidents.
This item is closed.
l
Closed) Unresolved Item 87-14-06 pertaining to generic use of BIW XLPE
{ibTe (modell Tb78-l 066) in H KB/LOCA instrument applications with peak
~ ~
c
accident temperatures of 285'F and peak pressure of 23.5 psia. The
licensee's BIW XLPE EQ Cable file No. 212 5as been revised to reflect the
licensees review and evaluation (ITS-87-0434) of October 21, 1987 which
determined that the BIW XLPE cable (model 14538-H-006) is only used in
non-EQ applications except for six instrueents which have been
reclassified as Category !! and III. The licensee has deleted this cable
from the EQ program and all applicable procedures, instructions have been
revised accordingly.
T'.is item is closed.
LCl_osed) Unresolved Item 87-14-07 pertaining to the seneric use of Eaton
cables inside the primary containment. The EQ file SCEV sheet indicates
,
the Ecton cables are qualified for generic application inside primary
I
containment. Note 2 of the SCEW sheet indicates cables are in a mild
emvironment. Licensee review and evaluation confirm cable is used in a
m 11d environment only. The cable has been removed from the EQ program
i
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. .
.
.
-
.
5
s
and all applicable doc.uments have been revised by the licensee to reflect
the limited use of the Eaton cable.
This item is closed.
(Closed) Unresolved item 87-14-08 pertaining to Ro.emount Model 1153
Series B transmitters (fQ file NO. 276) used to detect and initiate an
isolation signal in the event of a Main Steam Line Break (MSLB).
The EQ file review contained several deficiencies which the licensee
committed to address in the next file revision. The revisions to the EQ
file include:
- The results of the tssts performed on type "P" transmitters be added
or summarized in the Patel Reporc PEI-TR-82-4-25 since the type "R"
transmitter (installed at JAFNPP) test performed was not a full
sequential type test as defined in IEEE std.323-1974.
- File did not have sufficient justification to support qualification
of Rosemont model 1153 Series B transmitter at 350*F. However, the
Rosemont Model 11538 is qualified to 265'F which envelops the
highest specified temperature for locations where these types are
installed.
- Inconsistency on qualified life corrected to show a qualified life
of 40 years provided that the 0-rings are replaced each time the
cover is removed. The inspector verified licensee revisions to the
EQ files.
This item is closed.
[ Closed)Unresolveditem 87-14-09 pertaining to the qualification of
Magnetrols Level $ witches supplied with internal wiring manufactured by
Rockbestos.
To establish qualification of the Rockbestos internal wiring, the
Rockbestos Report No. 1806 is referenced. However, the NRC determined
the concerns of Information Notice 84-44 were not addressed. The
licensee committed to revise the EQ file No. 267 to reflect the new
Rockbeston Reports. The inspector verified that the new Rockbestos
Report JAF EQ Reference 205b, Revision 1 "Plant Specific Qualification
Report for Rockbestos Firewall III and Pyro-Tral III" was included in
Patel's Evaluation Report (PEI-TR-82-4-25) of the Magnetrol Level Switch.
This item is closed.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - __
s
. ,
,
-
l
-
i .
l 6 !
!
. .
.
"
(Closed) Unresolved Item 87-14-10 pertaining to the missing functional l
tests which were not performed during LOCA Testtag of the Thomas and l
- Betts Terminal lugs. The licensee does not take credit for insulating .
j capabilities provided by the Tefiel sections of these connectors in any l
of the installations. Instead, the required dielectric strength is '
] provided by properly installed and qualified terminal boards and l
<
insulated splices. This resolution to tne Franklin TER concern was !
J
determined to be acceptable but was not ircluded in the Thomas & Betts EQ [
. file No. 261. The NRC inspector reviewed the revised EQ file verifying >
j the addition of the above information.
'
l
This item is closed. l
.
l (Closed)UnresolvedItem 87-14-13 pertaining to MCC's ;usceptible to water !
l impingement resulting from steam condensations on equipment located above !
1
'
the MCC's. '
\
The licensee reported two LER's (LER 86-12 and 86-21) involving water !
- which was either sprayed or drained onto Motor Controi Centers (MCC) and l
j caused shorting of safety-related circuits. ;
'
The long term corrective action by the licensee was a design change to j
l increase the MCC's water tight integrity. :
i
!
{ The inspector verified that the licensee has modified (no F1-86-061) the t
8
"
MCC's by installing drfp shields and door gaskets for protection against !
water spray. Licensee evaluation determined that the direct water spray l
l 15 not part of the postulated DBA. The worst case documented in the EQ i
file is 100*4 relative humidity.
{
!
R
This item is closed.
i
I (Closed) Unresolved ll em 87-14-14 pertaining to the thermal aging
evaluation based on different materials of construction for the General
Atomic Radiation Monitor cable / connector.
The material used in the Conax electrical penetration assembly was I
1 identified as tetrachloroethylene (TFE), whereas the material in tne I
] amph2nol connector was cross-linked polystyrene,
4
f
i
] The licensee provided additional thermai aging data to demonstrate the !
suitability of the Amphenol connector at Fitzpatrick. The NRC inspector
'
I
reviewed the General Atomic Radiation Monitor EQ file No. 262 verifying I
addition of thermal aging data on Amphenol connectors. l
.
1
! This item is closed, t
1
k
j t
- i
l !
- i
!
!
'
,
--- __- _ . - . , . , - - _ , -
. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-
.
.
.
-
7
(Closed) Violation 87-14-16 pertaining to the thermal aping analysis used
in qualifications of AAA-Solenoid valves besed on the assumption that the
solenoid coil was similar in construction to the Limitorque Motor.
New thermal aging data was developed to qualify the solenoid coil
configuration.
All applicable documentation (QDR 35.4) has been revised to reflect new
data which demonstrates qualification for the JAF site.
1
This item is closed.
(Closedj_V,folation 87-14-18 pertaining to generic use of Cerro KXL-510
cable in the primary containment and missing insulation refistance
measurements. In p eparing a justification for continued operation, the
, licensee determined that all plant cables associated with the instruments
i identified in the EQ Master List WCAP10-1-11 using the Cerro KXL-510
'
- compound are used only as thermocouple extension wires. The licensee
committed to establish qualifiability of the Cerro KXL-510 cable for
specific applicacion in the plant and ensure controls are in place to
limit use of this cable.
The NRC inspector reviewed the revised EQ file QDR 6.8 which demonstrates
the qualification of these cables. The QDR also indicates that there is
no equipment serviced by these cables in the containment which require
environmental qualification.
The cable usage review confirms that only the thernocouple extension wire
used ina Cerro KXL-510.
This item is closed.
(ClosedlUnresolvedItem 87-21-05 pertaining to potential effects of two
missing 0-ring seals on the acceptability status of level switches
23LS-91A&B, located in the crescent area to nitigate an in-containment
sr.all break LOCA.
The licensee determined the seals do not provide a safety function and
have been removed from the EQ pregram (ref. JTS-87-0418 Revision 1). The
switches are in an area where the only potential environmental change
wculd be a small change in air temperature but a significant increase in
radiation. The switches are not required for any HELB accident in the
Reactor Building. The licensee concludes that the omission of 0-ring
seals in the level switches does not impair the function of any component
important to safety during an postulated Reactor Bailding HELB.
This item is closed.
i . ,
,
.
a
8
i
t
(Closed) Violation 86-04-02 pertaining to the licensee identification and j
replacement of unqualified torque svlitches and limit switches in the
recirculation systems discharge and discharge by pass valves. The
licensee determined the torque switc5 and the limit switch contained
insulation which did not meet primary containment environmental !
requirements. Test reports reference in the EQ files did not provide an i
adequate basis for qualification to 00R Guidelines. !
The licensee replaced the unqualified components in Limitorque valve !
Nos, 02 MOV-53 A, B, C, and D with components qualified to NUREG-0588 and !
filed a Licensee Event Report (LER) No.87-007. :
l
This items is closed.
l
4 Physical Inspection '
The inspectors examined three Limitorque installations in the drywell. i
Items examined include Limitorque Valve Nos. 02 MOV-53A & B and 12 MOV-15 !
located at elevation 300'-0". The valve operator 12 MOV-15 is one of !
three new units installed during this outage. [
The inspectors examined internal wiring, T-drain installation, splices !
and general installed configuration and orientation.
In one of the valves, No. 12 MOV-15 the inspector noted that the splice
configuration did not corroly with installation requirements for a
qualified splice. Procedure IS-E-03 Revision 1, paragraph H i.11 requires
two half-lapped layers of the T-95 (red) tape and two half-lapped layers ;
of the T-35 (black) tape over the T-95 (red) tape. ;
i
The T-95 (red) tape was visible at the end of the splice configuration. I
Visual observatien of the half-lapped layers indicate much less overlay !
(1/8-1/4 inch) than the required 3/8-1/2 inch half-lapped layers (as f
determined by width of tape). !
L
Licensee personnel present during this inspection acknowladge the [
finding. Further discussions with the licensee indicate contract personnel [
installing the Limitorque may have made the splice. Records indicate the i
splice was inspected and accepted by quality control inspection, j
The NRC inspector expressed concern over the control of work performed by !
contract personnel, The licenste comitted to examine other similar !
installaticns made during this outage. The plant is presently shut down i
and does not present a sa'ety hazard. i
i
This ite'n is a violation of 10 CFR 50.49 requirement for maintaining the :
qualified status of EQ equipment (50-333/83-25-01). !
[
.
- - -
- .. _ .. - - - - - -
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
, . . . ,
.
F
9
i
5. Exit Meetino
!
The inspector met with licensee personnel (denoted in Oetills, paragraph l
1) at the conclusion of the inspection on October 14, 1988, The !
inspector summarized the scope of the inspection and the inspection
findings. At no time during the inspection was written rnaterial given to
the licensee.
!
>
,
?
i
i I
i {
!
i
,
I
i l
, t
2
1
1
?
I
-! I
4 :
l
"
!
i
i
l !
a
'
f
i i
'
t
$
i
'
)
1
'
i
!
i
!
i
'
. _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ , . _ _