IR 05000275/2016002: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML16215A511 | | number = ML16215A511 | ||
| issue date = 08/02/2016 | | issue date = 08/02/2016 | ||
| title = | | title = NRC Inspection Report 05000275/2016002 and 05000323/2016002 | ||
| author name = Groom J R | | author name = Groom J R | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-A | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-A | ||
Revision as of 22:02, 2 April 2019
| ML16215A511 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 08/02/2016 |
| From: | Groom J R NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-A |
| To: | Halpin E D Pacific Gas & Electric Co |
| Jeremy Groom | |
| References | |
| IR 2016002 | |
| Download: ML16215A511 (47) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV 1600 E. LAMAR BLVD.
ARLINGTON, TX 76011-4511 August 2, 2016 Mr. Edward Senior Vice President, Generation and Chief Nuclear Officer Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Power Plant P.O. Box 56, Mail Code 104/6 Avila Beach, CA 93424
SUBJECT: DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000275/2016002 AND 05000323/2016002
Dear Mr. Halpin:
On June 30, 2016, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. On July 13, 2016, the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. J. Welsch and other members of your staff. Inspectors documented the results of this inspection in the enclosed inspection report.
NRC inspectors documented one finding of very low safety significance (Green) in this report. This finding involved a violation of NRC requirements. The NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation (NCV) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the NRC Enforcement Policy.
If you contest the violation or significance of the NCV, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
-0001; and the NRC resident inspector at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant. If you disagree with a cross
-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555
-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; and the NRC resident inspector at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant. In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide Document s Access and Management System (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,/RA/ Jeremy R. Groom, Chief Project Branch A Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50
-323 License Nos. DPR-80 and DPR
-82
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000275/2016002 and 05000323/2016002 w/ Attachment s: 1.) Supplemental Information 2.) RFI for Inservice Inspection 3.) RFI for Occupational Radiation Safety Inspection cc w/ enclosure: Electronic Distribution
SUMMARY
I R 05000275/2016002, 05000323/2016002
- 04/01/2016
- 06/30/2016
- Diablo Canyon Power Plant; Problem Identification and Resolution
. The inspection activities described in this report were performed between April 1 and June 30, 2016 , by the resident inspectors at Diablo Canyon Power Plant and inspectors from the NRC's Region IV office. One finding of very low safety significance (Green)is documented in this report. This finding involved a violation of NRC requirements. The significance of inspection findings is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, or Red), which is determined using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, "Significance Determination Process." Their cross-cutting aspects are determined using Inspection Manual Chapter 0310, "Aspects within the Cross-Cutting Areas." Violations of NRC requirements are dispositioned in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy. The NRC'
s program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG
-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process."
Cornerstone: Barrier Integrity
- Green.
The inspectors reviewed a self-revealed, non-cited violation of Technical Specification (TS) 5.4.1.a, "Procedures," for the licensee's failure to place a spent fuel assembly in its correct location in the spent fuel pool (SFP) in accordance with Procedure OP B-8H, "Spent Fuel Pool Work Instructions." Specifically, the fuel handling crew moved spent fuel assembly TT69 to location E
-37 rather than its intended location E-27. In response to this error, reactor engineering performed a technical specification verification in order to ensure that fuel assembly TT69 could remain in Cell E-37. The licensee suspended further fuel movements pending corrective action and remediation of the operators.
The licensee entered this into the corrective action program as Notifications 50846834 and 50847067. The licensee's failure to place a spent fuel assembly in its correct location in the SFP was a performance deficiency. The performance deficiency is more than minor, and therefore a finding, because it is associated with the configuration control attribute of the Barrier Integrity Cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective to provide reasonable assurance that physical design barriers (fuel cladding, reactor coolant system, and containment) protect the public from radionuclide releases caused by accidents or events. Using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Attachment 04, "Initial Characterization of Findings," and Appendix A, Exhibit 3, "Barrier Integrity Screening Questions," the inspectors determined that the finding was of very low safety significance (Green) because: (1)the finding did not adversely affect decay heat removal capabilities from the spent fuel pool causing the pool temperature to exceed the maximum analyzed temperature limit specified in the site-specific licensing basis, (2)the finding did not result from fuel handling errors, dropped fuel assembly, dropped storage cask, or crane operations over the SFP that caused mechanical damage to fuel clad and a detectible release of radionuclides, (3) the finding did not result in a loss of spent fuel pool water inventory decreasing below the minimum analyzed level limit specified in the site-specific licensing basis, and (4)the finding did not affect the SFP neutron absorber, fuel bundle misplacement (i.e., fuel loading pattern error) or soluble Boron concentration. This finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of human performance associated with avoiding complacency. Specifically, individuals failed to recognize and plan for the possibility of mistakes, latent issues, and inherent risk, even while expecting successful outcomes and individuals failed to implement appropriate error reduction tools (Section 4OA2). [H.12]
PLANT STATUS
Units 1 and 2 began the inspection period at full power.
On April 22, 2016, Unit 1, reduced power to 88 percent power for planned main turbine testing and returned to full power that same day.
On May 1, 2016, Unit 2, was shut down for a planned refueling outage. On June 2, 2016, Unit 2 returned to operation and began a controlled power ascension; it returned to full power on June 8, 2016. Units 1 and 2 operated at or near full power for the remainder of this inspection period.
REPORT DETAILS
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity 1 R 01 Adverse Weather Protection (71111.01)
Readiness for Impending Adverse Weather Conditions
a. Inspection Scope
On April 25, 2016, the inspectors completed an inspection of the station's readiness for impending adverse weather conditions. The inspectors reviewed plant design features, the licensee's procedures to respond to high winds, and the licensee's implementation of these procedures. The inspectors evaluated operator staffing and accessibility of controls and indications for those systems required to control the plant.
These activities constitute d one sample of readiness for impending adverse weather condition s , as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.01.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1 R 04 Equipment Alignment (71111.04)
Partial Walk
-Down
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors performed partial system walk
-downs of the following risk
-significant systems: April 25, 2016, Unit 2, safety injection pump 2
-1 April 29, 2016, Unit 2, emergency diesel generator 2
-1 May 17, 2016, Unit 2, auxiliary seawater pumps 2
-1 and 2-2 June 3, 2016, Unit 2, component cooling water system The inspectors reviewed the licensee's procedures and system design information to determine the correct lineup for the systems. They visually verified that critical portions of the systems were correctly aligned for the existing plant configuration
. These activities constitute d four partial system walk
-down sample s as defined i n Inspection Procedure 71111.04.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1 R 05 Fire Protection (71111.05)
.1 Quarterly Inspection
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors evaluated the licensee's fire protection program for operational status and material condition. The inspectors focused their inspection on five plant ar ea s important to safety
- April 11, 2016, Unit 1 and 2, 480V Switchgear Rooms and Hot Shutdown Panel
- Fire Areas 5
-A/B-1 , 5-A/B-2 , 5-A/B-3, and 5-A/B-4 May 13, 2016, Unit 1 and 2, , auxiliary building elevation 128 foot; Fire Areas 7A and 7B May 16, 2016, Unit 1 and 2, intake structure
- Fire Areas 30-A-1 through 30
-A-5, May 19, 2016, Unit 1 and 2, 12 kV switchgear room and cable spreading rooms
- Fire Areas 10 and 20 June 3, 2016, Unit 2, turbine building 85 foot elevation
- Fire Area TB-7 For each area, the inspectors evaluated the fire plan against defined hazards and defense-in-depth features in the licensee's fire protection program. The inspectors evaluated control of transient combustibles and ignition sources, fire detection and suppression systems, manual firefighting equipment and capability, passive fire protection features, and compensatory measures for degraded conditions.
These activities constitute d five quarterly inspection sample s , as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.05.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.2 Annual Inspection
a. Inspection Scope
On April 13, 2016, the inspectors completed their annual evaluation of the licensee's fire brigade performance. This evaluation included observation of an announced fire drill associated with a simulated fire in the Unit 1 turbine generator
. During th is drill, the inspectors evaluated the capability of the fire brigade members, the leadership ability of the brigade leader, the brigade's use of turnout gear and fire
-fighting equipment, and the effectiveness of the fire brigade's team operation. The inspectors also reviewed whether the licensee's fire brigade met NRC requirements for training, dedicated size and membership, and equipment.
These activities constitute d one annual inspection sample , as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.05.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1 R 08 Inservice Inspection Activities (71111.08)
The activities described in subsections 1 through 4 below constitute completion of one inservice inspection sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.08.
.1 Non-destructive Examination Activities and Welding Activities
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors directly observed the following nondestructive examinations:
SYSTEM WELD IDENTIFICATION EXAMINATION TYPE Residual Heat Removal Hot Leg Recirculation Before V-8702 Weld No. WIB-245 Ultrasonic Residual Heat Removal Hot Leg Recirculation Before V-8702 Weld No. WIB-246 Ultrasonic Reactor Vessel Radial Support Keys Visual (VT
-3) Steam Generator Steam Generator 2-1 Top Head/Shell Weld Ultrasonic Pressurizer WIB-359OL (Safety C)
Ultrasonic Phased Array The inspectors reviewed records for the following nondestructive examinations:
SYSTEM WELD IDENTIFICATION EXAMINATION TYPE Safety Injection Accumulator 2-2, Nozzle C-1A Liquid Penetrant SYSTEM WELD IDENTIFICATION EXAMINATION TYPE Safety Injection Accumulator 2-2, Nozzle C-1A (Refueling Outages 2R10, 2R12, 2R14, 2R16, 2R18 and 2R19) Ultrasonic Residual Heat Removal Valve RHR-2-1028 Weld No. FW-3 Liquid Penetrant Residual Heat Removal Hot Leg Recirculation Before V-8702 Weld No. WIB-245 (PSI and Second 10-year ISI) Ultrasonic Residual Heat Removal Hot Leg Recirculation Before V-8702 Weld No. WIB-245 (Construction)
Radiograph During the review and observation of each examination, the inspectors observed whether activities were performed in accordance with the ASME Code requirements and applicable procedures. The inspectors reviewed two indication s that were previously examined and observed whether the licensee evaluated and accepted the indications in accordance with the ASME Code and/or an NRC approved alternative. The inspectors also reviewed the qualifications of all nondestructive examination technicians performing the inspections to determine whether they were current.
The inspectors performed a focused review of a flaw found on weld WIB
-245 noted in the table above, and documented in Notification 50852155. The flaw was identified during a scheduled ultrasonic examination in the residual heat removal system on a pipe-to-elbow weld. The licensee sized the flaw and found it to be unacceptable per ASME Code,Section XI, Table IWB 3514
-2, "Allowable Planar Flaws." Subsequently, the licensee completed an evaluation of the flaw using the criteria in IWB
-3640, "Evaluation Procedure and Acceptance Criteria for Flaws in Austenitic and Ferritic Piping," and Section XI, Appendix C, "Evaluation of Flaws in Piping." At the time of the inspection, the inspectors verified that the flaw analysis was acceptable per ASME Code requirements. Specifically, the inspectors verified that the analysis took into consideration the most limiting degradation mechanism and that the crack growth analysis bounded those conditions.
The inspectors directly observed a portion of the following welding activities: SYSTEM WELD IDENTIFICATION WELDING TYPE Residual Heat Removal Valve RHR-2-1028 Weld No. FW
-3 Gas Tungsten Arc Welding The inspectors reviewed records for the following welding activities:
SYSTEM WELD IDENTIFICATION WELDING TYPE Safety Injection Accumulator 2
-2 Nozzle C
-1A Weld No. 1 and 2 Gas Tungsten Arc Welding The inspectors reviewed whether the welding procedure specifications and the welders had been properly qualified in accordance with ASME Code Section IX requirements. The inspectors also determined whether that essential variables were identified, recorded in the procedure qualification record, and formed the bases for qualification of the welding procedure specifications.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.2 Vessel Upper Head Penetration Inspection Activities
a. Inspection Scope
No inspection of the reactor vessel upper head penetration was performed.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.3 Boric Acid Corrosion Control Inspection Activities
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's implementation of its boric acid corrosion control program for monitoring degradation of those systems that could be adversely affected by boric acid corrosion. The inspectors reviewed the documentation associated with the licensee's boric acid corrosion control walk
-down as specified in P roced u r e ER 1.I D 2 , "B o r i c A c i d C o r r o s i on C o n trol P r o g r a m ," R e v i s i on 7. The inspectors reviewed whether the visual inspections emphasized locations where boric acid leaks could cause degradation of safety
-significant components, and whether engineering evaluation used corrosion rates applicable to the affected components and properly assessed the effects of corrosion
-induced wastage on structural or pressure boundary integrity. The inspectors observed whether corrective actions taken were consistent with the ASME Code and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B , requirements.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.4 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Activities
a. Inspection Scope
(Secondary Side Inspections)
Steam Generator eddy current examinations were not performed. The inspectors reviewed secondary side inspection results and verified the licensee did not have to take corrective actions in response to the examination results.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.5 Identification and Resolution of Problems
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed six condition reports which dealt with inservice inspection activities and found the corrective actions for inservice inspection issues were appropriate. From this review
, the inspectors concluded that the licensee has an appropriate threshold for entering inservice inspection issues into the corrective action program and has procedures that direct a root cause evaluation when necessary. The licensee also has an effective program for applying industry inservice inspection operating experience. Specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the attachment.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1 R 11 Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance (71111.11)
.1 Review of Licensed Operator Requalification
a. Inspection Scope
On June 21, 2016, the inspectors observed an evaluated simulator scenario performed by an operating crew. The inspectors assessed the performance of the operators and the evaluators' critique of their performance. The inspectors also assessed the modeling and performance of the simulator during the simulator training scenario
. These activities constitu te d completion of one quarterly licensed operator requalification program sample , as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.11.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.2 Review of Licensed Operator Performance
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors observed the performance of on
-shift licensed operators in the plant's main control room. At the time of the observations, the plant was in a period of heightened activity.
The inspectors observed the operators' performance of the following activities:
April 4-5, 2016, Unit 1, air side AC seal oil pump replacement and adjustment of seal oil regulating valves
, associated with the main turbine hydrogen seal oil system , due to the high risk of a turbine trip, including the pre
-job brief April 22, 2016, Unit 1, power descent and main turbine valve testing due to the high risk of a turbine trip In addition, the inspectors assessed the operators' adherence to plant procedures, including the conduct of operations procedure and other operations department policies.
These activities constitute d completion of one quarterly licensed operator performance sample s , a s defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.11.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1 R 12 Maintenance Effectiveness (71111.12)
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed two instances of degraded performance or condition of safety-related structures, systems, and components (SSCs): March 8, 2016, Unit 2, emergency diesel generator lube oil system leakage , Notification 50679028 June 29, 2016, 480 V ac switchgear room ventilation system performance criteria review, Notification 50684617 The inspectors reviewed the extent of condition of possible common cause SSC failures and evaluated the adequacy of the licensee's corrective actions. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's work practices to evaluate whether these may have played a role in the degradation of the SSCs. The inspectors assessed the licensee's characterization of the degradation in accordance with 10 CFR 50.65 (the Maintenance Rule), and verified that the licensee was appropriately tracking degraded performance and conditions in accordance with the Maintenance Rule.
These activities constitute d completion of two maintenance effectiveness sample s , a s defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.12.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1 R 13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control (71111.13)
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed four risk assessments performed by the licensee prior to changes in plant configuration and the risk management actions taken by the licensee in response to elevated risk:
May 1, 2016, elevated risk during Unit 2, 4160 volt bus G auto
-transfer testing, Surveillance Test Procedure STP M-13G May 3, 2016, elevated risk during Unit 2, performance of integrated plant testing , Surveillance Test Procedure STP M-15 June 6, 2016, elevated risk during Unit 2, ATWS [Anticipated Transient Without Scram] mitigation actuation system inoperability
, Notification 5085699 June 9, 2016, elevated risk during Unit 1, 480 volt switchgear cooling fans online maintenance, Notification 50818501 The inspectors verified that these risk assessment s were performed timely and in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.65 (the Maintenance Rule) and plant procedures. The inspectors reviewed the accuracy and completeness of the licensee's risk assessment s and verified that the licensee implemented appropriate risk management actions based on the result of the assessment s. The inspectors verified that the licensee appropriately developed and followed a work plan for these activities. The inspectors verified that the licensee took precautions to minimize the impact of the work activities on unaffected SSCs.
These activities constitute d completion of four maintenance risk assessments and emergent work control inspection sample s, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.13.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1 R 15 Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments (71111.15)
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed three operability determination s that the licensee performed for degraded or nonconforming SSCs:
May 10, 2016, operability determination of Unit 1, containment structure sump level detector, LT
-61, Notification 50843404 May 16-17, 2016, operability determination of failure of safety injection recirculation interlock for residual heat removal (RHR 2
-2) pump suction, Plant Engineering Procedure PEP V
-7B June 27, 2016, operability evaluation of degraded condition identified during inspections of reactor vessel baffle former bolting as reported in event reports and industry experience, Notification 50848011 The inspectors reviewed the timeliness and technical adequacy of the licensee's evaluations. Where the licensee determined the degraded SSC to be operable, t he inspectors verified that the licensee's compensatory measures were appropriate to provide reasonable assurance of operability. The inspectors verified that the licensee had considered the effect of other degraded conditions on the operability of the degraded SSC
. These activities constitute d completion of three operability and functionality review sample s , as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.15.
b. Findin gs No findings were identified.
1 R 18 Plant Modifications (71111.18)
a. Inspection Scope
On May 27, 2016, the inspectors reviewed a Unit 2, temporary plant modification that installed, temporary temperature monitoring thermocouples around residual heat removal piping per TMOD 60090550.
The inspectors verified that the licensee had installed t h is temporary modification in accordance with technically adequate design documents. The inspectors verified that th is modification did not adversely impact the operability or availability of affected SSCs. The inspectors reviewed design documentation and plant procedures affected by the modification to verify the licensee maintained configuration control.
These activities constitute d completion of one sample of temporary modifications, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.18.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1 R 19 Post-Maintenance Testing (71111.19)
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed f our post-maintenance testing activities that affected risk
-significant SSCs:
April 12-13, 2016, Unit 2, battery charger 2
-1, post maintenance testing, Work Order 64098910 May 2, 2016, Unit 2, component cooling water pump 2
-2 functional testing of relay 2 FS267 following replacement, Maintenance Procedure MP E-60.2HG12 May 25-26, 2016, Unit 2, auxiliary feedwater level control valve replacement and post maintenance testing, Work Order 64150035 May 31, 2016, Unit 2, post maintenance testing following replacement of rod control fuses, Work Order 64104543 The inspectors reviewed licensing- and design
-basis documents for the SSCs and the maintenance and post-maintenance test procedures.
The inspectors observed the performance of the post
-maintenance tests to verify that the licensee performed the tests in accordance with approved procedures, satisfied the established acceptance criteria, and restored the operability of the affected SSCs.
These activities constitute d completion of four post-maintenance testing inspection sample s , as defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.19.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1 R 20 Refueling and Other Outage Activities (71111.20)
a. Inspection Scope
During the station's refueling outage that concluded on June 2, 2016, the inspectors evaluated the licensee's outage activities. The inspectors verified that the licensee considered risk in developing and implementing the outage plan, appropriately managed personnel fatigue, and developed mitigation strategies for losses of key safety functions. This verification included the following:
Review of the licensee's outage plan prior to the outage Review and verification of the licensee's fatigue management activities Monitoring of shut
-down and cool
-down activities Verification that the licensee maintained defense
-in-depth during outage activities Observation and review of reduced
-inventory and mid
-loop activities Monitoring of heat
-up and startup activities These activities constitute d completion of one refueling outage sample , a s defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.20.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1 R 22 Surveillance Testing (71111.22)
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors observed six risk-significant surveillance tests and reviewed test results to verify that these tests adequately demonstrated that the SSCs were capable of performing their safety functions:
In-service test s: April 8, 2016, Unit 1, safety injection pump 1
-1 surveillance test
, per Procedure STP P-SIP-11 Containment isolation valve surveillance tests: May 8, 2016, Unit 1, penetration 82 containment isolation valve leak test
, per Procedure STP V-682B May 19, 2016, Unit 2, penetration 30 containment isolation valve leak test , per Procedure STP V-630B Reactor coolant system leak detection tests: May 6, 2016, Unit 1, reactor coolant system leak detection system test, per STP I-19-L61 Other surveillance tests:
April 22, 2016, Unit 1, main turbine stop, governor and intercept valve test, per Procedure STP M
-21C May 30-31, 2016, Unit 2, digital rod position indication functional test
, per Procedure STP R-1C The inspectors verified that these test s met technical specification requirements, that the licensee performed the tests in accordance with their procedures, and that the results of the test satisfied appropriate acceptance criteria. The inspectors verified that the licensee restored the operability of the affected SSCs following testing.
These activities constitute d completion of six surveillance testing inspection sample s , a s defined in Inspection Procedure 71111.22.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
RADIATION SAFETY
Cornerstones: Public Radiation Safety and Occupational Radiation Safety 2 RS 1 Radiological Hazard Assessment and Exposure Controls (71124.01)
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors evaluated the licensee's performance in assessing the radiological hazards in the workplace associated with licensed activities. The inspectors assessed the licensee's implementation of appropriate radiation monitoring and exposure control measures for both individual and collective exposures. During the inspection, the inspectors interviewed licensee personnel, walked down various areas in the plant, performed independent radiation dose rate measurements, and observed postings and physical controls. The inspectors reviewed licensee performance in the following areas:
Radiological hazard assessment, including a review of the plant's radiological source terms and associated radiological hazards. The inspectors also reviewed the licensee's radiological survey program to determine whether radiological hazards were properly identified for routine and non
-routine activities and assessed for changes in plant operations.
Instructions to workers including radiation work permit requirements and restrictions, actions for electronic dosimeter alarms , changing radiological condition s , and radioactive material container labeling. Contamination and radioactive material control
, including release of potentially contaminated material from the radiologically controlled area, radiological survey performance, radiation instrument sensitivities, material control and release criteria, procedural guidance, and control and accountability of sealed radioactive sources.
Radiological hazards control and work coverage. During walk
-downs of the facility and job performance observations, the inspectors evaluated ambient radiological conditions, radiological postings, adequacy of radiological controls, radiation protection job coverage, and contamination controls. The inspectors also evaluated dosimetry selection and placement as well as the use of dosimetry in areas with significant dose rate gradients. The inspectors examined the licensee's controls for items stored in the spent fuel pool and evaluated airborne radioactivity controls and monitoring.
High radiation area and very high radiation area controls. During plant walk-downs, the inspectors verified the adequacy of posting and physical controls, including areas of the plant with the potential to become risk
-significant high radiation areas.
Radiation worker performance and radiation protection technician proficiency with respect to radiation protection work requirements. The inspectors determined if workers were aware of significant radiological conditions in their workplace, radiation work permit controls/limits in place, and electronic dosimeter dose and dose rate set points. The inspectors observed radiation protection technician job performance, including the performance of radiation surveys.
Problem identification and resolution for radiological hazard assessment and exposure controls. The inspectors reviewed audits, self
-assessments, and corrective action program documents to verify problems were being identified and properly addressed for resolution.
These activities constitute d completion of the seven required samples of radiological hazard assessment and exposure control program, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71124.01.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
2 RS 2 Occupational ALARA Planning and Controls (71124.02)
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors assessed licensee performance with respect to maintaining individual and collective radiation exposures as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA). The inspectors performed this portion of the attachment during the refueling outage, in order to directly observe the licensee's ALARA process activities including planning, implementation of radiological work controls, execution of work activities, and ALARA review of work
-in-progress. During the inspection the inspectors interviewed licensee personnel, reviewed licensee documents, and evaluated licensee performance in the following areas:
Implementation of ALARA and radiological work controls, including a review of the planned radiological administrative, operational, and engineering controls, compared to results achieved in the field.
Radiation worker performance
, including radiation protection technician performance during work activities performed in radiation areas, airborne radioactivity areas, or high radiation areas.
Problem identification and resolution for ALARA and radiological work controls. The inspectors reviewed audits, self
-assessments, and corrective action program documents to verify problems were being identified and properly addressed for resolution.
These activities constituted completion of two of the five required samples of occupational ALARA planning and controls program, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71124.02.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, Barrier Integrity, Emergency Preparedness, Public Radiation Safety, Occupational Radiation Safety, and Security 4OA 1 Performance Indicator Verification (71151)
.1 Safety System Functional Failures (MS05)
a. Inspection Scope
For the period of April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016, the inspectors reviewed licensee event reports (LERs), maintenance rule evaluations, and other records that could indicate whether safety system functional failures had occurred. The inspectors used definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, and NUREG-1022, "Event Reporting Guidelines: 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73," Revision 3, to determine the accuracy of the data reported.
These activities constituted verification of the safety system functional failures performance indicator Units 1 and 2, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.2 Mitigating Systems Performance Index:
Emergency AC Power System s (MS06)
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's mitigating system performance index data for the period of April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016, to verify the accuracy and completeness of the reported data. The inspectors used definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, to determine the accuracy of the reported data.
These activities constituted verification of the mitigating system performance index for emergency ac power systems for Units 1 and 2, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.3 Mitigating Systems Performance Index
- High Pressure Injection Systems (MS07)
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's mitigating system performance index data for the period of April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016, to verify the accuracy and completeness of the reported data. The inspectors used definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, to determine the accuracy of the reported data.
These activities constituted verification of the mitigating system performance index for high pressure injection systems for Units 1 and 2, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.4 Occupational Exposure Control Effectiveness (OR01)
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors verified that there were no unplanned exposures or losses of radiological control over locked high radiation areas and very high radiation areas during the period of October 1, 2015, to March 31, 2016. The inspectors reviewed a sample of radiologically controlled area exit transactions showing exposures greater than
100 mrem. The inspectors used definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, to determine the accuracy of the reported data.
These activities constituted verification of the occupational exposure control effectiveness performance indicator as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.5 Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS)/Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) Radiological Effluent Occurrences (PR01)
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed corrective action program records for liquid or gaseous effluent releases that occurred between October 1, 2015, and March 31, 2016, and were reported to the NRC to verify the performance indicator data. The inspectors used definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, to determine the accuracy of the reported data.
These activities constituted verification of the radiological effluent technical specifications (RETS)/offsite dose calculation manual (ODCM) radiological effluent occurrences performance indicator as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA 2 Problem Identification and Resolution (71152)
.1 Routine Review
a. Inspection Scope
Throughout the inspection period, the inspectors performed daily reviews of items entered into the licensee's corrective action program and periodically attended the licensee's condition report screening meetings. The inspectors verified that licensee personnel were identifying problems at an appropriate threshold and entering these problems into the corrective action program for resolution. The inspectors verified that the licensee developed and implemented corrective actions commensurate with the significance of the problems identified.
The inspectors also reviewed the licensee's problem identification and resolution activities during the performance of the other inspection activities documented in this report.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.2 Semi annual Trend Review
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's corrective action program, performance indicators, system health reports, and other documentation to identify trends that might indicate the existence of a more significant safety issue. The inspectors reviewed the corrective action program emergent issue process to assess the licensee integrated response to events impacting equipment performance and requiring enhanced station support. These activities constitute d completion of one semiannual trend review sample , a s defined in Inspection Procedure 71152. b. Observations and Assessments The emerging issue and event investigation process supplements the corrective action program and is controlled by quality
-related procedure s. The process is used to identify and resolve emergent problems to ensure rigorous and timely responses to conditions that require integrated and enhance station support beyond normal operations. Since January 2016, there have been over fifty emergent issues documented. The inspectors reviewed several emerging issue summaries to determine if proper work control processes were followed and appropriate corrective actions were taken.
The inspector reviewed the following emerging issue final summaries: May 12, 2016, component cooling water 2-2 damaged wire, Notification 50848143 May 16, 2016, RHR 8700B broken stem mounted position switch, Notification 50852180 May 17, 2016, ultrasonic testing (UT) indication on weld WIB
-245, Notification 5085 2155 June 3, 2016, Unit 2, main generator hydrogen leakage, Notification 50856272 The inspectors observed that licensee use of the procedure was well documented including a detailed problem statement, extent of condition, bridging strategies, and documentation of the decision
-making processes. The inspectors determined the use of the emergent issues process was well coordinated and implemented in accordance to procedure guidance.
c. Findings
No findings were identified.
.3 Annual Follow
-up of Selected Issues
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors selected the following issue for an in
-depth follow
-up: On April 20, 2016, Notifications 50846834 and 50847067 documenting a misplaced fuel assembly in the spent fuel pool
. The inspectors assessed the licensee's problem identification threshold, cause analyses, extent of condition reviews and compensatory actions. The inspectors verified that the licensee appropriately prioritized the planned corrective actions and that these actions were adequate to correct the condition.
These activities constituted completion of one annual follow
-up sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71152.
b. Findings
Introduction.
The inspectors reviewed a Green, self
-revealed, non
-cited violation of Technical Specification (TS)5.4.1.a, "Procedures," for the licensee's failure to place a spent fuel assembly in its correct location in the spent fuel pool (SFP) in accordance with Procedure OP B-8H, "Spent Fuel Pool Work Instructions." Specifically, the fuel handling crew moved spent fuel assembly TT69 to location E
-37 rather than to its intended location E-27.
Description.
On April 20, 2016, as part of the preparations for the 2016 Unit 2 refueling outage (2R19), the licensee performed fuel movements per procedure OP B-8H, "Spent Fuel Pool Work Instructions." Procedure OP B-8H directs fuel movements per the tracking sheets developed in procedure PEP R-8H, "Spent Fuel Pool Fuel Assembly Movement Planning," Attachment 9.1, "SFP Fuel or Insert Movement Authorization and Instructions." Step 57 of Attachment 9.1 was to move fuel assembly TT69 from "Initial" location Z
-26 to "Final" location E
-27. The fuel handlers inadvertently moved this fuel assembly to location E
-37. The fuel handlers continued moving fuel until Step 63 of Attachment 9.1, when they discovered their mistake. This step required operators to move fuel assembly TT57 to location E
-37. When the fuel handlers attempted to place fuel assembly TT57 in its "Final" location, they discovered that there was already an assembly located in cell E-37. Upon discovery of the error, the fuel handlers stopped fuel handling operations, returned fuel assembly TT57 to its "Initial" location and notified site management.
Subsequent review determined that, as part of the process for moving fuel in the SFP, operators use a white board to track the planned fuel moves. Procedure OP B-8H, Step 4.3.11, allows the use of a white board as an external visual aid:
"Ensure an external visual aid is available to allow the fuel handlers a quick reference to SFP location (e.g. a white board or electronic display)."
The "Final" location used in Step 56 of the move plan was Y
-37. As operators prepared to move assembly TT69, the SRO did not fully erase the "Y-37." Instead, the operator changed the "Y" to "E" and mistakenly left the "37." The fuel handlers failed to recognize the discrepancy between the white board and the procedure
, and continued with moving fuel assembly TT69 to the incorrect "Final" location.
In response to this error, reactor engineering performed a technical specification verification in order to ensure that fuel assembly TT69 could remain in Cell E-37. The licensee suspended further fuel movements pending corrective action and remediation of the operators involved in the error. The licensee entered this issue into the corrective action program as Notifications 50846834 and 50847067 in order to determine the cause of this error
.
Analysis.
The licensee's failure to place a spent fuel assembly in its correct location in the SFP was a performance deficiency. The performance deficiency is more than minor, and therefore a finding, because it is associated with the configuration control attribute of the Barrier Integrity Cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective to provide reasonable assurance that physical design barriers (fuel cladding, reactor coolant system, and containment) protect the public from radionuclide releases caused by accidents or events. Using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Attachment 04, "Initial Characterization of Findings," and Appendix A, Exhibit 3, "Barrier Integrity Screening Questions," the inspectors determined that the finding was of very low safety significance (Green) because: (1)the finding did not adversely affect decay heat removal capabilities from the spent fuel pool causing the pool temperature to exceed the maximum analyzed temperature limit specified in the site
-specific licensing basis, (2)the finding did not result from fuel handling errors, dropped fuel assembly, dropped storage cask, or crane operations over the SFP that caused mechanical damage to fuel clad AND a detectible release of radionuclides, (3)the finding did not result in a loss of spent fuel pool water inventory decreasing below the minimum analyzed level limit specified in the site-specific licensing basis, and (4)the finding did not affect the SFP neutron absorber, fuel bundle misplacement (i.e., fuel loading pattern error) or soluble Boron concentration. This finding had a cross
-cutting aspect in the area of human performance associated with avoid complacency.
Specifically, individuals failed to recognize and plan for the possibility of mistakes, latent issues, and inherent risk, even while expecting successful outcomes, and individuals failed to implement appropriate error reduction tools [H.12].
Enforcement.
Technical Specification 5.4.1(a), "Procedures," requires, in part, that written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, February 1978, "Quality Assurance Program Requirements." Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, Section 2.k, "Preparation for Refueling and Refueling Equipment Operation," requires specific procedures for preparation for refueling and refueling equipment operation. The licensee established procedure OP B-8H, "Spent Fuel Pool Work Instructions," Revision 45A, for preparation for refueling and refueling equipment operation to meet the Regulatory Guide 1.33 requirement. Step 6.2.9 of OP B-8H requires operators to, "move assembly to 'final' location AND obtain peer check." Contrary to the above, on April 20, 2016, the licensee failed to move an assembly to its final location and obtain a peer check. Specifically, the licensee failed to move fuel assembly TT69 to location E
-27 as required. This violation is being treated as a non-cited violation, consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Policy, because it was of very low safety significance (Green) and was entered into the licensee's corrective action program as Notifications 50846834 and 50847067.
-01, "Misplace d Spent Fuel Assembly in the Spent Fuel Pool" 4OA 3 Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion (71153)
(Closed) LER 05000275/
1-201 5-00 1-0 0 and -01: Both Trains of Residual Heat Removal Inoperable Due to Circumferential Crack on a Socket Weld On December 31, 2014, the licensee identified a through
-wall leak associated with a socket weld for the Unit 1, residual heat removal system relief valve inside containment. The event was reportable in accordance to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), "any event or condition that could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems, that are needed to; remove residual heat and mitigate the consequences of an accident." The licensee determined the root cause of the cracked socket weld was due to cyclic stress as a result of resonant vibration. Corrective actions included replacing two socket welds, modifying pipe supports, and correcting the condition causing the resonant vibrations.
This issue was reviewed by the NRC, and, as documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000275/2015004, 05000323/2015004 (ML16035A481), the inspectors identified one non-cited violation, NCV 05000275/2015004
-02, "Failure to Identify a Cause and Implement Actions to Prevent Recurrence of a Significant Condition Adverse to Quality." All corrective actions and required responses have been completed.
No additional deficiencies were identified during the review of the licensee event report.
This licensee event report is closed.
These activities constitute d completion of one event follow
-up sample, as defined in Inspection Procedure 71153.
OA 6 Meetings, Including Exit
Exit Meeting Summary
On May 13, 2016, the inspectors presented the radiation safety inspection results to Mr. E. Halpin, Senior Vice President, Generation and Chief Nuclear Officer, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The licensee confirmed that any proprietary information reviewed by the inspectors had been returned or destroyed.
On May 23, 2016, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. J. Welsch, Site Vice President, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The licensee confirmed that any proprietary information reviewed by the inspectors had been returned or destroyed.
On July 13, 2016, the resident inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. J. Welsch, Site Vice President, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The licensee confirmed that any proprietary information reviewed by the inspectors had been returned or destroyed.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee Personnel
- T. Baldwin, Director, Nuclear Site Services
- E. Brackeen, System Engineer
- D. Evans, Director, Security & Emergency Services
- M. Franenheim, Manager, Performance Improvement
- R. Gagne, Foreman, Radiation Protection
- P. Gerfen, Senior Director Plant Manager
- M. Ginn, Manager, Emergency Planning
- D. G on z a l e z, S upe r v i so r , N uc lear E n g i nee r i n g
- E. Halpin, Sr. Vice President, Chief Nuclear Officer Generation
- H. Hamzehee, Manager, Regulatory Services
- M. Hayes, General Foreman, Radiation Protection
- A. Heffner, NRC Interface, Regulatory Services
- J. Hinds, Director, Quality Verification
- L. Hopson, Director Maintenance Services
- T. Irving, Manager, Radiation Protection
- K. Johnston, Director of Operations
- J. Loya, Manager, Quality Verification
- J. MacIntyre, Director of Equipment Reliability
- M. McCoy, NRC Interface, Regulatory Services
- C. Miller, Radioactive Waste Engineer, Radiation Protection
- J. Morris, Senior Advising Engineer
- C. Murry, Director Nuclear Work Management
- J. Nimick, Senior Director Nuclear Services
- P. Nugent, Director, Quality Verification
- A. Peck, Director, Nuclear Engineering
- L. Pulley, Manager, Nuclear Projects
- R. Rogers, General Foreman, Radiation Protection
- M. Sarantos, Foreman, Radiation Protection
- L. Sewell, Principle Health Physicist, Radiation Protection
- A. Warwick, Supervisor, Emergency Planning
- J. Welsch, Site Vice President
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
Opened and Closed
-01 NCV Misplace d Spent Fuel Assembly in the Spent Fuel Pool (Section 4OA2.3) Closed 05000275/1-2015-001-01 LER Both Trains of Residual Heat Removal Inoperable Due to Circumferential Crack on a Socket Weld
(Section 4OA3)
Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection
Procedure Number Title Revision CP M-16 Severe Weather
Notifications
50847527 50847529 Section 1R04
- Equipment Alignment
Procedures
Number Title Revision OP J-6B:I-A Unit 2; Diesel Generator 2
-1 - Alignment Checklist
MA1.ID9 Compressed Gas Cylinder Control
OP B-3A:II Safety Injection System Alignment Verification for Plant Startup 23B OP K-10A12 Sealed Component Checklist for Safety Injection Pump 2
-1 3 OP E-5:I-A Auxiliary Saltwater
- Alignment Verification
DCM S-14 Component Cooling Water System
Notifications
50846801 50847096 50847135 50847138 50831942 50850323 Work Order 64076822 Drawing s Number Description
Revision 108010 Residual Heat Removal System
57724 Equipment Location Plan @ Elev. 85'
-0" Auxiliary & Containment Buildings
57725 Equipment Location Plan @ Elev. 91'
-0" & 100'-0" Aux., Containment & Fuel Handling Bldgs.
107714 Component Cooling Water System
441311 Component Cooling Water Pumps
Section 1R05
- Fire Protection
Procedures
Number Title Revision OM8.ID2 Fire Systems Impairment
TQ1.DC12 Fire Brigade and Emergency Response Training
Appendix 9.5H FSAR Update
Inspection and Testing Requirements and Program Administration
Notifications
50708845 50797482 50704617 50804445 50804409 50852808 Work Orders
68041060 68040600 Drawing s Number Description
Revision 111906 Unit 1&2, Auxiliary Building Elev. 115 foot
111906 Fire Protection Auxiliary Building 128 foot Elevation 3 4002030 Type Penetration and Door AREA H
-Auxiliary B
ui ld in g 4 TB-3 Turbine Building Elevation 85' Unit 1
TB-4 Turbine Building Elevation 76'
TB-5 Turbine Building EV. 85' & 76' Unit 1
TB-14 Turbine Building Elevation 85' Unit 2
TB-16 Turbine Building EV. 85' & 76' Unit 2
111906 sheet 9
Unit 1-140 foot Elev. Pre
-fire Plans TB10/TB11
PA-1 Intake Structure Unit 1&2
PA-2 Intake Structure Unit 1&2
111906-32 Intake Structure 18'
111906, Sheet 11
Turbine Building Elevation 85' Unit 2
106718, Sheet 9
Operating Valve ID
- Fire Protection
166
106718, Sheet 7
Operating Valve ID
- Fire Protection
180 Section 1R08
- Inservice Inspection Activities
Procedures
Number Title Revision / Date NDE PT-1 Visible Dye Liquid Penetrant Examination Procedure
ISI X-1 Visual Examination of the Reactor Vessel Interior
ISI X-3 Core Plate and Core Support Structure Examination for Foreign Objects
PCR-93-086 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 Accumulator Nozzle Replacement Analysis and Technical Support
April 16, 1993
M000004 Accumulator Nozzle Replacement
and 3 OM8.ID1 Fire Loss Prevention
WDI-STD-088 Underwater Remote Visual Examination of Reactor Vessel Internals
DCL-93-266 Accumulator Nozzle Cracking Due to Intergranular Stress Corrosion
November 24, 1993
ISI ADD SUCCESS Additional, Supplemental and Successive Inspections
NDE UT ACC NOZ Ultrasonic Examination of Accumulator Tank Nozzle and Similar Fittings
NDE UT-WOL-PA1 Manual Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination of Weld Overlaid Similar and Dissimilar Metal Welds
OM7.ID12 Operability Determination
OM7.ID1 Problem Identification and Resolution
48A Steam Generator Degradation Assessment Refueling Outage 2R19
Notifications
50849012 50662092 50836915 50824452 50848555 50848522 Work Orders
60089765 64072507 68039802 64077050 64002431 R0266133 R0222784
Drawing s Number Title Revision 108009 Safety Injection System
226421 Safety Injection System Accumulator Tank 2
-2 5 663216 Accumulator Tanks 2
-1 & 2-2 Details of Nozzles
Section 1R11: Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance
Procedures
Number Title Revision OP J-4B:II Hydrogen Seal Oil
- Shutdown and Drain
OP1.DC10 Conduct of Operations
OP1.DC10 Conduct of Operations
OP B-1A:VII CVCS - Makeup Control System Operation
OP L-4 Normal Operation at Power
89A STP M-21C Main Turbine Valve Testing
Notifications
50821148 50847167 Drawing Number Title Revision 106722-4 Seal Oil System One Line Diagram
Section 1R12
- Maintenance Effectiveness
Procedure Number Title Revision AD7.ID11 Fluid Leak Management Program
Notifications
50679028 50684617 50691277
Miscellaneous
Number Description
Date M-Rule S-43/E-43 Maintenance Rule Goal/Status Record
March 19, 2015
Section 1R13
- Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control
Procedures
Number Title Revision STP M-13G 4 kV Bus G Non-SI Auto-Transfer Test
STP I-33A Reactor Trip and ESF Response Time Testing
AD7.ID14 Assessment of Integrated Risk
AD8.ID1 Outage Planning and Management
24A STP M-15 Integrated Test of Engineered Safeguards and Diesel Generators
AD7.DC6 On-Line Maintenance Risk Management
AD7.ID14 Assessment of Integrated Risk
AD8.DC55 Outage Safety Scheduling
Notifications
50838301 50341974 50818501 50818131 50856997 Work Orders
64004855 64102294 Miscellan e ous Number Title Date Unit 1 Operator's logs, Night Shift
November 7, 2015
Unit 1 Operator's logs, Day Shift
November 8, 2015
PRA07-04 AMSAC Allowed Outage Time Extension
September 12, 2007
Section 1R15
Procedures
Number Title Revision STP I-19-L61 Containment Structure Sump 1
-2 Level Channel LT
-61 Calibration
STP I-19-L61 Containment Structure Sump 2
-2 Level Channel LT
-61 Calibration
OM4.ID3 Operational Experience Program
PEP V-7B Test of ECCS Valve Interlocks
Notifications
50843404 50845141 50845746 50848966 50850712 50850715 50850717 50851485 50851561 50848011 50465474 Section 1R18
- Plant Modifications
Procedures
Number Title Revision CF4.ID7 Temporary Alterations
CF4.ID3 Modification Implementation
Notifications
50852155 50854126 50429891 50854511 Maintenance Orders
60090550 60090551
Section 1R19
- Post-Maintenance Testing
Procedures
NUMBER TITLE Revision MP E-60.2HG12 Circuit Function Test
- 4 k V Cubicle HG12 (CCWP22)`
STP M-12B Battery Charger Performance Test
STP V-3P6A Exercising Valves LCV
-111 AFW pump Discharge
STP R-1B Rod Drop Measurement
STP V-630 Penetration 30 containment isolation valve leak testing
Notifications
50848143 50708845 50835185 50854003 50849539
Work Orders
64098910 64098978 64150035 64112280 64104543 64163441 64071257 Section 1R20
- Refueling and Other Outage Activities
Procedures
Number Title Revision OP A-2:II Reactor Vessel
- Draining the RCS to the Vessel Flange
- With Fuel in Vessel
OP L-4 Normal Operation at Power
73A OP L-5 Plant Cooldown From Minimum Load to Cold Shutdown
OP A-2:II RCS Draining to Half Loop operations with Fuel in the Vessel 51 O A-2:IX Vacuum Refill of the RCS 28 Notifications
50848106 50851420 50852155 50851640 50852155 Clearances/Tagouts
Number Description
Revision / Date 2C19 R-64-001 480V Transformer Clearance
2C19 R-23-003 Cable Spreading Room Clearance
2C19 R-12-003B Containment Spray Header Supply
May 18, 2016
Other Document
Number Title Revision 2R19 Outage Safety Plan
Section 1R22
- Surveillance Testing
Procedures
Number Title Revision STP I-19-L61 Containment Structure Sump 1
-1 Channel LT
-61 Calibration
STP M-21C Main Turbine Valve Testing
STP P-SIP-11 Routine Surveillance Test of Safety Injection Pump 1
-1 24
STP V-682B Penetration 82B and 82C Containment Isolation Valve Leak Testing 13 STP R-1C Digital Rod Position Functional Testing
STP R-1B Rod Drop Measurement
Notifications
50848966 50847182 50561599 50561646 50547286 50032499 50844530 50850358 50855643 50855659 50856133 50849539 Work Orders
64147458 64101598 64101609 Drawing s Number Description
Revision 106709 Operating Valve ID
- Safety Injection System
102009 Sheet 5
Safety Injection System Piping Diagram
Section 2RS1: Radiological Hazard Assessment and Exposure Controls
Procedures
Number Title Revision RCP D-220 Control of Access to High, Locked High, and Very
RCP D-240 Radiological Posting
RCP D-500 Routine and Job Coverage Surveys
RCP D-620 Radioactive Source Control Program
11, 12 RP1 Radiation Protection
RP1.DC6 Radiation Protection Code of Conduct 2A RP1.ID10 Embryo/Fetus Protection Program
RP1.ID16 Radiation Worker Expectations
7A RP1.ID6 Personnel Dose Limits and Monitoring Requirements
Notifications
50813035 50814660 50815794 50816107 50820370 50820879 50842634 50842635 50848062 Audits and Self
-Assessments
Number Title Date 152930028 2016 Radiation Protection Audit Report
February 16, 2016
153060061 Quality Verification: Personal Electronic Dosimeter Alerts
November 5, 2015
50839149 Quick Hit Self
-Assessment Report: 2016 2R19 NRC Inspection 71151
-OR1 April 11, 2016
2660002 Quality Verification: Radiological Survey Documentation
September 15, 2015
50839147 Quick Hit Self
-Assessment Report:
NRC Pre-Inspection on Radiological Hazard Assessment and Exposure Controls April 12, 2016
50839230 Quick Hit Self
-Assessment Report:
Pre-Inspection of NRC Performance Indicator PR01 "RETS/ODCM Occurrences"
April 8, 2015
Radiation Work Permits
Number Title Revision 15-1014B 1R19 Lower Reactor Cavity Decontamination
15-1021 1R19 CETNA Maintenance
15-1030 1R19 NI and Excore Annulus Work
15-1042 1R19 Primary Steam Generator Nozzle Dam Work
15-1082 1R19 Entry into Cavity for Rx Head Set and Inspection
16-2002 2R19 Scaffolding in Containment
16-2006 2R19 Decontamination Activities in Containment
16-2015 2R19 Minor Work in Posted HRA/LHRA/VHRA in Containment
16-2020 2R19 Reactor Disassembly
16-2023 2R19 Fuel Movement and Underwater Work in Containment
16-2027 2R19 Reactor Reassembly
16-2032 2R19 Seal Table and MIDS Work
16-2037 2R19 RCDT, Rx Cavity Sump, & Under Vessel Work
16-2065 2R19 High Dose Valves
Radiation Surveys
Number Title Date 47947 HCV-111 Flange Adapter Install
May 1, 2016
44308 CVCS-1-9 Valve Replacement (Cutout and Weld) October 14, 2015
44365 RHR-1-8727A Valve Removal and Replacement
October 14, 2015
47474 U-2 140 SFP Transfer Canal
April 11, 2016
48364 TSC Calibration Facility
May 7, 2016
Miscellaneous Documents
Title Date Source Inventory (969 sources)
April 13, 2016
NSTS Annual Inventory Reconciliation Report
January 11, 2016
JL Shepherd Maintenance Logs
2014-2015 Unit 1 Spent Fuel Pool Map
February 17, 2016
Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool Map
April 6, 2016
Section 2RS2: Occupational ALARA Planning and Controls Procedures
Number Title Revision RCP D-200 Writing RWPs and ALARA Processes
RCP D-202 RWP Work Instructions
RP1.ID1 ALARA Program
RP1.ID9 Radiation Work Permits
RP1.ID15 Radiological Risk Assessment
Notifications
50663602 50669239 50808462 50811370 50811698 50813275 50813719 50815003 50815627 50824304 50833148 50833156 50848791 50848792
Audits and Self
-Assessments
Number Title Date 152930028 2016 Radiation Protection Program Audit Report
February 8, 2016
153500021 Quality Verification: Station ALARA Ownership
February 10, 2016
Radiation Work Permits
Number Title Revision 15-1044 1R19 Primary Steam Generator Eddy Current Testing and Tube Work
15-1065 1R19 High Dose Valves
16-0035B Radiography inside the PA, Outside in the RCA
16-2050 2R19 RCP Pump Maintenance
16-2085 2R19 Core Barrel Movement
Temporary Shielding Requests
Number Title Date 16-202 RHR Lines 508,509, 927
April 30, 2016
-3 Line 255 & RR's (Mode 5)
May 1, 2016 16-228 Unit 2 CTMT 115' LCV 459
-460 Actuator Work
May 2, 2016
16-271 Handrail Shielding for Core Barrel Work
May 10, 2016
Miscellaneous Documents
Title Date Outage 2R19 ALARA Review Committee Meeting Notes
May 11, 2016
2R19 Outage ALARA Report
May 9-13, 2016 Section 4OA1
- Performance Indicator Verification
Miscellaneous
Number Title Date 1-TS-16-0042 Technical Specification Tracking Containment Spray Pump 1-2 outage sheet
February 1, 2016
CD-Entry 4.0 Unit 1 & 2, Consolidated Data Entry 4.0 MSPI Derivation Report High Pressure Injection System
March 31, 2016
Notifications
50809622 50807757 50807756 Section 4OA
2: Problem Identification and Resolution
Procedures
Number Title Revision OM7.ID7 Emerging Issue and Event Investigations
Notifications
50848143 50852066 50852345 50852180
Attachment 2
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.
- S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 31500011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Information Request
March 17, 2016
Notification of Inspection and Request for Information
Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2
NRC Inspection Report 05000323/2016002
INSERVICE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
Inspection Dates: May 9-20, 2016 Inspector: Isaac Anchondo
A. Information Requested
for the In
-Office Preparation Week
The following information should be sent to the Region IV office in hard copy or electronic format (ims.certrec.com preferred), in care of Isaac Anchondo, by April 25, 2016, to facilitate the selection of specific items that will be reviewed during the onsite inspection week.
The inspector will select specific items from the information requested below and then request from your staff additional documents needed during the onsite inspection week (Section B of this enclosure). We ask that the specific items selected from the lists be available and ready for review on the first day of inspection. Please provide requested documentation
electronically if possible.
If requested documents are large and only hard copy formats
are available, please inform the inspector(s), and provide subject documentation during the first day of the onsite inspection. If you have any questions regarding this information request, please call the inspector as soon as possible.
On May 9, 2016, reactor inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's
(NRC) Region IV office will perform the baseline inservice inspection at Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, using NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.08, "Inservice Inspection Activities." Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive inspection both for the NRC inspectors and your staff. The date of this inspection may change dependent on the outage schedule you provide. In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for
documents needed for this inspection. These documents have been divided into two groups. The first group (Section
A of the enclosure) identified information to be provided prior to the inspection to ensure that the inspectors are adequately prepared. The second group (Section
B of the enclosure) identifies the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. It is important that all of these documents are up to date
and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation
and/or the onsite portions of the inspection.
We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Mr. Mike McCoy of your licensing organization. The tentative inspection schedule is as follows:
Preparation week: April 25, 2016
Onsite weeks: May 9
-20, 2016 Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of outage activities. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector Isaac Anchondo at (817) 200
-1152 or e-mail Isaac.Anchondo@nrc.gov
. A.1 ISI/Welding Programs and Schedule Information
1. A detailed schedule (including preliminary dates) of:
1.1. Nondestructive examinations planned for ASME Code Class Components
performed as part of your ASME Section XI, risk informed (if applicable), and augmented inservice inspection programs during the upcoming outage.
Please include the ASME Examination Category (i.e., B-A) and Item Number (i.e., B1.10) of each component within the format that this information will be provided. 1.2. Examinations planned for Alloy 82/182/600 components that are not included in the Section XI scope (If applicable)
1.3. Examinations planned as part of your boric acid corrosion control program (Mode 3 walkdowns, bolted connection walkdowns, etc.)
1.4. Welding activities that are scheduled to be completed during the upcoming outage (ASME Class 1, 2, or 3 structures, systems, or components)
2. A copy of ASME Section XI Code Relief Requests and associated NRC safety
evaluations applicable to the examinations identified above. 2.1. A list of ASME Code Cases currently being used to include the system and/or component the Code Case is being applied to.
3. A list of nondestructive examination reports which have identified recordable or rejectable indications on any ASME Code Class components since the beginning of the last refueling outage.
This should include the previousSection XI pressure
test(s) conducted during start up and any evaluations associated with the results of the pressure tests.
4. A list including a brief description (e.g., system, code class, weld category, nondestructive examination performed) associated with the repair/replacement
activities of any ASME Code Class component since the beginning of the last outage and/or planned this refueling outage.
5. If reactor vessel
weld examinations required by the ASME Code are scheduled to occur during the upcoming outage, provide a detailed description of the welds to be
examined and the extent of the planned examination. Please also provide reference numbers for applicable procedures that will be used to conduct these examinations.
6. Copy of any 10 CFR Part 21 reports applicable to structures, systems, or
components within the scope of Section XI of the ASME Code that have been identified since the beginning of the last refueling outage. 7. A list of any temporary noncode repairs in service (e.g., pinhole leaks).
8. Please provide copies of the most recent self
-assessments for the inservice inspection, welding, and Alloy 600 programs.
9. Copy of the procedures for welding techniques and NDE
that will be used during the outage. A.2 Boric Acid Corrosion Control Program
1. Copy of the procedures that govern the scope, equipment
, and implementation of the inspections required to identify boric acid leakage and the procedures for boric acid
leakage/corrosion evaluation.
2. Please provide a list of leaks (including code class of the components) that have been identified since the last refueling outage and associated corrective action documentation. If during the last cycle, the unit was shutdown, please
provide documentation of containment walkdown inspections performed as part of the boric
acid corrosion control program.
A.3 Steam Generator Tube Inspections
1. A detailed schedule of:
Steam generator secondary side inspection activities for the upcoming outage 2. Copy of SG history documentation given to vendors performing secondary side examinations of the SGs during the upcoming outage (If applicable)
3. Copy of previous outage SG tube operational assessment
4. Identify and quantify any SG tube leakage experienced during the previous operating cycle. Also provide documentation identifying which SG was leaking and corrective actions completed and planned for this condition.
5. Provide past history of the condition and issues pertaining to the secondary side of the steam generators (including items such as loose parts, fouling, top of tube sheet condition, crud removal amounts, etc.).
A.4 Additional Information Related to All Inservice Inspection Activities
1. A list with a brief description of inservice inspection and boric acid corrosion control
program-related issues (e.g., CRs) entered into your corrective action program since the beginning of the last refueling outage. For example, a list based upon data base
searches using key words related to piping such as:
inservice inspection, ASME Code,Section XI, NDE, cracks, wear, thinning, leakage, rust, corrosion, boric acid, or
errors in piping examinations.
2. Provide training (e.g.
, Scaffolding, Fall Protection, FME, Confined Space) if they are required for the activities
described in A.1 through A.3.
3. Please provide names and phone numbers for the following program leads:
Inservice inspection (examination, planning)
Containment exams
Reactor pressure vessel head examinations
Snubbers and supports
Repair and replacement program Licensing
Site welding engineer
Boric acid corrosion control program
Steam generator inspection activities (site lead and vendor contact)
B. Information to be Provided On
-site to the Inspector(s) at the Entrance Meeting
(May 9, 2016)
- B.1 Inservice Inspection/Welding Programs and Schedule Information
1. Updated schedules for inservice inspection/nondestructive examination activities,
including planned welding activities, and schedule showing contingency repair plans, if available
2. For ASME Code Class welds selected by the inspector from the lists provided from
Section A of this enclosure, please provide copies of the following documentation for each subject weld:
Weld data sheet (traveler)
Weld configuration and system location
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda for weldment
Applicable Code Edition and
Addenda for welding procedures
Applicable welding procedures used to fabricate the welds
Copies of procedure qualification records (PQRs) supporting the weld procedures from B.1.b.v
Copies of welder's performance qualification records (WPQ) Copies of the nonconformance reports for the selected welds (If applicable)
Radiographs of the selected welds and access to equipment to allow viewing radiographs (if radiographic testing was performed)
Copies of the preservice examination records for the selected welds
Readily accessible copies of nondestructive examination personnel qualifications records for reviewing.
3. For the inservice inspection
-related corrective action issues selected by the inspectors from Section A of this enclosure, provide a copy of the corrective actions and supporting documentation.
4. For the nondestructive examination reports with relevant conditions on ASME Code Class components selected by the inspectors from Section A above, provide a copy
of the examination records, examiner qualification records, and associated corrective action documents.
5. A copy of (or ready access to) most current revision of the inservice inspection
program manual and plan for the current interva
l 6. For the nondestructive examinations selected by the inspectors from Section A of this enclosure, provide a copy of the nondestructive examination procedures used to perform the examinations (including calibration and flaw characterization/sizing procedures). For ultrasonic examination procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Code,Section XI, Appendix VIII, provide documentation supporting the
procedure qualification (e.g.
, the EPRI performance demonstration qualification summary sheets). Also, include qualification documentation of the specific
equipment to be used (e.g., ultrasonic unit, cables, and transducers including serial numbers) and nondestructive examination personnel qualification records.
B.2 Boric Acid Corrosion Control Program
1. Please provide boric acid walk down inspection results, an updated list of boric acid leaks identified so far this outage, associated corrective action documentation, and overall status of planned boric acid inspections.
2. Please provide any engineering evaluations completed for boric acid
leaks identified since the end of the last refueling outage. Please include a status of corrective actions to repair and/or clean these boric acid leaks. Please identify specifically which known leaks, if any, have remained in service or will remain in service as active leaks.
B.3 Steam Generator Tube Inspections
1. Copy of the guidance to be followed in order to perform FOSAR inspections
2. Copy of the guidance to be followed if a loose part or foreign material is identified in the steam generators during FOSAR inspections
3. List of corrective action documents generated by the vendor and/or site with respect to steam generator inspection activities
B.4 Codes and Standards
1. Ready access to (i.e., copies provided to the inspector(s) for use during the inspection
at the onsite inspection location, or room number and location where available):
Applicable Editions of the ASME Code (Sections V, IX, and XI) for the inservice inspection program and the repair/replacement program.
2. Copy of NDE procedures (i.e., UT, MT, PT examinations) to be used on ASME Code required examinations during this outage.
3. Boric Acid Corrosion Guidebook Revision 1
- EPRI Technical Report 1000975.
Attachment 3
The following items are requested for the
Occupational Radiation Safety Inspection
at Diablo Canyon
May 9 - 13, 2016 Integrated Report 2016002
Inspection areas are listed in the attachments below.
Please provide the requested information on or before April 19, 2016
. Please submit this information using the same lettering system as below. For example, all contacts and phone numbers for Inspection Procedure 71124.0
should be in a file/folder titled
"1- A," applicable organization charts in file/folder "
1- B," etc. If information is placed on ims.certrec.com, please ensure the inspection exit date
entered is at least 30 days later than the onsite inspection dates, so the inspectors will have access to the information while writing the report.
In addition to the corrective action document lists provided for each inspection procedure listed below, please provide updated lists of corrective action documents at the entrance meeting. The dates for these lists should range from the end dates of the original lists to the day
of the entrance meeting.
If more than one inspection procedure is to be conducted and the information requests appear to be redundant, there is no need to provide duplicate copies. Enter a note explaining in which file the information can be found.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact John O'Donnell at (817) 200
-1441 or John.ODonnell@nrc.gov.
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.
- S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150
-0011.
1. Radiological Hazard Assessment and Exposure Controls (71124.01) and Performance Indicator Verification (71151)
Date of Last Inspection:
October 12, 2015
A. List of contacts and telephone numbers for the Radiation Protection Organization Staff and Technicians
B. Applicable organization charts
- C. Audits, self
-assessments, and LERs written since date of last inspection
, related to this inspection area
D. Procedure indexes for the radiation protection procedures
E. Please provide specific procedures related to the following areas noted below. Additional Specific Procedures may be requested by number
after the inspector reviews the procedure indexes.
1. Radiation Protection Program Description
2. Radiation Protection Conduct of Operations
3. Personnel Dosimetry Program
4. Posting of Radiological Areas
5. High Radiation Area Controls
6. RCA Access Controls and Radworker Instructions
7. Conduct of Radiological Surveys
8. Radioactive Source Inventory and Control
9. Declared Pregnant Worker Program
F. List of corrective action documents (including corporate and subtiered systems) since
date of last inspection
a. Initiated by the radiation protection organization
b. Assigned to the radiation protection organization
NOTE: The lists should indicate the significance level of each issue and the search criteria used. Please provide in document formats
which are "searchable" so that the inspector can perform word searches.
If not covered above, a summary of corrective action documents since date of last inspection
involving unmonitored releases, unplanned releases, or releases in which any dose limit or
administrative dose limit was exceeded (for Public Radiation Safety Performance Indicator verification in accordance with IP 71151)
- G. List of radiologically significant work activities scheduled to be conducted during the inspection period (If the inspection is scheduled during an outage, please also include a list of work activities greater than 1 rem, scheduled during the outage with the dose
estimate for the work activity.)
H. List of active radiation work permits
I. Radioactive source inventory list a. All radioactive sources that are required to be leak tested
b. All radioactive sources that meet the 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix E, Category 2 and above threshold. Please indicate the radioisotope, initial and current activity (w/assay date), and
storage location for each applicable source.
J. The last two leak test results for the radioactive sources inventoried and required
to be leak tested.
If applicable, specifically provide a list of all radioactive source(s) that have failed its leak test within the last two years
K. A current listing of any non
-fuel items stored within your pools, and if available, their appropriate dose rates (Contact / @ 30cm)
L. Computer printout of radiological controlled area entries greater than 100 mrem
since the previous inspection to the current inspection entrance date. The printout should
include the date of entry, some form of worker identification, the radiation work permit used by the worker, dose accrued by the worker, and the electronic dosimeter dose
alarm setpoint used during the entry (for Occupational Radiation Safety Performance Indicator verification in accordance with IP 71151)
. 2. Occupational ALARA Planning and Controls (71124.02)
Date of Last Inspection:
July 27, 2015
A. List of contacts and telephone numbers for ALARA program personnel
B. Applicable organization charts
- C. Copies of audits, self
-assessments, and LERs, written since date of last inspection
, focusing on ALARA
D. Procedure index for ALARA Program
E. Please provide specific procedures related to the following areas noted below. Additional Specific Procedures may be requested by number
after the inspector reviews the procedure indexes.
1. ALARA Program
2. ALARA Committee
3. Radiation Work Permit Preparation
F. A summary list of corrective action documents (including corporate and subtiered systems) written since date of last inspection
, related to the ALARA program. In addition to ALARA, the summary should also address Radiation Work Permit violations,
Electronic Dosimeter Alarms, and RWP Dose Estimates
NOTE: The lists should indicate the significance level
of each issue and the search criteria used. Please provide in document formats which are "searchable" so that the inspector can perform word searches.
- G. List of work activities greater than 1 rem, since date of last inspection
Include original dose estimate and actual dose.
H. Site dose totals and 3
-year rolling averages for the past 3 years (based on dose of record)
a copy of the ALARA outage report for the most recently
completed outages for each unit
K. Please provide your most recent Annual ALARA Report.