ML16293A279

Radiological Survey and Dose Assessment Report for the Western New York Nuclear Service Center and Off-Site Areas in Follow Up to Aerial Gamma Radiation Survey Conducted in 2014, Rev. 0, Reference 17

ML16293A279
Person / Time
Site:	West Valley Demonstration Project, P00M-032
Issue date:	08/22/2016
From:	MJW Technical Services
To:	Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, State of NY, Energy Research & Development Authority, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16293A155	List: ML16293A130 ML16293A131 ML16293A132 ML16293A133 ML16293A134 ML16293A135 ML16293A136 ML16293A137 ML16293A139 ML16293A140 ML16293A141 ML16293A142 ML16293A143 ML16293A178 ML16293A179 ML16293A180 ML16293A181 ML16293A182 ML16293A183 ML16293A184 ML16293A185 ML16293A186 ML16293A187 ML16293A278 ML16293A279 ML16293A281 ML16293A282 ML16293A364 ML16293A365 ML16293A366 ML16293A367 ML16293A368 ML16293A389 ML16293A391 ML16293A392 ML16293A393 ML16293A394 ML16293A674 ML16293A675 ML16293A676 ML16293A677 ML16293A678 ML16293A808 ML16293A809 ML16293A810 ML16293A811 ML16293A812 ML16293A843 ML16293A844 ML16293A846 ... further results
References
Download: ML16293A279 (102)

Text

Reference 17-WVDP Terrestrial Background Study (S&EC, 2014)

Reterence 17 -WVDP Terrestrial Back round Study UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT User must docume1it is current prior to use .. USER!'>Ai\IE:.

INITIALS:

DATE PRINTED: WEST VALLEY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT TERRESTRIAL BACKGROUND STUDY for TASKORDER5 WEST VALLEY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION SERVICES WEST VALLEY, NEW YORK Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy SEC-TBS Rev.1 July 2014 West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) Environmental Characterization Services (ECS) West Valley, New York Prepared by: Safety and Ecology Corporation (SEC) 2800 Solway Road Knoxville, TN 37931

---

I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I I WEST VALLEY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT TERRESTRIAL BACKGROUND STUDY for TASK ORDERS WEST VALLEY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION SERVICES WEST VALLEY, NEW YORK SEC-TBS Rev.1 July 2014 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) Environmental Characterization Services (ECS) West Valley, New York Prepared by: Safety and Ecology Corporation (SEC) 2800 Solway Road Knoxville, TN 37931 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUlVIENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. 1 West Valley Demonstration Project Terrestrial Background Study . U.S. Department of Energy West Valley Demonstration Project West Valley, New York* Contract No.: DE-EM0001242 TBS APPROVALS By their specific signature, the undersigned certify that they prepared, reviewed, or provided comments on this Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) for the DOE West Valley Demonstration Project, West Valley, New York. PREPARED BY: July 17, 2014 Project Manager Date Steven Green, CHP, PMP July 17, 2014 Date Jason Hubler APPROVED BY: . July 16, 2014 Date Andrew Lombardo, CHP July 17, 2014 Project Manager Date Steven Green, CHP, PMP TBD by PM/RM Effective Date July 2014 Ill I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. I TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF APPENDICES

..................................................................................................................

v LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................

vi LIST OF TABLES .... : ....................................................................................................................

vi ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS, AND SYMBOLS ...............................................................

vii EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

............................................................................................... , ...........

ix

1.0 INTRODUCTION

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • '************************************************************

1-1 1.1 Site Description

.... ; ...............................................................................................

1-1 1.2 Project Description

...............................................................................................

1-2 1.3 Objective

.............................................................................

................................

1-2 2.0 CHARACTERIZATION ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS ..............................................

2-1 2 .1 Gamma Walkover Survey ....................................................................................

2-1 2.2 Soil Sampling .. * .....................................................................................................

2-1 2.3 Radionuclide Concentrations in Background Soils Near the West Valley Demonstration Project .........................................................................................

2-2 2.3.1 Background Soil Data from Background Reference Areas .. ; ..................

2-3 2.3 .2 Gamma Walkover Data for Background Reference Areas ......................

2-9 2.3 .3 Gamma Measurements at References Areas Sampling Locations

........ 2-10 3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE

...............................................................................................

3-1 3.1 Soil Sample Quality Assurance

...........................................................................

3-1 3.1.1 Precision

...................................................................................................

3-1 3 .1.2 Accuracy ..................................................................................................

3-3 3 .1.3 Representativeness

...................................................................................

3-3 3.1.4 Completeness

.....................

.....................................................................

3-4 3.1.5 Comparability

.....................................................................

....................

3-5 3.2 Gamma Walkover Quality Assurance

.................................................................

3-5 3.3

• Data Verification and Validation

............................

............................................

3-7

4.0 REFERENCES

................................................................................................................

4-1 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Photographs APPENDIX B: Sample Analytical Results for Background Reference Areas APPENDIX C: Borehole Gamma Logs and Lithologic Logs APPENDIX D: Detector Control Charts July 2014 v I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT 1. Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1 LIST OF FIGURES 2-1 Background Reference Area 1 .........................................................................................

2-5 2-2 Background Reference Area 2 .........................................................................................

2-6 2-3 Side-by-Side Comparison of FIDLER and Nal Detector Results at Background Reference Area l ....................................................................................

.......................

2-11 2-4 Side-by-Side Comparison of FIDLER and Nal Detector Results at Background Reference Area 2 ............................................................................................................

2-12 2-5 Background Reference Area 1 Nal Distribution

...............

............................................

2-13 2-6 Background Reference Area 1 FIDLER Distribution

....................................................

2-13 2-7 Background Reference Area 2 N al Distribution

............................................................

2-14 2-8 Background Reference Area 2 FIDLER Distribution

....................................................

2-14 LIST OF TABLES 1-1 Primary and Secondary Radionuclides of Interest..

.........................................................

1-3 2-1 Background Soil Data Great Valley Locatio'n

..........................

......................................

2-4 2-2 Background Reference Area 1 Radionuclide Concentrations

.........................................

2-7 2-3 Background Reference Area 2 Radionuclide Concentrations

.........................................

2-8 2-4 Summary of Statistical Comparisons

...............................................................................

2-9 2-5 Summary Statistics for Each Detector Type ..................................................................

2-10 Gamma Measurements at Each Sample Location .. : ..........................................

." ...........

2-15 3-1 Precision Using Field Duplicates

.....................................................................................

3-3 3-2 Accuracy Data ..................................................................................................................

3-4 3-3 Completeness Data ......................................................................

....................................

3-5 3-4 Detector Statistics

............................................................................................................

3-6 July 2014 vi ANL CLP cm cpm CSAP CV DER DOE DP dpm ECS EDD EPA FIDLER FSP FSSP ft g GPS GWS HLW km LAGGSS Le LCS LCSD LLRW m m2 mis MARS SIM MDA MDC NaI NY SERDA pCi PDOP PROI QA QC RE ROI RPD SEC SOP TBS July 2014 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1 ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS, AND SYMBOLS Argonne National Laboratory Contract Laboratory Procedure centimeter

counts per minute Characterization Sampling and Analysis Plan Coefficient of Variation Normalized Absolute Difference U.S. Department of Energy Decommissioning Plan disintegration per minute Environmental Characterization Services Electronic Data Deliverable U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Field Instrument for Detection of Low-Energy Radiation Field Sampling Plan Final Status Survey Plan foot/feet gram Global Positioning System Gamma Walkover Survey High-Level Waste kilometer Large Area GPS Gamma Survey System Lower Critical Level Laboratory Control Sample Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate Low-level Radioactive Waste meter square meter meters per second Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual Minimum Detectable Activity Minimum Detectable Concentration

• Sodium Iodide New York State Energy Research and Development Authority p1cocunes Position Dilution of Precision Potential Radionuclide of Interest Quality Assurance Quality Control Relative Error Radionuclide of Interest Relative Percent Difference Safety and Ecology Corporation Standard Operating Procedure Terrestrial Background Study Vil TRU UTL WNYNSC WVDP July 2014 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1 Transuranic Upper Tolerance Limit Western New York Nuclear Service Center West Valley Demonstration Project viii I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

Radiological characterization of background reference areas is the subject of this Terrestrial Background Study (TBS). Background reference areas were characterized to determine the background radionuclide concentrations allowing a comparison to results of samples collected at locations potentially impacted by past operations at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP). Two background reference areas selected to represent sand and gravel near surface geology and an area of Lavery till near surface geology. These two different surface geologies are present at WVDP. The geology on the north plateau is typically sand and gravel. The geology on the South Plateau is typically Lavery till. Characterization was performed in accordance with the Field Sampling Plan (FSP) for Task Order 5, West Valley Demonstration Project Environmental Characterization Services (SEC 2012). Each background reference area was characterized by performing gamma walkover surveys (GWSs), collecting soil samples with a hand auger and with a geoprobe, scanning collected soil cores for gamma radiation, performing down-hole gamma logging in some cases, and performing a civil survey to record the sampling locations.

The results of this characterization are provided in this TBS. July 2014 ix I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This introductory section contains a site description, project description, and objectives.

1.1 Site Description The West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) (established to implement the WVDP Act) is located on approximately 152 acres within the 3,345-acre Western New York Nuclear Service Center (WNYNSC), owned by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) in rural Cattaraugus County, *about 35 miles south of Buffalo, New York. The WVDP site is complex, involving a large number of potential radionuclides of concern and a variety of historical processes and events that are known to have or may have released contaminants into the environment.

Known affected environmental media include surface soils, subsurface soils, groundwater, surface water, and sediments.

The decommissioning of the WVDP site will involve a sequential set of activities that will vary significantly depending on the exact location and activity purpose. WVDP is a unique operation within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The West Valley Demonstration Project Act of* I 980 directed the Secretary of Energy to unde1iake five major activities, as follows:

• Solidify the liquid high-level waste (HL W) stored at WNYNSC into a form suitable for transportation and disposal (completed);

• Develop containers for the HL W suitable for permanent disposal of the HL W (completed);

• Transport the waste to a federal repository for disposal (pending);

• Dispose of low-level radioactive waste (LLR W) and transuranic (TRU) waste produced by the Project (in progress);

and

• Decontaminate and decommission the HL W storage tanks (PUREX and THO REX HL W tanks deactivated, July 2003), the HL W solidification facilities (in progress), and any material and hardware used in connection with the Project (in progress).

Decommissioning of the site will occur in two phases. Phase I of the decommissioning will entail removal of the Main Plant Process Building, the Low-Level Waste Treatment Facility, and certain other facilities within the WVDP area, which is known as the project premises.

These activities will clean up much of the project premises to standards that will not prejudice decisions on the approach for Phase 2, which will complete the decommissioning.

The Phase 2 decision shall be made within 10 years of the Record of Decision and Findings Statement documenting the Phase 1 decisions.

Phase 2 actions will complete the decommissioning or long-term management of those facilities remaining at WVDP and WNYNSC following the completion of Phase 1 decommissioning.

Characterization of WVDP premises during and after Phase 1 decommissioning work is performed according to the Characterization Sampling and Analysis Plan (CSAP) (DOE 201 la). Characterization will be performed by Safety and Ecology Corporation (SEC) under a Task Order contract with DOE. As DOE identifies needed characterization work, Task Orders are issued to SEC with defined work scope. July 2014 1-1 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1 1.2 Project Description This Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) has been prepared for two background reference areas. Two background reference areas were used because of differences in near surface geology at WVDP. The two different geologies are sand and gravel and Lavery till. The background reference areas will be used throughout the remedial efforts at WVDP. The overall plan for Phase 1 decommissioning is specified in the Phase 1 Decommissioning Plan for the West Valley Demonstration Project (Phase l DP) (DOE 2009). Refer to that document for a discussion of project history and contaminants.

Characterization was performed according to specifications in the Field Sampling Plan (FSP) for Task Order 5 (SEC 2012).

• SEC mobilized the appropriate equipment and qualified personnel to perform the required data collection activities associated with the task. The FSP discusses the gamma walkover survey (GWS) methods, civil surveying, field instrumentation, soil sampling methods, sample chain of custody documentation, quality assurance (QA)/quality control (QC) procedures, laboratory analytical methods, and statistical data evaluation methods. This TBS discusses the results of the characterization effort. 1.3 Objective The objective of this effort was to characterize two background reference areas. The surveys required to meet the objective included GWSs and systematic surface and subsurface soil sampling.

The soil samples were analyzed for the 18 radionuclides of interest (ROis) and the 12 potential radionuclides of interest (PROis) as described in the CSAP and listed in Table 1-1. Also included in the table are the minimum volume of soil collected for each analysis and the analytical method used. The objective of the GWS was to determine the background gamma radiation signal for future comparisons.

The objective of soil sampling was to assess the average concentration of RO Is and PROis in the background. . July 2014 1-2 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUlVIENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. 1 Table 1-1. Primary and Secondary Radionuclides oflnterest

• . .. .. *Required " Detection

• Radionuclide . Minimum Analysis Method , . Limit

• Volume ! ' * , , ', . ' .. <PCill?) Primary ROis Am-241 5g EML HASL 300 A-01-R (alpha spectroscopy) 1 C-14 100 g EERF C-01-1 (liquid scintillation) 2 Cm-243 5g EML HASL 300 A-01-R 1 Cm-244 5g EML HASL 300 A-01-R 1 Cs-137 500 g EML HASL 300 Ga-01-R (gamma spectroscopy) 0.1 I-129 500 g EML HASL 300 Ga-01-R 0.06 Np-237 5g EML HASL 300 A-01-R 0.01 Pu-238 5g EML HASL 300 A-01-R 1 Pu-239 5g EML HASL 300 A-01-R 1 Pu-240 5g EML HASL 300 A-01-R 1 Pu-241 5g EML HASL 300 A-01-R 15 Sr-90 5g EML HASL 300 Sr-03-RC (extraction, gross beta) 0.9 Tc-99 100 g EML HASL 300 TC-02-RC (extraction, gross beta) 3 U-232 5g EML HASL 300 A-01-R 0.5 U-233 5g EML HASL 300 A-01-R 0.2 U-234 5g EML HASL 300 A-01-R 0.2 U-235 5g EML HASL 300 A-01-R 0.1 U-238 5g EML HASL 300 A-01-R 0.2 Secondary RO ls Ac-227 500 g EML HASL 300 Ga-01-R 0.5 Co-60 -500 g EML HASL 300 Ga-01-R 0.5 Cd-113m 500 g EML HASL 300 Ga-01-R 1 Eu-154 500 g EML HASL 300 Ga-01-R 1 H-3 100 g EML HASL 300 H3-04-RC (liquid scintillation) 50 Pa-231 500 g EML HASL 300 Ga-01-R 0.3 Ra-226 500 g EML HASL 300 Ga-01-R 0.5 Ra-228 500 g EML HASL 300 Ga-01-R 1 Sb-125 500 g EML HASL 300 Ga-01-R 1 Sn-126 500 g EML HASL 300 Ga-01-R 1 Th-229 500 g EML HASL 300 Ga-01-R 1 Th-232 500 g EML HASL 300 Ga-01-R 0.5 July 2014 1-3 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. I 2.0 CHARACTERIZATION ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS Each background reference area was characterized by performing GWSs, collecting soil samples with a hand auger and with a geoprobe for samples deeper than 15 centimeters (cm), scanning .collected soil cores for gamma radiation, performing down-hole gamma logging in some cases, and performing a civil survey to record the sampling locations.

Gamma radiation was measured at each sampling location with both the Field Instrument for Detection of Low-Energy Radiation (FIDLER) and Sodium Iodide (NaI) detector for 30 seconds each, 15 cm above the ground surface. The gross gamma measurements were made before soil samples were collected.

The soil cores were scanned for gross gamma radiation.

Down-hole gamma logging was also performed.

• The work performed was specified m the FSP for Task Order 5 (SEC 2012) and briefly summarized in the following section. 2.1 Gamma Walkover Survey SEC performed a GWS of 100 percent of accessible surfaces of each background reference area with a FIDLER detector and a 2-inch diameter by 2-inch tall NaI detector.

The detectors were coupled to a Large Area GPS Gamma Survey System (LAGGSS) consisting of a Trimble Global Positioning Sy1item (GPS) unit coupled to the detector(s) and subsequently downloaded and plotted to provide a visual map and the relative gross gamma activity.

The SEC LAGGSS system delivered multiple gross gamma results and coordinates per square meter of surface area. The raw data was processed into graphic depictions of gamma ray count contours.

The data was also used to compare the relative sensitivity of the NaI and FIDLER detectors to the mix of radionuclides present. The walkovers were performed using the cart shown in Photograph 1 in Appendix A in large open areas of the site. Detectors on the cart were positioned no farther apart than 85 cm to assure the minimum data density of one measurement per square meter is not exceeded.

A technician walked with the detector in other areas of the site where caii access was difficult or impractical.

The GWS recorded a survey measurement and a paired position approximately every second. The GPS attains sub-meter accuracy (x, y data). Data were electronically logged and include coordinates in New York West State Plane feet (NAD83). The data contain counts per minute (cpm), northing and easting (x, y), position dilution of precision (PDOP), date, and time. The average walkover speed did not exceed 0.5 meters per second (m/s). 2.2 Soil Sampling.

Soil horizons are defined as "shallow surface,';

0 -15 cm below ground surface; "deep surface," 15 -100 cm below ground surface; "surface,

0 -100 cm below ground surface; and "subsurface," 100 cm and deeper. Shallow surface soil samples to a depth of 15 cm below July 2014 2-1 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUlVIENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. I ground surface were collected using a 10-cm diameter hand auger. Samples deeper than 15 cm below ground surface were collected using direct-push drilling methods. A sufficient volume of soil was collected allowing all 18 ROis and 12 PROis to be analyzed.

Sufficient volume was approximately 900 grams (g). By collecting surface soil samples from 10-cm diameter holes 15-cm deep and deeper soil samples from 5-cm diameter holes, a sufficient volume of media was collected.

Thirty-second static FIDLER counts and 30-second Nal detector counts were performed at a distance of 15 cm above the ground surface prior to acquiring samples. A physical description of the material sampled, date, and.time was included.

Additionally, the location (coordinates) of the sample was recorded in NY State Plane West NAD83 with a quality of+/- a hundredth of a foot [+/- 0.01 foot (ft)] for each sample. Hand-auger samples were placed in stainless steel mixing .bowls and homogenized with a stainless steel trowel and packaged in plastic jars or glass vials (for tritium or carbon-14 analysis) as samples. The mixing bowls were placed on plastic sheeting to prevent sample contamination.

Samples taken using direct push methods were collected in acetate liners. Once removed from the steel collection tube, the acetate liners were cut open and the sample was extracted and placed into a mixing bowl for homogenization and packaging.

Sample collection was sometimes performed on a table covered with plastic sheeting.

The typical sample collection approach was shown in Photograph 2 in Appendix A. Sample tools and drilling equipment was wiped clean with masslin artd 409 cleaning solution as necessary to remove visible dirt. Tools were scanned for alpha and beta-gamma radiation and a swipe for radioactive contamination was collected.

The swipe was counted in a low background counter. The sampling equipment was considered free of radioactive contamination provided results were less than the instrument lower critical level (Le) of approximately 1 cpm for alpha and 19 cpm for beta-gamma radiation.

Surface and subsurface samples were scanned for gamma radiation before they were homogenized.

2.3 Radionuclide

Concentrations m Background Soils Near the West Valley Demonstration Project Background soil data is discussed in Section 2.3 .1. Gamma walkover data is discussed in Section 2.3.2. Gamma radiation data taken 15 cm above each soil sampling location before sample collection scans of soil cores and down-hole data are discussed in Section 2.3 .3. Data. used has been validated and more discussion of the validation results is presented in Section 3.3. All data was used in computations (e.g., means of data sets) unless it was rejected by the validator.

This is discussed further in the Radiological Interferences Technical Memorandum (SEC 2013). July 2014 2-2 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUlVIENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. I 2.3.1 Background Soil Data from Background Areas There are three sources of background soil radionuclide concentrations discussed in this TBS. The first is historical data compiled from 1991 through 2007 at the Great Valley soil sampling location.

This sampling station is located approximately 30 kilometers (km) directly south of WVDP. In 2007, soil sampling was reduced to once every 5 years; therefore, the sample collected in 2007 is the last available sample (DOE 2011 b ). This data, collected from 0 -15 cm deep, is compiled and shown in Table 2-1. The original data set was provided in scientific notation and was not altered for presentation herein. The data shown is uncensored; values less than the detection level are reported and values less than the laboratory detector background are reported as are negative values. The second and third sources are from data collected in July and August 2012 at two background*

reference areas within WNYNSC. The two background reference areas were chosen to represent differing surface geology found on the north versus the south plateaus of the WVDP site. Background Reference Area 1, shown on Figure 2-1, was in the sand and gravel unit. Background Reference Area 2, shown on Figure 2-2, was in a surface outcrop of Lavery till. Both of these locations were evaluated using site historical soil sampling data collected at the WNYNSC air sampling station (FXVDR) at the intersection of Thornwood Drive (Highway 86) and Fox Valley Road. This intersection may be seen on Figure 2-2. Sample analytical data for strontium-90, cesium-137, americium-241, plutonium-238, and plutonium-239 were compared to the same radionuclide analytes at the Great Valley background station. A student t-test showed there was no reason to suspect that the means of the data sets for each radionuclide were different at the 95 percent confidence level (DOE 2012). These two background reference areas were selected on this basis and because both background reference areas are typically upwind of the WVDP site. Each of the background r.eference areas was 2,000 m 2. Ten equally spaced locations representing 200 m 2 each were sampled. Two samples were collected at each location.

One was a 0 -15 cm near surface sample and the other was a 15 -100 cm deep surface sample. The analytical data from each background reference area is shown in Appendix B and summarized in Tables 2-2 and 2-3. Naturally occurring radionuclides and anthropogenic radionuclides reasonably detectable in background soils from nuclear fallout were compared to potential on-site radionuclide contaminants using the 95 percent upper tolerance level (UTL). Other radionuclides were compared to three times their uncertainty in accordance with the CSAP (DOE 2011). Tables 2-2 and 2-3 reflect these different methods for comparing data collected in areas potentially impacted by WVDP site operations to background soil data. The Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test was used to compare the mean concentrations of strontium-90, cesium-13 7, americium-241, plutonium-23 8, plutonium-239, uranium-232, uranium-233/234, uranium-235, and uranium-238 found at the Great Valley sampling station to the Background Reference Area 1 and Background Reference Area 2 near surface sample concentrations at the 95 percent confidence level. This comparison was performed as a further check as to whether the Background Reference Areas 1 and 2 were potentially impacted by past WVDP operations.

July 2014 2-3 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I --------

Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. I Table 2-1. Background Soil Data Great Valley Location (pCi/g) ' -,_ *'Pu-239/

,, --, -u-2337 U-235/ Am-24i Co-(iO t:s-137 -* -

Pu'-238 .

_-

U-238 ' -240-234 236 6.40e-3 3.60E-2 4.38e0 6.50e-2 6.35e-3 2.30e-2 l .49e0 8.18e-l 4.70e-l l.IOe-3 9.00e-2 7.603-3 1.1 Oe-1 I .80e-3 -1.00E-3 3.67e0 -2.30e-2 2.12e-2 l.80e-2 l .84e0 2.lOe-1 2. lOe-2 l.30e-I 7.40e-3 l.OOe-1 8.30e-4 -2.20E-3 6. lOe-1 O.OOe+O O.OOe+O -5.lOe-3 l .40e0 4.30e-1 2.20e-3 l.60e-1 l.36e-2 l.30e-l 9.40e-3 2.IOE-2 5.lOe-1 2.20e-2 5.67e-3 8.70e-3 5.20e-I l.70e-I 2.50e-3 l .60e-l l .50e-3 l.50e-1 4.98e-3 3.30E-3 5.40e-1 -7.lOe-3 4.23e-4 l.OOe-2 l.70e0 2.20e-l 2.70e-3 8.62e-l

• l.36e-2 l .40e-1 l.02e-2 -1.93E-3 3.86e-1 2.4le-2 2.94e-3 l .43e-2 7.63e-1 3.28e-l 0.00e+O 7.78e-1 2.82e-2 9.3le-l l .4le-2 -l.39E-2 9.85e-l l.49e-3 O.OOe+O 2.17e-2 8.83e-l 6.64e-l l .89e-2 6.59e-1 6.9le-2 8.45e-l I .42e-3 2.12E-2 6.93e-l 3.58e-2 -3.96e-3 2.80e-2 5.69e-l l.65e-l 4.7le-3 6.46e-l 2.29e-2 6.85e-1 2.55e-2 -6.07E-3 7.70e-l l.78e-2 2.82e-2 l.77e-2 9.98e-l l.56e-l l.lOe-2 6.39e-l 5.70e-2 6.49e-l l.52e-2 2.50E-3 9.19e-1 5.07e-2 l.70e-2 2.74e-2 2.92e-l -8.88e-3 7.79e-1 l.1 le-1 6.31e-l l .48e-2 3.91E-3 5.20e-l -3.70e-3 l.85e-3 1.06e-2 I .32e-1 4.90e-3 8.lOe-1 6.87e-2 7.48e-l 3.30e-2 2.23E-3 7.98e-1 -2.39e-3 l.9 le-2 l.94e-l -l .48e-2 8.48e-l 5.97e-2 8.43e-l l.75e-3 3.72E-3 7.81e-1 -8.62e-3 2.41 e-2 l.95e-1 -4.76e-3 8.28e-1 4.28e-2 7.60e-1 4.43e-2 -2.30E-3 6.47e-1 4.22e-2 l.38e-2 1.85e-l 2.3le-2 7.92e-l 2.l 8e-l 7.06e-1 l.36e-2 -5.26E-3 6.2le-1 -1.59e-2 4.59e-2 l.03e-l 5.82e-3 5.52e-l 8.35e-2 7.21e-1 l.66E-2 5.lOe-1 -2.82e-2 3.39e-2 7.04e-2 2.67e-3 7.98e-l 5.45e-2 7.52e-l 5.29e-I -7.07-2 l.82e-2 4.70e-l -6.37e-3 l.50e-l 4.l le-2 8.44e-l ' Ave. l.32e-2 5.19E-3 l.05e0 5.85e-3 7.24E-3 l .94e-2 l.13e0 8.18e-l 2.38e-l 3 .87e-3 5.69e-l 5.30e-2 5.73e-l S_t. l.02e-2 -3.93E-3 9.28e-l 3.30e-2 l .03e-2 l.13e-2 4.9le-l NIA l.57e-J l.02e-2 2.99e-l 5.23e-2

• 3.07e-l dev. July 2014 2-4 j u TROLLED DOCU T j Terr es tri a l Back g round Stud y (TBS) (T0 5) -R ev. l Legend

• B a ckground R eference Area 1 1 , 000 1 , 500 2,000 m:::mc::::i

___ c::====---

Mete r s Figure 2-1. Background Reference Area 1 Jul y 2 014 2-5 Terrestrial B ac k gro und Study (T BS) (TOS) -R ev. I Legend

• Backgro u nd Refe r ence A r ea 2 + 0 12.525 --0 200400 800 1 , 200 1 , 600 **CJ*-==---

c::==::::i

--*Meters Figure 2-2. Background Reference Area 2 Jul y 20 14 2-6 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT 1

• Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. I Table 2-2. Background Reference Area 1 Radionuclide Concentrations 0-15 cm 0-15 cm 0-15 cm 15-100 cm 15-100 cm Radionuclide Average Standard UTL 1 Average Standard Result* Deviation (pCi/g) Result Deviation (pCifg) * (pGilg)..

.. (pc;ilg).

• ' .. * (pCilgt * ,;, .',,' ... *' Am-241 0.052 0.069 NIA 0.007 0.033 C-14 1.23 0.470 2.33 0.185 0.233 Cm-2431244 0.042 0.083 NIA 0.042 0.061 Cs-137 0.187 0.134 0.503 0.067 0.072 1-129 2 Np-237 0.004 0.009 NIA 0.005 0.006 Pu-238 0.001 0.015 NIA 0.017 0.033 Pu-2391240 0.035 0.080 NIA 0.030 0.060 Pu-241 4.93 2.41 NIA 5.01 2.40 Sr-90 -0.039 0.101 NIA 0.088 0.068 Tc-99 -0.486 0.456 NIA -0.588 0.651 U-232 0.005 0.007 NIA 0.008 0.010 U-233/234 0.554 0.265 1.18 0.561 0.201 U-235 0.017 0.015 0.052 0.019 0.016 U238 0.542 0.292 1.23 0.503 0.242 Ac-227 0.026 0.056 0.159 0.018 0.033 Co-60 0.000 0.002 NIA 0.001 0.002 Cd-l 13mJ Eu-154 0.001 0.002 NIA 0.001 0.002 H-3 1.34 2.74 8.07 0.745 1.98 Pa-231 2 Ra-226 1.55 0.230 2.10 1.73 0.286 Ra-228 0.681 0.070 0.845 0.833 0.056 Sb-125 0.003 0.005 NIA 0.000 0.005 Sn-126 -0.000 0.001 NIA 0.001 0.002 Th-229 0.014 0.060 NIA 0.005 0.023 Th-232 0.681 0.070 0.845 0.833 0.056 1 Values calculated using the computer program Pro UCL. 2 I-129 and Pa-231 data were rejected during data validation.

See Radiological Interferences Technical Memorandum for further information (SEC 2013). 3 Cd-l 13m is a pure beta-emitter and cannot be detected by the gamma spectroscopy method used. NI A-radionuclide result compared to three times individual sample uncertainty.15-100 cm UTL 1 (pCilg) . . NIA 0.733 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA 1.03 0.056 1.07 0.095 NIA NIA 5.40 2.40 0.965 NIA NIA NIA 0.965 Background Reference Area 1 and Background Reference Area 2 mean concentrations for all RO Is and all PROis that would reasonably be expected in background soil were also compared at the 95 percent confidence level using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. The comparisons were made separately for the near surface samples and then with the deep surface samples. The hypothesis tested for the comparison to the Great Valley data set was: Null Hypothesis H 0: The mean concentration in the background reference areas is equal to or less than the mean concentration at the Great Valley sampling station. July 2014 2-7 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. I Table 2-3. Background Reference Area 2 Radionuclide Concentrations 0-15 cm 0 :--15 cm 0-15 cm 15__:100 cm 15-100 cm -Radionuclide

• .Average .UTL 1 Average Standard *Result Deviation Res tilt Devfation.

.* : (peilg) ' (p(::it;g)

..

' (pd@:*.: ' *,';, '",,', ,, ,-,,,,_:;

,."<' ',. *" ,., ",, "**' :* Am-241 0.012 0.022 NIA 0.022 0.039 C-14 1.56 0.590 2.95 0.779 0.324 Cm-243/244 0.038 0.059 NIA 0.016 0.071 Cs-137 0.262 0.109 0.520 0.032 0.112 I-129 2 Np-237 -0.000 0.005 NIA 0.001 0.005 Pu-238 0.005 0.013 NIA -0.004 0.013 Pu-2391240 0.007 0.007 NIA -0.002 0.011 Pu-241 0.596 2.81 NIA 1.88 4.37 Sr-90 0.114 0.135 NIA 0.011 0.059 Tc-99 -0.291 0.593 NIA -0.174 0.528 U-232 -0.003 0.017 NIA -0.004 0.007 U-233/234 0.777 0.184 1.21 0.851 0.194 U-235 0.038 0.022 0.092 0.047 0.067 U238 0.782 0.197 1.25 0.822 0.193 Ac-227 0.027 0.048 0.141 0.025 0.043 Co-60 -0.000 0.002 NIA -0.001 0.002 Cd-113m 3 Eu-154 0.001 0.002 NIA 0.000 0.002 H-3 -2.96 1.31 0.265 -0.170 1.09 Ra-226 1.62 0.267 2.25 1.80 0.277 Ra-228* 0.708 0.126 1.01 0.902 0.151 Sb-125 0.003 0.003 NIA 0.002 0.004 Sn-126 -0.000 0.002 NIA 0.004 0.002 Th-229 0.019 0.029 NIA 0.005 0.036 Th-232 0.708 0.126 1.01 0.902 *0.151 1 Values calculated using the computer program Pro UCL. 2 1-129 and Pa-231 data were rejected during data validation.

See Radiological Interferences Technical Memorandum for further information (SEC 2013). 3 Cd-l 13m is a pure beta-emitter and cannot be detected by the gamma spectroscopy method used. NI A -radionuclide result compared to three times individual sample uncertainty.

Versus15-100 cm UTI./, i (pCV,g) , ** ;:,'<' ... NIA 1.54 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA 1.31 0.203 1.28 0.126 NIA NIA 2.12 2.34 1.26 NIA NIA NIA 1.26 Alternative Hypothesis H : The mean concentration in the background reference .area is greater a . than the mean concentration at the Great Valley sampling station. The hypotheses tested when Background Reference Area 1 was compared to Background Reference Area 2 were: Null Hypotheses H 0: The mean concentration in Background Reference Area 1 (or 2) is equal to or less than the mean concentration in Background Reference Area 2 (or 1). July 2014 2-8 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. I Versus Alternative Hypothesis:

Ha: The mean concentration in Reference Area 2 (or 1) is greater than the mean concentration in Background Reference I (or 2). The results of these comparisons for the radionuclides are summarized in Table 2-4. If the entries indicate "yes," the null hypothesis was rejected or "no" if it was not. The entries in the table also indicate which background reference data set mean was greater than the other when the null hypothesis was rejected. "NA" in the table means that the radionuclide was not analyzed in both data sets that were compared.

Table 2-4. Summary of Statistical Comparisons Grelit Valley Vs. .** Grea"t Valley Vs. Ref. 1. Vs. Ref. 2 Ref. 1. Vs. Ref. 2 *,; Radionuclide*

Ref.1 Ref. 2 (0 -15 cm depth) * (15 -100 cm depth) . Am-241 No No Yes (1>2) No C-14 NA NA Yes (2>1) Yes (2>1) Cm-243/244 NA NA No No Cs-137 No No No Yes (1>2) Np-237 NA NA No No Pu-238 No No No Yes (1>2) Pu-239/240 No No No Yes (1>2) Pu-241 NA NA Yes (1>2) No Sr-90 No No Yes (2>1) Yes (1>2) U-233/234 No No Yes (2>1) Yes (2>1) U-235 No No Yes (2>1) No U-238 No Yes No Yes (2>1) Ac-227 NA NA No No Ra-226 NA NA No No Ra-228 NA NA No No Th-232 NA NA No No NA means not applicable.

This analyte was not analyzed in the Great Valley background location data set. The mean concentration for U-238, 0.78 pCi/g, at Background Reference Area 2, was greater than the mean U-238 concentration, 0.57 pCi/g, at the Great Valley location.

These results, while statistically significant, are well within typical concentrations of naturally occurring uranium throughout the United States. Otherwise there was no reason to suspect that the mean concentration of any other radionuclide was greater at a background reference area than at Great Valley. This conclusion is an indicator that the background reference areas selected have not been impacted by WVDP operations.

Table 2-4 above shows a statistical difference between the mean concentrations of several of the different radionuclides between the two background reference areas. However, many of the individual sample results used to compute the mean and standard deviation of the data sets were less than the analytical minimum detectable concentration (MDC). 2.3.2 Gamma Walkover Data for Background Reference Areas The surface of each background reference area was surveyed I 00% with both the FIDLER and the Nal detector types. The number of data points collected, minimum, maximum, average, and July 2014 2-9 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUlVIENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. I standard deviation for each detector type at each background reference area is shown in Table 2-5. Table 2-5. Summary Statistics for Each Detector Type ,, ,' " ' ,,'.FIDL.ER

" . '-, .Nal ,*;, "' ' '. : Statistics

'".

• Reference Area 1 .Reference Area*-2 Reference Area 1 Reference Area 2 Measurements 26,026 11,318 21,806 8,820 Minimum ( cpm) 6,177 7,436 4,697 5,787 Maximum (cpm) 13,184 17,756 11,485 11,450 Average (cpm) 9,684 10,537 6,961 8,248 Std. Dev. (cpm) 926 979 698 794 Shown on Figures 2-3 and 2-4 are side-by-side comparisons of the two detector types at each background reference area. FIDLER detectors are larger and more sensitive than NaI detectors, thus the higher overall count rates for the FIDLER detectors are expected.

Also shown on Figures 2-3 and 2-4 are the locations where soil samples were collected.

Figures 2-5 through 2-8 are plots of the count rates versus frequency of occurrence.

The data are clearly normally distributed as would be expected for background data sets. A t-test was performed comparing the means of each detector type at the two background reference areas at the 95 percent confidence level. The t-test was appropriate because the sample sizes were large and the data was normally distributed as seen in Figures 2-5 through 2-8. The mean count rate with both detectors is higher at Background Reference Area 2 compared to Background Reference Area 1 with 95 percent confidence.

2.3.3 Gamma

Measurements at References Areas Sampling Locations A 30-second gamma measurement was made with each detector type at.each location before soil samples were collected.

These results, along with location information, are shown in Table 2-6. The gamma signal was logged in each hole formed when the soil cores were extracted at the 10 sampling locations at each reference location.

The FSP required this to be done at 15 cm increments from four sample locations drilled 1 m deep in Lavery till. All locations in Background Reference Area 2 (Lavery till) were logged in 15-cm increments, All locations at Background Reference Area 1. (sand and gravel) were logged in 30-cm increments.

This field practice exceeded the FSP specifications.

The results of the gamma logs at each sample location are provided in Appendix C. Lithologic logs are also provided in Appendix C. July2014 2-10 J ul y2 0 14 FIDLER Data L e gend < 8 , 0 00 c pm

• 8 , 00 1 -1 0 , 000 cpm

• 10 , 001 -12 , 000 cpm

• 12 , 00 1 -14 , 000 cpm 14 , 001 -1 6 , 0 00 cpm *DDOCUME T l Te r r est ri a l Back g ro un d St u d y (TBS) (T05) -R e v. I Nal Data *

• Sa m ple Locat i ons N Bou n dary of Study Area 1 100 Sq. Meter Reference Are a 0 2 0 40 160 ... .:=3 .. -=:::. ...... c::::=:=:::m ...... F e et 8 0 120 Fi g ur e 2-3. S ide-b y-Sid e Comparison of FIDLER and Nal D e tector R es ults at B a ck g r o und Ref e r e nce A rea 1 2-11 Jul y 2 01 4 FI DL E R Da t a Legend < 8,000 cpm

• 8 , 001 -10.000 cpm

• 10 , 001 -12 , 000 cpm

• 12 , 001 -14 , 000 cpm 14 , 001 -16 , 000 cpm

• 16 , 0 0 1 -18 , 000 cpm TROLLED DOCU T e rr es tri al B ac k g ro un d S tud y (T B S) (TO S) -R ev. 1 Na l Data N

• Sample Location s N Boundary of Study Area 1 0 2 5 5 0 2 00

...... -======= ........ Feet 100 150 Figure 2-4. Side-b y-Side Comparison of FIDLER and Nal Detector Results at Background Reference Area 2 2-1 2

-, !UNCONTROLLED DOCUi\tENT I Terrestrial Back g round Stud y (TBS) (T05) -Rev. 1 16 0 0 1400 1200 1000 800 600 *Frequency 400 ..* 111 11111111 ... _ *-200 0 E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E

c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,.... 0 (Y) co en N U") co rl <t ,.... 0 (Y) co en N U") co rl <t ,.... 0 (Y) <t' U")-U")-U")-U")-co' co' co' ,....-,....-,....-co' co' 00 co' en' en' en' o' o' o' rl-rl-rl rl rl rl rl Figure 2-5. Background Reference Area 1 Nal Distibution 1400 1200 1000 800 600 *Frequency 400 _ .... 111111 1111 **.. 200 0 E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E

c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N U") co rl <t ,.... 0 (Y) co en N U") co rl <t ,.... 0 (Y) co en N U") co rl co' co' co' ,....-,....-,....-co' 00 co' co' en' en' en' o' o' o' rl-rl-rl-rl-N' N' N' (Y) rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl Figure 2-6. Background Reference Area 1 FIDLER Distibution Jul y2 0l4 2-1 3 500 450 400 350 3 00 2 50 200 1 50 1 00 50 0 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 [Ul\'CONTROLLED DOCUMENT I T e rr es tri al B ac k g round Stud y (T B S) (T0 5) -R ev. 1 I I *

• 111 II 11111 ..*.. E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E

c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. u .u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m l.O °' N LI) 00 ..... <:j-" 0 m l.O °' N LI) co ..... <:j-" l.0-l.0-l.0-<.ri r--' r--' r--' oo' oo' co' m' m' m' m' 6 6 6 ..... -..... -..... -..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Figure 2-7. Background Reference Area 2 Nal Distribution

• I 1111 I 111111 ...... E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E

c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. n c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l/l m m r--.-t l/l m m r--.-t l/l m m r--.-t l/l m m r--.-t l/l m m r--.-t l/l M M rl M M M M M M M M M M M rl M M M M E c. u 0 0 o_ N ..... Figure 2-8. Background Reference Area 2 FIDLER Di s tribution

• F requ e n c y *Frequency J ul y 2014 2-14 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestriai Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. 1 Table 2-6. Gamma Measurements at Each Sample , Location*., FIDLER(cpm)

Nal (cpm)* Northing( ft) . Easting ;(ft) . *Elevation f ft) Background Reference Area 1 1 10,190 7,278 885995.23 1133639.66 1440.243 2 8,002 6,266 886051.77 1133582.49 1440.075 3 9,962 7,664 886039.35 1133616.68 1440.304 4 9,930 7,202 886036.54 1133666.50 1438.849 5 9,564 7,028 886082.25 1133491.66 1440.165 6 9,232 6,932 886081.27 1133542.18 1440.282 7 9,866 7,406 886082.09 1133588.14 1439.567 8 10,368 7,698 886081.67 1133638.76 1439.738 9 9,904 7,624 886129.60 1133511.15 1438.671 10 9,658 7,244 886132.39 1133560.34 1439.345 Background Reference Area 2 1 9,879 7,284* 890110.917 1134457.852 1394.762 2 11,111 7,875 890108.926 1134506. 751 1395.245 3 9,749 7,108 890066.994 1134484.737 1395.508 4 11,098 8,242 890069.027 1134534.07 1395.804 5 9,507 6,724 890024.338 1134507.902 1396.154 6 11, 139 8,447 890023.73 1134557.031 1396.098 7 9,291 6,530 889979.098 1134533.251 1396.364 8 11,605 8,444 889982.845 1134583.566 1396.743 9 11,489 8,308 889949.628 1134572.237 1396.449 10 11,585 8,396 889936.75 1134608.726 1396.773 July 2014 2-15 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. I 3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE QA information was collected for soil data and for the GWS data. Soil QA data is presented in Section 3 .1 and GWS QA data is presented in Section 3 .2. Data verification and. validation information is presented in Section 3 .3. 3.1 Soil Sample Quality Assurance The characteristics of precision, accuracy, representativeness, completeness, and comparability are discussed in Sections 3.1.1 through 3.1.5, respectively.

3.1.1 Precision

Precision is a measure of the degree to which two or more measurements are in agreement.

Precision in the laboratory results was assessed through the calculation of relative percent differences (RPDs) for the replicate laboratory control samples (LCSs) and laboratory control sample duplicates (LCSDs). Precision was also evaluated for field duplicate sample analyses.

According to the CSAP, precision reflects measurement variability as observed in repeated measurements of the same subsample; for radio-analytical methods, the required precision is reflected by required method detection limits (DOE 201 la). In other words, specifying the required detection limits is equivalent to specifying the required method precision; therefore, specific tolerance limits for precision were not set in the FSP. The results of precision evaluations are simply reported.

Field duplicates are the least precise because they introduce all sample uncertainty from field sample collection through laboratory analysis.

Field duplicates are collected as sample splits from the same sample mass. Two samples were extracted after homogenization with hand tools. These two samples were sent separately for laboratory analysis and the results were compared to establish a measure of precision.

The RPD calculation allows for the comparison of two analysis values in terms of precision with no estimate of accuracy.

RPD is calculated as: . RPD = ( m M) x 100 Where: m = First measurement value, M = Second measurement value, and M =Mean value ofM and m. LCS and LCSD samples were analyzed for the following:

• Americium-241 by alpha spectroscopy arid gamma spectroscopy,

• Carbon-14 by liquid scintillation,

• Cobalt-60 by gamma spectroscopy, July 2014 3-1 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev.1

• Cesium-13 7 by gamma spectroscopy,

• Tritium by liquid scintillation,

• Neptunium-237 by alpha spectroscopy,

• Plutonium-239/240 by alpha spectroscopy,

• Strontium-90 by chemical extraction and gross beta analysis,

• Technetium-99 by chemical extraction and liquid scintillation,

• Uranium-232 by alpha spectroscopy, and

• Uranium-238 by alpha spectroscopy. . The LCS and LCSD RPD for gamma spectroscopy were all performed using a calibration check source with 40,000 to 70,000 disintegrations per minute (dpm) in the radionuclide-specific energy channel for the spectrometer.

While this is a measure of precision, this amount of radioactivity (dpm) is significantly higher than the amounts measured in the actual samples. The LCS and LCSD RPD for liquid scintillation, alpha spectroscopy, and gross beta analysis were calculated at concentrations that were representative of the soil clean-up goals. There were 23 LCS and LCSO data pairs that were evaluated.

In 74 percent of the data pairs, the RPD was 10 percent or less. Analyses for tritium, carbon-14, technetium-99, americium-241, and plutonium 239/240 each had at least one RPD result greater than 10 percent. The Normalized Absolute Difference (DER) between the LCS and LCSD is used to determine that the results do not differ significantly (at the 99 percent confidence interval) when compar-ed to their respective combined standard uncertainty.

A DER of less than or equal to three is considered acceptable.

Where: s D CS Us CSUn DER= ---====JS=-=D==J

== J(csus )2 +(csu D)2 LCS result Duplicate result Combined Standard Uncertainty of the LCS Combined Standard Uncertainty of the duplicate Ninety-three percent of the DER calculations for the LCS and LCSD were three or less. Precision for the field duplicates was calculated for cases when both samples analyzed for the same analyte had results greater than the minimum detectable activity (MDA) for each background reference area. This evaluation was performed for cesium-137, uranium-233/234, uranium-238, radium-226, radium-228, and thorium-232 (which is the same as for radium-228).

The results are shown in Table 3-1. The RPD and coefficient of variation (CV) for uranium-233/234 and uranium-238 exceeded 10 percent; otherwise, the results are acceptable.

These differences sometimes occur in field duplicates when the analytical results are small. July2014 3-2 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUlVIENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. I Table 3-1. Precision Using Field Duplicates ROI' PROis ,,., Cs-137 ii-233,/ 234 .. U-238 . Ra-226 Ra 7 228 Th-237 Sample ID. ', Resrilt Re.$ult Result Result , Result' Result WVDP-SS-SY-05-03-02-0-15-073112 0.289 0.390 0.360 2.030 0.743 0.743 WVDP-SS-SY-05-11-02-0-15-073112 0.274 0.730 0.793 1.866 0.796 0.796 RPD* 5.07 60:72' '75.09 8.4-l 6.95 6.95 CV 3.59 42.93 53.10 5.96 4.91 4.91: ,.,. ROI PROls ', ,,, .sample ID C-14 Cs-'1'37 U-238 Ra-.226 :Ra-228

'

• R'esult *Result**:

234 Result *Result Result . R.esult ' '* *., . Resµlt \ ' WVDP-SS-SY-05-10-03-0-15-080712 1.968 0.341 0.923 0.918 1.910 0.827 0.827 WVDP-SS-SY-05-11-03-0-15-080712 1.809 0 .. 338 0.976 0.987 2.192 0.917 0.917 RPD 8.42 0.71 5.58 7.24 13.74 10.37

' CV 5.95 0.50 ' 3.95 ,* 5;12 9.72 7,33 7.33 3.1.2 Accuracy Accuracy addresses the potential for bias and lack of precision in laboratory analytical results and is typically monitored through the use of standards, spikes, blanks, and control charts, as appropriate, depending on the method. The accuracy requirement for off-site laboratory analyses set in the CSAP is a relative standard error of I 0 percent, as measured at the cleanup goal value, after correcting for precision.

Analytical accuracy is expressed as the percent recovery of an analyte that has been added to the control samples at a known concentration prior to analysis or duplicate analysis of a gamma spectroscopy standard with a known amount of radioactivity.

The accuracy of data was summarized in terms of relative error (RE). This calculation reflects the degree to which the measured value agrees with the actual value, in terms of percent of the actual value. RE is calculated as: * % RE = Measured Value Actual Value x 100 Actual Value Table 3-2 shows the results of accuracy determinations for LCS and LCSD samples. 3.1.3 Representativeness

• Representativeness is guaranteed by appropriate sampling and analytical protocols and by collecting sufficient samples or obtaining sufficient measurements such that uncertainties July 2014 3-3 I I I I UNCONTROLLED DOCUlVIENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev.1 Table 3-2. Accuracy Data Method Nuclide Minimum Maximum Average :standard

• Number.of

.. Accuracy Accuracy Accuracy Deviation*

Measurements*

Alpha Spectroscopy Am-241 93.80 94.86 94.33 0.75 2 Gamma Spectroscopy Am-241 88.37 94.29 91.33 4.18 2 Liquid Scintillation C-14 77.30 98.16 87.73 14.75 2 Gamma Spectroscopy Co-60 99.83 99.83 99.83 NIA 1 Gamma Spectroscopy Cs-137 97.31 99.65 98.48 1.66 2 Liquid Scintillation H-3 88.02 89.95 . 88.99 1.36 2* Alpha Spectroscopy Np-237 96.96 97.69 97.33 0.52 2 Alpha Spectroscopy Pu-239/240 29.12 98.31 63.71 48.93 2 Gross Beta Sr-90 94.90 98.98 96.94 2.89 2 Liquid Scintillation Tc-99 73.64 93.78 83.71 14.24 2 *Alpha Spectroscopy U-232 96.65 97.20 96.93 0.39 2 Alpha Spectroscopy U-234/233 94.78 94.78 94.78 NIA 1 Alpha Spectroscopy U-238 94.69 94.69 94.69 NIA 1 introduced by the heterogeneity of contaminated media are sufficiently controlled for decision making purposes.

There is no formal quantitative requirement for representativeness; representativeness is monitored by ensuring that sampling and analytical protocols are, in fact, carried out during field and laboratory work and that the quantity of data collected is sufficient to allow decision-making with the necessary level of confidence.

The data were collected in accordance with the FSP and the standard operating procedures (SOPs) contained in the FSP and the supporting plans and procedures.

The data are considered representative of the field conditions and locations where they were collected.

3.1.4 Completeness

Completeness is a measure Of the degree to which the amount of sample data collected meets the scope and a measure of the relative number of analytical data points that meet the acceptance criteria, including accuracy, precision, and any other criteria required by the specific analytical . method used. Completeness is defined as a comparison of the actual numbers of valid data points and expected numbers of points expressed as a percentage.

The data completeness goal for the CSAP is 80 percent, consistent with the Phase 1 Final Status Survey Plan* (FSSP). Completeness is calculated after the QC data: have been evaluated, and the results applied to the measurement data. In addition to results identified as being outside of the QC limits established for the method, broken or spilled samples, or samples that could not be analyzed for any other reason, are included in the assessment of completeness.

The percent of valid results is reported as completeness.

The completeness will be calculated as follows: July 2014 T-(I+NC) Completeness(%)=

x 100 T Where: T I Total number of expected measurements for a method and matrix, = Number of invalidated results for a method and matrix, and 3-4 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev.1 NC Number of results n.ot collected (e.g., bottles broken, etc.) for a method and a matrix. Table 3-3 shows that the 80 percent completeness goal was met except for iodine-129 and protactinium-231.

These were the data sets where all the data were rejected.

Reasons for this are discussed in the Radiological Interferences Technical Memorandum (SEC 2013). Table 3-3. Completeness Data TO 05R01 TO 05PROI* Nu.clicle . Percent Valid Nuclide *Percent Valid Am-241 97.5 Ac-227 100 C-14 100 Co-60 100 Cm-243/244 97.5 Cd-113m 100 Cs-137 100 Eu-154 100 I-129 Q.00 H-3 95 Np-237 100 Pa-231 0.00 Pu-238 97.5 Ra-226 100 Pu-239/240 97.5 Ra-228 100 Pu-241 100 Sb-125 100 Sr-90 100 Sn-126 100 Tc-99 100 Th-229 75 U-232 100 Th-232 100 U-233/234 100 U-235 97.5 U-238 100 3.1.5 Comparability Comparability refers to how well data sets generated by CSAP work pertaining to the decisions that need to be made. Comparability is a qualitative parameter expressing the confidence with which one data set can be compared with another. The comparability of the data, a relative measure, is influenced by sampling and analytical procedures.

The data was collected with the specific protocols in the FSP. The collection methods were in accordance with the CSAP; therefore, this data set and future data sets should be comparable regardless of who obtains the sample or performs the analysis.

3.2 Gamma

Walkover Quality Assurance GWS QA includes the following:

• Each detector was calibrated according to procedure SEC-RP-08, Workplace Monitoring.

• Instruments were set-up and checked according to procedure SEC-RP-52, Set-up and Operability Tests for Portable Field Instruments.

This establishes reference readings and a +/-20 percent acceptance range. July 2014 3-5 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUIVIENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev.1

• Instruments were checked with a source of known radioactivity and for background according to procedure SEC-RP-53, Operability Tests -Field Instruments.

Instruments all passed the specification that source and background checks fall within +/-20 percent of their original set-up readings.

• A 30-second measurement was made each day before use and at the end of the day at a reference location as specified in the FSP. Control charts were generated and an example is provided in Appendix D. In addition to the measures listed above, each different.

detector was to be used to survey a 1 OO-m 2 area established in Background Reference Area 1. The purpose was to allow measurements made by different detectors of the same type (FIDLER or NaI) to be normalized, if needed. A tarp was then placed over the area to attain, over time, and maintain stable soil moisture content. Soil moisture may have an impact on the detector response.

It is expected that the moisture content will equilibrate over the course of several weather seasons. When the survey of the 1 OO-m 2 area was performed, two FIDLER and two NaI detectors were used. The number of measurements, minimum, maximum, average, and standard deviation for each detector at the 1 OO-m 2 test plot are shown in Table 3-4. Now that the 1 OO-m 2 plot on Background Reference Area I has been established, future site survey work can begin with the survey of this plot. Table 3-4. Detector Statistics (Readings in cpm) .,

I Calibration Date of: Number of ,, Detector SN ,

' *

• Mi.nimum .

'Average Std*. Dev. FIDLER ' ; 119204 I 6/13/13 08/02/12 576 7,098 12,547 9,629 876 07121 lA 183995 I 7/24/13 08/02112 389 7,119 13,148 10, 181 858 091806Al Nal ,' ' 216510 I 08/02112 08/02/12 383 5,594 8,423 6,966 500 PR242829 262318 I 06/21/13 08/02/12 233 5,850 10,302 7,676 797 PR240330 A t-test showed that the mean count rate of the FIDLER and the NAI detectors were different with 99 percent confidence.

The two FIDLER detectors exhibited a 552 cpm difference in the mean response.

The NaI detectors exhibited a 709 cpm difference in. the mean response.

A way to normalize the detector response would have been to add 276 cpm to the response of one FIDLER and subtract 276 cpm from the response of the other FIDLER. Similarly, 355 cpm could be added to the response of one Nal detector and 354 cpm could be subtracted from the response of the other Nal detector.

Such normalization would affect the response of the detectors by less than 5 percent. This would have virtually no impact in the GWS data interpretation.

The gamma radiation contours shown in Figures 2-1 and 2-2 are +/-2,000 cpm. Because the results of the two detector pairs shown in Table 3-3 is considered typical, normalization of detector response would not have added value to the way the data was interpreted.

The differences in the detector response are considered July 2014 3-6 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev.1 typical because detector crystals of the same media, size, and shape that are operated at their similar plateau voltages with photomultiplier tubes of a similar age will behave as the detectors shown in Table 3-4. 3.3 Data Verification and Validation Data verification was performed on 100% of the laboratory analytical data. Verification was performed to assure that samples sent for analysis were analyzed with results returned in hard copy and as an Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD). Verification of completeness of chain of custody records was performed.

Verification that hard copy records from the laboratory matched the EDD was also completed.

Errors found during verification were corrected.

Data deliverables meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Level IV quality. Contract Laboratory Procedure (CLP)-like data packages were provided by the analytical laboratory to support independent third party validation.

Ten percent of analyses were validated by an independent third party. The independent third party performed validation according to the US. Department of Energy NNSA Service Center Model Data Validation Procedure (AQA 2010) and the applicable methods. All data were used in computations (e.g., means of data sets) unless it was rejected by the validator.

The data that was rejected is shown in Appendix B. Further discussion of data validation is provided in the Radiological Interferences Technical Memorandum (SEC 2013). Reasons for rejected data were: " Samples with a negative result with an absolute value greater than the MDC,

• fodine-129 results where there was significant interference from a gamma photo-peak from naturally occurring bismuth-212, and

• Samples where the chemical yield was less than 10 percent and with results less than the MDC. July 2014 3-7 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1

4.0 REFERENCES

1. ANL 2005. Human Health Fact Sheet, http://www.ead.anl.gov/pub/doc/carbon14.pdf.

2. AQA 2010. Model Data Validation Procedure, Analytical Quality Associates, February.

3. DOE 2005. Pantex Plant Final Report on Tritium Released to the Environment, July 20, 200 5, http://www.seco .cpa.state.

tx. us/zzz _pantex/erproj ect/ 1 tritiumreport7-05.

pdf. 4. DOE 2009. Phase 1 Decommissioning Plan for the West Valley Demonstration Project, Washington Safety Management Solutions, URS Washington Division, and Science Applications International Corporation, December.

5. DOE 201 la. Phase 1 Characterization Sampling and Analysis Plan for the West Valley . Demonstration Project, Rev 1., ANL/EVS/R-11/6, June. 6. DOE 2011 b. Phase 1 Final Status Sun)ey Plan for the West Valley Demonstration Project, Argonne National Laboratory Environmental Science Division, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439, May. 7. DOE 201 lc. West Valley Demonstration Project Annual Site Environmental Report, Calendar 2010, September.

8. DOE 2012. Letter report from Bryan C. Bower, DOE Director, to Paul J. Bembia, Director NYSERDA, July 19. 9. EPA 2000. Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM), NUREG-1575 Rev. I, August. 10. SEC 2012. field Sampling Plan (FSP)for Task Order 5, West Valley Demonstration Project Environmental Characterization Services, June. 11. SEC 2013. Radiological Interferences Technical Memorandum, February.

July 2014 4-1 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUlVIENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1 APPENDIX A Photographs July 2014 l u TROLLED DOC T e rr est ri al B ac k gro und S tudy (TB S) (T OS) -R ev. 1 Photograph

1. Detector Cart Jul y 2 0 1 4 A-I Terrestrial Back grou nd Study (T BS) (T05) -Re v. I Photograph

2. Typical Sampling Arrangement Jul y 2014 A-2 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUIVIENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. 1 APPENDIXB Sample Analytical Results for Background Reference.Areas July 2014 I

DOCU T e rr est ri al B ac k g round Study (T BS) (T O S) -R ev. 1 Tab l e B-1. Reference Area 1 Sa m p l e ROis Am241 Am241 Am241 C14 C14 Location Resu l t Error MDA Result Error 01 0.099 0.065 0.08 3 0.9 18 1.4 3 (O-l 5cm) 02 0.075 0.055 0.067 1.1 1 1.20 (O-l 5cm) 03 0.212 0.095 0.099 0.617 1.15 (O-J5cm) 04 0.004 0.041 0.087 1.21 1.2 1 (0-1 5cm) 05 0.014 0.04-7 0.095 1.920 1.1 6 (O-l 5cm) 06 0.0 1 3 0.041 0.079 1.25 1.04 (0-15cm) 07 0.0 34 0.051 0.087 2.1 2 1.29 (0-1 5cm) 08 0.017 0.038 0.071 1.28 1.16 (0-15cm) 09 0.078 0.147 0.271 0.794 1.22 (0-15cm) 10 0.000 0.0 3 1 0.072 1.04 1.09 (0-15 cm) 01 0.000 0.027 0.068 -0.11 3 1.0 3 (1 5-lOOcm) 02 0.006 0.038 0.080 0.019 1.28 (15-IOO cm) 03 -0.026 0.059 0.136 0.192 0.838 (1 5-lOO c m) 04 -0.005 0.055 0.118 -0.025 1.25 (15-lOOcm) 05 -0.004 0.030 0.072 0.2 18 0.972 (1 5-lOO cm) 06 0.093 0.062 0.076 0.256 0.970 (15-100 c m) 07 0.000 0.051 0.108 0.680 1.12 ( 1 5-1 OOcm) 08 -0.006 0.037 0.083 0.1 3 1 0.941 (1 5-lOO cm) 09 -0.011 0.039 0.092 0.427 1.06 (15-lOO cm) IO 0.021 0.036 0.064 0.061 1.03 (15-IOO cm) 1 Units are pCi/g. 2 Error i s total propagated un certa int y at two standard deviations. 3 Shaded results were rejected during data va lid ation. Jul y 2 014 C14 Cm243 MDA 244 Result 1.01 2 -0.0 20 0.980 0.043 0.77 5 0.086 1.02 -0.050 1.34 -0.005 0.973 0.0 1 0 1.49 0.1 93 1.03 0.145 0.867 -0.095 0.901 -0.027 0.602 -0.012 0.745 0.015 0.506 0.037 0.72 8 -0.004 0.586 0.049 0.591 0.085 0.781 0.101 0.557 0.1 70 0.6 76 -0.0 27 0.601 0.007 Cm243 Cm243/244 244 MDA Error 0.04 9 0.109 0.043 0.060 0.070 0.102 0.038 0.11 2 0.045 0.1 04 0.044 0.087 0.117 0.169 0.100 0.147 0.229 0.510 0.027 0.086 0.036 0.090 0.042 0.082 0.062 0.10 9 0.047 0.10 5 0.041 0.047 0.057 0.0 69 0.110 0.180 0.099 0.1 36 0.045 0.110 0.039 0.08 1 B-1 1 u Terrestrial B ackgro und Study (T BS) (T05) -R ev. l Table B-1. Reference Area 1 Sample ROis Location Csl37 Csl37 Csl37 1129 1129 Result Error MDA Result Error 01 0.447 0.030 0.007 -0.0 09 0.589 (O-I 5cm) 02 0.090 0.009 0.006 0.099 0.049 (O-I 5cm) 03 0.2 8 9 0.0 2 1 0.007 0.154 0.0 5 1 (0-1 5 cm) 04 0.1 39 0.011 0.007 0.110 0.059 (O-l 5cm) OS 0.105 0.011 0.007 0.129 0.056 (0-15cm) 06 0.118 0.010 0.005 0.080 0.048 (0-1 5cm) 07 0.3 45 0.0 2 9 0.006 0.2 10 0.04 2 (0-1 5cm) 08 0.227 0.020 0.006 0.099 0.060 (0-1 5cm) 09 0.065 0.007 0.006 0.110 0.060 (0-1 5cm) 10 0.047 0.006 0.004 0.093 0.029 (0-15cm) 01 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.110 0.052 (15-IOOcm) 02 0.1 98 0.019 0.008 0.106 0.055 (1 5-IOO cm) 03 0.013 0.005 0.006 0.128 0.057 (1 5-IOO c m) 04 0.061 0.007 0.005 0.129 0.035 (15-lOOcm)

OS 0.002 0.003 0.005 0.2 13 0.054 ( 15-IOOcm) 06 0.1 76 0.0 1 3 0.006 0.142 0.061 ( 15-1 OOcm) 07 0.095 0.009 0.006 0.113 0.053 (1 5-IOO cm) 08 -0.001 0.017 0.006 0.194 0.051 (15-IOO cm) 09 0.079 0.008 0.006 0.137 0.048 (1 5-IOO cm) 10 0.047 0.006 0.005 0.14 2 0.048 (1 5-IOOcm) 1 Unit s a r e pCi/g. 2 Error is tota l propagated uncertainty at two standard de v i a ti o n s. 3 Shaded r es ult s were reject e d durin g data va lid at i on. July 2 0 1 4 1129 Np237 MDA Result 0.104 0.002 0.059 0.000 0.067 0.001 0.073 0.008 0.085 0.010 0.062 -0.011 0.056 -0.008 0.072 0.018 0.094 0.016 0.045 0.009 0.066 0.008 0.086 0.004 0.086 0.003 0.052 0.018 0.057 0.004 0.073 -0.005 0.079 0.005 0.057 0.00 3 0.062 0.002 0.056 0.002 Np237 Np237 Error MDA 0.352 0.018 0.416 0.028 0.333 0.0 2 7 0.3 97 0.029 0.376 0.022 0.375 0.0 27 0.3 5 I 0.024 0.415 0.0 1 6 0.445 0.031 0.378 0.0 3 4 0.356 0.017 0.331 0.022 0.246 0.010 0.324 0.02 2 0.234 0.015 0.270 0.018 0.355 0.023 0.302 0.015 0.247 0.0 1 3 0.211 0.01 1 8-2 I UNCO T TROLLEDDOCUME T l Terrestrial B ackgro und Study (T B S) (TOS) -Rev. 1 Table B-1. Reference Area 1 Sample ROis Location Pu238 Pu238 Pu238 Pu239/240 Pu239/240 Result Error MDA Result 01 -0.011 0.022 0.052 0.019 (0-1 5cm) 02 0.000 0.025 0.055 0.000 (0-15cm) 03 -0.008 0.02 3 0.054 0.006 (0-15cm) 04 -0.007 0.021 0.052 0.012 (0-1 5cm) 0 5 0.000 0.029 0: 062 0.0 1 8 (0-1 5cm) 0 6 0.010 0.0 38 0.074 0.012 (0-15cm) 07 0.018 0.040 0.075 -0.005 (0-1 5cm) 08 -0.0 1 2 0.101 0.243 0.024 (0-15 cm) 09 -0.021 0.014 0.055 0.249 (0-1 5cm) 10 0.028 0.041 0.070 0.002 (0-1 5cm) 01 0.003 0.019 0.041 -0.004 (15-lOOcm) 02 0.012 0.022 0.040 0.012 (15-lOO cm) 03 0.108 0.047 0.046 0.194 (1 5-IOO cm) 04 0.011 0.024 0.043 0.005 (15-lOO cm) 05 0.007 0.041 0.084 0.003 06 -0.00 1 0.029 0.065 -0.002 (1 5-IOO cm) 07 0.015 0.029 0.054 0.008 (15-lOOcm) 08 0.018 0.022 0.036 0.008 (1 5-I OOcm) 09 -0.015 0.04 3 0.100 0.056 (15-lOOcm) 10 0.010 0.024 0.046 0.017 (15-lOO cm) 1 U nit s are p C i/g. 2 E rr or is total propagated un certainty at two standard deviations. 3 Shaded resu l ts were rejected during data validation. Jul y20 14 Error 0.019 0.015 0.012 0.016 0.018 0.027 0.026 0.073 0.078 0.024 0.0 11 0.020 0.059 0.015 0.027 0.014 0.023 0.015 0.041 0.025 Pu239/240 MDA 0.025 0.036 0.022 0.026 0.018 0.051 0.064 0.1 60 0.045 0.054 0.0 34 0.035 0.029 0.030 0.061 0.04 1 0.046 0.027 0.020 0.04 3 Pu241 Pu241 Pu241 Result Error MDA 4.26 4.71 7.5 7 6.75 5.70 8.79 3.86 4.97 8.11 9.25 6.47 9.50 3.86 5.80 9.59 5.03 6.86 11.3 6.95 7.96 1 2.8 6.23 1 2.3 20.4 1.0 l 6.18 10.6 3.39 6.90 11.6 3.86 4.96 8.11 2.63 4.89 8.19 7.1 7 5.05 7.43 5.04 4.43 6.88 9.98 8.87 13.8 7.20 7.22 11.45 4.36 5.95 9.77 3.20 4.90 8.1 2 4.21 9.21 1 5.5 2.45 6.0 1 10.2 B-3 1 u Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. 1 Table B-1. Reference Area 1 Sample ROis Location Sr90 Sr90 Sr90 Tc99 Tc99 Tc99 U232 U232 U232 Result Error MDA Result Error MDA Result Error MDA 01 0.058 0.210 0.363 -0.230 0.820 1.40 0.000 0.015 0.020 (0-15cm) 02 -0.075 0.160 0.296 -0.420 0.820 1.40 0.010 0.020 0.038 (0-15cm) 03 -0.1 37 0.174 0.325 0.070 0.830 1.40 0.014 0.025 0.046 (O-l 5cm) 04 0.091 0.187 0.316 -0.090 0.770 1.30 0.004 0.016 0.040 (O-I 5cm) OS -0.253 0.142 0.272 -1.06 0.840 1.40 -0.005 0.015 0.042 (0-15cm) 06 -0.060 0.166 0.302 -0.650 0.800 1.40 -0.001 0.015 0.035 (O-l 5cm) 07 -0.018 0.148 0.266 -1.30 I. I 0 2.00 0.003 0.015 0.038 (0-15cm) 08 0.022 0.200 0.351 0.040 0.790 1.30 0.018 0.020 0.016 (O-l 5cm) 09 -0.043 0.136 0.248 -0.550 0.880 1.50 0.008 0.013 0.024 (O-l 5cm) 10 0.029 0.276 0.159 -0.670 0.890 1.50 0.004 0.018 0.038 (O-l 5cm) 01 0.014 0.147 0.259 -0.090 0.730 1.20 0.000 0.013 0.018 (15-IOOcm) 02 0.183 0.292 0.484 -0.230 0.740 1.30 -0.003 0.006 0.035 (15-lOOcm) 03 -0.009 0.208 0.370 0.170 0.800 1.40 0.006 0.011 0.016 ( 15-1 OOcm) 04 0.083 0.175 0.296 -0.530 0.830 1.40 0.000 0.012 0.016 (15-IOOcm)

OS 0.054 0.147 0.250 -0.700 0.980 1.70 0.030 0.035 0.056 ( 15-1 OOcm) 06 0.127 0.164 0.268 -0.960 0.840 1.40 0.006 0.018 0.038 (15-IOOcm) 07 0.037 0.126 0.216 -1.180 0.900 1.50 0.014 0.026 0.048 (15-lOOcm) 08 0.191 0.199 0.318 -0.050 0.810 1.40 0.014 0.027 0.051 (15-IOOcm) 09 0.075 0.253 0.429 -0.310 0.830 1.40 0.003 0.021 0.043 ( 15-1 OOcm) 10 0.1 27 0.164 0.268 -2.00 1.30 2.10 0.008 0.028 0.057 ( 15-1 OOcm) 1 Units are pC i/g. 2 Error is total propagated uncertainty at two standard deviations. July 20 14 B-4 TROLLED DOCU Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. 1 Table B-1. Reference Area 1 Sample ROis U233/234 U233/234 U233/234 U235 U235 U235 U238 U238 U238MDA Location Result Error MDA Result Error MDA Result Error 01 0.375 0.084 0.023 0.007 0.013 0.024 0.349 0.080 0.023 (0-15cm) 02 0.448 0.097 0.039 0.008 0.014 0.023 0.367 .0.087 0.044 (0-15cm) 03 0.3 90 0.09 3 0.041 0.00 3 0.010 0.025 0.360 0.089 0.042 (0-15cm) 04 0.250 0.066 0.024 0.001 0.003 0.011 0.255 0.067 0.024 (O-I 5cm) OS 0.769 0.136 0.040 0.027 0.024 0.031 0.828 0.142 0.03 l (O-l 5cm) 06 0.503 0.099 0.039 0.02 3 0.020 0.023 0.467 0.096 0.052 (O-I 5cm) 07 0.651 0.125 0.047 0.015 0.017 0.023 0.679 0.129 0.047 (0-15 cm) 08 0.283 0.071 0.029 0.009 0.014 0.0 2 2 0.21 2 0.060 0.0 3 1 (0-15cm) 09 1.08 0.179 0.047 0.0 3 8 0.028 0.03 l 1.09 0.1 79 0.029 (O-l5cm) 10 0.792 0.145 0.043 0.043 0.028 0.012 0.812 0.148 0.040 (O-I 5cm) 01 0.302 0.071 0.026 0.007 0.010 0.014 0.214 0.061 0.046 (15-lOO c m) 02 0.669 0.124 0.048 0.024 0.020 0.021 0.511 0.103 0.045 (15-lOOcm) 03 0.478 0.18 3 0.147 0.000 0.032 0.045 0.206 0.146 0.20 1 (15-IOO cm) 04 0.291 0.092 0.066 -0.007 0.016 0.052 0.260 0.088 0.073 (l 5-l OOcm) 05 0.648 0.1 25 0.036 0.017 0.017 0.012 0.61 l 0.121 0.042 ( 15-lOOcm) 06 0.602 0.1 22 0.049 0.020 0.020 0.025 0.7 1 9 0.1 37 0.047 ( 1 5-1 OOcm) 07 0.709 0.1 35 0.046 0.038 0.027 0.025 0.698 0.135 0.059 (15-lOOcm) 08 0.313 0.071 0.008 0.017 0.015 0.009 0.270 0.065 0.008 (15-IOO cm) 09 0.804 0.144 0.039 0.047 0.029 0.023 0.744 0.136 0.040 (15-lOOcm) 10 0.792 0.142 0.030 0.020 0.020 0.025 0.800 0.143 0.020 (15-IOOcm) 1 Units are pCi/g. 2 Error is total propagated uncertainty at two standard deviations. July2014 8-5 I TINCO TROLLED DOCU Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. I Table B-2. Reference Area 1 Sample PROis Location Ac227 Ac227 Ac227 Co60 Co60 Co60 Cdll3m Cdll3m Cdll3m Result Error MDA. Result Error MDA Result Error MDA 01 0.124 0.049 0.078 -0.002 0.009 0.009 -0.00 l 0.010 0.009 (0-15cm) 02 0.025 0.065 0.057 0.002 0.005 0.008 -0.003 0.004 0.007 (0-15 cm) 03 0.022 0.062 0.074 0.001 0.005 0.009 -0.002 0.0 05 0.008 (0-15 cm) 04 0.036 0.043 0.062 -0.004 0.011 0.009 -0.00 3 0.005 0.008 (0-15cm) 05 -0.009 0.040 0.063 0.000 0.005 0.009 -0.001 0.005 0.008 (0-15cm) 06 0.110 0.040 0.062 0.001 0.004 0.007 0.000 0.175 0.007 (0-15cm) 07 0.031 0.086 0.062 0.001 0.005 0.009 -0.004 0.006 0.006 (0-15cm) 08 -0.040 0.037 0.055 0.002 0.005 0.008 -0.002 0.005 0.008 (0-15 cm) 09 -0.050 0.040 0.065 -0.001 0.020 0.009 -0.003 0.005 0.007 (0-15 c m) 10 0.017 0.045 0.049 0.000 0.004 0.007 -0.004 0.004 0.005 (0-15 cm) ' 01 0.013 0.042 0.064 -0.001 1.655 0.009 0.000 0.004 0.006 (15-lOOcm) 02 0.019 0.05 I 0.067 -0.002 0.006 0.010 -0.004 0.005 0.008 (15-lOOcm) 03 -0.05 I 0.039 0.064 0.001 0.005 0.008 -0.003 0.005 0.007 (15-lOOcm) 04 0.046 0.023 0.045 0.001 0.005 0.008 -0.002 0.008 0.006 (15-lOOcm) 05 0.069 0.022 0.056 -0.002 0.011 0.008 -0.003 0.005 0.008 (15-lOOcm) 06 0.045 0.040 0.066 0.000 0.010 0.009 -0.002 0.005 0.008 (15-IOOcm) 07 0.028 0.080 0.064 0.002 0.005 0.009 -0.002 0.005 0.008 (15-lOOcm) 08 -0.002 0.084 0.071 -0.002 0.012 0.008 -0.00 I 0.005 0.008 (15-lOOcm) 09 0.004 0.039 0.058 -0.004 0.013 0.010 -0.001 0.004 0.007 (15-IOOcm) 10 0.005 0.109 0.062 0.000 0.004 0.007 -0.002 0.004 0.007 (I 5-1 OOcm) 1 Units are pCi/g. 2 Error is t o tal propagated un ce rtainty at two standard deviations. July2014 B-6 I

TROLLED nocu Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. I Table B-2. Reference Area 1 Sample PROis Location Eul54 Eul54 Eul54 H3 H3 Result Error MDA Result Error 01 0.002 0.007 0.011 2.28 2.87 (0-15crn) 02 -0.002 0.006 0.009 -1.47 2.43 (O-l 5crn) 03 0.002 0.010 0.010 1.39 3.61 (0-15crn) 04 -0.002 0.013 0.009 6.94 2.64 (O-l 5crn) 05 -0.004 0.004 0.011 -1.2.7 3.53 * (0-15crn) 06 -0.003 0.006 0.009 3.6 1 3.23 (0-15crn) 07 -0.003 0.006 0.009 -I. I I 3.78 (0-15crn) 08 -0.002 0.007 0.009 -0.069 2.87 (O-l 5crn) 09 0.002 0.009 0.009 0.090 2.81 (O-l 5crn) IO 0.000 0.008 0.006 1.74 2.70 (O-l 5crn) 01 -0.00 I 0.30 1 0.009 -0.08 1.92 (15-1 OOcrn) 02 -0.003 0.007 0.011 -2.47 3.58 ( 15-1 OOcrn) 03 0.003 0.009 0.010 4.634 2.05 (15-1 OOcrn) 04 -0.002 0.005 0.009 -0.890 2.72 ( 15-1 OOcrn) 05 0.002 0.009 0.010 1.58 2.01 ( 15-1 OOcrn) 06 -0.002 0.013 0.010 2.3 1 2.74 ( 15-1 OOcrn) 07 0.000 0.022 0.008 0.092 2.87 ( 15-1 OOcrn) 08 0.000 0.008 0.010 2.09 1.59 (15-IOOcrn) 09 0.003 0.006 0.009 -0.035 2.18 (15-IOOcrn) 10 -0.004 0.006 0.010 0.124 1.72 ( 15-1 OOcrn) 1 Units are pCi/g. 2 Error is total propagated uncertainty at two standard deviations. 3 Shaded re s ult s were re jected during data va lidati o n. July2014 H3 Pa231 MDA Result 4.80 -0.333 4.38 -0.254 6.19 -0.358 3.88 -0.332 6.29 -0.388 5.31 -0.2 52 6.72 -0.242 5.04 -0.394 4.92 -0.278 4.56 -0.159 3.37 -0.491 6.48 -0.510 3.10 -0.40 I 4.84 -0.212 3.36 -0.431 4.57 -0.458 5.02 -0.430 2.58 -0.3 96 3.82 -0.52 7 2.99 -0.3 13 Pa231 Pa231 Error MDA 0.166 0.261 0.1 25 0.20 1 0.159 0.256 0.136 0.217 0.174 0.245 0.126 0.198 0.118 0.186 0.158 0.228 0.142 0.223 0.092 0.146 0.147 0.230 0.179 0.257 0.139 0.2 18 0.107 0.168 0.145 0.230 0.153 0.241 0.149 0.236 0.147 0.235 0.150 0.230 0.134 0.2 16 B-7 TROLLED DOC Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1 Tab l e B-2. Reference Area 1 Sample PROis Location Ra226 Ra226 Ra226 Ra228 Ra228 Ra228 Sbt25 Sb125 Sb125 Result Error MDA Result Error MDA Resu l t Error MDA 01 1.62 0.179 0.148 0.649 0.048 0.023 0.007 0.012 0.018 (0-15cm) 02 1.57 0.149 0.121 0.638 0.044 0.020 0.003 0.009 0.015 (0-15cm) 03 2.03 0.230 0.1 56 0.743 0.053 0.025 0.004 0.013 0.020 (O-l 5cm) 04 1.40 0.161 0.139 0.668 0.049 0.023 -0.0 01 0.010 0.014 (0-1 5cm) 05 1.64 0.232 0.168 0.648 0.049 0.026 0.000 0.012 0.017 (O-I 5cm) 06 1.39 0.147 0.117 0.563 0.040 0.017 0.004 0.009 0.014 (0-15 cm) 07 1.37 0.144 0.119 0.786 0.104 0.021 -0.003 0.041 0.015 (O-I 5cm) 08 1.71 0.178 0.132 0.769 0.057 0.018 0.000 0.012 0.017 (0-15cm) 09 1.61 0.175 0.138 0.708 0.048 0.020 0.014 0.010 0.012 (0-15 cm) JO 1.20 0.116 0.092 0.634 0.084 0.018 0.002 0.032 0.011 (0-15cm) 01 1.64 0.170 0.135 0.846 0.058 0.020 0.00:3 0.011 0.017 (15-IOOcm) 02 2.29 0.248 0.166 0.930 0.070 0.022 -0.00 3 0.013 0.020 (15-IOOcm) 03 1.62 0.164 0.124 0.841 0.056 0.020 -0.001 0.009 0.016 (15-lOOcm) 04 l.l8 0.160 0.11 9 0.730 0.098 0.021 0.000 0.036 0.013 (15-IOOcm) 05 1.68 0.164 0.138 0.826 0.056 0.022 -0.00 1 0.010 0.017 (15-lOOcm) 06 1.67 0.188 0.153 0.778 0.051 0.022 -0.001 0.011 0.018 (15-lOOcm) 07 1.98 0.185 0.1 35 0.838 0.058 0.020 0.000 0.010 0.016 (15-lOO cm) 08 1.62 0.159 0.136 0.900 0.058 0.022 -0.001 0.010 0.017 (15-lOOcm) 09 1.83 0.191 0.150 0.808 0.060 0.022 0.007 0.012 0.016 (15-1 OOcm) 10 1.78 0.168 0.1 26 0.832 0.056 0.024 0.002 0.010 0.016 ( 15-l OOcm) 1 Units are pC i/g. 2 Error is total propagated uncertainty at two standard deviations. July2014 B-8 I UNCO TROLLED DOCUME T I Terrestria l Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1 Table B-2. Reference A r ea 1 Sa mpl e PROis Location Sn126 Sn126 Snl26 Th229 Th229 Result Error MDA Result Error 01 0.000 0.005 0.007 -0.016 0.012 (0-15cm) 02 0.000 0.00 3 0.005 -0.01 2 0.009 (O-I 5cm) 03 -0.001 0.942 0.007 -0.029 0.012 (0-15cm) 04 -0.001 0.011 0.006 0.042 0.012 (0-15cm) OS 0.000 0.004 0.007 -0.042 0.013 (0-15cm) 06 0.000 0.003 0.005 0.136 0.015 (O-l 5cm) 07 -0.001 0.021 0.006 -0.043 0.012 (0-15cm) 08 0.001 0.004 0.006 0.000 0.009 (O-I 5cm) 09 0.003 0.002 0.006 -0.014 0.011 (O-I 5cm) IO -0.001 0.015 0.005 -0.030 0.010 (0-15cm) 01 0.003 0.001 0.007 -0.047 0.012 (15-IOOcm) 02 -0.001 0.004 0.007 -0.051 0.014 (15-I OOcm) 03 0.000 0.007 0.006 -0.018 0.011 (15-lOOcm) 04 -0.001 0.034 0.006 0.040 0.013 (15-lOOcm) OS 0.005 0.002 0.006 0.024 0.007 ( 15-1 OOcm) 06 -0.001 0.014 0.005 0.021 0.007 ( 15-1 OOcm) 07 -0.001 0.004 0.006 -0.005 0.006 (15-1 OOcm) 08 0.004 0.002 0.006 -0.013 0.011 (15-lOOcm) 09 0.002 0.002 0.007 -0.095 0.017 (15-1 OOcm) 10 0.000 0.004 0.006 -0.013 0.010 (15-1 OOcm) 1 Units are pC i/g. 2 Error is total propagated uncert a in ty at two standard de v iation s. 3 Shaded results were rejected during data validation. July 2014 Th229 Th232 M D A Result 0.020 0.649 0.015 0.6 3 8 0.020 0.743 0.018 0.668 0.021 0.648 0.017 0.563 0.019 0.786 0.018 0.769 0.019 0.708 0.015 0.634 0.019 0.846 0.022 0.930 0.018 0.841 0.081 0.730 0.017 0: 826 0.019 0.778 0.017 0.838 0.018 0.900 0.025 0.808 0.016 0.832 Th232 Th232 Error MDA 0.048 0.023 0.044 0.020 0.053 0.025 0.049 0.023 0.049 0.026 0.040 0.017 0.104 0.021 0.057 0.018 0.048 0.020 0.084 0.018 0.058 0.020 0.070 0.022 0.056 0.020 0.098 0.021 0.056 0.022 0.051 0.022 0.058 0.020 0.058 0.022 0.060 0.022 0.056 0.024 B-9 l u TROLLED DOCU Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. 1 Table B-3. Reference Area 2 Sample ROis Am24l Am241 Am241 Cl4 C14 C14 Cm243 Cm243 Cm243/244 Location Result Error MDA Result Error MDA 244 244 MDA Result Error 01 0.013 0.038 0.074 1.55 1.27 1.45 0.093 0.057 0.06 3 (O-l5cm) 02 -0.007 0.045 0.099 1.67 1.30 1.36 0.055 0.094 0.16 3 (0-15 c m) 03 -0.00 I 0.0 42 0.090 0.0 25 0.7 62 1.3 I 0.1 35 0.100 0.14 9 (0-15cm) 04 -0.005 0.04 6 0.098 1.3 5 1.17 1.41 0.098 0.0 62 0.076 (O-I 5 c m) 05 0.017 0.037 0.070 1.9 I 1.40 1.34 0.053 0.048 0.06 3 (0-I 5cm) 06 0.044 0.046 0.070 1.42 1.0 9 1.14 -0.0 3 5 0.0 46 0.11 2 (0-1 5c m) 07 -0.01 3 0.0 3 4 0.08 2 1.76 1.3 4 1.3 7 -0.010 0.0 25 0.067 (0-I 5 c m) 08 -0.004 0.040 0.088 2.04 1.4 3 1.24 -0.040 0.0 3 9 0.105 (O-I 5cm) 09 0.048 0.045 0.064 1.9 3 1.3 4 1.13 0.01 4 0.04 2 0.08 2 (0-1 5 cm) 10 0.0 2 9 0.049 0.087 1.97 1.40 1.2 6 0.0 2 0 0.0 3 7 0.068 (0-I 5cm) 01 0.021 0.046 0.085 1.0 I 0.881 1.07 0.080 0. 100 0.166 (15-IOOcm) 02 0.046 0.045 0.066 0.759 0.717 0.928 0.196 0.10 2 0.1 3 8 (15-IOOcm) 03 0.004 0.049 0.101 0.054 0.664 1.14 0.0 23 0.057 0.106 ( 15-1 OOcm) 04 0.000 0.0 3 9 0.109 0.979 0.886 I.I I -0.02 4 0.0 2 7 0.123 ( 15-1 OOcm) 05 0.119 0.062 0.065 1.11 0.918 1.06 0.000 0.0 3 0 0.067 (15-lOOcm) 06 -0.011 0.032 0.096 0.430 0.6 2 7 0.965 -0.017 0.051 0.128 ( 15-1 OOcm) 07 0.0 3 6 0.040. 0.060 0.748 0.846 1.21 -0.029 0.050 0.115 ( 15-lOOcm) 08 0.014 0.0 3 5 0.067 0.76 3 0.720 0.93 -0.025 0.025 0.080 ( 15-1 OOcm) 09 0.01 I 0.042 0.083 0.879 0.8 3 6 1.09 -0.018 0.039 0.096 (15-lOOcm) 10 -0.014 0.0 32 0.080 1.06 0.890 1.04 -0.02 4 0.0 3 4 0.089 (15-IOO c m) 1 U nit s a r e p C i/g. 2 Error is total propagat e d uncertaint y at two standard deviations. Jul y 2 014 B-10 l UNCO TROLLED DOCU Terrestrial Back gro und Study (T BS) (TOS) -Rev. 1 Table B-3. Reference Area 2 Sample ROis Location Csl37 Cs l 37 Cs137 1129 1129 Result Error MDA Result Error 01 0.398 0.028 0.009 0.150 0.057 (0-15c rn) 02 0.236 0.018 0.008 0.221 0.095 (O-l 5c rn) 03 0.2 43 0.017 0.006 0.094 0.04 7 (O-l 5crn) 04 -0.001 0.004 0.007 0.079 0.057 (O-l5crn) 05 0.298 0.021 0.007 0.157 0.049 (0-15crn) 06 0.2 10 0.015 0.007 0.1 36 0.074 (O-l 5crn) 07 0.293 0.026 0.006 0.065 0.035 (O-l5crn) 08 0.251 0.022 0.006 0.090 0.0 53 (O-l 5crn) 09 0.35 1 0.030 0.006 0.104 0.056 (O-l 5crn) 10 0.3 41 0.023 0.008 0.145 0.071 (O-I 5crn) 01 0.00 3 0.005 0.008 0.11 l 0.059 (15-1 OOcrn) 02 -0.007 0.005 0.008 0.188 0.044 (15-lOOcrn) 03 0.3 50 0.030 0.008 0.114 0.061 ( 15-1 OOcrn) 04 -0.007 0.006 0.010 0.155 0.071 (15-1 OOcrn) 05 -0.005 0.005 0.008 0.110 0.066 ( 15-lOOcrn) 06 -0.006 0.006 0.008 0.253 0.061 ( 15-1 OOcrn) 07 0.000 0.004 0.006 0.093 0.044 (15-lOOcrn) 08 0.001 0.004 0.006 0.090 0.035 (15-lOOcrn) 09 -0.005 0.005 0.008 -0.001 0.056 (15-1 OOcrn) 10 -0.002 0.004 0.007 0.074 0.058 ( 15-1 OOcrn) 1 Un it s are pCi/g. 2 Error is total propagated un certainty at two standard deviations. 3 Shaded re s ults were rejected durin g data va lidation. July2014 1129 Np237 MDA Result 0.081 0.000 0.102 -0.004 0.061 0.002 0.091 0.001 0.06 3 0.001 0.091 -0.010 0.056 -0.006 0.084 0.001 0.087 0.00 3 0.107 0.007 0.077 0.006 0.063 0.002 0.096 -0.006 0.107 0.006 0.079 0.007 0.060 -0.00 2 0.067 0.002 0.054 0.00 2 0.092 -0.00 5 0.074 -0.006 Np237 Np237 Error MDA 0.23 4 0.013 0.338 0.026 0.260 0.0 1 4 0.308 0.021 0.353 0.023 0.385 0.029 0.3 1 0 0.019 0.2 19 0.013 0.242 0.01 3 0.18 6 0.013 0.18 3 0.008 0.266 0.016 0.2 71 0.020 0.270 0.017 0.33 0 0.026 0.277 0.015 0.3 15 0.016 0.095 0.003 0.208 0.015 0.469 0.060 B-11 j u TROLLED DOCU Terrestr i al B ackgro un d St u dy (T B S) (T05) -R ev. I Table B-3. Reference Area 2 Sample ROis Loc a tion Pu238 Pu238 Pu238 Pu239/240 Pu239/240 Pu239/240 Pu241 Pu241 Pu241 Re s ult Error MDA Re s ult Error MDA Re s ult Error MDA 01 0.000 0.009 0.0 1 2 -0.002 0.004 0.025 1.69 5.35 9.11 (0-1 5c m) 02 0.000 0.0 11 0.0 1 5 -0.003 0.005 0.030 0.7 1 9 6.34 10.9 (0-1 5cm) 03 0.006 0.01 1 0.015 0.008 0.016 0.031 -0.082 6.47 11.2 (O-l 5cm) 04 -0.007 0.0 1 3 0.041 0.000 0.029 0.060 0.934 4.58 7.85 (0-1 5cm) O S 0.004 0.033 0.066 0.010 0.014 0.013 -4.65 8.73 15.0 (0-15cm) 06 -0.005 0.028 0.070 0.0 1 8 0.036 0.066 -1.04 13.3 22.9 (O-l 5cm) 0 7 -0.010 0.027 0.066 0.017 0.027 0.048 -1.98 9.16 15.8 (0-1 5cm) 08 0.010 0.030 0.058 0.004 0.017 0.037 5.74 9.04 15.0 (0-1 5cm) 0 9 0.0 1 3 0.025 0.045 0.012 0.021 0.038 2.62 7.09 1 2.0 (0-15cm) 10 0.035 0.040 0.061 0.007 0.021 0.045 2.00 1 1.8 20.1 (0-1 5cm) 01 0.000 0.0 1 0 0.0 1 3 -0.002 0.005 0.027 5.27 6.1 3 9.91 ( 1 5-1 OOcm) 02 -0.003 0.005 0.029 0.000 0.0 1 0 0.0 1 4 4.2 0 6.56 10.9 (1 5-l OOc m) 03 0.000 0.009 0.0 1 3 -0.0 1 2 0.010 0.043 -2.93 4.94 8.60 ( 1 5-1 OOcm) 04 -0.0 1 6 0.030 0.083 -0.011 0.022 0.069 -5.44 13.7 23.7 (1 5-l OOcm) OS 0.00 8 0.0 30 0.059 0.002 0.020 0.045 7.64 8.7 8 1 4.2 (1 5-I OOcm) 06 -0.0 1 4 0.039 0.092 0.020 0.024 0.027 5.07 1 2.33 20.8 ( 1 5-1 O O c m) 0 7 0.0 1 6 0.0 59 0.11 5 -0.02 1 0.0 1 9 0.080 6.0 1 1 5.2 25.7 (15-1 OO c m) 08 0.000 0.0 30 0.065 0.008 0.02 1 0.042 0.804 9.49 1 6.3 ( 15-1 OOcm) 09 -0.0 1 2 0.031 0.084 0.000 0.020 0.055 -0.1 33 1 4.7 25.3 (1 5-l OOcm) 10 -0.015 0.036 0.085 0.000 0.021 0.051 -1.72 1 0.5 1 8.1 (1 5-l OOcm) 1 U n its are pCi/g. 2 Error is total propagated uncertainty at two standard deviations. Ju l y20 1 4 B-1 2 I UI\CO 1 TROLLED DOCUME T l Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. I Ta bl e B-3. Refere n ce Area 2 Sa m ple ROis Location Sr90 S r 90 Sr90 Tc99 Tc99 Tc99 U232 U232 U232 R esult Error MDA Result Error MDA Result Error MDA 01 0.016 0.192 0.110 0.560 0.820 1.40 0.000 0.009 0.013 (0-15cm) 02 0.069 0.165 0.100 0.060 0.900 1.50 0.005 0.009 0.01 2 (0-15 c m) 03 0.281 0.2 67 0.176 0.2 10 0.880 1.50 -0.005 0.008 0.03 7 (0-15cm) 04 -0.008 0.157 0.08 7 -0.020 0.860 1.50 0.004 0 , 009 0.01 2 (0-15cm) 05 0.114 0.216 0.1 3 3 0.2 00 0.780 1.30 0.001 0.0 2 8 0.059 (O-I 5cm) 06 -0.05 3 0.246 0.1 3 5 -0.700 0.8 2 0 1.40 -0.042 0.031 0.120 (O-I 5cm) 07 0.049 0.235 0.1 3 7 -0.420 0.790 1.3 0 0.008 0.032 0.066 (O-I 5cm) 08 0.392 0.345 0.2 3 0 -0.500 0.790 1.40 -0.006 0.044 0.098 (O-l 5cm) 09 0.1 3 8 0.199 0.1 2 7 -1.000 0.840 1.40 -0.015 0.040 0.089 (0-15cm) IO 0.137 0.274 0.168 -1.300 1.000 1.70 0.022 0.035 0.062 (O-I 5cm) 01 -0.049 0.192 0.104" -0.170 0.870 1.50 0.007 0.013 0.025 (15-lOOcm) 02 -0.060 0.183 0.099 0.850 0.900 1.50 0.000 0.010 0.014 (15-lOOcm) 03 0.017 0.181 0.104 0.330 0.730 1.20 -0.00 3 0.005 0.029 (15-lOOcm) 04 0.006 0.248 0.141 0.33 0 0.820 1.40 -0.015 0.028 0.073 (15-lOOcm) 05 -0.031 0.254 0.142 -0.350 0.760 1.30 -0.008 0.020 0.052 (15-lOOcm) 06 0.092 0.229 0.1 3 9 -0.560 0.810 1.40 -0.003 0.022 0.057 ( 15-1 OOcm) 07 0.056 0.229 0.135 -0.520 0.760 1.30 -0.003 0.031 0.068* (15-lOOcm) 08 0.087 0.236 0.142 -0.890 0.850 1.50 -0.011 0.026 0.064 (15-1 OOcm) 09 .0.051 0.246 0.143 -0.210 0.830 1.40 0.003 0.016 0.034 (15-lOOcm)

IO -0.060 0.245 0.135 -0.550 0.930 1.60 -0.005 0.021 0.053 (15-lOOcm) 1 Units are p C i/g. 2 Error i s t o tal propa g ated un c ertainty a t tw o st a nd a rd d e vi a ti o n s. Jul y 2 014 B-1 3 EDDOCU Terre s trial Back g round Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. I Table B-3. Reference Area 2 Sample ROis U233/234 U233/234 U233/234 U235 U235 Location Result Error MDA Result Error 01 0.799 0.164 0.056 0.031 0.028 (0-15 cm) 02 0.783 0.167 0.069 0.000 0.022 (O-I 5cm) 03 0.725 0.1 54 0.077 0.055 0.038 (O-l 5cm) 04 0.728 0.1 34 0.030 0.012 0.0 1 4 (0-I 5cm) 05 0.634 0.18 5 0.094 0.064 0.057 (0-15cm) 06 1.096 0.222 0.057 0.04 3 0.0 3 8 (0-1 5cm) 07 0.405 0.269 0.337 0.052 0.10 2 (O-l 5cm) 08 0.769 0.1 85 0.075 0.058 0.047 (0-15cm) 09 0.909 0.243 0.089 0.031 0.056 (0-1 5cm) 10 0.923 0.2 07 0.16 3 0.053 0.057 (O-l 5cm) 01 0.727 0.141 0.0 29 0.014 0.016 (15-IOOcm) 02 1.07 0.176 0.03 7 0.028 0.022 (15-IOO c m) 03 0.9 55 0.186 0.039 -0.002 0.012 ( 15-1 OO c m) 04 1.06 0.1 96 0.0 30 0.063 0.040 (15-lOO cm) 05 0.95 0.233 0.092 0.229 0.114 (15-IOO c m) 06 0.701 0.1 66 0.050 0.039 0.039 (15-lOOcm) 07 0.509 0.118 0.028 0.006 0.012 (15-lOOcm) 08 0.796 0.15 3 0.05 2 0.031 0.028 (15-IOOcm) 09 1.0 7 0.201 0.068 0.029 0.040 (15-lOOcm) 10 0.688 0.1 42 0.0 33 0.029 0.025 (1 5-IOO cm) 1 U nit s are pCi/g. 2 Error i s total pr opagated un certa in ty at two sta nd ard deviations. 3 Shaded r es ult s we r e rejected durin g d ata va lid at i o n. Jul y 20 1 4 U235 U238 MDA Result 0.0 17 0.800 0.055 0.922 0.034 0.74 1 0.016 0.798 0.035 0.677 0.023 1.0 3 9 0.1 93 0.314 0.026 0.734 0.103 0.881 0.089 0.9 18 0.014 0.818 0.022 0.990 0.0 42 1.01 6 0.017 1.1 3 8 0.086 0.592 0.048 0.633 0.016 0.643 0.035 0.870 0.066 0.899 0.016 0.622 U238 U238MDA Error 0.166 0.077 0.18 6 0.077 0.1 55 0.072 0.145 0.053 0.1 94 0.108 0.214 0.062 0.2 3 6 0.3 07 0.177 0.046 0.245 0.14 2 0.209 0.171 0.153 0.0 29 0.166 0.041 0.195 0.039 0.20 7 0.0 36 0.177 0.092 0.158 0.072 0.1 3 7 0.0 34 0.163 0.048 0.189 0.1 3 1 0.132 0.013 B-14 I Ul\CO TROLLED DOCUME T I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1 Table B-4. Reference Area 2 Sample PROis Location Ac227 Ac227 Ac227 Co60 Co60 Co60 Cdll3m Cdl l3m Cd113m Result Error MDA Result Error MDA Result Error MDA 01 0.081 0.0 3 4 0.067 -0.00 2 0.092 0.01 2 0.000 0.005 0.008 (0-15cm) 02 -0.015 0.118 0.07 3 -0.002 0.011 0.009 -0.00 3 0.00 6 0.008 (0-15cm) 03 0.0 3 0 0.09 2 0.0 6 1 -0.001 0.005 0.00 9 0.00 2 0.00 4 0.00 6 (0-15 c m) 04 0.0 68 0.0 2 8 0.0 59 -0.00 2 0.009 0.00 9 -0.00 3 0.00 5 0.008 (0-1 5c m) 05 0.0 3 5 0.069 0.06 9 -0.001 0.079 0.010 -0.00 2 0.005 0.008 (0-15cm) 06 0.047 0.056 0.077 0.000 0.009 0.012 0.000 0.00 6 0.010 (0-15 c m) 07 -0.004 0.069 0.049 0.000 0.005 0.009 -0.00 3 0.007 0.006 (0-15cm) 08 0.069 0.0 3 0 0.05 3 0.00 3 0.006 0.010 -0.004 0.00 5 0.008 (0-15 c m) 09 -0.078 0.0 44 0.0 5 8 0.00 2 0.00 6 0.010 -0.004 0.00 5 0.008 (0-15cm) IO 0.04 3 0.057 0.080 -0.002 0.062 0.011 -0.001 0.006 0.010 (O-l 5cm) 01 0.0 3 5 0.05 3 0.072 -0.001 1.9 1 0.011 0.004 0.004 0.007 (15-IOOcm) 02 0.04 3 0.072 0.068 0.001 0.007 0.012 -0.001 0.169 0.006 (15-IOOcm) 03 0.0 33 0.05 2 0.073 -0.001 0.007 0.011 -0.004 0.006 0.010 (15-lOOcm) 04 0.081 0.048 0.065 -0.00 2 0.06 4 0.01 3 -0.001 0.006 0.010 (15-IOOcm) 05 -0.011 0.066 0.070 -0.001 0.041 0.009 -0.002 0.006 0.008 (15-100cm) 06 0.002 0.0 3 8 0.069 -0.00 4 0.009 0.010 -0.00 2 0.005 0.008 (15-100 c m) 07 0.048 0.021 0.04 2 0.000 0.005 0.008 -0.001 0.004 0.006 (15-100cm) 08 0.052 0.024 0.046 -0.002 0.006 0.009 -0.002 0.007 0.006 (15-lOOcm) 09 0.0 3 9 0.096 0.074 0.001 0.006 0.011 0.001 0.005 0.008 ( 15-1 OOcm) 10 -0.07 4 0.047 0.0 7 6 -0.00 3 0.008 0.010 -0.004 0.005 0.008 (15-IOOcm) 1 U nits ar e p C i/g. 2 E rr o r i s t o tal p ro p aga t e d un ce rt a in ty at t wo s t a nd a rd d ev i a ti o n s. Jul y 2014 B-1 5 TROLLED DOCUME T I Terrestr i al B ackground Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1 Tabl e B-4. R e f e r e nce A r ea 2 Sa mpl e PROis Loc a tion E u154 E ul 5 4 E u154 H3 H 3 Res ult E rror M D A Result Er r or 01 -0.002 0.005 0.012 -3.42 3.16 (0-15cm) 0 2 0.000 0.006 0.010 -5.60 2.76 (O-I 5cm) 0 3 0.000 0.008 0.007 -2.66 2.90 (O-I 5cm) 04 0.001 0.008 0.011 -5.05 3.59 (0-15cm) 0 5 -0.00 I 0.006 0.010 -4.75 2.94 (O-l5cm) 0 6 0.003 0.007 0.01 1 -2.4 l 2.52 (0-15cm) 07 -0.001 0.005 0.008 -1.22 2.65 (0-15cm) 08 0.003 0.010 0.009 -3.18 2.74 (0-15cm) 09 0.001 0.006 0.010 -2.53 2.54 (0-15cm) 1 0 0.003 0.006 0.010 -1.42 2.70 (0-15cm) 01 0.001 0.006 0.010 1.21 1.66 ( 1 5-1 OOcm) 02 -0.002 0.014 0.010 0.064 1.86 (1 5-lOOcm) 03 0.002 0.006 0.010 -0.812 1.63 (15-l OOcm) 04 -0.00 1 0.162 0.012 0.717 2.8] (15-lOOcm) 05 0.003 0.017 0.010 -0.446 2.00 (1 5-lOOcm) 0 6 0.000 0.006 0.010 0.445 2.03 (15-.IOOcm) 07 -0.003 0.008 0.008 0.506 2.64 (1 5-lOOcm) 08 0.000 0.006 0.008 0.432 2.22 (15-l OOcm) 0 9 -0.001 0.017 0.009 -1.563 2.09 (15-lOOcm) 10 0.002 0.007 0.011 -2.25 2.54 (1 5-lOOcm) 1 Units are pCi/g. 2 Error i s tota l propagated uncertainty at two standard deviations. 3 Shaded resu l ts were rejected duri n g data validation.

July 2014 H3 Pa231 M D A Re s ult 5.56 -0.426 4.92 -0.344 5.08 -0.333 6.3 5 -0.442 5.37 -0.360 4.52 -0.45 1 4.67 -0.1 78 4.95 -0.43 1 4.56 -0.349 4.76 -0.562 2.79 -0.47 1 3.1 9 -0.333 2.83 -0.48 I 4.83 -0.523 3.51 -0.373 3.50 -0.322 4.62 -0.396 3.82 -0.262 3.71 -0.593 4.55 -0.440 P a 231 P a 231 E rror M D A 0.185 0.297 0.164 0.257 0.137 0.219 0.145 0.227 0.150 0.239 0.1 77 0.282 0.1 1 0 0.174 0.170 0.242 0.174 0.244 0.188 0.296 0.1 62 0.257 0.1 29 0.203 0.195 0.277 0.1 8.1 0.288 0.149 0.235 0.1 49 0.239 0.1 23 0.194 0.109 0.1 72 0.1 70 0.268 0.148 0.232 B-1 6 l u TROLLED DOCU Terrestr i al B ackgro u nd Study (T B S) (TOS) -Rev. I Ta bl e B-4. R e fe re n ce A r ea 2 Sa mpl e PROi s L o cati o n R a 22 6 R a 22 6 Ra226 Ra228 R a 228 R a 228 S b125 S b12 5 S b 1 2 5 Re s ult E rror M D A R es ult E rror MD A R es ult E rr o r M D A 01 1.88 0.199 0.180 0.7 3 7 0.053 0.028 0.005 0.013 0.020 (0-15cm) 0 2 1.69 0.175 0.151 0.747 0.05 3 0.024 0.001 0.01 l 0.019 (O-l5cm) 03 1.4 l 0.145 0.127 0.553 0.038 0.023 0.00 3 0.010 0.017 (O-I 5cm) 04 1.66 0.1 75 0.1 36 0.835 0.056 0.021 0.000 0.010 0.015 (O-l 5cm) 05 1.40 0.149 0.139 0.547 0.041 0.020 0.004 0.010 0.018 (O-l 5cm) 0 6 1.84 0.2 15 0.181 0.89 3 0.066 0.029 0.004 0.0 1 7 0.022 (0-15cm) 07 1.05 0.1 3 1 0.106 0.551 0.074 0.019 0.005 0.0 3 1 0.014 (O-l 5cm) 08 1.74 0.197 0.149 0.724 0.059 0.027 0.003 0.017 0.01 9 (O-I 5cm) 09 1.66 0.180 0.150 0.664 0.0 52 0.021 0.000 0.012 0.019 (O-I 5cm) 10 1.91 0.200 0.16 3 0.827 0.056 0.028 0.009 0.014 0.0 2 1 (0-15cm) 0 1 l.99 0.2 07 0.1 60 0.918 0.066 0.027 0.007 0.012 0.019 (15-I OOcm) 0 2 1.75 0.192 0.128 1.08 0.14 3 0.027 0.001 0.052 0.016 (15-IOOcm) 03 2.00 0.210 0.159 0.799 0.063 0.025 0.005 0.014 0.021 (15-lOOcm) 0 4 2.14 0.2 14 0.166 1.1 3 0.080 0.031 0.00 2 0.014 0.0 2 1 (15-IOO c m) 0 5 1.64 0.177 0.148 0.779 0.052 0.022 0.005 0.010 0.016 (15-IOOcm) 0 6 1.76 0.17 3 0.148 0.828 0.056 0.0 23 0.004 0.01 1 0.018 (15-lOOcm) 0 7 1.4 2 0.1 52 0.1 1 8 0.68 2 0.046 0.019 0.00 2 0.009 0.013 (15-lOOcm) 0 8 1.46 0.150 0.110 0.864 0.114 0.022 0.001 0.04 3 0.014 (15-I OOcm) 0 9 2.23 0.2 15 0.1 62 I. I 0 0.07 3 0.025 0.005 0.012 0.019 (15-IOOcm) 10 1.64 0.178 0.142 0.850 0.057 0.021 -0.007 0.012 0.017 (15-IOOcm) 1 U nits are p C i/g. 2 Error i s total propa ga t ed un ce rt a in ty at t wo sta nd ard d ev iation s. Ju l y 2014 B-17 I Ul\C0 1 TROLLED DOCU Terrestria l Background Stud y (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1 Tab l e B-4. Reference Area 2 Samp l e PROis Location Snl26 Snl26 Snl26 Th229 Th229 Result Error MDA Result Error 01 -0.003 0.012 0.008 0.006 0.017 (0-15cm) 02 -0.002 0.017 0.007 0.000 0.020 (0-15cm) 03 0.001 0.004 0.006 0.002 0.009 (O-l5cm) 04 0.005 0.002 0.006 0.070 0.022 (0-15 cm) 05 0.000 0.004 0.007 -0.019 0.011 (0-15cm) 06 0.000 0.007 0.008 0.000 0.008 (O-l 5cm) 07 -0.001 0.060 0.006 -0.019 0.011 (0-1 5cm) 08 0.000 0.004 0.007 0.051 0.019 (0-1 5cm) 09 0.000 0.004 0.007 0.000 0.010 (O-l 5cm) 10 0.000 0.007 0.008 -0.046 0.015 (0-15cm) 01 0.004 0.00 2 0.008 0.003 0.008 (15-lOOcm) 02 0.007 0.002 0.007 -0.052 0.013 (15-I OOcm) 03 -0.002 0.005 0.008 0.002 0.012 (15-lOOcm) 04 0.007 0.00 3 0.008 0.092 0.029 (15-lOOcm) 05 0.005 0.002 0.006 -0.041 0.013 (15-IOOcm) 06 0.005 0.002 0.007 0.010 0.010 (15-lOOcm) 07 0.003 0.002 O.OOS -0.009 0.007 ( 15-1 OOcm) 08 0.004 0.001 0.006 -0.006 0.010 (15-lOOcm) 09 0.005 0.002 0.007 0.007 0.020 (15-lOOcm) 10 0.005 0.002 0.005 -0.0 15 0.012 (15-IOO cm) 1 Units are pCi/g. 2 Error is t o t a l propagated uncert a inty at two standard de v iati o n s. 3 Shaded results were rejected durin g data validation. Jul y 2014 Th229 Th232 MDA Result 0.022 0.737 0.021 0.747 0.016 0.553 0.092 0.835 0.018 0.547 0.023 0.893 0.017 0.551 0.030 0.724 0.020 0.664 0.024 0.827 0.0 2 0 0.918 0.021 1.079 0.015 0.799 0.0 3 7 1.128 0.021 0.779 0.018 0.828 0.011 0.682 0.016 0.864 0.019 1.097 0.019 0.850 Th232 Th232 Error MDA 0.053 0.028 0.053 0.024 0.038 0.02 3 0.056 0,021 0.041 0.020 0.066 0.029 0.074 0.019 0.059 0.027 0.052 0.021 0.056 0.028 0.066 0.027 0.143 0.027 0.063 0.025 0.080 0.031 0.052 0.022 0.056 0.023 0.046 0.019 0.114 0.022 0.073 0.025 0.057 0.021 B-18 I UNCONTROLLED I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev. 1 APPENDIXC

• Borehole Gamma Logs and Lithologic Logs July 2014 I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev.I APPENDIXC Borehole Gamma Logs and Lithologic Logs The borehole gamma logs were performed using a Y:z-inch by I-inch Nal detector.

The smaller detector was used so that it could fit into the borehole.

Note that the smaller volume detector has a lower efficiency and a lower count rate response than the bigger NaI detectors used for the GWSs. Note also that the background count rate taken outside the borehole is less than that taken inside the borehole because inside the borehole the detector is surrounded by the source of gamma radiation signal. The borehole gamma logs were handwritten while work was performed.

The borehole gamma logs shown in this appendix were typed for this TBS. The signed original forms are on file. July 2014. C-1 RADIO.LOGICAL SWRVEY F.ORM Survey Type: D Job Coverage D Characterization D Equipment 0 Routine D Uppost/Downpost 0 Miscellaneous Page_1_of_t_

Survey Number: WVDP*MIS-017-8212*

Date: 8/2/2012 Time: 1000 RWP No: NIA ====-'--------------

---

..,.-------------

Survey Location (Site/Bldg)

WVDP Room/Area/Item Sample Location:Bkg; Area 01-Sample #01 Purpose of Survey: Down Hole Logging Remarks: To4 feet . --*---Technician:

• Michael Carlin Badge NIA Technician:

• NJA Badge N/A ,....._, ... . .. . . ..... *c "J:Ype Inst Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd. Detector T¥pe Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd. 2221/44..02 184010/PR212708

!)/19/2013 305cpm :z ---*-... 'O Item No. Radlatlon TYpe so.cmoose General Area Sample Location and/or Re.marks cpm Rate Dose Rate z 1ft. GAMMA 641 NIA NIA Bkg.-1..01 " """" 2 ft GAMMA 709 Bkg.-1..01

':;o 3 ft. GAMMA 655 Bkg.-1-01

.0 '* -4ft. GAMMA 737 L r -----. -------0 -----0 --------0 -------(j ----------:? ...... ----c.---'.2 -------3 . I -------------' I 'V --.. Surveyed By ____________

/'-. ------Date Slg(latlire Date RCT Supervisor Review _______

Signature Date Signature Date Note: Any response of the lns.trument that is above the Critcal Detection Level {or Lo) Is considered to be above background.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM Survey Type: 0 Job Coverage 0 Characteriiatl6n

• D Equipment D Routine D Uppost/Oownpost 0 Miscellaneous Page _.1_ of _1_. Survey Number:: WVOP.:.MIS-Oi8.:a212 Date: 812/2012 Time: *. 0910 RWP No: NIA

---

Survey Location (Site/Bldg)

_WV __ D_P ____________

Sample Location:Bkg.

Area 01-Sample #02 f'LlfQOSe of Suryey: Down f":lole;Logging

• Remarks: To 4 feet Technician:

Michael Carlin Badge NIA Technician:

NIA Badge N/A Detector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd. Detector Type Inst.-Serial. No. Cal Due *.Bkgd. r-* " .. **-**** z 2221144-62 18401 O/PR212708 6/19/2013 361 cpm (') "' 0 30 cm Dose *General Area *sample Location and/or Remarks Item No. Radiation TyPe cprn Rate *Dose Rate 2 1ft. GAMMA 765 NIA NIA Bkg.-1-02 -l 2 ft. GAMMA 786 Bkg.-1-02 s 3 ft. GAMMA 699 Bkg.-1-02

• r 4 ft. GAMMA 755 Bkg.-1-02 t"'1 ----m -----er -----0 -------0 -------.n --------C! -----'<: -m* i--:z *-------e--...., ---*'V \I/' ,. .. -*-" ***-**---** .Surveyed By 1 Surveyed By I Signature .Date Signature Date RCT Supervisor Review I Surveyed By I Signature Date Signafura Date Note: Any response of the Instrument that Is above the Critcal' Detection I.el/el {orlc}:is considered to be above background.

RADIOLOGICAL-SURVEY FORM _ Survey Type: 0 Job Coverage 0 Characterization 0 . Equipment 0 Routine 0 Upposf/Downpost 0 Miscellaneous Page;_1_of_1_ . Smvey Number:

Date: :8/2/2012 Time: 0930 RWP No: NIA

---

8 u rv e y Location (Site/Bldg)

WVDP Room/Area/Item Sample Loeation:Bkg.

Area 01-Sample #03 Purpose of Survey: Down Hole Logging Remarks: To 4 feet Technician:

Mfchael Carlin Badge

• NIA Technician:

NIA Badge NIA .-* Detector Type Inst. Serial No. .Cal Due Skgd. Detector Type* Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd. 2221/44-62 184010/PR212708 6/19/2013 . 340 cpm z (j Item No. Radiation Type 30cm Do.se General Area Samp1e*Location and/or*Hemarks 0 cpm Rate. Dose Rate 2 1ft. GAMMA 625 NIA NIA Bkg.-1-03 2 ft. GAMMA 6.88 BkQ.-1-03 3 ft. *GAMMA 788 Bkg.-1-03 0 4 ft. GAMMA 750 Bkg.-1-03 r-r-. __.-"-r-:1 -------*o. 0 0 ---(j .. -**--------------:: _L.-----------z ---,._... ...., -*--------'II \II ---****----Surveyed By I Surveyed By I *signature Date Signature Date RCT Supervisor Review _ .... .,. I Surveyed By Signature Date Signature oate Note: Any response of the Instrument thatis above the Crttcal Detection Level (or Le) !s considered lo ba above background.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM Survey Type: 0 Job Coverage D Charad:erizatfon 0 Equipment D Routine

• 0 Uppost/Downpost 0 Miscellaneous*

Page _1_._ of_J_ Survey Number: WVDP-MlS-020-8212 Date: .8/212012 Time: _o ... 9""50..._

______ RWPNo: ____ N ... IA__, ____________

_ SuNey Location (Site/Bldg)

_wv_* _D_P ____________________ .Room/Area/ltem Sample Location:Bkg:

Area 01-Sample #04 Purpose of-Survey:

Down:Hole Logging Remarks: To "4 feet Technician:

Michael Carlin Badge NIA Technician:

NIA. Badge .N/A -Detector Type Inst. Serial No .. Cal Due Bkgd. Detector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd: *.c:!. 2221/44-62 184010/PR21270S 6119/2013 363 ppm z (") Item No. Radratlon Type 30ct:itDose General Area Sample Location andlor Remarks .o cpm Rate Dose* Rate 2! 1"ft. GAMMA 568 Nf A NIA-Bkg.-1-04 2 ft. GAMMA 594 Bkg:,.1-04

• .:;o. 3ft. GAMMA 671 0 4 ft. GAMMA 738 Bkg,-1-04 t""" t""" ---__.;-----0 ------0 . ----.o --------n ----------.. .';;ill -----,.;:;;;; ----* t",fj -2! ......---,_____ --3

---

\ I \ '/* Surveyed By _________

__,,......I

______ _ Signature.

Date Signature Date RCT Supervisor Signature Date Slgnature Date Note: Any responSE!

of the Instrument that Is above the Coteat (or L:c) is considered to be above background.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM Survey Type: 0 Job Coverage 0 Characterization 0 EquipmentO Routine-0 UppostjDownpost

.0 Miscellaneous Page _1_ of _1_ SuNey Number: WVDP-MIS-021-8212 Date: 8/212012 lime: 0840 RWP No: NIA Survey Location (Site/Bldg}

WVDP Room/Area/Item Sample Location:Bkg.Area 01-,Sample,#06 Purpose ofSur\iey:

Down Hole Logging Remarks: To 4 feet --*---Technician:

Michatsl Carlin Badge N/A Technician:

NIA Badge N/A. Detector Type Inst: Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd.

Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd. 0 --. -----** *-**-z 2221/44-62 184010/PR212708 3 307cpm ("') -*O: 30cmoose-General Area liemNo. Radiation Type cpm Rate Dose Rate Sample LocatiOn-and/or Remarks z --1ft. GAMMA 568 N/A NIA Bkg.-1-06 --2 ft. GAMMA 748 Bkg . .:1-06 """ 3ft. GAMMA 647 Bkg.-1-06.

o r 4ft. GAMMA 654 Bkg.-1-06 r -----------0 --------t:'J -------0 -------n ----r: *--;;; --------..... t----'"' -z ----3 -----' ---------'I \I I Surveyed-By

__________

__: ______ _ Signature D11te srgnature Pate I Signature bate RCT Supervisor Review __ .....,...

_______ / ___ _ Signature , Date By_-'----........ .,-------'-------

Note: Any response of the Instrument that Js above the Critcal Detectlon:Lev1M (or Le): ls considered to be above.background.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM survey Type: D :Job Cnverage D Characterization D

0 Routine 0 Upj:Jost/Downpost 0 Miscellaneous Page _1_ of _1_ Survey Number:

Date: 8!212012 Time: 0830 RWP No: 0 NIA Survey Location (Site/Bldg)

WVDP Room/Area/Item Sample Location:Bkg.

Area 01-Sample.#05 Purpose ofSurvey: . Down Hole logging Remarks: Due to hole collapsing; could not get readings.

Technician:

Mlchael.Carlin.

Badge N/A TechnlCian:

NiA Badge NIA -Detector Type hist. Serial No, Cal Due Bkgd. Detector Type Inst.* Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd, 2221/44-62 18401 OIPR212708 6/19/2013

.399cpm .:z n Item No. Radiation

• aacmoose General Area Sample Location and/or Remarks* *o ci:m Rate *0oseRaie z N/A NIA ----------------:o -. -----. \,. r----------c -----0 0 ----(j __..--*,.,;;,,.

---

tzj --2

• i-3 v-------'/ v Surveyed By I Surveyed BY J Signature oats *Signattire Date RCT Super:v[sor Review .J surveyed 6y I Signature Data *Signature Date Neta: Any response of Illa Instrument thal Is above tM Critcal Detecilon t:evel (or Le} Js considered to be background.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM Survey Type: 0 Job-Coverage D Characteri:Zation D Equipment D Routine [j Uppost/Downpost 0 Miscellaneous Page _J_ of _1 __ Survey Number: WVDP-MIS-023-82-12 Date:. 8/212012 Time: 0850 RWP'No: NIA Survey location {Site/Bldg)

WVDP RoomfArea/ltem Sample Location:Bkg.

Area 01-Sample #07 Purpose of Survey: Down Hole Logging Remarks:*

To 4 feet **-***** Technician:

Michael Carlin Badge NIA Technician:

-*-N/A Badae NIA ,..,. **-**-Qetector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd. Detector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd.-'.__ z 2221/44-62 184010/PR212708 6/19/2013 330 cpm ("'j ---30cmDose .General Area 0 Item No. Radiation Type cpm Bate Dose Rate Sample Locatibn endfor -Remarks z 1 ft.. GAMMA 623 .N/A NIA

.;..;i _ _, 2 ft. GAMMA 661 BkgA-07 _,, 3 ft. GAMMA 703 Bkg.-1-07 "0 -t-' 4 ft. GAMMA 666 Eikg.-1-07 r-------**tzj ----0 ------0 ------0 -------------c ------'t::l ----_z --:__.....--.......__

---

\I ,1,. Surveyed By _________ ______ _ Surveyed Sy I Signature Date Signature Date Surveyed By I Signature Date* RCT Supervisor Revi7w_-

___ _ Sl_gnature Data Note: *Airy response of the lnstr_ument that is above_ the. Critca! Detection Level (or LcJ*ls considered to. be above background.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM survey Type: D lob' Coverage 0 Characterization D Equipment D Routine

• 0 Uppost/Downpos:t 0 Miscellaneous Page_1_of_1_

Survey Number: \MIDP-MIS-024-8212 Date: 8/2/2012 Time: 0900 RWP No: NIA

---

Survey Location (Site/Bldg)

\MIDP. Room/Area/Item Sample Location:Bkg.

Area

1. 08 Purpose of*Survey:

Down Hole* Logging Remarks: To*4 feet Technician:*

Michael Carlin Badge NIA Technician:

NIA Badge NIA Defector Type* Inst. Serial No. C?LDue Bkgd. Detector Type Inst: Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd. :C: 2221/44-62 1.8401 O/PR212708 6/19/2013 337C:Pt!l

• 2 ---. .*(-) llemNo. Radiation Type *30cm Dose. General Area Sample Location aria/or RemarkS 0 cpm Rate Dose Rate z 1ft. GAMMA 719. N/A NIA Bkg.:-1-08

....II ... 2 ft. GAMMA 695 l?kg;-1-d8

• O 3 ft. GAMMA 710 Bkg:-1..,08 0: -4.ft. GAMMA 694 Bkg:-1-08 L ***--****-* .. r ----0 -----0 .. -----0 ------"d -----*.c: ----._:-------*--------2 -------.. -----\I '\/, Surveyed By _______________

--'---------

RCT Super-Visor Review _________

---

Surveyed By ___________

_.. ______ _ Signature Date Note: Any response of the instrument that Ts above the Critca f Detecllon.

Level {0,r Le) Js ccinsfdered to be above background.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM survey Type: D Job. COverage D Characterization

• D Equipment D Routine D Uppost/bownpost 0 Miscellaneous Page_1_of_1_

Survey Number:

Date: 8/2/2012*

Tirne: .::0:::8::::10=--------

RWP No:* ____ N""'/A...;.*--------------

Survey (Site/Bldg)

WVDP Room/Area/Item Sample Location:Bkg.

Area 01-Sample #09 Purpose of Survex:: Down Hole Logging. Remarks: Refusal .at 4 ft Technician:

Michael Car:Jin Badge NIA Technician:

NIA Badge NIA -Detect9r Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Skgd. Detector Type Inst. Seri.al Ng. Ca!D(Je Bkgd. L! 2221/44-62 184010/PR212708 6/19/2013 349.cpm 2 (j o* 30cm Dose General Area Item No. Radiation Type cp"m Rate ()osaRate Sample Loca!i6n and/or Remarks z 1 ft. GAMMA 584 NIA NIA . Bkg.-1-09

-3 . 2 ft. GAMMA 614 Bkg .

---

0 r ------t"'" -----t'.'!"j -----0 ---0 -----0 -----Ci, ---L! ';;JI ---------i.--*---i.--2 -----3 ...__ ---------'1, *\ 11 -Signature Date RCT Supervisor Review*----------------

Signature Date Signature Date Note: Any response of the instrument that _is above !he .Critcal Detection Level (or Le) is oonsldere.d to be-above background.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM surveyType: . 0 Job Coverage D Characterization D EqulpmentD Routine D Uppost/Downpost 0 Mlscellaneous Page_1_of_1_

Survey Number:

Date: 8/2/2012 Time:: 0820 RWP No: NIA Survey Location (Site/Bldg)

_wv __ D_P _____________

-...,.. _______ Room/Area/ltem Sample Location:Bkg.

Area 01-*Sample'#10 Purpose of Suivey: . . .. Down Hole Logging Remarks: To 4 feet Technician:

Michael Carlin Badge N/A Technician:

NIA Badge NIA Detector Type

• Inst. Serial.No:

Cal Due Bkgd. Detector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd .. .c:= 2221/44-62 1'8401 O/PR212708 "6119/2013 337.(:pm 2 ... .. ... -----.o Item No. Radiation Type cpm 30 cm Dose Generar Area. S'ample location' ailcf/or Remarks 2 Rat a Dose Rate 1ft. GAMMA 654 NIA N/A B,kg.-1-'10

-,, ' 2 ff. GAMMA 679 Bkg.-1-10.

, 3 ft. GAMMA 616 BkgA-10 0 r-4ft. GAMMA 712 Bkg.-1-10'

-l----------0 0 -----0 -------(j ------.*":;ii# ----*..;;... 'tzj ----*z ---. ..., .. -----...___ ------------\I w .. Surveyed By I Surveyed By I Signature Dale Signature Date RCT Supervisor Review. I Surveyed By /. Signature Date Signature

• oate Note: Any response of the Instrument that rs abolle the Crltcat Detection Level (or Le) to ba above' background.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM Survey Type: D Job Coverage 0. Characterization D Equipment D Routine 0 Uppost/Downpost 0 Miscellaneous Page_1_of_1_

• Survey Number:

Date: 8/9i2012 Time: 0921 RWP No: NIA Survey Lo<:;ation (Site/Bldg)

WVDP Room/Area/Item Sample Location:Bkg.

Area 02* Sample #01 Purpose of Survey: .Down Hole Logging Remarks: To 4 feet TechniCian:

Michael Carlin Ba(jge NIA Technician:

NIA Badge N/A Detector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due *f?kgd. Detector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd. L: . '.Z 2221/44-62 184010/PR212708 6/19/2013 321 cpm -***** (j .-: Item No. Radiation Type 30cm Dose General Area Sample LocatJon and/or Rema.w.s '>...J' cpm Rate OoseRale 2 0.5 ft. GAMMA 710 N/A. N/A Bkg.-1-01 1 ft. GAMMA 804 Bkg.-1-01 . :.z'l 1.5 fL GAMMA 846 0 2 ft. GAMMA 913 .. Bkg.-1-01 r .. !'.'.""' 2.5ft. GAMMA 818 Bkg.-1-01 t'l"j 3 ft. GAMMA 839 .. .Bkg.-1-01 0 3.5ft. GAMMA 901 Bkg.-1-01 0 4 ft. GAMMA 879 Bkg:-1-01 0 -'("') -------.e: ----------z --------'f \Ii Surveyed By __________

__./ ______ _ Signaltire Date Signature .Date RCT Supervisor Review _________

__./_ ...... __ _ Surveyed By __

Signature Date Signature Date Nola: Any response of the Instrument that Is aboVe the Critcal beteclion Leval (or Le) ls considered to be above' background:

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM Survey Type: D lob Coverage D Characteriiaticin 0 Equipment D Routine 0 Uppost/Downpost 12J Miscellaneous Page _1_.of _1_. _ Survey Number: WVDP-MIS-028-8912 Date: 8/9/2012 Time: 0945 RWPNb: NIA Survey Location (Site/Bldg)

..c.wv_-_D__;_P ________ _____ ..__ ____ -:.-Room/Area/Item

-Sample Area 02-Sample #02 Purpose of Survey: pown Hole L9gging Remarks: To 4 feet Technician; Michael Carlin Badge N/A Technician:

N/A Badge NIA -Detector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due_ Bkgd; Detector Type Inst. _Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd;_ L: 2221/44 1840t0/PR212708 S/19/2013 409cpm z **----***-(") Item No. Radiation Type 30 cm Dose General Area Sample Loeatron and/or Remai'ks 0 cpm Rate Dose Rate z 0.5ft. GAMMA 859 NIA N/A Bkg.-1-02

'-.-3 1 ft. GAMMA 1065 Bkg.-1-02

1.5ft GAMMA 1074 Bkg.-1-02 0 r 2 ft. GAMMA 1038 Bkg.-1-02 re 2.5 ft. GAMMA 1061 Bkg.-1-02 ---.0 3 ft. GAMMA 994 Bkg.-1-02 3.5.ft. GAMMA 1028 *---* -Bkn.-1.-02 0 ----'O 4 ft. GAMMA 1047 Bkg

-1-02

-('9'j --------c:: -------z ------3 --------\, \/ Surveyed By Surveyed By Slgpalure Date Signature Date RCT Supervisor Review I Surveyed By I Signature Date Signature -Date Note: Any response of the Instrument that ls above the Critcal De!eclion Lever (or Le) Is considered to:be'al:iove backgrOOnd, RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM Survey Type: .0 Job Coverage D Characterization 0 Equipment 0 Routine D Uppbst/Downpost 12] Miscellaneous Page._ 1_ of_ 1_ Survey Number: WVDP-MIS-02g.:.3912 Date: 8i9/20:12 Time: 0904 RWP No: NIA Survey Location (Site/Bldg)

WVDP Room/Area/Item Sample Location:Bkg, Area 02-Sample #03 Purpose of Survey: Down Hole Logging

• Remarks: To 4 feet .. Technician:

Michael Carlin Badge NIA Technician:

NIA Badge NIA Detector Type Inst Serial No. **Cal Due Detector Type lrist. Serial No. Cal Due* Bkgc!. . Li. 2221144*62 184010/PR212708 6/19/2013

• 393 cpm 2 *("') 0 Item No. Radia!lon'fype

• 30cmDose*

General Area Sample Location and/or Remarks cpm Rate Dose Rale 2 0.5 ft. GAMMA 636 NIA NIA Bkg.-1-03 . --3 1 ft. GAMMA 785 BkgA-03 1.5 ft. GAMMA* 761 Bkg.-1'-03 0 *t-* 2 ft. GAMMA 868 Bkg.-1-03 r:-' 2.5ft. GAMMA 965 Bkg.-1-03 3ft GAMMA 1094

' *o 3.5 ft. GAMMA. 1108 Bkg.-,1-03 .C' 4ft. GAMMA 1101 0 -(j ----< -------------'Z --3 .. ----'I \I .. Signature Date RCT Supervisor Review _________

_...;/ ___ _ Surveyed By __________

/ ______ _ Signature Date Signature Date Note: Any response of the Instrument that Is above the Critcal Detection Level (or Le) is considered to. be above background.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM Survey Type: _ D Job Coverage D Characterization D Equipment 0 Routine D Uppost/Downpost 0 Miscellaneous Page _J_ o(_ 1_ Survey Number: WVDP-MIS-030-8912 Date: 8/9/2012 Time: 0845 RWP No: NIA ===---------

---

'--------------

8 mv e y Location (Site/Bldg)_

_WV_D_P ____________________

Room/Area/Item Sample Location:Bkg.

Area 02-Sample #04 Purpose of Down Hole Logging Remarks: To 4 feet Technician:

Michael Carlin Badge NIA Technician:

Ni A _Badge NIA -Detector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due* Bkgd. Detector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd. 222.1/44.62.

18401 O/PR212708 6/19/20J3 411 cpm_ 2 ----* (j Item No. Radiation Type cpm 30cmeose General Area SampterLocation and/or Remar'i<s 0 Rate Dose*Rata z 0.5ft. GAMMA $08 N/A NIA Bkg.-1--04

-3 1 ft. GAMMA 906 Bkg:-1-04 5 **-*--*1.5 ft. .GAMMA 1073 Bkg.-1-04 2 ft. GAMMA 971 Bkg.-1-04 L" t-* 2.5 ff. GAMMA 1087 Bkg.-1-04 3 ft. GAMMA 10313 Bkg.-1-04 0 3.5 ft. GAMMA 1131 Bkg.-1-04 0 4ft. GAMMA 1011 Bkg.-1-04 0 -n ----'? -:z ___-:------I ----\ '* \I/ I Surveyed By I Signature Date Slgnafure Date RCT Supervisor Review _________

....; ____ _ surveyed By I Signature bate Signature Date Note: Any response of the in;;trument that Is above the Critcal Detection Level (or Le) is considered to be above background.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM Survey Type: D Job Coverage D Characterization D Equipment D Routine D Uppost/Downpost 0 Miscellaneous Page_1_. _of_1_ Survey Number: WVDP-MIS-031-8912 bate: 8/9/2012 Time: 0823. RWP No:. NIA Survey Location {Site/Bldg)

WVDP Room/Area/Item Sample Location:Bkg

.. Area 02-Sample

1. 05 Purpose of Survey: Down Hole. Logging Remarks: To 4 feet Technician:

Miohael Carlin Badge NIA. Technlciah:

NIA Badge NIA Detector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd. Detector Type Inst Serfal"No.

Cal Due Bkgd. d 2221/44-62 . 18401 O/PR212708 6/19/2013 . 411 .cpm z (") *o .30cm Dose General Area Sample*Locatlon and/or Remarks Item No. RadlaUon Type cpm *Rate Dose Rate 2 0.5ft. GAMMA 645 NIA .NIA Bkg.-1-05

-.;i J Ht. GAMMA 693 Bkg.-1-0!) 0 1.5 ft. GAMMA 708 *Bkg.-1-05

..... 2 ft. GAMMA 705 Bkg.-1-05

-l 2.5 ft. GAMMA 696 Bkg.-1-05 *3 ft. GAMMA 728 Bkg.-1-05 0 3.5ft. GAMMA 821 .Bkg.-1-05 0 4 ft. GAMMA 739 Bkg.-1-05 0 ----('") ----------.., ------:z -** """3

• ---------\/ \/" Surileyed By ____________ , ______ _ Signature oate Signature Date RCT Supervisor Review _________

__./ ___ _ Signature Dale Signature Date Note: Aey response of tlie' Instrument that Is *above. ihe

• Crftcal Detection Level (or Le) Is considered to be above. background.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY.FORM Survey Type: D Job Coverage D Characterization D Equipment D Routine D Uppost/Downpost

• 0 Miscellaneous Page:_1_ of_ 1_ Survey Number: . wVDP-MIS-032-8912 Date: 8/9/2012 Time: -=0=8=07=-*------

RWP No: ----N_IA _____________

_ Sur\iey Location (Site/Bldg)'

_wv __ D_P ____________

__,_..._ _____ Room/Ar:ea/ltem Sample Location:Bkg.

Area 02-Sample #06 Purpose of Survey: Down Hole Logging Remarks: To 4 feet I Technician:

Michael Carlin Badge NIA Technician:

NIA Badge N/A Detector TYpe Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd.

Type lhst. Serial N.o. Ca!Due Bkgd. *c 2221/44-62 184010/PR212708

.6/19/2013 411 cpm z ('j Item No. Radiation Type cpm 30. cm uose

• General Area Sample Location and/or Remarks 0 Rate Dose Rate z N/A NIA Bkg.-1-06

' ' :1 0.5ft. GAMMA 800 """' 1 ft. GAMMA 890 Bkg.-1-06

rJ 1.5 ft. GAMMA 869 Bkg.-1'-06

,. *o t""' 2 ft. GAMMA 822 2.5 ft. GAMMA .832 Bkg . ..:1;:.06 3 ft. GAMMA 749. Bkg.-1-06

't::' 3:5 ft. GAMMA 721 Bkg.-1-06

• o 4 ff GAMMA 783

• o ---'(j ------------2 --

"'°3 . ..-----: -.. . ----------:

-'/ 'II Surveyed By I Surveyed By i Signature Da\e Signature Oat.e RC:f' Supervisor Review l Surveyed By J Signature Date. Signature Date Note: Any respoilse of tile lr\strumentthat is.above the Level (orLc) ls considered to be:above background.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM Survey Type: D Job Coverage 0 Characterization D . Equipment O Routine 0 Uppost/Downpost*

0 Miscellaneous . Page __ J_ of_1_

Number: WVDP-MIS"03S-$912 Date: 8/9/2012 Time: 0759 RWPNo: N/A Survey Location (Site/Bldg) . WVDP Room/Area/Item Sample Location:Bkg

.. Area 02-Sample #07 Purpose of Survey: Down HoleLogging Remarks: To 4feet Technician:

Michael Carlin Badge NIA Tei.:hnician:.

NIA Badge NIA -Detector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd. Detector.Type Inst

!'Jp. Cal Due Bkgd. c 2221/44-62 184010/PR212708 6/19/2013 333.cpm z {'"") *-:0 Item No. Radiation Type c:pm 30cm Dose General Area Samp1e*Locatron and/or Remarks* Rate Dose Rate :z 0.5 ft. GAMMA 583 NIA 'N/A Bkg.-1"07

-3 1ft. GAMMA 565 Bkg.-1-07

,., 1.5 ft. GAMMA 659 Bkg:-1-07 0 2 ft. .GAMMA 695 BkgA-07 r """"'( l 2.5 ft. GAMMA 802 Bkg.-'1-07 3 ft. GAMMA 787 Bkg ....

0 3.5 ft. GAMMA 721 Bkg.-1-07 0 4 ft. GAMMA 722 Bkg.-f'-07 0 -----n L:'. ------------H 2'. --------\I Signature Date* Signature Date RCT Supervisor Review ___________

/ ___ _ Surveyed

_ __,.. ___ _ S.lgnature Date Signature Date Note: Any tesponSe of the Instrument that Is above the Critcar DetecUon

{or Le) is considered to be above:back'1round.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM Survey Type: D Job Coverage D Cha.racterization

• D Equipment 0 Routine D Uppost/Downpost 0 Mlscellaneous Page_1_of_1_.

_ Survey Number: WVDP-MIS-034,8912.

Date: .8/9/2012 Time: 0752 RWP No: N/A Su y Location (Site/Bldg) . _WV_D_. P ____________________

Room/Area/ltem Sample Location:Bkg.

Area 02-*Sample

1. 08 Purpose of Survey: Down Hole Logging Remarks: To 4 feet .. .. Technician:

Mfci:tael Carlin Badge* NIA Technician:. .NIA Badge NIA -Detector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd; . DetectorTYfie Inst. Serial No. Cal Due . Bkgd. c 2221/44-62 18401 O/PR212708 6/19/201.3 514cpm z: (') Item* No. Radiation Type 30 cm Dose General Area *Sample.Location.and/or*

Remaiks o* cpm Rate Dose Rate z 0.5ft. GAMMA 762 N/A NIA Bkg.-1-08 1.ft. GAMMA 802 Bkg.-1-08

• O 1.5 ft. GAMMA 756 0 2ft .GAMMA 794 Bkg.-1-08 t-' 2.5ft GAMMA 792 -Bkg.-1-08* 3ft. GAMMA 714 Bkg.-1-0$

e 3.5ft. GAMMA 684 Bkg:+oa o* 4fL GAMMA 688 8kg,-h08 .o t'"'Y --------:';;# ,,.... ----------z ..____------,_:.---'I .. Surveyed By ............

I Surveyed By I Si1Jnature Date SJgnarure Date RCT Supervisor Review I Surveyed By l Signature Date* Signature Date Note: Any response or the Instrument that Is above the CiitcaLDetectfon Level (or le) Is eonsldered to be above bad<grourid.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM Survey Type: . D Job Coverage D Characterization 0 Equipment 0 Routine 0 Uppost/Downpost

• 0 Miscellaneous

• page __ ,:1_ of_ 1_ Survey Number: WVDP-MIS-035-8912 Date:* 8/9/2b.12 Tinie: 0730 RWP No: NIA Survey l:.ocation (Site/Bldg)

WVDP *Room/Area/Item Sample.Location:Bkg.

Area 02-Sample #09 Purpose of Survey: Down Hole Logging Remarks: To 4 feet Technician:

Michael Carlin Badge NIA Technician:

NIA Badge NIA ,.----..........

• • • -e Detector Typ*e Inst Serial No. Cal Due 13k,gd. Detector Type Inst. Serial No. Cal Due Bkgd. z 2221/44-62 184010/PR212708 6/19/2013

• 474cpm .(j o* 30.cmDose*

General Area Item No. Racilat!on Type cpm Rate DoseRat9 Sample Localion and/or 'Remarks z 0.5ft. GAMMA 976 NIA NIA Bkg . ..:1-09 _-J -1 ft. GAMMA 1035 Bkg . ..:1-09 *fN 1'.5 ft. GAMMA 1060 Bkg . .,1-09 :o *r-2 ft. GAMMA 115.7 Bkg.-'1-09 r-2.5ft. GAMMA 1141 . ' -3 ft. GAMMA 1068 1.,.1 3.5ft. GAMMA 1222 0 4ft. GAMMA 1125 c ---n I . ----'<'.""."!

.';;ii' ---------z H -----' I \I Surveyecl By I . Surveyed By I i;;!gnature Date Signature .Date RCT Supervisor Revl.ew I Surveyed ay. I Signature Date Signature Date Note: Any resporiS()

of the lnslrumenf thaf1s above the Critcal Detection*

Level( or Le} Is considered to. oe a!iove RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY FORM survey Type: D Job 0 Characterization 0 Equipment D Routine 0 Uppost/Downpost 0 Miscellaneous Page_1_of_1_

Survey Number: WVDP-MIS-036-8912 Date: 8(9/2012 Time: 0742 RWP'No: NIA Survey Location (Site/Bldg)

WVDP RoomJArea/ltem Sample Location:Bkg; Area 02-Sample #10 Purpose of Survey: Dmvn Hole Logging Remarks: To.4feet Technician:

Michael Cartin Badge NIA Techn!i::ian:

NIA Badge N/A c Detector Type lnsLSerlal No. Cal Due

• Bkgd: Detector-Type Inst. Serial No .. Cal Due Bkgd. z 2221/44-62 18401 O/PR212708 E)/19/2013

()* 0 .. *---.. . .. . . ********-****--*--

• ---. Item No. Radiation Type cpm so cm Dose General Area . Sample Location arid/or: Remarks '.Z Rate Do'seRate . 0.5 ft. GAMMA 874 N/A NIA Bkg . .;1-10 1 ft. GAMMA 925 Bkg.-1-10_ 0 *1.5 ft. GAMMA 930 Bkg.-1-10 r 2ft. GAMMA 997 Bkg.-1-10 e-2.5 ft. GAMMA 872 .... 3 ft. GAMMA 908 1..,,1 3.5ft. GAMMA 981 Bkg.-1-10 0 4ft. GAMMA 925 Bkg.-1-10 ----t"j' --.';j;iP .... -_,.,;.---------z ---*. ---:.---'V 'I . . ... ... SurileyedBy

___________

./ ______ _ Signature.

Date Signature Date RCT

--'"'---Surveyed By _____

Signature Dale Signature Date Note: Any response of the Instrument that Is above the Cn1cal Detection Level (or Le) ls eonslc!eied to be above background:

UNCONTROLLED DOCUIVIENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-01-01 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 1 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1133639.664 ft 1 g I w_J ui _J ;3: GRAPHIC I I a..o:: c.:i LOG I-I-2w ui a_ a_ <l'.1-w w (/);?; ::::J 0 0 CL SC BOREHOLE DEPTH: 3.3 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 8/1/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/1/2012 Y: 885995.229 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1440.243 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Clay, medium plasticity, trace gravel, subround, up to 1/2 inch (1.3 cm), subround, 1 OYR3/3 Dark Brown. Clayey Sand with Gravel, medium plasticity, gravel up to 3/4 inch, subround to subangular. -oarl<;-organicrilatter

____ --------------Gravel with Siitand-Sand,subroundtosUbanguiar;-upto --3/4 inch. Clayey Sand with Gravel, medium plasticity.

Gravel with Silt and Sand, up to 3/4 inch, subround to subangular; 2.5Y4/3 Olive Brown Bottom of borehole at 3.3 feet (1.0 m). 1 US State Plane, York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-01-02 Page 1of1 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 1 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push BOREHOLE DEPTH: 3.3 ft Borehole*Diameter:

2.25 inches LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig DATE STARTED: 8/1/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/1/2012 .X: 1133582.488 ft 1 Y: 886051.765ft 1 . ELEVATION:

1440.075 ft MSL g I w__J __J <( cti GRAPHIC I I a_> u LOG I-b:: 21l'. cti MATERIAL DESCRIPTION REMARKS [J_ w w 0 0 (/)Z ::i CL Clay with Gravel and Organic Matter, low-to medium plasticity; gravel subround, up to 3/4 inch (1.9 cm); \ 1 OYR3/2, Very Dark Grayish Brown. / -c1ay;-medfum plastlCitY;trace-gravel;2};y371 Very Gray. SC Clayey Sand with gravel, medium plasticity.

CL CL Clay, medium plasticity; trace gravel; 2.5Y3/2 Very Dark Grayish Brown. Gravel horizon Clay, medium plasticity, 5Y3/1 Very Dark Gray. Bottom of borehole at 3.3 feet (1.0 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES:

UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-01-03 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 1 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1133616.68ft 1 g I w--1 _J<( GRAPHIC I I a_> LOG I-I-20::: [J_ [J_ <(w w w 0 0 ui ci ui ::::J BOREHOLE DEPTH: 3.3 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 7/31/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

7/31/2012 Y: 886039.346 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1440.304 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Silty Clayey Sand, low plasticity, medium grained; trace gravel, subround, up to 3/4 inch (1.9 cm); 10YR3/3 Dark SC-Brown. SM SM SM Silty Sand with Gravel, medium-to coarse grained, non-plastic; gravel subround to subangular, up to 1 inch (2.5 cm); 2.5Y3/3 Dark Olive Brown. Gravel horizon, subangular, up to 1 inch (2.5 cm). Silty Sand with Gravel, medium-to coarse grained; gravel subround, up to 1/2 inch (1.3 cm). Bottom of borehole at 3.3 feet (1.0 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-01-04 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 1 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1133666.498 ft 1 g I w--'

GRAPHIC I I (Lo::: LOG I-I-2w [J_ [J_ <l'.t-w w 0 0 ui u ui :j CL SC BOREHOLE DEPTH: 3.3 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 7/31/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

7/31/2012 Y: 886036.537 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1438.849 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Clay with Gravel and Organic Matter, low to medium plasticity; gravel subround, up to 3/4 inch (1.9cm); 1 OYR3/2 Very Dark Grayish Brown. Clayey Sand with Gravel, low-to medium plasticity; gravel subround to subangula.r, up to 1/2 inch (1.3 cm); 1 OYR4/2 Dark Grayish Brown Silty Sand with Gravel, non-plastic, medium to coarse; SM gravel subround to subangular, up to 1/2 inch (1.3 cm); 10YR4/4 Dark Yellowish Brown. Bottom of borehole at 3.3 feet (1.0 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-01-05 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 1 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1133491.662 ft 1 g I_ w_J GRAPHIC I I a.. 0:: LOG I-I-;:2;w a.. a.. <(1-w LlJ 0 0 uj u uj ::i B.OREHOLE DEPTH: 3.3 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 7/31/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

7/31/2012 Y: 886082.253 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1440.165 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Silty Clayey Sand and Organic Matter, medium grained, low plasticity; trace gravel, subround, up to 1 inch (2.5 cm); 1 OYR3/2 Very Dark Grayish Brown. -Sl1fy Clayey salii[ medium:-ta coarse graTneci;low -----plasticity; trace gravel, subround to subangular, up to 3/4 inch (1.9 cm); 10YR4/4 Dark Yellowish Brown. Gravel, Poorly Graded, with Silt and Sand, angular, up to 3/4 inch (1.9 cm); 2.5Y4/4 Olive Brown. Bottom ofborehole at 3.3 feet (1.0 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-01-06 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 1 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1133542.178 ft 1 g I w-' cri _,<!: GRAPHIC I I a_> u LOG I-I-::2: 0::: cri [J_ [J_ <!:I=! w w UlZ ::i 0 0 BOREHOLE DEPTH: 3.3 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 7/31/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

7/31/2012 Y: 886081.266 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1440.282 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Silty Clayey Sand and Organic Matter, low plasticity; 1.ittle gravel, subround to subangular, up to 1/2 inch (1.3 cm); 2.5Y3/2 Very Dark Grayish Brown. ------Sl1iY Clayey 5and-wTtll Grave[ lowpiastlcTty;gravel --subround to subangular, up to 1 inch (2.5 cm). Clayey Sand, medium plasticity, medium-to coarse grained; trace gravel, subround, up to 3/4 inch (1.9cm); 2.5Y3/3 Dark Olive Brown. Bottom of borehole at 3.3 feet (1.0 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 {feet) NOTES: Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-01-07 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 1 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1133588.142 ft 1 s I w_J _J GRAPHIC I I a. 0:: LOG I-I-2w a. a. <1:1-w w CIJZ 0 0 ui c..:i ui ::J CL SC GM CL BOREHOLE DEPTH: 3.3 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 7/31/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

7/31/2012 Y: 886082.093 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1439.567 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Clay and Organic Matter, low plasticity; trace gravel, subround to subangular, up to 3/4 inch (1.9 cm); 2.5Y3/2 Very Dark Grayish Brown. Clayey Sand with Gravel, medium plasticity; gravel subangular, up to 3/4 inch (1.9 cm). Gravel, Poorly Graded, with Silt and Sand, subangular, up to 1 inch (2.5 cm). Clay, medium plasticity; trace gravel up to 1/2 inch (1.3 cm). Bottom of borehole at 3.3 feet (1.0 in). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-01-08 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 1 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1133638.764ft 1 g I w....1 ....1:=;:

GRAPHIC I I a_ 0::: LOG I-I-:;?w a_ a_ <(1-w w (f)z 0 0 BOREHOLE DEPTH: 3.3 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 7/31/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/1/2012 Y: 886081.674 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1439.738 ft MSL ui u MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 ::J Silty Clayey Sand with Gravel, medium-to coarse SC-grained, low plasticity; gravel subround to subangular, up to SM 1.5.inches (3.8 cm); 1 OYR3/2 Very Dark Grayish Brown. SM SM GM SM Sand, Poorly Graded, with Silt and Gravel, coarse. Silty Sand, non-plastic, coarse; 1 OYR 3/4 Dark Yellowish Brown. Silty Gravel with Sand; gravel poorly graded, angular, up to 1 inch (2.5 cm). Silty Sand with Gravel, medium-to coarse grained,

• non-plastic; gravel subround to subangular, up to 3/4 inch (1.9 cm). Bottom of borehole at 3.3 feet (1.0 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCU1\'1ENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-01-09 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 1 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1133511.149ft 1 g I w-' -'<( GRAPHIC I I CL> LOG 1--1--2: o:'. CL CL w w UJZ 0 0 ui cj ui ::J CL SM BOREHOLE DEPTH: 3.3 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 8/1/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/1/2012 Y: 886129.596 ft 1 ELEVATION:*

1438.671 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Clay and Organic Matter, low-to medium plasticity, trace coarse sand/finegravel up to 2 inches (5.1cm);10YR3/3 Dark Brown. Silty Sand with Gravel, fine-to medium grained; gravel round to subround, up to 2 inches (5.1 cm); 1 OYR4/4 Dark Yellowish Brown. Gravel, Poorly Graded, with Silt and Sand, up to 2 inches GP-(5.1 cm), round to subround; 2.5Y4/4 Olive Brown. GM Bottom of borehole at 3.3 feet (1.0 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-01-10 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 1 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1133560.343ft 1 g I UJ_J _J <!'. GRAPHIC I I a..> LOG I-I-:2 0:: a.. a.. <!'. UJ UJ UJ 0 0 ui c..:i 0 ::J GC CL SM SC BOREHOLE DEPTH: 3.3 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 7/31/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

7/31/2012 Y: 886132.389 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1439.345 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Clayey Gravel and Organic Material, poorly graded, sub round up to 2 inches (5.1 cm); 1 OYR3/3 Dark Brown. Clay, low-to medium plasticity, trace gravel up to 1 inch (2.5 cm); 10 YR3/3 Dark Brown. Silty Clayey Sand, fine-to medium grained, low plasticity; trace gravel up to 1 inch (2.5 cm); 10YR4/4 Dark Yellowish Brown. Clayey Sand, low-to medium plasticity; 1 OYR3/4 Dark Yellowish Brown. Bottorri of borehole at 3.3 feet (1.0 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, (feet) NOTES: Page 1 of 1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-02-01 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 2 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1134457.852ft 1 g I w_J ui GRAPHIC I I 0..o::: c..:i LOG I-I-2w ui a.. a.. <t-w w

J 0 0 BOREHOLE DEPTH: 4.0 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 8/9/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/9/2012 Y: 890110.917 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1394.762 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Silty Clay with Organic Material, low plasticity; 1 OYR3/2 Very Dark Grayish Brown.

• Clay with Sand, medium plasticity; trace gavel.up to 3/4 inch (1.9 cm); 1 OYR4/3 Brown. Clayey Sand with Gravel, medium plasticity.

Clay, medium plasticity, firm to stiff; 2.5Y4/3 Olive Brown. Bottom of borehole at 4.0 feet (1.2 m). US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Background Area 2 is in the Lavery Till Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-02-02 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 2 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1134506.751 ft 1 g I w__J __J:;: GRAPHIC I I O..o:: LOG I-I-2w 0.. 0.. w w <l'.1-0 0 CfJZ ui 0 ui :j CL BOREHOLE DEPTH: 4.0 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 8/9/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/9/2012 Y: 890108.926 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1395.245 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Clay and Organic Matter, medium plasticity, soft; 10YR4/2 Dark Grayish Brown. -Ciay,-medium PfasticitY, firm iO stiff. trace 9ravei;2.5v4/f --Dark Gray. Bottom of borehole at 4.0 feet (1.2 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Background Area 2 is in the Lavery Till Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-02-03 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 2 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1134484. 737 ft 1 !S I w--' ...J <( GRAPHIC I I a_> LOG I-I-20::: a_ a_ <UJ w UJ 0 0 ui c..:i 0 ::J SC-SM SC CL BOREHOLE DEPTH: 4.0 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 8/8/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/8/2012 Y: 890066.994 ft' ELEVATION:

1395.508 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Silty Clayey Sand with Organic Matter, low plasticity; 2.5Y3/2 Very dark Grayish Brown. Clayey Sand, medium plasticity; trace fine rounded gravel up to 1/4 inch (0.6 cm); 2.5Y 4/3 Olive Brown. Clay, medium plasticity, firm to stiff; variegated Dark Gray and Dark Grayish Brown. Bottom of borehole at 4.0 feet (1.2 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Background Area 2 is in the Lavery Till Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-02-04 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site FacHities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 2 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1134534.07ft 1 g I w__J __J <( GRAPHIC I I [J_> LOG I-I-:2:0:: [J_ (L w w Cl Cl CllZ ui u ui ::) SC* SM CL BOREHOLE DEPTH: 4.0 ft

• Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 8/8/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/8/2012 Y: 890069.027 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1395.804 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Silty Clayey Sand with Organic Material, low plasticity; 2.5Y3/2 Very Dark Grayish Brown. Clay, medium plasticity, firm to stiff, variegated Dark Gray to Dark Grayish Brown. Bottom of borehole at 4.0 feet (1.2 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Background Area 2 is in the Lavery Till Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-02-05 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 2 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1134507.902 ft 1 g I w__J __J:; GRA PHIC :r: :r: C..o::: LOG I-I-2w a.. a.. <l'.1-w w U):?; 0 0 ui c.:i 0 ::J BOREHOLE DEPTH: 4.0 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 8/8/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/8/2012 Y: 890024.338 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1396.154 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Silty Clay and Organic Material, low plasticity, 2.5Y3/3 Dark Olive Brown. -Si11Y c1ay;-Tow J)1a5ticiiY.2.5v514LTgilt 01ive8roWri:-----Silt, grading to Silty Clay with Fine Sand, 2.5Y 4/3 Olive Brown. * ' Bottom of borehole at 4.0 feet (1.2 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Background Area 2 is in the Lavery Till Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-02-06 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 2 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1134557.031 ft 1 g I ill _J cri _J:;; GRAPHIC I I a..o::: c) LOG I-I-2w cri a.. a.. ill ill <(1-::i 0 0 C/JZ SP 8 BOREHOLE DEPTH: 8.0 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 8/8/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/8/2012 Y: 890023.73 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1396.098 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Silty Clay with Organic Matter, low plasticity.

Clay, medium plasticity, firm to stiff; Olive Brown grading to Dark Grayish Brown. Clayey Sand with Gravel, medium-to coarse grained, medium plasticity; gravel round to subangular; up to 3/4 inch (1.9 cm); 2.5Y4/2 Dark Grayish Brown. Clay, medium plasticity, 2.5Y4/1 Dark Gray. Sand, Poorly Graded, medium grained. Bottom of borehole at 8.0 feet (2.4 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Background Area 2 is in the Lavery Till Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-02-07 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 2 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1134533.251 ft 1 g I w__J ui GRAPHIC I I 0.. 0::: u LOG I-I-2w 0 0.. 0.. <t'.1-w w

J 0 0 BOREHOLE DEPTH: 4.0 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 8/8/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/8/2012 Y: 889979.098 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1396.364 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION sSilty Clayey Sand with Organic Matter, low plasticity, 2.5Y3/2 Very Dark Grayish Brown. Clay with Sand, medium plasticity, variegated gray and rust brown. Clay with Gravel, medium plasticity; gravEll angular, up to 3/4 inch (1.9 cm); 2.5Y4/3 Olive Brown. Clay, medium plassticity, firm to stiff; 2.5Y4/1 Dark Gray. Sand, Poorly Graded, with Silt, medium grained. Clay with Sand and Gravel, medium plasticity. . . Bottom of borehole at 4.0 feet (1.2 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Background Area 2 is in the Lavery Till Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-02-08 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 2 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1134583.566 ft 1 g I w_J ui _J;;; GRAPHIC I I O..o:: c..i LOG I-I-:2:w cr.i a.. a.. w w <(1--:::) 0 0 BOREHOLE DEPTH: 8.0 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 8/8/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/8/2012 Y: 889982.845 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1396.743 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Clayey Sand with Organic Matter, low plasticity.

Clay, medium plasticity, variegated Dark Grayish Brown to Dark Gray. Clay with Gravel and Coarse Sand, medium plasticity; gravel up to 1/2 inch (1.3 cm). Silty Clay, low plasticity, soft, gray. Sand, Poorly Graded, medium grained. Clay, medium plasticity, firm, 2.5Y4/1 Dark Gray. Bottom of borehole at 8.0 feet (2.4 m). US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Background Area 2 is in the Lavery Till Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-02-09 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 2 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1134572.237 ft 1 g I w__J GRAPHIC :r: :r: a_ ll:'. LOG I-I-2w a_ a_ <t: I-w w 0 0 ui c..i ui :j CL-ML CL BOREHOLE DEPTH: 4.0 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 8/8/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/8/2012 Y: 889949.628 ft 1 ELEVATION:

1396.449 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Silty Clay with Organic Material, low plasticity, trace fine gravel up to 1/4 inch (0.6 cm). Clay, medium plasticity, firm to stiff, variegated Dark Grayish Brown to Dark Gray. Bottom of borehole at 4.0 feet (1.2 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Background Area 2 is in the Lavery Till Page 1of1 REMARKS UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT PROJECT: West Valley Demonstration Project BOREHOLE:

BKG-02-10 Page 1of1 PHASE/TASK:

05 Balance of Site Facilities Radiological Characterization SURVEY UNIT: Background Area 2 DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: Eric Koenig X: 1134608.726ft 1 g I w__J __J;;; GRAPHIC I I a..o:: LOG I-I-::2:w a_ a_ w w <(1-0 0 6 2 7 8 u) ci u) ::i BOREHOLE DEPTH: 8.0 ft Borehole Diameter:

2.25 inches DATE STARTED: 8/8/2012 DATE COMPLETED:

8/8/2012 Y: 889936.75 ft' ELEVATION:

1396.773 ft MSL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Silty Clay with Organic Matter, low plasticity.

Clay, medium plasticity, firm to stiff; 2.5Y4/2 Dark Grayish Brown. Sand, Poorly Graded, medium grained. Silt, grading to Clay, wet. Clayey Sand with Gravel, medium platicity, gravel up to 2 inches (5.1 cm). Bottom of borehole at 8.0 feet (2.4 m). 1 US State Plane, New York West 3103, NAD83 (feet) NOTES: Background Area 2 is in the Lavery Till REMARKS Run 2 (4 to 8 ft/ 1.2 to 2.4 m), recovery -40%

I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (T05) -Rev.1 APPENDIXD Detector Control Charts July 2014 J I UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. 1 APPENDIXD Detector Control Charts Example Source and Background Control Charts Example control charts for the FIDLER detector for source checks and background checks are shown here. Detectors are taken out of service if the source or background checks are not within the required tolerance of 20 percent. If a detector does not pass the morning daily check , the data from the previ0tis day is evaluated for use. The data is not used if erratic readings outside that previously collected for the area used are identified. One FIDLER detector was taken out of service because it failed the background check above the upper tolerance. The detector was damaged and the failure was due to a light leak. The detector was not returned to service. 80000 75000 70000 65000 60000 [ 55000 u 50000 45000 40000 35000 30000 Jul y 2014 --A --FIDLER 071211A Source -.... ....

• A ...,_Source (cpm) ,. ,. TV ........ -Low -High -Average D-1 17000 16000 15000 14000 E 13000 c.. u 12000 11000 10000 9000 8000 July 2014 I TROLLED nocuME T I Terrestrial Background Study (TBS) (TOS) -Rev. I FIDLER 071211A Background

-+-Bkg(cpm) -Low -High -Average D-2