ML20215J931
| ML20215J931 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 08/14/1986 |
| From: | TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215J430 | List:
|
| References | |
| DAP-19, NUDOCS 8610270252 | |
| Download: ML20215J931 (29) | |
Text
-
o , , .
- , r ;' q; j J )u;;: .
- - .n.'i !
, }
- FUit !1 70... '~.1
- , C,!!.Y TITLE PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY f)
's OF CONSTRUCTION, GA/QC ADEOUACY PROGRAM abo THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM NUMBER DAP-19 Revision Prepared Date Reviewed Date Approved Date 0
/ Shy /* '
f 4 to f4ltl
' b p G4 AS W
&f "Qr8& !o/MI'I
!? I)I$/50
_ g/ $l
% A 8f4 2.l6g 'YEL o s l
l l
l l
hhkO2ggggg5 boo 45 - CONTROLLED COPY i
A PDR ql =--~c No.
TN-85-6262il9 i
e TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Poae Co v e r S he e t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Tab le o f Con t en t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii 1.0 P URP O S E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 2.0 SCOPE..................................................... I 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESP ONSIBILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 4.0 I NS T R UCT I O N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5.0 DOCU ME NTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Q
ATTACHMENTS A INFORMATION FROM DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM TO QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTORS, OA/QC ADEQUACY PROGRAM .............................. A-1 B QAP/DAP INTERFACE DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL FORM .................................... B-l C TRT/DAP CONTACT LOG SifET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-l D GAP /DAP INTERFACE TRANSMITTAL LOG ................... D-l APPENDIX A l TN-85-6262/19 ii
1 COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEOUACY PROCEDURE Nurnber: DAP- 19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 lNFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, OA/QC PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEOUACY PROGRAM l.0 PURPOSE This procedure implements DAP responsibilities for CPRT program requirements for the interface between the Design Adequacy Program (DAP) and the Quality of Construction (OOC), OA/QC Prograrn (OAP).
2.0 SCOPE This procedure applies to the transmittal of information produced by the Design Adequacy Program (DAP) and forwarded to the Quality of Construction (OOC),
OA/QC Program (OAP) in accordance with the Program Plan and to the review by the DAP of information transmitted from the OOC /QAP.
3.0 DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 Definitions 3.1.1 "Information Only" The receiving organization will provide o mechanism to ensure that oppropriate i
personnel within their organization are aware of the existence of the input information and that is available for review. Appropriate mechanisms include, for examnie, routing copies, standard distribution and reference files. No further action is required. An example of this activity is the receipt by the DAP of the OA/OC ISAPs for "Information."
3.1.2 " Review and Comment" The organization with this responsibility will review input dato and will, as TN-85-6262/19 Page i of 10
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, OA/OC PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEOUACY PROGRAM required, provide the forwarding organization any comments in a timely manner.
The forwarding organization will consider the comments and resolve ca e conflict prior to completing their investigation of subject issue. Documentation of the comments and any resolution will be placed in the working files. An example of this would be the " Review and Comment" by the DAP of design related attributes for CPRT inspection activities.
3.1.3 " Action By" The receiving organization is charged with responding to the input by the forwarding organization. This con range from a request for information to the identification of an issue that requires a new or revised oction plan. A written response is to be provided by the receiving organization and action coordinated with the forwarding organization where necessary. An example of this activity is OA/OC-RTL forwarding to the DAP-RTL information on design related issues
- discovered during inspections, document reviews or external source material, l
l 3.2 Responsibilities 3.2.1 Construction Quality interfoce Monoger l The Construction Quality Interface Monoger is responsible for:
o Reviewing transmittals from the OOC /OAP to ossess the scope and extent of oction required by the DAP o Forwarding transmittals to the responsible Discipline Coordinator or the DAP files as appropriate I o Tracking the status of those transmittals which require action by the DAP lO TN-85-6262/19 Page 2 of 10
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-I9
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, OA/QC PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM o Transmittal to OOC /QAP of items from DAP which require action by GOC /OAP.
3.2.2 DAP Discipline Coordinators and the Programmatic / Generic implico-tions Coordinator
- ore responsible for:
o Completing the required action on documents received from the OOC /OAP o Documenting the results of action token for OOC /QAP transmittals that require action and forwarding the documentation to the Construction Quality Interface Monoger o Notifying the Construction Quality interface Monoger when a change is mode in the assignment of the discipline responsible for resolution of a required action o identifying items within their orcos of responsibility that require transmittal to the OOC /QAP in occordance with Attachment A and forwarding them to the Construction Quality Interface Monoger.
3.2.3 The OA/QC and DAP Review Team Leaders are responsible for the selection of personnel requested to perform hardware inspections.
4.0 INSTRUCTIONS 4.1 Processing of Transmittols from the OQQO;P to DAP Documents received on standard distibution from the OOC /QAP shall be screened by the Interface Monoger for action by DAP and forwarded to the DAP files. A copy of all documents requiring DAP oction (Review and Comment, or Action, as shown on Attachment A) shall be transmitted to the responsible DAP I
- Throughout the remainder of this procedure, " Discipline Coordinator" also includes the Programmatic / Generic implications Coordinator.
TN-85-6262/19 Page 3 of 10
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 O. INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, QA/OC PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM Discipline Coordinator by the Construction Quality Interface Monoger
(" Interface Monoger") or his designee using either on oppropriate transmittal form or memorandum.
d
, The assigned Discipline Coordinator shall notify the Interface Monoger if responsibility for resolution is reassigned to another discipline.
Documents transmitted for review and comment shall be reviewed by the responsible Discipline Coordinator or his designee. Resolution of comments shall be pursued directly with the responsible individual in the OOC /OAP. The final resolution shall be documented on a Contact Log Sheet (Attachment C) or a referencoble memo os oppropriate and a copy forwarded to the Interface Monoger. Reviews that result in no comments shall be noted as such on the transmittal form and a copy of the transmittal form returned to the Interface
, Manager.
Resolution of items requiring action (other than review and comment) shall be l ' documented as follows:
- o if the item involves o discrepancy, the Discipline Coordi-notor shall process it in accordance with DAP-2 and l forward a copy of the DIR to the Interface Monoger o if the item involves on external issue, the Discipline Coordinator shall process it in accordance with DAP-2 i and forward a copy of the issue Record to the Interface l Monoger. Alternatively, o memo documenting that the l Item need not be considered by DAP or that it is being considered by DAP shall be prepared by the Discipline Coordinator and forwarded to the Interface Manager.
o if neither of the preceding cases apply, document the resolution on a Contact Log form or o referencoble memo and forward a copy to the Interface Monoger.
O TN-85-6262/19 Page 4 of 10 l
I l
1 l
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, OA/OC PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM The Interface Monoger shall transmit to the OOC /OAP o copy of the above documentation except documentation for which the DAP response is "no com-ments."
The interface Monoger shall maintain oppropriate files that identify open DAP oction items and document the resolution of closed DAP oction items.
4.2 Review of Inspection Attribute Lists The DAP is required to review the OOC Inspection Attributes List. Inspection attributes are defined by OOC /OAP for each OOC inspection population in the inspection basis document referenced in the inspection procedure (01) and in i O more detail in the Ol (see Appendix A). For most populations, separate attribute 4
lists and Ols are prepared for the hardware reinspections and the document reviews. The purpose of the DAP review is to ensure that the attributes select.3d by the OOC /OAP:
o Adequately reflect the safety-significant inspection attri-butes important to the design for the population being inspected i
o incorporate any special considerations crising from CPSES design related issues / problems.
The assigned Discipline Coordinator, or his designee, shall review the inspection l
, Attribute Lists as described below and process the results in occordance with Section 4.1 of this procedure. Design issues / problems identified offer the initial review is completed that change the acceptance criteria or require additional inspection attributes should be processed as a request for oction by the OOC /OAP (see Section 4.4).
O TN-85-6262/19 Page 5 of 10 e , - - - - - . ,, -__ - -,
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, QA/OC PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM Level i Review (All OOC Inspection Populations)
For each OOC inspection population, the Interface Manager will transmit the inspection basis documents for review and comment by the assigned DAP Discipline Coordinator. This review is intended to be o " reasonableness" check of the attributes for all populations. The reviewers should evaluate, based on their experience, the consistency and sufficiency of the defined attributes and the justification provided in the inspection basis documents for any attributes excluded or alternate occeptance criteria utilized.
Level 2 Review For the selected populations listed below, the reviewer shall select three design related inspection attributes from the opplicable installation specification and 4
verify that these attributes and their occeptance criterio have been correctly incorporated in the inspection procedure (01). The results of this evaluation shall be documented in a referenceable memo or checklist identifying the attributes selected and the results of the review.
DAP Discipline OOC /OAP Population Piping / Supports I. Large bore pipe supports (non-rigid)
- 2. Small bore pipe supports
- 3. Large bore piping
- configuration
- 4. Small bore piping configuration Mechanical I. HVAC equipment installation TN-85-6262/19 Page 6 of 10
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 INFORMATlON BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, OA/QC PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM
- 2. Mechanical equipment installation Civil / Structural I. Structural Steel
- 2. Instrumentation equipment 4.3 Review of Sofety Significance Assessments Safety significance assessments are prepared by the OOC /OAP in occordance with Procedure CPP-016 and transmitted to DAP for review and comment or action as indicated in Attachment A. The nature of the review of these documents by DAP depends on which of the following categories the document falls within:
o Safety significance assessments which conclude that a deviation is not safety-significant are reviewed by DAP
! on a selected basis to evoluote the consistency of DAP I
safety significance evoluotions with OOC /QAP evalua-tions and to confirm that there are no design-related implications. The primary source of design-related problems identified by the OOC /OAP are the action transmittals identified in Attachment A.
o All safety significance assessments which conclude that the deviation is safety-significant, but which are not transmitted for action as o design-related problem, are reviewed to evoluote the consistency of DAP safety significance evoluotions with OOC /QAP evoluotsuns and to confirm that there are no design related implications.
o Safety-signficant design related deficiencies are trans-mitted to DAP for action and coordination of results with l OOC /OAP.
O TN-85-6262/19 Page 7 of 10 l
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE O Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, OA/OC Revision: 3 PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN l ADEQUACY PROGRAM l
l The Interface Monoger shall select opproximately ten percent of the OOC /OAP safety significance assessments that conclude that the deviation is not safety-significant. The documents selected shall be reviewed by the DAP Interface Manager or ossigned to o Discipline Coordinator for review and comment. The results of the review shall be processed per Section 4.1 of this procedure.
The DAP Interfoce Manager shall forward all deficiencies which are not transmitted as design related (including the associated safety significance assessment) to the responsible Discipline Coordinators for review and comment.
The results of this review shall be processed in accordance with Section 4.1 of this procedure.
The DAP Interface Coordinator shall forward for DAP oction all deficiencies (including the associated safety significance assessment) which are determined to be design related. The responsible Discipline Coordinator shall processes these transmittals in occordance with Section 4.1 of this procedure.
4.4 Processina of Transmittals from DAP to the OOC /QAP Program Attochment A identifies the types of information required to be transmitted from the DAP to the OOC /OAP. Items identified as "information only" shall be transmitted to the OOC /OAP Interface Coordinator via standard distribution.
Items identified as review and comment, action, or coordination of results shall be transmitted vio o OOC /OAP/DAP Interface Transmittal Form (Attochment B).
The DAP Program Manager shall identify those DAP documents required to be transmitted to the OOC /OAP via controlled distribution to meet the require-ments of Attochment A. The individual designated by the DAP Monoger shall O TN-85-6262/19 Page 8 of 10
- 1. . _- ._ _
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF Revision: 3 INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, OA/QC PROGRAM AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM transmit these documents directly to the OOC /OAP Interface Coordinator and i
shall maintain a file of the distribution lists for these documents.
The OA/OC RTL and the DAP RTL shall agree on the selection of personnel to perform DAP requested hardware inspections.
5.0 DOCUMENTATION The Discipline Coordinators shall identify the documents within their orcos of responsibility that need to be transmitted to the OOC /QAP for review and comment or action in accordance with Attachment A. These documents shall be forwarded to the DAP Interface Manager for transmittal to the OOC /QAP vio o i
OOC /QAP/DAP Interface Transmittal Form. The top portion of the form, including the number and transmittal comments, is to be completed by the Discipline Coordinator or his designee. These transmittols shall be numbered consecutively within each discipline and use the fo!!owing code to identify the originating discipline and sequential number:
DAP - T - XX - YYY Sequential Number Discipline / Subject Code Code Discipline C/S Civil Structural EIC Electrical /l&C G Generic implications M Mechanical P Piping / Supports TN-85-6262/19 Page 9 of 10
- . - - - - . . .-_ , - - _ _ . - . _ _ - - . - - - - ~ . . - - . - - - - . . - -. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM - DESIGN ADEQUACY PROCEDURE O Number: DAP-19
Title:
PROCESSING AND REVIEW OF INFORMATION BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, QA/QC Revision: 3 PROGRAM AND TFE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM S CDSES Site (DAP Interface Coordinator)
OOC OOC /QAP Program Originated E Electrical
- I Instrumentation
- The Discipline Coordinator will record each transmittal in o QAP/DAP Interface Transmittal log (Attachment D.)
iO l
- NOTE: Use of T" and "I" codes are optional alternatives to the TIC" code.
ElC may be used for both Electrical and I&C. "E" may be used when the document is relevant only to the electrical discipline. "1" may be used when the document is relevant only to Instrumentation and Control.
O TN-85-6262/19 Page 10 of 10 1 . - .. .- - -- --.-.___. - -.- ..- -._ _ ..- ..-- ..-.- - .- .---- - - - ---- - -----.- ----
i
)
1 EXPEllTS The following exhibits are examples of the first page of the types of documents listed below. They are provided to aid in the recognition of these types of documents.
Exhibit 1 - Hardware Population List Exhibit 2 -
Work Process Definition Exhibit 3 - Population Description Exhibit 4 - Population items List Exhibit 5 - Inspection Attribute List Exhibit 6 - ERC Deviation Report Exhibit 7 - ERC Safety Significance Evaluation 1
- O l
O TN-85-4262/19 DAP-19, Rev. 2
EXHEITI COMANCHE FEAK REVIEW TEAM '
MASTER FOPULATION LIST L
PREFARED BY: h.Fatterson DATE: August 13, 1985 QA/QC REINSPECTION ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR POPULATION DESCRIPTION COMPLETION DISCIPLINE FOPULATION DATES 1
Concrete Placement (CONC) 8/07/85 Structu.Tal Steel (STEL) 8/07/85
. Fill & Lackfill Placement (Fill) 8/01/85 Liners (LINR) 8/8/85 Fuel Fool Liner (TFLR) 8/8/85 Large Bore Pipe Supports - Risid (LBSR) 7/24/85Rev 1 Large Bore Pipe Supports - Non-Rigid (LBSN) 7/24/85Rev 1 STRUCTURAL Small Sore Pipe Supports (SBFS) 7/24/85Rev 1 (S) Fipe Whip Restraints (FWRE) 6/19/85 Instrument Pipe / Tube Supports (INSF) 8/06/85 Cat 1 Conduit Supports (COSF) 8/07/85 IVAC Duct Supports (BYDS) 8/08/85Rev 1 O
Conduit (CDUT) 7/10/85Rev i Cable (CABL) 7/18/85Rev 1 ELECTRICAL Cable Tray (CATT) 7/19/85Rev 1 (E) Electrical Equipment (EEIN) 6/12/85 Instrumentation Equipment (ININ) 6/13/85 EVAC Ducts and Plenues (DUFL) 8/14/85Rev 1 IVAC Equipment Installation (RVIN) 7/13/85 Field Fabricated Tanks (FFTA) 7/26/85Rev 1 Mechanical Equipment Installation (MEIN) 8/10/85 Large Bore Fiping Configuration (LBCO) 6/26/85 Small Bore Piping Configuration (SBCO) 6/26/85 MECRANICAL Large Bore Pipe - Welds / Material (L3WM) 6/26/85 (H) Small Bore Pipe and Instrument Pipe /
Tube Velds / Material (53WM) 6/26/85 Fiping System Bolted Joints / Materials (PROM) 6/26/85 APP ISSUE AFP ISSUE APP ISSUE APP ISSUE APP ISSUE APP a
ISSUI
.E.,
APP i
ISSUE g 2AFP ISSUE AFP 2
ISSUE APP 6
ISSUE APP 5
ISSUE AFP
'~
6 7 8 0 10 11
EXHBIT 2 Page 1 of 10 O
WORK PROCESS DEFINITION POR LARGE BORE PIPE SUPPORT - NON-RIGID POPULATION GROUP (LESN) l l
l INTRODUCTION The Large Bore Pipe Support - Non-Rigid Population includes supports for piping systems (21/2 inch nominal pipe
- siis an'd large'r) all of which are safety related. Safety Class 1. 2. or 3 and Seismic Category I. It includes only those supports which utilise constant or variable spring hangers or snubbers as components. It includes all the items shown on the pipe support detail drawings (BRNs).
The installation of all supports within this populatien requires the following work processes:
Fabrication - includes all activities prior to installing the support in its final location in the plant, i.e. before connecting the support structure or components to the building structure and the vendor supplied component ites to the pipe attachment point.
The process also includes modification of vendor supplied catalog items.
Installation - includes all activities re:uired to install the
! support at its final location in accorda-ce with the pipe support detail drawing (BRM) and the constructio- hanger package.
Welding - includes all welding processes t.uring fabrication and installation. ,
The following work process descriptions demonstrate that reasonable homogeneity does exist at the work process level. Regstdless of the type of support, size of pipe being supported or material and components used, each work process involves: a common specification, a common construction procedura, a common construction management organization, common craft labor performing the same Sasic types of operations, a common inspection instruction, and a common inspection organization. A sufficient number of samples will be randomly selected from the Large Bore Pipe Support-Non-Rigid population group to ensure that the required 3
confidence level is achieved for each work process. This approach will permit meaningful conclusions to be drawn regarding the construction adequacy of all small bore pipe supports.
O 4
-.,---,,-,,------,,,.---.m,_--,-,
_-,,-+ n- _--,-.-n.-__n--.,
EXH2iT 3 COMANCHE PEAK REVIEW TEAM POPULATION DESCRIPTION O Page 1 of 2 POPU1ATION NAME: Larne Bore Pipe Supports-Risid '
PREPARED BY: d km DATE: June 17, 1985 RESPONSIBLE QA/QC SUPPORT ENGINEER SYSTDt. COMPONENTS. AND STRUCTURES:
Supports for piping systems designated in Section 17A of the FSAR that are safety related and are Safety Class 1. 2 and 3 and Seismic Category
- 1. (see attachment)
POPULATION BOUNDARY:
Supports for large bore piping (23-inch 3 nominal pipe and larger) seeting the criteria for Safety Class 1. 2. and 3 and Seismic Category 1.
Support components as shown on pipe support drawings.
(e.g. structural l steel. BT welds, std. afg. componentr, plate, bolting material, anchor bolts and nuts EILTI type and Richmond Studs, etc.)
Supports that are construction complete and QC accepted up to and including June 17, 1985.
Supports located in Units 1, 2 and common areas.
All supports which are safety related.
Only supports which utilise anchors guides, rigid restraints, and three dimensional restreints. ,
( ITEMS NOT INCLUD D IN THE POPULATION:
Eydraulic or mechanical snubbers, pipe whip restraints and spring hangers.
Small bore pipe supports.
1arge bore piping.
Building structural members.
APPROVED BY: N, .eason_ DATE: 4,//&ff[
$/qc LEAD DISCIPLINE DGINEER APPROTED BY: I /4 W M
- N M - DATE: I!/fM S/qc REINSPECTION DGINEERING SepIRv1SoR
EXHBIT 4 COMANCHE PEAK REVIEW TEAM O POPULATION ITEMS LISI Fage 1 of 1 POPULATION NAME: Large Bore Pioe Sucports - Rigid FREFARED BY: "~
DATE: Julv 30. 1985 RESPONSIBLE QA/QC SUPPORI DGINEER ggy g F0FULATIONS LIST SOURCE:
The Ranger Installation Tracking System, commonly known as "RITS" is the source document for this population. The IITS program is a computerized report which contains information for all supports (i.e., Small Bore and Large Bore) as to the system, unit, building, room number, support mark number and safety class. In addition, data pertaining to pipe size, integral attachments and construction status is provided.
From the entire MITS program, a listing of Rigid Large Bore Pipe Supports was segregated out for only supports which are safety related, construction couplete and QC accepted. Attachment 2 lists supports that make up the Large Bore Pipe Supports - Rigid population. A correction was made on page 582 of Attachment 2. regarding one of the Randon Samples.
BASIS FOR ACCEPTING THE LIST: (Refer to Attachment 1)
Acceptance of the list is based on random sample verificat!on of the entire IITS program content utilizing a separate source for both safety and non-safety related supports. The separate source was a listing of Brown and Root Ranger Location (BREL) Drawings. Once the BREL Drawing Sample was established, all supports contained on the sample drawings were checked against IITS to verify completeness as to total support listings. An additional check was performed to verify the accuracy of support construction status. It was established that the Banger Mark Number and Construction Status Content of the BITS progree was accurate and could be used as a source for Large Bore Pipe Supports population.
BASIS FOR ACCEPT UC ANT ADDITIONAL ITEMS: Not Applicable APPROVED BY: o,es,- e DATE: I44 4.6I QA/qC LEAD DISCIPLINE DGINEER '
AFFROVED BY: M. M.MM&1 c DATE: M [,/ffi QA/QC RE1MSPECTION DCINEERING J SUPERVISOR
- EXHBIT 5 Page 1 of 3 ATTAC1DEh7 "A" Large Bore Pipe Supports-Mon-Rigid Population List of Source Document for Each Attribute Attribute Source *
- 1. Identification R&R QI-QAP 11.1-28. Rev. 31. Section 3.2 i 2. Location and B&R CF-CFM 9.10. Rev. 14. Section 4.7 (Unit 2)
Orientation TUCCO CF-EI-4.5-1 Rev. 12. sections 3.2.3. 3.2.4 (Unit i 1 and Common) l Gibbs and Bill Specification No. 2323-MS-43A. Rev. 5.
Section 3.5.3 [For pipe nominal vall thickness).
- 3. Configuration A. Components S&R QI-QAP 11.1-28. Rev. 31. Section 3.3
- 5. Material R&R QI-QAF 11.1-28. Rev. 31. Sections 3.2 and 3.3 C. Installation 54R QI-QAP 11.1-28. Rev 31. Attachment 3 D. Clearances B&R CP-CFM 9.10. Rev. 14. Sections 4.7.4. 4.7.5 O ,
and 4.11.1 i.
E. Baseplates R&R CP-CFM 9.10. Rev. 14. Sections 4.9 and 4.10 l 4. Bolting il Ingagement l A. SAR QI-QAP 11.1-28. Rev. 31.*Section 3.3.1.4
- 5. Contact R&R CP-CFM 9.10. Rev. 14. Section 4.12 I
l C. Richmond Inserts B&R CP-CFM 9.10. Rev.14. Section 4.12.4 l
D. Locking Devices ASME III. Snbsection NT S&R CP-CFM 9.10. Rev. 14. Section 4.17 R. U-Bolts B&R CF-QF 11.2-1. Rev. 18. Section 3.10 S&R QI-QAP 11.1-28. Rev. 31. Section 3.3.1.4 F. Torque B&R CP-CFM 9.10. Rev. 14. Section 4.13 C. Edge Distance 54R QI-QAF-11.1-28. Rev. 29. Section 3.3.3.
E. Grout-in Anchor TUSI CP-EI-13.0-3. Rev. 1
- 5. Piping Welds A. Location S&R QI-QAP 11.1-28. Rev. 31. Section 3.4.4 B. Sise ASME III. Subsection NB. NC. ND. Paragraphs 4427 C. Profile SSR QI-QAF 11.1-28. Rev. 31. Section 3.4.4 D. Reinforcement ASME III. Subsections NB. NC ND. Paracraphs 4426
EXHBIT 6 CO.w.ANC?.I PT.LS: RISPCNEE TIxi i.
IRC DFlIACCN RI? ORT (;R)
OA NW3ER ORIGT.iATOR ;A I I S LESR Zou ORS /. AM to 2E45 IDENTIFICA!ICN OF ITD'. R EVL RDOS cod SUPPORT
- LINIT C.C.-t-017 on1 5%3R. '
i ows."cc-t o n ost S%3R. Rtv.3 [0NI O r o c:x.:n SY3Xan AND LOCATION CC 3YSTER. ShrLGtARO ELOG. "Roou 69 s LOCMTnoW ELEV. St&'-3 ~ T WORTM Mf55 )*-8 ~ EAST t S OldG.* BRWL CC-1-55 oot tEV. 5 REQUIREENT (CRECKLIST i.Hd N0~. 3.A.6
) oz .o2 7 REV 1 PARA.S.S.t F VERIFY EVE ROO "TMEE AD ENGACtb44MT 'TMfa)Ghl "TML stGHT Hon.c., og, SY STAR. TRAMP.
4 MIACCN v% EYL MS "f %1' TAD LwC A4tNtNT 00ut.D W'T S E VirtFtt O h 'T O WO StGMT MOLES 07. STAQ STAM9S 70t4D
@ tis 'O No errorso (INCI.vDr asrIrICAr:Qx As RIac:Kra) i i
l
.. I.
'bllhw reltIFbl( Atl%
FIRst'savIr.Ta on! '
onIct3ATca
.v TALID DR Q YIS NO (INC:.TDE RSTITICATION AS RIOUIR.7. )
1Aa Va tr . ,ay,4p.m 4 ,< er !.sLs m ' ^ . '.'
- I ';
- A?% "
gja * /;'.. .. f .* * "4' , r /. .' .4 *,-
A)A 5
,j FIRSI REVIf.Ta DAT3
- 8h. 79
. - _ _ - , "?2" 7":'"T e /#/W8f
~
4/d ,
2* - - - - - - ^~~~~':~=- '~
EXHBIT 7 C:.w.:/: CHI ?IAK ?.II? NII TI/.M 3ATI Y 5 U;7:CANCI I'll*.~AT*0N EVAL *.*A!!ON NLME3: I S - L BS R - 7.o4.- O f2- S -s!! 53II 1 ;T?_
PRIFARER: A LAN QMQ w.5 Mm 3ATI: I a /t A /Ag OA,QC 551G DISCI?LINE ENGINEIR CHECKn: ~- 'M f ATYE.dDRA M-[w) DATE: U~ T-U
/\
v THE TOLLOUING ANALYSIS SUPPORTS THE CONCLUSION CONCI.UING THE SATETT SIGN!?IC6.NCI or THE CONDITION DESCRIBED IN THE DEVIATION REFORT NUMaEF. I-S-teSR -704-Of2-E AJiALT$IS:
AvreisvTE Devi ATioN :
cr- o?.7, EEN 1, 942n S.S.t F ATret SuTE S A. EiMitout ees, e.45 RCD THRE A D ENG AGEMENT BE VERT REC > WRCOCoH THE slGHT HOLE oR SY ST AR STAM P. NO SIGMT HOLES om STAR STAMPS extsT oN Twe STRUT TveRE FORE *1VROC aNsAce MswT ca.wwoT se ventFtep.
"~
l 4AFeTY CowCE R.M
! tu Aoeov ATE TwReno ENGAseMEwT couto Resuct- tu sTauT l ! FAtt.ute Auo twE Assemet.y wouto we towseg ResTw.scr l Tue movemewT oF THE SAFETY REL A.Teo PtPt MC. DO Ri NC, P t A stT oPeR ATi wG. CouOt t touS. -
I .,
REVIEWED BY: -
,Yb Date: ,
CONC:.tiSION:
BASED UPON THIS ANALYSIS. 3 E REPORTED CONDITION Rest lI.T IN W E INA31'~II OF THE AT7ECTED ITEM TO PERTOR.M ITS INTENDED SATETT RE' A.w t'.'NCTION.
A A fl REVIEVED ST: k 1ds q^eoC sstG t.
/ DATE: // !/ t I
/
Ao DtSCaLut sp3:a ,
AFFROVED BY: - DATE: //- 2 2 - AS~'
_ 3r 4Aloc ssw si.ru v.s.ut _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
i e ATTACHENT A PARTI IWORMATION FROM DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM TO QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, QA/QC ADEQUACYPROGRAM Review & Action Comment By ITEM Information by QOC/QAP OOC /QAP Action Plan X Results Reports
, Requests for QC inspec- X tions for Hardware Requests for QA Evoluo- X tions of identified design process problems O Construction items identified in external X
source review Information on root X cause onolysis (no quality of construction or QA/QC concerns identified)
Information on root X cause onelysis (OA/QC progrom or quality of construction concern l Identified)
I information on generic X implications evoluotion (no quality of construc-tion or QA/QC concerns identified)
O TN-85-6262/19 A-l Rev.2 Attochment A
e
. ATTACHAENT A PARTI O IPFORA4ATION FROM DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM TO QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, QA/QC ADEQUACYPROGRAM (Continued Review & Action Comment By ITEM Information by QOC/QAP OOC /OAP X
Information on generic implications evoluotion '
(QA/QC program or quality '
of construction concerns identified) i Collective Evoluotion X Report Information on X Construction related issues discovered during iO walkdowns or document reviews j Sofety Significant X Construction or QA/QC
- Deficiencies l
O -
TN-85 4262/19 A-2 Rev.2 Attochment A
ATTACHENT A PART2 NFORMATION FROM QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTK)N, QA/QC ADEQUACY PROGRAM TO DESIGN ADEQUACYPROGRAM Review & Action Comment By ITEM Information DAP DAP ISAP Results Report X Information on design X related issues dis-covered during inspec-tions and document reviews or review of external sources -
Selection of design- X related attributes q for CPRT inspection
- Q octivities Information on root X cause onolysis(no design concerns)
Information on root X cause onelysis (design .
related concerns identified)
Information on generic X 1mplications evoluotion (no design related concerns)
Information on generic X implications evoluotion (design related concerns identified)
O TN-85-4262/19 A-3 Rev. 2 Attochment /.
ATTACHAENT A PART2 O DFORMATION FROM QUALITY OF 1 I
CONSTRUCTION, QA/QC ADEQUACY PROGRAM TO DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM (Continued Review & Action Comment By ITEM Information DAP DAP Reinspection / Document Review Progrom Information Without Applicobility to Design Sompte Selection X Population Descriptions X Population Checklists X Sofety Significant X Construction or QA/QC Deficiencies Results X O Collective Evoluotion Report X
Periodic Trend Reporis X Sofety Significance X Evoluotions i Design Deviations X Noted by QOC/QA Sofety-Significant X Design-Related Deficiencies O
l TN-85-4262/19 A-4 Rev.2 Attachment A
ATTACHAENT B QOC/QAP/DAP INTERFACE DOCUAENT TRAN5MITTAL FORM l l
TRANSMITTAL NO. DAP.T. -
l TO: Dennis Alexander FROM: John Honekomp OA/QC Interface Coordinator DAP Interface Coordinator ,
DATE:
The ottoched document is transmitted for: ACTION REVEW AND COMMENT Document Title / Revision /Date i
Transmittal Comments: (I lud due date):
Follow-up Assignment: By ERC) l l
Assigned to: By:
Date Follow.up Comments:
O TN-85-6262/19 B-l Rev. 2 Attachment B
ATTACHMENT C FILE NO.
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM .
DAP/QOC CONTACT LOG SHEET
SUMMARY
OF TELECON OR MEETING DATE (of contact)
SUBJECT:
ORGANIZATION (S):
PARTICIPANTS: DAP:
- OOC:
OTERS:
SUMMARY
O l
ACTION:
DISTRIBUTION:
TN-85-6262/19 C-l O DAP-19, Rev. 3
l 1
i O ATTACHMENT D COMANCE PEAK DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM LOG QAP/DAP INTERFACE TRANSMITTAL LOG Transmittal , Requested No. Transmittal Response Document DAP-T-XX-YYY Date Date Description O
i i
i O
TN-85-6262/19 D-l DAP.19, Rev. 2
PageIof4 APPEtelX A BACKGROUPO
, This appendix is a non-mondatory attachment to DAP-19. The purpose of this appendix is to provide general background information and references related to the Quality of Construction Program (QOC) that may be useful to DAP personnel involved in the implementation of DAP-19.
PROGRAM STRUCTURE The Quality of Construction (QOC) and QA/QC Program (QAP) is described in Appendix B of the CPRT Program Plan and the following issue-Specific Action O Plans (15APs):
l l 1.d.1 QC inspector Qualifications l 1.d.2 Guidelines for Administration of QC inspector Tests
~
Vll.a.1 Material Troceability Vll.a.2 Non-conformance and Corrective Action Systems Vll.a.3 Document Control Vll.a.4 Audit Program and Auditor Quellfication Vll.a.S Monogement Assessment Vll.a.6 Exit interviews Vll.a.7 Housekeeping and System Cleanliness Vll.a.8 Fuel Pool Liner
,. Vll.b.I Onsite Ferication Vll.b.2 Volve Disassembly Vll.b.3 Pipe Support inspections Vll.b.4 Hitti Anchor Bolt Installation O
TN-85-4262/19 APPENDIX A
O Page 2 of 4 APPEIOlX A (Cont @
Vll.b.S Electrical Cable Troy Raceway Support inspections Vll.c Construction Reinspection / Documentation Review Plan ISAP Vll.c is the segment of the program under which the bulk of the hardware reinspections are performed, although ISAPs VII b.I through Vll.b.5 also include some hardware reinspection. The reinspections under ISAP VII.c are structured by populations of hardware which involve similar work processes. A list of the Vll.c hardware populations (Exhibit I) is issued periodically by the QOC/QAP.
PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION The general types of documentation issued by the QOC/QAP ore listed below.
The DAP maintains duplicate ERC Interface files in the Berkeley, Bethesdo and Site offices which contain the bulk of these documents (see ERC Interface File index for contents).
- Proarom
Description:
(Appendix B - CPRT Program Plan)
- l$APs: (Appendix C - CPRT Program Plan)
- ERC Manual Monogement Program Plan for the QA/QC Review Team and Quality Assurance Procedures
- ERC Manual: Comanche Peak Project Procedures (CPPs)
- ERC Manuals: Quality Instructions (Qls which contain the detailed inspection instructions)
TN.85 4262/19 APPENDIX A
, 4 3
Page 3 of 4
- PROGRAAA DOCUAENTATION (Cont'd)
- Population Descriptive Information:
1 o Work Process Definition (Exhibit 2) o Population Description (Exhibit 3) l o Population items List (Exhibit 4)
- Inspection Attribute List (Exhibit 5)
, (Note that this attribute list is ottoched to the description memoron-l dum referenced in each QI and is located in the DAP/ERC interface file under " Inspection Checklist".)
- ERC Deviation Report (Exhibit 6)
- ERC Sofety Slanificance Evoluotion (Exhibit 7) i 1
The QOC/QAP documents of most interest to the DAP are the population descriptive information, the inspection Attribute Lists, the Qls which describe the detailed inspection methods and inspection criteria and the safety signifi-conee evoluotions for deviations found. All of these documents are contained in the DAP/QOC/QAP interface files. The properation of these documents is controlled by the following ERC procedures which are also part of the DAP/QOC/QAP interfoce file.
CPP-001 Preparation of Project Procedures and Quality Instructions CPP-005 Establishing Populations M Somple Selection O
TN-85-4262/19 APPENDIX A l
i_ . _ . _ . , _ _ _ __ . - _ .
O Page 4 of 4 PROGRAM DOCUAENTATlON (Cont'd)
CPP-007 Preparation of Checklists and Data Base Reports CPP-010 Preparation of Deviation Reports CPP-016 Sofety Significance Evoluations of Deviation Reports PROGRAM ORGA>4ZATION A copy of the ERC organization chart is included in the DAP/QOC/QAP Interface file. The principal organizational units of interest to DAP ore:
Construction Somple Reinspection Enoineerina O This group, which prepares the population descriptive information, the attribute lists and tt.e Qls, is composed of three discipline areas which cor-respond to the structure of the master population list (Exhibit 1).
Sofety Stanificance Evaluation Group This group performs the safety significance evoluotions of all deviations identified during the QAP reinspections. It is composed of the following four discipliines:
- Electrical
- Mechonical
- Structural
- Supports inspection Group O This group contains the inspectors who perform the QAP reinspections.
Tt445 4262/19 APPENDIX A
. . . . . . . . . ..