ML20214R333

Comments on Feasibility of Evacuation Plan for Facilities & on Safety of Nuclear Power Per Telcon Suggestion of T Rehm. News Article Encl.Served on 860925

ML20214R333
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	09/16/1986
From:	Holway F AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	Zech L NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
CON-#386-849 OL-1, NUDOCS 8609290144
Download: ML20214R333 (2)

Text

"'

. , , , , , , O-ThNYN gL/q " Ef.T ' . , 'M3 '

647 Washington Rd. ,

Rye, N.H. 03870 September 16, 1(356 OTJE T Ei-

'.K Nh c Mr. Landow Zech, Chairman, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 gg '86 SEP 24 PS :26 Dear Mr. Zech OFFK!. r . m Yesterday while I was making a hurried visit to WashiB00Kfdii3GeriedVICf to see you but, as things turned out, ended with only a telepSS.@ con-versation witl) Tom Rehm who suggested I write this letter to you.

I was seeking facts on the power of the NRC and how it would use that power in the Seabrook dispute.

To what exDent can Governor Dukakis of Massachusetts and probably-to-be-elected Governor McEachern of New Hampshire overrule your decisions?

To what extent will the NRC Qbey the present regulaticns about needing satisfactory evacuation plans before allowing Seabrook Station to operate?

Satisfactory evacuation is absolutely imoossible in my town of Rye and sev-eral other towns in the 10 mile radius. Though we have been " dismissed" ,

our lives are still just as much in danger.

Please read the attached copy of a letter on the subject. You seem Lh be way out of line with the International Committee on Radiation Protection.

Please give human life andsafety a higher priority than investments in pub-lic utilities.

20W9E I understand that research in saf,a nuclear /may be completed in 15 years or so. Could it be that if you refuse to allow unsafe nuclear power this effort will be speeded up and be completed in a much shorter time?We really do have enough power sources in New Hampshire to wait for it.

Sincerely,

• -l;u w .- \ \ '~ $ w t .

(Mrs.) Frances I. Holway "

May God (and you) have mercy on the human race.

C.:a i n , .a _ g,.,3 25 EP 25 D: 3) 8609290144 860916

{DR ADOCK 05000443 PDR h

. _ . _ . _ . N.

• "di"'"*""'d'""'***

Write to dioactivity as and how they wish.

Foster's Daily Democrat ( Dover,14 H. J Write and tell the NRC you oppose the NRC me,e ch.mys. Write the Nuciear 2 1986 sept. 1, Regulatory Commission, Ducketing To the editor: & Service Branch, Washington, D.C.

The Nuclear Regulatory Agency 20555. Send copies to your rougress- -

was established as a reform agency men. Com ments due f ept. la.

after the old AEC was discredited Also write your congressman and . .. -

and dissolved in 1974. It was given ask them to curb the powers of the -

authority to regulate the commercial NRC. With one letter you can shoot aspects of the atom. Its mandate; to down two birds: the NRC, and the oversee the safety and licensing of nuclear plant owners who want to nuclear power plants. Its practice: to continue to tyrannize you, your puck-I speed the hcensing and overlook the etbooks, your lives, your progeny.

l safety. Write nowl In continuation of this policy,it has lagrid M. Sanborn

• proposed some rule changes to go Chairman Education Comunittee

! into effect immediately, after public Cit 14enn withla The i comment. , Ten Mlle Radius

• i One change would drastically re A duce pubhc participation in licensing hearings. Another would drasucally -

increase up to ten Umes the present limits set for radiation exposure to workers luside the plants, the public outside and the environment all around. la contrast, the Internation- '

al Commission on Radiation Protec-tion has recommended level hmits five times lower than present NRC .

I levels.

/ If these rule changes are allowed, the NRC could neatly kill off one bird (you the public) with two atones:

, shut you out of the heensing process, g --