IR 05000369/1997004
| ML20148B970 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 05/05/1997 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20148B961 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-369-97-04, 50-369-97-4, 50-370-97-04, 50-370-97-4, NUDOCS 9705130426 | |
| Download: ML20148B970 (31) | |
Text
.
-
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
Docket Nos: 50-369. 50-370 License Nos: NPF-9. NPF-17 Report No: 50-369/97-04, 50-370/97-04 l
i Licensee: Duke Power Company l
. l Facility: McGuire Generating Station. Units 1 & 2 l Location: 12700 Hagers Ferry R Huntersville. NC 28078 Dates: February 23, 1997 - April 5. 1997 Inspectors: S. Shaeffer. Senior Resident Inspector ti. Sykes Resident Inspector
N. Economos. Regional Inspector D. Forbes. Regional Inspector i S. Rudisail. Regional Inspector Approved by: C. Casto. Chief. Projects Branch 1 Division of Reactor Projects Enclosure 2 9705130426 970505 PDR ADOCK 05000369 0 PDR ,
-
.
Report Details Summary of Plant Status At the beginning of the inspection period. Unit 1 was being prepared to be defueled in day 10 of the planned 90 day 1E0C11 steam generator replacement / refueling outage. At the end of the inspection period. Unit 1 was defueled and conducting SGRP activities. Specific SGRP reviews were documented in IR 369/97-03 and 97-05. Based on the outage progress at the end ;
of. the inspection period, the licensee had reevaluated their SGRP outage completion schedule for a proposed 86 day outage. On February 25. the licensee . identified that two of the four main feedwater isolation valves did not close as expected during preparation for maintenance activities on the valves. Details of this problem are discussed later in the report.
Unit 2 began the inspection period at approximately 100 percent power. On March 10. a power reduction to approximately 88 percent was necessary due a turbine generator exciter cooler leak. After repairs were completed. the unit returned to 100 percent power the next da On March 13. Unit 2 reduced power to approximately 23 percent to allow for inspection and testing of the Unit 2 main feedwater isolation valves based on a problem identified on Unit 1. The unit remained at reduced power (approximately 28 percent) until March 22 when the root cause identification and appropriate repairs were completed to correct the problems. The unit then operated at approximately 100 percent power for the remainder of the inspection period.
Review of UFSAR Commitments While performing inspections discussed in this report. the inspectors reviewed the applicable portions of the UFSAR that were related to che areas inspected.
The inspectors verified that the UFSAR wording was consistent with the observed plant practices, procedures, and/or parameter I. Operations 01 Conduct of Operations 01.1 General Comments (71707)
Using Inspection Procedure 71707, the inspectors conducted frequent reviews of ongoing plant operations. In general, the conduct of operations was professional and safety-conscious: specific events and noteworthy observations are detailed in the sections below. The defueling of Unit 1 for the refueling / steam generator replacement outage was conducted in a good manner. Management oversight of the core off-load evolutions was evident. In addition to the issues discussed in this report. other concurrent steam generator replacement outage inspections are detailed in NRC Inspection Report 369/97-0 :
Enclosure 2
.-.
_ _ _ _- . .. _ _ . _- .. _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . _
-
.
,
i j 02 Operational Status of Facilities and Equipment (71707)
02.1 50.72 Notifications 1 l
a. Insoection Scooe During the inspection period, the licensee made the following notifications to the NRC as required or for information purposes. The inspectors reviewed the events for impact on the operational status of i the facility and equipmen ;
i b. Observations and Findinas On March 5. 1997, the licensee made a report in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72 due to an evacuation of the McGuire site environmental I lab following discovery of a container of picric acid which may have been unstabl The City of Charlotte HAZMAT Team and the ;
State of North Carolina were informed. The lab is located inside '
the licensee's owner controlled area; however, outside the facilities protected area. Specialized personnel were consulted ,
to evaluate the container and determine the best method for l disposal. The container was opened under controlled conditions and diluted to minimize any potential problem. The inspectors overviewed the licensee's response to the event and considered that all actions taken were conservativ . On March 13, 1997. based on NRC questioning. the licensee made a report in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72 due to two of the Unit 1 i feedwater isolation valves for the B and D steam generators I failing to actuate as expected. On February 25. the subject !
valves were identified by the licensee to not have closed as I expected during pre-outage valve testing. Unit 1 was shutdown and defueled at the time of discovery. The valves are containment isolation /feedwater isolation valves and were determined to be past inoperable. The cause of the subject valves and similar Unit 2 valves failing to actuate as expected is further discussed in section M2.1 of the repor The inspectors determined that between the period of February 25 until March 13 the licensee's engineering aersonnel reviewing the problem had determined that the two valves lad been inoperabl iowever, appropriate licensee personnel did not recognize the event was reportable per 10 CFR 50.72 four-hour report criteria (b)(2)(i) which states, in part, that "any event found while the reactor i.s shutdown, that had it been found while the reactor was in operation would have resulted in the nuclear plant, including its principle safety barriers, being seriously degraded or being in an unanalyzed condition that significantly compromises plant safety. Once brought to the licensee's attention by the NRC, the Enclosure 2
.
-. =- . -. . . - . - - - -
-
.
-
appropriate 10 CFR 50.72 report (s) were mad The problem was also re]orted under the requirements of four hour report 10 CFR 50.72 (3)(iii)(D). The failure to make the subject 10 CFR 50.72 report (s) in a timely manner will be identified as Violation 369/97-04-01. Failure to report a condition required by 50.72 in a <
timely manner.
3. On March 14. 1997, the licensee made a report in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72 due to the discovery that two of the Unit 2 containment /feedwater isolation valves did not actuate as expected '
during testing. Based on a Unit 1 problem. Unit 2 power had been reduced from 100% to ap of the subject valves. proximately During this 28% power testin to facilitate feedwater isolation testing valves 2CF-28 and 2CF-30 failed to meet required stoke times. The valves were placed in the TS required closed positions until l repairs could be completed. This event and the licensee's corrective action activities are further discussed in section M of the report. The licensee plans on submitting an LER on this I even l 4. On March 18. 1997, the licensee made a report in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72 concerning a past operability concern for the Unit 1 feedwater/ containment isolation valve ICF-26. The licensee !
identified that on November 27, 1996, the subject valve had been declared inoperable: however, was not logged under TS 3.6 3 as a containment isolation valve. During the time the valve remained 1 open for extended periods of time in excess of the ACTION statement requirements for the TS. The licensee identified this problem as part of corrective actions for previously identified problems associated with both units feedwater isolation valves and their apalicability to TS 3.6.3. The licensee plans to submit an LER on tais event. Other associated events are discussed in sections 02.1.b.2 and 02.1.b.3.
5. On March 20, 1997, the licensee made a report in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72 due to their determination that the TS for maximum power level setpoint for postulated inoperable main steam line safety valves (MSSVs) was in error. Specifically, the percent of rated thermal power listed in TS table 3.7-1. was found to be non-conservative w1en applied to postulated three inoperable main steam safety valves on the same loop. The subject TS allows for continued operation in this condition provided rated thermal power is limited to 43%. However, licensee calculations associated with an associated TS amendment request identified that the unit should be shutdown if three MSSVs were inoperable on the same loop to prevent overpressurization of the main steam system. Corrective actions for the apparent TS inadequacy include the development of a TS revision to correct the problem and interim guidance to operators to clarify appropriate actions to take in the postulated event of three inoperaale MSSVs on the same loo Enclosure 2
-
.
The inspectors concluded that the licensee's identification of the potential problem was good and the proposed corrective actions were determined to be acceptabl . On March 26, 1997, the licensee made a report in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72 concerning both trains of the control room ventilation system being inoperable for a) proximately two minute TS 3.0.3 was entered due to all four inta ces to the system being closed simultaneously. The event occurred when two of the four intakes were closed for maintenance activities and the other two intakes were closed by operators in response to a spurious actuation of radiation monitor 1 EMF-43A. Investigation immediately determined that the actuation was not valid and the intakes were reopened. The licensee plans to submit an LER regarding the even Conclusions The inspector concluded that the licensee reported the above events in accordance with the recuirements of 10 CFR 50.72 with the exception of example 2. which was icentified as a violation.
02.2 Main Generator Exciter Cooler Leakaae Insoection Scone and Observations On March 10. during routine operator rounds an operator recognized leakage from a gasket on the main generator exciter cooling syste The gasket was located in a portion of piping that supplies cooling water to one of four exciter cooling units. As a result. the licensee reduced power to approximately 90 percent power to com)lete repairs. Since the system design incorporated a parallel heat exc1 anger, the licensee was able to isolate and drain the leaking cooler and complete repairs on-line. The failed gasket was replaced and functionally verified. The unit was then returned to 100 percent powe b ._ Conclusions The inspectors recognized good operator attention to detail in identifying the degraded condition and prompt engineering and maintenance response to correct the equipment failure. The licensee has also proposed to aerform a root cause investigation to identify the cause for the gascet problem in efforts to preclude future premature failure Enclosure 2
-
.
04 Operator Knowledge and Performance (71707)
04.1 Review of Shift Turnover Processes a. Insoection Scooe
,
During the current and previous inspection periods, the inspectors l observed operator shift turnovers to assess the adequacy of the proces l b. Observations and Findinas The McGuire shift turnover process is controlled and described. in par I by the following procedures: )
- OMP 5-7. Unit Supervisor Turnover Revision 0, dated 2/23/94
- OMP Control Room SRO Turnover. Revision 3. dated 2/3/97
- OMP 5-14. Work Control SRO Turnover. Revision 0, dated 3/25/97 The listed procedures promoted continuity of the shift turnover and incorporate descriptions of expectations prior to assuming operational duties. The inspectors reviewed the procedures and concluded that they l provided good guidance to the various levels of the operational staff to l effectively accomplish shift turnover. The procedures aided operations management in focusing oncoming shift crews on emergent issues including special attention to conditional surveillances. This area has exhibited 1 previous problem The procedures included turnover checklists required I to be completed as part of the turnover proces Routine shift turnovers were observed by the inspectors in the control i room on a random basis. Periods reviewed included off-hours inspections !
as well as turnovers conducted during high activity levels. The ;
ins]ectors noted that the process appeared to be detailed and conducted j wit 1 a high degree of professionalism which reflected good operations 1 ownership of the plant. An example noted by the inspectors was the '
delay in the shift briefing due to a phone interru] tion of one of the unit R0s. The process was stopped until the RO's ]usiness was concluded. The process also appeared to be consistently implemented by the different shift c. Conclusions The inspectors concluded that the controlling processes for conducting shift turnovers were adequate. Im)1ementation of shift turnovers was good and consistently implemented )y the various shifts. Operations Shift Managers control and support of the process was eviden Enclosure 2
-
.
07 Quality Assurance in Operations (40500)
0 Identification of Problem Investiaation Reoorts a. Insoection Scooe Assessment of the licensee's ability to identify adverse conditions for correctio b. Observations and Findinas The inspectors reviewed the licensee's 1996 and current year-to-date information regarding the number of Problem Investigation Process (PIP)
forms. In 1996, the licensee identified in excess of 3.800 PIPS. By the end of the inspection period, the current year-to-date identifications exceeded 1.500 PIPS. Based on this rate, the licensee expected to exceed 5.000 PIPS for 1997 The inspectors discussed the identification process with a number of line management and concluded that the threshold for identification of PIPS was very low and I management at all levels were actively supporting use of the process to ;
identify, evaluate, and correct non-conformance. safety, and improvement issues. The inspectors also discussed with the licensee recent changes in the categorization of less important PIPS to allow for continued focus on the most important. safety-related and personnel safety issue The new process should help the licensee in properly maintaining focus in appropriate area c. Conclusions The inspectors concluded that the licensee's threshold for identifying PIPS in accordance with their corrective action program was established at a low level. The PIP process was being utilized by personnel at all levels and efforts were being implemented to allow for continued focus !
on the most significant issue !
07.2 Review of PORC Meetina for On-line Maintenance of Valve 2CA-61 The inspector observed the PORC review of on-line maintenance repair '
.
planned for valve 2CA-61. Valve 2CA-61 is the A" CA pump discharge check valve. Piping temperature alarms indicated leakage past the check valve that was resulting in pipe temperatures of 220 degrees !
Temperatures of 225 degrees F would require the leakage source to be i isolated and result in the CF train being declared inoperabl The inspector observed the PORC deliberations to be thorough with appropriate focus on plant and personnel safety. The execution plan for the repair work was discussed and the PORC questions were adequately resolved. Contingency plans were well develope Enclosure 2
._ _- _ ._ - .. - - _ . - - - - - .- - - - - . - . -
.
'
- 07.3 Block Tacout Prooram Revisions
, Insoection Scone The inspectors performed inspections to evaluate the effectiveness of recent changes to the station Block Tagout progra , Observations and Findinos The. inspectors evaluated the results of the licensee's efforts to improve the Block Tagout (BTO) Program. A Quality Improvement Team (OIT) had been established to develop an improved process to 1) better l control block tagouts during an outage: 2) formalize the documentation to capture the BT0 process: and 3) establish training requirements to ensure personnel who will interface with this process were properly i trained. The BT0 program provides protection for personnel and control of plant components and systems during maintenance, outages, and modification activities. A BT0 is defined as isolating and tagging a predefined )ortion of the plant. This allows multiple work groups to
, perform worc within the BT0 boundary minimizing redundant tagging and
'
expediting outage activities by considering the scope of all planned work activities on a particular system or partial system.
i i As a result of the OIT. McGuire Site Directive (MSD) 587. Block Tagout, was issued. The directive described the development, implementation, and clearing of BTOs as well as the process for controlling BTOs. The inspectors reviewed the MSD and reviewed BT0 activities throughout the period. The inspectors noted that the program included detailed
. procedures to provide for the verification of the removal and restoration of plant equipment and provided adequate documentation for
'
1 good control over BTO proces I Conclusions The inspectors concluded that the licensee's revisions to the program were appropriate. The inspector also noted that correct administration
and implementation of the program to maintain the status and integrity of plant components and systems should be effective in further reducing
-
the probability of tagout related incidents. However. isolated tagout problems have been occurring, indicating a need for management focus in this are Miscellaneous Operations Issues (92700)
i 0 (CLOSED) URI 50-369/97-01-01: Root Cause of RCS Letdown Filter Leak.
J This URI was identified to further evaluate the root cause and extent of condition for an RCS 14 gpm leak which occurred on one of the Unit 1 letdown filter housings. Details of the event were previously described in IR 97-01. The licensee completed a root cause investigation of the event and documented the results in PIP 1-M97-0531. The root cause of
, Enclosure 2
.
J *
-
-
.
the problem were leaking letdown filter isolation valves caused by malfunctioning or misadjusted travel stop through remote operators.
Several previous WRs were identified regarding the potential misadjustment of the filter housing inlet isolation valves; however, one was deleted and one was combined with another WR for subsequent review.
The event occurred when the leaking isolations allowed the filter housing to pressurize and blow out the filter housing gasket during cover removal. However, the magnitude of the leak was significantly increased due to a vent ca) being installed on the filter housing vent.
This vent was presumed to 3e open during performance of the filter changeout procedure: therefore with no functional vent established, the leaking isolation valves pressurized the filter housing and caused the gasket to dislodge. A similar vent cap was found installed on the Unit 2 letdown filter vent.
The inspectors reviewed the procedure used to perform filter changeout and concluded that the procedure was inadequate. in that no guidance was provided to ensure proper venting of the housing was accomplished prior to opening the housing. A flow device had been installed in the filter housing configuration which could have been used to verify the proper venting and draining of the filter housing. Corrective actions for the letdown filter vent configuration problem included modification to the filter changeout procedure to eliminate the use of the vent line during the future filter changeouts.
The inspector concluded that the licensee's root cause investigation of the event was adequate. The review also identified other system filter vents which could have been susceptible to an over-pressurization event due to the unproceduralized installation of vent caps. These systems included: seal water heat exchanger, recycle evaporator feed filter, recycle demineralizer effluent filter, and the spent fuel pool cooling filter vents. The inspector concluded that the corrective actions for the event were thorough and identified and corrected other potential problems. The inspectors reviewed the regulatory significance of the configuration problems and determined that procedures associated with the letdown filter and other systems filter assemblies were inadequate, in that, they did not identify or control the installed pipe caps or provide adequate steps to ensure associated filter housing were adequately vented. This issue will be identified as a Non-Cited Violation (NCV). 50-369.370/97-04-02. Inadequate Filter Housing Vent Procedures. This violation was treated as a NCV consistent with Section VII.B.1 of the NRC Enforcement Polic Enclosure 2 !
l l
- .- ._ - -- _ . . -.
-
.
II. Maintenance M1 Conduct of Maintenance M1.1 General Comments (61726 and 62707)
The inspectors witnessed selected surveillance tests to verify that approved procedures were available and in use, test equipment in use was calibrated, test prerequisites were met. system restoration was completed, and acceptance criteria were met. In addition resident inspectors reviewed and/or witnessed routine maintenance activities to verify. where applicable, that approved procedures were available and in use, prerequisites were met, equipment restoration was completed, and maintenance results were adequate.
M1.2 Ice Condenser Ice Basket Maintenance a. Insoection Scope This inspection was performed for the purpose of inspecting the ice condenser baskets and to review results of maintenance activities relative to screws used to secure the coupling rings to the baske b. Observations and Findinos Through the use of the Problem Investigation Process (PIP). the licensee reported that in the conduct of routine maintenance activities. i.e., <
empty and replenish ice condenser baskets, performed during refueling outage 1E0C11. in March 1997 technicians discovered that although basket 5-3-9 had been replenished, its weight was not indicative of a full baske The basket was subsequently emptied and a visual inspection l revealed that it was partly separated at a point approximately 27 feet i below the top at the coupling ring. The inspection also revealed that only two of the 12 required screws were 3 resent. Through document review and discussions with the responsi]le technician and the lead engineer. the inspector attained the following background informatio During refueling outage 1E0C9 in October 1994, a routine inspection revealed that the aforementioned basket was damaged and would require repair. The repair, which required the replacement of several basket sections. was started on the morning shift of September 15, 1994, and was completed on the night shift of the same da The basket was apparently replenished with ice and placed in service until the present outage (1E0C11). The screws were discovered missing when the basket failed to pass a weight test during maintenanc Through discussions with cognizant personnel the inspectors ascertained '
that through an apparent lack of communications between shifts, technicians failed to install the screws used to attach the basket j section to the coupling ring as required by the applicable procedure i MP/0/A/7150/098. The missing coupling screws were subsequently installed under Work Order 96064989-01 and Procedure SM/0/A/8510/07. The basket was tested and returned to servic Enclosure 2 j
.- - - - - -. -- - . - . - - - - - . -
,
,
10 !
F Through discussions with the lead engineer, the inspectors ascertained that a search of the ice condenser floor produced no evidence of broken or whole screws that could be associated with the loose basket. In >
addition the lead engineer stated that of the 2665 baskets that have '
been serviced at McGuire since 1990. this was the only basket found with l cou) ling ring screws missing. The lead engineer 01s0 stated that '
tec1nicians have never found loose or broken coupling ring screws on the floor of the ice condenser since the plant went nto ccamercial servic This licensee identified and corrected problem we determined to be a violation of 10 CFR 50. Appendix B. Criterion V. and was evaluated as a ;
Non-Cited Violation (NCV) 50-369.370/97-04-03. Failure to Follow Procedures. This violation was treated as a NC\ consistent with Section VII.B.1 of the NRC Enforcement Polic l The inspectors selected a sample of ice condenser taskets for
- observation. The emphasis of the inspection was the bottom ends of the
,
baskets for evidence of damage and for loose or broken scr(ws on the floor of the ice condenser.. The inspectors also checked the top ends !
i for missing screws or basket damage and noted that all the baskets inspected appeared to be in good condition and found no evidence of ,
missing screws on the floor of the ice condense As a followup to this work effort. the inspectors reviewed avality records pertaining to the subject screws. By this review and through discussions with technicians and the lead engineer the inspectors ,
ascertained that all ice condenser basket coupling ring screws used at i
.
McGuire and Catawba have been purchased from Westinghouse (W).
,
The present inventory was procured on purchase order C19846-M3 in July 1992. The screws were identified as Ice Basket sheet Metal Screws No. 10x32x1/2 inch long. W 3 art No. 1880E55H05. The screws were produced from AISI 1022 car]on steel material that was heat treated to a minimum tensile strength of 140KSI which is consistent with McGuire's FSAR paragraph 6.2.2 requirement i Use of Imorocer Reolacement Screvs
'
In addition to the above mentioned information, the inspectors ascertained that on May 30, 1990, the licensee issued Licensee Event Report (LER) 369/90-7 to notify the NRC that previously authorized replacement screws used during maintenance of certain ice cordenser baskets in McGuire Units 1 and 2. were made from improper stainicss steel type material. Following this discovery. Design Engineering reviewed the shear and binding forces applied to the basket couplings during seismic and design basis events. Results of this review concluded that the use of 10-16. type 410 stainless steel screws was unacceptable for the application. On April 17, 1990, the licensee issued a Prchl = Investigation Report (PIP) 1-M90-0107 to address this concern. The mbicm was resolved by replacing all 410 type stainless steel screws, i,. % hottom and or intermediate coupling rings on 10 Enclosure 2
.
- -. . - - . - _ _ . .. - ... - . . . . -- ..
l i
l .
Unit 1 baskets with W 10-32, AISI 1022 carbon steel screws. Following W recommendations based on analysis, the licensee used stainless steel cables to secure ice basket (7-6-10) in Unit 2 until the screws in question could be replaced with the original material. This was scheduled for the upcoming refueling outag By telephone the inspectors discussed the subject screws with the Catawba cognizant engineer. Through this discussion the inspectors ascertained that Catawba used the same maintenance procedure to perform
'
maintenance and tracking. Catawba also uses the same carbon steel 1022 material screws provided by W on their coupling ring application. In l addition, the engineer indicated that loose or broken ice basket screws i
have never been found on the floor of the ice condenser since the plant
'
! began commercial operatio As in McGuire, screws made of stainless steel material were used on the non-load bearing stiffener rings for the i purpose of securing them to the baskets. The inspectors reviewed the i following information/ documents for technical content and are provided
! for reference purposes: PIP l-M90-0107 Operability Evaluation. Ice Condenser Ice Basket l Coupling Screws. Unit 1.
! SM/0/A/8510/007 Rev. 3 Ice Basket Corrective Maintenance and
!
Tracking l .2.2 Ice Condenser System. McGuire Final Safety Analysis Report /4.6.5 McGuire Technical Specification SECL 90-283 Ice Condenser Lower Strength Evaluation. Unit 1 PIP 1-M9-0107 Rev. 2 Operability Evaluation Ice Condenser Ice l
! Basket Coupling Screws, Unit 2 l
!
c. Conclusions
!
The ice condenser maintenance program at McGuire appears to be l consistent with Technical Specification requirements and FSAR commitment Procedures and quality records reviewed for technical i
! content, completeness and accuracy were satisfactory. Supervisors and
!
technicians were very knowledgeable and dedicated to the task of maintaining the ice condenser, and therefore able to perform its design !
functions. One Non-C1ted Violation (NCV) was identifie M2 Maintenance and Material Condition of Facilities and Equipment M2.1 Unit 1 and 2 Feedwater Isolation Valves Not Actuatina as Exoected
,
! a. Inspection Stone i
"
During the inspection period, the inspector reviewed problems associated with the failure of Unit 1 and 2 feedwater/ containment isolation valves '
to close and or actuate within required times.
I Enclosure 2 i
-- - - - . - - _ - - - . - - - _ - - - - - - - - . - . . -
.
, b Observations and Findinas
On February 26. while performing 3reventative maintenance on the Unit 1 mainfeed (CF) isolation valves t1e licensee identified the hydraulic
! actuators for 1-CF28 and 1-CF30 did not actuate as expected. Unit I was in no MODE. Specifically. deenergizing the train A or B safety solenoids did not cause the accumulator to discharge nitrogen pressure
'
and close the valve.
!
The subject valves are Borg Warner.16 inch hydraulically actuated valves with nitrogen close safety feature. There are two safety trained solenoids on each valve to provide redundant means of porting nitrogen to the valve actuator to close the valve within the required time. The
'
safety solenoids are normally energized. The type of hydraulic oil used was Fyrquel 220 which has a recommended maximum operating temperature of l 160 degrees F. The valves are located in the main steam valve vaults !
(MSSV) in the feedwater system flowpath to the steam generator main i nozzles. The valves receive a signal to close on a Safety Injectio Low Tavg coincident with Reactor Trip. Hi-H1 t155V water level, or HI-HI steam generator leve Based on the identified Unit 1 concern, on March 14. Unit 2 was reduced to approximately 28% power for realignment of feedwater flow from the main feedwater nozzles to the upper feedwater (auxiliary feedwater)
nozzle. This was done to allow testing of the Unit 2 MF isolation valve without adversely impacting the unit. The testing identified that 2CF28 and 2CF30 were also unable to close within the required stroke tim The unit remainea at reduced power for 11 days to evaluate the problem .
and develop corrective actions as follows. The licensee made several !
50.72 reports regarding the problems and a violation was identified !
concerning licensee activities in the area of reportability (see section l 02.1). ;
The licensee's root cause investigation determined that the solenoid-failures were attributed to hydraulic oil degradation which produced 3 iron phosphate salts and gelling of the fluid within the solenoid. This ;
interfered with the movement of critical close tolerance parts within !
the solenoid valve resulting in the valves not being able to go close ;
The solenoids installed in the application are a wet type where i hydraulic fluid can communicate directly with the plunger mechanism. As
'
previously stated, the solenoids are normally energized, therefore the temperatures within the solenoid were found to exceed the manufactures recommended limit. The oil degradation occurs naturally over time; however, the degradation could be accelerated by either high moisture content within the oil and/or sustained oil temperatures greater than recommended levels. Stagnation of the oil also contributes to the ;
problem. Normal operation of the solenoid though infrequent, would not ;
result in " flushing" of the critical portions of the solenoid assembly ;
enough to prevent the proble i Enclosure 2 ;
- . . . - __ _ - _ _ _ __
,
f
-
.
!
l 13 Once the root cause of the problem was established, the licensee took extensive actions to ensure continued operability. Corrective actions !
for the oil salting problem included: :
-
Modification of the power supply to the safety solenoid valve i
'
coils to reduce terminal voltage at the coil and reduce operating temperature of the coil, plunger, and local hydraulic oi Monitoring of the condition of the hydraulic fluid via the total acid number (TAN) which is indicative of oil breakdow Installation of ventilation ports in the actuator enclosures to ,
increase cooling to the solenoid coil Installation of RTD's on the safety solenoid coil housing to allow for monitoring of coil temperature during operatio Revision of maintenance procedures for the actuators to incorporate more detailed cleaning methods of the safety coil )
-
Increased PM and inspection of all solenoid and plunger mechanisms.
.
-
Cleaning or replacement of all solenoid actuator components.
l
-
Replacement of hydraulic fluid / dehydrated oil as require The inspectors reviewed industry experience data and dottrmined that 3revious failures of hydraulically operated MF end MS n ulation valves lad been identified at other facilities with similar symptoms. The licensee incorporated this data during their root cause investigation.
, Subsequent to the end of the inspection period, the licensee reduced ,
l Unit 2 power again on April 18 to implement additional modification to l l the CF isolation valve solenoid circuitr This was accomplished to further ensure continued operation of the equipment within the manufacture's recommended operating temperature in the upcoming summer months. The modification further reduced the solenoids operating voltage by installing larger resistors in the circuitry. The addition of the resistors was shown not to adversely affect the solenoid drop out l voltage which could lead to inadvertent valve actuation. Valve stroke l timing tests, both before and after the modification were within
- required times. Once Unit 2 returned to 100 percent power, data l indicated that the modification further reduced the solenoid operating l temperature 10 to 15 degrees F. The licensee estimated that the current i i
design should enable the solenoids to operate within the manufacturer's I recommended temperature range throughout the hottest periods of the summe The licensee will continue to monitor the temperatures on a
)eriodic basis to ensure the conditions do not exist for continued lydraulic fluid saltin In addition, a special project has been i
Enclosure 2
,
__ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _
- ___ __ __ . _ - _ - _
'
-
'
initiated within engineering to review the potential for a reliable alternate type actuator / valve to replace the existing hydraulic actuators in the upcoming EOC12 outages. This is being reviewed to eliminate this and other long term performance problems associated with these valve Conclusions The inspectors concluded that the licensee's approach to identifying and correcting the root cause of the CF valve solenoid )roblems was detailed and aggressive. The use of root cause analysis tec1niques and incorporation of vendor technical expertise and available industry data i to resolve the problem was goo The licensee plans to submit an LER regarding the past inoperability of the subject valves. The inspectors
'
will review the safety significarce of the inoperable CF isolation
'
valves during LER closeout once the licensee's analysis of the event is complete.
,
The inspector: also concluded that PORC reviews associated with the second Unit 2 downpower to perform additional modification to the l solenoids were conservative and thoroughly evaluated the potential risk to the unit. The decision to reduce power for the modification reflected licensee managements commitment to limit potential transients
, to the plant. Engineering proposals regarding the solenoids were well
established and had valid technical basi M2.2 Reactor Trio Breaker Contact Resistance Concerns Insoection Scope l The inspectors evaluated the licensee's findings and response to higher l than expected resistance indications during testing of Solid State Protection System (SSPS) logic circuitry.
l Observations and Findinas l During the performance of PT/0/A/4601/08A. SSPS Train A Periodic Tes the licensee identified higher than ex)ected resistances on a P-4 contact on DS-416 bypass reactor trip 3reaker. BYA. The licensee
, recognized that higher resistances could potentially prevent the l function of the P-4 contact and not allow operator reset of the SI l signal adversely impacting the ability of operators responding to l' certain emergency conditions. The licensee stopped the test procedure and restored the SSPS system to its normal alignment through the main reactor trip breaker. RTA. The licensee immediately initiated investigations to determine the cause for the higher resistance value Although the measured values exceeded licensee expectations. the
licensee confirmed breaker operability and subsequently confirmed that the Solid state Protection System (SSPS) was also operabl )
i
'
Enclosure 2
.
t -
w -
. . =- - -_- - - - - - - *
.
i i 15 l The licensee identified and evaluated the possible failure modes and determined that the most probable cause for the higher resistance values
!
was due to excessive amounts of vendor recommende' graphite lubrican Excessive amounts of the lubricant created additi, 'l resistivity and prevented good continuity between the fixed and mtoble contacts. The I
inspectors reviewed maintenance procedures and ver 'ed that the licensee procedures specified the vendor recommende; lubricant, i Westinghouse 53701AN. The lubricant was applied on current carrying surfaces during each scheduled refueling outag .
,
The licensee responded by revising the station procedures to thoroughly l clean the contacts during periodic breaker maintenance and to replace '
the lubricant sparingly to minimize the potential for higher than
! expected resistance values. The licensee develo)ed and implemented emergency work requests to clean and lubricate t1e auxiliary switch i contacts on all installed reactor trip breakers in accordance with the l revised procedures to provided added assurance of trip breaker performanc The licensee contacted Westinghouse for additional l technical support to evaluate the significance of the higher resistance !
measurement The licensee was informed that resistance values should
'
be kept to a minimum to ensure proper operation of the SSPS circuitr !
The ins)ector verified that the licensee had revised SI/0/A/5100/00 Westinglouse 05-416 Air Circuit Breaker Inspection and Maintenance. to check contact resistance prior to and following maintenance. The i iicensee has also revised the procedure to include improved guidance on :
, cleaning and applying auxillary switch contact lubricant.
l I Conclusions i The inspectors concluded that the licensee's proactive response to the lubrication on breaker current carrying surfaces was good. The :
inspector also concluded that the licensee revision to the maintenance i and inspection procedure should provide assistance in identifying adverse switch performance during maintenance. Detailed testing and '
followup by engineering and maintenance teams has enhanced the i licensee's understanding of the DS-416 breaker and SSPS circuitr M2.3 Leakaae throuah Unit 1 Refuelina Cavity Seal Insoection Scope
!
The inspectors reviewed licensee actions associated with leakage identified during use of a new design of reactor refueling cavity sea Observations and Findings For the current Unit 1 SGRP/ refueling outage the licensee incorporated i a new non-inflatable type seal at the reactor vessel flange to support refueling activities. During initial floodup for core off-loa operators received repetitive HI-HI alarms for the incore
- instrumentation area sump indicating potential refueling cavity seal l
Enclosure 2 i
~ . _ _- __ . _ . _ _ _ . _ . . _ - . .
leakage. An estimated 17 gam was identified and the operators responded to each alarm by starting t1e local sump pump. At full flood conditions, the leakage had trended down to ap3roximately 7 gpm. PIP 1-M97-0665 was identified to track the issue. T1e inspector questioned
.
the long term seal integrity and discussed the new seal design and I leakage expectations with engineering and maintenance personnel. The '
l new seal design incorporated a five piece solid T-type design which was held in place via 50 toggle bolt assemblies. The seal design had been
'
changed to eliminate previous leakage problems associated with the old seal design and to eliminate the need for RTV sealant application to l achieve acceptable or zero leakage.
!
The licensee evaluated the existing leakage prior to proceeding with core offload. Based on the seal design, it was concluded that the seal l
'
integrity was intact and a catastrophic seal failure was not possibl The licensee also evaluated the impact of re)etitive sump pump cycling and developed operator guidance for use of t1e sump pum Based on the inspectors review of the seal design, a catastrophic seal failure was not probable and the leakage was stable. Defueling activities were ;
i completed without any further problems and engineering monitoring of the existing leakage for adverse trend was considered goo Prior to draindown, the licensee identified a suspect location for the '
leakage from beneath the vessel flange. After draindown, ins)ections l revealed that some areas of the seal mating surfaces may not lave been fully seated due to irregularities in the mating surfaces and/or seal.
! identified as the most probable area for the identified leakage. To l
'
temporarily correct the problems for core reload, the licensee i detensioned the affected areas and used approved RTV to provide adequate {
sealing. Long term corrective actions include mapping of the mating
,
surfaces to identify any additional surface inconsistencies and use the I
information to specify im) roved seal dimensions. The licensee stated i
- that their goal was to aclieve a zero leakage seal with the improvement Engineering guidance was developed to monitor any leakage during refueling canal fill and while at full flood conditions and also r identified acceptable conditions for operator information.
l c. Conclusions i
The inspector concluded that the licensee took appropriate actions to
, identify and temporarily correct the arevious reactor refueling cavity l seal leakage. Attempts to identify t1e location of the seal leakage l were performed in a timely manner. Adequate repairs were completed
! prior to reflood for refuelin Final evaluation of the repairs will be l determined during reflood activities for core reload. Overall, the j observed maintenance activities were performed in a good manner.
.
- Enclosure 2
!
. __ .- ._ .
,
.
M4 Maintenance Staff Knowledge and Performance M4.1 Unit 1 Main Turbine Oil Soill Insoection Scooe i
On March 27. 1997. a substantial amount of main turbine oil was l
'
inadvertently spilled out of the turbine during maintenance activities.
i The inspectors monitored the licensee's response to the problem and l eva.luated the corrective actions / cleanup activitie !
b. Observations and Findinas L The problem occurred during planned turbine oil flushing operations and was documented via PIP 1-M97-128 Two temporary covers made of plexiglass were installed near the shaft driven oil pump. One of the covers developed a crack which allowed approximately 1.000 gallons of turbine oil to spill from the system onto the turbine deck and belo The evolution was identified as a risk evolution and as such, had contingency measures established at the pre-job briefing to cope with l this type of problem. Once aware of the leak. personnel reacted quickly l (within 45 seconds) to isolate recirculation pumps to limit the total oil spil No personal injuries occurred due to the leak and the event did not affect the operating unit.
'
Immediate corrective actions included timely efforts to contain the spill and to stop any activities involving cutting or grinding which could be a source of ignition for the oil. Turbine building sump pumps
, were quickly secured to prohibit evacuation of the oil to outside holdup
' pond At the end of the inspection period, some oil sheen was identified and collected on one of the external holdup ponds. No oil was known to be released to the river.
, The licensee conducted significant cleanup efforts to identify the l affected areas of oil intrusion. Focus areas included potential oil intrusion into electrical components cable conduits, and secondary i Jiping insulation. The oil spill primarily affected the area of the l ligh pressure turbine and areas below. At the end of the inspection period, the licensee had manufactured new metal covers to continue the turbine flushing activities. Personnel familiar with the plexiglass covers had not experienced any previous problems with their use. The licensee informed the Catawba facility of the problem for information and was continuing to develop their root cause determination for the failure at the end of the inspection perio c. Conclusion The inspector concluded that the licensee initial response to the turbine oil spill was good. This was possible due to the pre-planned contingencies incorporated into the maintenance. The success of these
Enclosure 2
!
. - - .. - efforts were in-part due to good risk assessment planning during maintenance planning. Efforts to contain. identify. and clean affected components was considered adequate; however. any residual oil may ,
present a challenge during the Unit I restart if not completely remove '
M7 Quality Assurance in Maintenance Activities M7.1 Foreian Material Exclusion (FME) Controls a. Insoection Scope The inspectors evaluated recent FME issues to evaluate the effectiveness of the licensee's FME controls. Three recent instances of foreign material identified in safety systems were reviewe b. Observations and Findinas ;
The inspectors reviewed station drawings and system operating procedures in an effort to develop an understanding of the potential foreign material entry pathways. The inspectors also held detailed discussions I and reviewed licensee documentation to validate the licensee's !
assumption of the material origin and intrusion dat l The material (metallic shavings and powdery substance) was identified during disassembly of ND heat exchanger discharge side drain and accumulator 1A discharge check valve. Tne material appeared to be similar and potentially from the same or. gin. The licensee speculated that the material was introduced into the system during modifications to the ND system during the 1993 1EOC8 outace. Tne modification included wet tap drilling to install an additionaf Tlow loop to correct potential weak pump-strong pump concerns during small break LOCA scenarios.
,
c. Conclusion The inspectors reviewed the licensee current foreign material control procedure and policy and concluded that the licensee has established l adequate controls to currently prevent material intrusion into plant systems. The inspector also noted that the small cuantity and physical properties of the foreign material had not resultec in noticeable damage to ecuipment. A review of operational data found no indications of fuel
'
cladcing damage due to debris induced fretting. The licensee performed inspections of attached piping and valves to identify and remove any remaining material. The licensee's response to the identification of l the debris was good. Review of specific examples indicated that, once l identified. licensee root cause assessment of FME events was goo ,
s
Enclosure 2
'
l l
!
i
!
- . . -. --- . . . . . . - ~.
l i
-
. ;
I
l M7.2 Review of Unit 1 Maior Overhaul of Diesel Generators :
a. Insoection Scooe (62707) l l
The inspector reviewed activities associated with the Unit 1 emergency diesel generators (EDG) overhau l b. Observations and Findinas 1
The. diesel engines at McGuire have been in service for approximately 25 l year Although the number of run hours are approximately 8.000 with 1.000 starts, due to the fa-i starting consideration. EPRI guidelines J
would equate to approximate ; 16.000 run hours. The diesel manufacturer '
recommends a 10.000 hour0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> tear down inspection. The SGRP outage represented an opportunity to perform a major overhaul of the diesel engines to satisfy this recommendatio In preparation for the diesel generator overhaul, the licensee compiled a Maintenance Activity Planning Package (MAPP). This package included the scope of work key personnel involved in the work and su) port of work activities. listing of parts and materials needed for t1e overhaul, tools, a comprehensive listing of maintenance procedures needed for the diesel work, key personnel contact listing, and a schedule. The MAPP also included a listing of goals and expectations for the diesel overhauls project with an emphasis on safety.. The inspector reviewed this package and found it to be useful in understanding the scope of work, identifying personnel involved in the project, and the overhaul schedul The scope of work for the diesel overhaul included replacement of all i cylinder liners. replacement of heads with rebuilt heads, replacement of l fuel injectors, and rebuilding of rocker boxes. Additionally, j l inspections were performed on connecting rod bearings, main bearings, i cam bearings. crankshaft thrust bearings, and camshaft thrust bearing '
,
I Bearings were inspected and if necessary, replaced. The IB EDG overhaul j l was completed during this inspection period. Overall. the material ;
condition of this diesel was determined by the licensee to be better j than expected. The licensee attributed the good as-found condition of 1 the EDGs. in part, to the use of synthetic oi After, the completion of the overhaul work, a series of break-in runs i are completed on the diesels. These break-in runs are completed ;
utilizing procedure MP/0/A/7400/065. Nordberg Diesel Generator break-in runs. These break-in runs are a series of seven runs at increasing ,
power level for varying lengths of tim i The EDG runs on the IB EDG went very well with few problems encountered.
- Minor problems encountered during the break-in runs included small leaks which were corrected by tightening connections. One leak in a fuel line
.
resulted in suspending the diesel ru A small leak occurred in a 90
.
Enclosure 2
.- . . .- - - .. . .. .
l
' -
,
degree fitting on a fuel injector that requires hand tightening. After t
,
the fitting was tightened the diesel runs continued with no additional l leaks encountered. The leaks were anticipated due to the large amount l of work performed during the overhaul. The inspector observed portions l
'
of the break-in runs and noted that they were in accordance wit 1 procedures. Additionally, the inspector noted strong engineering involvement and suppor c. Conclusions
,
Maintenance activities associated with the major overhaul of the Unit 1 EDGs during the EOC 11 outage were conducted in accordance with 3rocedures. coordinated well and maintenance personnel were (nowledgeable of the work to be performed. Strong engineering support was noted. The overall condition of the IB EDG was found better than expected. A fuel line leak encountered during a post maintenance run '
was corrected and determined to be unrelated to previous fuel line ,
failures associated with improper crimpin III. Enaineerina El Conduct of Engineering E1 1 Review of Goerator Aid Comouter Reolacement a. Insoection Scoce (37551)
The inspector reviewed the Operator Aid Computer (OAC) replacement modification to determine the scope of the project, adequacy of design controls, adequacy of compensatory measures for control room integrity and compensation for loss of parameters during the no-mode phase of the projec b. Observations and Findinas Nuclear Station Modification NSM MG-12412/00. McGuire Unit 1 OAC Replacement, was implemented during the 1EOC11 outage. The original computer was a early 1970s vintage Honeywell 4400 process monitoring l syste This system had become increasingly difficult to maintain due i to spare parts availability, had limited input / output and processing capacity and limited graphics capability. The vendor for the
'
! replacement OAC will be Science Application International Corporation l (SAIC). In addition to providing an SAIC system OAC, the vendor also
- provided field support and training prior to and during the replacement
!
project.
,
Enclosure 2
_- - -- -- . .~ - - _~ -. -
In addition to replacing the OAC. additional systems will be replaced l
'
and integrated into the OAC to provide plant monitoring function These included the Plant Events Recorder, the ESF Bypass Status Indication System, the Transient Monitoring System, the Unit Interface Controller and Diesel Generator Diagnostic Engine Monitoring Systems.
,
'
The inspector reviewed variout [,ortions of the OAC installatio Walkdowns of the work areas for the OAC project were performed periodically. The inspector reviewed compensatory measures that were
- established for cable routing through control room penetrations related *
'
to the OAC replacement modification. McGuire establishes compensatory measures for penetration breaches in procedure MP/0/A/7650/064 Initial Penetration and Penetration Repair Prior to the penetration breaches, personnel briefings were conducte The inspector attended the briefings and found them thorough. All key personnel were in attendance and a detailed review of the procedures was performed. The inspector observed the cable pulling process and found the implementation of the compensatory measures well executed with adequate support from Operations personne Additionally, the inspector observed )ortions of the OAC enhancements after installation. During post overlaul runs of the EDGs the inspector observed personnel using the Diesel Generator Diagnostic Engine Monitoring Systems. The inspector observed this enhancement to the diesel monitoring capability to be a useful addition to EDG operator The inspector reviewed the variation notices (VN) that had been issued for the OAC replacement modificatio Approximately 30 VN had been issued during this inspection period. The inspector concluded that this number of VN was not high due to the scope of the OAC replacement modi fication. The inspector reviewed the VN that were written and
'
determined most to be minor variations that would normally be encountered in this type of projec The inspector observed the OAC replacement project to be effectively l l
implemented. Engineering support to the OAC project was excellent. The i significantly low number of problems encountered during the project implementation indicated effective planning and engineering during all phases of the project.
l Conclusion Engineering activities associated with the OAC replacement project were determined to have appropriate design controls with good overall l engineering performanc Compensatory measures established for cable pulling through control room penetrations were observed to be conservative and properly implemented.
!
Enclosure 2 l
- . . _ - .. _ - - - - . - - - -
. .
l
\ 22 E2- Engineering Support of Facilities and Equipment E2.1 125V Vital DC Power System Battery Seismic Qualification Insoection Scoce The inspectors reviewed the licensee's response to potential operability concerns identified following identification of poor quality welds on batteries shipped back to the manufacture b. Observations and Findinas Testing was per direction of the Nuclear Utility Users Council and 1 included old and new AT&T lineage 2000 round cell batteries to determine the cause of premature battery capacity loss (see IR 96-10 for details).
During testing, a single cell immediately dropped voltage indicating a direct short. The manufacturer conducted additional inspections of the battery. The cell was removed and shipped along with one other test cell to the manufacturers facility for further analysis. The manufacturer determined that the positive plate circuit of the failed cell had opened at the four welds that connect the positive post harness to the first positive plate. The depth of the weld penetrations were approximately half of the minimum manufacturing specification requirement. Because the poor weld quality could potentially have affected seismic qualification and current carrying capability of the
'
battery, the vendor. Lucent Technologies, filed a Report of Discovery on March 3 and began investigations in accordance with 10 CFR Part 2 A subsequent teleconference between Region 11 and the licensee was held requesting expeditious completion of an operability determination. The licensee evaluated battery operability using worst case. Design Basis Seismic Event assumptions. The licensee determined that the battery seismic qualification test accelerations exceeded the McGuire floor spectra accelerations at the battery location when reduced to account for smaller positive plate welds. The licensee also stated that
,
previous battery service test had proven the current carrying capability
< of each cell currently installed at McGuire had not been significantly affected.
l The licensee had previously notified the inspectors of the their intent
'
to replace all Lineage 2000 round cell batteries by December 1997 with standard rectangular lead acid batteries due to the unrelated premature I capacity loss problems.
l l
t t
i
. Enclosure 2
. -, . - _ _ _ . - -. - .-
.
l Conclusions The licensee's response to aotential vital battery seismic operability
- concerns was appropriate. However, the inspectors requested additional review by the NRC Staff to validate the licensee's conclusions. The inspectors concluded that the licensee's response to the vendor notification was appropriat E4 Engineering Staff Knowledge and Performance E4.1 Review of Response to Nuclear Service Advisory Letter Reaardina incore l Thermocouoles l Inspection Scooe (37551)
The inspector reviewed the licensee response to Nuclear Service Advisory Letter # NSAL-95-006 to ensure the concern for moisture intrusion for the incore thermocouples identified by NSAL was adequately addresse b. Observations and Findinas NSAL-95-006 was issued by Westinghouse in August 1995 to alert nuclear plants of a potential problem with incore thermocou)les manufactured by CKB Industries. Incore thermocouples manufactured )y this vendor have a potential for moisture intrusion. The concern identified by Westinghouse was that moisture which had intruded into the thermocouple sheath would flash to steam in a post accident environment and rupture the thermocouple sheat McGuire was not identified in the original listing of plants with this vendor's type thenacouple. McGuire was added later after it was identified that two Unit 2 thermocouples had been manufactured by CKB Industries. McGuire initiated PIP 0-M95-1641 to address this concern.
'
The inspector reviewed the licensee actions to address the moisture intrusion concern and held discussion to understand the scope of the corrective actions and the results of the licensee revie The licensee initiated insulation resistance testing of the incore thermocouple insulation. This testing was done in conjunction with the
'
other incore thermocouple PMs as part of IP/0/A/3000/19. Inadequate Core Cooling Monitor ICCM-86 Maintenance and Calibration Procedure. The l results of the Unit 2 testing in the previous 2E0C10 outage did not l identify any resistance values which might have been indicative of l moisture intrusio During the Unit 1 outage 1EOC11. the insulation resistance testing resulted in the identification of numerous thermocouples with low insulation resistance values. Subsequent testing of the thermocouples at the reactor head confirmed nine safety related thermocouples with IR and capacitance values which indicated moisture intrusion. PIP 1-M97-i 0261 was initiated to document the Unit 1 thermocouple discrepancie Enclosure 2
_ _ _ ___ _ _ . _ _
,
l-
.
I
As a result of the Unit 1 findings the licensee performed a Fault Tree Analysis to determine if moisture could lead to any viable failure mechanisms that could affect thermocouple operability. The failure mechanism for post accident failure was the thermocouple sheath bursting due to moisture intrusion flashing to steam. Limited testing by Westinghouse indicated that, even with a ruptured sheath, the leads were
,
not damaged on the tested thermocouples and they continued to indicate accurate temperatures. Also. review of the reactor vessel head internals drawings indicate substantial support and shielding to protect the.thermocouple The results of the Fault Tree Analysis indicate that all post accident failures mechanisms associated with moisture intrusion were not viable. The ins]ector reviewed the Fault Tree Analysis results and discussed them with t1e license The inspector agreed with conclusion drawn from the analysi The licensee still has a concern on the long term affect of moisture intrusion on thermocouple operation. The licensee will continue i monitoring and trending of the thermocouple insulation resistance ;
integrit Additionally, the licensee is pursuing Westinghouse owner's Group involvement for long term resolution of the thermocouple issu c. Conclusions The inspector concluded that the licensee actions to address the concern identified in the NSAL were adequate. Review of licensee engineering response and possible affect of thermocouple failure were strong with conservative operability determination E8 Hiscellaneous Engineering Issues (92902)
E (CLOSED) URI 50-369.370/96-10-01: Failure to Ensure Installation of Correct Heaters in FWST Enclosur During the previous inspection. (see inspection report 96-10. heater elements installed for freeze protection 1 in the Unit 1 and Unit. 2 Refueling water Storage Tank (FWST) safety- l related level transmitter enclosures were found to be of a higher l capacity than described on engineering design drawings and document Specifically, two 250 watt heater elements were installed in each enclosure, whereas the applicable design documents specified one 50 watt l element per enclosure. The URI was identified to determine the safety significance of the problem and evaluate other relative informatio .
i The inspectors reviewed the most recent information regarding the
!
subject URI. The inspectors concluded that if the thermostats were to
- fail to deenergize the heaters, the high enclosure temperatures could significantly degrade the safety related transmitters. This could potentially have adversely affected the plant's ability to ensure automatic ECCS swapover. Based on the potential for the adverse effects of excessive temperatures on the safety-related level and temperature transmitters the inspectors determined that failure to incorporate the
-
correct wattage heater element into the subject enclosures was a l Violation of 10 CFR 50 Appendix B. Criterion V. This Violation will be Enclosure 2
-. . . . .. - . . .
I l
l l 25 t
i identified as VIO 369. 370/97-04-04 Failure to ensure installation of correct heaters in FWST enclosures. The significance of the violation ,
was heightened based on the NRC's identification of the problem and a j lack of engineering attention to detail during corrective actions for J other FWST freeze protection related issue '
The licensee has installed the correct wattage heaters in the subject enclosures and incorporated a high temperature alarm to alert control l room operators of a failed thermostat. At the end of the inspection '
per.iod, the licensee was continuing to develop additional corrective actions to address design challenges associated with the FWST transmitter enclosures. This URI is close IV. Plant Support R7 Quality Assurance in Radiation Protection Activities R7.1 Foreign Material Identified in Soent Fuel Pool Coolina System a. Insoection Scope (83750)
The inspectors reviewed licensee self assessment activities for followup to an unplanned high radiation area event that occurred on February 2 , to determine the adequacy of the licensee's radiological controls as required by 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 20.160 b. Observations and Findinas l At approximately 0230 hours0.00266 days <br />0.0639 hours <br />3.80291e-4 weeks <br />8.7515e-5 months <br /> on February 23. 1997, the licensee began a planned alignment of the Refueling Water Sy! tem for purposes of filtration and cleanup of the system. At aproximately 0530 hours0.00613 days <br />0.147 hours <br />8.763227e-4 weeks <br />2.01665e-4 months <br /> an operator entered a refueling water pump roori to verify proper pump operation. During the entry. the operator': alarming dosimetry alarmed in the dose rate mode indicating radiation hvels of 245 millirem / hour at approximately 3 feet from the pump. The operator left the roo exited the radiological control area (RCA) and notified radiation protection of his dosimetry alarm. Radiation protection personnel 1 responded to the area and performed radiation surveys posted and
'
controlled the room as a Locked High Radiation Area, and surveyed additional areas and components to determine the extent of the proble j Surveys determined the source of the highest radiation levels was a ;
strainer in the refueling water cleanup system. Surveys determined I radiation levels of 20 rem / hour on contact with the strainer housing and )
i 5 rem / hour at 1 foot from the strainer housing. The strainer was !
'
removed and replaced on February 26 without difficulty and minimal exposur Shreds of clear plastic were found in the straine Surveys determined dose rates on the old strainer were 80 rem / hour contac The
licensee placed the old strainer in a shielded containe i The inspectors reviewed the licensee's actions regarding the event and determined that the licensee. upon identification of the problem, exercised adequate radiological controls to minimize personnel radiation Enclosure 2
- - - . - . - - .
-
.
.
exposur The licensee initiated a Problem investigation Process (PIP)
report to investigate potential causes and corrective actions for the I event. The licensee informed the inspectors that clear plastic had not i
been authorized for use in the reactor building for approximately 5 years to prevent intrusion of plastic materials in plant systems. At the time of the inspection the source of the plastic material was unknow ,
i c. Conclusions l
Based on a review of this event, the inspectors determined the license Upon identification of the high radiation area problem, exercised adequate radiological controls as required by 10 CFR 20.1601 for access controls of high radiation area S4 Security and Safeguards Staff Knowledge and Performance S4.1 Foreion Ob.iect Identified in Reclacement Picina Durina Protected Area Access Search Insoection ScoDe The inspector reviewed the discovery of a foreign object identified by security personnel during PA access searc b. Observations and Findinas
!
On March 24. 1997, a security access inspection of a CF pipe for !
installation on one of the new steam generators was performed. After FME covers were removed, security personnel identified a metal rod (17" l long. 3/8" diameter) inside the pipe. The rod was removed and the issue was documented via PIP 1-M97-1222 for review. The subject pipe ends had a plywood cover to protect the ends, a FME endcap. and was banded prior to the security inspectio The CF pipe had been prefabricated for SG installation (pipe number ID-004 CC project 19420) approximately two months before.
l An investigation was conducted by site security and other personne Based on the available information. the origin of the rod could not be determined. It should be noted that the licensee's OA process would also have inspected the piping via video prior to installation, allowing for additional opportunities for discovery. Although the origin of the foreign material was not determined, the licensee planned additional I measures to heighten secirity officer awareness for such matters, including what actions should be taken in the event of additional incidents.
!
c. Conclusions The inspectors concluded the identification of the foreign object within the pipe was indicative of good security performance. The inspectors also concluded that other opportunities would have ensured
, identification of the object had security not found the ro Security Enclosure 2
_
.- . .-. . .. - . _ _ .-
.
l response to the event and followup investigation was considered aggressiv Lessons learned from the incident were being planned to improve future security involvement in similar matters.
l
'
V. Management Meetinas X1 Exit Meeting Summary ,
The inspectors ) resented the inspection results to members of licensee management at t'1e conclusion of the inspection on April 9,1997. The licensee acknowledged the findings presente The inspectors asked the licensee whether any materials examined during the inspection should be considered proprietary. No proprietary information was identified.
!
l r
l l
l
!
I l
Enclosure 2 i
,
_ _ - __ . _.___ _ - . _ _ _
,
!
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED l Licensee l Barron. B., Vice President. McGuire Nuclear Station Boyle, J. , Civil / Electrical Systems Engineering Byrum W., Manager. Radiation Protection Cline. T. , Senior Technical Specialist. General Office Support Cross. R. Regulatory Compliance Davison. Valve Supervisor Dolan. B.. Manager. Safety Assurance Geddie. E., Manager. McGuire Nuclear Station Herran. P., Manager. Engineering Jones. R. Superintendent. Operations Michael. R. Chemistry Manager Nazar. M., Superintendent. Maintenance Sam 31e. M., Manager. Steam Generator Maintenance Group Cas1 M., Manager Regulatory Cocpliance Thomas, K., Superintendent. Work Ctntrol Travis. B., Manager. Mechanical / Nuclear Systems Engineering Tuckman. M.. Senior Vice President. Nuclear Duke Power Company Welch, T., Engineering Supervisor NRC S. Shaeffer. Senior Resident Inspector. McGuire M. Sykes Resident Inspector McGuire N. Economos. Regional Inspector S. Rudisail. Regional Inspector D. Forbes. Regional Inspector i
!
!
Enclosure 2 l
L
!
- - - . . - _ . - - - ~ . . _ _ _ - . . . . - . . . - - . _-
.
INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED IP 71707: Conduct of Operations IP 61726: Surveillance Observations IP 40500: Self Assessment IP 37551: Onsite Engineering IP 83750: Occupational Exposure IP 62707: Maintenance Observations IP 92700: Miscellaneous Operations Issues IP 92902: Miscellaneous Engineering Issues ITEMS OPENE0. CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED l OPENED
!
50-369/97-04-01 VIO Failure to report a condition required by *
50.72 in a timely manner (paragraph 02.1) l l
50-369.370/97-04-04 VIO Failure to ensure installation of correct ,
l heaters in FWST enclosures (paragraph -
E8.1) !
!
l i CLOSED
' i l
50-369,370/97-04-02 NCV Inadequate Filter Housing Vent Procedures l (paragra?h 08.1) j i 50-369/97-04-03 NCV Failure to Follow Procedure Guidelines for l
'
Service of Ice Condenser Baskets (paragraph M1.28)
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED BT0 -
Block Tagout I - CA -
Auxiliary Feedwater System l CF -
Main Feedwater System l
CFR -
Code of Federal Regulations EDG -
Emergency Diesel Generator EPRI -
Electric Power Research Institute ESF -
Engineered Safety Feature FME -
Foreign Material Exclusion FSAR - Final Safety Analysis Report FWST - Refueling Water Storage Tank GPD -
Gallons Per Day
! HAZMAT- Hazardess Material Response Team
'
IFI -
Inspector Followup Item LER -
Licensee Event Report i'
LOCA - Loss of Coolant Accident MF -
Main Feed Enclosure 2 l
.
w , --
. .. . . . . . .- - - . - - _ -._ - - . - . - - - . _ - -.
'
l MS -
Main Steam MSD -
McGuire Site Directive MSSV -
Main Steam Line Safety Valve NCV -
Non-Cited Violation l NRC -
Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
'
NRR -
OAC -
Operator Aid Computer OMP -
Operations Management Procedure PIP -
Problem Investigation Process PORC - Plant Operations Review Committee -
OA -
Quality Assurance OIT -
Quality Improvement Team RCA -
Radiological Control Area 1 RO -
Reactor Operator i SGRP - Steam Generator Replacement Project '
SRO -
Senior Reactor Operator TAN -
Total Acid Number TS -
Technical Specifications URI -
Unresolved Item VIO -
Violation .
VN -
Variation Notice '
W -
- WO -
Work Order WR -
Work Review
i l t
!
i
,
l
!
i l
Enclosure 2 i
l -