ML20126B439

Notice of Violation from Insp on 921013-1122.Violation Noted:On 921026,maint Electrician Did Not Open Isolation Knife Switch as Required by Procedure Rmp 74 Prior to Depressing Relay Test Button

ML20126B439
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	12/08/1992
From:	Greger L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20126B431	List: ML20126B427 ML20126B439 ML20126B447
References
50-266-92-23, 50-301-92-23, NUDOCS 9212220087
Download: ML20126B439 (1)

Text

' '

... q MllCE OF VIOLATigi Wisconsin Electric Power Company Dockt: Nos. 50-266;.50-301 Point Beach Nuclear Plant Licer:e Nos. OPR-24; DPR-27 During an NRC inspection conducted from October 13 thrtugh November 22, 1992, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. 'In acc:rdance with the

" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for hRC Enfc cement Actions",

10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed beltw:

A. Technical Specification 15.6.8 requires that the :lant be operated and maintained in accordance with approved procedures. Procedure RMP 74, "B Train Degraded & Loss of Voltage Relay Test', step 3.2.1,- directs opening a knife blade switch in preparaticn for listing. Step 3.2.3 directs depressing the relay test button, A cau:'on statsment preceding step 3.2.1 warns the technician that the ir.ife b'ide switch is to be opened first.

Contrary to the above, on October 26, a maintenar,:e electrician-did not open the isolation knife switch as. required by pr:cedure MiP 74 prior to -

depressing the relay test button.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Su;plemen 1).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Wisconsin E'ectric is hereby  !,

required to submit a written statement or explar.ation :: the U.5. Nuclear $

Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Wuningtor, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Regicn 111, ind a ccoy to the.NRC i Resident inspector,-within 30 days of the date of the istter transmitting this 1:

Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a "Repij to a hotice of Violation" and should include for each violatior: (1) :ne reason for the violation, or if contested, the basis for. disputing the violation; (2) corrective action taken and the results achievec; (3) c:-rectise action to be taken to avoid further violations; and (4) the cate whei full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, censideration-hay be civen to

. extending your response time, i:

l' Dated at Glen Ellyn, -Illinois / E4 this ] day of ~ December,1992 L. Robs ~r.- Gregte, Chief Reactor orojects Branch 3

-9212220087 PDR 921200 0- ADOCK 05000266' PDR J

, -