|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARTXX-9924, Forwards Responses to Questions by NRC Re Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89,by Incorporating Changes Increasing RWST low-level Setpoint from Greater than But Equal to 40% to Greater than But Equal to 45% of Span1999-10-22022 October 1999 Forwards Responses to Questions by NRC Re Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89,by Incorporating Changes Increasing RWST low-level Setpoint from Greater than But Equal to 40% to Greater than But Equal to 45% of Span ML20217M5711999-10-20020 October 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-445/99-15 & 50-446/99-15 on 990822- 1002.Two Severity Level IV Violations of NRC Requirements Identified & Being Treated as non-cited Violations Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy TXX-9923, Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for CPSES, Units 1 & 2,per Plant TS 5.6.4.No Failures of Challenges to PORVs of SV for Units Occurred1999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for CPSES, Units 1 & 2,per Plant TS 5.6.4.No Failures of Challenges to PORVs of SV for Units Occurred ML20217E7951999-10-12012 October 1999 Forwards COLR for Unit 1,Cycle 8,per TS 5.6.5 ML20212L2891999-10-0101 October 1999 Discusses Closeout of GL 97-06, Degradation of Steam Generator Internals. Purpose of GL Was to Obtain Info That Would Enable NRC to Verify That Condition of Licensee SG Internals Comply with Current Licensing Bases TXX-9922, Forwards Revised COLR, for Cycle 5 for Unit 21999-10-0101 October 1999 Forwards Revised COLR, for Cycle 5 for Unit 2 ML20216J5571999-10-0101 October 1999 Provides Final Response to GL 98-01,suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps ML20212G0721999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards Rev 4 to Augmented Inservice Insp Plan for CPSES, Unit 1. Future Changes & Revs to Unit 1 Augmented Inservice Insp Plan Will Be Available on Site ML20212H0461999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards Rev 6 to CPSES Glen Rose,Tx ASME Section XI ISI Program Plan for 1st Interval on 990820 ML20212F7481999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards SER Authorizing Relief from Exam Requirement of 1986 Edition ASME Code,Section XI Pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(ii) for Relief Request A-3 & 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(i) for Relief Requests B15,16,17 & C-4 ML20212F1041999-09-23023 September 1999 Requests That NRC Be Informed of Any Changes in Scope of Y2K System Deficiencies Listed or Util Projected Completion Schedule for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20212E6661999-09-21021 September 1999 Advises That Info Contained in Application & Affidavit, (CAW-99-1342) Re WCAP-15009,Rev 0, Comache Peak Unit 1 Evaluation for Tube Vibration Induced Fatigue, Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure ML20212D9111999-09-16016 September 1999 Informs That on 990818,NRC Completed Midcycle PPR of CPSES & Did Not Identify Any Areas in Which Performance Warranted Insp Beyond Core Insp Program.Core Insp Plan at Facility Over Next 7 Months.Insp Plan Through March 2000 Encl ML20212A7601999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-445/99-14 & 50-446/99-14 on 990707-0821.Four Violations Occurred & Being Treated as Ncvs.Conduct of Activities Was Generally Characterized by safety-conscious Operations & Sound Radiological Controls TXX-9921, Suppls 981221 LAR 98-010 to Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89, Clarfying Conditions of Use Re Analytical Methods Used to Determine Core Operating Limits,Per Telcon with NRC1999-09-10010 September 1999 Suppls 981221 LAR 98-010 to Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89, Clarfying Conditions of Use Re Analytical Methods Used to Determine Core Operating Limits,Per Telcon with NRC ML20211P3761999-09-0707 September 1999 Ack Receipt of Ltr Dtd 990615,transmitting Rev 30 to Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).No NRC Approval Is Required ML20211L9871999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Rev 31 to Technical Requirements Manual. All Changes Applicable to Plants Have Been Reviewed Under Util 10CFR50.59 Process & Found Not to Include Any USQs TXX-9915, Responds to 990701 & 0825 RAI Telcons Re Spent Fuel Pool Temp,Per LAR 98-008,which Requested Increase in Spent Fuel Storage capacity.Marked-up Page 4-1 of CPSES Fuel Storage Licensing Rept, Encl1999-09-0303 September 1999 Responds to 990701 & 0825 RAI Telcons Re Spent Fuel Pool Temp,Per LAR 98-008,which Requested Increase in Spent Fuel Storage capacity.Marked-up Page 4-1 of CPSES Fuel Storage Licensing Rept, Encl ML20211K2231999-08-31031 August 1999 Forwards Txu Electric Comments of Rvid,Version 2 ML20211J3801999-08-27027 August 1999 Forwards Corrected TS Page 3.8-26 to Amend 66 to Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89,respectively.Footnote on TS Page 3.8-26 Incorrectly Deleted ML20211G7301999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards Revs 29 & 30 to CPSES Technical Requirements Manual (Trm). Attachments 1 & 2 Contain Description of Changes for Revs 29 & 30 Respectively ML20211G1081999-08-26026 August 1999 Responds to NRR Staff RAI Re Util Mar 1999 Submittal for NRC Review & Approval of Changes to CPSES Emergency Classification Procedure ML20211G3441999-08-25025 August 1999 Forwards Response to NRC RAI on LAR 98-010 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2.Communication Contains No New Licensing Commitments Re Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20211B2861999-08-18018 August 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-445/99-13 & 50-446/99-13 on 990720- 23.No Violations Noted.Insp Included Implementation of Licensee Emergency Plan & Procedures During Util Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise ML20211C4661999-08-18018 August 1999 Discusses Proprietary Info Re Thermo-Lag.NRC Treated Bisco Test Rept 748-105 as Proprietary & Withheld It from Public Disclosure,Iaw 10CFR2.790 ML20210U3981999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for CPSES, Units 1 & 2,per TS 6.9.1.5.No Failures or Challenges to PORVs or SVs for Plant Occurred ML20211C0991999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Rev 3 to ASME Section XI ISI Program Plan,Unit 2 - 1st Interval, Replacing Rev 2 in Entirety ML20211C4571999-08-16016 August 1999 Forwards Omitted Subj Page of Contractor TER TXX-9919, Forwards Relief Request A-3,Rev 1 to Unit 1 ISI Program,Per Conversations Between NRC & Txu Electric on 9908021999-08-16016 August 1999 Forwards Relief Request A-3,Rev 1 to Unit 1 ISI Program,Per Conversations Between NRC & Txu Electric on 990802 ML20210R6561999-08-13013 August 1999 Forwards Response to NRR 990805 Telcon RAI Re License Amend Request 98-010,to Increase Power for Operation of CPSES Unit 2 to 3445 Mwth & Incorporating Addl Changes Into Units 1 & 2 TS ML20211A9501999-08-12012 August 1999 Discusses 990720-21 Workshop Conducted in Region IV Ofc,Re Exchange of Info in Area of Use of Risk Insights in Regulatory Activities.List of Attendees,Summary of Topic & Issues,Agenda & Copies of Handouts Encl ML20210S6411999-08-12012 August 1999 Informs That Wg Guldemond,License SOP-43780,is No Longer Performing Licensed Duties.Discontinuation of License Is Requested ML20210R2221999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-445/99-10 & 50-446/99-10 on 990510-0628.Violations Noted & Being Treated as Ncvs, Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20210N1101999-08-0404 August 1999 Provides Supplemental Info to Util 990623 License Amend Request 99-005 Re Bypassing DG Trips.Info Replaces Info Contained in Subject Submittal in Attachment 2,Section II, Description of TS Change Request ML20210L1461999-08-0303 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Requests Submittal of Ltr Identifying Individuals Taking Exam,Personnel Allowed Access to Exams & Mailing Address for Exams ML20210J2301999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards Amend 96 to CPSES Ufsar.Replacement of FSAR Figures with Plant Process Flow Diagrams Meets Intent & Requirements of NRC Reg Guide 1.70,Rev 2 ML20210J6071999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards line-by-line Descriptions of Changes in Amend 96 to CPSES UFSAR Transmitted by Util Ltr TXX-99166,dtd 990802. Replacment of FSAR Figures with Plant Process Flow Diagrams Meets Intent & Requirements of NRC Reg Guide 1.70,rev 2 TXX-9916, Notifies NRC That CPSES Units 1 & 2,improved TS Implemented on 9907271999-08-0202 August 1999 Notifies NRC That CPSES Units 1 & 2,improved TS Implemented on 990727 TXX-9918, Forwards CPSES 10CFR50.59 Evaluation Summary Rept 0008,for 970802-990201 & CPSES Commitment Matl Change Evaluation Rept 0003,for 970802-9906301999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards CPSES 10CFR50.59 Evaluation Summary Rept 0008,for 970802-990201 & CPSES Commitment Matl Change Evaluation Rept 0003,for 970802-990630 ML20210K2321999-07-29029 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-445/99-12 & 50-446/99-12 on 990530-0710.No Violations Noted ML20210G5861999-07-29029 July 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Six Month Period of Jan-June 1999 ML20210J0121999-07-27027 July 1999 Forwards Summary of Methodology for Determination of NDE Measurement Uncertainty,In Response to Recent Discussions with NRC Re LAR 98-006 Concerning Rev to SG Tube Plugging Criteria TXX-9917, Provides Info Re Augmented Inservice Insp Plan,Which Requires Periodic Insp of Rv Head & Internals Lifting Devices at CPSES1999-07-26026 July 1999 Provides Info Re Augmented Inservice Insp Plan,Which Requires Periodic Insp of Rv Head & Internals Lifting Devices at CPSES ML20210F3121999-07-26026 July 1999 Responds to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal, ML20210D8231999-07-23023 July 1999 Forwards Safety Evaluation of Relief Requests Re Use of 1998 Edition of Subsections IWE & Iwl of ASME Code for Containment Insp ML20210D3211999-07-21021 July 1999 Provides List of Estimates of Licensing Actions,In Response to Administrative Ltr 99-02,dtd 990603 ML20210C2931999-07-21021 July 1999 Supplements 880323 Response to NRC Bulletin 88-02, Rapidly Propagating...Sg Tubes, Non-proprietary WCAP-15010 & Proprietary Rev 0 to WCAP-15009, CP Unit 1 Evaluation for Tube Vibration... Encl.Proprietary Rept Withheld ML20209H0111999-07-16016 July 1999 Forwards Relief Request C-4 to CPSES Unit 2 ISI Program for Approval ML20210C3331999-07-16016 July 1999 Forwards Exam Repts 50-445/99-301 & 50-446/99-301 on 990618- 24.Exam Included Evaluation of Six Applicants for Senior Operator Licenses ML20209H2551999-07-16016 July 1999 Forwards ISI Summary Rept for Fourth Refueling Outage of CPSES Unit 2 & Containment ISI Summary Rept for Fourth Refueling Outage of CPSES Unit 2,per ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Xi,Paragraph IWA-6230 1999-09-07
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARTXX-9924, Forwards Responses to Questions by NRC Re Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89,by Incorporating Changes Increasing RWST low-level Setpoint from Greater than But Equal to 40% to Greater than But Equal to 45% of Span1999-10-22022 October 1999 Forwards Responses to Questions by NRC Re Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89,by Incorporating Changes Increasing RWST low-level Setpoint from Greater than But Equal to 40% to Greater than But Equal to 45% of Span TXX-9923, Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for CPSES, Units 1 & 2,per Plant TS 5.6.4.No Failures of Challenges to PORVs of SV for Units Occurred1999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for CPSES, Units 1 & 2,per Plant TS 5.6.4.No Failures of Challenges to PORVs of SV for Units Occurred ML20217E7951999-10-12012 October 1999 Forwards COLR for Unit 1,Cycle 8,per TS 5.6.5 ML20216J5571999-10-0101 October 1999 Provides Final Response to GL 98-01,suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps TXX-9922, Forwards Revised COLR, for Cycle 5 for Unit 21999-10-0101 October 1999 Forwards Revised COLR, for Cycle 5 for Unit 2 ML20212G0721999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards Rev 4 to Augmented Inservice Insp Plan for CPSES, Unit 1. Future Changes & Revs to Unit 1 Augmented Inservice Insp Plan Will Be Available on Site ML20212H0461999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards Rev 6 to CPSES Glen Rose,Tx ASME Section XI ISI Program Plan for 1st Interval on 990820 TXX-9921, Suppls 981221 LAR 98-010 to Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89, Clarfying Conditions of Use Re Analytical Methods Used to Determine Core Operating Limits,Per Telcon with NRC1999-09-10010 September 1999 Suppls 981221 LAR 98-010 to Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89, Clarfying Conditions of Use Re Analytical Methods Used to Determine Core Operating Limits,Per Telcon with NRC ML20211L9871999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Rev 31 to Technical Requirements Manual. All Changes Applicable to Plants Have Been Reviewed Under Util 10CFR50.59 Process & Found Not to Include Any USQs TXX-9915, Responds to 990701 & 0825 RAI Telcons Re Spent Fuel Pool Temp,Per LAR 98-008,which Requested Increase in Spent Fuel Storage capacity.Marked-up Page 4-1 of CPSES Fuel Storage Licensing Rept, Encl1999-09-0303 September 1999 Responds to 990701 & 0825 RAI Telcons Re Spent Fuel Pool Temp,Per LAR 98-008,which Requested Increase in Spent Fuel Storage capacity.Marked-up Page 4-1 of CPSES Fuel Storage Licensing Rept, Encl ML20211K2231999-08-31031 August 1999 Forwards Txu Electric Comments of Rvid,Version 2 ML20211G1081999-08-26026 August 1999 Responds to NRR Staff RAI Re Util Mar 1999 Submittal for NRC Review & Approval of Changes to CPSES Emergency Classification Procedure ML20211G7301999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards Revs 29 & 30 to CPSES Technical Requirements Manual (Trm). Attachments 1 & 2 Contain Description of Changes for Revs 29 & 30 Respectively ML20211G3441999-08-25025 August 1999 Forwards Response to NRC RAI on LAR 98-010 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2.Communication Contains No New Licensing Commitments Re Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20210U3981999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for CPSES, Units 1 & 2,per TS 6.9.1.5.No Failures or Challenges to PORVs or SVs for Plant Occurred ML20211C0991999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Rev 3 to ASME Section XI ISI Program Plan,Unit 2 - 1st Interval, Replacing Rev 2 in Entirety TXX-9919, Forwards Relief Request A-3,Rev 1 to Unit 1 ISI Program,Per Conversations Between NRC & Txu Electric on 9908021999-08-16016 August 1999 Forwards Relief Request A-3,Rev 1 to Unit 1 ISI Program,Per Conversations Between NRC & Txu Electric on 990802 ML20210R6561999-08-13013 August 1999 Forwards Response to NRR 990805 Telcon RAI Re License Amend Request 98-010,to Increase Power for Operation of CPSES Unit 2 to 3445 Mwth & Incorporating Addl Changes Into Units 1 & 2 TS ML20210S6411999-08-12012 August 1999 Informs That Wg Guldemond,License SOP-43780,is No Longer Performing Licensed Duties.Discontinuation of License Is Requested ML20210N1101999-08-0404 August 1999 Provides Supplemental Info to Util 990623 License Amend Request 99-005 Re Bypassing DG Trips.Info Replaces Info Contained in Subject Submittal in Attachment 2,Section II, Description of TS Change Request TXX-9918, Forwards CPSES 10CFR50.59 Evaluation Summary Rept 0008,for 970802-990201 & CPSES Commitment Matl Change Evaluation Rept 0003,for 970802-9906301999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards CPSES 10CFR50.59 Evaluation Summary Rept 0008,for 970802-990201 & CPSES Commitment Matl Change Evaluation Rept 0003,for 970802-990630 ML20210J2301999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards Amend 96 to CPSES Ufsar.Replacement of FSAR Figures with Plant Process Flow Diagrams Meets Intent & Requirements of NRC Reg Guide 1.70,Rev 2 ML20210J6071999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards line-by-line Descriptions of Changes in Amend 96 to CPSES UFSAR Transmitted by Util Ltr TXX-99166,dtd 990802. Replacment of FSAR Figures with Plant Process Flow Diagrams Meets Intent & Requirements of NRC Reg Guide 1.70,rev 2 TXX-9916, Notifies NRC That CPSES Units 1 & 2,improved TS Implemented on 9907271999-08-0202 August 1999 Notifies NRC That CPSES Units 1 & 2,improved TS Implemented on 990727 ML20210G5861999-07-29029 July 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Six Month Period of Jan-June 1999 ML20210J0121999-07-27027 July 1999 Forwards Summary of Methodology for Determination of NDE Measurement Uncertainty,In Response to Recent Discussions with NRC Re LAR 98-006 Concerning Rev to SG Tube Plugging Criteria TXX-9917, Provides Info Re Augmented Inservice Insp Plan,Which Requires Periodic Insp of Rv Head & Internals Lifting Devices at CPSES1999-07-26026 July 1999 Provides Info Re Augmented Inservice Insp Plan,Which Requires Periodic Insp of Rv Head & Internals Lifting Devices at CPSES ML20210F3121999-07-26026 July 1999 Responds to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal, ML20210C2931999-07-21021 July 1999 Supplements 880323 Response to NRC Bulletin 88-02, Rapidly Propagating...Sg Tubes, Non-proprietary WCAP-15010 & Proprietary Rev 0 to WCAP-15009, CP Unit 1 Evaluation for Tube Vibration... Encl.Proprietary Rept Withheld ML20210D3211999-07-21021 July 1999 Provides List of Estimates of Licensing Actions,In Response to Administrative Ltr 99-02,dtd 990603 ML20209H2551999-07-16016 July 1999 Forwards ISI Summary Rept for Fourth Refueling Outage of CPSES Unit 2 & Containment ISI Summary Rept for Fourth Refueling Outage of CPSES Unit 2,per ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Xi,Paragraph IWA-6230 ML20209H0111999-07-16016 July 1999 Forwards Relief Request C-4 to CPSES Unit 2 ISI Program for Approval ML20209G0721999-07-13013 July 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for CPSES, Units 1 & 2,per TS 6.9.1.5.No Failures or Challenges to PORVs of SV Occurred During Reporting Period ML20209F0681999-07-0909 July 1999 Informs That Effective 990514,TU Electric Formally Changed Name to Txu Electric.Change All Refs of TU Electric to Txu Electric on Correspondence Distribution Lists ML20209E0421999-07-0909 July 1999 Forwards Response to NRC Request for Addl Info on LAR 98-010.Attachment 1 Is Affidavit for Info Supporting LAR 98-010 ML20209B6021999-06-30030 June 1999 Submits Second Response to NRC GL 98-01,Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Readiness Disclosure for Reporting Status of Facility Y2K Readiness Encl ML20195J6981999-06-15015 June 1999 Provides Addl Info Related to Open Issue,Discussed in 990610 Conference Call with D Jaffe Re ISI Program Relief Request L-1 Submitted by Util on 980220 ML20196A4921999-06-15015 June 1999 Forwards Rev 30 to Physical Security Plan.Rev Withheld,Per 10CFR73.21 ML20195J0491999-06-14014 June 1999 Submits Response to RAI Re Implementation of 1.0 Volt Repair Criteria ML20195J0651999-06-14014 June 1999 Submits Response to RAI Re GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety Related Power Operated Gate Valves 05000445/LER-1999-001, Forwards LER 99-001-00, Some Electrical Contacts for RCS Pressure Relief Valves Were Not Included in Surveillance Testing Procedures. New Licensing Commitments Identified in Attachment 11999-06-0808 June 1999 Forwards LER 99-001-00, Some Electrical Contacts for RCS Pressure Relief Valves Were Not Included in Surveillance Testing Procedures. New Licensing Commitments Identified in Attachment 1 ML20195F0091999-06-0808 June 1999 Forwards Response to RAI Re Units 1 & 2 ISI Program for Relief Requests E-1 & L-1.Communication Contains No New Licensing Basis Commitments Re Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20207E1921999-05-28028 May 1999 Submits Updated Request for NRC Staff to Review & Approve Certain Changes to CPSES Emergency Plan Submitted in 981015 & s Prior to Changes Being Implemented at CPSES ML20207E1711999-05-28028 May 1999 Supplements 990526 LAR 99-004 as TU Electric Believes Extingency Exists in That Proposed Amend Was Result of NOED Granted to Prevent Shudown of CPSES Unit 1 ML20207D9841999-05-26026 May 1999 Requests That NRC Exercise Enforcement Discretion to Allow Cpses,Unit 1 to Remain in Mode 1,power Operation,Without Having Performed Svc Test,Per SR 4.8.2.1d on Unit 1 Battery BT1ED2 ML20195B6351999-05-25025 May 1999 Submits Response to RAI Re GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety Related Power Operated Gate Valves TXX-9912, Forwards Txu Electric (Formerly TU Electric) CPSES Emergency Preparedness Exercise Scenario Manual for 990721-22,Graded Exercise1999-05-21021 May 1999 Forwards Txu Electric (Formerly TU Electric) CPSES Emergency Preparedness Exercise Scenario Manual for 990721-22,Graded Exercise ML20206U1981999-05-20020 May 1999 Forwards Form 10K Annual Rept,Per 10CFR50.71(b). Communication Contains No New Licensing Basis Commitments Re Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20196L1931999-05-20020 May 1999 Forwards MOR for Apr 1999 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2.During Reporting Period There Have Been No Failures or Challenges to Power Operated Relief Valves or Safety Valves TXX-9911, Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Responses to RAI Re LAR 98-010 by Incorporating Attached Changes Into CPSES Unit 2 OL NPF-89 & CPSES Units 1,OL NPF-87 & 2 TS to Increase Licensed Power.W & Caldon Proprietary Responses Withheld1999-05-14014 May 1999 Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Responses to RAI Re LAR 98-010 by Incorporating Attached Changes Into CPSES Unit 2 OL NPF-89 & CPSES Units 1,OL NPF-87 & 2 TS to Increase Licensed Power.W & Caldon Proprietary Responses Withheld 1999-09-03
[Table view] Category:LEGAL/LAW FIRM TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20055E2741990-05-0101 May 1990 FOIA Request for Investigation Rept 4-89-008 ML20042E3291990-04-10010 April 1990 Advises That Due to Clerical Error,Author Ltrs to NRC Re Insp Repts 50-445/90-05 & 50-446/90-05 Not Served.Repts Will Be Served to All Parties on Attached List ML20042E3311990-03-31031 March 1990 Advises That Open Issues Re Thermo-Lag Insulation Matl & Harassment & Intimidation of QC Inspector Not Addressed in Insp Repts 50-445/90-05 & 50-446/90-05.CASE Questions Whether Formulas to Mfg Thermo-Lag Changed ML20042E3351990-03-28028 March 1990 Requests Listed Info or Basis for Specific Action Re C Grimes 900208 Ltr to J Cahill Re Issuance of License NPF-28,specifically Why Temporary Exemption from Schedular Requirements Granted ML20042E4301990-03-26026 March 1990 Lists Questions Based on Review of Insp Repts 50-445/89-88, 50-446/89-88,50-445/88-88 & 50-446/88-88,including Contamination Problems Found Inside Namco Switches in 1989 & Aircom Fasteners ML20043B7341990-03-0202 March 1990 FOIA Request for Records Re Insp Performed by C Williams on 900207-0302 Concerning ASME Section III Compliance Review & Weld 12A ML20011F0091990-02-0808 February 1990 Certifies That Util Covered for Decontamination Liability & Excess Property Insurance,Effective on 900208 ML20012D6361990-02-0505 February 1990 Responds to Util 891221 Ltr to NRC Re thermo-lag Dispute ML20012D5951990-02-0505 February 1990 FOIA Request for Documents & Records Relevant to & Generated in Connection W/Insp Repts 50-445/90-05 & 50-446/90-05 on 900131 Re Therm-o-Lag Issues ML20005G5381990-01-10010 January 1990 Urges Resolution of Issues in Dispute & Matters of Concern to Case Prior to Fuel Load Decision.Issues Include, Auxiliary Feedwater Check Valve & Pending Enforcement Action & Station Svc Water Sys Enforcement Action ML20005G5481990-01-0909 January 1990 Forwards Analytical Evaluation of Station Svc Water Sys for Facilities by Case Consultant J Doyle Dtd 891231.Rept Submitted to Document Events Re Removal of Plastite Liner in Station Svc Water Sys in Spring 1988 ML19354D7631990-01-0909 January 1990 Forwards Rev 0 to Case Final Rept, Analytical Evaluation of Station Svc Water Sys,Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Station. Rept Contains Conclusions Applicable to Issues of Regulatory Character & Competence of Util to Manage & Operate Plant ML20005G6951990-01-0909 January 1990 Corrected Ltr Discussing K Doyle Rept, Analytical Evaluation of Station Svc Water Sys for Comanche Peak. Rept Concludes That Probable Cause of Failures of Sys Due to Inability of Util Personnel to Perform Accurate Analysis ML20005G6751989-12-12012 December 1989 FOIA Request for Documents Re Insp Repts 50-445/89-23 & 50-446/89-23 on 890405-0502 ML20006B8811989-12-0505 December 1989 Appeals Denial of FOIA Request for App B Records ML19332F4911989-12-0101 December 1989 Discusses NRC 891027 Ltr to B Brink Re Citizens for Fair Util Regulation 891016 Request for Stay.Nrc Must Be Consistent in Application of NRC Procedures Re Probing of Allegations.Improprietaries Should Be Sought from Case ML20005G5441989-11-29029 November 1989 Requests That NRC Independently Conduct Insp/Investigation of Dispute Between Case & Util Re Thermo-Lag & Thermo Science,Inc Qc/Qa Breakdown.Util 891116 Ltr to Case Re Results of Investigation of Inspector a Concerns Encl ML20011D1221989-11-20020 November 1989 Discusses Concerns Re Integrity of Regulatory Process as Affecting Plant ML19332D7371989-10-0606 October 1989 FOIA Request for Records Re Chronology of Events Beginning 1985 ML19332F3141989-09-27027 September 1989 FOIA Request for Documents Re 890908 Insp Repts 50-445/89-38 & 50-446/89-38 ML20247R0381989-09-23023 September 1989 Advises of Case Position Re Need for Regulatory Enforcement Action in Response to Mgt Process & Administrative Control Failures Evidenced by 890505 Event at Facility ML20248C2711989-09-23023 September 1989 Requests Reclassification of Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-445/88-47 & 50-446/88-42 on 880707-0802.Informs Case Believes Further Insp & Enforcement Review Appropriate ML20245J9341989-06-30030 June 1989 Forwards Util Response to Cap Rock Electric Cooperative,Inc Request for Order Modifying Antitrust License Conditions ML20248D6571989-06-16016 June 1989 Ofc of Inverstigations Subpoena to Jj Macktal,Nrc Investigation 4-89-008.* Requests Leave of 5 Days to Respond to Request Filed for Enforcement of Subpoena & to Brief Commission on Issues Re Subpoena ML20246K3781989-05-22022 May 1989 Requests Status of NRC Determination of Pending Fee Waiver Requests for FOIAs 89-47 & 89-52 ML20245A0381989-05-12012 May 1989 Forwards Request from Cap Rock Electric Cooperative,Inc for Order Enforcing & Modifying Antitrust License Conditions & Certificate of Svc.W/O Request ML20244D8701989-04-0606 April 1989 Forwards Endorsement 27 to Nelia NF-274 ML20246K3621989-03-30030 March 1989 Responds to Responding to Appeal of Denial of Fee Waivers for 890301 FOIA Requests.Justification for Fee Waiver Provided ML20246K3401989-03-0101 March 1989 Appeals Denial of Two Requests for Fee Waivers Re FOIAs 89-47 & 89-52 on Behalf of Jj Macktal & SM Hasan.Purpose of Requests to Examine Process Utilized by EDO & NRC for Revoking Confidentiality of Allegers ML20244D8771989-01-26026 January 1989 FOIA Request for Records Re Settlement Negotiations & Agreements in Licensing Proceedings Effectuated During Jul 1988 ML20246K2061989-01-25025 January 1989 FOIA Request for Records Re Revocation of Confidentiality on 890123 by V Stello & Requests for Info by Third Parties Which Concerns SM Hasan or Jj Macktal &/Or Respective Allegations About Facility ML20205D1401988-10-14014 October 1988 Forwards State of Tx Public Utils Commission Substantive Rule 23.66 Re Wheeling for Cogenerators ML20151U5971988-08-0808 August 1988 Requests Withdrawal of Portion of 860131 Filing Re Case Request for Imposition of Fine,For Suspension of Const Activities & for Hearing on Application to Renew CP ML20150E1411988-07-12012 July 1988 Forwards Suppl Filing of Response of Applicant to Motions to Stay,To Intervene & for Sua Sponte Relief Filed by Various Parties ML20150E2061988-07-10010 July 1988 Clarifies Relevant Issues Raised in LC Clark Re Recent Filings by J Doe.W/Supporting Info & Certificate of Svc ML20150D5031988-07-0808 July 1988 Forwards Motions to Intervene & for Sua Sponte Filed on Behalf of Citizens for Fair Util Regulation & Individual Residents ML20150D5091988-07-0707 July 1988 Forwards Substitute Pleadings of Petitioner J Doe ML20150D5261988-07-0606 July 1988 Forwards Motion for Permission to Withdraw Pleadings W/O Prejudice & W/Leave to File Substitute Pleadings within 48 H ML20151Y6221988-04-29029 April 1988 Forwards Wg Counsil Transmitting Errata to Project Status Repts for Mechanical Suppl a - Sys Interaction & Mechanical Suppl B - Fire Protection. Related Correspondence ML20151T7141988-04-26026 April 1988 Forwards Applicants Answers to Board 14 Questions Re Action Plan Results Rept VII.a.9.Checklists Used for Reinsp/ Documentation Review for 81 Items of Equipment & Matl Not Included W/Answers Due to Vol Amounting More than 1,000 Pp ML20151E9771988-04-0808 April 1988 Informs That Applicants Notified Board & Parties of Availability in TU Electric Document Room of Matls Ref in NRC Sser 14.W/Certificate of Svc ML20148M0221988-03-30030 March 1988 Forwards Exhibit 18 Introduced to Record by Counsel for co-owners During Williams 880218 Deposition & Pages 190-195 & 464-465 of Transcript,Representing Entire Contents of Deposition Re Exhibit.W/Certificate of Svc ML20148K3681988-03-24024 March 1988 Forwards Excerpts from Form 10-K Filed by Util W/Security & Exchange Commission.Excerpts Contain Financial Disclosures Re Facility.Info Provided to Keep Board Apprised of Matters Re Facility ML20150D0151988-03-21021 March 1988 Forwards Transcripts of Meeting Held on 871217-18 & 880218 Between Case & Util.W/O Encl.W/Certificate of Svc ML20150D0201988-03-18018 March 1988 Informs That on 880314,CASE Filed Tenth Progress Rept W/ Board & Urged Board to Review Transcript of Public Meetings Held Between Case & Applicants in Which Walsh/Doyle Issues Discussed.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20148G1411988-03-17017 March 1988 Forwards Ltr of Even Date from Util to NRC Which Transmits Copies of Errata Prepared for Project Status Rept Re Cable Tray & Cable Tray Hangers & Conduit Supports Train C 2 Inch Diameter & Less ML20150D0381988-03-14014 March 1988 Forwards Util Informing That Licensee Still Collecting Documents for Files Containing Documentation for Result Rept VII.a.9 ML20196D5001988-02-0808 February 1988 Forwards Wg Counsil Transmitting Project Status Rept for Civil/Structural, Rev 0.Related Correspondence ML20195J0621988-01-15015 January 1988 Forwards Wg Counsil to Nrc,Transmitting Project Rept for Electrical, Rev 0.Rept Also Sent to J Ellis & Cygna.Related Correspondence ML20147D5771988-01-14014 January 1988 Forwards Util Form 8-K,current Repts, & 1214,filed W/Securities & Exchange Commission.Documents Forwarded as Part of Parties Efforts to Keep Board Apprised to Matters Re Facility.Related Correspondence 1990-05-01
[Table view] |
Text
,W) ' 'f',..
y ' 4 tw law orr:CEs or BISHOP, LIBERMAN, COOK, PURCELL & REYNOLDS C (200 S t.VENTEENTH STR E ET, N. W. IN NCw YOnn WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036 'g GISHOP. LIBERMAN & COOK as anoADWAY (202) 857-9800 5 wtw vonn Mcw vonn sooo.
TELEX 440s74 aNTLAW UI r g, (212)244-6900 TCLEA 222767 July 18, 1984 Peter B. Bloch, Esq.
Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 )
Re: Texas Utilities Electric Company, et al.
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric StatTon, Units 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446)O L-
Dear Chairman Bloch:
In Mr. Roisman's July 7 letter to the Board, he'makes a number of serious, albeit inaccurate, charges regarding the current statts of requested discovery. We deal point-by-point with these unfounded charges below. More disturbing to us, however, are the circumstances surrounding that letter.
First, before writing the Board, Mr. Roisman never discussed with us the charges he now makes nor did he give us an opportunity to correct what may have been his misimpressions.
Second, although we met daily with Mr. Roisman between the time he wrote the letter in question and our receipt of a copy of it a week later -- on July 14 -- Mr. Roisman made no mention of what he now seems to characterize as grave concerns. On the contrary, during the course of the taking of depositions between July 9 and July 13, Mr. Roisman twice indicated to Applicants' counsel that he felt that whatever discovery differences there were between us, they were of no great moment.
4 Item 1 A measure of the present charges is CASE's item 1 in which it is claimed that Intervenor has been severely disadvantaged by the July 6 delivery in Washington of an otherwise unidentified "2 inch stack" of material. What is overlooked is that the documents in question were previously reviewed by CASE representataives in Applicants' Dallas office. -The asserted late delivery was merely the subsequent transmission of material designated by CASE for copying after review of Applicants' files.
8407190519 840718
[ u
}N3
h.
n '
l
~
Item 2 Equally without merit are the claims made in item 2 with respect to certain exit interviews. We wrote CASE's counsel, Mr.
Roisman, as long ago as June 20, inviting him to review those documents at our offices (see copy attached). Some two days later, when CASE-representatives were at our offices, Mr. Roisman was once again invited to review the exit interview files. Mr.
Roisman expressed no interest at that time in doing so. But now, Intervenors claim extreme prejudice from the asserted untimely delivery of the exit iterviews.
Turning to the materials we provided to CASE in Glen Rose on July 6, those consisted of two items: An investigation into Darlene St'oer's allegations of harassment and intimidation; and, a summary of hot line use and disposition. Intervenor makes no specific claim of any prejudice due to the time of production of either document. Moreover, those hot line summaries were in fact used by CASE in deposing Mr. Clements on July 10, 1984. CASE was likewise aware of the investigation into Mrs. Stiner's allegations well before her deposition was taken. In brief, it is not at all apparent to us how the timing of production of either document could have prejudiced intervenor in any manner.
Granted, Applicants have, during the course of preparing witnesses for depositions, discovered certain'other documents which might arguably be responsive to CASE's data request. But, where this has occurred, we have provided copies to CASE in good faith, and have offered to recall witnesses to the extent CASE can show prejudice.
Further, in order to reassure ourselves that.our initial' document production was fully responsive, we are now conducting a review of our earlier document search. If significant new information is discovered, we of course will provide CASE the opportunity to recall witnesses. We apprised CASE in mid-week of all this,'and Mr. Roisman did not advise us of his July 7 letter at that time.
Item 3 CASE's complaint in item 3 that some documents have had the names of individuals deleted is similarly without merit. Such
, deletion is precisely in accord with the procedures endorsed by the Board during the conference held with respect to confidentiality. We have fully complied with the Board's Order as is indicated in our report to the Board with respect.to our i
efforts to persuade witnesses to waive confidentiality. Where
- CASE desired the names of those continuing to request confidentiality, we had' understood that they would so advise'us e
e v -- --.r+ ,,w r - ..y , .
and steps would be taken, such as a protective order, to accommodate the interests involved. CASE has taken no such action.
Item 4 With respect to item four, CASE's assertions that Applicants' search of the thousands of documents maintained by TUGCO and Brown & Root should also have included other contractors or subcontractors will not bear scrutiny. Contractor or subcontractor personnel (other than Brown & Root) performing QC functions at Comanche Peak over which Applicants have direct organizational authority, do so for the TUGCO site quality assurance organization and are integrated into that organization.
Relevant information with respect to these personnel would be maintained within the TUGCO system, the files of which Applicants reviewed in response to CASE's request. Applicants produced such material irrespective of the company by which such persons were
, employed. To the extent that vendors, contractors and 4
subcontractors perform quality-related work to be supplied to TUGCO, they perform the necessary construction, fabrication and quality assurance / quality control functions within the auspices of their respective organizations. Applicants have no direct organizational authority over these organizations. To fulfill their ultimate responsibility for the activities performed pursuant to the license, Applicants, however, do conduct audits of those organizations in accordance with the requirements of Appendix B. These audits have also been made available to CASE for examination throughout the proceeding.. In short, Applicants' examination of materials for the instant document request was entirely reasonable and appropriate.
4 Item 5 The claims regarding the 1979 questionnaire forms that are the basis of CASE's item 5 are again charges that will not bear 4
examination. These questionnaire forms were made available for CASE's review during the week of June 15, and CASE was advised of their existence prior to June 15. These documents were utilized by CASE during the depositions last week (see, for example, deposition of Mr. Chapman). The only objection made by counsel for CASE with respect to those documents was a claim of inability i to cross-examine because he did not have the names associated with each individual interview. The names were not requested, however, until after the deposition began. Moreover, the i
transcript of Mr. Chapman's deposition makes clear that having the names of the persons who had been' interviewed would not have
- assisted cross-examination. (See, e.g., Chapman dep., Tr.
35,723-30).
l
1 i
2 y.
Item 6-Finally, as to the alleged restricted use of documents provided in the rate case documents which in item 6 CASE claims are pertinent to harassment and intimidation, Mrs. Ellis and Mr.
Reynolds reached agreement that they could in fact be used during the depositions to the extent they were relevant and they were so utilized. Por example, several of these documents were used in the cross-examination of Mr. Clements. Use of these documents, however, revealed, contrary to CASE's claim, that these documents do not bear at all on the intimidation issue. (See Clements dep. Tr. 40,161 et seq.).
In sum, CASE's July 7 charge of discovery misconduct appears wholly manufactured and designed to create a controversy where none need or should exist. As CASE indicates, both parties have encountered difficulties and have not met previously established schedules in all respects due to the extraordinary circumstances under which we are all operating. Considering that CASE's nominal discovery burdens do not bear comparison with Applicants' obligation to search through thousands of documents, CASE is hardly in a position to complain. The fact that CASE could not discharge even its minimal burden in a timely fashion.ought to put its self-righteous and inaccurate claims in proper perspective. We are quite simply surprised and chagrined that we j were allowed to operate throughout last week without knowledge of Mr. Roisman's letter and CASE's inaccurate charges.
4 In view of the foregoing, it is plain there is no basis for CASE's demand for a procedure to " compensate" for discovery iniquities. Moreover, what CASE proposes is not compensation, but an invitation to abandon all evidentiary safeguards and turn the hearing record into one founded on hearsay, rumor and innuendo.
This is not to say that CASE should be denied a fair opportunity to offer documents in evidence. But such an~ offer should be limited, as it is before other tribunals in other proceedings, solely for the purpose of showing that a statement or report has been made, not for the truth of the matter so recorded. If CASE wishes to prove that e.n event reported in a document did in fact occur, it should and must do so, as in other forums, through the presentation of competent witnesses and other recognized affirmative proofs.
1 -
<V We believe the facts revealed by this letter fully substantiate our view that no Board action is necessary regarding discovery. However, should the Board wish to inquire further into this matter, we would welcome an on-the-record conference call.
Very truly yours, /
[ '
Bruce L. Downey cc: Anthony Roisman (by hand delivery)
, Service List l
s i
l I
m.
9 m
l l
LAW OFFICES OF CISHOP, LIBERM AN, COOK, PURCELL & REYNOLDS e200 S EVENTEENTH STM EET, N. W. GN NCW YQMR WAS HINGTON, D. C. 2 00 38 BISHOP LISCRMAN & CCQK as sneaOway faca) es7-eaCo N CW Y O n M NCwVCNR 10004 TcLcx 440s74 INTLAw us (aia) a.e eooo tcLcx amarer BY MESSENGER June 20, 1984 Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.
Trial Lawyers for Public Justice 2000 P Street, N.W.
Suite 611 Washington, D.C. 20036 Re: Texas Utilities Generating Company; NRC Docket Nos. 50-445-2 and 50-446-2
Dear Mr. Roisman:
In response to CASE's data requests relating to the issue of intimidation, I have caused a number of documents to be collected for your review at the Dallas office of
/ TUGCO.
A number of documents have been previously provided to you. In addition, I have available in our offices here in Washington, a set of the exit interview files for your Since almost all of this file was maintained at review.
the Comanche Peak site, it has been sent to our office.
I would estimate that the documents for your review measure approximately two feet in thickness. It is not clear that all of these documents, or even the greater part of them, are responsive to your request, but we have erred on the side of inclusion in order to avoid any dispute. Includeiare documents obtained from a review of Board of Director minutes, the Dallas QA office,. corporate security office, the embudsman and hotline files and various corporate executives, as well as the personnel files of those named in my letter of May 10, 1984, to Ms. Ellis and those named in Ms. Garde's letter of June 4. Absence of documents in any of these files does not mean that the subj ect was not discussed orally.
l
- f,M9 yv VWM 9 l
P
?
Anthony A. Roisman, Esq.
June 20, 1984 Page Two You may arrange to review the material by calling me or Ms. Susan Spencer at 214-979-8861. If you wish to copy any documents after your review, copies will be provided at the price consistently charged to CASE (S.15 per page) .
- With respect to documents provided in the course of the now-pending rate case proceeding, I have not attempted to review the massive material which has been provided in that case. It is, however, not my intention to prevent use in this proceeding of relevant documents provided in that rate case. I believe that your review of documents in response to this data request should eliminate this problem entirely. If it does not, please advise me as I am sure we can resolve the matter.
With respect to names of persons who have been promised confidentiality, we are well along in contacting them and I believe we have been f airly successful to date'in persuading persons to allow their names to be used. I am aware of
- at least one instance, however, where it appears that the whereabouts of the person in question is unknown and we are writing to the last know1 address. I suspect that when you see the context of this person's statement, you will have no need to pursue the matter.-
Am I to understand that Ms. Garde's letter of June 15 constitutes your response to our request for " . . . a summary of testimony that CASE intends to illicit from (each witness),
including a list of f acts that CASE intends to establish through the persons' te stimony. " ? If so, the response is
> clearly inadequate. If you really believe, that the time for surprise is over, then you will provide us an adequate response immediately since our witnesses are to be deposed beginning July 2. I believe our on-the-record discussion at last week's prehearing conference makes clear that you are required to specify this information in advance with l
respect to each of your witnesses'. I P. is not our obligation to ferret out such information from various sources and make inferences as to the facts that your witnesses will testify to. Previously supplied statements (for example, limited appearance statements') are not evidence in this case and l
hardly provide the type of detail necessary for our witnesses to adequately refresh their memories in advance of depositions.
~\ :
1 Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.
June 20, 1984 Page Three i.
A number of TU witnesses you indicate CASE wishes to depose may have planned vacations in early July. I will contact you shortly to propose a planned schedule for deposing these witnesses commencing on July 2.
Very truly yours, lJ.Y Leonard W. Belter LWB/jf cc: Service list W
I 9
9 L