ML20076C065

Forwards Corrected Pages 16.1-3 & 16.2-9 to Psar,Reflecting Two Minor Changes to QA Program Description

ML20076C065
Person / Time
Site:	Hope Creek
Issue date:	08/11/1983
From:	Martin T Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	Murley T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
NUDOCS 8308220205
Download: ML20076C065 (3)

Text

.,

s IfN4L5 Thomes J. Martin P&.M Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Plaza Newark, N.J. 07101 201/4304316 Vics President Engineering and Construction

• August 11, 1983 g,36 Dr. Thomas E. Murley, Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I

631 Park Avenue I

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

Dear Dr. Murley:

QA PROGRAM DESCRIPTION UPDATE PRELIMINARY SAFETY ANALYST.S REPORT (PSAR)

HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION Please refer to our letter of June 6, 1983, which transmitted an updated copy of the Hope Creek QA Program Description.

As a result of silbsequent discussions between Mr. J. Prell of your staff and Mr. A. Giardinc of my staff, we have made two minor changes to provide clarification.

Please replace pages 16.1-3 and 16.2-9 with the attached pages dated 8/8/83.

! Should you have any further questions, please contact Mr. Giardino

at the Hope Creek site.

Very truly yours, Attachment cc: NRC Resident Inspector - Hope Creek P. O. Box 241 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 8308220205 830811 PDR ADOCK 05000354 B PDR g,0di

• "'9 Wlpyg f4 1

- , 4 t

ontractor and the aren i tect-en.; Tee r ) .  ! ~.e, 2c,

-tne :isSS resp'onsiale for surveillance activities over eneir JA.< .i n d inspection functions and tnose of ene ir suo-con tract o rs.

c.

These principal contractors have quality groups res(onsiole foh this quality ef fort, as descrioed in the following sections 1613 and 16.4 Their quality groups include personnel with technical backgrounds in materials, special processes .such as welding and non-destructive testing), and in mechanical, electrical, structural, instrumentation and controls disciplines.These quality groups have

.two major tasks within their scope of work:

1. Re spons ibili ty for the review of . specifications, draw-ings, procedures, and associated documents for quality [

requirements within their respective scopes. 4

2. Respons ib ili ty for surveillance 05 the actual fuality ,

control and inspection activities perf ormed witnin t e. e . ,

respective scope to assure. that materials, equipment anc construction meet the specified req u i reme n t s du,r i ng manuf acturing and construction, and that this t conf o rm a nce is duly documented . -

n Phase C is the Quality Assurance Aud i t i ng function which is I.

,r pe rf ormed by each of the principal contractors over their I'.

own OA program and those of their sub-contractors. In i; i

addition, PSE&G audits both its internal ope ra t ions and [

t those. of its principal contractors in order to verify l conformance to applicable Quality Assurance Programs in each case. [ t To accomplish this the documented Quality Control program of the Ij C

principal contractors is su'2mitted to PSE&G QAE&C for audit purposes.

l i

I L

HCGS-PSAR 16.1-3 i fr M.P32 55/06-mw 8/8/83 7 b

3. Pcrformanco of joint curvoillcnca with GE,NEBO of thoir and l

,,'. thair cubcontrcctors' work in accordance with an interface

~

cgrerm:nt.

4 16.2.4.3 PROCUREMENT BY THE ARCHITECT-ENGINEER +

6 Ir I addition to controls exe rcised by the Architect-Engineer oder his procurement documents, the following direct con-trols shall be exercised by PS E&G fo r Q- a nd F- de s ig na ted items, bulk material, etc.:

1. Participation by PSE&G in surveys of chosen sub-contractors.

2. Audits by PSE&G of the Architect-Engineer's QA activi- l

(

ties and those of its sub-contractors.

i

3. Performance of joint surveillance with the Architect-

' Engineer of its work and its sub-contractors' work. f s

16.2.4.4 CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF PRINCIPAL CONTRACTORS OA PRO'GRAMS PSE&G evaluation and approval of principal contractors' QA f

programs as described in the QA progran plans and other documentation will include but not necessarily be limited to ,

the following:

1. The degree of demonstrated provision for conpliance with 100FR50, Appendix B a nd for compliance with applicable codes, NRC Regulatory Guides, and other applicable f,'.

governing documents.

L

2. Provision for management assessment of the effectiveness of the ir QA prog r am in assuring compliance with applic-able regulatory requirements.

HCGS-PSAR 16.2-9 S i

M P82 55/06-mw 8/8/83

- .