ML20012B639

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Addl Info in Response to Generic Ltr 88-11 Re Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel Matls,Including Comparison of Irradiation Embrittlement Predictions of Reg Guide 1.99,Revs 1 & 2 for Plant
ML20012B639
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 03/08/1990
From: Crimmins T
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
RTR-REGGD-01.099, RTR-REGGD-1.099 GL-88-11, NLR-N90042, NUDOCS 9003150475
Download: ML20012B639 (21)


Text

'"

.g

.4 y.

u-

.c, Public Service Electric and Gas

'/

Company Thomas M. Crimmiris, Jr.

Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 00038 009 339-4700

. Vice Prescent Nuclear ingneenng MAR 0 61500 NLR-N90042 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk

' Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION GENERIC LETTER-88-11 RADIATION EMBRITTLEMENT OF REACTOR VESSEL MATERIALS HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-354 Public Service Electric and Gas (PSE&G) hereby provides the additional'information requested to support its response to Generic Letter 88-11, dated November 28, 1988.

Attachment A is a comparison of the irradiation embrittlement predictions of Regulatory Guide 1.99, Revisions 1 and 2 for Hope Creek' Generating Station.

Should you have any questions regarding this transmittal, please feel free to contact us.

Sincerel n

_- s Attachment 06

[0

\\\\\\

, 3 f.h hD g

-3

=

Document control Desk 2

MAR 0 81993 NLR-N90042-C Mr.

C. Y. Shiraki Licensing Project Manager Mr. T. P. Johnson Senior Resident Inspector Mr W.

T. Russell, Administrator l

Region I Mr. Kent Tosch, Chief New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Environmental Quality Bureau of Nuclear Engineering i

CN-415 1

Trenton, NJ 08625 I

.l i

i l

l l

l-l-

1 ;-- 4 g

.~

.t o -l p

f:*sj i.

-.1 l

N

'I

{ '.

.T 4

ATTACHMENT A 4

3.

COMPARISON OF IRRADIATION EMBRITTLEMENT PREDICTIONS t

OF REGUIATORY CUIDE 1.99, REVISIONS 1 AND 2 FOR i

s

' HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION 4

h t

i P

J r

I e

5 1

U ;. ;.?

' COMPARISON OF REG. GUIDE.1.99 REVISIONS 1 AND.2 FOR HOPE CREEK BELTLINE MATERIALS Shell Course # 3 Plate:

S3C Thickness 6.1' inches Material Heat:

5K3025-1 Chemistry:

C.

Mn P

S Si Cu Ni Mo-0.17 1.46 0.012 0.009 0.3 0.15 0.71

^0.52-Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

19 F, Sigma-I =

0F l

l l

32 EFPY Fluence (f):

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

2.4E+17 n/ca^2 (used with'Rev 1) l Calculated Peak.I.D. f=

3.7E+17 n/ca^2 Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =

2.6E+17 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT)

Surveillance Testing Affecting.Rev 1 Shift calculation:

Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction factor applied =

1 l

Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:

CF=

112.8 Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev l' Rev 1 EFPY Delta-RT Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART 4

5.4 5.4 10.8 29.8 7.1 26.1 8

.9.1 9.1

.18.1 37.1 10.0 29.0 12 12.0 12.0 24.1 43.1 12.3 31.3 16 14.6 14.6 29.2 48.2 14.2 33.2 20 16.9 16.9 33.8 52.8 15.8 34.8-i 24 18.9 18.9 37.9 56.9 17.3-36.3 28 20.8 20.8 41.7

- 60.7 18.7

- 37.7-32 22.6 22.6 45.2 64.2 20.0 39.0-i a

a I*

'tY"9+

W--

W F a

' - + -a 1:

  • v

" * - -rw w-+

9 f

ms--# n-m+*e-r

=

gr

4, 3 CONPARISON OF' REG.x GUIDE 1.99 REVISIONS l'AND 2

-FOR HOPE CREEK BELTLINE MATERIALS Shell Course # 3 Plate:

S4B' Thickness 6.1 inches Material Heat:

SK2608 Chemistry:

C Mn P

S Si Cu Ni

.Mo' O.19 1.46 0.009 0.014 0.3 0.09 0.58 0.52 Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

19 F, Sigma-I'=

0F 32 EFPY Fluence (f):

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

2.4E+17 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak I.D. f=

.3.7E+17 n/ca^2 Rev 2 Attenuated.1/4T f =

2.6E+17 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT)

Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1 Shift Calculation:

Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction factor applied =

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev'2 Shift:

CF=

58 Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and ' ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 1 Rev 1 EFPY Delta RT Margin

-SHIFT ART SHIFT ART:

4 2.8 2.8-5.5 24.5 3.0 22.0 8

4.7 4.7 9.3 28.3 4.2

23.2 12 6.2 6.2 12.4 31.4 5.2 24.2 16 7.5 7.5 15.0 34.0 6.0 25.0 20 8.7 8.7 17.4 36.4 6.7-

'25.7-24 9.7

.9.7 19.5 38.5 7.3 26.3 28 10.7 10.7 21.4 40.4 7.9 26.9-32 11.6 11.6 23.2 42.2 8.5 27.5L

~

.. ~._;y:

COMPARISON OF REG. GUIDE 1.99 REVISIONS 1 AND 2 FOR' HOPE CREEK BELTLINE MATERIALS

-Shell Course # 3' Plate:

S4C Thickness 6.1 inches Material Heat:

SK2698-1 i

Chemistry:

C Mn P

S Si Cu Ni No-0.21 1.41 0.01 0.01 0.3 0.1.

0.58 0.56 l

l Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

19 F, Sigma-I =

0F l

l l

32 EFPY Fluence (f) :

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

2.4E+17 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak I.D.

f=

3.7E+17 n/ca^2 l

Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =-

2.6E+17 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2' delta RT)

Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1. Shift Calculation:

l Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction factor applied =

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:

CF=

65 Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

Rev 2-Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 1 Rev 1 EFPY Delta RT Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART j

4 3.1 3.1 6.2 25.2 3.8 22.8 8

5.2 5.2 10.4 29.4 5.4 24.4 L

12 6.9 6.9 13.9 32.9 6.6

.25.6 16 8.4 8.4 16.8 35.8 7.6 26.6 20 9.7 9.7 19.5 38.5 8.5-27.5 24 10.9 10.9 21.8 40.8.

9.3 28.3 l

28 12.0 12.0 24.0 43.0 10.1 29.1 l

32 13.0 13.0 26.0 45.0 10.8 29.8 i

~.. n..

~

'.=

L

' 4. g.:.. '

i; COMPARISON OF REG. GUIDE.-l.99 REVISIONS 1 AND 2~

FOR HOPE CREEK. BELTLINE MATERIALS

~

Shell Course # 4 Plate:

S2B Thickness 6.1 inches Material Heat:

5K2963-1 Chemistry:

C-Mn P.

S Si Cu

- Ni Mo.

0.22

.1. <4 3 0.009 0.008 0.29 0.07 0.58 0.59 Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

-10 F, Sigma-I =

0F 32 EFPY Fluence (f):

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

1.3E+18 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

~

Calculated Peak-I.D. f=

1.7E+18 n/ca^2 Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T_f =

1.2E+18 n/ca^2.(basis for Rev 2 delta RT)

Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1 Shift Calculation:

Surveillance testing not yet'done.

Correction factor applied =

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:

CF=

44 Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

Rev 2

- Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 1

- Rev 1 l

EFPY Delta RT Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART 4

6.2 6.2.

12.5 2.5 5.3

-4.7 8

9.6 9.6 19.1 9.1 7.5

-2.5.

12 12.0 12.0 24.1-14.1 9.1

-0.9l 16 14.1 14.1 28.1-18.1-10.6 0.6 20 15.8 15.8 31.6 21.6 11.8 1.8 24 17.3

~

17.3 34.6 24.6

-12.9 2.9 28 18.6 18.6 37.2 27.2 14.0

'4.0 32 19.8-19.8 39.7 29.7 14.9 4.9

~

y y

a e

m

,n..<

+

,.ww-

=,,,,

.w n w

- m w.a ae,e___-

.u.w

h:,

COMPARISON OF REG. GUIDE 1.99. REVISIONS 1 AND 2 FOR HOPE CREEK BELTLINE MATERIALS Shell Course f 4 Plate:

S3B Thickness

-6.1 inches Material Heat:-

SK2530-1 Chemistry:

C Mn P

S

' Si Cu' Ni Mo

j 0.2 1.43 0.01 0.008 0.3 0.08 0.56 0.54 j

Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

19 F, Sigma-I =

0F l

32 EFPY Fluence (f):

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

1.1E+18 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak-I.D.

f=

1.7E+18 n/ca^2 Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =

1.2E+18 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT)

Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1 Shift Calculation:

Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction factor applied =

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:

CF=

51 Comparison of Rev.1 and Rev 2-SHIFT and ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 1 Rev 1 EFPY

-Delta RT Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART 4

7.2 7.2 14.5 33.5 5.9 24.9 8

11.1 11.1 22.2 41.2 8.3 27.3 12 14.0 14.0 27.9 46.9 10.2 29.2 16 16.3 16.3 32.6 51.6 11.7 30.7 20 18.3 18.3 36.6 55.6 13.1 32.1 24

'20.0 20.0 40.1 59.1 14.4 33.4 ~

28 21.6 21.6 43.2 62.2

.15.5 34.5 32 23.0 23.0 46.0 65.0 16.6 35.6 C

g r-a w

.,.-w y.

u,_

.s,

_g

y j..,

COMPARISON OF REG. GUIDE 1.99 REVISIONS 1 AND 2-

'FOR HOPE CREEK. BELTLINE ~ MATERIALS Shell Course # 4 Plate:

54A Thickness 6.1 inches Material Heat:

SK3238-1 Chemistry:

'C Mn P

S Si Cu Ni Mo 0.2 1.45 0.012 0.008-0.31 0.09 0.63 0.56-Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

7 F, Sigma-I =

0F 32 EFPY Fluence (f):

Calculated Peak 1/4T-f =

1.1E+18 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak I.D.

f=

1.7E+18 n/ca^2 Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =

1.2E+18 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT)~

Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1 Shift Calculation:

i k

Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction factor applied =

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:

CF=

58 j

Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

l Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 1 Rev 1 EFPY Delta RT Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART 4

8.2 8.2 16.4 23.4 8.2 15.2 8 '

12.6 12.6 25.2 32.2 11.6 18.6 12 15.9 15.9 31.8 38.8 14.2 21.2-16 18.5 18.5 37.1 44.1 16.4 23.4' 20 20.8 20.8 41.6 48.6 18.4

-25.4 24 22.8 22.8

.45.6 52.6~

20.1 27.1' 28 24.5 24.5 49.1 56.1 23.7.

28.7 32 26.1 26.1

.52.3 59.3 23.2 30.2

=

..e 1 j ;.

r

'i -

COMPARISON OF. REG. GUIDE 1.99 REVISIONS.1 AND 2

.FOR HOPE CREEK-BELTLINE-MATERIALS Shell Course f~5 Plate:

SSA' Thickness 6.1 inches Material Heat:

'5K3230-1 Chemistry:

C Phi P

S lSi Cu Ni-No 0.19.

1.44

. 0.01 0.012 0.3 0.07 0.56' O.5:

Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

-10 F, Sigma-I'=

0F 32 EFPY Fluence (f):

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

1.1E+18 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak I.D. f=

1.7E+18 n/ca^2 Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =

1.2E+18 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT) 1 Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1. Shift calculation:

j Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction factor applied =.

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:

CF=

44 l

Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and - ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 1 Rev 1 EFPY Delta RT Margin SHIFT ART

. SHIFT

. ART 4

6.2 6.2 12.5 2.5 5.9

-4.1 8

9.6 9.6 19.1 9.1 8.3

-1.7 12 12.0 12.0 24.1 14.1 10.2 0.2 16 14.1 14.1 28.1 18.1 11.7 1.7 l

15.8 31.6 21.6.

13.1 3.1 20 15.8

, 17.3-34.6 24.6 14.4 4.4-i 24 17.3 28 18.6 18.6 37.2

'27.2 15.5 5.5 32 19.8'

'19.8

.39.7 29.7 16.6 6.6 l

~

i

.e m

wr er 1y 4

m en..

w V

'-'W'e

<,4e-m-4 es.+y-

"<g

_a COMPARISON OF REG. GUIDE l'.99 REVISIONS 1 AND 2

.FOR HOPE' CREEK BELTLINE MATERIALS-Shell' Course.# 5 Plate:

SSB Thickness-6.1 inches Material Heat:

6C35-1 Chemistry:-

C Mn P

S Si Cu Ni Mo.

0.2 1.46 0.01' O.011 0.27 0.09 0.54 0.51' Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

-11 F, Sigma-I =

0F 32 EFPY Fluence (f):

Calculated ~ Peak 1/4T f =

1.1E+18 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak I.D.

f=

1.7E+18 n/cm^2 Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =

1.2E+18 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT)

Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1 Shift calculation:

Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction factor applied =

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:-

CF=

58 Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2-' SHIFT and ART (degrees F) versus-EFPY:

Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev-2 Rev.1

-R6v 1 EFPY Delta RT Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART L

4 8.2 8.2 16.4 5.4 7.0

-4.O' 8

12.6 12.6 25.2 14.2 9.9

-1.1 12 15.9 15.9 31.8 20.8 12.2 1.2-16 18.5 18.5 37.1 26.1 14.1 3.1 t

20 20.8 20.8 41.6 30.6 15.7-4.7 24 22.8 22.8-45.6' 34.6:

17.2 6.2 28 24.5

~24.5 49.1 38.1 18.6 7.6 32 26.1-26.1 52.3 41.3 19.9.

8.9

~..

. al m,-

COMPARISON OF REG. GUIDE 1.99-REVISIONS 1 AND 2 FOR HOPE CREEK' BELTLINE MATERIALS Shell Course # 5 Plate:

SSC Thickness 6.1 inches Material Heat:

6C45-1 Chemistry:-

C Mn P-G Si' Cu Ni Mo 0.18 1.49 0.008 0.01 0.31 0.08 0.57 0.5 Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

1 F, Sigma-I =

0F 32 EFPY Fluence (f):

' Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

1.1E+18 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak I.D. f=

1.7E+18 n/ca^2 Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =

1.2E+18 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT)

Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1~ Shift Calculation:

Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction factor applied =.

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:'

CF=

51 l

Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2

-Rev 1 Rev 1

'EFPY Delta RT EMargin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART.

4 7.2-

'7.2 14.5 15.5 4.7 5.7 8

11.1 11.1 22.2 23.2 6.6 7.6 12 14.0 14.0 27.9 28.9~

8.1 9.1 -

16 16.3 16.3 32.6 33.6 9.4 10.4 20

-18.3 18.3 36.6 37.6 10.5

" 11.5-24.

20.0 20.0 40.1 41.1 11.5 12.5 28

21.6 21.6 43.2

-44.2 12.4

'13.4 32 23.0 23.0-46 0 47.0.

13.3

~14.3

.~

...., _ -,.. _ ~ -

X.-

5: [;V '

e -:

l COMPARISON'OF-REG. GUIDE 1.99 REVISIONS 1 AND 2 FOR HOPE CREEK BELTLINE MATERIALS

{

l Girth & Long. Welds for'Shell Coursesn4,5

. Thickness-6.1 inches I

and Long. Welds for Shell' Course 13 Material Heat:

510-01205 i

Chemistry:

C Mn P

S Si Cu Ni' Mo.

0.072 1.2 0.01 0.011 0.42 0.09 0.54 0.45 i

Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

-40 F,-

Sigma-I =

0F I

32 EFPY ' Fluence (f):

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

1.1E+18 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak 1.D. f=

1.7E+18 n/ca^2-Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =

1.2EF18 n/cm^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT)

Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1 Shift Calculation:

Surveillance testing not yet done.

-Correction factor applied =

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:

CF=

108.7 Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIET and ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 1 P.ev 1 EFPY.

Delta RT Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART 4

15.4 15.4 30.8

-9.2 7.0

-33.0 8

23.6 23.6 47.3 7.3 9.9'

-30.1 12 29.8 29.8 59.5 19.5 12.2

-27.8 16 34.7 34.7 69.5 29.5 14.1-

-25.9 20

' 39. 0 -

39.0 78.0 38.0 15.7

-24.3 1

24 42.7 42.7 85.4 45.4 17.2

-22.8 28 46.0 46.0 92.0 52.0' 18.6

-21.4-32 49.0-

.49.0 98.0 58.0 19.9

-20.1 l

i 4

+=,

~

--=

e

<v

---r.-

e

_ eq pg.

. ~,;.

COMPARISON'OF REG.: GUIDE 1.99 REVISIONS-1 AND 2' FOR HOPE CREEK BELTLINE MATERIALS-1 Girth & Long. Welds for Shell Courses 4,5 Thickness 6.1 inches and Long. Welds.for Shell Course 3-Material Heat:

D53040/1125-02205 Chemistry:

C Mn P

'S

'. Si ~

-Cu Ni-Mo-0.01 1.68 0.01 0.004 0.3 0.08 0.63-0.43

-Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

-30 F, Sigma-I =

0F 32 EFPY Fluence (f):

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

1.1E+18 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

-Calculated Peak I.D. f=

1.7E+18 n/ca^2 Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =

1.2E+18 n/ca^2 (basis ~for Rev 2 delta RT)

Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1 Shift Calculation:

Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction factor applied =

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:

CF=

106.3 Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2_ SHIFT and ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 P.ev 1 Rev.'.

EFPY Delta RT Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART 4

.15.1 ~

15.1-30.1 0.1 5.9

-24.1 8

23.1

~23.1 46.2 16.2 8.3

-21.7-12 29.1 29.1 58.2 28.2 10.2

-19.8 16 34.0 34.0 67.9 37.9 11.7

-18.3 i

20 38.1 38.1' 76.2

'46.2.

13.1

-16.9 24 41.7

'41.7 83.5 53.5 14.4

-15.6 28' 45.0 45.0 90.0 60.0 15.5

-14.5

.32 47.9 47.9 95.8 65.8-16.6

-13.4

-l

a

. f

+

COMPARISON OF REG. GUIDE 1.99-REVISIONS'l AND 2; FOR HOPE CREEK BELTLINE MATERIALS Girth Weld Between Shell Courses 3,4

~ Thickness 6.1 inches Material Heat:

519-01205 Chemistry:

C Mn P

S Si Cu Ni

.No 0.051 1.17 0.01 0.007 0.26 0.01 0.53 0.45 Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

-49 F,

-Sigma-I =

0F 32 EFPY Fluence (f) :

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

2.4E+17 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak I.D. f=

3.7E+17 n/ca^2 Rev 2 Attenuated.1/4T f =

2.6E+17 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT)

Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1 Shift Calculation:

Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction factor applied =

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:

CF=

20 Comparison ~of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

Rev'2' Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev'1 Rev'l l

EFPY Delta RT.

Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART' l

1 l

4 1.0 1.0 1.9

-47.1 2.7

-46.3 8

1.6 1.6 3.2

-45.8 3.8

-45.2 12 2.1' 2.1 4.3

-44.7 4.7

-44.3 16 2.6 2.6 5,2

-43.8-5.4

-43.6 20 3.0 3.0 6.0

'-43.0 6.1

-42.9 24 3.4 3.4 6.7

-42.3 6.7

-42.3 28 3.7 3.7 7.4

-41.6 7.2

-41.8 32 4.0-4.0 8.0

-41.0-7.7

-41.3

~

- t 4

.m u

J

l i.

N:

..}

W COMPARISON OF REG. GUIDE-1.99 REVISIONS.1 AND 2 FOR HOPE CREEK BELTLINE. MATERIALS

- Girth Weld Between Shell Courses.3,4 Thickness 6.1 inches Material Heat:

504-01205-l Chemistry:

C Mn P

S Si Cu Ni Mo O.06 1.3 0.011

.0.0051 0.26 0.01 0.51:

0.41 Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

-31 F, Sigma-I =

0, F 32 EFPY Fluence (f) :

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

2.4E+17 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak I.D.

f=

3.7E+17 n/ca^2-Rev 2. Attenuated 1/4T f =

2.6E+17 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT)

Surveillance' Testing Affecting Rev 1 Shift Calculation:

Surveillance testing not yet done.

t Correction factor applied =

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev 2. Shift:

CF=

20 4

l

.t Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and' ART l(degrees F) versus EFPY:

t Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 1 Rev 1 i

EFPY Delta RT Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART-4 1.0.

1.0 1.9

-29.1-3.0

-28.0 8

1.6 1.6 3.2

-27.8 4.2

-26.8 12 2.1 2.1 4.3

-26.7 5.2

-25.8 l

16 2.6 2.6 5.2

-25.8 5.0

-25.0 t

20 3.0 3.0 6.0

-25.0 6.7

-24.3' 24 3.4 3.4 6.7

-24.3 7.3

-23.7 28 3.7' 3.7 7.4

-23.6 7.9

-23.1-32 4.0 4.0' 8.0

-23.0-8.5

-22.5

[

,y COMPARISON OF-REG.' GUIDE.'1.99 REVISIONS 1 AND'2-FOR' HOPE CREEK BELTLINE MATERIALS GirthcWeld Between Shell Courses 3,4 Thickness 6.1 inches Material Heat:

D55733/1810-02205 Chemistry:

C Mn P

S Si Cu Ni No O.076 1.57 0.013 0.003 0.34 0.1 0.68 0.43 Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

-40 F, Sigma-I =

0F 32 EFPY Fluence (f):

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

2.4E+17 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak I.D.

f=

3.7E+17 n/ca^2 i

Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =

2.6E+17 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT) i Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1 Shift calculation:

j Surveillance testing not yet done.-

Correction factor applied =

1 l

Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:

.CF=

126.4 Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and ART.(degrees F)'versus EFPY:-

Rev 2.

Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev l' Rev 1 EFPY Delta RT Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART 4

6.0 6.0 12.1

-27.9 4.6

-35.4-8 10.2 10.2 20.3

-19.7,,

6.5

-33.5 12 13.5 13.5 27.0

-13.0 8.0

-32.0 16 16.4 16.4 32.7

-7.3 9.3

-30.7 20 18.9 18.9 37.8

-2.2 10.3

-29.7

24 21.2 21.2 42.5 2.5 11.3

-28.7 28 23.3

.23.3 46.7 6.7 12.2

-27.8' 32

'25.3 25.3 50.6

.10.6 13.1-

-26.9

.~

.}

COMPARISON OF REG.-GUIDE 1.99 REVISIONS 1 AND 2 FOR HOPE CREEK BELTLINE MATERIALS Girth Weld Between Shell Courses 3,4' Thickness 6.1 inches Material Heat:

D53040/1810-02205 Chemistry:

C Mn P

S Si Cu Ni-No 0.088 1.69 0.012 0.003 0.34 0.1-0.68 0.45 Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I =

-49'F, Sigma-I =

0 F-i 32 EFPY Fluence (f) :

Calculated Peak ~1/4T f =

2.4E+17 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak I.D. f=

3.7E+17 n/ca^2 Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =

2.6E+17 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT)

Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1 Shift Calculation:

Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction' factor applied =

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:

CF=

126.4

(

Comparison ofL Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

f Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 1 Rev 1 EFPY Delta RT Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART I

l I

l 14 6.0 6.0 12.1

-36.9 4.4

~ -44.6 t

8 10.2 10.2 20.3 28.7 6.2-

-42.8 12 13.5 13.5 27.0

-22.0 7.5

-41.5 16 16.4 16.4

.32.7

-16.3 8.7-

-40.3 11.2 9.7

-39.3 1

20 18.9 18.9 37.8 24 21.2 21.2 42.5 6.5 10.7

-38.3 28 23.3 23.3 46.7

-2.3 11.5

-37.5 32 25.3 25.3 50.6 1.6 12.3

-36.7 V

~W

'i4w Lair."

+,J-'r m4' g-

- =

__q

-.W f

.-at

-=r.==

e

f

~

f_.

COMPARISON OF REG. GUIDE 1.99 REVISIONS 1 AND 2-FOR HOPE CREEK EELTLINE MATERIALS LPCI Weld :

^ Thickness 6.1 inches Material Heat:

001-01205-Chemistry:

C Mn P

S Si Cu Ni Mo O.058 1.26 0.012

-0;006 0.25 0.02 0.51

0.4 Initial-RTndt

RTndt-I.=

-40 F, Sigma-I =

0F 32 EFPY Fluence (f):

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

1.6E+17 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak I.D.

f=

2.5E+17 n/ca^2 Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =

1.7E+17 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT)

Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev 1~ Shift Calculation:

.q Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction factor applied =

1 L

Chemistry Factor for Rev 2 Shift:

CF=

27 Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2

'Rev 2 Rev 1 Rev 1 EFPY Delta RT Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART 4

0.9 0.9 1.9

-38.1 2.7.

-37.3 8

1.6 1.6 3.3

-36.7 3.8'

-36.2-12-

-2.2 2.2 4.4

-35.6 4.6

-35.4 16 2.7 2.7 5.4

-34.6 5.4

-34.6 20 3. 9.

3.1 6.3

-33.7 6.0

.-34.0 24 3.5 3.5 7.1

-32.9 6.6

-33.4-l

~!

28 3.9 3.9 7.8

-32.2 7.1-

-32.9 32 4.2 4.2 8.5

-31.5 7.6

-32.4 t

~.

.,, ~,

. }L -

~

COMPARISON OF' REG.' GUIDE 1.99 REVISIONS 1 AND 2' FOR HOPE CREEK BELTLINE MATERIALS LPCI Nozzle :

Thickness 6.1 inches l

19468-1 l

Material Heat:

Chemistry:

C Mn P

S Si Cu Ni No 3

0.15 0.74 0.011 0.011 0.28 0.12 0.8 0.62 Initial ~RTndt:

RTndt-I =

-20 F, Sigma-I =

0F 32 EFPY Fluence (f):

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

1.6E+17 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak I.D.

f=

2.5E+17 n/ca^2 Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =

1.7E+17 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT) i Surveillance Testing Affecting Rev i Shift Calculation:

Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction factor applied

1 i

i Chemistry Factor.for Rev'2 Shift:

CF=

86 l

Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 1 Rev 1~

EFPY Delta RT Margin SHIFT ART SHIFT ART l

4 3.0 3.0 6.0

-14.0 4.2

-15.8 8

5.2 5.2 10.4

-9.6 6.0

. -14.0 1

12 7.0 7.0 14.0

-6.0 7.4

-12.6 16 8.5 8.5 17.1

-2.9 8.5 ~

-11.5 I

20

~10.0 10.0 19.9

-0.1 9.5

-10.5 s

24 11.2 11.2 22.5 2.5 10.4

-9.6 28 12.4 12.4 24.9 4.9 11.2

-8.8 3:2 13.5 13.5 27.1 7.1 12.0

-8.O~

r*T

'*u-w-

+w.i re - -

w ev w g wsi..

, 5:

[-

-);

.t

' COMPARISON OF' REG. GUIDE 1.99 REVISIONS 1'AND_2 FOR: HOPE' CREEK BELTLINE MATERIALS LPCI Nozzle :

Thickness 6.1' inches Material Heat:

10024-1 Chemistry:

C

Mn P.

S-Si Cu

-Ni Mo 0.15 0.73~

0.01 0.009 0.29.

0.14 0.82-0.64 Initial RTndt:

RTndt-I = '

-20 F, Sigma-I =

0F 32 EFPY Fluence (f) :

Calculated Peak 1/4T f =

1.6E+17 n/ca^2 (used with Rev 1)

Calculated Peak I.D.

f=

2.5E+17 n/ca^2 Rev 2 Attenuated 1/4T f =

1.7E+17 n/ca^2 (basis for Rev 2 delta RT)

Surveillance Testing Affecting.Rev 1 Shift Calculation:

Surveillance testing not yet done.

Correction factor applied =

1 Chemistry Factor for Rev.2 Shift:

CF=

105.1 Comparison of Rev 1 and Rev 2 SHIFT and ART (degrees F) versus EFPY:

Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 2 Rev 1 Rev 1 EFPY Delta RT Margin-SHIFT ART

' SHIFT ART-4 3.7 3.7 7.4

-12.6 4.9

-15.1 8

6.3 6.3 12.7

' -7.3 7.0

--13.0 12 8.5 8.5 17.1-

'-2.9 8.5

-11.5 16 10.4-10.4 20.9 0.9 9.8

-10.2 20-12.2 12.2 24.3 4.3 11.0

--9.0 24 13.7 13.7

- 27.5 7.5 12.0

-8.0-28 15.2 15.2 30.4 10.4

' 13.0

-7.0 32 16.5 16.5 33.1 13.1 13.9

-6.1 suf'i-er i

4 W-

't%'T W ep&

T WT-

.m

'=c.-

44 y eN9--""4 adyP

  • ey="

--m.ps_%

y y

y'waa m