ML20070T779

Reaffirms Intent to Pursue Improved Tech Spec & to Establish Revised Expected Submittal Date for Amend Application,Per 910110 & 29 Ltrs.Revised Date Is 12 Months After NRC Issuance of SER

ML20070T779
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	04/01/1991
From:	Beck G PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
GL-89-19, NUDOCS 9104050112
Download: ML20070T779 (2)

Text

- ____ __ _

, u PIIILADELPIIIA ELECTRIC COMPANY NUCLEAR GROUP HEADQUARTERS 955 65 CHESTERBROOK BLVD, WAYNE, PA 19087 5691 (215) 640-6000 NUCLEAR ENGINEERINO & SERVICES DEPARTMENT Docket Nos. 50-277 50-278 License Nos. DPR-44 DPR-56 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

SUBJECT:

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Improved Technical Specifications

REFERENCES:

(1) Letter from D. R. llelwig (PECo) to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission dated January 10, 1990 (2) Letter from G. J. Beck (PECo) to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission dated January 29, 1991

Dear Sir:

In Reference (1), Philadelphia Electric Company (PECo) stated our intent to pursue Improved Technical Specifications (ITS) for Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3. The version of the ITS applicable to PBAPS was proposed by the Boiling Water Reactors Owners' Group (BWROG) and is currently under NRC review. We indicated our plan to submit, by March 31, 1991, an amendment application requesting a conversion from the existing custom Technical Specifications to the ITS. This expected submittal date was contingent upon the NRC issuing a Safety Evaluation Report (SER) on the BWROG Licensing Topical Report in June 1990 and the approved version of ITS not deviating significantly from the BWROG proposed ITS.

The purpose of this letter is to reaffirm our intent to pursue ITS, and to establish a revised expected submittal date for the amendment application. The revised date is 12 months after NRC issuance af an SER. As before, this date is contingent upol the approved version of ITS not deviating significantly from the BWROG proposed ITS, f.oQ J.hS438$$$ ids $ff;7 1 i16 P

e -

U.S.-Nuclear Regulatory Commission April 1, 1991 Improved Technical Specifications Page 2 This letter is also a follow-up to Reference (2) wherein we referenced our intent to pursue ITS and its impact on a Generic Letter 89-19 issue. In that letter we committed to provide the NRC with a revised ITS amendment submittal date.

If you have any questions regarding this issue, please do not hesitate to call.

Very truly yours, a- og G. J. Beck, Manager Licensing Section Nuclear Engineering & Services cc: T. T. Martin, Administrator, Region I, USNRC J. J. Lyash, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, PB l

l l

1

--