Text

Response to Request for Additional Information for Review of License Renewal Application TAC ME0278 - Environmental Review
	ML101810176
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	06/28/2010
From:	Franke J; Progress Energy Florida
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	3F0610-07, TAC ME0278
	Download: ML101810176 (159)
	v • d • e

Progress Energy Crystal River Nuclear Plant Docket No. 50-302 Operating License No. DPR-72 Ref: 10CFR54 June 28, 2010 3F0610-07 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

Subject:

Crystal River Unit 3 - Response to Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant, License Renewal Application (TAC NO. ME0278) - Environmental Review

References:

(1) CR-3 to NRC letter, dated December 16, 2008, "Crystal River Unit 3 -

Application for Renewal of Operating License" (2) NRC to CR-3 letter, dated June 3, 2010, "Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant, License Renewal Application (TAC NO. ME0278)"

Dear Sir:

On December 16, 2008, Florida Power Corporation (FPC), doing business as Progress Energy Florida, Inc. (PEF), requested renewal of the operating license for Crystal River Unit 3 (CR-3) to extend the term of its operating license an additional 20 years beyond the current expiration date (Reference 1). Subsequently, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), by letter dated June 3, 2010, provided a request for additional information (RAI) concerning the CR-3 License Renewal Application and a request for documents (Reference 2). The Enclosure to this letter provides the response to the RAI. A response to the request for documents is being provided in a separate letter (CR-3 letter 3F0610-08 dated June 28, 2010).

No new regulatory commitments are contained in this submittal.

If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Mike Heath, Supervisor, License Renewal, at (910) 457-3487, e-mail at mike.heath@pgnmail.com.

Sincerely, Jon Franke Vice President Crystal River Unit 3 JAF/dwh

Enclosure:

Response to Request for Additional Information xc: NRC CR-3 Project Manager NRC License Renewal Project Manager NRC Regional Administrator, Region II Senior Resident Inspector iA/c Progress Energy Florida, Inc.

Crystal River Nuclear Plant 15760 W. Power Line Street Crystal River, FL 34428

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 of 2 3F0610-07 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF CITRUS Jon A. Franke states that he is the Vice President, Crystal River Nuclear Plant for Florida Power Corporation, doing business as Progress Energy Florida, Inc.; that he is authorized on the part of said company to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the information attached hereto; and that all such statements made and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information,.and belief.q-N J oiA. Franke

,Vice President Crystal River Nuclear Plant The foregoing document was acknowledged before me this c2? day of J'", e/_ _, 2010, by Jon A. Franke.

/

.1 ~ 4~A',~-

Signature of Notary Public State of Florida CAROLYN E.PORTMANN

-- Commission # DD 937553 S Expires March 1,2014

.,, , ded Thm Ty FainInsuinanc M,185-7019 (Print, type, or stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public)

Personally 7 Produced Known V/ -OR- Identification

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NUMBER 50 - 302 / LICENSE NUMBER DPR - 72 ENCLOSURE RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 3F0610-07 Page 1 of 4 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This enclosure provides the request for additional information that is needed by the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff to complete its review of the Crystal River Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 3 (CR-3) application for license renewal and prepare the draft supplemental environmental impact statement. To support the staff's continued review of the CR-3 environmental report (ER), please provide the information described below.

RAI 1 Provide a status of plans to study elevated levels of Na, As, Ra-226 and Ra-228, and gross alpha in some monitoring wells associated with Industrial Wastewater Permit No.

FLA016960, including a description of study plan (Geosyntec).

Response

Progress Energy Florida, Inc. (PEF)has commissioned two studies: the first study involving exceedences of sodium, while the second addresses arsenic and radionuclides (gross alpha and radium 226/228). Draft copies of the sodium evaluation and arsenic and radionuclide Plan of Study have been submitted to Crystal River Energy Complex (CREC) personnel for their review/approval. No deadline was imposed by Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)to complete these studies.

Sodium Evaluation Groundwater monitoring is currently being conducted at the CREC in accordance with the groundwatermonitoringplan specified in the industrialwastewaterpermit for the facility. Recent review of the groundwaterquality data indicated that elevated sodium concentrationshave been detected in the groundwater at the site at concentrations that exceed the FDEP's primary drinking water standard (PDWS) as defined in Rule 62-550, Florida Administrative Code.

However, these levels of sodium may be due to natural background levels associated with sea water influences from the Gulf of Mexico. Therefore, PEF is currently seeking relief from having to meet the PDWS for sodium at the site; Geosyntec will prepare a sodium backgroundstudy for relief from the sodium groundwater standard. The sodium study will be prepared based on existing site groundwaterquality data provided to Geosyntec by PEF and other available data from published sources. The study will include the following tasks:

" Development of a site conceptual model to present the historic and current site conditions regardinggeology, hydrogeology, and surface and groundwaterquality in the vicinity of the CREC,

Evaluation of existing site conditions, including background surface and groundwater quality, operationalprocesses, and evaluation of potential sodium sources; and

" Development of a rationale and justification for the elimination of sodium from the groundwater monitoring plan at the CREC to achieve regulatory acceptance. This includes an evaluation and inventory of current and future potential groundwater resources in the vicinity of the CREC.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 3F0610-07 Page 2 of 4 Arsenic and Radionuclides Plan of Study The objective of the plan of study (POS) is to assess the presence of arsenic and radionuclides (gross alpha and radium 226/228) in the soil and groundwater at the CREC and to evaluate various remedial technologies that will enable the CREC to meet the FDEP'sPDWSs for these constituents., Therefore, the POS will contain the following elements:

Evaluation of existing soil and groundwaterdata - Geosyntec will evaluate all available soil and groundwater data that has been collected during the operation of the CREC.

The main objective of this task is to assess the distribution of arsenic and radionuclides in the environment at the CREC and to identify and evaluate the potential source(s) of these constituents currently detected in the groundwaterat the site.

Collection of additional data - if data gaps are identified during the data evaluation process, a work plan will be developed to collect additionaldata. Collection of additional data may include soil and groundwatersampling, hydrogeologic testing, and bench/pilot testing. The main objective of this task is to identify the data necessary to design and implement a remedy for the site, if appropriate.

" Remedial alternatives evaluation - Geosyntec will utilize the information obtained from the previous two steps to evaluate various remedial alternatives for the site. Each remedial alternative will include a conceptual design of a corrective action for bringing the CREC station into compliance with the PDWSs for arsenic-and radionuclides. It is anticipated that several remedial alternatives will be evaluated for the site. The report will recommend the most appropriate and cost effective alternative to achieve the mandated compliance.

RAI 2 Provide annual groundwater use data from 2000 to 2009 in a spreadsheet format.

Response-Refer to the spreadsheeton the following page.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 3F0610-07 Page 3 of 4 PROGRESS ENERGY CRYSTAL RIVER POWER PLANT WATER USE DATA 20OD-2000 Ya200 Ya "wlt 2901 Year MM0 Acbual M~w Musfaftm

'ftwMiO j Year =04 [ Vgif lmn I~ntiruO YB8N2006 J to M Bd4DnW WM 7 - VbWi2MO8 Year 20M F~rd-2m- Rwkk{ G rtum ~ 1J7 30:7 299.92 ME&1 ML5,42 325M 32. 335.3M 3W,34 ý Guf- 1tr z 9egr 35,73~3,5 32,79.50L 315A31AD 35.M1.40 UI,72EM ~ 31,1071.5 336A9941 29,02,8 3.W92 PubIE~upol [_______ ______ ______

b ! g pt _________ 36,7h33M 32,796.50 3&831A 35.E31.40 37269 1.07EU 29237M 209,gou 33.W.2 Taw~ Ivwi [U3081.78 3C.04327 33,03GA2, x01.57A 3U5L5.2, &%M023 31.4751T 33S534Y 30.2T11 3.D5 Ta WOMI CnOumedW M28.2 30217 295.5 ca;- S42 325M3 3GESS 4,M5712 39&U3 M55_____

lobE [M 1254 S37.301 13GA2337G5 123.2G.45.701 13GýSGS3.7G3 13r.,M.B03.701 13Z,67515A6& 11Sj10.M751 12Q5.2S.185.15 114.S70.06.33 114.485.04.00 Tat" DACWG~dOOZl 1,079,71480l 1,172AM4.5 1,135.197.201 1,347,S14201 i.1%6.01dJ0 1.13361t1 1.=jMI53 I0.04,A 20 14.100I30 1541.82.41 Fft-AWalar- FEO rkm l 237.8a 229j52 244.79 265.0 24541I 256.0 258.58 25234 .307.0 mzz4

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 3F0610-07 Page 4 of 4 RAI 3 Provide summary of design features for two coal runoff ponds, including bottom and top areas, bottom and top elevations, peak inflow and outflow, peak storage, and fact that they are lined with a geosynthetic clay liner.

Response

Coal Runoff Pond Design Features:

Bottom area: 320 ft. x 591 ft. (each)

Top area (at elevation 97.5 ft.): 347 ft. x 618 ft.

Bottom elevation: 93.0 ft.

Top elevation: 100.0 ft.

Peak inflow: 193.17 cubic feet per second (cfs)

Peak outflow: 2.23 cfs Peak storage: 25.79 acre-feet The ponds are lined with a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL). The GCL on the bottom of the pond is overtopped with 6 in. of sand/pea gravel, 12 in. of crushed rock and 6 in. of concrete pavement.

RAI 4 Provide a brief documentation that the oil storage tanks were cleaned, closed (including date), and converted to warehouse facilities.

Response

As stated in Section 5.2 of the Crystal river Units 1, 2, 3 Storm Water Pollution Prevention and Best Management PracticesPlan, two oil tanks located west of Crystal River Units I and 2 have been modified and are now used as material/equipmentstorage warehouses. The tank that is used by Crystal River Units 1 & 2 was inspected on July 10, 1991, to determine the condition of the structure for future conversion to a warehouse. No comparable information regarding the inspection or preparationof the tank used by CR-3 could be located; however, both tanks that are in use were converted to warehousespriorto the end of 1993.

RAI 5 Provide Progress Energy's response to RAI from Florida Department of Environmental Protection on NPDES Major Permit Modification Application - Units 1, 2, and 3.

Response

Refer to the attached letter from Progress Energy (L. Hatcher) to Florida Department of Environmental Protection (M. Harris), dated May 20, 2010: Re: Progress Energy Florida, Inc. -

Crystal River Units 1, 2, & 3 DEP File No. FLOO00159-013-IWIS/NR Request for Additional Information (RFI) No. 1 NPDES Permit Renewal Application.

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NUMBER 50 - 302 / LICENSE NUMBER DPR- 72 ATTACHMENT RAI 5: Progress Energy's Response to RAI from Florida Department of Environmental Protection on NPDES Major Permit Modification Application - Units 1, 2, and 3

K Progress Energy Larry E. Hatcher Manager, Crystal!River Fossil Plant &Fuel Operations, May"20 2010 Mr. Marc Harris, P.E.

Supervisor, Power-Plant NPDES Permitting Industrial Wastewater Section Florida Department of Environmental Protection 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 Re: Progress.Energy.FIrida, InCd. -CrystalRiver Unitsi'1, -2, & 3 DEP File. Nloi FLO000! 59-01 3'-IWIS/NR Request for Additional Information (RFI) No. 1 NPDES Permit Renewal Application

Dear Mr.Harris:

Progress Energy Florida (PEF) received the request for additional information (RAI) dated December 8, 2009 in response to the application for renewal of the Crystal River Units 1, 2 & 3 NPDES'Permit FL0000159. The.Department's request for additional information is provided in bold type followed by the responsefror PEF.

Additionally, please note that additional information is provided that was unavailable at the time of the original permit renewal application submittal back on October 30, 2009. This includes Form 2CS-data for Outfall I-OFE (LSST discharge) as well as supplemental Form 2F data relative to several storm walter ouffalls. This information is included in Attachment 1 -of this

.submittal.

1. As'the responses to the requests below require engineering review and calculations, please submit the responses under the seal of Progress Energy's Engineer of Record for this project PEF Response Comment acknowledged.

2. The information in Section VII,. Part-A, of Form 2CSi shows values that exceed existing permit limits for the cOmbined cooling water flow of once-through cooling water from Units 1, 2, and 3 (Outfalls D-611, D-012, D-013:and D-00F). The maximum daily flow is limited to 1897.9 MGD for May 1 St through October 31stand 16113.2 MGD during the remainder of the year. Please provide the following:

a'. Clarification whether the maximum combined flow-of the cooling water intake structures actually exceeds permitted flows;

b. A graph for eachof the intake structure coolingwater pumps for unitst 1,2, and.3 thatshows the pump performance cuire, thesystem head curve and-the intersection of the two curves;. and,

c. Engineering data and calculations, signed by'a Professional EngIneerlicensed in Florida,, for each system head curve including the pump static suction and discharge head and friction, losses associated with the pipe System.

PEF Response The, information provided in Section VIi, Part A, of Form 2CS, shows a maximum Value of once

'through condenser-coolihg water from Outfall D-013,as being 985.0 MGD. This flow should actual0y be repred as 979.2 MGD based on 'the design point for each of the four CR-3' circulatingwaterPumPs (170,000 gpm at 35 ft. Total Dynamic Head - TDH). The adjusted

combined condenser cooling water flow of once-through:cooling water.from Units 1,2, and3 (OutfallsD-01 1, D-012' and D-013), therefore, should be 18970.9'MGD, which' isthe current permit limitation during the period May Istthrough.October 3 1st* Pleasenote that flow is reduced by throttling Units 1 and 2 circulating water pumps during the remainder of the year in order to meetthe i1,613.2 MGD limitation; Attachment 2 contains resultsfrom a dye"test,of the.. CR-3circulating water pumps'c6nducted durin'g February.2009. All four'circulating water pumps tested at various'RPM and TDH levels averaged 160,843 gpm each. Corrected to 252 R.PM,1these pumps averaged 169,094 gpm,.

which is very close to the design point of 170,000 gpm per pump. The primary purpose of thei test was t0 assist the-plant-in determiningthe impact of having a certain heat exchanger in service, however, pressure taps on the "A"'and 1B"pumps"alsoallo-wed datato betaken and compared to: design curves, copies ofwhich are attached;

,Section i.A.1. "of'the active permit states "During the period beginning onthe issuance-date and'

!asting through the expiration"date of'this permit; -the permittee is, authorizedto discharge Once-through non-contact condenser cooling water (OTCW) from OuWfalls D-01 1, D-01-2, and D-01 3 to the site discharge canal'thence the Gulf of Mexico." Flow from.OtLifalls D-01 1,D-01 2, and"D-013 is limited by item I.A.3, which says "Combined OpTCW discharge from Units, 1, 2, and 3

,shall not exceed: 1,89749 MGD during the period May 1- ýthrough October 31Stof each year, or:

i1,61'32 MGD during the remainder of the'year Outfall D-00F is not'limited~by Section L.AI ,or item Il.A.3. Insteadd,Outfall D-OOF is limited bySection I.A.15 of the permit. Theonlyl requiremientfor flow on Outfall D-OOF is "report only" daily maximum and daily average, flows.

Thereforej permitted OTCW flows'from Units., 1, 2 and 3 have not been eXceeded.'

3. Please provide a process description for the block identified as "MWST" 6n the NUclear Serviceds and Decay Heat Non-ConitactCooling Water system shown, onthe flow diagram in Attachment 3.

PEF Resbonse "MWST" which stands for "'!Miscellaneous Waste Storage Tank" receives low-olume wastestreams frorma number of sources consisting mostly of sump'and floor drains within the reactor and auxiliary buildings. Attachment;3 contains adiagram detailing inputs to the MWST.

Please notelthat,' per NRIC regulations, wastewater from these internal CR3 outfalls are

,required to be monitored, ,and meet limits for,-sever radionuclides.

4. Please provide a description of the nuclear services and decay heat non-contact

,cooling water system. In addition; please providethe, design cooling water discharge flow rate and temperature and the design temperature rise across the cooling water isystem (D-OOF).

PEF Re,snse The Nuclear Services and Decay Heat Seawater system also -referred to as the Raw Water (Rw) system is comprised of two "sub-systems". One sub-system services the nuclear services closed cycle cooling water system heat exchangers, alsoreferred to as the RW/SW :system.

The. other sub-systernservices .the,decay heat closed cycle, cooling :systemr heat exchangers,

,also referred to as the RW/DC system.

.Average;RW/SW flow to the SW heat exchangers during normal operation is approximately 12,000 gpm .(17.3, mgd). At this flow rate, average'delta Tis approximately 70' F. The flow rate is based on providing sufficient capacity to remove heat generated by equipment and

.components during niorral operations. Please note that this.flow represents lessthan 1% of the

.total condenser cooling water flow of Units1l,.2, & 3.

The Decay Heat Closed Cycle Cooling Water (DC) system.only operates for shorft time periods during unit shutdown,, which 'occurs predominately during refueling outages once every tWo years.

5. Please describe the cleaning process, including final disposition of wastewaters, for the Unit 3 ion exchange unit shown on the flow diagram in Attachment 3.

PEF Response Asstated in, Attachment 4 of'the permit renewal application, the ECST system (rad-waste treatment system) utilizes: an ion exchange system as a pollutionrontrol device. Spent resin

from the ion exchange system is notl regenerated on-site. Spent resins are sluiced t0*a spent resin storage tank along with other,spent resins (i.e. those used to polish wafer used for the spent fu el pool), whereby they are then-disposed off-site. The treated sluice water is then.

discharged by batch releases via the ECST internal outfall through ouffall D-O0F. This is the

'samejioh exchange unit'shoWn on theflow diagram in Attachment 3 of the permit renewal

application.

16. Please confirm whether the UnitM3 screen wash water Is discharged to theintake canal and whether it is recycled as once-through cooling water.

PEF Response Unit 3 screen wash water enters acommon trough, which flows to a trash collection basket.

This water-then enters the intake baybehind-the bar racks directly in front of the traveling screens where it is ultimately recycled'as once-through cooling water.

7. The description for Outfall D-0l indicates that the wastewater discharge from the FGD blowdown treatment-pondsystem is directed to the industrial wastewater percolation pond system. However, the flow diagram in Attachment 3 does' not show this interconnection. Please provide the following:

.a. anupdated flow diagram

b. signed and sealed drawings~of'the FGD blowdoWnlstormwaterpond system; and

c. ýsigned andsealed percolationbasin capacity, loading rate and storage:

calculations.

PEFIReso0nse Since'the NPDES ouffall associated with the IM percolation ponds'is only meant as an emergency outfall, specific inputs to the IWW percolation ponds Were nof listedon the_drawing.

Rather, thesedeIscriptions are all found inA MWpermit no. FLA016960 (copy provided 4in Attachment 4). Nevertheless, we have revised the drawing toshow the treated FDG blowdown to the IW*W pond system (see Attachment 5). As far as signed.and sealed draWings of the FGD. blowdown ponds',this :information was submittedtbothe SouthWest District,viathesiting.

office, onJune 22 2Q.09.

In addition, information related tdo lOading rate and 'storagecalculations-were provided to the FDEP-Southwest'District as part of an !W'Wpermit modification package submitted June 30, 2009. The most ýrecent versions of the Conditions of Certification (PA77-09A2).and IWW *

ýpermitf(FLA016960) reflect the:FGD blowdbwnpoInds and percolation capacity f the WW percolation pond systemi., we respectfully reques tthat you discussthese issues with Yanisa Angulo of the Southwest District since they were heavily involved in permitting issues related to the'FGD blowdown treatment ponds and disposal oftreated FGD blowdown within the IWW percolation pond system.I

8. Please provide a detailed description ofthe FGD-operations, including wastewaters generated by production sand storage of any gypsum, the final'disposition'of these' wastewatersi Whether the FGD system iS connected to selective catalytic or noncatal*ti Wreduction unibs, and the FGD blowdown treatment system.

PEF Response Attached, Please s find an'. orviewoftheCystal River Units,4& 5.CleanAir Project that contains descriptions of the FGD andSCR systems (Attachment 6). Runofffrom gypsum

'storage and otherFGD systems are addressed, in -the most recent versions:of the, onditions of Certification (pA77-09A2) ahd IMw permit (FLA01'6960).

9. Please provide Watewaterclharacteriiations forthe FGD blowdown and effluent from

,thle ýFGD blowdown treatment pond system. The wastewater characterization should include. metals (such as arsenic co pper, lead- mercury, selenium"and zinc) cyanide, nutrients, and radionuclides.

PEF Response' Little data exists to date from which, to characterize actualitreated FDG blowdown. However, Attachment 7 contains two sets of recentlycollected data., The firttset contains first quarter 20101 data pertaining to industrial wastewater entering the, percolation pond system from the existing Units: 1, 2, and 3 (samplePoint, EFF-1 in WiW Permit FLA016960) as well as from the FGD3blowdown treatment system (sample point EFF-2). The Units 1,,2, 3, IVWW discharge-data have been collected quarterly since the sebond quarter; 2007 per the requirements of IW Pof2010 Permit FLAO16960.

per the requirementsSampling of theitreated FGD. blowdown began with the first quarter' of modified IW Permit FLA0i 69960.ý Some things t0onote concerning these data. First, 'EFF-lýPows to the percolation 1averaged approximately 0.6350 mgd since flow measurement requirements began pond have in July 2007.

By contrast,, treated FGD blowdown flowsfor the past'several Weeks discharged to the percolation'pond:system via EFF-2 have averaged approximately 0 _105M gd.

Second, this, FGD blowdown'flow is only for a single FGD system, i.e. the'system associated

-with Crystal River Unit 5 scrubber. The Unit 4 FGD'system has only recently begun. operation.

Areasonable estimate of total treated FGD blowdown flow from both:scrubbers would be.

around,double the current fows or around 0.210 mgd during the "shake-down" phase and approximatelyb'0.6 mgd once the systems have. been° tuned. Therefore, total treated FGD blowdown flow,. once both FGD systems'are inoperation.and tuned, will represent, less,.than',half the total ýindustrial wastewater flow to the, IW. percolation pond system.

Third, thevalues measured during the first quarter 201 Ofor EFF-2 represent FGD blowdown treated with"atemporary filter press system asý opposed tolthe FGD biowdown treatment pond system. Approval for.use ofthis temporary system was granted by'the: Departmenrt pending final review and approval of the FGD blowdown treatment pon"d'system. Thissystem was approved and placed into operation on February 23, 2010. The second quarter*2010 sampling of EFF-2 is representative of-the smaller FGD backuptreatment pond operation. The reasonf we used the backup pond rather than the larger primary pond was to forcea discharge to calibratethe EFF-2 flow meter, and tosend flow to the perco lation pond system in order to.

complete a groundwatefr Jmounding study. The larger FGD'blowdown treatment pond (in service now) is not expected to discharge to the percolation pond system for several weeks.

Finally, again, you should note that both FGD systemsare .still undergoing thetuning process.

Therefore, thedatashown for EFF-2:

" must be flow-weighted With values measured for EFFtI :and, While representativeof current operation, may or may not. be representative in the long-w

,term since:

o the current FGD systers are still undergoing the tuning. process;.

" EFF-2 sample results areprepresentative of treatment utilizing a temporary filter press arrangement and/or smaller backup treatmeint pond and. notthe larger, primary-FGD blowdownd treatment pond;, and, o may change as a result of the.switch to a different coal source.

Future :monitoring results,from EFF-2, treated FGD blowdOwn to.the IMW percolation. pond system, can. be-sentto the NPDES permit-writeras these data become available:

'10. Please providea ,topographic map extending One-quarter, mile beyond the property boun~daries of the facility, showing: (several items not listed).

PEF Response.

These items appear to apply to Form 2F relative to the stormwater.outfalls, All 0f the informationý requested is contained within the BMP plan that-was submitted as part -of the NPDES permit reneWalpackage.and contained on the compact disk. Attached is.a hardcopy of the BMP plan for Crystal River Units 1, 2, & 3 thatcontains the requested information (see Attachment 8).

11. The discharge, from the Plant InduStrial Wastewater Percolatioh Pond Systermno Iotgerdischprgesto thecanal. Please provide signed and sealed drawings of the percolation pond depicting the overflow structure.

PEF Response The Department, is correct in that Outfall D-0C2, thelformer outfall structure from the IWW pond system, no longer discharges to the site discharge canal due to Pending construction of the rnew Helper Cooling Tower South. (HCTS). The new replacement outfall structure (i.e.

suggested outfall D-0C2R) for the IWW pond, system is proposed to discharge to the site intake canal. Signed ýand sealed drawings of'this new outfall structure:were included in the helper cooling tower NPDES permit modification request submhitted September 11, 2009.. Additional.

information pertaining to the outfall structure;was submitted January::25, 2010 as part of the RAI response to thisiNPDES permit modification request.

12. Based on the modification of the Plant Industrial Wastewater Percolation Pond System, which includes theaddition of the Helper Cooling Tower South andthe relocation ofthepercolation pond overflow structure;please provide thefollowing:

a. percolation basin capacity and storage calculations;. and

b. signed and sealed drawing and dimensional cross-section of the percolation pond.

PEF Response The informati.on requested was provided to the Department in the Helper Cooling Tower South (HCTS) NPDES Permit. Modification RAI response submitted January 251 2010. Information related to the IWW percolation, pond system has also been submitted to the. Southwest District IWW~section in-support of the IWW permit modification.

13. The Department understands that Outfalls D-OH and D-OCI discharge infrequently!

Please provide data from prior discharges and/or-engineering estimates of anticipated future discharges.

PEF Response, We reviewed-discharge records from January 1999 tothe present (May 2010). During this time, Outfall D-0OH1 (South Coal Pile Runoff Discharge) discharged only once, which was in September, 2004, and was due to the successive hunicanes-that occurred in August and September of thatyear. Regarding C-OC1 (North Ash Pond Discharge), 'this outfalialso.only discharged, during a singlemonth from January 1999 through.January 2010. This. occurred in September 2008 as a result of dewatering activities resulting from site preparation to construct the FGD blowdown ponds.. Both sets of results are provided in Attachmerit 9.

It is anticipated that'further discharge events.from these outfalls will continue to be extremely rare. Also, in the: case of D-OC1, per.the information supplied with the- application,-this area has' changed significantly since the September 2008 discharge event. The area has: been cleaned ofall residual ash and largely serves as a non-contact strtm water management system for the area around the FGD blowdown treatment ponds (a recent aerial phpto of the area is provided in.Attachment 10). As such, the data collected during the September:2008 event will likely not be representative of any potential future discharges from this outfall..

Another option to consider for dealing; with "theseoutfalls isto remove them from the list of permitted NPDES outfalls, but recognize them in special conditions subject to bypass provisions. Attachment 11. coritainsva page from, NPDES Permit !L0048321,

!n. this ase, an emergency outfall from a generat!ng station~s cooling pond had been listed as:

.permitted.0utfall,,but due to the extreme rarity in discharges from this outfall,, theper'mitting agency (Illinois EPA) removed it from the.i ist of permitted ouffalls for'this.facility and.instead covered this discharge location with a special condition subject to the bypass proviSionsof 40 CFR 122I41(m). :Under thei.bypass provisions, we would be required to sample this outfall pursuant to the same conditions that would be imposed -on,say,ý outfall D-OC2R -the percolation'pond'discharge point.

A similarconditiionas exists.in this example could be applied to outfall D-OCI andwould:be

,applicable onlyin the event of a discharge from the FGD blowdown treatment pond emergency verflow *into the nhon-contact stoimwater managementtsystem that reads:"

Special Codition':xx: An, emergenrcy ov'erffl.iwexistsfrom the FGD blowdown treatment.pond'area storm water marnagenent, systemto0 ihe Gulf of Mexico via theU Units 1, 2, &3 discharge canal In the event of.discharge.from the FGD treatment pond ;emergency o0veriflow p6inti, dischargi:s fom this outffall!

shall be: subjecttothe' bypass provisionsf*U4CFR and 62-620 F.A.C.

a22.41(m)

Additionally, given the raritiyof discharge events from D-0OH, a similar-condition'could be imposed for that emergency discharge 1catioi. This condition could read:

Special Condition xx: An emergency discharge point exists from thecoal piledrnoff area stornnwater management system to the Gulf of Mexicovia a,,marshy area (wetlands) located westof the coal pile storagebaýra Dischrges fom this overflow shall be subjec thedo bypass proyisionsof 40 CFR

12. 41(n) and 62-620 F.A.C.

rInthe ase of'Outfall DOCI, this special cohdition would require sampling of the outfall in the event industrial wastewater (iLe. discharge from the emergency FGD tteatment pond overflow).

were to co-mingle with the non-contact storr water that would'otherwis*, dischargefm D--CL.

In the case of. D-OOH- ,again , rather than submitting DMR forms every .month indicated "no discharge"';any discharges ofrom this outfall would be subject to the bypass provisions which would ihclude analytical monitoring.

14.The effluent.characterizations in SectionVIl of Form 2CS indicatedexceedences of Class Ill maine waterquality standards (WQS) for1total recoverable aluminum, arsenic, copper and selenium. The exceedences,are :as follows:

a. Effluent Value reported for total recoverable aluminum atOtiffall D-70OHwas 120 mgiL. The class ill marine water quality standard is 1.5 mglL

b. Effluent values reported for total recoverable arsenicat Ouffalls D-011,1 Dz013, D-091, D-092anid D-071 were4, 466, 75,75, 75, and 71ugiL, respectively. The Class II marinewater quality standardis 36 Ug/L.

c. Effluent values for total* recoverable copPer-at.Outfails DýOH, D-072, D-01 3 and D-094.werer.73, 84, 54,;and87 ugL, -respectively. *TheClass Ill marine water qualitystandard is 3.7 ug/Landthe reported intke value of 35 ugL.

d. Efflu*nt value reported for selenium at OuffallD-033was 74 ug/L The Class III

,marine water quality standard is 71 ug!L Please clarify whether effluents actually exceed the,WQS as indicated. .Clarification may require additionai mOnitorinig'for any constituent-demonstrated to exceed WQS.

PEF will need to identify thersource(s) of*the constituentand the method that will be.

.used to meetWQS, as appropriate. If these ar'eexceedences, please id~ntify andprovide information on the,sources oftthese exceedences..

PEF Response

a. As stated in the permit renewal application,1attachment 5, given the'lack of historic discharge:events:from Ouffall D-00H, we collected grab samples from within .the;coail pile perimeter ditch system and,.as such, likely represent worst-case conditions should the outfal discharge. Therefore, these were not exceedences'of permit limits, sincer the' sampIes were collected within the: treatment system.

b. Outfalls.D-0l1, b-013, D-091, D-092 and. D-071 are all."non-process" ouffalls. .-011 and D-o013 are'non-contact cooling water outfalls; D-091 and, -092 ate intake scren.

backwash water discharges: and -071 is oncethrough helper cooling water tower discharge. In all cases; no pollutants are added with the exception of heat for'Outfalls D-01i1, D"'013 and D-071. The screen backwash discharges,consist of.wa'shwiater associated with the traveling sc6reens., Noarsenic-containing wastewater is introduced or is arsenic-containinghqoqmpounds utilized within these-systems. We believe that the arsenicjlevels measured: represent natural variability of the intake-water.

., As stated in item a. above, :samples~collected.for D-OOH werecol11ected within the coal pile6runoff'treatment system given the, lack of historic disct*arges fro:mthis .oufall,,and, therefore, are not exceedenices-of permit limits. Regarding exceedences, of. copper limits atlOutfalS D-072, 0-013,U-091 and D-092, again, these ouffalls are all non-process wastewater ouffalls. Once again, we believe the copper values measured from these ouffalls reflect intake water only,.

d. See above., Outfall D-013 consists solely of.: qnce-though non-contact cooling water. No selenium is introduced intothis ouffall. The only possible-source' is the'intake water.

15. Please, providea detailed description of ECST System' (radwaste system) forUnit'3.

PEF'Response Please see response-to RAt comment no. 3.. TheMWST-(miscellaneous waste storage'"tank) is, part of the ECST, system. :Basically, the ECST receives process*d low-Volume` wastestreams from the reactor bUilding :(i.e. floor and equipment drains) as well as auxiliary building sumpsý and drains. ;These wastewaters are collected in the MWST from which they' are sent the.rad-! .t

-waste treatment system, which is'a filtration,:cation bed, ion exchange resin and purification

,system. Fromtthisttreatment systemý,treateldwastewateriis collected in the EcSTs's.

Dischargesfrom: the ECSTs must be-sampledanalyzed and processed through *radiological monitors tocomply with NRC regulatory requirements pertaining to isotopic releases.

please explain:'the alternate flow'path from SDTI and condensate system (CD) to P6.

industrial wastewater percolat!on pond system. Pleaseclafy whether.this waste

'stream contains any.radionuclides.

PEF Response The alternate:flow patihfrom SDT-1 andthe CD system'to,'the industrialwastewater percolation pond system has always existed, but is used rarely. It exists in the event that sampling indicates that a batch release.from SOT-i Or CD system- may exceed surface water discharge permit limits,. or, if thereowere to bepa simultaneous need -to discharge from the CD.syStern~and

'SDT-I" at the.same'time. Current configuration disallows simultaneoius discharges from the CD and SDT-i systems to the discharge canhal. Therelis also a mechanismto<pump the turbine building sumd y to the perco,lation pond system n the event thatthe SDT-I discharge path is incapacitated or overwhelmed due to the need to release large volumes at shutdown.

Please note that, regardless of discharge flow path - whether'to D-00F ýor to the IWW percolation pond system; all discharges must be radiologically monitored and must meetstrict" NRC limits relative to: isotopic releases-.

17. The backup pump~test discharge describes floodfrom the spent fuel pool. Please clarify whether thewaste stream contains radionuclides.

PEF Response As stated in -Attachment 4; the NRC is requiring the backup pump in the event that there was a9 realtemergecy that requires, among other activities, emergency flooding of the-spentfuel pool..

Routineftestin of.the pump does notinvolve thesei activities. Rather,;1testing ofthe pump (also an, N1RC6 requirement) simply, involves pumping water from the intakeithrough the pump, and back into the intake ranal.. it is this routine itesting activity for which we require a ,newoutfall designation. Should the pump be required in anactual emergency, discharges.;will'likely, proceed through one of the currently. permhitted outfallsthat already' have radiological monitors.

18. Progress Energy requested discontihuation of Whole effluent toxicitytesting during Spectrus CT1300 treatment of the Nuclear Services Heat Decay.System that discharges via D-OOF. The toxicity datasubmitted to the Department isbased on.

application concentration of 2.25 ma!L; however, .the current permit current!y authorizes a maximum application concentration :of 4.5 mg/L. Please clarify whether Progress Energy is requesting a maximum application concentration of 2.25 mgIL PEF Response We believe the-confusion is over terminology. Basically, 'CR3 applies (injects) Spectrus CT1 300. at a maximum concentration of 4.5 mg/L in order to achieve a .target concentration of <

2.5mgIL in the D-OOF discharge. In-fact, in order to build in conservatism, we-set:our target discharge.concentration not to.exCeed:2.25 mg/L. Again,.these target discharge concentrations are. predicated on0r an Iinitialjapolication corncentration of< 4.5 mgiL. We request that the'current permit condition relative toqapplication rates not-to exceed,4.5 mg/L remain"Unchanged.ý

19. Please. provide information on the amount used. and'final application concentration for Neutral Multi-Use Cleaner, Crud Remover Cleaner,.and Foamtrol AF1440.

PEF Response.

In looking at historical records of usage of these products, we note the following, Both the Neutral prodUct and the Crud Remover Cleaner are typically used for decontamination activities within the aux .and containment-.buildings. In:looking at work orders and am0ounts of thiSt product checked out of the CR-3 warehiouse, typical use involves 1-2' gallons of product.. In 2009', a' total.of 94 gallons of this cleaning product was used. The prior year (2008) a total of,31 gallons of this product was used. Worst-caseidischarge would be through the ECST system, and -thence through D-OOF. Average .concentrations in the D-OOF discharge are calculated :to be around 5.5 mg/L with maxkimum discharge concentrations around 10-12 mgiL.

.Regarding Neutral Multi-Use Cleaner, at most, approximately 12 gallons, are Used atany ohe.

time. Again, worst-casedischarge concentrations would be through D-00F via the ECST system Would be around 1.8.mgIL.

Finally, Foamtrol AF1440 was first permitted-tocontrol foaming in the.heat-exchanges. The last time Foamtro/ Was purchased foruse at CR3 was. in 2004. Calculated'worst',case discharge.

concentrations to-D00F through SDT-1,*would be approximately 1.9: mg/I.

Please, note that: all of these concentrations assume worst-case conditions in that we rassume

'that noneof these products degrade and that all product used is discharged through the outfalls. This certainlywould not be the caseifor'the6twq cleaning products, iLe., Crud Removerý

-and Neutral Multi-Use cleaner where we; know that some-quantity is contained inrags, etc.,

which ape disposed as solid waste and do-not end up in the wastewater streams'.

20. Various potential miscellaneous discharges indicate untreated groundwater is discharged to the intakeldischarge: canal 'and AC condensate is being discharged via, stormwater.ouffalls, Please explain.

PEF Response As you know, treated groundwater (i~e. groundwater that has:been filtered and disinfected With chlorine) is used for a number-of service water applications. At times, groUndwater that has not undergone this treatment process, iLe. groundwater is simply pumped into a storageitank, is substituted and used in lieu of treated groundwater. This "rawn groundwater may then be:

discharged via the same processes that discharge the treated groundwater (serviCedwater). AC, condensate is simply the condensation that collects on the outside 'of a heatexchanger or chiller and drips'off tothe ground, much like a home air conditioning unit.

Finally, per EPA Guidance Document EPA 833-B1-09-002 - Developing Your Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan- A Guide for IndustrialOperators,there arepa number ofallowable non-stormwater discharges that may be discharged through storm water outfalls. These include:

, Discharges from :fire-fighting activties; P Fire hydrantiflushings;

Potablewater, including water line flushings;

Uncontaminated condensate from air conditioners, coolers, and other compressors-and from the Outside storage6of refrigerated gaSes or liquids;

" Irrigation drainage;

Landscapewatering provided all pesticides, .herbicides and fertilizer' have been applied in accordance with the approved labeling; Pavement wash waters where no detergents are used 'and,nospills or leaks of toxic or hazardous materials have occurred (unless all spilled material has been Tremoved);

Routine,external building washdown that does notuse detergents;'

Uncontaminatedgroundwater or spring water;.

.Foundation or footing drains where flows are not contaminated:with proceSS materials;

'and fIncidental-wind-blown mist'from cooling towers-that collects on rooftops or adjacent portions of yourfacility, but. not intentional discharges from the. cobling tower (e.g.

"piped" cooling tower blowdown.or drains).

The guidance goesonto state 'the recommendation that these allowable noni-stormwater discharges via stormwater ouffalls be inco&prated into a site's existing NPDES permit to avoid confusion over what' is allowable and what is not. Accordingly, we. request that the above list be.

incorporated, into:the CR123 NPDES&permit which would provide consistency with the federal guidance.

21. Please include the proposed discharges from.LeývyNuclear Plant in the permit renewal: application.

PEF ResOonse The Le Nuclear Plant discharges are described in theNPDES permit'application associated with that facility. In addition;- PEF recently announced a further delay in the construction and.

operation of the Levy' facility until 2021, which is likely well beyond the time:.frame, encompassing the upcoming reissued CR`123 NPDES permit.

22. Pleaseindicate the statustof the mericulturei center fortheabatement of'thermal pollution.*

PEF Response PEF's intention is to continue:.with operation of, the Mariculture Center:as.part of-a mitigation strategy fo- addressing potentiallthermal impacts.,

23. (Introduction to this RAI purposely omitted). Please provide informationron the, measures Prgress Energy will implement for minimizing entrainment and impingement morlity of aquatic organisms, including implementation timeframes and estimates in tons per year for reduction in etitrainmentand impingement mortality.

PEF Response Recent events have necessitated that-PEF: reevaluate the business strategies and operational plans for addresSing entrainment and impingement reductions at CrystalRiver.Units 1, 2,&3,

'the resuits of'which could change-the content of responses PEF can make at this time to RFI#23. Deisionsasthey may relate to the RFI response are forthcoming'but are currently not available., PEF will provide lappropriate 'responses:to the comments contaihnd in this request as accurate information becomes available. PEF understandsthat pthepermitrenewal

,application cannotbe deemed complete; until the FDEP comments contained iný RFI#23 are

,addressed satisfactorily and hopes that the Department understandsfthe need of PEF to temporarily postponethe submission of responses to .thiS RA.'comment at thisý.time,.

.24.(Iniroduction to this RAI purposely omitted). Please provide information on Progress Energy's progress with re-planting, including the number of acres thatare currently barren, number of acres replanted, species of sea grasses replanted, and survival and propagationW rates for-the re-plantid sea grass beds.

PEF Response The evalUation of a seagrass replanting program was included 'in anearlierversion of the

'NPDES permit as a requirementzshodid seagrass re6colonization notzbe'demonstrated. Per the settlement agreement associatedtwithdftheral discharges associated with o*eration of CR Units 1; 2, & 3, the CGompany installed the Helper CoolingTowers.(HCTs) aiong the discharge:

,canal. After:the.cooling .towers began operation, PEF conducted three yearsof sea grass.

,surveysand convened a technical advisory committee (TAC),tO .revieW the tesults. This TAC was-comprised of members from PEF theDepartmenft, private research organizations,.and expet- consultants.

Though' seagrass monitoring data has demninstrated temporal variations.,in-seagrass coloniization and expansion in the previously thermally impacted areas of Crystal Bay, the Seagrass TAC concluded that.light intensity, turbidity,. salinity variation and suspended load have a-significant impact on seagrass colonization and could be more criti'al than t.he temperaturre factor. The TAC dis"cussedthe cost and benefits of seagrass sprig planting anrd subsequent monitoring. The TAC agreed that sprig planting would be futilesince turbidity and light intensity may be critical limiting factors to seagrass growth - the area. As a result, the requirement for replantingl was removed from the NPDES permit requirements.

,25. ACcordingto the Crystal RiVerPower-Plant Fish Impingement Report,, the numberof die! sampling events-was reducedfromtwo to one night and day samples starting in March 2007. It wat not clear whether the duration of the collection was increased to 12,hours insteazd of.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months of if it remained 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months . Please provide&details about

,the sampling times and durations after February 2007.

PEF Response During the December 7-8,-2006'to April 12-13, 2007,sampling events, sampling was conducted

-at 6 hour6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months intervals resulting in four samples over.a 24 .hour-period. This was later modified to'a 1.2 hour2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months sampling interval over a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months period,, starting with the April 26, 2007 sampling event, The modification allowed for better interface With plant 6perationhs and more time to process samples, resulting in l4-ager subsample6sizes to be analyzed during periods of high debris-.loads.

Impingement samples,-continued to be collected over an entire-24, hour period (6A12 hr intervals) biweekly for one:year. Sampling Would typically begin at 0800 on iday 1 and.,end at00*.0Othei following day.

26. (Introduction to;"this: RAI purposely omitted). Please provide details as to the methodology employed for determining which species and the& number of each speciesat each trophic level to' be released from the mericulture centerto maintain a balanced indigenous population. In addition, please provide information on the species and. number of each species released from the mericulture center for the.

past.permit cycle*

PEF Response While it is cofre6that the numbers offish and invertebrates-collected during the 2006-2007 impingement studywas-approximately one-half those collected during the'1985 stUdy, we note that diversity rermained relatively unchanged. It's likely that changes in numbers simply reflect niatural population variation. The original intent ofthe Mariculture Centerwas not to represent each trophic level,ý butrather was designed to address. selected importantorganisms .(SIO's)

.focusing on commercially, recreatiohally, or ecologically irmportant species. PEF convened ,a technical advisory committee that' included fisheries: professionals, private research

ýorganizations; and Agency representativesto provide input on-species selected and to develop targets regarding numbers ofeach species to be released. :See attachment 12 for a table

showing Mariculture Center'releases from 1992.through 2009

27.. The Department could not reproduce the adjustment factor calculations as given in Tables 38-40 ofthe 'Crystal River Power PlantFish' Impingement Report. (additional sentences purposely omitted). Please describe'the derivation of the calculated values given in Tables 40*.

PEF Response Adjustment factors were calculated before rounding. Rounding to two places for ease of display in :the tables results in the apparent variations noted whencalculating using the final rounded values. Adjustment values depicted on-the-tables are correct.

28. Quality controlfor the taxonomiC results was not included in theCrystal River Power Plant Fish Impingement Report., Please provide information for the quality control.

PEF ResponSe A QA/QC Plan was implemented as part of the Crystal River Impingement Study to ensure that.

work performance and work products provided were of'the highest quality and Provided in a cost-effective, scientifically defenSible, and timely manner. All deliverables were subject.to QA/QC guidelines,,checks, and reviews. As part of this plan, field and laboratory taxonomic identification and measurements were standardized for sample specimens and:data collection.,

Species collected were identified to'the. lowest practicable taxonomic level using current reference and'taxonomic keys. Depending on the taxon, 1this was, species, genera, or species group. Samples of all .taxonomically vague specimens were'delivered to independent exers for identification/Verification. A random 5% subset of all sampleswas reviewed by an indePendent qualified expert taxonomist to ensure consistency in identifications of samples sent for QA/QC purposes. Where appropriate, voucher specimens wereqcollected and retained during the study.

29. Key information is missing in order for the submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) mapping results tO be assessed in the context of the Crystal River thermaldischarge plume. Please provide vertical temperature profile data, Bathymetry data, theextent (oateralland Vertical):and duration-of the thermal plume.

PEF Response ExtenSive physical water quality data, analysis, and modeling were performed during the '1985 316(a) and (b) demonstration, study. The modeling studies used conservative assumptions for NPDES permitting purposest. The existing phySical conditions near-the CREC discharge as used in the 316 studies modeling have not substantially changed 'since 1i985. The negotiated

settlement resulted in the .requirements for the construction and operation of helper cooling towers and a 3-hour rolling maximUm temperature limit of 96.5'degrees. F. These conditions resulted 'in a significant decrease inthe size and maximum temperature~ofthe thermal plume, the, extent of which-was demonstrated using study results. Data indicated the thermalplume is well mixed vertically...Modeling provided a depiction of both summer and winter conditions while

,the plume dischargeis considered to be constant.

30. (!ntroductioiito this RAI purposely omitted). Please describeProgress Energy's plans to mitigate any affects from the thermal plume'.

PEF Response Extensive water quality,:data, analysisand modeling indicate that the thermal plume is well mixed and evenly, distributedthroughout the water.column in this shallow water basin of Crystal Bay. There is: little evidence of thermal stratification in the area. The presence of spoil islands to

,the north and spoil islands to the sduth.of the CREC 'discharge creates a basin area-where considerable seiche' activity occursAduring prevailing westerly wind and wave. conditions,

Erosion of the spoil banks coupled with persistent seiche activity also results: in:a highly turbid basin. $ignificant'freshwater'inputs from the Withlacoochee River to the north during high flow periods results in significant localized reductions in salinity. Furthermore, astronomical low tides results in extremely shallow flats throughout many parts ofCrystal Bay, especially during extreme weather conditions, Allthese factors conspire to create regional conditions that contribute significant influence on sea grass bed speciation, distribution, expansion, and:

contraction. Theinstallation of helpercooling towers and' reduction in thermal maximum discharge temperature has created conditions whereby the recolonization of sea grasses-can occur within areas formally'impacted by thermal-discharge. The rate and extent ofthiS recolonization:is.related.tO the ekternal factors described above and not by the existing thermal regime.

31. Thestudy Conducted by ReMetrix was successful at mapping the: SAV. Comparison of 2007 SAV biomass to that of 2001 is problematic due to the different methods, used to collect the data. A different rnalysis of the data from what is presented in the ReMetrix. report is needed to determine expansion of the contraction of the SAV.

Please re-analyze the SA" data.

PEF Response Progress Energy has~completed studies:over.several years. in an attempt to characterize sea grassdistribUtion and- trends in the Vicinity of the Crystal River Energy. Complex.: The'Seagrass.

Technical Advisory'Committee concluded that the three years "ofstudies completed after the construction and initial opefation of the helper.cooling towers'indicatedthe coastal region surrounding the ,CREC was very dynamic, with variable. expansion and contraction of sea grass areas.occurning over several growing seasons. Results also suggested that that there were

,external factors not associated with the-thermal regime contributing to sea grass distribution and trends.

These historcal studies furtherindicated thattraditionarlaerial photOgraphic mapping methods

,are problematic because.ofprevalent conditions of poor water clarity, persistentactive sea

-state, and cloud cover/poor meteorological factors. As'a result of these conditions, alternative methods have: been~employed'in anattempt to better~characterize sea grass distribution.

A diver study was completed in 2001 to provide additional information on the distribution of sea

-grasses. Bounce.dives along selected transects provided evidence thatsome historic sea grass beds were expanding- and Halodule sea.grassvappeared to be colonizing areas within Crystal Bay that had previously reported to be devoid of vegetation.

Sihce diver surveys are both restrictive.in their coverage and dependnt: on water visibilityand-weathericonditions, other methods Were sought to provide a more comprehensive survey-of sea grass beds. In2008, the use of sonar-basdd Itechnology was evaluated. Results indicateda

'variablepresence of sea grasses withinthe Cstal Bay area, but the. results also indicated that the.technology was constrained somewhat by issues associated witheminimum water depthand the need for extensive emergent blade.growth for good target acquisition.

The intent of utilizing different' methodologieswas not to allownfor'the analysis of results between methods, but ratherwas'to provide a method. that provides the. most accurate characterization of sea grasses in the vicinity of the CREC. Results of studies performed to.

date provide. thefollowing; conclusions: (1) Seagrass. beds.in'the vicinity of-the CREC are in a dynamic environment, and -expand and contract seasonally based.on the influence ýof amnumber of factors. (2) The installation and operation of the' helperocooling towers has reduced the size of the thermal'plume and allowed the expansion of sea grass-beds into areas previously, considered to beimpacted by'the historidcthermal plume.

(3) Factors. n6t~associated with the thermal plume, such as light penetration, salinity, precipitation amounts, and water depth have an effect on sea grass"distribution. (4) Traditional.

aerial photography is. of limited use for mapping sea grass.distribution in the area.

32. Progress Energy claims in its application that the main discharge canal 'for Crystal River Energy Complex is not waters, of the State. However, according to EPA:and Department factsheets, associated with issuance.of previous NPDES permits,, the main discharge .canal is considered jurisdictionalwaters. Please provide

,documentation for.any Federal or State determinations contrary to the adrninistrative, record.

PEF' Response We want to emphasize.that the-Crystal River Energy Complex's (CREC's) main discharge*canal

'is not waters of'the state; insteadjitfis an essential component of the "p'oint source" o "wastewater facility" for regulator, purposes. PEF relies.on the heat loss in the canal -to-!come into tempernatur*ecmplianrce by the-end of it, hence the helper cooling towers along its banksý.

Pursuant to Section 403.0885(,2), Florida Statutes, the -Department "is empoweredlto establish

.a state NPDES prbgram inaccordance With Section 402 of the federal Clean Water Act'.

Requirements' under.the -Clean Water Act are applicable to discharge from point sources that are released j= jurisdidtional waters. See Rule 62-660.400(1), F.AC. The term. "point source" is defined as' .any discermible, confined, and discrete conveyance," such as a "ditch" or "channel," Rule 62-620.200(37), F.A:C. Similarly, the term "Wastewater facility" includes the

'wastewater"transmission syste'hm,"Rule 62-620.200(55);, F.A.C.

Simply put, the:'CREC, main.d ischarge'canal is aclassic example of an existing "discrete conveyance" that constitutes part of an existing pqint source, n6tijurisdictional waters. As eXplained in Rule62-302.520(3)(g),. F.A.C., the point of discharge for a thermal discharge is "that point atwhich the effluent physically leaves its -carrying'conduit (open or CloSed), and, discharges into the waters of the state.. ,7'(Emphasis added.O) This confirms that themain discharge canal itself is not jurisdictional waters. Note that the main, discharge canal was constructed'specifcally to transport the Crystal River cooling water from the6pantto jurisdictional waters. Because "waste transport" is specifically excluded as a permissible designated use for jurisdictional*waters (40 CFR 1.31.10), itwould not be logical to assert that water quality'standards (which include designated uses).apply within the main discharge canal.

Note that in the.last EPA-issued NPDES permit, for theCRUnits, 1, 2, &3, EPA describedthe "receiving waters" asv"Gulf of Mexico,." EPA did not'identify the main dischargecanal as jurisdictional waters.

Insum, the receiving (urisdictional).water is the Gulf of Mexico.. It is notthe ,CREC main

'discharge canal.

33U Progress Energy has requested new outfalls' associated with the proposed Helper Cooling Tower South (HCTS). Please refer to the letter, dated October.5, 2009, requesting:-additional information-for questions on the proposed HCTS.

PEF Resbonse Progress Energy submitted responses'to.the HCTS RFI no. 1 on January 25, 2010. PEF subsequently received a second RFI from the Department dated Febru'ary 22, 2010.'

On April 6, 2010, PEF requested that the Substantial RevisionReqiuestDEP. File No.

FLOOO !59-01 2iWISNR be Incorp*orated ,into the renewal of theCR 1., 2.and.3 NPDES permit.

Consequently, please note the following concerning HCTS RFI #2 questions ,though 7.

Recent- events have6 necessitated "that PEF reevaluate the, business.strategies and operational plahs fr thee proposed Helper Cooling Tower South, the results of which couid change the content of'responses PEFcan make at this time6to0RFi#2. Decisions as they mayrelate to the RFI responses are forthcomihg butaare'crrently ot available.

PEF will provide ýappropdate responses to tecomments contained' in RFI#2 as accurate information becomes available. PEF understands that the perit renewal application cannot"be

%deemedcomplete, until the FDEP comments conta in RFi#2areaddressed satisfactorily

,and hopesthatithe Department understands'the 'need of PEFto temporarily postpone the

,submission of'responses to: the RFI#2'comments.

34. The Departmenticomments on the "Plan of Studyfor.a Thermal Plume Assessment of Crstal RiVer Units 1, 2, and 3, Citrus County, Florida,"' please refer'to

Attachment:

2 of this letter.

PEF Response - Attachment 2,. comment #1 Extensive modeling verified with field data was presented in the 1985 studY to charaderize: the thermal plume. Verified model reSUlts were,then Utilized to predi6t thermal plume estimates-based:on, helper cooing tower operation.- Physical conditions at the site have not changed since that time. It is reasonable'to assume'thatithe model results are still valid for the-site.

PEF Response.- Attachment 2.. comment #2 Near-field.study results from t1985 showed that there was little summer.-winter differences in isotherm estimates:. Differences betWeen the winter and summer isotherm locations were largely due to differences in heat transfer co0efficients. However, summer months were chosen for 'this,thermalprlume assessment study because 'the.most pronounced effect of the thermal effluent will be seen during the summer when the' benthic communities are normallyexposed to.

natural Water temperatures* closer to0their,maximurm thermal tolerance limits.

PEE Response%, Attachment 2i. comment #3 Representative1sampling tirnesiand locations were Selected to validate previouslconclusions regarding the thermai plume delineation and effects'..

PEF Response - Attachment 2, -omment #4'

'Since Crystal River Units 1, 2, & 3 are "baseqload"'generation facilities,,generally speaking, plant conditions are stable and flows' remain constant over time.

PEF Response - Attachment 2.t -mment#5.

During .the '1985 study, no significant or consistent plume stratificationcould bedetected due either to temperature or salinity..

I I PEF Response - Attachment 2, comment #6 The largest volume of the discharge effluentfis confined to the drpdged channel adjacent-to the discharge spoil bank and exits into the adjacent basin t*o the west. Theý plume at that point tendstowards the'southwest,but rapidly becomes we.l' mixed in the-relatiVely shallow water.

Areas north of Drum Island were not selected for-sampling sites as a result of this thermal.

regime.

f you have' any questions orrequire further information regarding-this response, please contact Mr. Doug Y6well.at (727) 82O-52*8.

Sincerely,

" Rob:.Odom ShiftOper~~ions Manager, Crystal River Fossil Plant & Fuel Operations Enclosures CERTIFIED

Progress Energy Florida,. InC, *-Crystal River'Units 1, 2, &3 DEP File No.- FL0000 159-01t3-IWIS/NR Attachment 1 Form 2CS Information for Outfall I-OFE-and Form 2F Information for Outfalls D-100,1 D-200, D-300 and D-400

Facility ID: Number: FL0000l 59 Outfall No. [6OFE - LSST PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ONLY: You may report some oi allof this'information on separate sheets. insteadOofcompletingthese pages. Use the same format..

SEE'INSTRUCTIONS.

VII. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT:CHARACTERISTICS PART A - You must rovide theresultsofatleastoheanalvsisforevery olltant inthistable. Compete ne'tablefor each outfall. See instructions fbr additional details.

I.. _2:Effluent 3. Units, 4. Intake (optional Pollutant a. Max. Daiy Value: b. Max. 30-day Valueý c. Annual AvN/Value A, No. of a. Concintration b, Mass, ir Loiig"emri Avk. Value b. No.of.

(I) Cone. (2'Mass (I) Cone.- (2) Mass (I) Conc. (2) Mass 'Analyses _(1) Cone; (2) Mass Analyses a~bmawmMdvW .37.9 H' I mg/L

b.Chemrical Oxygen-. 256 *lMg/I.

Leand (COD) c.rTotal. Organic 28.6 .1 mgI

Carbon (TOc) _

d.,Total Suspended 29.0 29.0 6.14 34 ingtL Sol1idsO'(SSY clTotal N-"qm(as N) 7J55 __ 1l __

f.TotWlFPht-tors (aP) 1.44 1_ mgtl

g. Atnsonia (as N) 7.55 A1 ,n_ __

It. Flow- actual or, Value.0.001523 Value.0.001268 Value,0.0000673 50. mgd Value projected i/FloW - designf Valuc N/A Value Value Value

j. speif&cmductity Valtie'415 Valui Value .I u-mhosIm _ __ Value, k; Temperature (%vintei) Value28 Value- Value I C ValuE_

1<:Temnhratnirc (summineril valuei ,Value. vattie .Valuem L-Tern rature(suffinierl in.-: Value in, 6.30 Mx 7186' Min.

Valud Max. Value 34- 'STANDARDUNITS H ;ýTM PART B- Mark "' :in column 2afor each pollutant you knowor have reason to believe is' preseit; Mark 'X" in column 2b For eachpollutanit ybiobelicve to beLabsent. If you mark c6lumn 2a for any pollutantwhich is :limited either diirectly, or indirectly but~exprcssly; in an'efflnentlimitatioins guideline, youtmust provide-the results.of at least one analIysis:tIorthat pollutant: For other pollutants for whi6h you mark column 2a; you must provide quantitative data or an explanation of their presence in your discharge. Complete one tableior eacti outfall. See-the instructionhs Jfor adiitonaol details and requirenients..

I2.Mark "X 3. Effluent. 4. Unitsw 5litake (optionil)

.

I. Pollutant and CAS a. be- .Itbe a. Maximum-Daily b. Max.0-day V aluec e.Long Tenn Avg. d. No. of a. Conc. b..Mass a. Long Term Avg. b. NoWof N (if.0availale') liived lieved Value . .. (ifavnilable)"" Value(ifavailable)_ Analyses Value Analyses present abseiti (I) Cone... (2) Mass (l) Cone. '(2).Miss (I) Conc.. (2) Mass _ (I) Cone. (2)Mass I a .B.romide 01 0 < 0.66 1 mg/L (24949-67-9) b.Chlorine, 0 0 :1 mg/L.

Total Residual' e "Coloir 0 U. :510.0,11 1. RCUI

d. Feca] Coliforn 0 eCFluoride 0"1 0.141 "I mag/I.

(16994,48-8)

f. Nitrate-Nitrite 0 <u0L0 I mg/I (as N),

VII-I PERForm 62*-62.910(5)2cS 4 Efqectivc November -29, 1994

Item VII-B Contd. Facility ID. Number FL60600159 OutfII No. I.0FE - LSST

2. Mark "X" 3: Etfuent 4. Units. 5. Intake(oinional)

I. Pollutant and CAS. a be- b; beý a. Maximum Daily Value b. Max.,.30wday Value c. Long Term Avg. Value d. No. of -a. Cone. b. Miss a.,Long Tenn Avg. Value b. No. of

,No.. ifa vailable) lieved lieved (if availablW) (if available)y Analyses, Analyses present absent.

(Q)Conc. (2) Mass () Con.. (2)Mass (1) Conc. (2)Mass _ ().Conc: (2) Mass,

g. NitrogenjTotal 0 0 7.55 1 mg/L.

Organic (as N)

-.h Oil and grease E E0 8441 8.41. < 2;77 34 mg/l.

i. Phosphorus, Total 0 [ 1.44 1 ,ng/L (as P) (7723-14-0).

j. Radioativity (I) Allha Totl'al 0 El <r2'08 I pCi iL (2) Bela,.Total 0 01 .75A I pci/L (3) Radiun, Total E] El < 0.3631 1 Rci/i.

(4) Radiumn226, Total 0 n 0.280' pCI/

k. Sulfate (as SO 4 ) 669 1L mg/L (14808-794Y) '

1, Sufide (asS) [ l <ý0.03 I mg(L.

n.iSulfite (as SO 3 ) [ 0 1.50WH 1 mg/IL (1426-.4 5-3') _____ ___________

'n. Surfach'ints [ El 0. 156 H I mg/l.

o. Aluminum Total -- 0 .0.101. I rig/L (7429-90-5) p.,BariumTotal 0- 11 0.00878 I ig/I.

3)1 (7440-39 q* Bdron, Total E El 0.305 I mg/IL (7,440-42-8):

r. Cobalh Total El 0 0.00114 I mgAI (744048-4) saIron, Total 11 0 0.796 I mg/I.

(7439 89-6) t' Maagnesium,nTotal [] El 5.71 I mg/I

_____ ____________

_(7439 95-4) ___ _______________

u.- Molybdenum, lotal El 0 0.724 I ug/L (7439-9847)

v. Manganese, Total [] El 0141 I ing"'

(7439-96 5)._________

w. Tin, Total El [ <0.001 I mgI (7440-31-5),

x. Titaniun Total El .0 <0.001 I. mg/LI (74 26 _744M2_____ _____ ___________________________ ______6 _____ ______' _____ _______

VII:2 DER Form 62-620.910(5)2CS, Effective Noyember 29, 1994

Facility !DNumb&r: FL0000159 Outfall NO. I-OFE.-LSST PART C- If you re aý.prii.ary industry and ihis outfall contains process wastewatcr,-refer io Table:2c-2 in the.ingtructions to determinte.whichl6f the'OC/MS~fractions you inust test for. Mark "X-in columin'2a for all GC/MS' fractions that apply to*,your'indistry an.difo ALL toxic metals,,cyanidcs. anditotal phenols. Ifyou arcnot required :to mark column 2a (secondary industries, non-process wastewater outfalls, and non-rcquiled GC/MS fractions), mark '" in. column 2b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe'ispresent: Mark,"X" in column 2c for ea'ch pollutaiit you :clic'veis absent. lfyoumark column 2a for any pollutant, you must provide thic results of at least neain'alysig.fof that'"ollutant. -If you mark column 2b for any pollutant, you must providethe, results of at. least-one anlysis for that pollutnat~if you know. or have reason to believe-it willbe-disharged in concentratibnsd6f"iO:ppb or greater. If you mark coluno.2b fo-r acrolein; acryloniitrile,2;4,dinitrophenol; or 2-methy . ,6 diriitrolhenol, you must provide theesulls of-at least'onc analysis f6i each of-these pollutants which you know or:hav reason to~bclicvc that you discharge in concentrations of 100:ppbor.greater: Otherwise, for pollutants for which you mark column2b, you must either submit at least one analysis orbricfly describe the reasons the polluitant is expected io be diischarged. Note that theire are7 pages to this part;Iplease'review each carefully. Complete onetablc (all.-7 pages) for each outfall. Seeifistructions for additional~details and requirements. __*___" __ "_ _ _"

2. Mark "X" .3. Effuent. 4. Units 5. tntake (optional)

1. Pollutant and CAS-, a b. be. c. be-,. a. Maximum Daily Value- b. Max. 30-day Value c Long-Term Avg. Value d. No. of a.:C-Oc; b: Mass a. Louig TemiAvg. Value, b. No. of NO. (if available) " testing lIieve leved d (if available) (if aviilable) Analyses1 Analyses required present: -absent . F 2

_____________________ ____ J(1) Conc. (2) Mass (1) Cn.- *(2) Mass j (1) Conc: 2 as___________J____ (l) Conc. (2) Mass METALS, CYANIDE. AND TOTAL PHENOLS -

IM: Antinmony, Total 0l [ 0 <6:00 1 uglL (7440-36-0)"

2M. Arsenic,...Total.

(7723-I14-0) 0 < 1.66, I tug/L 3M. 13erylliem. Total 1 .0 0 <.0.100 1 ugI (7440-41-7) 4M.-Cadmium; Tota! [0 0 0 0.902 I ug/L (7440-'43-9) 5M. Chromitlan. Total 0 0 0 60.8 I- UgI (7440-47-3) 6M. COpper, total 0 - 0 .44.9 1 ug/L (7440.50.8)'____ ___ _______________________

7M. Lcad,.Total, " 0 -7.78 I ugL.

(7.4390-9-)

SM: Mercuty Total 0 0 [ "728 1 ng-t8 (7439-97-6) ____ _______ _____ ______

'9M., Nickel, Total 0 1.] 0 18.7 1 ugIL (7440-02-0)

!OM. Selenium, Total 0 f [ -<[00 I uglt.

('77 82-49-2Y)

Il M.-Silver.-Tolal 0 0 0,334 1 -ug/L (7440-2224) i2M. Thallium, Total 0 0 0 0.340 F ug/L (7440-28-0) 13M. Zinc Totsal0 0 3421 I ug/L (7440-66-6) 14M.'Cyanide, Total 0 0 E <<1.66 I ug/I.

(5742725)-

IM; Phenols Total 0 0 0 232 I ugL Whoiodibetizciomsrioiu IV.Acrolci<

.- __

I

___

U-i

/

__ __

2V. A^_

(107-13-1)

" _enitri] I"1 < _ 1oo _ _ ._rn VII-3 DER Forni 62-620.910(5)2CS, Effective N ovember-29, 1994

Facility ID. Number: FLOO00159. Outfall No.. i7OFES LSST

2. Mark "X". .3.' Effuent* 4.:Units 5. l.nake (optional)

I. PC1lutant and CAS

'No..(ifavailable) a testing, rfquiired b..be-lieved present'.

c. be-ienved absents

a. Maximum Daily Value

[ b..Max. 30-day.Value (iftavailable)

c. Iong Term Avg. Value j(ifavai able).

d.No: of Analyses

a. C6nc:.- b.,Mass - a' Long Teirm Av4 Vaiue b:No"df Anbi~ses

.(l)Conc. (2)M(2) M 'aC)Cos '(t)Co C. (2)Mis- ()*Con.c" (2) Maa GCUMS FRACTION - VOLATILE COMFPOUNDS (continued) 3ý.Be~nzene ~ El 0l [1 <.0.300: IuOj/

(71-43-2) t 4V.'Bis (Chlorcmethyl) Ether . El3 (542-88-1) 5*. Bi-m6fofl 0 0 <,0.250 1 ug/L (75-25-2) 6V. Carbon Tetrachloride E [] E -<0.300W u1g (56r23-5)_

1 :ug/L (0o8-90"7j

.7.V'Chlor0bcnzene 0[ 1 <<0.250 8V Chl od, 0<'0.300 El E01 I uIL" broinomethac (124-84) 9V. ,Chloroethane [j [ < 0,300: I ug/l (74 00-3)

I0V' 2-Chloi*-cihylvinyl 0 0r l < 1:50 I uAgL Ether ( 0-75-8) l IVý Chloroform 0, 0[ [ <0.250 I ug/l.

(67-86-3) 12V. Dichlor- 0 0 r <U0.2.50 I ug/L bromomethane (75 4) 13V. Dichloro 0 E [ < 0.300W I ug/0j difhnelumm ne(75-71-8).________________

14V. lI -Dichloroelhaie r] El <-0.300 i ugIL (75-34-3) 1V.l,2-Dichloroethane 0l El [1 <0.250 I tig/-

(107-06-2) ___ _____ _________________ ___________

16V. I,-Didilrodehyene 13 11 0. <0.300 I u/L (75-35-) _______

17V.l,2-EDchdero -pane: l El El <0250 I ugh..

(787-S)__________

ISV. 1.3-E)

(542-75.4) El [1l 0.250

____ __ ______

u.IL I

19V.Ethylbenzene 0 El [J. <.0.250 1 ug/L (100-41W4) 03 0,0 20V. Methyl Bromide r [] 0 < 0-300 ugig (4-83-9) '

21V. Methyl Chloride El El E II-I5.0.300 I 1131.

(74-iI7÷3) 22V. Methyline Chloride : l El El <2.00 I ug/L (748-982) 23V,"II2,2-.Tetra- IJ [ E E < 0.250 I ug/L clhoroethane (079.-34-5) 24V.Tetrachloroethylene E El [ < 0:300 l ug/l (I127-18.4)_

VII-4 DER Form 62-620.910(5)2CS, Effective Novcenber 29, 1994

Facility IDI.Number: FL0000159 Outfall No: [IOFE - LSST-

~.poii~i-t2. Mark "X.'___ 3.eEffuent 4:,Units ;5. Intake (optionasl)

I Pluatand CAS' NWojif availale) a.

testing.

b. bic-lievesi

c. be- rw~aixiammn Daily Valnce lieved

§.iMax. 3-da al (if available) e, Long Term Avgt'aluze (if available) d No. of AvuaaIYS~es a oe b.lvMass a:Long Tcrm.Avg, Value I b. No. of

-y~

Gc./,NS

_ _ _

PRACTION -

_ ~~~~~required

______

________________ _____ ]____

present absent VOLATILE COMPOUNDS (continued)

I __

(I)Con.. (2),Mass

____

~(I) Conc.

_

(2) Mass (1) Cone.

_

_____________

1(2) Ms

_I

._____ ____

_

___

_j_

U oe ()as ____

____

25Y. Toluene (P08-88-3) 0 0 0 <20I ugI 26V:. 1,2-Trans- 0 01 0 < 0.300 69gL.

_ ____ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _

Dielkn~1!~eneC156,60-5) ________ _ _

21V-l,l,2-Tudsl~onsellsane 0l 1 0. 'c0.250. '. uiL 28V., I l.12-Tndskuoetlinne 0 < Q<0325. 1 ug/llt

_ _______ ___

C/9-00-5)__ _ __

?9V. Trichloroethylene 0: 0 0 <0.250 I u/

S 0 0 <5.300, g 30V. rojcuicslor-69LWL 3 IV. Viny[,Chloride 0: 0 <0.500

< 1 'ujvfl-IA. 2ý'Chiorophenol 0 U Liu) 2AA 24-Dschlorqphcnol E0 0 0 < .9I ug/L (120-83-2) _____ ___ ____________

3A. 2,4wDfnsethylplserol 0 0 1.99 '1 ug/L-4A. 4,-6-Dinmtro-OýCresol 01 0 cl <2.83 I ug/L SA. 2,4 Diitrophetiol 0 0_ ~ <4:72, 1 UgIL

'6A- 2-Nitrophenol .8 I1 14 ug1:

7A. 4.Nitrophnl 11 0 1.89I ug/L SA PChloro'M-Cresol 0 0 <1u.89 I igtL.

(59-50-7) ____________ ____ ________________

9A PintachlssorphrtoI 0 '.8 1 ug/L.

lOAkPhenol 1 0 11 7.5 I IA2,4,5-Triclsloro- I ugIL

18. ,Acenaplsthcnc 01 0 0 < 0.292' .1 ag:I.

2B.Acenaphtylenc 03 0 01 <,1.89 1 ug/L

-3B. Anlbracene ~7 W <.91 u/

4B. Bentzidinte (9-75'-. 4-0 0 El

_____________

<.3I _____________ _____ _______________ u/ _____________

Vll-5 DFER Foim 62-620.910(5)2CS, Effcctivc'November 29, 1994

.facilitID.'Numibei:.- FLOOOO 159: outfaI No., 1-oF L~sT

2. Mark"X" ____ 3-Iffnent _____ 4. nits A__________ '52ln~doke(optional I. Pollutant and CAS a.;. b.,bý b'6., h~e- a,Mxiu Datly Value IS.Max. 30-da)ý Value c.Long TermeAvg. Valute- d: No.. of a':Conc. b. Mass .a. Long-TemnAv g.Value b,.TNo. of' NO. (if availib~le)ý testing lieved libeds i ava ilable) (favailable) ANfalyses A~ye-ye~quirid presentt absent. ______ ____ ___________________

________ (I) Cone' (2)-Massý .(I) Cone. -(2) Mass (I) Conc, (2),Mass ______(I)'Concý. (2) Mass 5BBitooAnhacn(6- ~ 0 0 <.1.89 1 ug/Lý 55-3 _______

6.Benz (a):Pyrene .: LI 0 < 1.89 1 ug9I.

81B.Benzo:(ghi) Perylene, 0, 01 0 <;1.89 :, ug/L 9B. BraZo ):Fliotstaie(207- [I < LI<P., I tig/L IOB.Bis (2-Oikwhaaz./se [I C3 <2.83 c 1 g/

I U g11-11, EI0 <18

. Bis ?2-chforbefil)y, 1185) agI 1' 0l -0 < 1.89.

121B.Bis (2ý0*Ob*Pt ____ ____ ______ ___

FEthei (102.60-I)_________

13B:- His (2-Ehlhyiheyl) 13 El cl 340 I ug'L.

_____ __________

+/-hihalate (I117-8 1-7) ___________

I 13. -Brombnphenyl El 11 < 1.89 1 AXL PleylIEther( 10 I-,55-3).

-

15B Butyl BenzylPhthalate LI UI LI <. I 89 1 tsg/Lý (84-68-7) _______________

16B. 2--(Tbbsqiak--sI~ '0 LI 0 < 0ý283 I ugIL, 173.,4-Chlorophenyl 0 0 [1 <1 9I u/

____ _______________________

Phenyii Ether (7005-72.3) _____________

I 8B. Cbnyace L L 1.89 1 ug/ýL 19B3. Dibenzo (a./i) El LI 0l < 9 tl Antlhiacene (53-70-3). ____ ____

'20B. 1,2-Diidoobcrtszoemc E LI ý<:189 I PAg/

2 IB.l3-7Dkchoiobcnizn. LI' ' 03 <1L89 1 ug/l,

.22B. l,4-Dichksbcnzene, 0 11 LI <1.89 I u/

(10&-46-7) __ __________

23B3. 3,3TDdsolisi LI 0 EA18 ugtL

__

(92-44I) __ ____________

2413,-Dehtlyl Ptlitalate: 0 0 ZTl 189 I Stg/WL

_____

(84.65&2) 25B. Diniethy~l Phithalite 0l **-

L <A.89 I ugfL.

(1317111-3) _____ ______ ____

26B,. Di.'N-Bityl Phthalate Li El11I~91 uw/l.

____

(84-7,4-) ___________

27.2,4-Diiniirotolucie. 0 1l 0l <L.89 I ag/I.

(121-14-2)_______________________________________________

r28B. 26ý-Dinitrotoluenc' ElP ' ~. <1.,89 Iu/

(606-20-2) - - :

DER Forth 62-620'910(5)2CS,:EffectiVe Novemiber 29, -1994.

Facilitý ID.-Number: FL0000159 Outfall No. 1-OFE - LSST

2. Mark "X" 3. Effuent' ._. 4:.U its. 5. Intake.(optional)

. ýPbllulant and CAS a. b. be- e.*c, be- a'aMaximunifDaily Valie b. Max..30-day Value c. Long-Term Avg. Value d:No.,of a.ýb.

Conc Mass a. Long TermrnAvg. -Value b. No. of No. jf available) iesfing liev*ed ie .. . (if available) (if ayailable) Analyses Analyses rYeqizred 'present ,absent _ . . . ... . ...

(I)Conc. (2) Mass (0)'Conc, (2) Mass (1) Cone. (2) Mass (1) C66iý. (2) Massa 129BDi-N-OctAyl phIha1atc E 0 . < 2.83, U.g/I

_____ _________

(,117:84-0) _____ ________

El.Dai~ti7n 0, 0 <189IUIL:

.(Azobenzeni) (122.6"7)

(206..4.-0) 3B~loaihn ...... E0 0l 0. <.8 ,_ __ __ __ _ _ __ _

32B ealuorene (864<3-7)I <89 1 ng/L 336BHesarchlor6eobbnee 0 El0 < 1-89 1 ug/L 9 b 14en 0 189 I u 3358.*-ldlbAip E 0 0 <2.283. ugL-

__ _____ _______ ______

077-47-4y El71 0 ] <El1.89 83 I ug/,

3460B.Jlcxicbloriotne

_(67-72-0)' ... ...

'37B.Indeno (123d-Nd) 0. 0 E <[ 189. V ug/L

____

ý.Pyiene (193-39-5) ___________

0=*oh0 E < 283 I ugEL 438B!s*NNioT 39<B:WPNaptlene( 0 0 .- <0.283 1 u$IL (91-2-3) (Nitro8s, 43.-H

..........

ey) 0E El 0 1.8

______ ______"

448 Phienantbrene 0 0 0 -<1.9Lun 45B3,pyrene(I29-00-0): E El 0 '<0.283 I g/L Propyl-mme(621-64-7): ____ _____

0 46B)2~rrchrnbtI 9-4/L- 11 IP. Aldrn (309-00-e2) El. I El 2)

.2P.,-B C (31944-6) 01 El

3PIH(319i8-7 0 03 0 01,13-13C (58-899) E BE

-C(19-86-)0 0 V1117 DER.*Form' 626 20,9 10(5)2CS, ffctivee November- 29, 19.94

Facility'ID. Nydmber' FL000159 .OutfallNo. .1-FE - LSST

2. Mark !X" 3. Effuent- -4:Uniti 5:.Inae (optional)

I. Pollutant and CAS 'a,. b. be- c. be- a. Maximum Daily Value b:,Maxi 30-day.Value c. Long Tern Avg.'Value d. No. of a. Cone. b; Mass, a., LngrerA.in M VNalue*. b. N6. of N (if available). testing lgevel lieved (ifavailablc)ý (if available) . Analyses Analyses rcquiicd .present absent ______ ___________ ____

(I) Cone. (2) Mass (1) Cone. (2) Mass (1),Cond. .(2)'Mass () conc. (2) Miss

6P.Chlordane.(57-74-9). El .l"

'7P. 4,4'-DDT (50-29-3) 11 C"- _0 8P; 4,4'-DDE (72-55-9) El El 0 9P:4 4 ODDD (72-54-8) [- 0 lOP Dieldrin'(60-57-l) "I fl 0 IIP. -Endosulfan 11 0- [

(1It-29-7) 12P1-Endosulfian El" 1 0 13P .'Endosulfan :Sulfate lh

'14P.End rin(72-20-8) I0 . El

.15p.Endrin Aldehyde El .- '] 0 (7421,92-4) 16P.Heptachlor E1 0 [

(76-44-8)'

1I7P. Heptachlor Epoxide ['] [

'(1024-'57ý3)

ISP. PCB-1242 E-. El 0 (53469-21-9) 1PP PCB-1254 El 0 0

-(11097-69-1) 20P.,PCB-1221 El .El 0

(.1104-28-2)

.21ll'.PCB-1232 [ [T __

(11141-16-5)

22P: PCB-1248 0l El 0 (i 2672ý29-6)

.,23P. PCB-1260 [ [

( 1096-82-5) 24P. PCB-1016 El W 0

.(Ii674-1I 1-2) ____ ____ _____ __________ _____ _____ ____

25P. Toxapliene El [ 0

,.(8001-35-2)

VII-8 DER Form 62-620.910(5)2CS, Effcctivc Novvember 29, 1994

Facility ID. Number! FL0000159;. D-100' ViL Discharge Information (Continue'd from page.2ZF-1515 Form 2F)

PaitA , You must*piovide the results of'at:least oneanalysis for:ev.ery, pollutant in thiitable. Complcte one table.foreach.outfall. See'instructions for-additional details.

of Storm Minimum Values.(include units) Average Values (include unit') Events Sources, of Pollutants ollutant and CAS: Grab Sample Taken During Flow-weighted. Grab'SampleTaken During Flow-weighted Sampled Number (if available) First30 Minutes Compoiste First 30 Minutes Composite.

,Oil andGrease, NN/A N/A N N/A I Biochemýnical Oxygen 13,mgiL. 21 mg/L N/A N/A Vehicl*ehicle Traffic/Gencral Demand (BODs)' _ "'._ SiteRunoffeTraffiC Cbemieal Oxygen 224 mg/L 210 mg.IL NWA N/A. I Vehicle Traffic/Genera] Site bDemand (COD) Runoff Total Suspended Solids 412 mg/iL 188 mg/I 'N/A N/A I Vehicle Traffic/Genera Site (TSS) ________ _________________Runoff" Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 4.9 mg/L 4.0,mg/i. N/A N/A i Vehicle-Traffic/General Site Runoff" Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen 1.3 mg/L .1.0 mg/L. NiA N/A I Vehicle Traffic/General Site

.Runoff' Total Phosphorus 1.6.mg/L 1.2 mgiL N/A N/A I Vehicle Traffic)General Site Rurioff pH inimnum' Maxsmimi ininum lmaximum Part B- List each'pollutint that is limited in aneffluent guideline whichtie facility is subjeettb o.r any pollutant litedir" the facility's:wastewater permit' f6r its wastewater effluent if the facility is operating under an existing wastewater permit. Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional deiails and requirements.

Mihimumn Values (include units) Average Values (inc6ideuniti) # of Stonn

,olntndCAS Events Sources of Pollutants Pollutant and Gr a Samnle TkeýRD°Wrin Oab Flow,-weighted Grab Sample Taken During Flow-weighted .eSampil -' .......

=ed o Firs 30tMinutes .Cmposite First30 Minutes' Comsite:

Airaic. 30097 mro/ 0-0073.in*/I _PDFSPesmit r-efikirenent Cadmium .0 oll m)mfOf/ 0,0027 mn/ll _S 1__I_ perit reui__men_

Chromium 0,02R ifim/l. 0 016,me/ _ _ I__1 NPDFS Permit reuiremment cbnboei. 0,16 mk/L -0 .1 .2 ma/L l PE'Pimtrediiretent:

Iron 45 mo1-I m___Y!__h_ I NeDlFS'Permit reauirement "Niclel . )i022mpI Ol, md/t. I__PD__ Perit i____irem ILead 0-016 ma/L A)00 74'm/, rt Selemium 0.(0063ýmpA -00030. ()i mL/L INPD_.RS'Prmitrerement Vanadiim l1043 mr/I. 0,033 (1* mo/L I NPDFESPermitfreouireiment zinc 5,6 ma/l 0 69 mr/l 1. NPDlS: Permit reouiiement DEP Form 62U620,91o(S) VII-I Effecive October 23,2000

Ficility I.D. Number: FL00001'59;.D-100 VII. Dischaige Information (Continued from Table VIIon page'VIl - 1 of:Form 2F)

Part.C.- List each pollutant shown.in.Tables 2F-2, 2F-3,and 2F4tthat you know or have reasonsto believe is presentý . Comrpeieieonetablefor each outfall. See.

instructions for additional,details.

Minimum Values (in*lude units) Ave rage Values (include itS) of ursof Pollutat "Events Pollutant and.CAS Grab Sample.Taken During Flow-weighted Grab Sample Taken During Flow-weiglited! Sampled Number (if available) First 30 Minutes Composite First 30 Minutes Composite PartD Provide'data.for the:storm eveilt(i) whichfresulted:in the maxxirumnvialuei for the flow weighted.,composite sfimple, I. 2. 3., 4. 5: 6. -7.

Date of Storm Event. 'Duration ofiStorm Total rainfall during -Number'of hours Maximum floov riate Total.fl6w tomments Event storm event between beginning of during rain event, from rain (in minutes)" ý(in indes) storm measured and end (Specif units) event Of previous~measurable , (specifýy rain event0'u2it, )

t. 27,,2009R 3310. 0.1 6. 528 .2,087 gpmn 4,1,74 gRal.

Provide a descripiion of the method of.flow measuremeni, or estimate.

Total daily rainfall and maximumn rainfall rates were obtaihed from a local weather, monitoring facility located on-site atLat_: 1 28

57'3 '1(,28.959)

Lofi:'W 820-41 `48," ( -82.697" ),which,is"within 1/4.,mileof the'outfall locatioms: Flow volumes andfloW rates-were determined.by using~exposqedsurfaee~area, rainfall data, and runoff coeffic'ients. A runoff coeffiiiieni of 0:9 was used for impervious surface area and'0.5"was-used.for 'ervious area.

Note that this isrthe second sampled rainfill event for this outfall. The first rainfal event sampled for this outfall occurred on August.18, 2009.

DEP Form 62-6209 1t0(8 VII-22 Effetiv'e Octobe b,-.2t060

Facility l.D.Nuribe'r FLO0000159;- D-200 Vui. Discharge information (Conitinued from page 2F-i5 of Form 2F).

PartA - Youmustprovide th6 resulisof at least one analysis for every pollutant in this tabJe ,Complete one table for each outfall., See instructions :for additional details:

Minimum Values (inclucde units) Average Values'(inlude Vau.in l d units) - . fF-.Events Sourcesof Pollutants PollutantandCA S Grib Sample'Taken During How-weighted Grab Sample Taken During Flow-weighted Sampled Nufi'iber (if available) First 30 Minutes Composite First 30:Minutes Composite Oil and Grease N/A; Biochemical Oxygen. 12 mg/L 9.8'mg/L V ehicular Traffic, misc..Unit 3 Demand (BODs) __activities Cbhemiil Oxygen 240 mg/L. 97 mg/t I VehiculairTraffic- misc. Unit3 Demand (COD) activities Total Suspended Solids 164 mg/L 124 mg/L I Vehicular Traffic; misc: Unit (TSS) activities Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 1.9 mg/L !21 mg/i I Vehicular Traffic; misc: Unit3 activities lNirate +-NitriteNitrogen 0.92 mg/I..- 0.66 mg/I. f VehiculairafT c;,misc;'Unit actiVitjies otaolPhosphorus 0.;50 mg/I.. 0.73 mg/L I Vehiiculairtraftfic misc. Unit activities pH Minimum Maximum mimur aximtma, Part B- List each pollutant that is limited in an effluent guideline which the facility is~subject towor any pollutant listed in the facility's~wastewatet Oermit.for its wastewater effluent if the faciliiy is operating under an existing wastewater permit Complete one table foreach ouifall. Se6eihstructions foIradditional details and requirements..

Minimumn aluesi (include anits) Average Value" (include urits) # of Ston,*,n Pollutant and CAS Events :Sources of Pollutants N.umber (if aailable) Grab Sample Takeni During Fl6w-weightd G.rb'Saunle Taken During Flow-weighted Sampled First 30. Minutes. compo ite First 30 Minutes Composite, Asenic 0.0060 m,/l, 6OO49 mi/."l I NPD_:__S Permit i,_e__l-__i, Cadmium M,060 f Ii)p/. Io l0

.. (I ________P__S Permit reouirement Chtrbiium Ii019.+rffiq/l, 00022ni/, _IPES Permitreaiiiremerit_

Conner R mo/L 001 0O62 . /g. NPDFS Permii i Uirnient"

'irnn 17m9/A mgat __ _ __ I ___eme__ ES &rmit

-Nickel. 0. 16 mrnIp ni/uie__ent_

'0l.:mi711 NPDFS Permit ULead 0 0 Igmv/L Oltie,/I _l_ PDESPer__it___ireeif_

Selenium - 0073 mol/l,

0062 =A'/l. _ _PDSPerm__r_ 1 uirement Vlnadium 0032(lt, mn/I 0:027 flYmni/L _uireme_ I. NPDES permi__r__

7inc 317 m/I" 0.43'mn/l. __i_ _eni I_ NPDES'_Peri_

__________~~~~~

_ _ _I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _I_ _ _ _ I___ _ _ _ _ _

DEP Form62-620M910(8) VIII' Eff!ectiveOctober23'. 2000

Facility I.D. Number: FL0000159, D-200.

Vii. bischarge Information (Continued from Table VII'on pageVlI - 1 of.Form'2F')

Part C- Lisfeach pollutant shown in Tables22F-2, 2F-3, and 2F-4 that you know or have reasons to believe is present.-Complete one table! for each outfall, See instructions for.additional. details.

Minimum Values incl ude.units) Average Values (include units) #,ofEStor Sources of Pollutants Flow,-weighted Grab Samnple Taken During Flow-weighted Sampled Pollutant and CAS Grab Sampnli TakI= Duiig Number (if available): First 30OM\mtne Composite Firt 30 Minutes Composites 4 + 4 4 -

4 4 + 4 + 4 4 + 4 + 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Part D - Provide&data for the storm event(sy)'which resulted in the maximum values fotr the flow weightedcomposite sample.

L. 2. 3. 4. 5: 6. 7.

Date of Storm Event Duration of Storm Total rainfall during Number of hours Maximum flow rate Total flow :Comments Event, storm event "between bginning of duiriig' ain event from' raio e (in minutes), (in inches) storm measured and~end (specifý.un.its) event ofiprevious measurable (specify rain event 0nits)

Oct. 27, 2009 3j3 0.16 528, 7;'488 gpm l4;975 gal 2nd'event sampled Provide a description of the method of flOw measureMent or estimate.

rotal daily rainfall and maximum rainfall rates were obtained from a local weather monitoring facility lbcated:on-site it Lat. N 28 57' 31 "(28.959")

Lon: W 82 441 "48." (-82.6970); which is within 1/4 mile of the outfall.locations. Flow volumes and-flow rates were determined byusing exposed surfacearea, rainfall data, 0ndrunoff coefficients. ,A runif coefficient oO.9was ued for~imperious surface area and .0.5 Was used forperyiouss area.

Noteiiat ihis is the sie6nd sampled raififalleievtfor this butfall. The first rainfall event sampled:for thiis:butfall occurred on Augut7,,2009.

0 DEP Form 62-620,910(s) VII-2 Effective October 23, 2000

Facilityl.D. Number: FL0000159; D-300ý VII. Dischargelinformation (Continued from page,2F-15 of Form 2F)

PartA - .You must provide the results of at.la~stone analysis for every pollutant in thisutable. Complete one table for each outfall Seeinstructions-for

additional details, a*of Storm Minifmium'Values (include units) Av'erage Values (include units) Ees Sources 0ofPollutants Pollutant and CAS" Grab Sam~ie Taken.Duribg Flow-weighted G-ab:Sample Take During Fl10W-Weighfed ýSamplcdA Number,(if available) Firs! 30 Minutes Cot osite GrabSam30 TakeDr loweo d Sm d

_________________

________________ Fusi 130 Miriutes- Composite' _________________

09il and Grease.. 4.6 (1) mg/L 'N/A 1 Materialistorage(Veh. Traffic Biochernical Oxygen -23 mg/L 15 mglL 1 .Matefial Storage/Veh. Traffic Demand (BODs)

,Chemical Oxygen. 250 mg/L. 250 mgWL 1 MateriaI-St6rag*TVeh.iTraffic Demand (COD) __

Total Susp*ded Solids. 280 mg/L 292rnpg/L I Material Storage6eh. Traffic (TS$ý)

,Total Kjeldahl Nitrog 2.8 Mng/L 2.4 m/L I Material St6rage/Veh: Triffic Nitrate + Nitrite Nirogen 1 4 mg/i 0.99 ig/.L. I Material St6rage/.eh.jTrqaffic Total Phosphorus' 1.1 mg/L 0.172 mg/LI I Material Storage/Veh. Traffic 0pHi imuna uM n um Maximum um* rl :NPDES Permit requirement Part B - List each pollutant that is limited in an effluent guideline which the facility-is subjectto or~any pollutant listed'in'the facility's wastewater permit for it, wastewater effluent if the facility is operating under an existing wastewater permit, Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions fofadditional details and requiircijients.

Minimum Values (incld units), Average Values (include units) .,#of Storm "Pollutait and CAS Events E Sources of Pollutants Number (ifavailable) Grab Sample Tiken Diring First 30 Minutes' Flow-weighted.

composite Grab 'First Sample Taken During 30 Minutes.

Flow-weighted. Sampled Composite:

"Hvdrazine < 0006 m/iL N/A _ _FIDS" Permitreouirement Mornh0line 0068 me/" N/A Hvdroauinonens 17 m,/I ..* MA_ NsPermitrum TRC - I mi* N/A NPDFo/ Permit reouirement_

,Cctnhner" l:0*g*/I t505_

OSrme/l _ _ _ _____i___

__L__,._EP 7

Iron 5,mg/L A.3me)L" _re__en

_ NmiES Permit re_

Arsenic 023 m0/ll 1,0 motMll. _ _PDES Permit reouirement_

Ciadiiumr 0015%(I) my/L 0 0018 (1) mq/L _________________

Chrorinnum 046PDES _ Permit reou0r/men_

Nickel 044 mq/IL 00 1 m___ NPF__Pemit__uiremett Lead 0150m /I '0'23 /!I NP1__SPermitrieme__t Selenium I I ma/l 0 010 m'/L. _ NPDS.Per__ii r__uireme_

Vanadium, 0090 Mrll. 0M088 mO/L NPDES Permit reuiement 7inc .56 mg/I 07"4 mh/L __PDESP__ir___ ie__nt_

Mercury 22 n/_

nlow-level'," N/A _ NPDES Permit re__irement PCR-I94R8 < 0'? i____, N/A_ _fflUejht '-uidelirjeq 40CFR423 PCk-1254 <f20u N __ _iA Ffhuent.,uiieline s 40CIFR423 PCnl260 <0 2iue/L Nl__"_ _ ffluent auuiuielineq 40CFR42' Temneratmile 29 deog" C N/A _PDE__ _Pei-itriiremi__

4 7 4. 4 5 1.

DPEPPins o.62b 2t910(s) Vi14,

ýEffectie Ocober 23.'200

Fagilit I.D.*Nurber: FL0000159; D-300 VIL Dishiasge lIformatiin (Contiifuedsfuis TableVII onptage VII - lof Form 2F)

Part C ,List each p6olutant'shown in TableS2F-2,2F-3, and 2F:4 that youknowor, havercasons to believe ispresent, Complete one table for each outfall. Se*.

.instructions*ifdadditionial details:.

Mi nimm Valtuesi (include un its) Average Values (include units) # of Storm Sources f Pollutants Events Pollutant and CAS Grb Sample Tbao W Dn 'Fl ow-weighted Girb Sample Ta*3eiiDiiing Flow-weigted sampled Number (tif available) First 30 Miiuties Composite First 30 Minutis Composite Part D -Provide data for the storm event:s) which resulted in the maximum values for the flow weighted composite sample..

1. :2. -3. 4. ,5 6. 7 Dare-of Storm-Event Duration otfStorm Total rainfall during Numbcr of hours Maximum flow rate Total flow Commffitts Event storM event betýno-beginning of during rain event fron rain (in minutes) (injinches) storm measured and end (specify units) event of previotis measurabble (specify

-raievent units),,

Det: -27,2009; 30 0.6 528 39 lOOgp 7,820 gal.

Provide-a description of the method of floW measurement"o estimate:

T6tal daily rainfalliand m"aximnum rainfall 'rates w-ere obtained from a local weather monitoring facility:located on-site ,at Lai: MN28-657!-31"--(28.9590.)

Lon: W 82k,4i '48" (-82.97 ), which ýiswithin fI4 mile of the outfall locations. Flow Volumes and flow rates -were determined by using exposedisurface area, rainfall]data, and rinoffcocfficicrts.A runofff ciint Of 0.9 w*su*d for litnlervious saurfce-area a*id 5 Was Wued for pervious ara..

DEP Form62;.620.9 0(S) VlI-2, Effentive Octobmer 23, 2060

Facility I:D. Number: ;FL0000159; D-400 VII. Discharge information (Continued from page2F-15 ofFori-2.1

,Part A - You must provide the results of atleast one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete. one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional-details."

of Storm Minimum Vilues (include units) Average Values (include units) Evnts, Sources ofPollutants Pollutant and CAS ld Pollutavand CA le Grab Sample Take Durinig Flowv-wýighted Grab Sample Taken During Flow-weighted Sampled Nu.imb0r (if avail be) Wi'36Minutes Composite First 30tMinutes. Compdsiie' "

Oil andGrease, N/A :N/A Biochemical Oxygen .27 mg/L 19.mg/L 1 Vehic;.triff:eqiuip._taging Demnmd (lOD,)

'Chemical Oxygen 230 mg/I, 200mg/L. I Vehic. iaf:'eqluip. staging tmibd (COD), _ _.. ...

Total Suspended Solids 900 mg/LI 552 mg/,. i Vehic. friid equip. stagiing

'(TSS) _________ _______ _____ ._______

Total Kjeldahl Nitr6gen 2A4 mg/L 2.0 mg/L I Vehic: tiaf: equip: staging Nitrate'+ NitriteNitrogen 0:59 mg/L 0.57 mg/L 1 Vehict..rfaf: 'equip:staging Total Phosphosa. 0'.88mg/L, 0.70 mjI/L I Vehic: ta:equip.-stagihgi Mp inimum Maxim Minium. mum Part B - List each olluta that is limited in an effluent guidelinewhichihe faciliiy. is subject to or any pollutant listedin the facility'swastewater permit for.is wastewater effluent ifthe facility is operating undeian existing wastewater.permit: Complete one table for each outfall: See inst-uctions for idditional details, and requirerenits.

.Mininium"Values.(include units) Average Values (inclteunits): # of Storm Iiollutant and CAS .Events. Sourrces oi'Pollutants

'olutant fand CAS Gab'Sample Taken During Flow-weighted Grab Sample Taken During Flow-weighted v Number (ifavailable) First 30,,n"ues composite First 30,Minues Composite Sampled Arsenic. X rlL 0r1 m1ffL NPDESPi it'r~duirement Cadmium 0 0019 (1) m911 o/I w4,(Winiz I NP___S__Prmit raiI__ett Chromium 6056 EII/L_ 0'_0__45-m__L I NPDFS Permit renuitmen!

Conner 0l043 mE/UIL 039 mg/t NPQFS'Permit renuiementt Iron R__5__ o/L 6&7 _____ 1 NPDFs' Permii reouirement Nieket 0.039 me/dl 6'6030 m/LI I NPDFIS'Permit reauirement Lead 0.012 ma/l. 0 012 mv/l. I: NPDFDSRPefmit reauireimein

SelenfiirnO q 10.10 0_ mo/t..

6i_0____ P Fýt%.Permit remai'remeni Vanadim Is 12 mA. NPDES Permit reauirement ninc

.54 meiI. 1 42 me/I _irrrieit NPDRS Permit___

DOEeoim 6i-&o0:*:9) VII-o Effecivectober 2i, 2000

Facilityl.D..Number: FL0000159; D-400 VIl.Discharge Information.(Continued, from Table VIl on page VIi- 1 of Form.2F)

Part C.- List each pollutant shown in Tables 2F-2, 2F-3; and 2F,4 that you know or have reasons to believe is present. Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional details..

MinimuimValuies (ihclude'units) AverageValues (include inits) 4 *Events of-Stbrm Soirces of Pollutants Pollutant and .CAS Grab Sample Taken Durng First 30 Minutes Flow.wighted Composite IGrab First Sample Taken During 30 Minutes, Flow-weighted Composite Sampled Number (if availal61e)'

+ 4 4. 4 4. 4

4. 1* 4 1- 4

.4. 4 4. 4 4. 4 4 1- 4 1- 4

4.

4. 4 4. 4 4 t 4. 4 4 4 + 4 4. 4 4 4 + 4 + 4 4 4 + 4 + 4 4 1 4. 4 4 4 4 4. 4 4. 4 4 4 -I* 4 4. 4 4 1 -I' I I Part D - Provide data for the storm event(s) which riestifed inlthe maximumfvalues 'for the flow weighted composiie 'sarriple.

1. '2. 3. 4.. 5. 6.. -7.

Date of Storm Event Duration of Storm Total rainfall during Ntmber of hours Maximum flow rate 'Total flow Comments Event storm event between beginning of during rain event from rain (in miniitesý O(in'inches) storm measured'and end (specify uits) .event of previous measurable: (specify, r.ain event units)

Oct. 27, 2009 330 0:1 6 528 4,027 gpm 8,0552:ga!. 2nd event sampled' Provide a:descripiion of the medtod'ofiiow~medsurement or estimate.

rotal daily rainfall ahdmaximfium rainfall rates were obtained froma lbcal weatherimonitoring facility located on-site at Eat: N 280 57':31 ' (ý28.959).?)

oh: W 82V41 .'48." (,,82:697 ),'which is'Within 1/4`mile of the 6utfall locations. Flow volumes'and'flow rates were determiinted by using exposed siurfaceýarda,

ainfall data, and runoff coefficients. A runoffcoefficient of 0.9was used'for'impervious surface area and:0.5 was used for pervious area.

'4ote.tht this is thesecond.sampled rýinfall!event for this outfall. The first rainfall event sampled f6r this outfall occurred on Augusit 8,200:

001' Forn, -620 910,(8) V II-2*

Effetv October ii, 2000.

Progress Energy. Florida, Inc. -Crystal River'Units 1, 2, & 3 DEP File No. FLO000159.0!3-IWIS/NR Attachment 2 CR-3 Circulating Water Pump Flow Measurement Study

,C Progress Energy Crystal River eUnit 3 Circulating Water Pump Flow Measurement February 2009 Final RepOrt May 8, 2009

/

Prepared by:

DickFletcher, PRE.,

Test Team:

Earl Green Jerry, Warren

Crystal River Unit 3 Circulating Water Pump Tests A Pump, Test 1 Test Date: 2-10-2009 Motor Data As Tested Design Motor Power 2,250 bhp Motor Voltage: 4,000 V Motor Amps: 325A Speed: 231 RPM 248 RPM Pump Test Data Tested at Corrected to 231 RPM 252 RPM Flow: 163,961 GPM 178,807 GPM TDH: 27.68 if 32.94 ft Pump Power 1,182 whp 1,534 whp DYE CONCENTRATION 40

0.

I 800 1000 1200 140Onme16O 1800 2000 2200 verticallines indicate test pe~ked

Crystal River Unit 3 Circulating Water Pump Tests B Pump, Test 2 Test Date: 2-10-2009 Motor Data As Tested Desion Motor Power: 2,250 bhp Motor Voltage: 4,000 V Motor Amps: 325 A Speed: 249 RPM 248 RPM Pump Test Data Tested at Corrected to 249 RPM 252 RPM Flow: 164,660 GPM 166,644 GPM TDH: 31.33 ft 32.09 ft Pump Power. 1,343 whp 1,392 whp DYE CONCENTRA T/ON waft 0 1000 1200 14OTime 1 600 1800 2000 2200 vertical lines indicate test period

Crystal River Unit 3 Circulating Water Pump Tests C Pump, Test 3 Test Date: 2-10-2009 Motor Data As Tested Desion Motor Power 2,250 bhp Motor Voltage: 4,000 V Motor Amps: 325 A Speed: 249 RPM 248 RPM Pump Test Data Tested at Corrected to 249 RPM 252 RPM Flow: 167,366 GPM 169,383 GPM TDH:

Pump Power:

DYE CONCENTRATION 0.40

- ----- ~ I~ ~

600 8 lowo00 1400 1600 1800 verticallines indicatetest period

Crystal River Unit 3 Circulating Water Pump Tests D Pump, Test 4 Test Date: 2-10-2009 Motor Data As Tested Design Motor Power. 2,250 bhp Motor Voltage: 4,000 V Motor Amps: 325 A Speed: 230 RPM 248 RPM Pump Design Point 170,000 GPM 35.00 ft Pump Test Data Tested at Corrected to

-7 230 RPM 252 RPM Flow: 147,384 GPM 161,482 GPM TDH:

Pump Power 98.00 inches DYE CONCENTRATION 0.40 0.35 0.30 -

0.25

&0.20 - __

0.15 __

0.10 0.05 0.00 - ~ -

600 800 1000 1400 1600 10 vertical lines indicate test pedod

70 80 . . . __

-_

_ _

7.1 Crystal River Unit 3 A Circulating Water Pump 7

__ _ __ __

, ,1 -- , ,----------_

.......-I-'t.... _"_-_--

T -_llA C E~ I rzz I

_ _ _o___ __ _ *___ . . ....I _2....

050 __

'1 00, _ _ - 150 200 __250 4I-4, 100____P

___ ___-1--l__ .1 _

10----- __. 10_--1_t 0 50 100; 150. 20025 Flow, 1000 GPM

Crystal River Unit 3 B Circulating. Water Pump 80

,__ I _ In" 70 7i* - Design Head Ci.rve { - zz!zz K ........

60 50 4-I __ - -

i*' 40

--. I- .. I _

-

'" .- .-. .. - t Fe-ea-y,1- -11,_

-09Tt-t

30 l-~1 Fe-u r 1, 09'esS

.20

'10 0

0Q 50 OO 0 iF~ow, O00GI 2.0 250.

-Flow, 106006P.M

Progress Energy Florida, Inc.-Crystal River Units 1, 2, &l3 DEP File No. FL0000159-01,3-iWiS/NR Attachment 3 MiscellaneOus Waste Storage Tank (MWST)

Diagram

MWST Waste Stream Raw Water

-Provides

,Dilution Flow for Liquid Releases, Note: Numerous scehariosrOf valve alignments can alter the flow paths indicated by this flow diagram. :Examples are, tanks can be put on recirc pumped backto another tank for reprocessing; pumped to anothersy'stemr,:etc. .

Progress; Energy Florida, .Inc. -Cr'ystal River Units 1, 2, & 3, DEP File No,. FLOO00t59-013-IW1S/NR Attachrment 4 Industrial Wastewater Permit FLAI 6960

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF *hglie Crist ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Governor Southwest District Office 13051 Noth Telecom Park-vay Jef kottkamp, Temple TerraceFlofida 33637-0926 Lt. Governor Michael W,.Sole Secretary, STATE- OF FORIDA INDUSTRUL WASTEWATER FACILITY PERMIT PERMIrTEE: "I .PERMITNNUMBERi, FLA016960 Priogress Energy;Florda, Inc. , PAFILE NUMBER: FLA016960-002-IW 1N/NR P.-0. Box 14042,MAC PEF-903, ISSUANCE DATE: ,Januaiy 9, 2007:

St. Petersburg,kFL 33701-501 PA FILE NUMBER: FLAO1 6960-006-IWB/MR REVISION DATE: Noveifiber 17, 2009

'EXPIRATiONDATE: Janiar8,.20,12 RE$SPONSIBLE 'AUTHORITY-Mr.,Larry E,. Hatcher Plant Manager Larr.Hafcher(vgnmaaii.com FACILITY:

Crystal:River Energy Complex 15760 West Powerline. Street Crystal River, FL 34428 Citrus County "Latitude: 289 57'.27"'N Longitude: 820 42' 36"W This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 403, Florida Statutes (FS.) and applicable rulesof theFlorida Administrative. Code (F.A.C.). This pprmit is accpmpanied by an Administrative, Order pursuaft to Paragraph's 403088(2), (e) and (f), Florida. Statutes. Compliance, with Administrative' Order AO'-114rSW 'is.-a specific requirement of this permit. The above named permittee-is. hereby authorized to operate the facilities shownron the

application and other documents attached hereto or on file with the Department'and made -a.part hereof and 1specifically. described as fo1lows,:

The Crystal River.Energy Complex is a steam electric power-genemtion facility consisting of five units. Units 1,;2.4,

,aid 5 are coal-fired.while Unit #3 is'a nuclear-powered unit. Unitsi3, 4 and-5 areicertified pursuantto Power Plant,

,SitinigAct.

More Prolection, Less Process" výw.dep.stdtefl, us

PERMITTEE: Progress Energy Florida, Inc. PA FILENUMBER:ý FLA016960-006-IWB/MR FACILITY: Crystal River Energy Complex

`WASTEWAT.ER TREATMENT:

The neuiralizedwastes are discharged into a percolation pond system conisiing ofthreeqpqnds.YPonds #'`and#'*2 are operatedin paraliele Theponds actas settling basins andAthe settled effluent 'from eitherpond isroutfed to Pond&#3 whic'h overflows into. an area called ".South Pond' Expansion" (7.16 acres) for. percolation. The 'South Pond

'Expansion area has the capability to hold the wastewater.as well as direct rainfall resulting from a 25-year;24-hour storm, inithe 13.6-acre pond .catchmentateae The sources of wastewater include, power plant equipment, drains, laborat6ry drains, floor drains, neutralized regeneration wastes from the demifieralizer resin beds, wastewaier from the wate6rtreatment process (carbbn and-mediaf-iltbr backwah;, and lime sludge) boilei blowdown, boiler drains (chemiical cleanings), air pre;heateri ash drains,- sewage¢treaimenit plahtzefflehts, stormwater driinage from the transfofrmier area, blowidown from the-Flue Gas Desulfuiizatibn, ýprecipitator Washes, boiler washes, cooling. water blowdown, and reverse'osmosis/micr6 filtratior conicentrate.

EFFLUENT DISPOSAL:

Land 'App icaition:

An existing 0.76 MGD monthly average daily flow (AF) landPF applicatiion system (G-0001 consistinig 6f percolation pond. Land application System G-001 is located approxmately atlatitude 28V 57' 27' N, longitude

ý820 42' 36" W.

INiACCORDANCE WITH: The limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions as set forth in PartlI through Part VIIIon p ages:3 t.hrough* 9 ofthisipermi.-:

2

PERMITTEE.'Progrss Energy Florida,; Inc 1PA FILE NUMBER':, FLýAOI`6960-006-I 64/M, FACILITY: CryýsýtlRiver Energy Complex I. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements A. Surface waterDischargnes 1*. ThissecstidoiýiS'nioapplicable to this facility.ý B. Underground'fInecti6n Control Systems I., This, sectionisinot applicable, to this facility.

C. Land Application Systemsrs I. During'ite' period bdegining onlthe iissuane dateandlasting thrugh the"expiration date of this permit, te permtee is authorize iodischage proesswatewater,. non processýwatewatci, powej plant equiipment drains,

'laboratory drans,ý flo risneutralized regeneration wastes-f~rom, theý deminera~lizer: resin beds, Waistewvater from the iwtertrea"meni process (carbon and media filter bakwh,* and.lim sludge)boiler llowd1wn, boiler dians (chemical cleanig),airpreheater wash -dins, sewage treatment plant effluents, stormwatter '"nage::

.from the rsfomer area, blowdown fm th1e Fe GasDcsulfiration, prpitatr washeS, b!iler:washes, cooling wateirblowdown, and reivese osmosisimicro filitrtion concentrate to:LandApplication Sysiern- 0001a,

'percolation :'pond. Such discharge,:shall be limited, andmonitored ibY theipeb ttee as,- specified below and, reeported ina fkcodahcemith *nditionLI.E.l"

Dis 'Limitations Monitoring Requirem-ents' Parameters (units). Monthly Daily Daily M6nitoring Sample Sample

___.......... __ Average NlMaximum' MihimIum Fr'eqUency TNe 'Piýnt Flow (MGD), 0.76 " eport -- Daily Calculated FLW-3 Flow1(MGD) R'ort .. DMeter, Dai FLW-I

'Flow(MGD) . Report - Daily) .Meter FLW-2 Water Level , :Report* -, ,Weekly In-situ 0TH-1 Relative tO, D '

______ See Cond.

e I.C.5o __nd' Water Level - . Report

'LC;5* -, Weekly In-situ OTH-2 Relative toNGVD See Cond.

_______

_____ _ _______ I.C.5 _ _ _ _

Watr evl.- Report - ekyIn-situ OT Relative to .NGVD' e od pH:(SU)) -. eorit Report Quiarterly Ini-situ EF-So .. . oaILkprtEFF-2I ....

Solids Total. -- ' Reportl -,- QUarterly Grab EFF-l Dissolved(TS).. EFF-2 I ,(MG/L) _. _ _. . ..

,3

PEAR TTEE Pirogress Energy Floridn, Inc. PA FILENUMBjER: F'L-A01'9,6'0,-006'-I'WBIMR, FACILITY: Crystal River EnergyjComplex Discharge: Limitations Monitoring Requirements Parameters (units) Monthly Daily *Daily Monitoring: Sample Sample Average Maximum Minimum Frequency pe Point Specific - Report Quarterly In-situ EFF- I Conductance- EiF-2 (MHOICM ____________ ____ __

Oil and Greasee -Report- Quarterly: Grab EFF-1 (MG/Ly -__EFF-2 Nitrogen, Nitrate, Report, Quartejiy Grab, EFF-I Total (as-N) EFF-2 (MG/L) ____ ___

Chloride (as C1) Report: - Quarterly Grab EFF-I (MG/L) _-_____ ___EFF-2.

'Cyanide; Total Report. -- Quarterly Grab EFF-i

'(MGIL,) EFF-2

.Alpha, Gross -- Report .. Quarterly -Grab . EFF- I

.Paticle Activity EFF-2

,(PCIL). ____ ___

Radium 2261+ Report- - - Quarterly Grab, EFE,-

,Radium 228, Total EFF-2 (PCI/L) ....

Antimony;,Total: - Relort- , Quarterly 'Grab" EFF-1 Recoverable EFF-2

,Arsenic, Total 'Report -- Quarterly Grab,: EFF-l RecoVerable EFF-2.

(UGAL) .... _ _

Beryllium,Total -- Report - Quarterly Grab E:FFili Recvyerable EFF-2 (UG/L). ____ ___

,Boron, Total -- QuartReport erly` Grab EFF-I Recoverable EFF-2

-MG/L)

.admium, Tota Report Quarterly Grab- EFF=l Recoverable EFF=2 Copper,.Total -- - Report, - Quarterly Grab- EFF-RJecverable EFF-2 (MG/LY ___ ___ _________

Chromium,-Total Report. - Quarterly: Grab, EFF-I Recoverable. EFF-21 (MGL)'

-4

PERPMITEE: Progress'Efergy Florida, Inc, PA, FILENNUMBER. FLA016960-006-4WBIM FACILITY: Cr(ystaiRivyer Energy Complex Dischafge Limititions Moniitorinig Re-qurfi~ets-Parameters (units) Monthy Dajy Daily Monitoring. ..Sample Sample

, Average Maximum Minimum Frequency Typve Poinit Iron, Total - Re'prt' :Quarterly 6r4b EFF! I

Recoverable' 'EFF-2

.(MG/ILI)____

_____ ____ __

Lead; Totai Repoort Quarterly Grab, EFF-1 Recoverable. EFF-2 (UG/L)____ ____ ___ __

Mercury, Total -- Report -- Quaetrly Grab " IFF-Recoverable* EFF-2

(@G/L) '

Nickel, Tota Report -- Quarterly Grab EFF-1 Recoverabi EFF-2 (UG/LY ________ ________

Selenium, Total -- Report -- Quarertle Grab EFF-1 Recoverable" EFF-2 (UGfL) .

Sodium, Total Report -, Quarterly. Grab EFF-I Recoverable EFF-2

(MGIL))

_ _

Thallium, Tot1 Report - Quarterly Grab EFF-I, Recoverable EFF-2 Total Tii Report - Quarterly Grab EiF-i ReCoverableW EFF-2 (MG/)

_______ _ __ ____ ______ ________

2. Effiuent samples shall ibe taken at thebmonit6ring sitelocations t in LI.:'andasdegcribed below:

Sample Point Description0of Mon~itoring Location FLW-3 The sum ofFLW-1I andFýLW-2.

FLW-I The'sum'of all flows t :percolation'pond system :not including the FGD blow down.

FLW-2 'Flow from the FGD blow.down into-evaporation/pdrc6latiorponida#3 EFF-2 Effluent:fromnthe FGD treatment system. At-discharge pipe into,.

...... ______________ .evaporation/percolation pond,#3:

EFF-I At discharge pipe into the active pond, either the.East Pond.or West Pond.

Ponds will be rotated on a yearly basis, or as:necessary.

5

<PERMITTEE: Progress Energy Florida, Inc. PA-FILE!NMER:,' TFLA6O1660-06-I WB/MR" FAC ILITY: Cystal River Energy Complex sample~pPoint- Descriptibn:ofMonitoring Location OTH-i Staff gauge locatedin Ponia#!

OTH2- Staff gauge located-iriPond#2.

OTh-3 Stffgaugelocatedin Pond#3'

3. The permittee;shall cofitactvandrequstý authorizations from the.Department's Southwest District Office, prior to placing into service any backup/ ehergency ireatment system for the FGD blow down,. (i.e. 'Filter.press). The.

request shlall provide details and-specification for the proposed system and opertiona details along withe expected duratirin.

.4. All flow mneasitrement devices shall be calibiated' at least once eVery'.12 m6nths or based, onth e mianiufacturer.

requirements.

. W4ater leyels in ponds 1, 2,:& 31.shallbe recodedt weekly ohithe part :B DMRs. The:paitB DMRs'shall be, s quarterly inýaccordalnce to the schedulein.section I.E. I

,ubmted A OiherM*le*h*osof Disposai or.Recyciing 1., There shall be no discharge of indus~trial wastewatr fromrithis facility to. ground or surface wate rs', excepIt as.

authorized by this permit.

E. teri Limitations and Monitoringand Repoftin R uirenients

1. Monitoring requirements underithis permit aire effective onlthe first day of the second mont following peImit

.issuance. Until such: time, -the permittee shall continue to monitor and. report in accordancewith preiouslyi effectiye -permit requirements,if 'any. Duringthe period of operation authorized by this permitthe.permittee' shall ýcompl .eteand& submit to the Southwest Distri-ct Office Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) in accordance with ýthe-frequencies specified by the REPORT type (Lie,-monthly, toxicity, quarterly, semiannual,,

ainual, etc.) indicated on the.DMR.forms attached to this permit., Monitoring results foreachirmonitoring period shall be.submittedinaccordance with the.associaied DMR dueddatesbelow.

REPORTType. MonitioringPeriod DMRDue Date.

on DMR_

'Montihly 6oToxicity 'firsi day of riionth - lastday of month :283'dayobf followii"i;nmoniA Quarterly J'anuary 1 - March 31 Apfril28

,April I - ,.June.30 JUly28 July.i - September 30 Qctober.28 I_'October.1 - December 31 January,28ý

,Semiannual Jailuary+/-l-June301 JUly-28 July. I -December 31 January.28 Annual January l.-'ecember.3 . , Jariua:28 DMRsshall be ,submitted foreach required monitoring period including mbioths':6f no:discharge.,

the permittee shall make copiesbofthe *attac'hed; DMR formi(s) Ind shall submitthe original completed DMR form(s) to the address spýcified beloW:(IPlease submit a0copy of the.DMRt.o the, SOuthwest District Office).

.6

PERMIITIEE:' pogressEiergy. Floqrda, Inc. PA ILE NUMBER:, FLA0169,60-006,IW /1 R FACILITY' Crystal River Energy Complex Ofiginalgsto: Copiesto:

Department of Environmetfil Potection FDEP-SouthweýtDistricit Wastewater Compliance Evaluation Section industrial Wastewater Programýý Mail Station 3551 Southwest Diitfict Office Bob Martinez Center 13051 North Telecom Parkway 2600 Blair Stone Road. Temple'TeriaceFL.33637,0926, Tallahassee, Florida:32399-240,0 Facsimile (813) 632-7662

2. Unless specifed otherwise in this permit, all repo*ts and hotifications required bythis permitý,includinkgtwenty-four hour notifications, shallbe~submittedto.or reported to the:Soiithwest District Office at the address specified below:

Southwest District Office 13,051 N51h Telecom Parkwgay Temile Terrac0, FL"063702026 Phone Number - (813). 632-7600 FAXNumber - (813) 63247662 (All FAX-copies shall be.followedby, original copies.)

3. All reports and oth[er information shall be signed iccordancewithrequiiements 6fRle62620.305ý F.A.C'-

4. Thefperrnittee. shall provide..safeýaccesspoints,,for-obtaining representative samples which are requiretdby this permit..

5., If thereisno discharge~f'om the ona day scheduled .for samplingj.the~sample 'shall be c11ected;on the; ofacility day-of the next discharge.

6. Any bypass of thet*r atment facilityiwhich.is~not.,includdinithe mOnitoring specified"inSectiohsl.'A, I.B,*I:C, or Ib, is to be, monit6red f6r. flow.andi¢ftMoter requiredoparan.eters. For pvaraeters other thzanflow,, atleast one grabsgample'. per day/shall beemonitored...,Dailyflgw. shall be monitored or ^estimated,, as, approphiate,.to obtain reportable data. All monitoring results shall be reported on the appropriateDMR.

II. Induistril Sludge/SbfidsMaiag'iMen Requirements

1. The m ethod odf slu~dgeslids use 'rdscsal by thiisfacilityi ls rIoi at adil

-2. The. permittee shall be responsible for piroer treatmet, manaI sludges/solids, [62-62,0.'320(6)]g

3. Disposal of.sludge/solids in al solid, Waste management facility permitted by: the Department shall be in.

accordance.withthhe requirementsiofChipt&r;62,70l*, F.AC..

4. Storage,,transportation, and ýdisposal'ofi.sludge/salids charicterized :ashazardous ,wate shall -be in accordance

,withthe requirements of Chapter .62 730,,F.A.C.

5. the permiftee.shal. marintain records availabe. forinspection Iby theDepartment at the permitted facility, as, follows:

a. Quantity of sludge/solids generated;.

b: Quantity of sludge/solids.minsp'oted forttreatmentand/dr disposal;

c. 'Name and location of the:site(s) to which sludge/solids is'transported;

PERNMITTEE:. Progress Energy* Forida, Inc. PA FILENUMBER: FLA01696006-IWB/MR FACILITY: Crystal River Energy Complex

d. If 'a pers9n other than the .permittee is responsible for sludge/solids 'transportation; :treatment, and/or disposal,Ahe permittee shall also keep records.of the name and address ofech transporter, andcopespf all shippjing manifests.

[62-620.-320(6)].

Il1 Giound Wi'ter Monitoring Requirement A. Construction Requirements 1.- The peftittee-shall give.af'least 724h6urs notice to the-Deprtrntfits Southwest-Dis*ict Officd, prior to the installation of any monitoring wellsdetailed in this permit.

2. The QUARTERLY s;anmpling and analysis of all new, ground water monitoring wells shall begin upon proper completion of the GWMP well system in-accordance .with condition II.B. I. Themvells shall be sampled for the parameters identified in Permit Condition IIIB1.3 and in accordane to theiDepartmerit's..Sý"adard Operating Procedures-For Laboratory Operatiois and Sample Collection' Activitieý," .DEP-SOP-00i'/01, FS 2200 Ground watefrSamplingJanuary"1, 2002.

3. Prior to construction of!-newgrounid water-monitoringwells, a'soilboring'shall be made'ateach new*monitioring Well 1ocationiii order to-establish the well depth andhscreen, intervaIl.

4. Withinmthirty,.days after completion of constructnioinoflthe- ground-watermoiitbrihg ,Wells, a-properly, scaled figure depiig monitor welllocations (activeand abandone)with identificationinumlers shall.'be submitted.

The figure shall also include, (or attached) the, monitoring-:well, top of casing and- ground surface elevations referencedf to Nationa Geodetic Vertical Datum INGVD) Vnearest to he 0.1 foot, along withz monitoi well

'location-latitude and iongit-ud etothe nearest 0.1 second.

5. Wiihin-'thirt daystafter completion -of construction- ofthe ,groundwaterý monitoring.,wells, well completion

-eports shall besent ,to tfie Industrial Wastewater Section,,FDEP Southwest District Office. The information is to :be submitted on the attached form :for each well, DEP. Form *62-522:906(3), Monitor Well Completion

'Report.

6. In Districts where applicable,-witih 30 days0of completionof co.nstfrution-of new ground water monitor:wells, the.Departmenfrequests that the permittee submitthe following'informationifor eachliionitor well:

a. A' copy 0fthe Florida.Water ManagementDDistrict -(WMX)),

'State. of Florida Permit Application to Construct, Repair, Modi' or Abandona .Well,.Form 41.10-41:0(1), :and

b. Acopy oftheWM1D Well Completi6nReport, Form 41'10-41'0(2),62-610.412(2)(b),

B. Operational Reiquirements

1. During the peri0dof operation authorized'by ihis pcfi-it, the permiiiee-shll. continue tosaifnpje-ground waterzat the existing monitoring wells identified in iteml I.B:2'below, in accordance with ihis permit and the approved

groiund waterimonitofinngplan 'prepared ini bccodaficewith Rulez62-522.600'F.A.C ,.Withiný90 days of.placing the, new or modified ekstewater facility into operation, or installationi of-rnew mioinitoring, well§;-whichever occurs sooner, the permiitee shall begin sampling ground water at-the new-monitdrin-g Wells identified in item III.B.2 below, in accordance with this permiiit and the approved ground wate-r-ronitoringplan.

8

PERMITTEE: Progress Energy Florida, Inc. ,PA:FmE-NUMBER:. FLA0169660-006-IW FACILITY' CrysialrRivef Energ*Complex

2. The following monitoring wells shall be sampled for Land :Applichiion System G-001:

Monitoring .Alternate Well Namne and/or Depth Aquifer ,New or W ell ID Description of Monitoring.Location (Feet) M6nitOred . Extihg MWB-30 Background'Well 20 Upper Floridan, Exi ings-MWC-l rComplianqeeMonitorinWell 20 Upoe'Flofididid , Eiditiifig.

MWI-2R2 'IntermediatedMonitor Well _ UppefFl6fidaii4 Existing-MW1i-7R IntermediateMonit6iVWell (Reloceated) 20 Upti Flbiida--- Exifiiiing i MWC-12R Cofmpliaice Monitoi Well 20 Upper Floridan, Existi MWC-16' Compliance MonitorWell l21. Upper Floridan tE*dsiing.,

MWC-21R. :Compliance Monitor Well 20 Upper'Floridan* Exitirmg

.MWC-27 ComdpianceMonitor-Well i 33 Upper Floridan EXisting::,

AMWC-28-,.. .Compliance-Monitor Well - 20 Upper Flda xigtin MWC-29. Compliance Monitori Wll i20 Up~iFldfidafi Exting.,

MWC-IF2T ComplidankeMNitor Well 14 . UpperFlorid , Existing,'1 MWC-31 ... ComlianceMonitr:Well 20 . Upper. Fjordan, .Ne ,

MWBi= Background,--;MV = Intermedit*.MWC = Comiipliaince; MWP *-Pie+/-ometer

3. Themionitor welis specified in Condition I[IB.2shall' besample for theparameters listed~below:

P~aran~ietrNime -mplii--e- Units -Samp, le M...i ring We. . jit., "Type _ Frequency, Radium 226,and 22.8 5A.0PCI/L G'raMb Quaeiyr Copper,Tbtal '-,Repiort- 'MG/L Gr'b Quarterly Recoverable..-.... .... .. . . ......

,Chlofrijle(as-Cl) , Report MG/L Grab Quartrly

.In,oiTalReoverable- Re .. MG/L Grab Quarterl y

-Nitrogen,,NitiatejTdtal, 10.0 MG/L, , Grab .. QUarerly (isN) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

pH* Reprt, SU Grab Quarterly ..

Sodiumi Total 160 MGiL/ .Grab Quarter!y .

Recoverable. , ..

_____. .... - , , - ,

Solids, Total Dissolved. Reportý. MG/b Grab Quarterly

.(TDS) _ _, .___... * .

Specific Cohdu6tanc#* 'keport MAHOS/cM ,In-situ, .Quarterly:"

Turbidity*ý Report NTU In-situ. Quarterly Water Level Relativelto Report' FEETA Ins itu " Quailely-NGVD Alpha, Gross Particle 15.0f PCI/L Grab Quarterly Activity Aitimony, T`tal 6.0 " UG/L Grib- Quately Recoverable Arseniic,'Total 10:0 UG/L Grab Quarterly

_

Recoveiable' Boron, Ttail Re*pt MG/L GiAb .Quare'rly Recoverable_

9

PERMITTE: Pro*gress Energy Florida, Inc. PA FMlE NUMBER: FLA016960 -0060-IWBI FACILITY: Crystal Riyer Energy Complex ParameterName Compliance 'Units Sample Monitoring Well Limit , _'_ Type Frequency Barium, Total, 2.0 MG/L 'Grab Quarterly ,

-Recoverable' __'__

Berylliur, Total' 4.0 UG/L .Grib&QFite&..

Recoverable. .

Cadmiumý TotalO. 5.0 UG/L Grab. Qiiiteflyl

RecbVerablek __.,__.... ...

iMercuryTotal. 2.0 UG/L, Grab .Quiarterly Rec6veiab! .

Selenijii;,Total %500 UG/L Grab Quarterly Recoverable Chromium,, Total 100.0 UG/L Grab 'Quarterly Recoverable Lead, Total Recoverable 15.0 UG/L Grab

.. uarrly. .

Nickel, T6tal f00.0 UG/L Grab Quakterly Recoverable" .

ThalliiumnT6,!l' T2*.a20 'UG/L " 7Grab. Quarterly Recoverable Oxygen, Dissolved Report MG/! JrIn;situ Quarterly (DO)* _ _ _ _ _ __......_ __......

Zinc, Total Recoverable Report .MG/L ,Grab Quarterly Flu6ride, T.al (as*F) Report MG/L Girab! Quarterly"

.Cyaiide', Tdtal. 0.2 MG/L Gihb Quarterly Temperatire,:Water* e ,F In-situ .Qurterly

The ,field parameters-Olhall be sampled per DEP-SO-l00l/01,. .S2200 Groundwater SarApling,-,Figure FS 2200-2 Groundwater.'Purgging Procedure and~recorded-onI Form FD.9000-24, droundwater Saplinig log (both docubents attached to this6petmit)..The sampling logs shall be submitted with each groundwaterParUDDMR.

The field parameters to be rejofted on Patv'D of GW DDMR- shall be the last sample recorded on FD99000-24.

4. For :theland appli i*ti sste'fo - G-006l; all gi~ond ater quality criteria specified in Chapter 62520, F.A.C.,

shall :be met at the edge. ofthe zone ofdischrge. The zonie of discharge foribthis project isithe lateral extent-of the upland envirionment on'the property, whe giround water is discharging to thema'ine ehvironment.

'5, The permittee's discharge to-ground Water shall notlcause a wiolation ofwater quality standards forgfround waters at the boundary of the zone of discharge'in'accordanceWithRiules62-520.400 and 62ý520.420', F.A.4C..

,6. The permittee's discharge to ground water shall> not -cause~i violation'of-the zniihimmfic iteiia for'ground' water, specified in Rule,62-520.400, F.A.C.,"Within the.'7one of dischiage¢'

7. If the concentration for any constituent listed inPermit.C6nditionhll.B.3 in'the natural background qualityofthe ground water is. greater thin, the' stated ,1haxinim , or in.the-tcase 0f-'pH is also less than:the:minim-unm the' representative. background quality shall be the prevailing'standard.

.8. Water levels shall be recorded pri"r to evacuating the -well for sample collection- Elevation references shall inciýet-h* top ofthe'-well casing'and land surface ateachwell site (NGVD allowable)ýat: ailrecision of plus or minus 0.01 feet.

-9. Girund .watermnitnritng wells shallbepurged priorto samp ling 0t.obtain arepresentativesamprle.

10

PEIMvT*EE-, Progress'Energy Florida,.Inc: PA FILENUMBER: FLA01,6960-006-IWB/MR FACILITY: CrystallRiver, Energy Complex 10: Analyses: shall, be. conducted on unfiltered samples; unless. filteredý samples .have been approved by the!

Department as being more representative, of ground water conditions.

11. Ifa'monitoiihg -well: becomes, damaged or'cannot be sampled for some reason, t!heper.mitte.e-shall:notify the:

Department immediately and, a written report shall follow within -seven days detailingthe circumstances and'

'remedial measures taken or proli0oed. Repair or replacement ofmonitoringwellsýshall beapproved in advanceý by the Department.

12. AllHpiezometars and'monitoring wells not part ofthe approved groundwater monitoring: plan are.to be pluggedi and abandoned.inaccordance with Rule 62-532.500(4);F.A.C., unless there iiksiiht firlheier future: use.

13. ,Ground,.water monitoring test .-results shall be submitted on Part D of DEP Form 62-620.9010(10) (attacbed) anrd

.shall be submitted to the address specified ,in.l.3.- Results. shall be.submitted:-with ,the-DMR fireach, month fis-ted. in the following schedule.

SAMPLETPERIOD A..

REPORTDUEMDATE, JanuT - March April128.

April - June July.28.

Julj -- September Octoberf28 Octb6er :-December Januar*y*28 IV. Other Land ApplicatinO' Requfiements L Thiiusctionifis not aplicable to:this facility.

V. Operation:and aiMhinienancel Requrements A., Tratmeiit aidDispesal Faicilities

1. The :p6eriittee&shall ensiuire'that-,.(the, operiation 6f this facility isa*s described iwnthý applicatiIon and .supporting documents.

2. The operationof the:pollution-'cintrolfcilitiesdesciibed-in this perimitshall be underýthe-supervision of a-person

,who is qualified by-formal training and/6r piracticailexperience in the-field of Waietrpollution control.

,B. RecOrd keeDin Requi-emeints:

I.Tezpermittee shall;maintain.the f6illoig recirds on the site of the permhitted facilityanid niike'themava'l'able

.for inspection::.

a. Records.of ill compliance monitorig ififormation,:including all calibration and maintenance6ecords and-all, original'strip;chart.recordings for- conftinuous monitoring-instrumentation,*ijicluding,if applicible, a .copy of 7the laboratory.certificationshowng.the certification:number-of the laborat6ry, for 'at'.least three yeats fromt

.the date the sam pe: or, measurement was ,taken;-

b. Copies-of all reports, other than~those required in items a..and f, ofthissection;require by the permit fof atý,

least three years 'from the date the-report was prepared, unless otherwise specified by Departmento rule;

c. Records- of all data, including reports and.documents used to complete:the application for Ate permit..fr:at least three years'from the date the application was filed, unless otherwise.specified byDepartment-rule; d; -A copy of the current permit; 11.

PERMITTEE: Progress Eneirgy Florida,-Inc. PA FILE: NUMBER:: FLA016960-006-IWB/MR .i FACILITY: CrystalRiverEnergy Complex

e. A-copyof any requiredrecord drawings;

f. Copies of the logs and schedules showing plarii operations and. equipmpentvmainteniance. for threeyears from the dateonf thevlogs or schedule:

VI. ThSchedules 1'. The permit~teesihallýa~chieve ,cmomli~ance. with the other conditions of this permhit as follows:

operational level attained Issuance ,Date of permit

.2. No later than"14 calendar days following a date'identified intheschedule(s) ofcompliahce, the permilftee -shall

subaiit either a report of'irg'es's 'or, in the a*6seof soecific ictions -being requiied' y an identified datej,a Written "hotice' of compliance or no6ricompliance; :Iri the lafter: ,..the iotice shall include the ýcause. of noncompliance; any riemedial actions taken, ahd the probability of meeting theýiiekxt :schediiled-requirement.

3. A Best-Managerment Piactices. (BMP*I..an. shall be p"epared.and implemented, in.accordance with Part VII of this permit and the following schedule:

4. Thefollowing implementation steps shall be completed in acobrdýce.withtlihe f16ling-sc6hedule.

Implementation Stepsý Scheduled Completioni Date

'Installition of a staff gauge in p6nd'#1, pond #2 and Within hinety (90) days of revision evaporatio/percolation pond #3 - date.

.otifySthe Department when. irstallationof the staff h t ' y er 2 gauges is completed'. installation. .

The permittee shalllnotify'the Departmenit.when the-Flue 3 GasDesulfuriztibn, s~shtem (FGD)will'.be.`placed into Pr operationi. strtup.

-Installation of the proposed groundwater m6nitoring Within niriety (90) days of revision

,Well MwC-31 date.

12

PERNUTTEE' Progress EnergyMFlorida, Inc. PA FIE-NUNBER:. ELA016960Q-006.IWI MR FACILITY:. Crystal River Energy Complex

5. In accordance ,withsections:403 .088(2) (e) and,(f),F.S., a compliance schedule. for this facility is contaned in Administrative Order AO1 14-SW that is hereby incorporated by r'eference.

VII. Other Specific Conditions A. Specific Conditions Ayblicablet All Permits I. Drawings, plans, documents or specificationss6bmitte*d by thepermittee, notattached hereto; butretained onfile at the.Souýtwest Di.strictOffice, are made a,parth:ereof:"

Where required bylChapter 471 (PE.E) or-Chapterq492(P;G.).F.S., applicable pottionsof reports to0be'subrfitted under this permit, shall be signed andsealed bythe professional(s) who prepared them.

3. This permit, satisfies Industrial Wastewater program permitting requirements.s:only and 'does not-.authir-ize operation of thisfacility.,prior to obtaining any other-permits required by local, state or federal agencies.

4. The permiftee shallprovideerbal notce. _Departmnas o as practicaliafler discoyeriyof asikhole within an area for the management, or application of wastewater or -sludge. The: permittee shall immediately implement measures appropriate to. control the entry of contaminants, and shall detail these measures to the Department in a written rebort within 7days'ofthe sinkhole discovery.

&. Sbeeific Conditi6ns Related. to Consict ion This section is'.not applicable to'this facility 7C. Duty to Rea66lY 1: The permittee shall apply for renewal of this ,permit attleast180 :days before the. expirationdaie:ofthe periit usng the aproprittelfOmslisted in.Rule 62-620.910,,F.A.C., including submittal:of the approiateprocssing fee set forth in Rule 62-4.050, F.A.C. The existing pet-mit shall-notexpire until the Depaent has taken' final action on th-eapplication-renewal in accordance with the'provisions of,62-620:335(3) and (4), F.A.C:

D. Snecific:ConditiosRelated toksEi"tin .ManufactUrin*ý.Conm.rcialMinilipandSilviculture

-Wastewater Facilities or Activities I. Existingmanufactging, commercial, mining, and.siiviculturalvwastewater' facilities oractivities that sdichaige.

into'surfacewaters shallnotify' the Department as soon as.they know or have reason tobelieve:

a. That any, activiity has occurred or xilloccur which .would.result intie dischage,,;on a~routine or frequent-basis, of'ny toxic pollutantwhich is, not limited.in~the:permitif that discharge will, exceed the highest ofthe followiniglevels (1) One hundred micrograms pertliter,

(2) Two hundred micrograms per liter for. acrl ir and acylonitrile, five hundred.micrograms per ltrfor 2,4,dinitrophenoland for 2-methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol; and* one milligram per.liter for:antimony,.or (3) Five timesthe maximum conentriation value reported'for that pollutanit in th'epermi!Application.

b. That any activity has§ `occurred or will occur which-'wouiild result' .inany discharge,.0n a hon-ioutine or infrequent basis,.Mof a toxic pollutant which-is hot limited in the.,permiftý if that discharge. will exceed the highest of the following levels (1) Five hundred microgram -sperliter, (2) One milligram ?per-liter foi antimony*,'or, 13

.PER*MTTEE: Progress Energy FlIorida,:Inc. PA' ILENUMBER:!. FLA016960z006-IWB/MR FACILITY: Crystal River Energy Complex (3) Ten' times the maximum concenifrition value reported for. that p6lluant,in the permit application.,

E. Specific Conditions Related to Best Management Practices

1. BMP Plan' For purposes of this part, the: terms "pollutant" or "pollutants" refeiio -any ubstance listed astoxic under Section 307(a)(1)" of the., Clean Water Act (the 'Act"),"bil,as defin'ed in' Sectiofn'31H(a)(1) of the Act,and adiy'substance listead as hazardous under Section 311 'of 'the Act. The'periinittee 'sihallý. develop and implement- a 'Best Management Practices (BMP) plan which preVehts, or minimizes, the potentialfor the ielgea6f pollutants from ancillary activities, incldding'ftiaterial Istorage afes'; .'plant site'trmof-, ini-plant transfer, process an'd&material handling areas; loading:and.unloiading operations; arid sludge ,and waste dsposal areast,tothewaters 0ofthe State through plant site runoff- spillage or leaks; sludge or waste-disposal; or drainage from rawmatierial st6rage.

,2. mplementation:

The BMP' plan- shall tbe.,developed;and implemented in/accordance with the schedule cOntained-in Part VIof this permit.

3. General Requirements:

The BMP plan shall:

a. Be documented in narrativewfornm and shall include any necessary, plot plans, -drawingsor maps.

b. Establish.specific objectives for the control of polluiants.

(1) Each facilit",#coniponeno' 'system shall be examined for its potential 'or causing a release of signif icant amounts of pollutanits to Waters of the Stite due to ,equiPmenft .filure, improper operation, natural pheii6me*a'suchlas rain 6frisnowfall,:'etcý

(2) Where expefiehce indicate's a re'asonable. potenialtfr eq"uiipment fajiluie; (e.g.*,'*a tank overflow. or leakage), natural conditions .(eig;,'precipiiAti6n), orothercii6umstances.toresult,,inisigifi canýtamounts of pollutants, reaching.surfaceýWateýrs, the' plan should iiiclhdeý,pýredictioni ofitheldieioi"n, rate*offlow,

'andltotal quantity.of pollutants"which could be discharged from the facility as a result of each condition or circumstance.

c. 'Establish specific: best managementt pactices'to meet the 'objectivesjIdentified under paragraph.(b)Wof.thisý subsection, addressing. each :component or .system capable of 'causing a release'of signifibantvamounts of 0Pllutan6, io the waters of theiSiate; alrd identifyrig', specific .pre'ventative: or remedial measures *t0 be implemented,

'd. Be reviewed by plant engineering staff.and pWantmanagerq

4. D6cUmernittion:,

Th'e, perniiime shall maintainithe BMIP -plan at the.facilityýand shall make-.the.plan available to the Department upon request.

.14

PERMITI7EE! ProgressEnergy~Flo6ida, Inc, PAFENUMBER: F*LA016'604-6O-IWB/MR

'FACILITY: .Crystal River Energy Complex

5. BMP PlanhM dificatin:,

The permittee shall ameiend the BMP plan whenever there is a change in the:faci!ity or change inthe operation of the fucilitywhi

teally !ibcreases the potential for the ancillary, a-tvities to result in a discharge of significant amounts of.pollutants.,

6. Modification forIneffectiveness:

If*t* BPfplanprovesto eiineffective in achievigthep generalnobjectiveofpreventing the release of signifian

.anountsiofpolutan*ts to surface:waters and theispecific :objectivesand requirements under pa gph (b)and (c) of:itemý,3,thepeFr.it tstomodian pursuant to nire 62-620.325,F.A.C.to C4,Js6'besubj inoprtrevised BMIP requirements.

F. Reopener Clause.,

1. The.permit shall be, revised,, or:altematively,,revoked and reissued inraccordance with the-pfoVisions contained in Rules62-620.325 and 62ý620.345, F.A.C., if applicable, or-to comply with any applicable effluentstandard orlimittion issued or approvqedunder Sections 30i(b)(2C) nd.(D),d304)(2) 307()(2)

Jd of.te lean Water Actf(the:Act), as amend!edif the effluent standardsflimitation*,or.water .quglity.-stai*dards:so.issued or approved:

a. Contains different conditions or is otherwise more stringenthan any.conditioniipthepermit/or;

b. Controls ay p6llutant'notiaddressed in the permit.

The pernit as' revised0orireissuied under thiS paragraph shall'also contain any other requirementst0f the Act then applicable.

2. The ermiit iay be"'reopened to adjust effluent limitations, or monioriing requirements should future Water Quality Based Effluent Limitation';de6tminations,.water"qu a"lityilsiudies, DEPapproved changes in water, quality standardsior other information show a need fora differentlimiitation ormionitoringrurequiment.

3. The Department may deyelop aTotal Maximumi :Daily Load (TIMDLA)duringrthe life of TMDL has been establishedand adopted by rule, the Department'shall ievise this permitto.incorporate .Once ,,e~permit:

a the final findings of theTMDL.

VIII. GeneralýConditions-

1. The terms, conditions, requirements, limitations and restrictions set forth in -this; permit iire binding and enforceable pursuant-to Chapter403, F.S. Any permit noncompliance'constitutes a violation of Chater 403, F.S., and is grounds for,.enforcement action, permit termination,permit.revocatfiponand reissuanc ,e,,.or-perhiit revision.,[62-6202610O(1), F.A.*C.] " .

2. This permii iswvalid only for.the specificprocesses,fandoperations applied for and indicated iin:the approvqed drawings or ekxhibits., A'ny unauthorizeddevieation .from 'the .approed drawing 'exhibits, specificatios Or conditions of ihis permit.sonstitutes grounds ,for.revocationandý enforcemenit action :by ,the .Department. [62-620.610(2),F.A.C.]

3. As provided iinistbsetion 403'087(7);, F.S.; the issuance'of this-permitdoes not conveyanyyested rightsorany exilusive privileges. Neither does:..it authorize.,any injur to iublicýor'privateprperty orpay invasion of personalrights, nor authorizerany.infinrgements of federal, state,; ortlocal laws or regulations; This peritis t 15

PERMITIEtE: Progress'Eeregy Florida, 1c'. PA FILE NUMBER: FLA016960-'006-IWBIMR FACILITY: Crystal Rver Energy Complex a waiver. of or-approval of any-otherDepartmnent permit or.au.thorization that:may bereqtiirefd'fbr otli arspects of the total project which are not addressed in this permit. [62,-620.610(3), F A..C].

4.. Thispermit conveys no title to. land, or.water,, does n6t constitute state-recognition or1acknowiedgmentwof title, and does not constitute: authority for. the use of-submerged landstunless herainhprovided and the-,necessary,ýtitleor leasehold'inserests-have been obtained from the State. Only the-Trustees of the Intemal,,Improvement Trust Fund may express State opinion as to title. [62-620:610(4);,F.A:.C]

5. This permiit.ddes not relieve the perinittee fromoliability and penaltiis' for -harm or njuiry-tbhurfan health or wielfare,:,'anirx 6c-pian life, Obr)~ropeij:caied ~t~-he6-c6nstuctitii 6r*0peration of this permitted source; nor Adis, it.aillo4Wthe p`rmittee'to causep6iluftion in c6nfitravefntion of Flofida Statutes ahd Departnient rulesý, unless specifically authorized by an 6oder fromi the Dopirtifient. The permittee 'shall take4all r'easonable steps to minimize or preventariy discharge, -reuse of reclaimed ýwater; or residuals 'use or disposal in Viblatin "ofthis permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affect*ng:human health or the envir6nnient: :It shall.iotfbe a;defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary 'tb0 halt or reduce the

pemitteda aciVity'in order.to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit..[62-620.610(5), -FA: C.]

6. Ifthe permiftee :wishes to.continue an aciivity reg'ulated by-this permitaxfteri its, expiration date, hje*,permittee shall apPly for'and obtainLa~new permit. [62&629.610(6),FA. C].

7. The eprmitteeshall atall! times properly operate anrd maintain the facility, and systems oftreatment and-control, and related'appurtenances, that are installed -and'usedby, the permittee:toachievecompliance with the conditions of this permit. This provision includes theýoperation of backup or,auxiliary facilities or, similar syslems when necessary to maintain or-.achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit: [62-620.6 0(7), F.A.. ..

8. This permit `may.'be:modified, revoked- and reissued;. or terminated -for.cause.. The filing of-airequest by the 0permittee for-a.permit revision,. revocation and reissuance, or termination; oif a notification of planned -changes

.oranticipated no0ncompliance doesint stay any permit condition. [62-620.610(8), FA.C]

9. Thdepermitte,*by 46cepfing this perniitsp'cificaly'agree's toaflow-authorized Departmeni personnelin6luding.

an *authorized r'epresentative, of the Department "and authorized EPA personnel,. when applicable: upon presentationotf credentials0or other documents as may be requiird by- law,, and at reasonable tiines, depending

.upon the natureof the ýconceribeing investigated, to - -

ii* -Enteruponthe permittee's premiseswhere&a regulated faCihtyg.system, orIactityis locatedor conducted, or where records.sh*ll be kept under theconditions of this permit;

b. Have accesstoand copy anyTrcords that shall be kept under the"c.nditions.f this.peit,'

C. Inspect the facilities, equipment,-practices, -or operations regulated or required under:ihis perit; and

d. S ample, or-monitor any substances or'parameters at,-any location- necessary 1to assure compliance with this permit oriDepartment rules. [62-620.60O:9), F.C.].

10. Ink accepting'this permit, the permittee understands and: agrees that al.records, notes, monitoring data,,and.other iniformaiion relating io the construction or operation of this-: permitted source.which ;a9 submitted to the Departmentitmay be used:by the-Department as. evidence iz any enforcement case involving the permitted source *

.arising.inder -the-Florida, Statutes or Department -tiles; except as such use -is proscribed by Section 403.1i.1, Florida Statutes,;o-.ZRule 62-620.302, F.A.C. Such evidence'shall-only be used 'to the extenitthat it'is consisient With the&Florida:Rules-of Civil Procedure and,applicable evidentiaky rules. [62-620,610(10),"F..*C.]

11. When ,uested by the Department, the perimittee shall-ýithin a, reasonable time provide any'iniformation

required by' la1w which is' needed :to determhine-whether there is-cause for -revising, -*e'vokinrg and reissuing, or terminating this permit,.or to- determinIe ,ompliatnce. with theiperinit.-Thlae'ýpermitite shall also' prvideto :the Departmeifitupon request copies of records required by this permit.to be kept. .If.the permittee becdmes awaie

~I6

PERMI TrE: Progress Energy, lor ida, Inc. PAFILTENUMBEL: *FLA016960-006-IWB/NM FACILITY: Crystal RiverlEnergy Complex of relevanti.facstat -were inot *submitted, or-.were.incorrect in the ;permit aplication orinaycreport to the Db epmt, such fints, orinformation shall be promptly submitted 'or coriectiots promptlyreportedý to the Department [62-620.610(1), FA.C]

12.. Unless specidfkally sitatedrotherwise in Department; rules, 'the permittee,, in accepting'. this permiitagrees to comply wihchangesin !Department;rsiand daStatues after a reaWnabl:time.*for compliance;.MroVided however, he iperieedoes notawaive.any other, rightsgrantdby Florida Statutes or Depa ent rules. A reasonaible time for, complianice with a.-new or amended surface ýwater qu*alt' s;pdardj,,qther thia those Standards addrssedin.Rule 62-302.500,FA.C., shall incluae axreasonable timeto obtain or be denied a mixing z6ne fo- the new or'amended stadard. [62-62010(12); F.A.c..

413 The permnittee,- in accepting this p6rmit,4agrees to-pay the, applicable regulatorY program, and surveillance feer.i*n accordan-cewiith Rule 62-4.052, F.A.C. f[62'620.610(13),F.. .]

14. T:TisIpernit isftrAnsfabl,6foly; upon D'pa entapprval in a*ccoidance with Rule 62-*60.340, FA..C.' The permittee 'shall be *liable forýany" noncomplia'nce activity until tel Deprtent aofrth'eperitted approves the

,tMnsfer. [62-;620 610(1#4), FAC.].C,'

1-5. The pernmittee shall give the.Departent wfitten ii6tice at least 60'days before'ifiactivation-o6i,rabando'n'ment of a wastewater facility andishall-speci6fyWhat steps will be taken to:safeguard public helthand safet ding and following.ýintivationor abandonment. J[62620610(l ) F'A.C]

16. The pernittee shall.apply fora: revision'to the;Department permit'n accordance with Re62620.300, F.A.C.,

and tthe" Department of EnvironmentalProteciion Guide 'to ýWastewlater :Permiitting at least 90 days before construction of any. lanned substantial modifications to the!ptermitted facility is to ommence6r with Rule 62-k620:k35(2.),JA.C, -forminor; modifications to -the.permtted4ýfacilityA reieprisa] ebe otined efr contrctin begnsexcepta provided inlRule 6-60.00 FAC.[2206(6) .C]-

17. The pernfiiee s4hiiae advan*ce notie to the Departmetofffany planned changes in the peitted facility or activity,wic ;may resu ii noncompliance ,with permitrequirement*. ,The permittee shAll'b responsible for any and all' damages. which may result .from'the chaes:and may :beSUbject to 'enforcement action by the Department fOr'peni*ies'or revocationof th*is permit. The notice shall incl~ude the followingi-rifrmation:

a. A-description f the'anticipated*noncomPliance;

b. T'heperiod':of the',anticipaioednonco6plia-nce including.dlatesad times; and

c. Steps being taken~to prevent fiitue occur~rdee~fthe noncompliance. [62462.0.6O(17),'A.C.]

18. Sampling and monitoring datashall beco611ed and analyzed~in' accordae with Rule 62-4246, Chapters62-160 and ý2-601, F.A.Cp,ind 40CFR 136,as appropiriate.,.

a. Monitoring results shallbe reportedat: the inter6vals. specified elsewhere iinthis :permitr'aid shall- be reported on a Discharge 'Monitoring Reprt'(DMR), ýDEP 'F6rm 62-620.910(,10), or,:,eis",specified elsewhere in the

.permit. . . .. "

b. Ifthe permitte.,monitors' any contaminate more frequenfly -thanrequiredby the -permiti: using Department approvedti~estýprocedures, theresulsfthis 'monitoring shallbecincluded in the 'calculati6nandreprting, of the data submittedin the DIMR.

c. Calcuations for0alllimitations which r'quiraveraging- measurements shalluse an arithmeticemean unless otherwisesipecified*in thisjpermit.

d. Exceptasspecifically providedinRule626.300,A.C.,qany laboratory *est required-by Ahisipermit shall be performed'by a laboratory thaIat h been certified by the Departmeit of HealthEnvironmental Laboratory CertificationPil gram (DOH:ELCP). Such ýcertification shalljbe for the matrix; testmethod and' a s) being measured t' compl, th'is peri* For dome stic wastewaer. faciliies, testingfor parameterselistd in Ruile 62-160.300(4).F.A.C., shall be conducfd uiidei the dir ecioi :fa cer"tfiedopertor.

.17

PERNITTEE Prog"ress-EneirgFy Floiidii, Inck*. PA.FILENUMBER: FLA616960-006-iWB/MR FACILITY: CistailRitver EnTergy Complex oe Field activities including on-site tests andsample'ýbliectionrshal follow theý'applicable.standard operatinig

,,ptroe6durepsdtksibed;iinDEP-SOP-001/6l adopteddby teferencei*.ýChapter,62160,F.A.,C.

f. Altemate field procedures and laboratory methods. may beý used where they have 'been approyed in accordance-with Rules,62--160.220 and 62-160.,330, F.A,.C.I[62-600.61,0(18), FAC]

1,9: Reportsofcompclianceor noncompliance 0rany, progress reports oini;.interim, d '(final 'requirements owit*

ýcontained in"an/ compliance schedul dwetied else here'iihthis permit sliallibe submitte&dno later than 14 days eyoliowingeachschdmulnedate d ed62-620.6(19),iF.A:C, .

26. Thepermiftee ,shall report to the Department's outhf"west DistrictOffice ýay .noncoml!iance-which may endgerhieialth or the environment.- Any information shallbe proidedoraiy Wihin 24'hours'sivm the timeAehe tpemite'bciiies Awareofe the circumstances. A writtnisiibmission shall also beiprovide&.within:five~days,of'

'the time'thepe'riittee becnmes aware of the c-"ir"cistin . The w.ritten submission shall cohtain::a description "of. the ndn'conipliance and 'its cause; the period of noncompliance including exact dates-and time, and if the Snonomp~liaieh'as'no~tbee correctedthe anticipated 6time iti9isexp~ected bto6oitinue;.aind, st-pstaiken.

ný&plannea

-.to r-educe; :elimfinate :and prevent recuirrence o f the'iioincompliance*. . ..

'a. The"followiig shall:be included'as'infoimation which mustbeiep6ortedWithii :24 houisunder thisýcnditioin:

,(i) *nyunanticipated bypass _whichi-causesahny reclaimed Waterbr, effluent to exceedany'ýperxnit'limitation

or resultsinuanupermitted discharge, (2) ýAny upset'wlhichcausesýanyrectaimned .waterorýtheefflentto:exceed any limitatio 'in the permit, (3) Violation of a maximum daily discrge' limitation for any'of"f thipollutantsbSpecifically'listed~in the pemi't for, such noti ce; and (4) 'An *unauthorizeddischarge.to~surfaceor groundwaers.

.,Oral repqortas requiredbythis subsectionshallbe-prpyided asf*ollws.:

(ij Forv:unauthorized -;releases, or, 'spillsk of untreated or, treated wastewater reported. pursuant' to s-ubparagraph a.(4) that aremin'excss.o f4,000,gallons-per, incident, or where infornationAindicates that, ipublicihealih orthe environimnent !willbe endangered, oral report shll be provided: to theDepartnt by calling 'te STATE WA NG POIN FRE'.TOLL BER,(800).320-051, as soon as:

Opraticalv butno0 laierthan 24 hour2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months s* fromthe time:the pemiiitee'becomes' aware ofthedischarge. ,Te:;

ýpermitt'ee, ,to.te'extenitkow, shl orvide'the following information toteSaeWrig Point:

(a)m'Nae;"addries, and'teleph6ne-nuiiber:ofprson reIportinIg;,

(b), Name,4address, antdtelephon6iiumber of permitteer orespoinsible person for6thedischarge; (c) Date,.and time of th'e discharge'and'statubsof discharge (ongoifgor ceased);

(d),, Characteristics of the Wastewater spiled*or released '(untreated*ortreated industrial:6r domestic wastewater);

(e)Fstimated amount of the dischage;.

(f) Location.gor address ofthe discharge; (g)1 Sourceandcauseof the,,discharge;.

.(h)I-,Whethertfteidischage was contained on-site, an**cleanup. actions'takenjto date;i

'.(i) Description of area af*ected by the discharge,. including namer Ofwater:body affectedif any; and

(j) Other'persons or agencies conatd.

.(2) r0al reports,-,not otherwise ýrequired to beproyided pursuantito subparagraph b*.) above, shall be

'.provided to Department's Southwest .Disict 0ffice witin 424 ho'ur from the time ,thelfpermittee-

.be comes aware6ff the'circumstances. "

,c If the 'raltrepoot' hAs, been .receiied Withihn.224ý,h0us, ýthe noncompliance has been correct&d*, and the.

rionompliancedid not eidasger healthor'tlie envronment,1 6e D*eartmen1ts Southwest District Officeshall

.waii6'.th written repoir, [622620.610(20),FA 'C.]

21. ThepPermittee shalreport all* inst 1ncesof noncompliance notfreported uder Condiions vIII.17., 18. and 19.,of this' permit'at the ttmemoihtoring reports aresubmitted.- This report shall contain the samefiformation required byConditionVIIH.20..of thispermit. [62-620:610(21):.F.A:C.]

18

PERMITTEE: Piogress Energy Florida, Inc. PAFILE NUMBER: FLA016960006-IWB/M FACILITY:- Crystal River Energy C6mplex.

122., BypassProvisions.

a. Bypas is prohibited, and the Department may take enforcehent action against a permhittee for bypass,ý unless

11tpermitteel affirmatively demonstrates.that:

(1) Byp.as*swas uavoidable to prevent lossiof iife;personal.injury, or severe-property~damageý, aid (2) There were, no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such ,as:the use of auxiliary t'eaitment facilities, retention of untreated wastes,: or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition! is mno. satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a. bypass' which occurred during, normal periods of equipment downtime or:preventative maintenance;ý and .

"(3) The permitfee subnittodnotices as required under Condiiiori VIII.22b. of this permit.

b. If ihelpermittee knows in advance of theneed for.a bypass, it shall, submit, prior notice to the Depariment, if possible, ateast.10'days before the date of the bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass within 24hours ofleaing abbut the bypass as requiied in tondition VIII.20f this perm. A notice shall include,4adescripiion of the by psand its cAuse; t period and times;if.the¢ bypass' has-nt beenocorrected,.the anticiPated time itis expected to continue; and thesteps taken orplAnned't0 reduce,-eliminate, and prevent recurrence! oftheibypass.

c. The Departmeht shallapproVe an anticipated'bypass, after considering itsý adverse effect if:the peimitee demonstrates that itwlil meetvthe three:conditions listed in Condition VIII.22 a.(1) through (3) of this permii.

d. A permittee may allow any bypass to'occur which'does not-causeredlaimed water6r effluent limitions to

!be exceedoedifit i~sfor essential maintehance'to assure efficient:operation. These bypasses are not subject to the proýisionof Condition VII.22.aý.through c.of this permit. [62-620.610(2?), F.A.C.]

,23. Upset OPrvisions

a. A permittee who, wishes to establish'the affirmative defense of upset. shall demonstrate, through properly signed contemporaneous operating logs, or other re!evrant evidencethat:

(1) An iupsetoccurred and thatthe permittee can identify the causes) ofthe upset;

,(2), The permitted facility was aqtthefime being properlypoperated; (3). The permittee:submitted notice of the upset as required in Condition VIII.20. of-this permit;ýand, (4) The permittee complied with any'remedial measures required under Condition VIII.5. of thispermit.

b; In any enf6ocemenit proceeding,,the burden of proof for establishing the~occurrence of an upset restsvwith the peirmitfee.

c. Before :an enforcement p'roceeding. is-instituted, no representation made during the Department review of a claim that: noncoriipliance'Was caused-by an u pset istfinal Agency action subjecito j udicial review.-

[62-620&610(23), F.A..]

Executed in"Hilliborough County, Florida.

STATE.OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Water Facilities Administrator Southw~est District 19

Progress Energy Florida, Inc. -Crystal River Units 1,2, & 3.

DEP File No. FL0000159-013-1W1S/NR Attachment 5 Updated CR 123 Process: Flow. Diagram

Crystal River Units 1, 2, & 3 NPDES Flow Diagram - FL0000159 Unit 3 Condenser & Heat Exchanger Non-Contact Cooling Water Nuclear Services & Decay Heat Non-Contact Cooling Water Unit 1 Condenser & Heat Exchanger Non-Contact Cooling Water Unit 2 Condenser & Heat Exchanger EFF-Of0 (494.64) Non-Contact Cooling Water Helper Cooling Treated FGD Blowdown D-OOH Tower - South EFF-9

( Flowpath 40....... Adtsnstef Flowp~ath Plant Industrial Wastewater Percolation

Exietkng Sample Point Pond System Overflow 0 Proposed Sample Point EFF-xx (40o.D)

(Max. Flow - >

--- -Ato.me to~swvuhwm .d

.z. a - r fm* trNs wowdm

.Oh, m4d..,MqWn.n eNft*VO hIM C

Progress Energy Florida,. Inc. -Crystal River Units 1, 2, & 3 DEP File No. FL0.000159-013-IWIS/.NR.

Attachment 6 CR-4&5 Clean Air Project Overview

CLEAN AIR PROJECT OVERVIEW TRAINING MODULE 1 GENERAL.OVERVIEW 1.1 FGD Operaton 1.2 SCR Operafion 2 PROJECTMODULES 2.1 Limestone Preparation

OperatingTheory kEquipment 2.2 Absorber

Operating Theory

Equipment:

2.3 Gypsum Preparation

OperatingTheory

Equipm~ent 2.4 Selective CatalyticReduction 0Qperating Theory

Equipment 2.5 Urea/Ammonia;Conversion

Operating Theor

l Eqmpment 1

1 GENERAL OVERVIEW The Clean Air Project consists of two (2) major systems: 1) Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) and 2) Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR). The purpose of the FGD is to reduce the S02 (sulfur component) of the boiler exit flue gas. The purpose of the SCR is to reduce the NOx (nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide component) of the boiler exit flue gas. Low NOx burners, S03 mitigation, coal pile liner, well water supply, access road modifications, and precipitator rebuild are all significant projects required to support the FGD and SCR project. This training module provides a general overview of the clean air project. Additional details are in the five specific PlantView training modules listed:

CA-1 Limestone Slurry Preparation CA-2 Absorber CA-3 Gypsum Preparation CA-4 Selective Catalytic Reduction CA-5 Urea / Ammonia Conversion Figure 1 is a snap shot of a fly over of the 3D model video link on this page. You can access this video by clicking on the link below the figure.

FIGURE 1 CR Clean Air Project Overview 2

1.1 FGD Operation Figure 2 illustrates the mass balance diagram for the entire FGD process. The RED line illustrates the flow path from limestone to gypsum, starting with #1 and ending with #19.

The FGD process starts with receiving limestone that is ground into a slurry product (calcium carbonate).

This is called the Limestone Preparation System. The limestone is used to quench the boiler exit flue gas while at the same time removing sulfur dioxide (S02) from the flue gas. This S02 removal occurs in the absorber module. Removing S02 is the primary function of the absorber module. The cleaned flue gas is then discharged to the atmosphere through the associated gas stack flue. The S02 that is removed from the flue gas mixes with the limestone slurry. The limestone slurry returns to the bottom of the absorber know as the Absorber Reaction Tank. Forced oxidation air is injected into the absorber reaction tank where "calcium sulfate", also known as "synthetic gypsum." is generated. Synthetic gypsum is commonly used to manufacture wallboard. The Gypsum Preparation System rinses and dewaters the synthetic gypsum for sale to a wallboard manufacturing company.

FIGURE 2 A a

1. osuawmrHefrt Mpe adm i l G luy a LSIfwk uPaft bfv MsmW

~

1.~~

MY ~

=swus ~ Lftndb go Jn Stakf Iuin ISI'eI

33. P hmy poinq

2) AborberIsl and3 a, Gypsum4 PreparaWONtion Faciity Generll speaking a limetonulodgad storage facility, service water system, Dibasic Acid (DBA) system, tank farm, and waste water treatment process are needed to support the FWD process.

3

1.2 SCR Operation Figure 3 is an illustration of the SCR system and gas flow.

Boiler exit flue gas enters the boiler economizer section. The flue gas temperature entering the reactor is critical to proper operation of the NOx reduction process. This operating temperature requirement is between approximately 630 - 7500 F. At low loads the economizer outlet temperature can fall below the lower limit (6300 F). During low loads, an economizer bypass duct and damper system will supply hot flue gas for mixing with the economizer exit gas to maintain the minimum flue gas temperature requirement at the reactor inlet. As flue gas flows out of the economizer, a baffle located at the economizer hopper outlet eliminates large particle ash (LPA) from being carried over and entering the reactor. As the flue gas flows from the economizer outlet to the inlet of the reactor, ammonia is injected into the flue gas stream. Static mixers are located downstream of the ammonia injection grid inside the flue gas duct to thoroughly mix the ammonia with the flue gas. Turning vanes are located inside the flue gas duct between the static mixers and the reactor inlet to provide even flue gas flow distribution through the reactor catalyst surface. As the ammonia treated flue gas flows through the reactor, it comes in contact with the honeycomb-type catalyst layers where the NOx reacts with the ammonia and is converted into nitrogen and water. This chemical reaction results in NOx reduction. The flue gas flow continues to the primary and secondary air heaters, precipitator, absorber and out the stack.

NOTE: The SCR process requiresan ammonia sourcefor NOx reduction. The ammoniasource comes from liquid Urea which will be delivered to the CR North site and converted to ammoniagasfor use in the SCR reactor.

FIGURE 3 D&4Sowia Seal Air Selective Catalytic Reduction (5CR) 4

2 PROJECT MODULES 2.1 Limestone Peparaaon Operatng Theory Figure 4 illustrates the Limestone Preparation system.

The purpose of the Limestone Preparation system is to receive and process limestone for use in the FGD absorber.

Limestone slurry (calcium carbonate) is needed in the absorber module operation as a reagent to feed the absorber reaction tank. Course limestone, - 2", is delivered to the CR North site. This material is unloaded and stored in a limestone storage building. This limestone is then conveyed to a crusher and crushed to -

W", and then conveyed to a limestone silo. From there the limestone is metered utilizing a conveying belt feeder and fed to a horizontal ball mill. The mill grinds the limestone to a wet medium to produce the desired limestone slurry. This slurry is a mixture of limestone particles, 95% passing 325-mesh product, and water that is - 26% by weight by solids. The slurry is transported and temporarily stored in a limestone slurry storage tank. A slurry feed pump transports the slurry to each unit's absorber reaction tank.

FIGURE 4 Unowbris From LigenBulling sell Mifl chasmer oyFe Slm'ry Pumps Equipment This system is a common system designed for Crystal River Units 4&5. Three (3) 74% capacity limestone milling system trains and associated equipment are provided. This capacity percentage is determined using design bases coal which is 5.5 LB SO2/MMBTU and both units 4 & 5 operating at continuous Overpressure Operation. The major components of the each milling train include the following: one (1) Limestone Silo, one (1) Limestone Rotary Feeder, one (1)Limestone Silo Weigh Feeder, one (1) Limestone Ball Mill with auxiliary equipment, one (1) Limestone Ball Mill Slurry Tank with Agitator, two (2) Limestone Ball Mill Slurry Pumps (1 operating, 1 stand-by), and one (1) Limestone Ball Mill Slurry Classifier.

5

2.2 Absorber OperatingTheory Figure 5 illustrates the Absorber Module and its associated equipment.

The purpose of the Absorber Module is to remove S02 from the boiler exit flue gas.

The absorber is designed to remove 97% of the S02 from the flue gas while burning 5.5 LB S02 / MMBTU coal. The absorber module quenches the boiler exit flue gas with limestone slurry by spraying the slurry downward as the flue gas flows upward, thus removing the sulfur dioxide (SO2) within the flue gas. The slurry that has absorbed the S02 within the boiler flue gas falls to the lower section of the absorber module referred to as the "absorber reaction tank." Compressed air, referred to as "oxidation air" is injected in the reaction tank. A chemical reaction occurs when the limestone slurry comes in contact with the flue gas sulfur components. Ultimately this happens again as the oxidation air is injected in the reaction tank. The result of the chemical reaction between the sulfur dioxide component in the flue gas, the calcium carbonate in the limestone slurry, and forced oxidation air is the formation of "calcium sulfate", known as "synthetic gypsum." A portion of the limestone slurry containing the calcium sulfate is continuously removed from the reaction tank and is dewatered to obtain a 90% solids product. This product (synthetic gypsum) is then used to manufacture wallboard.

FIGURE 5 mum* out Equqrmsnt One (1) 100% capacity Absorber Module and associated equipment is provided for each unit. The major components of each Module include the following: five (5) Absorber Recycle (recirculation) Pumps, each with their designated piping headers and spray distribution nozzles, one (1) Perforated Absorber Tray, two (2) levels of Mist Eliminators, one (1) Reaction Tank which is the bottom portion of the Absorber Module, seven (7) Reaton Tank Agitators, two (2) Absorber Bleed Pumps, two (2) Absorber Limestone Slurry Feed Pumps and two (2) Absorber Blowdown Pumps.

6

2.3 Gypsum Preparation OperatingTheory Figure 6 illustrates the Gypsum Preparation system.

The purpose of the Gypsum Preparation system is to support the operation of the Absorber Module by: 1) maintaining a chemical balance of the limestone slurry (calcium sulfate) within the absorber reaction tank, 2) prepare the slurry that is removed from the absorber reaction tank for sale as "synthetic gypsum." Calcium sulfate is also known as "synthetic gypsum".

As the absorber is in operation, a large percentage of the slurry in the absorber reaction tank is continuously removed. This slurry is rinsed and dewatered for use in the production of wallboard. For the gypsum to become wallboard grade, it is necessary to dewater the slurry to not less than 90% solids. As this process is taking place, a small amount ofthe solids within the slurry will become waste. This waste is discharged to the Waste Water Treatment Process.

FIGURE 6 FGOD FWSs FGO pA%

PWM T" Equipment Gypsum dewatering is accomplished in two (2) stages. 1) A Primary Dewatering System is the first stage of water removal from the gypsum slurry produced in the Absorber. The major component of this system is the Primary Hydrocyclone, which dewaters the gypsum slurry bleed stream prior to feeding it to the Vacuum Filter for further dewatering. 2) A Secondary Dewatering System is the second and final stage of the gypsum slurry water removal process. The major component of this system is the Vacuum Filter which removes water from the Primary Hydrocyclone underflow slurry.

7

2.4 Selective Catalytic Reduction Operating Theory Figure 7 illustrates the SCR system.

The purpose of the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system is to reduce Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) in the boiler exit flue gas.

The design basis for the SCR system reducing NOx is 90% from the NOx value achieved with low NOx burners installed. The nitrogen contained in fossil fuels combines with oxygen during boiler combustion to create thermal NOx. When released to the atmosphere, the NOx (NO - Nitrogen Monoxide, N02 - Nitrogen Dioxide) combine with available oxygen and water and forms nitric acid (HN03). The nitric acid returns to the earth in the form of acid rain, which is harmful to the environment. NO is the principal emitted NOx gas from high temperature combustion in air. N02 is the lesser of the two emitted NOx gases from high temperature combustion in air. Within an SCR, the NOx in the flue gas reacts with ammonia in the reactor catalyst layers to form harmless N2 (molecular nitrogen) and H20 (water). The N2 and the H20 remain in the flue gas as it passes through the stack to the atmosphere. The result is reduced NOx emissions.

FIGURE 7 Selective Catalytic Rehwictor Equipment The SCR is a component / system within the Boiler Flue Gas System and is located between the economizer outlet and the air heaters.

The SCR system includes one (1) 100% capacity Reactor, Catalysts Elements, Ammonia Injection System, Sonic Horns, Reactor Inlet Dampers, Reactor Outlet Dampers, Reactor Bypass Dampers, Economizer Bypass Dampers, Reactor Seal Air, Static Mixers and Turning Vanes.

8

2.5 Urea/Ammonia Conversion OperatingTheory Figure 8 illustrates the Urea /Amnimonia Conversion process.

The purpose of the urea and the conversion of urea to ammonia is to supply the needs of the SCR reactor and the S03 reduction system (AMM).

Urea is delivered by tanker, either by rail or truck, in a solution of 70%. While the urea tankers are on site, the urea temperature inside each tanker is maintained at approximately 1400 F utilizing plant auxiliary steam.

The 70% urea solution is pumped from the tanker(s) to the urea solution storage tank via a urea solution unloading pump. As the urea is unloaded, demineralized water is injected and mixed with the 70% urea solution to dilute the solution to a 47% solution. A urea solution transfer pump and heater provides continuous urea solution storage tank heating to maintain the 47% urea solution temperature at or slightly above 800 F, utilizing plant auxiliary steam. This same pump supplies the urea solution feed tank located at each units' hydrolyzer skid. The urea solution feed tank supplies the hydrolyzer. Utilizing plant auxiliary steam, the hydrolyzer converts the urea to ammonia gas of 28 - 38% ammonia concentration by volume. The ammonia gas in the two (2) 100% capacity SCR hydrolyzers, which are under pressure, supplies four (4)

Ammonia Flow Control Units (AFCU). Two (2) AFCU's per unit supply ammonia gas to each unit's SCR system for NOx reduction. Two (2) separate 100% capacity hydrolyzers supply two (2) separate AFCU's, one for each unit, for injection of ammonia gas into the SCR exit gas stream for S03 mitigation. The ammonia gas that is supplied to the areas mentioned contains less than 5% ammonia concentration by volume.

FIGURE 8 CS%. Auuwwnwre"d TIss a sirrplifle! lilkstration of the SSCR system~ The 903 RadcktUon IO(AW) System is -an Idrtical with a

-W-M s--allr Urea Solition Day Tak,

.... olyzHr and AFCJ. One (1) 903 PRduction AFCUJ is provided for each m unit. Two (2) ydolyzers are provided ai for NOx Yahe for both units.

Two (2) NOx Redwction is are provided for Urea Lkiedn a Storage Section Lkiea to Armmonia Conversion Skid Equipment Major systems in the urea to ammonia module are urea storage and handling, urea to ammonia conversion skids, and the ammonia flow control units for NOx and S.3 control.

9

Progress Energy Florida, Inc. -Crystal River Units 1.,2, & 3 DEP File No. FL0000159-013-4W S/NRI Attachment 7 1st & 2 ,nd Quarter, 2010 IWW Percolation Pond Sample Results

Sample Point EFF-1 is the existing Units 123 IVV discharge

Sample Point EFF-2 is the FGD treated blowdown discharge

Southern Analytical LaboQratories 1 10' B.ViE'W bULEVAD OkLD'MAR FL 3467A7

.-8 1 3-855 1844 fax 813-3855-221ý8 inc. .

ProgressEnergylInc. -Fiiruary 210 40 15760 West Crysta BPower34428-River,,F*L Linei Street ... .Prject No' 98743

.... *-'**:....

Laboratm y Repor Piroject Name Quare"rly L.nd Appl..to.Aayes.Cysa.iv..t Sample Description, EFF-l Matrix, Wastewater SALSample Number 98743.01 Date/Time Collected 01li8/O 11:17 Date/Time Received 01118/10 16:20 Paramers Unt Results mMethod io DateTme Daterne An

-LimIt Analyzed Prep, Fieid Parameter Specific-Cordductance. umhos/cm 841i 'DEP FT1206 OA 0.1 01/8/10 11:17 PH" Su 8,3 DEP FT1"100 !0:71 01118110 11:17, LRW, Inomanics Chlorideý mg/9 .29, ,EPA'300.0 *0.05' 01/19/10' 15:26' 'vWC

0.oo5;.

mg/i 0.005 U: 'SM 4500 CN 01/22/10' 14:45' 01/22/10 08:50 EPL, Hexane Extrctable Material, Total rmg/I- 1.3 U: EPA 1664A EPA 300.0:

~1.3. ,'01/23/10?13:00 "01/22/10'1000ý S;mg/. 0.61 0.01 ,01119/10" 15:26 NwC To Ital: isolved Solids .'500 T10' SM:2540C 0112iO"*0:35:0, JSB Metals mg/ 0.0092 0.001 01/201/10 17:00 0i/21/10 11:10, Boron. 0.05 U ýEPA 200.T :0.05" ,01/20/10.17:00 Beryllium., 0.0001 U EPA 200.7, -0.0001, 01/20/10 '12:40 Cadmium 020020 1 0.0101 0/ 20/10 17:00 ,H.WS EPA 200.7.

Chromium mg/I 0.004 U: EPA 200.7 :0.004 ,01/20/10 17:00 HWS Copper 0.006s I EPA200Z7. 0.003 01120/10 17:00 ,01/20/10 12:40 Iron: S01/20/10:12:410, ýHWS, 1.4 0.02 01/2 0110 12:490

,.mg/I Mercuryý 0.0001 U. EPA 245.1. ý0.0001 ,,01/20/10' 12:15 '01/20/1012:40'

01/20/10',09:401 SMW'-

SOdiUm mg/I1 26 EPA 200:7' 0.01 ,01/21/10 18:02 ,HWS Nicnkely .mg/I 0.001 U ,EPA 200.7,; '.01/20/10 17:00 ,HWSI Lead*

0.001 U: j- - 1,

o,2,10 17: 00. 01/20/10 12:40. ýHWS

01/20/10:17:00

, mpg/I 0.01 0V/20/10'12:40' m:cil: EPA 200.T /20/10 '2:40 W,01 A Selenium mg/I 0.05 U; EPA 200i.7 0,1/20/10 17:!00 HW-S EPA 20o.7 0.005.

Thaillium 0.005 U o0/20/10 I1:,00 01/20110,112:40. HWS Zinc 0.043 011/

.20,/10 ino0

0.6003 0/01.12:40' ,HWS Radiochemistrv Gross'Aipha.(lncl- Uranium) ,02/0;i/10 09:00.

pCi/I 2:8+/-2.1 Ul EPA 00.02' :2.8 Radium-226/228 Cornbined 'CalculatiOn 1.0.07 0.07' 01/21/10:12:30: iARM Radium;22 . *pCi/I 1.0*0.07 ,EPA 903.1, 0.07 01/21/10 12:30 A.RMý Radiur-228 0.6+/-0*.4 UIl ýEPA RiA-OS 0,.6' 01/28/10l 11:,49 jmF:K FDOH Laboratory No. E84129 Francis 1.Daniels;Laborator DirectOr NELAPAccredited , Leslie c;Boardmai, Q. A.Manager*,

Page 1 of 6

Southern Ana lytica I Laboratori in nc. ,.~.

~.

'~ ~

~

'4~

1 10 BOB IEW BOULEVARD, OLDSMAR, FL 34677 813-8551-1844 fax 81:3-855-22118 PfdgresisEnergylnc. February, 1, 2010 15780 West Pw'r Li ne'Streeti ProjectNo: 98743 Crystal River, FL -34428-Laboratory Report Pr0J~eci Name Qarte~iy[*nd ApplicationAnalyses Crystal

-Rve~ Site Saniple Description. EFF-2ý Matrix, Wastewater SAL mpleNumbere 98743.02.

Dat*e/TmeColected 0111810 .12:35 DateITineReIeiVed 01i18i10 1 6:20 Paramniters Units Results, *Method Detection Date/Time Date/Time6 ;Analyst L.Mi. Analyzed Prep Field.Paremeter Sb~diic Conductance ,umnhos/6mr 17;300o DEPFTI200' 0.1 01/113810' f235' LRW pH DEP.FT110 :0.1 01118110 12:35: LRW Inoroanics

.Chloride 6,600 EPA4'5300.0 Cyan ide, Total 'mg/ 0.03 SM o0 CN' 0:05, 01/21/10 .:00:00 vwCI 0q1 2110, 14:45 z01/2110 086:150, EPL Hexane Extiactabie Matearia;,TotaI *~gA 1.3 ,U EPA :664A 1.3: 01/(23h11 1.:00 01/22/10 10:00 SGF N),

-irtea 17 EPA 353.2 0.01 01/20/110 10:14 JSB Dssolve~d'Slids iTotal 12,000 SM 2540C" 10 01(2/10 1*2:00 01.i/19o0/10 10:435 QSBI metals .m*,

Arsenic 0.0022 1I SM.i313' *,0122/10 10:18- SMW 0.001, 0,1/21/10.,.121:410 Boron: HWS mg/I, *200 EPA 200.7 005, 01/2010t 17:00 Beryllium. 6=001 .U EPA 2007.7 0.0001 01/20/10o 17:00 01/20/10 1240' HWS Cadmimu"m- 0:069 EPAX200;4 0oi/20/1 1i7:06 o01/20/10 12:40' HWS Chromium 0004: U, EPA-200.7 n0/20/i0 17:00 :01/20/10 12:40.

mg/I mg/I HWS 0;053 EPA200.7- 01120i0' 1:7:00 HWS Iron, IEP.A:200.,7 0.035I 01/20/10 ,17:00 HWS:

01.0ý001 U, EPA 245:1 0.0001 SMW

'01/21(10 1:.,02.

Nickel

.mg/i EPA 200.7 0.01 01/20/.1 12:40"

0.21 mng/i EPA 200.7ý 10.001 .01/20!10M 17: 00 01/20/10.12:40 HWS 0.01 U EPA 20047 "01 940 .2I0 mg/I 01o/201401017:00 Antimony. .mgcI 0.056'r'

ý0.01 .61lqohi6 17:00

'01120/10 12:40~ HWIS HWS Selenium, p.

MO 0.31 EPA200.7 0:05 EPA:200:7. '01/20/10 17:00 01/20/10 12:40 Thallium 0.005 U EPA 200.7 0'.005 01/20110 17:00 Zinc lg/Il :0.30 EPA 200.7 60:00 0 1/201/1 0 'ý12 :3T HWS' RadiochemisrV mg/Il 01/20/10 '12z3O0 Gro*S Alph!' (lncl.)Uraniiin) 2:8 '02/02/10 13:52: 02/01/10 011201l 09:00*

72+/-9.0 EPA 00-02 12:40 JMK

,Raium-,226 8Cmie 32+/-0.5 Calculat0n 01129(10 1?2:45 ARM, Radftu-n226 .0'6: 01*/21/0 12:30.

01)29/10 1'2:45 ARM Radiurn-228 2:8+/-0.5 EPA PA05 ,

JMK FNEHPLaboratory No. E"4*ii Francis'I.,Dan!els, Laboratody Diiector NELAP Accreidited. Leslie C."Board man, Q.k A.Manager' Page 2 of*6

SoUthern Ana lytica I Laborat ories, inc.

-110 BAYVIEWBOULEVARD,.OLDSMAR, FL 3,677 81*3-855-1'.84:",4.fax;8'1 3-855.-2218 Prbgress Energy Inc.ý February.'10,,20 10 15760PWest Power Street Project Iin No: 98743, Crystal.River, FL 34428-Laboratory Report.

Footnotes Questions regaiding this report should be6'directe6d to Clien Seivices at 813855-1844.

Test results presented in this- poitmeetaltherequife ientsofthe NEIaACsf lards. Test results within this re*ort relate only to these samples.

,A statement of esti".tbd dncertinty 6oftest.eiults is avaiilable:upon request.,

,Formethods ma'rkedwhth,, allQC:&ierii'haivebeen met for tlismetl*od which is euiivalent to a .SAL certified method..

Tfe reporited value is between the' labratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitation lmitr.

Analyte was Undetected. Indicated concentration ii.method detection limit:

ul and An'ayterWasnoditdetected;.indicýýtedco6ncentration is'method deteconliilit. Radiochemistry MDL is sample~spedific

matri depend'nt.

FDOH LaboratoryNo. E841'29 ApOoived i'By:ýFrancis I.iDnieis, L*abraitoryýDirector NELAPAccredited !*Pb~C. DoardmnIan, Q. A.Ma naTger Page'3. of.6

SOUTHERN ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. &ALPqeed NO.'_

1 io BAYVIEW BObULEVARD. OLoSMAR, FL:134-77, "81,-5-144 f*i813-8E-55-_21 B Client Name.' Contact I Phone"

,Cyndy Wilkinson, EriWTuchlbaurn-BIro Doug Yowell

'Progress Enery .Inc.

Project Namne I1Location Land Appllcation Analyses Crystal River:Site TE/TAN ,EC IIN ,_.. ...

Samplers: (Sigatre)"..-'- . Quarterly .P*

___________________ ______ PARAMETER4ICONTAINFEq btSCPiPiOrIN __

Matrix Codes: 0. . -

DW:)inklng Water -WW-Wast*water SW-Su.faceWater SL-Sludge SO-Soil " (3Z c*E GW-GroundwaterSA-Salihe'Water 040ther --

R-ReegentfWater ,6 O.

-

SampleDescrtptioh n :a. ,, E e.

.iz 01 "EFF.-1 .... I/*jg'/(7 WW X x Ii 1 1 1 1 1 ____

02 ,°EFF.,2 1/ :/**- WW X 1 1 1 1- 1 1__I ___ 6

-a 0)

CD _ __ _ ___ -' -f120__ - 4_ _ _ z_

(D iS.

0 0,

., ha .........

Y .', .'

Cc,,ouieiu Frepre&

Relnqushd:

Daleflm: Re ved*:

'-.--e' %~senvIesý7euponintat s"

.

na ?

on Ice? Tew

..

arriver? N Ilnstructions/ Remarks WAFielci Measurements: pH4

/ IR.-iquiO1w R elv.

Received: Dablelbn. Prowe pieservaties indtcted?. 0N1 WA iteiinuhZ?

Rec'd wftW* fw&in lVe1h? (N WA Relinquised: oaleTlmeF Receved: DatlTmaN RVoene V eedd w/ot headspsce' .Y N" Relinquished. Dete/Time. Receved:e Dale/rime: (*NW - -

R~v~ unse, ChaNo Cstd

C Clhalnof:Cu-stodyi

SOUTHERN ANALYTICAL LABO*RATOkRIES,-1INC. .

1 10 BAWtEW E30 LEVAR, OLDSMAR ýFL ý:4.677 613-51 1-2521 S04F wASTEWATERSAMPLING-LOG __

ertwNare:. progress Eef-y, Cysltla River Locat,b: EFF-1'Pho "e Date o Sampe ( I f At PioeqA U' Name,

'aPrtct uarel LawdApiatn Ali, r are Rep Name:,

1 SALAU, P" toied: ______________________Ci Y N " t e ritRepreoserallveon S..iN. ... ..

... ... . : " SSAuEeDATA Samrpleid SAL6-J opstrBlnsT:NA MCin 0qh BtaQleWeONgTo A-e NIA Compoitor D: fBottle Ifl intake Tubig,;Ty PP PE- NP* TL Tr -SI IillakeTublnq, , g 4 1up-Tu COMPOSiTE DATA: positeID Number:

START Time: Compos.to Set-u BIT ST.P Oata Time Comp Pop By]

Comoite T-ype: Timz Flow Conditinus Collect S pl Mze. GaO Calibrated Sampl Vollwre. rfus Pro.ramme o,

. S"mples Actual Number of SamplesMCoM FinalCompoitorTempes IcePresnt InComposftorrat Picik-upYe N GRABa SANPLEy~ DATAau Grab A0Nube Date Ccl dllsil/

/ //,7 Cosled.

Tim~otel ARMTR RAIGUNITS PEMIiT LIMIT pSH Temperaturei(. _______ ____.....__......F..D AMETER _.

Report MlY Spdioductance 'C/ _______

Preservation ChecKed inc- N.heckedBy:

Field?- -__-_-_.__._,,

List any PresenrativesAdded in Field:

Conmments:(2-1 JY Samnpler s),Signature: ~ ~ ae /.

Date, Reviewed By:< Date:

Page5 of 6

,progress Crystal River Q Land App WW FSids

.Revision Date, 0118/2005

SOUTHERN ANALYTICAL LAtBORAATORIES*,fINC.

1 1l0 BAYVIEW edIILIEVARD. OLDSMAR. FL 346,77 S-1 3-855~-1 E844 t7AX 81 3-855-~221 S WASTEWATER SAMPLING3LOG y c ' ystid. Rivir Location. EFF-2 PCon ct:

i2ntiT me:

I .ý I I Prgi .ss n ':"ýI " " ' ' . I . - ,,P - one Date~of SaPrle uc ,L Pct"# Name: Qt k .AudAlPc*forwcd i.- ,N AtN Auto Name: -R Ml il l Ml rpbtve C'l,- V N "

Rep. NafT Signatore.:e

,SAMPLE DATA Sah pIediof] SAL -Cue ComposaMorBeons'q -CuAt 0 G" A COMP Bowle elongi Co tmg I I .o Bo ii o Irdake TulType. PP PE" NP TL Tl ISI n oiakerulior*lk Pump Tubing COMPOSITE DATA Cmposite ib"Number:

,STARtT Dater ' e.0M.-ws-pB' STOP Date. m PiýPBj

ýComposite Type Time Flow Conuous "colect SmlIe Ei Minutes GaIoit-Cabbatet! Saplppe volume. MLs Programmed Number of.Samle A Numbeof Sampes Co*Illee F'etCOMposbe.Temperiiur~e Ice Prsn iCopstor at Pick-p? Yes

,GRAB SAMPLiE DATA Gr*ab1AI Numjber.: ,

Daecollte e- - Ti e Colle.ted I 2..3tS C6tected g

... ............... . .:FiELD PARA ETERS PARAMETER: READING UNITS PERMIT LUMIT pH .Sul Teinprs~ir ~Report ~ Only

-Specific Conductance 17 O£ Preservation. Checked in Y N tef'By:

Field? ...... .. _*

LIst'ahy Preseivatives.Added in Field:

Comments; S*alner(4Signature: c" Date "

Rlevj~ei:.Bý.Date:

Reviewed By: DOate:

Page:6 of 6 Progress Crystal Riýer Q Land App WW FS.xls Revision Date 01/18/2005

THERANALYTCA LoE c 1 10CBAYVIEtW BOuLEVARD. OLOSMAR. R.. ,34677 813S-855-,18144 feix 8 13-855-2218 a ProgresspEnergy Inc. April 29, 2010 15760"westPow er LineoStreet Proje*ct*?o 109874 Crystal River, FL 34428-Laboratory Reporot Project Name .......... Quarterly Land Application Analyes: Crystal River. Site ,

SSample D~sciiptin EFF-I Matrix Wastewater S

S rl.ample Number 100874.01 Date/TieColled6i 041110 08:45

,Date/Time Received 04112110 15:44 Paraimeirs , Units Results Method Detection. DatefTime Datel'ime -Aalyst

'ti.mt -Analyzd' Prep

-:Field Parmmeteir Specific Conductance' umhos/cm '887 DEP FTi200 0.1 '04/12/10' 08:45 LRW "Su DEP FT1iOO. 0'1 '04./12110.:08:451 LRW Inortuanict Chloride- mrg/I ',34, :EPA 300.0, 10205 MEJ cyanide. total, 0.005 U *SM 4500'CN 0.005 04/15/10 12:00 0,4/15/10. 11:00 04/14110- 14:40, Hexane E*tractable Maten-al, Tbtal :mg/I 13 U 1*.3*

EPA 1663A 04/13/10l 09:100' CDP, Nitrate (asý N) 2.2 EPA 300. 0.01 :04113/10,01:03, MEJ, T*0tlDissolved Solids '10'

,mg/I 6510 :5jM/I 2540C 041/0,16:25 04/16/10 10:40 Metals Arsenic 001o8 SM 313B 0:06i 04/22110 14:1.0 ,04/14110;,09:40 M.KBI Boron, 0.05 U '.EPA 200.7' '04./15/10 08:29 0.0001 HWS Beylium "0.001U ,EPA 200:7, '04/15110,08:29 HWS Cadmium 'E A 200.7 0.9004 mgA. 0.00i e04/14110 .1545-04115/10'*0829.

Chromium mg/I '0.004 UW EPA 200.-7 04/15/1Qo08:9

,04/15/10 08-29. HWS.

Copper '0.01.8 EPA 200.7 .04/1 5/10 ;08:29 HWS mg/I 2'.7 EPA200.7, 6,4i ho ,b,,2,9 04/15/10 11:504 Mercury mg/I*

mg,/I EPA 245.1 0.0001 MKB5,'

Sodium 29 EPA 200.7, 0,11 0.001 ,04/21/10 17:33, HWS4 Nickel. 0.001. U, ,EPA 20OT: ;04/16/10.'08:29 104/14/10 15:45:

Lead 0.001' EPA 200.7 0.001 .15:45.

HWS,,

Antimony U 0.01 0.01 U

ý04/15/104 0,:9 HWS

'EPA 2007 04/14/10 15:45' Selenium 041/1 8:29n HWS%

0.05 U ýEPA'20017 0.05 04/14/,10 15:45 Thallium 'EPA 200.7- 0.6005 ,04/15/,10, 08:29 15:45.

.Zinc

'0.0097, I :EPA 200.7 0.003 04/15110 08:29 04/ 14/10 15:4`5'

Radiochemistr GrossA*phi(lIncl. Uranium)' -2.+/-20 UlI , EPA 00-02' 2.5 04/20/10 4:69 04/19/10 008456"y JMK Radium-226228 Combined ' ýpCi&L 1:00.2 SCalciulation, 0.14 t04/15/10 ,14:30 ARM Radiurn-22. 1.0+/-0.2 EPA 903.1 0.4 645/o 1-4,:30- ARM' Radiunm-228 :'pCi/L 0.6+/-0.4 UI EPA RA-'05 04/21/10A'4`43' 0G4/15/10 14':3'0 0.6 JMK FDOH LaboratorY No. E84129 Francst I. D anILab Director NiELAP'Aicredited Lestie IC.' Boardman, Q.A. Maaera ~

Page 1 of:6

'lt ACC, SOGUTHERN ,ANAL-YTICAL L . A.BORATORIES, .!NC.

1 1*YV1WBUEAD LSAF 477 836514 a 1-5-2 P.ogreis Energy Inc. 'Apr*i49, 201ý0 15760WdstPdwer 'Line Street Projeýt No' .100874 Crystal River, FL 34428-Laboratory Report Project.Name: Quartery LandApplication Analyses -Crystal River, Site Sample Description, EFF-2 Matr&- Wastewater SAL$.Sample Number 100874.02 DatieTimeCollected' 04112/10 09:12.

Date/Time Received. 041i2110 15:44, P'arameters, Units Resuits, Method Detecti, n Date/Time Date/Time Analyst Limit Analyzed Prep FleildParametvr

'S0e6lfc..Conductance urhos/cm ý16!i700 DEP FT1200 0.11 04/12/10 09:12 LRW P.H1 So '7.4 DEP FT1100 .0.1. 04/12/10 0912 LRW Inorganics Chloride mg/i "6,000 EPA 300.0 0.05 04/13i10 23:31 MEJ Cyanide, Total mg/I 0.005. U SM.4500 CN 0.005 04/15/10 11:00 04/14/10 14:40. EPL Hiihahe,Extrad.ablW WMtdialii'Total mg/I 1.3' U EPA.1664A

.04/1*3/100o9o00 1.3' 04/15/10 12:00 CDD Nitrate (as'N) 19' EPA 353.2 0.01 04/13/10 12:53 SMW Total'Dissolved Solids m~g/ 12;000 ýSM 2540C 10 W41/i'gi/ 16:25 04/16/10 1.0:40 EPL TotalSuspended, So!ids 58, SM 2540D 04/19/10 `17:00 04/16/10ý 12:30 EPL mea~ls Arsinic, mg/i 0*00i, U SM 3113B, 04/22/10 i4:10 04/14/1 '0:4 MKB_'

Boron.

Berlliumf: fij§A o:0ool u EPA 200.7 0.05' 04/22/10 18:04 HWS

'EPA 200.7. 04/15/10 08:29 04/14,10 15:45 HWS Cahnmium 0.070. 'EPA,200.7 0:001 04/15/10 08:29 04/14/10 i5:45 HWS iChr~ium .0.048'&

mg/I .EPA'200.7' .0.004 .04/15/10 0829 '04/14/10: 1f5:45. HWS

Copper

mg/i '0.48. EPA 200.7 o:oo3 04115/10 08:29 04114/10 15:45, HWS

'Iron EPA 200.7 0.02. 04/15/10 08:29 04/114/10 15:45' HWS Mercurý mg/I EPA-245.1 '0.0001 04/15/110 15:21 04/1/10 11i:50 MKBý Sodiumi :0:191 4.2 EpA 200:7 0.01 04/21/10 17:3 HWS Nickel EPAý200.7 *0.001 04/15/10 08:29 04/14/10 15:45 HWS Lead :0.01 U EPA 200.7 0.01 04/15)101 08:29 04/14/10` 15:45 HWS Antimony nin mg/I 0.0456 EPA 200.7 0.01* 04/15110 08:29 04/14/,10 15:45 HWS

'Selenium mgi 1.9 IEPA 200.7 .0.105 0415/10 08:29 15:45: HWS Thallium 0.005 :U EPA 200.7 0.005 04/15/10 08:29 04/14/101 15:45 Zinc; '0.:18 EPA 200.7 .01003 04/15/10 08:.29 15:45' Radlochemristm Gross Apha:(Inc.. Uranium) pCi/L 11015.3 EPA 00-02 2:5 04/21/10 16:10 *04/19/10"'08:45 JMK Radium-2261228 Combined pCi/L 50:0.9, Calculation 0.7 04/23/10 07;30 04/15/10. 14:30 ARM Radium-226', pCi/L 46-0.69 EPA 903'1 0.19 04/22/10 14:53 04/15/10 14-.30 ARM' Radium-228 pci/L 3.6+/--0.61 EPARA-05 0.7 04/21/10 14123 04115/10 14:30 JMK FDOH'laboratory No. E84I129 Fitancis 1. Danhels,.Lahbbratoig Directr NELAP'Accredited Lesilie C. Bidardman, Q A.,Manager Pagez2 of 6

ACC0

SOUTHERN ,ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.

.110 bAYVIEW BOULEVARD, OLOSMIVAR, FL..346.77 61 3-B55-1 64ý4 fNxax 61 3-65221 B Progress Energy Inc. . April129, 2010 15760 West Power LUneStreet Project No: 0087-4 Crystal River, FL 34428-Laboratory Report Footnotes dues'tions Fegarding this report should be directed toCiientLServices at 813-855-10.,

Test results, pesented Inthis report meet the reýqui6ementsof the NELAC

.. standardS..Test 'results Within thisreport relate .onlyto th ese sam ples.

A statement o estimated'uncertainty of testresults isavailable upopnrequest.

For methods marked with -, all QC driteria-have.been met for this method which is e Uivalent'tb a SAL certifidd Methodd.

The'rep,.rted value isbetweenthe laboratory method detectionlirmit and the laboiratory. practical quantitation limit.

U Analyte was undetected. Indicated:concentration'is method detection limit, UI Analyte was:npt detected; indicated coricentratidn ismethoddetection limit. Radlochemist-yrM01isrsape I. ... .t L..s s l p cificand c an.

matrix'delendent.-

FDOH Laboratory'No. E84129 Approved By: Francis L Daniels, Laboratory'Director.

NELAP Accredited Leslie C. Boardman, Q. A. Manager, Page 311f6

SOUTHERN ANALYTiCAL LABO3RATODRIES . INC*.* SAL Piject N6; 100AV~v OL VARED. LILOSMAP. FL 34677? 8 B3-aiS5,1 44 fmx81 3-EL9S-~2! B Client Nameii Iertact IPhone-I? t ame *Pro~ess Eergy;Inc Cyndy WilkinsMn Erika Tuchbikum-Biro, DougowI "mject NaeLocat~ion Oa1ryLn plctd~aye' rsa ie~t 9

samplers:'(Signature)~~ PARAMETER I,CONTAINEýR DESCRIPTION ___ ______

.Matrix'Co~des: 4 OW-Dunriiking Wat1er, WW-Wastiewater. Zr L R-Reagent.Water~f- 0 i MAL use cc -- E8 0 c6C

-- E 02 EFF-2c 4/14 ~1V ww 1k _

.8

'a 4~.

0 o~.

Cwanem Prpa-o PTh1f~r Receald IDct yN Instructiods I Remarks

§S~en~s'41ci 60o arrest? N WA Flield Measurements: pHi

/

RelinquS DS~?~(Received-6o~n ed ke7Tenflpý N Reiinquish .-. Received: Daterf~ime Roper piessrvitrvos',inarcated?' (:y4 WA,_

Reeir~e:DatefTime:

Veceivedsmodffiwtout headpc y

_________________________________________________roper cmanlaners used?

Relinquishied: iseTm eevdDate/Tme (JWA:

,CA of rinder Ctiain of Cuslody

SOUTHERN ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.

11i0 BAY\AEW EBOULS'CARD; OLDSMA Fk' L-3' 77365' B4' Fal b46-5~2

______ ~ .,WA$TWTR ERSAMWWPLI -jtLG ___

Niie ~ ~ FZ. 7 EF- na

,J:j *~i. -~

Client Representavive on, site?

Progress CR0 Lan.d App-Perc POnd FSJxls Revision Date 01/1812005 Page 5.of 6

SOUTHERN-ANALYTICAL LA'OATRiES, INC.ý 110 bBAyiEw 0ULEVARD, OLPSMAR; FL ,348677,'~13-855-1 844 F'XE81:3-855-2218e Progessnegy,- Crystl River

'progress CR O LandApp.Perc Pond FS x s Reisln, Date 01118/2005.-

,Page666f 6

Progress Energy Florida, Inc. -Crystal River Units 1, 2, ,& 3 DEP File No. FLOOO19-01 3-IW1 S/NR Attachment 8 CR 123 BMP (SWPPP)

CRYSTAL RIVER UNITS 1,2,3 Storm Water Pollution Preventionand Best Management PracticesPlan Rev. 5 - August 2009

Plan Summary Consistent with provisions set forth in the Clean Water Act, this Best Management Practices (BMP) Plan Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3) has been developed in compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No.

FL0000159 and the Multi-Sector General Permit for Steam Electric Generating Facilities.

The plan acts as a supplemental control to the NPDES permit effluent limitations guidelines, and serves to improve water quality by stipulating actions or procedures to prevent or minimize the potential for release of pollutants to waters of the United States and minimize and control pollutants in stormwater discharges.

The development of the Plan included a review of existing programs and procedures, a site assessment to identify potential sources and pathways for uncontrolled pollutant and stormwater discharges to waters of the United States. Management Practices and controls have been developed as a result of the site assessment and review of existing programs.

These include:

1. Revision of existing programs and procedures, which are incorporated as part of the Plan, to reflect current conditions/requirements.

2. Management of site stormwater to minimize the possibility of offsite discharges of pollutants to Waters of the U.S.

3. Periodic evaluation of the effectiveness of the plan.

With the completion of these measures, Crystal River 1, 2, & 3 Plants will have endeavored to minimize or eliminate the potential of an improper discharge from its ancillary areas and activities and minimize and control pollutants in stormwater discharges.

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Best Management Practices Plan Requirements 3.0 Pollution Prevention Committee 4.0 Description of Units 1,2,3 Facilities 5.0 Description of Potential Pollutant Sources 5.1 Outfall Basin Inventory 5.2 Site Evaluation Summary 5.3 History of Spills and Leaks 5.4 Summary of Stormwater Data 6.0 Preventive Maintenance 7.0 Inspections 7.1 Comprehensive Site Compliance Evaluation 7.2 Quarterly Inspection 7.3 Annual Site Evaluation 7.4 Monitoring and Record-keeping 8.0 Spill Prevention and Response Procedures 9.0 Measures and Controls 10.0 Employee Training 11.0 SWPP and BMP Plan Certification 11.1 Units 1 and 2 Certification 11.2 Unit 3 Certification 12.0 References 13.0 Revision Summary APPENDICES A. Crystal River Units 1 and 2 Quarterly Inspection Form B. Crystal River Unit 3 Quarterly Inspection Form C. Crystal River Energy Complex Vicinity Map D. Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3 NPDES Storm Water Outfalls E. Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3 Storm Water Basins F. Designated Areas of Responsibility G. Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3 Storm Drains, Potential Sources of Pollutants H. Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 NPDES Flow Diagram

SWP3 and BMP Plan 1.0 Introduction BMP On May 1, 1995, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No.

FL0000159 became effective for the Florida Power's Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3 Plant. Part VI of the NPDES Permit requires the implementation of a Best Management Practices (BMP) Plan as soon as practicable but not later than six months after the effective date of this permit. BMP requirements have been included in subsequent NPDES Permit renewals. The most recent NPDES permit became effective May 9, 2005.

SWP3 On September 29, 1995, the NPDES Multi-Sector Permit for Industrial Activities became effective for the Florida Power's Crystal River Units 1,2 and 3. Part VIII, 0 requires the development and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3) by September, 1996.

The development and implementation of the Plan in conjunction with the conditions of the above referenced NPDES Permits are designed to reduce pollutants of concern that could discharge to navigable waters via stormwater discharge or uncontrolled spills. The plan should address all activities that could or do contribute pollutants to surface water discharge, including storm water, water and waste treatment and plant ancillary activities. All components of this plan will not necessarily apply to all units.

I

2.0 Best Management/Stormwater Pollution Plan Requirements Best management practices are procedures and/or programs which are implemented by an industry to provide pollution control, safety, industrial hygiene, fire protection, employee training and site management. The benefits to be attained through the establishment of BMPs include:

" Protection of employees,

" Reduction/elimination of adverse environmental impacts,

Reduction in costs associated with spill cleanup,

Compliance with applicable state and federal regulations,

Education in the potential to discharge significant materials and/or pollutants of concern to surface waters via stormwater discharge, and

" Increased overall efficiency of the Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3 Plant ancillary operations/procedures.

This BMP Plan is designed to prevent or minimize the potential for the release of significant amounts of pollutants to waters of United States from activities and areas which are ancillary to the operation of the Crystal River Units 1,2 and 3 Plant. The designated pollutants of concern in the BMP Plan are:

" Materials such as solvents and detergents,

" Fertilizers, pesticides, and waste products (ashes, slag and sludge),

Oil, as defined by Section 311 of the Clean Water Act,

Substances listed as toxic under Section 307(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act,

Substances listed as hazardous under Section 311 of the Clean Water Act, and

" Chemicals required to be reported under Section 313 of EPCRA.

The types of ancillary activities and areas addressed by the BMP are:

Material storage areas,

Plant site runoff,

In-plant transfer, material handling and process areas,

Loading and unloading operations, and sludge and waste disposal areas,

Oil-filled transformers,

" Coal pile storage areas, and

General good housekeeping practices in all areas.

The Plan identifies and evaluates the risk of oil and other toxic or hazardous substances, and significant materials from any of the ancillary industrial operations at the Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3 Plant, being discharged into navigable waters as a result of spillage, leaks, drainage, stormwater runoff and/or sludge and waste disposal practices.

The Plan was developed in accordance with the following:

Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3 NPDES Permit-FL0000159-009, Part VII.D "Specific Conditions Related to Best Management Practices / Pollution Control Conditions".

Criteria and Standards for BMPs, 40 CFR Part 122.44(k).

NPDES Stormwater Multi-Sector General Permit for Industrial Activities, FR Vol 60, No.

189, VIII, 0.

2

3.0 BMP/Pollution Prevention Committee In order to develop an effective plan, a BMP committee was assembled to provide representation from each Progress Energy - Florida department affected by the plan. Individuals were selected based on their knowledge of the Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3 Plant facilities and procedures, experience with toxic and hazardous materials and familiarity with pertinent environmental regulations.

The BMP/Pollution Prevention Committee is comprised of the following persons:

Erika Tuchbaum-Biro Crystal River Fossil Plant Cyndy Wilkinson Crystal River Fossil Plant Brandon Barr Crystal River Unit 3 Ron Johnson Crystal River Unit 3 Major Projects Doug Yowell Environmental Health & Safety Services 3

4.0 Description of Crystal River Units 1,2,3 Plant Facilities The Crystal River site is known as the Crystal River Energy Complex (CREC) and contains 5 power generating units. Units 1 and 2 (also known as Crystal River South) are coal fired and are adjacent to Unit 3, which is nuclear powered, and have a total generating capacity of 1854 MW.

Units 1, 2, and 3 are permitted under the same NPDES permit. Units 4 and 5 (also known as Crystal River North) are also coal fired, but are permitted under a separate NPDES permit.

Units 1, 2 and 3 are located on the Gulf of Mexico, approximately five miles west of U.S. Highway 19 at Crystal River, Florida (See Appendix C: Crystal River Energy Complex Vicinity Map). These units utilize water from the Gulf of Mexico for cooling via a common intake canal, which is an earthen structure. The cooling water is discharged to the discharge canal, also an earthen structure, which is routed back to the Gulf of Mexico. Helper-cooling towers pull some water from the discharge canal to cool the water before it enters the Gulf. Unit 3 is built on a berm capable of withstanding storm surge from the maximum probable hurricane.

NPDES Permit No. FL0000159 authorizes the following outfalls, which are described in more detail in the permit. See Appendix H: Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 NPDES Flow Diagram for a summary of outfall flow paths.

Effluent Outfall No. Description D-01 1 Once through cooling water (Unit 1)

D-012 Once through cooling water (Unit 2)

I-OFE Laundry and Shower Sump Tank (Unit 3)

D-OC1 South Ash Pond D-013 Once through cooling water (Unit 3)

D-OOF Nuclear Services and Decay Heat Seawater System (Unit 3)

I-OFG Regeneration Waste Neutralization Tank (Unit 3)

D-OOH Coal Pile Runoff D-0C2 North Ash Pond D-091 Intake Screen Backwash D-092 Intake Screen Backwash D-093 Intake Screen Backwash D-071 Helper Cooling Tower D-072 Helper Cooling Tower D-094 HCT Intake Screen Backwash NPDES Permit No. FL0000159 also authorizes the discharge of stormwater from plant areas to the site intake and discharge canals via outfalls D-100, D-200, D-300, D-400, D-500, and D-600.

Stormwater outfall locations are shown on the aerial map of Appendix D.

4

5.0 Description of Potential Pollutant Sources (stormwater outfall locations)

Site assessments of the stormwater outfalls and drainage basins were conducted to evaluate impervious and pervious areas and significant materials exposed to stormwater and activities within the basins that may contribute pollutants to the stormwater discharge. A vicinity map of the CREC is in Appendix C and a map showing the storm water basins for CR 1, 2, 3 can be found in Appendix E.

5.1 Outfall Basin Inventory Table 5.1 contains a description of each storm water outfall located on the CR 1, 2, and 3 site including potential pollutant sources within the associated basin.

5

Table 5.1 Outfall/Basin Inventory for Units 1, 2, and 3 1 #3 building (UU2) L,- xi parKing uanai

-area' D-200 CRS2 Discharge Stormwater 42" CMP Vehicular Traffic (003) CR #3 building Canal Miscellaneous Activities NA 004 CR #1 and 2 Discharge Stormwater. Drainage Ditch Vehicle Traffic N/A parking area Canal REMOVED Parking Area D-300 CRS3 CR #1 and 2 Discharge Stormwater 24" RCP Used oil staging & other wastes (005) parking area Canal Maintenance equipment storage Mobile equip. storage Metal storage Vehicle traffic DD-400 CRS4 CR.#1 roof drains Discharge . Stormwater 24" RCP Vehicle traffic.

(006) CR #1 parking Canal Equip. staging area 24.. RCP. Fly ash vehicle traffic D-500 CRS5 Discharge Stormwater 24" RCP Vehicle traffic (007) CR #2 roof drains Canal Fly Ash vehicle traffic Bottom ash run off NA 008 Water treatment Percolation Stormwater Sump Chemical Storage-.'

N/A - building Pond Waste water storage 42" CMP Vehicle Vehicle Traffic traffic D-600 CRS6 So side of CR#3 Intake Canal Stormwater (009) Ea side of CR#1 Material storage Intake area NA Discha.rge Storm Water Storm -drains to ..Storm water, ground water -Cable Vault water Canal System dischairge canal with periodic qualitative or Storm drain j~quantitative analyses NA Discharge Plant Access Discharge Storm water, ground Drainage Ditch Vehicle Traffic, Storm Water, Canal Road Ditch, North Canal water, Mari culture Center on North Side Ground Water Side of CR3 (Dept. of Acriculture) of CR3 Notes:

N/A - SWP3 no longer applicable to outfall.

1 - Outfall designation in NPDES Permit No. FL0000159-009 2 - Outfall designations from previous BMP plans and/or as identified in NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit submittal to the FDEP.

6

5.2 Site Evaluation Summary (See Appendix G for area locations)

Percolation Pond System The percolation pond system includes an evaporation/percolation pond system and groundwater monitoring wells to ensure system efficiency. Should oil or pollutants enter the plant drain system, it would be removed from the various sumps and discharged to the evaporation/percolation ponds with no discharge to area surface waters. The evaporation/percolation pond is designed to contain a 10-year/24 hour storm event with no overflow to surface waters.

Unit 1 and 2 Material Storage Area The area east of Units 1 and 2, next to the machine shop, is used as a miscellaneous storage area by the plant and Material and Stores. Miscellaneous pieces of equipment may be located in this area. Several storm drains are located here and the potential for equipment and material that is stored in this area to contaminate stormwater runoff is high. Plant staff has been instructed to minimize material storage in this area at all times. Additionally, used oils and other waste liquids are staged on container pallets which provide secondary containment in the event leakage occurs.

Oil Tank Storage Warehouses There are four decommissioned oil tanks located west of Units 1 and 2. Two of these oil tanks have been modified and are now used as material/equipment storage warehouses. These can be used to store equipment and new 55 gallon drums of oil. (The remaining tanks serve as fly-ash storage tank and spare water tank, respectively).

Unit 3 Chemical Warehouse The Chemical Warehouse is located east of Unit 3. The warehouse is used to store chemicals that are routinely used for plant activities, such as 55 gallon drums of various chemicals and lubricating oil. The drums are stored in an area with concrete curb secondary containment capable of holding the contents of at least one of these drums if it were to spill. There are also other various chemicals in smaller containers stored here. The Chemical Warehouse is a well structured building with its contents not being exposed to stormwater. The potential of a spill making it to the storm drains is low.

Unit 3 Issue Warehouse The Issue Warehouse is used to store products that are routinely used for plant activities. These products are stored indoors in a well structured building not exposed to stormwater. Spills are not expected to occur in this building since the products are of solid form.

Unit 3 Receiving Warehouse When products are shipped to the site, they must first be processed at the Receiving Warehouse.

There are some chemicals temporarily stored in this warehouse, but the duration of storage is typically a few days. This is a well structured building with its contents not being exposed to stormwater.

Unit 1 and 2 Waste Water Neutralization Tank 7

The wastewater neutralization tank is located to the south of the Water Treatment Plantadjacent to the intake canal. The wastewater neutralization tank has redundant level controls and a high level alarm to minimize the possibility of an overflow. Additionally, the area adjacent to the intake canal has a concrete containment wall surrounding the area, thereby, eliminating the potential of spills in these areas impacting surface waters. The waste water line from the waste neutralization tank and low conductivity tank runs underground south and then west of the water tank area. This line on occasion has leaked causing surface emanations of treated waste water which could result in a discharge to the site intake canal.

Sewage Treatment Plant The sewage treatment plant (STP) is located to the southwest of the Unit 3 adjacent to the intake canal. Containment is present to contain spills of sludge, untreated waste or wastewater from the sewage treatment plant. Spills from the sewage treatment plant or stormwater runoff from this area will not impact adjacent surface waters. A STP lift station is located north of Units 1 and 2, adjacent to the discharge canal. An overflow or malfunction of this lift station could result in a discharge of domestic wastewater to the site discharge canal.

No. 2 Fuel Oil Storage Tank The diesel fuel tank at Units 1 and 2 has adequate containment capacity to contain a spill in the event of a leak or tank rupture. Stormwater that collects in the containment area is inspected, discharged to a sump, and then to the evaporation/percolation pond system.

Sulfuric Acid and Caustic Tanks An 8,000 gallon acid bulk storage tank (sulfuric acid) and a 8,000 gallon bulk storage caustic tank (sodium hydroxide) are located south of Units 1 and 2, on the west side of the water management building. In the event of a leak or spill, adequate containment is available to prevent the discharge of acid or caustic to surface waters. Stormwater that collects in the containment area is pumped into the waste sump, monitored for pH, directed to either the waste neutralization tank or the low conductivity tank depending upon the need for treatment, and then discharged to the percolation pond.

Fuel Loading/Unloading Area The No. 2 fuel oil unloading area at Units 1 and 2 has adequate containment curbs for leaks or spills which may occur during unloading operations. Additionally, tank truck operators monitor the unloading operations to ensure that a significant leak or spill does not occur. It should be noted that the storm water collection basin located adjacent to the truck unloading area discharges to the site evaporation/percolation pond, thereby eliminating the potential for a spill of oil to surface waters.

Bottom Ash Loading/Unloading The bottom ash tanker truck ("scud" truck), used to collect bottom ash from the bottom ash system for transport to the site ash landfill, is also located west of Units 1 and 2 within a containment area near the wastewater drainage trench.

8

Bottom Ash Silo The silo which drains residual fine bottom ash from Unit 2 into transport trucks is located north and west of Units 1 and 2 and adjacent to the discharge canal. There is containment and a collection sump for the discharge of wastewater to the evaporation/percolation pond system.

Occasionally clogging of the system drain and sump occurs which may result in the discharge of ash to the discharge canal during rainfall events. Historically, containment has not been adequate to contain and minimize ash deposition, resulting in the discharge of ash to the discharge canal during high wind and/or rainfall events. In 2005 a road paving project installed a drainage swale on the north side of the road near the discharge canal. This improvement should help minimize and/or prevent future ash discharges.

Hazardous Waste Accumulation Area Unit 3 has a hazardous waste accumulation area located on the southeast side of the berm. This area is used to temporarily store waste material until it is shipped off-site. Common waste materials are 55 gallon drums of used oil, empty 55 gallon drums of hydrazine and morpholine, and expired chemicals. This area is fenced off and in located in a low traffic area.

Chemical Addition Areas Unit 3 performs monthly chemical injections to reduce the build-up of marine growth within the Raw Water System. This is known as Clamtrol. The injection skid is located at the intake and has high risk of entering the water if a spill outside of the containment ever did occur. The skid has sufficient secondary containment to hold the contents of the chemical storage tank. A Haz Mat spill kit is located in close proximity to this skid.

Unit 3 also has a chemical addition station located on the north end of the berm. The chemical addition station consists of one 55 gallon drum of sulfuric acid and one 55 gallon drum of morpholine. These drums are strapped down and located in diked containment capable of holding the contents of both drums.

Old Steam Generator Storage Area The two steam generators that will be replaced at the end of 2009 are going to be stored in a large concrete building. This building has reinforced concrete walls on all sides. Since these steam generators have come in contact with radioactive water there is some radioactive contamination of these generators. They will be permanently stored in this building and will not be exposed to stormwater.

Reactor Head Storage Building There is a building located east of the warehouse area for Unit 3. This build contains the retired reactor head and has no adverse impact on stormwater.

5.3 History of Spills and Leaks (Past Three (3) Years) 9

08/18/08 Crystal River South's Helper Cooling Tower (HCT) - A puddle of oil was found on the asphalt in the HCT roadway just south of #2 Lift Station by mechanics working in the area. Upon investigation from the Plant Environmental Specialist the oil was determined to have come from a leak in the sealed lid of the oily water separator located underneath the roadway adjacent to and associated with #2 Lift Station and had migrated to a rainwater retention pond. ERC was called to come begin managing the control and clean-up of the spill. An oil absorbent boom was placed at the inlet and outlet of the pond and oil absorbent pads were being used to remove oil from the surface of the water. During this cleanup a torrential rainfall began causing the additional water and oil entering the retention pond to mix together well enough to bypass the oil absorbent booms and the oil separating weir, entering the discharge canal. Less than two gallons were estimated to have been released into the canal.

08/03/08 Crystal River Coal Yard - While discharging the Mickie Birdsall barge, the Crane Operator, was raising the bucket out of #2 hold when a hydraulic hose failed on the bucket. This failure caused hydraulic fluid to spray on the deck of the barge and some into the canal. Approximately 1 pint to 1 quart contacted the water (canal). The Emergency Response Coordinator was contacted to provide support in cleaning up the oil sheen. The Environmental Specialist made notifications to EHSS and Regulatory Authorities. All oil was contained, recovered, and cleaned up.

11/09/07 Crystal River South - Units 1 & 2 Unit 1 & 2 were receiving service water from units 4 & 5 to make up to treated water in preparation of the unit 1 start up. Facility security called and reported they could see a water leak on a pipe on the fishing bridge. Operators responded to the fishing bridge and found the line leaking. The line was identified as the service water line coming from units 4 & 5. The SSOD at 4 & 5 was contacted and asked to shut down the pump supplying service water to units 1 & 2 and the leak was isolated. A leak was found on the vacuum breaker were the pipe entered the flange. The Fin team was notified to repair the leak. An estimated 750 gallons of chlorine residual water was discharged to the canal. Verbal notification was made to Florida Department of Environmental Protection, action items assigned and completed.

10

5.4 Summary of Stormwater Data Recent stormwater data has been obtained for outfall D-600 (see Appendix D for location). Iron is the only water quality parameter that is routinely monitored at outfall D-600. An outside contractor, Southern Analytical Laboratories, performs the iron analysis using EPA Method 200.7 with a detection limit of 0.02 mg/L. Table 5.1 lists the recent iron concentrations observed at D-600.

Table 5.2 Outfall D-600 Iron Concentration M7 h V IronC *bcntration June 2009 3.3 May 2009 2.6 April 2009 3.0 March 2009 0.64 February 2009 0.64 January 2009 2.8 December 2008 4.6 September 2008 0.12 August 2008 1.8

ýJuly 2008 0.62 June 2008 1.3 April 2008 3.9 February 2008 7.8 6.0 Preventive Maintenance Preventive maintenance is a periodic, formal inspection of plant equipment or stormwater devices to uncover conditions that could lead to breakdowns and to adjust or repair them while problems are still minor or manageable. The criteria for formal inspections are determined by analyzing the short-term and long-term effect equipment breakdowns will have on generation, personnel safety, regulatory requirements, economic and historical data.

The objectives of Progress Energy - Florida's Preventive Maintenance Program are to:

Demonstrate acceptable system and equipment performance.

Confirm system compliance with established procedures.

Assess plant and system reliability improvements. If deficient propose new procedures and or preventive maintenance measures.

7.0 Inspections Visual inspections of plant facilities, systems, tanks, pipelines, STPs, the wastewater system (including ponds) and storage areas are conducted on a regular basis. Plant operations personnel are required to make routine rounds or patrols of various areas of the power plant as part of their I1

job responsibility. While on these rounds, they look for any unusual conditions, faulty equipment operation, leaks, spills, or other problems that are or potentially could cause an environmental incident. If any deficiency is observed, a work request is generated.

7.1 Comprehensive Site Compliance Evaluation Vi~sualinspection of areas Which cor tribute to storm"va-er d*chargesmust beeon ducl quarterly and aninuallyrto determine if controls are adq'Uate and properly implemented. A report which ';,summarizes the scope,' date,, major,- observatiOns :!or, incidentsi of n0oncompliancet must be maintained for'threei(3) years. Certificationr: that the facility is in compliance with the SWP3 must be documented annually. ' :SeeAppendix Aand B 4for;

inspection forms used.

Field inspections of the Crystal River Power Plant ancillary systems and associated site support facilities should be conducted by members of the BMP Committee to determine areas of potential concern with respect to discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States. The BMP inspection should focus on material storage areas, plant site runoff, loading and unloading areas and waste disposal areas.

7.2 Quarterly Inspection Site personnel will walk down the site to ensure no unauthorized pollutants are entering surface waters and that each pollutant control measure is working properly. An inspection form is used to document quarterly inspections.. Separate inspection forms have been created for Units 1 and 2 and Unit 3 and are provided in Appendix A and Appendix B, respectively. Certain areas around the site have been delegated to Units 1 and 2 and Unit 3 (See Appendix F).

7.3 Annual Site Evaluation Anual inspection requied by June 30, 1996(a~n'd e6ac~hypear thereafe.-

The inspection of areas of concern should include the following:

Evaluation of the effectiveness of BMPs and determine the necessity of implementing additional measures and controls.

" Evaluation of the drainage areas for evidence of pollutants entering the drainage system.

7.4 Monitoring and Record-Keeping Steam electric.generating fadci!ites are requiredp t- r-monitor s torm; water discharges associated with industriali activity quartprly for total recover able i Samples shuld Srn.

be collected from a discharge resulting froma storm event greater than 0.1 inches magnitude each calendar month. Records of rain fall amounts must;also be, tabulated an~kept onfile.-

Records for Units 1 and 2 are kept in the plant environmental file room. Rainfall and storm water sampling data is kept at file point 12520-B. Quarterly and annual 12

inspection records are kept at file point 12520-R-03-B. Records for Unit 3 will be kept on file in the office of the Unit 3 Environmental Specialist.

8.0 Spill Prevention, Notification and Response OIL SPILLS Refer to the Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plans in effect at these facilities.

ACID/CAUSTIC SPILLS Caustic/Acid Bulk Storage Emergency Procedures. Crystal River Units 1 and 2 have the following acid and caustic bulk storage tanks on site:

Size (gallons) Contents 8,000 Sulfuric Acid 8,000 Hydroxide (caustic)

These tanks are located immediately west of the water management building. Both tanks have secondary containment.

A Containment and Integrity Plan requires that the plant inspect the sulfuric acid tank area on a monthly basis and the secondary containment system at least once per year by personnel certified by SNT-TC-1A.

Units 1 and 2 personnel are trained to report any spill, no matter the location or quantity, to the control room by calling 311, their supervisor and /or the plant Environmental Specialist. Unit 3 personnel are trained to report any spill to the control room by calling 5555. Reporting guidance is available to all plant personnel in the Oil Spill and Chemical Release Notification Procedure EVC-SUBS 00018 and on the Progress Energy Web in the environmental guidance manual.

The Environmental Health and Safety Services Section (EHSS) shall be responsible for the reporting to all Local, State, and/or Federal agencies. Any written reports will be prepared by EHSS and the Plant Environmental Specialist, for the Plant Manager.

13

9.0 Measures and Controls A description of pollution prevention, sediment and erosion control measures, BMPs and other controls that are (or will be) implemented to improve the prevention and control of the discharge of contaminated stormwater at Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 are presented in the following tables.

Table 9.1 Measures and Controls

-AREAS OF CQNCERNN- , MEASURES ':' CONTROLS Fuel Oil Unloading Vehicles Runoff from fuel oil unloading areas. Containment curbs or block off storm drains in unloading areas.

Immediately clean up leaks/spills.

Chemical Loading/Unloading Runoff from chemical Containment curbs or block off storm loading/unloading areas. drains in unloading areas.

Immediately clean up leaks/spills.

Liquid Storage Tanks Runoff from aboveground liquid Containment curbs.

storage tanks. Dry cleanup methods.

Large Bulk Fuel Storage Tanks Runoff from bulk storage tanks. Comply with SPCC requirements.

Secondary containment.

Oil and Chemical Spills Reduce potential for spills. Weekly inspection of tanks, pipelines, pumps and other equipment to reduce incidents of spills.

Secondary containment.

Oil Bearing Equipment in Runoff from oil bearing equipment. Inspection of oil bearing equipment.

Switchyards Bottom Ash Loading Areas Runoff from spills, deposition of bottom Reduce/control tracking of ash from ash. loading areas.

Cleanup spills, debris, excess water.

Install wind curtains.

Coal Barge Unloading Area - Coal Runoff into intake canal Installation of a short containment wall Conveyor #5 along coal barge unloading area.

Inspection of canal annually and dredge as needed Material Storage Areas Runoff from areas used to store misc. Store material indoors, cover material, products, construction materials, etc. etc. or use secondary containment.

Staging Areas for Used Oils Reduce potential for leaks and spills. Stage material on secondary I I_containment pallets.

14

Table 9.2 Allowed Non-Storm Water Discharges1

. Planned-Activity Allowed Action - CR I&2` Allowed Action - CRK3V Discharges from fire-fighting activities Route to storm water drain. Route to storm water drain.

Fire hydrant flushing Route to storm water drain. Route to storm water drain.

Potable water, including water line Route to storm water drain. Route to storm water drain.

flushing Uncontaminated condensate from air Route to storm water drain. Route to storm water drain.

conditioners, coolers, and other compressors Uncontaminated condensate and from Route to storm water drain. Route to storm water drain.

the outside storage of refrigerated gases or liquids.

Irrigation drainage Route to storm water drain. Route to storm water drain.

Landscape watering provided all Route to storm water drain. Route to storm water drain.

pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizer have been applied in accordance with the approved labeling Pavement wash waters where no Route to storm water drain. Route to storm water drain.

detergents are used and no spills or leaks of toxic or hazardous materials have occurred (unless all spilled material has been removed)

Routine external building wash down Route to storm water drain. Route to storm water drain.

that does not use detergents Uncontaminated ground water or Route to storm water drain. Route to storm water drain.

spring water Radiological analyses need to be performed before vaults or manholes are drained.

Foundation or footing drains where Route to storm water drain. Route to storm water drain.

flows are not contaminated with process materials Draining of secondary containment Drain to adjacent area. Only authorized personnel areas can perform discharges from secondary containments per WP-106.

Notes:

1. Most industrial stormwater general permits include a list of non-stormwater discharges that are "allowable" and do not need to be eliminated. Allowable non-stormwater discharges are those that while not stormwater discharges, are covered under the terms and conditions of the stormwater permit. These are often discharges that ifnot covered under a stormwater permit would require coverage under some other NPDES permit. All secondary containments should be checked for rain water accumulation on a daily basis and immediately after any rain event.

Accumulated rain water should be checked for oil sheen before release. Oil sheen may be removed with oil absorbent pads or socks.

2. Actions which specifically apply to Crystal River Units 1 & 2.

3. Actions which specifically apply to Crystal River Unit 3.

15

Table 9.3 Requirements 1 for Spill Prevention Planned Activity Required Action' Reference Comments Storage of petroleum

Containers must be Procedure based products in stored inside a chemical Used in addition to any small containers (< 5 cabinet designed to applicable plant procedures.

gallons). capture the contents of the largest container.

Storage of petroleum 0 Container must be Regulatory SPCC requirements.

based products in stored inside a lined Caution: Use of and large containers or secondary containment, placement location of tanks tanks (> 5 gallons). or on site are also subject to

Tank must be certain record keeping constructed with an requirements, and special integral double wall. Note: approvals (e.g., chemical even if double-walled; a control, fire protection, plastic liner beneath the environmental) tank should be used to capture small spill Used in addition to any resulting from transfer applicable plant procedures.

operations.

Storage of petroleum 0 All containers used for Regulatory RCRA rules based liquid waste storage of waste materials BMP EVC-SUBS-00016 materials (e.g., used must be U.S. DOT oils, unusable approved and in good Used in addition to any gasoline, used condition. applicable plant procedures.

antifreeze, etc.)

Containers must be stored inside a lined secondary containment.

Operation of mobile

Each piece of BMP All mobile equipment must equipment with equipment shall carry a be checked prior to operation hydraulic systems "spill kit", suitable for an for obvious leaks, frayed (eg., fork lift, man lift, immediate response to a hoses, ect. In accordance mobile crane, heavy small leak. with:

hauler) ° Documented "pre-flight" checks for oil leaks, Used in addition to any damaged hoses, proper applicable plant procedures.

connections, etc.

Notes:

4. Requirements listed in this Table are a combination of regulatory requirements, corporate / plant procedures, and BMPs adopted by the site. A regulatory requirement or procedural requirement may not be waived. BMPs may be waived on a case by case determination made by the plant environmental specialist where a) implementation of the BMP is not practical or infeasible, or b) the BMP would be cost prohibitive. All waivers shall also be approved by the plant manager.

5. All secondary containments should be checked for rain water accumulation on a daily basis and immediately after any rain event. Accumulated rain water should be checked for oil sheen before release. Oil sheen may be removed with oil absorbent pads or socks.

16

6. In the event of a spill: 1) notify the appropriate plant control room or work control center, and 2) take appropriate immediate action to minimize the extent of the spill. If using oil dry or oil absorbent materials, clean it up and properly dispose. Do not leave it for someone else to handle.

17

10.0 Employee Training Various documents and manuals developed for Units 1, 2, and 3 contain procedural guidelines to be followed in a variety of scenarios. Training in the use of the manuals and the implementation of proper procedures serve to reduce the likelihood of leaks, spills, or releases to surface waters of the United States.

MSDS Sheets: MSDS sheets for chemical substances, both hazardous and non-hazardous, are obtained by calling 3E at 1-800-451-8346 or by accessing the 3E web page via the Progress intranet under Business Units & Departments/Safety Department/MSDS. If the 800# is used the MSDS sheet will be promptly faxed to the fax number provided during the call. The MSDS can be printed directly to a local printer using the on-line option.

Environmental Compliance Manuals: These documents provide useful information and guidance regarding various environmental disciplines. The Environmental Compliance Manuals can be found by following the link below:

http://sharepoint/c3/C 17/Crystal%20River%20Enerqy%20Complex/default.aspx?Mode=Edit&Paq eView=Shared The Unit 3 Environmental Compliance Manual is titled "Crystal River Nuclear Plant Site-Specific Environmental Compliance Manual" and the Unit 1 and 2 manual is titled "Crystal River Fossil Plant Site-Specific Environmental Compliance Manual".

Acid and Caustic Procedures: To increase personnel safety and improve environmental protection, Acid and Caustic Procedures Manuals highlight information provided in the MSDS sheets concerning chemical and hazardous properties, precautions, exposure and first aid.

Procedures for handling leaks and the associated emergency response are also documented in these manuals. A Containment and Integrity Plan (CIP) requires that the plant inspect the mineral acid tank area on a monthly basis and the secondary containment system must be inspected at least once per year by personnel certified by SNT-TC-1A.

Oil Spill Prevention and Response: Training in the use of the SPCC Plan and the Oil Spill Recovery Guide are coordinated by the Progress Energy - Florida Emergency Response Coordinator to ensure Response Team familiarity with spill containment and cleanup equipment and procedures. The training is in the form of actual oil spill simulation drills and improved knowledge of specific areas such as safety, notification, boom deployment, etc.

Violent Storm Emergency Procedures (CR 1&2 Procedure EP-2 and CR 3 Procedure EM-220):

These documents were developed to identify areas which should be addressed prior to the onset of a potentially violent storm. Procedures are addressed to minimize the catastrophic release of pollutants during a storm event and emergency response notification.

BMP/SWP3 Requirements: A Plant View online training course, ENCO013G, has been developed for appropriate Unit 1 and 2 personnel and must be reviewed annually as part of their training matrix requirements. Computer Based Training (CBT) was developed for appropriate personnel at Unit 3. The course code is ENCO004C and is reviewed annually as part of their training matrix requirements. The training addresses topics such as good housekeeping, materials management, record keeping and reporting, spill prevention and response, as well as specific waste reduction practices to be employed.

18

11.0 SWPP and BMP Plan Certification 11.1 Units I and 2 Certification I hereby certify that I have reviewed the Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 Storm Water-Pollution .

Prevention and Best Management Practices Plan, as required by National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit No. FL0000159 and agree with the recommended best management practices.

Larry Ha~her Date Manager, Crystal River Fossil Plant

&Fuel Operations 19

11.2 Unit 3 Certification I hereby certify that I have reviewed the Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 Storm Water Pollution Prevention and Best Management Practices Plan, as required by National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit No. FL0000159 and agree with the recommended best management practices.

Jimes W. Holt Date Plant General Manager Crystal River Nuclear Plant

. 20

12.0 References 1.0 EPA Industrial SWPP Template 2.0 Developing Your Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan: A Guide for Industrial Operators. EPA 833-B-09-002.

13.0 Revisions Incorporated In Rev. 5 The title of the Plan was changed from Crystal River Units 1, 2, 3 Best Management Practices NPDES FLOO00159 to Crystal River Units 1, 2, 3 Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Best Management Practices Plan Section 3.0: BMP/Pollution Prevention Committee was revised to include current committee members Section 4.0: Description of Crystal River Units 1,2, 3 Plant Facilities was revised to include a more detailed description Section 5.2: Site Evaluation Summary was revised to include Oil Tank Storage Warehouses, Unit 3 Chemical Warehouse, Unit 3 Issue Warehouse, Unit 3 Receiving Warehouse, Hazardous Waste Accumulation Area, Chemical Addition Areas, and Old Steam Generator Storage Area Section 5.3: History of Spills and Leaks (Past Three (3) Years) was revised to include current spills and leaks Section 5.4: Summary of Stormwater Data was added Section 6.0 Unit 1 and 2 SIDTEC maintenance procedure was removed Section 7.2 Monthly Inspection was changed to Quarterly Table 9.2: Allowed Non-Storm Water Discharges was added Table 9.3: Requirements for Spill Prevention was added Section 10.0: Employee Training was revised to include BMP/SWP3 Requirements for Unit 3 Former Section 11.0: Recommended Best Management Practices was removed Former Section 12.0: Security Plan was removed Section 11.0 was revised to include separate certifications for Units 1 and 2 and Unit 3 Appendix B: Crystal River Unit 3 Quarterly Inspection Form was added Appendix C: Crystal River Energy Complex Vicinity Map was revised to include a more recent vicinity map 21

Appendix C: Crystal River Unit 3 Storm Water BMP Plan was removed and its applicable contents were added to the body of the current revision Appendix F: Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 Designated Areas of Responsibility was added Appendix G: Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 Storm Drains, Potential Sources of Pollutants was revised to include 4 separate drawings that better define storm drains and potential sources of pollutants Appendix H: Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 NPDES Flow Diagram was added 22

Appendix A Crystal River Units 1 and 2 Quarterly Inspection Form

Crystal River South - NPDES Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Quarterly Site Evaluation Date:

Issue/Concern Specific Observations East South West North SCY Side Side Side Side Parking / drive Is there evidence of spills of oil, fuels, greases, or antifreeze from vehicles or mobile areas equipment that has not been cleaned up?

Lay down / Is there staged or stored equipment/parts which are capable of rusting because they are storage not painted or covered, or they are capable of leaking lubricating oils/greases?

Chemicals and Are there orphan containers (jugs, bottles, cans, drums, etc.) of chemicals or oils containers (empty, full, or partially full)?

Housekeeping Does the area show good housekeeping, i.e., clean of trash and debris?

Vegetation Is there area neatly trimmed of vegetation growth?

Erosion Is there evidence of uncontrolled erosion?

Rusting Structures Are steel support structures adequately painted or coated to minimize corrosion and rusting?

Oil containing Is there evidence of spills of oil from equipment that has not been cleaned up?

equipment Leaking pipes Are there any leaking pipes containing water, waste water, or ash?

Debris piles Is there evidence of orphan piles of debris, ash, contaminated soil or other material?

Ash Is there evidence of uncontrolled or uncontained releases or spillage of ash material?

Rainwater Is there an accumulation of rainwater in a containment structure which has not been drained in accordance with operating procedures?

Chemical Spills Are there stains on soil or facility structures which might indicate leaks or spills of chemicals or oils?

Notes:

i i

Inspection Performed By:

File Point: 12520-R-03-B See reverse side of form for area descriptions U:\My Documents\Storm Water BMP\BMP revision 2009\CRS Quarterly Evaluation Form.doe August 12, 2005

Crystal River South - NPDES Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Walk Down Area Description East Side East side area of CRS. This area starts at the parking/drive area near the administration building at the north end to the warehouse area on the south end. Specific areas of note:

Parking/driving areas

" Several storm drains that discharge either to the intake canal or discharge canal

Laydown areas along the eastern fence

Warehouse storage area next the Machine Shop building

Machine shop waste storage and chemical cabinet area South Side South side area of CRS. This area starts at the sewage treatment plant on the east end to the staging area west of the No. 2 fuel oil tank.

Specific areas of note:

Vegetation/debris and housekeeping around sewage treatment plant

Potential piping leaks associated with water tanks

Water management building activities

Secondary containment around acid, caustic, and fuel oil tanks

Housekeeping around water front facilities, tanks, pump house, and staging area

Oil containing fan motors, no. 2 fuel oil tank and transfer pumps West Side West side area of CRS. This area starts at the staging area west of the Unit 2 precipitator at the south end to the bottom ash silo facility at the north end. It also includes the percolation pond system., Specific areas of note:

Housekeeping around the staging area, coal conversion warehouse, pipe trench, and Sidtec shed

Leaking water or ash pipe within pipe trench

Piles of ash around bottom ash silo

Vegetation management around percolation ponds North Side South side area of CRS. This area starts at the Sidtec capture system on the west end to the waterfront area just east of the cable bridge and catwalk. Specific areas of note:

Potential erosion issues along waterfront

Vegetation management along waterfront

Housekeeping in and around unit transformers and administration/electric shop offices

Secondary containment around spare transformer

Valve reduction pits for Unit 1 and Unit 2

A couple of storm drains discharge directly to the canal SCY (South Coal Yard) South Coal Yard Areas adjacent to waterfront, wetland areas, and storm water retention areas. Specific areas of note:

Excessive coal buildup along barge un-loader dock area

Housekeeping in and around ancillary buildings near waterfront a Erosion issues along waterfront, storm retention areas, and wetlands areas

Adequate storage capacity in coal pile storm water retention areas File Point: 12520-R-03-B See reverse side of form for area descriptions U:\My Documents\Storm Water BMP\BMP revision 2009\CRS Quarterly Evaluation Form.doc August 12, 2005

Appendix B Crystal River Unit 3 Quarterly Inspection Form

CR3 NPDES Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Evaluation Date:

Conducted By:

Signed:

Berm Warehouse Paint Waterfront Issue/Concern Specific Observations Shack Area Area Parking/Drive Is there evidence of spills of oil, fuels, greases, or antifreeze from vehicles or mobile equipment that has not been cleaned up?

Laydown/Storage Is there staged or stored equipment/parts which are capable of rusting because they're not painted or covered, or they are capable of leaking lubricating oils/greases?

Chemicals/ Are there orphan containers (jugs, bottles, cans, drums, etc.) of chemicals or oils Containers (empty, full, or partially full)?

Housekeeping Does the area show good housekeeping, i.e., clean of trash and debris?

Vegetation Is the area neatly trimmed of vegetation growth?

Erosion Is there evidence of uncontrolled erosion?

Rusting Structures Are steel support structures adequately painted or coated to minimize corrosion and rusting?

Oil Containing Is there evidence of spills of oil from equipment that has not been cleaned up?

Equipment Leaking Pipes Are there any leaking pipes containing water or waste water?

Debris Piles Is there evidence of orphan piles of debris, contaminated soil or other material?

Rainwater Is there an accumulation of rainwater in a containment structure which has not been drained in accordance with operating procedures?

Chemical Spills Are there stains on soil or facility structures which might indicate leaks or spills of chemicals or oils?

Comments:

Crystal River Unit 3 Walk Down Areas and Descriptions Walk Down Area Description Berm This includes all areas inside the protected area of Unit 3.

Specific areas of note:

Numerous storm drains discharge directly to the intake and discharge canals

Fuel transfer activities

Spare transformer on the northeast side of the berm

Chemical addition area on north side of the berm

Hazardous waste accumulation area on southeast side of berm.

Warehouse This includes the issue, receiving, chemical, and oil storage tank warehouses for Unit 3. Areas in the general vicinity of these warehouses should also be walked down.

Specific areas of note:

Lay-down areas east of issue and receiving warehouses

Chemical and material storage

Retention pond south of the issue warehouse Paint Shack Area This area includes the paint shack area that is located inside the rail loop. The area also includes the wetland area east of the issue and receiving warehouses.

Specific areas of note:

Chemical and material storage

Housekeeping in the area

Condition of wetland area. Any land disturbing activities?

Waterfront Area This includes the intake area on the south side of Unit 3 and the discharge canal area that stretches from the fishing platform to the end of the canal. The area also includes the new lay down area west of the percolation ponds.

Specific areas of note:

Erosion issues along intake and discharge canals

Storm drains that discharge to the intake and discharge canals

Overflow parking on the north side of the discharge canal

Clamtrol injection skid at the intake

Land disturbing activities

Appendix C Crystal River Energy Complex Vicinity Map

Crystal River Energy Complex Crystal River Energy Complex Vicinity Map

Appendix D Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 NPDES Storm Water Outfalls

D-500 D-400 D-300 D-200 D-100 Crystal River Units 1, 2 and 3 NPDES Storm Water Outfalls Permit No. FL0000159

Appendix E Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 Storm Water Basins

nAA J

Oc Railroad Loop (Basin 010)

Coal Pile Runoff Holding Pond Coal Storage Area Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 Storm Water Basins Permit No. FL0000159

Appendix F Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 Designated Areas of Responsibility

Areas outlined in blue are Unit 3 responsibility and areas outlined in green are Unit I and 2 responsibility Designated Areas of Responsibility

Appendix G Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 Storm Drains, Potential Sources of Pollutants

Discharge Canal New Lay-down Area I Oil Tank Storage Warehouses Rifle Range L

"* ,ntaeCanal Percolation Pond System Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 Potential Sources of Pollutants

DischargeCanali Storm Drain System

[Bottom As~h ilo

[Transformers ]

Units 1 and 2 Material Storage Area No. 2 Fuel Oil Acid &

Caustic Tanks Storage and Truck Offloading JSewage Treatment Plant Intake Cana I Unitland2 Wastewater Neutralization Tank

Discharge Canal Transformers Hazardous Waste Accumulation Area Clamtrol Skid Intake Canal]

Crystal River Unit 3 Storm Drains and Potential Sources of Pollutants

Receiving Warehouse Issue ..WtlndArea

Warehouse Chemical Warehouse Old Steam Generator Storage Area Stormwater Retention Pond Reactor Head Storage Building Radioactive Materials Paint Shack Area Warehouse Crystal River Unit 3 Storm Drains and Potential Sources of Pollutants

Appendix H Crystal River Units 1, 2, and 3 NPDES Flow Diagram

Crystal River Units 1, 2, & 3 NPDES Flow Diagram - FL0000159 Unit 3 Condenser & Heat Exchanger Non-Contact Cooling Water (979.2)

Emergency Overflow - Dredge FEDewatering & FGD Blowdown System D-0C1 D-071 EFF-5 EFF-10A Nuclear Services & Decay Heat Non-Contact Cooling Water (43.5)

Unit 1 Condenser & Heat Exchanger Non-Contact Cooling Water D-012 D-072 - Unit 2 Condenser & Heat Exchanger EFF-10B (494.64)

Non-Contact Cooling Water Pile Runoff Legend EFF-9

-Flowpath (3.11) 0 Existing Sample Point D-0C2 (I-0C2) Notes:

0 Proposed Sample Point EFF-6 -Not to Scale (intermittent) -Does not include storm water (Max. Flowrate, MGD) -Flows ore maximum expected and can be significantly less based on operating

Progress Energy Florida, Inc. -Crystal River Units 1, 2, & 3 DEP File No. FL0000159-013,-W!S/NR Attachment 9 Historical DMR Results for D-OOH and D-OC1

DEPARTMENTOF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT .PART A COAL PILE RUNOFF WHEN COMPLETED MAILTHIS REPOCTrTO: Department of Environmental Prolecllon,.Waslewater Facilities Regulation.Secto.o. MS 3550,2606)Blair Stone.Road, Tallaoassee. FL 32399-2400. WAFR Sil No::

PERMIT NUMBER:: FLO0000159-001.1WIS GMS IONo.: 1037M25518 PERMITTEE NAME: Progress'Energy Florida LIMIT: Final MAILING P.O. Box 14042, MACCN77 CLASS SIZE: Major .GMS Test Site No.:

St. Petersburg, FL 33733 DISCHARGE POINT NUMBER' D-OH REPORT: Monthly, PLANT SIZE/TREATMENT TYPE: ;GROUP:ý IndustrIal ATTN: Michael Olive FACILITY: NO DISCHARGE FROM SITE: E LOCATION: -15760 W. PoweulineSi;, CrylstaiRIver.'FL 34426 COUNTY: Citrus PARAMETER I I I I . -

Flow, STORET No. 500501 1 Mon. SiteNo. EFF-9

'Total Suspended rSolids STORET No. 00530 i1 Man. Site No. EFF-9 Arsonic, Total RecoNero.ie SrORET No. 00978 "1 Mon'. SiteoNo. EFF-9 Ca*dmIium Totl iRecoverab'le

.STORETr No. b)1ili3

Mon. Site No. EFF-9 rChiomiurbtfh TolalA -ec()verab a STORET No- 61118 Mon. Site No. EFF-9 Copper'. Total Recovers .b, Men. 8iteNo:. :ýEFF4.9 lIron, Total Recoverable 00980* 1 STO)RETNo.-.

Men:Slite No. EFF-9ý and based on my Inquiry of those -ndlvlduelaslrnmeately responible for oblaining "the Information, I believe the submrit I certify under 0enalty of: law.thai I have personally examined and am faomiier with the Information submitted herein:

poIssibilIty of fine and Imprisoninen.

information Is (rue, accurate end complete. I am aware that there are slgn*lont penatiles'for subnrlitng, false Inrormatlon, Including the Telephona NofincI. area cedot Data(Vyrmfdd)

Namef4lfle ot Pdncipal ExeCuflve Otlce- or Authorized Agent (rype or Print) Sinature ofPincipal Execuie Offico Ateofted Agent

" .

Maia'aCrystal RIver Fossil Plant COMMENT AND EXPLANATION OF ANY VIO.LATIONSt(Relfertce 6lt alachmnents here)

Addendum aee Page 1013 DPI-oml 62ý620.*910(1 0),Effsccivc Nov4Drnbcr 29;. 1994

DEPARTMENT OF ENViRONME4N7AL PRO~tECTiON DiSCtARGE MONITORING REPORT- PART A WHENCOMPLETED MAIL THIS REPORT To:Oepoartmnent of Enviionmanlal Proiecton, Wastewater* COAL-PILE'RUNOFF Faiciltlis Regulation Section. MS 3550,-2600 Blair Stone Road. Tallahassee, FL. 32399,2400 No.i PERMITTEE NAME: Progiess Energy Flolda PERMIT-NUMBER: FL0000I59-01-1WIS WAFR site LIMIT: Final. GMS ID No 1037M25518 MAILING P.O. Box,-4042, MAC CN77 CLASS SIZE" Major GMS Test Ile No.:

St. Petersburg. FL 33733 DISCHARGE POINT NUMBER: O0.H REPORT:' Monhlly ATTN-MIchsel Olive nPLANT SIZE/TREATMENT TYPE:: GROUP: IrndustrI6l FACILITCY: Crystal River S0outh Plant- Units ;, i C NO DISCHARGE FROM SITE:

LOCATION: 15760 W. Powedlne SL. Crystal River, FL 34428 El COUNTY: Citrus MONITO)RINGPERIOD--From: 2004109101 To: 2004101 STORET Ho. 00400 -7 Mon. Site,No. INT-3D 1 Rq-em~I.

COMMENTAND EXP!LANATIONOF.ANY VIOLATIONS (Rarerence'all aitachnents here) 8ee.Addendum Page 2of3 DEP Form 62.620.91OIt10), Effective Noveinitg 29, 1994

DEPARTMENT OFENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT-- PART A WHEN COMPLETED MAIL THIS REPOIi rTO: Department of Environmental Protection, Wastewatei COAL PILE RUNOFF Fecli.ties. Ragulalfon SeclIon MS 3550,,2600JB6i6r Stone.Road. Tellahaisee.e Ff 32399.2400E PERMITTEE NAME; Progress Energy Florida

.... ... " . ... LIMIT&

LIMIYF. nl Final " .S GMS ID ID No No 1037M25518 MAILING P.O. Box 14042, MAC.CN77 CLASS SIZE:. Major' GMS-Test Sile No.:

St. Petersburg, FL,33733 DISCHARGE POINT NUMBER: D-H ,REPORT:

Monthly ATALN: MIchael Olive PLANT, SIZEJTREA"MENT TYPE: GROUP: IInduslrial FACIITy. cýstal River South Plant:, UnItsl, 2 NO DISCHARGE FROM SITE:

LOCATION: -16760 W. PowerfllnreSt., C*rysal River, FL 34428z El COUNTY: Citrus MONITORING PERIOD--From: 2004(109101 To: 2004160 COMMENT AND EXPLANATION OF ANY VIOLX7IONS (Reference at illachments here)

"e,Addanduom Page 3o13ý

DEP.Fqfli,62-620.9 10(19), Hffc~iiviNe~cnibcr MAW99

Progress Energy Larry E. Hatcher Manager, CrystalRiver-Fossi Plant &.FUe O*erations' October 22, 2008 Florida Departrrient of Environmental Protection Wastewater Facilities RegUlation Sedtion Twin Towers:Office Buildings.

2600 Blair Stone Road, Mail Station 3550 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400

Dear Sir:

.

Re::. Progress Energy Florida Crystal River Units1, 2 Permit ID# NPDES FL0000159-001 4IW1S Enclosed are. the monitoring reportsr for the month of September 2608 in accordance wit the requirements

,of the above-cited permits.

Storm water sampling of outfall D;600 was performed on the; first available, storm event during the reporting month producingqat least 0.10 inches of rain in ahalf 'hour's; timer. Discharge flow duringo the sampling of outfall D-600 was calculated using, the established square4footage of the stori waterbasin muitiplied by the total rainfall during 'the half hour the sample was collected to produce the total 'cubicfeet of 'sto ater discharged,'The total cubic.feet of storm water was converted into units of MGD"(million gallons per day) of discharge.

-Additi6nally, on Septembetr- 11, 2008 construction personnel working .on thEilinedl FGD,..blowdoWn pofid

.project needed. to per6rm isomedewatering in .order to continuewo~rking inthe aiea of the old CRSash

storage area (Where the FGD blowdownr ponds are being: constructed). They bermed offasmall area within the largrer pond area.with the rinentito pump wafer to'that area. From this location, our intentwas to sample prior discharge through the NPDES outfall,(outfall no. D.OCI ofQCRS NPDES.permit),to ensure.

we.would meet"the limits prior to0discharge.

This small-bermed area was located next'to a Weir and stop logs that prevent water from enteringqthe permittedobutfall (D-OC1). During this dewatering operation, it was noted that water went over the'weir and that the-sto.plogs were leaking such that flow was proceeding out through the permitted outfall.

Subsequently, perm it-required sampling Was performed at sample point:EFF-5 prior.to stopping the discharge. Results showed that all parameters were within theptermit-limits except forarsenic and iron.

The arsenic:value was 0.082 mg/L (permitlimnit =.005 mgI).and the iron value was 0.42,mgIL (permit limit =10.3 mg/L). As a result, the intent is to direct further discharges from this area to the CRS percolation pondsrather than'the NPDES outfall.

Progress Energy Florida.,Inc.

Crystal River Steam Plant 15761WV Powedine Sheet.

CN77 Crystal River. FL34428

If you should have:qany questions, concerning these: reports.,please contact Erika ;TuchbU'mh-Biro of 'imy staff at (352) 563-43496 or Doug -Yowell at'(727) 820-5228.',

Sincerely, Larry E. Hatther Managerý Crystal River FossilPlant & F'u'eiOperations Enclosures6.

Cc:, FMDEp Southwest District Offi*e

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DISCHARGE. MONITORING :REPORT- PART A NWHEN COMPLETED MAIL.THIS.RrEPORT.TO Department of Environmental Protection, Wastewater Facilies Regulation S~cti*.S355$0 2600 Blair.Stone Road. Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 PERMIT NUMBEkR<FL00.O159 PERMITTEEA*INA ~E:: Frogress"E'nergy Florida MONITORING PERIOD-,From: 2008109601' To:"*2008109/30 MAil: ING.

't..iO.Pete Box 1ý4O4 MA6C0C77 ts burg FL33733-4042 LIMIT: Final CLASS 6lZE.: 1,jor REPORT: Monthly, GROUP: Industr~l UTTN: Larry Eý. Hatcher FACILITY-. rystal RIver S louth Plantf- UnIits, 1, 2 ,GMS ID No.: 10 37M2 5518 GMS Test Site No.;:

LOCATION: 5760W.. Poverline *.VCqystaI Rivei FL, 34.428 DISCHARGE POINT NUMBER: D-OC1 NO DIS CHARGE FROM SITE:, I I

&0UNlY,: itrus PLANT SIZE/TREATMENT TYPE:;' .

i. QUANTiTY-,OR LOlADING 'QUALITYOR CONCENT.RATIZ)N-N-F E PARAVAETER - ---. ___ .~- ------------ ~----* - EX OF: TYPE AWRAdE I MAXIMI 'MINIM SU AVE..AGE MAXIMUM . UNITS I ANALYS..IS ..

"lDayofOischrg* 'CJ Qcuiai on

',Flow Sample 0.9 0.9

.1 MeasUrement ; MGD, --

ýSTORET NO.

.Mcn SiteNo 50'050, EF F-5 1 P4 ito AILY AVG.

DRurmel 4

Rpoi OAiL.Y PAA 1 4~ K C~iir Oil and Grease SSa mple 1.3eet Grab

.Measuremen tI .. . 1 . mg/L '

STORET No. 00 EF

,. . . .. DAILY..AX...........

McmýSite No rota!, Susp~end ec .1MeasUreriient_, :.. . 21.0 21.0 3/wek - rab WLý STORET No. 00 pegni~t Grab, 53' , '-I Mol i.Sie, No,0 EF - 79.

-~ DAILY AVG)'tCDAILYMv1X.I

.Total Iecoverab leArsenic Sample.* 82.0 G rabý Gtoh ugý/(

STORETNo.

M im.eSitoerNoEF F-.

00 Total R~ecoverab IeCadmium :ISample SMo~o,!lrnm~nt

.... .

".

... . ..;t II w ~~ - ~

_50 DAILY JA) 1.0 iI/Mcrdi ygL .0 Ma. siteNo EF-'5, Penmt.

.Requirepvent,- ~:-~;~j~ [ DAIL'IY %,AxA Commeits*,

,b= Lirru calculated from backgroud/effluent lins:R = .ExceednceoI the calculated tmit7 = Backgroundbr upstream sample point P = Effluenfsample po0i. 'Sanies taken-in comlliancewilh tie monitoring req.iremenis spedfad

~ab0ve~sh~~belake~~at tlhe fdtcloing ocatior(s):,discharge.from each ash pond effluent pro tombiingwilh any other waste'stream EFF-5, EFF-6ý EFF-9. EFF;1OA & EFF. 102) and pH1samples for the puiposes of delarrrinlngý

'ackgro ud stal beIaý tatke iei. ai take (INT,3te.

Cat N If ny e,rno.I sed'... ntei,. 'MNR.: ' " '. '. .. . . . . . .. .. . . .. .in, . . .. . ..

S8amples takn n omplipnce with the moritonrg requlremenis.spediied abode shat be ak en at theflowing Iocaio(s): at the outlet conrespdndig~to a, invidua cmdenser (4 condenser s per unk) (EFIF -1A. EFF '18,. EFF-1iC);.flow from th comt nedcirculating'.ater pumpls(EFF-2); intake temperatureat unitU1 (LNT-1);: and discharge temperature at the interoessionof the st discharge canaland the-aigirel blkhead line (EFF-3D). (1) ombined cmdenser flow from Units ,2ad'. straI rot ex~ceeal 197.9 MGD durtng perod May~l stthroughObct'o-b'eru31 at of e',ach Or, 6a61r 3I" GDdr h renainthr of Iheyear. 1'any tsnenqot~s~ede~nter 'MNR".,

I certify urder penalty of *I that I have personally examinedaid am familiar with the information submnited'herer: and based on my inquiry of those individuas immediately responsible for obtainurg the informalon, Ibelieve the

'-a ýýue fa c submiti.d.irnritrmatio:'iste ac.rateand .r6ompte. Iam-aware.tha.'there-are igrai.

....no !7fo.:l nlomai~n ................. inE.a~id mfion e'

.pnaltiesfor;si ittting-fiseinfamationiLncvding n... eposstilyofine ai impuis.onrt .r

...... .... . .

Naril fPicplEetiv,*fe rAl~ie gn (Tp orkt Sjigniaure clPrincipal Exetv fcero.LAhorizedAgei Telephone;No,(icl aeacoe - a lae(yyltmPJ d)

LarryE.Hatcher * . ..

3, 563.4484 Manager, Crystal.River Fossil Plant.& Fuel Operations . it. .. I- lr .... ------ :

COMMENT, AND;EXPLANAT ION OFANY:VIOLATION (Reference.eltatadimertsý here)

On 911/08- Co0systN nstructton -pe-rs-onnel wor'king o~nthe lined PGD0 blowýd'ownodnd projectI inadveirtently dewateredl through the~PEE outat 6taILDi Qe ern lb ietdt trelw t b 4iec.edt IWW perc. pond iyaiem.frir ~i'~~u npmp Q 04 Page 1 6f:3

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT ; PART.A WHEN COMPLETEDMAIL THIS REPORT.TO: Department of Environmental Protection, Wastewater Facilfties Regulation SecticflS 3550,-2600 Blair'Sitone.Road, ,TallahKasSe6 FL 32399-2400 PERMIT NUMBER fFL0000159 PERMITTEE NAME: Progress Energy Florida MONITOR INfG'P ERIOD3F rmrni:` 20081091011 To: 20,8/09130 MAILING P.O. Box 1,404, MAC CN?7 LIMIT: -Final StE Peters buig FL 33733,4042.

REP ORT: Mnithly.

,C*LASS SIZE:Major GRC IUP: Industrial ATTN: Larry E. Haicher FACILITY: Crystal River South Plaint Units1, 2 GMS ID No.: 1037M25518 NMO ,TestSite No.;

LOCATION. 15760W. Powerline jt.Crystal'River: FL,34428 DISCIHARGE POINT NUMBER: .*c00. NOr )ISC-ARGE FROM-SITE .T,.-

,COUNTY: Citrus PLANT-S IZEiTREATME.NT TYPE:-

........... "REQUENCY.

FNO ýSAMPLE QUANTITY OR LOAXING :QUALITY OR CONC ENTRATION.

PARAMETE R. s - !. OF TYPE-AVERAGE IMAXIMUM. i UNITS, MINIMUM AVERAGE -M.XIMUM A UNITS- E ANALYSIS.

i 1iMonI" Grab

Total Recoverable' C h'o mium Sample Me, urrhrnnt. ug!L .

......... ,

STORET No. 01118 1 ° .

i Mr. Site No EFF-5 am,

[SSample ....

.~

..... . I mon Grob Total Recoverable Copper ug/L Measurement STORET No. 01119 1 Peilt 7" t M49. Sie!No EFF-5 Requirement . . , DAL'Y" Al MA XIý tSample .... 11Monr, Grab Total Recoverable Iron

-STORET No.

Vi.Sde No' 00980, E-FFP-5 1' L1, M~syrcm en t._______

Penrnit Re -.Uiremb t 1.. -

W.., I __________

1,7D 02 YAILMAX rmg/L

. -- . -

Total Recoverable Lead Sample 1/Manlh Grab t ug/L.

STORETNo: 01114 fI Mm. SiteNo EFF-5 'Regk~ernt__ e_9_

Total Recoverable Mer'cury ISample <0.1 Grab ug/L 0 T/clr

'STORET No. 71'901" EPern-it - *-I Mm. Ste.No EFF-5 I. :Rec'Luirem ent.-. . '

-fýPAl Y MA X,.

COMMENT AND-EXPLANATION OF ANY VIOLATIONS' (Referenr:allattadhmerts here)

On 911/t08 construction personnel wodW ng on ihe. ined.FGD b owdown pon6 prpojectI nadveL intiydewater throbgh the NPDESoutMfalL Dewating will be dlrected t(othe IlWW-perc.pond

S -tPage2 of 3 DEP Form 62-620;9 10(10). EfIt- civi N6V4mber 29, 199 4

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A WNHEN COMPLETED MAIL THIS.REPORT TO:.DePartmentof Environmental Proiectio, .Wastewater Facilties Regulation.. cti dWS 3550. 2600 Blair Stone Road TaJlahassele FL .32399-2400 PERMIT NUMBER- FL00001Z59 PERMITTEE,NAME: Progress Energy Florida MONITORINGPERIOD.--Fioroim 2008109/01 To: 2008/09130.

MA,ILINd P.O.Box 14042 MAC CN77 LIMI T:"FinaI St.Pete sburg FL-3373340'42ý CLA SSSIZE: Mjor REPORT: Monthly GROUP: Industrial ATTN: Lairry E ;J-H6 tcher FAC ILITY: Crystal River South"Plant,- Units 1, 2 GMS".ID N0* 1037M25518. GMS'Te tISite!'N.:

LOCATION: 15760W. PomrIneSt. CfystaI Rive( FL.34428 DISCHARGE POINT NUMBER: D-0C1 NO, DISCHARGE FROMSITE:

COUNTY" Citrus PLANT SIZE/TREATMENT TYPE:*

-SAMPLE QUALI"TY OR CONCENTR AT O N NO. FREQUENCY

PARAMETER UTEX. OFI TYPE AVE AGE MAXIMUM UNITS M INI MU m AVERA:GE. MAXIMUM UNIT[S X. ANALYSIS-Salnrippanie ..... . . 1/Monh.

Total Recoverable Nickel Grab SMeas'uremni 'nt

,ugiL. :. 0 0

STORET No. 01074 1 Pqiermi nt '

Mar. Site No EFF-5 S;.D L AILY MAX Total Recoverable Selenium lSample . i/Mantl Grab Measurement- I

.1.0

.ugiL, STORET No, 00981

Mm. Site No EFF-5 Total Recoverable Zi*c Sample I/Monti I Grab NA - umo.- f IgL 0

STORETNo. 061094 ...

DAILY MAX 1/M~rrrf' Mm Sfte-No EFF-5 pH (Backgmround) Sample I S, 83 J 8.3 SU lIMO Ii

'Grab 0

STORET No. 004060 7. PReori., 1 ReporfWl Ma. Site No INT-1 ""DAILYR:iN*. . .., DAILY pH .(Effluent) Sample n 7.9 7.9 " I 1/Monti - Grab 0.

'STbRETNo. 004006, p ~ e it -..

6,5 ~

Mon, SiteNo .EFF-5 'DAlL I N _ -j COMMENT AND EXPLANATION OF ANYViOLATINS: (Reference all attachmrgýshe)r}

On'9' 1i08 co nstruction personnelJwo rlng: on thelined FG D blowd own pond project inadvertanty d ewatered through the NPDES outfall.Oewatring w!ll be-dIrected to .W.the perc Pond*

nsystem.

Page 3 of 3

ýDEP Forhi:62-620:9 10(1'0): Etft~ciiv6 N~vcnihib 29-19,94'

Progress Energy Florida, InC. -CrystalRiVeQr Units 1,2; & 3 DEP File No, FL000Q1Q59-01 3-WI S/NR Attachment 10 Aerial Photo of FGD Blowdown Treatment Ponds and Associated Non-Contact Stormwater Management System

Backup FGD Blowdown Treatment Primary FGD Pond Blowdown Treatment Pond Non-contact stormwater management system Emergency Overflow Conveyance Ditch Stormwater management system outlet D-OC1 outlet to Discharge Location of D-OC1 Canal flow measurement weir and sampling point

Progress Energy Florida, Inc. -Crystal River Units 1, 2, & 3 DEP File No. FL0000159-013-1WIS/NR.

Attachment 11 Page From NPDES Permit 1L00483211 Showing Example Bypass Provision Special ConditioniLanguage

1~--e i.iac 'or su ... AozinceonDateAuaut2 Annuaifir ditior's

* .. f th

.. -c .... pe. , :' rm intion ... mor troe v',thaern l Ioo I.Ob 7l2i*,emi *h ,ded" I be ve. uts C,-

SprIqiec's Enirnmental Pecton 1-9

,.

i Anfora al,insthe tinua reoor

PEC!Al-CONDrTION 9, Discharge ofstatio coolincýorionid waterto6 ad!: acentlmocound'merits ins, sn i be ...

ownreo

..

by the-Petee. t6 'o ewia-Mr

. ....

't ' , T" ,P<e' ,ornp Ms 927e ,a: Mottnn Rcoon .... on r,

___________________Guno Prcu Ivorutonr R~eorFrs wheinonuf 4o .8t than tie oý,aw tie jo P F.

S... *Son 'nove led.

I 10. s 62706 llinoi e 7 9Aguncy, - -,onCS record ,.. ; ,

re.svirtsmennal + . . . , ,s . ,M ,

10briri21

,Idscth NorthGrand:ve a.l TeMiu'ngepn shall be

,lrEast ComAiied t teJEAat Sur oloiniadrs

,.."" th,

" 2 oJ'th ": . %

-) ephcsWateearý Polton Cotro Mi. i ECciomenialf AssrainceAgectio ' A CC'NQrON, 11. The "tupseV detense prviinso Title- 40. -SPdctiri 1'ý22.~)~ h F deral Recunafioris &e -'itb LPCI!

zincorpor-aed inothis permit by reference. * ~ 4.

SPECk* A CONUFfDN 1e2. An emergen cooling pond ov.rf...o ex.sts tnributaryto an unnamed diaiage ditchvwhidt is+t"ibuta,:to theMazon River. Dsigi esfrom this overflow shall be subiect to the bypass provisionis of 40 CFR 122 41&rnr.h)

STECIAL CONDMON 13. The zrnmittee shall submit a cd pteted Foromn 2F assoon aslonditions allow. foG-OutaltlOO aid.*- Vtf 6003. Based on the new information the Agency may choose to modify the piermit after public notice and opportunityfor herlnno.g

.*', - I** ¢ p n fed Ihos (2C8 ,,.., . . * . . ... ...

NQecN :A*.;~ C~:C S PECIAL -:,. eischarge m ta 14.c Fors ra c ~ No-cin 001(b),

?7,7 any,

" use .,-;i of chlon

,'i ',: ,-,"..citro r -.slime to I,.. . ,+*;oI ,;"***

S odors or " ..as anricor icm nona 6tc. shell net exceed the limrit of 0-05 ring/I (daily maximumn) total residual chlorine inthe effluent. Sampling is required oni a d~g snleubmitted on the on a monthey b hfis.

}basis

(:.,,*i.*during ttiec

....*.*.,.., v.. .%:*:.le a

. !st'dReportingsh onipoes in e: ...

tosi f""il:F"JlO:$e (DR te,*;*:1....2in)O*** ,;.e *e" "eeal'*"*;: R 4atl <'< :....,1.

' EC.~1AtND1oIton' d: Ito thS

' :,,t~n C~i~to~ . peritb ..reshall

. Floew .. , as a-_:

ee bee,repolTed caily maxihf- rn arnd amrn*oItl averaae. and shall berrpote . . . . . .. " ' ,

P<r'.n.

sti 7 A..

Progress Energy Florida, Inc. -Cry~tal Rivet Units 1, 2, &3 DEPR Fil No., FL0000159-0,-1.3-IWI SiNR Attachment 12 Mariculture Center Release Summary 1992 -2009

PROGRESS ENERGY CRYSTAL RIVER MARICULTURE CENTER FINGERLING/JUVENILE RELEASE

SUMMARY

RED RED DRUM SPOTTED SPOTTED STRIPED YEAR DRUM LARVAE SEATROUT SEATROUT PINK SHRIMP MULLET PIGFISH SILVER PERCH STONE CRAB BLUE CRAB LARVAE 1992 17,519 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1993 169,165 0 6,908 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1994 12.204 0 55,304 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1995 26,900 0 60,189 0 12,000 0 0 0 0 0 1996 50,795 0 32,994 0 7,750 0 0 0 0 0 1997 0 0 0 0 0 pond trials 0 0 0 0 1998 157,833 800.000 171,350 425,000 0 pond trials 0 0 0 0 1999 67,227 575,500 40,536 290,000 34,541 25,000 first feeding 0 0 0 0 larvae controlled spawning/I,300,000 2000 285,366 0 11,000 0 9,839 0 first feeding 0 0 0 larvae/pond trial (none released) 2001 16,251 0 130 0 91.079 indoor culture 0 0 0 0 controlled 2002 4,070 0 250,054 0 36,934 indoor culture 0 spawning/pond trial 0 0 (none released) 500,000 first 39,942 first feeding controlled spawning and feeding larvae larvae pond trial (none released) 2004 15,000 0 16,500 0 0 0 0 0 4,000,000 Zoea 1 35,000,000 Zoea 1 2005 0 0 4,768 0 87,374 0 0 0 8,767,055 Zoea 1 31,447,656 Zoea 1 2006 0 0 81,700 0 42,830 0 0 0 14,851,947 Zoea 1 15,475,245 Zoea I 2007 0 0 70,000 0 43,000 0 0 0 4,729,060 Zoa I 11,823,30 Zoca 1 2008 0 0 75,180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 0 0 92,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32347,962 93,746,281 ZI Totals I 947,394 I 1.375,500 I 1,131.813 715,0W 415102 525000Iarvae feeding first 39942 tmva first feeding Stage I zoca

v t e Letter Sequence Response to RAI
TAC:ME0278, Elimination of Hydrogen Recombiners and Change to Hydrogen and Oxygen Monitors (Approved, Closed)
Initiation Request, Request Acceptance Supplement Administration Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance Meeting, Meeting Questions 20 April 2009 3 August 2009 10 August 2009 20 August 2009 14 August 2009 14 August 2009 11 September 2009 20 August 2009 31 August 2009 31 August 2009 31 August 2009 2 September 2009 22 September 2009 15 October 2009 3 November 2009 27 October 2009 1 December 2009 30 November 2009 2 February 2010 21 May 2010 2 June 2010 8 July 2010 8 July 2010 14 October 2010 8 November 2010 16 November 2010 31 March 2011 10 June 2011 30 June 2011 8 November 2011 Answers 9 October 2009 11 May 2009 11 September 2009 11 September 2009 18 September 2009 30 September 2009 2 October 2009 13 October 2009 22 October 2009 5 November 2009 12 November 2009 3 December 2009 30 December 2009 27 January 2010 3 March 2010 1 April 2010 5 November 2009 1 April 2010 21 June 2010 28 June 2010 28 June 2010 9 August 2010 12 November 2010 23 November 2010 16 December 2010 29 December 2010 25 February 2011 15 March 2011 26 April 2011 15 June 2011 20 July 2011 29 November 2011 Results Approval, Approval, Approval Other: 3F1109-06, State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Conditions of Certification, 3F1209-04, Response to Follow-up to Progress Energy RAI Responses on CR-3 SAMA Evaluation, ML090090233, ML090210171, ML090350657, ML090420362, ML090780840, ML091200415, ML091660559, ML091820465, ML092600889, ML092610309, ML093200023, ML093520079, ML100050166, ML100980517, ML100980519, ML100980520, ML100980523, ML100980524, ML100980525, ML100980526, ML100980528, ML101110235, ML101320401, ML101460577, ML110250183, ML110410597, ML110460629, ML110820185, ML110880294, ML11137A009, ML11140A100, ML11180A275, ML11343A639, ML12117A260, ML12213A058, ML12346A011
MONTHYEAR2009-06-10 [Table View]

ML101810176

Text

Subject:

References:

Dear Sir:

Enclosure:

Response

Response

Response

Response

Dear Mr.Harris:

Attachment:

Dear Sir:

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search