Text

November 2002 Monthly Operating Report for Palo Verde
	ML023530436
Person / Time
Site:	Palo Verde
Issue date:	11/30/2002
From:	; Arizona Public Service Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	Download: ML023530436 (81)
	v • d • e

- - - 44 4 444444

- 44 K r A . 44 444 444444 44 44

- 4 4 4 ' 4 4 444 4 4 44 it 444 44 -

4 41 4 4 4 44 4 4

4.

AU.,p.4 4-

- 4 4

>44444, 4

4 44 4 4 4 4 44 4 44 4

-t 4 4 44 4 A 44 4 4- 4444 4 4-4 ':444 44 444 44' 4 0 4 4 44 -4

'4 0

4 4 4 444 4 444 -

4 4 4 4 Cl 44t44 4-. 4444-4 g) 4 4 4 444 4 44f 44444 A 444 4444 4 J44%44 4 4444.

444444

4;4%,

44 44-

.4.

H 44 4 L 4444 0

K 4-4 V

4 4- 4 A 444 Dr>< 444 44 4444 0 44 44 4 4 Li 4

444444 4 44 4 4 44 4-44 444!

U. 444 41 3/4. 444

¶4 4 4 4 4-4 4-44 44 4- 4 44 4-4 4-44444 44 4 44 4;, 4 44 444 44 4 4 4 44 44 4

44 4 S 4444 44 14'4' 4

4444

,4 4 4.4- .

44 4) 4 4-44 4 4

<'A 444 44-4 t1/4V

'-4 4 4 4 4 4 4- 44 444444 4444/

4 4- 44 44 4 44 4

444 44

'4 r 444

f- " -- - .... [ r .... f -- f ..

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Monthly Trend Report November 2002 Compiled and Published By Generation Analyses and Data Support Contacts: S. M. Meyer (602) 250-3078 C. L. Jury (602) 250-2445

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Monthly Trend Report The Monthly Trend Report monitors current performance trends and progress toward goals established in the Palo Verde Business Plan.

Responsibility for completing the tasks described in the Business Plan is shared by all Palo Verde team members.

This report is made available to the entire Palo Verde team, so that all personnel are constantly aware of the team's objectives, and our current standing in achieving, and then exceeding, the established goals.

SIMPLICITY INTENSITY ACCOUNTABILITY TENACITY POSITIVE ATTITUDE TEAMWORK L- --.

. L- I- I I- _- I - I -- I [ 11 1 1 [ . , I - ( I L

--- f .... F-- f--- ( .... r F - F F-- V.. T F- r'-- I [r - r ... v- -

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 19 BZ*,rnmutmln Ooiceii 0 Ratt J

'77 Sj6 d on. ary

'Yalvi Leeks 'd -777

-r Ravat T

L LýIind En Inddi"nts 83 November 2002

" Funding of this plan occurs once threshold earnings are achieved by Pinnacle West Capital Corporation.

1. Reactor Trips Definition: Number of unplanned automatic and manual reactor trips during the current calendar year Site Total Unit I Unit 2 Unit 3 Year-To-Date Monthly Monthly Monthly Month Reactor Trips Goal Automatic Manual Automatic Manual Automatic Manual 2001 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 Jan *1 0 Feb *1 0 Mar <1 0 Apr *1 0 May *1 0 Jun <1 0 Jul <1 0 Aug *1 0 Sep <1 0 Oct <1 0 Nov <1 1 Dec *1 YTD 1 0 S1 11 0 1 0 0 0 Data Source: John Simpkins - 393-5325 Indicator Owner: Dave Smith - 393-2656 L I- - I I I I I I I I I I I I

r ... r r".. r ... r .. (/7 r* - v .. r r.. .. fr - r

r~.... u-... - c- r ...

ýi

Description:

11110102 - Manually 3 tripped U1 RX to repair vibrations on SIA-UV-651 2

1 0

2001 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec YTD t L

=_*Unit 1,, Unit 2 Unit 3 r YTD 'nGoal

INPO Best Quartile = 0 0

2. Maintenance Rule Performance Definition: Percentage of Maintenance Rule Systems meeting performance criteria.

Jan 96.8 96.8 98.0 Feb 98.1 97.5 98.0 Mar 98.5 97.8 98.0 Apr 986 98.0 98.0 May 98.0 98.0 98.0 Jun 98.4 981 980 Jul 986 981 980 Aug 986 98.2 98.0 Sep 98.6 982 98.0 Oct 98.2 98.2 98.0 Nov 98.7 98.3 98.0 Dec 98 0 Data Source: Duane Sills - 393-6852 Indicator Owner: Mike Winsor - 393-5120

a 9 leOE) GIA 96ejoAV (]jký oa(3 AON 100 d6S 6nV inr 6np ý`"46Vqý 1dV Jevq qo=l Uer Woz 1 mv Hvný-Immcam 1 1_ý 1,1m;wn 1 96 L6 96 Ij 66 OU IUODJad

--- I -- j .-- j -j ----i -- i - -) - i -- j .---i - I --- I - i

3. On-Line Equipment Reliability Definition: # of high risk significant functional failures and failures causing downpowers >10%

Month # of Failures # of Downpowers YTD # of Failures Goal 2001 29 6 35 Jan 0 3 Feb 0 6 Mar 3 9 Apr 6 12 May 8 15 Jun 9 18 Jul 15 22 Aug 17 25 Sep 19 28 Oct 2 21 31 Nov 2 23 34 Dec 37 Data Source: Duane Sills - 393-6852 Indicator Owner: Mike Winsor - 393-5120 t t [ I ( t I I

r ...- r. r. c- r r -- r- r - r r r- r

3. On-Line Equipment Reliability 1! High Risk Significant FunctionalFailures

,p'tt November Descriptions:

Unit I - Valve 1JSGAPVO313A failed to open during the perforrfance'of 73ST-9XI20 (CRDR 2562893)

Unit 2 - Air Compressor 2MIANCO1C tripped on high vibration (CRDR -

2568234) - -

2001 ., Jan, Feb . Mar, , Apr, - May-, -, Jun , July, Aug Sep . Oct Nov Dec I

SI I, #of Failures S# of Downpowers "-'"Goal I I I I I B

4. Reactivity Management Performance Definition: The combination of human performance, programs, and equipment that allows for continuous reactivity monitoring and control as well as maintenance of fuel integrity such that safe and conservative operation of PVNGS is assured.

1 Plant Operation Reflects performance of all plant operations including steady states, power maneuvers, and shutdown operations.

2 Equipment Reflects equipment failure impact to reactivity control and monitoring.

3 Design Reflects quality of all design inputs that potentially impact reactivity monitoring and control.

4 Fuel Management Reflects performance in maintaining fuel integrity, such as fuel handling, FME controls, SFP inventory and control, dry casks storage, etc.

JAN JFEB i MAR APR [MAY JUN [JUL iAUG SEP OCT NOV I DEC Monthly White White Performance

_____ 2 2 j.WhitI White 2

White 2

Iellow'l White 2

White 2

,Yellow:

YTD White Performance 2

"*GREEN annunciator = Significant Strength (1)

"*WHITE annunciator = Strength (2)

"*YELLOW annunciator = Improvement Needed (3)

"*RED annunciator = Significant Weakness (4)

Data Source: Erik Flodin - 393-5899 Indicator Owners: Paul Crawley - 393-6360 & Dave Smith - 393-2656 t [I ( I I I 1 I I I I

F V F f' F U r- [ ( r r F-_- r_- r ( __ r-__U

,4.Reactivity Management Performance I Reactivity ,....

Management '

Plant Design Fuel Equipment Management Operation "Previjous Current"

...Month"...

Activities Affecting Annunciators:

U1 reactor trip occurred during a planned downpower due to a CEA deviation. (Equipment)

U1 was manually tripped from - 19% due to exceeding chemistry Action Level 3 for steam generator sulfates. (Plant Ops)

An incorrect 'ev ofda Rel6ad'Analysis d6c. was used to gen6r4atb CPC 'addressable donrstant change at 70% RTP in UlC1 1. (Plant Ops)

U02 expeiefnic6da" i F rfdiktidi*" I6RCS hot leg teii"'-vvhile 16"e'ringf pF-r§urizef le66l t6 support rhainte-ance on CVCS'system. (Plant Ops)

U1 experienced a loss of letdown during Power Ascension Testing. (Equipment)

U3 received CPC D pre-trips when the operator's module lost power. (Equipment),

During initial startup, UlC1 1 had a large unexpected azimuthal tilt. (Design)

U2CI I Subcritical Main Steam Line Break analysis used a non-conservative reactivity credit. (Design)

NAD review of UICI 1 reload design identified several errors with no direct impact to the analyses conclusions. (Design)

5. Collective Radiation Exposure Definition: The total external and internal whole-body dose received by all personnel, including contractors and visitors, as measured by incremental dosimetry, and thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD). Year-end goals, exclude RX vessel head inspection and repairs Site Total Unit I Unit 2 Unit 3 SMonthly YTD YTD Monthly YTD YTD Monthly YTD YTD Monthly YTD YTD Month Actual Actual Goal Actual Actual Goal Actual Actual Goal Actual Actual Goal 2001 187.3 86.2 18.9 80.7 Jan 31 31 2.6 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.7 Feb 20 5.1 5.0 0.8 2.0 1.7 0.6 1.2 1.6 0.5 1.5 1.4 Mar 34.6 39.7 594 0.2 22 2.6 33.7 34.9 54 3 0.6 2.1 21 Apr 25.1 64.8 101.5 0.4 26 3.5 24.1 59.0 94 7 0.4 25 2.8 May 2.2 67.0 1042 08 34 44 06 59 7 95 5 07 32 36 Jun 2.4 694 106 6 08 42 5.2 0.7 60 3 96 3 0.9 40 43 Jul 1.8 71.2 109.2 0.7 48 61 0.5 60 8 97 1 05 46 5.0 Aug 1.8 72.9 1118 08 5.6 70 06 61 4 97 9 02 48 58 Sep 7.0 79.9 119.8 6.0 11 6 13.5 0.7 62.1 98 7 0.2 50 6.5 Oct 60 9 140.9 189.0 60.4 72.0 80.9 0.1 62.3 99.6 0.4 5.4 7.2 Nov 1.9 142 8 193 1 11 73.0 81.7 04 62.7 102.0 0.4 5.7 7.9 Dec 197.0 82.6 104.3 86 Data Source: James Bungard - 393-2797 Indicator Owner: John Gaffney - 393-2860 t I I I I I I I I I t I I I I

r -- - -- r- c-- i- - c ... .. r - - r - rFf- r --- v- - C -

5. Collective Radiation Exposure Site Total. Unit 1,

,, Man-Rem Man-Rem 100

-,1 6 0 .........................................

- ------ --......... 80 A12 0 ..'- ------------------ . .. . ..

60 ..... ---

40 480 ............ ----..... ..I------ ----- .... ....

20 0

1. 1, a' 0 U)3:3 a 0 0) oa '-D 0)4)(

~ C ~ CL >f 0

0 a) 0 U.~ ~ <C z 0 Co - < -) < 0 z 0 ti: YTD Actual ' YTD Goal Co"=

C.,4

YrD Actual iYTD GoalI Unit 2

Unit'3" Man-Rem Man-Rem , ,

120 100 100 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 n

- a L- " 75 (M . > C oý M Q) Me

<O. =3 n 0 0) < < ~0 z0 o -) LL 2 0)

C',4 c TD ctal - YmD Goal F yTD Actual inaYTD GoalI

INPO Best Quartile[ Ave age'(mahý-iýrh'per unit-per year, 3 y~ar64vage) = 78

6. Contaminated Area Definition: Percentage of the radiological controlled area that is designated contaminated at the end of each month, shown for each unit, based on floor square footage of the RCA

% of RCA Contaminated = Contaminated Area (sq. ft.) / Total RCA (sq. ft.) x 100 Contaminated Area (sq. ft.) % of RCA Contaminated UntIUi o-Non- Non- Non- Non- Nn Unit I2 Unit 2 nUnit on-honUnit N Outage UiiUtl Nontn 2

Non 2Unit nit I2Untini2Site Ut3 Ouage 3 Outage O Site utage Non-UnitUit Outage 2Unit3 tage Ou oua Ui3 Outage Outage Outage Outage Outage Outage Outage Outage Jan 1,862 2,705 1,703 0 88 300 71 2,405 0.5 0.7 1.3 0.0 0.1 02 0.1 1.8 Feb 918 2,705 763 0 84 300 71 2,405 0.2 0.7 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 1.8 Mar 818 2,405 518 0 209 300 91 2,105 0.2 0.6 04 00 02 02 0.1 1.6 Apr 691 2,405 488 0 115 300 88 2,105 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 16 May 441 3,215 290 0 80 300 71 2,915 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.1 02 0.1 2.2 Jun 615 3,215 285 0 134 300 196 2,915 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 2.2 Jul 545 3,365 410 0 64 450 71 2,915 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 2.2 Aug 968 1,570 710 400 64 450 194 720 0.2 0.4 0.5 03 00 03 01 0.5 Sep 543 1,795 410 400 64 675 69 720 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.5 Oct 338 1,570 205 400 64 450 69 720 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.1 05 Nov 607 1,270 354 100 184 450 69 720 0.2 0.3 0.3 01 01 03 01 05 Dec Data Source: James Bungard - 393-2797 Indicator Owner: John Gaffney - 393-2860 I ( f I I I I

ieoEo G§~1lO-uoNmu leoEo e~ejnQ-uoN.."".

e~elno E= e6elnO-UON 9eino a~elnO-uoN CD 0 CD c w CD co CD C) 0

< a CD

'a c

to C -

c i l<

CD C-a) 0 c £ - ¶ 0 00 -0'0 To 90 0'.

0-JuqOiad 0 cJnun z nun teoEs,?6efl&uONum I ieoEo e6ejnO-uONe

- e~6elno - 6efljn-uO N =j e6ejno epiS e6elnO.uON eIIS 0 z0 o W > C-. :K > -n c o z 0 cl) > c_ c-. >-n CD C

w~

CD 0 CD c C 03 w

CD c'

w3 CD 0

0 C CD a CO (0

a S c w a)

- ' 0 o $i 'D (a 00 0*0 To 90' 0 I.

S'I 9, L t nuno ILJOI iS I ivpeWU!eueUOo -9

-- i ---- ) -- i -- i J --J -- 9

7. Preventable Recordable Injuries Definition: The number of OSHA recordable injunes judged to have been preventable.

ot a li W# of Weeks Without An Injury Monthly T Montly Ttal Month Palo YTD PV Goal i Total Goal Palo Fossil /

Verde Total Other Verde Other 2001 12 37 49 41 26 Jan 0 0 1 6 6 3 5 2 Feb 1 1 2 8 15 6 3 1 Mar 1 2 3 2 18 9 3 3 Apr 3 5 4 1 22 12 2 3 May 0 5 5 4 26 16 5 2 Jun 0 5 6 5 31 19 4 0 Jul 2 7 7 4 37 22 4 3 Aug 1 8 8 3 41 25 3 2 Sep 0 8 9 1 42 28 4 3 Oct 3 11 10 2 47 31 2 3 Nov 0 11 11 0 47 34 4 4 Dec 12 37 Total 39 26 Data Source: Wayne Rowe - 393-1956 Indicator Owner; Angie Krainik - 393-2099 I I I

I - I -, Fr- -_- rI- - (- F - Fv- __ F - C - rF -r rFf - r- - r -(- . . -r ...

7. Preventable Recordable Injuries I Descriptions 2127 - An RP employee mixing in a. Palo Verde Descriptions 7/11 - An Operations employee a drum strained right shoulder sustained a fracture to the left requiring medication and therapy. 20 elbow. The employee was 3/29 - Employee sustained head, assisting another employee in neck, and shoulder strain requiring .................... restoring the spray pond filter prescription medication while 15 pump following scheduled performing routine radiological maintenance activities. After survey in Unit 1 auxiliary building. closing the valve, the employee 4105 - A RAMS employee 10 stepped away and misjudged the sustained an OSHA Recordable sloping surface surrounding the injury while working in Unit 2 pump resulting in an approximate Containment reassembling a 5 two-foot fall to level ground.

valve. When a co-worker moved 8/13 - A Maintenance Services the rigging, he was struck In the employee cut the tip off of his left mouth by the hook of a chain fall, 0

Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec thumb while using a plastic shear which resulted In a fractured tooth 2001 Jan Feb Mar Apr May In the Engraving Shop at the North requinng repair by a dentist.

4115 - An Operations employee ~YTD PV -Goal B Annex.

10111 - A Radiation Protection sustained a right elbow strain due employee fell in Containment and to operating an excessively difficult struck an I-Beam causing a to operate valve or due to b.- Total Generation (GBU) laceration to the employee's excessive use while operating # of Injuries forearm requiring 15 sutures. ,

several valves, requiring 50 I 10115 - A Maintenance Services medication. This injury was employee sustained chemical originally classified as minor but 40 ....--- ----...

conjunctivitis and comeal bum to has changed to OSHA Recordable due to prescription medication.

'44 ioal = 37 his left eye while applying epoxy 30 coating to CW valve #10 requiring 4119 - An Outage & Scheduling - -- - ----- - - -- -- -

prescription medication and also employee reported that on 4-12-02 . ......... work restrictions.

he struck his left elbow on a 20 A RAMS employee 10125 -

bracket while lowering a double --------- -- - - sustained Injury to his right foot three foot lead blanket. Injury when an object weighing required prescription medication. 10f approximately 250 pounds fell 7/11 - A RAMS employee was 1- - resulting in a fracture/crushed part of a crew assigned to perform 0 maintenance on Unit 3 great toe. Employee was given 2001 Jan Feb , Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec prescnption medication, placed In Containment Building tendons.

This accident occurred when B a splint, given crutches and placed another worker, standing on the 13YTD APSGen. I on restricted duty.

scaffold planks, accidentally kicked an 8-pound hammer off the platform and struck the RAMS employee on the top of his head requiring 5 sutures.

8. Contractor Preventable Recordable Injuries Definition: The number of OSHA recordable injuries sustained by contractor personnel judged to have been preventable.

F[

Ihlonth PV Contractors Monthly YT D Total Goal 2001 31 Jan 0 0 < 2 Feb 0 <

0 4 Mar 1 1 < 6 Apr 2 3 < 9 May 1 4 < 11 Jun 0 4 < 13 Jul 1 5 < 15 Aug 3 8 < 17 Sep 2 10 < 19 Oct 7 17 < 22 Nov 3 20 < 24 Dec 26 Data Source: Wayne Rowe - 393-1956 Indicator Owner: Angie Krainik - 393-2099 I I I

("_ F..

F.... [----7 r .... F-- __ C- .... KF F F--

-, V - ri--FV C--- [7 F F T r- F V F- -- rV---

8. Contractor Preventable Recordable Injuries J

oflInjuries 35 30 25 S.. . . . . . . . . . .:. . . . .:. . . . . . . .. . ................. '............................................................

20- "Xi' <'w 15+

10-5

,-.--0== ===

====== === : -- ..-..-------

0 2001 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec I I", ,-rnYTD Total -Goal I1-Descriptions:

3-22 An Atlantic employee sustained a laceration to his left thumb requidng sutures while 10-04-02 An Atlantic employee, while wJ6lding, received second and third degree bums on his working at the North Access Facility. upper left arm when a piece of welding slag fell burned through his welding jacket.

4.04 An Atlantic employee was involved in an operation with several other employees 10-09-02 An Atlantic employee experienced minor swelling, tenderness on both feet after moving a cart loaded with a heavy piece of pipe (approximately 2,880 lbs.). While holding onto excessive walking Determined to be OSHA Recordable 10-23-02 after work restnctions.

the pipe, the employee turned his upper body and felt pain to his lower back. The employee was 10-09-02 An Atlantic employee sustained injury when a metallic foreign body became embedded given work restrictions and prescription medication. in his finger which had to be surgically removed.

4-16 An Atlantic employee caught his finger between two pull boxes being installed for the 10-11.02 - An Atlantic employee was hauling a flatbed trailer to Unit I.W while pulling away from conduit banks. His finger was crushed, resulting in a fractured bone and required 5 sutures to the trailer, one air brake line released and struck the employee in the back of the head resulting-close the cuts on his finger. in nine sutures.

5-22 An Atlantic employee reported that on 5-17-02 he sustained a lower back strain when 10-11 An Atlantic employee was removing a rusted fan blade. The blade broke loose he picked up a piece of scrap metal weighing approximately 30 pounds requinng prescription,. causing the ratchet to slip and the employee's arm contacted the blade of the fan resulting in medication. "1

. , seven staples.

7-5 An ABM employee reported on 8-6-02 that she had sustained a left shoulder strain while 10-13 An Atlantic employee reported on 10-22-02 that he struck against a guardrail in dumping recycle paper into a bin resulting in work restrictions and prescription medicati'on.. . "Containmentwhiile-6lwering a tool b6xsiustaining in a contusion to a rib.

8-20 An ABM employee reported that on 8:1 5-02 while he was lifting heaVy trash bags to the 10-14 An Atlantic employee picking up an Impact wrench caught his thumb between the dumpster, he felt his abdomen tighten resulting in restncted duties as assigned by APS medical. Impact wrench and concrete resulting in prescnption pain medication.

ABM sent the employee home resulting in an OSHA Lost-Workday. 11-14 A Welding Services Incorporated employee was working In the Unit 2 Fuel Building 8-22 An Atlantic employee was using a cutting torch when an acetylene hose connection when he dropped his welding shield and the filter lens broke. While replacing the lens the came loose and caused a brief flash bum. Employee was prescribed medication to treat the bum, employee sustained a finger laceration that required sutures.

8-27 A Guckenheimer employee, not wearing gloves, placed her hand Into a steamer and 11-02 An Atlantic employee was welding on the Unit I "Sunshine Deck" when he developed received second degree bums requiring presciption"Fnedlcation" ......... Irritation in the right eye. He flushed his eye and the Irritation subsided. Several hours later the 9-12 An Atlantic employee reached through metal shavings while he was beveling an 8" pipe eye Imtatlon returned. He reported to Medical where several pieces of debris were removed. A which cut through his glove and thumb requiring 5 sutures. piece of debris was embedded and had to be removed with a surgical instrument.

9-30 An Atlantic employee was walking next to his leader on a sidewalk at Unit I when he 11-29 An Atlantic employee was stepping out of a water truck at WRF when he slipped off of inadvertently stepped off the curb and fell onto his right leg, wrist and chest resulting in work the step. The employee grabbed onto the handles to catch his fall. The incident resulted In restrictions. severe lower abdominal pain requiring hospitalization and surgery.

9. Significant Human Performance Events Definition: CRDRs that identify events attnbuted to human performance including lost time injuries Month Monthly YTD Goal 2001 9 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Data Source: Mike Radoccia - 393-6794 Indicator Owner: Craig Seaman - 393-5421

. I-

[-- . F... r --- (F..F... r----. i---- r I- F-1 F.- ( --- F_ r-Descriptions K 9. Significant Human Performance Events 03102 - A valve was found In the # of Events open position after a red tag had 10 been hung by FP Operations.

(CRDR 2476624) 10102 - As spent fuel assembly M 316 was lifted from the upender, the crane operator Initiated trolley movement prior to the assembly clearing the upender. (CRDR 8 2559423) 6 4

2 0

I YTD - Goal I

10. Noteworthy Human Performance Events Definition: A human performance error that results in an undesirable consequence (includes significant human performance events and recordable injuries).

2Month Monthly YTDIZ 2001 138 Jan 5 5 Feb 8 13 Mar 8 21 Apr 24 45 May 7 52 Jun 5 57 Jul 4 61 Aug 5 66 Sep 5 71 Oct 14 85 Nov 7 92 Dec Data Source: Mike Radoccia - 393-6794 Indicator Owner: Craig Seaman - 393-5421

v r r r-- v F F F F F F F F r r r- r- r

10. Noteworthy Human Performance Events I

.7# of Events I.18F(

0 150 -

120 90 60

<:730 0

2001 Jan Feb Marl Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec U YTD Descriptions:

CRC Date CRDR # Summary of Events 05-Nov-02 2554246 (U-I) An individual inappropriately entered and exited an RCA without complying with the RCA controls.

05-Nov-02 2564869 (U-,I) RCS Temperature was raised to >250 degrees F. without performance of 74ST-9RCO1.

05-Nov-02 '2565825-(0-2) The fe6eder break~r for "ARN-P01C" was inc~rrectly 6peened durinrg the pe6rformainc6 of 40DT-9AR01.

07-Nov-02 2562870 (U-I) On 10/20/02, aRM Techniiar discovered that the RU-34 Coritainnriit Pirg6 Noble Gas Monitor setpoints had been incdbrrectly inputted.

07-Nov-02 2565954 An incorrect revision of a Reload analysis document was used to generate CPC addressable constant change at 70% RTP in U1 C11.

07-Nov-02 2566042 (U-3) While verifying the data for RCS leakage in the STA data spreadsheet, it was noticed that the periodicity of 40ST-9RC02 had been exceeded.

08-Nov-02 2566050 (U-2) ESP Zinc Phosphoric Acid Bin was pumped dry because the B pump timer failed to turn off and the pump status was not verified.

11. Tagging Permit Events Definition: The number of significant and adverse CRDR events for clearance implementation errors.

Adverse Evients Significant Events Total YTD Events Month Monthly YTD Tota Goal Aonthly YTD Tottal Goat It A ctual Total Goal Actual 2001 8 2 10 Jan 0 0 1 0 1 Feb 1 1 1 2 2 Mar 2 2 1 3 3 Apr 4 2 1 5 3 May 5 3 1 6 4 Jun 7 4 1 8 5 Jul 8 5 1 9 6 Aug 8 6 1 9 7 Sep 10 6 1 11 7 Oct 11 7 1 12 8 Nov 11 8 1 12 9 Dec 9 1 10 Data Source: Gene Elmar- 393-1762 Indicator Owner: Dave Smith - 393-2656 I I I t

( -.. F. F.. F-- F-- F-- F-- r-- F _-1-F - (_-- F- - F-- r- r - ... r-- r_-

25 20 ------------

20i--- ------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------ _--------- - ----------------------

15--------------------- -- - -- - - - - -

S..........................................................................j --------------------

7"------------

5- ...........

0+

2001 Ja n Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep' Oct Nov Dec

" YTD Significant Events " YTD Adverse EventsA - Goali "Descriptionof Significant Events:

of.. Advr" Events:...

Decito 2/02 - In U-3, a credited tag was inadvertently removed from permit 60345 for the Liquid Nitrogen 2102 - A valve was found in the open position after a red tag had been hung by FP pumps. No components were reposition~d and the tag was rehung. (CRDR 2469353) Operations. (CRDR 2476624) -

3102 - Tag #1 for permit #31887 was Improperly removed during restoration of permit 63570.

(CRDR 2476232) 4/02 - Facilities Maintenance hung tag on bkr 20 vice bkr 18 per permit SS-02-022. Discovered by work group during walkdown. (CRDR 2496954) 4102 - Operations hung permit 64290 but failed to open bkrs 15 and 19 on 3ENHND26 per conditions required. Discovered by work group dunng walkdown. (CRDR 2510268) 5/02 - A Water Reclamation Facility "Maintenrance-in-Progress" tag was removed by an unauthorized Individual. (CRDR 2514105) ......... .. . .

6102 - SRP work was performed on AENANX01 without Operations accepting permit #38826 for ..

SRP. (CRDR 2528716) 6102 - Dunng the restoration of a permit, the wrong tags were lifted. (CRDR 2524174) 7102 - Tags were hung for Permit 80719 without establishing the required conditions. The valve required to establish plant conditions for maintenance was not on the P*ID that Operations uses to generate permits. The permit was sent to Working. However, no Maintenance personnel accepted clearance before this problem was identified ....

9/02 - Maintenance was performed per WM #2360038 without a permit acceptor being signed onto Permit #83058. (CRDR #25570470) ........... I -,, -. -,

9102 - The TD used to establish a permit on the CW System was deficient ast it did not Include the water box drain valve resulting In a small standing head of water in the water boxes over some of the manways. (CRDR #2557836) 10102 - White transfering ownership of Permit #88226 from night shift to day shift, the team leader's transfer was not completed In SWMS. (CRDR #2560819)

12. Timely Issues Resolution Definition: The time required to resolve employee issues through the MITR process, or through the Employee Concerns Program Current Month 12-Month Rolling Goal Average Days Average Days

4 2001 27 II

4 Jan 11 26 30 Feb 0 24 30 Mar 0 23 30 Apr 24 22 30 May 1 21 30 Jun 33 21 30 Jul 26 20 30 Aug 10 20 30 Sep 0 21 30 Oct 28 22 30 Nov 0 19 30 Dec 30 Data Source: Karen Greiner - 393-6313 Indicator Owner: Ruben Sanchez - 393-6927 t S! I I I I

f- - I --- F-

. . Fr

. . I-- [r F. " r....

r- [--- f".. F- F--- F- r--- F-- r i

I

12. Timely IssUesRes61Utin6 40 30 20 10 0

2001 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Goal 12-Month Rolling Average Days B

13. Coal & Nuclear Capacity Factor Definition: A weighted average of nuclear and coal capacity factors, subject to adjustments due to economic dispatch.

(relative ratio is nuclear 39%, coal 61%)

Avg. = (.39 x PVMDCNCF) + (.61 x COALNCF)

Month Monthly YTD YTD Adjusted Goal 2001 85.5 Jan 85.2 85.2 89.7 88.6 Feb 86.2 85.7 89.5 86 6 Mar 84.2 85.2 88.0 82.6 Apr 72.6 82.0 84.7 81 4 May 79 5 81.5 84.4 82.5 Jun 90.7 83.0 86.0 84.0 Jul 91.4 84 3 86.9 850 Aug 91.6 85.2 87 6 85.8 Sep 92.1 86.0 88 2 86.2 Oct 80.4 85.4 87.5 85 5 Nov 87.2 85.6 87.6 85.9 Dec 86.4 Data Source: Jessica Hildebrandt - 250-3087 Indicator Owner: Jim Levine - 250-2095 I I [

I

r-- rF....... i. -- i--- r -- r--[ F*--- r--- F-- F- r--- F-* ---.. r-- r . --

13. Coal & Nuclear Capacity Factor Percent September: 100 * - 4' - 44 YTD Budgeted

- 4'44 444' 44 44 4' Nuclear CF: 96 7 92.9", 4 4 4 4 Coal CF: 79.1 81.9 44'- 44).* 4 4-. '1 '4 October:

XYTD Budgeted 90, --------------

J 4)444 ,i -F Nuclear CF: 93 8 90 1 Coal CF:

November:

' 80.1 82.51 I rn -_

YTD Budgeted Nuclear CF: r' 93.7

90.5 80. - - - - - -- - - - - - -- -

Coal CE: 80.4 82.9 1'70 50 2001" Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec F" 1,YTD Adjusted -Goal 7 $

14. Palo Verde Capacity Factor (MDC Net)

Definition: The gross electrical output, less the normal station service loads, as measured at the output terminals of the turbine generator during the most restrictive seasonal conditions (usually summer)

Capacity Factor (MDC Net) % = [Net Generation (MWh) / (Maximum Dependable Capacity x Period Hours)] x 100 Total Nuclear Unit I Unit 2 Unit 3 Month Monthly YTD Goal Monthly YTD Goal Monthly YTD Goal Monthly YTD Goal Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual 2001 88.1 87.8 92.6 83.9 Jan 102 4 102.4 96.5 102.0 102.0 98.6 1027 102.7 98.6 102.5 102.5 98.6 Feb 102 3 1024 96 5 101 6 101.8 98.6 102.7 102.7 98.6 102.7 102.6 98 6 Mar 84 4 96.2 92.3 101.6 101.7 98.6 49.1 84 2 79 7 102.5 102.5 98.6 Apr 80 7 92 3 88.5 101.1 101 6 98 6 38 9 72.9 68.4 102.0 102.4 98 6 May 101 5 94 2 90 6 101 0 101.5 98.6 101.5 78.8 74 6 102 0 102 3 98.6 Jun 101.1 95.3 91.9 100.6 101.3 98 6 101 1 82 5 78 6 101.7 102.2 98.6 Jul 100 5 96 1 92 9 99 9 101 1 98 6 1006 85.1 81.5 101.1 102 1 98 6 Aug 100.6 96.7 93.6 99.7 100.9 98.6 100 8 87 1 83 7 101 2 102.0 98.6 Sep 97 3 96 7 93 6 89 5 997 97 0 101.0 88.7 85.3 101 4 101 9 98.6 Oct 67.6 93.8 90.8 0.0 89.5 87.2 101.3 90 0 86 7 101.6 101.9 98.6 Nov 93.3 93.7 91.4 75.3 88.2 87.9 1022 91 1 87 7 102.3 101.9 98.6 Dec 92.0 88.8 88 7 98.6 Data Source: Cathy Jury - 250-2445 Indicator Owner: Dave Smith - 393-2656 I I i I

VVO6 abe6jaAV einieno Isee lOiu a

. 0 Z- 0 > > K L- 0ý CD >

z0Z 0 c- . > K

0) C 0T CD 0 0o CDDa CD c CD a-

0) 0 C ' .... mD0 )0 0 < 2. -a co £. *r 0) <~~- -. 10 co , " o-I I I I - I I Af%

..0,09 I

0*09 OL r nun z nun I eo 0D enpov CiiA=

a z 'U o

CD 0 z o) C/) >:, C- C- KD

~ 0 m<--

0

) c 0<

CD0CD 0-0 CD cCc0 - r_ ) o b,

'0 a)'

- oCD ~

0) Oý

0. < C') (D C : c 09 09 t LL

~ OLI 7 01r ----- fl -ej0j I. JI06 jealonN IeJOI (1~N3O~~I) OI~ I ýAI tPOd3 OId fL,

-1 1-11 __j __j I .j - A - =j I -

15. Forced Outage Rate Definition: The average percentage of time each unit was unavailable due to forced events compared to the time planned for electrical generation.

Forced Outage Rate % = [Forced Outage Hours / (Forced Outage Hours + Hours On-Line)] x 100 Total Nuclear Unit I Unit 2 Unit 3 Month Monthly YTD Goal Monthly YTD Goal Monthly YTD Goal Monthly Actual Actual Actual Actual YTD Goal 2001 0.7 0.0 06 1.6 Jan 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 00 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Feb 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 10 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Mar 0.0 00 10 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1,0 Apr 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 00 10 0.0 0.0 1.0 May 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 00 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Jun 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 10 00 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Jul 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 10 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Aug 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 10 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 00 1.0 Sep 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 00 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 00 1.0 Oct 1.2 01 1.0 755 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 00 0.0 1.0 Nov 2.5 0.3 1.0 7.5 1.0 1.0 00 00 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Dec 1.0 10 1.0 1.0 Data Source: John Simpkins - 393.5325 Indicator Owner: Dave Smith - 393-2656 II I I I I I

a z j)> C Ieocjj~

CD~~ > CD 0 c a) < (D ) 0. 'a i _.---

ii i _I- - , Oo 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~0.0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0

..... ..... -------- ..... ----------- --- ---------- - -------- 9

- 01

I~ L j

~

- - ---- --- 9- -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- L

-- - - - - -- - - S---

c Jgid0 z cDg ~

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I0I 0 0 0n 0 0 C01 CDe C_,. > -n o- > -- >, C_ oeaox CD 0) CD 0 CD c c w CD 0I C

....------------ 90-----

-------------------------------------------------- 9*I soejn osPIA 94-o11jen ed p /u o 9n

-~S

nt I - - lueDjedeI5einQ 0 --

pe.ioj si JRGIJflN '

,- U8OJGd0

- - -- .LandJsea ABenuew

___.j __j -i _j __j IJ __ J - -) -1 -_j --_ I _j

16. Net Generation Definition: Net Generation (MWh) - Actual electrical output in megawatt hours generated during the reporting period, minus the normal station service or auxiliary electrical energy utilization Total Nuclear Unit I Unit 2 Unit 3 Monthly YTD Goal Monthly YTD Goal Monthly YTD Goal Monthly YTD Goal Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual 28,813,483 9,559,578 10,083,517 9,170,388 Jan 2,844,318 2,844,318 2,729,462 942,991 942,991 908,846 949,906 949,906 908,846 951,422 951,422 911,770 Feb 2,566,693 5,411,011 5,194,781 848,590 1,791,580 1,729,738 857,904 1,807,809 1,729,738 860,200 1,811,622 1,735,305 Mar 2,343,803 7,754,814 7,419,834 939,458 2,731,038 2,638,584 453,804 2,261,613 2,134,175 950,541 2,762,163 2,647,075 Apr 2,169,710 9,924,523 9,489,895 905,230 3,636,268 3,518,112 348,290 2,609,903 2,442,350 916,190 3,678,353 3,529,433 May 2,819,293 12,743,816 12,219,356 934,298 4,570,566 4,426,957 938,659 3,548,561 3,351,196 946,336 4,624,689 4,441,203 Jun 2,717,773 15,461,589 14,860,771 899,980 5,470,545 5,306,485 904,878 4,453,439 4,230,724 912,916 5,537,605 5,323,562 Jul 2,792,098 18,253,687 17,590,232 923,937 6,394,482 6,215,331 930,527 5,383,966 5,139,569 937,634 6,475,238 6,235,332 Aug 2,793,709 21,047,396 20,319,693 921,897 7,316,380 7,124,176 932,481 6,316,447 6,048,415 939,331 7,414,569 7,147,102 Sep 2,615,411 23,662,807 22,837,827 801,128 8,117,508 7,880,424 904,101 7,220,548 6,927,943 910,181 8,324,750 8,029,460 Oct 1,879,762 25,542,569 24,658,442 0 8,117,508 7,880,424 937,210 8,157,758 7,836,788 942,551 9,267,302 8,941,230 Nov 2,506,794 28,049,362 27,270,539 673,574 8,791,082 8,730,634 914,376 9,072,135 8,716,316 918,844 10,186,146 9,823,589 Dec 30,000,000 9,639,479 9,625,162 10,735,359 Data Source: Cathy Jury - 250-2445 Indicator Owner: Dave Smith - 393-2656 I I I L [ I

leO,=, lenoV 31Ar - , .A. j....enoV C) z o (n > _ - > -n

o o z o > > n c- c CD0 z

"Cici D

"C ; ll0l CD C 0D. 0 0 0 CD C

~

to~v

' '~

w CD ~D 0

.. .. . . 000'000

--- 1------lI l---I- 0'17------ - -.------------------------------ 000'000'7

OOO' 00oo0,0-' O

000-0 00- --- ---- - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 ,00 009

--- - ..... ' .-I -"- .....

M----............................................

'9 000 00-'00'.1 000'0o leoD- - lflI)V 31A~

IeOE - 8leno G.LA

, dooo'oooz, * "oi , ozi (D c 0 a)

~ ~ K 0)

D CD 0

0) 0 CD 0D 0

CD a

S.-

CD0 O00'00'$

~~~~~~ 0 0 ,00,U., * ,=................................. 000'000' ý o

00 '0 0000 00

'z11 s

... . 0'

. 000 '0 , - . ...

..... 0O0 0 0, 00 0' 0 ,9 ~

- - -- - - -- -- -- - - - - - - -0

-- 0 0 ,0 0 0 'O -9o ' o o

; U-- --- ------------- 000,000,l7

----- ------------------------ 00-000 000,0000 4 s 00

-jeaIlflNIUJOI -

tji un I u0,,OUGE) ION I9L

___I -__ A

.....- - -I.. - -.... J _j . I__ ....A ___J .. .

S.

17. Thermal Performance Definition: A measure of unit thermal performance based on the best 24-hour period during the month at a power level above 80%

Thermal Performance (%) = (Actual Gross Heat Rate / Design Gross Heat Rate) x 100 Jan 100.0 100.0 99.8 100.0 100.0 99.8 1000 1000 99.8 100.0 100.0 > 99.8 Feb 100.0 100.0 99.8 100.0 100.0 99.8 1000 1000 99.8 100.0 100.0 > 99.8 Mar 100.0 100.0 99.8 100.0 100.0 99.8 100.0 1000 99.8 100.0 100.0 > 99.8 Apr 100.0 100.0 99.8 100.0 100.0 99.8 100.0 1000 99.8 100.0 100.0 > 99.8 May 99.9 100.0 99.8 99.9 100.0 99.8 99.9 100.0 99.8 100.0 100.0 > 99.8 Jun 99.8 99.9 99.8 99.7 99.9 99.8 99.8 99.9 99.8 100.0 100.0 > 99.8 Jul 99.8 99 9 99.8 99.7 99.9 99.8 99.8 99.9 99.8 100.0 100.0 > 99.8 Aug 99.8 99.9 99.8 99.4 99.8 99.8 99.9 99.9 99.8 100.0 100.0 > 99.8 Sep 99.7 99.9 99.8 99.3 99.8 99.8 99.9 99.9 99.8 1000 100.0 > 99.8 Oct 100.0 99.9 99.8 0.0 99.8 99 8 100.0 99.9 99.8 100.0 100.0 > 99.8 Nov 100.0 99.9 99.8 99.9 99.8 99 8 100.0 99.9 99.8 100.0 1000 > 99.8 Dec 99.8 99 8 99.8 99.8 Data Source: John Simpkins - 393-5325 Indicator Owner: Mike Winsor - 393-5120 I I I I I I I I I

r- r-- n-- .. .r [- ..fl . . . t- fl. F- r-- r- r-- r-- n- - n- n- r - n-TY- 1 17. Thermal Performance,,

Site

,-,1000 Percent NPO INPO .

99.5 ..... 99.5 - - - - --------- 9 99.50"+-+

.99.0 985 *'98.5 - -,-:

"-----98.0 '" +';

98.0 97.5 - F.. ,i

'*97.5 .. i 975 CO N

0 z 0' .*_, <) z EMnMonthly A~tdal aGoal - ;' MitlActualGol-V >

+---Unit2 ,,/- . v- rUnit3 100 100-.Percent 0 Percent iNPO*

+4~C -4 Omsawi~ I 1 INPO 99ý5 99.5 ;- * , .. * *. * * , y;+"...

' 99.0 S'+, A' 4 9.

,, ;¢,SU7,, r 4+, +* . + .. , ,o . ..

98.5 toto OLJ.....2 - -. 4 .....

-980, 98.5w' 97.55 Cct 0 (1) + a. '1 :" ,` (D 0 0.

0lCu < < - . .)

CN Actual 0 ,) N L <Cn F Monthly AcGotl - Goa , C= Monthly Actual Goal

INPO Best Quartile Average 99.9% per Unit B

18. Fuel Reliability Index Definition: The average monthly value of Iodine-131 activity in the reactor coolant corrected for tramp Iodine-131 Fuel reliability data is derived from radiochemistry data obtained at steady state conditions excluding any data obtained within an appropriate waiting period following significant reactor power transients Site Unit I Unit 2 Unit 3 Month YTD Actual Fuel Monthly YTD Goal Fuel Monthly YTD Goal Fuel Monthly YTD Goal Defects Actual Actual Defects Actual Actual Defects Actual Actual 2001 2.25E-04 0 4.62E-04 0 1.48E-05 1 1.98E-04 Jan 7.42E-05 0 5.59E-06 5.59E-06 < 5.OOE-04 7.31 E-05 7.31 E-05 "<5.OOE-04 1.44E-04 1.44E-04 "<5.OOE-04 Feb 7.57E-05 0 1.98E-05 1.27E-05 < 5.OOE-04 8.58E-05 7.94E-05 "<5.OOE-04 1.26E-04 1.35E-04 "<5.OOE-04 Mar 8 41E-05 0 3 26E-05 1.93E-05 < 5.OOE-04 8 70E-05 8.19E-05 "<5.OOE-04 1.83E-04 1.51 E-04 "<5.OOE-04 Apr 7 85E-05 0 1 OOE-06 1 48E-05 < 5 OOE-04 1 OOE-06 6.17E-05 "<5.OOE-04 1.83E-04 1.59E-04 "<5.OOE-04 May 7 48E-05 0 9 75E-06 1 38E-05 < 5 00E-04 1 OOE-06 4.96E-05 "<5.OOE-04 1.69E-04 1.61 E-04 "<5.OOE-04 Jun 7.50E-05 0 1.19E-05 1 34E-05 < 5 00E-04 1.OOE-06 4.15E-05 "<5.OOE-04 2.13E-04 1.70E-04 "<5.OOE-04 Jul 7.33E-05 0 1.07E-05 1.31 E-05 < 5.OOE-04 1 44E-06 3.57E-05 "<5.00E-04 1.88E-04 1.71E-04 "<5.OOE-04 Aug 7.17E-05 0 1.10E-05 1.28E-05 < 5.OOE-04 3.11 E-05 3.52E-05 "<5 OOE-04 1.44E-04 1.67E-04 "<5.OOE-04 Sep 7.16E-05 0 1.OOE-06 1.15E-05 < 5.OOE-04 4.66E-05 3.64E-05 "<5.OOE-04 1 62E-04 1 67E-04 "<5.OOE-04 Oct 1.06E-04 REFUEL OUTAGE < 5.OOE-04 6.66E-05 3.95E-05 "<5.OOE-04 2 22E-04 1.72E-04 "<5.OOE-04 Nov 1.07E-04 0 1.OOE-06 1.04E-05 < 5.OOE-04 4.75E-05 4.02E-05 "<5.OOE-04 1.91 E-04 1.74E-04 "<5.OOE-04 Dec < 5.OOE-04 "<5.OOE-04 "<5.OOE-04 Data Source: Kristine Govertsen - 393-5935 Indicator Owner: Paul Crawley - 393-6360 I

'SJaONCO lIIWS GA84c iiu 1flpue z iun :GIoN 90-:]00*17 = 91j1ieno Iseg OdNI.

ienioV Q.Lký I 0 0 MCl> c- t- > K L1 C- n 90-300' L

.OdNi *OdNI 90-3001.

...... U ,----

z )tun,,,

0~~~~ ~ -r ~ >ozo( z & 90-3001.

C- > -nj C- C0 0 Z 0 CD> c C- 0 CD ) 0CD 0( C ~CD~ 0) 0)

CD0 0r CD ~ >~ 0 0< .0f~O C-o O C ) 0 '90-9100' 90-300*L

- It'90-001 170-3001 co-3001.L

- kJiun -* OHiS

-i -i __j -- ) .--- ] ___j J ] U

19. Chemistry Index Definition: Priority-based, weighted perfomance measurement focused on Molar Ratio Control, Corrosion Product Management and ALARA Chemistry.

Note, A score of 8.5 equals Palo Verde Site Goals.

PVCI Value Window Color

> 8.5 M Fe = Iron Cl = Chloride 7.5 - < 8.5 White Na = Sodium S04 = Sulfate

>6.0 - < 7.5 t-4- YellowI0. MR = Molar Ratio

<6.0 .i. i w .w FT Site Unit I Unit 2 Unit 3

.4,. F II.

Month PVCI PVC' Comments PVC' Comments Comments PVC' I

2001 8. 61 1 L9.8 118.01 Jan 9.2 8.8 Fe = 2.80 (6 92) 99 Fe = 1 50 (10 0) 8.9 Fe = 2.67 (7.34)

Feb 79 73 Fe 3 93 (3.39) 7.7 Fe = 3.60 (4.43) 8.6 Fe = 2.97 (6.4)

Mar 7.4 6.3 Fe =4 69 (0 97) 72 Fe = 4.00 (3 15) 8.8 Fe = 2.73 (7.16)

Apr 7.7 6.5 Fe = 4.59 (1.30) 0.0 2R10 8.9 Fe = 2 65 (7 40)

Na = 1 87 (6 66), Fe = 3 02 (6 24);

May 68 7.1 Fe = 4.10 (2 84) 5.0 MR = 0.66 (0.00) 8.4 Fe = 3.04 (6.18)

Jun 8.5 7.4 Fe = 3 87 (3 56) 9.1 Na 1 29 (7 89)" Fe = 1 52 (10.00) 9.1 Fe - 2.51 (7 84) hI' An 00 nP 0 9A 17 AlO'P. = I AQ 11r) nrn 0'1 C- =AD 17 QA\

Fe -J~I 5 19 In~ OM*JJ .. I I -A l ~

Aug 8.1 6.0 Fe = 6.58 (0.00) 10.0 Na = 0.43 (9.72); Fe = 1.50 (10 00) 8.4 Fe = 3.10 (5.99)

Sep 8.0 6.0 Fe = 6 43 (0 00) 9.1 Na - 0 49 (9 59); Fe = 2 52 (7 81) 88 Fe = 2 76 (7 06)

Oct 8.3 0.0 1R10 7.5 Fe - 3.77 (3.88) 9.1 Fe - 2.52 (7.81)

Nov 7.3 5.6 Fe = No Value Reported 7.5 Fe - 3.75 (3.94) 8.7 Fe = 2 77 (7 01)

(4-wk from Startup)

Dec Data Source: Larry Johnson - 393-6516 Indicator Owner: John Scott - 393-2780 I I I1 I I I [

r- r..

I---- ". .r- --n r '" r... c-- v...

.. n. . F --- r- r- r

f .. r- - r- r -T- -I-

"Site' J Unit 1 '

Previous 8.3 White I Previous 11R10 ---- I Current *n,7.3 . p.t*-tYeiI6 Currenit',,",

10.0 Index 8.0 6.0 6.0 40 2.0 0.0 i'i i r r T1 a =3 0 >) V c_ - >, a -5 0 a t3 > o 0 m l ( > %Ccc T NSite PVci Goal f"Pm-"

- Unit 1 " Goal G66oba ý ,' "Good ' ....... . .

Unit 2 Unit 3 Previous 7.5 White Previous

"- . ,.W hite '.* Current Current, 7.5 10 0 -10.0 8.0~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ -, .....

-- ---------------- 8.b - !z -" oa

6.0 -/t - w4 -

A~ G- 20 20-4 00 ILL'2 <- mC0) a > a) 0L 0)_3 a) 03 0 o

< w 0 z0) 2

43.9 Days -. . i ' 32.9 Days -"

7.7 324 Days , 75,v D

.~*3/16 4/178 ~ Kt.'* ,5' d',.

V 9127 12/1 Planned3/1 4/17." /9 /

371Dasays. ~~~~~~3

-17 3119, '7 Data Source: Tom Trieckel - 393-1734 Indicator Owner: John Hesser - 393-2517 B

26. Control Room Discrepancies Definition: Control Room handswitches, plant indicators or alarms not functioning as designed (30-day rolling average)

Site Unit I Unit 2 Unit 3 Month Total Goal I Anu 1CRDLs

_Annun Goal CRDLs / Liu Annun Goal CRDLs /

Annun Goal Jan 22 Feb 15 Mar 10 Apr 10 May 6 Jun 9 Jul 8 Aug 7 Sep 1 Oct 2 Nov 2 Dec Data Source: Gene Eimar - 393-1762 Indicator Owner: Dave Smith - 393-2656 I I I I I I i It

F [ F F F F F fl 7 [ f---

F F---

F f--

1 FF_- F-F Fr- F..

, ,26.-Control, Room-Discrepancies,. I Site Total Unit I 25 #of Discrepancies # of Discrepancies 15 _ 4...... ... .. . 6 .. ..

251 10: ....... .......... ------...------ -..2 .... 4 A. . C- 5

0) 0 '

20 .........................................

5 --------- 2 - a Co :3 0 )LLU

-,- i~ 4 U ~0 0'.. z zz 1b Total -Goal CRDLs 17-1 LitAnnunciators 'Goal

,,u-, 0* linit 2 '." :.. .' '* Unit 3 ,,

Discrepancies '""f #of-Discrepancies

-10 # of Discrepancies

............. 48-S..... N8 -.-.----------- - ...

46 4 ZJ-- -------------------------------------

"00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.Ca),,.. 0LL_ I < ) .. '0

-- CRDLs L-tAnnunciators "Goali r"CRDLs -- LitAnnunciators n--Goali

27. Production Cost Definition: Production cost ratio = Total O&M + fuel cost for a time period, divided by net energy produced dunng the period O&M includes NRC fees but excludes load dispatch and certain other overhead costs, YTD O&M Cost Ratio YTD Fuel Cost Ratio YTD Production Cost Ratio Month Actuals Goal_ _ _

Actuals

_ _ _ Goal _ Actuals

_ I Goal _ T Year-End Feast Forecast 2001 0,87 0.43 1 30 Jan 0 79 0.79 0.42 0.44 1.22 1 23 Feb 0 80 0.77 0.42 0.41 1 22 1.18 Mar 0.86 0.84 0.43 0.42 1.29 1.27 Apr 0.92 0.95 0.43 0.43 1 35 1.39 May 0.85 0.89 0.43 0.43 1.28 1.33 Jun 0.83 0.86 0.43 0.43 1.26 1 30 Jul 0.81 0.83 0.43 0.43 1.24 1 28 Aug 0.80 0.81 0.43 0.43 1.23 1.25 Sep 0.81 0.82 0.43 0.44 1.24 1.26 Oct 0.87 0.87 0 44 0.44 1.31 1.32 Nov 0.86 0.86 044 0.44 1.30 1 30 Dec 0.83 0 44 1.29 Year-End Forecast 1 30 Data Source: Becky Payne - 393-6130 Indicator Owner: Rose Majors - 393-6527

a 9 Iseoeaol pu3-J68Aý ien.1 GjkEM NVO 3atk j

090 AON loQ daS bnv n unj* Aevy AdV JBLAJ qejl uer WEoo I

II .0*0

.90

0 S

MEN elli-luno

- 777 7 7 4 7777 7 pase 4 .7 ... 77

7 Lii 7 (477 I 7 . 2.

-91 ian 7 '7 7 - - .

'7 7 7 -77 77' 4 7-7 -7 7 7 '.7. 47 7 7. 477 7 7 77 7 77 7 4 774 777 * .**.- 74 7.77.... .7 7

77 '.777 7 - 4 4 7

-7 7 7 4 .7 77 7... 4 7 7 7.77.

77(7.. ,,4,J,.-., 7 I 7 77-7 7 7 7

7'/ .7 4 77 p 47 7 7 7 7777 7 '7 7 C

77 L4 JJO

___-j ___--j *-7 7-7 I -J ___j ___-_j -- i __j __j __j

28. Economic Performance Definition: The year-to-date costs for Palo Verde, by budget excluding incentive plan payouts.

O&M Costs Capital Improvement Nuclear Fuel Monthly YTD YTD Goal Monthly YTD YTD Goal Monthly YTD Actual Actual hoActual Actual Actual Actual YTD Goal 2001 320.7 101.4 141.3 Jan 31.6 31.6 31.0 10.6 10.6 10.6 14.7 14.7 3.2 Feb 264 58.0 55.1 15.1 25.7 27.5 4.2 189 17.9 Mar 30.2 88.2 83.2 6.3 32.0 37 0 3.5 22.4 25.8 Apr 32.1 120.3 118.7 18.0 50.0 47.4 36.4 58.8 59.6 May 23.2 143.5 143.5 9.1 59.1 61.1 3.6 62.4 62.5 Jun 25.9 169.4 1682 8.5 67.6 65.5 3.0 654 68.4 Jul 254 194.8 193.7 13.5 81.1 79.3 31 68 5 71.8 Aug 26,6 221.4 218.2 4.0 85.1 92.8 15.3 83.8 86.2 Sep 29.0 250.4 245 6 7.1 92.2 100.5 44.0 1278 102.7 Oct 38 8 289 2 281.3 18.5 110.7 108.1 3.1 130.9 136.9 Nov 25.3 314.5 306.7 12.2 122.9 111.4 3.1 134.0 140.2 Dec 327 6 122.6 143.8 Data Source: Becky Payne - 393-6130 Indicator Owner: Rose Majors - 393-6527

PeOO alA-- lenv 01A7 0,0 0*017

'ff009 00OL 110 en I.Apov (ij 11 IIico nen jo v a k

'D~~ Cc -O9Lc CD ) > C>- - c.. C M o- C) C C.. 0 0Z CD r. I C~w CDOC 0,0 f00 0 00M 0.00z Q*oos I su~jpj $0,09L IUGLLJAOidLLI jujIde D so:) WTO Si sj. 0*00t' LIII 9OUEWJOJJ9J 0! W0U003 :81 SOQ £4flQ

___j -i __j -- ] . --i ___j __j

29. Licensee Event Reports Definitions: Required reports are generated because of a notification requirement in 10CFR50 73 Voluntary reports are generated to inform the industry of a condition or finding, but is not required by 10CFR50.73 Required Reports Voluntary Reports Month Total YTD Monthly YTD Monthly YTD 2001 1 9 2 11 Jan 0 0 Feb 1 1 Mar 1 2 Apr 0 2 May 1 3 Jun 0 4 Jul 0 4 Aug 1 5 Sep 0 5

Oct 0 5

Nov 0 5

Dec Data Source: Dan Marks - 393-6492 Indicator Owner: Craig Seaman - 393-5421

F-- F.- rF.... F.. Fr- r--- F- rF -- r. r F_ I- [- Fr F- [_

29.- Licensee-Event Reports. .

15# of Reports 7 *-,

0-0 2001 Jan Feb P; :*, Mar :',-, 'Apr,., :

May""., J3un 1_-".*cJul:'-:. -. Aug." , " Sep ,,: : Oct::-. Nov Dec EYTD Required Reports E3YTD Voluntary Reports Report Date Event Date Number ,,:,,,. ,., . Description Report Date . Event Date .,.,Number Description 2/7/2002 12/11/2001 1-2001-005-00 Inadequate ST for time response testing of Hi Log

- -. 1 - ', I .I ,-,I 1

'_ - I. 1 Power Trip. _ _ _

311312002 . 1/16/2002 3-2002-001-00 TS violation due to lncorreict constant ,nCOLSS.

5/1/2002 3/5/2002 2-2002-001-00 U2 MSSV lift pressures outside TS limit.

6/17/2002 4/1812002 2-2002-002-00 Post-test constants entered Into CPCs. --. ' - , .

8/7/02 6111/02 1-2002-SOl-00 Loss of Safeguards Control.-------------. ... ". - . . .

30. NRC Performance Indicators Definitions: Monthly calculation of NRC Performance Indicators per NEI 99-02 (Note that information is updated in the MTR monthly, but only submitted to NRC quarterly)

Initiatincg Events - Number of unplanned manual and automatic scrams per 7000 critical hours.

- Number of scrams with a loss of normal heat removal capability over the previous 12 quarters.

- Number of unplanned power changes (>20%) per 7000 critical hours.

Mitigating Systems - EDG average individual train unavailability during the previous 12 quarters expressed as a ratio.

- HPSI average individual train unavailability during the previous 12 quarters expressed as a ratio.

- AFW average individual train unavailability during the previous 12 quarters expressed as a ratio

- RHR average individual train unavailability during the previous 12 quarters expressed as a ratio.

- Number of safety system functional failures reportable under 50.73(a)(2)(v) in the previous 4 quarters.

Barriers - Maximum RCS activity monthly values during previous 4 quarters expressed as a percent of TS limit.

- Maximum RCS leakage monthly values during previous 4 quarters expressed as a percent of TS limit Emergency Prepa redness - Percentage of all drill, exercise, and actual opportunities performed satisfactorily during the previous 8 quarters.

- Percent of key ERO personnel that have participated in a drill or exercise during the previous 8 quarters.

- Percent of satisfactorily tested ANS sirens in the previous 4 quarters.

Occupational Radiatio n Safety - Number of LHRA violations, VHRA violations, and unintended exposures during the previous 4 quarters.

Public Radiatio n Safety - Number of radioactive effluent releases that exceeded the ODCM limits in the previous 4 quarters Physical Pr otection - IDS and CCTV unavailability index derived from compensatory hours in the previous 4 quarters.

- Number of reportable programmatic access control failures during the previous 4 quarters.

- Number of reportable programmatic FFD failures during the previous 4 quarters.

Data Source: Dan Marks - 393-6492 Indicator Owner: Craig Seaman - 393-5421 I I I I I

I- F-- f-- I-- I-- F-F-- [---'- F- [--- F- -- F--- r-F r-- r--- --

30.i NRC Performance Indicators I Data for this indicator lags by one month. Data is not collected and approved until the middle of the following month.

Strategic Performance Areas" Safeguards I

Physical Initiating Events' Mitigating Systems Protection l

I Unit 1 Unit2 Unit 3 Unit1 nUit2 unit 3 Site Site Site Unit I Unit 2 Unit 3 ERO Exposure Offsite PA Scrams Per 7000 Hours EDG Unavailability RCS Activity Control Release Equip.

HPSI Unavailability RCS Leakage ERO Personnel Scrams With Loss of Participation ..... Screening Normal Heat Removal , , . , -- .. .

Alert & FFD Unplanned Power Changes AFW Unavailability Per 7000 Hours . Notification.

RHR Unavailability Safety System:.

Functional Failures

A. -

B

31. INPO Plant Performance Index Definition: An overall performance indicator consisting of the weighted tabulation of WANO plant performance indicators.

Areas for Improvement:

Unit 1 = No Issues; Top Quartile Unit 2 = Unit Capability Factor Unit 3 = Unit Capability Factor/High Pressure Safety Injection Unit Capability Factor (UCF): The percentage of maximum energy generation that Palo Verde is capable of supplying to the electrical grid, limited only by factors within control of the plant management. (18 months/0.15 Weight)

Forced Loss Rate (FLR): The percentage of production losses as a result of unplanned outages and load reductions. (18 months/0.15 Weigh Unplanned Automatic Scrams: Automatic plant shutdowns, that are unplanned, per 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> (approximately 1 year) of operation. (18 months/0.8 Weight)

Safety System Performance: Monitors the availability of HPSI, RHR, and AF safety systems to mitigate off-normal events. (36 months/0.10 Weig Fuel Reliability (FRI): Monitors progress in preventing defects in the metal cladding that surrounds fuel. (Recent Qtr/0.10 weight)

Chemistry Performance (CPI): Monitors operational chemistry control effectiveness as measured by the concentration of important impurities and corrosion products (18 months/0.07 Weight)

Collective Radiation Exposure (CRE): Monitors the effectiveness of personal radiation exposure controls. (18 months/0.10 Weight)

Industry Safety Accident Rate (ISAR): Tracks the number of accidents that result in lost work time, restricted work or fatalities per 200,000 worker-hours (18 months/0.05 Weight)

Quarterly INPO PPI: 96 Green Current quarter INPO PV index is greater than 98 (industry best quartile)

White Current quarter INPO PV index is between 93 and 98 (above median quartile)

Yellow Current quarter INPO PV index between 88 and 93 Red Current quarter INPO PV index is less than 87 Data Source: John J. Scott - 393-6104 Indicator Owner: Craig Seaman - 393-5421 I I I I I I I I I I I I I

r--- F-- (-- F--- F- '-- F--

F--- F - ( r-K f-- F-- [ F-- -

31'. INPO Plant Performance Index I 100- Percent '

A I -'Green 95 - 'White IF Red 80 1 1-ME 3rd Qrtr 2000 '4th Qifi 2000 1st Qrtr 2001" 2nd Qrtr 2001 '3rd Qrtr 2001 '4th Qrtr 2001 1st Qrtr 2002 2nd Qrtr 2002 3rd Qrtr 2002

,

Current Quarter Index ,- . - E .. Median .,

B

32. Timeliness of Corrective Actions Adverse and Significant CRDRs Definitions: Adverse - Any item or activity that does not conform to requirements Significant - A condition which, if uncorrected, could have a serious effect on safety or operability Goals Not to exceed a specified number of open CRDR evaluations greater than 30 days Not to exceed a specified number of open CRDRs greater than 180 days

t CRDR Evaluation Time CRDR Closure Time al (No. Of Number of Number Goal (No. Of Average Number of Number Months Evaluations Over 30 Average Go alD~s)

(oO CRDRs Over 180 I Goal ( fage 3RDRs) Closed Days Old ** CRDRs) Time (Days)

Closed Days Old Jan 162 35 31 35 176 103 80 126 Feb 172 34 30 30 166 99 75 131 Mar 251 31 29 40 248 85 90 127 Apr 273 26 34 50 295 82 115 113 May 195 30 30 45 182 85 100 118 Jun 177 31 35 40 173 78 90 122 Jul 192 30 34 35 184 73 80 109 Aug 222 27 29 30 180 68 75 106 Sep 211 21 26 40 203 59 90 101 Oct 269 33 22 50 267 64 115 90 Nov 186 30 32 45 167 65 100 108 Dec 40 90

= Includes open CRDRs and CRDRs closed during the month

- = Excludes CRDRs w/open Priority 1,2,3 action(s) with milestone indicators Data Source: Sue Mitchell - 393-5999 Indicator Owner: Craig Seaman - 393-5421 I I I i I I I I i I I I

(SUaOH 1o 'oN) 1800'~ plo SAeaj 013 JOAO 49qwnN Dec] AON 10 daS BnV-, IflP!-, unp' AeNj AdV qaed uer OL 06 IflOý1?WUSCJVJ tiaf() ~J(J J,ýU P. jWI5#

'(SUOU3 1o ON) posAeGl PIO,' os .aoJGAQqwnN og 1 AON Po daS BnV Inp unr ~Avij~ v ot,

7 -----------------------

L -------------------------------

.......... 09 sAva Or ueqjL JeaeaJj SUOijefljAg uado jo jaqwinN SHOaU3 lUeO!JIUB!S pueGSJGAPV,,,

SUO!JO3V 8AIj3GJJO3)J0 SSGU!IGW!1L 'Z

--l -J

~~1

33. Corrective Action Effectiveness Significant CRDRs Definitions: Significant CRDR Corrective Action Effectiveness, i e., reviews determine priority 1 and 2 actions have been completed as intended and the condition is corrected to prevent recurrence.

Goal:

Significant CRDR Corrective Action Effectiveness

> 97% YTD Effectiveness of Significant CRDRs Monthly YTD Months # Reviewed # Satisfactory % Acceptable YTD (%) Goal (%)

Jan 22 22 100 100 97 Feb 37 37 100 100 97 Mar 25 25 100 100 97 Apr 32 32 100 100 97 May 41 38 93 98 97 Jun 29 26 90 97 97 Jul 25 25 100 97 97 Aug 16 16 100 97 97 Sep 15 15 100 98 97 Oct 19 19 100 98 97 Nov 39 37 95 97 97 Dec 97 Data Source: Sue Mitchell - 393-5999 Indicator Owner: Craig Seaman - 393-5421 I i I I tI I

r[-- F- m F - F--F- n..

-- Irf -- r-m F - f- r f- F-- f-333 Corrective Action EffectivenessI Monthly Significant CRDR Effectiveness.

-1 dO I; Mar Apr May Jun A S Sep Octi Nov Dec Jan Feb 77*

"2"1 " %Acceptable

%. " WE Year-To-Dae Significant CRbR Effectiveness ' J r,-,100 .

100 TV177

.Percent

-I

-7:7' S -1I S.. ,.,

. ,, *. r- YTD(% . _-7-'

r,.. Goal(% " B

34. Overall Training Effectiveness & Accreditation Status Definition: Measures the overall training effectiveness and accreditation renewal readiness of Palo Verde's accredited training programs. Evaluates the line organizations' involvement and ownership in their respective training programs as well as implementation of processes and programs.

Evaluation Area NLIT NLCT LOIT LOCT STA SM ENG MECH ELEC I&C ML CHEM RP Site I Totals 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.8 43 37 Improvement 4.0 3.8 4.0 3.6 Process & Resources 3.9 3.8 3.5 32 3.6 3.0 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.7 3.7 3.4 3.4 3.6 Initial Training 4.0 N/A 4.0 N/A 4.1 3.6 3.4 3.3 4.1 4.3 3.6 3.5 3.3 3.7 Continuing Training N/A 4.0 N/A 3.8 4.4 3.0 40 4.6 4.4 4.0 3.6 3.4 3.6 3 9 Conduct of Training 4.3 4.5 3.6 3.7 4.1 3.3 33 3.5 4.3 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.5 37 Effectiveness Evaluation 36 3.6 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.4 3.2 3.8 3.4 4.0 3.6 38 3.5 Program Average 3.9 3.9 34 34 3.7 3.1 3.5 3.7 4.2 38 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.6 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD Monthly Performance White White White White White White White White White White White White 3.5 3.6 37 37 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 36 3.6 3.6 Strength = Green = Avg. of 4.0 through 5.0 Noteworthy Negative = Yellow = Avg. 2.0 through 2.9 Satisfactory = White = Avg. of 3.0 through 3.9 Area for Improvement = Red = Avg. of 0 through 1.9 Data Source: Butch Whisnant - 393-3758 Indicator Owner: Mike Shea - 393-1785 I I I I II [ I I I Ir

7- F 77 F 7- V 7 77 7 K F r- [ 7- 7- ff - F- -

F- F---

F-

34. Overall Training Effectiveness & Accreditation Status I Programs NLIT: INLCT LOIT LOCT STA SM ESP MECH ELEC I&C ML CHEM 1'RP SITE Previous White-, White White- White, . White White White White , White' , White -White -, White White Current White, White White j White, White White White White White White White j White White 3.9 _ 3.9 3.4 3.4 3.7 3.1 3.5 , 3.7 3.8 3.7 __3.5 3.6 3.6 S

Performance : Process & Continuing Conduct of Effectiveness Accreditation Objectives improvemant ce Resourcess Initial Training '* T Training '

Previousý 3 i,-White White , .. White ,* White White Current White White White White White White Activities Affecting Annunciator(s): ; " ,,,

+ NLIT observations of OJT/TPE,anchors management explectations for use of STAR, self-checking, and'procedure use and adh'erence..,,

- NLCT needs to be observed by more management personnel.

"+ LOIT and Operations personnel meet mon'thly to discuss perfo'rmance issu6es and determrine how training can be used to improve performance

"+ LOCT JITT session for Steam Generator Chemical Cleaning prior to U1R10 prepared personnel to perform this evolution.

"+ STAs received Probabilistic Risk Assessment training provided by the PRA Engineering Section Leader.

"+ ENG student feedback about Heat Trahifer and Fluid Flow rei6ited In expanding the handout to provide more fundamental information. -

+ MECH Instructor developed and provided PowerPoint presentations about Beanngs, Preparng UGS, and Moving UGS which wereusied durnng U1 00-pre6-jb briefings

"+ ELEC MFP course feedback and instructor input resulted Inchanging the power supply calibration work instructions.

"+ I&C Instructors validated training content while working the U1R1O outage.` .

"+ CHEM Technicians are trained and qualified in the use of new instruments prior to their use in the field. ' - .

"+ RP and Training perso nnel enhanced the rejected instrument process, changed procedures, provided continuing training, and updated the initial training.- -

Green = Strength .... .*,. -.. Yellow = Noteworthy Negative W hite =Satisfactory ,- -. - -- -t ,. - - -. . .. . --. , - . ". ' Red Issue ,

4,4.4 t 4. *4

35. Low-Level Solid Radwaste Definition: The total volume of low-level solid radioactive waste that has been processed and is in final form ready for disposal during the month, In addition to solid waste volume in final form ready for disposal, it includes the estimated final volume of waste generated in the month but not in final form for shipment.

The INPO Best Quartile Average = 17 cubic meters per unit (3 year average).

rT II Site Total Unit I Unit 2 Unit 3 Mo 'Monthly YTD YTD Monthly YTD YTD Monthly YTD YTD Monthly YTD YTD M tActual Actual Goal Actual Actual Goal Actual Actual Goal Actual Actual Goal 2001 64.1 20.0 29.0 15.1 Jan 11.2 11.2 5.6 3.1 3.1 3.3 2.2 2.2 0.1 5.9 5.9 2.2 Feb 4.1 15.3 75.2 0.1 3.2 65.7 0.2 2.4 0.2 3.8 9.7 9.3 Mar 8.6 23.9 98.2 1.8 50 83.4 1.7 4.1 1.7 51 14.8 13.1 Apr 27.3 51.2 102.7 0.1 5.1 83 5 40 8.1 6.0 23.2 38.0 132 May 2.6 53.8 107.3 0.2 5.3 83.6 09 9.0 9.8 1.5 39.5 139 Jun 1.1 54.9 117.0 0.1 5.4 83 7 08 9.8 17.9 0.2 39.7 15.4 Jul 1.4 56.3 119.3 0.9 6.3 85.2 02 10.0 18.6 0.0 39.7 155 Aug 19.8 76.1 123.3 2.2 8.5 89.0 17.4 274 187 0.2 39.9 15.6 Sep 8.0 84.1 140.6 2.2 10.7 89.1 5.8 33.2 35.8 00 39.9 15.7 Oct 6.4 90.5 145.1 3.0 13.7 93.4 0.2 33.4 35.9 3.2 43.1 15.8 Nov 0.5 91.0 151.1 02 13.9 93.5 0.2 33.6 36 0 0.1 43.2 21.6 Dec 158.5 99.3 36.1 23.1 Data Source: Varcel Huntsman - 393-2670 Indicator Owner: John Gaffney - 393-2860

F- m c-* .'- c- r c- F--r (n-" r- r-- f- r i- - F--"'r--

35., Low-Level, Solid, Radwaste ,,- --

,Site Ioai U-lI I' Cubic Meters ', , 100.0 -Cubic Meters 1800 1500 ............ 80.0 60 --------------

8o ... .........

-I --- - -- - ---- - -- - -- - ---- - -- - - -- -

120.0 -------------------- - -4N

, 600- i

.... ............. INI P 40.0- -

I A IN4P 0 .0 .............. ---- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

INPO*

'1 20.0 - ---------

0.0 - 0.0J

,h< . C .5 0), a< > C 0

04

" ) ., C Cc

. :3 o a Z ,0

0) 0 M (D

- YTD Actual YTD Goal TMYTD Actual ... YTD Goal "iiiI Unit 2 1

4KC4 I; Unit3.: ",,;

t C., i.FtA,,,* fare Cubic Meters 500 .... 50-----0 400 300 200 1w.

-INPO*

30 0 2

20 0 -..........---------

INPO*

- ILL (j 0O o I ILL. <1!-I 100 0.0 0410 I

>.-fCM .5 0)a > C3 (V

- iI "--) .

-0 0

Z 0 a) 0 WTD Actual I2PGoBcrav Actual YTD Goal I NOBest Quartile Average

h =17 cubic meters per unit (3 year average). B

36. Waste Definition: Mixed Waste - Includes waste that is both radioactive and hazardous.

Hazardous Waste - Solid waste that is a listed hazardous waste or exhibits one or more hazardous characteristics NOTE: To maintain Small Quantity Generator status site must generate less than 2,200 lbs. per month and 26,400 lbs per year Mixed Waste Hazardous Waste Month Monthly YTD YTE) Goal Monthly YTD (TD Goal 2001 0 0 10,047 Jan 0 0 < 1 737 737 1,000 Feb 0 0 < 2 1,099 1,836 2,000 Mar 0 0 3 191 2,027 3,000 Apr 0 0 3 919 2,946 4,000 May 0 0 < 4 876 3,822 5,000 Jun 0 0 < 5 133 3,955 6,000 Jul 0 0 < 6 85 4,040 7,000 Aug 0 0 < 7 1,071 5,111 8,000 Sep 0 0 < 8 513 5,624 9,000 Oct 0 0 < 8 1,680 7,304 10,000 Nov 0 0 < 9 194 7,498 11,000 Dec 10 12,000 Data Source: Don Paul - 393-5655 Indicator Owner: Craig Seaman - 393-5421 I 1 1

a I IeO . ,. Oleo 000] AON des 6nv Inr unr JdV Jel" q81l LO0K 0

000't,

. ... -- A--- -- - - -. .-- -- - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

000,8

-, A - - ..................... ... ----------------- --------------------- ---------------------

A o00'L S......., ,*, ;

spunod 000'9L "eseM snopJezH1 'q ,q ofa AON lo' AAer oeo AON 1oO das 6nv '" n iun£ ABelh , adeN qa uer ';LOO*0; StII I I I I I I 4-]

0 0o ooo000000 0 V

... ..... ........ -- ------ ----------- --- -- --- ---------- ------ --- - -------------- A--- ------ ------- --- .......

8

, Spunod s:-

t

,pseM pexfiJ "e,

- A* '9C A 1 A' es M "9(,:

-j I , I J __J __J i__ -_ ] -__]I_ - -- - - j] _ .) ' i ___J ___ I __ __ _J _ __]

37. PV Environmental Incidents Definition: Spills' Spills > 500 gallons, not reportable and not released off site Reportable Environmental Incidents, Releases and violations of environmental laws/regulations or permits that are determined to be preventable and are identified by, or reported to, federal, state or local regulatory agencies that do not result in a fine or penalty Spills Reportable Environmental Incidents Month Current Month YTD Goal Current Month YTD Goal Incident(s) Incident(s) 2001 0 2 Jan 0 0 1 0 0 0 Feb 0 0 2 0 0 1 Mar 2 2 3 0 0 1 Apr 0 2 4 0 0 2 May 1 3 5 0 0 2 Jun 2 5 6 0 0 2 Jul 2 7 7 1 1 3 Aug 2 9 8 0 1 3 Sep 2 11 9 0 1 4 Oct 2 13 10 1 2 4 Nov 3 16 11 1 3 4 Dec 12 5 Data Source: Dan Blackson - 393-6567 Indicator Owner: Craig Seaman - 393-5421 I I

F - -- F -- F - ""- F- ('-__ F- F- I- F- F- I- - 1- If

37. PV Environmental Incidents S. EnvironmentalSpills ..

of Spills 20 15 I 10.

5. - , -- . - --- - "------ 17~

4 0U...~U F~I 77 I .171 7

0 L "

I 2001 Jan Feb Mar "Apr May JLn' Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Spills Goal I B

b. Reportable EnvironmentalIncidents 1 nf Fnt v If of Events 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------

4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------

2 ---------------- -------------------------------- ... ------------------------------------------------------------

0 0 0 0 -Z I 0

I I 0

i 1,m lý ý l 2001 Jan Feb Mar ' Apr May Jun' Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

-Incident(s) .

1- - Goal' I B

a. Spills - .

11115102 - Failure of Unit blowdown pipe - 5,000 gallons .. .

11120102 - Fire main rupture: 3,000 gallons - .

11127102 - Overflow of Unit I B spray pond backwash sump

b. Environmental Incidents 10130102 - 400,000 gallons of water were released when the Unit I cooling towers overflowed but only 4,000 were released to the sedimentation basin #2. The 4,000 gallons were reported.

11105/02 - Less than 500 gallons of reverse osmosis product water was released onsite to the unlined ditch that cames storm water from the gunnite line collection system to the Sedimentation Basin #2.

38. Workforce 2002 Definition: The number of PVNGS employees on board excludes summer hires and vacancies.

Jan 2,094 Feb 2,107 Mar 2,104 Apr 2,097 May 2,100 Jun 2,095 Jul 2,105 Aug 2,109 Sep 2,105 Oct 2,095 Nov 2,105 Dec i Source: Karen Greiner - 393-6313 Indicator Owner: Ruben Sanchez - 393-6927 I ( I i

r F F F F F F--

V C-U F--- F .. F--T F F-E F-V I--... F- ...

7 F-F ---

[

38. Workforceb2002 I

of Employees 2,1.50.7

I' C r - '

J 2,100

'.1 2,050" I

2,000 I A ir iMy S'" Jui' Aug Sep' Oct Nov Dec rnPVNGS Employees On Board

Palo Verde EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE SCORE CARD November 2002 Year to Date Indicator Threshold Threshold Maximum Maximum Actual / Incentive %

Incentive Incentive Forecast Where Actual Noted Nuclear Safety Reactor Trips I of 3 0.2% 3 of 3 08% 0.80 Maintenance Rule White or Green White or Green Collective Radiation Exposure Safety 0/week .015%/week 0/week .015%/week 0.59 Weeks w/o a Preventable Recordable Weeks Significant Human Performance Events 8 0 3% 4 0.6% 2 0.60 Production Cost- Site 1 30 C/kWh 07% 1 27 0/kWh 1 2% 1.30Fo.7 Forecast Coal & Nuclear Capacity Factor 84 0% 0 5% 880% 0.8% 880% 0.80 Equipment Reliability Equipment Reliability I of 3 0.3% 3 of 3 09% 30.90 White or Green White or Green Work Management Corrective Maintenance Backlog Palo Verde Incentive 4.39 PNW Earnings (including incentive payout) $293M 0.0% $337M 1 8% TBD 0.00 Total Company Earnings Incentive Total **

"*Including seventy adjustment (Maximum funding = 6 % of Base Pay) 4.39

- Funding of this plan occurs once threshold earnings are achieved by Pinnacle West Capital Corporation I I I I I

ML023530436

Text

Description:

Navigation menu

Search