IR 05000395/1979039
| ML19260C972 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 12/21/1979 |
| From: | Conlon T, Walters D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19260C963 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-395-79-39, NUDOCS 8002070193 | |
| Download: ML19260C972 (4) | |
Text
-
.
- pa nuagi 'o UNITED STATES
~,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'
.
$
E REGION il p"[
101 MARIETTA ST N.W., SUITE 3100 o,
ATLANTA, G EoRGIA 30303 Report No. 50-395/79-39 Licensee: South Carolina Electric and Gas Company Pcst Office Box 764 Columbia, South Carolina 29218 Facility Name:
V. C. Summer Nuclear Station License No. CPPR-94 Inspection at V. C. Summer Nuclear Station near Columbia, South Carolina Inspector:
[, (
/
/2/.2 / /7 9'
D.
K'.
' alters '
Date Signed W I<v
/ 2]2/ ["I 9 Approved by:
/
T. E. Conlon, ISection Chief, RC&ES Branch Ddte ' Signed SUMMARY Inspection on November 27-30, 1979 Areas Inspected This special, unannounced inspection involved 22 inspector-hours onsite in the of electrical, piping and instrumentation lines in the turbine building; areas 7200 volt switchgear terminations; followup inspection of licensee identified item 395/79-02-01 and inspector followup item 395/79-32-01.
Results Of the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
.
1937 069 800207o 19 3
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- J. F. Algar, Site Manager
- 0. S. Bradham, Operations Manager
- D. A. Nauman, Group Manager, QA and Security
- A. A. Smith, Site QA Supervisor
- D. R. Moore, Director, Surveillance Systems
- E. Evans, QA Engineer
- C. A. Price, Nuclear Engineer
- C. C. Turkett, QA Supervisor K. Chapman, Startup Test Supervisor Other Organizations
- A. L. Hartman, Resident Engineer, Gilbert Associates Inc. (GAI)
- D. Wieland, Site Manager, Westinghcase
- L. T. Sutlinger, I&C Engineer, Westinghouse
- C. C. Wagoner, Project Manager, Daniel Construction Company (DCC)
- J. R. Fletcher, Project QA Engineer, DCC NRC Resident Inspector
- J. L. Skolds
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview T'ae inspection scope and findings were summarized on November 30, 1979, with those persons indicated in Paragraph I above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
'
5.
E.lectrical and Instrumentation (Components, Systems, Cables and Terminations)
Observation of Work and Work Activities A visual inspection of electrical, piping and instrumentation lines in the turbine building (elevations 436 and 463) between the turbine, turbine
'
pedestal, condenser and building was performed. There were no safety-related class 1E installations observed in this area. Class IE is defined as the 1937 070
.-
-2-
,
safety classification of the electric equipment and systems that are essential to emergency reactor shutdown, containment isolation, reactor core coc, ling, and containment and reactor heat removal, or are otherwise essential in preventing significant release of radioactive material to the environment. With the excep-tion of associated circuits, there are no installations in this area which are required to meet any seismic design requirements. Associated circuits are defined as non-Class IE circuits that share power supplies, enclosures, or raceways with Class IE circuits or are not physically separated from Class IE circuits by acceptable separation distance or barriers. All Class IE and non-Class 1E associated circuit cables have been reinspected by the licensee to ensure
" seismic requirements have been met (see paragraph 7).
The inspector observed terminations to 7200 volt switchgear IDA and IBl.
Due to the licensee's use of a counterclockwise phase rotation sequence (C-B-A) in lieu of the standard closewise phase rotation sequence (A-B-C),
the phasing is rolled at the 7200 volt switchgear such that the licensee's leading phase (C) is connected to bus 1 (normally phase A) of the switchgear.
This connection scheme was verified to be in accordance with drawings E-207-016(RB),E-207-013(R4),E-207-031,R3.
Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspector Followup Items (0 pen) Item 79-32-01, Manufacturer's connection box support brackets on flow transmitters. The inspector reviewed documentation dated November 12, 1979, of a telephone conversation between a GAI engineer and the flow transmitter manufacturer (Barton). The document indicated that the flow transmitters had been qualified to the configuration of the site installation.
The licensee was informed that a telephone conversation was not sufficient confirmation of the configuration to which the transmitters were qualified.
This item will remain open pending review of documentation confirming qualification of the actual site installation.
7.
Action on Licensee Identified Item (50.55(e))
Item 395/79-02-01; Insufficient cable slack to Class 1E electrical equipment.
The licensee has completed the following actions.
a.
Cables terminated before January 8, 1979, were inspected to criteria established by the Architect / Engineer (A/E) using a special computer printout entitled " Selected Circuit Summary" dated January 8, 1979.
The printout ident.ified those cables (class IE and associated) requiring
,
seismic installation. Cables not meeting the criteria were identified by nonconformance notice (NCN) 640E. NCN 640E cables were re-inspected and evalated to refined criteria applicable to the specific installation.
Refined criteria and calculations for cables TAE IX, B1W 28FA(FR), B1W 28FA(FR), B1W 28XA(TO), ESL 393A(FR), ESL 461A(FR), ESL 461A(TO), ESM 1937 071
,.
.
-3-
.
81A, ESN 6XA, AHC 311X, ESL364X, WPN 11X, WPN IZX, AHC 262X and AHC 255X were documented in GAI memo file code 28.640 dated November 14, 1979.
b.
Cables terminated after January 8, 1979, are inspected to the A/E criteria provided by Drawing S-200-r12, " Electrical Construction Guideline for Cable Installation:, per Field Quality Control Procedure (FQCP) 7.1.2, " Cable Termination."
All cable slack analysis and criteria examiaed were based on site seismic criteria. This item is closed.
.
1937 072