ML20212L012

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:44, 20 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Reconsideration of Ruling to License Plant
ML20212L012
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/06/1987
From: Almeida G
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC
References
CON-#187-2607, FRN-52FR6980, RULE-PR-50 OL, NUDOCS 8703100063
Download: ML20212L012 (1)


Text

t C ET M Y-d4 PJDP.03ED guLE___ ]f' C.

(JEB 2 3198l) m r. r [

  • i

- q:

February 6, 1987 '87 FEB 19 P5 :55 Nuclear Regulatory Commission ((gy ,,] m ., ,y 1717 H Street 9 , N. .

N. Washington D.C. 20555 Attn; The Director

Dear Director,

I just read that your department is intending to propose a ruling by which the nuclear power plant at Seabrook NH would be able to obtain an operating licence. I am appalled by this impending decicion.

The Governor of Massachusetts and its representatives are the only people that are trustworthy enough to make such a decicion regarding the safety of the people within the 10 mile radius of this plant. It is abunbantly clear what is motivating the owners of the Seabrook plant to seek such a ruling. They are in business to make profits and my safety will always be a drain upon their goal.

I do not understand why the mistaken dicicion to build this plant so close to such a densely populated summer resort area should forever require bad decicions be made from:then on for the benefit of reducing monetary loses. A great lesson can be taught here to all if we can only see that no amount of profits can outweight the potential devastation that could result from this ruling. There is a vast waste land in Russia that is the result of decicions made by interests with such pri- .

orities.

It is the state of Massachusetts that will be faced with the burden of dealing with accidents of such a magnitude there-fore it is the state of Massachusetts that should determine the feaibility of its prevention.

Please, please reconsider your ruling. It could be the dif-ference between millions of dollars and millions of lives.

Yours ruly, gW rret A meida V( - "

148 Orchard Street Newbury, MA 01922 c

B703100063 870206 3 ,/

PDR ADOCK 0500 H

l-