ML20136F511

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:10, 19 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 851001-1130
ML20136F511
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/02/1986
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20136F504 List:
References
50-382-85-28, NUDOCS 8601070414
Download: ML20136F511 (2)


Text

F i

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Louisiana Power & Light Company , Docket: 50-382 Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 License: -NPF-38 During an NRC inspection conducted October 1 through November 30, 1985, two violations of NRC requirements were identified. The violations involved failure to implement procedures UNT-5-002, MM-6-002, and QP-10-001; and failure to follow Technical Specification 3.7.4. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy.and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"

10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violations are listed below:

A. Technical Sp$cification 6.8.1. requires, in part, that written procedures be implemented for activities in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978. Performance of maintenance on safety-related equipment is one of the activities specified in Appendix A, Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2. Licensee Procedures UNT-5-002, " Condition Identification and Work Authorization"; MM-6-003, " Rotating Equipment Repair"; and QP-10-001, " Inspection" were three procedures required to accomplish the work specified in Condition Identification Work Authorizations (CIWA)_ 022173 and 022169 which involved Charging Pumps A and AB.

Contrary to the above, UNT-5-002, MM-6-003, and QP-10-001 were not properly implemented in that:

1. UNT-5-002, Attachment 6.2, page 7 required the work group supervisor and shift supervisor / control room supervisor initials to be noted in

-block 29 of the CIWA. This was not done for CIWAs 022173 and 022169.

2. UNT-5-002, Attachment 6.3, page 7 required that the applicable technical manual number and sections be entered in block 28 of the CIWA. This was not done for CIWAs 022713 and 022169.
3. UNT-5-002 required that block 48 of the CIWA contain the applicable part numbers. For CIWA 022173 this block was completed but not with part numbers.
4. MM-6-003, Section 4.0 and Section 5.0 state that precautions and initial conditions be included in the CIWA. These items were not included for CIWAs 022173 and 022169.
5. CIWAs 022173 and 022169 required hold points as described in QP-10-001 for verifying cleanliness of components prior to reassembly.

8601070414 860102 PDR ADOCK 05000382 O PDR

~ '

F 5 , 'N %

s e

-e-  :.. ~

T I f -4

~

-- These hold points were not incorporated-in the maintenance and should have been per the guidance of QP-010,.001~.

a This~.is a Severity' Level V violation (50-382/8528-01).

~

Be ~ Technical Specification 3.7.4' requires, in part, that two independent trains'of ultimate heat sink cooling towers shall be OPERABLE each with a wet' mechanical draft cooling tower water basin with a minimum water level of 97% (-9.86 MSL). Further, ACTION b. of Technical Specification 3.7.4 requires that,'with both towers inoperable 1due to basin low water ~1evel, one tower has to be restored to OPERABLE status within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> and both restored-to OPERABLE statuszwithin 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> of the initial loss; otherwise

~

, ~be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

Contrary to the above, on November 26, 1985, it was determined that the

~ minimum level had not been maintained in either water basin for'a significant percent of the time since the unit initially entered MODE 4 and the requirements of ACTION b.:of Technical Specification 3.7.4 were not followed. >

This is a Severity Level IV violation (50-382/8528-02).

Pursuanttotheprovisionsof10CFR2)201,LouisianaPower&LightCompanyis-hereby required to submit to this Office within-30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) the reason for the violations if admitted, (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown,

'~ consideration will be given to' extending the response time.

DatedatArlington, this 2d day of Jan. Texas,[ , 198 y

1 d- I