ML20059E156
| ML20059E156 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 10/28/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20059E148 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-382-93-29, NUDOCS 9311030112 | |
| Download: ML20059E156 (2) | |
Text
.
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Entergy Operations, Inc.
Docket:
S0-382 Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 License: NPF-38 During an NRC inspection conducted on September 27 through October 1, 1993, one violation of HRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the
" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:
Inadeouate Procedure Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 states, in part, that,
" Instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished." These activities are accomplished, in part, by Site Directive W4.101, "Nonconformance/Indeterminance Analysis Process," Revision 0, Steps 4.6.4 and 5.10.4, which specify, in part, that the Events Analysis Reporting and Response Manager is responsible for ensuring that Potential Reportable Event documentation is generated if necessary by processing the Potential Reportable Event as necessary in accordance with existing procedures.
Contrary to the above, during an inspection conducted September 27 through October 1, 1993, NRC identified that Site Directive W4.101, was inadequate for initiating an evaluation to determine the reportability of an event or condition, because there was no longer a position of Manager, Events Analysis Reporting and Response, within the site organization, and there were no clearly specified criteria for -
initiating a repr
_sility determination.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Entergy Operations, Inc., is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.
20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).
This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is-not received within the 9311030112 931028-i PDR ADDCK 05000382 G
l 2-time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated agArlington,G44vl993 Tgxas this.7f day ofl2G b
L 2
--