ML20134K183

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 961201-970111.Violation Noted:Security Patrol Officer Observed Protective Lighting Sys Deficiency When Lighting Was Needed & Did Not Immediately Notify Central or Secondary Alarm Station
ML20134K183
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/07/1997
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20134K171 List:
References
50-382-96-14, NUDOCS 9702130173
Download: ML20134K183 (2)


Text

'

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Entergy Operations, Inc. Docket No.: 50-382 Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 License No.: NPF-38  !

i During an NRC inspection conducted on Dec: ember 1,1996 through January 11,1997, two violations of NRC requirements were identified, in accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG-1600, the violations are listed below:

A. Technical Specification 6.8.1.a states, in part, that written procedures shall be maintained covering surveillance and test activities of safety-related equipment.

Contrary to the above, procedures were not maintained covering surveillance activities of safety-related equipment in that Procedure ME-003-431, " Containment Hydrogen Analyzer Functional Test and Calibration," did not provide adequate instructions for the testing of the hydrogen analyzers.

This is a Severity LevelIV violation (Supplement I) 50-382/9614-02.

B. Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires, in part, that written procedures shall be implemented covering applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of

)

Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978. Appendix A, Sections 1 and 9, require that the licensee have administrative and maintenance procedures.

Administrative Procedure PS-012-102, " Protective Lighting," Revision 6, Section 5.3.2, required, in part, that in the event of a protective lighting system deficiency or failure is observed when lighting is needed, the reporting officer will immediately notify the central or secondary alarm station.

Contrary to the above, on December 17,1996, a security patrol officer observed a protective lighting system deficiency when lighting was needed and did not immediately notify the central or secondary alarm station.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) 50-382/9614-04.

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Entergy Operations, Inc. is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region IV,611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011, and a copy to the NRC Resic'ent inspector at the f acility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Your response may reference or include previous docketed 9702130173 970207 PDR ADOCK 05000382 G PDR

4 i

i correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified,' l suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. I Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time, r i

Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the i extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards .

information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. However, if you find it l necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information j that you desire not to be placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your '

request for withholding the information from the public.

Dated at Arlington, Texas  !

this7thday of Feb. 1997 j

l I

l l

I