ML20149F303

Notice of Violation from Insp on 940529-0709.Violation Noted:In Violation of TS 6.8.1a,CVC Sys Flow Diagram Failed to Show All Letdown Radiation Monitor Purge Connections & Component CWS Flow Diagram Failed to Show All Valves in Sys

ML20149F303
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	08/05/1994
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20149F260	List: IR 05000382/1994015 ML20149F257 ML20149F303
References
50-382-94-15, NUDOCS 9408100062
Download: ML20149F303 (2)

Text

I 1

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION i

Entergy Operations, Inc. Docket: 50-382 Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 License: NPF-38 During an NRC inspection conducted on May 29 through July 9,1994, two examples of one violation cf NRC requirements were identified. In dcordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enfercement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:

Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires, in part, that written procedures be established, implemented, and maintained covering the ,

activities referenced in Appendix A of Regl'latory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.

Site Directive W4.201, Section 3.4, " Configuration Management" states, ,

in part, that " Plant configuration documents specifying operations, {

maintenance, testing, installation, procurement and training i requirements are updated and maintained consistent with the plant design."

I

1. Contrary to the above, the flow diagram for the chemical and  !

volume control system did not show all letdown radiation i monitor purge connections. Specifically, on June 7, 1994, I the flow diagram for the primary makeup water system incorrectly indicated that letdown radiation monitor purge flow was routed to a floor drain and not the r.hemical and volume control system. The flow diagram discrepancy contributed to an inadvertent posithe reactivity addition to the core during a letdown radiation monitor purge evolution.

l

2. Contrary to the above, the component cooling water system flow diagram did not show all the valves in the system. Specifically, on June 23, 1994, the inspectors identified that a ball valve installed immediately downstream of component cooling water heat exchanger drain Valve CC-120A did not appear on the diagram and did not have an identification label.

These two examples constitute one Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1) (382/9415-01).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Entergy Operations, Inc. is hereby required to submit a writ ten statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011, and a copy to tha fRC Resident inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for l I

l 9400100062 940005 PDR ADOCK 05000382 O PDR

1 l

each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and  !

the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown,  ;

consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Arlington, Texas, Datedat{payofg, thisf}cj g, 73g4-1994 l

l k

p

$