ML20217B382
| ML20217B382 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 03/04/1991 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20217B373 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-382-91-03, 50-382-91-3, NUDOCS 9103120092 | |
| Download: ML20217B382 (1) | |
Text
_
l
, APPENDIX-A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Entergy Operations, Incorporated Docket No. 50-382 Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 License No,' NPF-38 During an NRC inspection conducted January 9 through February 19, 1991, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.'
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcenent Actions," 10 CFR Part 2 Appendix C (1991), the violation is listed below:
Technical Specification (TS) 6.8.1.c requires, in part, that written procedures shall be established, implemented. and maintained covering test activities of.
safety-related equipnent.
TS 6.5.1.6.a requires, in part, that all procedures required by TS 6.8 shall be reviewed by the plant operations review connittee (PORC).
TS 6.5.1.7 requires, in part, the PORC to recomend, in writing to the plant manager, approval of the above procedures prior to implementation.
Section 5.6.1.3' of Administrative Procedure UNT-007-028, Revision 0, " Design Change Initiation and Review." states that acceptance tests, regardless of the test format, and which affect safety-related equipment, shall be reviewed by the PORC and' approved by the general manager.
Contrary to the above, on January 15, 1991, part of the acceptance testing of a new type digital voltmeter installed in the Channel A plant protection system bistable _ control panel was not reviewed by the PORC or approved by the General Manager.
This is a Severity Level IV' violation.
(Supplement I)(382/9103-03)
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Entergy Operations, Incorporated, is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.
Nuclebr Regulatory Comission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.
20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30-days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a
" Reply. to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the.results
. violation,(3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further achieved,.
violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received ~within the tine specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the-license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be
. here good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the W
taken.
response time.
Dated t rlington, Texas, this dayof//
L 1991 h
2 DO 0
.. -