ML20082Q766

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:56, 14 May 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
County Station Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept 1994
ML20082Q766
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1994
From: Ray D
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9505010084
Download: ML20082Q766 (115)


Text

r Commonwealth I:dison Company lasalle Generating Station Rd)I North 21st Road , , . ,

Marwilles. 11.61311-9757

  • r Tel 8153574761 April 20,1995 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 l

l Enclosed is the 1994 LaSalle County Station Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, Docket Numbers 50-373 and 50-374. l This report contains the results of the Radiological Environmental and 1 Meteorological Monitoring Programs. The Radioactive Effluent Release Report (s) were submitted under separate cover in August of 1994 and February 1995. ]

Sincerely, ,

1 l

W..

D.J. Ray Station Manager LaSalle County Station DJR/LMS/lja ec: J. B. Martin, Region ill Administrator P. G. Brochman, Resident inspector K. A. Aleshire, Corporate EP L. M Shearer D. M. Boone 9505o1ooe4 941231 PDR R ADOCK c5000373 PDR Y

L

.sene,m o,mnans

[ h,ff j

(; 1 i ,

I I '

LASALLE COUNTY STATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL EN'/IRONMENTAL OPERATING ,

REPORT 1994 I

I I

I APRIL 1995 I

1 i  :

I I

r l

t TABLE OF CONTENTS ,

i jl i

r I INTRODUCTION.... .. .. ........ . ... . ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page 1

I

SUMMARY

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 l 1.0 EFFLUENTS 1.1 Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosphere ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3 1.2 Liquids Released to Illinois River .. . .... .... .. ..... ... . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.0 SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE.... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3 3.0 DOSE TO MAN iE E 3.1 Gaseous Ef fluent Pathways ... . ... . ... . . ..... . ... .. ..... .. ... .......... .. . ... 3 3.1.1 Noble Gases.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.1.1.1 Ga mma Dose Ra tes... . ..... . . ... . . . .... . . .

I 3.1.1.2 Beta Air and Skin Rates..

3.1.2 Radioactive Iodine... .... .. ....... ... .... . .... . ..

3 4

4 3.1.2.1 Iodine Concentrations in Air.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 3.1.2.2 Dose to Infant's Thyroid.. .... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 4 3.1.3 Concentrations of Particulates in Air.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.2 Liquid E ffluent Pathways.. ...... .. . . . .. ... .... .. . .. ....... .. . . ... . . . . 4 3.3 Assessment of Dose to Member of Public...... ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.0 SITE METEOROLOGY... . ... .... ... . . .... .......... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 5.1 G a mma Rad ia ti o n .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 I 5.2 Airborne I-131 and Particulate Radioactivity.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3 A q u a tic Ra d i oa c t iv i ty. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . ... ... . . . .

5.4 Milk.................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6 6

7 I 5.5 S a m p ! e Coll ec ti o ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . .. .

5.6 Program Modi fications ... . ... ............ .. ...... .. .... . ... .... ..

7 7

6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES. . ... . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 7.0 MILCH ANIMALS AND NEAREST LIVESTOCK CENSUSES....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8.0 N E AR EST RESIDENT C ENSUS . .. .. . . . .. . .. .. . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . ... .. ... .. . . . . .. . .. 8 9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS.. . .. . . .. .... ...... . 8 I

u

{~

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) b, t Eage

{

A PPENDIX I - DATA TA B LES AND FIG URES ............................. ......................... ....... 9 h Station Releases Table 1.1-1 Gaseo us E ffl uen ts . . .... . . . . . . . . . . ... . ... . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . ..10 . .. .

{. Table 1.2-1 Table 2.0-1 Liquid Effluents ....... .... ...... ...... ........ .... . ...... .. .. .. . . . 12 Solid Waste Shippec* Offsite for Burial or Disposal.. .. ...... 16 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1-4 Isodose and Concentration Contours... ..... .. . .... ............... 24 b Table 3.1-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Airbome 4

Releases........................................................................... 28 Table 3.2-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Liquid '

( Table 3.3-1 Disch a rges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 10CFR20 Compliance Assessmen t.... ................... . ........ .... 33 Environmental Monitoring

{

Figure 5.0-1 Inner Ring TLD Locations ............. ........ . ..... .. . ..... . ...... .. 35 Figure 5.0-2 Outer Ring TLD Loca tions.... ....... . .... . . ..... .. ............ . 36

[ Figure 5.0-3 Fixed Air Sampling and TLD Sites......... .. .... . . . ......... 37 Figure 5.0-4 Ingestion and Waterborne Exposure Pathway Sa mple Loca tio ns .. . . .. .... . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .... . . .. . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . 38

{ Table 5.0-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Loc a t i o n s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39 .........

Table 5.0-2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, r Sam aling Locations and Sample Collection and L Ana ys es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ........ ..... 40 Table 5.0 Table 5.0-6

_ Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Q u a rterly S u m ma ry.... .. . . . ..... . . . .. . ... ... . . .. . .. . . . .. . . . .. . ... . . . . . . 46 Table 5.1-1 Gamma Radiation measured in mR by TLDs. . .... . .... . . . 52 APPENDIX II - METEOROLOGICAL DATA ........ ............. .. .......... .. ................... . .... 56 APPENDIX III - LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES.. ......... ....... .... .... . ...... ....... ....... 85 APPENDIX IV - MILCH ANIMALS, NEARESI' LIVESTOCK, AND NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUSES................. .............. 87

{ - APPENDIX V - INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM R ES U LTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ...................... 92

[-

[ iu

{

__ i' _________________._m_ ____________________._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

INTRODUCTION LaSalle Station, a two-unit BWR plant is located near Marseilles, Illinois , in LaSalle County,3.5 miles south of the Illinois River. Each reactor is designed to have a capacity of 1078 MW net.

Unit No.1 loaded fuel in March 1982. Unit No. 2 loaded Fuel in late December 1983. The plant has been designed to keep releases to the environment at levels below those specified in the regulations.

Liquid effluents from LaSalle County Station are released to the Illinois River in controlled batches after radioassay of each batch. Gaseous effluents are released to the atmosphere after delay to permit decay of short half-life gases. Releases to the atmosphere are calculated on the basis of analyses of routine grab samples of noble gases and continuously collected composite samples of iodine and particulate matter. The results of effluent analyses are summarized on a monthly basis and reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as required per Technical Specifications / Standards. Airborne concentrations of noble gases, I-131, and particulate radioactivity in offsite areas are calculated using effluent and meteorological data.

Environmental monitoring is conducted by sampling at indicator and control (background) locations in the vicinity of the LaSalle County Station to measure changes in radiation or I radioactivity levels that may be attributable to plant operations. If significant changes attributable to LaSalle County Station are measured, these changes are correlated with effluent releases. External gamma radiation exposure from noble gases and I-131 in milk are the most critical pathways at this site; however, an environmental monitoring program is conducted which includes many other pathways of less importance.

i l

l l

l I

I I

I

1 I

I

SUMMARY

I Gaseous and liquid effluents for the period contributed to only a small fraction of the Technical Specification / Standards limits. Calculations of environmental concentrations based on effluent, Illinois River flow, and meteorological data for the period indicate that consumption by the public of radionuclides attributable to the plant are well below the regulatory limits. Radiation I exposure from radionuclides released to the atmosphere represented the critical pathway for the period with a maximum individual total dose estimated to be 9.72E-04 mrem for the year, where a shielding and occupancy factor of 0.7 is assumed. The assessment of radiation doses is ,

performed in accordance with the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). The results of analysis confirm that the station is operating in compliance with 10CFR50 Appendix I and 40CFR190.

I I

I I

2

i 1.0 EFFLUENTS l

l 1.1 Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosohere Measured concentrations of noble gases, radiciodine, and particulate radioactivity rehased to the atmosphere during the year, are listed in Table 1.1-1. A total of 4.17E+01 curies of fission and activation gases was released with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 5.36 pCi/sec.

'E A total of 3.30E-03 curies of I-131 was released during the year, with a maximum E quarterly average release rate of 2.82E-04 pCi/sec for all iodines.

A total of 3.91E-03 curies of beta-gamma emitters was released as airborne particulate matter with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 3.33E-04 pCi/sec. Alpha emitting radionuclides were not measurable.

I A total of 1.32E+02 curies of tritium was released, with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 9.02 pCi/sec.

I I

1.2 Liquids Released to Illinois River A total of 6.26E+04 liters of radioactive liquid wastes containing 4.37E-03 curies of fission and activation products (excluding tritium, gases, and alpha) was discharged from the station. These wastes were released at a maximum quarterly average concentration of 6.99E-05 Ci/ml. Also,1.45E-01 curies of tritium and 2.31E-07 curies of alpha radioactivity was released. Release estimates are given in Table 1.2-1.

2.0 SOLID RADIOACTIVE W.ASTE Solid radioactive wastes were shipped by truck to Barnwell, South Carolina and Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The record of waste shipments is summarized in Table 2.0-1.

3.0 DOSE TO MAN 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pathways Table 3.1-1 summarizes the doses resulting from releases of airborne radioactivity via the different exposure pathways.

3.1.1 Noble Gases 3.1.1.1 Gamma Dose Rates Offsite Gamma air and whole body dose rates are shown in Table 3.1-1 and were calculated based on measured release rates, isotopic I composition of the noble gases, and average meteorological data for the period. Isodose contours based on concurrent meteorological data for ganuna dose for the year are shown in Figure 3.1-1. Based on measured effluents and meteorological data, the maximum dose to an adult would be 9.72E-04 mrem for the year, with an occupancy or shielding factor of 0.7 included, and based on measured effluents and concurrent meteorological data would be 1.85E-03 mrem. The maximum gamma 3

o

)

O air dose was 1.29E-03 mrad, and 3.09E-03 mrad based on concurrent meteorological data.

3.1.1.2 Beta Air and Skin Rates The range of beta particles in air is relatively small (on the order of a few meters or less); consequently, plumes of gaseous effluents may be considered " infinite" for the purpose of calculating the dose from beta radiation incident on the skin. However, the actual dose to sensitive skin tissues is difficult to calculate because this depends on the beta particle energies, thickness of inert skin, and clothing covering sensitive tissues. For purposes of this report the skin is taken to have a thickness of 7.0 mg/cm2and an occupancy factor of 1.0 is used. This skin dose from beta and gamma radiation for the year was 1.03E-03 mrem . The maximum offsite beta air dose for the year was 4.41E-05 mrad.

The air concentrations of radioactive noble gases at the offsite receptor locations are given in Figure 3.1-2.

3.1.2 Radioactive Iodine The human thyroid exhibits a significant capacity to concentrate ingested or inhaled iodine. The radiciodine,I-131, released during routine operation of the g plant, may be made available to man resulting in a dose to the thyroid. The 3 principal pathway of interest for this radionuclide is ingestion of radioiodine in milk by an infant.

3.1.2.1 ladine Concentrations in Air The calculated concentration contours for iodine in air are shown in Figure 3.1-3. Included in these calculations is an iodine cloud depletion factor which accounts for the phenomenon of elemental iodine deposition on the ground. The maximum offsite concentration is g estimated to be 4.53E-05 pCi/m3 for the year. E 3.1.2.2 Dose to Infant's Thyroid The hypothetical thyroid dose to an infant living near the plant via ingestion of milk was calculated. The radionuclide considered was I-I 131 and the source of milk was taken to be the nearest dairy farm with the cows pastured from May through October. The maximum infant's thyroid dose was 0.00 mrem during the year (Table 3.1-1).

3.1.3 Concentrations of Particulates in Air Concentration contours of radioactive airborne particulates are shown in Figure 3.1-4. The maximum offsite average level is estimated to be 5.04E-05 l

pCi/m3, '

3.2 liquid Effluent Pathways The three principal pathways through the aquatic environment for potential doses to man from liquid waste are ingestion of potable water, eating aquatic foods, and 4

]

exposure while walking on the shoreline. Not all of these pathways are applicable at a given time or station but a reasonable approximation of the dose can be made by adjusting the dose formula for season of the year or type and degree of use of the aquatic environment. NRC-developed ec uations' were used to calculate the doses to the whole body, lower GI tracts, thyroid, aone, skin; specific parameters for use in the equations given in the Commonwealth Edison Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. The

'I maximum whole body dose for the year was 5.84E-06 mrem and no organ dose exceeded 1.51E-05 mrem (Table 3.21).

3.3 Assessment of Dose to Member of Public During the period January to December,1994, LaSalle County Station did not excee, these limits as shown in Table 3.1-1 and Table 3.2-1 (based on yearly average meteorological data), and as shown in Figure 3.1-1 (based on concurrent meteorological data), and as shown in Table 3.3-1:

I

  • The RETS limits on dose or dose commitment to an individual due to radioactive materials in liquid effluents from each reactor unit (1.5 mrem to the whole body or 5 mrem to any organ during any calendar I
  • quarter; 3 mrem to the whole body or 10 mrem to any organ during any calendar year).

The RETS limits on air dose in noble gases released in gaseous effluents I to a member of the public from each reactor unit (5 mrad for ganuna radiation or 10 mrads for beta radiation during any calendar quarter; 10 mrads for gamma radiation or 20 mrad for beta radiation during any calendar year).

The RETS limits on dose to any individual due to iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than eight days in gaseous effluents released from each reactor unit (7.5 mrems to any organ during any calendar quarter: 15 mrems to any organ during any calendar year).

The 10CFR20 timit on Total Effective Dose Equivalent to individual members of the public (100 mrem).

4.0 SITE METEOROLOGY I A summary of the site meteorological measurements taken during each calendar quarter of the year is given in Appendix II. The data are presented as cumulative joint frequency distributions of the wind direction for the 375' level and wind speed class by atmospheric stability class determined for the temperature difference between the 375' and 33' : evels.

Data recovery for these measurements was about 99.7%

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING i

Table 5.0-1 provides an outline of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) as required in the current Technical Standards. Tables 5.0-2 lists the program's

l 5

E'

=l l

1 l

sampling locations, collection frequencies and analyses for all samples collected. Tables 5.0-3 to 5.0-6 summarize data for the year. Except for tables of special interest, tables j listing all data are no longer included in the annual report. All data tables are available for l inspection a t the Station or in the Corporate Office. I 1

Specific findings for various environmental media are discussed below. l 5.1 Gamma RadiaNG External radiation dose from onsite sources and noble gases released to the atmosphere was measured using CaSO4:Tm thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).

Each location normally consists of 2 TLD sets. The annual average external radiation dose was 16.2 mR at the indicator locations and 14.7 mR at the control locations. TLD results are listed in Table 5.1-1 and locations are shown in Figures 5.0-1 and 5.0-2.

Quarterly external radiation dose at fourteen air sampling locations averaged 15.4 mR g and is similar to levels measured in 1986 (17.1 mR),1987 (17.8 mR),1988 (16.5 mR), g 1989 (17.6 mR),1990 (17.8 mR),1991 (17.7 mR),1992 (15.5 mR), and 1993 (14.5 mR).

These differences are not statistically significant.

5.2 Airborne I-131 and Particulate Radioactivity Locations of the samplers are shown in Figure 5.0-3. Airborne I-131 remained below g the LLD of 0.10 pCi/m3throughout the year. E Gross beta concentrations ranged from 0.010 to 0.048 pCi/m3 and averaged 0.022 pCi/m3 and is similar to levels measured in 1985 (0.02.5 pCi/m3),1986 (0.027 pCi/m3, except for the period from May 16 through June 6 when it was influenced by the nuclear reactor accident at Chernobyl),1987 (0.027 pCi/m3 ),1988 (0.031 pCi/m3),

1989 (0.028 pCi/m3),1990 (0.024 pCi/m3), and the same as in 1991 (0.022 pCi/m3),

1992 (0.022 pCi/m3), and 1993 (0.022 pCi/m3),

Gamma emitting nuclides were below the LLD level of 0.01 pCi/m3 in all quarterly composites.

No activity attributable to plant operation was detected in any sample.

5.3 &quatic Radioactivity Well water was collected quarterly from one onsite well and five offsite wells and ,

analyzed for tritium and gamma-emitting nuclides. All results were below the limits l of detection, indicating that there was no measurable amount of radioactivity due to the Station's releases.

Weekly surface water samples from the Illinois River at Seneca and LSCS Cooling l Lake were composited monthly and analyzed for gamma-emitting nuclides. Weekly ,

samples from the same locations were composited quarterly and analyzed for tritium.

None of the composited samples indicated the presence of gamma-emitting nuclides above their respective LLD levels. Tritium was detected in the quarterly upstream E samples, Illinois River at Seneca, with a maximum third quarter concentration of 406 3 pCi/L. It is possible that the tritium is the result of upriver discharges from Dresden and Braidwood Stations.

6 I.

In the LSCS Cooling Lake samples, tritium was detected in the third quarter at a concentration of 212 pCi/L, just over the LLD of 200 pCi/L. It is possi31e that the tritium is the result of the Illinois River being the source of make-up water to the lake.

Sediment samples were collected twice a year from one indicator location (downstream of the Cooling Lake discharge structure) and analyzed for gamma-emitters. All gamma-emitters were below their respective detection limits in both samples. There are no adverse effects expected to the environment.

Levels of gamma radioactivity in fish were measured and found in all samples to be below the lower limit of detection for the program.

5.4 Milk Milk samples were collected monthly from November through April and biweekly from May through October and analyzed for Iodine-131 and gamma-emitting nuclides.

I-131 remained below the detection limits of 0.5 pCi/L.

Cs-134 and Cs-137 were below the LLD level of 10 pCi/L. All other gamma-emitting nuclides, except naturally-occurring K-40, were below their respective LLDs.

5.5 Sample Collections All samples were collected as scheduled except those listed in the Listing of Missed Samples, Appendix III.

5.6 Program Modifications Various editorial changes were made to the ODCM Chapter 11. Table 11-1 was revised to update dairy locations, TLD locations, and numerous sampling location sector and direction information. Figures 11-1,11-2, and 11-3 were revised to update TLD locations and existing sampling locations.

The requirement for the fellowing TLD's was removed for the third quarter:

L-111a-1,2 L-213-1,2 I However, these TLD's remained in the field and results were reported for all quarters of1994.

Flatness Dairy Farm (L-18) went out of business in April and was replaced by Ricker Dairy Farm (L-38). Hayer-Patterson Dairy (L-17) went out of business in August and was replaced by Village View Acres Dairy (L-39).

Sample location names L-36 (Illinois River, Upstream; Fish) and L-37 (Illinois River,

/ Discharge; Fish) have been revised to read LSP-36 and LSP-37, respectively. Also included is new downstream surface water sample location LSP-40 (Mallard Bay Boat

,I Launch, Marseilles). The code letters SP refer to Special Program indicating that these samples are taken above and beyond those samples required by the ODCM.

1 7 i l

l

E, O

A more rigid definition for the quarter had been adopted for 1994. Each quarter is 13 weeks long. The week shall start on Monday and end on Sunday, with week #1 (1994) beginning on the first Monday of January (1/3/94). Due to this new definition all samples collected prior to 1/3/94 were reported as 1993 samples.

6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Procedures used during the period covered in this report remained essentially unchanged.

A summary of the procedures used for analyzing radioactivity in environmental samples is given in Appendix VI of the report for the period January - December 1993.

7.0 MILCH ANIMALS AND NEAREST LIVESTOCK CENSUSES A census of milch animals was conducted within a five mile radius of the station. The survey was conducted by " door-to-door" canvas by A. Lewis on August 22,1994. The nearest livestock census was conducted by A. Lewis on August 22,1994. The results of each census are presented in Appendix IV.

8.0 NEAREST RESIDENT CENSUS A census of the nearest residences within a five (5) mile radius was conducted by A. Lewis on August 29,1994.

Results of the nearest residence census are presented in Appendix IV.

9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS Teledyne's Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results are presented in Appendix V.

Commonwealth Edison's Thermoluminescent Dosimeter (TLD) Program is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) which requires review and evaluation. In addition to the biennial ANSI tested requirement, Commonwealth Edison also tests to the ANSI standard during the non-NVLAP visitation year. Conunonwealth Edison additionally has an internal irradiation program that tests each of the six nuclear station TLD processors once per quarter. The results of all TLD performance tests are retained by Commonwealth Edison's Corporate Health Physics Support.

l 1

l 8  :

=,

4a -p m .,6-- - -s - w '-.-+ -- .- ..+> s . a .a 2 s

l I

s l APPENDIX I DATA TABLES AND FIGURES I

I I

f I .

13

TABLE 1.1-1 LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS ONE AND TWO DOCKET NUMBERS 50-373 AND 50-374 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (19941 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Estimated First Second Total Quarter Quarter Error %

A. Fission and Activation Gases

1. Total release Ci 4.17E+01 1.17E-03 46%
2. Average release rate for period uci/sec 5.36E+00 7.50E-04 B. Iodines
1. Total iodine-131 Ci 2.20E-03 N/A 33%
2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 2.82E-04 N/A C. Particulates
1. Particulates with T1/2 >8 days Ci 1.06E-03 2.14E-04
2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 1.36E-04 2.75E-05 41%
3. Gross alpha radioactivity (estimate) Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 D. Tritium
1. Total release ci 4.43E+01 1.56E+01 181
2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 9.02E+00 3.26E+00

"<" indicates a:t.vity of sample is less than LLD given in uci/ml I

I I

I w

E

E.

TABLE 1.1-1 (Continued)

I: ,

IASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS ONE AND TWO -

DOCKET NUMBERS 50-373 AND $0-374 I EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI,-ANNUAL REPORT (1994)

GASEOUS EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Estimated Third Fourth Total Quarter Quarter Error t A. Fission and Activation Gases l

1. Total release Ci 3.68E-03 3.69E-03 36
2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 4.68E-04 4.69E-04 l B. Iodines l
1. Total iodine-131 Ci 8.44E-04 2.52E-04
2. 35 Averags release rate for period uCi/see 1.07E-04 3.21E-05 C. Particulates
1. Particulates with T1/2 >B days C1 2.62E-03 1.99E-05
2. Average release rate for period uCi/see 3.33E-04 2.50E-06 29
3. Gross alpha radioactivity (estimate)Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 D. Tritium
1. Total release Ci 3.31E+01 3.87E+01 19
2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 4.21E+00 4.92E+00

"<a indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uci/ml l

1

- sw I

=

r -

TABLE 1.2-1 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1994)

UNIT ONE LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES First Second Quarter Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products

1. Total release (not including Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 tritium, gases, alpha)

-I '

2.

3.

Average concentration released Maximum concentration released uCi/ml uCi/ml N/A N/A N/A N/A B. Tritium

1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
2. Average concentration released uC1/ml N/A N/A C. Dissolved Noble Gases
1. Total release ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
2. Average concentration released uci/ml N/A N/A D. Gross Alpha Radioactivity
1. Total release ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
2. Average concentration released uci/ml N/A N/A E. Volume of Waste Released (prior to dilution) liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 F. Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

"<" indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/ml I  ;

I I

I 12

1 l

l em l l

l l

TABLE 1.2-1 (continued) i EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1994 UNIT ONE LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUMMATIot{ CF ALL RELEASES ESTIMATED Third Fourth TOTAL Quarter Quarter ERRORt A. Fission and Activation Products

1. Total release (not including Ci 0.00E+00 4.37E-03 94 tritium, gases, alpha)
2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A 6.99E-05
3. Maximum concentration released uCi/ml N/A 6.99E-05 B. Tritium
1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 1.45E-01 84
2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A 4.34E-03 C. Dissolved Noble Cases
1. Total release ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 74
2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A D. Gross Alpha Radioactivity
1. Total release ci 0.00E+00 2.31E-07 N/A
2. Average concentration released uC1/ml N/A <3.69E-09 E. Volume of Waste Released (prior to dilution)1iters 0.00E+00 6.26E+04 F. Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E+00 5.93E+07

"<" indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/ml t

4 I

I 13

-1

I

~ TABLE 1.2-1 (continued)

EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1994)

UNIT TWO LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES First Second Quarter Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products

1. Total release (not including Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 I 2.

3.

tritium, gases, alpha)

Average concentration released Maximum concentration released uCi/ml uCi/ml N/A N/A N/A N/A I

B. Tritium

1. Total release ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A C. Dissolved Noble Gases
1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A D. Gross Alpha Radioactivity
1. Total release ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
2. Average concentration released uC1/ml N/A N/A ,

E. Volume of waste Released liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 F. Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

"<" indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/ml I

I I

14 j

0 0

TABLE 1.2-1 (continued)

EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1994)

UNIT TWO LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES E Third Fourth Quarter Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products

1. Total release (not including Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 tritium, gases, alpha)
2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A-
3. Maximum concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A B. Tritium
1. Total release ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 W
2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A C. Dissolved Noble Gases
1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A D. Gross Alpha Radioactivity
1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
2. Average concentration released uct/ml N/A N/A E. Volume of waste Released liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 F. Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

"<" indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/ml l

l 4

I 15 m

TABLE 2.0-1 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1994)

SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL First January Februar,y March Quarter

1. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottone, etc.
a. Quantity shipped cu.m. 1.64E+01 4.59E+01 2.83E+01 9.06E+01
b. Total activity Ci 2.36E+01 6.43E+02 6.17E-01 6.67E+02
c. Major nuclides (estimate)

Mn-54  % 9 8 7 Fe-55  % 54 54 75 Co-58  % 1 1 1 Co-60  % 33 33 17

d. Container type LSA LSA LSA I e. Container volume cu.m. 4.83E+00 5.82E+00 4.33E+00 5.82E+00 2.36E+00 2.36E+00 4.33E+00
f. Solidification agent Cement Cement Cement
2. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
a. Quantity shipped cu.m. 0.00E+00 7.24E+01 2.43E+02 3.15E+02
b. Total activity Ci 0.00E+00 3.84E-01 1.48E+00 1.86E+00
c. Major nuclides (estimate)

Cr-51  % 0 5 5 Mn-54  % 0 15 15 Fe-55  % 0 55 55 Fe-59  % 0 6 3 Co-60  % 0 15 15

d. Container type N/A LSA LSA
e. Container volume cu.m. N/A 7.24E+01 7.24E+01 1.70E+02 I

I I

i l

I 16 1

l 1

N a

TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)

EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1994)

I SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL January February March Quarter

3. Other
a. Quantity shipped cu.m. 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
b. Total activity Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
c. Major nuclides (estimate)

Cr-51 1 0 0 0 Mn-54 1 0 0 0 Fe-55 1 0 0 0 Fe-59  % 0 0 0 co-60  % 0 0 0

d. Container type N/A N/A N/A
e. Container volume cu.m. H/A N/A N/A
4. Irradiated components
a. Number of shipments 0 0 0 0
b. Mode of Transportation N/A N/A N/A
c. Destination N/A N/A N/A
5. Solid Waste Disposition
a. Number of Shipments 3 10 9 22
b. Mode of Transportation Truck Truck Truck Number 3 10 9
c. Destination Oak Ridge, TN Oak Ridge, TN Oak Ridge, TN Number 0 1 1 Barnwell, SCBarnwell, SCBarnwell, SC Number 3 9 8 l

l 1

)

17 am

1 1

TABt.L 2.0-1 (Continued) l EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1994)

SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE EVR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL Second April My June Quarter I 1. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc.

Quantity shipped cu.m. 6.80E+00

a. 2.41E+01 1.78E+01 4.87E+01
b. Total activity Ci 5.67E-02 4.95E-01 3.22E-01 8.73E-01
c. Major nuclides Mn-54  % 6 7 7 I' re-55 Co-50 Co-60 22 9

59 64 1

26 68 0

23 I d. Container type LSA LSA LSA

e. Container volume cu.m. 3.40E+00 4.33E+00 4.83E+00

- 5.82E+00 2.36E+00 2.36E+00 3.40E+00

f. Solidification agent Cement Cement Cement
2. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
a. Quantity shipped cu.m. 1.44E+02 2.46E+01 1.35E+02 3.03E+02
b. Total activity Ci 2.27E-01 9.50E-02 7.17E+00 7.49E+00
c. Major nuclides (estimate)

Mn-54  % 15 15 15 Fe-55  % 54 54 58 Fe-59  % 7 7 4 Co-60  % 15 15 16

d. Container type LSA LSA LSA
e. Container volume cu.m. 7.24E+01 2.46E&O1 4.88E+00 4.83E+00 2.46E+01 1.52E+01 3.62E+01 18

\

i

\

l 1

as TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)

EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPJRT (1994)

I SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL Second April y M June Quarter

a. Quantity shipped cu.m. 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
b. Total activity Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
c. Major nuclides (estimate) 3 Mn-54 1 0 0 0 Fe-55 4 0 0 0 Fe-59 1 0 0 0 Co-60 1 0 0 0
d. Container type N/A N/A N/A
e. Container volume cu.m. N/A N/A N/A
4. Irradiated Components
a. Number of shipments 0 0 2
b. Mode of Transportation N/A N/A Truck
c. Destination N/A N/A Barnwell, SC
5. Solid Waste Disposition
a. Number of Shipments 4 6 14 24
b. Mode of Transportation Truck Truck Truck Number 4 6 3

14

c. Destination Oak Ridge, TN Oak Ridge, TN Oak Ridge, TN Number 2 1 3 Barnwell, SC Barnwell, SC Barnwell, SC Number 2 5 11 I

I 19 g

TABLE 2.0-1 (Continued)

EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SENI-ANNUAL REPORT (1994)

SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE IVR BURIAL CR DISPOSAL

. Third July August September Quarter

1. Spent resins, filter sludges, NO NO NO evaporator bottoms, etc. SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS N/A
a. Quantity shipped cu.m.

b.

I Total activity Ci

c. Major nuclides (estimate t)
d. Container type
e. Container volume cu.m.
f. Solidification agent
2. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
a. Quantity shipped cu.m.
b. Total activity Ci
c. Major nuclides (estimate t)
d. Container type
e. Container volume cu.m.

I I

20

N TABLE 2.01 (Continued)

EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1994)

I SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL July

, Third 1 August Septerrber Quarter

3. Other )
a. Quantity shipped cu.m. No No No N/A I

SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS  !

b. Total activity Ci
c. Major nuclides (estimate t)
d. Container type
e. Container volume cu.m.
4. Irradiated Components
a. Number of shipments
b. Mode of Transportation E
c. Destination
5. Solid Waste Disposition
a. Number of Shipments
b. Mode of Transportation 5
c. Destination i

I 21 g

=

I I

TABLE 2.0-1 (Continued)

EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1994)

SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL

, Fourth October November December Quarter.

I 1. Spent resins, filter sludges, No evaporator bottoms, etc. SHIPMENTS NO SHIPMENTS NO SHIPMENTS N/A

a. Quantity shipped cu.m.
b. Total activity Ci
c. Major nuclides
d. Container type
e. Container volume cu.m.

I Solidification agent f.

2. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
a. Quantity shipped cu.m.
b. Total activity Ci
c. Major nuclides (estimate t)
d. Container type
e. Container volume cu.m.

!I s.

e

'I i

)

22 j

t

E e

TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)

EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1994)

~

SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL

. Fourth October November December Quarter

3. Other i

{

a. Quantity shipped cu.m. No NO No N/A SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS
b. . Total activity Ci j
c. Major nuclides (estimate t)
d. Container type
e. Container volume cu.m.
4. Irradiated Corrponents
a. Number of shipments
b. Mode of Transportation
c. Destination S. Solid Waste Disposition
a. Number of Shipments
b. Mode of Transportation
c. Destination I I

l l

1 23

=

I FIGURE 3.1-1 Estimated Cumulative Gamma Dose (in mrem)

/

/ 2, from the LaSa!!e Station for the period -

January-December 1994 hpoleth Labels j ('

Small figure multiply by 104 7- i Large figure multiply by 104 } 5C I ,

..... .. ,Y v

ll 9 i y'

/ s ,3 I 25

.. e

\

e l

...... u.,,,.

g

, u. ,,. .

I ,

/, [

l i "~a \

NN c-lD I

strea,or g

,I .-

e.. , >g n, g-24 I

1

E a

FIGURE 3.1-2 Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCvm3) of Noble Gases from the LaSalle Station j for the period January-December 1994

/

lsooleth labels f Small figure multiply by 10

Large hgure multiply by 10'8

  • 250 '[}scs ]

s  ; .a ,,. ,,aumaa,

,800 ws .... ne s

/

p 9  !  !-

l

w. .

I

,, j Ottowo M

Illinois 250 & l

( v

$ 250

\(ge<.a4% ,

y

, J --

I 4 ...... ) E

u..... g 5 su. <

J o.isht/

a 50 ss l

( ) Odstl

'8 - .

t_a_ .g ., 2g- I I

25 I

FIGURE 3.1-3 l3 Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCVm3)

J of lodine from the LaSane Station for the period January-December 1994 [ / 3 150

Isoofeth Labels j Small figure multiply by 10

Large figure multiply by 10 --

)""' (g -

250 y ,

250 +

). ...

l /

v' ll 42 9 i P 5

e.+ . .

NC"

/

.: Ottovo y ,,,i, Senoco Illinois M e 50 0

j 'r Outc'(\_ -

~ '

-l .y.,y23/Q;o y . . . .

i u i

,,,..o,. 'N~M s ,

n -

,,X-W<- ,

Odell I ts--

I u_, .g .. -

, 2e

- - 9

Ej o

FIGURE 3.1-4 Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCi/m3) of Particulates from the LaSane Station 350- j for the period January-December 1994 /* 3no Isooleth Lahtli ,/

Small figure multiply by 10 -- , ' ' ' " " - (. .350 .

Large figure . multiply by 10 [250, V

9@- !

i

)

) l 350

/

g ~

9 t 2-l r ,x

/ l Otteso yorri, Illinoi t

R'

~ ~

. .. .,/

s l

N,7..q. 250 ,

' ~

Q -v .. .

50 b a.....

N' t

/-

\

is Dwight

\

unas

\ -ta -

e SS Odal ,

0 S 10 15 20m'

~

IllI k.d=k L=k d- l

TABLE 3.1-1 l

LASALLE STATION UNITS ONE AND 'IWO ACTUAL 1994 I MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/94 TO 12/31/94 INFANT RECEPTOR CALCULATED 04/10/95 I TYPE IST QUARTER JAN MAR 2ND QUARTER APR-JUN 3RD QUARTER JUL-SEP 4TH QUARTER OCT-DEC ANNUAL CAMtm AIR 1.29E-03 2.69E-08 3.79E-09 2.53E-09 1.29E-03 (MRAD) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW j (WSW ) (WSW )

BETA AIR 4.41E-05 9.24E-10 1.29E-09 1.10E-09 4.41E-05 (MRAD) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE )

JT. BODY 9.72E-04 2.02E-08 2.85E-09 1.90E-09 9.72E-04 (MREM)

(WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW )

! SKIN 1.03E-03 2.15E-08 3.40E-09 2.28E-09 1.03E-03 (MREM) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW )

ORGAN 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

, (MREM) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALt.NDAR YEAR 1994 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I INFANT RECEPTOR

............ g or App I. ............

QTRLY IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY  % OF

  • OBJ JAN41AR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ I

APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.01 BETA AIR (MRAD: 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.02 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.01 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JHIY 1994 ODCM SOFWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I

28 l

1 5

m I

TABLE 3.1-1 (Continued)

I LASALLE STATION UNITS ONE AND TWO I

ACTUAL 1994 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING rs<0M AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/94 TO 12/31/94 CALCULATED 04/10/95 CHILD MECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL TYPE JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 1.29E-03 2.69E-08 3.79E-09 2.53E-09 1.29E-03 (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) E (MRAD)

BETA AIR 4.41E-05 9.24E-10 1.29E-09 1.10E-09 4.41E-05 (MRAD) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE )

TOT. BODY 9.72E-04 2.02E-08 2.85E-09 1.90E-09 9.72E-04 (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW )

(MREM)

SKIN 1.03E-03 2.15E-08 3.40E-09 2.2BE-09 1.03E-03 (MRD4) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW )

ORGAN 1.29E-03 4.58E-04 9.81E-04 1.08E-03 3.81E-03 (WSW ) (W3W ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW )

(MREM)

GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAP. 1994 COMPLIANCF STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I CHILD RECEPTOR

............ % OF APP I. ------------

IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY  % OF QTRLY OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.01 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.02 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.01 E ORGAN (MEEM) 7.5 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 15.0 0.03 g GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOF'IVARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 29

i I

1 TABLE 3.1-1 (Continued) l l

i LASALLE STATION UNITS ONE AND TWO )

ACTUAL 1994 I MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/94 TO 12/31/94 CALCULATED 04/10/95 TEENAGER RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 1.29E-03 2.69E-08 3.79E-09 2.53E-09 1.29E-03 (MRAD) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW )

BETA AIR 4.41E 05 9.24E-10 1.29E-09 1.10E-09 4.41E-05 (MRAD) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE )

TOT. BODY 9.72E-04 2.02E-08 2.85E-09 1.90E-09 9.72E-04 (MREM) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW )

SKIN 1.03E-03 2.15E-08 3.40E-09 2.28E-09 1.03E-03 (MREM) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW )

Onu;J: 1.07E-03 3.E-04 8.22E-04 8.98E-04 3.17E-03 (MREM) (WSW ) (W',W ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW )

GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1994 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I TEENAGER RECEPTOR


 % OF APP I. ------------

f QTRLY IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY t OF I APP. I OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ CAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.01 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00

'IVT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.02 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.01 I ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 GI_LLI 0.01 GI_LLI 0.01 GI_LLI 0.01 GI_LL 15.0 0.02 GI_LLI RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOF'IMARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I

1 1

1 -

  • i 1

1 TABLE 3.1-1 (continued)

LASALLE STATION UNITS ONE AND 'IWO AC'It1AL 1994 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/94 TO 12/31/94 CALCULATED 04/10/95 ADULT RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 1.29E-03 2.69E-08 3.79E-09 2.53E-09 1.29E-03 (MRAD) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW )

BETA AIR 4.41E-05 9.24E-10 1.29E-09 1.10E-09 4.41E-05 (MRAD) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE )

?37. BODY 9.72E-04 2.02E-08 2.85E-09 1.90E-09 9.72E-04 iMmq (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW )

SKIN 1.03E-03 2.15E-08 3.40E-09 2.28E-09 1.03E-03 (kRC4) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW )

02cAN 1.80E-03 6.38E-04 1.38E-03 1.51E-03 5.32E-03 E (MPSM' (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) (WSW ) g GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1994 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I ADULT RECEPTOR

............ g or App I, ............

QTRLY IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY  % OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.01 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.02 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.01 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 15.0 0.04 GI_LLI GI_LL: GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOF7 WARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 Januarf 1995 I

I 31

== 1 I

TABLE 3.2-1 I LASALLE STATION UNITS ONE AND WO ACTUAL 1994 MAXIMUM DOSES (MRDf) RESULTItKi FROM AQUATIC EFFLUENTS PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/94 TO 12/31/94 CALCULATED 04/10/95 ADULT RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH I- DOSE TYPE QUARTER JAN-MAR QUARTER APR-JUN QUARTER JUL-SEP QUARTER OCT-DEC ANNUAL TOTAL 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 5.84E-06 5.84E-06 I BODY INTERNAL ORGAN 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.51E-05 GI LLI 1.51E-05 GI_LLI THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1994 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CFR 50 APP. I

..-...----.- t OF APP I. ------------

QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY  % OF I TOTAL BODY (MREM)

OBJ 1.5 JAN-MAR 0.00 APR-JUN 0.00 JUL-SEP 0.00 OCT-DEC 0.00 OBJ 3.0 APP. I 0.00 CRIT. ORGAN (MREM) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 I RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION GI LLI 1.0 JANUARY 1994 GI_LLI I ODCM SOFWAPE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I

I 32

L  ;

J l

- TABLE 3.3-1 l

LASALLE STATION UNITS ONE AND '!WO l

10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/94 To 12/31/94 CALCULATED 04/10/95

1. 10 CFR 20.1301 (a) (1) Compliance Total Effective Dose Egivalent, mrem /yr 1.76E-01 10 CFR 20.1301 (a) (1) limit mrom/yr 100.0 4 of limit 0.18 L ':

l Compliance Summary - 10CFR20 let 2nd 3rd 4th 4 of Qtr Qtr Qtr Qtr Limit t

i TEDE 3.70E-02 4.60E-02 4.45E-03 8.87E-02 0.18 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOF'IWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 CDCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 1 E

[

E-

[.

[

[.

[

(

33 W

us TABLE 3.3-1 (Continued)

LASALLE STATION UNITS ONE AND TWO 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMErff 01/01/94 % 12/31/94 CALCULATED 04/10/95

2. 10 CFR 20.1301 (d)/40 CFR 190 Compliance {

Dose Limit t of (mrem) (mrem) Limit Whole Body Plume 9.72E-04 (DDE) Skyshine 1.72E-01 Ground 0.00E+00 Total 1.73E-01 25.0 0.69 Organ Dose Thyroid 3.25E-03 75.0 0.00 (CDE) Gonads 3.26E-03 25.0 0.01 Breast 3.25E-03 25.0 0.01 Lung 3.25E-03 25.0 0.01 Marrow 3.26E-03 25.0 0.01 Bone 3.25E-03 25.0 0.01 Remainder 3.28E-03 25.0 0.01 CEDE 3.27E-03 TEDE 1.76E-01 100.0 0.18 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCH SOF'IMARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 i

I I

x s.

I FIGURE 5.0-1 I Revision 1.1 July 1994

./

. .y..

I g . , ,6-1 L, '

.1es a

%W w

.. v.- . :-. .

.5 t.,, t. , , .. .... .. .

I L-, c3-, L.,os '

04 1 a ,,4 3 Waste Stablitzation Pond '

a , , s.,

g h.$ b N, . -

's.: Fwww'" 1 1,n '

I

/ ,, -

a ,,1A 3 X'~ nan..S 2 q ~

,I

. r- .::M . .:- ,-i. s o, . . 9. - i t':t;

' ry c.,,

7,- j, 3, x

I j . . . . . ,, ,m,

> 9' . .. .3 ,A 2.8 8Cassestare I

' ~~""

I -

t s ttecousrvsrizios 1

INNER RING TLD LOCATIONS 35 l

E

=,

FIGURE 5.0-2 Revision 1.1 July 1994 I

Ottawa r "

os,..nle.

I S.no t 2i64s ee g

t 2 848,

/ e.

L nisas

2 ' 5 4 '

a t 2144

/\

t.mo t.ma e ses.i l 5 t.2144 t.zisa s gPlant

!:ti L-aisos

,a , ,,l e tesa

. t=4 Site Property Grand Ridge

  • a M1
  • "8
    • Es, Verona se gj .

BR)

    • II Kinsman g

Ransom E

, Koman Streator Grundy La Salle County County' l

~

Uvingston County s TLD Location E LaSalle Station K

~

e_ mme xe m1,e~s I I

36 I

=

i

I Revisjon 1.1 July 1994 FIGURE 5.0-3 ,

I Ottawa I

I o14

' 3 I"~ Marseilles South 8 Ottawa . .

m ,

l l

i 2* I

.. @Plad l l Site Property j *13

Grand Ridge

  • Verona Kinsman 11eRansom e12 8 i Koman Streator .

10' ' Orundy

~

La Salle

~

County County'

' ~ ~

Air SampGng Location LIvangston County I E LaSaHe Station LASALLE COUNTY STATION FIXED AIR SAMLING SITES

. .0 I b01 Nearsite No.1 IA2 NearsiteNo.2 L@ Onsite No. 3 L-08 Marseiues IA9 Grand Ridge b10 Streator L-04 Nearsite No. 4 L-11 Ransom L-05 Onsite No. 5 L-12 Keran L-06 Nearsite No. 6 L-13 Route 6 at Conrum Rd.

L-07 Seneca L 14 Ottawa 37 l

____-----_--_-----_--_1

E R:vrsim 1.1 as JuPy 1994 FIGURE 5.0-4

)

6-40 l

' Ottaws

. Merseines U.s.8 f

4 31 Illin01:

928  ?"" g/

D32 e35 520 329 e21 RL 23

/

I i .2d -

E l Lacse ssilo. E Rt.110 m 39 5 38 3 16 r Ranecen j L see E19 LASALLE COUNTY STATION INGESTION AND WATERBORNE EXPOSURE PATHWAY SAMPLE LOCATIONS

,,, e 1 1 s 4 s unos j e t 4 e e to Knomesse, I. 1-16 Lowery Dairy

  • Fish L.17 Mayer-Patterson Dairy B Milk 1 18 Flatness Dairy e Sediment 1 19 Bettenhausen Dairy a Vegetables L-20 Cass Dairy L 21 Illinois River at Seneca e Water L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake Near Recreation Area 1-27 LSCS Onsite Well at Station L 28 Marseilles Well le29 Seneca Well L 30 Ranson Well L 31 Ottawa Well 1-32 Illinois State Park L 34 Downstream of Cooling lake Discharge Structure L-36 Marseilles Pool ofIllinois River l L-39 %Ilage View Acres Dairy 38

TABLE 5.0-1 u

2 LaSalle Station g l

- Radiological Environmental Monitoring g w Locations y y , 2  % .

i E

5 y 3 5 2 $k g 7 kO .c .2 6 Q 1 A Y U} $ 0 s E b" I L-01 Nearsite No.1 L-02 Nearsite No. 2 L-03 Onsite No. 3 0

0 0 0 0

0 I

le04 Nearsite No. 4 I

0 0 . ,

leos Onsite No. 5 0 0 . . . .

L-06 Nearsite No. 6 0 0 .

L-07 Seneca 0 0 . . .

!<08 Marseilles 0 0 . . . .

L-09 Grand Ridge 0 0 . . . . .

L-10 Steator 0 0 . . . . .

tell Ransom 0 0 . .

L-12 Kernan 0 0 . . . .

L-13 Route 6 at Gonnam Road 0 0 . . . . .

1 14 Ottawa 0 0 . . .

1-16 Lower . 0 le17 ifayery DairyPatterson Dairy . 0 L-18 Flatness Dairy . . . . 0 le19 Bettenhausen Dairy . 0 . .

L-20 Gass Dairy .

0 .

L-21 Illinois River at Seneca . . . O L-24 ISCS Cooling Lake near Recreation Area 0 . 0 ,

127 LSCS Onsite Well .

. O L-28 Marseilles Well . . . O L-29 Seneca Well . . .

. O L-30 Ransom Well . . . . . O L-31 Ottawa Well . . . . O I-32 Illinois State Park . . . . O L-34 Downstream of Cooling Lake Discharge Structure

. . . . 0 .

L-35 Marseilles Pool of Illinois River 0 . .

LSP-36 Illinois River, Upstream . 0 .

LSP-37 Illinois River, Discharge j le38 Richer Dairy Farm

. 0 .

0 g

L-39 Village View Acres Dairy . . . 0 . . .

LSP-40 Mallard Day Boat Launch, Marseilles . . 0 .

CENSUS Dairy Residence Livestock I

I 39

TABLE 5.0-2 LASALLE STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS I 1. AIR SAMPLERS Distance Direction Site Codea Location (miles) ()

L-01 Nearsite No.1 0.5 337 L-02 Nearsite No. 2 0.6 25

g L-03 Onsite No. 3 0.2 60 g L-04 Nearsite No. 4 1.5 81 L-05 Onsite Station No. 5 0.3 115 L-06 Nearsite No. 6 0.4 248 I L-07 le08 Seneca Marseilles Grand Ridge 5.2 6.3 10.4 33 336 L-09 (C) 260 I L-10 (C)

L-11 L-12 (C)

Steator Ransom Kernan 13.5 6.0 5.0 222 177 207 L-13 Route 6 at Gonnam Road I

7.0 95 I-14 (C) Ottawa 12.0 311

2. 'Ill,2s
a. Same as No.1.
b. SpecialTLD Samplers I Site Code Distance (miles)

Direction (0)__

I Inner Ring L-101-1,2 0.5 357 L-102-1,2 0.6 17 L-103-1,2 0.7 47 I L-104-1,2 le105-1,2 L-106-1,2 0.8 0.7 1.4 65 91 110 I L-107-1,2 L-108-1,2 L-109-1,2 0.8 0.5 0.6 128 156 178 le110-1,2 0.6 205 L-111a-1,2 0.7 217 L-111b-1,2 0.8 230 L-112-1,2 0.9 244 l I L-1Da-1,2 '

0.8 262 L-111 b-1,2 0.8 273 L-114. ' ? 0.9 288 L-115-1,2 0.7 310 L-116-1,2 0.6 330 a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.  !

l 40

R TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)

LASALLE STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS

2. TLD3
b. SpecialTLD Samplers (continued)

Distance Direction Site Code (miles) (0}__

Outer Ring L-201-3,4 4.0 0 L-202-3,4 3.6 23 L-203-1,2 4.0 56 L-204-1,2 3.5 78 L-205-1,2 3.5 102 Ie205-3,4 5.1 90 L-206-1,2 4.3 125 L-207-1,2 4.5 150 L-2081,2 4.5 170 L-209-1,2 4.0 192 L-210-1,2 3.3 216 L-212-1,2 4.0 255 L-213-3,4 4.9 270 L-214-3,4 5.1 291 L 215-3,4 5.0 320 L-216-3,4 5.0 338 Distance Direction Site Codea Location (mile) (0)_

L-16 (C)

L-17 (C)

Lowery Dairy liayer-Patterson Dairyb 7.2 12.3 120 18 I

L-18 (C) Flatness DairyC 12.5 10 L-19 (C) Bettenhausen Dairy 7.0 180 le20 Gass Dairyd 4.6 348 L-38 Richer Dairy Farm 7.6 213 L-39 Village View Acres Dairy 10.5 232 a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.

b g Ilayer-Paterson Dairy went out of business in August of 1994 and was replaced by Village View Acres E Dairy (L-39).

c Flatness Dairy went out of business in April of 1994 and was replaced by Richer Dairy (L-38). g d

Additional dairy was not required by Technical Standards but was included to ensure that program E has at least four milking stations. This is not a commercial dairy but a farm having milking cows for personst use.

41 g

TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)

LASALLE STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS

4. CROUND/WELL WATER Distance Direction Site Codea Location (miles) (0)__.

L-27 LSCS Onsite Well At Station I L-28 L-29 (C)

L-30 Marseilles Well Seneca Well Ransom Well 7.0 5.1 6.0 326 18 191 L-31 Ottawa Well 12.8 304 L-32 Illinois State Park 6.5 326 I 5. SURFACE WATER Site Codea Location Distance (miles)

Direction (0)__

L-21 (C) Illinois River at Seneca 4.0 22 L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake Near 0.3 112 Recreation Area LSP-40 Mallard Bay Boat Launch, Marseilles 5.5 345

6. EISH Distance Direction Site Codea Location (miles) (0)

L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake 0.3 40 Near Recreation Area L-35 Marseilles Pool ofIllinois River 6.5 326 LSP-36 (C) Illinois River, Upstream 4.5 20 LSP-37 Illinois River, Discharge 4.5 5

7. SHORELINE SEDIMENTS Distance Direction Site Codea Location (miles) (0)

L-34 Downstream of Cooling At Station Lake Discharge Structure a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.

42

TABLE 5 0-2 (continued)

LASALLE STATION RADIOI.OGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLE COLLEC110N AND ANALYSES tocaten Collecton Type of Trequency Sample Media Codea Site Frequency Analysts ofAnalpis Remarks

1. Airborne Onsite and Near Field Continuous Gross Beta Weeuy On all samples.

Particulates operation Gamma Isot. Quarterly On Quarterly composite from each locatiort b01 Nearsite No. I for one week bO2 Nearsite No. 2 Gamma Isot. If gross beta in a sample exceeds 10 tunes the bO3 Onsite No. 3 yearly mean of control samples.

L-04 Nearsite No. 4 L-05 Onsite No. S Filter Weekly b06 Nearsite No. 6 Exchange Far Fseki Continuous Gross Beta Weekly See footnote ~b."

operation L-07 Seneca for one week Gamma Isot. See footnote "b".

L-08 Marseilles If gross beta ir a sample exceeds 10 tunes the LO9 (C) Grand Ridge Filter Weekly yearly mean of mntrol samples.

b10 (C) Streator Exchange A bil Ransom l Kernan

, b12 (C)

L-13 Route 6 at Gonnam Rd.

bl4 (C) Ottawa

2. Airborne Same as 1. Near Field Weekly 1-131 Weekly On all samples.

i Iodine j Far Fieki Baweekly 1-131 Biweekly See footnote %~

3. AirSampling Same as 1. -

Test and Weekly On all samplers.

Tr in Maintenance

4. TLD a. Same as 1. Quarterly Gamma Quartedy Two sets of TLD's at all air sampler locations. All11.Ds are read Quarterly.
b. b101-1,2 Inner Ring Quarterly Gamma Quarterly AllTLDs are read Quarterly.

102-1,2 103-12 104-1,2 105-1,2 106-1,2 107-1,2 108-1,2 109-1,2 a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C"in this column All other locations are indicators.

b Far-field samples are analyzed when near-field results are inconsistent with previous measurements and radioactivity is confirmed as having its orgin in airborne effluents released from the station or at the discretion of the Emergency Preparedness Director.

I M M M EM

M M M M M M

~

M -

M M M M M M M TABLE 5 0-2 (continued)

LASALLE STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSES Imtion Collection Type of Frequency Sample Media Codea Site Frequency Analysis of Analyw Remarks

4. TLDs L-110-1,2 (continued) 111a-1,2 111b-1,2 112-1,2 113a-1,2 113b-1,2 114-1,2 115-1,2 116-1,2 L-201-3,4 Outer Ring Quarterly Gamma Quarterly AllTLDs are read Quarterly.

202-3,4 203-1,2 A 204-1,2 20S-1,2,3,4 206-1,2 207-1,2 208-1,2 209-1,2 210-1,2 212-1,2 213-3,4

5. Mdk L-16 (C) Lowery Dairy Biweekly- 1-131 Biweekly Onall samples. LLDt 0.5pCi/L.

L-17 (C) Hayer-Pattersonb May-October Gamma Isot. Biweekly Dairy L-18 (C) Hatness Dairy C Monthly- I-131 Monthly On all samples. LLD- 05 pCi/L L-19 (C) Bettenhausen Dairy November-April Gamma Isot. Monthly L-20 Cass Dairyd t-38 Richer Dairy L-38 Village View Acres Dairy

6. Ground /Well L-27 LSCS Onsite Well Quarterly Gamma Isot. Quarterly On aII samples.

Water L-28 Marseilles Well Quarterly Tritium Quarterly On all samples.

L-29 (C) Seneca Well L-30 Ransom Well L-31 Ottawa Well L-32 IllinoisState Park a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C" in this column. All other locations are indicators.

b Hayer-Patterson Dairy went out of business in August of 1994 and was replaced by Village View Acres Dairy (L-39).

C Flatnew Dairy went out of business in April of IW4 and was replaced by Richer Dairy (L-38).

b Additional dairy was not required by Technical Standards but was included to ensure that the program has at least four milking stations. This is not a commercial dairy but a farm having milking cows for personal use.

TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)

LASALLE STAllON RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSES frcathm Collection Type of Frequency Sample Media Code' Site Frequency Analpis of Analysis Remarks

7. Surface Water L-21 (C) Ilhnois River at Weekly Gamma Isot. Monthly On nuthly composites from eadi Seneca location.

L-24 ISCS Coohng Lake Tritium Quarrterly On quarterly composites from each L-SP-40 Mallard Bay Boat Launch, location.

Marseilles

6. Iish L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake Semiannually Gamma Isot. Semiannually On edibleportkmsordy. Atleast L-35 Marseilles Poolof two speces.

Illinois River LSP-36 (C) Illinois River, Upstream LSP-37 Illinois River, Discharge

9. Shoreline L-34 Downstream of Semnannually Gamma Isot. Semiannually On all Samples.

Sediments Cooling 12ke

@ 10. Land Use Censur Milch Animals a. Site boundary to 2 miles -

a. Enumeration by Annually Dunng granng season.

a door to door or equivalent counting technique.

b. 2 miles to 5 miles -
b. Enumerationby Annually During grazing seassm.

using referenced information from county agncultural agents or other reliable sources.

c. At dairies listed in item 5. -
c. Inquire as to Annually Dunng granng season.

feeding practices:

1. Pastureonly.
2. Feed and chop only.
3. Pasture and feed:if both,ask farmer to estimate fraction of food from pasture-25 %,25-50 %,50 75 %

or 75%

Nearest In all16 sectors up to 5 miles Annually Residence Censun a Control (background) locations are denoted by a C" in this column. All other locations are indicators.

f ' M N

M M M M M "

M - ^ M TABLE 5.0-3 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONTiORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY

SUMMARY

Name of Faality LaSa!)e Nuclear Power Statxm Docket No. 50-373_ 50-374 Locationof Fachty 12%!!eCounty. Ilhnois Reporting Penad 1st Ouarter 1944 (County, State)

Sample Type and Indscator location with Highest Control Number of Type Number of locations Duarterly Mean locations Non-routme (Umts) Analyses LLD Mean a

Mean a Resula Mean Range Imcation Range Ranga Air Particulates Gross Beta 77 0.01 0.025 (76/76) L-02b,Nearsate No. 2 None 0 0.025 (13/13)

(pCi/m3) (0.0154 041) 0.6 mi @ 11 (0.017-0.(MI)

Gamma Spec. 6 0.01 <LLD . -

None O Airbome Iodine I-131 78 0.10 <LLD - -

None 0 (pCi/m3)

Gamma Background Gamma Dose 100 3.0 14.4 (92/92) L-102-1,2 0 16.2 (2/2) 13.4 (8/8)

(TLDs) (mR/Qtr.) (12.3-16.6) 0.6 mi @ 17* (15.9-16.6) (12.4-14_6)

Mdk 1-131 15 0.5 <LLD <LLD 0

A (pCi/L)

  • Gamma Spec. 15 Cs-134 10 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD <LLD 0

Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Surface Water Gamma Spec. 6 - -

(pCi/L)

Cs-134 10 <LLD <LLD 0

Cs-137 10 <LLD <LLD 0

Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Tritium 2 200 <LLD L-21, Illinois River at 0 260 (1/1) 260 (1/1)

Seneca 4.0 mi @ 22*

Well Water Gamma Spec. 6 (pCi/L)

Cs-134 10 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD <LLD 0

Tritium 6 200 <LLD <LLD 9

  • Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.

b 3 Locations L42,IA5, and L46 had identical means of 0.025 pCi/m . Only 1 02 is detailed in this summary.

TABLE 5.0-4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONTTORING PROGRAM QUAR 1TRLY

SUMMARY

Name of Facihty LaSalle Nudear ibwer Statxm Docket No. 50-371 % 374 Locatxm of Facihty taSalkCounty. Illmm Reporting Period hd Ouarter 1%4 (County, State)

Sample Type ni Indicator Location with Highest Control Number of Type humber of locations Ouarterly Mean Locations Non-routine (Units) Analyses LLD Mean a Mean Meana Ranits Range location Range Range Air Partxulates Gross Beta 78 0.01 0.017 (78/78) L_otb, Nearsite No.1 0.017 (13/13) None 0 (pCi/m3) (0.010 4.025) 0.5 mi @ 337* (0.012-0.024)

Gamma Spec. 6 0.01 <LLD .

None O Airbornelodine I-131 73 0.10 <LLD - -

None 0 (pCi/m3) u Gamma Background Gamma Dose 100 3.0 16.9 (92/92) L-210, 18.8 (2/2) 0 N 15.5 (8/8)

(TLDs)(mR/Qtr.) (14.1-19.4) 3.3 mi @ 216* (18.1-19.4) (14.3-17.1)

Mdk I-131 24 0.5 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 (pCi/L)

Gamma Spec. 24 Cs-134 10 <LLD <LLD 0

Cs-137 10 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Surface Water Gamma Spec. 6 - -

(pCi/L)

Cs-134 10 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Other Gammas 20 <LI D - -

<tLD 0 Tritium 2 200 <LLD L-21,Illmois River at 224 (1/1) 224 (1/1) O Seneca 4.0 mi @ 22*

  • Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.

b s 3 locations IA)1,' 32,1,04, and L-05 had identical means of 0.017 pCi/m . On!y L-01 is detailed in this summary llm a rii M M M '

EE

i e n n n n n n n F7 n F~1 J~1 F~T TG F~'l f~a F3 p TABLE 5.0-4 (continued)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY

SUMMARY

Name of Facility LaSalle hiear Power Statum Docket No. 50-371 50-374 location of Facility I Ah County. Illinnis Reportmg Period 2nd Ouarter 1W4 (County, State)

Sample Type and Indicator location with Highest Control Number of Type Number of locations Ouarterly Mean locations Non-routme (Units) Analyses LLD Mean a Mean Mean* M Range Location Range Range WellWater Gamma Spec. 6 (pCi/L)

Cs-134 10 <LLD - - <LLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD - - <LLD 0

' I Other Gammas 20 <LLD - - <LLD 0 j l

Tritium 6 200 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 6

oo Bottom Sediments Gamma Spec. 1 )

(pCi/g dry)

Cs-134 0.2 <LLD - - None O Cs-137 0.2 <LLD - - None 0 Other Gammas 0.2 <LLD - -

None 0 Fish Gamma Spec 18 (pCi/g wet)

Cs-134 0.1 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Cs-137 0.1 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Other Gammas 0.2 <LLD - -

<LLD 0

  • Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.

m__ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ .

..._...._.-..___L_______

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . ~ _ _ _ _ . _ _

TABLE 5.0-5 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARERLY

SUMMARY

Name of Facihty LSalle Nuclear Power Station Docket No. % 373. %34 Locaten of Facihty b%1te county. Uhnois Reportmg Penod 3ni Ouaner 19%

(County, State)

Sample Type and Indicator Location with Highest Control Number of Type Number of Locatons Ouarterly Mean I.ocations Non-routine (Units) Analyses LLD Meana Mean Mean a Results Range Location Range Range Air Particulates Cross Beta 78 0.01 0.022 (78/78) L.ogb, Nearsite No.1 0.022 (13/13) None 0 (pCi/m3) (0.011-0.048) 0.5 mi @ 337* (0.012-0.042)

Gamma Spec. 6 0.01 <LLD _

None O AirborneIodine I-131 78 0.10 <LLD - -

None 0 (pCi/m3)

A Gamma Backgmund Gamma Dose 100 3.0 1 & 1 (92/92) L-102, 18.0 (2/2) 14.7 (8/8) O C

(TLDs) (mR/Qtr.) (13.0-18.4) 0.6 mi @ 17* (13.1-16 8)

M21k I-131 27 0.5 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 (pCi/L)

Gamma Spec. 27 Cs-134 10 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Surface Water Gamma Spec. 6 - -

(pCi/L) .

  • 4 134 10 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 i Cs-137 10 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Tritium 2 200 <LI.D  !<21, Illinois River at 212 (2/2) 406 (1/1) O Seneca 4.0 mi @ 22*

  • Mean and rang = based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses, b

locations L-01, L-48, and L-06 had identical means of 0 022 pCi/m3 . Only L-01 is detailed in this summary.

M M M E E

O n n n R ._ 7 R. f7 f- I R R R A R . f'~1 R- f~1 M

.. ?

TABLE 5.0-5 (continued) ' ,

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY

SUMMARY

Nameof Facihty I2411 Nuct.ar PowerStatkm~ Docket No. 50-3n 50-374 Location of Fachty 5 2G11 Countv. Illmnis Reporting Perud 3rd Ouarter 1994 (County, State)

Sample Type and Indicator location with Highest Control Numberof -

Type Number of locations Ouarterly Mean tocations Non-routine (Units) Analyses LLD Meana Mean Mean* M

~ Range Location Range . Range WellWater Gamma Spec 6 (pCi/L)

Cs-134 10 <LLD - - <LLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD - - <LLD 0 I Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -

<LLD 0-I

-$ Tritium 6 200 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 -

J )

i

  • Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.

TABLE 5.0-6 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY

SUMMARY

Name of Facility 12Salle Nudear Power Station Docket No. 50-371 M-374 f Location of Facihty I2%!!e County Ilhnois Reporting Period 4th Ouarte- 1494 (County, State) l Sample Type and Indicator Location with Highest Control Number of Type Number of locations Ouarterly Mean Locath ns Non-routine (Umts) Analyses LLD Meana Mean Mean a Resuls j

Range Location Range Range Air Particulates Gross Beta 78 0.01 0 024 (78/78) g,ogb, Nearsite No.1 0.025 (13/13) None 0 (pCi/m3) (0.01M.044) 0.5 miO337* (0.01W.042)

Gamma Spec. 6 0.01 <LLD . -

None 0 l

I.

AibomeIodine I-131 78 0.10 <LLD - - None 0 3

(pCi/m )

en Gamma Backgro,ind Gamma Dose 100 3 16.9 (92/92) L 113A-1, 0

  • " 19.2 (1/1) 153 (8/8)

(TLDs) (mR/Qtr.) (13.9-19.2) 0.8 mi @ 262* (13.9-16.6) l Milk I-131 19 0.5 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 (pCi/L)

Gamma Spec. 19 I

I Cs-134 10 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 i i

Cs-137 10 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 l

i Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Surface Water Gamma Si,ec. 6 - -

(pCi/L) )

Cs-134 10 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 i

Cs-137 10 <LLD <LLD 0 l Other Gammas 20 <LLD -

<LLD 0 i Tritium 2 200 <LLD L-21, Illinois River at 247 (1/1) 247 (1/1) O Seneca, 4.0 mi @ 22*

  • Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.

b 3 Imcations 1<01, IAM, L-05 and L-06 had identical means of 0.025 pCi/m . Only le01 is detailed in this nummary.

~

' TABLE 5.0-6 (continued)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY

SUMMARY

Name of Fachty 12 Gila NirI*ar Power Station Docket No. 50-373 50-374 Imtion of Fachty 12Gite raunty. Yttin Reportmg Period 4th Ouarter 1994 (County, State)

Sample Type and Indicator Location with Eghest Control Number of Type Number of locations Ouarterly Mean Locations Non-routme -

(Umts) Analyses LLD Meana Mean Mean* M Range Location Range Range Well Water Gamma Spec. 6 (pCi/L)

Cs-134 10 <LLD - - <LLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD - - <LLD 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Tntium 6 200 -iLD - -

<LLD 0 .j us PJ Bottom Sediments Gamma Spec. 1 (pCi/g dry)

Cs-134 0.2 <LLD - - None. O Cs-137 0.2 <LLD - - None 0 Other Gammas 0.2 <LLD - - None 0 i

Fish Gamma Spec. 16 (pCi/g wet)

Cs-134 0.1 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Cs-137 0.1 <LLD - -

<LLD 0 Other Gammas 0.2 <LLD - - <LLD 0

  • Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.

o_..._

_ _ _ _ - -. _ . _ . _ . . . . _ _____.____u_____._______._____ __

TABLE 5.1-1 Commonwealth Edison Cnspany Date 14-FEB-95 Environmental Site Report for LaSalle Pages 1 Gamma Radiation Measured in mR t>y TLDs Stie Miles Degrees Description Quarter ! Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 1994 1994 1994 1994 Air Samplers LO7A 6.0 33 ?LNECA 14.6 17.2 15.5  :,6.5 LO7B 6.0 33 SENECA 14.2 16.6 15.6 LOSA 6.3 334 nMSEILLES 14.2 16.0 15.5 '

,,6 .9 LO38 6.3 336 MARSE!LLES 14.5 16.3 15.5 ,7 .1 Life 6.1 177 RANSOM :6.7 12.5 14.4 13.8 14.9 I

LilB 6.1 177 StetSOM 13.3 14.6 13.3 14.5 LISA 6.4 95 RT. 6 AT GOte4M ROAD 13.4 15.8 14.2 16.2 L138 6.4 95 RT. 6 AT GoremM ROAD 13.5 16.1 14.3 15.3 Mean 1 S.D. 13.3 + 0.7 15.9 : 1.0 14.3 1 0.3 16.0 g 1.0 An w al Mean and S.D. 15.111.3 CONTROL LOCAfl0NS LO94 8.6 261 GRAND RIDGE 13.3 15.2 14.4 15.6 LO98 8.6 268 GRAND RIDGE 13.4 15.3 14.3 15.1 I

L10A 12.6 222 STREATOR 13.0 15.0 13.9 15.0 L108 12.6 222 STREATOR 12.8 15.1 14.1 L12A 8.3 207 KERNAN 15.3 12.8 15.1 14.1 14.7 L128 3.3 207 FERNAN 12.4 14.3 13.I 13.9 Ll4A 11.4 Sit OTTANA 14.6 17.1 16.2 16.6 L148 11.4 311 OTTANA 14.5 16.3 16.3 16.2 Mean : S.D. 13.4 + 0.3 15.5 1 1.0 14.7 t 1.2 15.3 1 0.8 Annual Mean and S.D. 14.7 1 1.3 inner Ring (100 Seriest L101-1 0.5 357 lNNER RING 14.9 17.1 16.3 17.4 L101-2 0.5 357 M ER RING 14.3 17.0 16.0 17.1 L102-1 0.4 17 NNER R:NG 15.9 18.3 17.6 18.3 L102-2 0.6 17 NNER R NG 16.6 18.1 18.4 18.6 L103-1 0.7 47 .

NNER R NG 14.6 16.1 16.4 17.4 L103-2 0.7 47 NNER R NG 15.0 17.1 16.8 17.3 L104-1 0.8 67 NNER R. NG 14.3 17.3 16.7 17.3 Ll04-2 0.3 67 NNER R NG 14.4 17.2 16.3 16.7 L105-1 0.7 91 NNER R4 NG 15.0 18.5 17.5 18.3 L105-2 0.7 11 NNER R.NG 16.0 18.4 18.4 18.5 L106-1 1.4 110 NNER R fG 14.2 16.6 15.6 16.3 L106-2 1.4 Ito NNER R NG 14.6 16.7 16.0 16.)

I  !

I I

l 1

l l

l 53

O O

l l

TABLE 5.1-1 (continued)

Dates 14-FEs-95 Environmental Site Report for LaSalle Pages 2

$6te Miles Degrees Descriotton harter 1 harter 2 Quarter 3 h arter 4 1994 1994 1994 1994 Ll07-l 0.3 123 NNER R:M3 15.1 17.6 16.9 17.5 L107-2 0.3 128 NPsER R. NG 14.9 17.2 16.6 17.2 LIO3-1 0.0 0 NNER R NG 15.3 17.5 87.0 17.0 L103-2 0.0 0 NNER R NG 13.0 14.6 13.4 15.1 t.107- l 0.5 173 NNER R NG 14.6 17.5 16.7 16.9 L109-2 0.5 178 NNER R NG 15.0 17.9 17.7 17.0 Lito-t 0.6 205 NNER R NG 14.5 17.4 16.2 17.6 Lito-2 0.6 205 NNER R NG 14.2 17.5 17.8 16.7 LillAl 0.7 217 NPER R :NG 14.3 17.5 16.7 17.7 L111A2 0.7 217 NNER RING 14.9 16.3 16.3 17.6 LillB1 0.3 230 NNER R. NG 15.4 18.3 15.9 18.1 LillB2 0.3 230 .

NNER R, NG 15.7 17.0 16.5 18.5 L112-1 0.3 244 :NNER R NG 14.4 16.5 15.3 17.0 Lll2-P 0.9 244 INNER R:NG 14.3 17.5 15.9 17.7 Lil3Al 0.3 262 NNER R NG 15.2 18.2 17.4 19.2 Lil3A2 0.3 262 NNER R' NG 15.0 17.6 .6.3 17.9 Lil391 0.3 273 Pe#ER R NG 15.3 17.4 . 6 .1 17.3 L18392 0.8 273 NNER R; NG 15.2 17.2 .6.7 17.9 Lit 4-1 0.9 233 NPER R NG 15.3 18.3 6.6 17.7 Ll!4-2 0.9 203 , NPER R NG 15.4 17.1 17.2 17.5 Litt-1 0.7 314 NP4R R'.NG 14.9 16.0 14.7 16.3 L115-2 0.7 314 NNER R NG 12.3 14.7 13.7 14.9 Li14-l 0.6 331 NNER R :NG 12.5 15.4 14.5 16.0 Lil6-2 0.6 334 NPER R'.NG 14.1 15.2 14.7 15.7 L205-4 5.1 89 OUTER R;NG 13.6 16.2 15.3 17.6 Mean i S.D. 14.0 + 0.8 17.1 1 1.0 16.4 1 1.1 17.3 g 0.9 Annual Mean and S.D. 16.4 1 1.4 Outer Ring (200 Series:

L201-3 4.0 0 OUTER RING 12.3 14.1 13.0 14.1 L2Ol-4 4.0 0 OUTER RING 15.2 17.2 16.1 16.6 L2M-3 3.6 23 OUTER R NG 12.8 15.2 14.3 15.2 L202-4 3.6 23 OUTER R Ms 13.4 15.2 14.9 16.0 L203-1 4.0 56 OUTER R. NG 14.9 16.3 16.2 16.5 L203-2 4.0 56 OUTER R ' NG 15.0 17.1 16.9 17.6 L204-1 3.5 78 OUTER R:NG 14.8 17.6 16.3 17.3 L204-2 3.5 73 OUTER R NG 14.2 17.5 16.1 16.9 L205-1 3.5 102 OUTER R; NG 14.9 16.9 16.1 17.4 L205-2 3.5 102 OUTER R'NG 14.0 17.4 16.4 17.3 L205-3 5.1 89 OUTER R NG 15.0 17.1 16.0 17.9 L20*>- 1 4.3 123 OUTER R NG 15.3 17.6 16.4 17.2 L204-2 4.3 123 OUTER R NG 15.5 17.5 16.9 18.0 L207-8 4.5 146 OUTER R NG 15.6 17.5 16.2 17.9 L207-7 4.5 146 0 UTER R NG 15.1 16.1 15.9 . 6.3 L203-1 4.5 170 OUTER R NG 14.8 17.2 15.7  : 7.5 L203-2 4.5 170 OUTER R NG 15.4 17.3 16.3 7.7 L204-1 4 .0 192 OUTER R' NG 14.5 16.6 15.9 7.7 L209-2 4.V 192 OUTER R. NG 15.1 17.1 16.4 7.4 Lato-1 3.3 216 0 UTER R NG 16.0 19.4 18.0 .'.8.3 L216 2 3.3 216 OUTER R;NG 16.0 18.1 17.2 17.7 54 m

I TABLE 5.1-1 (continued)

Dates 14-FED-95 Environeental Site Report for LaSalle Pages 3 Site Miles Degrees rescription Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 L994 1994 1994  !?M Lett-l 4.5 240 OUTER R NO 5.5 17.7 17.0 17.2 Latt-2 4.5 240 OUTER R NG 5.7 17.3 17.3 17.7 L212-1 4.0 261 OUTER R .NG 5.1 18.0 16.3 17.7 L212-2 4.0 26l OJTER R PG 5.8 17.9 16.4 17.4

3. SS OUTER R NG 4.5 17.7 17.3 17.4 LIg,-c L !.

1

3. 83 OUTER R NG 4.3 17.7 16.1 18.0 L 13-3 4 69 OUTER R NG 4.3 16.5 14.9 16.7 L2 3-4 4.9 269 OUTER R: NG 14.3 16.4 15.0 16.3 L2 ,4-3 5.t 291 OUTER R. NG 14.9 17.2 15.3 16.3 L2 4-4 5.8 211 OUTER R NO 14.6 16.3 15.9 16.7 L2 ,5-3 5.0 320 CUTER R NO 16.4 18.5 16.5 18.4 L2,5-4 5.0 320 OUTER R NO 85.3 17.5 17.7 18.4 L216-3 5.0 333 OUTER R NO 15.3 18.2 16.6 17.6 L216-4 5.0 333 QUTER R.NG 15.V 16.1 16.4 18.1 Mean i S.D. 14.1 1 0.3 17.2 1 1.0 16.2
  • 1.0 17.3 1 0.9 Annual Mean and S.D. 16.4 1 1.3 SPECIAL INTEREST LOCATIONS L304-1 0.0 0 LEASED Ft.AM LAND 17.0 17.9 17.4 18.4 L305-1 0.0 0 BOAT RAPP 14.0 14.9 14.7 16.1 L310-4 0.0 0 NGET BUILDING 15.0 16.6 16.4 18.6 L316-1 0.0 0 LEASED F ARM LAND 14.5 13.0 16.2 17.3 Mean i S.D. 15.1 1 1.3 16.9 1 1.4 16.2 1 1.1 17.7 1 1.1 Annual Mean and S.D. 16.5 1 1.5 Air Samplers L0tA 1.6 337 WARSITE NO. I 14,3 17.3 16.7 18.6 LOlB 1.6 337 NEARSITE NO. 1 14.1 16.7 15.7 17.7 LO2r 1.7 25 ONSITE NC. 2 13.9 16.2 15.7 16.9 LO2B t.7 25 ONSITE NO. 2 13.6 15.1 14.7 16.6 LOTA 1.2 34 ONSITE NO. 3 13.4 15.2 14.6 16.3 LO3B t.2 34 ONSITE NO. 3 13.1 15.7 14.4 15.3 LO4A 3.2 81 M ARSITE NO. 4 13.8 16.4 15.3 16.I LO4B 3.2 St NEARSITE NO. 4 14.2 15.5  : 5.0 15.3 LO5A 0.2 112 ONSITE NO. 5 14.0 16.3  : 6.3 17.2 LOSB 0.3 112 ONSITE No. 5 14.9 15.9 5.5 16.0 LO6A 0.3 248 NEARSITE NO. 6 14.8 16.7  : 6.6 17.6 LO68 0.3 243 NEARSITE NO. 6 13.3 16.1 15.7 16.3 Mean i S.D. 14.0 1 0.6 16.2 1 0.6 15.6 1 0.8 16.3 1 0.9 Annual Mean and S.t. 15.6 1 1.2 lNMEN75: *** IndlCates lost dotteeter. A portion of the Dose Was estteated.
  • 4* Incicates edated costmeter. The original Dose was replaced with an entlaated value.

. I I

55

- - _ . _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ . , - ._ ., _ m., ,

I I

I APPENDIX II METEOROLOGICAL DATA -

l l

1 l

I l I

I I

I 56

I LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1994 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O 1 0 0 1 NE O O 2 2 0 0 4 ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O 1 0 0 0 1 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l

SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 l

WNW 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 NW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 NNW 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 l VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 0 3 7 1 4 15 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 I

I

l .

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1994 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O 1 3 0 0 4 NNE O O 3 3 0 0 6 NE O O 1 1 0 0 2 ENE O O O 2 1 0 3 E O O O O O O O ESE O O O 1 0 0 1 SE O O 1 0 0 0 1 SSE O O 1 0 0 0 1 S O O O O O O O SSW 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 SW 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 WSW O O 1 5 0 0 6 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 1 0 3 4 NW 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 NNW O O O 4 1 0 5 VARIABLE O O O O O O O I

l TOTAL 0 0 11 20 2 9 42 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurement s in all stability classes: 3 58

I LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1994

~

STABILITY Cl. ASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET

, WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O 3 1 3 0 7 NNE O O 4 1 0 0 5 NE O 1 3 3 0 0 7 ENE O O 3 1 0 0 4 E O O O O O O O ESE O O O 3 0 0 3 SE O O 2 0 0 1 3 SSE O O O O O 2 2 S 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 SSW 0 0 3 1 2 0 6 SW 0 0 3 0 2 1 6 WSW 0 0 1 4 0 3 8 W 0 0 1 2 2 1 6 WNW O O O 3 4 4 11 NW 0 0 0 3 5 2 10 NNW 0 0 2 3 0 0 5 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 1 25 25 20 14 85 l Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 )

f Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O l Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 Ill l l

59 1

_ _ __ l

E

=

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1994 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION O.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N 2 4 22 29 25 1 83 NNE O 7 25 16 1 0 49 NE O 9 18 26 5 0 58 ENE O 3 8 30 23 36 100 E O 6 14 21 10 13 64 ESE O 1 9 23 9 13 55 SE O 3 7 4 13 12 39 SSE O 1 14 11 8 9 43 S O 3 2 18 5 3 31 SSW 0 0 3 4 2 8 17 SW 0 1 1 5 8 18 33 WSW 0 1 5 11 6 7 30 j l

W 0 6 8 16 16 22 68 l WNW 0 2 11 52 43 68 176 NW 1 4 27 41 28 31 132 1 NNW 0 4 19 29 26 9 87 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 3 55 193 336 228 250 1065 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hoars of missin9 stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 l 6

1.1

l

\

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION l l PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1994 l

STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 1 3 10 1 0 15 NNE O 3 4 7 1 0 15 NE 2 2 6 7 1 0 18 ENE O O 12 7 10 0 29 E 1 1 2 10 4 4 22 ESE 1 1 2 14 8 7 33 SE O 3 5 11 16 7 42 SSE 1 2 3 4 4 12 26 S 1 0 4 4 7 24 40 SSW 3 2 0 4 3 24 36 SW 0 1 6 3 9 22 41 WSW 0 2 3 6 8 18 37 W 0 2 4 8 25 16 55 WNW 0 4 8 30 23 20 85 NW 0 1 9 20 19 9 58 NNW 0 1 6 16 5 0 28 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 9 26 77 161 144 163 580 Hours of calm in this stability class: O Hours of missin9 wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 1

61

E LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1994 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEF0 (;.7 7.ip h )

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O 3 1 0 0 4 NNE 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 NE O 1 1 1 2 0 5 ENE O O 2 0 0 0 2 E O 2 3 1 0 0 6 ESE 1 4 3 4 6 0 18 SE O O 1 3 2 1 7 SSE O 2 1 1 2 1 7 S O 3 1 3 3 21 31 SSW 0 0 3 2 1 43 49 SW 0 0 2 2 3 18 25 WSW 1 1 3 1 5 6 17 W 0 2 5 7 8 15 37 l WNW 1 1 0 ;5 11 5 33 NW 0 0 1 9 5 1 16 NNW 0 4 2 5 2 0 13 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 4 21 31 55 50 111 272 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 l

Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 g Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 l

E I

62

l LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1994 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINOS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL i

E N 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 NNE O O O O O O O NE 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 SSE O O O O O 5 5 S 0 0 0 1 0 9 10 SSW 0 0 0 0 1 12 13 SW 0 0 0 0 2 8 10 I WSW 0 0 0 1 6 12 19 W 0 0 0 0 6 6 12 WNW 0 0 2 2 3 6 13 NW 0 0 1 0 8 1 10 NNW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 l

VARIABLE O O O O O O O l l

l TOTAL 3 0 3 5 26 61 98 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Houro of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 63

O o

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1994 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION O.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O 1 2 0 0 0 3 NE O O 7 12 0 0 19 ENE O O 3 3 1 1 8 E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S O O O O O O O l

SSW 0 0 0 4 5 3 12 SW 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 ,

WSW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 l W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,

NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O

'OTAL 0 1 12 22 6 4 45 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 I

Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 4 I

~

s.,

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1994 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET )

l WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND l DIRECTION O.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 1 5 3 0 0 9 NNE O O 3 4 0 0 7 1

NE O 3 3 3 1 0 10 ENE O 1 6 8 0 2 17 E O O 1 2 0 0 3 ESE O O O O O O O l 1

SE O O O 1 0 0 1 SSE O O O 4 0 0 4 S 0 2 3 1 1 0 7 SSW 0 1 2 5 12 11 31 SW 0 1 2 3 5 2 13 WSW 0 0 2 5 1 5 13 -

I

. l W 0 0 2 0 1 1 4 WNW 0 0 2 1 3 3 9 NW 0 3 0 1 1 2 7 )

NNW 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 i

VARIABLE O O O O O O O l TOTAL 0 10 34 43 24 26 137 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 1 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 4 65

1 LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1994 Il STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) l WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET a i

WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 4 8 3 2 2 19 NNE O 3 2 2 1 0 8 NE O 5 4 1 1 0 11 ENE O 4 7 1 2 2 16

! E O 4 8 7 1 0 20 l

ESE O O O 2 1 0 3 SE 1 2 1 0 2 0 6 SSE O O O 2 0 0 2 S 0 2 3 1 1 0 7 SSW 0 2 0 0 5 5 12 SW 0 3 6 1 8 4 22 WSW 0 6 4 5 11 4 30 m W 0 g

1 3 3 1 1 9 WNW 0 2 2 7 9 9 29 NW 0 0 2 10 10 7 29 NNW 0 4 4 6 2 1 17 VARIABLE O O O O O O O l

TOYAL 1 42 54 51 57 35 240 l Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 I

l Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 t

Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 4 4

I

. LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1994 I STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WIND SPEED (in mph)

I WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N 2 12 9 12 18 9 62 NNE O 3 6 12 29 9 59 NE O 8 13 32 15 1 69 ENE 2 12 16 45 24 14 113 E 5 27 13 22 21 26 114 ESE 1 7 9 14 2 1 34 SE O 3 3 5 7 0 18 SSE O 5 1 4 4 4 18 S 0 4 2 3 1 7 17 SSW 0 3 1 4 3 17 28 SW 1 3 3 5 5 18 35 WSW 5 9 I 14 1 6 9 44 W 1 5 13 12 5 14 50 WNW 0 2 16 13 10 15 56 NW 0 5 12 15 15 9 56 NNW 0 7 6 13 20 3 49 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 13 111 132 217 193 156 822 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 23 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 4 67 l

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1994 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N 1 1 4 5 4 2 17 NNE O 3 5 7 2 0 17 NE 1 8 9 20 1 0 39 ENE O 3 8 11 7 0 29 E 1 1 12 30 12 0 56 ESE O 3 6 11 8 5 33 SE O 2 9 3 3 7 24 SSE O O 2 1 1 4 8 l S 0 0 2 0 6 11 19 SSW 0 1 2 3 10 37 53 SW 0 0 5 9 7 15 36 WSW 1 2 11 5 16 2 37 W 0 1 7 7 9 37 61 WNW 1 0 8 4 6 6 25 NW 1 2 4 12 5 6 30 NNW 1 0 2 6 2 9 20 l

l VARIABLE O O O O O O O l

l l TOTAL 7 27 96 134 99 141 504 l

Hours of cc m in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 13 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 4 68

[ LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1994 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL

{ _________ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____

N O O 4 7 3 0 14 r- '

L NNE O O O i 0 0 1 7 NE O O O O O O O l ENE O O O O O O O E E O 1 2 3 3 0 9 u

ESE O 1 5 4 11 3 24 F

L SE O O 4 3 3 9 19 SSE O 1 1 1 2 6 11 S 0 0 1 2 4 5 12 0

{ SSW 1 2 2 7 18 30 SW 0 0 3 9 15 30 57

[ WSW 0 1 3 4 17 12 37 W 0 0 4 3 11 8 26 WNW 0 1 4 5 7 6 23 NW 0 0 2 3 2 5 12 NNW 0 1 3 5 4 2 15

{ VARIABLE O O O O O O O g 10TAL i e se 52 89 404 220 Houro of calm in this stability class: 0

[Hoursofmissingwindmeasurementsinthisstabilityclass: 10 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 4 E

69

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J

E LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1994 I STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) E WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET E WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O O 1 1 0 2 NNE O O O O O O O NE O 1 0 0 0 0 1 ENE O O O O O O O E O O 1 1 0 0 2 ESE O 1 0 2 0 0 3 SE O O O 2 0 1 3 SSE O 1 2 3 1 4 11 S 0 0 0 2 3 2 7 SSW 0 0 0 0 4 6 10 SW 0 0 2 1 3 11 17 WSW O O 2 0 1 8 11 W 0 0 0 3 0 1 4 WNW 0 0 0 1 10 1 12 6

NW 0 0 0 3 3 1 7 NNW G 0 0 0 5 0 5 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 3 7 19 31 35 95 I

Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 I

Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability meacurements in all stability classes: 4 E

h LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1994 E STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL

{'- _________ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____

N O O O O O O O C

k NNE O O 4 0 0 0 4 NE O 1 6 0 0 0 7 ENE O O O O O O O  !

{ E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O r ]

i L SE O O O O O O O SSE O O 1 0 0 0 1 S 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 E SSW 0 0 2 5 0 0 7 L

SW 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 E

E WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L

NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

[ VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 3 14 6 0 0 23

{

p Hours of calm in this stability class: O L Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0

[

71 F ___ - - - - - - - - - - - - - i

0 a

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION 1

PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1994 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O 4 1 0 0 5 NNE O 2 6 2 0 0 10 NE O 1 5 0 0 0 6 ENE O O 4 1 0 0 5 E O O O 2 1 0 3 ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O 1 3 0 0 0 4 S O 4 11 1 2 0 18 SSW 0 3 15 17 1 0 36 SW 1 2 6 11 4 0 24 WSW 0 0 8 7 3 0 18 W 0 0 3 1 0 0 4 WNW 0 3 1 0 0 0 4 NW 0 2 0 0 1 0 3 NNW 0 0 1 5 2 0 8 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 1 18 67 48 14 0 148 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 l l

72 Ii l

l

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1994 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 1 4 3 0 0 8 NNE O 4 4 1 0 0 9 NE O 3 2 0 0 0 5 ENE O 3 0 2 0 0 5 E O 3 0 4 0 0 7 ESE O 1 0 0 0 0 1 SE O 4 0 1 0 0 5 SSE 1 4 4 0 0 0 9 S 0 5 12 1 0 0 18 SSW 0 1 6 8 1 0 16 SW 0 4 4 10 2 0 20 WSW 0 2 6 11 1 0 20 W 0 4 8 2 3 0 17 WNW 0 1 7 0 1 0 9 NW 0 1 2 9 7 0 19 NNW 0 0 4 16 1 0 21 VARIABLE O O O O O O O I TOTAL 1 41 63 68 16 0 189 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missin9 stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 l

73 ,

j

E, a

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1994 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N 2 8 8 7 4 0 29 NNE 3 8 13 8 2 0 34 NE 1 12 20 18 1 0 52 ENE O 2 7 16 1 0 26 E O 9 5 16 2 0 32 ESE O 13 8 7 4 2 34 SE 1 15 8 6 13 1 44 SSE 2 7 5 9 7 0 30 S 2 7 7 10 14 1 41 SSW 0 5 10 18 22 6 61 SW 0 10 10 12 11 0 43 WSW 2 13 8 31 8 2 64 W 0 9 19 27 17 4 76 WNW 1 9 26 33 2 0 71 NW 2 11 12 26 9 1 61 NNW 2 8 15 18 7 0 50 VARIABLE O O O O O O O ll<

TOTAL 18 146 181 262 124 17 748 I Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 l Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 4 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1994 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N 1 5 4 11 6 1 28 NNE 2 5 7 8 4 3 29 NE 1 1 7 3 0 0 12 ENE O 3 0 1 1 0 5 E O 3 5 9 5 2 24 ESfi 1 3 8 8 5 0 25 SE 2 3 4 8 11 4 32 SSE O 3 5 8 12 7 35 S 1 2 3 12 14 4 36

SSW 0 2 4 17 6 26 55 l SW 2 4 5 6 14 23 54 WSW 1 0 10 11 11 7 40 W 0 5 6 4 6 1 22 WNW 0 3 7 6 7 5 28 NW 1 3 7 9 7 0 27 NNW 1 0 0 12 8 0 21 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 13 45 82 133 117 83 473 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missin9 wind measurements in this stability class: 14 Hours of missin9 stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 75 i

~

R.

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1994 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND E DIRECTION 0.8-3 E 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N 1 1 5 3 5 2 17 NNE O 4 3 3 1 0 11 NE O 3 0 0 0 0 3 ENE 1 0 0 0 1

0 2 E 1 3 0 4 0 0 8 ESE O 3 5 12 3 3 26 SE 1 6 2 12 3 6 30 SSE O C 4 9 4 0 17 S 2 0 4 8 9 10 33 SSW 0 0 5 7 10 27 49 SW 0 0 10 12 10 43 75 WSW 0 2 7 9 12 3 33 W 0 1 3 8 4 2 18 WNW 1 3 1 9 5 3 22 NW 0 0 8 29 6 0 43 NNW 0 0 6 18 0 0 24 f VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 7 26 64 143 72 99 411 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 I

Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 5 Hours of missin9 stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 I

76

l LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1994 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

I WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24

> 24 TOTAL N O 4 0 2 0 0 6 NNE O O 1 0 4 0 5 I

l NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O l

ESE O 1 1 1 0 0 3 SE O O O 1 4 1 6 SSE 1 0 4 17 7 1 30 1

S 1 0 3 10 10 6 30 SSW 1 1 1 6 4 12 25 SW 0 0 5 4 8 10 27 L wSw 0 3 3 e 10 e 28

_ W 0 1 1 3 3 0 8 WNW 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 NW 0 0 1 10 2 0 13 NNW 0 0 3 4 0 0 7 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 3 10 25 65 52 36 191 F Hours of calm in this stability class: O L Houro of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 2 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0

[ n i

E

=

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF (1ECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1994 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF_ TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION O.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O I S O O O O O O O SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stabilit y measurements in all stability classes: 3 I

78

I LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1994 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINOS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL

[ _________ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____

N O O O O O O O E

NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O 1 0 0 1

[ E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

{ SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

- W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

{ NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O

[. TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 p Hours of calm in this stability class: O L Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 79

_ _ _ _ . _ . . _ m . . _ _ _ _ . . . . .. mm.

E LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1994 1

STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) l WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET I I

WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND E' g

DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O O O O 1 1 NNE O O O O O 1 1 NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O 2 0 1 3 E O O O O 3 0 3 ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSW 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 WNW 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 0 0 4 6 6 16 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 I

Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 l

80 l

l l

I l

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION l i

PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1994 '

STABILITY Cl'AS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) .

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET  !

WIND SPEED (in mph)  ;

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 10 11 17 4 4 46 NNE 1 10 22 8 7 1 49 NE O 9 17 39 16 3 84 ENE 1 6 15 13 32 7 74 E O 2 18 23 24 23 90 ESE 2 7 12 17 10 4 52 SE 1 7 14 5 9 0 36 SSE 1 4 4 7 11 8 35 S 1 3 1 10 22 18 55 SSW 1 6 16 18 25 26 92 SW 0 4 5 13 15 7 44 WSW 0 1 4 3 8 20 36 W 0 1 3 11 11 20 46 WNW 0 6 6 21 31 14 78 NW 0 2 25 35 27 19 108 NNW 1 10 28 29 10 3 81 VARIABLE O O O O O O O I TOTAL 9 88 201 269 262 177 1006 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 12 Hours of missin9 stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 81 l 1

E as LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1994 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) ,

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N 1 3 11 12 0 2 29 NNE 1 1 12 9 4 0 27 NE 3 3 18 9 1 0 34 I ENE 4 2 9 9 9 6 39 E 2 4 8 14 14 11 53 ESE O 2 10 3 24 9 48 SE 2 4 7 5 11 13 42 SSE O 1 1 6 7 19 34 S 1 3 1 4 20 40 69 SSW 0 1 0 11 16 70 98 SW 1 3 4 7 11 32 58 WSW 2 1 1 5 2 8 19 W 2 2 10 9 10 30 63 WNW 1 2 4 12 9 17 45 NW 0 3 4 16 8 7 38 NNW 0 2 2 7 4 2 17 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 20 37 102 138 150 266 713 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 8 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 82 I

?

I LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1994 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)

WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O 1 2 5 0 8 NNE O O 4 6 0 0 10 NE O O 5 7 0 0 12 ENE O O O 1 2 0 3 E O 2 1 0 6 2 11 ESE O 5 5 4 9 15 38 SE 1 2 3 5 8 4 23 SSE O 1 3 2 3 4 13 S O O 1 3 4 18 26 SSW 0 3 1 4 3 26 37 SW 0 2 1 1 5 21 30 WSW 0 2 2 4 1 2 11 W 0 2 0 4 12 12 30 WNW 0 0 1 4 13 7 25 NW 2 2 4 5 7 1 21 NNW 0 1 5 5 2 0 13  ;

VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 3 22 37 57 80 112 311 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 t

Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0

} Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 i

n 83

I.

LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1994 j STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)

WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph) 1 WIND 1 DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O  !

NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O

)

ESE O O O O O 1 1 SE O O d 1 2 6 9 SSE O O O 3 6 12 21 S 0 2 3 4 8 11 28 SSW 0 1 3 4 4 4 16 SW 2 0 1 1 8 7 19 WSW 0 0 1 1 3 S 10 W 2 0 0 1 1 4 8 WNW 0 1 0 0 1 3 5 NW 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 NNW 0 2 3 2 9 1 17 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 4 6 15 17 42 54 138 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missin9 wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 84

,,a no_4-4s A A ~ - - J L A&

5 )

l 4

l l

l k

I  ;

1

. APPENDIX III l

LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES i

i I

I L

W

[  !

85

I LASALLE LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES I Expected Collection I- Sample Type a Location Date Reason AP/AI L-03 03-18-94 No electricity.

MILK L-18 04-08-94 Went out of business.

MILK L-20 04-01-94 Cow is dry.

I MILK MILK MILK L-20 L-20 L-20 05-06-94 05-20-94 06-03-94 Cow is dry.

Cow is dry.

Cow is dry.

MILK L-20 06-17-94 Cow is dry.

MILK L-20 07-01-94 Cow is dry.

MILK L-20 07-15-94 Cow is dry.

MILK L-20 07-29-94 Cow is dry.

I Pump Calibrations MILK L-01 thru L-14 L-20 08-05-94 08-14-94 Field calibrations missed; performed on 08-11-94.

Cow is dry.

MILK L-17 08-14-94 Went out of business.

MILK L-20 12-02-94 Cow is dry.

I Air Samoline Variancesb AP/AI L-03 01-28-94 Low volume; no electricity.

AP/AI L-03 03-10-94 Low volume; no electricity.

AP/AI L-03 03-25-94 Low volume; no electricity.

AP/Al L-01 12-09-94 Volume estimated.

AP/AI L-% 12-09-94 Volume estimated.

I I

a AP/l = Air Particulate / Air Iodine, b Air Sampling Variances are samples which have not been missed but indicate unusual sample results or factors which contribute to sample anomalies.

I 86

\

l l

l l

l l

l APPENDIX IV l

i 4

MILCH ANIMALS, NEAREST LIVESTOCK, AND NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUSES i l

l I

4 4

M 87

I l

l LASALLE L

{ MILCH ANIMALS CENSUS,1994 A. There is only one dairy farm within a 6.5 mile radius of LaSalle County Station.

B. Sampling Locations L-16 Lowery Dairy Farm 8.2 miles @ 120 Number of cows - 105

[ Diet consists of: ground grain, hay and silage; no pasture L-17 Earl Hayer - Andrew Patterson 12.3 miles @ 18 Number of cows - 30 Diet consists of: feed and chop L-18 Flatness Dairy Farm 12.5 miles @ 10 i Number of cows - 48 Diet consists of: feed, chop, and pasture L-19 Robert Bettenhousen Farm 8.5 miles @ 180 Number of cows - 50 l

Diet consists of: 5% or less pasture, ground grain, silage, and hay i l

L-20 Gass Farm )

4.6 miles @ 348 Number of cows - 1

{

Diet consists of: 50% pasture 25% ground grain

( 25% hay

[ 88

E a

LASALLE MILCH ANIMALSCEI4 SUS,1994 I

(continued)

I L-38 Ricker Dairy Farm 8.2 miles @ 213 Number of cows -36 Diet consists of: 50% pasture 25% ground grain 25% hay L-39 Village View Acres Dairy 10.4 m.iles @ 232 Number of cows - 35 Diet consists of: 50% pasture 25% ground grain 25% hay Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 22,1994.

J I

I 89 l

I M

LASALLE NEAREST LIVESTOCK CENSUS,1994

!I Nearest livestock of the LaSalle Station within a 6.5 mile radius.

, Sector Direction Distance

!I A N 4.0 miles B NNE 1.9 miles

C NE 3.5 miles D ENE 3.1 miles
E E None
F ESE None l G SE 4.7 miles i H SSE 4.7 miles J S None 1
K SSW None L SW None i

M WSW None N W 3.0 miles P WNW 3.2 miles Q NW 4.0 miles R NNW 4.6 miles Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 22,1994.

90

E LASALLE NEAREST RESIDENCE CENSUS,1994 Nearest resident of the LaSalle Station within a 6.5 mile radius.

Sector Direction DJslara A N 3.9 miies B NNE 1.8 miles C NE 2.1 miles D ENE 3.3 miles E E 3.2 miles F ESE 1.4 miles G SE 1.7 miles H SSE 1.8 miles J S 1.5 miles K SSW 0.7 miles L SW 1.0 miles M WSW 1.5 miles N W 0.8 miles P WNW 0.9 miles Q NW 1.8 miles R NNW 1.7 miles Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 29,1994. l I

91

lI

!I.

lI

!I 4

APPENDIX V INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS il I

il I

I I

I e2 I

Appradix A Interlaboratory Comoarison Program Results I Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest Laboratory (formerly Teledyne Isotopes and Hazelton Environmental Services) has participated in interlaboratory comparison (crosscheck) programs since the formulation of it's quality control program in December 1971. These programs are operated by agencies which supply environmental type samples (e.g., milk or water) containing concentrations of radionuclides know to the issuing agency but not to participant laboratories. The purpose of such a program is to provide an independent check on the laboratory's analytical procedures and to alert it to any possible problems.

Participant laboratories measure the concentration of specified radionuclides and report them to the issuing agency. Several months later, the agency reports the known values to the participant laboratories and specifies control limits. Results consistently higher or lower than the known values or outside the control limits indicate a need to check the instruments or piocedures used.

I The results in Table A-1 were obtained through participation in the environmental sample crosscheck program for milk, water, air filters, and food samples during the current year. This program is conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Intercomparison and Calibration Section, Quality Assurance Branch, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Table A-2 lists results of the analyses on in-house " spiked" samples.

Table A-3 lists results of the in-house " blank" samples.

Table A-4 lists results of the in-house " duplicate" program.

Out-of limit results are explained directly below the result.

1 I

I 93 I

l Tcble A-1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's crosscheck program, comparison of EPA and Tcledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest Laboratory results for various sample media'.

Concentration in pCi/L6 l

g Lab Sample Date EPA Result' Control TBEESML Results E Code Type C llected Analysis s, N=1 Limits i 2 Sigma d STW-702 WATER Jan,1994 Sr-89 25.015.0 16.3 - 33.7 20.011.7;2.6 STW-702 WATER Jan,1994 Sr-90 15.015.0 6.3 - 23.7 14.0 i 1.0;1.7 STW-703 WATER Jan,1994 Gr. Alpha 15.0 i 5.0 6.3 - 23.7 20.310.6;2.5 STW-703 WATER Jan,1994 Gr. Beta 62.0 i 10.0 44.7 - 79.3 55.3 i 3.2;9.1 STW-704 WATER Feb,1994 1-131 119.0 i 12.0 > 2.". - 139.6 110.0 1 2.7;11.3 STW-705 WATER Feb,1994 Ra-226 19.913.0 14.7 - 25.1 19.411.5;2.5 STW-705 WATER Feb,1994 Ra-228 14.713.7 8.3 - 21.1 15.0 f 0.8 ; 1.7 STW-705 WATER Feb,1994 Uranium 10.113.0 4.9 - 15.3 9.710.4;1.0 STW-706 WATER Mar,1994 H-3 4936.0 1 494.0 4078.9 - 5793.1 4843.3 1 231.2;698.1

{ STW-707 STW-708 WATER WATER Mar,1994 Pu-239 27.612.8 22.7 - 32.5 28.210.9;3.0 Apr,1994 Gr. Alpha 86.0122.0 47.8 - 124.2 73.312.9;9.4

{ STW-708 WATER Apr,1994 Ra-226 20.0 i 3.0 14.8 - 25.2 16.911.2;2.1 STW-708 WATER Apr,1994 Ra-228 20.1 i 5.0 11.4 - 28.8 19.710.7;2.1 STW-708 WATER Apr,1994 Uranium 25.0 i 3.0 19.8 - 30.2 25.li o.1 ; 2.5 STW-709 WATER Apr,1994 Co40 20.015.0 11.3 - 28.7 20.310.6;3.0 STW-709 WATER Apr,1994 Cs-134 34.0f5.0 25.3 - 42.7 32.310.6;4.7 STW-709 WATER Apr,1994 Cs-137 29.0 i 5.0 20.3 - 37.7 31.3 i 0.6;4.5 STW-709 WATER Apt,1994 Gr. Beta 117.0 1 18.0 85.8 - 148.2 101.0 1 10.5;18.8 STW-709 WATER Apr,1994 Sr-89 20.015.0 11.3 - 28.7 15.0 i 1.7;2.3 STW-709 WATER Apr,1994 St-90 14.015.0 5.3 22.7 14.3 i 0.6;1.6 STW-710 WATER Jun,1994 Ba-133 98.0 i 10.0 80.7 - 115.3 87.310.6;12.6 STW-710 WATER Jun,1994 Co-60 50.0 i 5.0 41.3 - 58.7 48.7i 3.2;7.7 STW-710 WATER

{ Jun,1994 Cs-134 40.0 5.0 31.3 - 48.7 35.012.7;5.7 STW-710 WATER Jun,1994 Cs-137 49.015.0 40.3 - 57.7 51.310.6;7.4 94

su Table A-1. U.S. Envitorunen'.al Protection Agency's crosscheck program, comparison of EPA and Teledyne Brown l Engineering Envimnmental Services, Midwest Laboratory results for various sample media'.

Concentration in pCi/L' Lab Sample Date EPA Result' Control TBEESML Results Code Type Collected Analysis 1s, N=1 Limits i 2 Sigrna d STW-710 WATER Jun,1994 Ru-106 252.0 i 25.0 208.6 - 295.4 184.7 1 6.7;27.4 A Ixtter from the EPA was received with the report. It states,"The Radiation Quality Assurance Program has been experiencing problems with the Ruthenium-106 currently used in the Perf,rmance Evaluation (PE) Studies and in the Standards Distribution Program. If these problems can be satisfactorily resolved, this analyte will once again be placed into this PE Study. If the problems cannot be resolved, the Ruthenium-106 wi!! be replaced. Formal written notice will be given to all participants in the Gamma in Water PE Study before the Ruthenium-106 is reintroduced or replaced. At that time, g new calibration standards will be available to all participants in the Gamma in Water g PE Study." Teledyne will continue to monitor this situation, but at this time, plans to take no additional action.

STW-710 WATER Jun,1994 Zn-65 134.0 13.0 111.4 - 136.6 135.3 i 2.3;19.6 STW-711 WATER Jun,1994 Ra-226 15.0 i 2.3 11.0 - 19.0 15.0 i 0.4;1.6 STW-711 WATER Jun,1994 Ra-228 15.4 i 3.9 8.6 - 22.2 14.8 0.3 ; 1.5 STW-711 WATER Jun,1994 Uranium 52.6 i 5.3 43.4 - 61.8 45.7 i 0.2;4.6 STW-712 WATER Jul,1994 Sr-89 30.015.0 21.3 - 38.7 26.011.7;3.1 l STW-712 WATER Jul,1994 Sr-90 20.015.0 11.3 - 28.7 18.710.6;2.0 l

l STW-713 WATER Jul,1994 Gr. Alpha 32.0 i 8.0 18.1 - 45.9 19.311.2;2.6 STW-713 WATER Jul,1994 Gr. Beta 10.0 i 5.0 1.3 - 18.7 12.711.5;2.5 STW-714 WATER Aug,1994 H-3 9951.0 1 995.0 8224.7 - 11677.3 10186.7 i 66.6;1387.0 STAF-715 AIR FILTER Aug,1994 Cs-137 15.015.0 6.3 - 23.7 14.010.0;1.4 STAF-715 AIR FILTER Aug,1994 Gr. Alpha 35.019.0 19.4 - 50.6 29.311.2;3.2 l STAF-715 AIR FILT11R Aug,1994 Gr. Beta 56.0110.0 38.7 - 73.3 56.010.0;5.6 1

i STAF-715 AIR FILTER Aug,1994 St-90 20.0i 5.0 11.3 - 28.7 18.011.0;2.1 STW-716 WATER Sep,1994 Ra-226 10.0 i 1.5 7.4 - 12.6 10.1 i 0.3;1.1 STW-716 WATER Sep,1994 Ra-228 10.2 2.6 5.6 - 14.7 9.8i0.1;1.0 l

STW-716 WATER Sep,1994 Uranium 35.013.0 29.8 - 40.2 31.9 i 1.8; 3.7 STW-718 WATER Oct,1994 1-131 79.018.0 65.1 - 92.9 81.313.1;8.7 l

I 95

I i

Table A 1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's crosscheck program, comparison of EPA and Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest Laboratory results for various sample media'.

Concentration in pCi/L6

) ,

l Lab Sample Date EPA Result' Control TBEESML Results '

Code Type Collected Analysis 1s, N=1 Limits t 2 Sigma d l

  • Results obtained by Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the environmental sample crosscheck program operated by the Intercomparison and Calibration Section, Quality Assurance Branch, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency j (EPA), Las Vegas, Neveda.

6 All results are in pCi/L, except for elemental potassium (K) data in milk, which are in mg/L; air filter {

samples, which are in pCi/ Filter; and food products, which are in mg/Kg. J USEPA results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1s,1 determination) l and control limits as defined by the EPA.  !

d Unless otherwise indicated, the TBEESML results are given as the mean i 2 standard deviations for three determinations. The numbers after the semi-colon are the Total Propagated Uncertainty of the result.

I L

l 96 j

Table A-2. In-house " spike" samples.

1 Concentration in pCi/L' Lab Sample Date Accepted Known TBEESML Results Code Type Collected Analysis _,_ Rejected Activity Control Limits

  • 2s, n=1' SPW-4821 WATER Jan,1994 Ce-144 A 2692.5 2158.2- 3226.8 2593.1 i 54.9;265.1 SPW-4822 WATER Jan,1994 Ce-144 A 1749.8 1397.7- 2101.9 1705.1 1 48.1;177.2 SPW-4823 WATER Jan,1994 Ce-144 A 49.0 25.7- 72.3 55.4 i l7.5;18.4 SPW-4825 WATER Jan,1994 Gr. Alpha A 41.7 33.7 49.7 34.4 f l.6 ; 3.8 SPW-4825 WATER Jan,1994 Gr. Beta A 30.2 23.6- 36.8 33.6 i l.2 ; 3.6 SPW-4826 WATER Jan,1994 Gr. Alpha R 83.4 68.1- 98.7 66.8 2.1 ; 7.0 A review of the raw data for the Alpha analysis revealed no errors in calculations or transcribing of data. The technician was observed performing this analysis; no discrepancies where noted. The technician's performance in the future will be monitored. It should be noted that TBEESML's results are within the EPA specified controllimits. No further action is planned.

SPW-4826 WATER Jan,1994 Gr. Deta A 60.4 47.8- 73.0 63.811.5;6.6 SPMI-4848 MILK Jan,1994 Cs-134 A 31.7 22.2- 41.2 27.2 i 5.7;6.3 SPMI-4848 MILK Jan,1994 Cs-137 A 34.8 22.4 - 47.2 34.618.2;8.9 SPMI-4848 MILK Jan,1994 Sr-89 A 35.0 26.8- 43.2 28.2 i 3.8;4.7 SPMI-4848 MILK Jan,1994 Sr-90 A 40.7 32.3- 49.1 41.211.2;4.3 SPMI-4849 MILK Jan,1994 Sr-89 A 11.9 8.8- 15.0 9.511.6;1.9 SPMI-4849 MILK Jan,1994 Sr-90 A 20.1 16.0- 24.2 19.4 0.8 ; 2.1 SPMI-4862 MILK Jan,1994 Cs-134 A 338.0 267.5- 408.5 328.3 1 16.3;36.7 SPMI-4862 MILK Jan,1994 Cs-137 A 1114.4 899.4- 1329.4 1019.6 18.3;103.6 SPAP-4953 AIR FILTER Jan,1994 Gr. Beta A 4.2 3.3 - 5.1 4.810.1;0.5 SPAP-4954 AIR FILTER Jan,1994 C3-137 A 1.3 1.0 - 1.6 1.4 i 0.1 ; 0.2 SPW-4955 WATER Jan,1994 H-3 A 17163.0 13700.3- 20625.7 17080.0 i 364.0;1746.4 SPW-4956 WATER Jan,1994 Co60 A 1545.0 1232.2- 1857.8 1514.0 1 46.2;158.3 SPW-4956 WATER Jan,1994 Cs-134 A 479.0 380.8- 577.2 433.7 1 25.5;50.3 SPW-4956 WATER Jan,1994 Cs-137 A 732.0 571.5- 892.5 742.7 i 45.9;87.3 SPCH-492 CHARCOAL Feb,1994 I-131(g) A 1452.8 1148.6- 1757.0 1449.9 1 65.1;158.9 CANISTER SPW-4934 WATER Feb,1994 I-131 A 90.8 74.0- 107.6 76.4 i l .4 ; 7.8 SPW-4934 WATER Feb,1994 I-131(g) A 90.8 69.9- 111.7 90.2 i 7.6;11.8 SPMI-4935 MILK Feb,1994 I-131 A 43.6 35.1- 52.1 40.4 i 1.0;4.2 SPMI-4935 MILK Feb,1994 I-131(g) A 43.6 31.3- 55.9 41.8 i 6.7; 7.9 SPBS-5102 SEDIMENT Mar,1994 H-3 A 105.4 85.1- 125.7 97.2 i l .0 ; 9.8 SPW-5146 WATER Mar,1994 Sr-89 A 26.4 19.1- 33.7 25.5 i 3.9;4.7 SPW-5146 WATER Mar,1994 Sr-90 A 18.8 15.0- 22.6 16.2 i 1.1;2.0 SPW-646 WATER Apr,1994 H-3 A 9855.0 7841.5- 11868.5 9847.8 i 294.9;1028.0 SPW-648 WATER Apr,1994 Co40 A 22.6 13.4- 31.8 21.616.6;6.9 97

l El 1

Table A-2. In-house " spike" samples.

Concentration in pCi/L' Lab Sample Date Accepted Known TBEESML Results Code Type Cc.11ected Analysis Rejected Activity Control Limits

  • 2s, n=1' SPW 648 WATER Apr,1994 Cs-134 A 33.6 21.1- 46.1 33.318.5;9.1 SPW-648 WATER Apr,1994 Cs-137 A 36.3 22.2- 50.4 37.619.8;10.5 SPMI-650 MILK Apr,1994 Cs-134 A 50.6 38.1 - 63.1 52.015.3;7.4 SPMI-650 MILK Apr,1994 Cs-137 A 54.5 38.7- 70.3 61.6 i 8.3;10.3 SPW-652 WATER Apr,1994 Gr. Alpha A 41.6 32.8- 50.4 44.8 i 1.2;4.6 SPW-652 WATER Apr,1994 Gr. Beta A 25.4 20.3- 30.5 24.111.0;2.6 SPAP-654 AIR FILTER Apr,1994 Cs-137 A 1.3 1.0 - 1.6 1.3 i 0.1 ; 0.2 SPW-974 WATER May,1994 Fe-55 A 58.5 39.4- 77.6 56.7 i 12.0;13.3 SPF-1023 FISH May,1994 Cs-137 A 6.8 5.4 - 8.2 6.9 0.1 ; 0.7 g (JELLO) g SPBS-1024 SEDIMENT May,1994 Cs-137 A 6.0 4.8 - 7.2 6.2 i 0.1 ; 0.6 SPW-1850 WATER Jun,1994 I-131 A 51.8 42.0 - 61.6 46.010.7;4.7 SPW-1850 WATER Jun,1991 1-131(g) A 51.8 36.9 - 66.7 50.918.3;9.7 SPMI-1851 MILK Jun,1994 I-131 A 51.8 41.4- 62.2 51.710.6;5.2 SPMI-1851 MILK Jun,1994 I-131(g) A 51.8 34.7- 68.9 51.3 i 10.8;12.0 SPVE-1854 VEGETATIO Jun,1991 I-131(g) A 1.0 0.8 - 1.2 0.910.1;0.1 N

(SAWDUST)

SPCif-185 CHARCOAL Jun,1991 1-131(g) A 1.8 1.4 - 2.2 1.9 i 0.1 ; 0.2 CANISTER SPW-3278 WATER Jun,1994 Gr. Alpha A 23.4 18.7- 28.1 20.811.1;2.4 SPW-3278 WATER Jun,1994 Gr. Beta A 31.8 25.5- 38.1 29.5 i 1.1;3.1 SPW-3276 WATER Jul,1994 11-3 A 25019.0 20030.6- 30007.4 24504.6 i 421.7;2486.5 SPMI-3282 MILK Jul,1994 Sr-89 A 22.5 15.2- 29.8 16.414.8;5.1 SPMl-3282 MILK Jul,1994 Sr-90 A 25.4 20.0- 30.8 25.311.4;2.9 SPW-3284 WATER Jul,1994 Cs-137 A 221.5 168.5 - 2:'4.5 240.8 1 19.3;30.9 SPAP-3388 AIR FILTER Jul,1994 Gr. Beta A 8.3 6.7- 9.9 7.9 i 0.1 ; 0.8 SPAP-3390 AIR FILTER Jul,1994 Cs-137 A 1.3 1.0 - 1.6 1.3 i 0.1 ; 0.2 SPF-3603 FISH Jul,1994 Cs-137 A 8.5 6.1- 10.9 8.3 i 1.3 ; 1.5 (JELLO)

SPW 5549 WATER Oct,1%4 I-131 A 79.9 64.1 - 95.7 77.4 i 0.9;7.8 SPW-5549 WATER Oct,1994 I-131(g) A 79.9 59.1- 100.7 85.5 i 9.5;12.8 i SPMI-5550 MILK Oct,1994 Cs-134 A 36.4 25.8- 47.0 35.016.0;6.9 SPMI-5550 MILK Oct,1994 Cs-137 A 44.1 29.2- 59.0 46.119.4;10.5 SPP4.-5550 MILK Oct,1994 1-131 A 63.9 50.9- 76.9 65.210.9;6.6 SPMI-5550 MILK Oct,1994 I-131(g) A 63.9 44.5- 83.3 68.4 i 11.1;13.0 Oct,1994 I-131 g

SPW-5594 WATER A 95.8 76.9- 114.7 92.511.0;9.3 5 98

=

I Table A-2. In house " spike" samples.

I Concentration in pCi/L' Lab Sample Date Accepted Known I Code SPW-5594 Type WATER Collected Analysis Rejected Activity Oct,1994 1-131(g) A 95.8 Control Limits 6 72.1- 119.5 TBEESML Results 2s, n=1' 98.2 i 10.1;14.1 Oct,1994 I-131(g) A 1.6 1.22.0 1.7 i 0.1 ; 0.2 I SPVE-6067NVEGETATIO (SAWDUST)

SEDIMENT Oct,1994 Cs-134 A 0.3 -23.9- 24.6 0.3 t 24.2 ; 24.2 I SPS-5946 (BOTTOM)

SPF-6208 FISH Oct,1994 Cs-137 A 12.1 9.7- 14.4 11.6 i 0.1;1.2 (JELLO)

I SPW-6955 WATER Nov,1994 Ni-63 A 1931.0 1549.6- 2312.4 1851.6 1 34.3;188.3 SPW-6994 WATER Nov,1994 Tc-99 A 66.0 49.3- 82.6 63.2 i 7.8;10.0 SPW-7440 WATER Nov,1994 H-3 A 24260.0 19387.1- 29132.9 24099.2 i 423.9;2446.9 SPAP-7507 AIR FILTER Nov,1994 Cs-137 A 1.9 1.5 - 2.3 2.2 i 0.0 ; 0.2 I

  • which are in pCi/ Filter; and food products, which are in mg/Kg.All results are in pCi/L, exc
  • Control limits are based on the known value i 10hTPU (Where all parametric uncertainties, other than counting statistics, are less than 5%).

I

  • All samples are the results of single determinations. The result is reported in the following format:

Activity i Counting Error ; Total Propagated Uncertainty.

I I I I

1 i

i I

g

i t

lI Table A 3. In-house " blank" samples.

Concentration pCi/L*.

Teledyne Results Accep i Lab Sample Sample (4.66 Sigma) Crite.

Code Type Date Analysis LLD Activity' (4.66 Sigma)

SPW-4820 WATER Jan 1994 Cs-134 < 1.9 -1.76 1 7.24;7.24 < 10.0 SPW-4820 WATER Jan 1994 Cs-137 <4.4 -0.31 i 2.67;2.67 < 10.0 SPW-4824 WATER Jan 1994 Gr. Alpha <0. 3 0.00 1 0.20;0.20 < 1.0 SPW-4824 WATER Jan 1994 Gr. Beta <0.9 0.401 0.59;0.59 < 3.2 SPW-4827 WATER Jan 1994 Co60 < 1.8 1.10 i 1.04;1.05 < 10.0 SPW-4827 WATER Jan 1994 Cs-134 < 1.9 0.51 1 6.76;6.76 < 10.0 g SPW-4827 WATER Jan 1994 Cs-137 <2.0 0.43 i 0.84;0.84 < 10.0 E SPW-4827 WATER Jan 1994 Gr. Alpha <0.4 0.12 i 0.25;0.25 < 1.0 SPW-4827 WATER Jan 1994 Gr. Beta <0.8 0.21 1 0.55;0.55 < 3.2 SPW-4827 WATER Jan 1994 H-3 <192.0 133.90 1 101.00;102.63 < 200.0 SPW-4827 WATER Jan 1994 1-131 <0.3 -0.12 1 0.14;0.14 <0.5 g SPMI 4846 MILK Jan 1994 Co-60 <3.6 0.62 i 2.67;2.67 < 10.0 E SPMI-4846 MILK Jan 1994 Cs-134 <5.4 0.52 I 3.83;3.83 < 10.0

( SPMI-4846 MILK Jan 1994 Cs-137 <3.4 -0.74 i 2.93;2.93 < 10.0 SPMI-4846 MILK Jan 1994 I-131 <0.5 0.27 i 0.34;0.34 <0.5 l SPMI-4846 MILK Jan 1994 Sr-89 <0.5 -0.54 1 0.79;0.79 < 5.0

! SPMI-4846 MILK Jan 1994 Sr-90 N/A 1.93 i 0.44;0.48 < 1.0 Low level of Sr-90 concentration in milk (1-5 pCi/L)is not unusual.

l SPAP-4950 AIR FILTER Jan 1994 Co-60 <2.2 -2.61 i 2.19;2.21 < 10.0 SPAP-4950 AIR FILTER Jan 1994 Cs-134 <3.1 -0.31 i 3.65;3.65 <10.0 SPAP-4950 AIR FILTER Jan 1994 Cs-137 <2.9 2.78 1 23.94;23.94 < 10.0 SPAP-4952 AIR FILTER Jan 1994 Gr. Beta <0.9 0.00 i 0.58;0.58 < 3.2 SPCH-4951 CHARCOAL Feb l994 I-131(g) < 7.0 0.64 4.80;4.80 < 9.6 CANISTER SPW-5054 WATER Mar 1994 Ra-226 <0.1 0.01 i 0.03;0.03 < 1.0 l SPW-5054 WATER Mar 1994 Ra-228 < 1.0 0.54 1 0.67;0.67 < 1.0 SPBS-5101 SEDIMENT Mar 1994 Co-60 <5.9 -0.19 i l.63;1.63 < 10.0 g SPBS-5101 SEDIMENT Mar 1994 Cs-134 < 6. 2 -31.20 1 13.10;13.47 < 10.0 im SPBS-5101 SEDIMENT Mar 1994 Cs-137 <4.4 -0.26 i 2.75;2.75 < 10.0 SPW-647 WATER Apr 1994 Co-60 <5.8 0.56 i 0.53;0.54 < 10.0 SPW-647 WATER Apr 1994 Cs-134 <3.4 0.86 1 0.72;0.73 < 10.0 SPW-647 WATER Apr 1994 Cs-137 <5.1 2.65 1 2.75;2.78 < 10.0 I

i SPW-647 WATER Apr 1994 H-3 <191.5 148.40 1 100.90;102.90 < 200.0 j SPW-647 WATER Apr 1994 I-131 <0.5 -0.34 0.22;0.22 < 0.5 I SPMI-649 MILK Apr 1994 Co-60 <6.5 0.55 i 1.39;1.39 < 10.0 l

l )

100 lI )

a!

Table A-3. In-house " blank" samples.

El '

Concentration pCi/L'.

Teledyne Results Acceptance Lab Sample Sample (4.66 Sigma) Criteria Code Type Date Analysis LLD Activity * (4.66 Sigma)

SPMI 649 MILK Apr 1994 Cs-134 <3.4 -3.45 1 5.60;5.62 < 10.0 SPMI 649 MILK Apr 1994 Cs-137 <4.6 0.59 i 3.98;3.98 < 10.0 SPMI-649 MILK Apr 1994 1-131 < 0. 5 -0.11 i 0.19;0.19 < 0.5 SPW-651 WATER Apr 1994 Gr. Alpha < 0. 4 0.14 1 0.25;0.25 < 1.0 SPW-651 WATER Apr 1994 Gr. Beta <0.8 0.12 1 0.54;0.54 < 3.2 SPAP-653 AIR FILTER Apr 1994 Cs-134 < 2.1 -0.12 i 0.18;0.18 < 10.0 SPAP-653 AIR FILTER Apr 1994 Cs-137 <3.4 1.05 i 1.55;1.55 < 10/)

SPCli 654 CHARCOAL Apr 1994 I-131(g) < 6.1 0.96 i 3.84 ;3.84 < 9.6 CANISTER SPAP-4956 AIR FILTER Apr 1994 Gr. Beta < 1.0 0.32 i 0.96;0.96 < 3.2 SPW-974 WATER May 1994 Fe 55 <0.8 0.101 0.47;0.47 < 1000.0 SPF-1022 FISH OELLO) May 1994 Cs-134 <9.2 12.70 1 31.70;31.73 < 10.0 SPF-1022 FISH OELLO) May 1994 Cs-137 <10.0 27.30 1 58.30;58.36 < 10.0 SPW-1075 WATER May 1994 Ra-226 <0.1 0.01 i 0.04 ;0.04 <1.0 SPBS-3254 SEDIMENT May 1994 Co-60 < 5. 8 5.93 1 8.06;8.08 < 10.0 SPBS-3254 SEDIMENT May 1994 Cs-134 <2.0 5.67 i 6.69;6.71 < 10.0 SPBS-3254 SEDIMENT May 1994 Cs 137 <5.0 -2.11 i 4.69;4.69 < 10.0 SPVE-1852 VEGETAT10N Jun1994 Cs-134 <5.4 -1.47 i 2.14;2.15 < 10.0 (SAWDUST)

SPVE-1852 VEGETATION Jun1994 Cs-137 <6.6 2.12 i 3.44;3.45 < 10.0 (SAWDUST)

SPVE 1852 VEGETATION Jun1994 1131(g) <5.6 -0.73 i l.08;1.08 < 20.0 (SAWDUST)

SPW-3277 WATER Jun 1994 Gr. Alpha <0.3 0.10 i 0.22;0.22 <10 SPW-3277 WATER Jun1994 Gr. Beta <0.8 0.14 1 0.54;0.54 < 3.2 SPW-3275 WATER Jul1994 H-3 <154.9 22.81 77.81; 77.87 < 200.0 SPMI-3281 MILK Jul 1994 Co-60 <3.6 0.87 i 2.22;2.22 < 10.0 SPMI-3281 M1LK Jul1994 Ca.134 <2.3 -0.45 i 2.61;2.61 < 10.0 SPMI-3281 MILK Jul1994 Cs-137 < 4.2 0.07 i 2.28;2.28 < 10.0 SPMI-3281 MILK Jul1994 1-131 <0.2 0.10 i 0.16;0.16 < 0.5 SPMI-3281 MILK Jul 1994 Sr-89 <0.9 -054i 1.32;1.32 < 5.0 SPMI-3281 MILK Jul1994 Sr-90 N/A 2.29 1 0.56;0.61 < 1.0 Low levo of Sr-90 concentration in milk (1-5 pCi/ L) is not unusual.

l SPW-3283 WATER Jul 1904 Co-60 <2.2 -3.09 i 3.52;3.55 < 10.0 l SPW-3283 WATER Jul1994 Cs-134 <5.4 0.79 1 3.13;3.13 < 10.0 101

==

f f

!I Table A 3. In-house " blank" samples.

Concentration pCi/L'.

Teledyne Results Acceptance Lab Sample Sample (4.66 Sigma) Criteria Code Type Date Analysis LLD Activitv' (4.66 Sigma)

SPW 3283 WATER Jul1994 Cs-137 <5.0 -0.10 1 3.05;3.05 < 10.0 SPW-3283 WATER Jul1994 I-131 <0.4 0.14 1 0.22:0.22 <0.5

SPAP-3389 AIR FILTER Jul 1994 Gr. Beta < 0. 2 0.16 0.26;0.26 <3.2 SPAP-3391 AIR FILTER Jul 1994 Co-60 < 1.7 -0.74 i 1.44;1.44 < 10.0 SPAP-3391 AIR FILTER Jul 1994 Cs-134 <2.3 0.95 1 4.86;4.86 < 10.0 SPAP-3391 AIR FILTER Jul1994 Cs-137 < 4.1 -3.03 1 3.15;3.16 < 10.0 SPF-3602 FISH (JELLO) Jul 1994 Co-60 <3.6 -4.451 4.27;4.29 < 10.0 SPF-3602 FISH (JELLO) Jul1994 Cs-134 < 4.1 -3.91 1 5.63;5.64 < 10.0 SPF-3602 FISH (JELLO) Jul 1994 Cs-137 <4.7 -5.171 5.80;5.82 < 10.0 SPMI-5551 MILK Oct 1994 Cs-134 <4.3 0.90 i 3.34;3.34 < 10.0 SPMI-5551 MILK Oct 1994 Cs-137 < 4.1 -0.55 i 3.43;3.43 < 10.0 g SPMI-5551 MILK Oct 1994 I-131 < 0. 2 -0.03 i 0.16;0.16 < 0.5 l

5 SPSO-5947 SOIL Oct 1994 Cs-134 <2.3 -4.84 4.84;4.86 < 10.0 SPSO-5947 SOIL Oct 1994 Cs 137 <6.4 -0.50 1 4.71;4.71 < 10.0 SPW-6995 WATER Nov l994 Tc-99 <4.2 1.24 i 2.19;2.19 < 10.0 SPW-7441 WATER Nov l994 H-3 <169.0 -74.64 i 80.48;81.12 < 200.0 SPW-7442 WATER I SPW-7451 SPW-7451 WATER WATER Nov 1994 H-3 Nov 1994 Gr. Alpha Nov 1994 Gr. Beta

<169.0

<0.3

<0.8

-37.02 i 82.14;82.29 0.11 1 0.19;0.19 0.10 1 0.52;0.52

< 200.0

<1.0

< 3.2 SPAP-7506 AIR FILTER Nov 1994 Co-60 < 2.1 0.17 i 1.63;1.63 < 10.0

)

SPAP-7506 AIR FILTER Nov 1994 Cs-134 < 1.6 -1.08 i 1.70;1.70 < 10.0 l SPAP-7506 AIR FILTER Nov 1994 Cs-137 <3.0 -0.55 i 1.65;1.65 I

  • Liquid sample results are reported in pCi. Liter, air filter sample results are in pCi/ filter, charcoal sample results are in pCi/ charcoal, and solid sample results are in pCi/ kilogram.

< 10.0 l

1

  • The activity reported is the net activity result.

I -

)

102

{

I Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program.

Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second I Collected Analysis Jan,1994 Co-60 Codes

  • Jm,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-4607,4608 M1LK 166,167 Rejected A

A Result 1.410.7;0.7 1.413.7;3.7 Result 1.4 i 0.7 ; 0.7

-1.1 i 4.3 ; 4.3 Jan,1994 Cs-137 MILK-166,167 A -0.3 i 3.4 ; 3.4 -0.7 i 2.6 ; 2.6 Jan,1994 I-131(G) MILK-166,167 A -0.1 i 0.2 ; 0.2 0.2 i 0.2 ; 0.2 J;n,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-4711,4712 A 1.7 i 0.6 ; 0.7 1.810.6;0.7 Jan,1994 Co-60 MILK-187,188 A 0.112.9;2.9 -1.413.4;3.4 Jan,1994 Cs-137 MILK-187,188 A 0.2 i l .9 ; 1.9 1.9 f 2.6 ; 2.6 I Jan,1994 Jan,1994 I-131 H-3 MILK-187,188 Jin,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-4664, 4665 WATER-4664,4665 A

A A

0.2 i 0.2 ; 0.2 8.8 i l .8 ; 2.3 93.0 i 95.9;96.7 0.1 0.2 ; 0.2 4.4 i l.4 ; 1.6 37.2 i 93.6;93.8 Jan,1994 Gr. Alpha WATER-4687,4688 A 1.611.5;1.5 0.0 i l.2 ; 1.2 Jan,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-4687,4688 A 3.2 i 0.8 ; 1.0 2.510.8;0.9 Jan,1994 H-3 WATER-4687, 4688 A 171.8 i 99.0;101.7 183.4 i 99.4;102.5 Jan,1994 H3 WATER-4741,4742 A 105.0 i 101.0;102.0 127.0 1 102.0;103.5 Jan,1994 K-40 MILK-208, 209 A 1,396.0 1 148.0;240.7 1,586.0 i 162.0;269.8 Jan,1994 Sr-90 MILK-208, 209 A I

3.0 i 0.6 ; 0.6 3.610.7;0.8 Jan,1994 H3 WATER-4830,4831 A 73.8 i 89.4;89.9 79.3 1 89.6;90.2 Jan,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-4865,4866 A 1.9 i 0.2 ; 0.4 1.9 i 0.2 ; 0.3 I jan,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-5052,5053 Jan,1994 H-3 WATER-4890,4891 Jin,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-4919,4920 A

A A

2.210.6;0.6 421.9 1 109.0;123.2 2.8 i 0.8 ; 0.9 2.610.6;0.7 454.8 i 106.6;123.2 3.4 i 0.8 ; 1.0 Feb,1994 G r. Beta WATER-4952, 4953 A 2.710.6;0.7 2.110.5;0.6 Feb,1994 H-3 WATER-5010, 5011 A 142.0 1 99.0;100.9 119.0 i 98.0;99.3 Feb,1994 K-40 MILK-250, 251 A 1,087.0 i 77.0;166.7 1,036.0 1 98.0;171.6 Feb,1994 Sr-90 MILK-250, 251 A 3.710.6;0.7 4.1 i 0.6 ; 0.7 Fib,1994 K-40 MILK-271, 272 A 1,510.0 i 90.0; 224.2 1,520.0 1 110.0;234.2' Feb,1994 H-3 WATER-4978, 4979 A 83.8 i 97.0;97.6 69.8 1 96.4;96.9 Fcb,1994 Co-60 MJLK-229, 230 A -1.5 i 4.2 ; 4.2 -1.615.5;5.5 Feb,1994 Cs-137 MILK-229, 230 A -0.7 i 3.1 ; 3.1 -2.0 i 3.7; 3.7 Fib,1994 1-131 MILK-229, 230 A 0.2 i 0.2 ; 0.2 0.110.2;0.2  ;

Feb,1994 H-3 WATER-5081,5082 A 28.0 1 95.0;95.1 72.0 i 96.0;96.5 '

Feb,1994 H-3 WATER-5124,5125 A 465.8 i 113.7;130.1 358.0 i 109.8;120.1 Feb,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-5212,5213 A 2.9 i 0.7; 0.8 2.210.6;0.7 l

Feb,1994 CM0 WATER-5183,5184 A 1.511.6;1.7 -0.712.0;2.0 Feb,1994 Cs-137 WATER-5183,5184 A 0.3 i 1.6 ; 1.6 0.4 i 2.1 ; 2.1 Feb,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-5183,5184 A 4.9 i 1.1 ; 1.3 4.5 i 1.1 ; 1.3 103

E Table A-4 In-house " duplicate" program.

Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes

  • Rejected Result Result Mar,1994 K-40 MILK-292, 293 A 1,377.0 i 85.0;205.7 1,364.0 i 100.0;210.7 Mar,1994 Sr-90 MILK-292, 293 A 1.2 i 0.4 ; 0.4 1.510.4;0.4 Mar,1994 Gr. Beta MILK-5246,5247 A 6.S i 0.8 ; 1.1 6.410.9;1.1 Mar,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-5270, 5271 A 3.311.0;1.1 2.8 i 1.0; 1.1 Mar,1994 H-3 WATER-5293,5294 A 620.2 i 118.7;145.6 582.3 i 117.5;141.7 Mar,1994 1-131(G) MILK-313,314 A 1.3147.7;47.7 0.310.8;0.8 Mar,1994 K-40 MILK-334,335 A 1,392.0 i 95.0;211.8 1,437.0 i 115.0;226.8 Mar,1994 H-3 WATER-5400, 5401 A 77.7 i 97.2;97.8 66.8 i 96.5;97.0 g Mar,1994 H-3 WATER-5485, 5486 A 336.0 i 107.0;116.3 272.0 1 105.0;111.3 =

Mar,1994 Co-60 WATER-5446,5447 A 1.8 i 4.4 ; 4.4 0.1 i 0.5 ; 0.5 Mar,1994 Cs-137 WATER-5446, 5447 A 0.7 i 1.6 ; 1.6 1.0 i 1.9 ; 1.9 Mar,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-5446, 5447 A 3.8 t l.3; 1.4 3.711.3;1.4 Mar,1994 H-3 WATER-5510,5511 A 396.0 i 89.0;104.0 458.5 t 113.1 ; 129.2 Mar,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-5538, 5539 A 2.6 i 0.6 ; 0.7 g

2.010.6;0.7 g Mar,1994 :i-3 WATER-5593,5594 A 139.9 i 101.1;102.9 169.4 i 101.8;104.3 Mar,1994 Co-60 WATER-5614, 5615 A 0.4 i 1.0 ; 1.0 0.2 2.2 ; 2.2 Mar,1994 Cs-137 WATER-5614,5615 A 0.9 i 3.8 ; 3.8 -0.412.6;2.6 Mar,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-5566,5567 A 2.810.5;0.7 2.2 i 0.5 ; 0.6 Mar,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-72, 73 A 1.610.5;0.6 1.510.5;0.5 Apr,1994 Gr. Deta WATER-49, 50 A 3.410.9;1.1 3.4 i 0.9 ; 1.1 Apr,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-102,103 A 2.0 i 0.5 ; 0.6 2.l i 0.5 ; 0.6 Apr,1994 H-3 WATER-102,103 A 165.0 i 102.0;104.4 79.0 1 98.0;98.6 Apr,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-187,188 A 3.4 i 0.7; 0.8 3.2 i 0.6 ; 0.8 Apr,1994 Co-60 MILK-246, 247 A 1.811.6;1.6 1.811.6;1.6 Apr,1994 Cs-137 MILK-246, 247 A 0.111.9;1.9 g

0.111.9;1.9 g Apr,1994 I-131 MILK-246, 247 A 0.lio.2;0.2 0.2 i o.3; 0.3 Apr,1994 Cr. Deta WATER-257, 258 A 3.3 i 0.7 ; 0.9 3.3 i 0.8 ; 0.9 Apr,1994 Cs-137 WATER-267, 268 A 0.2 i 2.7; 2.7 E

1.212.2;2.2 E Apr,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-281, 282 R 15.7 i 2.0;3.2 30.412.6;5.4 A review of the raw data revealed no errors or discrepancies. Both samples were recounted. The results of the recounts were in agreement with the initial results. The sample was reanalyzed. The result of the reanalysis was 30.712.1 pCi/L No further action is planned.

Apr,1994 H-3 WATER-281, 282 A 381,181.0 1 1,740.0;51,869.8 378,406.0 1 1,733.0;51,492.4 Apr,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-454, 455 A 3.312.1;2.2 3.712.2;2.3 Apr,1994 H-3 WATER-405, 406 A 65.9 i 98.2;98.6 62.0 i 98.1;98.4 Apr,1994 K-40 MILK-464, 465 A 1,630.0 i 130.0;257.0 1,589.0 i 162.0;270.1 Apr,1994 H-3 WATER-516, 517 A 37.6 i 95.0;95.1 69.3 1 95.8;96.2 I

104

=

I Table A-4 In-house " duplicate" prograrn.

Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes

  • Rejected Result Result Apr,1994 Cs-137 WATER-267, 268 A 0.2 2.7 ; 2.7 1.2 2.2 ; 2.2 Apr,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-616, 617 A 2.510.5;0.6 3.0 i 0.6 ; 0.7 Apr,1994 H3 WATER-616, 617 A 193.0 i 102.0;105.3 203.0 103.0;106.6 Apr,1994 Co-60 WATER-739, 740 A 0.8 i 11.4; 11.4 0.3 i 0.4 ; 0.4 Apr,1994 Cs-137 WATER-739, 740 A -0.313.6;3.6 0.813.2;3.2 Apr,1994 Cs-137 WATER-739, 740 A -0.313.6;3.6 0.8 i 3.2 ; 3.2 Apr,1994 Co-60 WATER-697, 698 A 3.414.4;4.4 2.112.8;2.8 Apr,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-697, 698 A 2.9 1.0 ; 1.1 3.1 i 0.8 ; 0.9 I Msy,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-1003,1004 May,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-796, 797 A

A 2.810.3;0.5 1.7i 0.5 ; 0.5 2.6 i 0.3 ; 0.5 2.1 i 0.5 ; 0.6 May,1994 H-3 WATER-931, 932 A 531.3 i 109.7;131.4 554.5 i 110.6;133.8 M:y,1994 Co-60 WATER-893, 894 A -1.514.1;4.1 1.3 i 3.2 ; 3.2 MIy,1994 Cs-137 WATER-893, 894 A 0.9 i 2.3 ; 2.3 1.5 i 3.1 ; 3.1 M:y,1994 Gr. Deta WATER-893, 894 A 1.3 i 1.9 ; 1.9 -0.2 i 1.8 ; 1.8 M:y,1994 H-3 WATER-893, 894 A 159.0 i 95.6;98.0 118.3 1 94.0;95.4 May,1994 Co-60 MILK-900, 901 A -2.8 i 3.0 ; 3.0 -1.7i 6.1 ; 6.1 Mry,1994 Cs-137 MILK-900, 901 A -0.1 t l.3 ; 1.3 0.S i l.7 ; 1.7 M:y,1994 I-131 MILK-900, 901 A 0.l i 0.2 ; 0.2 0.li0.2;0.2 May,1994 K-40 MILK-1001,1002 A 1,250.0 1 180.0;247.6 1,370.0 i 140.0;233.1 May,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-1171,1172 A 9.712.0;2.5 7.5 i 2.2 ; 2.5 Msy,1994 H-3 WATER-1171,1172 A 950.0 i 108.0;168.4 1,012.0 i 109.0;175.6 May,1994 Co-60 MILK-1214,1215 A 0.712.4;2.4 0.2 i 0.6 ; 0.6 May,1994 Cs-137 MILK-1214,1215 A -0.4 i 1.5 ; 1.5 1.4 i 1.8 ; 1.8 M y,1994 I-131 MILK-1214,1215 A 0.1 i 0.2 ; 0.2 0.1 i 0.2 ; 0.2 Msy,1994 Cr. Beta WATER-1565,1566 A 2.610.9;1.0 2.6 i 0.9 ; 1.0 May,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-1399,1400 A 6.010.7;1.1 5.510.7;1.1 Mny,1994 1-131(G) MILK-1301,1302 A -0.110.2;0.2 0.0 i 0.2 ; 0.2 Mcy,1994 Gr. Beta SEDIMENIS-1550, A 2.l i 0.1 ; 0.2 2.2 i 0.1 ; 0.2 M:y,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-1545,1546 A 6.610.6;1.2 5.4 t 0.6 ; 1.0 Mty,1994 Co-60 WATER-1670,1671 A -0.3 i 0.6 ; 0.6 1.4 i 2.4 ; 2.4 M y,1994 Cs-137 WATER-1670,1671 A 1.7 i 3.0 ; 3.0 -1.7 i 2.6 ; 2.7 Mry,1994 I-131(G) MILK-1510,1511 A 0.110.1;0.1 -0.110.1;0.1 Mxy,1994 H-3 WATER-1520,1521 A 48.4 1 97.3;97.5 79.9 i 98.5;99.1 Jun,1994 1-131 MILK-1744,1745 R 0.9 i 0.2 ; 0.2 0.110.2;0.2

[ Jun,1994 Gr. Deta WATER-1786,1787 A 31.413.1;5.8 31.413.0;5.7 Jun,1994 H-3 WATER-1786,1787 A 236,078.0 i l,364.0;32,135.6 235,776.0 1 1,363.0;32,094.5 105

0 a1 1

Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program. _

I 1 Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes

  • Rejected Result Result Jun,1994 Co-60 WATER-1843,1844 A 1.311.0;1.0 0.5 i 2.2 ; 2.2 Jun,1994 Cs-137 WATER-1843,1844 A 0.0 i 1.1 ; 1.1 1.0 i 1.8 ; 1.8 Jun,1994 H-3 WATER 1843,1844 A 138.7 i 79.6;81.8 69.6 i 76.7;77.3 Jun,1994 Co-60 MILK-1818,1819 A -1.3 i 3.1 ; 3.1 0.2 i 4.5 ; 4.5 Jun,1994 Cs-137 MILK-1818,1819 A 0.312.3;2.3 1.9 i 3.5 ; 3.5 Jun,1994 I-131(G) MILK-1818,1819 A -0.2 i 0.2 ; 0.2 g

0.010.1;0.1 g Jun,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-1882,1883 A 5.0 t 0.7 ; 1.1 5.6 i 0.8 ; 1.2 Jun,1994 H-3 WATER-1882,1883 A -32.6 i 76.9;77.0 -55.8 1 76.9;77.3 g Jun,1994 Be-7 GRASS-1900,1901 A 0.5 i 0.1 ; 0.1 0.510.1;0.1 E Jun,1994 K-40 GRASS-1900,1901 A 4.310.2;0.5 4.3 i 0.2 ; 0.5 Jun,1994 I-131 MILK-1982,1983 A 0.0 i 0.2 ; 0.2 0.1 i 0.1 ; 0.1 Jun,1994 K-40 MILK-1982,1983 A 1,562.0 1 98.0;233.9 1,553.0 1 116.0;241.0 Jun,1994 Gr. Deta WATER 1972,1973 A 25.7 i 2.4;4.6 23.7 i 2.3;4.3 Jun,1994 K-40 MILK-2092,2093 A 1,430.0 i 170.0;258.3 1,430.0 140.0;239.6 Jun,1994 C-14 WATER-2116, 2117 A -28.0 t 49.0 ; 49.1 -9.0 i 52.0;52.0 Jun,1994 Gr. Alpha WATER-2116,2117 A 0.610.5;0.5 1.110.6;0.6 Jun,1994 Gr. Deta WATER-2116,2117 A 8.410.8;1.5 7.210.7;1.3 Jun,1994 H3 WATER-2116, 2117 A 2,544.0 i 152.0;377.9 2,522.0 i 152.0;375.2 Jun,1994 U-233/4 WATER-2116,2117 A 1.5 i 0.2 ; 0.3 1.5 i 0.2 ; 0.2 Jun,1994 U 235 WATER 2116,2117 A 0.010.1;0.1 0.010.1;0.1 Jun,1994 U-238 WATER.2116, 2117 A 0.9 i 0.2 ; 0.2 1.1 i 0.2 ; 0.2 Jun,1994 Gr. Deta WATER-2198, 2199 A 5.3 i 0.9 ; 1.2 5.2 i 0.8 ; 1.2 Jun,1994 Co-60 MILK-2156,2157 A -0.5 i 3.1 ; 3.1 1.514.0;4.0 Jun,1994 Cs-137 MILK-2156,2157 A 1.3 i 3.6 ; 3.6 1.2 i 5.9 ; 5.9 Jun.1994 I-131(G) MILK-2156,2157 A -0.110.2;0.2 0.010.2 ; G.2 Jun,1994 I-131 MILK-2194,2195 A 0.210.3;0.3 0.110.2;0.2 Jun,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-2238,2239 A 1.5 i 0.6 ; 0.7 1.710.6;0.7 g Jun,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-2363, 2364 A 69.5 i 84.0;84.7 5.9 i 81.3;81.3 E Jun,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-2336,2337 A 6.211.3;1.6 6.4 t l.3 ; 1.6 Jun,1994 H3 WATER-2336,2337 A 23.6 i 80.1; 80.1 -20.9 i 78.2;78.3 Jun,1994 Be-7 SLIME-2480,2481 A 0.410.2;0.2 0.410.2;0.2 Jun,1994 Cs-137 SLIME-2480,2481 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Jun,1994 K-40 SLIME-2480,2481 A 1.3 i 0.2 ; 0.2 1.310.2;0.2 Jun,1994 I-131 MILK-2334,2335 A 0.110.2;0.2 0.010.2;0.2 Jun,1994 Gr. Deta WATER 2733,2734 A 2.010.5;0.5 1.6 i 0.4 ; 0.5 l Jun,1994 Sr-89 WATER-3056,3057 A -0.6 i 1.1 ; 1.1 -0.110.8;0.8 106 l

I I Table A-4. In house " duplicate" prograrn.

Concentration in pCi/If Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes

  • Rejected Result Result Jun,1994 Sr-90 WATER-3056,3057 A 0.5 i 0.4 ; 0.4 0.310.3;0.3 Jun,1994 K-40 MILK-2405,2406 A 1,730.0 1 190.0;302.4 1,710.0 1 120.0;261.7 Jun,1994 H-3 WATER-2432, 2433 A 26.9 i 81.9;82.0 123.21 85.9;87.5 Jun,1994 H-3 WATER-3000, 3001 A 213.6 i 86.2;91.0 192.4 i 85.3;89.2 Jun,1994 Gr. AIpha WATER-2459,2460 A 0.110.2;0.2 0.010.2;0.2 Jun,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-2459,2460 A 2.3 i 0.2 ; 0.4 2.0 f 0.2 ; 0.4 Jun,1994 H3 WATER-2712, 2713 A 260.0 i 90.0;96.7 170.0 i 80.0;83.3 I Jun,1994 H-3 WATER-2501, 2502 Jun,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-2662, 2663 Jun,1994 Gr. Deta WATER-2691, 2692 A

A A

70.0 i 80.0;80.6 5.0 i 0.9 ; 1.2 2.4 i 0.5 ; 0.6 137.0 1 80.0;82.1 5.5 i 0.9 ; 1.2 2.110.5;0.6 Jun,1994 H-3 WATER-2691,2692 A 192.6 i 87.0;90.9 108.3 i 83.6;84.8 Jul,1994 Co-60 MILK-2522,2523 A 5.714.5;4.5 -3.215.3;5.3 Jul,1994 Cs-137 MILK-2522,2523 A 0.2 i 3.3 ; 3.3 2.013.3;3.3 Jul,1994 I-131(G) MILK-2522,2523 A 0.110.2;0.2 0. l i 0.2 ; 0.2 Jul,1994 Gr. Beta WATER 2543,2544 A 1.l f 0.3 ; 0.4 1.l i 0.4 ; 0.5 Jul,1994 K-40 WATER-2543, 2544 A 1.210.1;0.2 1.210.1;0.2 Jul,1994 Gr. Alpha WATER-2631,2632 A 0.310.9;0.9 0.8 i l.0; 1.0 Jul,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-2631, 2632 A 8.111.0;1.6 7.1it.0;1.5 Jul,1994 I131 MILK-2863,2864 A 0.110.2;0.2 0.0 i 0.2 ; 0.2 Jul,1994 K-40 MILK-2863, 2864 A 1,360.0 i 130.0;226.1 1,450.0 i 100.0;221.1 Jul,1994 Be 7 GRASS-2754, 2755 A 2.2 i 0.2 ; 0.3 2.2 i o.1; 0.2 )

Jul,1994 K-40 GRASS-2754, 2755 A 7.310.4;0.8 6.9 i 0.2 ; 0.7 l Jul,1994 Co-60 WATER-2775, 2776 A -0.513.1;3.1 0.313.3;3.3 I Jul,1994 Cs-1M WATER 2775,2776 A -0.8 i 3.4 ; 3.4 -1.013.2;3.2 Jul,1994 Cs-137 WATER-2775,2776 A 1.9i 3.0 ; 3.0 0.7 i 2.9 ; 2.9 Jul,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-2775, 2776 A 3.010.5;0.7 2.9 i 0.5 ; 0.7 Jul,1994 I-131 WATER-2775,2776 A 0.010.2;0.2 0.110.2;0.2 Jul,1994 I131 MILK-2889,2890 A 0.1 i 0.2 ; 0.2 0.2 i 0.2 ; 0.2 Jul,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-2842, 2843 A 4.011.1;1.3 5.2 i 1.2 ; 1.4 Jul,1994 H-3 WATER 2842,2843 A 65.8 i 83.7; 84.1 32.3 i 82.2;82.3 i Jul,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-2910,2911 A 1.6 i 0.4 ; 0.5 1.5 i 0.5 ; 0.5 )

Jul,1994 H-3 WATER-2910,2911 A 74.9 i 82.6;83.2 146.8 i 85.6;87.9 l Jul,1994 Gr. Deta WATER-2930, 2931 A 1.7i 0.6 ; 0.6 2.210.6;0.7 Jul,1994 1-131 MILK-2958,2959 A l

-0.1 i 0.2 ; 0.2

-0.110.2;0.2 jul,1994 K-40 MILK-2958,2959 A 1,445.0 i 122.0;231.3 1,445.0 i 134.0;237.9 Jul,1994 Sr-89 MILK-3010, 3011 A -0.511.0;1.0 -0.410.7;0.7 107

\

E as Table A-4. In-house "d uplicate" program.

Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second 6

Collected Analysis Codes Rejected Result Result Jul,1994 St-90 MILK-3010, 3011 A 1.6 i 0.6 ; 0.6 1.3 i 0.4 ; 0.4 Jul,1994 I-131 WATER-3031, 3032 A 0.2 i 0.2 ; 0.2 0.210.3;0.3 Jul,1994 1-131 MILK-3083,3084 A 0.210.2;0.2 0.li0.2;0.2 Jul,1994 K-40 MILK-3083,3084 A 1,420.0 i 170.0;257.3 1,380.0 i 150.0;240.3 Jul,1994 H3 WATER-3106,3107 A 79.1 i 80.4;81.1 98.4 i 81.3;82.4 Jul,1994 Gr. Beta WATER 3154,3155 A 1.710.8;0.8 2.210.8;0.9 E

3 Jul,1994 C-14 URINE-3748, 3749 A 76.0 1 83.0;83.3 74.0 1 96.0;96.3 Jul,1994 Gr. Alpha URINE-3748,3749 A 0.312.3;2.3 2.1 2.5;2.5 Jul,1994 Gr. Deta URINE-3748, 3749 A 3.9 i 2.5 ; 2.5 3.312.7;2.7 Jul,1994 H3 URINE-3748, 3749 A 175.0 1 583.0;583.3 198.0 t 584.0; 584.3 Jul,1994 H3 WATER-3209, 3210 A -25.3 i 82.3;82.4 0.9 i J3.4 ; 83.4 Jut,1994 11-3 WATER-3234,3235 A 7.7 i 82.8;82.8 -38.3 '-80.8;81.0 Jul,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-3261,3262 A 4.410.8;1.1  :.' 10.9 ; 1.1 g Jul,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-3310, 3311 A 2.611.3;1.4 1.411.2;1.2 g Jul,1994 K-40 VEGETAT10N-340 A 3.4 i 0.4 ; 0.5 3.510.4;0.6 Jul,1994 H3 WATER-3469,3470 A 563.1 i 99.6;125.6 510.6 1 97.7;119.9 Jul,1994 Co-60 WATER-3811,3312 A 5.614.2;4.3 0.112.3;2.3 Jul,1994 Cs-137 WATER-3811, 3812 A 2.914.0;4.0 -0.412.3;2.3 Jul,1994 H-3 WATER-3358,3359 A 180.0 1 100.0;103.0 200.0 i 100.0;103.6 Aug,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-3559,3560 A 2.110.8;0.8 1.410.7;0.8 Aug,1994 Be-7 GRASS-3586, 3587 A 3.5 i 0.5 ; 0.6 3.710.5;0.6 Aug,1994 Gr. Beta GRASS-3586,3587 A 7.4 i 0.3 ; 0.8 7.l i 0.2 ; 0.7 Aug,1994 K-40 GRASS-3586,3587 A 7.4 i 0.8 ; 1.1 7.110.8;1.1 Aug,1994 Sr-89 GRASS-3586, 3587 A, 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Aug,1994 Sr-90 GRASS-3586, 3587 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Aug,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-3611, 3612 A 1.910.6;0.6 2.010.5;0.6 Aug,1994 I-131 MILK-3942,3943 A -0.110.2;0.2 0.210.3;0.3 Aug,1994 K-40 MILK-3942,3943 A 1,544.0 1 128.0;245.9 1,416.0 i 191.0;271.2 Aug,1994 H-3 WATER-3638,3639 A 147.4 i 86.3;88.6 38.6 i 81.7;81.9 Aug,1994 H-3 WATER-3683,3684 A 7.1 i 81.0;81.0 38.9 i 82.3;82.5 Aug,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-3727,3728 A 4.5 i 0.8 ; 1.0 4.8 i 0.8 ; 1.1 Aug,1994 K-40 MILK-3842,3843 A 1,419.0 i 120.0;227.3 1,411.0 i 142.0;238.7 Aug,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-3869,3870 A 4.210.7;0.9 3.210.6;0.8 Aug,1994 H-3 WATER-3869, 3870 A 43.8 i 81.8;82.1 33.3 i 81.4;81.5 Aug,1994 Gr. Beta VEGETATION-389 A 2.S i 0.1 ; 0.3 2.510.1;0.3 Aug,1994 K-40 VEGETATION 389 A 1.910.3;0.3 g

2.310.3;0.4 3 108 se

I I Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program.

Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis I Rejected Codes

  • Result Result Aug,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-3964, 3965 A 3.910.7;0.9 4.9 i 0.8 : 1.1 Aug,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-3913, 3914 A 4.3 i 0.8 ; 1.1 3.8 i 0.7; 0.9 Aug,1994 Tc-99 WATER-3991, 3992 A 84.9 i 9.3; 12.6 96.4 i 9.9;13.8 Aug,1994 Co-60 MILK-4016,4017 A 1.0 i 3.6 ; 3.6 -0.9 i 0.4 ; 0.4 Aug,1994 Cs-137 MILK-4016, 4017 A -0.312.7;2.7 2.3 i 3.9 ; 3.9 Aug,1994 1-131 MILK-4016,4017 A 0.210.2;0.2 0.010.2;0.2 Aug,1994 Sr-89 MILK-4040, 4041 A 0.911.1;1.1 -0.110.8;0.8 Aug,1994 Sr-90 MILK-4040,4041 A I

0.9 i 0.5 ; 0.5 1.110.4;0.4 Aug,1994 K-40 MILK-4459,4460 A 1,528.0 i 170.0;268.5 1,481.0 i 151.0;251.7 Aug,1994 Gr. Deta WATER-4061, 4%2 A 4.610.8;1.1 4.610.8;1.1 I Aug,1994 Gr. Deta WATER-4113, 4114 Aug,1994 K-40 MILK-4168,4169 Aug,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-4284,4285 A

A A

1.6 i 0.6 ; 0.7 1,300.0 1 140.0;225.5 1.8 i 0.6 ; 0.7 1,390.0 1 140.0;235.2 5.4 i 0.9 ; 1.2 5.2 i 0.9 ; 1.2 Aug,1994 H-3 WATER-4504, 4505 A 378.0 t 99.0; 111.6 428.0 i 100.0;115.7 Aug,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-4259,4260 A 2.9 t 0.5 ; 0.7 2.5 i 0.5 ; 0.6 Aug,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-4308, 4309 A 2.110.5;0.6 2.1 i 0.5 ; 0.6 Aug,1994 H-3 WATER-4308, 4309 A 172.7 i 89.0;92.0 148.1 i 88.0;90.2 Aug,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-4333,4334 A 5.1 i 2.1 ; 2.3 4.112.0;2.1 Aug,1994 H-3 WATER-4333, 4334 A 161.3 i 87.4;90.1 98.0 1 84.9;85.9 Aug,1994 K-40 VEGETATION-440 A 2.7 t 0.1 ; 0.3 3.011.0;1.0 Aug,1994 K-40 MILK-4459,4460 A 1,528.0 1 170.0;268.5 1,481.0 1 151.0;251.7 Aug,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-4475, 4476 A 2.8 i 0.3; 0.5 2.910.3;0.5 Aug,1994 H-3 WATER-4475, 4476 A 51.1 i 80.3;80.6 56.3 1 80.5;80.9  !

Sep,1994 Co-60 MILK-4423,4424 A -1.015.0;5.0 -0.9 4.1 ; 4.1 Sep,1994 Cs-137 MILK-4423,4424 A 0.714.1;4.1 -0.612.8;2.8 Sep,1994 I131 MILK-4423,4424 A 0.2 i 0.2 ; 0.2 0.2 i 0.2 ; 0.2 Sep,1994 H-3 WATER-4446, 4447 A 186.2 i 89.0;92.5 223.4 i 90.4;95.4 Sep,1994 Co-60 MILK-4525,4526 A 2.8 i 3.5 ; 3.5 1.2 i 2.9 ; 2.9 Sep,1994 Cs-137 MILK-4525,4526 A 0.4 i 3.2; 3.2 1.3 i 2.4 ; 2.4 I Sep,1994 Sep,1994 I-131 K-40 MILK-4525, 4526 Sep,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-4571,4572 WATER-4571, 4572 A

A A

0.210.3;0.3 0.110.2;0.2 7.2 i 1.0 ; 1.2

-0.110.3;0.3 0.110.2;0.2 7.211.0;1.2 Sep,1994 it-3 WATER-3636, 3637 A 445.2 1 99.0;116.1 529.7 i 102.0;124.9 Sep,1994 I-131 MILK-4550,4551 A 0.010.2;0.2 0.310.3;0.3 Sep,1994 K-40 MILK 4550,4551 A 1,410.9 i 109.0;220.7 1,398.1 i 155.0;245.3 Sep,1994 Ra-226 SLUDGE-4613, j A 1.410.0;0.1 1.4 i 0.1 ; 0.1 109

I I

=

l l

l Table A-4. In house " duplicate" prograrn.

Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes

  • Rejected Result Result Sep,1994 H-3 WATER-4810,4811 A 36,966.3 i 557.2;5,058.2 37,783.0 i 563.1;5,169.2 Sep,1994 H-3 WATER-4688, 4689 A 62.8 i 82.1;82.6 -9.4 i 79.0; 79.0 Sep,1994 I-131 MILK-4886,4887 A 0.0 i 0.3 ; 0.3 -0.1 f 0.2 ; 0.2 Sep,1994 K-40 MILK-4886,4887 A 1,397.9 1 152.0;243.4 1,319.0 i 171.0;247.8 Sep,1994 Gr. Alpha WATER-4744,4745 A 7.1 i 2.3 ; 2.5 7.6 i 2.2 ; 2.4 Sep,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-4744, 4745 A 16.4 i 1.7;3.0 16.011.7;3.0 Sep,1994 K-40 SEDIMENTS 4570, A 7.810.6;1.0 7.710.6;0.9 Sep,1994 K-40 MILK-4934,4935 A 1,519.5 i 170.0;267.6 1,421.3 i 190.0;271.0 Sep,1994 Gr. Beta SEDIMENT-5000, A 8.6 i 2.0 ; 2.2 8.612.0;2.2 Sep,1994 1131 MILK-5022,5023 A 0.2 i 0.2 ; 0.2 0.3 i 0.3 ; 0.3 Sep,1994 Sr-89 VEGETATION-525 A 0.0 i 0.0 ; 0.0 0.0 i 0.0 ; 0.0 Sep,1994 Sr-90 VEGETATION-525 A 0.0 i 0.0 ; 0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1994 Co-60 WATER-5952,5953 A 1.7 i 2.5 ; 2.5 1.212.4;2.4 Sep,1994 Cs-137 WATER-5952,5953 A 1.8 2.4 ; 2.4 0.312.2;2.2 Sep,1994 St-89 AIR FILTER-5348, A 420.1 i 11.4;43.5 439.4 1 22.0;49.1 Sep,1994 Sr-89 F1LTER-5348,5349 A 420.1 i 11.4;43.5 439.4 i 22.0;49.

Sep,1994 Sr-90 AIR FILTER-5348, A 5.6 i 1.2 ; 1.3 E

7.112.0;2.1 E Sep,1994 Gr. A1pha FILTER-5728,5729 A -0.8 i 2.6 ; 2.6 1.9 i 2.6 ; 2.6 Sep,1994 Gr. Alpha FILTER-5728,5729 A -0.812.6;2.6 1.912.6;2.6 Sep,1994 Sr-89 FILTER-5728, 5729 A 2.0 t 6.3 ; 6.3 -3.0 i 3.6 ; 3.6 Sep,1994 Sr-90 FILTER-5728,5729 A 0.9 i 1.9 ; 1.9 1.711.3;1.3 Sep,1994 H-3 WA'IER 5373,5374 A 565.0 i 96.0;123.0 561.0 i 96.0;122.6 Oct,1994 I131 MILK-5274,5275 A 0.2 0.2 ; 0.2 0.210.3;0.3 Oct,1994 Be-7 SOIb5394, 5395 A 0.710.4;0.4 0.9 i 0.5 ; 0.5 Oct,1994 Cs-137 SOlb5394, 5395 A 0.2 i 0.1 ; 0.1 0.2 i 0.1 ; 0.1 Oct,1994 Cs-137 SOIL-5394, 5395 A 0.210.1;0.1 0.2 i 0.1 ; 0.1 Oct,1994 Gr. A1pha SOIb5394,5395 A 8.912.5;2.7 9.7 i 2.7; 2.9 Oct,1994 Gr. Beta SOIL-5394,5395 A 27.2 i 2.4;3.6 E

27.8 i 2.2;3.6 m

( Oct,1994 K-40 SOIb5394, 5395 A 22.9 i 1.2;2.6 22.4 i 1.4;2.6

! Oct,1994 Sr-89 SOIb5394,5395 A 0.0 i 0.0 ; 0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1994 St-90 SO!b5394,5395 A 0.1 i 0.0 ; 0.0 0.1 0.0 ; 0.0 Oct,1994 Gr. Beta WATT:R-5421,5422 A 2.610.5;0.7 3.5 i 0.5 ; 0.7 Oct,1994 K-40 WATER-5421, 5422 A 0.910.1;0.1 1.0 0.1;0.1 Oct,1994 Co-60 MILK-5527,5528 A -1.l i 3.3 ; 3.3 0.9 i 3.9 ; 3.9 Oct,1994 Cs-137 MILK-5527,5528 A 3.212.4;2.5 -0.5 i 3.5 ; 3.5 Oct,1994 I-131 NIILK-5527,5528 A 0.010.2;0.2 0.010.2;0.2 I

110 g

Table A-4. Ir. house " duplicate" program.

Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes

  • Rejected Result Result Oct,1994 K-40 VEGETATION-557 A 3.010.3;0.4  ?.8 i 0.4; 0.5 Oct,1994 Co-60 MILK-5552,5553 A 2.0 i 3.3 ; 3.3 1.314.1;4.1 Oct,1994 Cs-134 MILK-5552,5553 A -0.8 i 2.8 ; 2.8 0.2 i 3.0; 3.0 Oct,1994 Cs-137 MILK-5552,5553 A 1.0 2.6 ; 2.6 -0.513.6;3.6 Oct,1994 I-131 MILK-5552,5553 A 0.1 i 0.2 ; 0.2 -0.110.2;0.2 Oct,1994 I-131 MILK 5552,5553 A 0.110.2;0.2 -0.110.2;0.2 Oct,1994 K-40 MILK 5552,5553 A 1,468.l i l22.0; 234.0 1,322.0 1 146.0;231.6 Oct,1994 Sr-89 MILK-5552,5553 A 0.711.1;1.1 -0.110.9;0.9 Oct,1994 Sr-90 MILK-5552,5553 A 1.7i 0.4 ; 0.5 1.4 i 0.4 ; 0.4 Oct,1994 I-131 WATER-5595, 5596 A 0.1 i 0.2 ; 0.2 0.110.3;0.3 I Oct,1994 Co-60 Oct,1994 Cs-137 Oct,1994 Cs-137 FISH-5637, 5638 FISH-5637, 5638 SEDIMENT-5850, A

A A

-0.1 i 1.3 ; 1.3 0.3 i 1.3 ; 1.3 0.210.0;0.0

-0.8 i 1.9 ; 1.9 2.0 i 1.7 ; 1.7 0.210.0;0.1 Oct,1994 K 40 SEDIMENT-5850, A 13.S i 0.9 ; 1.6 12.2 i 0.9;1.5 Oct,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-5658,5659 A 7.4 i l .1 ; 1.6 8.011.0;1.6 Oct,1994 Co-60 WATER-5682,5683 A 0.2 i 3.4 ; 3.4 2.013.5;3.6 Oct,1994 Cs-137 WATER-5682,5683 A 0.2 i 3.1 ; 3.1 0.713.7;3.7 Oct,1994 H3 WATER-5682,5683 A 78.6 i 76.4; 77.2 -41.8 i 71.1; 71.4 Oct,1994 H-3 I

WATER-5707, 5708 A 12,727.1 1 1,756.4;2,465.9 12,799.1 i 1,766.1;2,479.8 Oct,1994 Co-60 SEDIMENTS-5829, A 0.411.5;1.5 -0.6 i 1.7; 1.7 Oct,1994 Cs-137 SEDIMENTS-5829, A 0.2i00;0.0 0.2 1 0.0; 0.1 I Oct,1994 Oct,1994 Oct,1994 Be-7 K-40 K-40 GRASS 4879,5880 GRASS 5879,5880 A

A 2.410.1;0.3 6.510.2;0.7 2.4 i 0.1 ; 0.3 6.6 0.2 ; 0.7 ,

VEGETATION-590 A 3.4 0.4 ; 0.5 3.110.3;0.4 I Oct,1994 St-89 VEGETATION 590 A 0.0i0.0:0.0 0.0 i 0.0 ; 0.0 Oct,1994 Sr 90 VEGETATION-590 l

A 0.010.0;0.0 0.0 i 0.0 ; 0.0 Oct,1994 H3 WATER-5928,5929 A 402.9 1 94.7;109.4 446.3 1 96.2;113.8 l Oct,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-6018, 6019 A 2.410.7;0.8 1.6 i 0.4 ; 0.5 Oct,1994 Co-60 SEDIMENTS-6301, A 1. I i 0.1 ; 0.1 1.1 i 0.1 ; 0.1 OcQ,1994 Cs-137 SEDIMEN'IS 6301, A 1.6i0.1;0.2 1.6 i 0.1 ; 0.2 Oct,1994 Gr. Beta SEDIMENT 54301, A 11.811.7;2.1 8.3 i l.8 ; 2.0 1 Oct,1994 Mn-54 SEDIMENTS 6301, A 0.7i 0.1 ; 0.1 0.8 i 0.1 ; 0.1 Oct,1994 l-131 WATER-6070,6071 A 0.1 i 0.2 ; 0.2 -0.2 i 0.2 ; 0.2 Oct,1994 H-3 WATER-6116,6117 A -7.5 i 76.8; 76.9 -21.5

  • 76.2;76.3 Oct,1994 Gr. Beta SEDIMENT-6256, A 5.511.7;1.8 7.411.4;1.6 Oct,1994 K-40 SEDIMENT-6256, A 9.3 i 0.3 ; 1.0 9.3 t 0.3 ; 1.0 111

q El

=

l Table A-4 in-house " duplicate" program.  !

Concentration in pCi/L' )

Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes' Rejected Result Result Oct,1994 Ra 226 eiDIMENT-6256, A 0.1 0.0 ; 0.0 0.1 0.0 ; 0.0 Oct,1994 Ra 228 SEDIMENT-6256, A 0.110.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct, t '94 1131 MILK-6091,6092 A 0.2 i 0.2 ; 0.2 0.0 i 0.2; 0.2 Oct,1 fy4 H-3 WATER-6139,6140 A 23,478.0 1 782.0;3,287.4 23,509.0 i 782.0;3,291.5 Oct,1994 Co-60 FISH-6162, 6163 A 0.0 0.0 ; 0.0 0.0 i 0.0 ; 0.0 g

Oct,1994 Co-60 FISH-6162, 6163 A 0.1 i 0.0 ; 0.0 0.1 i 0.0; 0.0 m Oct,1994 Co-60 WATER 4635,6636 A 1.8 i 2.4 ; 2.4 -0.2 i 1.7; 1.7 Oct,1994 Cs-137 WATER 4635,6636 A 1.1 3.4 ; 3.4 0.712.3;2.3 Oct,1994 Be-7 GRASS-6235, 6236 A 1.9 i 0.1 ; 0.2 1.9 i 0.1 ; 0.2 Oct,1994 K-40 GRASS-6235,6236 A 7.010.3;0.8 6.810.2;0.7 Oct,1974 Gr. Deta WATER-6277,6278 A 2.4 i 0.6 ; 0.7 2.4 i 0.6 ; 0.7 Oct,1994 H-3 WATER 4277,6278 A -4.1 i 79.6; 79.6 66.3 i 89.9;90.3 Oct,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-6489,6490 A 2.0 f 0.5 ; 0.6 2.0i 0.5 ; 0.6 Oct,1994 H3 WATER-6480,6490 A 742.2 i 106.5;146.7 763.2 1 107.2;149.2 Oct,1994 H-3 WATER-6214,6215 A 4,466.0 i 189.0;636.1 4,595.0 1 191.0;653.5 Oct,1994 H-3 WATER-6327,6328 A 131.6 i 82.8;84.7 147.3 i 83.5;85.9 Oct,1994 AC-228 SOIL 6447,6448 A 0.7 i 0.1 ; 0.1 0.7 i 0.0 ; 0.1 Oct,1994 BI-212 SOIL-6447,6448 A 0.7 i 0.2 ; 0.2 0.710.1;0.1 Oct,1994 BI-214 SOIL-M47, M48 A 0.5 i 0.0 ; 0.1 0.5 i 0.0 ; 0.1 Oct,1994 Gr. AIpha SOIL 4447,6448 A 6.5 i 2.7 ; 2.7 6.6 i 2.5 ; 2.6 Oct,1994 Gr. Deta SOIL 4447,6448 A 21.5 i 2.4;3.2 20.6 i 2.4;3.2 Oct,1994 K-40 SOIL-6447, 6448 A 18.110.4;1.8 18.7 t 0.3 ; 1.9 Oct,1994 PB-212 SOIL-6447, 6448 A 0.7 i 0.0 ; 0.1 0.7 i 0.0 ; 0.1 Oct,1994 PU-214 SOIL-6447,6448 A 0.6 i 0.0 ; 0.1 0.610.0;0.1 Oct,1994 RA-226 SOlL-6447, 6448 A 1.2 0.2 ; 0.2 1.0 i 0.2 ; 0.2 Oct,1994 TL-208 SOIL-6447,6448 A 0.2 i 0.0 ; 0.0 0.2 i 0.0 ; 0.0 Oct,1994 Co-60 FISH-6372, 6373 A 0.0 i 0.0 ; 0.0 0.0 i 0.0 ; 0.0 Oct,1994 Cs-137 FISH-6372, 6373 A 0.0 i 0.0 ; 0.0 0.0 i 0.0 ; 0.0 Oct,1994 Gr. Deta WATER-6468,6469 A 1.8 i 0.5 ; 0.5 1.8 i 0.5 ; 0.6 Oct,1994 H-3 WATER-6468, 6469 A 137.6 i 84.6;86 6 90.4 i 82.6;83.5 Nov,1994 Gr. Deta WATER-6401,6402 A 1.810.5;0.5 1.7 i 0.6 ; 0.7 Nov,1994 Gr. Deta SEDIMENTS 4422, A 6. l i 0.6 ; 0.9 6.410.6;0.9 Nov,1994 K-40 SEDIMENTS 4422, A 8.2 i o.5 ; 1.0 7.210.6;0.9 l Nov,1994 Sr-89 SEDIMENTS 4422, A 0.010.0;0.0 0.0 i 0.0 ; 0.0 Nov,1994 Sr-90 SEDIMENTS-6422, A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0

)

Nov,1994 H-3 WATER-6534,6535 A 67.9 i 82.6;83.1 36.3 i 81.2;81.4 '

Il 112

""" 1

1 I

Table A-4 In-house " duplicate" prograrn.

Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Callected Analysis Codes

  • Rejected Result Result Nov,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-6614, 6615 A 5.0i2.0;21 3.9 1.8 ; 1.9 Nov,1994 H-3 WATER-6614, 6615 A 30.7 i 81.5,81.6 -4.1180.0;80.0 Nov,1994 H-3 WATER-6746, 6747 A 2,734.0 i l76.0;411.4 2,851.0 178.0;426.6 Nov,1994 H-3 WATER-6767, 6768 A 107.0 i 83.0; 84.3 95.0 t 82.0; 83.0 Nov,1994 Co-60 WATER-6788, 6789 A -1.9 i 2.2 ; 2.2 -0.2 i 3.2 ; 3.2 Nov,1994 Cs-137 WATER-6788, 6789 A 1.6 i 3.7 ; 3.7 -1.813.0;3.1 Nov,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-6788, 6789 A 5.2 i 1.3 ; 1.5 3.0 i 0.9 ; 1.0 Nov,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-6985, 6986 A 2.0i0.5;0.6 2.010.5;0.6 Nov,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-7059, 7060 A 8.6 t l.3 ; 1.9 7.7 i l .7; 2.1 Nov,1994 H3 WATER-7059, 7060 A 0.0 i 100.1;100.1 0.0 i 100.1;100.1 Nov,1994 Co-60 WATER-7615, 7616 A 1.3 i 2.7 ; 2.7 1.413.1;3.1 Nov,1994 Cs-137 WATER-7615, 7616 A -1.6 i 3.8 ; 3.8 1.113.0;3.0 Nov,1994 I-131 MILK-7144, 7145 A 0.2 i 0.3 ; 0.3 0.3 i 0.3 ; 0.3 Nov,1994 K 40 MILK-7144, 7145 A 1,226.8 i 161.0;231.9 1,298.2 i 152.0;233.0 Nov,1994 Sr-89 MILK-7144,7145 A 0.5 i 0.7 ; 0.7 0.510.8;0.8 Nov,1994 Sr-90 MILK-7144, 7145 A 0.8 i 0.4 ; 0.4 1.1 0.5 ; 0.5 Nov,1994 Cs-137 SOIL-7193, 7194 A 0.110.0;0.0 0.1 i 0.0 ; 0.0 Nov,1994 Gr. Alpha SOIL-7193, 7194 A 11.7 i 4.0; 4.2 8.213.4;3.5 Nov,1994 Gr. Deta 501L-7193, 7194 A 22.0 i 2.8; 3.6 18.0 i 2.6;3.2 Nov,1994 K-40 SOIL-7193, 7194 A 15.9 i 0.8;1.8 17.110.8;1.9 Nov,1994 Co-60 WATER-7594, 7595 A 2.4 i 3.0 ; 3.0 -2.7 i 3.2 ; 3.2 Nov,1994 Cs-137 WATER-7594, 7595 A 1.5 i 2.6 ; 2.6 1.6 2.9 ; 2.9 Nov,1994 Be-7 GRASS-7246, 7247 A 5.310.2;0.6 5.3i0.2;0.6 Nov,1994 K-40 GRASS-7246, 7247 A 5.8 i 0.3 ; 0.6 6.010.4;0.7 Nov,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-7367, 7368 A 6.010.6;1.1 4.9 i 0.5 ; 0.9 Nov,1994 H-3 WATER-7367, 7368 A -67.8 i 80.9;81.5 -98.7 i 79.5;80.7 Dec,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-7288, 7289 A 2.2 i 0.7; 0.8 2.6 i 0.7; 0.8 Dec,1994 Co-60 WATER-7330, 7331 A -0.3 t 2.8 ; 2.8 -1.0 t 2.7 ; 2.7 Dec,1994 Cs-137 WATER-7330, 7331 A 1.4 i 2.8 ; 2.8 1.2 i 2.4 ; 2.4 I Dec,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-7330, 7331 Dec,1994 I-131(G) MILK-7391,7392 A

A 2.S i 0.8 ; 0.8 1.6 i 2.8 ; 2.8 2.4 i 0.8 ; 0.9

-3.0 i 4.6 ; 4.6 Dec,1994 H-3 WATER-7536, 7537 A 142.3 i 83.5;85.7 61.0 i 79.8;80.3 Dec,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-7639, 7640 A 5.5 i 0.8 ; 1.2 -

4.8 i 0.8 ; 1.1 Dec,1994 H-3 WATER-7639, 7640 A 60.9 i 82.6;83.1 23.6 i 81.0;81.0 Dec,1994 H-3 WATER-7691, 7692 A 117.1 i 84.5;86.0 89.9 i 83.3;84.2 Dec,1994 Co-60 WATER-7838, 7839 A 3.8 i 2.8 ; 2.9 -0.312.2;2.2 113

l l

Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program.

Concentration in pCi/ L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second i Collected Analysis Codes

  • Rejected Result Result Dec,1994 Cs-137 WATER-7838, 7839 A 1.2 i 2.9 ; 2.9 -0.2 2.7 ; 2.7 Dec,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-7838, 7839 A 2.710.8;0.9 3.9 t l.0; 1.1 Dec,1994 Gr. Nta WATER 7940,7941 A 2.0 t 0.4 ; 0.5 2.4 i 0.5 ; 0.6 Dec,1994 H3 WATER-7940,7941 A 212.5 1 85.8;90.5 208.8 87.6;92.1 Dec,1994 K-40 MILK-7889,7890 A 1,468.1 i 191.0;276.3 1,373.2 i 160.0;245.9 Dec,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-7961, 7962 A 2.0 1.1 ; 1.1 2.611.1;1.1 Dec,1994 H-3 WATER-7961, 7962 A 49.8 i 82.7;83.0 -10.0 i 80.0;80.0 Dec,1994 Gr. Alpha WATER-8107,8108 A 0.3 i 0.8 ; 0.8 0.610.8;0.8 Dec,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-8107,8108 A 1.210.7;0.7 1.5 i 0.7 ; 0.7 Dec,1994 Gr. Beta WATER-8086, 8087 A 3.3 i 0.6 ; 0.8 2.5 i 0.6 ; 0.7 Dec,1994 H-3 WATER-8009, 8010 A 71.4 i 82.3;82.9 11.8 i 79.6; 79.6 All concentrations are reported in pCi/L, except solid samples, which are reported in pCi/g wet. Results are reported as Activity Counting Error; Total Propagated Uncertainty (TPU).

6 Lab codes are comprised of the sample media and the sample numbers. Client codes have been eliminated to protect client anonymity.

Acceptance is based on the difference of the two results divided by the pooled standard deviation being less than two, where, the pooled standard deviation is the square root of the sum of the squares of the TPU's.

I I

114 4