ML20042E832
| ML20042E832 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1989 |
| From: | Diederich G COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Bradley Davis NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9005030190 | |
| Download: ML20042E832 (272) | |
Text
. - - . . -
LaS-Ile County Nucliar Station Fiural Route #1, Box 220 O Commonwealth E son Marseilles, Illinois 61341 Telephone 815/357 6761 April 23, 1990 Mr. Bert Davis Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
Dear Mr. Davis:
Enclosed is Part 1 of the 1989 LaSalle Station Operating Report, Docket- {
Number 50-373 and 50-!e74. This report contains the results of the l Radiological Environmontal and Meteorological Monitoring Programs. Part 1,-
facility operating experience was submitted under' separate cover in February, nnd Part 2, radioactive effluents in February and August. . i.
Two copies of the report are provided fur your use. Two copies will be forwarded to the Document Control Desk and oi.e copy .to the Resident Inspector. I Sincerely you Wh&V G.'J. Diederich kStationManager'-
LaSalle County Station GJD/msh . - .
~- --
Enclosure _ _ ___ -!
i
- f i
i 9005030190 891231 PDR ADOCK 05000373 R PDC l
ZCADBULL/343
^\\ a 1
1 +
i LASALLE COUNTY NUCLE AR POWER- STATION ,
i E
ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL R ADIOLOGICAL OPER ATING REPORT ANNUAL REPORT 1989 .
E MARCH 1990
TABLE OF CONTENTS
,(
Page INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 1 SUMM AR Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.0 EFFLUENTS 1.1 Gaseous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . -
3 1.2 Liquid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 3 2.0 SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 3 3.0 DOSE TO MAN
=i 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pathways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 3 1 3.2 Liquid Ef fluent Pathways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.3 Direct Radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-. .. 5- l 4.0 SITE METEOROLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 6L j 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 6 ;
i 5.1 Gamma Radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5.2 Airborne I-131 and Particulate Radioactivity . . . . . . .. . 6 5.3 Terrestrial Radioactivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 7 i 5.4 Aquatic Radioactivity . . . . . . . . . . . .- .- . .. . 7 5.5 Milk . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
5.6 Sample Collections
. .. . 7 i
...........,.... 8 5.7 Program Modification . . . .-. . . . . . . .-.:. . .. .. ...... .. 8 6.0 ANALYTI CAL PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 i t
1 7.0 MILCH ANIMAL CENSUS . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . .. . 8 j 8.0 NE AREST RESIDENCES CENSUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS ......... .. 8 10.0 REVISIONS TO THE ODCM RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING l PR OGR AM S I N C E 19 8 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 APPENDIX I - DATA TABLES AND FIGURES . . . . ........... .. 9 Station Releases Table 1.1-1 Gaseous Effluents ............... .. 10 Table 1.2-1 Liquid Effluents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 16 111
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
Page APPENDIX ! - DATA TABLES AND FIGLt.ES Station Releases (continued)-
Table 2.0-1 Solid Waste St.ipments ................-
25 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1-4 Isodose and Concentration Contours . . .:. . .:. . . .- 33 Table 3.1-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Airborne Releases . . . .. 37 Table 3.2.1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Liquid Discharges . . . ,. 39 Environmental Monitoring Figure 5.0-l'- Figure 5.0-4 Locations of Environmental Radiological Stations . . . - 41 i Table 5.0-1 Environmental Radiological Monitoring a Sampling Sites ................. -45 Table 5.0-2 Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program . . . .- _46 Table 5.0 Table 5.0-6 Environmental Summary Tables . - . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Table 5.1-1 Gamma Radiation Measurements (TLD) . . . . . . . . . . 58 -j APPENDIX 11 - METEOROLOGICAL DATA . . . . . . ._. . . . . ._.. . . . . . 61 ;
APPENDIX III - LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 l
APPENDIX IV - MILCH ANIMAL AND NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS . . . . . . . . 92 i APPENDIX V - INTERLABOR ATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS. . . . . . . . -. 96 !
APPENDIX VI - REVISIONS TO THE ODCM RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM SI N CE 19 8 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 i
h.
iv l
l f
INTRODUCTION -
j LaSalle Station, a two-unit BWR plant is located near Marseilles, Illinois, in Lasalle County, 3.5 miles south of the ' Illinois River. Each. reactor . is designed to have a capacity of 1078 MW net. Unit No.1 loaded fuel in March 1982. Unit No. 2 loaded fuel in late December _1983. The plant has - !
been designed to keep releases to the environment at-levels'below those specified in the regulations.
Liquid effluents from LaSalle County Station - are released to the ' Illinois River in controlled batches after radioassay of- each batch. Gaseous effluents are released to the atmosphere after delay to . permit decay of- short half-life gases. Releases to the atmosphere are calculated on the basis of analyses of routine grab samples of noble gases and continuously collected composite samples of iodine and particulate matter.- The results of effluent analyses are summarized on a monthly basis and reported to =the Nuclear Regulatory ;
Commission as required per Technical _ Specifications. Airborne concentrations:
- of noble gases, 1-131 and particulate radioactivity - in- off-site areas are calculated using effluent and meteorological data on. isotopic composition of effluents.
Environmental monitoring is conducted' by sampling at indicator and _ reference (background) locations in the vicinity ,of the LaSalle County Station to measure 1anges in radiation or radioactivity levels that may _ be attributable to plant operations. If significant changes attributable to LaSalle County Station are measured, these changes are correlated with effluent releases.
External gamma radiation exposure from noble gases and I-131 in milk are the i most critical pathways at- this site; however, an ' environmental monitoring l program is conducted which includes other pathways of -less importance, j i
i
~l s
f i
1
L
SUMMARY
Gaseous and liquid . effluents for the period remained at a fraction of the Technical Specification limits. ' Calculations of _ environmental concentrations based on' effluent, Illinois River flow, and meteorological data for the period indicate that consumption by the public of radionuclides attributable to the plant are well below- the regulatory limits. , Radiation exposure fran radio-nuclides released to the atmosphere represented the " critical pathway for the period with a maximum individual dose- estimated to be 1.49E-02 mram for the year, when a shleiding. and occupancy . factor of 0.7 is assumed. . The assessment of radiation doses are performed in accordance with the Offsite Dose Calcu-lation Manual (00CM).- The results of analysis confirm that the station is operating in compliance with 10CFR50 and 40CFR190.
a
~.
l 1
i i
i 2
i I
l 1.0 FFFLUENTS 1 1
1.1 Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosphere .)
i Measured concentrations and isotopic composition of noble gases, l
radiciodine, and particulate- radioactivity released to the atmos ; i phere during the year, are listed in-Table 1.1-1. A total of '
l 1.08E+03 curies of fission and activation gases was released with- an ,
average release rate of 9.31E+01 pCi/sec.
A total- of 5.60E-03 curies of I-131 was released during the year, I with an' average release rate of 8.17E pCi/sec for all iodines.
A total of 2.54E-03 curies of. beta-gamma emitters were released as airborne particulate matter, with an ' average release rate of 8.52E-03 uCi/sec. Alpha emitting radionuclides were not measurable.
A total of 5.99E-01 curies of tritium was released, with an average release rate of 8.13E-02 pC1/sec.
1.2 Liquids Released to the Illinois River A total of ' 1.51E+06 liters of radioactive liquid- waste (prior to dilution) containing 4.02-01 curies ' (excluding tritium, ~ gases, and alpha) were discharged af ter dilution with ~a total of 1.86E+09 liters of water. These wastes were released at a quarterly-average concentration of 2.68E-05 vC1/ml, discharged on an unidentified nuclide basis. A total of 5.74E-05 curies of alpha -radioactivity and 1.76 curies of tritium were released. Monthly release estimates and principal radionuclides _in liquid effluents are given in Table '
1,2-1.
s 2.0 SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE Solid radioactive- wastes were shipped to Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Beatty,_
Nevada;. Waltz Mill, Pennsylvania; Barnwell Nuclear Center, South Carolina by Hittman Nuclear and Development Company and U.S. Ecology. The record of waste shipments is summarized in Table 2.0-1..
l 3.0 DOSE TO MAN 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pathways Gamma Dose Rates Gamma air and whole body dose rates off-site were calculated based [
on measured release rates, ' isotopic composition of the noble gases, I and meterological data for the period (Table -3.1-1). Isodose contours of whole body dose 'are shown in Figure 3.1-1 for the year.
3
Based on measured - effluents. and meteorological -data, the maximum ,
dose to an individual would be 1.49E-02 mrem for -the year, with an occupancy or shielding factor of 0.7 included. The maximum gamma air dose was 2.57E-02 mrad.
Beta Air and Skin Rates The range of beta particles in air is relatively small (on'the order- y of ~a few meters or less); consequently, plumes of gaseous effluents '
may be considered " infinite" for - purpose of calculating the dose from beta radiation incident on the - skin. However, the actual _ dose.
to sensitive skin tissues is difficult to calculate because this-depends on the beta particle ~ energies, thickness of ? inert skin, and - p clothing covering sensitive' tissues. For purposes of this report '
the skin is taken to have a thickness of 7 mg/cm2 and an occupancy !
factor of 1.0 is used. The skin dose from beta and- gamma radiation. l for the year was 2.20E-02 mrem. The maximum- off-site beta air dose !
for the year was 2.86E-03 mrad. -l The air concentrations of radioactive noble gases at. the off-site ;
receptor locations are given in Figure 3.1-2.. j Radioactive Iodine The human thyroid exhibits a significant l capacity to concentrate !
ingested or inhaled iodine, and the radioiodine, I-131,- released during routine operation of the plant, may be made available- to man j thus resulting in a dose to the thyroid. The principal pathway of l interest for this radionuclide is ingestion of radioiodine in milk i by an infant.
1 Iodine-131 Concentrations in Air The calculated concentration contours for I-131 in air are shown in Figure 3.1-3.. Included in these calculations is an iodine cloud 1 depletion f actor which accounts for the phenomenon of elemental iodine deposition on the ground. The maximum off-site concentration is estimated to be 6.44E-04 pC1/m3 for the year.
Dose to Infant's Thyroid i l
The hypothetical thyroid dose to an infant living near-the plant via ingestion of milk was calculated. The radionuclide. considered was i 1-131 and the source of milk was taken to be the nearest dairy farm !
with the cows pastured from May to October. The maximum infcnt's ;
thyroid dose was 1.54E-02 mrem during the year (Table 3.1-1). ;
4 !
Concentrations of Particulates in Air Concentration contours of radioactive airborne particulates are :
shown in Figure - j.1-4. The maximum off-site level is estimated to be 3.18E-05 pC1/m . -
Summary of Doses Table 3.1-1 summarizes the doses resulting from releases of airborne ,
radioactivity via the different exposure pathways. -
3.2 Liquid Effluent Pathways The three principal pathways through the aquatic environment for-potential doses to man from liquid waste are ingestion of. potable water, eating aquatic foods, and exposure while walking on .the shoreline. Not all of these pathways are applicable at a given time or station but a reasonable: approximation of the dose can be made by adjusting the dose formula for season of the year or type and degree- of -use of the aquatic environment. NRC* developed equations were used to calculate the .do'ses to the whole body, lower GI tract, thyroid, bone and skin; specific parameters for use:in the .
equations are given in the Commonwealth Edison Off-site. Dose Calcu- !
lation Manual. .The maximum whole. body dose ~ for the year was 4.38E-05 mrem and no organ dose exceeded 2.75E-04 mrem.
3.3. Direct Radiation i In section 3/4.11 of the LaSalle Techritcal Specifications. -40CFR190 t
calculations of total dose due to the Uranium fuel ' Cycle are required only when calculated doses from liquid or gaseous- releases ;of radio-activity exceed certain levels. These levels are twice the following ' :
limits:
1
'he RETS limits on dose or dose' commitment to an ' individual due to radioactive materials in ' liquid effluents from each reactor unit (1.5 mrems to the whole- body 'or 5 mrem' to any ;
organ during any calendar quarter; 3 mrem -to the whole body or 10 mrem to any organ during any calendar year)..
l The PETS limits on air dose in noble gases releas'ed in gas-eous effluents to a member of the public from each . reactor ;
unit (5 mrad for gamma radiation or 10 mrads for beta radia- '
tion dJing any calendar quarter; 10 mrads for_ gamma radiation or 20 mrad for beta radiation during any calendar year).
1 The RETS limits on dose to any individual due to Iodine-131, lodine-133, tritium, and. radionuclides in partuculate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents re-(
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Rev.1).
L _
leased from each reactor unit (7.5 mrems to any organ during any calendar quarter; 15 mrems to any organ during any cal-endar year).
During the period Juuary to December,1989 LaSalle Station did not exceed these criteria.
4.0 SITE METEOROLOGY A summary of the site meteorological measurements taken during each quarter of the year is given in Appendix 11. The data are presented as cumulative joints frequency distributions of 375' and 33' levels. Data recovery for these measurements was about 98.8%.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Table 5.0-1 provides an outline of the radiological - environmental moni-toring program as required in the Technical Specifications. Tables 5.0-3 to 5.0-6 sumarize data for the year. Except for tables of special inter-est, tables listing all data are no longer included in the annual report.
All data tables are available for inspection at the . Station or in the Corporate offices.
Specific findings for various environmental media are discussed below.
5.1 Gamma Radiation External radiation dose from on-site sources and noble gases released to the atmosphere was measured at ten indicator and four reference (background) locations using CaSO 4 :Dy. thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). A comparison of the TLD results for reference stations with on-site and off-site indicator stations is included in Table 5.1-1. A total of 48 additional TLDs were installed on June 1,1980 such that each sector was covered at both five miles and the site boundary. Six (6) TLD locations _ were added to the monitoring program on July 1,1985.
Quarterly external radiation dose at fourteen air sampling locations averaged (17.614.1mR) and was similar to 'cels measured in 1986 (17.1mR) ,1987 (17.8nR) , and 1988 (16.51 o The differences are not statistically significant.
! 5.2 Airborne I-131 and Particulate Radioactivity Concentrations of airborne I-131 and particulate radioactivity at monitoring locations are sumarized in Tables 5.0- 3 through 5.0-6.
Locations of the samplers are shown in Figure 5.0-1. Airborne.
1-131 remained below the LLD of 0.10 pC1/m3 throughout the year.
1 6
L
Gross beta concentrations ranged from 0.006 to 0.069 pC1/m3 and ayera 0.028 pCi/m3 and was similar to that in 1985 (0.025 pCi/
m3),ged1986 (0.027, except for the period from May 16 through June 6 when it was influenced by the nuclear reattor accident at Chernobyl),
1987 (0.027 pC1/m3), ;nd 1988 (0.031 pC1/m3).
No radioactivity attributable to plant operation was detected in any sample.
5.3 Terrestrial Radioactivity Well water was collected quarterly from one on-site well and five off-site wells and analyzed for tritium and gamma-emitting isotopes.
All results were below the limits of detection, indicating that there was no measurable amount of radioactivity due to the Station releases.
5.4 Aquatic Radioactivity Weekly surface water samples from the Illinois River at Seneca and LSCS Cooling Lake were composited monthly and analyzed for gamma-emitting isotopes. Weekly samples from the same locations were com-m
.osited quarterly and analyzed for tritium. None of the composited samples indicated the presence of gamma-emitting isotopes above their respective LLD levels. Tritium was detected in five samples and ranged from 204 to 256 pCi/1. Similar results were obtained in 1988.
Sediment samples were collected twice a year, from one indicator location (downstream at Cooling Lake) and analyred for gamma-emitters.
Gamma-emitters were below the detection limits in the sample collected ,
in May. Sample collected in October had trace amounts of Cs-137 (0.3 pC1/g), Co-60 (0.9 pCi/g), and tin-54 (0,3 pC1/g). Similar re-sults were obtained in 1988.
Levels of gamma radioactivity in fish were measured and found in all.
samples to be below the lower limits of detection for the program.
5.5 Milk Hilk samples were collected monthly from November through April and weekly from May through October and analyzed for iodine-131 and gamma-emitting isotopes.
1-131 remained below the detection limit of 0.5 pCi/1.
Cs-134 and Cs-137 were below the LLD level of 5 pCi/1. All other gamma-emitting isotopes, except naturally-occurring K-40, were below j
l their respective LLDs. There was no indication of the effect on the environment due to station operation. q i
7
1 i
i 5.6 Sample Collections
,i All samples were collected as scheduled except those listed in the !
Listing of Missed Samples, Appendix 111. !
7 5.7 Program Modifications Granby Dairy (L-15) w'is replaced by R. Bettenhousen Fam (L-19), [
Norsen Dairy (L-17) was replaced by E. Hayer-A. Patterson Dairy. ,
6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ,
A sumary of the procedures used for analyzing radioactivity in environ-mental samples is given in Appendix V of the report for the period January - December 1988. Procedures used during the period covered by this report remained essentially unchanged. i 7.0 MILCH ANIMAL CENSUS A census of milch animals was conducted within five miles of the station.
- The survey was conducted by a " door-to-door" canvas and by infomation ;
from Illinois Agricultural Agents. The census was conducted by A. Lewis i on August 19 and 26, 1989. ,
There are no dairy farms within a five mile radius of the LaSalle County Power Station. A list of dairies that were sampled follows.
l 8.0 NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS A census of the nearest residences within a five (5) mile radius was conducted by A. Lewis on August 26, 1989.
Results of milch animals and nearest residence census -are presented in Appendix IV.
9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results are presented in Appendix V.
10.0 REVISIONS TO THE ODCM RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SINCE 1985 l
/
Revisions to the Radiological Environmental . Monitoring Program for the years 1985, 1986 and 1987 are presented in Appendix VI. <
8 ;
s r. t ,
4'
, .i_- < s n 3, . ,
. w * , -
. s b4 8 s.
ma w'
?1 4 4
}
.h.... g x :
s m, s
s , , ,
~
e s
r k' ,
1 d-
, Y ,-
$, , \'-.
d .
(
- '1
- : . ,44; 5
i 1 a .
, ),Ti-5 s l O,'1 ,1 '
. - g 1, y '
3 ,
s r
l
\ 6 i,
'}
4 A -
b ' _
_\,,
t l l /
I m > v y j F
k '
g
- I=
..+ , - ' *+ -.
4
' 4 ,
3 - ._
2 y .l h
' V a
p f'
, .%.s4 Y
' --h'. '
i .
1.
, ( g
& L~' )~ - i Y
- . _ i . . -
f I
,9 f '-A c,
- (f . ' 7 h -.
t <
w 3
_ + , , ,
t <
. . ,(, -. p
{APPEIIDIX!!
1 s,
2 DATA TABLESjAND FIGURES.
i
! 4* ,
~ 'a 4 g '_i!
. r:
.,',4, g 2
+
4 ,,
,'-' $ ',! 4 1
' I
% . .- is k *
-3
' . - . t ,
Ar . f
- 5. ,
_ ,; I' ;- -
5 4
+-
a y
> ;i .
i 5
w k
k ..
- f.
4 p-
+
k ( )
P, .J
. -s 4
\% y
"-,sr'. -
Gr. i g -
_"eg- ;.
.gsh0-5 -b
..I T
t-i
'! s ','
e
'f'
?L :
3-y
) t 5
.;-a_ '
r
':, f' 6
- k b 3
5 h y..,'
i
, n. -
n ir 3 3 '
hY>.
'_3 f. i ~~ g ~, ,
j ' , .
>_; 5x i
. ., s :
A. ?
y -
g 5;+l5 .' f a
, 3 . A -.,,. # f [ gk :
,;, 'g <w ; -
1.,, < s - ,- ,. >
- < f,W~ ;- _ ..
. . - .c ;o..
..:* 1s e
~?, *
.a 4 :w-n ri 1
- i i f, k, , m
, ;'J{ L :
mm.rta
TABLE 1.1-1 LAB &LLB 00WBTV guCLEAR POWBB STAT 10B URITs OBB ARD TWO 90 CERT NURSERB 30 373 AD 90 W 4 g m ,UERT AND WA878 DISPOSAL SENIABBUAL REPORT (1M9)
SASBOUS EFFLURNTS SUHATIM GP ALL RELEARER First Second Guarter Guarter A.P&estonandAetivenenSaoes
- 1. Total release C1 9.2SE-07 8.03E-04
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 2.75E+02 2.34E+01 S. 19 dines
- 1. Total iodine-131 Ci 8.01E-05 8.95E-04
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 9.56E-04 5.36E-04 C. Particulates
- 1. Particulates with T1/2 38 days Ci 9.76E-04 2.98E-04
- 2. Average release rate for period uC1/sec 1.06E-02 2.31E-02
- 2. Gross alpha radioactivity Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 D. Tritius
- 1. Total release Ci S.95E-01 4.02E-03
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 3.27E-01 2.21E-03
- <' indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uci/ml i
4 10 .
i
1
)
4 TABLE 1.1 1 (continued) ,
I l i J
1 LASALLE COUNTT NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS ONE AND TWO-DOCKET NUMBERS S0-373 AND S0-374 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SENIANNUAL REPORT (1989)
GASEQUS EFFLUENTS-SUNNATION OF ALL RELEASES f Third Fourth I Guarter Guarter r i
A. Fission and Activation Games
- 1. Total release Ci 1.04E+03 4.29E-03 ;
- 2. Average release rate for period 2.73E-01 uC1/sec 7.3SE+01 1 B. Iodines l
- 1. Total iodine-131 C1 2.SSE-03 2.15E-03
- 2. Average release rate for period uCt/sec 6.47E-04 1.13E-03 C. Particulates
- 1. Particulates with T1/2 >4 days Ci 6.SSE-04 6.26E-04
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 1.80E-04 2.08E-04 ;
l
- 3. Gross alpha radioactivity Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 l
l D. Tritium
- 1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- 2. Average release rate for period uC1/sec <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06
'<* indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uci/s1 '
i b
11
i TABLE 1.1-1 (continued) i WPLUNT AB VASTE D!WWAL REPWT (1999)
S&SmW EPPLUBETS ELET&TED RELIAN Nuclideo Released Jan. Feb. March First. !
Quarter ,
- 1. Pission Sasse Ar-41 C1 1.43E-07 5.19E-07 9.02E-04 7.52E-07 Kr-85s Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E 06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Kr-87 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 ,
Kr-64 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xe-133 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E 06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xe-133e Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 ;
Xe-135 C1 1.65E-04 1.11E-07 4.51E-08 1.73E-07 Xe-134 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Total for period C1 1.60E-07 6.30E-07 1.35E-07 9.25E-07
- 2. Iodines I-131 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 8.01E-05 8.01E-05 I-132 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 7.87E-04 7.87E-04 I-133 C1 <1.00E-11 3.04E-05 9.18E-04 9.48E-04 I-134 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 3.15E-03 3.15E-03 1-135 Ci <1.00E-11 <1;00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 Total for period Ci <1.00E-11 3.04E-05 4.94E-03 4.97E-03
- 3. Par" w1stes ;
f -Mn-54 C1 7.56E-08. 1.14E-05 1.12E-05 2.26E-05 Co-58 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 !
Fe-59 Ci <1.00E-04 8.98E-06 -(1.00E-04 8.98E-06
- Co-60 Ci 5.24E-05 5.78E-04 3.07E-04 9.38E-04 Zn-65 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Sr-89 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 '
Sr-90 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 Mb-95 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 ,
Mo-99 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Co-134 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Cs-136 Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 6.58E-06 6.58E-06 Cs-137 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Ce-141 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E Ce-144 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 t
Total for period Ci 5.25E-05 5.98E-04 3.25E-04 9.76E-04 j i
'<* indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uci/mi i
12' 1
.. _ -- - _ ~ - . - - - - - - . - . . _- - _ . . _
l TABLE 1.1-1 (continued) ]
a l
i l I WPhWMT ABB VeffB DISPOS &L BBPett 4909) j sassous arri. users-st.starse asuuss )
i Nuclides Released April May June Second ,
Guarter i
{ 1. Fiesten stees ;
Ar-41 Ci- 3.19E-04 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 3.19E-08 -
Kr-85 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Kr-85s Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 l Kr-87 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 i Kr-84 -
C1 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 ,
Xe-133 Ci <1.00E 06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xe-133s C1 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 ;
Xe-135 Ci 4.84E-08 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 4.84E-04 Xe-138 C1 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 .
Total for period Ci 8.03E-08 <1.00E 06 <1.00E 8.03E-04
- 3. Indines 1-131 C1 1.14E-04 2.19E-04 5.62E-04 8.95E-04 i
1-132 C1 1.40E-03 <1.00E-11 <1.00E 1.40E-03 1-133 Ci 7.38E-04 1.23E-03 2.10E-03 4.07E-03 ,
1-134 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 ,
j I-135 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 1.90E 03 1.90E-03 Total for period C1 2.25E-03, 1.45E-03 4.56E-03 8.27E 03 ,
- 3. Particulates ,
Mn-54 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 4.45E 4.45E-05
- Co-58 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E 04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 i 8 Fe-59 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Co-60 Ci 5.48E 05 6.09E-05 1.29E-04 2.45E-04 Zn-65 Ci <1.00E 04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 i Sr-89 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E 11 >
Sr-90 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 2r-95 Ci 9.01E-06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.01E-06 Mo-99 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Cs-134 Ci (1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Cs-137 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 -<1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Ce-141 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.OOE 04 (1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Ce-144 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Total for period Ci 6.38E-05 6.09E-05 1.73E 2.98E-04
'<' indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/s1 13
I i
TABLE 1.1-1 (continued) ;
r l
l i
l EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1989) ,
GASEOUS EFFLUENTS-ELEVATED RELEASE 1
t Nuclides Released July Aug. Sept. Third .
- Guarter l
^
- 1. Fission Genes i Ar-41 C1 1.33E-07 4.51E-09 3.74E-08 1.75E-07 l' Mr-85s Ci <1.00E-06 6.89E+01 8.29E+01 1.52E+02 Kr-87 Ci <1.00E-06 4.79E+01 3.51E*01 8.30E+01-Mr-SS Ci <1.00E-06 1.85E+02 1.46E+02 3.31E+02 i l '
Xe-133 Ci <1.00E-06 2.21E+02 1.95E+02 4.16E+02 3
Xe-133s Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 2.16E-06 2.16E-06 '
Xe-135 Ci <1.00E-06 8.47E*01 9.19E+00 9.39E*01 ,
Xe-138 Ci <1.002-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Total for period C1 1.32E-07 6.08E+02 4.68E+02 1.08E+03
- 2. Iodines I-131 C1 1.74E-04 2.55E-04 2.12E-03 2.55E-03 1-132 C1 1.16E-03 3.64E-03 <1.00E-11 4.40E-03 I-133 C1 1.89E-03 2.24E-03 4.53E-04 4.59E-03 1-134 Ci <1.00E-11 7.41E-03 <1.00E-11 7.41E-03 6
?
I-135 C1 1.00E-03 1.75E-03 <1.00E-11 2.75E-03 Total for period C1 4.22E-03 1.53E-02 2.57E-03 2.21E-02
- 3. Particulates Mn-54 Ci <1.00E-04 3.81E-05 4.92E-05 8.73E-05 r Co-58 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 l Fe-59 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 -
Co-60 C1 1.04E-04 2.21E-04 2.43E-04 5.64E-04 Zn-65 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Sr-89 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 Sr-90 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 Nb-95 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Mo-99 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Cs-134 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Cs-137 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Ce-141 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E Ce-144 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 .<1.00E-04 Total for period C1 1.04E-04 2.59E-04 2.92E-04 6.55E-04
'<' indicates activity of sample fa less than LLD given-in uct/mi o
14
q i
i l TABLE 1.1-1 (continued) l c
l EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPCSAL REPORT (1989)
! GASEOUS ErrLUENTS-ELEYATED' RELEASE i
i Nuclides Released Oct. Nov. Dec. Fourth :
Guarter ;
- 1. Fission Gamee {
Ar-41 Ci 2.35E-03 <1.00E-06 6.93E-10 2.35E-03
, Kr-85e Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06_ <1.00E-06 [
- Kr-47 Ci <1. 'J0E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Kr-88 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xe-133 C1 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xe-133a Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xe-135 C1 1.94E-03 <1.00E-06 4.2SE-10 1.94E-03 i Xe-138 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 {
Total for period C1 4.29E-03 <1.00E-06 1.52E-09 4.29E-03 -
l I-132 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 ;
l I-133 C1 4.27E-04 1.58E-03 7.49E 2.75E-03 1-134 Ci 5.91E-03 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 5.91E-03 +
I-135 Ci 2.33E-04 1.41E-03 <1.00E-11 1.64E-03 Total for period C1 8.29E-03 3.22E-03 9.48E-04 1.2SE-02
- 3. Particulates &
Cr-51 C1 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.33E-04 1.33E-04 7 Mn-54 C1 3.46E-05 1.41E-05 <1.00E-04 4.47E-05 Co-58 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Fe-59 C1 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Co-60 C1 2.22E-04 1.80E-04 4.24E-05 4.44E-04 Zn-65 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 -<1.00E-04 '
Sr-89 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 '
Sr-90 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 Nb-95 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Mo-99 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Co-134 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Co-137 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E Co-141 C1 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 .
Co-144 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Total for period C1 2.57E-04 1.94E-04 1.75E-04 6.26E-04
'<* indicates activity of easple is less than LLD given in uci/e1 15 4
TABLE 1,2-1 s rbusst AED vasts ptsPos&L sestassWAL esp 0sf 4909)
LIQUID EPFbuBBTS 8UBB&TICE W ALL RELEASBS First Second Quarter Guarter A. Fiestoa sad Aettvetten Produete
- 1. Total release (not including C1 2.78E-01 0.00E+00 tritius, gases, alpha)
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/a1 5.02E-05 N/A
- 3. Maximus concentration released uCi/a1 5.00E-04 N/A
- 8. fritius
- 1. Total release C1 3.07E 01 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/mi 5.00E-04 N/A C. Dissolved Noble Beses
- 1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/mi <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 D. Orose Alpha Radioactivity
- 1. Total release Ci 5.47E 05 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released uC1/ml 7.89E-10 N/A i
. s. Velves ei Weste Reletted liters 6.13E+05 0.00E+00 F. Volume of Dilution Water liters 6.90E+08 0.00E+00
'<' indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/mi 16
TABLE 1.2 1 (continued)
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SENIANNUAL RL:-ORT (1989)
UNIT ONE LIGUID EFFLUENTS-SUNNATION OF ALL RELEASES Third Fourth Guarter Guarter A, Fission and Activation Products
- 1. Total release (not including C1 0.00E+00 3.07E-02 (
tritius, pases, alpha) 0
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/a1 N/A 4.15E-06
- 3. Maximum concentration released uCi/a1 N/A 9.10E-05 {
B. Tritive
- 1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 3.46E-01
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/mi N/A 8.60E-04 C. Dissolved Noble Bases
- 1. Total release ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/mi N/A <1.00E-05 D. Groes Alpha Radioactivity 1
- 1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 1.14E-06
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/mi N/A 6.00E-09 E. Volume of Weste Released liters 0.00E+00 4.47E*05 F. Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E+00 6.05E+08
'<* indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/e1 17
i l TABLE 1.2-1 (continued)
I i
i l
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEN! ANNUAL REPORT (1989) 1 UNIT TWO l 1
LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUNNATION OF ALL RELEASES Third Fourth Guarter Guarter I
A. Fission and Activation Products 1
- 1. Total release (not including Ci 0.00E+00 9.30E-02 tritive, gases,sipha)
- 2. Average concentration released uC1/mi N/A 2.20E-05 3.80E-04
]
l 3. Maxieue concentration released uC1/s1 N/A
- 8. Tritium I
- 1. Total release C1 0.00E+00 3.75E-01
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/mi N/A 4.60E-04 1 C. Dissolved Noble Gases
- 1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released uC1/e1 N/A <1.00E-05 D. Gross Alpha Radioactivity ,
- 1. Total release ci 0.00E+00 4 2.57E-06
- 2. Average concentration released uC1/mi N/A 4.00E-09 ;
E. Volume of Weste Released liters 0.00E+00 4.46E+05 i F. Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E*00 5.69E+08
'<' indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/e1 I
c .
18 ,
r l ('
t
_ _ . ~_ _ .._. _ _ _. . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
i TABLE 1,2-1 (continued)
)
W M.UERT AND WASTI DISPOSAL REP 0t? (1999)
LISUID EPPLUERTS j l l Nuclides Released Jan. Feb. March First Guarter l
l Cr-51 Ci 6.95E-03 No No 6.95E-03 Mn-54 C1 2.34E-02 Releases Releases 2.34E-02
, Fe-55 C1 1.99E-01 1.99E-01 ,
l Co-58 C1' 1.02E-03 1.02E-03 ;
Fe 59 Ci 3.21E-04 3.21E-04 l Co-60 C1 4.52E-02 4.52E-02 2n 65 C1 1.05E-03 1.05E-03 3 Sr-89 C1 2.09E-04 2.09E-04 ;
I Sr-90 C1 2.45E-05 2.45E-05 Mo-99 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 l I 131 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 ,
Xe-133 Ci <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 t Xe-133s Ci <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 Co-134 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Xe-135 Ci <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 Co-137 C1 1.29E-04 1.29E-04 Ce-141 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 -
Ce-144 C1 <5.00E-07 <$.00E-07 Total for period Ci 2.78E-01 0.00E+00 0.00E*00 2.78E-01
'<' indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/mi l
19
t
- TABLE 1.2-1 (continued) i ;
WPLUBBf AED V&Sf3 DINOS&L REP 007 (1999) -l L19UID EPPLUEff0 ;
I i
Nuclides Released April May June Second Guerter i Cr-51 C1 No No No Mn-54 Ci Releases Releases Releases '
i Fe-55 Ci
~
Co-58 Ci
, Fe-59 Ci I Co-60 Ci ;
2n-65 Ci ;
Sr-89 Ci Sr-90 C1 ;
No-99 Ci '
1-131 Ci Xe-133 Ci l Xe-133e C1 Co-134 Ci '
Xe-135 Ci Co-137 C1 Ce-141 Ci Ce-144 Ci Total for period Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 5
i
)
l i
1 I
t 20
TABLE 1.2-1 (continued)
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1989)
UNIT ONE LIBUID EFFLUENTS Nuclides Released July Aug. Sept. Third Guarter Cr-51 C1 No No No Mn-54 Ci Releases Releases Releases Fe-55 C1 Co-S8 C1 Fe-59 C1 Co-60 C1 2n-65 C1 Sr-89 Ci Sr-90 Ci No-99 Ci 1-131 Ci Xe-133 C1 Xe-133e C1 Co-134 C1 Xe-135 C1 Co-137 C1 Co-141 Ci Co-144 C1 Total for period Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 21
TABLE 1.2-1 (continued)
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1949)
UNIT TWO LIBUID EFFLUENTS Nuclides Released July Aug. Sept. Third Guarter Cr-51 C1 No No No Mn-54 C1 Reletees Releases Releases Fe-SS C1 Co-54 Ci Fe-59 Ci Co-60 C1 2n-65 Ci Sr-09 Ci Sr-90 Ci Mo-99 Ci 1-131 Ci Xe-133 Ci Xe-133s C1 Co-134 Ci .
Xe-135 Ci Cs-137 C1 Co-141 C1 Co-144 Ci Total for period C1 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1
22
TABLE 1.2-1 (continued) :
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1949) '
UNIT ONE :
LIQUID EFFLUENTE I
Nuclides Released Oct. Nov. Dec. Fourth !
Puerter Cr-51 Ci No No 2.64E-03 2.64E-03 Mn-54 Ci Neleases Releases 5.37E-03 5.37E-03 -
Fe-55 C1 1.09E-03 1.09E-03 .
Co-54 C1 1.33E-04 1.33E-04 !
Fe-59 C1 3.52E-04 3.52E-04 Co-60 C1 2. lit-02 2.11E-02 2n-65 C1 <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 ,
Sr-49 C1 2.69E-06 2.69E-06 Sr-90 C1 4.03E-07 4.03E 07 !
No-99 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.002-07 t
Tc-99e C1 4.60E-05 4.60E-05 I-131 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Me-133 Ci <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 ,
Xe-133e Ci <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 ,
Co-134 Ci <5.00E-07 .<5.00E-07 Xe-135 Ci <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05
<3.00E 07 <5.00E-07 Co-137 C1 Ce-141 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Ce-144 Ci <5.00E-C7 <5.00E-07 .
Total for period C1 0.00E+00 0. (CE+00 3.07E-02 3.07E-02
?
l l
l l
l l
i 23
TABLE 1.2-1 (continued) l t
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1989)
UNIT TWO j LIGUID EFFLUENTS l
Nuclides Released Oct. Nov. Dec. Fourth Ouarter l
4.60E-06 4.06E-06 l Na-24 Ci No No i Cr 51 Ci Releases Releases 2.73E-03 2.7M-03 r Nn-54 C1 1.59E-02 1.59E-02 Fe 55 C1 1.44E-02_ 1.44E-02 i Co-58 C1 1.86E-04 1. ME-04 Fe-59 Ci 4.36E-04 4.36E-04 Co-60 Ci 5.85E-02 5.45t*02 2n-65 Ci 7.40E-04 7.40E-04 i Sr-89 C1 1.73E-05 1.73E-05 '
Sr-90 C1 4.25E-07 4.25E-07 No-99 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 r l 6.40E-05 6.40E-05 ;
l Tc-99e C1 '
Ag-lion Ci 6.50E-05 _6.50E-05 I-131 Ci <1.00E-00 <1.00E-06 Xe-133 Ci <1.00E-05 <i.00E-05 Xe-133s Ci <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 Co-134 C1 <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Xe-135 Ci <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 .
Co-137 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E -
<5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Ce-141 C1 Ce-144 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Total for period Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.30E-02 9.30E-02 i
b b
24
. . _ . - - . - _ - - ~ _ - - . - - - - ... - ._..
l i
TABLE 2.0 1 P M ut a vasts stePes&L sestassual RIP 0Rt 4000) I sa.:n um mireso arrsin ros usin a orsposa. 4 e
Jan. Feb. March First !
Quarter l
- 1. spent restas, filter sludges, :
evaporator bottone, oto, j
- a. Quantity shipped cu. a. 1.67E+01 2.27E+01 4.24E+01 8.18E+01 !
- b. Total activity C1 3.66E+02 4.19E*02 5.OSE+02 1.29E+03 !
i l
l c. Major nuclides (estimate) l l Co 60 % 23 23 24 Fe-55 % 52 68 57' Mn 54 % 18 05 13 Cr-51 % 01 02 03
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 3.85E+00 3.85E+00 3.29E-01 !
3.94E+00 3.94E+00 3.94E+00 5.07E+00 y
- f. Solidification agent Cement Cement Cement
- 2. ory sempressible vaste, sentaminated equipment, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu. a. 4.04E+01 5.50E+01 5.23E+01 1.48E+.
- b. Total activity C1 2.44E+00 1.85E+00 1.33E+01 1.76E+C
- c. Major nuclides (estimate) i Co-60 % 10 10 10 Te-55 % 71 71 71 Mn-54 % 06 06 06
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 '
2.72E+00 2.72E+00 2.72E+00 i 1.54E+01 h
! t l
25 t
- . _ . . , , , . - . _ ,.g,_y.. +.~......,.y,. , , , . , _ . _ . -
- g. .-. , , .
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
W TWR39 450 VASTB 988P08&L OBBIARBU6L RBPORT (1999) 30Ltp vasts setPP8D GPPetts Poe setal 08 D!sP0BAL April May June Second Guarter
- 1. Spent restas, filter sludges, evaporator bottone, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu.s. 4.17E+01 4.83E+01 3.32E+01 1.23E+02
- b. Total activity C1 3.34E+02 4.32E*02 1.62E+02 9.28E+02
- c. Major nuclides testimate)
Co-60 % 25 25 25 Fe-55 % 58 58 58 Mn-54 % 13 13 13 Cr-51 % 01 01 02
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 3.85E+00 3.29E-01 3.29E-01 3.94E+00 3.94E*00 3.85E+00 5.07E+00 3.94E+00 5.07E+00
- f. Solidification agent Cerm Cecent Cement
- 2. Dry compressible veste, senteeinated equipment, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu. a. 1.89E+01 2.19E+01 3.34E+01 7.42E+01
- b. Total activity Ci 7.95E-01 2,28E+00 1.87E+00 4.95E*00
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Co-60 % 10 10 10 Fe-55 % '71 71 71 Mn-54 % 06 06 06
- e. Container volume cu. m. 2,12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.72E*00 2.72E+00 1.54E+01 1
26 1
l l
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
EFFLUERT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT (1949)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL ',
July Aug. Sept. Third Guarter
- 1. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottone, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu. a. 3.92E+01 3.64E+01 2.56t+01 1.01E+02
- b. Total activity C1 4.07E+02 7.11E+02 2.01E+02 1.32E+03
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Co-60 X 25 25 25 Fe-55 % 54 54 58 Mn 54 X 13 13 13 Cr-51 % 02 02 02
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 3.29E-01 3.85E+00 3.29E-01 3.94E+00 3.94E+00 3.94E*00 5.07E+00
- f. Solidification agent Cement Cement Coment
- 2. Dry compressible vaste, contaminated equipment, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu.a. 1.33E+02 2.19E+01 1.82E+01 1.73E+02
- b. Total activity C1 5.01E*00 1.46E+00 1.23E+00 7.70E+00
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Co 60 % 10 10 10 Fe-55 % 71 ., 71 Mn-54 X 06 06 06
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.72E+00 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 3.51E*01 2.72E+00 3.29E-01 2.72E+00 27
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
EFFLUENT AND WAETE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT (1989)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR Di&POSAL Oct. Nov. Dec. Fourth Guarter
- 1. Spent resine, filter sludges, evaporator bottone, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu. s. 2.22E+01 1.70E+01 3.47E*01 7.34E+01
- b. Total activity C1 2.-07E*02 3.57t+02 2.19E+02 7.83E+02
- c. Major nuclides testimate)
Co-60 X 25 25 2$
Fe-55 % 54 58 58 Mn-54 % 13 13 13 Cr-51 % 02 02 02
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 3.29E-01 5.07E+00 3.94E+00 3.86E+00 5.07E+00 3.94E+00 5.07E+00
- f. Solidification agent Cement Coment Cement
- 2. Dry compressible vaste, contaminated equipment, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu. a. 4.65E+01 3.71E+01 2.17E+01 1.05E+02
- b. Total activity C1 8.52E+00 1.90E+00 3.04E-03 1.04E*01
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Co-60 % 10 10 10 Fe-55 % 71 71 71 Mn-54 % 06 06 06
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 3.29E-01 2.72E+00 2.72E+00 28
1 i
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued) !
l 6 45 WABTE DISPOSE pl#84JE EPORT (1989)
SCLID WRSTE 94!PpED (PTSITE FOR BUR!E OR DISPOSE (CONT!!aED)
- 3. Solid seeste disposition Raig Transnort Cemeany Destination Shioment Volume Act ivit y (cubic feet) (mCil 01/05/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 24574.58 Hittman Beatty,'NV 105.0 33931.17 01/06/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 171285.57 01/11/89 02/28/89 Hittman Featty, NV 139.1 194689.59 ;
01/18/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 27511.07 01/23/89 Hittman Oak Ridge, TN 660.0 1620.35 01/26/89 Hittman Oak Ridge, TN 768.0 820.19 01/30/89 Hittman Barnwell, SC 135.8 198724.92 02/08/89 Hittman Oak Ridge, TN 660.0 896.80 l 02/06/89 Hit t man Beatty,NV 105.0 25489.53 02/07/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 25789.35 02/13/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 26525.63 02/15/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 24002.74 02/09/89 Hittman Waltz Mill, PA 544.0 97.54 02/14/89 Hittman Beatty,-NV 105.0 24429.30 !
03/01/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 115108.80 j
t 02/17/89 Hit tinan Barnwell, $3 135.8 188250.51 ;
I 02/24/89 Hittman C#k Ridge, TN 738,0 859.21 '
03/13/09 Hit t rnen Bernwel1, SC 178.9 16195.43 I
03/10/89 Hittman Oak Ridge TN 774.0 2010.91.
03/22/89 Hittman Walt: Mill, P4 864.0 39.73 l 03/13/83 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 20168.26 l 03/17/03 Hittman Beatty,NV 139,1 Q275.19 03/16/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 -7(55.9' Oak Ricge, TN 666.0 795.1? ;
04/07/89 Hittman Hittman Beatty, NV 98.9 s??2, 3?
03/14/89 03/15/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 7B33.0) 03/29/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 56166.1*
03/30/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 63470.5A 03/20/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 3369. ~-5 03/21/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 17922.'3 03/22/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 19061.7* -
03/27/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105s0 22176.I' 03/28/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 17812.9I 05/01/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 85312.6; 04/26/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 76351.52 04/03/89 Hittman Barnwell, SC 178.9 11549.3E 06/22/89 Hittman Waltz Mill, PA 544.0 489.04 04/04/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 19448.09 '
04/13/89 Hittman Bearnwell, SC 135.8 72037.4) 04/05/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 19118.is 05/26/89 Hittman Oak Ridge, TN 774.0 1279. E ;
- 29
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
EFFLLEBff 48 6dASTE DISMBE SDl!NeduA REPORT (1949)
SOLID 6dRSTE SHIPPED WFS!TE FOR BURIE OR DISPOSE (CONTINLED) 04/17/89 Hittman Beatty, W 105.0 18223.20 05/10/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 38794.31 04/18/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 18449.15 04/19/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 19999.14 04/24/89 Hittman Barnwell, SC 178.9 11217.09 05/99/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 68122.65 04/25/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.8 22338.98 04/27/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.8 22787.30 04/28/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 195.0 22844.58 05/02/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105. 0 21622.32 05/03/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 22384.50 06/15/89 Hittman Barnwell, SC 178.9 13946.11 05/05/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 22465.35 05/08/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 21041.32 05/31/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 60852.18 06/01/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 63325.77 05/11/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 16433.49 05/12/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 8066.15 05/15/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 12091.11 s 05/17/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 16709,81 05/24/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 18260.95 05/i5/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 13:16.01 06/22/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 10808.21 0!/30/89 Hittman Beatty, NV ?8. 9 6962.65 06/06/89 Hittman Barnwell, SC 135.8 12243,il M /iB/89 Hittman Oak Ridge,TN 626. 0 1379.9?
06<07/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 98.9 10375.17 M/19/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 98,9 8726. M 06/27/89 hittman Barnwell, SC 178.? 7310.1; 06/19/89 Hittman Beatty, NV ?8. 9 9229.i; 06/20/89 Hittman Beatt y, NV 105,0 14751.!;
30
i TABLE 2.0-1 (continued) 4 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SER! ANNUAL REPORT (1949)
SOLID WASTE SNIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL July Aug. Sept. Third Guarter
- 3. Solid Weste Disposition
- a. Number of Shipments 16 12 08 36
- b. Mode of Traneportation Nittaan Nittaan Nittaan Number 16 12 04 i
- c. Destination Beatty, NV Bernwell, BC Barnwell, SC Number 12 02 01 Waltz Mill, PA Beatty, NY Beatty, NV Number 04 09 06 !
Dak Ridge, TN Dak Ridge, TN Number 01 01 i
I
.31 1
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued) :
I
\ l l EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SENIANNUAL REPORT (1989)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR SURIAL OR DISPOSAL Oct. Nov. Dec. Fourth Guarter i
- 3. Solid Weste Disposition f
- a. Number of Shipments 04 07 12 27 f
- b. Mode of Transportation Mittman. Mittaan Mittaan ,
Musber 07 07 12 U.S. Ecology Number 01
- c. Destination Bernwell, SC Barnwell, SC Barnwell, SC !
' Number 02 01 01 j Beatty, NV Seatty, NV Beatty, NV
! Number 04 04 09 ;
Oak Ridge, TN Dak Ridge, TN Dak Ridge, TN ;
Number 02 02 02 l
I l
?
4 0
32
i FIGURE 301-1 l
\
l i
i Estimated Cumulative Gama Dose (in mrem) l from the LaSalle Station for the period / >*, ,
i January-December 1989 // g l
Isopleth Labels e#
200 75 Small figure - multiply by 10'4 . ,,j l Large figure - multiply by 10-5 _
7 , ;
g ... .
4,0sy 1
- o ! ?*i
su.
p *.
- ' . ,, J mi T) ..,,,.
S.n.c. ;
nn **'
$00,i j 250 'Y '
// .Tgi l f~1f
[
j d ....
mer .
. . . ... ,- r *
(m."' / .,
j o.i...
y so f .n o s to is to mi
. . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . - . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _..__._ _ _ .. _ _ _. . _ . _ . . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ ~ .
FIGURE 3.1-2 i
Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCi/m3) r l
of Noble Gases from the LaSalle Station for the period January-December 1989
[g/*po g'
,\ i l- Isopleth labels 10 0 j
Small figure - multiply by 101 1 g Large figurr. - multiply by 10- I d ^ -
, r( ! A > ,,,,,_, r
.3.......y ,
so J ,
e o i e mi .
i es
,5 A ,., .
j -
. /,
m ~
50 M orris Morteilles i
L Senece lilino. * *' -I 15 .
f a
[100 . ins._
( s 50 e o :- .k p .-
4 S ....
25
/- i.
.4 Dwight l
/ o l l ' N "-- -
I
- O, , ,
,9- 19 IS ' 2pmi 3,4
b FIGURE 3.1-3 Estimated Total Concentrations (in pt1/m3) of Iodine from the LaSalle Station for the g #je w -
period January-December 1989 J
,/ ~
Isopleth Labels F Small figure - multiply by 10-6 250 l (6,,[#100-s j
Large figure - multiply by 10-6 C y ..
t....- .
350
, as i o' '
a' mi
/ 75
/
f
\
1 j i otte 5 Morrie !
u., .. ;
, senece 4
.ee x _9 7 .( N ;
e5003 .
. = , . 3 250 y e , "
'tl 500 , omm
- iro a 250 Q [ a, ,,,,,,
g u.. .
streetor r - 10 0 75 it
,,,q ,,
xw / >
angene
/
55 50 WI T ra -
N '
9 ...s ip is aos -35
-1 FIGURE'3.1 l 1
Estimated Total Concentrations-(in' pCi/m3) of Particulate Matter from the LaSalle-Station
/ 200b 9& ',
for. the period January-December 1989 jo*9 Isopleth Labels Small figure - multiply by 10-7 , 15 0 100 Large figure - multiply by 10-7 h te \
3 pSCS
% 8 l% wwwaww.vwwwn f ';
L n,,,,wmii 200 m
'V- / !
O { . J *i
+
, . /
W.dr.a o l d 80
- 0,
. Morris j >- s.a. .
Illinois N k i
/ -
.. ..s. , , , , ,
4
> 4' 15 0 s .-
4a ...
4E"'
"- ( _
g o,.,,...., 50 b
J Dwight y 17 0d.11
(- .
36 0 6 1 1 A i 5n
.10 15 20 mi -
-- - - . - , , w ,c.-yev . ,- *.c, .-r- w-m,-, , , --~d
i TABLE 3,1-1 !
3 LAsALLE UNIT ONE '
1989 ANNUAL REPORT-PERIOD OF RELEAst - 01/01/89 70 FROM RANIMUM DOsts REsVLTINO AIRBORNE RELEAsts 12/31/89 INFANT RECEPTOR CALCULATED 03/09/90 1sT 2ND 3RD 4TN TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-RAR APR-JUN JUL-stP- OCT-DEC GAnnA AIR 3.05t-11 .1.655-12 (MRAD) 2.575-02 1.07B-07 2.57t-02 (Est 1 (tst ) (Est )
BETA AIR. 2.95t-12 2.31E-13 (ast )
2.862-03 (Est ) I (MRAD) (t ) (t )
'1.288-04 -2.865-03 j TOT. sODY (t ) (t -)
1.65t-11 8.495-13 1.498-02 5.67t-08 :1.492-02 (t ) :
(MREM)- (Est ) (Est.) 1 sRIN 2.605-11 (tst ) (Est ) (Est )
1.45E-12. 2.20E-02~ 9.325 08: 2.208-02 i ORGAN (MREM) (Est ) ttst ) (tst ) .(Est ) l 4.295-04 2.36t-03 7.35t-03 4.935-03 (est ) 'l (MREM) (Est ) ( ast- ) 1.54t-02 (s . . ) (3 ) (tst )
THYRO 10 THYROID THYRO!D THYROID THYROID THis Is A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1989 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CFR 50 . APP. !
INFANT RECEPTOR
......-..... g or App I, ............
QTRLY IST QTR 2ND QTR- 3RD QTR 4TH QTR 05J JAN-MAR APR-JUN 'YRLY- % OF JUL-stP OCT-NOV OBJ APP.!
CAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.51 BL'TA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.26 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.03 0.00 20.0 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 SRIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.30 ORGAN thatM) 7.5 0.29 0,00 15.0 0.15 0.01 0.03 0.10 0.07 l 15.0 0.10 '
THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID
-f RESULTS RASED UPOh ODCM petigston 11
' UPDATE CS204 FEBR"ARY 1986
)
1
- 37. '
W
ib 1
l l
l l
l TABLE 3.1-1 (continued) {
l i
i i
LAsALLE UNIT ONE i
1989 ANNUAL REPORT =
MARIMUM Doses REsULTING PROM AIRS 0RNE RELEAsts PERIOD OP RELEASE - 01/01/89 70 12/31/89 CALCULATsp 03/09/90 i ADULT RECEPTOR I i
187 2ND 3RD 4TM TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL 1 JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-stP' OCT-DSC j
GAMMA AIR 3.053-11 1.65E-12 2.575-02 1.078 2.575-02: -
(MRAD) (Est ) (88B ) (EsE ) -(Est ) (Est ) I stTA AIR 2.958-12 2.315-13 2.868-03. 1.285-08 2.868-03.
(MRAD) (E ) . (E ) - (8 ) (8 ) (t ) i TOT. 30DY 1.658-11 '8.495-13 1.495-02 5.675 '1.492 1 (MasM) (Est-) (Est')- (Est-) (tst ) -(Est )
BRIN 2.60s-11 1.458-12 2.20E-02 9.328-08 2.20s-02 l (MRen) (ass ) (sse-) -(ast )- (ast n (Est 1 !
ORGAN 8.18E-04 1.62E-03 4.94t-03 3.325-03: 1.075-02 i (MREM) (sse ). (Est ) (sst ) (ssa ) (sse-). .p GI-LLI THYROID THYROID TRYROID THYROID i
THIs Is A REPORT POR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1989-1 i
C0hPLI ANCE STATUS - 10 CPR 50 ' APP.1 '
I
' ADULT RECEPTOR
-.---------- % OF AFP I. ------------ j QTRLY 1s? QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR- 4TH'QTR. YRLY % OP OsJ' JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-stP' .OCT-NOV OBJ- APP.! l GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.51' O.00 10.0 0.26 sETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 20.0 0.01 TOT. BooY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 10.60 0.00 5. 0 ~ 0.30 sRIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 15.0 0.15 i
ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.04- 15.0 0.07 GI-LLI THYROID THYROID- .THYROIU THYROID RESULTS DA. ICD UPON' {
ODCM REVt$tnN 11 ;
UPDATE C3204 '
FEBRUARY 1986 -l f
1 38
~
i-l' 1
i TABLE 3.2-1 LASALLE UNIT TWO ADULT RECEPT 0R 1989 ANNUAL REPORT RAA! {
PERIOD OFMUM RELEASE DOSES- (MREM) RESULTING FROM LIQUID BFFLUENTS 01/01/09 TO 12/31/89 :
CALCULATED 01/04/90 1ST 2ND 3RD- 4TR DOSE TYPE- QUARTER QUARTER- -)
QUARTER. ; QUARTER' ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR=JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC !
TOTAL 8.09E-06 0.00E+00 30DY 0.00E+00 1.538-05 2.42E-05 ~l INTERNAL 4.87E-05 0.00E+00 CRGAN 0.00E+00 1.16E 1.65E-04 GI'LLI
=GI-LLI GI-LLI THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1989 .;
COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 Crm 50 APP. !~
{
% OF AFP !. -------~~~--
QTRLY 157 QTR 2ND'QTR 3RD QTR 4TM QTR 08J JAN-NAR YRLY % ' 0F '
APR-JUN. JUL-SEP OCT-NOV' .0BJ APP.! i TOTAL 800Y (MREM) 1.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .3.0 0.00 CRIT. ORGANIMREM) 5.0 0.00 f 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 -
GI-LLI og*LLI CI-LLI 3 i
RESULTS BASED UPON 4 CDCM REVISION 11 ,
UPDATE CS204' {
FEBRUARY 1966 l
-i l
1 1
4 39
Y i
r k
F
?
TABt.E 3.2 1'(continued) l s
LASALLE UNIT ONE ADULT RECEPTOR 1989 ANNUAL REPORT MAXIMUM DOSES (MREM) RESULTING FROM LIQUID EFFLUENTS $
PERIOD or RELEASE . 01/01/89 70.12/31/89 CALCULATED 01/04/90 .
s 1ST 2ND 3RD 4Tu' DOSE TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER- . ANNUAL. . . .
- JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC j
TOTAL 1.40E-05 0.00t+00 BODY 0.00E+00 5.55t-06 1.96t-05 INTERNAL 6.86E-05 '0.00E+00. 0.00E+00 4.14E-05 1.10E-04 4
ORGAN GI-LLI GI-LLI 'GI-LLt' THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1949
?'
COMPLIANCE STATUS . 10 CPR 50 APP. I '
~
............ g oP AyP g. ............
QTRLY IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY ~ % Or CaJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-NOV. - 0BJ - APP.!
TOTAL BODY (MREM) 1.5. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.0 0.00 CRIT. CRGAN(MREM) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 l 0.00-GI-LLI GI.LLI G1-LLI-RESULTS BASED UPON ODCM REVISION 11 UPDATE CS204 FESRUARY 1986-4 ,
s
)
40 >
y * --
c .- ., ,, 6 ~-v= . . , - , . , _ , . . ~ ,
, - - ~. . . - . .- . -- _ . _ . . - _ .- - - - _ . _ - _ . - _ - - - . - - _ - - _ - _ - - - .
1 FIGURE 5.0-1 i
l 82!!f!'J' q14 gm ,m o ,
Itlatsetilee Ottawa ***,
e Senota .t-Ie
( 3*
e, . .i Plant -
[
J 86te Property e13
Grand Ridge Verona i
Kinsman t P
11eRansom e12 e i Kernan i t Streator 10' Grundy La Salle County e-- - -- - Coun,tyr- _ . ,
Livingston County l .
l
=
. i a n a s ense*
1
% LA S ALLE COUN TY ST ATION ;
_. _. x ;
FIXED AIR SAMPLING AND TLD SITES.
9 1At* Nummes81 LeJ Normas 63 L.4 04een#3 L9% Naarmee M LelCasis es Le Nemune M L 49 Saees L 48 Marunden Le Greed ludge L 10 tenener .
L il Ramese i.
L 13 Kenen
' ' ' 13 Rasse e at Gesenen Reed t 14 Ouese ,
41
A J --k--- O &Q ,e,g.. w S 'na-',,-
, aws ,m-a,as. ,--e,- a me.4-- -a , w y - - - - - - - - -
. i
-l i
FIGURE 5.0 )
1 l
l-I '
<t. e in.: *
,\ ' w as =8 si. .
< j? ,,*8 ~
f k.
c-
[ '
e ....
e 114 I .$g
' :p
- gsgv e- .
i t
9Ky l llg:! h.. Fv o ' +" s x.y
\ iee.ig lii.i i ::n "nie a
, joie.
usa a u*a
, Li&t ,yeI - ser.g ggg g i,s a na .
in, .
e ss en se se ,e u
=e a. as ,, ,e to .
L A SALLE COUNTY ST ATION INNER RING TLD LOCATIONS ~i l
o ,
42 l
I FIGURE 5.0-3 l 1
1
%n2 '
r mer m
-34 g ,,,"O,
/ o,ggg . es sen.e.,
\,
,, s , .. ., y. .. . . .sys ,. . , ,a
,,sgay
. . .8 - .i,.
,,,, t ..
g Plant ' l
,,.. ., s
-sit eropeny I
orand Ridge lli:1 -
a l,>,,
IRI . v.ron.
l l
! -at inn , 4 Kinsmen L
Ransom i
i Kernan .
Streatot '
~
Grundy 1
. La Salle County County
~" '
LMngston County '
n
- S,****
.,,_t LA SALLE COUNTY ST ATION
_ _' J _'
OUTER RING TLD LOCATIONS k
43 >
3 FIGURE 5.0-4 '
- 6. .. e L et -
e g e.
In aseresses u.a.e tn g~., i
'k m testees !
e .a
/
RL 33 r
e 6.ie -
4.as , g , ,,
Lpe
-48, 36 % }
9 800.t F0 e
gg 4'le Lmo I
- ' ' 8 *
- e. ,e ease LA SALLg COUNTY STATION
_n _ _
- a a ie - --- -r ;
L 16 L F INGESTION AND WATER 80RNE EXP050RE L 17 EyNatt$r en ostry '"" "I # "
L 18 soldt ostry L 19 Beuenhausen Dairy .
L 21 lhois River at Seneca
L 27 LSCS Onsite Well L 28 Marseilles Well Water !
L 29 Seneca Well Water L 30 Ransom Well Water L 31 Ottawa Well Water L 32 Illinois State Park Well L 34 Cooling Lake Discharge Structure Downstream i L 35 Marseilles Pool ofIllincis River 1
44
i TABl.E 5.0-1 i.
LaSalle Station u u _g Radiological Environmental Monitoring
- Locations b 3. -
A..A" J .-
b- ~
I e -
4 4
A e., A o 4 ,
. . , ..o.
i
- .c - .. 5
'u 1$..i.
.s. .
. m, . 1. 6
<> v w s zA a e o_> 8 3 i
l L 01 Nearsite #1 I L 02 Nearsite #2 ' 00.............. !
L 03 Onsite #3 00....................... ;
L 04 Nearsite #4 00..............-........- :
L 05 Onsite #5 00........'............... ........ L L.06 Nearsite #6 OO..............
L 07 Seneca 00....................... .
i L 08 Marseilles 00.............. ,
00,-.............. .......
L 09 Grand Ridge I L.10 Streator 00 ...................... .......
L.Il Ransom OO............. . .-. . . . . . .
L.13 Kernan 0 0. . . . ... . . . . . . . .........
L.13 Route 6 at Gonnam Road OO...........
00;....-..................
L.14 0ttawa ...
00.......................
L.16 Lowery Farm .... .....
L.17 Heyer Petterson Dairy .,,,.....O.......... -
L.18 Boldt Dairy .
.......O............... ....
- L.19 Bettenhausen Dairy .........O........... .. ;
L 21 filinois River at Seneca .........*O............ .. ;
L 24 LSCS Cooling Lake near Recreation Area .................O....... i L.27 LSCS Onsite Well . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . O. . ... . . .
L 28 Marseilles Well Water .......................O.
L.29 Seneca Well Water .......................O.
L.30 Ransom Well Water .......................O.
L 31 Ottawa Well Water ........................O, i L 32 tilinois State Park Well .......................O.
L.34 Cooling Lake Discharge Structure Downstream .......................O.
L.35 Marseilles Pool of Illinois River ..............
.....O.........,O........, .
CENSUS D:iry !
Residence I
4ti f/ '
Table 5.0-2 l LA SALLE COUNTY STATION ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS l
- 1. AIR SAMPLERS
~;
Distance Direction 4 Site Codea Location imiles) _(_')-
L-01 Near-site No. 1 0.5 326 L-02 On-site Station No. 2 0.6 11-L-03 On-site Station No. 3 0.2 56 L-04 Near-site No. 4 1.5 90 L-05 On-site Station No. 5 0.3 145 L-06 . Near-site No. 6 0.4 270 L-07 L-08 Seneca Marseilles 5.2 7.0 18 326 l[
L-09 (C) Grand Ridge-- 10.4 260 ,
L-10 (C) Streator 13.5 220 l L-11 Ransom 6.0 191 L-12 (C) Kernan 5.0 214 .
L-13 Route 6 at Gonnam Road 7.0 100 '
L-14 (C) Ottawa 12.0 31 5
- 2. TLDs
- a. Same as No. 1. 4
- b. SJecial TLD Samplers Distance Di rection l Site Code Inner Ring (miles) (')_ !'
L-101-1,2 0.5 359 L-102-1,2 0.6 17 L-103-1,2 0.7' 46 L-105-1,2 0.7' 91 !
L-106-1,2 1.4 110' l
. L-107-1,2 0.8 128 !
L-109-1,2 0.6 178 l L-110-1,2 0.6 205 i L-111a-1,2 0.7 217 L-111b-1,2 0.8- 230 L-112-1,2 0.9 244
-L-113a-1,2 0.8 262 L-113b-1,2 0.8 273 L-114-1,2 0.9 288 a '
Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All' other locations are indicators.
l l
46 ,
b I p TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LA SALLE COUNTY STATION ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGI AL MONITORING PROGR AM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS -
o
- 2. TLDs
- b. Special TLD Samplers (continued)
Distance Direction- ,
Site Code (miles) (*)
Outer Ring L-;01-1,2 2.0 15- -
L-202-1,2 2.3 33 L-203-1,2 4.0 . 56
'L-204-1,2 3.5 78 L-205-1,2 3.5 102 L-206-1,2 4.3 '123 L-207-1,2 4.5 146 ;
L-208-1,2 4.5 170' L-209-1,2 4.0 192 L-210-1,2 3.3- 216 L-211-1,2 4.5 240 L-212-1,2 4.0 261 L-213-1,2 3.8 283-L-214-1,2 2.0 303 L-215-1,2 2.0 330.
L-216-1,2 1.5 350 q i
- 3. MILK Distance ~ Direction Site Codea Location (miles) _
(*)
L-16 Lowery Dairy 8.2 1 120 L-17(C) Hayer-Patterson Dairy 9.0 350 L-18(C) Boldt Dairy 13.2' 25 ",
L-19 Bettenhousen. Dairy a
Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after. site code. All other locations are indicators. ,
1 47-
Table 5.0-2 (continued)
LA SALLE COUNTY STATION ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAtiPLING LOCATIONS
- 4. GROUND /WELL WATER _
Distance Direction Site Codea location ., _(mil esl _(*)_
L-27 Onsite Well .
h L-28 Marseilles Well 7.0 326- 1 L-29 (C) Seneca Well 5.1 18' l L-30 Ranson Well 6.0 191- it L-31 Ottawa Well 12.8 304 L-32 Illinois State Park 6.5 326- i i
- 5. SURFACE WATER v Distance Direction @
Site Codea Location (miles) ' _( _* ) fj
-l L-21 (C) Illinois River at 4.0' 22 !
Seneca i L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake 0.3 112 -l
- 6. FISH Distance Direction Site Codea Location (miles) _ (*) :l
.i' L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake 0.3 112 near Recreation Area ,
L-35 . Marseilles Pool of 6.5 326 :
Illinois River i
- 7. SHORELINE SEDIMENTS Distance Direction 1 Site Codea Location (miles) , _ ( * )__ _ j
~
L-34 Downstream of cooling At Station- .)
lake discharge structure a '
Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators. i 48 <
. M_M l
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LA SALLE Cout:TY STATION ENVIR08r1 ENTAL RADIOLOGICAL F10f41TORING PROGRMt. SMFLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSES Location Collectton Type of Fregeency Sample Media Code
- Site frequency Analysis of Analysts senarks
- 1. Airborne a. Onsite and fecar Field Coatinsous Gross beta Weekly On all samples.
Particulates operation Gesuna Isot @arterly ' On quarterly composites frau each location.
L-I Mearsite no. I for a meet L-2 taearsite too. 2 Geena Isot Weekly ~ If gross beta in a sample esteeds 10s the L-3 Onsite tso. 3 yearly mean of the control sagples.
L-4 Nearsite fio. 4 Filter . Weekly L-5 Onsite ib. 5 Enchange L-6 Nearsite No. 6
- 6. Far Field L-7 Seneca L-8 fiersefile L-9 (C) Grand Ridge L-10 (C) Streator L-II Ranson L-12 (C) Kercan S L-13 Route 6 at Gonnam Rd.
L-14 (C) Ottawa
- 2. Airborne Same as 1. Weekly I-131 Weekly . On all samples.
todtne
- 3. Air Sampling Same as I. --
Test and Weekly On all samplers.
Train flaintenance
- 4. TLO Same as 1. @arterly Gamma Quarterly Two sets at all AP locations. One set read quarterly. Second set read if-L-101-1,2 Inner Ring required by Casumonwealth Edison. At other 102-1.2 locations, all sets read qwarterly.
103-1.2 flinimua of two TLos per set.
105-1.2 106-1,2 101-1.2 108-1.2 109-1.2.
110-1,2, Ille-l.2
-Illb-1,62 112-1.2 113a-1.2 2
. 114-1.2 Il3b-1 6 a Control (reference) locations are denoted by a *C". in this column. AII other locations are indicators.
b flew special TLD site for this Spec.
- - -.- - - - - - - - - - - - -L--- - - - I^'-"^ - - - ' - -~- ' ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~~
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LA SALLE COUNTY STAT!DM ENf!RONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGtAM, SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSES Location Collection Type of Frequency Sample Media Codes site Frequency Analysts of Analysis Romert s
- 4. TLD (continued) L-201-1,2 Outer Ring 202-1.2 203-1,2 204-1,2 205-1,2 206-1,2 207-1,2 208-1,2 209-1,2 210-1,2 211-1,2 212-1,2 213-1,2
'214-1,2 215-1,2 m 216-1,2
- c. .
L-17(C) Heyer-Patterson Dairy May through Gasme Isot. BI-teeekly On all samples.
L-18 (C) Boldt Dalry' October ,
L-19 8ettenhousen Dairy l
. Monthly: .'l-131 Month 1; On all samples. - LLD : 0.5 pct /1. l November Gamma Isot- Monthly On all samples.
through April. ,
i l
- 6. Ground /Well L-27 Onstte Well- Quarterly' Gamme isot Overterly On all samples.
Water L Marseilles Welli . Trftfue Quarterly On all samples.
L-29 (C) Seneca Well L-30 Ranson Well L-31 Ottawa well L-32 Illinois State Park Well
- 7. Surface Water L-21 (C). Illinois River at : Ideekly Gamme Isot Men'hly c the monthly composites from each location.
Ottawa. Tritfue ' Quarterly _ On guarterly composttes from each
-locatfon.
- 8. Fish L-24' LSCS Cooling Lake : Semi-annual Gauna isot Semi-annual On edible portions only. Two species.
L-35 Marsettles Pool a Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.
= - - -
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LA SAttE EOUNTY STATI0ft Ef1VIR0fetENTAL RADIOLOGICAL 710rlITORING PROGRAff, SAPPLE CotLECT10ff AnD AftALYSES Locatfon .Collectfon Type of Frequency Sample tiedta Codes Site Frequency Analysts of Analysis Neuerk s
- 9. Shoreline L-34 Downi,trean of Sent-annual- Gamma Isot Semi-annual 4
Sediments cooling take
- 10. Dairy Census a. Site boundary to 2 miles -
- a. Enumeretton- Annually During gra:Ing season.
by a door to-door or equiva-lent counting technique.
- b. 2 miles to 5 miles -
- b. Enumeration Annually During grarfag season.
by using-referenced infonnation from county agrfcuttoral agents or other
. reliable sources..
m c. At defries 11sted in Itera 4 -- c. Ingoire as . Annually During gra2 fag season.
e--
to feedfag practices:
- 1. Pasture only.
- 2. Feed and chop only.
- 3. Pasture and feed; if both, ask famer to estimate fract fon of food fran pasture:
<255,25-505. 50-755, or >751.
II. Nearest In all 16 sectors up to 5 miles Annually Fesidence Census A _ ___-i----u-- - ~ - - ~ - - ' - ~ ' ' - ^ ' ~ ~ ' ' ' ~
TABLE 5.0-3 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY SUMPiARY Name of Facility LaSalle Nuclear Power Station Docket Iso. 50-254. 50-265 Location of Factitty Marsettles. tilinois Reporting Period 1st Quarter 1989 (Lounty. htstep indicator Location with Highest Control Sample Type and Locations Quarterly Mean Locations sweer of Type Number of Meana . Mean MeJna Non couttne (Units) Analyses LLD Range Locatfon Range Range ResO ts Air Particulates Gross Beta 78 0.01 0.034 (78/78) L r5. Near-site No.6 0.035 (13/13) None 0 (pct /m3) (0.015-0.069). 0.4 mie 270* (0.019-0.061)
Gastaa Spec. 6 0.01 <LLD Mone 0 Afrborne lodine 1-131 78 0.10 <LLD - -
4LD 0 (pct /m3)
Gansna Background Gam a Dose 14 3.0 16.2 (10/10)' L-07. Seneca 17.5 (1/1) 15.0 (4/4) 0 (TLDs)(mR/Qtr.) (14.4-17.5) 5.2 mi p l8* -
(14.8-15.5)
Milk 1-131 12 0.5 <LLD - -
<tLD 0~
$ (pC1/1) Gamma Spec.
Cs-134 12 5 4LD - -
<tto O Cs-137 5 <tLD - -
4LD 0
-Other Gapunas 10 <tLD -- -
4LD 0 Surface idater - Gasuna Spec. 6:
(pCf/1) Cs-134 10 (LLD - --
<tLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD - -
<LLO O Other Gensnes 20 (LLD - ' -
4LD 0 Tritium 2 200 235 (1/1) L-24.LSCS Cooling Lake 235(1/1) 0
_4LD 0.3 at 9112*
Idell Idater Ganuna Spec. 6 (pCf/1) Cs-134- 10 4LD - -
Cs-137 10 4LD 0 4LD - -
<tLO ^ 0 Other. Gauunas - 20 4LD -
Trftfum ;6 200 4LD 0
<tLD - .
4LD 0 a 34ean and range based on detectable measurements only. Traction indicated in parenthesis.
.. - , - - . ~ - . ~~- -:--------
^
-- ' ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ '
~ ~ ~
TABLE 5.0-4 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY SupmARY Name of facility LaSalle Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-254. 50-265 Location of Facility Marseilles. Illinois Reporting Period 2nd Quarter 1989 (County, State)
Indicator Location with Highest Cont rol -
Sample Type and Locations Quarterly mean Type Number of Locations nunter of Meana n, pp ns feon-routine (Units) Analyses LLO Range Locatloc Rampe Range- Results Air Particulates Gross Beta 78 0.01 0,022 (7e/73) L-02.near-site station (pCf/m3) 0.022(13/13) none -
(0.006-0.033) flo. 2 0.6 m1911* (0.013-0.033)
Gama Spec. 6 0.01 (LLD -
teone 0 Airborne Iodine 1-131 78 0.10 <LLD - -
None 0 (pCi/m3)
$ Gama Background Ganana Dose 14 3.0 19.8 (10/10) L-05,leear. site no. 5 23.0 (1/1) 18.5 (4/4) 0 (TLDs) (mR/Qtr.) (16.7-23.0) 0.3 et 9 145* -
(17.2-19.5)
Milk 1-131 20 0.5b 4LD -
<tLD (pCi/1) 0 Ganuna Spec. 20 Cs-134 5 4LD - -
<LLD 0 Cs-131 5 4LD -
<tLD 0
Other Gammas 10 <LLO - -
<tLD - 0 Surface Water Gansna Spec. 6-(pCi/1) Cs-134 10 4LD : '- -
<LLO O Cs-131 10' 4LD - -
<tLD 0 Other Ganunas 20 4LD - ' -
<LLO 0 Tritium 2 200 204 (1/1) 236 (1/1) 0 s
a Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fraction indicated in parentheses.
- . .m i. ...~-a... ..-%%_i,_.._._.._._-_ _ _ -
ll TABLE 5.0-4 (continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM 00ARTERLY SUtmARY Mame of Facility LaSalle Nuclear Power $tatfon Docket No. 50-254. 50-265 Location of Facility Marseilles. 111foofs Reporting Period 2nd Quarter 1999 (County. State)
Indicator Location with Highest Control f sample Type and Locations Quarterly paran Locatfons Munter of
. Type Nuecer of Meana Mean Meana non.routfne Analyses LLD Range Location Range Range Results (Units) well Water Gausna Spec. 6 (pCf/1) Cs-134 10 <tLD - -
<Lt c 0 Cs-137 10 <tLD - - <tL D 0
' Other Gansnas 2C <LLO - - <tLD 0 Tritfum 6 200 <LLD - - <LLO O Botton Sediment Gaeuna spec. 1 (pct /m3) Cs-134- 0.1 <tLD - - None 0 m Cs-131 0.1 <LLD - - None 0
- Other Gansnas 0.2. <tLD - - Nore 0 Fish Gasuna $pec. 9 (PCf /g wet ) - Cs-134 0.1 <tLD - - None 0 l Cs-137 0.1 - (LLD - - None 0 !
l Other Gansnas 0.2 (LLD - - None 0 a Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fraction indicated in parenthesis.
S f
i
!._____ -..-.L-_ . . ~ - . - - .
ENVIROISENTAL ftA010 LOGICAL MONITORING Pit 0GstAf4 OuARTERLY 5tpWWWtf -
Name tf Facility _ LcSalla Nuclear Power Station Docket No. __ . 50-254, 50-265 Lecttfon cf Facility . Marselites. Illinois steporting Period 3rd Geerter 1989 (County. Statel Indicator '
Location with Highest Control
$mple Type and Locations ----Ouarterly 14een tocations Type Wr of Nwaber of Meana Wan ~ ~~ Meana gon-routine (Units) Analyses LLD Range Location Range Range Resul ts AirPartgculates Gross Beta 79 0.01 0.023 (78/78) L-04. Near-Site #4 0.024 (13/13) -None J (ptt/m ) (0.006-0.034) 1.5 at 9 90* (0.018-0.029)
Gamma Spec. 6 0.01 <LLD - -
None O Airborne Iodine 1-131 78 0.10 <ttD - --
<tLD 0 (pC1/m3)
Gamuna Background Games Dose 14 3.0 17.4 (10/10) L-01. Wear-stte *1 20.5 (1/1) 15.7 (4/43 0 (14.8-20.5) 0.3 et 9 326* -
(15.1-16.11 Milk 1-131 24 0. 5 . <LLD (ptt/11 4LD 0 Gesuma Spec. 24 Cs-134 5 <LLD m
4LD 0 Cs-137 5 <tLD - -
<tLD 0 Other Gammes 10 <tLD - -
<tLO - 0-Surfaca water Gamma Spec. 6 - -
(pC1/11 Cs 134 10 <tLD - -
<tLO . O Cs-137 10 <LLO - -
<tto 0 Other Gammes 20 <tLD .- -
<tLD 0 Tritium 3 200 230 (2/2) L-21.1111nois River 256 (1/1) 256 (1/11 0 (204-256) at Seneca. 4.0 9 22*
Well Water Gemme Spec. 6 (pCf/1)
Cs-134 10 <tLD - -
<LLO O Cs-137: 10 <tLD ' - -
<LLD 0 Other Gammes 20 <LLD --
<tLD 0 TritIam 6 200 <tLD - -
<LLO O a foran and range based on detectable measuraments only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
_ . _ . _ _.._. ._.____._.___.._.u;__.u_..__ ,. - _ . _ _. _
TABLE 5.0-6 ENVIROIMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY StNMMtY Name of Factlf ty LaSalle Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-254, 50-265 Location of Facf1ity Marseilies, 111inois Reporting Peried 4th Quarter 1999 _
(County, Statel Indicator Locatjon wfth Highest Control Sample Type and ' Locations Quarterly Mean Locations stumber of Meana gran nyana geon-routine Type Number of (Unfts) Analyses LLD Range Location Range Range Reselts Afr Partleviates Gross Beta 78 0.01 0.035 (78/78) L-06, Near Site No. 6 0.036 (13/13) soone 0 (pCf/M) (0.017-0.056) 0.4 of 9 270" (0.028-0.053)
Gamma spec. 6 0.01 4LD - - None O Airborne Iodine I-131 78 0.10b 4LD - - None 0 (pCf/m3)
Gamma Background Gamma Dose 14 3.0 18.8 (10/10) L-05, On $tte No. 5 21.6 (1/1) 16.9 (4/4) 0 (15.6-21.6) 0.3 et 9 145' (16.0-18.0)
Milk I-131 16 0.5 4LD - -
4LD 0
$ (pCf/11 Gamma Spec. 16 Cs-134 5 4LD - -
. <tLO O Cs-137 5 . 4LD - -
4LD 0 Other Gammes 10 4LD - - ' 4LD 0
.-~..-
Surface Water Gamma Spec. 6 - -
(pCf/1)
Cs-134 10 ALD - -
4tD 0 Cs-137 10 <tLD - - 4LD 0 Other h s 20 <tLD - - 4LO O Tritium 2 200- 4tD -- -
4LD 0
~"'"
_,.y a-rw-.,*.es. 'w * '
h= * * "-
TABLE 5.0-6 (continued) '
EWylRounEmTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRApt QUARTERLY SIfeWlY Name of Facility LaSalle nuclear Power Station Docket me. 50-254, 50-265 Location of Facility starsellies,111f ools '
Reporting Period 4th Omarter 1989 (County 6 Statel Sample indicator location with Highest Type and Locations Control Type leumber of Quarterly steen Locations Meana number of (Units) Analyses LLD Range nean strana Ison-routine 1
Location Range Range Resul ts Well Water - Gamma Spec. 6 (pC1/l)
Cs-134 10 <tto -
<tLD . O Cs-137 10 <tLD -
sLD 0 Other Gammes 20 <tLD -
<tLD 0 Tritium 6 200 4LD -
(LD 0 Fish Gamma Spec. 10 (pCf/g met)
(n Cs-134 0.1 <tLD -
Isone 0 Cs-137 0.1 <tLD - - '
none 0 Other Gammes 0.2 <tLD - -
geone 0 Bottom Sediments Gamma Spec. 1 (PCf /g dry)
Cs-134 0.1 <LL D -
Isone O Cs-137 0.1 0.30 (1/1) L-34. Downstream of' O.30 (1/1) Isone 0 Discharge 9 Station Other Gammasc 0.2 0.90 (1/1) L-34. Downstream of 0.90 (1/1)- soone 0 Discharge 9 Station 8
Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in perentheses, cbCo-60 one result for 1-131 exceeded LLD (<0.18) because of very low volume (64m3); low volume due to air sampler pump malfunction.
'l
, - , . ~~ . . , -, ,. . -, - . . - - . ,. . ~. .. ., . - - . . .
LASALLE Table 5;1-1 GAMMA RADIATION, AS MEASURED BY THERM 0 LUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS (TLDs)
STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter ' 4th Quarter Date Placed: 12-30-88 04-01-89 07-01-89 09-30-89 Date Removed: 04-01-89 07-01-89 09-30-89 12-29-89 Days in the Field: 92 91 91 90 location Average mR/ Quarter On-Site and Near-Site Indicator Locations !
L-01 Near Site No. 1- 17.2 0.6 19.2i 4 20.5 0.9 19.2:0.9 L-02 On-Site No. 2 16.4 0.6 19.2 0.8 18.0 0.9 18.6il.2 L-03 On-Site No. 3 14.7 0.8 19.3 0.9 15.4 1.1' 17.9 0.9 L-04 Near-Site- No. 4 16.0 0.6' 19.421.5 16.6 1.0 19.8 1.6 i
L-05 On-Site No. 5 16.8 0.7- 23.020.9 19.7:0.9 L-06 21.611.1 ;
Hear-Site No. 6 16.7 0.7 22.7 0.9 18.1 1.5 20.5 0.8 i i
Mean s.d. 16.-3:0.9 20.5 1.8 18.1:1.9 19.6'1.3 !
i Off-Site Indicator Locations !
4 L-07 Seneca 17.5 0.7 19.9 0.8- 18;4t0.8 L-08 18.5 0.7 Marseilles 16.7 0.7 20.3 0.9 17.5 0.2 18.6 1.2 '
L-11 Ransom 14.4 0.8 16.7:0.8 14.8 1.0 L 15.6 0.8 Rt. 6/Gonnam Road 15.120.6 18.4 0.9 15.3 1.0 17.3 0.7 ;
Mean s.d. 15.921.4 18.8:1.6 16.5 1.7 17.5 1.4 Background Locations L-09 Grand Ridge 15.1 0.9 18.3:0.8 15.9 1.1 L-10 16.7 0.7 Streator 14.8 0.8 17.2 0.9 15.1 1.2 16.0 0.7 L-12 Kernan 14.8 0.7 18.9 0.8 15.6 1.2 L-14 16.9 0.9 i Ottawa 15.5:0.8 19.521.1 16.1 1.3 18.0 1.0 q
Mean s. d. 15.0 0.3 18 5 1.0 15.7 0.4 16.9 0.8 58
i LASALLE
')
Table 5.1-1 (continued) :
GAMMA RADIATION, AS ME'ASURED BY-THERM 0 LUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS (TLDs)
SPECIAL PROGRAM ,
Outer Ring, Near 5 Miles Radius, Indicator Locations 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter- 4th Quarter-Date P1 aced: 12-30-88 04-01-89 07-01-89 09-30-89 Date Removed: 04-01-89 01-89 09-30-89 12-29-89 .
Days in the Field: 92 91 91 - 90 -
Location Average mR/Qtr.
L-201 16.420.8; 21.0t1.2 16.It0.9 18.310.9 L-201-2 16.3t0.8 20.520.8 17.0tl.0 17.520.8 L-202-1 16.4t0.8 20.6t0.8 15.920.8' -18.010.9 L-202-2 16.7t0.7 21.120.9 17.1t0.7 - 17.921.2; L-203-1 15.120.8 18.421.4_ 14.821.0 '16.1tl.2 L-203-2' 17.7tl.0 21.3t0.7 17,920.9 18.4tl.0' L-204-1 15.0t0.9 18.121.0 15.6tl.1 -17.8t0.8-L-204-2 14.720.7 19.820.8 16.121.0 16.910.8 L-205-1 16.3t0.9 19.320.9 15.721.2 20;221.1 L-205-2 15.220.7 19.8tl.0- -15.4t0.8 '17.7t0.9 L-206-1 15.1t1.1 21.0t0.8 14.7tl . 2 17.9tl.1 L
L-206-2 16.0t0.7 19.5tl.2 17.221.1- 17.310.9 L-207-1 16.1*1.1 21.021.0 17.010.8 18.7t0.8 L-207-2 16.6t0.8 19.111.1 15.4*0.8- 16.220.9 L-208-1 15.6t0.7 23.6t0.9 18.210.7 19.310.8 L-208-2 16.310.9 21.021.1 16.111.0 17.821.0 L-209-1 18.620.7 22.6t0.9 19.5tl.2 19.320.9 L
l L-209-2 15.510.7 20.0t0.8. 15.511.2 17.711.0 L-210-1 16.510.6 23.6t0.7 17.7*0.8 19.6t0.9 L-210-2 17.4t0.8 21.7tl.1 18.321.1 18.511.0 L-211-1 15.320.9 24.411.0: 19.611.2 20.7 1.1 L-211-2 17.310.8' 20.911.1- 17.4t0.9 .18.210.9 L-212-1 15.310.7 20.7t0.8 16.210.7 18.311.0 -
L-212-2 17.410.9 20.110.9 17.6tl.1 17.920.9 L-213-1 15.0t0.7 20.110.9 17.611.2 17.7tl.2 L-213-2 .15.720.7 22.111.3 16.811.3' '18.8t0.7 L-214-1 18.210.7 22.7t0.8 18.410.8 19.6tl.0 L-214-2 18.411.0 22.6tl.0 18.110.9 19.211.0 L-215-1 16.720.7 23.510.7 17.810.7 19.6t0.7 L-215-2 17.410.8 23.510.7 18.310.7 19.7tl.2 L-216-1 16.4t0.8 20.610.8 17.211.1 18.511.0=
L-216-2 15.710.7 19.910.7 17.4tl.2 17.6t0.8
'Mean i s.d. 16.3tl.0 21.121.6 17.011.3 18.311.1 [
59
LASALLE
. Table 5.1-1 (continued)
GAMMA RADIATION. AS MEASURED BY THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS (TLDs)
SPECIAL PROGRAM -
Inner Ring, Near Site Boundary, Indicator locations 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter. 4th Quarter Date Placed: 12-30-88 04-01-89 07-01-89 09-30-89 Date Removed: 04-01-89 07-01-89 09-30-89 12-29-89 Days in the Field: 92 91 91 90 Location ' Average mR/ Quarter-Code L-101-1 16.320.7 20.920.7 17.021.3 17.720.7 L-101-2 15.920.7 19.521.0 16.511.0- 16.8t0.8 L-102-1 17.510.7 24.410.7 20.2t1.5- 20.Sil.2 L-102-2 17.510.7- 23.2t0.9 19.211.1 -20.120.9 .
L-103-1 17.610.7 20.611.0 18.221.0 18.521.3 L-103-2 17.4*0.7: 23.810.9 18.4t0.9 20.110.7 L-105-1 18.420.7- 22.6tl.0 17.920.8 20.1t0.9 L-105-2 16.7t0.6 22.0tl.4 18.020.9 18.911.4 L-106-1 16.3t0.7 19.910.8 17.411.1 17.821.2 L-106-2 16.210.9 18.920.9' 16.4t0.8- 16.3tl.0 L-107-1 15.610.7 23.0tl.2 18.411.0' 19.221.3-L-107-2 16.720.7 20.410.8 17.310.8 17.521.0-L-108-1 17.0t0.8- 21.011.4 17.321.3 19.121.0 L-108-2 14.210.9 17.lt0.9- 15.1tl.2 15.520.9 L-109-1 17.120.6 21.120.7 17.920.9 18.210.7 L-109-2 16.910.9 21.2tl .3 17.6tl.3 17.6tl.3 L-110-1 16.410.8 20.421.0 17.211.2 17.510.9 L-110-2 16.110.7 19.810.9 -17.111.0 17.4t0.9 L-111a-1 16.8t0.7 21.610.9 17.7t0.8 18.621.0 L-111a-2 16.210.8 22.011.4 17.0t0.9 19.221.2 L-111b-1 15.220.7 21.510.7- 18.010.7 18.6t0.8 L-111b-2 15.610.6 20.610.7 17.2t1.3 17.521.3 L-112-1 16.110.7 19.911.0 16.111.3 17.210.9 L-112-2 15.510.6 20.720.8 17.220.9 18.021.0 L-113a-1 16.310.7 22.211.0 15.921.0 19.211.0 L-113a-2 15.810.7 22.810.9 17.110.9 18.920.8 L-113b-1 16.210.8 21.7tl.0 15.420.9 18.911.0 L-113b 16.010.7 20.4tl.0 17.920.9 18.510.9-L-114-1 17.4t0.8 21.411.3 -16.211.0 18.3t1.0 L-114-2 15.9t0.7 20.7tl.0 17.910.8 17.510.8 Mean t s.d. 16.4t0.9 21.211.5 17.411.1 18.321.2 i
60
1
-- ! ~
i APPENDIX II i
METEOR 0 LOGICAL DATA !
i i
is i
i 1
1 k
f t
l
'l 61 y
5 LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION FER10D OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1989 ,
STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL 1
N 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 NNE O 1 3 0 0 0 4 NE O -3 2 0 0 0 5 ENE O O O O O O O ,
E O O O O O O O [
ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O 0 ;
S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !
SW 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 l WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '
VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 7 5 1 1 1 15 L
l Haurs of calm in this stability class: 0 :
j Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 t
Heurs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 l
l 62
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1989 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O 1 1 0 0 2 r NE O 1 1 1 0 0 3 ENE O O 2 2 0 0 4 E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 ;
WSW 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 i
( W 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 l
WNW 0 0 3 0 0 1 4 NW 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 NNW 0 0 0 0 5 2 7 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 3 9 7 5 4 28 Hours of calm in this stability class 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 ,
63
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION l PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1989 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET
[
WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH) i DIRECTION .7-3 '4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL !
1 N O O 1 1 0 0 2 ;
NNE O O 2 0 1 1 4 ;
NE O O 3 2 4 1 10 ENE O O O 2 1 0 3 -
E O O O O O O O ESE O 1 0 0 0 0 1 I SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O 1 0 0 1 S O O 1 2 0 0 3 SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 0 2 2 0 4 WSW 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 W 0 1 2 0 0 1 4 WNW 0 0 1 0 1 4 6 NW 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 NNW 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 3 11 10 11 10 45 l
Hours of calm in this stability class: 0
- Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class
- 2 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 l
l l 64 l
J
- ]
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORT - JANUARY-MARCH 1989 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN NPH)'
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19*24 GT 24 TOTAL -l N O 2 15 59 31 11 118 NNE O 5 19 23 21 6 74 NE 1 4 17 44 22 1 89 ENE O 4 7 24 19 4 58 E 2 5 8 19 23 6 63 ESE 1 6 4 4 5 8 28 Ii SE O 3 18 11 1 6 39 SSE O 4 8 13 7 3 35 S 1 1 6 17 16 .7 48 L SSW 2 3 8 7 12 20 51 SW 0 7 5 9 10 15 46 i WSW 4 4 s 18 19 10 63 i
W 1 6 8 14 21 35 85 WNW 0 1 4 15 38 42 100 NW 0 6 10 13 22 24 75 <
NNW 0 5 8 32 27 6 78 VARIABLE O O O O O O O I TOTAL 11 66 153 322 294 204 1050 '
Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 43 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 f
65 l d
m
i i
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MAP.CH 1989 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 ' TOTAL N O O 3 5 3 3 14 l I
NNE 6 1 0 2 6 3 18 l NE 2 2 9 9 0 0 22 I ENE o 6 3 8 0 1 18 ,
1
. E 1 1 5 6 1 5 19 ESE O 2 3 13 11 8 37 ,
SE 1 1 3 16 16 7 44 SSE 2 0 4 14 11 7 38 3 S O 5 2 9 12 25 53 SSW 2 5 5 6 7 64 89 SW 0 3 3 9 1 42 58 WSW 3 6 2 6 12 19 48 W 2 6 4 4 15 36 67 WNW 0 6 4 10 24 32 76
! NW 1 4 0 10 8 9 32 NNW 0 3 4 5 2 0 14 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 20 51 54 132 129 261 647 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 14 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability claatses: 3 1
1 66
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1989 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-16 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O 1 3 0 2 6 NNE O O O O O O O NE O O 2 5 2 0 9 ENE o 0 0 3 2 0 5 E 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 ESE O O O 1 2 0 3 SE O 1 0 5 6 6 18 '
SSE 1 1 0 2 9 4 17 S 0 12 1 1 5 26 45 SSW 0 2 0 5 24 1 32 SW 1 1 1 2 3 31 39 WSW 1 1 0 0 4 22 2B W 0 2 0 2 4 15 23 WNW 1 0 1 2 10 6 20 NW 0 0 0 1 5 2 B NNW 0 1 2 2 5 0 10 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 6 10 8 34 69 138 265 Heurs of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 2 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 1
67
I LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION ;
PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1989 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O ,
NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O' O O E O O O O O O O ,
ESE O O O O O O O ,
SE O O O O 2 3 5 SSE O O O O 2 3 .5 .
S 0 0 0 2 3 9 14 i
SSW 0 1 0 0 0 4 5 SW 0 0 1 1 2 3 7 WSW 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1
W 0 0 0 1 0 3 4 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 NNW 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 VARIABLE O , 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 1 1 6 12 26 46-Hsurs of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing. wind measurements in this stability class: 0 :
Hours of-missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 i
68
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1989 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O O 1 0 0 1 ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSW O O O O O O O SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 Hours of calm in this stability class 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 6 t
69
1 i
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1989 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O 5 0 0 5 '
NE O O O 1 0- 0 1-ENE O O 1 6 0 0 7 ;
E 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 ESE O O O O 1 1 2 ,
SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O ,
S O O O O O O O SSW 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 SW 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 WSW I O O O O 0 1 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O l
TOTAL 1 0 3 12 1 5 22 Hours of calm in this stability class: O liours of missing wind meastatements ir. this stability class 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 6 1 r
s- 70
1 l
l 1
l LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION i PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1989 l STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS NEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH) .
70TAL DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 N O O 1 1 0 0 2 NNE O O O 4 1 0 5 NE O O 5 3 0 0 8 ENE O O 2 3 1 0 6 E O O 1 4 0 1 6 i
ESE O O 1 0 0 2 3 SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S 0 1 2 4 1 1 9 SSW 0 0 10 9 0 0 19 SW 0 0 2 4 0 0 6 WSW 0 0 0 3 1 0 -4 W 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 WNW 0 0 0 0 3 6 ,
NW 0 0 0 3 3 2 8 NNW 0 0 1 3 1 0 5 VARIABLE O O O O O O O l
TOTAL 0 1 25 41 11 10 88 Houro of calm in this stability class: 0 Houro.of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Houro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 6 l
l I
l 71
. .~-
P LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1989 i STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 1 11 20 12 6 2 52 ,
NNE 2 19 10 15 12 0 Se NE ? 13 18 25 5 0 63 i
ENE O 7 22 40 12 8 89 i
E 3 9 21 9 5 5 52 ESE 1 3 11 10 11 12 48 SE 1 8 13 12 9 9 52 SSE 1 8 12 33 14 18 86 S 1 6 12 20 10 17 66 SSW 1 8 14 6 6 18 53 i SW 0 6 6 10 7 8 37 WSW 1 6 10 8 14 5 44 W 2 5 19 23 15 12 76 WNW 2 9 19 43 19 32 124 i NW 2 11 21 51 41- 11 137 j NNW 0 6 42 32 6 0 86 1
VARIABLE O O O O O O O i TOTAL 20 13$ 270 349 192 157 1123 Hours of calm in this stability _ class: 0 Hsurs of missing wind measurements in this stability classi 0 Hsurs of missing stability = measurements in all stability classes: 6 72
f LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APR IL-JtiNE 1989 STABILITY CLASS -
SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET l WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION . 77 3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 2 2 6 4 1 6 21 HNE 1 3 2 11 4 2 23 NE O 3 5 13 1 0 22 ENE 1 6 9 4 1 0 21 E O 5 10 28 6 8 57 ESE 1 4 5 18 17 5 50 SE 1 2 3 5 12 8 J1 SSE O 5 5 7 4 16 37 S 1 3 5 4 5 10 28 t SSW 1 5 10 13 10 34 73 SW 0 5 6 6 8 23 48 WS'f 0 4 6 10 8 i 29 W 3 7 10 6 9 -2 37 WNW 0 9 9 7 25 12 62 i
NW 2 3 12 15 10 1 43 NNW 0 5 9 8 4 0 26 j VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 13 71 112 159 125 128 608 1
Hours of calm in this stability class: O Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 6 73
i LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1989 ,
STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE tDIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N' O O O 3 1 0 4 NNE O O 2 2 0 0 7 NE 1 0 1 2 0 0 4
[
ENE O O O O O O O E 1 0 2 5 0 0 8 r
ESE O 2 1 9 10 0 22 SE O 4 5 3 5 3 20 SSE O 4 3 1 5 6 19 S 0 4 0 3 7 7 21 SSW 0 1 6 9 4 13 33 SW 0 1 6 8 8 4 27 HSW 0 0 0 9 8 2 19 W 0 0 4 10 6- 3 23 .
i, WNW 0 0 1 3 8 7 19 ,
NW 0 0 0 6 5 4 15 :
I 7
~
NNW 0 2 3 5 3 0 13 VARIABLE O O O O O O O ,
TOTAL 2 18 34 78 13 49 254 l-l Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 1 ,
Hours of missing stability measureuents $n all stability _ classes: 6 l
l r
-74 -
L
U l
G LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1989 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 '20TAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O 0 0 C ESE O O O O O O O <
l SE O O O 3 0 l' 4 SSE O O O 2 3 3 8 S O O 1 0 1 6 8 SSW 0 0 1 6 3 4 14 SW 0 0 1 2 S 2 10 WSW 0 0 0 4 2 3 9 W 0 0 0 6 3 1 10 WNW 0 0 0 1 1 3 5 NW 0 0 0 4 2 0 6 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O 0-
.]
s TOTAL 0 0 3 28 20 23 74 Hours of calm in this stability-class: .
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 5 Hours of missing stability measurements in all= stability classes: 6 i
75
I i
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) I WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET 1
WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH) 1 DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O {
NNE O O O O O O O NE- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,
ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O ,
SE O O O O O O O i
SSE O O O O O O O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !
SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i
WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N!i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heurs of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hsurs of missing stability neasurements in all stability. classes: 22 76 :
i l' . _
p.
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL !
N O O O O 1 0 1 NNE O O 3 0 0 0 3 NE O O 9 0 0 0 9 ENE O O O 1 0 0 1 E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l
SSW 1 2 4 1 0 0 8 SW 0 3 2 0 0 0 5 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 1 5 18 2 2 0 28 Houro of calm in this stability class: 0 Houro of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Houro of missing stability measurements in all stabflity classes: 22 ,
l
! 77
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 STAB 17JTY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) ;
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WINb WIND SPEED (IN NPH) '
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL i
N 0 1 1 0 3 0 5 l NNE O 1 2 7 1 0 11 NE O O 5 2 0 0 7 'i ENE o 0 2 2 0 4 i E O C 0 0 0 0 0 ESE '
O O O O O O O l
SE O O O O O O O SSE O 2 2 1 0 0 5 t
S 0 5 2 1 0 0 8 l
SSW 0 2 2 0 1 0 5 SW 1 5 2 2 0 0 10 WSW 0 0 3 3 0 0 6 W 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '
NNW 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 VARIABLE O O O O O O O I
1 TOTAL 1 16 23 19 6 0 65 Heurs of calm in this stability class 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hsura of missing stability measurements in all atability classes 22 78
t LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 '
STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) '
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET ,
WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 2 14 16 19 9 8 68 NNE 2 17 27 24 24 1 95 ,
NE 4 26 72 38 9 0 149 ENE 3 19 20 43 3 0 80 E 4 19 23 28 3 0 77 ESE 1 33 21 10 1 0 66 SE 2 26 29 7 0 0 64 j SSE 1 10 29 16 1 1 58 S 2 16 19 9 5 1 52 SSW 0 7 12 7 1 34 l
SW 1 14 6 10 3 1 35 WSW 0 8 15 29 6 2 60 W 1 10 7 18 9 0 45 ,
WNW 1 7 8 11 1 0 28 NW 0 5 11 6 1 0 23 NNW 2 2 5 25 4 3 41 VARIABLE O O n 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 26 233 315 305 86 18 983 Houro of-calm in this stability class 0 Houro of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Houro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 22 79
i I
t LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF REC 0kD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 i STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
- WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH) ,
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL 5
N O 2 8 1 0- 2 11 .
NNE 1 3 13 4 6 4 31 NE 1 10 25 12 0 0 48 ,
ENE O 9 14 16 4 1 44 t
E 1 13 24 32 9 0 79 t
ESE O 3 11 11 13 0 38 SE 1 6 15 16 5 0 43 ~
SSE O 7 8 9 9 3 36 ,
S O 3 5 8 13 5 34 ;
SSW 0 3 8 8 12 10 41 SW 1 1 6 8 12 18 46 WSW 1 0 3 13 6 5 28 W 1 1 6 10 7 0 25 WNW 0 6 3 9 1 0 19 NW 0 5 3 7 4 1 20 NNW 1 3 3 3 5 0 15 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 8 75 155 167 106 49 560 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hcurs of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measuremen*3 in all stability classes: 22 80
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE' (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH) '
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19 GT 24 TOTAL N O 1 2 4 3 2 12 NNE O 1 0 0 0 0 1 NE O 3 3 2 0 0 8 ENE o 3 2 1 0 0 6 E 1 2 3 7 1 0 14 ESE 1 2 10 21 5 0 39 SE O 1 16 13 9 4 43 SSE O 7 14 18 3 2 44 S 0 2 11 13
, 3 2 31 SSW 2 6 5 13 6 6 38 SW 2 3 10 12 15 5 47 WSW 3 3 9 9 8 '3 35 W 1 4 4 8 9 0 26 WNW O 2 9 1 0 1 13 NW 0 1 2 1 2 0 6 i
NNW 0 1 4 9 5 0 19 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 10 42 96 140 69 25 382 Houro of calm in this stability class: 0 Hnuro of missing wind measurements in this stability class 0 Houro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes 22 81 !
_ _J
~
i I
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION ;
PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 ~
STABILITY CLASS -
EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O 1 0 0 1 NE O O 1 0 0 0 1 ENE O O O O O O O E O O 1 1 1 0 3 ESE O O O O O O O t
SE O O O 1 1 2 4 SSE O O 2 13 14 2 31 S 0 0 8 11 6 8 33 SSW 0 0 1 9 9 14' 33 l
SW 0 2 4 6 8 5 25 WSW 0 2 3 6 3 4 18
- W 0 0 0 1 5 5 11 WNW 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 ,
NW 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 NNW 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 VARIABLE O O O 0- 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 6 22 50 50 '40 168 t
Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0-Hours of missing etability measurements in all stability classes: 22 ;
82
1 LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 ,
STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET ,
WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S O O O O O O O i
SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '
l l
VARIABLE O O O O O O O
- TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hsura of calm in this stability class: 0 Haura of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Houro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 114 83
1 LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION l PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 i STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) ,
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH) ,
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O 0 0 NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O
[
E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O t SE O O O O O O O -
SSE O O O O O O O S O O O O O O O -
SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 0 0 0' O O WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '
W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 'O O NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l
Heurs of calm in this stability class: O Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hsure of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 114 84
1 LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O
- O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S O O O O O O O SSW 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 SW 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 0 0 0 8 4 12 Houro of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 3 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 114 85
i LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) !
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH) '
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 OT 24 TOTAL N O 3 8 15 36 36 98 f l
NNE O 5 13 18 15 9 60 NE O 7 18 9 3 0 37 ENE 1 7 9 18 0 0 35 ,
E O O 3 9 0 0 12 ESE O 7 4 8 1 0 20 SE 1 7 12 5 1 0 26 SSE 1 3 2 14 8 0 28 ,
S 1 8 12 14 13 20 68 SSW 0 0 8 18 25 34 85 :
SW 0 4 3 17 21 11 56 WSW 0 3 5 11 14 5 38 W 0 2 5 16 25 16 64 WNW 1 7 11 28 16 48 111 NW 3 5 9 47 18 67 149 NNW 1 2 3 33 32 31 102 ,
VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 9 70 125 280 228 277 989 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hsurs of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
36 -
Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 114 86
.s
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 04 TOTAL N O 1 1 6 7 0 15 NNE 1 0 3 6 3 0 13 NE 1 2 3 3 0 0 9 ENE O 3 6 3 0 0 12 E O 2 3 4 0 0 9 ESE O 4 3 4 1 0 12 SE O O 6 1 1 4 12 ..
SSE 1 1 3 3 5 7 20 S 1 1 7 7 35 1 52 SSW 0 0 2 5 14 51 72 SW 2 1 1 7 18 27 56 WSW 1 1 6 7 6 13 34 W O 1 1 5 6 33 46 WNW 0 2 1 11 17 25 56 NW 2 4 2 16 17 28 69 NNW 0 4 4 14 15 6 43 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 9 27 46 102 117 229 530 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 33 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 114 87
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O 1 5 4 0 10 NNE O O 2 2 3 0 7 NE o 2 1 0 0 0 3 ENE O O O 1 0 0 1 E 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 ESE O 1 1 2 1 0 5 SE O O 4 2 4 10 20 SSE O 4 1 5 6 3 19 S 1 1 3 12 1 7 25 SSW 0 3 0 7 5 22 4 37 SW 0 3 2 6 5 20 36 WSW 1 0 2 3 5 2 13 W 0 0 2 4 8 5 19 WNW 1 0 3 10 17 14 45 NW 0 0 2 7 22 7 38 NNW 0 0 3 10 8 2 23 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 4 15 27 65 100 92 303 Hours of calm in this stability classi 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 6 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 114 88
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN mph)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 NNE O O O 1 0 0 1 NE O O O O O O o ENE O O O O O O O E O O 0 0 1 0 1 ESE O 2 1 0 0 0 3 SE O O 6 0 0 0 6 SSE O 1 0 10 4 8 23 S O O O 3 4 27 34 SSW 0 0 0 6 9 33 48 SW 0 0 3 4 5 8 20 WSW O 1 0 7 1 13 22 W 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 WNW 0 0 1 0 1 2 4 NW 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 NNW O O 1 3 0 0 4 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 4 15 28 32 96 175 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 7 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 114 89
-h APPENDIX-III LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES 4 !
i
-i l
.x
)
i
. 90- 1
+ g Jp-_ e
~ LASALLE' 7-LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES Expected Collection Sample Type location Date Reason There were no missed samples .in 1989.
4 i
l.
l l
i'
\
91
l 1
.i tj o
.. . 1 APPENDIX IV o
MILCH ANIMAL AND-NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS !
4 l
l 1
'i 1
l 92 i
4 >- . .
-9
'k ~. s
<;j
.. ]
i L AS ALLE" i
MILCH ANIMALS CENSUS, 1989 There are no dairy farms within a f.ive mile radius of LaSalle.-
+ Sampling Locations L-19 Robert Bettenhousen Farm Number of cows : 72 Humber of fresh cows - 50 Diet consists of the .following: 4
'l Ground feed
- 10 lbs, per day Corn silage Free choice !
Green chop Free choice l{ .
- Ground feed consists of:
Hay .10 lbs.
Silage 70 lbs.- I L-16 Lowery Dairy Farms q Number of cows - 100 Number of fresh cows - 72' Diet consists of the following:
Ground feed
- 20 lbs. per day Corn and oats silage Free choice !
Alf alfa hay Free choice :
- Ground corn mix consists of:
l Ground Corn Soybean meal l
93
- r
-~ -
l LASALLE MILCH ANIMALS CENSUS, 1989 (continued) 1 L-17 _ Earl Hayer - Andrew Patterson Numbersof cows - 35 Number of_ fresh cows - 22 Diet consists of the following:
Ground corn mix
- 15 lbs. per day l Silage 20 lbs, per day i Hay Free choice {
- Ground corn mix consists of:
Corn 4000 lbs. i Oats 1000 lbs.
Protein 700 lbs.
Minerals 50 lbs.
Salt 50 lbs.
L-18 Boldt Dairy Farm -
Number of cows - 22 Numberlof fresh-cows - 17 {
Diet consists of the following:
Ground corn mix
- 20 lbs. per day Hay Free choice -
Green chop Free choice ,
- Ground corn mix consists of:
Corn 2,000 lbs.
Soybean meal 600'lbs.
Oats 300 lbs. i Minerals 50 lbs. 1 Salt 50 lbs.
Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 19 and 26,1989.
94
LASALLE NEAREST RESIDENCE CENSUS,1989 Nearest residences of the LaSalle Station within a five (5) mile radius.
1 Direction Distance '
N 2.2 miles NNE 1.4 miles-NE 1.8 miles. 1
- (
ENE 3.4 miles L E 3.1 miles t i
ESE -1.6 miles-SE 1.5 miles SSE 1.1 miles '
S 2.2 miles SSW 2.0 miles SW 0.7 miles WSW 1.3 miles - ,
W 0.9' miles WNW 1.0 miles ):
NW 2.6 miles NNW 1.2 miles (new house).
4 Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 26, 1989.
4 I
95 ;
i
i
-l i
APPENDIX V- -i, INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS a
l l
-i 4
f i
f a
t i
l 96- <
-n . _ _ . . . .. .
Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results.
Teledyne Isotopes Midrest Laboratory- (formerly Hazleton Environmental- Sciences) =
has participated in. interlaboratory comparison (crosscheck) programs since the:
formulation of its quality ccatrol program in December 1971. These: ,
are operated by agencies which supply environmental-type samples; (e.g., p ?inigrams-lk - or 1 water)' containing concentrations of radionuclides known to the issuing: agency but not to participant laboratories. The purpose of such a . program-is to provide: t an independent check on the' laboratory's analytical procedures and to alert it to any possible problems. j j
Participant laboratories :- measure the concentrations of - specified radionuclides- i
' and report them to the issuing agency. Several _ months later, the agency reports i the known values to the participant laboratories and -specifies control ' limits.
Results consistently higher or lower than the known values or outside the control 1
limits indicate a need to check the instruments or procedures used.
The results in Table A-1 were obtained through participation in the environmental sample crosscheck program for milk, water, . air; filters, and' food samples during a the period January 1986 through November,1989. This program has been conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Intercomparison and Calibration .i Section, Quality Assurance Branch, Environmental Monitoring and Support Labora-tory, Las Vegas, Nevada. '
l, The results in Table A-2 were obtained for thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's) .;
during the period 1976, 1977, 1979, 1980,1984, and 1985-1986 through partici-pation in the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, and Eighth International i Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters eder the sponsorships listed in Table A-2.
Also Teledyne testing results are linted.
Table A-3 ' lists results of the analyses on in-house : piked samples.
Table A-4 lists results of the analyses on in-house " blank" samples.
Attachment B lists acceptance criteria for " spiked" samples.
Addendum to Appendix A provides explanation for out of limit results.
97
_m
Table A-1. U.S.- EnvirCnmental Protection' A9ency's crosscheck pragram, com-parison of EPA and Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory results for milk, water, air filters, and food samples. 1986 through 1989.a Concentration in pCi/l b i Lab Sample Date TIML Result EPA Resultd Code Type Collected. Analysis 12cc Is, N=1 Control Limits
-- I STF-447 Food Jan 1986 Sr-89 24.312.5 25.015.0 -16.3-33.7 Sr-90 17.310.6- 10.011.5 -7.4-12.6 1-131 22.722.3. 20.010.6 9.6-30.4 i Cs-137 16.310.6- 15.025.0 6.3-23.7- .i K 927246 9501144 '701-1199 1 STW-448 Water- Feb 1986 Cr-51 45.013.6 38.025.0 29.3-46.7 Co-60 19.711.5 18.0*5.0 - 9.3-26.7 Zn-65 44.023.5 ~ 40.015.0' 31 .3-48 .7 I Ru-106 <9.0 0.015.0 0.0-8.7 '
Cs-134 28.322.3 .30.015.0 -21.3-38.7 u Cs-137 23.720.6. 22.025.0 13.3-30.7 STW-449 Water Feb 1986 H-3 5176248 5227tS25 4317<6137 STW-450 Water Feb 1986 U total 8.010.0 9.016.0 -0.0-19.4 l
STM-451 Milk -Feb 1986- I-131 7.0t0.0 9.0t6.0 0.0-19.4 ] !
STW-452 Water Mar 1986 -Ra-226 3.810.1 .4.120.6. 3.0-5.2 Ra-228 11.020.5 12.421.8 -9;2-15.5 STW-453 Water. Har 1986 Gr. alpha 6.710.6 15.015.0
, 6.3-23.7 !
Gr. beta 7.310.6 8.015.0 0.0-16.7 STW-454 Water Apr 1986 1-131 7.010.0 - 9.016.0 0.0-19.4 STW-455 Water Apr 1986 456 (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha 15.011.0' 17.015.0 '
8.3-25.7-Ra-226 3.120.1 2.910.4 2.1-3.7 1 Ra-228 1.510.2 2.0 0.3 1.5-2'5 Uranium 4.710.6 5.026.0 0.0-15.4 Sample B Gr. beta 28.711.2 35.015.0 26 3-43.7 Sr-89 5.710.6 7.025.0 0.0-15.7 Sr-90 7.010.0 7.0 1.S 4.4-9;6 ,
Co-60 10.721.5 10.015.0 1.3-18.7 Cs-134 4.011.7 5.015.0 0.0-13.7 i Cs-137 5.310.6 5.015.0 0.0-13.7. l 1
l l
98
L -!
L Table A-1. (continued)
Concentration in pCi/lb Lab Sample' Date TIML Result- EPA Resultd Code Type Collec ted Analysis 12cc Is, N=1 Control Limits STAF-457 Air April 1986 Gr. alpha 13.710.6 15.015.0 6.3-23.7-
, Filter Gr. beta 46.3t0.6 47.015.0 38.3-55.7' L Sr-90 14.7t0.6 18.0tl.5 15.4-20.6 Cs-137 10.7i0.6 10.0tS.0 1.3-18.7-
/ .
1 STU-458- Urine April 1986 Tritium- 4313t70 4423t189 4096-4750 l-L STW-459 Water May 1986 Sr-89 4.3t0.6 5.0*5.0 0.0-13.7' i
L Sr-90 5.010.0 5-Otl.5 2.4-7;6' STW-460 Water May 1986 Gr. alpha 5.310.6 8 r_3,0 0,0 16.7 Gr. beta 11.3tl.2 15.0*5.0 6.3-23.7 Water STW-461 June 1986 Cr-51 <9.0- 0.0t5.0 0.0-8.7 Co-60 66.011.0 66. 0*S.0 57.3-74.7 Zn-65 87.311.5 86.0t5.0 77.3-94.7 L Ru-106 39.712.5 50.015.0 41.3-58.7 I Cs-134 49.312.5 49.0t5.0 40.3-57.7 ,
Cs-137- 10.311.5 10.0t5.0 1'.3-18.7 STW-462 Water: June 1986 Tritium 3427*25 3125*361- -2499-3751 3 STM-464 Milk June 1986 Sr-89 <1. 0. 0.0t5.0 0.0-8.7 Sr-90' 15.3t0.6 16.0tl.5 13.4-18.6 I-131 48.3t2.3 41.0i6.0 30.6-51.4-Cs-137 -43.7tl.5 31.0*5.0 22.3-39.7L K 1567i114 1600t80 1461-1739 STW-465 Water July 1986 Gr. alpha 4.710.6 6.015.0 0.0-14.'7 Gr. beta -18.7tl.2 18.0t5.0 9.3-26.7 STW-467 Water August 1986 I-131 30.3t0.6 45.0t6.0 34.4-55.4 STW-468 Water August 1986 Pu-239 11.3t0.6 10.lil.0 8.3-11.9 l STW-469 Water August 1986- Uranium 4.0t0.0 4.016.0 0.0-14.4 STAF-470 Air Sept 1986 Gr. alpha 19.311.5 22.0t5.0 13.3-30.7 471 Filter Gr. beta 64.0t2.6 66.015.0 57.3-74.7 a 472 Sr-90 22.011.0 22.0*5.0 19.4-24.6 Cs-137 25.711.5 22.0t5.0 13.3-30.7 4
STW-473 Water Sept 1986 Ra-226 6.0 0.1 6.1 0.9 4.5-7.7 Ra-228 8.7tl.1 9.1tl.4 6.7-11.5 99' - -
4 t
Table A-1. (continued) .
Concentration in pCi/lb Lab Sample Date TIML Result EPA Resultd Code Type Collec ted Analysis 12cc Is, N=1 Control Limits STW-474 Water Sept 1986 Gr. alpha 16.3t3.2 15.015.0 6.3-23.7 Gr. beta 9.011.0 8.015.0 0.0-16.7
=
STW-475 Water Oc t 1986 Cr-51 63.315.5 59.0t5.0 50.3-6 7. 7 Co-60 31.0t2.0 31.0t5.0 22.3-39.7 Zn-65 87.3i5.9 85.0t5.0 76.3-93.7 Ru-106 74.717.4 74. 0t5.0 L 65.3-82.7 Cs-134 25.7*0.6 28.0t5.0 19.3-36.7- ,
Cs-137 46.3tl.5 44.0t5.0 35.3-52.7 STW-476 Water Oct 1986 H-3 5918t60 5973tS97 4938-7008 SPW-477 Water Oct 1986 478 (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha 34.0c6.0 40.0t5.0 31.3-48.7 Ra-226 5.8i0.2 -6.0f0.9 4.4-7.6 Ra-228 2.7tl.0 5.0t0.8 3.7-6.3 Uranium 11.0t0.0 10.0t6.0 0.0-20.4 Sample B Gr. beta 38.7tl.2 51.0t5.0 42.3-59.7 Sr 5.0t0.0 10. 0t5. 0 . 1,3-18.7 Sr 3.0f0.0 4.0tl.5 1.4-6.6 Co-60 24.7tl.2 24.015.0 15.3-32.7 Cs-134 11.0t2.0 12.0t5.0- 3.3-20.7 Cs-137 9.3tl.2 8.0t5.0 0.0-16.7 STM-479 Milk Nov 1986 Sr 89- 7.7*1.2 9.0t5.0 0.3-17.7 Sr-90 1.0i0.0 0.0tl.5 0.0-2.6.
I-131 52.3t3.1- 149.016.01 38.6-59.4
.Cs-137 45.7*3.1 39.0t5.0 - 30.3-47.7-K 14891104 1565t78 1430-1700 STU-460 Urine Nov 1986 H-3 5540i26 5257t912 4345-6169 STW-481- Water Nov 1986 Gr. alpha 12.014.0 20.015.0 f.1. 3-28. 7 -
Gr. beta 20.0t3.5 20.0t5.0 11.3-28.7 STW-482 Water Dec 1986 Ro-226 6.7t0.2 6.8tl.0 5.0-8.6 Ra-228
=
5.210.2 11.lil.7 8.2-14.0-STW-483 Water Jan 1987 Sr-89 19.7i5.0 25.0t5.0 16.3-33.7 Sr-90 21.Di2.0 25.0tl.5 22.4-27.6-
.i 100 e
.= _
l Table A-1. (continued). !
Concentration in pCi/lb j Lab Sample Date TIML Result EPA Resultd i Code Type Collected Analysis. 120C 15, N=1 Control Limits S19-484 Water Jan 1987 Pu-239- 17.0t2.3- 16.711.7 13.8-19.6 !
STF-486 Food Jan 1987 Sr-90 36.014.0 49.0110.0 31.7-66.3 I 131 78.0t3.4 78.018.0 64.1 -91 . 9 Cs-137 89.7t3.0 84.015.0 75.3-92.7 K 942156 980t49 895-106b STF-487 Food Jan 1987 SR-90 2.010.0 ---
I (Blank). 1-131 <3 ---
Cs-137 <2 ---
.K 993t102 ---
STW-488 Water Feb 1987 Co-60 49.0i0.0 50.0t5.0 41.3-58.7 Zn-65 96.0t7.2 91.015,0 82.3-99.7-Ru-106 !
92.0t20.2 100.0t5.0 91.3-108.7 '
Cs-134 53.0t3.4- 59.0t5.0 50.3-67.7 Cs-137 89.314.6 87.015.0 78.3-95. 7 STW-489 Water Feb 1987 H-3 4130t140 42091420 3479-4939 STW-490 Water Feb 1987 Uranium 8.3tl.2 8.0t6.0 0.0-18.4 e
STM-491 Milk Feb 1987 1-131 10.0f 0. 0 9.00.9. 7.4-10.6. '
STW-492 Water Mar 1987 Gr. alpha 3.7tl.2 3. Ft5 .0 0.0-11.7 Gr. beta 11.3tl.2 '
.t; 0 4.3-21.7 S TW-493 Water Mar 1987 Ra-226 7.010.1 )..zl.1 5.4-9.2 Ra-228 7.lt2.3 't . Sil .1 5.5-9.5 t STW-494 Water Apr 1987 I-131 8.0t0.0 7.010.7 5.8-8.2 STAF-495 Air Apr 1987 Gr. alpha 15.0t0.0 Filter 14.0t5.0 5.3-22.7 Gr. beta 41.012.0 43.0t5.0 34.3-51.7 Sr-90 16.3tl.2 17.0tl.5 14.4-19.6 Cs-137 7.0f0.0 8.015. 0 0.0-16.7 STW-496 Water Apr 1987 497 (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha 30. 7tl . 2 30.0t8.0 16.1-43.9 Ra-226 3.9t0.2 3.910.6 2.9-4.9 Ra-228 4.91 0. 9 4.0t0.6 3.0-5.0 Uranium 5.0f0.0 5.0t6.0 0.0-15.4 101 m
~. _,
u p
-i s
Table A-1. (continued).
3_ j Concentration hn pCi/l b Lab ' Sample Date TIML Result EPA Resultd Code Type Collec ted Analysis- 12ac is, N=1 Control' Limits STW-496 Water Apr 1987 497 (Bl;cd)
Samle B Gr. Beta 69.3i9.4' 66.0t5.0 *
~ 57.3-74.7 Sr-89 16.3t3.0 14. 0t5. 01 10.3-27.7 Sr-90 10.0t0.0 10.0x1.5 7.4-12.6-Co-60 8.3t3.0 8;0t5.0 0.0-16.7 Cs-134 19.0t2.0 20.0i5.0 '11.3-28.7 t Cs-137 14.711.2 15.015.0 6.3-23;7' y ST0-498 Urine Apr 1987 H-3 6017t494 5620t795 'I 4647-6593 STW-499 Water May 1987 Sr-89 38.0t6.0 41.0t5.0 32.3-49.7 Sr-90 21.0t2.0 20.0tl.5 17.4-22.6-STW-500 Water May 1987 Gr. alpha 9.0t3.4 11.015.0 2.3-19.7 '
Gr. l' eta 10.3tl.2 7.0t5.0 0.0-15.7' STW-501 Water June 1987 Cr-51 40.Qt8.0 41.015.0 -32.3-49.7 I Co-60 60.3f3.0 64.0t5.0 55.3-72.7 ,
2n-65 11.3t5.0 10.015.0, 1;3-18.7 l Ru-106 78.3i6.4- 75.015.0 '66.3-83.7 Cs-134 36.713.0- 40.0t5.0 31.3-48.7 Cs-137- 80.3i4.2 80.015.0' 71.3-88.7-STW-502 Water June 1987 H-3 2906t86 2895t357'- 2277-3513 STW-503 Water June 1987 Ra-226- '6.910.1 7.3tl.1 5.4-9.2 Ra-228 13.3tl.0 -15.2t2.3 11.2-19.2 STM-504 Milk June 1987 Sr-89 57.0t4.3 69.0t5.0 60.3-77.7 Sr-SC 32.011.0 35.011.5- 32.4-37.6 1-131 64.0 2.0 59.0t6.0 48.5-69.4 Cs-137 77.710.6 74.0i5. 0 65.3-82.7- ~;
K 1383f17 1525t76 1393-1657 STW-505 Water July 1987 Gr. alpha 2.310.7 5.015.0 0.0-13.7 Gr. beta 4.0il.0 5.0t5.0 0.0-13.7-STF-506 Food July 1987 I ~ 31 82.7i4.6 80.018.0- 66.1-93.9 Cs-137 53.713.0 50.015.0 41.3-58.7 K 1548157 1680i84 1534-1826 STW-507 Water Aug 1987 I-131 45.714.2 48.0i6.0 37.6-58.4 STW-508 Water Aug 1987 Pu-239 5.8f0.2 5.310.5 4.4-0.2 102 3 ,
\
t T able A-1. (continued) p
+.
_o M Concentration in pCi/lb <
L ab Sample Date TIPt. R esul t EPA Resultd s C ode Type Collected Analysis 22cc Is,N=1
. Control Limits
. STW-509 Water Aug 1987- Uranium 13.320.3 13.026.0 2.5-23.4 \
STAF-510 Air Aug 1987 hr. alpha 9.720.4. 10.0 6 .0 1.3-18.7 Filter G r. beta. 28.320.6. 30 .025.0 21.3-3817 S r-90. 10.020.9 10.011.5 7.4-12.6-Cs-137 10.021.0 10.025.0 1.3-18 7
\ ! 4 STW-511 Water Sept 1987. R a-226 - 9 .9 20 .1 9.711.5-7.2-12.2-R a-228 8 .1 11 .4 : , 6.321.0 4.6-8.0 .
STW-512 Water Sept 1987 G r. alpha 2.0 t0.6 4.025.0' O.0-12.74 G r. beta 11.311.3 , 12 .0 25 .0 3.3-20.7 !
.STW-513 Water Odt 1987 H-3 4473t100 44922449 371415270 STW-514 Water Oct 1987 (Blind) 1 Sample A G r. alpha '29.3*2.6 28.017.0 15.9140'.1 Re-226 4 .9 20 .1 4.820.7 s3.6-6.1 R a-228 4.211.0' 3.620.5 2.7-4.5 Uranium 3.020.1 : 3 .0 26 .0 0.0-13.4 Sample 8 S r-89 14.311;3 16.025.0 7.3-24.7 S r-90 9 .7 20 .4 10.011.5 7.4-12.6 Co 60 16.7 3.0 , 16.025.0 17.3-24.7 C s-134 16.7.t2 .3 16.025.0 7.3-24.7 C s-137 24 .3 23 .3: 24.025;0 15;3-32.7 STW-516 Water Oct 1987 C r-51 B0.3 17.5 70iO25.0 6103275.7 C o-60 16.0 2.3 15 .0 25 .'J 6.3-23.7 Z+65 46 .3 25 .5 46.025.0 37.3-54 .7 Ru-106 57.3115.4 61 .0 25.0- 52.3-69.7 C s-134 23.722.5 25 425.0 16.3-33.7 C s-137 51.723.2 51.025.0 42.3-59.7 STU-517 U rine Nov 1987 H-3 72671100
, 74322743 6145-8719 STW 518 Water Nov 1987 Gr. alpha 3.022.0 7.025.0' O.0-15.7 G r. beta 15.722.3 19.0AS? 10 3-27.7 STW-519 Water Dec 1987 I-131 26.013.0~ 26.026.0 15.6-36.4 I
s 103
., __ a M ---
'abl e A-1. (continued)
Concentration in pCi/lb Lab Sampl e Date TIML Result EPA Resul td Code Type Coll ected Analysis 22cc Is, N=1 Control Lirit5 STW-520 Water Dec 1987 Ra-226 5.120.8 4.820.7 3.6-6.0 Ra-228 3.420.1 5.320.8 3.9-6.7
'; TW-521 Water Jan 1988 Sr-89 27.315.0 30.015.0 21.3-38.7 Sr-90 15.311.2 15.021.5 12.4-17.6 STV-523 Water Jan 1988 Gr. alpha 2.321.2 4.015.0 0.0-12.7 Gr. beto 7.7tl.2 8.015.0 0.0-16.7 STF-524 Faed Jan 1988 Sr-89 44.024.0 46.025.0 37.3-54.7 Sr-90 53.012.0 55.012.8 50.2-59.8 1-131 102.324.2 102.0t10.2 84.3-119.7 i Cs-137 95.7*6.4 91.0t5.0 82 .3-99. 7 K 1011t158 1230t62 h( 1124-1336 STW-525 Water Feb 1988 Co-60 69.312.3 69.015.0 60.3-77.7 Zn-65 99.023.4 94.0t9.4 77.7-110.3 Ru-106 92.7214.4 105.0210.5 86.8-123.2 Cs-134 61.7t8.0 64.0t5.0 55.3-72.7 Cs-137 99.7t3.0 94.015.0 85.3-102.7 STW-526 Water Feb 1988 H-3 34531103 33271362 2700-3954 STW-527 Water Feb 1988 Uranium 3.020.0 3.026.0 0.0-13.4 STM-528 Milk Feb 1988 I-131 4.7tl.2 4.0t0.4 3.3-4.7 STW-529 Water Mar 1988 Ra-226 7.110.6 7.611.1 5.6-9.6 s
Ra-228 NAE 7.7tl.2 5.7-9.7 STW-530 Water Mar 1988 Gr. alpha 4.321.2 6.015.0 0.0-14.7 Gr. beta 13.321.3 13.015.0 4.3-21.7 STAF-531 Ai r Mar 1988 Gr. alpha 21.022.0 20.0t5.0 11.3-28.7 Filttr Gr. beta 48.0A0.0 50.015.0 41.3-58.7 Sr-90
~
16.721.2 17.021.5 14.4-19.6 Cs-137 18.7tl.3 16.025.0 7.3-24.7 STk-532 Water Apr 1988 I-131 9.0t2.0 7.520.8 6.2-8.8 :
1 104 .
i
Table A-1. (continued)
Concentration in pCi/lb Lab Sampl e Date TIML Result EPA Resultd Code Type Collected Analysis 22b c 15, N=1 Control Limits STW-533 Water Apr 1988 534 (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha NDf 46.0111.0 27.0-65.0 Ra-226 ND 6.411.0 '4.7-8.1
.Ra-228 NO 5.6t0.8 4.2-7.0 Uranium 6.020.0 6.026.0' O.0-16.4
-Sample B Gr. beta - ND 57.015.0 48.3-65.7 Sr-89 3.311.2 5.025.0 0.0-13.7 Sr-90 5.3tl.2 5.021.5 2.4-7.6 Co-60 63.3t1.3 50.025.0 41.3-58.7 Cs-134 7.7tl.2 7.0t5.0 0.0-15.7 Cs-137- 8.311.2 7.015.0 0.0-15.7 STU-535 Urine Apr 1988 H-3 6483t155- 62021620 5128-7276 STW-536 Water Apr 1988 Sr-89 14.711.3 20.025.0 11.3-28.7 Sr-90 20.0t2.0 20.0tl.5 17.4-22.6 STW-538 Water June 1988 Cr-51 331.7t13.0 302.0t30.0 250.0-354.0 Co-60 16.022.0 15.0t5.0 6.3-23.7 Zn-65 107.7t11.4 101.0210.0 83.7-118.3 Ru-106 191.3t11.0 195.0220.0 160.4-229.6 :
Cs-134 18.314.6 20.0t5.0 11.3-28.7 Cs-137 26.311.2 25.015.0 16.3-33.7 STW-539 Water June 1988 H-3 5586192 55652557 4600-5530 1 STM-541 Milk June 1988 Sr-89 33.7t11.4 40.025.0' 31.3-48.7 Sr-90 55.315.8 60.013.0- 54.8-65.2 1-131 103.723.1 94.019.0 78.4-109.6 Cs-137 52.7t3.1 51.025.0 42.3-59.7 K 1587123 1600tS0' 1461-1739 ,
.STV-542 Water July 1988 Gr. alpha 8.7t4.2 15.0t5.0t 6.3-23.7 Gr. beta 5.321.2 4.015.0 0.0-12.7 STF-543 feJ July 1988 Sr-89 ND 33.015'.0 24.3-41.7-Sr-90 ND 34.022.0 30.5-37.5 o I-131 -115.015.3 -107.0111'.0 88.0-126.0 1* Cs-137 52.7t6.4 49.015.0 40.3-57.7 K 1190266- 1240162 1133-1347
. 1
- . , 105' > ,
lq .e, '
i ' '
[
, -l A i m , - - m ,, - - - ,
Table A-1. (continued)
' Concentration in pCi/lb I.ab Sanple .Date TIML Result ,_ EPA Resultd
' ode Type Collected Analysis 2cc . Is, N=1 Control Limits-SlW-544 Water Aug 1988 I-131 80.0t0.0 76.0t8.0 62.1-89.9 STW-545 Water Aug 1988 Pu-239 11.0t0.2 10.221.0 8.5-11.9 STW-546 Wasar Aug 1988 Uranium 6.0t0.0- 6.0t6.0 0.0-16.4 STAF-547 Air Aug 1988 Gr. alpha- 8.0t0.0 8.015.0 0. 0-16 '. 7 .
Filter Gr. beta 26.321.2 29.015.0 20.3-37.7 Sr-90 8.022.0. .8.021.5 '
5.4-10.6 Cs-137 13.0t2.0 12.015.0 '3.3-20.7 STW-548 Water Sep 1988 Ra-226 9.3t0.5 -8.4t2.6 6.2-10.6
=Ra-228 5.820.4 -5,421 6 4.0-6.8-STW-549 Water Sep 1988 Gr. alpha 7.0t2.0' .8.0t5.0 0.0-16.7 Gr. beta 11.3t1.2 10.0 t5.0' 1.3-18.7 STW-550 Water Oct 1988 Cr-51 252.0114.0- 251.0t25.0. 207.7-294.3 Co 60 26.012.0 25.015.0 16.3-33.7 Zn 15.8.3110.2 151.0115.0. 125.0-177.0 Ru-106 -153.0t9.2 152.0215.0 126.0-178.0-Cs-134 28.715.0 -25.0t5.0 16.3-33.7 Cs-137- 16.311.2 15.015.0- 6.3-23.7-STW-551 Water Oct 1988 H-3 23331127' .2316t350 1710-2927 STW-552 Water Oct 1998 553 (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha '
-38.318.0 41.0110.0 - 23.~7-58. 3 Ra-226 4.5t0.5 5.0t0.8 3l,6-6.4 Ra-228 4.410.6- 5.210.8 3.6-6.4 Uranium' 4.711.2- 5.016.0 0.0-15.4 Sample B Gr. bet.a 51.3t3.0 54.0t5.0 45.3-62.7 Sr-89 3.7tl.2 11.015~.0 '2.3-19.7 Sr-90 10.7t1.2 10.011.5 T.4-12.6 Cs-134 15.312.3 15.015.0 6.3-23.7-Cs-137 16.7tl.2 15.025.0- 6.3-23.7
- -h 106 .
- j}l.- ,y >
r , r
7:
Table A-1. (continued)
Concentration in pC1/lb Lab Sample Date TIML Result _ EPA Resultd Code Type Collected Analysis 2 2cC 1s, N=1 _ Control Limits STM-554 Milk Oct 1988 Sr-89 40.317.0 40.025.0 '31.3-48.7 Sr-90 51.012.0 60.023.0 54.8 65.2 1-131 94.0t3.4 91.0t9.0 75.4-106.6 Cs-137 45.0t4.0 50.025.0 41.3-58.7 K 1500145 1600280 1461-1739 STU-555 Urine Nov 1988 H-3 3030t209 ~3025t359 l
'2403-3647 STW-556 .Water Nov 1988 Gr. alpha 9.0t3.5 9.015.0 0.3-17.7 :
Gr. beta 9.7tl.2 9.015.0 0.3-17.7 STW-557 Water Dec 1988 1-131 108.7t3.0 _115.0t12.0 94.2-135.8 STW-559 Water Jan 1989 Sr-89 40.028.7 40.015.0 '
h . 3-48. 7 Sr-90 24.3t3.1 25.0tl.5 22.4-27.6 '
STW-560 Water Jan 1989 Pu-239 5.8tl.1 4.220.3 1.5-4.9 l STW-561 Water Jan 1989 Gr. alpha 7.3tl.2 8.015.0 0.0-16.7 Gr. beta 5.3tl.2- 4.015.0 0.0-12.7 4 STW-562 Water Feb 1989 Cr -51 245146 235t24- 193.4-276.6 4 Co-60 10.012.0 10.0t5.0 1.3-18.7 Zn-65 170110 159116 139.2-186.7 i Ru-106 18117.6 178118 146.8-209.2 Cs-134 9.7t3.0 10.025.0 1.3-18.7 Cs-137 11.7 tl .2 10.015.0 1.3-18.7
)
i 107
i l
' Table A-1. (continued)
Concentration in pCf/lb Lab Sample Date TIML Result- EPA Resultd i Code Type Collected Analysis 22 c 1s, N=1- Control Limits 1 STW-563 . Water- Feb 1989 I-131 109.014.0 106.0t11.0 86.9-125.11 STW-564 Water Feb 1989 H-3 2820120 27541356 .2137-3371-STW-565 Water Mar 1989 Ra-226- 4.210.3 4.920.7 3.7-6.1 r Ra-228 1.921.0 1.7t0.3 1.2-2.2.
STW-566 Water Mar 1989 U 5.020.0 5.0i6.0 0.0-15.4 STW-567 Air Mar 1989 Gr. alpha 21.7*1.2 21.0t5.0 12.3-29.7: ,
Filter Gr. beta 68.324.2 62.0t5.0 53.3-70.7-Sr-90 20.0t2.0 20.0*1.5 17.4-22.6 !
Cs-137 21.3*1.2 20.015.0 11.3-?8.7 ;
STW-568 Water Apr 1989 569 (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha 22.712.3 .29.017.0. 16.9-41.2 Ra-226 3.6t0.6 '3.510.5 2.6-4.4 Ra-228 2.6tl.0 3.620.5 2.7-4.5 V 3.0 0.0- 3.016.0 0.0-13.4 l- Sample B Gr. beta- 52.3*6.1 57.0 5.0 43.3-65.7 ;
Sr-89 9.3*5.4 8.015.0 0.0-16.7 !
i Sr-90 7.0t0.0 8.0 1.5 5.4-10.6 L Cs-134 21.015.2 20.0 5.0 -11.3-78.7 L Cs-137 23.0i2.0 20.0*5.0 11.3-23.7 STW-570 Milk Apr 1989 Sr-89 26.0110.0 39.0 5.0 30.3-47.7 ~,
l Sr-90 45.7*4.2 55.0 3.0 49.8-60.2 l Cs-137 54.016.9 50.025.0 41.3-58.7
! K-40 1521t208 1600t80' 1461-1739 109
< s
~
a, i
-Table'A-1. (continued). f>
Lab Sample Date Concentration in pCi/lb-EPA Resultd
{'
TIML Result _
Code Type Collected Analysis 12aC- 1s, N=1 Control Limits i 9
STW-571 Water May 1989- Sr-89 40.7 6.015.0 0.0-14.7[
Sr-90 5.0tl.0 6.021.5 3.4-8.6 l' STW-572 Water May 1989 Gr. alpha 24.012.0 .30.0t8.0 16.1-43.9 Gr. beta 49.3115.6 50.015.0 41.3-58.7 ;
STW-573 Water Jun 1989 Ba-133' 50.7tl.2 49.0t5.0. 40.3-57.7I Co-60 31.312.3 31.0t5.0 -22.3-39.7'i Zn-65 167t10 - 165t17 135.6-194.41 Ru-106 123t9.2 -128t13 105.5-150.56 ;
Cs-134 40.311.2 39t5 30;3-47.7.i{
Cs-137- 22.311.2- 20t5 11.3-28.7 T'I i
STW-574 Water Jun 1989 H -3 4513t136 45031450 3724'5282 5tW-575 Water Jul 1989 Ra-226 16.823.1 17.712.7 13.0-22.4 Ra-228 .13.813.7 18.3t2.7 13.6-23.0 J STW-576 Water Jul 1989 U 40.3tl.2 .41.026.0 30.6-51i4 STW-577 Water Aug 1989 I-131 84.7t5.8 _83.028.0 69.1-96.9 STW-579 Air Aug 1989 . Gr. alpha- 6. 0 t.0. 0 - 6.015.0 0.0-14.7 Filter Cs-137 10.312.3 10.015.0 1.3-18.7 1 STW-580 Water Sep 1989 Sr-89 14.7tl.2 14.0t5.0 5.3-22.7 s Sr-90 9.711.2 10.0tl.5 7.4-12.6 ;
STW-581 Water Sep 1989 Gr. alpha 5.0t0.0 4.015.0- 0.0-12.7 ;
Gr. Beta 8.7t2.3 6.0t5.0 0.0-14.7
! t 1
c 109
Tabl e A-1.- (continued)
Concentration in pC1/1.t!
Lab Sample .Date TIML Result EPA - Re sul to _
Code Type Collected - Analysis 22cc 15, W=1 Control-Limits STW-583 Water Oct 1989 Ba-133 60.3 10.0 59.0 6.0 48.6-69.4 Co-60 29.0 4.0 30.0 5.0 21.3-38.7 Zn 132.3 6.0 129.0:13.0 106.5-151.5 Ru-106 155.3:6.1 161.0 16.0 133.3-188.7-Cs-134 30.7 6.1 29.0 S.O- 20.3-37.7 Cs-137 66.3t4.6 59.0 5.0 50.~3-67. 7 STW-584 Water Oct 1989 H-3 3407 150 3496 364~ 2866-4126 STW-585 Water Oct 1989 586 L(Blind)
Sample A Gr. Alpha 41.719.4 49.0 12.0 28.'2-69.8 Ra-226 7.9 0.4 8.4 1.3 6.2-10,6 Ra-228 4.420.8- 4.110.6 3.1-5.1 U 12.0 0.0 12.0 6.0 1.6-22.4 Sarnple B Gr. Beta 31.722.3 32.0 5.0 23.3-40.7 Sr-89 13.3 4.2 15.0 5.0 6.3-23.7 Sr-90 7.0 2.0 7.0 3.0 4.4-9.6 Cs-134 5.0!0.0 5.0 5.0 'O.0-13.7 Cs-137 7.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0-13.7 STW-587 Water Nov 1989 Ra-226 7.9 0.4 8.7 1.3 6.4-11.0 Ra-228 8.9il.2. 9.3 1.'2 .6.9-11.7 STW-588 Water Nov 1989 U 15.020.09 15.0 6.0 4.6-25.4 a Results obtained by Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory asLa participant'in the environmental sample crosscheck program operated by the Intercomparison and Cali-bration Section, Quality Assurance Branch, Enviromental Monitoring -and- Support b
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), ~ Las Vegas, Nevada, All results are in the pCi/1, except for elemental potassium (K) data'-in milk,.
which are in eg/1; air filter samples, which are in pCi/ filter; and- food, which is.
in mg/k c Unless g.
otherwise indicated, the TIML.results are given as the mean i 2 standard deviations for three detenninations.
d USEPA results are presented as the known values and, expected laboratory precision (1s,1 detennination) and control limits as defined by EPA.
e NA = Not analyzed.
3 f ND = No data. Not analyzed due to relocation of the lab.
J 9 Sagle was analyzed but the results not submitted to EPA because deadline was. '
missed.
t a 110 n
- - ~ -
w.
Table A-2. Crosscheck program results, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).
mR Teledyne Average 12 o d Lab TLD ' Result Known (all-Code Type Measurement 12oa val uec partic ipants) 2nd International Intercomparisonb 115-2 CaF2:Mn Field 17.0il.9 17.1 16.417.7 Bulb Lab 20.814.1 21.3 18.817.6 3rd International Intercomparisone 115-3 CaF2:Mn Field 30.713.2 34.914.8 31.513.0 Bulb gg - Lab 89.616.4 91.7114.6 86.2124.0 4th International Intercomparisonf 115-4 CaF7:Mn Field 14.lil.I' 14.111.4 16.019.0 Bulb Lab (Low) 9.3fl.3 12.212.4 12.017.6 Lab (High) 40.411.4 45.819.2 43.9113.2 Sth International Intercomparison9 115-5A' CaF2:Mn Field 31.411.8 30.016.0 30.2114.6 Bulb-Lab at .77.415.8 75.217.6 75.8140.4 beginning Lab at . 96.615.8 88.418.8 90.7131.2 end
---~m, mm ~ wms---- -
m-namm - --M*.- +.-- -- _---d---mmrk-.-A-wmaz-.a pA. ,ye,.g s w on. ,- s.-
Table A-2. (Continued) mR Teledyne Average 120 d Lab. TLD Result Code Type Measurement Known (all' 12aa valuec participants) 115-5B LiF-100 Field 30.314.8 30.016.0 30.2114.6-Chips Lab at 81.117.4 75.217.6 75.8140.4 beginning Lab at 85.4111.7 88.418.8 90.7131.2 the end 7th' International Intercomparisonh Of 115-7A -LiF-100 Field 75.412.6 75.816.0 Chips 75.1129.8
' Lab (Co-60). 80.013.5 79.914.0 77.9127.6 Lab (Cs-137) 66.612.5 75.0t3.8 73.0122.2 115-78 CaF2:Mn Field 71.512.6 75.816.0 75.1129.8 Bulbs Lab-(Co-60) 84.816.4 79.914.0 77.9127.6 Lab (Cs-137). 78.811.6 75.013.8 73.0122.2 115-7C CaSO4 :Dy Field 76.812.7 75.816.0
~
Cards 75.1129.8 Lab'(Co-60) 82.513.7_ 79.914.0 77.9127.6 Lab.(Cs-137 79.013.2 75.013.8 73.0122.2
, ~ . _ . , _ . . -
.- , . . - - ._ - . . . _ . . . ,, ,m.. .
l Table A-2. (Continued) mR Teledyne Average 120 d Lab TLD- Result Known (al1 Code Type Measurement 12ca ValueC participants) 8th International Intercomparisoni 115-8A LiF-100 Field Site 1 29.511.4 29.711.5 28.9112.4 Chips Field Site 2 11.310.8 10.410.5 10.119.06 Lab (Cs-137) 13.7t0.9 17.220.9 16.216.8 115-8B CaF2:Mn Field Site 1 32.311.2 29.711.5 28.9212.4 Bulbs Field Site 2 9.011.0 10.410.5 10.119.0 Lab (Cs-137) 15.810.9 17.210.9 16.226.8 115-8C CaSO4 :Dy Field Site 1 32.310.7 29.711.5 28.9112.4 Cards Field Site 2 10.610.6 10.410.5 10.119.0 U Lab (Cs-137 18.110.8 17.210.9 16.216.8 Teledyne Testingd 89-1 LiF-100 Lab - 21.0t0.4 22.4 -
Chips 89-2 Teledyne Lab 20.911.0 20.3 -
CaSO4:Dy Cards a Lab result given is the mean .12 standard deviations of three determinations.
b Second International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in April of 1976 by the Health and Safety Laboratory (GASL), New Yort, New York, and the School of Public ~ Health of the Uni-versity of Texas, Houston,. Texas.
c d
Value determined by sponsor of the intercomparison using' continously operated pressurized ion chamber.
Mean 32- standard deviations of results obtained by all laboratories participating in the program.
1
- - - - - . - - _ _ . _ . - ~ . - - ~ _ - . . - -
m
- . . ~ _ = . . . -
- m.-... >-~m , . - . - _ _ - - - . ._.
.~ mm...
Table A-2. (centinu2d) mR Teledyne Average s2o d Lab TLD Resul t Known (al1 Code Type Measurement 2aa Valuec participants)
Footnotes continued e Third International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in summer of 1977 by Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the School of Public Health of the University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
f Fourth International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in summer of 1979 by the School of Public Health of the University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
9 Fif th International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeter conducted in fall of 1980 at Idaho Falls, Idaho and sponsored by the School of Public Health of the University of Texas, Houston, Texas and Environmental Measurements Laboratory, New York, New York, U.S. Department of Energy.
h Seventh International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in the spring and summer of 1984 at Las Vegas, Nevada, and sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission, ano the U.S. Environmental Protec'41on Agency.
9
- Eighth International -Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in the fall and winter of
% 1985-1986 at New York, New York, and sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy.
d Chips were submitted in September, 1989;and cards were submitted in November, 1989 to Teledyne Isotopes, Inc., Westwood,. NJ for irradiation.
- * " ' - - ~ - - - - - ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ ~ ~ '
e . - ,.. ..r .-,.w--. 4- ,-.,,.s.e-% ...,
p& $%/o tt IMAGE EVALUATION //j gpy v: + /
Md TEST TARGET (MT-3) g[,4@ #g,
/4fj$
NYk e 2
<>t r, 1 1.0 d 2 M4
!! $ R E i,l [!E INE l.8 I.25 1.4 1.6 4 150mm >
- 6" >
- N;f 5>,,
- A /+ 4 h
4 _ _ _ , _ . , _ _
770 BASKET ROAD
<N[gt,h .
f(t '
WEBSTER NE YORK 14580 (716) 265-1600
)
Table A-3. In-house spiked samples.
Concentration in pC1/1 I Lab Sample Date TIML Result Known Expec ted Code Type Collec ted Analysis n=3 Ac tiv ity Precision 1s, n=3a QC-MI-6 Milk Feb. 1986 Sr-89' 6.0il.9 6.4t3.0 8.7 ,
Sr-90 14.2il.7 12.9t2.0 5.2 I-131 34.213.8 35.2*3.5 10.4-Cs-134 32.0tl.8 27.3t5.0 8.7 Cs-137 35.812.1 35.015.0 8.7 QC-W-14 Water Mar. 1986- Sr-89 1.6i0.4 1.6tl.0 7.1 Sr-90 2.410.2 2.4*2.0 4.2
- QC-W-15 Water Apr. 1986 I-131 44. 9t2. 4 41.5t7.0 10.6 Co-60 10.6fl 7- 12.1t5.0 7.lb Cs-134 30.2*2.4 25.8i8.0 7.lb Cs-137 21.911.9 19.9t5.0 7.lb QC-MI-7 Milk Apr. 1986 I-131 39.7t3.3 41.5t7.0 10.4 Cs-134 28.712.8 25.8i8.0 8.7 Cs-137 21.2i2.8 19.915.0 8.7 SPW-1 Water May 1986 Gross alpha 15.8tl.8 18.015.0 Sc QC-W-16 Water June-1986 Gross alpha 16.210.7 16.9f2.5 8.7 Gross beta 38.4t3.5 30.215.0 8.7 QC-MI-9 Milk June 1986 Sr-89 <1.0 .
0.0 7.lb Sr-90 12.6fl.8 13.3t3.0 4.2b I-131 38.917.0 34.8f7.0 10.4 Cs-134 33.0t3.4 36.115.0 8.7 Cs-137 38.Si2.8 39.0t5.0 8.7 SPW-2 Water June 1986 Gross alpha 16.8tl.8 18.015.0 -5c SPW-3 Water June 1986 Gross alpha 17.710.8 18.015.0 Sc QC-W-18 Water Sep. 1986 Cs-134 34.715.6 31.3f5.0 '8. 7 Cs-137 51.117.0 43.318.0 8.7 QC-W-19 Water Sep. 1986 Sr-89 13.614.1 15.6f3.5 _ 7. lb Sr-90 6.4tl.6 6.2i2.0 4.2b i
i 115
Table A-3. In-house spiked samples (continued)
Concentration in pC1/1 [
lab Sample Date TIML Result - Known Expecti~d ' !
Code Type Collected- Analysi s n=3 Activity Precision .
1s; n=3a r QC-W-21 Water Oct.-1986 C -60 19.212.2 18.523.0 8.7 Cs-134 31.715.2 25.628.0 8.7 a Cs-137 23.811.0 21.615.0 8.7 '
Milk QC-MI-11 Oct 1986 Sr-89 12.311.8 14.3t3.0- 8.7 QC-W-20 Water Nov. 1986 H-3 3855t180 3960t350 L520b QC-W-22 Water Dec. 1986 Gross alpha 9.821.4_ 11.224.0 8. 7 -
Gross beta 21.7t2.0- 23.815.0 8. 7 --
1 QC-W-23 Water Jan. 1987 I-131 29.822.5 27.9t3.0 10.4 QC-MI-12 Milk Jan. 1987 I-131 36.Stl.3 "32.6t5.0 10.4 i Cs-137 32.6t4.2 27.428.0 8. 7 -
QC-MI-13 Milk Jan 1987 Sr-89 10.422.1- 12.224.0' 8.7 ;
Sr-90 14.6tl.6- 12.6t3.0- 5.2 1-131 49.5tl.2 54.928.0- 10'4.
Cs-134 -41.6 - - 0.0 8.' 7 -
Cs-137 -33.310.6 27.4t8.0- 8.7 QC-W-24 Water Mar 1987 Sr-89 24;7t3.6 25.915.0 8.7 Sr-90 23.913.8 22.828.0 5.2 QC-W-25 Water Apr 1987 I-131 28.021.9 29.325.0 10.6 QC-MI-14 Milk Apr 1987 I-131 25.0t2.2 23.9 5.0 - 10.4 - .I Cs-134 <2.1- O.0 8.7 Cs-137 34.2t2.0t 27.2t7.0 -8.7 i
QC-W-26 Water Jun 1987 H-3 3422t100- 3362t300 520 Co-60 .24.811.4 26.517.0 8.7 Cs-134 <2.0 0.0 8.7 Cs-137 21.210.5- 21.6t7.0 8.7.
l-QC-W-27 Water Jun 1987 Gr. alpha 8.5tl.9 10.114.0^ 8.7 Gr. beta 22.611.9 21.225.0 8.7.
QC-W-28 Water -Jun 1987 Gr. alpha 8.721.3 10.114.0 8.7 Gr. beta 12.2t5.2 9.4t3.0 8.7, 116
1 i
Table A-3. In-house spiked samples-(continued) i
~
Concentration in pC1/1 Lab Sample Date TIML Resu'lt Known Expected i Code Type Collected Analysis n=3 Activity Precision-1s, n=3a l QC-W-29 Water Jun 1987 .Gr. alpha 16.421.3 18.925.0 8.7' Gr. beta 15.914.0 '11.814.0 8.7 QC-MI-15 Milk Jul 1987 Sr-90 19.421.6 18.823.5 5.2 1 1-131 43.520.7 45.327.0 10.4 Cs-134 17.922.2 16.015.3 8.' 7 Cs-137 25.421.8 22.725.0- 8.7 1
QC-W-30 Water Sep 1987 Sr-89 17.523.0 14.3t5.0 8.7 Sr-90 18.412.2 17.5*2.2 5.2 l
QC-W-31 Water Oct 1987 H-3 2053t939 2059*306 520 QC-W-32 Water Dec 1987 Gr. alpha 8.621.0. 10.1 5.0 8.7 i Gr. beta 15.210.1 13.113.0 8.7 i QC-W-33 Water Dec 1987 Gr. alpha 7.7*1.4 10.125.0 8.7 i Gr. beta- 10.911.0 7.913.0 8.7 .
QC-W-34 Water Dec 1987 Gr. alpha 4.020.9 5.123.0 8.7 j Gr. beta 9.4t0.9 7.913.0 8.7 !
QC-MI-16 Milk Feb 1988 Sr 31.824.7 31.7t6.0 8.7 1
Sr-90 25.522.7 27.823.5 5.2 1-131 26.420.5 23.215.0. 10.4 u Cs-134 23.822.3 24.226.0' 8.7 !
Cs-137 26.5 0.8 25.116.0 8.7 l
QC-MI-17 Mil k Feb 1988 I-131 10.621.2 14.321.6 10.4 QC-W-35 Water Feb 1988 1-131 9.7 1.1 11.621.1- 10.4 1
l QC-W-36 Water Feb 1988 I-131 10.5 1.3 11.6*1.0 10.4 !
-i QC-W-37 Water Mar 1988 Sr-89 17.1 2.0- 19.828.0 8.7. l Sr-90 18.720.9 17.315.0 5.2 QC-MI-18 Milk Mar 1988 I-131 33.2 2.3 26.725.0 10.4 Cs-134 31.3 2.1 30.2 5.0 8.7 1 Cs-137 29.9 1.4 26.225.0 8.7 i 117
Table A-3. In-house spiked samples- (continued)- I Concentration in pCi/l i Lab Sanple Date TIML Result. . Known - Expected Code Type Collected Analysis n=3 Activity Precision 15, n=3a QC-W-38 Water Apr 1988 I-131 17.111.1 14.2t5.0 10.4 E QC-W-39 Water Apr 1988 H-3 4439231 41762500 724 I QC-W-40 Water Apr 1988 Co-60 23.7t0.5 26.124.0 8.7 Cs-134 25.412.6 29.224.5 8.7 Cs-137 26.612.3 -26.224.0 8.7 QC-W-41 Water Jun 1988 Gr. alpha 12.3*0.4 13.115.0_ 8.7 ;
Gr.' beta 22.6tl.0 20.115.0 8. 7 -
QC-MI-19 Milk Jul 1988 Sr-89 15.111.6 16.425.0 8.7 Sr 18.020.6- 18.315.0 5.2 1-131 88.414.9 86.618.0 10.4 Cs-137 22.7t0.8 20.826.0- 8.7 QC-W-42 Water Sep'1988 Sr-89 48.513.3 ' 50.8*8.~ 0 8.7 Sr-90 10.911.0 11.423.5 :5.2 QC-W-43 Water Oct 1988 Co-60 20.913.2 21.4*3.5 8.7 Cs-134 38.7tl.6 38.0*6.0L ~8.7 Cs-137 19.012.4 21.0t3.5 .8.7 QC-W-44 Water Oct 1988 I-131 22.210.6 23.323.5 10.4 QC-W-45 Water Oct 1988 H-3 4109143 4153*500 724 QC-MI-20 Milk Oct 1988 I-131 59.820.9 60.629.0' 10.4 Cs-134 49.6 1.8 48.627.5 8.7 Cs-137 25.824.6 24.714.0 8.7 QC-W-46 Water. Dec 1988 Gr. alpha 11.522.3 15.225.0' 8.7 Gr. beta 26.5 2.0 25.7tS.0 8.7 QC-MI-21 Milk Jan 1989 Sr-89 25.5110.3 34.0210.0 8.7_
Sr 28.323.2 27.li3.0 5.2 3 1-131 540113 550120 10.4 I Cs-134 24.512.6 22.6*5.5 8.7 i Cs-137 24.020.6 20.5 5.0 8.7 .I l l I
118 l
t
[ - Table A-3. In-house spiked samples (continued)
Concentration in pCi/l Lab Sample Date TIML Result Known Expected Code Type Collected Analysis n=3 Activity Precision ,
1s, n=3a !
l QC-W-47 Water Mar 1989 Sr-89 15.223.8 16.125.0 8.7.
Sr-90 16.421.7 16.9 3.0 5.2 QC-MI-22 Milk Apr 1989 I-131 36.311.1 37.215.0 10.4 Cs-134 20.8 2.8 -20.718.0- 8.7 Cs-137 22.2t2.4 20.4t8.0 8.7 QC-W-48 Water Apr 1989 Co-60 23.512.0 25.118.0 8.7 Cs-134. 24.2tl.1 25.918.0 8.7 Cs-137 23.6tl.2 23.028.0 8.7 QC-W-49 Water Apr 1989 I-131. 37.223.7 37.215.0 10.4 QC-W-50 Water Apr 1989 H-3 3011tS9 3089 500 724 QC-W-51 Water Jun 1989 Gr. alpha 13.021.8 15.015.0 8.7 Gr. beta 26.011.2 25.518.0 8.7 QC-MI-23 Milk Jul 1989 -Sr-89 19.416.5 22.0210.0 8.7
-Sr-90 27.613.5 28.613.0 5.2 1-131 46.813.2 43.415.0 10.4 Cs-134 27.4tl.8 28.3*6.0 8.7 Cs-137- 24.1*1.8 20.816.0 8.7 QC-MI-24 Milk Aug 1989 Sr-89 25.4t2.7 27.2210.0 8.7 Sr-90 46.011.1 4 7.8t9.6 . 8.3 t QC-W-52 Water Sep 1989 I-131 9.610.3 9.721.9 10.4 QC-W-53 Water Sep 1989 I-131 -19.020.2 20.914.2 10.4 QC-W-54 Water Sep 1989 Sr-89 25.824.6 24.724.0 8.7 Sr-90 26.5 5.3 29.725.0 5.2 a n=3 unless noted otherwise.
b n=2.
c n=1.
119
n l
Table A-3. In-house spiked samples (continued) I Concentration in pC1/1: J Lab Sample Date TIML Result- Known Expected -
Code Type Collected Analysis n=3: Activity Precision 1s, n=3a QC-MI-25 Milk Oct 1989 I-131 70.0t3.3 73.5220.0 10.4
~
Cs-134 22.112.6 22.628.0 8.7-Cs-137 29.421.5
'27.528.0 8.7 QC-W-55 Water Oct 1989 I-131 33.3tl.3 35.3t10.0- 10.4 -i QC-W-56 Water Oct 1989 Co-60 15.220.9 17.415.0' 8.7 i Cs-134 22.124.4 18.928.0 8.7 Cs-137 27.2il.2 22.918.0 8.7 -r QC-W-57 Water Oct 1989 H-3 3334222' 3379tS00 -7,24 ,
QC-W-58 Water Nov 1989 Sr-89 10.9tl.4d 11,131,od 8.7 i Sr-90. 10.4tl.0d 10.3tl.0d 5.2 j QC-W-59 Water Nov 1989 Sr-89 d 101.0t6.0 '. 104.1210.5d 17.5
'Sr-90 98.023.0d 95.0i10.0d 17.0 QC-W-60 .Water Dec 1989 Gr. alpha .10.821.1 10.6t4.0 8.7 Gr. beta 11.6t0.5 11.414.0 8.7 1
a n=3 unless noted otherwise.
b n=2.
c n=1.
d Concentration in pC1/ml e
=
C 120 j
.Jama _ a- m . _ . , _.._- . ._n-a .w: ,m Table A-4. In-house " blank" sampl es.
Concentration in pCi/1 Acceptance Lab Sample Date Resul ts Criteria
- Code Type Collected Analysi s (4.66o ) (4.66o )
BL-1 D.I. Water' Nov. 1985 Gross. alpha <0.1 <1 Gross beta <0.4 <4 BL-2 D.I. Water Nov. 1985 Cs-137 (gamma) '<1.9 <10-BL-3 D.I. Water Nov. 1985 Sr-89 <0. 5 <5 Sr-90 <0.6 <1 BL-5 D.I. Water Nov. 1985 Ra-226 <0. 4 <1 4
Ra-228 (0. 4 <1 SPW-2265 D.I. Water Apr. 1985 Gross alpha <G.6 <1 Gross beta <2.2 <4
' Sr-89 <0. 2 <5 Sr-90 <0.4 <1 1-131 <0. 2 <1 Cs-137 (gamma) <7.4 <10 BL-6 D.I. Water Apr. 1986 Gross alpha <0.4 <1 BL-7 D.I. Water Apr. 1986 Gross alpha <0.4 '1 BL-8 D.I.-Water June 1986 Gross alpha <0.4 <1 BL-9 0.I. Water June 1986 . Gross alpha <0.3 <1 SPW-3185 D.I. Water Jan 1987 Ra-226 <0.1 <1 Ra-228 <0. 9 <1 SPS-3292 Mili Jan 1987 I-131 <0.1 <1 Cs-134 < 6.2 <10 Cs-137 <6 . 4 <10 - :
SPW-3554 D.I. Water Feb 1987 H-3 <180 <300 Gross beta <2.6 <4 SPS-3555 Milk Feb 1987. Sr-89 <0.6 <5 Sr-90 1.9 0.4a <1 SPS-3731 Milk Mar 1987- Cs-134 <2.2 <10 Cs-137 <2.5 <10 a Low level (1 - 5 pC1/1) of Sr-90 concentration in milk is not unusual.
121 ;
Table A-4. In-house " blank" samples (continued).
. Concentration in pCi/1 l-Acceptance L ab' Sampl e Date Resul ts Criteria Code Type Coll ected Analysi s (4.66c ) . (4.660 )
SPS-3732 0. I. Wa ter Mar 1987 Sr-89 <0. 9 ' <S Sr-90 <0.8 <1 1-131 <0.3 <1 :
Co-60 <2.3 <10 Cs-134 <2.2 <10 Cs-137 - <2.4 <10 Ra-226 <0.1 <1.
Ra-228 <1.0 <1 .
Np-237- <0.04 .<1 _
i Th-230 <0.05 <0.1 Th-232 <0. 02 - <0.1 U-234 <0.05- <0.1-U-235 <0.03 <0.1 ;
U-238 <0.03 <0.1.
SPS-4023 Milk !
May 1987 I-131 <0.1 <1 SPS-4203 D.I. Water May 1987 Gross alpha <0.7. <1 Gross beta <1.7 <4 SPS-4204 Milk May 1987 Sr-89 <0.5 <5 Sr-90 2.4 0.6a <1 l' SPS-4390 Milk Jun 1987 Cs-134 <4.7. <10 Cs-137.
~
<5.2 (10 i
SPS-4391 0.I. Water Jun 1987 Sr-89 <0 . 4 . <5 Sr-90 <0.4 <1 I-121 <0.1. <1 Co-60 <3.8. <10 Cs-137 < 5.7 <10 Ra-226- <0.1 <1 Ra-228 <0.9' <1 SPW-4627 0.I. Water Aug 1987 Gross alpha <0.6 <1' Gross beta <1.4 <4 Tritium <150 SPS-4628 Milk Aug 1987 Sr-89 <0.6 <5 Sr-90 2.410.6 a <1 ,
SPS-4847 Milk Sep 1987 Cs-134 <4.4 .<10 Cs-137 <5.3 <10 i
a Low level (1 - 5 pCi/1) of Sr-90 concentration in milk is not unusual.
122
Table A-4. In-house " blank"' samples (continued).
Concentration in pCi/l .
Acceptance Lab Sample Date Resul ts - Criteria !
Code Type Collected Analysi s (4.660 ) (4.66o ) ..
SPS-4848 0.1. Water Sep 1987 ~I-131 <0.2 <1 SPW-4849 D.I. Water Sep 1987 Co-60 <4.1 <10 Cs-134- <4.8 <10 Cs-137 <4.0 <10 Sr-89 <0.7 <5-Sr-90 <0. 7 - <1 SPW-4850 D.I. Water Sep 1987- Th-228' <0.04 <1 Th-232 .< 0.8 <1-U-234 <0.03 <1 U-235' <0.03 <1 >
U-238 <0.02 <1 Am-241 <0.06- <1 Cm-242 <0.04 <1 Ra-226 <0.1 <1 Ra-228 <1.0 <2 l e
SPW-4859 D.I. Water Oct 1987 Fe-55 <0.5 <1 SPS-5348 Milk Dec 1987 Cs-134 <2.3 <10 Cs-137 <2.5 <10 SPW-5384 D.I. Water Dec 1987 Co-60 <2.8 <10 Cs-134 ~< 2.6 <10 Cs-137 <2.8 <10 I-131 <0.2 <1 Ra-226- <0.1- <1 ,
Ra-228 <1.2 <2 Sr-89 <0.5 <1 Sr-90 <0.4 <1 SPW-5385 D. I. Water Nov 1987 Gr. alpha ><0.4 <1 Gr. beta <2 . 2 <4 :
Fe-55 <0.3 <1 SPS-5386 Milk Jan 1988 I-131 <0.1 <1 SPW-5448 " Dead" Water Jan 1988 H-3 <177 <300 d
123
F~
Table A-4. In-house " blank' samples (continued).
Concentration in pCi/l Acceptance Lab Sampi e Date Resul ts Criteria Code Type Collected Analysis (4.660 ) (4.660 ).
SPS-5615 Milk Mar 1988 Cs-134 <2.4 <10 Cs-137 <2.5 <10- j
!-131 <0.3 <1 3 Sr-89 <0.4 (5 )
Sr-90 2.4 0.Sa <1 SPS-5650 D.I. Water- Mar 1988 Th-228 <0.3 <1 Th-230 <0.04 <
'1 ,
Th-232 <0.05 <1 t !
U-234 <0.03 <1 '
U-235 <0.03 .1 U-238 <0.03 <1-Am-241 <0.06 <
'1 Cm-242 <0.01 <1 :
Pu-238- < 0.08 <1 l Pu-240. <0. 02 <1 !
l SPS-6090 Milk Jul 1988 Sr-89 <0 . 5 <1 Sr-90 1.b_0.5a <g l I-131 <0.4 <1- l Cs-137 .<0.4 <10 -
SPW-6209 Water Jul 1988 Fe-55 <0.8 <1 - .l SPW-6292 Water Sep 1988 Sr-89 <0.7- <1 Sr <0.7- <1 1 SPS-6477 Mil k Oct 1988 I-131 <0.2 <1 !
Cs-134 <6 .1 <10 Cs-137 <5.9- <10 SPW-6478 Water Oct 1988- I-131 <0.2 <1 SPW-6479 Water Oct 1988 Co-60 <5 '. 7 <10 l Cs-134 Cs-137
<3.7
<4. 3
<10 l
<10 ;
SPW-6480 Water Oct 1988 H-3 <170 <300 ,
'SPW-6625 Water Dec 1988- Gr. alpha <0.7 <1 !
Gr. beta <1. 9 <4 ~ i a Low level (1 - 5 pCi/1) of Sr-90 concentration in milk is not unusual. l 124
Table A-4 In-house ' blank" samples (continued),
Concentration in pCi/l -
Acceptance ,
Lab Sampie- Date Resul ts Criteria
! Code Type Collected Analysis (4.660 ) (4.66o )
l SPS-6723 Milk Jan 1989 Sr-89 <0. 6 <5 Sr-90 1.91. 5a <1 1-131 <0.2 <1 Cs-134 <4. 3 <10. l Cs-137 (4. 4 <10 SPW-6877 Water Mar 1989 Sr-89 <0.4 <5 l Sr-90 <0. 6 <1 SPS-6963 Milk Apr 1989 I-131 <0. 3 <1 Cs-134 <5.9- <10 Cs-137 <6. 2 <10 SPW-7561 Water Apr 1989 H-3 <150 <300 SPW-7207 Water Jun 1989 Ra-226 <0. 2 <1-Ra-228 <0.6 <1 SPS-7208 Milk Jun 1989 Sr-89 (0. 6 <5 Sr-90 2.1 0.5a <1 1-131 <0. 3 <1 Cs-134 <6.4- <10 Cs-137 <7. 2 <10 SPW-7558 Water Jun 1989 Gr. alpha <0.2 <1 Gr. beta <1.0 <4 SPS-7322 Milk Aug 1989 _Sr <1. 4 <5 Sr-90 4.8 1. 0a <1 1-131 <0. 2 <1 Cs-134 <6. 9 <10 Cs-137 <8. 2 <10 SPW-7559 Water Sep 1989 Sr-89 <2.0 <5 Sr-90 <0 . 7 <1 SPW-7560 Water Oct 1989 I-131 <0.1 <1.0 SPW-7562 Water Oct 1989 H-3 <140 <300 SPS-7605 Milk Nov 1989 I-131 <0.2 <1 Cs-134 <8 . 6 <10 Cs-137- - <10 <10 SPW-7971 Water Dec 1989 Gr. alpha <0.4 <1 Gr. beta <0.8 <4 a low level (1-5 pC1/1) of Sr-90 concentration in milk is not unusual.
125~
TIML dLINO-01 Revision 0, 12-29-86 j ATTACHMENT B ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR " SPIKE 0" SAMPLES
~
LABORATORY PRECISION: ONE STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES FOR VARIOUS ANALYSESa 3
One Standard Deviation Analysis Level for Single Determination
, Ganna Emitters 5 to 100 pC1/ liter or'kg 5 pCi/ liter
>100 pCi/ liter or kg 5% of known value Strontium-8gb 5 to 50 pCi/ liter or kg 5 pCi/ liter
>50 pC1/ liter or kg 10% of known value- 1 Strontium-90b 2 to 30 pCi/ liter.or kg 3.0 pCi/ liter
>30.pCi/ liter of kg 10% of known value Potassium >0.1 g/ liter or kg 5% of known.value Gross Alpha <20 pCi/ liter 5 pCi/ liter
>20 pCi/ liter 25% of known value Gross Beta <100 pCi/ liter 5 pCi/ liter
>100 pCi/ liter 5% of known value i Tritium <4,000 pCi/ liter is=(pCi/ liter)=
>4,000 pCi/ liter 169.85 x (known).0933
'10% of known value Radium-226, <0.1 pC1/ liter 15% of known value Radium-228 Plutonium 0.1 pC1/ liter, gram, 10% of known value or sample Iodine-131, b <55 pCi/ liter 6 pCi/ liter lodine-129 >55 pCi/ liter 10% of known value '
Uranium-238, <35 pCi/ liter 6 pCi/ liter Nickel-630, >35 pCi/ liter 15% of known value l Technetium-99D L Iron-55b 50 to 100 pCi/ liter 10 pC1/ liter.
10% of known value a
From EPA publication, " Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercompari-b son Studies Program, Fiscal Year 1981-1982. EPA-600/4-81-004.
TIML limit.
126
l ADDEf1Dutt TO APPEf10!X A The following is an explanation of the reasons why certain samples were outside the control limit specified by the Environmental Protection Agency for the Interlabora-tory Comparison Program starting January 1987.
EPA Lab Code Analysis tit 1L Result Control Limit Explanation STil-504 Sr-89 57.024.3 60.3-77.7 flilk had high' fat content which Sr-90 32.021.0 32.4-37.6 made analyses difficult. Ad-dition of errors to T!!!L result would put values within EPA control limits.. EPA also- had the same problem in analyzing its own sample.
STW-511 Ra-228 8.121.4 4.6-8.0 tit!L results are usually within EPA control limits. Analysis of the next sample was within EPA control limits. No further action is planned.
STW-516 Cr-51 80.3217.5 61.3-78.7 Results in the past have been within EPA control limits and TIf1L will monitor the situation in the future.
ST F-524 K 1010.71158.5 1123.5-1336.5 Error in transferrance of data.
Correct data was 1105233.
Results in the past have been within the limits and tit!L will monitor the situation in the future.-
- STW-532 1-131 9.022.0 6.2-8.8 Sample recounted after 12 days.
The average result was 8.811.7 (within EPA control limits).
The sample - was recounted in order to check the decay.
Results in the past- have been within the limits and TINL will -
continue to monitor the situ-ation in the future.
STW-534 Co-60 63.321.3 41.3-58.7 High level of Co-60 was due to contamination of beaker.
Beaker was discarded upon dis-covery of contamination and sample was recounted. Recount results were 53.223.6 and 50.922.4.
127 -
1 ADDENDUM TO APPENDIX A (continued)
EPA Lab Code Analysis TIML Result Control Limit Explanation STM-554 Sr-90 51.0i2.0 54.8-65.2 The cause of low result was due to very high f at content in the milk. It should be noted that 63%- of all participants failed this test. Also, the average for all participants wts 54.0 pC1/1 before the Gruob and 55.8 pC1/1 after the Grubb.
STW-560 Pu-239 5.811.1 3.5-4.9 The cause of high .results11s not known. It is suspected-th&t the standard was not properly calibrated by supplier and-is under investigation.- New Pu-236 standard -was obtained and will be used for the next test.
STW-568 Ra-228 2.611.0 2.7-4.5 The cause of- low results is not known. Next EPA crosscheck re-suits were within.the control limits. No further action is planned.
STM-570 Sr-89 26.0i10.0 30.3-47.7 The cause of low results was Sr-90 45.714.2 49.8-60.2 falsely high recovery due to suspected incomplete calcium removal. Since EPA sample was used up, internal spike was pre-pared and analyzed. The results were within control limits- (See table A-3, sample QC-MI-24).
No further action is planned.
128
P T
.i APPENDIX VI i REVISIONS TO TEH ODCM RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SINCE 1985
(
P i
t t
I 129
i REVISIONS TO THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM LASALLE STATION DATE (ODCM Revision) SAMPLE MONITORING COMENTS TYPE LOCATION
'85 (11) All All Addition The station code, L proceeds monitoring location.
All All Revision Listed distances and directions from center of the station.
Airborne All Revision Added gama isotopic analysis on quarterly composites.
All Addition Analysis frequency is clarified the following '
ODCM statement:
" Perform game isotopic on each sample when gross beta activity is found to be >10 times the yearly mean of control samples." ;
Direct Radiation All Revision Itemized TLD monitoring locations.
Ground /Well Water All Addition- Gamme isotopic and tritium analyses quarterly.
L-28 Addition Marseilles Well, 7.0 mi W.
L-29 Addition Seneca Well, 5.1 mi WE.
O L-30 Addition Ranson Well, 6.0 mi S.
O L-31 Addition Ottawa Well, 12.8 mi W.
L-32 Addition Illinois State Park,' 6.5 mi W.
Surface Water Deletion Illinois River monitoring locations at Marsellies Ottawa, and Seneca.
Addition Tritium analysis to occur on quarterly composites.
Revision Monroutine Reporting Levels for the following nuclides in water were changed accordingly.
Nuclide Reporting levels (pCi/1)
'Former' Revised Fe-59 100 400 Co-58 600 1000' Zn-65 200 300 Ba-La-140 100 200 Revision The Maximum Values for the Lower Limit of Detection were changed.for the I-131 contained in water from 5.0 pCi/1 to 0.5 pCi/1. Initially, limited to milk samples collected during the pasture season.
Sediment All . Revision Analysis to occur semiannually, not annually.
- _ . . . _ . , .. . - _. ,.. __ - _ = . _, _
REVISIONS TO THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM LASALLE STATION Cont'd DATE (00CM Revision) SAMPLE MONITORING' COMMENTS TYPE LOCATION
'85 (11) Cont'd Milk All Revision ' Itemized dairies.
Revision Gausna isotopic and I-131 analyses occur bi-weekly during the grazing season, not weekly.
Revision Monroutine Reporting Levels for the following nuclides 1.1 milk were changed accordingly.
Nuclide Reporting Levels (pCi/1)
Former Revised Cs-134 70 60 Cs-137 60 70 Fish L-24 Addition LSCS Cooling Lake Recreation Center.
U
~
t i
REVISIONS TO THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM LASALLE STATION Cont'd DATE (ODCM Revision) SAMPLE MONITORING CON 9ENTS TYPE LOCATION
'86 (12) Airborne All Addition Collection frequency is clarified with the following 00CM statement:
" Continuous sampler operation with particulate filter exchange weekly and radioiodine canister a exchange bi-weekly."
Addition Analysis frequency is clarified with the following 00CM statement:
"Frc field samples are analyzed when near field results are inconsistent with previcus measurements and radioactivity is confinned as having its origin in airborne effluents released from the station or at the discretion of the Emergency Planning Supervisor.*
Direct Radiation All Revision Itemized TLD monitoring locttias.
U ro Cooling Water All Deletion m ,
o..4 ~
_ e-- ______ .'h * '# ""'* "' #
- l REVISIONS TO THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM LASALLE STATION Cont *d DATE (ODCM Revision) SAMPLE MONITORING COMMENTS TYPE LOCATION
'87 (12A) All All Addition Listed distances frw the center of the station in kilometers and listed sectors.
Airborne L-11 Revision Distance was corrected from 4.3 to 7 mi.
Direct Radiation Revision The direction from the center of the station for the following TLDs were corrected:
Fonner Revised 201-1,2 N NME 205-1,2 E ESE 208-1,2 SSE S 209-1,2 S SSW 210-1,2 SSW SW 211-1,2 SW WSW 212-1,2 WSW W o.o 213-1,2 W WNW d 215-1,2 WW NNW 216-1,2 NNW N Ground /Well Water L-27 Addition ' Genene isotopic and tritium analyses quarterly at LSCS Onsite Well.
Surface L-23 Deletion L-24 Deletion Milk All. Revision Collection frequency was changed from weekly to biweekly for May through October.
L-17 Revision The direction for the Norsen Dairy was corrected from NNW to N.
4
._m____.
- --wveu v e. -*_
.--m., r_-- _.=-sw c-m---->~-.--a_p-.--e -.+,_s.m --- ' - i- -
wm-_.mm.aC
.f
.[
I LASALLE~ COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER STATION i e
ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL OPERATING REPORT-ANNUAL REPORT 1989 i
s l'
l i
I i
MARCH 1990
TABLE OF CONTENTS !
Page ;
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .1 S UMM AR Y , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.0 EFFLUENTS 1.1 Gaseous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 3 1.2 Liquid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 3 i
2.0 SOLID R ADI0ACTI VE WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.0 DOSE TO MAN 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pathways . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. . .3-3.2 Liquid Effluent Pathways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 5 3.3 Di rect R ad i ati on . . . . . . . . . . . - , . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 -l 4.0 SITE METEOROLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 6.
I 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 6 -!
i 5.1 Gamma Radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . .. . 6 1 5.2 Airborne I-131 and Particulate Radioactivity .. . . . . . .. .- 6 -!
5.3 Terrestrial Radioactivity . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . .. . 7 1 5.4 Aquatic Radioactivity-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . 7 ;
5.5 Milk..................'...........- .. . 7 5.6 Sample Collections ..........-....... 8-5.7 Program Modification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .... .. . 8 6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 8 :
7.0 MILCH ANIMAL CENSUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 8 8.0 NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-. . . .. . 8 j 9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARIS0N PROGRAM RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . .. 8 10.0 REVISIONS TO THE ODCM RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ..
PROGRAM SINCE 1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 !
1 APPENDIX 1 - DATA TABLES AND FIGURES . . . . ............ .. 9 i
Station Releases Table 1.1-1 Gaseous Effluents . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. 10 1
i Table 1.2-1 Liquid Effluents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 16 l
. l iii 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
Page APPENDIX 1 - DATA TABLES AND FIGURES Station Releases (continued)
Table 2.0-1 Solid Waste Shipments ................ 25- ;
Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1-4 Isodose and Concentration Contours . . . . . . . . . . 33 Table 3.1-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Airborne Releases . . . . 37 !
Table 3.2-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Liquid Discharges . . . . 39 Environmental Monitoring ,
I Figure 5.0 Figure 5.0-4 .
Locations of Environmental Radiological Stations . . . 41 !
Table 5.0-1 Environmental Radiological Monitoring -!
Sampling Sites ................. 45 l Table 5.0-2 Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program .... 46 ,
Table 5.0 Table 5.0-6 Environmental Summary Tables . . . . ..... . . . . . 52 :
Table 5.1-1 GammaRadiationMeasurements{TLD)..-......... 58 !
APPENDIX II - METEOROLOGICAL DATA .................... 61 ,
-APPENDIX III - LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 APPENDIX IV - MILCH ANIMAL AND NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS . . . ... . . . . 92 j APPENDIX V - INTERLABOR ATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS. . . . . . . . . 96 i I
APPENDIX VI - REVISIONS TO THE ODCM RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM !
SINCE 1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 ;
I iv l
l
-l INTRODUCTION L LaSalle Station, a two-unit BWR plant is located ' near Marseilles, Illinois, in Lasalle County, 3.5 miles south 2 of the Illinois River. Each reactor- is ,
designed to have a capacity of 1078 MW net. Unit No. I loaded fuel in -
l March 1982. Unit No. 2 loaded fuel in -late December 1983. The plant has l
been designed to keep releases to the environment at levels below those specified in the regulations.
Liquid effluents from LaSalle County Station are released . to the ~ Illinois - ,
River in controlled batches after radioassay of each batch. Gaseous effluents !
are released to the atmosphere'after delay to permit decay of short half-life l gases. Releases to the atmosphere are calculated .on the . basis of analyses '
l of routine grab samples of noble gases and continuously collected composite-samples of iodine and particulate matter.- The results of effluent analyses are summarized on a monthly basis and reported .to the Nuclear. Regulatory Commission as required per Technical Specifications. Airborne - concentrations of noble gases, I-131 and particulate radioactivity in off-site areas are calculated using effluent and meteorological data on.. isotopic composition of effluents.
p Environmental monitoring is conducted by sampling at indicator and reference (background) locations in the vicinity of the LaSalle County Station -to measure changes in radiation or radioactivity levels that may be attributable to plant operations. If significant changes - attributable to ' LaSalle County.
Station are measured, these changes 'are correlated with effluent releases.
External gamma radiation exposure from noble gases and I-131 in milk are the most critical pathways at this site; however, an environmental monitoring program is conducted which includes Lother pathways .of less importance.
1
l.
l l
l
SUMMARY
Gaseous and liquid effluents for the period remained at a fraction of the l
Technical ' Specification limits. Calculations of_ environmental concentrations based on effluent, Illinois River flow, and meteorological- data for the period-indicate that consumption by the public of radionuclides- attributable to the-plant are well below the regulatory limits. Radiation exposure from radio-nuclides ~ released to the atmosphere represented the critical pathway for the period with a maximum individual dose estimated to' bel 1.49E-02 mrem for-the
-i year, when a shielding and occupancy factor of 0.7 is assumed. .The assessment of radiation doses are _ perfonned in accordance with the Offsite Dose Calcu--
lation Manual (0DCM). The results of analysis confirm- that the station .is operating in compliance with 10CFR50 and 40CFR190.
s b
I 2
- . . . . . ~ - - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
i 1.0 EFFLUENTS 1.1 Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosphere Measured concentrations and isotopic composition of noble gases, radioiodine, and particulate - radioactivity released to the atmos-phere during the year, are listed in Table 1.1-1. A total of 1.08E+03 curies of fission and activation-gases was released with an average release : ate of 9.31E+01 pCi/sec.
I A total of 5.60E-03 cucies. of I-131 was released during the~ year,
! with' an average release rate af .8.17E-04 uCi/sec for all iodines, l
A total of 2.54E-03 curies of beta-gma emitters were released as airborne particulate matter, with an cyerage release rate of 8.52E-03 pC1/sec. Alpha - emitting radionuclides were not measurable.
A total of 5.99E-01 curies' of tritium was released, with an average ,
release rate of 8.13E-02 uCi/sec.
1.2 Liquids Released to the Illinois River A total of 1.51E+06 liters of radioactive ; liquid. waste (prior to dilution) containing. 4.02-01 curies (excluding tritium, gases, and alpha) were discharged af ter dilution with. a total.' of .1.86E+09 -
l liters of water. These wastes were. released at a- quarterly. average .
concentration of 2.68E-05 pCi/ml, discharged on an- unidentified ,
nuclide basis. A total of 5.74E-05 curies of alpha radioactivity and 1.76 curies of tritium were released. Monthly release estimates and principal radionuclides in liquid- effluents' are given 'in Table 1.2-1.
2.0 SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE Solid radioactive wastes were shipped to Oak Ridge, . Tennessee; Beatty, Nevada; Waltz Mill, Pennsylvania; Barnwell Nuclear Center, South Carolina by Hittman Nuclear and Development Company and U.S. Ecology. The record of waste shipments is summarized in Table 2.0-1. q 3.0 DOSE TO MAN 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pathways Gamma Dose Rates Gamma air and whole body dose rates off-site were calculated ' based i on measured release rates, isotopic composition of the noble gases, and meterological data for the period (Table 3.1-1). Isodose contours of whole body dose are shown in Figure 3.1-1 for the year.
3
Based on, measured effluents and meteorological data, the' maximum dose to. an individual would be 1.49E-02 mrem for the . year, with an occupancy or shielding factor of 0.7 included. The maximum gamma e air dose was 2.57E-02 mrad. ;
Beta Air and Skin Rates =
The range of beta particles in air is relatively small) (on the order of a few meters or less); consequently, plumes of gaseous effluents '
may be considered " infinite" for purpose of Lcalculating the - dose from beta radiation incident on the skin. However, the actual dose to sensitive skin tissues'-'is difficult to calculate because .this-depends on the beta particle energies, _ thickness of- inert skin, and .
clothing covering sensitive ~ tissues. For purposes - of this report- J the skin is taken to have a thickness of --7 mg/cm2 and an occupancy- ;
factor of 1.0 is used.- The skin dose" from beta - and gamma radiation for ' the -year was 2.20E-02 mrem. The maximum off-site beta air dose for the year was 2.86E-03. mrad. -
The air concentrations of radioactive noble gases at the off-site '
receptor locations are given in Figure 3.1-2.
Radioactive Iodine The human thyroid exhibits a significant capacity to concentrate ingested or inhaled iodine, and -the radiotodine, I-131, released during routine operation of the ' plant, may be_ made. available to' man thus resulting in a dose to the thyroid. The principal pathway of -
interest for this radionuclide is ingestion of radioiodine in milk by an infant.
Iodine-131 Concentrations in Air p The calculated concentration contours for- I-131'in air are shown in Figure 3.1-3. Included in these : calculations 'is an iodine cloud .
depletion f actor which accounts for the phenomenon '_of elemental iodine deposition on the ground.3 The maximum off-site concentration is estimated to be 6.44E-04 pCi/m for the year. l Dose to Infant's Thyroid L The hypothetical thyroid dose to an infant living near the plant; via-' '
! ingestion of milk was calculated. The radionuclide considered was I-131 and the source of ' milk was taken. to .be the- nearest dairy farm with the cows pastured from May to October. The maximum infant's thyroid dose was 1.54E-02 mrem during- the year (Table 3.1-1).
4
+-s- -
w
l Concentrations of Particulates in Air I Concentration contours of radioactive airborne particulates are shown in Figure The maximum off-site level is estimated to 1 be3.18E-05pC1/mg.1-4.
i L Summary of Doses i
Table 3.1-1 summarizes the doses resultirg from releases of airborne radioactivity via the different exposure pathways.
3.2 Liquid Effluent Pathways The three principal pathways through the aquatic environment for potential doses to man from liquid waste are ingestion of potable water, eating aquatic foods, and exposure while walking on the-i shoreline. Not all. of these pathways are applicable at a given time or station but a reasonable approximation of the dose can be made by adjusting the dose formula for season of the -year or type and degree of 'use of the aquatic environment. NRC* developed equations were used to calculate the do's es to the whole body, lower.
GI tract, thyroid, bone and skin; specific parameters for use in the equations are given in the Commonwealth Edison Off-site Dose Calcu- '.
lation Manual . The maximum whole body dose for the year was 4.38E-05 mrem and no organ dose exceeded 2.75E-04' mrem.
3.3. Direct Radiation In section 3/4.11 of the LaSalle Technical Specifications, 40CFR190
-calculations of total dose due to the Uranium fuel Cycle are required only when calculated doses from liquid or gaseous releases of radio-activity exceed certain levels. These levels are twice the following-limits: <
l The RETS limits on dose' or dose commitment to an individual due to radioactive materials ' in . liquid effluents from each -
reactor unit (1.5 mrems to the whole body or 5 mrem to' any organ during any calendar quarter; 3 mrem to the' whole body or 10 mrem to any organ during any calendar year).
1 The RETS limits on air dose in noble gases released in gas-eous effluents to a member of the public from each reactor unit (5 mrad for gamma radiation or 10 mrads for beta radia-tion duing any calendar quarter; 10 mrads for gamma radiation or 20 mrad for beta radiation during any calendar year).
The RETS limits on1 dose to any individual due to Iodine-131, Iodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in partuculate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents re-I i
l Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Rev.1).
9 ,%,,.
a-- -
leased from each reactor unit (7.5 mrems to any organ during -
any calendar quarter; 15 mrems to any organ during any cal-endaryear).
During the period January to December,1989, LaSalle Station did not exceed these criteria. ,
4.0 SITE METEOROLOGY A summary of the site meteorological measurements taken during- each' i quarter of the year is given in Appendix !!. The. data are presented as cumulative joints frequency distributions of 375' and 33' levels. Data recovery for these measurements was about 98.8%.
- 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Table 5.0-1 provides an outline of the radiological environmental moni-toring program as required in the Technical Specifications. Tables 5.0 to 5.0-6 summarize data for the: year. Except for tables of special inter-est, tables listing all' data- are no longer-included in the annual report.
All data tables are available for inspection at the Station or in the.
Corporate offices.
Specific findings for various environmental media are discussed below. ,
1 5.1 Gamma Radiation External radiation dose f rom on-site sources and noble gases released to the atmosphere was measured at ten indicator and -four reference (background) locations using CaSO :Dy 4 thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). A comparison- of' the TLD results for reference stations with on-site and . off-site indicator stations is -included in Table 5.1-1. A total of 48 additional TLDs were installed on June.1,1980 such that each sector was covered' at both five miles and the site boundary. Six (6) TLD locations were added to the monitoring program on July 1,1985..
Quarterly external radiation dose at fourteen air sampling locations averaged (17.614.1mR ) and was similar to levels -measured -in 1986 (17.1mR) ,1987 (17.82) , and 1988 (16.5d). The differences are not statistically significant. [
l 5.2 Airborne I-131 and Particulate Radioactivity l
Concentrations of airborne.1-131 and particulate radioactivity. at !
! monitoring locations are summarized in Tables 5.0-3 through 5.0-6. :
1 Locations of the samplers are shown in Figure 5.0-1. Airborne I-131 remained below the LLD of 0.10 pC1/m3 throughout the year.
6
Gross beta concentrations ranged from 0.006 to 0.069 pCi/m3 and eyeraged 0.028 pCi/m3 and was similar to that in 1985 (0.025 pCi/
m3), 1986 (0.027, except for the period from May 16 through June 6 when it was influenced by the nuclear reaqtor accident at Chernobyl),
1987 (0.027 pC1/m3), and 1988 (0.031 pC1/m3).
No radioactivity attributable to plant operation was detected in any sample, 5.3 .Terrest_r_ial Radioactivity Well water was collected quarterly from one on-site well and five off-site wells and analyzed for tritium and gamma-emitting isotopes.
All results were below the limits of detection, indicating that there was no measurable amount of radioactivity due to the Station releases.
5.4 guaticRadioactivity Weekly surface water samples from the Illinois River at Seneca and LSCS Cooling Lake were composited monthly and analyzed for gamma-emitting isotopes. Weekly samples from the same locations were com-posited quarterly and analyzed for tritium. None of the composited samples indicated the presence of gamma-emitting isotopes above their respective LLD levels. Tritium was detected in five samples and ranged from 204 to 256 pCi/1. Similar results were obtained in 1988.
Sediment samples were collected twice a year, from one indicator location (downstream at Cooling Lake) and analyzed for gamma-emitters.
Gamma-emitters were below the detection limits in the sample collected l
in May. Sample collected in October had trace amounts of Cs-137 (0.3 pC1/g), 00-60 (0.9 pC1/g), and Mn-54 (0.3 pC1/g). Similar re-sults were obtained in 1988.
Levels of gamma radioactivity in fish were measured and found in all-samples to be below the lower limits of detection for the program.
5.5 Milk Milk samples were collected monthly from November through April and weekly from May through October and analyzed for iodine-131 and gamma-emitting isotopes.
1-131 remained below the detection limit of 0.5 pC1/1.
Cs-134 and Cs-137 were below the LLD level of 5 pCi/1. All other gamma-emitting isotopes, except naturally-occurring K-40, were below their respective LLDs. There was no indication of the effect on the environment due to station operation. ;
I
)
7 1
5.6 Sample Collections !
All samples were collected as scheduled except those listed in the ,
Listing of Missed Samples, Appendix !!!. . -
5.7 Program Modifications ;
Granby Dairy (L-15) was replaced by R. Bettenhousen Farm (L-19), l Norsen Dairy (L-17) was replaced by E. Hayer-A. Patterson Dairy.
6.0 _ ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES A sumary of the procedures used for analyzing radioactivity in environ-mental samples is given in Appendix V of the report for the period January - December 1988. Procedures used during the period covered by this report remained essentially unchanged.
7.0 _ MILCH ANIMAL CENSUS -
A census of milch animals was conducted within five miles of the station.
The survey was conducted by a " door-to-door canvas and by infonnation from Illinois Agricultural Agents. The census was conducted by A. Lewis on August 19 and 26, 1989.
There are no dairy farms within a five mile radius of the LaSalle County Power Station. A list of dairies that were sampled follows. [
8.0 NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS A census of the nearest residences within a five (5) mile radius was conducted by A. Lewis on August 26, 1989.
Results of milch animals and nearest residence census are presented in ,
Appendix IV.
9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS ,
Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results are presented in Appendix V.
10.0 REVISIONS TO THE ODCM RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SINCE 1985 1 Revisions to 'the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the I years 1985, 1986 and 1987 are presented in Appendix VI.
1 l
8 l
l APPENDIX I DATA TABLES AND FIGURES l
i 9
I
1 TABLE 1.1-1 LASALLB 00UEff BUCLEAR POWEB ffe?!N UE!?S ORE ABD 790 )
30c ET susaEas 30-37 Asp 30-374 l l
EFFLUERT AND WASTE DISPOB&L SERIAERUAL REPORT (1989) 54850U5 EFFLUENTS SUNNA?!OE OP ALL BELEASES ;
First Second Guarter Quarter i
A. Finesen and Aetivatten Sasse ,
- 1. Total release Ci 9.2SE-07 8.03E-08
- 2. Average release rate for period uC1/sec 2.75E+02 '2.38E+01
- 8. Zodines
- 1. Total iodine-131 Ci 8.01E 8.95E-04
- 2. Average release rate for period uC1/sec 9.56E-04 5.36E-04 C. Partteulates ,
- 1. Particulates with T1/2 >B days Ci 9.76E-04 2.98E-04
- 2. Average release rate for period uC1/see 1.06E 02 2.31E-02
- 3. Gross alpha radioactivity Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 .
D. Tritive
- 1. Total release Ci 5.95E-01 4.02E-03
- 2. Average release rate for period uC1/sec 3.27E-01 2.21E-03 l ,
'<' indicates activity of sample is less than 1.1.D given in uci/ml i
I i
8 10
TABLE 1.1-1 (continued)
LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER STATION '
UNITS ONE AND TWO -
DOCKET NUMBERS 50-373 AND 50-374 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SENIAENUAL REPORT (1949) i GASEOUS EFTLUENTS-SUNNATION OF ALL RELEASES ,
i Third Fourth Guarter Guarter A. Fission and Activation Gases >
- 1. Total release C1 1.04E+03 4.29E-03
- 2. Average release rate for period uC1/sec 7.3SE+01 2.73E-01 ,
p
- 5. Iodines
- 1. Total iodine-131 C1 2.SSE-03 2.15E-03
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 6.47E-04 1.13E-03 >
! C. Particulates
- 1. Particulates with T1/2 >4 days Ci 6.55E-04 6.26E-04
- 2. Average release rate .'or period uC1/sec 1 Ane-94 2.04E-04
- 3. Gross alpha radioactivity C1 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 [
D. Tritive
- 1. Total release C1 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06
'<* indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uci/mi i
l l t 4
?
11
-- . ,---,.--,,-.,7.- , - - - . . , , - ~ , . _ , _ , . _ , . _ _ . ~ , . _ _ , ,.._.,,.,,%,, . , . . .- . . . . . . - , ,
i J
I TABLE 1.1-1 (continued) 1 l
WFLUMT AND WARTE DIWC5&L REMRT (1999)
B&SIOUS EFFLUENTS ELET&TED RELEASE Nuclideo Released Jan. Feb. March First ,
Guarter
- 1. Fiesten Basse Ar-41 C1 1.43E-07 5.19E-07 9.02E-08 7.52E-07 Kr-85s Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 ,
Kr-87 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Kr-88 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xe-133 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 '
Xe-133s Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xe-135 C1 1.65E-08 1.11E-07 4.51E-08 1.73E-07 Xe-138 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Total for period C1 1.60E-07 6.30E-07 1.35E-07 9.25E-07
- 2. Iodines -
I-131 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 8.01E-05 8.01E-05 I-132 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 7.87E-04 7.87E 9.48E-04 I-133 C1 <1.00E-11 3.04E-05 9.18E-04 I-134 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 3.15E-03 3.15E-03 I-135 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 Total for period Ci <1.00E-11 3.04E-05 4.94E-03 4.97E-03
- 3. Particulates Mn-54 Ci 7.56E-08 1.14E-05 1.12E-05 2.26E-05 Co-58 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Fe-59 Ci <1.00E-04 8.98E-06 <1.00E-04 8.98E-06 Co-60 Ci 5.24E-05 5.78E-04 3.07E-04 9.38E-04 Zn-65 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 ,
Sr-89 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 Sr-90 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 Nb-95 C1 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Mo-99 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Cs-134 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Cs-136 Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 6.58E-06 6.58E-06 .
Cs-137 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Co-141 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Ce-144 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E <1.00E-04 Total for period Ci 5.25E-05 5.98E-04 3.25E-04 9.76E-04
'<* indicates activity of easple is less than LLD given in uci/s1 12
i i
TABt.E 1.1-1 (continued) !
M 459 WAM 5 M W M &L REP W T (1999) 0485000 EFFLUERTS ELETATED entraer I
Nuclides Released April May June Second
' Guarter
- 1. Fineton Saoes Ar-41 C1 3.19E-04 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 3.19E-08 Kr-85 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xr-85e Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Kr-87 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06
- Kr-88 '
Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xe-133 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 '
Xe-133e Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xe-135 C1 4.84E-08 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 4.84E-04 Xe-138 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 4
- Total for period C1 8.03E-08 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 8.03E-08
- 2. Iodines I-131 C1 1.14E-04 2.19E-04 5.62E-04 8.95E-04 1-132 C1 1.40E-03 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 1.40E-03 ,
I-133 Ci 7.38E-04 1.23E-03 2.10E-03 4.07E-03 i I-134 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 I-135 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 1.90E-03 1.90E-03 4
Total for period Ci 2.25E-03 1.45E-03 4.56E-03 8.27E-03
- 3. Pertteulates Mn-54 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 4.45E-05 4.45E-05 Co-58 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Fe-59 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E Co-60 Ci 5.48E-05 6.09E-05 1.2?E-04 2.45E-04 Zn-65 Ci <1.00E 04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Sr-89 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 Sr-90 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E <1.00E-11 Zr-95 Ci 9.01E 06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.01E-06 Mo-99 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Cs-134 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Cs-137 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1'00E-04 .
i Ce-141 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Ce-144 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Total for period Ci 6.38E-05 6.09E-05 1.73E-04 2.98E-04
"<* indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/mi 13
l 1
TABLE 1.1-1 (continued) 1 1
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1989)
\
GASEOUS EFFLUENTS-ELEVATED RELEASE Nuclides Released July Aug. Sept. Third i Guarter !
- 1. Fission Gases t Ar-41 C1 1.33E-07 4.51E-09 3.74E-04 1.75E-07 Mr-45m Ci <1.00E-06 6.49E*01 8.29E+01 1.52E+02 Kr-87 Ci <1.00E-06 4.79E+01 3.51E+01 8.30E+01 Kr-88 Ci <1.00E-06 1.85E+02 '1.46E+02 3.31E+02 '
Xe-133 Ci <1.00E-06 2.21E+02 E.95E+02 4.16E+02 Xe-133e Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-00 2.16E-06 2.16E-06 Xe-135 C1 <1.00E-06 8.47E+01 9.19E+00 9.39E*01 Xe-138 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 ;
Total for period C1 1.33E-07 6.03E+02 4.68E+02 1.08E+03
I-132 Ci 1.16E-03 3.64E-03 <1.00E-11 4.40E-03 I-133 C1 1.89E-03 2.24E-03 4.53E-04 4.59E ,
I-134 Ci <1.00E-11 7.41E-03 <1.00E-11 7.41E-03 ,
1-135 C1 1.00E-03 1.75E-03 <1.00E-11 2.75E-03 Total for period C1 4.22E-03 1.53E-02 2.57E-03 2.21E-02
- 3. Particulates Mn-54 Ci <1.00E-04 3.81E 4.92E-05 8.73E-05 Co-58 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 .<1.00E-04 Fe-59 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Co-60 C1 1.04E-04 2.21E-04 2.43E-04 5.68E-04 Zn-65 Ci <i.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Sr-89 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 Sr-90 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 :;
Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Nb-95 Mo-99 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Cs-134 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Cs-137 ]
Ce-141 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 i Co-144 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 l Total for period C1 1.04E-04 ~ 2.59E-04 2.92E-04 6.55E-04 I
'<* indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uci/s1 1
1 I
14
TABLE 1.1-1 (continued) 1 l
J EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1989) 3 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS-ELEVATED RELEASE Muc11 des Released Oct. Nov. Dec. Fourth Guarter
- 1. Fission Games Ar-41 C1 2.3SE-03 <1.00E-06 6.93E-10 2.35E-03 -
Kr-85s Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.005-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 L
Kr-87 Kr-48 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 :
Xe-133 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xe-133e C1 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1c00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xe-135 C1 1.94E-03 <1.00E-06 8.2SE-10 1.94E-03 Xe-138 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Total for period C1 4.29E-03 <1.00E-06 1.52E-09 4.29E-03 -
- 2. Iodines 1-131 C1 1.72E-03 2.28E-04 1.99E-04 2.15E-03 I-132 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 I-133 C1 4.27E-04 1.58E-03 7.49E-04 2.75E-03 I-134 Ci 5.91E-03 <1.00E-11 -<1.00E-11 5.91E-03 '
I-135 Ci 2.33E-04 1.41E-03 <1.00E-11 1.64E-03 Total for period Ci 8.29E-03 3.22E-03 9.48E-04 1.2SE-02
- 3. Particulates Cr-51 Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.33E-04 1.33E-04 Mn-54 C1 3.46E-05 1.41E-05 <1.00E-04 4.47E-05 Co-58 C1 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Fe-59 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Co-60 Ci 2.22E-04 1.80E-04 4.24E-05 4.44E-04 Zn Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 -<1.00E-04 Sr-89 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 '
Sr-90 Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 Mb-95 Ci <1.00E-04 <t.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Mo-99 C1 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 '
Cs-134 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Ce-137 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Ce-141 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Ce-144 Ci <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 <1.00E-04 Total for period C1 2.57E-04 1.94E-04 1.75E-04 6.26E-04
"<* indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uci/mi 15
i TABLE 1.2-1 l
N AB VAfft DIWWAL NEl&BEUAL REPWT (1989) :
J LISUID EPPLUBETS- W EEAT!M W ALL RELEAS W l l First Second '
' Guarter Guarter
- 4. Fies!.en and Activation Produste 2
- 1. Total release (not including- C1 2.78E-01 0.00E+00 -
tritius, gases, alpha) .
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/mi 5.02E-05 N/A :
- 3. Maximum concentration released uC1/mi 5.00E-04 N/A ;
- 8. fritius .
- 1. Total release C1 3.07E-01 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released uC1/mi 5.00E-04 N/A ;
C. Dissolved Noble Gases
- 1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/mi <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 D. Gross Alpha Radiosotivity
- 1. Total release Ci 5.47E-05 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/mi 7.89E-10 N/A E. Volume of Weste Released liters 6.13E+05 0.00E+00 F. Volume of Dilution Water liters 6.90E+08 0.00E+00 i
'<' indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/mi ,
16
-'"*-*P" B+'-e e ,em- - . - . _ , , , , . , , _ _
l TABLE 1,2-1 (continued) !
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SENIANNUAL REPORT (1989)
UNIT ONE i
LIGUID EFFLUENTS SUNNATION OF ALL RELEASES l Third Fourth Guarter Guarter A. Fission and Activation Products ,
t
- 1. Total release (not including C1 0.00E+00 3.07E-02 tritive, gases, alpha)
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/e1 N/A 8.15E-06 ;
- 3. Maximum concentration released uCi/e1 N/A 9.10E-05
- 8. Tritium
- 1. Total release Ci 0.00E*00 3.86E-01
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/a1 N/A 8.60E-04 C. Dissolved Noble Bases ;
- 1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 '
- 2. Average concentrattore released uCi/e1 N/A <1.00E-05 D. Gross Alpha Radioactivity
- 1. Total release ci 0.00E+00 1.14E-06
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/mi N/A 6.00E-09 ;
E. Volume of Weste Released 11 tere 0.00E+00 4.47E+05 F. Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E+00 6.05E+08 l '<' indicates activity of esople le less than LLD given in uCi/e1 f
D 17
t l
TABLE 1.2-1 (continued) [
t i
i i
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEN! ANNUAL REPORT (1989) t l UNIT TWO {
?
LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUNNATION OF ALL RELEASES Third Fourth Guarter Guarter A. Fission and Activation Products ;
- 1. Total release (not including Ci 0.00E+00 9.30E 02 :
tritius, gases,alphal :
- 2. Average concentration released uC1/s1 N/A 2.20E-05 i uCi/s1 3.40E-04
- 3. Maximus concentration released N/A l t
?
B. Tritius
- 1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 3.75E-01 l 2. Average concentration released uC1/s1 N/A 8.40E-04 !
C. Dissolved Noble Gases t
l 1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released <1.00E-05 uC1/s1 N/A t
h D. Gross Alpha Radioactivity l
- 1. Total release. Ci 0.00E+00 2.57E-06
- 2. Average concentration released uC1/s1 N/A 4.00E-09 i E. Volume of Waste Released liters 0.00E+00 4.46E*05 F. Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E+00 5.69E*04
'<' indicates activity of easple is less than LLD given in uC1/s1 f
l l
18 l
\
?
TABLE 1.2-1 (continued)
MLUERT AED VeffB DISPOSAL RSPott (1999) l t L!WID SPPLUEETS l t
Nuclides Released Jan. Feb. March First !
Guarter i i
Cr-51 Ci 6.95E-03 No No 6.95E-03 Mn-54 C1 2.34E 02 Releases Releases 2.34E 02 -
Fe-55 C1 1.99E-01 1.99E-01 t Co-54 C1 1.02E 03 1.02E-03 ;
Fe 59 Ci 3.21E-04 3.21E-04 Co-60 C1 4.52E-02 4.52E 02 2n-65 C1 1.05E-03 1.05E-03 Sr-89 Ci 2.09E-04 2.09E 04 [
Sr-90 C1 2.45E-05 2.45E-05 -
Mo-99 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 1 131 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 Xe-133 Ci <1.00E 05 <1.00E-05 Xe-133m Ci <1.00E-05 <1.00E 05 Co-134 Ci <5.00E 07 <5.00E-07 l Xe-135 Ci <1.00E 05 <1.00E-05 Co 137 C1 1.29E-04 1.29E-04 Ce-141 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 ,
Ce-144 Ci <5.00E 07 <5.00E-07 l
Total for period C1 2.78E-01 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.78E-01 >
l I
'<' indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/mi 1
i l
k 19 ,
TABLE 1.2-1 (continued) i I
.1 EPPLUEBf AED WAffB DINOS&L REP 0ff (1989) !
j LISUID EPPLUERTS ,
Nuclides Released April May June Second Guarter l l Cr-51 Ci No No No ,
Mn-54 Ci Releases Releases Releases -
Fe-55 C1
- Co-SS Ci Fe-59 Ci ;
i Co 60 C1 Zn-65 Ci ;
Sr-89 Ci ,
I Sr-90 Ci No-99 Ci 1-131 C1 Xe-133 Ci .
Xe-133a Ci Co-134 Ci Xe-135 C1 Co-137 Ci .
Co-141 C1 Ce-144 Ci I
Total for period Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 I
l l
l i
i 1
20
l 1
l i
TABLE 1.2-1 (continued) r EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1989)
UNIT ONE LIGUID EFFLUENTS Nuclides Released July Aug. Sept. Third :
Guarter Cr-51 C1 No No No Mn-54 Ci Releases Releases Releases Fe-55 C1 Co-54 Ci Fe-59 Ci Co-60 Ci ,
2n-65 Ci ,
Sr-49 Ci Sr-90 Ci No-99 Ci I-131 Ci Xe-133 C1 ,
Xe-133a C1 Cs-134 C1 -
Xe-135 Ci Co-137 Ci Co-141 C1 i
Ce-144 Ci Total for period Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 ;
1 l
21
t
' TABLE 1.2-1 (continued) !
i EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1949) ;
( UNIT TWO LIOU1D EFFLUENTS Nuclides Released July Aug. Sept. Third '
Guarter l
Cr-51 C1 No No No Nn-54 Ci Releases Releases Releasee Fe-55 Ci Co-54 Ci Fe 59 Ci '
Co-60 Ci Zn-65 Ci i Sr-49 C1 Sr-90 C1 No-99 C1 I-131 Ci Xe-133 Ci Xe-133a C1 Co-134 Ci Xe-135 C1 Co-137 Ci .
Co-141 Ci Co-144 Ci Total for period Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 l
1 22
TABLE 1.2-1 (continued) i EFFLUEN? AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1989)
UNIT ONE LIQUID EFFLUENTS Nuclides Released Oct. Nov. Dec. Fourth Guarter
- Cr-51 Ci No No 2.64E 2.64E-03
- Nn-54 C1 Releases Releases 5.37E-03 5.37E-03 Fe-55 C1 1.09E-03 1.09E-03 Co-54 C1 1.33E-04 1.33E-04 Fe-59 C1 3.52E-04 3.52E-04 i
Co-60 Ci 2.11E-02 2.11E-02 2n-65 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Sr-49 C1 2.69E-06 2.69E-06 i Br-90 C1 4.03E-07 4.03E-07 No-99 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Tc-99a C1 4.60E-05 4.60E-05 I-131 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06.
- Xe-133 C1 <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 Xe-133a Ci <1.00E-05' <1.00E-05 Co-134 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Xe-135 Ci <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 Ca-137 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Co-141 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Co-144 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Total for period Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3.07E-02 3.07E-02 23
l l
i TABLE 1.2-1 (continued)
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1989) ;
- UNIT TWO LIQUID EFFLUENTS ;
Nuclides Released Oct. Nov. Dec. Fourth i
99arter Na-24 Ci No No 4.60E-06 4.06E-06 i Cr-51 Ci Releases Releases 2.73E-03 2.73E-03 Mn-54 C1 1.59E-02 1.59E-02 Fe-55 C1 1.44E-02 1.44E-02 ,
- Co-58 C1 1.465-04 1.46E-04 re-59 Ci 4.36E-04 4.36E-04 Co-60 C1 5.45E-02 5. 45F .'4 2n-65 Ci 7.40E-04 7. Mf oc
Sr-89 C1 1.73E-05 1. , 0.1 1 Sr-90 C1 4.25E-07 4.'.:11 U7 . l
<5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Mo-99 Ci Tc-99s C1 6.40E-05 6.40E-05 ;
Ag-lion C1 6.50E-05 6.50E-05 I-131 Ci <1.00E-06 <1.00E-06 '
Xe-133 Ci <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 Xe-133s Ci <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 Co-134 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Xe-135 Ci <1.00E-05 <1.00E-05 Co-137 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Ce-141 Ci <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Ce-144 C1 <5.00E-07 <5.00E-07 Total for period Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.30E-02 9.30E-02 5
i n
24
I I i TABLE 2.0 1 ,
l l
l I
M AS VASTS BI N E l& E &le M 4909) 35.!D WASTE W IPPD GPP9175 POR But!&L M DIN OB&L !
l Jan. Feb. March First-Guarter !
l
- 1. Spent resine, filter sludges, ,
evaporator bottone, etc. !
i ,
- s. Quantity shipped cu.a. 1.67t+01 2.27E+01 4.24E+01 4.18E+01 [
I
- b. Total activity Ci 3.66E*02 4.19E+02 5.05E+02 1.29E+03 i i
- c. Major nuclides (estimate) ,
Co-60 X 23 23 24 !
Fe-55 % 52 64 57 i Mn-54 % 18 05 13 !
Cr-51 X 01 02 03
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 3.85E+00 3.85E+00 3.29E-01 3.94E+00 3.94E+00 3.94E+00 5.07E+00
- f. Solidification agent Cement Cement Cement
- 2. Dry esepressible veste, sentaminated equipment, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu. m. 4.04E+01 5.50E+01 5.23E+01 1.48E+.
Ci 2.44E+00
- b. Total activity 1.85E+00 1.33E+01 1.76E+C:
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Co-60 % 10 10 10 Fe-55 % 71 71 71 Mn-54 % 06 06 06
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.72E+00 2.72E+00 2.72E+00 '
1.54E+01 25
l TABLE 2.0-1 (continued) ;
WFWMT 459 Vefft 98WOS&L 385!A550&L REPett (1969) l 30Lts vasts su! PPD orrstfB Foe SURIAL 08 ptsPos&L l, April May June Second !
Quarter ,
- 1. spent resine, filter sludges, ,
eveperator bottone, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu. a. 4.17E+01 4.83E+01 3.32E+01 1.23E+02
- b. Totsi activity C1 3.34E+02 4.32E+02 1.62E+02 9.28E+02 l
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Co-60 x 25 25 25 Fe-55 x 58 54 58 .
Mn-54 1 13 13 13 :
Cr-51 % 01 01 02 (
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 '
3.85E+00 3.29E-01 3.29E-01 3.94E+00 3.94E+00 3.85E+00 5.07E+00 3.94E+00 5.07E+00
- f. Solidification agent Cement Cement Cement j
- 2. Dry eesproselble vaste, sentesinated equipment, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu. a. 1.89E+01 2.19E+01 3.34E+01 7.42E+01
- b. Total activity Ci 7.95E-01 2.28E+00 1.87E+00 4.95E+00
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Co-60 % 10 10 10 Fe-55 % 71 71 71 Mn-54 % 06 06 06 1
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 4 2.72E+00 2.72E+00 1.54E+01 i
l 26
A j TABLE 2.0-1 (continuGd) l
- l
! EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEN! ANNUAL REPORT (1949) 4 SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR SURIAL OR DISPOSAL l l
- 1
' July Aug. Sept. Third j Guarter ;
l '
! 1. Spent resine, filter sludges,
- j evaporator bottone, etc. l 1
1.01E+02
- a. Quantity shipped cu. a. 3.92E+01 3.64E+01 2.56E+01
- b. Total activity C1 4.07E*02 7.11E+02 2.01E+02 1.32E+03 i
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Co-60 X 25 25 25 .
Fe-55 X 54 54 58 Mn-54 X 13 13 13 Cr-51 X 02 02 02
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 ;
3.29E-01 3.85E+00 3.29E-01 ;
, 3.94E*00 3.94E+00 3.94E+00 I 5.07E+00 ,
- f. Solidification agent Cement Cement Cement l [
- 2. Dry compressible vaste, ;
contaminated equipment, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu.a. 1.33E+02 2.19E+01 1.82E+01 1.73E+02 t,. Total activity C1 5.01E+00 1.46E+00 1.23E+00 7.70E+00
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Co-60 X 10 10 10 Fe 55 X 71 71 71
( Rn-54 X 06 06 06 b
I l
l
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.72E+00 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 >
3.51E+01 2.72E+00 3.29E-01 2.72E+00 5
27 l
i TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT (1949)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL Oct. Nov. Dec. Fourth Guarter ,
- 1. Spent resine, filter sludges, j evaporator bottoso, etc. t
- a. Quantity shipped cu. a. 2.22E+01 1.70E+01 3.47E+01 7.34E+01 1
- b. Total activity C1 2.07E+02 3.57E+02 2.19E+02 7.43E+02
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Co 60 X 25 25 25 Fe-55 X 54 54 54 Mn-54 X 13 13 13 !
Cr-51 X 02 02 02
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E 01 3.29E-01 5.07E+00 3.94E+00 3.46E+00 5.07E*00 3.94E+00 5.07E+00
- f. Solidification agent Cement Cesent Cement i 2. Dry compressible vaste, contaminated equipment, etc.
s
- a. Quantity shipped cu. a. 4.65E+01 3.71E+01 2.17E+01 1.05E+02 l
- b. Total activity C1 4.52E+00 1.90E+00 3.04E-03 1.04E+01
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Co-60 X 10 10 10 ,'
Fe-55 % 71 71 71 Mn-54 X 06 06 06 l
- e. Container volume cu. a. 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 2.12E-01 3.29E-01 2.72E+00 2.72E+00 28
l TABLE 2.0 1 (continued) i 6 808 WASTE DISP 00AL EM!ftet.lft. Ip0RT (1989) ,
StLIO WRETE 941PPED (FFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (CONT!ftED)
- 3. Solid maste disposition I
ggl,g Transnet t Comeany Destination Shioment Volume Activitv (cubic feet) (mCl)
Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 24574.58 01/05/89 33931.17 01/06/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 l
Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 171285.57 01/11/89 194689.59 02/28/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 27511.07 01/18/89 '
Hittman Oak Ridge, TN 660.0 1620.35 01/23/89 820.19 01/26/89 Hittman Oak Ridge, TN 768.0 Hittman Bat'nwell, SC 135.8 108724.92 01/30/89 896.80 02/08/89 Hittman Oak Ridge, TN 660.0 02/06/89 Hittman Beatty,NV 105.0 25489.53 3 t
02/07/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 25789.35 02/13/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 26525.03 02/15/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 24002.74 02/09/89 Hittman Waltz mill, PA 544.0 97.54 02/14/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 24429.30 -
03/01/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 125108.00 02/27/89 Hit t tnan Bat'nwell, SC- 135.8 188250.!! ;
02/d'4 / 89 Hittman Oak Ridge, TN 738.0 e!3. 2d 02/13/B9 Hittman barnwell, SC 178.9 16195.43 03/10/89 Hittman Oak R1:;e, TN 774.0 2010.91 03/22/89 Hittman Walt: Mill, PA 864.0 39.73 03/13/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 20168.26 03/17/89 Hittman Beatty,NV 139.1 U275.1B 03/16/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 -7(55 E 04/07/89 Hittman Oak Ricge, TN 666.0 7?$.13 03/14/89 Hittman Beatty, NV PS. 9 $972. 3?
03/15/89 Hit ttnan Beatty, NV 105.0 7B33.0?
Eeatty, NV 129.1 $6266 ;;
03/29/89 Hittman 03/30/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 63470.!!
03/20/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 3369.i$
03/21/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 17922.73 ,
03/22/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 19061.7' 03/27/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 22176.27 ,
Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 17812,92 03/28/89 85312,E:
05/01/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 04/26/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 76351.52 04/03/89 Hittman Sarnwell, SC 178.9 11548.36 Walt: Mill, PA 544.0 489,04 06/22/89 Hittman 04/04/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 19448.03 Bearnwe11, SC 135,8 72037,4*:
04/13/89 Hittman 04/05/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 19118.65 05/26/89 Hittman Oak Ridge, TN 774.0 2279.i!
29 ,
v -
i i
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued) ,.
f EFFLABff fWe WASTE DISPOSE MM!fetWL IEPORY (1999) ,
t SOLID WABTE SHIPPED (FFSITE FOR BUR!AL OR DISP 00E (CONTINLEDI 18223.20 :
04/17/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 05/10/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 38794.31 l 04/18/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 18449.15 i 04/19/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 19999.14 ,
04/24/89 Hittman Barnwell, SC 178.9 11217.09 i 05/09/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139,1 68122.65 04/25/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105. 0 22338.08 04/27/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 22787.30- ;
04/28/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 22044.58 05/02/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105. 0 21622.32 ,
05/03/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105. 0 22384.50 06/15/89 Hittman Barnwell, SC 178.9 13946.11 05/05/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 22465.35 05/08/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 21041.32 05/31/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 60852.le 06/01/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 139.1 63325.77 05/11/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 16433.49 05/12/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 8066.15 05/15/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 12091.11 05/17/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 16709.82 05/24/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 18260.?5
- 05/25/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 105.0 13126.01 l 20008,22 l 06/22/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 119.1 05/30/89 Hittman Bwetty, NV ?8. 9 6?62.65 06/06/89 H1ttman Barnwell, SC 135. B 13243.12 06./28/89 Hittman Oak Ridge,TN 626.0 1379.9?
06<07/89 Hittman Beatty, NV ~1 8. 3 10375.27
?6/19/89 Hittman Beatty, NV 98.9 8726.01 06/27/83 Hittman Barnwell, 3C 178. 9 7310.1; 06/19/89 Hittman Beatty, NV ?B. 9 3229.s:
- 05.0 14752.5; 06/30/89 Htttman Beatti, NV-I I
30
L TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)' l l
l i
I
, EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SENIANNUAL REPORT (1989) i SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL 1
July Aug. Sept. Third Guarter ,
i
- 3. Solid Weste Disposition
- a. Number of Shipments 16 12 08 36
- b. Mode of Transportation Mittaan Hittman Mittman Number 16 12 04
- c. Destination Beatty, NV Barnwell, SC Barnwell,- SC '
Number' 12 02 01 Waltz Mill, PA Beatty, NV Beatty, NV Number 04 09 06 Dak Ridge, TN Dak Ridge, TN
' Number 01 >
01 1
1 l
l t
l-
! 1 l
.31 ,
l e
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued) l l
1 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEN! ANNUAL REPORT (1949)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL Oct. Nov. Dec. Fourth Guarter
- 3. Solid Waste Disposition
- a. Number of Shipmente 08 07 12 27 i
- b. Mode of Transportation Mittman Mittman Mittoon Number 07 07 12 ;
U.S. Ecology $
Number 01
- c. Destination Barnwell, SC Barnwell, SC Barnwell, SC Number 02 01 01 Beatty, NV Beatty, NV Beatty, NV ,
i Number 04 04 09 Dak Ridge, TN Dak Ridge, TN Dak Ridge, TN Number 02 02 02 y
b
[
32
s FIGURE 3.1-1 i
i Estimated Cumulative Gama Dose (in mrem) .
l from the LaSalle Station for the period / !
l January-December 1989 // f
\ ,
Isopleth Labels
)f**p 200 +
75
$ mall figure - multiply by 10*4 large figure - multiply by 10-6 f j ,
F
\ t U:!wc /, j wou umumnA fiwtwwn k ,m g ... . :
l
,0 s-,.
9 ] fai
$t p eo ,
80 V
ri - ,,, .
~~ AN m .e Y" s.,a.
500 ,g j 250 -
// "'
a4"k.
~
r% y j {.
l V, .. .
i r -* ., s i ... ., yV o.i. .
m ..
/
/
,$0 ,
ra - ,
o S to 15 2o mi Y ._ '_. , . - . . . . . . . - . _ . ~ . . . .
FIGURE 3.1-2 Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCi/m3) i of Noble Gases from the LaSalle Station for the period January-December 1989 4p^\
>/ ;
J
$ f g re multiply by 10-1 large figure - multiply by 10-1 b ' ^ ,
- -[ f <
j
<% b>10 3 1
, .. ..... 9 ;
l 50J .
I w f '
i o ! ? [
7 4
~
15 N '**
m / i-l
'm
,,_ , 50 ,
) errie tiliam R" I 15 t 1 I g
( 'w '
n.., g 50 g a 7 .~..
g i;.
1 4.
,5 . -
25
/, it g i Dwight v *! .
y 56 l odWI e
es - ,
l o. . . . . s. lo is to. mi 34
FIGURE 3.1-3 1.
!= l Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCi/m3) y, <
L of lodine from the LaSalle Station for the ii period January-December 1989 49 Isopleth Labels /J Small figure - multiply by 10-6 250-Large figure - multiply by 10-6 (L/r,,100( N ,
- .... r 350 n>
o t mi
/ 75
/-
\ j
.. /
80 Ottowo h Morris,
.n..
, .r ***E
(
y 2 003 .
. nie,. 3 250 y e j7 %500 **** '
250 v ;[ r ... .
g - 10 0 '
,,$treeter
"> Deight tw
.a.
u/ 55
/
i 50 WI rs - ,
0 ip 2o mi
. . . S- 19 _
35
FIGURE 3.1-4 1 1
Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCi/m3)
/
/ 200b v of Particulate for the Matter from period January-December 1989 the LaSalle Station s#"s /
Isopleth labels Small figure - multiply by 10-7
! 100
/ /[! /4 ,'IE* A l Large figure - multiply by 10-7 i 6 .
3 ,
I j^ ~ jss[ . , ;
% s .. w awwnweiwww j ,
=--
N p
,,,,,,,,n,oa,x es,..
/ <
-3 N 200 i A
% /
o- I - t mi
- 82 W.dr.a o d
Bo otwf k e r u ine.
Senoco j Hlinovo M l f m*
, ove.. .
15 0 s s 4n ...
( e' _
,,Streetor 50 W
y
,, Vj 55 o~< ;
. o .n
) 36 i, o- 5 to 15 20 mi !
k A A 1 1 b A
- , - , e,- .-y,
i
(
l ,
TABLE 3.1-1 1
l LASALLE UNIT ONE 4 1989 ANNUAL REPORT MAKIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEA$ts PERIOD OF RELEAst . 01/01/89 TO 12/31/89 CALCULATED 03/09/90 INFANT RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TM TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAS APR-JUN JUL-4EP- .OCT-DEC 3
GAMMA AIR 3.058-11 1.65t-12 2.57t-02 1.07E-07 2.57t-02 (MRAD) (Est-) (Est ) (Est 1 (Est I _(ast )
BETA AIR 2.95E-12 2.312-13 2.865-03 (MRAD) 1'.285-04 2.86E-03, *
(t ) (t ) (t -) (t )
TOT. SODY (t )
1.655-11 . 8.49E-13 1.492-02 5.67t-04 .1.49t-02 (MREM) (ESE ) (t5t-) (ESE I SRIN 2.608-11 '1.45t-12 (ESE I '(ESE )
2.20E 9.328-08 2.20E-02 (MREM) (Est ) (Est ) (Est ) (Est -) (tst )-
ORGAN 8.29t-04 2.36t-03 7.35t-03 4.93E-03' 1.548-02 (MREMI '(tst ) -(tst ) (s. ) (t 1 (Est )
THYRO!D THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1989 i
COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 Crn 50 APP. I INFANT RECEPTOR
....... g-Or AFP I. ............
QTRLY IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TM QTR- YRLY g OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-NOV 'OBJ APP.!
- GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 -
stTA AIR ( M RAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.26 '
TOT. sODY (MREM) 0.03 0.00 20.0. 0.01 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.60- 0.00 5.0
$RIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.29 0.00 15.0 0~15 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.03 0.10 0.07 15 0 0.10 THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID. THYRO 10 RESULTS nASED UPON ODCM-REvtSION 11 UPDATE CS204~
FEBRUARY 1986 l
37
.r
[
TABLE 3.1-1 (continued)
LA$ ALLS UNIT ONs ,
1989 ANNUAL RsPORT RAK! MUM D05s8 RsSULTING PROM AIRSORNs EsLsASs3 PsRIOD OF RsLsA8s. 01/01/89 TO 12/31/89- CALCULATED 03/09/90 ADULT RsCsPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TN TYPs OUARTsA QUARTER QUARTsm; QUARTsR ANNUAL-JAN-RAR APR-JUN JUL-ssp OCT-Dsc GAMRA AIR 3.05s-11 1.65s 2.57s-02 1.07s-07 2.57s-02 {
(MRAD) (sSE ) (sSt ) (58s ) . (sSs ) (ES: ) i
.nsTA AIR 2.95s-12 2.31s-13 2.86s-03 1.28s-08 2.86s-03 (MRAD) (s ) ( ) (2 ) (s F (s I t TOT. BODY 1.65s-11 8.49s-13 1.495-02 5.672-08 1.49s-02 !
(MRsM) (Ess ) (sse ) (sst ) (sst ). .(sss-)
Ss!N 2.60s-11 1.45s 2.20s-02 9.32s-08 2.205-02 (MRsM)
ORGAN (Ess )
8.10s-04 (sst )
1.62s-03 (ass )
4.94s-03 (ss ) (ass-)
3.32s-03 ~1.078-02 (MRsM) (ssa ) (ssa ) (sss-) -(ssa ) (ss: 1-GI-LLI THYROID ' THYROID .TMYROID THYROtD TH!$ IS A REPORT FOR THE CALsNDAR YsAR 1989 ,
COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CPR 50 APP. I >
ADULT RsCsPTOR '
....----.... g Or AFP I. ....-....-..
QTRLY- 1st QTR 2ND OTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY g OF.
OBJ ' JAM-RAR APR-JUN- JUL SEP OCT-NOVc OBJ APP.I GAMRA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00- 0.51 0.00 10.0 0.26 !
BsTA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 20.0 0.01 TOT. sODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.60- 0.00- 5.0 0.30 SKIN (MRsM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00' 15.0 0.15 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0,.02 0.07- 0.04 15.0 0.07- 1' l
i GI-LLI THYROID THYROID THYRO!D THYROID l
i RESULTS n/JCD UPON l
l ODCM RsV8MinN 11 UPDATs C3:04 FEBRUARY 1986 l
38
1 TABLE 3.2-1 LASALLE-UNIT TWO ADULT RECEPTOR 1989 ANNUAL REPORT nAx! nun Doses (MREn) REsULTING FROM LIQUID EFFLUENTS PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/89 TO 12/31/89 CALCULATED 01/04/90 ;
187 2ND 3RD' 4TN DOSE TYPE QUARTER ~ QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL J AN- RAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC-
'i TOTAL 8.89E-06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 toDY 1.53E-05 2.42E-05 INTERNAL 4.87E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 ORGAN 1.16E-04' 1.65EiO4 GI-LLI GI-LLI GI.LLI THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1989 COMPLIANCE STATUS . 10 CFR 50 APP. I
............ g Or AFP I. ............
I QTRLY IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TN QTR YRLY. % Or OBJ JAN-RAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-NOV OSJ - APP . I TOTAL BODY (MREM) 1.5 -0.00 0.00- 0.00 0.00 3.0 0.00 CRIT., ORGAN (MREM) 5.0 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00' 10.0- 0.00 GI-LLI -GI.LLI .GI.LLI i
.RESULTS BASED UPON ODCM REVISION 11 UPDATE ~CS204 FEBRUARY.1986
}
l
'1 39
i i
l I
1 TABLE 3.2-1 (continued)
LASALLE UNIT ONE ADULT RECEPTOR 1989 ANNUAL REPORT' RAXIMUM DOSES (MREM) RESULTING FROM LIQUID EFFLUENTS . -j PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/89 TO 12/31/89 CALCULATED 01/04/90 IST . 2ND 3RD 4TM DOSE TYPE -QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER . ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR=JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC TOTAL 1.40E-05 0.00t+00 0.00t+00 .5.55t-06 1.965-05 BODY I INTERNAL 6.86E-05 0.00t+00 0.00t+00 4.14t-05 1.10E-04 ORGAN GI-LLI GI-LLI GI-LLI' THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1989 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CFR 50 APP.-1 l ------------
' % OF AFP I. ------------
.QTRLY IST QTR- 2ND QTR. 3RD QTR 4TN QTR- YRLY % OF' OsJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP .OCT-NOV OBJ APP.!
TOTAL BODY (MREM) 1.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 'O 00- 3.0 .0.00 CRIT. ORGAN (MREM) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0- 10.00 ,
l GI-LLI l
GI-LLI- GI-LLI
'RESULTS BASED UPON ODCM REVISION 11 i UPDATE CS204
.rteRUARY:-1986 l
l l
40
FIGURE 5.0 9 ona.ii W
- Q14 r d uareemo.
/ South ovia e Seneca e
7 it .
b M g s' T ant Sne property els I* Grand Ridge Verona i
Kinsman 11eRansom e12 '
, Mernan ,
Streator 10' Grundy La Salle County County Liv 6ageton County l 'i l
In e i a n a t ienes s
i 9 LA SALLE COUNTY ST ATION
$ _' _* _* _* U "
FIXE 0 AIR SAMPLING AND TLD SITES L48 Mennes el L43 Naarmas #2 L 43 0mmes f3 L as Naarnas se L el Ommen 83 L 46 Neareas $6 Let $smess Let MesaAss
4 41 4
FIGURE- 5.0-2
)
f i
4 9
5 4
,\"..
_ , . . . k-
.Y
. . st:- ..
+Y 0168 N. 32 ** St.
- k} ,,*3 e
[' ? * .
+
. i,.
u..'i%m.
l ;;tt *t.. . F+v. W ..s. [
~,,,
a G 19 3A.8 ' 143 .
E ll3A.t i ::n N ii A.
ii i.. ,,. . ...
\ ,.,.g g ;;;
7 ...
l 7 ..
l e . .. -e. .. i.
l
! . .. .. .. .. 2. .
s i
I L A S ALLE COUNTY ST ATION
~
l j innta a:No tto tocartons >
1 --
l
- i. 42
l l
l I
l FIGURE 5.0-3 i l
a Ottawo Sa r-u r.eme.
~.
'"m o .
,l t'
Seneca -
i.
i
.F -
sis i si+ mi mi sisgrigeaga,seta g ge ,
i -
' I sia.:
sia. i g 315 e mi aiki I e se*
. r Plant l_
e ansi sia.:i 8 sia e ses-a Site Property e mi
] a orsad Ridee ** lil'. verona '
== 1i,.
+i
-Eti s El ,
no .
- se6 . Kin man i l
l Raum e
i Mernan Streator Grundy La Salle County County .
LMngston County
. , , a 3 e s aan.*
LA SALLE COUNTY ST ATION f _' _* J _* J "
OUTER RING TLD LOCATIONS l'
43 4
- . . - - . - - - . . . __ ~ - . - . - . - . . - -_
FIGURE 5.0-4 > '
- 6. .e .
I t..t i b-N Omsoe
., _ me.me v.s.s
%W ,_ '
si: ,,
. s..
t .
Rt. 33 7
i e t.as t". '~
. LS% 34.esen 28.170 m
e w L. it L ne i
ll * ' 1 2 . s aan e LA SALLE COUNTY STATION j e
_ _. _ _ _ . u -.
a a '
I- L 16 Lowery Farm IIIGEST!0N ANO idATERSORNE EXPOSURE L 17 Heyer Patterson Delry PA N Y M E m ilons l
i L 18 Boldt Dairy L 19 Beuenhausen Dairy L 21 filinois River at Seneca L 24 LSCS Cooling Lake near Recreation Area i- L 27 LSCS Onsite Well L 28 Marseilles Well Water L 29 Seneca Well Water L 30 Ransom Well Water .
L 31 Ottawa Well Water L-32 filinois State Park Well L 34 Cooling Lake Discharle Structure Downstream L 35 Marseilles Pool of Illinois River 1
44 t
4 l
l i
1 1
TABLE 5.0-1 1
l L-
~
LaSalle Station >
, , g ;
Radiological Environmental Monitoring g h 3- !
Locations ::: -j k-
" ~
4 t .
e J J..J" o
o I.
s 5
,, - 5 cm .
.- a .
..c ,,.
1.l6 2.% 8 .
e v u. s E a. er a 3 >. 6 e
L Cl Nearsite #1 L 02 Nearsite #2 00.......................
L.03 Onsite #3 00................. .....
L 04 Nearsite #4 00.................
L 05 0nsite #5 00.......................
L 06 Nearsite #6 00.........................
L 07 Seneca OO....................... ....
L 08 Marseilles OO.................. ...
L 09 Grand Ridge 00................... .-.
L 10 5treator 0 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ..
L il Ransom 00..................- ....
L 12 Kernan 00,..............-... ....
0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . .. ....
L.13 Route 6 at Gonnam Road L.14 Ottawa 00,....................... ..
L 16 Lowery Farm 00....................... ...
L.17 Heyer. Patter 3on Dairy
... .....O........-...... .
L 18 Boldt Dairy .........O.......,.......-.
L 19 Bettenhausen Dairy .........O..............
L.21 lilinois River at Seneca .........O...............
L.24 LSCS Cooling Lake near Recreation Area .................O.......
.....O,.
L 27 LSCS Onsite Well ,.......O.-......
L.28 Marseilles Well Water ........,,............O.
L 29 5eneca Well Water .......................O.
L.30 Ransom Well Water ..........~.............O. -
L.31 Ottawa Well Water
.. ...............,....O.
....................,,.O.
L 32 lilinois State Park Well L 34 Cooling Lake Discharge Structure Downstream .,,...,...,,....,,..O-L.35 Marseilles Pool of Illinois River
...............O,........
.....O...................
CENSUS Driry
- 1. Residence l
45
Table 5.0-2 LA SALLE COUNTY STATION ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL-MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS l-
' Distance Direction.
Site Codea Location __{, mil es ) _')
(
L-01 Near-site No. 1 0.5 326 L-02. On-site Station No, 2 0.6 11 i L-03 On-site Station No. 3 0.2 56 L-04 Near-site No. 4 1.5 90 L-05 On-site Station No. 5 0.3 145-L-06 . Near-site No. 6 0.4 270' L-07 Seneca 5.2 18 L-08 Marseilles 7.0 326 L-09 (C) Grand Ridge 10.4 260 L-10 (C) Streator 13.5 220 L-11 Ransom 6.0 -191 L-12(C) Kernan 5.0 214 L-13 Route 6 at Gonnam Road 7.0 100 L-14 (C) Ottawa 12.0 315 1 2. TLDs
- a. Same as No. 1.
- b. Special TLD Samplers Distance Direction Site Code (miles) (*)___ <
Inner Ring L-101-1,2 0.5 359 L-102-1,2 0.6 17 L-103-1,2 0.7 46 L-105-1,2 0.7 91 L-106-1,2 1.4 110 L-107-1,2 0.8 128 L-109-1,2 0.6 178 L-110-1,2 0.6 205 L-111a-1,2 0.7 217 L-111b-1,2 0.8 230 L-112-1,2 0.9 244 L-113a-1,2 0.8 .262 L-113b-1,2 0.8 273 L-114-1,2 0.9 288 a
Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" af ter site code. All other locations are indicators.
46
4 t
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LA SALLE COUNTY STATION ,
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGI AL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS !
- 2. TL0s
- b. Special TLD Samplers (continued)
Distance . Direction Site Code '(miles) (*) -;
Outer Ring L-201-1,2 2.0 15 L-202-1,2 2.3 33 L-203-1,2 4.0 56 L-204-1,2 3.5 78 L-205-1,2 3.5 102 L-206-1,2 4.3 123 L-207-1,2 4.5 146 L-208-1,2 4.5 170 L-209-1,2 4.0 192 L-210-1,2 3.3 216 L-211-1,2 4.5 240-L-212-1,2 4.0 261 L-213-1,2 3.8 283 L-214-1,2 2.0 303 L-215-1,2 2.0 330' i L-216-1,2 1.5 350
- 3. MILK Distance Direction Site Codea Location (miles) (*) _
L-16 Lowery Dairy 8.2 120 L-17 (C) Hayer-Patterson Dairy 9.0 350 L-18 (C) Boldt Dairy 13.2- 25 L-19 Bettenhousen Dairy- i a
Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are-indicators.
t 47 i
Table 5.0-2 (continued)
LA SALLE COUNTY STATION-ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS-r
- 4. GROUND /WELL HATER Distance Direction-Site Codea . Location ,(miles) __ (*) ,
L-27 Onsite Well L-28 . Marseilles Well 7.0 326' L-29 (C) -Seneca Well- 5.1 18-L-30 Ranson Well 6.0' 191-L-31 Ottawa Well- '12.8 304 L-32 Illinois State Park 6.5 326' t
- 5. SURFACE WATER Distance Direction Site Codea Location (miles) (*)
L-21 (C) Illinois River at 4.0 22 Seneca L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake 0.3 112 1
- 6. FISH l- Distance Direction Site Codea Location (miles) (*)
L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake 0 ~. 3 112 near Recreation Area L-35 . Marseilles Pool of 6.5' 326 Illinois River
- 7. SHORELINE SEDIMENTS Distance Direction Site Codea Location -(miles) _fj_ _ l L-34 Downstream of cooling At Station-lake discharge structure a
Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.
48 .
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LA SALLE CoutJTY STAT 10ft ENVIRONNENTAL RA010t0GICAL F10NITORING PROGRAff. SAMPLE COLLECTIOPI AND A:sALYSES tocation Collection Type of Frequency Sample Pfedta Coded site Frequency Analysis of Analysts Renarks
- 1. Airborne a. Onsite and tecer Field Continuous Gross beta Weekly On all sanples.
Particulates operation Gamma Isot @ arterly On quarterly coriposites f reu each location.
L-1 Nearsite tio. I for a week L-2 Plearsite tso. 2 Gamma hot Weekly if gross beta in a sample esteeds IOR the L-3 Onsite 780. 3 yearly mean of the (ontral sal 9 Ies.
L-4 Nearsite too. 4 Filter Weetly L-5 Ons1te tio. 5 Exchange L-G Nearsite No. 6
- b. Far Field L-7 Seneca L-8 Narseille L-9 (C) Grand Ridge L-10 (C) Streator L-Il Ransom L-12 (C) Kernan
,$ L-13 Route 6 at Gonnam Rd.
L-14 (C) Ottawa
- 2. Afrborne Same as 1. Weekly 1-131 todine Weekly On all samples.
- 3. Air Sampling Same as I. --
Test and Weekly On all samplers.
Train risintenance
- 4. TLD Same as 1. @arterly Ganna Quarterly Two sets at all AP socations. One set read quarterly. Second set read if L-101-1,2 Inner Ring 102-1,2 required by Commonwealth Edison..At other 103-1,2 locations, all sets read quarterly.
105-1,2 Pfinimuo of two TL0s per set.
106-1,2 101-1,2 100-1,2 109-1,2 110-1,2, lita-l.2, litb-1,b2 112-1,2 Il3a-l.2,
'113b-1,2 i 114-1,26 a Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" in this column. All'other locations are indicators.
b tiew special TLD site for this Spec.
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LA SALLE COUNTY STATION ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PR09 AM, SAMPLE COLLECTION Am ANALYSES-Location Collection Type of Frequency Sample Media Codes Site Frequency Analysts of Analysts R emark s
- 4. TLD (continued) L-201-1,2 Outer Ring 202-1,2 203-1,2 204-1,2
- 205-1,2 206-1,2 207-1,2 208-1,2 209-1,2 210-1,2 211-1,2 212-1,2 213-1,2 214-1,2 215-1,2-m 216-1,2 O
- 5. Milk L-16 Lowery Dairy 81-weekly: 1-131' 81-Ideekly on all samples. LLD: 0.5 pC1/1.
L-17(C) Hayer-Patterson Oatry May through Gamme Isot. 81-Ideekly on all samples.
L-18 (C) Boldt Dairy October L-19 ' Bettenhousen Dairy . .
Monthly: 1-131 Monthly On all samples. LLD : 0.5 pCf/t.
November Gamma Isot Monthly On 311 samples.
through ApriI ~
- 6. Ground /Well L-27 'Onsste idell Quarterly Gamme Isot Quarterly' on all samples.
Water L-28 Marsellies well ' Tritium .
^
' Quarterly On all semples.
L-29 (C) Seneca Well L-30 Ranson leell L-31 Ottawa Well L-32 Illinofs State Park idell
- 7. Surface Water L-21 (C) Illinois River at ideekly . Gaumme Isot Monthly- On monthly composites from each locatton.
Ottawa ' Trittum Quarterly. On quarterly. composites from each location.
- 8. Fish L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake Semi-annual Gamme Isot. ~ Semi-annual On edible portfons only. Two species.
L-35 - Marsellies Pool' s Cbntrol (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. . All other locations are Indicators.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ .
,- m ... . , . m.___________.___
TABLE 5s0-2 (continued)
LA SALLE COUNTV STATION -
ENVIR0tr1 ENTAL RADIOLOGICAL t10filTORING PROGRArt, sat 1PLE COLLECTION AND An4 LYSES Location Collection Type of Frequency Sanple tiedf a Codes Site Frequency Analysis of Analysts Neuerk s
- 9. Shoreline L-34 Downstrean of sent-annual Canma Isot Semi-annual
-Sediments cooling take
- 10. Dairy Census a. $tte boundary to 2 miles --
- a. Enumeration Annually Durtny grazing season.
by a door-to-door or equiva-lent counting technique.
- b. 2 miles to 5 miles b. Enumeration Annually During grating season.
by esfng referenced informatton '
from county agricultural agents or other reliable sources.
, c. At dafries listed in item 4 c. Inquire as ca --
Annually During grazing season.
to feeding practices:
- 1. Pasture only.
- 2. Feed and chop only. '
- 3. Pasture and feed; if both, ask famer to estimate fractfon of food fran pasture:
<251,25-501, 50-151 or 2151.
II. Nearest In all 16 sectors up to 5 miles Restdence Census Annuelly f
,.,r - . . - . . . . ., e. ~ , .
, , ,, . e n., ,_ ,. -
TABLE 5.0-3 ENVIR0fMFNTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM @ARTERLY StMtARY Mame of fact 11ty LaSalle Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-254. 50-265 Location of Facility Marseilles. Illinois Reporting Period 1st Quarter 1969 ttounty, atatep Indicator Location with Highest ~ Control Sample Type and Locations Quarterly mean Type Number of Locations Museer ef Meena Mean Neana (Units) Analyses LLO non. routine Range ~ Location Range Range- Results Air Particulates Gross Beta 70 0.01 0.034 (78/78) L-06. Near-site No.6 (pCf/m3) 0.035 (13/13) 'Mone 0 (0.015-0.069) 0.4 m8 9 270* (0.019-0.061)
Gamma Spec. 6 0.01 <1lo Mene O Airborne lodine I-131 78 0.10 <LLO - -
(pCf/m3) <LLO O Game Background Gasma Dose 14 3.0 16.2 (10/10) ' L-07. Seneca 17.5 (1/1) 15.0 (4/4) 0 (TLos) (mR/Qtr.) (14.4-17.5) 5.2 mi p 18* -
(14.8-15.5).
Milk 1-131 .12 0.5 <LLO
$ (pCf/1) Gama Spec.
Cs-134 12
-<LLO O 5 (LLO -
Cs-137 5 4LO -
4LD 0 Other - Gammas
<tLD 0 10 <LLO .- -
(LLO O Surface Water Gama Spec. 6 (pC1/1) Cs-134 10 <tLo -
Cs-137 10 <LLO -
<LLO. O Other Gansnas - 20 ~
<tLD 0
<tLD - -
<LLO Tritium 2 200 235 (1/1) L-24.LSCS Cooling Lake O 235 (1/1) . <tLD 0 0.3 et 9112' Well Water Gasuna Spec. - 6 (pC1/1) Cs-134 10 <LLO -
Cs-137 10 (LLO -
' 4LD 0 Other Gansnes 20 <tLD -
<tLD - 0 Trftfue .. 6. 200: <tLD ' -
<LLO - 0
<LLO O --
4 Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fraction indicated in parenthests.
TABLE 5.0-4 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY SUMPERY Name of Facility LaSalle Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-254, 50-265 Location of Facility Marsettles Illinois Reporting Period 2nd Quarter 1989 (County, State) l'ndicator Location with Highest Control Sample Type and Locations Ouarterly Mean Type Locations Nueer of Number of Meana . Mean Meena Non-roottne (Units)
Analyses LLD Range Locatfon Range Range .Results Air Particulates Cross Beta 78 0.01 0.022 (78/78) L-02.Near-stte station -0.022(13/13) None -
(pCf/m3) (0.006-0.033) No. 2 0.6 at 911* (0.013-0.033)
Gamma Spec. 6 0.01 <tLD - -
None O Afrborne lodine I-131 78 0.10' <tLD - -
teone 0 (pct /m3}
$ Gama Background Gafuna Dose is 3.0 19.8 (10/10) L-05,Near-site No. 5 23.0 (1/1) 18.5 (4/4) 0 (TLDs) (mR/Qtr.) (16.7-23.0) 0.3 at 9 145*- -
(17.2-19.5)
Milt 1-131 20 0.5D <LLD - -
4LD 0 (pCf/1) Gamma Spec. 20 Cs-134 5 CLD - - --
. <tLD 0 Cs-137 5 4LD - -
4LD 0 Other Gammas 10 <LLD - -
4LD 0 Surface Water Gamma Spec. 6 (pct /l) Cs-134 10 CLD - -
. 4LO O Cs-137 10 <1LD - -
<tLD 0 Other Gamras 20 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 Tritium 2 200 204 (1/1). 236 (1/1) 0 8
Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fraction indicated in parentheses.
_ n _ ..-~-
. . . . ~:--. ..-.- - . - - . - . -..
1 .
- o. g ,, . - . --
TABLE 5.0-4 (continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY SUPPARY Mame of Factltty LaSalle Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-Z54. 50-265 Location of Factltty Marsellies. 111tnots Reporting Period 2nd Quarter 1989 (County State)
Indicator Location with Highest ' Control !
Sample Type and Locations Quarterly Mean tocations Nureer of Type Munter of Meana Mean Meana Non. routine (Units) Analyses LLD Range location Range Range . ' Results well Water Gansna Spec. 6 (pCf/1) Cs-134 10 <LLD - -
<tLD 'O Cs-137 10 <tLD - -
<tLD 0 other Gansnas 20 <tLD - -
<LLD 0 Trition 6 200 <LLD - -
<tLD 0 Bottom Sediment Ganuma Spec. 1 (pC1/m3) Cs-134 0.1 <tLD - -
None .O c.n Cs-137 0.1 ~ <LLD - -
None 0
'* Other Gansnas 0.2 <tLD - -
None 0 Fish Gansna Spec. 9 (pCf/g wet) Cs-134 0.1 (LLD - -
None 0
.Cs-137 0.1 <tLD - -
None 0 Other Gansnas 0.2 (LLO - - None 0 a Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fraction indicated in parenthesis.
~
1.c
~
- P ' ~ ' " ' " ' '
- t H 4 W"'T ~
. ENyl#0mE".TAL RADI!10GICAL MONITORING PROGRM QUARTE 2Y SUmRRY Mame sf Facility Lt.5311a Nuclear Power Station Docket No. __ , 50 254, 50-265 Locitton cf Facility Marseilles. 1111nofs Reporting Period _3rd_ Quarter 1989_
ICounty. State)
Indicator Location with Highest Control Sample Type and Locations Quarterly Mean Type Locations Nu%er of Number of Meena -~-'--~~. Me~an " ~ ~ Meana Non-routine (Unfts) Analyses LLD Range Location Range Range Resul ts Gross Beta 78 0.01 0.023 (78/78) L-04. Near-Site #4 0.024 (13/13)
AirPart{culates (ptf/s ) (0.006-0.034) 1.5 mi 9 90*
None 0 (0.018-0.029)
Gamma Spec. 6 0.01 <LLD - -
None 0 Airborne Iodine 1-131 78 0.10 <tLD - -
<ttD 0 (pCf/m3)
Gamma Background ca=== Dose. 14 3.0 17.4 (10/10) L-01. Near-site *1 20.5 (1/1) 15.7 (4/41 0 (14.8-20.5) 0.3 af 9 326* -
(15.1-16.11 Milk I-131 24 0.5 <LLD -
(pCf/11
<LLD 0 Genna Spec. 24 Cs-134 5 <tLD -
m -
4LD 0 Cs-137 5 <LLD - -
<LLO 'O Other Gammes 10 <tLD - -
<t LD 0
~ _ _ _ . _ --.,___. . .___ _. _. __.
Surface Water Gamma $pec. 6 - -
(pCf/11 Cs-134 10 <LLD - '- <tLD 0 Cs-137 10 <tLD - -
4LD 0 Other Gammes 20 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 Trftfue 3 200 230 (2/2) L-21. Illinois River 256 (1/1) 256 (1/11 0 (204-256) at Seneca. 4.0 0 22*
Well Water . Gamma Spec. .6 (pCf/1)
Cs-134 10 <tLD -- -
<LLD 0 Cs-137 - 10 <LLD - -
<tLD 0 Other Gammes 20 . <LLD -
<tLD 0 Trftium 6 200 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 a Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
TABLE 5.0-6 ENVIR00 MENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY Stp4 MARY Name of Factitty LaSalle Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-254, 50-265 Location of Factitty Marseflies, Illinois Reporting Perfod 4th Overter 1989 (County, State) +
Indicato. Location with Highest Control Sample Type and Locations Quarterly Meen Locations Number of Type Nisaber of Meana MPan Meena' Non-routine (Units) Analyses LLD Range Location Range Range Results Air Particulates Gross Beta 78 0.01 0.035 (78/78) L-06 Near Site No. 6 0.036 (13/13) None 0 (pCf/m3) '(0.017-0.056) 0.4 mi 9 270* (0.028-0.053)
Gessna spec. 6 0.01 <tLD - -
None O Airborne Iodine I-131 78 0.10D <tLD -- -
None 0 (pct /m3)
Gamune Background r.==== Dose 14 3.0 18.8 (10/10) L-05. On Site No. 5 21.6 (1/11 16.9 (4/4) b (15.6-21.6) 0.3 al 9 145* (16.0-18.0)
Milk I-131 '16 0.5 <tLD - -
<tLD 0
$ (pC1/1)
Gapuna Spec. 16 Cs-134 5 <tLD
<t L D 0 Cs-137 5 <LLD -
. <t LD 0 Other Gasunas 10 <t LD - -
<tLD 0 Surface Water Gamma Spec. 6 - -
(pCl/1)
Cs-134 10 <LLD - -
- <tLD 0 Cs-137 10 - <LLD -
<LLO O
Other Gammes 20 <tLD - -' <LL D 0 Tritium 2 200 .. <tLD
<tLD 0 M "- vc m 4 ,yy- , y,y,,
TABLE 5.0-6 (continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGILAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY St9mRRY meme of Facility LaSalle nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-254, 50-265 Location of Facility Marsettles, Illinofs Reporting Period 4th Quarter 1999 __
(County, State)
Sample Type and Indicator location with Highest Locations Control Type Number of Quarterly Mean Locattens Meana. thauber of (linits) Analyses LLD Range Mean Stran8 mon-routfne Location Range Range Results Well Water - ' Cm==+ Spec. 6 (pct /1)
Cs-134 10 <LLD -
<tLD . O Cs-137 10 <LLD -
<LLD 0
~Other Gammes 20 <LLD . -
<tLD 0 Trittim 6 200 <LLD -
<LLO O Fish Gamma Spec. 10 (pCf/g wet) t.n Cs-134 0.1 <t L D -
None 0 Cs-137 0.1 <tLD -
none 0 Other Gammas 0.2 <t L D -
none 0 Botton Sediments Gamma Spec. 1 (pCi/g dry)
Cs-134 ' O.1 <t LD -
mene O Cs-137 0.1 0.30 (1/1) L-34, Downstream of 0.30 (1/1) mone O Discharge 9 Station Other GammasC 0.2 0.90 (1/1) L-34, Downstream of 0.90 (1/1) None 0 Discharge 9 Station 1
ba Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
c Co-60 One result for 1-131 exceeded LLD (<0.181 because of very low volume (64m3); low volume due to air sampler pump malfunction.
l l
LASALLE -l l'
Table 5.1-1 GAMMA RADIATION, AS MEASURED BY THERM 0 LUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS (TL0s) i STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ist Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th' Quarter r
i Date Placed: 12-30 04-01-89 07-01-89 09-30 l Date Removed: 04-01-89 07-01-89 09-30-89 12-29-89 l Days in the Field: 92 91 91 90
\ l Location Average mR/ Quarter On-Site and Near-Site Indicator Locations L -01 Near Site No. 1 17.2 0.6 19.2 1.4 20.5 0.9 -19.2 0.9 L-02 On-Site No. 2 16.4 0.6 19.2 0.8 18.0 0.9 18.6 1.2 L-03 On-Site No. 3 14.7t0.8- 19.3t0.9 15.4 1.1 17.920.9 ,
L-04 Near-Site No. 4 16.0 0.6 19.4 1.5 16.6 1.0: 19.8 1.6 L-05 On-Site No. 5 16.8 0.7 23.0 t0. 9 19.7 0.9 21.6 1.1 L-06 Near-Site No. 6 16.7 0.7 22.7 0.9, 18.1 tl .5 '20.5 0.8 Mean s.d. 16.3 0.9 20.'5 1.8- 18.1 1.9' 19.6'1.3 l Off-Site Indicator Locations L-07 Seneca 17.5 0.7 19.9 0.8 18.4 0.8 18.5 0.7 L-08 Marseilles 16.7t0.7 20. 3 t0. 9 17.5 0.2 18.6 1.2 L-11 Ransom 14.4:0.8 16.720.8 14.8 1.0 -15.6 0.8 L-13 Rt. 6/Gonnam Road 15.1 0.6 18.4 0.9 15.3 1.0 17.3t0.7 Mean s.d. 15.9 21.4 18.8 1.6 16.5 1.7 17.5 1.4 Background Locations L-09 Grand Ridge 15.1 0.9 18.3 0.8 15.9 1.1 L-10 16.7 0.7 Streator 14.8 0.8 17.2 0.9 15.1 1.2 16.0 0.7 L-12 Kernan 14.8 0.7 18.9 0.8 15.6 1.2 L-14 16.920.9- 1 Ottawa 15.5 0.8 19.5 21.1 16.1 1.3 '18.0 1.0 !
Mean s.d. 15.0 0.3 18.5 1.0 15.7 0.4 16.9 0.8 l
l 58
LASALLE Table .5.1-1 (continued) r GAPNA RADIATION, AS MEASURED BY THERMOLUNINESCENT 00SIMETERS (TLDs)-
SPECIAL PROGRAM Outer Ring, Near 5 Miles Radius, Indicator Locations 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Date Placed: 12-30-88 04-01-89 07-01-89 09-30-89 Date Removed: 04-01-89 07-01-89 09-30-89 12-29-89 Days in the Field: 92 91 91 90 Location Average mR/Qtr.
L-201-1 16.420.8 21.0tl.2 16.1*0.9 18.3t0.9 L-201-2 16.320.8- 20.5t0.8 17.0tl.0 17.520.8 L-202-1 16.420.8 20.6*0.8 15.920.8 18.0t0.9-L-202-2 16.7t0.7 21.110.9 17.1t0.7- 17.921.2 -
L-203-1 15.110.8 18.411.4 14.811.0 16.1*1.2 L-203-2 17.7tl.0 21.320.7 17.910.9 18.4tl.0 -
L-204-1 15.0t0.9 18.121.0 15.611.1 17.810.8-L-204-2 14.7t0.7 19.8t0.8 16.121.0 16.920.8 L-205-1 16.320.9 19.320.9 15.711.2 20.221.1-L-205-2 -15.220.7 19.811.0 15.4t0.8 17.7t0.9 L-206-1 15.111.1 21.020.8 14.7tl.2 17.9tl.1-L-206-2 16.020.7 19.511.2- 17.2tl.1 17.3t0.9 L-207-1 16.121.1 21.011.0 17.010.8 18.7t0.8 L-207-2 16.6t0.8 19.121.1 15.4t0.8 16.220.9 L-208-1 15.610.7 23.6*0.9 18.210.7 19.3t0.8 L-208-2 16.320.9 21.011.1- 16.1tl.0 17.8tl.0 L-209-1 18.6t0.7 22.6t0.9 19.5tl.2- 19.310.9-L-209-2 15.5t0.7 20.0 0.8 '15.511.2 17.711.0
_1 L-210-1 16.520.6 23.6:0.7- 17.7t0.8 19.6t0.9 l L-210-2 17.4t0.8 21.721.1 18.321.1 18.521.0 +
L-211-1 15.810.9 24.411.0 19.611.2. 20.7tl.1 L-211-2 17.310.8 20.921.1 17.410.9- 18.210.9 L-212-1 15.310.7 20.720.8 16.210.7 18.321.0 i L-212-2 17.4t0.9 20.120.9 17.6t1;1 17.910.9 L-213-1 15.010.7 20.110.9 17.621.2 17.7tl.2 .
L-213-2 15.7t0.7 22.121.3 16.811.3 L18.820.7 L-214-1 18.220.7 22.7t0.8 18.410.8 19.6tl.0-L-214-2 18.411.0 22.611.0 18.120.9 19.211.0 L-215-1 16.7t0.7 23.510.7 17.810.7 19.6t0.7 '
L-215-2 17.410.8 23 510.7
. 18.3t0.7 19.7tl.2 I L-216-1 16.410.8 20.6t0.8 17.211.1 18.5t1.0 L-216-2 15.710.7 19.910.7 17.421.2 17.6t0.8 Mean i s.d. 16.311.0 21.121.6 17.011.3 18.311.1-2 59 l
LASALLE 'i I
. Table S.1-1;(continued)-
l 1
GAPHA RADIATION. AS MEASURED BY THERM 0 LUMINESCENT D051 METERS (TLDs) .
SPECIAL PROGRAM Inner Ring, Near Site Boundary, Indicator locations '
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Date P1 aced: 12-30-88 04-01-89 07-01-89 30 Date Removed: 04-01-89 07-01-89 09-30-89 '12-29-89.
Days in the Field: 92 91 91 90 Location Average mR/ Quarter !
Code L-101-1 16.320.7 20.910.7 17.011.3 17.710.7 L-101-2 15.9t0.7 19.521.0 16.511.0 16.810.8- -
L-102-1 17.520.7 -24.410.7 20.211.5 20.511.2 L-102-2 17.510.7 23.220.9 19.221.1 20.110.9 ,
L-103-1 17.6t0.7 -20.611.0 18.221.0 18.511.3 L-103-2 17.410.7 23.8t0.9 18.420.9- 20.lt0.7 L-105-1 18.4t0.7 22.6tl.0' 17.920.8 20.1*0.9 L-105-2 16.7*0.6 22.0tl.4 18.010.9 18.911.4 L-106-1 16.3t0.7- 19.910.8 .17.4*1.1 17.811.2 L-106-2 16.210.9 -18.920.9 16.410.8 16.321.0 ;
L-107-1 15.610.7 23.011.2 18.411.0- 19.211.3 L-107-2 16,710.7 20.4t0.8. 17.310.8 17.511.0-L-108-1 17.0t0.8 21.021.4 17.321.3 19.121.0 L-108-2 14.210.9- 17.120.9 15.121.2 -15.510.9
, L-109-1 17.110.6 21.110.7 '17.910.9 18.210.7 L-109-2 16.910.9 21.211.3 17.611.3 17.621.3 L-110-1 16.410.8 20.411.0 17;2tl .2 17.St0.9 L-110-2 16.120.7 19.820.9- 17.111.0 17.410.9-L-111a-1 16.810.7 21.620.9- 17.7t0.8 18.621.0 L-111a-2 16.220.8 22.011.4 '17.0t0.9 19.211.2 l
L-111b-1 15.2t0.7 21.520.7 18.0t0.7 18.6t0.8 L-111b-2 15.610.6 20.610.7 17.211.3 17.511.3 L-112-1 16.110.7 19.921.0 16.111;3 17.220.9 L-112-2 15.510.6 20.7t0.8 17.210.9 18.011.0 L-113a-1 16.3t0.7 22.211.0 15.921.0 19.211.0-L-113a-2 15.8t0.7 22.8t0.9 17.110.9 18.920.8 l
L-113b-1 16.210.8 21.721.0 15.420.9 18.921.0~
L-113b-2 16.020.7 20.4t1.0 17.910.9 18.510.9 :
L-114-1 17.4t0.8 21.411.3 16.211.0 18.3tl.0-L-114-2 15.910.7 20.7t1.0 17.910.8 17.520.8 Mean i s.d. 16.420.9 21.211.5 17.4tl.1 18.311'.2 i
i 60
'l >
~ _ . _
i
.l i
l l
1 APPENDIX II METCOR0 LOGICAL DATA I i
l I
1 e
i 4
61
i LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1989 i STABILITY CLASS -EXTREMELY UNSTABLE- (DIFF TEMP-375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH) ?
DIRECTION .7-3' 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL <
N O 1 0 0 0 0 1 ,
NNE O 1 3 0- 0 0 4-P NE O 3 2 0- 0 0 5 ENE O O O O O O 0-E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O (
SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S O O O O O O O SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,
SW 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 '!
WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.
W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~
WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i
NW 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 i NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 7 5 1 1 1 15 5
Hours of calm in this stability class: O l Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 l Hours of missing stability measurements in.all stability classes: 3 62
i LA6ALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1989 '
STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) ,
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O 1 1 0 0 2 NE O 1 1 1 0 0 3 ENE O O 2 2 0 0 4 E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S O 1 0 0 0 0 1 SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 t
WSW 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 W 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 t WNW 0 0 3 0 0 1 4 NW 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 NNW 0 0 0 0 5 2 7 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 3 9 7 5 4 28 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hturs of missing wind measurements in this stability class 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 3 l 63
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1989 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O 1 1 0 0 2 NNE O O 2 0 1 1 4 NE O O 3 2 4 1 10 ,
ENE O O O 2 1 0 3 ,
E O O O O O O O ESE O 1 0 0 0 0 1 SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O 1 0 0 1 S 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 0 2 2 0 4 WSW 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 W 0 1 2 0 0 1 4 WNW 0 0 1 0 1 4 6 NW 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 NNW 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 3 11 10 11 10 45 Hours of calm in this stability classt 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 2 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes 3 64
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION :
PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1989 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET ,
WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O 2 15 59 31 11 118 :
NNE O 5 19 23 21 6 74 ,
NE 1 4 17 44 22 1 89 i ENE O 4 7 24 19 4 58 E 2 5 8 19 23 6 63 ESE 1 6 4 4 5 8 28 SE O 3 18 11 1 6 39 ,
SSE O 4 8 13 7 3 35 S 1 1 6 17 16 7 48 SSW 1 3 8 7 12 20 51 SW 0 7 5 9 10 15 46 i
WSW 4 4 8 18 19 10 63 W 1 6 8 14 al 35 85 WNW 0 1 4 15 38 42 100 NW 0 6 10 13 22 24- 75 t l NNW 0 5 8 32 27 6 78 VARIABLE O O O O O O O i
TOTAL 11 66 153 322 294 204 1050 -
Houro of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurementa in this stability class: 43 Houro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes 3 65
I l LASALL- NUCLEAR POWER STATION
! PERIOD OF 2ECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1989 l
STABIL13Y CLASS - El 3HTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
! WI ieS MEASURED AT 375 FEET i
l WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH) 29-24 GT 24 l DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 TOTAL N O O 3 5 3 3 14 ,
NNE 6 1 0 2 6 3 18 i
NE 2 2 9 9 0 0 22 ENE O 6 3 8 0 1 18 E 1 1 5 6 1 5 19 ESE O 2 3 13 11 8 37 SE 1 1 3 16 16 7 44 SSE 2 0 4 14 11 7 38 S 0 5 2 9 12 25 53 SSW 2 5 5 6 7 64 89 SW 0 3 3 9 1 42 58 WSW 3 6 2 6 12 19 48 ,
W 2 6 4 4 15 36 67 WNW 0 6 4 10 24 32 76 NW 1 4 0 10 8 9 32 NNW 0 3 4 5 2 0 14 VARIABLE O O O O O O O i l
TOTAL 20 51 54 132 129 261 647 l
l Hours of calm in this stability classt 0 l Hsurs of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 14 l
Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability: classes: 3 +
66
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOC OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1989 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O 1 3 0 2 6 NNE O O O O O O O NE O O 2 5 2 0 9 ENE O O O 3 2 0 5 E 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 ESE o 0 0 1 2 0 3 SE O 1 0 5 6 6 18 SSE 1 1 0 2 9 4 17 S 0 1 1 5 12 26 45 SSW 0 2 0 5 24 1 32 SW 1 1 1 2 3 31 39 WSW 1 1 0 0 4 22 28 W 0 2 0 2 4 15 23 WNW 1 0 1 2 10 6 20 NW 0 0 0 1 5 2 8 NNW 0 1 2 2 5 0 10 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 6 10 8 34 69 138 265 Heurs of calm in this stability class: 0 '
Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class 2 Hours of missing stability measurements in all etabi'lity classes 3 f 67 s
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1589 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET l WIND WIND SPEED LIN MPH) '
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL i
N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O O O >
NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O ,
ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O 2 3 5
- SSE O O O -0 2 3 5 t
S O O O 2 3 9 14 SSW 0 1 0 0 0 4 5 SW 0 0 1 1 2 3 7 WSW 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 W 0 0 0 1 0 3 4 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 ,
NNW 0 0 0 '. 2 0 3-VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 1 1 6 12 26 46 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 ;
Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class O Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: -3 68
i l
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PT,RIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1989 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEEC (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL 1
N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O I E O O O 1 0 0 1 ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 Houro of calm in this stability class: 0 Houro of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Houro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 6 r
69
e LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1989 i STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375 33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET +
WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O 5 0 0 5 NE O O O 1 0 0 1 ENE O O 1 6 0 0 7 E O O O O 0 2 2 ESE O O O O 1 1 2 SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSW 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 SW 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 WSW 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j NNW O O O O O O VARIABLE L 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 0 3 12 1 5 22 Hours of calm in this stability class 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 6
-70
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1989 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) l WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET i WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13 18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL '
N O O 1 1 0 0 2 NNE O O O 4 1 0 5 NE O O 5 3 0 0 3 ENE o 0 2 3 1 0 6 E O O 1 4 0 1 6 ESE O O 1 0 0 2 3 SE O O O O O O O j SSE O O O O O O O S 0 1 2 4 1 1 9 l
SSW 0 0 10 9 0 0 19 SW 0 0 2 4 0 0 6 WSW 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 l W 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 WNW 0 0 0 0 3 3 6 NW 0 0 0 3 3 2 8 NNW 0 0 1 3 1 0 5 VARIABLE o 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 1 25 41 11 10' 88 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Heure of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 6 l
l t
l 71
I LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1989 !
STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH) .
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 CT 24 TOTAL l N 1 11 20 12 6 2 52 NNE 2 19 10 15 12 0 58 NE 2 13 18 25 5 0 63 ENE O 7 22 40 12 8 89 E 3 9 21 9 5 5 52 ESE 1 3 11 10 11 12 48 SE 1 0 13 12 9 9 52 SSE 1 8 12 33 14 18 86 S 1 6 12 20 10 17 66 SSW 1 8 14 6 6. 18 53 SW 0 6 6 10 7 8 37 WSW 1 6 10 8 14 5 44 W 2 5 19 23 15 12- 76 3 WNW 2 9 19 43 19 32 124 NW 2 11 21 51 41 11 137 NNW 0 6 42 32 6 0 86 VARIABLE O O O O O O O -
TOTAL 20 135 270 349 192 157 1123 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements.in this stability class O Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 6 72
i LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL + JUNE 1989 '
STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH) l DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13a18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL i N 2 2 6 4 1 6 21 NNE 1 3 2 11 4 2 23 ,
NE o 3 5 13 1 0 22 ENE 1 6 9 4 1 0 21 E O 5 10 28 6 8 57 ESE 1 4 5 18 17 5 50 SE 1 2 3 5 12 8 31 i SSE O 5 5 7 4 16 37 i
S 1 3 5 4 5 10 28 i
SSW 1 5 10 13 10 34 73 9
SW 0 5 6 6 8 23 48 WSW 0 4 6 10 8 1 29 W 3 7 10 6 9 2 37 WNW 0 9 9 7 25 12 62 NW 2 3 12 15 10 1 43 NNW 0 5 9 8 4 0 26 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 13 71 112 159 125 128 608 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes 6 73 l
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1989 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTICS .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL T
N O O O 3 1 0 4 NNE O O 2 2 3 0 7 l NE 1 0 1 2 0 0 4 ENE O O O O O O O f
E 1 0 2 5 0 0 8 ESE O 2 1 9 10 0 22 SE O 4 5 3 5 3 20 SSE O 4 3 1 5 6 19 S O 4 0 3 7 7 21 p SSW 0 1 6 9 4 13 33 SW 0 1 6 8 8 4 27 WSW 0 0 0 9 8 2 19 W 0 0 4 10 6 3 23 WNW 0 0 1 3 8 7 19 NW 0 0 0 6 5 4 15 1
NNW 0 2 3 5 3 0 13 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 2 18 34 78 73 49 254 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in thia' stability class: 1 Hours of missing stability measurements in_all stability classes: 6 t
74
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1989 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O 3 0 1 4 SSE O O O 2 3 3 8 S O O 1 0 1 6 8 SSW 0 0 1 6 3 4 14 SW 0 0 1 2 5 2 10 WSW 0 0 0 4 2 3 9 W 0 0 0 6 3 1 10 WNW 0 0 0 1 1 3 5 NW 0 0 0 4 2 0 6 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 0 3 28 20 23 74 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class _5 Hsurs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 6 75
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION ,
PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 23-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S O O O O O O O SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSW O O O O O O O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 NW O O O O O O O NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heurs of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 22 76 o
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET i
WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION ,7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL !
N O O O O 1 0 1 NNE O O 3 0 0 0 3 NE O O 9 0 0 0 9 ENE O O O 1 0 0 1 E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O e
SE O O O O O O O ;
SSE O O O O O O O S O O O O O O O SSW 1 2 4 1 0 0 8 l
SW 0 3 2 0 0 0 5 l WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l
WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i NNW 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 1 5 18 2 2 0 28 Houro of calm in this stability class 0
-Houro of missing wind measurements in this stability; class: 0 Houro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 22 77
i LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET ,
WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH).
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL t
N O 1 1 0 3 0 5 NNE O 1 2 7 1 0 11 NE O O 5 2 0 0 7 ENE O O 2 2 0 0 4 i E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O 2 2 1 0 0 5 S 0 5 2 1 0 0 8 SSW 0 2 2 0 1 0 5 L
SW 1 5 2 2 0 0 10 WSW 0 0 3 3 0 0 6 W 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 VARIABLE O O O O O O O
+
TOTAL 1 16 23 19 6 0 65 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 22 l 78
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 47 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 2 14 16 19 9 8 68 NNE 2 17 27 24 24 1 95 NE 4 26 72 38 9 0 149 ENE 3 19 20 43 3 0 88 E 4 19 23 28 3 0 77 ESE 1 33 21 10 1 0 66 SE 2 26 29 7 0- 0 64 SSE 1 10 29 16 1 1 58 S 2 16 19 9 5 1 52 SSW 0 7 7 12 7 1 34 I
l l SW 1 14 6 10 3 1 35 l
l WSW 0 8 15 29 6 2 60 W 1 10 7 18 9 0 45 WNW 1 7 8 11 1 0 28 NW 0 5 11 6 1 0 23 NNW 2 2 5 25 4 3 41 i
VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 26 233 315 305 86 18 983 Houro of calm in this stability class: 0 Hsure of missing wind measurements in this stability class 0 ;
Houro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 22 '
l 79
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION '
PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL !
N O 2 8 1 0 2 13 NNE 1 3 13 4 6 4 31 ,
NE 1 10 25 12 0 0 48 ENE O 9 14 16 4 1 44 E 1 13 24 32 9 0 79 ESE O 3 11 11 13 0 38 i CE 1 6 15 16 5 0 43 ,
SSE O 7 8 9 9 3 36 S 0 3 5 8 13 5 34 SSW 0 3 8 8 12 10 41 SW 1 1 6 8 12 18 46 ;
WSW 1 0 3 13 6- 5 28 ,
W 1 1 6 10 7 0 25-i WNW 0 6 3 9 1 0 19 NW 0 5 3 7 4 1 20 NNW 1 3 3 3 5 0 15 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 8 75 155 167 106 49 560 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 22 .
I 80
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O 1 2 4 3 2 12 NNE O 1 0 0 0 0 1 NE O 3 3 2 0 0 8 ENE O 3 2 1 0 0 6 E 1 2 3 7 1 0 14 ESE 1 2 10 21 5 0 39 SE O 1 16 13 9 4 43 SSE O 7 14 18 3 2 44 S O 2 11 13 3 2 31 SSW 2 6 5 13 6 6 38 SW 2 3 10 12 15 5 47 WSW 3 3 9 9 8 3 35 W 1 4 4 8 9 0 26 WNW 0 2 1 9 0 1 13 NW 0 1 2 2 1 0 6 NNW 0 1 4 9 5 0 19 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 10 42 96 140 69 25 382 Hauro of calm in this stability class: 0 Hauro of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hauro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 22 t
81
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE o 0 0 1 0 0 1 NE O O 1 0 0 0 1 ENE O O O O O O O E O O 1 1 1 0 3 ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O 1 1 2 4 SSE O O 2 13 14 2 31 S 0 0 8 11 6 8 33 SSW 0 0 1 9 9 14 33 SW 0 2 4 6 8 5 25 WSW 0 2 3 6 3 4 18 W 0 0 0 1 5 5 11 i WNW 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 NW 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 l
NNW 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0- 6 22 50 50 40 168
! kours of calm in this stability class 0 i Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 l Hours of missing stability mearurements in all stability classes: 22 l
l 82 l
i LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION '
PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O O O ;
NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H0uro of calm in this stability class: 0 Heuro of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Houro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 114 l
83
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S O O O O O O O SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H urs of calm in this stability class: 0 Heurs of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 114 '
84
I LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET t WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL
......... . ... ...s.. ..... ..... ..... . ... ......
N O O O O O O O l NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O i E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESE O O O O O O O -
SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSW O O O O 5 0 5 SW 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 I
WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '
WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +
NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 VARIABLE O O O O O O O ,
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 8 4 12 Houro of calm in this stability class 0 Houro of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 3 ,
Houro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 114 i
9 85
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION !
PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) ,
WINDS MEe.SURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O 3 8 15 36 36 98 NNE O 5 13 18 15 9 60 ,
NE O 7 18 9 3 0 37 ENE 1 7 9 18 0 0 35 [
i E O O 3 9 0 0 12 ESE O 7 4 8 1 0 20 SE 1 7 12 5 1 0 26 i
SSE 1 3 2 14 8 0 28 S 1 8 12 14 13 20 68 [
SSW 0 0 8 18 25 34 85 SW 0 4 3 17 21 11 56 WSW 0 3 5 11 14 5 38 W 0 2 5 16 25 16 64 i WNW 1 7 11 28 16 48 111 l NW 3 5 9 47 18 67 149
- NNW 1 2 3 33 32 31 102 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 9 70 125 280- 228 277 989
- Hours of calm in this stability class
- 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 36 l Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 114 l
l L
i 86
h 1
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED A* 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION 7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O 1 1 6 7 0 15 i NNE 1 0 3 6 3 0 13 NE 1 2 3 3 0 0 9 ENE O 3 6 3 0 0 12 E O 2 3 4 0 0 9 ESE O 4 3 4 1 0 12 SE O O 6 1 1 4 12 SSE 1 1 3 3 5 7 20 S 1 1 1 7 7 35 52 i SSW 0 0 2 5 14 51 72 SW 2 1 1 7 18 27 56 WSW 1 1 6 7 6 13 34 W 0 1 1 5 6 33 46 WNW 0 2 1 11 17 25 56 NW 2 4 2 16 17 28' 69
- NNW 0 4 4 14 15 6 43 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 9 27 46 102 117 229 530 Houro of calm in this stability class
- 0 Houro of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 33
, Houro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
i 114 l 87
LASALLE hUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FECT WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O 1 5 4 0 10 NNE O O 2 2 3 0 7 NE O 2 1 0 0 0 3 ENE O O O 1 0 0 1 E 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 ESE O 1 1 2 1 0 5 SE O O 4 2 4 10 20 SSE O 4 1 5 6 3 19 S 1 1 3 1 12 7 25 SSW 0 3 0 7 5 22 37 SW 0 3 2 6 5 20 36 WSW 1 0 2 3 5 2 13 W 0 0 2 4 8 5 19 l WNW 1 0 3 10 17 14 45 NW 0 0 2 7 22 7 38 ;
NNW 0 0 3 10 8 2 23 l VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 4 15 27 65 100 92 303 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missinn wind measurements in this stability class: 6 '
Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 114 '
88 i
1 LACALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1989 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET !
WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH).
DIRECTION .7-3 4 *- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL ,
N O O O 1 0 0 1 NNE O O O 1 0 0 1
~
NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O 1 0 0 0 1 ,
ESE O 2 1 0 0 0 3 SE O O 6 0 0 0 6 SSE O 1 0 10 4 8 23 S 0 0 0 3 4 27 34 i
SSW 0 0 0 6 9 33 48 SW 0 0 3 4 5 8 20 WSW 0 1 1 0 7 13 22 W 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 WNW 0 0 1 0 1 2 4 NW 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 NNW 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 VARIABLE O O O O O O O i +
l TOTAL 0 4 15 28 32 96 175 1
Houro of calm in this stability class: 0 Heuro of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 7 Houro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 114 89
. _ . _ . . . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . ~ _ . . --
i i
)
I i
t i
5
-t i
I f
)
I APPENDIX III !
i LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES r
k 4
t l
l l
l l
k l
r I
L
?
5 k
90
LASALLE LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES i
s Expected Collection !
Sample Type location Date Reason There were no missed samples in 1989.
l l
l l-m 91 -
APPENDIX IV r
MILCH ANIMAL AND NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS I
1 1
1 y
i
'l
-l
.I ,
i l
i o
92 1
LASALLE MILCH ANIMALS CENSUS, 1989 There are no dairy farms within a five mile radius of LaSalle.
Sampling Locations L-19 Robert Bettenhousen Farm Number of cows - 72 Number of fresh cows - 50 i
Diet consists of the following:
Ground feed
- 10 lbs per day Corn silage Free choice 1 Green chop Free choice ;
- Ground feed consists of:
Hay 10 lbs. I Silage 70 lbs.
L-16 LovwPy Dairy Farms i Number of. cows - 100 i Number of fresh cows - 72 Diet consists of the following:
Ground feed
- 20 lbs. per day Corn and oats silage Free choice '
Alfalfahay Free choice
- Ground corn mix consists of:
i Ground Corn Soybean meal 93
e l
LASALLE t
MILCHANIMALSCENSUS,1989(continued)
L-17 Earl Hayer - Andrew Patterson Number of cows - 35 I Number of fresh cows - 22 Diet consists of the following: ,
Ground corn mix
- 15 lbs. per day Silage 20 lbs. per day ,
Hay Free choice (
- Ground corn mix consists of:
Corn 2000 lbs.-
Oats 1000 lbs.
Protein 700 lbs.
Minerals 50 lbs.
Salt 50 lbs.
L-18 Boldt Dairy Farm Number of cows - 22 Number of fresh cows --17 Diet consists of the following:
Ground corn mix
- 20 lbs. per day Hay Free choice Green chop Free choice
- Ground corn mix consists of:
Corn 2,000 lbs.
Soybean meal 600 lbs.
Oats 300 lbs.
Mineral s 50 lbs.
Salt 50 lbs.
Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 19 and 26, 1989.
l L
l l, 94
i l
LASALLE i NEAREST RESIDENCE CENSUS,1989 Nearest residences of the LaSalle Station within a five (5) mile radius.
Direction Distance [
N 2.2 miles r NNE 1.4 miles 1 NE 1.8 miles ENE 3.4 miles E 3.1 miles ESE 1.6 miles SE 1.5 miles SSE 1.1 miles S 2.2 miles SSW 2.0 miles -
SW 0.7 miles WSW 1.3 miles W 0.9 miles WNW 1.0 miles NW 2.6 miles NNW 1.2 miles (new house)
Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 26,:1989.
95
. APPENDIX V t
I INTERLABORATORY' COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS l
-l 9
i l
-1 1
1 .:.
I i
t 1 ,
1 l
.a t
96' i 1
interlaboratory Comparison Program Results Teledyne- Isotopes Midwest Laboratory (formerly Hazleton Environmental Sciences) has participated in interlaboratory comparison (crosscheck) programs since the formulation of its quality control program in December -1971. -These are operated by agencies which supply environmental-type samples _(e.g., programs milk or water) containing concentrations of radionuclides known to- the issuing agency.
but not to participant laboratories. The purpose of such a program is to provide an independent check on the laboratory's analytical procedures and to alert .it to any possible problems, ,
j Participant laboratories measure the concentrations of specified radionuclides !
and report them to the issuing agency. Several months later, the agency reports j the known values to the participant laboratories and specifies control limits.
Results consistently higher or lower than the known values or outside the control limits indicate a need to check the instruments or procedures used. ;
1 The results in Table A-1 were obtained through. participation = in the environmental sample crosscheck program for milk, water, air filters, and food samples' during the period January 1986 through November,- 1989. This program has been conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Intercomparison and Calibration Section, Quality Assurance Branch, Environmental Monitoring and Support Labora- .
tory, Las Vegas, Nevada.
l The' results during in Table the period 1976,A-2 were obtained for thermoluminescent dosimeters -(TLD's) !
1977, 1979, 1980, 1984, and 1985-1986 - through partici- ;
pation in the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, and Eighth International '
Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters under the sponsorships listed in l Table A-2. Also Teledyne testing results are listed.
1 Table A-3 lists results of the analyses on in-house spiked samples, j i
Table- A-4 lists results of the analyses on in-house " blank" samples.
Attachment B lists acceptance criteria for " spiked" samples.
Addendum to Appendix A provides explanation'for out of limit results.
97
t Table A-1. U.S. Environmental Pr:tection Agency's crosscheck prcgram, com.' !
parison of EPA and Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory results for milk, water, air filters, Land food samples,1986 throu9h 1989.a-Concentration in pCi/l b Lab Sample- Oate TIML Result EPA Resultd Code Type Collected Analysis 12ac Is , N=1- Control _ Limits STF-447 . Food Jan 1986 Sr-89 24.312.5 25.025.0 16.3-33.7 i Sr-90 . _17.310.6 10.021.5 _7.4-12.6 i 1-131 22.722.3 20.020.6 9.6-30.4 Cs-137 16.310.6 15.015.0 6.3-23.7 ;
K 927246 - 9501144 701-1199 STW-448 Water Feb 1986 Cr-51 45.0t3.6 38.025.0 29.3-46.7 Co-60 19.711.5 -18.015.0 9.3-26.7' a 2n-65 44.023.5 40.025.0 31 .3-48.7 Ru-106 <9.0 0.015.0 0.0-8.7 '
Cs-134 28.312.3 30.015.0 -21.3-38.7 Cs-137 23.710.6 22.015.0 13.3-30.7 .
STW-449 Water Feb 1986 H-3 5176248 52271525 4317<6137-STW-450 Water Feb 1986 U total 8.020.0 9.016.0 0.0-19.4
- STM-451 Milk Feb 1986 I-131 7.0t0.0 9.0t6.0- 0.0-19.4 STW-452 Water Mar 1986 Ra-226 3.810.1 4.110.6' 3.0-5.2-3 Ra-228 11.0i0.5 12.411.8 9.2-15.5 STW-453 Water Mar 1986 Gr. cipha 6.710.6 15.015.0- 6.3-23.7 Gr. beta _ 7.310.6 8.025.0 0.0-16.7 STW-454 Water Apr 1986 I-131 7.020.0 9.026.0 0.0-19.4 i STW-455 Water Apr 1986 456 (Blind) i Sample A Gr. alpha 15.021.0 -17.015.0 8.3-25.7 Ra-226 3.110.1 2.910.4 2.1-3.7 Ra-228 1.510.2- 2.010.3 1.5-2.5 Uranium 4.7 0.6 5.016.0 0;0-15.4 Sample B Gr. beta 28.711.2 35.015.0 26.3-43.7 '
Sr-89 5.7t0.6 7.015.0- 0.0-15.7 Sr-90 7.010.0 7.021.5 4.4-9.6 Co-60 10.711.5 10.025.0 1.3-18.7 Cs-134 4.011.7 5.025.0 0.0-13.7 Cs-137 5.320.6 5.015.0 0.0-13.7 98
Table A-1. (continued)
Concentration in pC1/lb ;
Lab Sample Date TIML Result EPA Resultd Code Type Collec ted Analysis- i20c 15 N=1 Control Limits l
/
STAF-457 Air April 1986 Gr. alpha 13.7t0.6 15.0t5.0 6.3-23.7 ;
Filter Gr. beta 46.310.6 47.015.0 38.3-55.7-Sr-90 14.7t0.6 18.0tl.5 15.4-20.6 Cs-137 10.7t0.6 ,
10.0t5.0 1.3-18.7 STU-458 Urine April 1986 Tritium 4313t70 4423t189 4096-4750 :
STW-459 Water May 1986 Sr-89 4.3t0.6 5.015.0 0.0-13.7 Sr-90 5.0t0.0 5.0tl.5 2.4-7.6 STW-460 Water May 1986 Gr. alpha 5,310.6' 8.0f5.0 0.0-16.7 Gr. beta 11.311.2 15.0t5.0 6.3-23.7 STW-461 Water June 1986 Cr-51 <9.0 0.015.0 0.0-8.7 Co-60 66.011.0 66.0f5.0 57.3-74.7 Zn-65 87.3tl.5 86. 0t5. 0 77.3-94.7 Ru-106 39.7t2.5 50.0t5.0 41.3-58.7 Cs-134 49.312.5 49.015.0- 40.3-57.7 Cs-137 10.3tl.5 10. 0t5. 0 1.3-18.7 1
l STW-462 Water June 1986 Tritium 3427t25 3125t361 2499-3751 STM-464 Milk June 1986 Sr <1.0 0. 0t 5. 0 - 0.0-8.7-Sr-90 15.3t0.6 16. 0tl . 5 13.4-18.6
! I-131 48.312.3 41.0t6.0 30.6-51.4 Cs-137 43.7tl.5 31.015.0 22.3-39.7-K 1567t114 1600180 1461-1739 STW-465 Water July 1986 Gr. alpha 4.7t0.6 6. 015. 0 0.0-14.7 Gr. beta 18.711.2 18.0t5.0' 9.3-26.7 STW-467 Water August 1986 I-131 30.310.6 45.0t6.0 34.4-55.4 STW-468 Water August 1986 Pu-239 11.310.6 10.111.0 8.3-11.9 l STW-469 Water August 1986 Uranium 4.010.0 4.016.0 0.0-14.4 STAF-470 Air Sept 1986 Gr. alpha 19.311.5 22.0 5.0 13.3-30,7 471 Filter Gr. beta 64.012.6 66.0t5.0 57.3-74.7 472 Sr-90 22.0tl.0 22.0i5.0 19.4-24.6 1
Cs-137 25.711.5 22.0t5.0 13.3-30.7
! STW-473 Wate" Sept 1986 Ra-226 6.010.1 6.1*0.9 '
4.5-7.7 Ra-228 8.711.1 9.111.4 6.7-11.5 99
Table A-1. (continued).
Concentration in pCi/lb ]
Lab Sample Date TIML Result EPA Resultd-Code Type Collec ted Analysis 120c .ls, N=1 Control Limits l
STW-474- Water Sept 1986 Gr. alpha 16.3i3.2 15.0 5.0 6.3-23.7 Gr. beta 9.0tl.0 8.0t5.0 0.0-16.7- ,
-a STW-475 Water Oct 1986 Cr-51 '63.3i5.5- 59.015.0 50.3-67.7 Co-60 31.0t2.0 31.0t5.0 22.3-39.7 Zn-65 87.3t5.9 85.0t5.0 76.3-93.7 Ru-106 74. 7t 7. 4 74. 0t5.0 - 65.3-82.7 Cs-134 25.7t0.6 28.015.0 19.3-36.7' "
Cs-137 -46.3i1.5 44.0t5.0 35.3-52.7- -
STW-476 Water Oct 1986 H-3 5918t60 5973tS97 .4938-7008 SPW-477 Water Oct 1986 478 (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha 34-0t6.0
- 40. 0t5.0 - 31.3-48.7 Ra-226 5.8t0.g 6.0t0.9 4.4-7.6 Ra-228 2.7tl.0 5.0*0.8 3.7-6.3 Uranium 11.0t0.0 10.0t6.0 0.0-20.4 Sample B Gr. beta 38.7tl.2 51.0t5.0 42.3-59.7 Sr-89 5.0t0.0 -10.0*5.0' 1,3-18.' 7 -
Sr-90 3. 0t0. 0 . 4.0tl.5 1.4-6.6 Co-60 24. 7tl . 2 24.0t5.0 15.3-32.7 Cs-134 11.0t2.0 12.0*5.0 3.3-20.7 Cs-137 9.3*1.2 8.0t5.0' O.0-16.7
! STM-479 Milk Nov 1986 Sr-89 7. 7tl . 2 9.015.0 l
0.3-17.7 Sr-90 1.0t0.0 0.011.5 0.0-2.6 l l-131 52.3t3.1 -49.016.0 38.6-59.4 Cs-137 45.713.1 39.0t5.0 30.3-47.7 K 1489i104 1565178 1430-1700 STU-480 Urine Nov 1986 H-3 5540126 52571912 4345-6169 STW-481 Water Nov 1986 Gr. alpha 12.0t4.0 20.015.0 11.3-28. 7 l Gr. beta 20.013.5 20.015.0- 11.3-28.7' l STW-482 Water Dec 1986 Ra-226 6.7t0.2 6.8tl.0 5.0-8.6 Ra-228 5.2*0.2 11.1tl.7 8.2-14.0 i STW-483 Water Jan 1987 Sr-89 19.7t5.0 25.015.0 16.3-33.7 Sr-90 21.012.0 25.0il.5 22.4-27.6 ,
l l
1 100 '
l e
f Table A-1. (continued).
Concentration in pCi/lb Lab Sample Date TIML Result EPA Resultd Code Type Collec ted Analysis t20C 1s, N=1 Control Limits l STW-484 Water Jan 1987 Pu-239 17.012.3 16.711.7 13.8-19.6 l'
STF-486 Food Jan 1987 Sr-90 36.014.0 49.0110.0 31.7-66.3 1-131 78.0t3.4 78.018.0 64.1-91.9 Cs-137 89.713.0 84. 0t5. 0 .75.3-92.7 K 942tS6 980149 895-1065 STF-487 Food Jan 1987 SR-90 2.010.0 ---
(Blank) I-131 <3 ---
Cs-137 <2 ---
K 9931102 ---
STW-488 Water Feb 1987 Co.60 49.0t0.0 50.015.0 41.3-58.7 Zn-65 96.017.2 91.015.0 82.3-99.7 Ru-106 92.0t20,2 100.'Ot5. 0 91.3-108.7 Cs-134 53.0t3.4 59.0t5.0 50.3-67.7 Cs-137 89.3t4.6 87.015.0 78.3-95.7 l STW-489 Water Feb 1987 H-3 4130t140 4209t420 3479-4939 l
STW-490 Water Feb 1987 Uranium 8.3tl.2 8.016.0 0.0-18.4 STM-491 Milk Feb 1987 I-131 10.0t0.0 9.0t0.9 7.4-10.6 l
l STW-492 Water Mar 1987 Gr. alpha 3.7tl.2 3.015.0 0.0-11.7 i Gr. beta 11.311.2 13.015.0 4.3-21.7.
STW-493 Water Mar 1987 Ra-226 7.0f0.1 7.3tl .1 5.4-9.2 Ra-228 7.112.3 7.511.1 5.5-9.5 STW-494 Water Apr 1987 I-131 8.010.0 7.0t0.7 5.8-8.2 STAF-495 Air Apr 1987 Gr. alpha 15.0t0.0 14.015.0 5.3-22.7 Filter Gr. beta 41.0t2.0 43.015.0 34.3-51.7 Sr-90 16.3tl.2 17.011.5 14.4-19.6 Cs-137 7.0t0.0 8.015.0 0.0-16.7 STW-496 Water Apr 1987 497 (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha 30.7tl.2 30.0t8.0 16.1-43.9 Ra-226 3.910.2 3.9t0.6 2.9-4.9 Ra-228 4.910.9 4. 0t0. 6 3.0-5.0 Uranium 5.0t0.0 5.0t6.0 0.0-15.4 101
i Table A-1. (continued)
Concentration in pCi/lb Lab Sample Date TIML Result EPA Resultd l Code Type Collected ' Analysis 120c 15, N=1 Control Limits STW-496 Water Apr 1987 497 (Blind)
Sample B Gr. Beta 69.319.4 66.015.0 - ! 7; 3-74. 7 i Sr-89 16.3f3.0 19.015.0 10.3-27.7 Sr-90 10.010.0 10.011.5 7.4-12.6 Co-60 8.3t3.0 8.015.0 0.0-16.7 Cs-134 19.0t2.0 20.0t5.0 11.3-28.7 Cs-137 14.711.2- 15.0t5.0 6.3-23.7- ,
STU-498 Urine Apr 1987 H-3 60171494 56201795 4647-6593 STW-499 Water May 1987 Sr-89 38.0t6.0 41.015.0 32.3-49.7' Sr-90 21.0*2.0 20.0fl . 5 17.4-22.6' STW-500 Water May 1987 Gr. alpha 9.013.4 11.015.0 2.3-19.7 i Gr. beta '10.311.2 7.0i5.0 0.0-15.7 STW-501 Water June 1987 Cr-51 40.0f8.0 41.0t5.0 32.3-49.7-Co-60 60.313.0 64.0f5.0 55.3-72.7 Zn-65 11.315.0 10.0f5.0 .1.3-18.7 ,
Ru-106 78.316.4. 75.015.0 66.3-83.7 ;
Cs-134 36.7t3.0 40. 0t5. 0 -31.3-48.7 l Cs-137 80.314.2 80.0f5.0 71.3-88.7 s
STW-502 Water June 1987 H-3 2906186- 28951357 2277-3513 STW-503 Water June 1987 Ra-226 6.9t0.1" 7.311.1 5.4-9.2 Ra-228 13.311.0 15.212.3 11.2-19.2 STM-504 Milk June 1987 Sr-89 57.0t4.3 69.015.0- 60.3-77.7
'l Sr 32.011.0 35.0tl . 5 32.4-37.6 I-131 64.0t2.0 59. 0f 6. 0 48.6-69.4 a Cs-137 77.710.6 74.0i5.0 65.3-82.7 K 1383*17 1525i76' 1393-1657 ,
STW-505 Water July 1987 Gr. alpha 2.310.7 5.015.0 0.0-13.7 Gr. beta 4.0fl.0 5.015.0 0.0-13.7 4
STF-506 Food July 1987 I-131. 82.714.6 80.018.0- 66.1 -93. 9. ~
Cs-137 53.7*3.0 50. 0t5. 0 41.3-58.7 K 1548i57 1680184 1534-1826 STW-507 Water Aug 1987 I-131 45.714.2 48.0t6.0 37.6-58.4 STW-508 Water Aug 1987 Pu-239 5.810.2 5.3t0.5 4.4-6.2 l' 102
- = - - - __ _-_
T able A-1. (continued) .
Concentration in pCi/l b L ab Sample Date' TIML Result EPA Resultd C ode Type Collected Analysis 22cc Is, N=1 Control Limits STW-509 Water Au91987 U ranium 13.320.3 13.026.0 2.6-23.4 -
STAF-510 Air Aug 1987 G r. alpha 9 .7 20 .4 10.0 25.0 1.3-18.7 Filter G r. beta 28.3 20 .6 30.025.0 21.3-38.7 S r-90 10.020.9 10.011.5 7.4-12.6
, C s-137 10.021 .0 10 .0 25 .0 1.3-18.7 -
STW-511 Water Sept 1987 R a-226 9.920.1 9.721.5 7.2-12.2 R ar228 8.111.4 6 .3 21 .0 4.6-8.0 STW-512 Water Sept 1987 G r, alpha 2.020.6- 4.025.0. 0.0-12.7 G r beta 11.321.3 12 .0 25 .0- 3.3-20.7 .
STW-513 Water Oct 1987 H-3 44732100 44922449 3714-5270 STW-514 Water Oct 1987 (Blind)
Sample A G r. alpha 29.312.6 28.027.0 15.9-40.1 R ar226 4 .9 *0 .1 4.820.7- 3.6-6.1 R a-228 4.211.0 3 .6 20 .5 2.7-4.5 U ranium 3 .0 20 .1 3 .0 26 .0 0.0-13.4 Sample B S r-89 14'.3 21 .3 16.0 5.0 7.3-24.7 S r-90 9.7 0.4 10.021.5 7.4-12.6 l C o-60 16.723 .0 16 .025 .0 7.3-24.7 C s-134 16.7 12 .3 16.025 .0 7.3-24.7 l C s-137 24.313.3 24.025 .0 15.3-32:.7. ;
STW-516 Water Oct 1987 C r-51 80.3217.5 70.025.0 61.3-78.7 '
C o-60 -16.022 .3 15.'025 .0 6.3-23.7 Z n-65 46 .325 .6 46.025 .0 37.3-54.7 R u-106 57~3115.4
. 61.0 25 .0 52.3-69.7 C s-134 23.722.5 25.025 .0 16.3-33.7 C s-137 51.713.2 51 .0 25 .0 42~.3-59.7 STU-517 U rine Nov 1987 H-3 7267 100 74321743 6145-8719 STW-518 Water Nov 1987 G r. alpha 3.022.0 7.0 5.0 0.0-15.7 l G r. beta 15.7 2.3 19 .0 25 .0 10.3-27.7 i STW-519 Water Dec 1987 I-131 26.0 3.0 26.0 26 .0 15.6-36.4 l
l 103
1 l
i Table A-1. (continued)
Concentration in pCi/lb -
Lab Sampie Date TIML Result. EPA Resultd Code Type Collected Analysi s 22cc Is, N=1' Control - Limi ts STW-520 Water Dec 1987 Ra-226 5.1t0.8 4.8t0.7 '3.6-6.0 Ra-228 3.420.1 5.3t0.8 3.9-6.7- ,
STW-521 .Water Jan 1988 Sr-89 27.315.0 30.025.0. 21~3-38.7 Sr-90 .-15.321.2 15.021.5 12.4-17.6-STW-523 Water Jan 1988 Gr. alpha 2.311.2 4.0t5.0 0.0-12.7-Gr. beta- 7.711.2 8.025.0 0.0-16.7 STF-524 Food Jan 1988 Sr-89 44.024.0 46.015.0 37.3-54.7 Sr-90 53.0i2.0 55.022.8 50.2-59.8 I-131 102.324.2 102.0210.2 84.3-119.7 Cs-137 95.7t6.4 91.0t5.0- 82.3-99.7 K 1011t158 1230t62 1124-1336 STW-525 Water Feb 1988 Co-60 69.3t2.3 69.015.0 60.3-77.7-Zn-65 99.0t3.4 94.0t9.4 77.7-110.3 Ru-106 92.7214.4 105.0210.5. 86.8-123.2 Cs-134 61.7t8.0 64.025.0- 55.3-72.7 Cs-137 99.7t3.0 94.015.0 85.3-102.7 STW-526 Water Feb 1988= H-3 3453t103 3327t362 2700-3954
~
STW-527 Water Feb 1988 Uranium 3.010.0 3.0t6.0 0.0-13.4 STM-528 Milk Feb 1988 I-131 4.7tl.2 4.0t0.4 3.3-4.7 !
l
- STW-629 Water Mar 1988 Ra-226- 7.110.6 ~ .7. 6 tl .1 5.6-9.6 Ra-228 nae 7.7tl.2 5.7-9.7-STW-530 Water Mar 1988 Gr. alpha- 4.321.2 6.025.0 0.0-14.7 Gr. beta 13.311.3 13.025.0 4.3-21.7-STAF-531 Ai r Mar 1988 Gr. alpha- 21.0t2.0 20.0t5.0 11.3-28.7 Filter Gr. beta 48.020.0 50.0t5.0 41.3-58.7 Sr-90 16.721'2 . 17.021.5 14.4-19.6 Cs-137 18.7tl.3 16.015.0- ~7.3-24.7 STW-532 Water Apr 1988 I-131 9.012.0 7.510.8 6.2-8.8 104
1 I
Table A-1. (continued) l Concentration in pCi/lb L t.b ' Sampl e Date TIML Result EPA Resultd Code Type Coll ected Analysis 223 c Is, N=1 Control Limits i
STW-533 Water Apr 1988 534 (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha NDf 46.0t11.0- 27.0-65.0 Ra-226 ND 6.4tl.0 4.7-8.1 Ra-228 ND 5.6t0.8 4.2-7.0 Uranium 6.020.0 6.016.0 0.0-16.4 Sample B Gr. beta ND .
57.025.0 48.3-65.7 Sr-89 3.3tl.2 5.025.0 0.0-13.7 .
Sr-90 5.3tl.2 5.0tl.5 2.4-7.6 !
Co-60 63.311.3 50.015.0 41.3- 58.7 Cs-134 7.7tl.2 7.015.0 0.0-15.7 Cs-137 8.3tl.2 7.015.0 0.0-15.7 STU-535 Urine Apr 1988 H-3 6483t155 - 6202t620- 5128-7276 STW-536 Water Apr 1988 Sr-89 14.7tl.3 ~ 20.0t5.0' 11.3-28.7 Sr-90 20.0t2.0 20.0tl.5 17.4-22.6 STW-538 Water June 1988 Cr-51 331.7t13.0 302.0t30.0 250.0-354.0 Co-60 16.0t2.0 15.025.0 6.3-23.7 Zn-65 107.7t11.4 101.0110.0 83.7-118.3 Ru-106 191.3211.0 195.0220.0 160.4-229.6 Cs-134 18.3t4.6- 20.0t5.0 11.3-28.7 i Cs-137 .26.311.2 25.015.0 16.3-33.7 STW-539 Water June 1988 H-3 5586192 5565t557 4600-6530 STM-541 Milk June 1988 Sr 33.7t11.4 40.025.0 31.3-48.7 Sr-90 55.3t5.8 60.023.0- 54.8-65.2 1-131 103.723.1 94.029.0 78.4-109.6 Cs-137 52.7t3.1 51.015.0 42.3-59.7-j K 1587t23 1600t80 1461-1739 l
f STW-542 Water July 1988 Gr. alpha 8.7t4.2 15.015.0 6.3-23.7 Gr. beta 5.3tl.2 4.015.0 0.0-12.7 4 STF-543 Food July 1988 Sr-89 ND 33.025.0 24.3-41.7 Sr-90 ND 34.012.0 30.5-37.5 l I-131 115.015.3 107.0211.0 88.0-126.0 Cs-137 52.7t6.4 49.025.0 40.3-57.7 K 1190166. 1240162 1133-1347 105
Table A-1.- (continued) 1 Concentration in pCi/lb ]
Lab _ Sample Date TIML Result _,
EPA Resultd-Code Type Collected Analysis 2cc Is , N=1- Control Limits STW-544 Water Aug 1988 I-131 80.020.0 76.0t8.0_ 62.1-89.9' STW-545 Water Aug 1988 Pu-239 11.0t0.2 ' 10.211.0 8.5-11.9 ,
Aug 1988 6.020.0 6.026.0 0.0-16.4 STW-546 Water Uranium STAF-547 Air Aug 1988 Gr. alpha 8.020.0 8.025.0' O.0-16.7 Filter Gr. beta- 26.321.2- 29.015.0 20.3-37.7 Sr-90 8.012.0 8.0tl.5 5.4-10.6 ,
Cs-137 13.012.0 12.0t5.0 -3.3-20.7 ,
STW-548 Water Sep 1988 Ra-226 9.320.5 8.412.6 6.2-10.6 Ra-228 5.810.4 - 5.421.6 4.0-6.8 STW-549 Water Sep 1988 Gr. alpha 7.022.0 8.015.0 0.0-16.7-Gr. beta 11.3tl .2 10.015.0 1.3-18.7-STW-550 Water Oct 1988 Cr-51 252.0t14.0 251.0225.0 207.7-294.3 !
Co-60 26.012.0- 25.015.0 16.3-33.7 Zn 158.3t10.2 151.0t15.0 :125.0-177.0 Ru-106 153.0t9.2 152.0t15.0. 126.0-178.0 '
Cs-134 28.725.0 25.015.0 16.3-33.7 .'
Cs-137 16.311.2 15.025.0 6.3-23.7 STW-551 Water Oct 1988 FF3 2333t127 2316t350 1710-2927 STW-552 Water Oct 1988 '
553 (Blind) ,
Sample A Gr. alpha 38.328.0 41.0110.0 23.7-58.3 Ra-226 4.510.5 5.010.8 3.6-6.4 Ra-228 4.420.6 5.220.8 3.6-6.4-
- Uranium 4.711.2 5.016.0 0.0-15.4 Sample B Gr. beta- 51.313.0 54.0t5.0 45.3-62.7 Sr-89 -3.7tl.2 11.015.0 2.3-19.7 Sr-90 10.7tl.2 10.0tl.5 7.4-12.6 Cs-134 15.322.3 15.015.0 6.3-23.7 Cs-137 16.7tl.2 15.025.0 6.3-23.7 106
Table A-1. (continued)
Concentration in pC1/lb ~~
Lab Sample Date TIML Result EPA Resultd c Code Type Coll ected Analysis 2 Bac Is, N=1 Control: Limi ts STM-554 Milk Oct 1988- Sr-89 40.3t7.0 40.025.0 31.3-48.7 Sr-90 51.012.0- 60.013.0 54 . 8 -6 5.2 1-131 94.0t3.4 91.019.0 75.4-106.6 Cs-137 45.0t4.0 50.025.0 41.3-58.7
- K 1500t45 1600280 1461-1739
- STU-555 Urine Nov 1988 H-3 30301209 3025t359 2403-3647 l STW-556 Water Nov 1988 Gr. alpha 9.0t3.5 9.015.0 0.3-17.7 Gr. beta 9.7tl.2 9.015.0 0.3-17.7 STW-557 Water Dec 1988 I-131 108.7t3.0 115.0t12.0 94.2-135.8:
STW-559 Water Jan 1989 Sr-89 40.018.7 40.015.0 31.3-48.7 4 Sr-90 24.323.1 25.021.5 22.4-27.6 STW-560 Water Jan 1989 Pu-239 5.821.1- 4;2t0.4 3.5-4.9 STW-561 Water Jan 1989. Gr. alpha 7.3tl.2 8.025.0 0.0-16.7 l Gr. beta 5.311.2 4.015.0 0.0-12.7
- STW-562 Water Feb 1989 Cr-51 245146 235t24 193.4-276.6 Co-60 10.012.0 10.015.0 1,3-18.7' ,
i- Zn-65 170t10 159116 139.2-186.7 Ru-106 18117.6 178118 146.8-209.2 Cs-134 9.7t3.0 10.0t5.0 1.3-18.7 Cs-137 11.7tl.2. 10.015.0 1.3-18.7 I
6 E
107
. ~-
i Table A-1. (continued)
Concentration in pCi/lb Lab Sample Date TIML Result EPA Resultd i Code Type Collected Analysis 22 c Is, N=1 Control Limits
.STW-563 Water Feb 1989 I-131 109.014.0 106.0 11.0 86.9-125.1 STW-564 Water Feb 1989 H-3 2820i20 27541356 2137-3371 STW-565 Water Mar 1989 Ra-226' 4.220.3 4.910.7 3.7-6.1 Ra-228 1.9tl.0 1.7i0.3 1.2-2.2 STW-566 Water Har 1989 U 5.0i0.0 ~5.016.0 0.0-15.4 ,
STW-567 Air Mar 1989 Gr. alpha 21.7tl.2 21.0t5.0 12.3-29.7 t Filter Gr. beta 68.314.2 62.015.0 53.3-70.7 Sr-90 20.022.0 20.011.5. 17.4-22.6 '
Cs-137 21.321.2 20.015.0 11.3-28.7 i
STW-568 Water Apr 1989 ,
569 (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha 22.712.3 29.0i7.0 16.9-41.2 Ra-226 3.6*0.6 3.5i0.5 .2.6-4.4 Ra-228 2.611.0 3.6i0.5 2.7-4.5 U 3.0f0.0 3.016.0 0.0-13.4 Sample B Gr. beta 52.316.1 57.015.0 43.3-65.7 Sr-89 9.325.4 8.015.0 0.0-16.7 :
Sr-90 7.020.0 8.011.5 5.4 10.6' Cs-134 21.015.2- 20.0 5.0 11.3-28.7 l
Cs-137 23.0i2.0 20.015.0 11.3-28.7 l STW-570 Milk Apr 1989 Sr-89 26.0i10.0 39.0t5.0 30.3-47.7 i
Sr-90 45.714.2 55.013.0 49.8-60.2
l L
l t.
l l
L i
108 -
Table A-1. (continued) !
Concentration in pCi/l b Lab Sample Date TIML Result _
EPA Resultd ;
Code Type Collected Analysis 2cc 15, W=1 Control Limits 9
STW-571 Water- May 1989 Sr-89 40.7 6.025.0 0.0-14.7 Sr-90 5.011.0 6.021.5- 3.4-8.6 STW-572 Water May 1989 Gr. alpha 24.012.0 30.0t8.0 16.1-43.9 Gr. beta 49.3115.6 50.015.0 41.3-58.7 :
STW-573 ' Water Jun 1989 Ba-133 .50.7tl.2 49.015.0.. 40.3-57.7 Co-60 31.312.3 31.0t5.0- 22.3-39.7 Zn-65 167t10 165117 135.6-194.4 Ru-106 123t9.2 128t13. 105.5-150.5 Cs-134 40.3tl.2 39t5 30.3-47. 7 L Cs-137 22.321.2 20t5 11.3-28.7 STW-574 Water Jun 1989 H-3 4513t136 45031450 3724'5282 STW-575 Water Jul 1989 Ra-226 16.823.1 17.712.7 13.0-22.4 Ra-228 13.813.7 18.312.7 13.6-23.0 STW-576 Water Jul 1989 0 40.3tl.2 41.016.0 30.6-51.4 STW-577 Water Aug 1989 I-131 84.7t5.8 83.0t8.0 69.1-96.9 STW-579 Air Aug 1989 Gr. alpha 6.0t0.0 6.015.0 0.0-14.7 Filter Cs-137 10.3*2.3 10.015.0 1,3-18.7 STW-580 Water Sep 1989 Sr-89 14.7tl.2 14.015.0 5.3-22.7 Sr 9.7tl.2 10.011.5 7.4-12.6 STW-581 Water Sep 1989 Gr. alpha 5.0t0.0 4.015.0 0.0-12.7 Gr. Beta 8.712.3 6.015.0 0.0-14.7 i
109
l Table A-1. (continued) i
~
Concentration in pCi/l_b _
I Lab Sampl e Date TIML Result EPA Resulto _
Code Type Collected Analysis 22cc Is, N=1- Control Limits STW-583 Water Oct 1989 Ba-133 60.3210.0- 59.026.0 48.6-69.4-Co-60 29.024.0 30.025.0 21.3-38.7 Zn-65 132.326.0 129.0 13.0 106.5-151.5 Ru-106 155.326.1 161.0216.0 133.3-188.7 '
l Cs-134 30.726.1 29.0 5.0 20.3-37.7 Cs-137 66.324.6 59.025.0 50.3-67.7 STW-584 Water Oct 1989 H-3 3407t150 3496 364 2866-4126-STW-585 Water Oct 1989 586 (Blind)
Sample A. Gr. Alpha 41.7 9.4 49.0 12.0 28.2-69.8 Ra-226 7.910.4 8.4 l'.3' 6.2-10.6M Ra-228 4.4 0.8 4.1 0.6 3.1-5.1 ;
U 12.010.0 12.0 6.0 1.6-22.4-Sample B Gr. Beta 31.712.3 32.0 5.0 23.3-40.7 Sr-89 13.3t4.2 15.025.0 -6.3-23.7 Sr-90 7.022.0 7.0 3.0 4.4-9.6 Cs-134 5. 0 +0. 0 5.0 5.0 0.0-13.7 Cs-137 7.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0-13.7 STW-587 Water Nov 1989 Ra-226 7.9 0.4 8.7 1.3 6.4-11.0- '
Ra-228 8.9 21 .2 9.3 1.2 6.9-11.7 STW-588 Water Nov.1989 U 15.020.09 15.026.0 4.6-25.4 a Results obtained by Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory as a participant in'the environmental sample crosscheck program operated by the Intercomparison and Cali-bration Section, Quality Assurance Branch, Environmental Monitoring and Support l
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- (EPA), Las.Ve i b All results are in the pCi/1, except for elemental potassium (K) gas, Nevada.
data in milk, which are in mg/1; air filter samples, which are in pCi/ filter; and food, which is in mg/kg.
c Unless otherwise indicated, the TIML results are given as'the mean 12 standard deviations for three deteminations, d USEPA results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1s,1 detemination) and control limits as defined by EPA.
8 NA = Not analyzed, f ND = No data. Not analyzed due to relocation of the lab.
9 Sample was analyzed but the results not submitted to EPA because deadline was ,
missed.
110
Table A-2. Crosscheck program results, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).
mR Teledyne Average 12 od Lat TLD Result Known (all Code ' Type Measurement Zaa valuec partic ipants) 2nd International _stercomparisonb 115-2 CaF2:Mn Field 17.011.9 17.1 16.417.7 Bulb Lab 20.814.1 21.3 18.817.6 3rd International Intercomparisone 115-3 CaF2:Mn Field 30.713.2 34.914.8 31.513.0 Bulb
- {' Lab 89.616.4 91.7114.6 86.2124.0 4th International Intercomparisonf 115-4 CaF7
- Mn Field 14.111.1 14.111.4 16.019.0 Bulb Lab (Low) 9.311.3 12.212.4 12.017.6 Lab (Iligh)- 40.411.4 45.819.2 43.9113.2 5th International Intercomparison9 115-5A CaF2:Mn Field- 31.411.8 30.016.0 30.2114.6 Bulb Lab at. 77.415.8 75.227.6 75.8140.4 beginning Lab at 96.615.8 88.418.8 end 90.7131.2 e w- - - - - . +., + W9
- T r s F
Table A-2. (Continued) mR ----
Teledyne Average 120 d Lab TLD Result Code Type Measurement Known (all 12aa Valuec participants) 115-5B LiF-100 Field 30.314.8 30.016.0 30.2114.6 Chips Lab at 81.117.4 75.217.6 75.8140.4 beginning Lab at 85.4111.7 - 88.418.8 90.7131.2 the end 7th International Intercomparisonh 115-7A LIF-100 Field 75.4i2.6 75.816.0 75.1129.8 Chips Lab (Co-60) 80.013.5 79. 9t4.0 71.9127.6 Lab (Cs-137) 66.612.5 75.0t3.8 73.0122.2 115-78 CaF2:Mn Field 71.512.6 75.816.0 Bulbs 75.1 29.8 Lab (Co-60) 84.816.4 79.924.0 77.9127.6 Lab (Cs-137) 78.811.6 75.0t3.8 73.0122.2 115-7C CaSO4 :Dy Field 76.812.7 ' 75.826.0 Cards 75.1129.8 Lab (Co-60) 82.513.7 79.914.0 77.9127.6 Lab (Cs-137 79.013.2- 75.013.8 73.0122.2-
.-gy-. 9 - as..,_. -waid- m -@ p- 3-V- 79+, % ,,. y-.,
I I
l Table A-2. (Centinued) !
mR l Teledyne Avera9e 22o d Lab TLD Result Code Type Known (all Measurement 12aa Valuec participants) i 8th International Intercomparisoni 115-8A LiF-100 Field Site 1 29.511.4 29.711.5 28.9112.4 Chips Field Site 2 11.3t0.8 10.410.5 10.119.06 Lab (Cs-137) 13.710.9 17.210.9 16.216.8 115-8B CaF2:Mn Field Site 1 32.311.2 29.711.5 28.9t12.4 Bulbs Field Site 2 9.011.0 10.410.5 10.119.0 Lab (Cs-137) 15.810.9 17.210.9 16.216.8 115-8C CaSO4 :Dy Field Site 1 32.310.7 29.711.5 28.9112.4 Cards Field Site 2 10.6i0.6 10.410.5 10.1t9.0 u>
Lab (Cs-137 18.110.8 17.210.9 16.216.8 Teledyne Testingj 89-1 LiF-100 Lab 21.0t0.4 22.4 -
Chips 89-2 Teledyne Lab 20.911.0 20.3 -
CaSO4 :Dy Cards a Lab result given is the mean.12 standard deviations of three determinations.
b Second International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in April of 1976 by the Health and Safety Laboratory (GASL), New York, New York, and the School of Public Health of the Uni-versity of Texas, Houston, Texas.
- c Value determined by sponsor of the intercomparison using continously operated pressurized ion chamber.
d Mean 2 standard ' deviations of results obtained by all laboratories participating in the program.
e- a e v . v =
t Table A-2. (continued) mR !
Teledyne Average !?ad Lab TLD Resul t Known (al1.
Code Type Measurement 2oa Valuec participants)
Footnotes continued i e Third International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in summer of 1977 by Oak f
Ridge National Laboratory and the School of Public Health of the University of Texas, Houston, Texas. ,
i Fourth International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in summer of 1979 by the School of Public Health of the University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
9 Fifth International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeter conducted in fall of 1980 at Idaho Falls, Idaho and sponsored by the School of Public Health of the University of Texas, Houston, Texas and
~
h Environmental Measurements Laboratory, New York, New York, U.S. Department of Energy.
Seventh International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in the spring and summer of 1984 at Las Vegas, Nevada, and sponsored by the U.S. Department'of Energy, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 9 Commission, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Eighth International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in the fall and winter of-
% 1985-1986 at New York, New York, and sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy.
3 Chips were submitted in September,1989.. and cards were submitted in November,1989 to Teledyne Isotopes, Inc., Westwood, NJ for Irradiation.
1 4
.t T
6 r '. __-__.1. _ - - . _ _ . _ _ _ _ - - . _ _ .
l Table A-3. In-house spiked samples.
I !
l Concentration in pCi/1 Lab Sample Date .TIML-Result Known Expec ted Code Type Collected Analysis n=3 Activity- Precision
'Is, n=3a ,
QC-MI-6 Milk Feb. 1986 Sr-89 6.0*1.9 . 6.413.0 8.7 Sr-90 -14.2tl.7 12. 9t2. 0 5.2 I-131 34.213.8 35.2t3.5 10.4 t Cs-134 32.0tl.8 27.3t5.0' 8.7 Cs-137, 35.8i2.1- 35.0t5.0 8.7 QC-W-14 Water. Mar. 1986 Sr-89 1.6t0.4 1. 6tl . 0 - 7.1-Sr-90 2.410.2 2.412.0 4.2 QC-W-15 Water Apr. 1986 I-131 44. 9t2.4 41.5t7.0 10.6 Co 10.6tl.7 12.115.0 7.lb .,
Cs-134 30.2i2.4 25.8t8.0 7lb Cs-137 21. 9tl . 9 19.9t5.0 7.lb QC-MI-7 Mi1'k Apr. 1986 I-131 39.7i3.3 41.5t7.0 10.4 ,
Cs-134 28.712.8 25.8t8.0 8.7 Cs-137 21.212.8- 19.915.0 8.7 SPW-1 Water May 1986 Gross alpha 15.811.8 18.0t5.0 Sc QC-W-16 Water June 1986 Gross alpha 16.2i0.7 16.9t2.5 8.7 Gross beta 38.413.5 30.215.0 8.7
.QC-MI-9 Milk June 1986 Sr-89 <1.0 0.0 7.lb Sr-90 12.6tl.8' 13.3f3.0 4.2b I-131 38.9 7.0 34.8i7.0 10.4 o
Cs-134 33.0i3.4 36.115;0 8.7 Cs-137 38.512.8 39.015.0 8.7 SPW-2 Water June 1986 Gross alpha 16.8tl.8 18. 0t5. 0 Sc SPW-3 Water June 1986 Gross alpha 17.710.8 18.015.0 Sc QC-W-18 Water Sep. 1986 Cs-134 34.715.6 31.3f5.0 8.7 Cs-137 51.117.0 43.3f8.0 8.7 i
QC-W-19 Water Sep. 1986 Sr-89 13.6t4.1 15.6t3.5 7.l b.
Sr-90 6.4fl.6 6.212.0 4.2b t
.~
i 115 i
1 Table _A1 3. In-house spiked samples (continued)
Concentration in pC1/1 Lab Sampie- Date TliE Result Known Expected-Code ~ Type Collected Analysis n=3, Activity Precision
-1s, n=3a ,
QC-W-21 Water Oct. 1986 C -60 19,2t2.2 18.St3.0 8.7 Cs-134 31.7t5.2 25.618.0- - 8.7 Cs-137 23.8tl.0' 21.625.01 8.7 QC-MI-11 Milk .Oct 1986 Sr-89 12. 3 t1'. 8 . 14.323.0 8.7: l QC-W-20 Water Nov. 1986 H-3 3855t180 3960t350 520b QC-W-22 Water Dec. 1986 Gross alpha 9.811.4 11.2i4.0 8.7 t Gross beta - 21.7t2.0 23.815.0 8.7 QC-W-23 Water Jan. 1987 I-131 29.8t2.5 27.923.0 10.4 QC-MI-12 Milk Jan. 1987 I-131 36. Sil'.3 32.615.0 10.4
-Cs-137 32.6t4.2 27.4t8.0 8.7 QC-MI-13 Milk Jan 1987 Sr-89 10.4t2.1 12.214.0 8.7 Sr-90 14.611.6 '12.613.0' 5.2 1-131 49.511'.2 54.928.0 10.4 Cs-134 41.6 0.0 8.7 Cs-137 33.320.6 . 27.428.0 8.7- 4 i
QC-W-24 Water Mar 1987 Sr-89 24.723.6 25.915.0- 8.7 Sr-90 23.913.8 22.8t8.0- 5.2 1 -
) QC-W-25 Water Apr 1987 I-131 28.021.9 29.315.0 10.6 QC-MI-14 Milk Apr 1987 I-131 ~25.012.2 23.915.0 10.4 Cs-134 42.1 '
O.0 -8.7 l Cs-137- 34.212.0 27.217.0 8.7
' QC-W-26 Water Jun 1987 H-3 3422t100 '33622300 520 Co-60 24.811.4 '26.St7.0 8.7' Cs-134- 42.0 0.0 8.7 Cs-137 21.210.5 21.617.0 8.7 QC-W-27 Water Jun 1987 Gr. alpha 8.Sil.9 10.124.0- 8.7 Gr. beta. 22.621.9 21.2t5.0- 8.7 QC-W-28 Water Jun 1987 Gr. alpha 8.7tl.3 10.114.0 8.7 Gr. beta 12.2t5.2 9.423.0 8.7-I e
116 i
Table A-3. In-house spiked samples (continued)
Concentration in pC1/1 Lab- Sample Date TIML Result Known Expected l Code Type Collected Analysis .n=3 Activity Precision !
1s, n=3a l QC-W-29 Water Jun 1987 Gr. alpha 16.411.3 18.915.0 8.7 ]
Gr. beta- 15.914.0 11.814.0 8.7 QC-MI-15 Milk Jul 1987 Sr-90 19.411.6 18.813.5 5.2 I-131 43.520.7 45.3*7.0 10.4-Cs-134 17.922.2 .16.025.3 8.7 5
-Cs-137 25.4*1.8 22.715.0 8.7 QC-W-30 Water Sep 1987 Sr-89 17.5*3.0 _14.3t5.0 8.7 Sr-90 18.412.2 17.512 7. 5.2 ,
QC-W-31 Water Oct 1987 H-3 2053 939 2059*306 520 QC-W-32 Water Dec 1987 Gr. alpha 8.61.0 10.115.0 8.7 Gr. beta 15.210.1 13.113.0 8.7 QC-W-33 Water Dec 1987, Gr. alpha 7.711.4 10.115.0 8.7 '
Gr. beta 10.9*1.0 7.9 3.0 8.7 l QC-W-34 Water Dec 1987 Gr. alpha 4.020.9 5.1*3.0 8.7 i Gr.. beta 9.4*0.9 7.913.0 8.7 QC-MI-16 Milk Feb 1988 Sr-89 31.824.7 31.716.0 8.7 Sr-90 25.512.7 27.813.5 5.2 ;
I-131 26.420.5 23.225.0 10.4 Cs-134 23.822.3 24.2*6.0 8.7 Cs-137 26.5 0.8 25.116.0 8.7 QC-MI-17 Milk Feb 1988 I-131 10.611.2 14.311.6 10.4 QC-W-35 Water Feb 1988 I-131 9.7 1.1 11.611.1 10.4 QC-W-36 Water -Feb 1988 I-131 10.5 1.3 11.621.0 10.4 !
QC-W-37 Water Mar 1988 Sr-89 17.1*2.0 19.828.0 8.7 Sr-90 18.710.9 17.315.0 5.2 i
QC-MI-18 Milk Mar 1988 I-131 33.212.3 26.715.0 10.4 Cs-134 31.312.1 30.215.0 8.7 Cs-137 29.911.4 26.215.0 8.7 .
-4 117 ,
Table A-3. In-house spiked samples (continued)- )
Concentration in pC1/1 Lab. Sample Date TIML Result. Known Expected Code Type Collected Analysis n=3 Activity Precision. 1 1s, n=3a QC-W-38 Water Apr 1988 I-131 17.121.1 14.225.0 _10.4 QC-W-39 Water Apr 1988 H-3 4439231 41761500' 724-QC-W-40 Water Apr 1988 Co-60 23.720.5 26.124.0 8.7 .
' Cs-134 25.4t2.6 29.224.5 8.7 Cs-137 -26.6t2.3 26.2*4.0 8.7-QC-W-41 Water 'Jun 1988 Gr. alpha 12.3*0.4 13.115.0 8.7 Gr. beta 22.6tl.0 20.125.0 8.7 QC-MI-19 Milk Jul 1988 Sr-89 15.Itl.6 16.425.0 8.7 Sr-90 .18.0*0.6 18.325.0 5.2 '
I-131 -88.424.9~ 86.618.0 10.4 Cs-137 22.710.8 20.826.0 8.7' !
QC-W-42 Water Sep 1988 Sr-89 48.5t3.3 50 .8*8.0 '8.7 Sr-90 10.921.0 11.423.5- 5.2 QC-W-43 Water Oct 1988 Co-60 20.913.2 21.4*3.5 18.7 Cs-134 38.721.6 -38.0*6.0 8.7 Cs-137 19.0t2.4 21.013.5
- 8.7 QC-W-44 Water Oct 1988 I-131 22.210.6 23.323.5- 10.4 QC-W-45 Water Oct 1988 H-3 4109143 41532500 724 QC-MI-20 Milk Oct 1988 I-131 59.820.9 60.619.0 10.4 >
Cs-134 49.6 1.8 48.627.5 0. 7 - i Cs-137 25.814.6 24.7*4.0 8.7 QC-W-46 Water Dec 1988 Gr. alpha 11.5i2.3 15.225.0 8.7 Gr. beta 26.5 2.0 25.715.0 8.7 QC-MI-21 Milk Jan 1989 Sr-89 25.5210.3 34.0 10.0. 8.7 Sr-90 28.323.2 27.113.0 5.2 I-131 540*13 550*20 10.4' l
Cs-134 24.5 2.6 22.615.5 8.7 Cs-137 24.010.6 20.525.0 8.7 11 8
l l
7able A-3. In house spiked samples (continued)
Concentration in pC1/1 Lab Sample Date TIML Result Known Expected Code 7ype Collected Analysis n=3 Activity Precision 1s, n=3a QC W-47 Water Mar 1989 Sr-89 15.213.8 16.115.0 8.7 Sr-90 16.421.7 16.913.0 5.2 i QC-MI-22 Milk Apr 1989 I-131 36.321.1 37.215.0 10.4 Cs-134 20.812.8 20.718.0 8.7 Cs-137 22.212.4 20.418.0 8.7 QC-W-48 Water Apr 1989 Co-60 23.512.0 25.118.0 8.7 Cs-134 24.211.1 25.918.0 8.7 Cs-137 23.611.2 23.018.0 8.7 QC-W-49 Water Apr 1989 I-131 37.213.7 37.215.0 10.4 QC-W-50 Water Apr 1989 H-3 3011159 30891500 724 !
QC-W-51 Water Jun 1989 Gr. alpha 13.011.8 15.015.0 8.7 Gr. beta 26.011.2 25.518.0 8.7 QC MI-23 Milk Jul 1989 Sr-89 19.416.5 22.0110.0 8.7 Sr-90 27.613.5' 28.613.0 5.2 1-131 46.813.2 43.415.0 10.4 Cs-134 27.411.8 28.326.0 8.7 Cs-137 24.111.8 20.816.0 8.7 QC-MI-24 Milk Aug 1989 Sr-89 . 25.412.7 27.2110.0 8.7 Sr-90 46.011.1 47.819.6 8.3 l Water QC-W-52 Sep 1989 l-131 9.610.3 9.721.9 10.4 i QC-W-53 Water Sep 1989 l-131 19.010.2 20.924.2 10.4 QC-W-54 Water Sep 1989 Sr-89 25.824.6 24.714.0 8.7 Sr-90 26.515.3 29.715.0 5.2 1
t a n=3 unless noted otherwise. '
b n=2.
c n=1.
119
Table A-3. In house spiked samples (continued)
{
. . - . i Concentration in pCi/l
- Lab Sample Date TlhTTesult Known Expected Collected Code Type Analysis n=3 Activity Precision ;
1s. n=3a QC-MI-25 Milk Oct 1989 I-131 70.013.3 73.5t20.0 10.4 '
Cs-134 22.112.6 22.618.0 8.7 Cs-137 29.411.5 27.528.0 8.7 ;
QC-W-55 Water Oct 1989 I-131 33.311.3 35.3210.0 10.4 QC-W-56 Water Oct 1989 Co-60 15.210.9 17.415.0 8.7 Cs-134 22.114.4 18.928.0 8.7 Cs-137 27.211.2 22.918.0 8.7 QC-W-57 Water Oct 1989 H-3 3334122 33791500 724 QC-W-58 Water Nor 1989 Sr-89 10.911.4d 11.1tl.0d 8.7 Sr-90 10.4tl.0d 10.311.0d 5.2 QC-W-59 Water Nov 1989 Sr-89 101.026.0d 104.1110.5d 17.5 !
Sr-90 98.013.0d 96.0110.0d 17.0 -
QC-W-60 Water Dec 1989 Gr. alpha 10.821.1 10.614.0 8.7 Gr. beta 11.610.5 11.414.0 8.7 a n=3 unless noted otherwise.
b n=2.
c n=1.
d Concentration in pC1/ml '
f t
5 120
Table A-4. In-house " blank" samples.
Concentration in pC1/1 Acceptance Lab Sample Date Resul ts Criteria Code Type Cellected Analysis (4.66c ) (4.66o )
BL-1 D.I. Water Nov. 1985 Gross alpha <0.1 <1 Gross beta (0.4 <4 BL-2 0.1. Water Nov. 1985 Cs-137 (gamma) *(1.9 <10 8L-3 D.I. Water Nov. 1985 Sr-89 <0. 5 <5 Sr-90 <0. 6 <1 BL-5 0.I. Water Nov. 1985 Ra-226 <0.4 <1 Ra-228 <0.4 <1 SPW-2265 D.I. Water Apr. 1985 Gross alpha <0.6 <1 Gross beta <2.2 <4 Sr-89 <0. 2 (5 Sr-90 (0.4 <1 1-131 <0. 2 <1 Cs-137 (gamma) (7. 4 <10 BL-6 0.I. Water Apr. 1986 Gross alpha <0.4 <1 BL-7 D.I. Water Apr. 1986 Gross alpha <0.4 <1 BL-8 0.1. Water June 1986 Gross alpha <0.4 <1 BL-9 D.I. Water June 1986 Gross alpha <0.3 <1 SPW-3185 D.I. Water Jan 1987 Ra-226 <0.1 <1 Ra-228 <0.9 <1 SPS-3292 Milk Jan 1987 I-131 (0.1 <1 Cs-134 <6.2 (10 Cs-137 (6.4 <10 SPW-3554 D.I. Water Feb 1987 H-3 <180 <300 Gross beta (2.6 <4 SPS-3555 Milk Feb 1987 St-09 <0.6 (5 Si'-90 1.9 0.4a <1 SPS-3731 Milk Mar 1987 Cs-134 <2.2 <10 Cs-137 <2.5 <10 a low level (1 - 5 pC1/1) of Sr-90 concentration in milk is not unusual.
4
\
121
Table A-4. In-house ' blank" samples (continued).
[
i Concentration in pC1/1 r Acceptance l Lab Sample Date Resul ts Criteria ;
i Code Type Collected Analysis (4.667 ) (4.60 )
i SPS-3732 0.1. Wa ter Mar 1987 Sr-89 (0.9 <5 Sr 90 <0.8 <1 I-131 <0.3 <1 ,
Co-60 <2.3 <10 Cs-134 <2.2 <10 Cs-137 - <2.4 <10 :
Ra-226 <0.1 <1 '
Ra-228 <1.0 <1 Np-237 (0.04 <1 Th-230 <0.05 <0.1 Th-232- <0.02 <0.1 ,
U-234 <0.05 <0.1 !
U-235 <0.03 <0.1 U-238 <0.03 (0.1 ;
SPS-4023 Milk May 1987 I-131 <0.1 <1 .
SPS-4203 D.I. Water May 1987 Gross alpha <0.7 <1 Gross beta <1.7 <4 SPS-4204 Milk May 1987 Sr-89 <0.5 (5 I Sr-90 2.410. 6a <1 SPS-4390 Milk Jun 1987 Cs 134 <4.7 <10 Cs-137 (5.2 <10 ,
SPS-4391 D.I. Water Jun 1987 Sr-89 <0. 4 <5 Sr-90 <0.4 <1 1-121 <0.1 <1 '
Co-60 <3. 8 <10 Cs-137 <5.7 <10 Ra-226 <0.1 <1 Ra-228 <0.9 <1 SPW-4627 D.I. Water Aug 1987 Gross alpha <0.6 <1 :
Gross beta <1.4 <4 Tritium (150 SPS-4628 Milk Aug 1987 Sr-89 <0.6 (5 Sr-90 2. 410. 6 a <g SPS-4847 Milk Sep 1987 Cs-134 (4.4 <10 Cs-137 <5.3 <10 .
a Low-level (1 - 5 pCi/1) of Sr-90 concentration in milk is not unusual.
122
Table A-4 In-house " blank" samples (continued).
Concentration in pCi/1 Acceptance L.ab sampl e Date Results Criteria l Code Type Collected Analysis (4.663 ) (4.663 ) .
SPS-4848 D. I. Water Sep 1987 I-131 <0.2 <1 SPW-4849 D. I. Water Sep 1987 Co-60 <4.1 <10 Cs-134 <4.8 <10 l Cs-137 <4.0 <10 !
Sr-89 <0. 7 <5 ;
Sr-90 <0.7 <1 SPW-4850 D.I. Water Sep 1987 Th-228 <0.04 <1 Th-232 <0.8 <1 U-234 <0.03 <1 i U-235 <0.03 <1 U-238 <0.02 <1 An-241 <0.06 <1 Co-242 <0.04 <1 ,
Ra-226 <0.1 <1 l
Ra-228 <1.0 <2 SPW-4859 D.I. Water Oct 1987 Fe-55 <0.5 <1 SPS-5348 Milk Dec 1987 Cs-134 <2.3 <10 Cs-137 <2.5 <10 SPW-5384 0.1. Water Dec 1987 Co-60 <2.8 <10 Cs-134 (2.6 <10 Cs-137 <2.8 <10 1-131 <0.2 <1 Ra-226 <0.1 <1 Ra-228 <1.2 <2 l
' Sr-89 <0.5 <1 Sr-90 (0.4 <1 l
SPW-5385 D.1, Water Nov 1987 Gr. alpha <0.4 <1 Gr. beta (2. 2 <4 Fe-55 <0.3 <1 SPS-5386 Milk Jan 1988 1-131 <0.1 <1 SPW-5448 " Dead" Water Jan 1988 H-3 <177 <300 123
i Table A-4. In-house ' blank
- samples (continued).
Concentration in pC1/1 Acceptance :
Lab Sampl e Date Resul ts Criteria !'
Code Type Callected Analysis (4.663 ) (4.663 )
SPS-5615 Milk Mar 1988 Cs-134 <2.4 <10 Cs-137 <2.5 <10 ;
I-131 (0. 3 <1 Sr-89 (0. 4 (5 l Sr-90 2.4!0.Sa <1 SPS-5650 0.1. Water Mar 1988 Th-228 <0. 3 <1 I Th-230 <0.04 <1 Th-232 <0.05 <1 U-234 <0.03 <1 <
U-235 <0.03 <1 U-238 <0.03 <1 ,
Am-241 <0.06 <1 Cm-242 <0.01 <1 Pu-238 <0.08 <1 ,
Pu-240 <0.02 <1 SPS-6090 Milk Jul 1988 Sr-89 <0. 5 <1 ,
Sr-90 1.810.Sa <t ;
I-131 <0.4 <1 Cs-137 <0.4 (10 SPW-6209 Water Jul 1988 Fe-55 <0. 8 <1 ,
SPW-6292 Water Sep 1988 Sr-89 <0.7 <1 Sr-90 <0.7 <1 SPS-6477 Milk Oct 1988 I-131 <0. 2 <1 Cs-134 (6.1 <10 Cs-137 (5.9 <10 SPW-6478 Water Oct 1988 I-131 <0. 2 <1 SPW-6479 Water Oct 1988 Co-60 <5.7 <10 Cs-134 <3.7 <10 Cs-137 <4. 3 <10 SPW-6480 Water Oct 1988 H-3 <170 (300 SPW-6625 Water Dec 1988 Gr. alpha <0.7 <1 Gr. beta <1. 9 <4 a Low level (1 - 5 pCi/1) of Sr-90 concentration in milk is not unusual.
I 124 e
Table A-4 In-house ' blank samples (continued).
Concentration in pCf /1 Acceptance Lab Sample Date Resul ts Criteria Code Type Collected Analysi s (4.66o ) (4.66o )
SPS-6723 Milk Jan 1989 Sr-89 (0. 6 <5 Sr-90 1.920.5a <1 1-131 (0. 2 <1 Cs-134 (4 . ~3 <10 Cs-137 (4.4 (10 SPW-6877 Water Mar 1989 Sr-89 <0.4 <5 Sr-90 <0. 6 <1 SPS-6963 Milk Apr 1989 I-131 <0. 3 <1 Cs-134 <5. 9 <10 Cs-137 <6 . 2 (10 SPW-7561 Water Apr 1989 H-3 (150 <300 SPW-7207 Water Jun 1989 Ra-226 <0. 2 <1 Ra-228 <0.6 <1 SPS-7208 Milk Jun 1989 Sr-89 <0.6 <5 Sr-90 2.120.Sa <1 1-131 <0.3 <1 Cs-134 (6. 4 (10 Cs-137 <7.2 (10 SPW-7558 Water Jun 1989 Gr. alpha <0.2 <1 Gr. beta <1.0 <4 SPS-7322 Milk Aug 1989 Sr-89 <1.4 <5 Sr-90 4.821.0a <1 1-131 <0.2 <1 Cs-134 (6. 9 <10 Cs-137 <8. 2 <10 SPW-7559 Water Sep 1989 Sr-89 <2.0 <5 Sr-90 <0. 7 <1 SPW-7560 Water Oct 1989 I-131 <0.1 <1.0 SPW-7562 Water Oct 1989 H-3 <140 <300 SPS-7605 Milk Nov 1989 I-131 <0.2 <1 Cs-134 <8. 6 (10 Cs-137 <10 <10 SPW-7971 Water Dec 1989 Gr. alpha <0.4 <1 Gr. beta <0.8 <4 a Low 1,y,1 ( g.$ pCi/1) of Sr-90 concentration in milk is not unusual. )
125
l l
itML. BLIND-01 Revision 0, 12-29-86 ATTACHMENT B i
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR " SPIKE 0" SAMPLES LABORATORY PRECISION: ONE STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES FOR VARIOUS ANALYSESa j t
One Standard Deviation i Analysis level for Single Determination l l Gama Emitters 5 to 100 pCi/ liter or kg 5 pCi/ liter [
l >100 pC1/ liter or kg 55 of known value l
Strontium-89b 5 to 50 pCi/ liter or kg 5 pCi/ liter
>50 pCi/ liter or kg 10% of known 'value ;
Strontium-90b 2 to 30 pCi/ liter or kg 3.0 pCi/ liter -t
>30 pCi/ liter of kg 10% of known value Potassium >0.1 g/ liter or kg 55 of known value Gross Alpha <20 pCi/ liter 5 pCi/ liter
>20 pCi/ liter 25% of known value Gross Beta <100 pCi/ liter 5 pCi/ liter
>100 pCi/ liter 5% of kilown value ;
Tritium (4,000 pCi/ liter is = (pC1/ liter) =
>4,000 pCi/ liter 169.85 x (known).0933 10% of known value Radium-226, <0.1 pCi/ liter 15% of known value Radium-228 Plutonium 0.1 pCi/ liter, gram, 10% of known value or sample Iodine-131, b (55 pCi/ liter 6 pCi/ liter I
lodine-129 >55 pCi/ liter 10% of known value Uranium-238, <35 pCi/ liter 6 pCi/ liter Nickel-630, >35 pCi/ liter 15% of known value '
Technetium-99D Iron-55b 50 to 100 pCi/ liter 10 pCi/ liter 10% of known value a
From EPA publication, " Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercompari- '
b son Studies Program, Fiscal Year 1981-1982. EPA-600/4-81-004. '
TIML limit.
126 +
y -
-- +
ADDEf1Dutt TO APPEtlDix A The following is an explanation of the reasons why certain samples were outside the control limit specified by the Environmental Frotection Agency for the Interlebora-tory Coaparison Progran starting January 1987.
EPA Lab Code Analysis Titil Result Control Limit Explane. tion STil-504 Sr-89 57.024.3 60.3-77.7 1111k had high fat content which Sr-90 32.021.0 32.4-37.6 made analyses difficult. Ad-dition of errors to Tillt result would put values within EPA -
control limits. EPA also had '
the same problem in analyzing its own sample.
STW-511 Ra-228 8.121.4 4.6-8.0 Tillt results are usually within EPA control limits. Analysis of the next sample was within EPA control limits. No further action is planned.
STW-516 Cr-51 80.3117.5 61.3-78.7 Results in the past have been within EPA control limits and Tilit will monitor the situation in the future.
ST F-524 K 1010.72158.5 1123.5-1336.5 Error in transferrance of data.
Correct data was 1105t33.
Results in the past have been within the limits and TitlL will monitor the situation in the future.
STW-532 1-131 9.022.0 6.2-8.8 Sample recounted af ter 12 days.
The average result was 8.821.7 (within EPA control limits).
The sample was recounted in i
order to check the ' decay, l
Results in the past have been
! within the limits and TlHL will continue to monitor the situ-ation in the future.
STW-534 Co-60 63.321.3 41.3-58.7 High level of Co-60 was due to contamination of beaker, i
Beaker was discarded upon dis-covery of contamination and sample was recounted. Recount results were 53.223.6 and 50.922.4.
127
ADDENDUM TO APPENDIX A (continued)
EPA Lab Code Analysis TIML Result Control Limit Explanation STM-554 Sr-90 51.022.0 54.8-65.2 The cause of low result was dug to very high fat content in thC milk. It should be noted that
, 63% of all participants faile9 this test. Also, the averagG for all participants was 54.0 pC1/1 before the Grub 3 and 55.8 pC1/1 after the Grubb.
STW-560 Pu-239 5.821.1 3.5-4.9 The cause of high results is not known. It is suspected that the. standard was not properly calibrated by supplier and is under investigation. New Pu-236 standard was obtained and will be used for the next test.
STW-568 Ra-228 2.611.0 2.7-4.5 The cause of low' results is not known. Next EPA crosscheck re-sults were within the control limits. No further action is pl anned .
STN-570 Sr-89 26.0110.0 30.3-47.7 The cause of low results was Sr-90 45.714.2 49.8-60.2 falsely high recovery due to suspected incomplete calcium removal.. Since EPA sample was used up, internal spike was pre-pared and analyzed. The results were within control limits (See table A-3, sample QC-MI-24).
No further action is planned.
t O
128
I I
r APPENDIX VI REVISIONS TO TEH ODCM RADJ0 LOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MON!TORING PROGRAM SINCE 1985 1
i 1
129 P
REVISIONS TO THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM LASALLE STATION DATE (00CM Revision) SAMPLE MONITORI!tG COPMENTS TYPE LOCATION l
'85 (11) All All Addition The station code, L, proceeds monitoring location.
All All Revision Listed distances and directions from center of the station.
Airborne All Revision Added gasuna isotopic analysis on quarterly composites.
All Addition Analysis frequency is clarified the following 00CM statement:
" Perform genna isotopic on each sample when gross beta activity is found to be >10 times the yearly mean of control samples."
Direct Radiation All Revision Itemized TLD monitoring loca* ions, Ground /Well Water All Addition Gensne isotopic and tritive analyses quarterly.
L-28 Addition Marseilles Well, 7.0 mi W.
L-29 Addition Seneca Well, 5.1 mi NNE.
g L-30 Addition Ransom Well, 6.0 mi S.
o L-31 Addition Ottawa Well, 12.8 mi W.
L-32 Addition Illinois State Park 6.5 mi W.
Surface Water Deletion Illinois River monitoring locations at Marseilles, Ottawa, and Senece.
Addition Tritium analysis to occur on quarterly composites.
Revision Nonroutine Reporting Levels for the following nuclides in water were changed accortlingly.
Nuclide Reporting Levels (pci/1)
Former Revised Fe-59 100 400 Co-58 600 1000 Zn-65 200 300 '
Ba-La-140 100 200 Revision The Maximum Values for the Lower Limit of Detection were changed for the I-131 contained in water from 5.0 pC1/1 to 0.5 pCf/1. Initia11ya, limited to milk samples collected during the pasture season.
Sediment All Revision Analysis to occur semiannually, not annually.
l I
, .,. . - - w- .e --
s e 4 .-m .v , - - - , , , . . , . . . _____.m_. _ _ . _ m. . _m ,
REVISIONS TO THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRM LASALLE STATION Cont'd DATE (ODCM Revision) SAMPLE MONITORING ComENTS TYPE LOCATION
'85 (11) Cont'd Milk All Revision Itemized dairies.
Revision Gansna isotopic and I-131 analyses o(car bi-weekly during the grazing season, not weekly.
Revision Monroutine Reporting Levels for the following nuclides in milk wre changed accordingly.
Nuclide Reportir.J Levels (pCi/1)
Former Revised Cs-134 70 60 Cs-137 60 70 Fish L-24 Addition LSCS Cooling Lake Recreation Center.
U
_ . . - _ . - - ~ . - -
REVISIONS TO THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGR m LASALLE STATION Cont'd DATE (00CM Revision) SAMPLE MONITORING ComENTS TYPE LOCATION
'86 (12) Airborne All Addition Collection frequency is clarified with the following 00CM statement:
" Continuous sampler operation with particulate filter exchange weekly and radioiodine canister exchange bi-weekly.*
Addition Analysis frequency is clarified with the following ODCM statement:
"Far field samples are analyzed when near field resuitt are inconsistent with previous measurements and radioactivity is confinned as having its origin in airborne effluents released from the station or at the discretion of the Emergency Planning Supervisor."
-Direct Radiation All Revision Itemized TLD monitoring locations.
{ Cooling Water All Deletion i
y REVISIONS TG THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIROvMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM LASALLE STA110N Cont'd DATE (ODCM Revision) SAMPLE MONITORING COMMENTS TYPE LOCATION
'S7 (12A) All All Addition Listed distances from the center of the station in kilometers and listed sectors.
Airborne L-11 Revision Distance was corrected Trom 4.3 to 7 mi.
Direct Radletion Revision The direction frue the center of the station for the following TLDs were corrected:
Former Revised 201-1,2 N NME 205-1,2 E ESE 208-1,2 SSE 5 209-1,2 S SSW 210-1,2 SSW SW 211-1,2 SW WSW 212-1,2 WSW W 213-1,2 W WNW U 215-1,2 NW NNW 216-1,2 NNW N Ground /Well Water L-27 Addition Gama isotopic and tritium analyses quarterly at LSCS Onsite Well.
Surface- L-23 Deletion L-24 Deletion Milk All Revision Collection frecuency was changed from weekly to biweekly for May through October.
L-17 Revision The direction for the Norsen Dairy (
was corrected from NNW to N.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _