ML20107K800
| ML20107K800 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1995 |
| From: | COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20107K791 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9604290041 | |
| Download: ML20107K800 (123) | |
Text
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _
LASALLE COUNTY STATION I
ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 1945 7
x APRIL 1996 9604290041 960327 PDR ADOCK 05000373 R
1 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS EASC INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................
1
SUMMARY
2 1.0 EFFLUENTS 1.1 Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosphere....................................................
3 1.2 Liquids Released to Illinois River........................................................
3 2.0 SOLID R ADIOACTIVE WASTE................................................................
3 3.0 DOSE TO MAN 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pathways....
3 3.1.1 Noble G a ses................................................................................
3 3.1.1.1 Ga mma Dose Ra tes................
3 3.1.1.2 Beta Air and Skin Rates................................................
4 3.1.2 Radioactive Iodine...
4 3.1.2.1 Iodine Concentra tions in Air....................................
4 3.1.2.2 Dose to Infant's Thyroid................................................
4 3.1.3 Concentrations of Particulates in Air............................
4 3.2 Li quid Ef fluen t Pa thways.........................................................
4 3.3 Assessment of Dose to Member of Public..................
5 4.0 S ITE M ETEORO LOG Y..................................................................................
5 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 5.1 Gamma Ra dia ti on...................................................................
6 5.2. Airborne I-131 and Particulate Radioactivity........................................
6 5.3 A q u a t ic R a d io a c tivi ty..........................................................................
6 5.4 Milk...................................................................................................
7 5.5 Sample Collections.........................
7 5.6 Program Modi fica tions.....................................................................
7 6.0 AN A LYTICA L PROC E DURES...............................................................
8 7.0 MILCH ANIMALS AND NEAREST LIVESTOCK CENSUS.......................
8 8.0 NE AREST RESIDENT CENSUS.............................................................
8 9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS............
8
- 10. 0 E R RAT A......................................................................
8 ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
Eage APPENDIX I - DATA TABLES AND FIGURES...........................................................
9 Station Releases Table 1.1-1 Gaseo us E ffl uen ts......................................................10 Table 1.2-1 Liquid E fflu en ts..........................................................
11 Table 2.0-1 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Burial or Disposal...
13 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1-4 Isodose and Concentration Contours................................
19 Table 3.1-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Airborne Releases......................................................................
23 Table 3.2-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Liquid Discharges.................................................................27 Table 3.3-1 10CFR20 Compliance Assessment...............................
28 EnvironmentalMonitoring Figure 5.0-1 Inner Ring TLD Locations..............................................
30 Figure 5.0-2 Ou ter Ring TLD Loca tions...........................................
31 Figure 5.0-3 Fixed Air Sampling and TLD Sites....................................
32 Figure 5.0-4 Ingestion and Waterborne Exposure Pathway Sa mp le Loca ti ons..........................................................
33 Table 5.0-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring L oca ti o n s..................................................................
34 Table 5.0-2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, Sampling Locations and Sample Collection and Anayses........................................................................
35 Table 5.0 Table 5.0-6 Radiological Environmental Monitorin Quarterly Summary........................g Program 41 Table 5.1-1 Gamma Radiation measured in mR by TLDs....................
48 APPENDIX II - METEOROLOGICAL DATA......................................
50 APPENDIX III - LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES......................
79 APPENDIX IV - MILCH ANIMALS, NEAREST LIVESTOCK, AND NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS..................................
82 APPENDIX V - INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS.......................................................................
87 APPENDIX VI - ERRATA DATA.....................................................
116 l
iii f
I
INTRODUCTION LaSalle Station, a two-unit BWR station is located near Marseilles, Illinois, in LaSalle County, 3.5 miles south of the Illinois River. Each reactor is designed to have a capacity of 1078 MW net.
Unit No. I loaded fuel in March 1982. Unit No. 2 loaded Fuel in late December 1983. The station hr.s been designed to keep releases to the environment at levels below those specified in the regulations.
Liquid effluents from LaSalle County Station are released to the Illinois River in controlled batches after radioassay of each batch. Gaseous effluents are released to the atmosphere after delay to permit decay of short-lived (noble) gases. Releases to the atmosphere are calculated on the basis of analyses of routine grab samples of noble gases as well as continuously collected composite samples of iodine and particulate radioactivity sampled during the course of the year. The results of effluent analyses are summarized on a monthly basis and reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as required per Technical Specifications / Standards. Airborne concentrations of noble gases, I-131, and particulate radioactivity in offsite areas are calculated using effluent and meteorological data.
Environmental monitoring is conducted by sampling at indicator and control (background) locations in the vicimty of the LaSalle County Station to measure changes in radiation or radioactivity levels that may be attributable to station operations. If significant changes attributable to LaSalle County Station are measured, these changes are correlated with effluent releases. External gamma radiation exposure from noble gases and internal dose from I-131 in milk are the most critical pathways at this site; however, an environmental monitoring program is conducted which includes these and many other pathways which are less significant in terms of radiation protection.
Comed is in the process of implementing a Uniform Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, referred to as UREMP, among the Comed nuclear stations. This program includes generic requirements pertaining to environmental sampling and analysis, an annual land use census, an interlaboratory comparison program and environmental reports. LaSalle County Station implemented UREMP in October of 1995.
1
l
SUMMARY
Gaseous and liquid effluents for the period contributed to only a small fraction of the LaSalle County Technical Specification / Stand ards hmits. Calculations of environmental concentrations based on effluent, Illinois River flow, and meteorological data for the period indicate that consumption by the public of radionuclides attributable to LaSalle County Station does not exceed regulatory limits. Radiation exposure from radionuclides released to the atmosphere l
represented the critical pathway for the period with a maximum individual total dose estimated i
to be 1.03E-05 mrem for the year, where a shielding and occupancy factor of 0.7 is assumed.
(
The assessment of radiation doses is performed in accordance with the Comed Offsite Dose l
Calculation Manual (ODCM). The results of analysis confirm that the station is operating in compliance with 10CFR50 Appendix I,10CFR20 and 40CFR190.
l l
l l
l l
1 l
l r
o 2
i I
m,-
1.0 EFFLUENTS 1.1 Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosphere Measured concentrations of noble gases, radiciodine, and particulate radioactivity released to the atmosphere during the year, are listed in Table 1.1-1. A total of 3.91 curies of fission and activation gases was released with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 2.45E-01 pCi/sec.
A total of 4.46E 03 curies of I-131 was released during the year, with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 1.87E-04 pCi/sec for all iodines.
A total of 6.08E-03 curies of beta-gamma emitters was released as airborne particulate matter with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 3.69E-04 pCi/sec. Alpha emitting radionuclides were not measurable.
A total of 9.55E+01 curies of tritium was released, with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 4.48 pCi/sec.
1.2 Liauids Released to Illinois River No radioactive liquid waste was discharged from the station during 1995. Release estimates are given in Table 1.2-1.
2.0 SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE Solid radioactive wastes were shipped by truck to Barnwell, South Carolina. The record of waste shipments is summarized in Table 2.0-1.
3.0 DOSE TO MAN 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pathways Table 3.1-1 summarizes the doses resulting from releases of airborne radioactivity via the different exposure pathways.
3.1.1 Noble Cases 3.1.1.1 Gamma Dose Rates Offsite Gamma air and whole body dose rates are shown in Table 3.1-1 and were calculated based on measured release rates, isotopic composition of the noble gases, and average meteorological data for the period. Isodose contours based on concurrent meteorological data for gamma dose for the year are shown in Figure 3.1-1. Based on measured effluents and meteorological data, the maximum dose to an adult would be 1.03E-05 mrem for the year, with an occupancy or shielding factor of 0.7 included, and based on measured effluents and concurrent meteorological data would be 1.10E-04 mrem. The maximum gamma air dose was 1.37E-05 mrad, and 1.55E-05 mrad based on concurrent meteorological data.
3
I 3.1.1.2 Beta Air and Skin Rates The range of beta particles in air is relatively small (on the order of a few meters or less); consequently, plumes of gaseous effluents may be considered " infinite" for the purpose of calculating the dose from beta radiation incident on the skin. However, the actual dose to sensitive skin tissues is difficult to calculate due to the effect of the beta particle energies, thickness of inert skin and clothing covering sensitive tissues.
For pur oses of this report the skin is taken to have a thickness of 7.0 mg/cm and an occu aancy factor of 1.0 is used. The skin dose from beta and gamma raciation for the year was 1.20E-05 mrem. The maximum offsite beta air dose for the year was 2.40E-06 mrad.
The air concentrations of radioactive noble gases at the offsite receptor locations are given in Figure 3.1-2.
3.1.2 Radioactive Iodine The human thyroid exhibits a significant capacity to concentrate ingested or inhaled iodine. The radioiodine, I-131, released during routine operation of the plant, may be made available to man resulting in a dose to the thyroid. The principal pathway of interest for this radionuclide is ingestion of radioiodine in milk by an infant.
3.1.2.1 Iodine Concentrations in Air The calculated concentration contours for iodine in air are shown in Figure 3.1-3. Included in these calculations is an iodine cloud depletion factor which accounts for the phenomenon of elemental iodine deposition on the ground. The maximum offsite concentration is 3
estimated to be 1.31E-04 pCi/m for the year.
3.1.2.2 Dose to Infant's Thyroid The hypothetical thyroid dose to an infant living near the station via ingestion of milk was calculated. The radionuclide considered was I-131 and the source of milk was taken to be the nearest dairy farm with the cows pastured from May through October. The maximum infant's thyroid dose was 1.63E-02 mrem during the year (Table 3.1-1).
3.1.3 Concentrations of Particulates in Air Concentration contours of radioactive airborne particulates are shown in Figure 3.1-4. The maximum offsite average level is estimated to be 1.07E-05 3
pCi/m,
3.2 Liquid Effluent Pathways The three principal pathways through the aquatic environment for potential doses to man from liquid waste are ingestion of potable water, eating aquatic foods, and exposure while walking on the shoreline. Not all of these pathways are applicable at a given time or station but a reasonable approximation of the dose can be made by adjusting the dose formula for season of the year or type and degree of use of the 4
aquatic environment. NRC-developed ec uations' were used to calculate the doses to the whole body, lower GI tracts, thyroid, sone, skin; specific parameters for use in the ecuations given in the Comed Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. The maximum whole body dose for the year was 0.00E+00 mrem and no organ dose exceeded 0.00E+00 mrem (Table 3.2-1).
3.3 Assessment of Dose to Member of Public During the period January to December,1995, LaSalle County Station did not exceed these limits as shown in Table 3.1-1 and Table 3.2-1 (based on yearly average meteorological data), and as shown in Figure 3.1-1 (based on concurrent meteorological data), and as shown in Table 3.3-1:
The RETS limits on dose or dose commitment to an individual due to radioactive materials in liquid effluents from each reactor unit (1.5 mrem to the whole body or 5 mrem to any organ during any calendar quarter; 3 mrem to the whole body or 10 mrem to any organ during any calendar year).
The RETS limits on air dose in noble gases released in gaseous effluents to a member of the public from each reactor unit (5 mrad for gamma radiation or 10 mrads for beta radiation during any calendar quarter; 10 mrads for gamma radiation or 20 mrad for beta radiation during any calendar year).
The RETS lindts on dose to any individual due to iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than eight days in gaseous effluents released from each reactor unit (7.5 mrems to any organ during any calendar quarter; 15 mrems to any organ during any calendar year).
The 10CFR20 limit on Total Effective Dose Equivalent to individual members of the public (100 mrem).
4.0 SITE METEOROLOGY A summary of the site meteorological measurements taken during each calendar quarter of the year is given in A[pendix IL The data are presented as cumulative joint frequency f
distributions of the win direction for the 375' level and wind speed class by atmos aheric stability class determined for the temperature difference between the 375' and 33'. evels.
Data recovery for these measurements was about 99.8% during 1995.
f 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING f
Table 5.0-1 provides an outline of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) as required in the current Technical Standards. Tables 5.0-2 lists the program's sampling locations, collection frequencies and analyses for all samples collected. Tables 5.0-3 to 5.0-6 summarize data for the year. Except for tables of special interest, tables listing all data are no longer included in the annual report. All data tables are available for inspection at the Station or in the Corporate Office.
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Rev.1).
5
Specific findings for various environmental media are discussed below.
5.1 Gamma Radiation External radiation dose from onsite sources and noble gases released to the atmosphere was measured using CaSO4:Tm thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).
Each location normally consists of 2 TLD sets. The quarterly average external radiation dose for the year was 16.2 mR at the indicator locations and 14.8 mR at the control locations. TLD results are listed in Table 5.1-1 and locations are shown in Figures 5.0-1 and 5.0-2.
Quarterly extemal radiation dose at fourteen air sampling locations averaged 15.3 mR and is similar to levels measured in 1986 (17.1 mR),1987 (17.8 mR),1988 (16.5 mR),
1989 (17.6 mR),1990 (17.8 mR),1991 (17.7 mR),1992 (15.5 mR),1993 (14.5 mR) and 1994 (15.4 mR). These differences are not statistically significant.
5.2 AirborneI-131 and Particulate Radioactivity Locations of the samplers are shown in Figure 5.0-3. Airborne I-131 remained below 3
the LLD of 0.10 pCi/m throughout the year.
Gross beta concentrations ranged from 0.008 to 0.054 pCi/m3 and averaged 0.021 pCi/m3 and is similar to levels measured in 1985 (0.025 pCi/m3),1986 (0.027 3
pCi/m, except for the period from May 16 through June 6 when it was influenced by 3
the nuclear reactor accident at Chernobyl),1987 (0.027 pCi/m ),1988 (0.031 pCi/m3),
3 3
3 1989 (0.028 pCi/m ),1990 (0.024 pCi/m ), and the same as in 1991 (0.022 pCi/m ),
3 3
1992 (0.022 pCi/m ),1993 (0.022 pCi/m ) and 1994 (0.022 pCi/m3),
Gamma isotopic results were below the LLD level of 0.01 pCi/m3 n all quarterly i
composites.
No activity attributable to station operation was detected in any sample.
5.3 A. uatic Radioactivity q
Well water was collected quarterly from one onsite well and five offsite wells and analyzed for tritium and gamma-emitting nuclides. All results were below the limits of detection, indicating that there was no measurable amount of radioactivity due to the Station's releases.
Weekly surface water samples from the Illinois River at Seneca and LSCS Cooling Lake were composited monthly and analyzed for gamma-emitting nuclides prior to implementing UREMP during October,1995. Weekly samples from the same locations were composited quarterly and analyzed for tritium. None of the composited samples indicated the presence of gamma-emitting nuclides above their respective LLD levels. Tritium was detected in the quarterly upstream samples, Illinois River at Seneca, with a maximum first quarter concentration of 370 pCi/L. It is possible that the tritium is the result of upriver discharges from Dresden and Braidwood Stations.
6
{
In the LSCS Cooling Lake samples, tritium was detected in the second, third and fourth quarters at a maximum fourth quarter concentration of 383 pCi/L. It is
(
possible that the tritium is the result of the Illinois River being the source of make-up water to the lake.
(
Sediment samples were collected twice a year from one indicator location (downstream of the Cooling Lake discharge structure) and analyzed for emitters prior to implementing UREMP during October,1995. All gamma gamma-emitters
[
were below their respective detection limits in both samples. There are no adverse L
effects expected to the environment.
Levels of gamma radioactivity in fish were measured and found in all samples to be
[
below the lower limit of detection for the program.
5.4 Milk Milk samples were collected monthly from November through April and biweekly from May through October and analyzed for Iodine-131 and gamma-emitting nuclides.
{
I-131 remained below the detection limits of 0.5 pCi/L.
(
Cs-134 and Cs-137 were below the LLD level of 10 pCi/L. All other gamma-emitting nuclides, except naturally-occurring K-40, were below their respective LLDs.
5.5 Sample Collections All samples were collected as scheduled except those listed in the Listing of Missed Samples, AppendixIII.
5.6 Program Modifications
{
In January,1995, L-39 (Village View Acres Dairy) went out of business.
In June,1995, L-38 (Ricker Dairy Farm) went out of business and was replaced by L-41 (Burton Farm).
Implemented UREMP in October,1995. Changes based on UREMP implementation are summarized as follows:
[
Deleted air sampling locations L-02, L-04,L-09, L-13 and L-14. Regrouped the remaining 9 air samplers into near field, far field and control.
b Deleted Ground /Well locations L-29 (Seneca Well), L-30 (Ransom Well), L-31 (Ottawa Well) and L-32 (Illinois State Park).
Revised analysis of surface water samples to additionally perform gross beta on monthly composite. Deleted surface water sample location L-24 (Cooling Lake near recreation area) and added location L-40 (Illinois River Downstream).
Deleted sediment sample location L-34 (Downstream of Cooling Lake discharge structure at station) and added L-40 (Illinois River Downstream).
Deleted dairy locations L-19 (Bettenhausen Dairy) and L-20 (Gass Dairy).
7
Deleted fish location L-24 (LSCS Cooling Lake near recreation area) and added location L-36 (Illinois River upstream of discharge).
Added requirement for food product sampling and analysis.
6.0 ANALYrICAL PROCEDURES Procedures used during the period covered in this report remained essentially unchanged.
g A summary of the procedures used for analyzing radioactivity in environmental samples g
is given in Appendix VI of the report for the period January - December 1993.
7.0 MILCH ANIMALS AND NEAREST LIVESTOCK CENSUS A census of milch animals was conducted within a five mile radius of the station. The survey was conducted by " door-to-door" canvas by J. Benham on August 28,1995. The nearest livestock census was conducted by J. Benham on August 28,1995. The results of each census are presented in Appendix IV.
8.0 NEAREST RESIDENT CENSUS A census of the nearest residences within a five (5) mile radius was conducted by J.
Benham on August 28,1995.
Results of the nearest residence census are presented in Appendix IV.
l 9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS Teledyne's Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results are presented in Appendix V.
Comed's Thermoluminescent Dosimeter (TLD) Program is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) which requires review and evaluation. In addition to the biennial ANSI tested requirement, Comed also tests to the ANSI standard during the non-NVLAP visitation year. Comed additionally has an internalirradiation program that tests each of the six nuclear station TLD processors once per quarter. The results of all TLD performance tests are retained by Comed's Corporate Health Physics Support Department.
10.0 ERRATA DATA In January,1996, while turnover was being conducted between two computer programmers on the ODCM computer program, 5 of the 6 pathways used in the calculation of organ dose to verify compliance with 10CFR50 dose limits were found to be turned "off". It was determined that these pathways were "off" since January 1,1994, when the computer program was updated to comply with the revision to 10CFR20. The pathway switches were immediately turned on and the organ doses for 1994 and 1995 were recalculated. Appendix VI contains the corrected organ dose data for 1994.
8
APPENDIX I DATA TABLES AND FIGURES t
s 1
l l
9
TABLE 1.1-1 LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS ONE AND TWO DOCKET NUMBERS 50-373 AND 50-374 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1995)
GASEOUS EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Estimated First Second Total Quarter Quarter Error t A.
Fission and Activation Gases 1.
Total release ci 1.02E-03 2.05E-02 30t 2.
Average release rate for period uCi/sec 1.31E-04 2.61E,03 B.
Iodines 1.
Total iodine-131 C1 4.23E-04 4.51E-04 31%
2.
Average release rate for period uCi/sec 5.44E-05 5.74E-05 C.
Particulates 1.
Particulates with T1/2 >8 days Ci
<1.00E-11 1.58E-04 29%
2.
Average release rate for period uCi/sec <1.00E-11 2.01E-05 3.
Gross alpha radioactivity (estimate)Ci
<1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 D.
Tritium 1.
Total release Ci 3.4BE+01 2.68E+01 194 2.
Average release rate for period uCi/sec 4.48E+00 3.41E+00
"<" indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uci/ml Estimated Third Forth Total Quarter Quarter Error i A.
Fission and Activation Gases 1.
Total release ci 3.89E+00 5.60E-04 31%
2.
Average release rate for period uCi/see 2.45E-01 3.52E-05 B.
Iodines 1.
Total iodine-131 Ci 2.97E-03 6.16E-04 35i 2.
Average release rate for period uCi/see 1.87E-04 3.87E-05 C.
Particulates 1.
Particulates with T1/2 >B days Ci 5.21E-05 5.87E-03 29) 2.
Average release rate for period uCi/sec 3.28E-06 3.69E-04 3.
Gross alpha radioactivity (estimate)Ci
<1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 D.
Tritium 1.
Total release C1 2.17E+01 3.37E+01 175 2.
Average release rate for period uC1/sec 1.37E+00 2.19E+00
'"<" indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uci/ml 10
TABLE 1.2-1 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1995)
UNIT ONE LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES l
ESTIMATED First Second TOTAL Quarter Quarter ERROR %
l A.
Fission and Activation Products i
1.
Total release (not including Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 tritium, gases, alpha) l l
2.
Average concentration released uci/ad N/A N/A i
3.
Maximum concentration released uci/ml N/A N/A j
B.
Tritium 1.
Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00-2.
Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A l
C.
Dissolved Noble Gases 1.
Total release ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.
Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A l
D.
Gross Alpha Radioactivity j
1.
Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.
Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A E.
Volume of Waste Released (prior to dilution)1iters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 i
F.
Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 ESTIMATED Third Forth TOTAL Quarter Quarter ERROR %
A.
Fission and Activation Products 1.
Total release (not including Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 tritium, gases, alpha) 2.
Average concentration released uci/ml N/A N/A 3.
Maximum concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A B.
Tritium 1.
Total release ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.
Average concentration released uci/ad N/A N/A C.
Dissolved Noble Gases i
1.
Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.
Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A D.
Gross Alpha Radioactivity 1.
Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.
Average concentration released uci/mi N/A N/A l
l E.
Volume of Waste Released (prior to dilution)1iters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 F.
Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 I
l 11 i
I
I 1
TABLE 1.2-1 (continued)
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1995)
UNIT TWO LIQUID EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES First Second Quarter Quarter A.
Fission and Activation Pro' ducts 1.
Total release (not including Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 tritium, gases, alpha) 2.
Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A 3.
Maximum concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A B.
Tritium 1.
Total release ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.
Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A C.
Dissolved Noble Gases 1.
Total release ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.
Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A D.
Gross Alpha Radioactivity 1.
Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.
Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A E
E.
Volume of Waste Released liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 F.
Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Third Forth Quarter Quarter i
A.
Fission and Activation Products 1.
Total release (not including Ci 0.00E+0'0 0.00E+00*
W.
tritium, gases, alpha) 2.
Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A 3.
Maximum concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A B.
Tritium 1.
Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.
Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A C.
Dissolved Noble Gases 1.
Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.
Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A D.
Gross Alpha Radioactivity 1.
Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.
Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A E.
Volume of Waste Released liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 F.
Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 12
I TABLE 2.0-1 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SENI-ANNUAL REPORT (1995)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL First January February-March Quarter 1.
Spent resins, filter sludges, NO NO No evaporator bottoms, etc.
SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS N/A a.
Quantity shipped cu.a.
b.
Total activity C1
-c.
Major nuclides (estimate t) d.
Container type e.
Container volume cu.a.
f.
Solidification agent 2.
Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
a.
Quantity shipped cu.a.
b.
Total activity Ci c.
Major nuclides (estimate t) d.
Container type e.
Container volume cu.a.
January February March Quarter 3.
Other a.
Quantity shipped cu.a.
NO NO No N/A SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS b.
Total activity Ci' c.
Major nuclides (estimate t) d.
Container type e.
Container volume cu.a.
4.
Irradiated Components a.
Number of shipments b.
Mode of Transportation c.
Destination f
5.
Solid Naste Disposition a.
Number of Shipments b.
Mode of Transportation 5 c.
Destination l
13
I TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1995)
SOLID NASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL Second April Mja June Quarter 1.
Spent resinsi filter sludges, NO No NO N/A evaporator bottoms, etc.
SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS a.
Quantity shipped cu'. m.
b.
Total activity Ci c.
Major nuclides d.
Container type e.
Container volume cu.m.
f.
Solidification agent 2.
Dry compressible waste, i
contaminated equipment, etc.
a.
Quantity shipped cu.m.
b.
Total activity Ci c.
Major nuclides (estimate 4) d.
Container type e.
Container volume cu.m.
Second April May June Quart"r 3.
Other a.
Quantity shipped cu.m. NO NO NO N/A SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS b.
Total activity Ci' c.
Major nuclides (estimate t) d.
Container type e.
Container volume cu.m.
4.
Irradiated Components a.
Number of shipments b.
Mode of Transportation c.
Destination 5.
Solid Waste Disposition a.
Number of Shipments b.
Mode of Transportation c.
Destination 14
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1995)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL Third July August September Quarter 1.
Spent resins,. filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc.
a.
Quantity shipped cu.a.
0.00E+00 1.93E+01 3.62E+01 5.55E+01
\\
b.
Total activity Ci 0.00E+00 1.15E+02 1.60E+02 2.75E+02 c.
Major nuclides (estimate t)
Mn-54 4
0 23 23 Fe-55 t
0 1.24 1.24 Co-58 4
0 9.62 9.62 Co-60 l
0 65.20 65.20 d.
Container type N/A LSA LSA 1
e.
Container volume cu.a.
N/A 4.83E+00 2.36E+00 4.83E+00 f.
Solidification agent N/A Cement Cement 3.
Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
a.
Quantity shipped cu.a.
0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 j
b.
Total activity Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 c.
Major nuclides (estimate t) l Cr-51 t
0 0
0 Mn-54 4
0 0
0 Fe-55 t
0 0
0 Co-59 0
0 0
Co-60 t
0 0
0 d.
Container type N/A N/A N/A e.
Container volume cu.a.
N/A N/A N/A 15
. ~.
I TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1995)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE IVR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL Third 3g July August September Quarter 3.
Other a.
Quantity shipped cu.a.
0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- 0. 0'0 E+ 00 0.00E+00 b.
Total activity Ci-0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 c.
Major nuclides (estimate 4)
Cr-51 l
0 0
0 Mn-54 4
0 0
0 Fe-55 4
0 0
0 Co-59 0
0 0
Co-60 t
0 0
0 d.
Container type N/A N/A N/A e.
Container volume cu.m.
N/A N/A N/A 4.
Irradiated Components a.
Number of shipments 0
0 0
0 b.
Mode of Transportation N/A N/A N/A c.
Destination N/A N/A N/A 5.
Solid waste Disposition g
a.
Number of Shipments 0
4 8
24 W
b.
Mode of Transportation Truck Truck Number N/A 4
8 c.
Destination N/A Barnwell Barnwell Number 0
4 8
I I
16
TABLE 2.0-1 (Continued) l EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SD(I-ANNUAL REPORT (1995)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE It)R BURIAL OR DISPOSAL Forth October November' December Qua rte r 1.
Spent resins,. filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc.
a.
Quantity shipped cu.a.
6.52E+02 9.86E+01 3.86E+01 7.89E+02 b.
Total activity C1 1.03E+02 1.21F+02 7.96E+02 1.02E+03 I
c.
Major nuclides (estimate t)
Mn-54 4
23 23 23 Fe-55 4
1.24 1.24 1.24 Co-58 t
9.62 9.62 9.62 I
Co-60 t
65.2 65.2 65.2 d.
Container volume cu.a.
4.83E+00 4.83E+00 4.83E+00 2.36E+00 3.40E+00 f.
Solidification agent Cement Cement Cement i
2.
Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
a.
Quantity shipped cu.a.
0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.66E+00 9.66E+00 b.
Total activity Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.02E+01 1.02E+01 c.
Major nuclides (estimate 4)
Mn-54 4
0 0
4.28 I
Fe-55 t
0 0
22.8 Co-59 0
0 0.05 Co-60 4
0 0
7.08 d.
Container type N/A N/A LSA e.
Container volume cu.a.
N/A N/A 4.83E+00 1
I I
[
Fc P
17 res*
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1995)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL Forth October November December Quarter 3.
Other a.
Quantity shipped cu.a.
0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 b.
Total activity Ci-0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 c.
Major nuclides (estimate t)
Cr-51 4
0 0
0 Mn-54 4
0 0
0 Fe-55 4
0 0
0 co-59 0
0 0
Co-60 t
0 0
0 d.
Container type N/A N/A N/A e.
Container volume cu.m.
N/A N/A N/A 4.
Irradiated Components a.
Number of shipments 0
0 0
0 b.
Mode of Transportation N/A N/A N/A c.
Destination N/A N/A N/A 5.
Solid waste Disposition a.
Number of Shipments 14 21 10 45
=
b.
Mode of Transportation Truck Truck Truck Number 14 21 10 c.
Destination Barnwell Barnwell Barnwell Number 14 21 10
=W Estimated total error i for spent resins, filter sludges, E
evaporator bottoms, etc. (July-Dec) 12%
Estimated total error t for dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc. (July-Dec) 14%
I-I 18
FIGURE 3.1 1 Estimated Cumulative Gamma Dose (in mrem) from the LaSalle Station for the period f
y January-December 1995
/
[250--
)
lsooleth labels Small figure - multiply by 10
Large figure multiply by 10
r 1
'00
.t s
\\- C.,..Jx,,,x.
7 f
50 l
w
/
e Pi
/!
10 w...
- ria,
/
N ris towo
)
Mor eities M
tilinois l
s i
{
s 100 50 i
i i
e
- ,qrJ
....... y g... D""'(W,
2
'i' 1
(
.,,,...,o, d,
/
- owie, 55 a g.a.
odolf o
23 -
0
?
'O
't ap ei 4
4 19 w
m
+c y
FIGURE 3.1-2 Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCi/m3) of Noble Gases from the LaSalle Station
- 500 for the period January-December 1995 j/
q 500
- - 250 ligg[eth labels f- *"
d
-g' Small figure multiply by 10 1
Large figure multiply by 10'
.t s 1D-M..'a
/
l
- ,.y 3
fi 500 250 u
5-i 9
gl
/
I 10 0 "U '*o E
-80 w
f Ottowo Morris g
g 500 %
[@'-(
I g
......... y u
g t3
'0 47 Ok..
l 50 j
g.....
streator
/
Owight
$5 l
A.;.a.
Odsll 5
to I S.
20mi 0
u, 20
FIGURE 3.1-3
[M gs#
Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCi/m3) of lodines from the LaSalle Station for y
the period January-December 1995 50 10 0 11ooleth Labels j- ),,,,,,
I 4
I Small figure - multiply by 10 psel 4
Large figure multiply by 10
,,,,,,,,,,,c, u.s..
10 0 t s
~
N f
0 2 '"i st 10 w.e,
[' ' ' ' '.
E so N
3 ottowo Morris o
R uors ines seneca Illinois
\\e
- l,
,........ v ei r,
t
'fo 47
- 5 a
f e
,, sir..i.,
M Dwight if Ane 55 l,,
\\
,0
% c, 2 -
o.
._,_._?
'l 2 '"'
21 l
.- -.. ~.
I FIGURE 3.1-4
[ m" 998 Estimated Total Concentrations (in POL';n3) d3o of Particulates from the LaSalle Station for the period January-December 1995 l
lsooleth Labels Small figure multiply by 10
d W
[quoi-d
.tses Large figure - multiply by 10-'
(
50 ""
,b
$woruununs Y
,.,,,,,.,,,,,,,iY/
\\
y qq s..
a 50 g
l 10 0
'/Y
[/*
9 2 *i g
/
....a o
/
fN j
g
- o...,
Ottowo
[be-O M or sailles Senece lilinois s
A
~
50 e
m y
s.
50 ove.
es tro a'
Wl l
i
~ 25 I "
os b
Dwight g
D 55 Aage Ae., /
ts -
0 5
to 15 20 mi
- u. _ >_. _u g,
22
TABLE 3.1-1 LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1995 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE -- 01/01/95 TO 12/31/95 CALCULATED 03/11/96 INFANT RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER
. QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 5.04E-09 2.79E-09 1.37E-05 6.39E-09 1.37E-05 (MRAD)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
BETA AIR 4.76E-10 8.35E-09 2.40E-06 3.86E-10 2.41E-06 (MRAD)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
TOT. BODY 3.79E-09 2.10E-09 1.03E-05 4.81E-09 1.03E-05 (MREM)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
SKIN 4.15E-09 6.34E-09 1.20E-05 5.19E-09 1.20E-05 (MREM)
(WSW )
(ESE )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
ORGAN 3.06E-03 2.48E-03' 7.28E-03 3.45E-03 1.63E-02 (MREM)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID THYRO 1D THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1995 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I INFANT' RECEPTOR
% OF APP I.
QTRLY 1ST QTR 21TD QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.00 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.04 0.03 0.10 0.05 15.0 0.11 THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.7 SEPTEMBER 1995 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 1
f 23
II TABLE 3.1-1 (continued)
LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1995 MAXIMUM DOSES RES'JLTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/95 TO 12/31/95 CALCULATED 03/11/96 CHILD RECEPTOR I
l 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 5.04E-09 2.79E-09 1.37E-05 6.39E-09 1.37E-05 (MRAD)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
BETA AIR 4.76E-10 8.35E-09 2.40E-06 3.86E-10 2.41E-06 (MRAD)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
TOT. BODY 3.79E-09 2.10E-09 1.03E-05 4.81E-09 1.03E-05 (MREM)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
SKIN 4.15E-09 6.34E-09 1.20E-05 5.19E-09 1.20E-05 (MREM)
(WSW )
(ESE )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
ORGAN 2.49E-03 1.09E-02 3.91E-02 9.82E-03 6.22E-02 (MREM)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1995 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I CHILD RECEPTOR
% OF APP I.
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.00 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.03 0.15 0.52 0.13 15.0 0.41 THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.7 SEPTEMBER 1995 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I
24
TABLE 3.1-1 (continued)
LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1995' MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/95 TO 12/31/95 CALCULATED 03/11/96 TEENAGER RECEPTOR 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TrPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 5.04E-09 2.79E-09 1.37E-05 6.39E-09 1.37E-05 (MRAD)
-(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
BETA AIR 4.76E-10 8.35E-09 2.40E-06 3.86E-10 2.41E-06 (MRAD)
(ESE )
(ESE-)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
TOT. BODY 3.79E-09 2.10E-09 1.03E-05 4.81E-09 1.03E-05 (MREM)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
SKIN 4.15E-09 6.34E-09 1.20E-05 5.19E-09 1.'20E-05 (MREM)
(WSW )
(ESE )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
ORGAN 1.75E-03 7.18E-03 2.55E-02 6.48E-03 4.09E-02 (MREM)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
THYROID GI_.LLI THYROID THYROID THYROID THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1995 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I TEENAGER RECEPTOR
% OF APP I.
QTRLY IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.00 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.02 0.10 0.34 0.09 15.0 0.27 THYROID GI_LLI THYROID THYROID THYROID l
RE3b TS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.7 SEPTEMBER 1995 I
ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 l
25
TAELE 3.1-1 (continued)
LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1995 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/95 TO 12/31/95 CALCULATED 03/11/96 ADULT RECEPTOR I
1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 5.04E-09 2.79E-09 1.37E-05 6.39E-09 1.37E-05 (MRAD)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
BETA AIR 4.76E-10 8.35E-09 2.40E-06 3.86E-10 2.41E-06 (MRAD)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
TOT. BODY 3.79E-09 2.10E-09 1.03E-05 4.81E-09 1.03E-05 (MREM)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
SKIN 4.15E-09 6.34E-09 1.20E-05 5.19E-09 1.20E-05 (MREM)
(WSW )
(ESE )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
ORGAN 2.01E-03 6.66E-03 2.34E-)2 6.18E-03 3.83E-02 (MREM)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE l (NNE )
(NNE )
THYROID GI_LLI T!:YROID THYROID THYROID THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 4995 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I ADULT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I.
1 QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF j
OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I 3J00( AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.00 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.03 0.09 0.31 0.08 15.0 0.26 THYROID GI_LLI THYROID THYROID THYROID RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.7 SEPTEMBER 1995 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I
l I
26
l l
TABLE 3.2-1 LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1995 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AQUATIC RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/95 TO 12/31/95 CALCULATED 03/11/96 ADULT RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH DOSE TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL
- JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC TOTAL 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 BODY INTERNAL 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 I
ORGAN GI_LLI LIVER GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI I
THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1995 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CFR 50 APP. I
% OF APP I.
I QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I TOTAL BODY (MREM) 1.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.0 0.00 CRIT. ORGAN (MREM) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 GI_LLI LIVER GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.7 SEPTEMBER 1995 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I
There were no liquid releases from LaSalle County Station during 1995.
I 27
TABLE 3.3-1 LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/95 TO 12/31/95 CALCULATED 01/27/96 1.
10 CFR 20.1301 (a)(1) Compliance Total Effective Dose Eqivalent, mrem /yr 2.75E-01 10 CFR 20.1301 (a) (1) limit mrem /yr 100.0
% of limit 0.27 Compliance Summary - 10CFR20 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
% of Qtr Qtr Qtr Qtr Limit TEDE 7.18E-02 5.68E-02 7.74E-02 6.89E-02 0.27 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995
{
l
)
28
t TABLE 3.3-1 (continued) 4 LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/95 TO 12/31/95 CALCULATED 01/27/96 2.
10 CFR 20.1301 (d)/40 CFR 190 Compliance Dose Limit
% of (mrem)
(mrem)
Limit Whole Body Plume 1.03E-05 (DDE)
Skyshine 2.51E-01 Ground 2.10E-04 Total 2.51E-01 25.0 1.01 Organ Dose Thyroid 2.40E-02 75.0 0.03 (CDE)
Gonads 2.35E-02 25.0 0.09 Breast 2.35E-02 25.0 0.09 Lung 2.35E-02 25.0 0.09 Marrow 2.35E-02 25.0 0.09 Bone 2.35E-02 25.0 0.09 j
Remainder 2.35E-02 25.0 0.09 CEDE 2.35E-02 TEDE 2.75E-01 100.0 0.27 j
RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 l
I 29
[
FIGURE 5.0-1
[
Revision 1.1 July 1994
[
e 15,
g 116-1 L 11 E IM a
\\ **
m.a N. ttd St.
[
em L 1151 L 115-2 1s11 e e L 103-1 L 103-L 1041 L 104-2 N
Wash Milaattori Pocid
[
m.1,14,3 s
s
\\.
,,\\\\\\O \\,
\\
[
' \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" '.
,:g\\' \\.-
\\
[
SN
[
~
\\r
- ::=
1.i. s
,.r,.... e::::
. 11,
.u
.e 1118 8 11 M 109 8 C 108 2 1SM
[
k 0
M M
M 89 1J taae r
M M
13 1J M IEnesseeere E TLD Location LASALLE COUNTY STATION INNER RING TLD LOCATIONS
[
Il Il FIGURE 5.0-2 Revision 1.1 July 1994 i
\\
Ottawa e
.a o F Marseilles a
South E-Ottawa swe' 8'"***
not a t 2osa/ \\
L aisa.
L zis4=
t,,,,, t,,,,,
gg e L-2144' l
8 L-2144
,I, gPlant L zisa.
L-21:4 =
g g g l[g Site Pmporty e ses.s Grand Ridge
- *8 Verona E
um M E1 se M EE3
- E Kinsman Ransom Koman Strestor ll
~
Grundy La Salle County County uvingston County a TLD Location E LaSalle Station g
e
""*"d*
LASALLE COUNTY STATION OUTER RING TLD LOCATIONS 31
Revision 1.1 July 1994 FIGURE 5.0-3 Ottaws o14 3
I"" Marseilles South Ottawa
.~
e
~
Senece i
M i
Y28 1
s.
S*
I,,,,,
g e13 Site Property j
8' Grand Ridge Verona i
Kinsman 11eRansom e12 8
i Koman Streator.
18' '
Grundy La Salle County County Air Sampling Location E LaSalto Station LASALLE COUNTY STATION FIXED AIR SAMLING SITES IA1 Nearsite No.1 L-08 Marseiues L 02 Nearsite No. 2 L-09 Grand Ridge IA3 Onsite No. 3 L-10 Streator L44 Nearsite No.4 L-11 Ransom IAS Onsite No. 5 L 12 Keran L-06 Nearsite No. 6 L-13 Route 6 at Gonnam Rd.
Remsion 1.1 JuPy 1994 I
l FIGURE 5.0-4 4
l.so 4
Il 2-Marsemes u.s.s f'
Ittin0/
4 31 8_-
a
- d0 32 e +35
,3y E20 e29
- 36 0 21 Rt.23
/
O 24 LSC8 4 St'atloa e 2 7 Rt.170 l
m 39 1
m38 316 I
1, LASALLE COUNTY STATION INCESTION AND WATERBORNE EXPOSURE PATHWAY SAMPLE LOCATIONS e
1 s
a s esses j
i 4.
~,
L-16 Lowery Dairy Fish L 19 Bettenhausen Dairy 1
5 Milk L-20 Cass Dairy L 21 Illinois River at Seneca L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake Near Recreation Area L-27 LSCS Onsite Well at Station G
Water L-28 Marseilles Well L-29 Seneca Well l
L-30 Ranson Well L-31 Ottawa Well L-32 Illinois State Park L-35 Marseilles Pool of Illinois River 1.SP-36 Illinois River Upstream of Discharge LSP-37 Illinois River Discharge L-38 Ricker Dairy Farm L 39 Village View Acres Dairy LSP40 Illinois River Downstream L-41 Burton Farm 33 I
TABLE 5.0-1 5m?
LaSalle Station t
g ec Radiological Environmental Monitoring j
s y
j 3
Locations 3
g L
g g
g 01 5
1 5@
5 5
a a
x a
8 3"
e 2
=
e 4
s V
E e
d m
o L-01 Nearsite No.1 0
0 L-02 Nearsite No. 2 0
0 L-03 Onsite No. 3 0
0 L-04 Nearsite No. 4 0
0 L-OS Onsite No. 5 0
0 L-06 Nearsite No. 6 0
0 L-07 Seneca 0
0 L-08 Marseilles 0
0 L-09 Grand Ridge 0
0 L-10 Steator 0
0 L-11 Ransom 0
0 L-12 Kernan 0
0 L-13 Route 6 at Gonnam Road 0
0 L-14 Ottawa 0
0 L-16 Lowery Dairy 0
L-19 Bettenhausen Dairy 0
L-20 Gass Dairy 0
L-21 Illinois River at Seneca O
L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake near Recreation Area 0
0 L-27 LSCS Onsite Well at Station 0
L-28 Marseilles Well O
L-29 Seneca Well 0
L 30 Ransom Well O
L-31 Ottawa Well 0
L-34 Downstream of Cooling Lake Discharge Structure 0
L-35 Marseilles Pool of Illinois River 0
LSP-36 Illinois River Upstream of Discharge O
LSP-37 Illinois River Discharge 0
L-38 Ricker Dairy Farm o
a b
L-39 Village View Acres Dairy 0
LSP-40 Illmois River Downstream 0
0 L-41 Burton Farma O
CENSUS Dairy Residence Livestock a Ricker Dairy Farm (L-38) went out of business in June of 1995 and was replaced by Burton Farm (L-41).
b V llage View Acres Dairy (L-39) went out of business in January of 1995.
34
[.
TABLE 5.0-2
(
LASALLE STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS
- 1. AIR SAMPI FRS Distance Direction
[.
Site Codea Location (miles)
(0) _
c L-01 Nearsite No.1 0.5-337 L-02 Nearsite No. 2 0.6
-25 L-03 Onsite No. 3 0.2 60 L-04 Nearsite No. 4 1.5 81 l
L-05 Onsite Station No. 5 0.3 115
[- -
L-07 Seneca 5.2 33 L-06 Nearsite No. 6 0.4 248 L-08 Marseilles 6.3 336 L-09 (C)
Grand Ridge 10.4 260
[
L-10 (C)
Steator 13.5 222 L-11 Ransom 6.0 177 L-12 (C)
Kernan 5.0 207
(
L-13 Route 6 at Gonnam Road 7.0 95 L-14 (C)
Ottawa 12.0 311 2.
ILDs a.
Same as No.1.
b.
SpecialTLDlocations Distance Direction
[
Site Code (miles)
(0)__
Inner Ring L-101-1,2 0.5 357 L-102-1,2 0.6 17 L-103-1,2 0.7 47 L-104-1,2 0.8 65
(
L-105-1,2 0.7 91 L-106-1,2 1.4 110 i
L-107-1,2 0.8 128 i
[.
L-108-1,2 0.5 156 L-109-1,2 0.6 178 L-110-1,2 0.6 205 L-111b-1,2 0.8 230
[
L-112-1,2 0.9 244 L-113a-1,2 0.8 262 L-114-1,2 0.9 288
(
L-115-1,2 0.7 310 L-116-1,2 0.6 330
{
a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.
r L
35 r
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LASALLE STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS 2.TLDs b.
SpecialTLD locations (continued)
Site Code (miles)
(OL Outer Ring L-201-3,4 4.0 0
L-202-3,4 3.6 23 L-203-1,2 4.0 56 L-204-1,2 3.5 78 L-205-1,2 3.5 102 L-205-3,4 5.1 90 L-206-1,2 4.3 125 L-207-1,2 4.5 150 L-208-1,2 4.5 170 L-209-1,2 4.0 192 L-210-1,2 3.3 216 g
L-212-1,2 4.0 255 g
L-213-3,4 4.9 270 L-214-3,4 5.1 291 L-215-3,4 5.0 320 L-216-3,4 5.0 338
- 3. hilLE Distance Direction Site Codea Location (mile)
Lowery Dairy 7.2 120 L-19 (C)
Bettenhausen Dairy 7.0 180 b
L-20 Gass Dairy 4.6 348 L-38 (C)
Ricker Dairy FarmC 7.6 213 L-39 (C)
Village View Acres Dairyd 10.5 232 L-41 (C)
Burton FarmC 7.5 359 a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.
b Additional dairy was not required by Technical Star.dards but was included to ensure that program has at least four milking stations. This is not a commercial dairy but a farm having milking cows for personst use.
c Ricker Dairy Farm (L-38) went out of business in June of 1995 and was replaced by Burton Farm (L-39).
i d V llap View Acres Dairy went out of business in January of 1995.
36
1 i
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued) l l
1 LASALLE STATION l
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS l
t l
\\
- 4. GROUND /WELL WATER Distance Direction Site Codea Location (miles)
(0)__
l L-27 LSCS Onsite Well at Station At Station L-28 Marseilles Well 7.0 326 L-29 (C)
Seneca Well 5.1 18 L-30 Ransom Well 6.0 191 i
L-31 Ottawa Well 12.8 304 L-32 Illinois State Park 6.5 326 1
- 5. SURFACE WATER Distance Direction Site Codea Location (miles)
(0)_
)
L-21 (C)
Illinois River at Seneca 4.0 22 L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake Near 0.3 112 Recreation Area LSP-40 Illinois River Downstream 5.5 345 i
l I
6.ELH Distance Direction Site Codea Location (miles)
(0)_
L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake 0.3 40 Near Recreation Area L-35 Marseilles Pool of Illinois River 6.5 326 LSP-36 (C)
Illinois River Upstream of Discharge 4.5 20 l
LSP-37 Illinois River Discharge 4.5 5
7.
SHORELINE SEDIMENTS Distance Direction Site Codea Location (miles)
(0)
L-34 Downstream of Cooling At Station Lake Discharge Structure LSP-40 Illinois River Downstream 5.5 345 a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.
l 37
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LASALLE STATION t
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSES I_ncation Collection Type of Frequency Sample Media Codea Site Frequency Analym of Analysis Remarks 1.
Airbome Onsite and Near Field Continuous Gross Beta Weekly On all samples.
Particulates operation Gamma Isot.
Quarterly On Quarterly composite from each locatim.
L-01 Nearsite No. I for one week L-02 Nearsite No. 2 Gamma Isot.
If gross beta in a sample exceeds 10 times the L-03 Onsite No. 3 yearly mean of control samples.
L-04 Nearsite No. 4 L-OS Onsite No. S Filter Weekly L-06 Nearsite No. 6 Exchange Far Field Continuous Gross Beta Weekly See footnote "b."
operation L-07 Seneca for one week Gamma Isot.
See footnote "b".
L-08 Marseilles If gross beta in a sample exceeds 10 times the le09 (C)
Grand Ridge Filter Weekly yearly mean of control samples.
L-10 (C)
Streator Exchange W
Kernan L-13 Route 6 at Connam Rd.
L-14 (C)
Ottawa 2.
Airbome Same as 1.
Near Field Weekly I-131 Weekly On allsamples.
Iodine Far Fiekt Biweekly I-131 Biweekly See footnote "b" 3.
Air Sampling Same as 1.
Test and Weekiy On all samplers Train Maintenance 4.
RD
- a. Same as 1.
Quarterly Gamma Quarterly Two sets of RD's at all air sampler locations. All TLDs are mead Quarterly.
b.1 101-1,2 Inner Rmg Quarterly Gamma Quarterly All TLDs are read Quarterly.
102-1,2 103-1,2 104-1,2 105-1,2 106-1,2 107-1,2 108-1,2 109-1,2 a Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C" in this a>Iumn. All other locations are indicators.
b Far-field samples are analyzed when near-field results are inconsistent with previous measurements and radioactivity is confirmed as ha ring its orgin in airborne effluents released from the station or at the discretion of the Emergency Preparedness Director.
E E
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LASALLE STATION -
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSES Location Collection Typeof Freouency Sample Media Codea Site Frequency Analysis of Analysis Remarks 4.
H.Dr.
L-110-1,2 (continued) 111b-1,2 112-1,2 113a-1,2 114-1,2 115-1,2 116-1,2 L-201-3,4 Outer Rmg Quarterly Gamma Quarterly AllTLDs are read Quarterly.
202-3,4 203-1,2 204-1,2 205-1,2,3,4 W
206-1,2 207-1,2 208-1,2 209-1,2 210-1,2 212-1,2 213-3,4 5.
Mdk L-16 (C) lowery Dairy Biweekly-I-131 Biweekly Onall samples. LLD 05pCi/L.
L-19 (C)
Bettenhausen Dairy May-October Gamma lsot.
Biweekly b
L-20 Gass Dairy C
L-38 (C)
Ricker Dairy Farm Monthly-I-131 Monthly Onallsamples. LLD- 0.5pCi/L d
L-39 (C)
Village View Acres Dairy November-April Gamma Isot.
Monthly L-41 (C)
Burton FarmC 6.
Ground /Well L-27 LSCS Onsite Well at Station Quarterly Camma isot.
Quarterly On alisamples.
Water L-28 Marseilles Well Quarterly Tritium Quarterly On ailsamples.
L-29 (C)
Seneca Well L-30 Ransom Well L-31 Ottawa Well L-32 IllinoisState Park
- Control (background) locations are denoted by a "C" in this column. All other locations are indicators.
b Additional dairy was not required by Technical Standards but was included to ensure that the program has at least four milking stations. This is not a wr... xkl dairy but a farm having milking cows for personal use.
c Ricker Dairy Farm (L-38) went out of business in June of 1995 and was replaced by Burton Farm (IAI).
d V llage View Acres Dairy (L-39) went out of business in January of 1995.
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LASALLE STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSES incation Collection Typeof Frequency a
Sample Media Code Site Frequency Analysis of Analysis Remarks 7.
Surface Water L-21 (C)
Ilknois River at Weekly Gamma Isot.
Monthly On monthly composites from each Seneca location.
L-24 LSCS Coolmg Lake Tntium Quarrterly On quarterly composites from each LSP-40 tilinois River Downstream location.
8.
Fish L-24 ISCS Cooling Lake Semiannually Gamma Isot.
Semiannually On edable portions only. At least L-35 Marseilles Poolof two species.
Illinois River LSP-36 (C)
Illinois River Upstream of Discharge LSP-37 Illinois River Discharge 9.
Shoreline L-34 Downstream of Semiannually Gamma Isot.
Semiannually On all Samples.
Sediments Cooling Lake LSP-40 Illinois River Downstream e
10.
Land Use Census Milch Animals
- a. Site boundary to 2 miles
- a. Enumeration by Annually During grazing season.
a door to door or equivalent counting technique.
- b. 2 miles to 5 miles
- b. Enumerationby Annually During grazing season.
using referenced information from county agricultural agents or other reliable sources.
- c. At dairies listed in Item 5.
- c. Inquire as to Annually During grazing season.
feeding practicts:
- 1. Pasture only.
- 2. Feed and chop only.
- 3. Pasture and feed:if both, ask farmer to estimate fraction of food from pasture:
<25%, 25-50%, 50-75%
or >75%.
I i
Nearest In all 16 sectors up to 5 miles Annually i
Residence Census I
a Control (back nd) locations are denoted by a n this rloc re rs.
. TABLE 5.0-3 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PRCSRAM QUARTERLY
SUMMARY
Name of Facility bSalle Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-373. 50-374 locationof Facihty bSalleCounty. Illinois Reporting Period 1st Ouarter 1995 (County, State)
Sample Type and Indicator I.ocation with Highest Control Number of Type Numberof Locations Ouarterly Mean locations Non-routine (Units)
Analyses LLD 8
Mean Mean*
N'S Mean Range Location Range Range Air PartKulates Gross Beta 78 0.01 0.022 (78/78)
L-02,Nearsite No. 2 0.023 (13/13)
None 0
3 (pCi/m )
(0.012-0.035) 0.6 mi @ 11*
(0.012-0.035)
Gamma Spec.
6 0.01
<LLD None O
Airborne lodine I-131 78 0.10
<LLD None 0
3 (pCi/m )
Gamma Background Gamma Dose 92 9.7 16.1 (84/84)
L-205-2 20.2 (1/1) 14.9 (8/8) 0 ULDs)(mR/Qtr.)
(12.8-20.2) 35 mi e 102*
(14.2-16.2)
A Mdk 1-131 10 05
<LLD
<LLD 0
(pCi/L)
Gamma Spec.
10 Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 20
<LLD
<LLD 0
Surface Water Gamma Spec.
6 (pCi/L)
Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 10
<LLD J
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 20
<LLD
<LLD 0
Tritium 2
200
<LLD L-21, Illinois River at 370 (1/1) 370(1/1)
O Seneca 4.0 mi @ 22' Well Water Gamma Spec.
6 (pCi/L)
Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 20
<LLD
<LLD 0
Tritium 6
200
<tLD
<LLD 0
- Mean and range bael on detertaNe measurements only. Fractions indicated in parenthenes.
h TABLE 5.0-4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY
SUMMARY
Name of Facility _12Salle Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-373. 50-374 locationof Facility 12SalleCounty. Illinois Reporting Period 2nd Ouarter 1995 (County, State)
Sample Type and Indicator Location with thghest Control Number of Type Number of I.ncations Ouarterly Mean locations Non-routme a
Ws (Units)
Analyses LLD Meana Mean Mean location Range Range Range L_ot, Nearsite No.1 0.017 (13/13)
None 0
b Air Particulates Cross Beta 78 0.01 0.017 (78/78) 3 (0.011 0.033) 0.5 mi @ 337*
(0.012-0.028)
(pCi/m )
Camma Spec.
6 0.01
<LLD None O
<LLD None 0
3 (pCi/m )
Gamma Background Gamma Dose 92 9.7 16.3 (84/84)
L-210-1, 17.9 (1/1) 15.0 (8/8) 0 (ILDs) (mR/Qtr.)
(13.8-17.9) 3.3 mi @ 216*
(14.3-16.3)
Milk I-131 17 0.5
<LLD
<LLD 0
(pCi/L)
Gamma spec.
17 Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 20
<LLD
<LLD 0
Surface Water Gamma Spec.
6 (pCi/L)
Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 20
<LLD
<tLD 0
Tritium 2
200 215 (1/1)
L-21, Illinois River at 307 (1/1) 307 (1/1) 0 Seneca 4.0 mi @ 22*
- Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
b 3
All locations had identical means of 0.017 pCi/m. Only L 01 is detailed in this summary.
M M
M M
M M
TABLE 5.0-4 (continued)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY SUMM ARY Name of Facility LaSalle Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-371 50-374 locationof Facility LaSalleCounty. Illinois Reporting Penod 2nd Ouarter 1W5 (County, State)
Sample Type and Indicator Location with Highest Control Number of Type Number of locatkms Ouarterly Mean locations Non-routine a
a Results (Units)
Analyses LLD Mean Mean Mean Range location Range Range L
WellWater Gamma Spec.
6 (pCi/L)
Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 20
<LLD
<LLD 0
Tritium 6
200
<LLD
<LLD 0
l Bottom Sediments Gamma Spec.
1 (pCi/g dry)
Cs-134 0.2
<LLD None 0
[
t Cs-137 0.2
<LLD None 0
Other Gammas 0.2
<LLD None 0
Fish Gamma Spec.
17 (pCi/g wet)
Cs-134 0.1
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 0.1
<LLD
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 0.2
<LLD
<LLD 0
- Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
TABLE 5.0-5 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY
SUMMARY
Name of Facihty 12Salle Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-373. 50-374 Locationof Facility 12SalleCounty. IUinois Reporting Period 3rd Ouarter 1995 (County, State)
Sample Type and Indicator Location with liighest Control Number of Type Number of Locations Ouarterly Mean locations Non-routine (Units)
Analyses LLD a
Mean Meana Results Mean Range Location Range Range b
0.017 (77/78)
L-06, Nearsite No. 6 0.026 (13/13)
None 0
Air Particulates Gross Beta 78 o.og 3
(pCi/m ;
(0.014-0.054) 0.2 mi @ 248' (0.015-0.040)
Gamma Spec.
6 0.01
<LLD None O
Airbome lodine I-131 78 0.10
<LLD None 0
3 (pCi/m )
A Gamma Background Gamma Dose 92 9.7 16.6 (84/84)
L-102-1, 18.8 (1/1) 14.8 (8/8) 0 A
ULDs)(mR/Qtr.)
(13.9-18.8) 0.6 mi @ l7*
(13.9-16.9)
Milk I-131 18 0.5
<LLD
<LLD 0
(pCi/L)
Gamma Spec.
18 Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 10
<tLD
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 20
<LLD
<LLD 0
Surface Water Gamma Spec.
6 (pCi/L)
Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 20
<LLD
<LLD 0
Tritium 2
200 212 (1/1)
L-21. Illinois River at 366 (1/1) 366 (1/1)
O Seneca 4.0 mi @ 22*
- Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
b 3
One (1) result was excluded in the determination of LLD for gross beta. Higher than normal LLD (<0.019 pCi/m ) resulted from low volume due to a blown fuse.
E E
E E
.l)'
,I 1
e f
n oi rt S mrM eu b o 0
0 0
0 u n NoN l
n*
s o
e r o ng D D D D L L L L t i a n nt e oc a
L L L L a
CoMR l
YR 4
A 7
5 M
3 9
9 0
1 n
M 5
ae r
eg U
te Man S
3 r
Y 7
a R
3 u
L
- O t
R 0
s 5
e E
d h
T r
n R
o3 ig a A
N HeM U
d h
te o t ly Q
ki iwr r
c e e
M oP nt
)
A Dg ioa r
d R
itn u
t e
G aO r
c u
O o
o n
n R
p l
o P
e it i
R tn G
ac N
o I
o c
R n
l o
s
(
O i
ne t
s 5
IN S
o h
T a
t i
e 0
n r
i t
O e
l n
M w
Il
)
e 5
e r
o a
L A
ty ta p
E L
P t
r s S.
on* e D D D D in r
n o ng B
T a
u t
e o
y ai t
ct an L
L L
L d
A N
l C
n inoMR t
a ea L
L L L e
E c
dc u
T M
N l
C d
e u
a a
ic l
o I L N
e O
2 i
R ll s
(
n a
I S
s t
n V
2 o
1 y
i N
l t
t i
c E
yi a
c A
it r
L licf a
F.
F D
0 0
0 0
C a o L
F L
2 ly 0
1 1
2 I
n G
n f
o o
O oi s
L et t
a O
mc n
I a o e
L m
D N
6 6
e A
r c
R usae m
f s
dos a
le m
nr e m
a b
ae s c
y e
bl t
e p
a c
pma S
G e
n yuA a
4 7
te 3
3 re m d
TN m
1 1
h u
m s
s t
i on a C C O itr G
T d
esa beg r
n e) lppi W/
d a
e
)
taL r
s et i
m yn l C n
aTU a
lep S
(
n W(
aeM ll ll
TABLE 5.0-6 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUAR ERLY
SUMMARY
Name of Facihty _ l_aSalle Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-373. =0-374 location of Facility IMalleCounty. Ilhnois Reporting Penod 4th Ouarter 1995 (County, State) i Sample Type and Indicator Location with Highest Control Number of Type Number of locations Ouarterly Mean locations Non-routine a
Results (Units)
Analyses LLD 8
Mean Mean Mean Range location Range Range Air Particulates Cross Beta 70 0.01 0,026 (60/60)
L-04, Nearsite No. 4 0.028 (4/4) 0.027 (10/10) 0 3
(0.008-0.048) 15 mi @ 81*
(0.017-0.044)
(0.017-0.039)
(pCi/m )
Gamma Spec.
6 0.01
<LLD None O
Airborne hxtine 1-131 70 0.10
<LLD None 0
3 (pCi/m )
A Gamma Background Gamma Dose 92 9.7 16.0 (84/84)
L-113A-1, 17.8 (1/1) 14.6 (8/8) 0 (TLDs) (mR/Qtr.)
(13.1-17.8) 0.8 mi @ 262*
(13.8-16.4)
Milk I-131 6
0.5
<LLD
<LLD 0
(pCi/L)
Camma Spec.
6 Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 20
<LLD
< LID 0
Surface Water Gamma Spec.
7 (pCi/L)
Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 20
<LLD
<LLD 0
Tritium 3
200 373 (2/2)
L-24, LSCS Cooling 383 (1/1) 247 (1/1) 0 (363-383)
- Lake, 0.3 mi @ 122*
- Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
M M
M M
M
TABLE 5.0-6 (continued)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY
SUMMARY
Name of Facihty LaSalle Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-373. 50-374 locationof Faality 12SalleCounty. Illinois Reporting Period 4th Ouarter 1995 (County, State)
Sample Type and Indicator Location with Highest Control Number of Type Number of locations Ouarterly Mean Locatkms Non-routine a
a Results (Units)
Analyses
.LLD Mean Mean Mean Range Location Range Range Well Water Gamma Spec.
6 (pCi/L)
Cs-134 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 10
<LLD
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 20
<LLD
<LLD 0
Tritium 6
200
<LLD
<LLD 0
4N Bottom Sediments Gamma Spec.
2 (pCi/g dry)
Cs-134 0.2
<LLD None O
Cs-137 0.2
<LLD None 0
Other Gammas 0.2
<LLD None 0
Fish Gamma Spec.
21 (pCi/g wet)
Cs-134 0.1
<tLD
<LLD 0
Cs-137 0.1
<LLD
<LLD 0
Other Gammas 0.2
<LLD
<LLD 0
- Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
...~.
1r/\\f3LE 5.1-1 Common ealth Edison company Daten 27-MAR-96 Enytroamental Site Report for LaSalle Pagen 1
Gamma Radiation Measured in mR by TLDs Site Description Guarter !
Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 1995 1995 1995 1995
- 1. lir.lCATOR LOCAf!ONS.
!? 2
- 5.2 14.4 L-04 NE AASif E NO. 4 15.3 15.1 16.0 15.4 L-05 DNSITE NO. 5 16.0 16.1 16.3 17.1 L-06 PEAASITE NO. 6 16.4 16.3
.6.9 16.2 L -07 SENECA 16.1 16.3
' 6.6 16.0 L-08 MARSE!LLES 16.3 16.1 6.8 15.7 L-11 RANSOM 13.8 14.1
- .4.5 13.1 L-13 ROUTE 6 14.5 15.1 16.6 15.1 Air Sampler Mean 1 S.D.
15.5 t 0.9 15.6 1 0.9 16.1 g 0.8 15.6 1 1.1 Annual Air Sampler Mean 1 S.D.
15.7 t 0.9 i
- b. Inner Ring (100 Seriest L-101-1 16.8 16.3 17.4 16.1 L-101-2 15.3 16.6 16.7 15.5 L-102-1 17.5 17.9 18.6 17.3 L-LO2-2 16.6 17.1 18.8 18. 2 L-LO3-1 15.9 16.5
- 6.8 u6.3 L-,03-2 16.0 16.2
,7.4 16. 2 L-. 04-1 16.4 16.2 7.4 L5.7 L- (4 -2 15.9 17.7
.7.3 5.3 L-LO5-1 17.7 16.7
- 8.0
- l. 7.1 L-' 05-2 17.3 17.1 18.7 17.1 L- 06-1
- 5.4 15.7
- 6.4 15.5 L- (4-2
.5.8 16.2
.6.8 15.2 6.5 16.6
,7.6 16.9 L- 07-1
.16.7 16.5
,7.1 16.6 L-107-2 L-108-1 16.5 L6.8 u?.7 16.7
~4.3
. 4.0 13.9 3.2 L-108-2 L-109-l
,6.6
- 6.5 17.8 L6.1 L-109-2
,6.8 7.2 18.8 L6.4 L-ll0-l 16.4 16.9 17.8 L6.1 L-Ito-2 16.8 17.2 18.1 L6.5 L-lilB-1 16.1 16.6 17.3 L6.6 L-illB-2 16.4 16.4 17.0 16.9 L-112-1 15.7 15.5 16.5 L6.6 i
48 l
l
i TABLE 5.1-1 (continued)
Dates 27-MAR-M Environmental Site Reccrt for LaSalle Pages 2 1
Site Description Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 1995 8995 1995 8995 l
- 6. Inner Ring (100 Series) i L-ilf-2 16.4 16.9 17.2 16.7 L*ll34-1 17.3 17.5 17.6
,7.3 l
L:lliai' 12:2 1:8 11:1 1:1 L-il4-2 16.7 7.0 17.3 6.2 I
L*ll5-l 14.8
.5.3 14.5
.6.0 I
L-Il5-2 13.6 1 4.6 14.4
.. 4.0 4.0
.4.8 15.1 t
L-ll6-1 14.4 L-116-2 14.4
- ,4.4 14.6 14.6 Inner Ring Mean i S.D.
16.2 t 1.0 16.4 1 0.9 17.0 1 1.2 16.2 g 1.1 Annual Inner Ring Mean i S.D.
16.4 1 1.1
)
l
- c. Outer Ring (200 Sernes) 14.1 15.2 3.2 l
L-201-3
.2.8 L-201-4 6.0 16.6 16.9
,6.5 L-202-3
.4.0 13.8 14.4
.4.6 L-202-4
,4.2 14.5 15.0 e
.4.3 i
L-203-1
-,5.8 16.3 16.0
.5.8 L-203-2 6.2 16.3 17.1 6.4 L-204-I l5.8
' 6.3 17.2 6.5 L-204-2 15.5 7.2
' 6.
6.0 L-205-1 16.6 6.6
- 6.
6.4 L-205-2 20.2
.6.3
.6.5 6.3 L-205-3 15.8 6.5
. 6.2 l 6.2 1
L-206-1 16.6 4.6
' 5.4
,5.6 L-205-4 15.4 5.8 7.2 15.8 i
l L-206-2 16.1
.6.7 6.7 16.5 L-207-5 16.4 17.6 16.3 16.2 i
L-207-2
- ,5.3 15.9 16.1 15.6 r
L-208-I h6.6 17.0 16.2 16.0 I
L-208-2
- ,6.3 17.0 16.9 16.5 15.7 15.8 15.8 L-209-1
',5.9 16.5 16.1 16.4 L-209-2 6.2 L-210-1
- i7.3
- 7.9 1.8 17.4 L-210-2 17.4
' 7.3 17.3 17.5 L-212-1 17.4 7.0 16.9 16.1 L-212-2 16.8
,,7.0 16.6
- .6.4 L-213-3
'5.6
- 5.8 14.9 5.2 L-213-a 15.6 15.5 15.7 15.0 L-214-3 16.0
.5.9 16.2 5.6 L-214-4 16.1
- i7.0 15.9
,5.1 16.9
,7.1 L-215-3 16.4
',6.3 L-215-4 16.9 7.1 17.6
,;7.0 L-216-3 16.9 l,7.0 16.9
- .6.5 l
L-216-4 16.8 16.6 16.5 16.2 Outer Ring Mean i S.D.
16.2 1 1.2 16.4 1 0.9 16.3 1 0.3 16.0 1 0.9 Annual Outer Anng Mean 1 S.D.
16.2 1 1.0
- j INDICATOR LOCATION ITAN 1 S.D.
16.1 t 1.1 16.3 1 1.0 16.6 1 1.1 16.0 1 1.0 l
Annual INDICATOR LOCAi!ON MEdde t S.D.
16.2 t 1.0 II. CONTROL LOCAf!ONS (2 TLDs per location)
L-09 GAAND R1DGE 14.9 15.1 14.7
- 4.3 L-10 STEEATOR 14.2 14.3 13.9
' 3.3 L-12
- EANAN 14.2 14.4 14.0
' 3.8 L-14 OTTAWA 16.2 16.3 16.9 6.4 e CONTROL LOCATION Mean t S.D.
14.9 1 1.0 15.0 1 0.9 14.8 t 1.4 14.6 1 1.3 Annual CONTROL LOCAfl0N Mean 1 S.D.
14.3 t 1.0
[
III. SPECIAL INTEREST LOCATIONS (1 TLD per toCation)
L-304-1 LEASED FARM LAND 17.2 18.0 18.1 17.6 L-305-1 BOAT RAMP 14.1 14.4 84.7 14.5 L-310-1 NGET E4J1LDING 16.8 18.1 17.2 17.1 L-316-1 LEASED FARM LAND 16.7 16.3 17.4 16.9 SPECI AL INTEREST LOCATION Mean i S.D.
16.2 1 1.4 16.7 1 1.7 16.9 t 1.5 16.5 1 1.4 Annual SPECIAL INTEREST LOCAf!ON Mean i S.D.
16.6 t 1.4 COMMENTS: "a* Indicates lost dosimeter. A portion of the Dose was estimated.
"e-Indicates edited dostmeter. The original Dose was replaced with an estimated value.
I 49
APPENDIX II METEOROLOGICAL DATA 50
(
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1995 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET
(
WIND SPEED (in mph)
DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
O O
O O
O NNE O
O O
O O
O O
NE O
O O
O O
O O
[
ENE O
O O
O O
O O
{
E O
O O
O O
O O
ESE O
O O
O O
O O
(
SE O
O O
O O
O O
SSE O
O O
O O
O O
[
S 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
SSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
SW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
[
WSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
W 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
WNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NW 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
NNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
{
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
0 51
_ - ~.
4 LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1995 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
O O
O O
O NNE O
O 3
0 0
0 3
NE O
O 1
0 0
0 1
ENE O
O O
O O
O O
E O
O O
O O
O O
ESE O
O O
O O
O O
SE O
O O
O O
O O
SSE O
1 0
0 0
0 1
S 0
1 2
0 0
0 3
j SSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
SW 0
1 0
1 1
0 3
WSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
I,l W
0 0
0 0
3 0
3 WNW 0
0 0
0 1
4 5
I NW 0
0 0
1 1
2 4
NNW O
O O
O 1
0 1
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
3 6
2 7
6 24 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
0 I
52
[
[
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1995 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET
(
WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL
{
N O
1 1
1 0
0 3
NNE O
O 2
0 0
0 2
NE O
1 1
0 0
0 2
[
ENE O
O 1
0 0
0 1
{
E O
O O
O O
O O
ESE O
O O
O O
O O
[
SE O
O O
2 0
0 2
SSE O
O 1
0 0
0 1
[
S O
O O
1 0
0 1
SSW 0
0 0
2 4
0 6
SW 0
1 3
0 2
0 6
(
WSW 0
3 0
1 1
0 5
W 0
0 0
3 3
0 6
WNW 0
0 0
4 8
8 20 NW 0
2 0
9 5
3 19 NNW 0
0 0
7 2
0 9
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
8 9
30 25 11 83
{
Houro of calm in this stability class:
0 (Hoursofmissingwindmeasurementsinthisstabilityclass:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
0 53
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1995 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
2 3
20 30 18 5
78 NNE 1
12 31 36 6
5 91 NE O
10 17 13 14 0
54 ENE 2
8 7
20 24 4
65 E
4 15 14 24 15 5
77 ESE O
4 8
21 8
1 42 SE 1
3 6
6 12 14 42 SSE O
3 2
8 4
8 25 S
0 4
4 2
13 11 34 SSW 1
0 2
7 14 16 40 SVI 1
4 5
2 3
5 20 W'3W 0
4 3
22 11 8
48 W
0 5
18 35 13 23 94 WNW 0
7 21 54 37 78 197 NW 0
10 24 35 34 32 135 NNW 0
3 18 33 33 28 115 VARIABLE O
1 0
0 0
0 1
TOTAL 12 96 200 348 259 243 1158 Hours of calm in this stability class:
O Hours of missing wind measurements in tnis stability class:
8 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
0 54 I
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1995 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O 4
6 9
6 2
27 NNE 1
4 11 2
7 8
33 NE O
5 10 4
2 0
21 ENE 1
1 9
12 3
0 26 E
O O
4 16 4
4 28 ESE O
O 5
9 14 24 52 SE O
1 2
2 5
3 13 SSE O
O 1
2 3
0 6
S O
O 2
2 5
24 33 SSW O
3 1
2 14 27 i
SW 0
3 2
5 i.
23 44 WSW 0
3 4
6 18 6
37 W
0 5
2 19 27 13 66 WNW O
4 12 21 29 7
73 i
NW 0
4 19 25 8
13 69 NNW O
3 16 13 5
0 37 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 2
40 106 143 154 141 592 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
4 Hours of missin9 stability measurements in all stability classes:
0 55
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1995 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
4 0
1 0
5 NNE 1
0 3
1 0
0 5
NE O
O O
O O
O O
ENE 1
0 1
2 1
0 5
E 1
0 2
1 2
0 6
ESE 1
1 2
3 7
9 23 SE 1
2 4
2 3
2 14 SSE O
2 6
1 0
0 9
S 0
6 1
0 0
13 20 SSW 0
0 0
2 3
19 24 SW 0
0 0
0 1
15 16 WSW 1
1 1
4 3
8 18 W
0 0
3 4
3 2
12 WNW 0
1 1
8 4
0 14 NW 0
1 2
4 1
0 8
NNW 0
0 1
2 5
0 8
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 6
14 31 34 34 68 187 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
0 56
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1995 l
STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET l
l WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND N
O O
O O
O O
O NNE O
2 0
0 0
0 2
i NE O
1 0
0 0
0 1
ENE O
2 0
0 0
0 2
E 1
1 3
0 0
0 5
ESE O
O O
1 0
1 2
SE O
1 0
2 0
0 3
SSE O
O 1
2 8
5 16 S
0 0
0 5
3 16 24 SSW 0
0 0
0 0
23 23 SW 0
0 0
0 0
4 4
WSW 1
0 0
3 2
1 7
W 0
1 0
0 0
1 2
WNW 0
1 0
0 0
1 2
NW 0
1 4
0 0
0 5
NNW 0
0 2
3 0
0 5
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 2
10 10 16 13 52 103 l Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 l Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 jHours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
0 57
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1995 i
STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
I WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
O 1
0 0
1 o
NNE O
O 4
1 0
0 5
NE O
O 6
2 0
0 8
ENE O
O O
5 0
0 5
E O
O O
O O
O O
ESE O
O O
O O
O O
SE O
O O
O O
O O
I SSE O
O O
O O
O O
S O
O O
O O
O O
SSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
SW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
WSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
W 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
WNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
0 10 9
0 0
19 I
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing st abilit y measurement s in all st abilit y classes:
11 58 s
eis-m LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1995 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
I WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET
(
WIND SPEED (in mph)
I WIND DIRECTION O.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
1 1
0 0
2 NNE O
2 8
5 0
0 15 NE O
2 4
0 0
0 6
ENE O
O 1
0 0
0 1
E O
O 1
0 0
0 1
ESE O
O 1
0 0
0 1
SE O
O O
O O
O O
SSE O
O O
2 1
0 3
S 0
0 1
2 2
0 5
SSW 0
1 1
8 0
0 10 SW 0
0 3
1 0
0 4
h WSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
W 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
[
WNW 0
0 0
0 1
3 4
NW 0
0 0
0 6
1 7
NNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
[
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
{
TOTAL 0
5 21 19 10 5
60 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0
[ Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
11 59
l l
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION I,
PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1995 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL l
l N
O O
4 1
0 0
5 l
NNE O
1 4
0 0
0 5
NE O
2 7
3 0
2 14 ENE O
O 3
1 1
1 6
E O
O 1
2 2
0 5
ESE O
O 1
0 1
0 2
SE O
2 1
0 0
0 3
SSE O
O 3
6 0
0 9
S 0
0 5
4 4
0 13 SSW 0
2 4
6 2
0 14 SW 0
4 6
8 0
0 18 WSW 0
0 6
2 0
1 9
W 0
1 0
1 1
4 7
WNW 0
0 0
3 8
5 16 NW 0
0 0
3 4
2 9
NNW 0
0 1
1 0
1 3
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
12 46 41 23 16 138 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 l
Hours of missing stabi1ity measurements in al1 stabi1ity ciasses:
11 I
60
l LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1995 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL l
N O
8 3
9 3
0 23 NNE O
12 18 18 8
1 57 NE 3
16 57 61 10 9
156 ENE O
13 23 30 21 22 109 E
2 5
27 14 12 21 81 ESE 1
4 11 14 7
19 56 SE O
3 11 4
4 11 33 SSE O
2 5
8 1
0 16 S
1 3
7 8
5 8
32 SSW 0
2 10 8
3 9
32 SW 0
3 7
14 6
16 46 WSW 2
6 16 12 6
32 74 W
0 8
19 14 6
28 75 WNW 0
5 14 13 21 36 89 NW 0
8 17 26 27 7
85 NNW 3
2 18 10 7
0 40 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 12 100 263 263 147 219 1004 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
14 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
11 61
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1995 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
E WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET E
WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O 3
9 4
6 0
22 NNE O
1 9
2 2
0 14 NE 1
8 10 10 0
0 29 ENE 2
4 17 19 5
0 47 E
O 7
8 11 11 11 48 ESE 2
6 5
11 13 36 73 SE 2
1 3
7 2
18 33 SSE 1
3 3
7 8
11 33 S
2 4
0 3
10 15 34 SSW 0
4 1
8 12 16 41 SW 0
0 7
14 7
9 37 WSW 0
2 11 12 2
8 35 W
0 2
6 7
10 5
30 WNW 1
2 7
12 12 9
43 NW 1
1 4
12 19 1
38 NNW 0
3 2
5 7
0 17 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 12 51 102 144 126 139 574 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
21 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
11 I
62
)
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1995 l
STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
1 0
4 3
8 NNE 3
0 0
1 0
0 4
NE 2
1 0
0 0
0 3
ENE O
1 4
0 2
0 7
l E
O 5
2 3
1 0
11 ESE O
4 3
2 3
1 13 SE O
6 3
7 4
3 23 SSE O
1 3
10 3
0 17 1
S 0
2 3
4 4
7 20 l
SSW 0
0 5
5 12 7
29 l
l SW 0
2 1
6 3
3 15 WSW 1
1 7
16 5
8 38 W
0 0
5 14 11 10 40 WNW 0
1 3
2 5
4 15 NW 0
0 4
7 9
2 22 NNW 0
2 1
7 2
0 12
' VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 6
26 45 84 68 48 277 Hours of calm i" this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
8 i
Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
11 l
i 63
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1995 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET l
WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
O O
O O
O NNE O
O O
O O
O O
i
]
NE 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
ENE O
O O
O O
O O
E O
O O
O O
O O
i ESE O
O O
O O
O O
SE O
O O
O O
O O
SSE O
O O
O 1
0 1
S 0
0 0
0 3
0 3
SSW 0
0 0
0 5
2 7
GW 0
1 1
0 1
1 4
WSW 0
0 0
0 2
0 2
W 0
0 0
1 3
3 7
WNW 0
0 0
3 7
4 14 NW 0
0 1
4 8
6 19 NNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 1
1 2
8 30 16 58 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
11 j
i 64
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER S1ATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET l
WIND SPEED (in mph) l WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
O O
1 0
1 1
NNE O
O O
O O
O O
NE O
O 1
0 1
0 2
ENE O
O O
O O
O O
E O
O O
O O
O O
ESE O
O O
O O
O O
SE O
O 2
0 0
0 2
SSE O
O 1
0 0
0 1
S 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
SSW 0
1 1
1 0
0 3
SW 0
0 0
3 0
0 3
WSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
W 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
WNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
1 5
4 2
0 12 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 l Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
l 0
Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 i
11 LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
4 3
2 0
9 NNE O
1 3
2 1
0 7
NE O
O 6
3 0
0 9
ENE O
O 4
1 0
0 5
E O
O O
O O
O O
ESE O
O O
O O
O O
SE O
O 7
0 0
0 7
SSE O
1 11 1
0 0
13 S
O 3
14 6
3 0
26 SSW 0
4 8
4 0
0 16 SW 0
3 13 8
0 0
24 WSW 0
1 3
5 2
0 11 W
0 1
3 3
4 1
12 WNW 0
1 0
0 5
3 9
NW 0
0 0
0 2
0 2
NNW 0
0 0
5 0
0 5
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
15 76 41 19 4
155 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 66
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
4 4
0 0
8 NNE O
1 5
0 0
0 6
NE O
1 0
1 1
0 3
ENE O
O 2
3 1
0 6
E O
O 3
0 0
0 3
ESE O
1 3
0 0
0 4
SE O
4 10 0
0 0
14 SSE O
4 12 0
0 0
16 S
1 9
3 4
4 1
22 SSW 0
3 8
3 1
1 16 SW 1
15 14 10 2
1 43 WSW 0
4 13 11 1
0 29 W
1 8
8 4
1 5
27 WNW 0
1 0
2 8
1 12 NW 0
0 1
2 5
1 9
NNW 0
0 4
15 0
0 19 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
I TOTAL 3
51 90 59 24 10 237 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0
[ Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 67
lI' LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph) g WIND g
DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
1 6
13 34 13 1
68 NNE 3
4 2
9 8
0 26 NE 1
2 7
10 1
0 21 ENE O
6 9
20 4
0 39 E
O 11 12 8
0 0
31 ESE O
14 21 4
0 0
39 SE 3
10 13 4
0 1
31 SSE 2
7 12 8
7 1
37 S
2 17 10 9
15 14 67 SSW 0
2 12 10 4
6 34 SW 4
7 12 20 11 1
55 WSW 1
11 27 18 5
1 63 W
1 13 9
8 2
5 38 WNW 1
14 13 10 5
2 45 l
NW 0
7 5
11 6
0 29
)
NNW 1
7 6
18 4
0 36 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
I TOTAL 20 138 183 201 85 32 659 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 f
Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 t
I l
68
)
(
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION i
PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET
[
WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL
{
N 1
2 1
13 5
0 22 NNE 1
3 4
11 4
0 23 NE 1
0 3
8 1
0 13
(
ENE 3
12 16 10 0
0 41
{
E 1
5 10 9
7 0
32 ESE 1
2 10 16 3
0 32
[
SE O
4 10 16 7
1 38 SSE O
8 6
9 10 6
39 S
0 11 9
10 9
18 57 SSW 1
4 6
9 15 23 58 SW 0
5 22 20 12 15 74
[
WSW 3
11 15 15 14 0
58 W
2 4
10 13 7
1 37 WNW 0
3 7
9 6
0 25 NW 0
3 5
8 4
1 21 NNW 0
2 2
6 5
0 15 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 14 79 136 182 109 65 585
{
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0
[' Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
5 Hours of-missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 69
_ _ _ _ - _ _ - =. -. _ - - - -
4 LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND l
DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O 2
3 3
1 0
9 NNE 1
0 1
1 0
0 3
I NE 2
1 2
0 0
0 5
ENE 1
1 1
0 0
0 3
E O
2 2
0 0
0 4
ESE 1
4 4
8 6
0 23 SE 1
1 9
16 6
2 35 SSE 2
6 8
9 2
5 32 S
O 2
6 17 3
8 36 SSW 0
1 13 20 18 9
61 2
SW 0
3 12 11 15 12 53 l
WSW 1
2 7
11 10 6
37 W
3 3
5 14 11 13 49 WNW 3
4 2
6 6
8 29 NW 1
3 4
8 0
0 16 NNW 0
0 3
4 1
0 8
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 16 35 82 128 79 63 403 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
10 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 I
70
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND.
DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
O O
O O
O NNE O
O O
O O
O O
NE O
O O
O O
O O
ENE O
O O
O O
O O
E O
O O
O O
O O
ESE O
O 1
0 2
0 3
SE O
O O
3 5
2 10 SSE O
O 4
5 2
5 16 S
O O
3 3
8 11 25 SSW 0
0 2
10 6
4 22 SW 0
0 3
12 0
3 18 WSW.
0 1
3 9
6 8
27 W
0 0
0 1
0 2
3 WNW 0
1 4
2 0
0 7
NW 0
0 4
4 0
0 8
NNW 0
0 0
0 2
0 2
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
2 24 49 31 35 141 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 l
71
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
O O
O O
O NNE O
O O
O O
O O
NE O
O O
O O
O O
ENE O
O 1
0 0
0 1
E O
O O
O O
O O
ESE O
O O
O O
O O
SE O
O O
O O
O O
SSE O
O O
O O
O O
S 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
SSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
SW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
WSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
W 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
WNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurer,ients in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 I
72
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
O O
O O
O NNE O
O O
O O
O O
NE O
O O
O O
O O
ENE O
O 1
0 0
0 1
E O
O O
O O
O O
ESE O
O O
O O
O O
SE O
O O
O O
O O
SSE O
O O
O O
O O
S 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
SSW 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
SW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
WSW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
W 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
WNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NNW 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
l VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
[
TOTAL 0
0 1
0 1
1 3
(
Hours of calm in this stability class:
0
} Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 73
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
E WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET E
WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O O
O O
O O
O NNE O
O O
O O
O O
NE O
O O
O O
O O
ENE O
O O
O O
O O
E O
O O
O O
O O
ESE O
O O
O O
O O
SE O
O O
O O
O O
SSE O
O O
O O
1 1
S 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
SSW 0
3 2
4 3
5 17 SW 0
2 2
4 5
3 16 WSW 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
W 0
0 0
0 0
4 4
WNW 0
0 0
0 4
2 6
NW 0
0 1
0 8
4 13 NNW 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
I TOTAL 0
5 6
8 21 21 61 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 74
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O 9
14 15 10 7
55 NNE O
3 1
0 8
11 23 1
NE O
7 18 9
24 3
61 ENE O
4 23 21 20 15 83 E
1 4
7 10 19 3
44 ESE 2
3 4
2 8
3 22 SE O
2 2
8 3
3 18 SSE 2
6 3
9 11 7
38 S
0 2
5 8
20 19 54 SSW 1
4 8
11 15 13 52 l
SW 0
8 4
10 6
5 33 WSW 2
1 2
7 16 20 48 W
0 1
10 25 47 73 156 WNW 0
6 19 47 63 82 217 NW 1
7 29 33 49 21 140 NNW 0
3 20 31 19 11 84 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 9
70 169 246 338 296 1128 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 i
75
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
O 7
3 11 7
1 29 NNE 2
4 8
4 1
0 19 I
NE 1
6 3
0 0
0 10 ENE 2
3 5
1 2
0 13 E
1 3
4 4
8 1
21 ESE 1
1 5
6 14 2
29 SE O
2 8
4 5
3 22 SSE 1
3 6
6 5
18 39 S
0 1
7 5
11 49 73 SSW 1
5 6
7 8
42 69 SW 1
3 8
6 7
20 45 WSW 2
1 3
4 4
12 26 W
1 3
5 7
18 7
41 WNW 0
2 3
17 18 35 75 NW 0
1 6
13 14 6
40 NNW 0
4 14 10 11 0
39 VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 13 49 94 105 133 196 590 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
3 Hours of mit sing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 76
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WINO DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N
1 5
5 10 3
0 24 NNE O
1 1
2 0
'O 4
NE O
O 1
0 0
0 1
ENE 2
0 0
0 0
0 2
E O
O O
4 0
0 4
ESE O
O 1
3 5
3 12 SE O
O O
3 1
2 6
SSE O
O 3
7 3
5 18 S
O 2
1 2
4 16 25 SSW 0
0 0
2 4
28 34 SW 1
0 3
3 10 11 28 WSW 0
1 7
8 4
2 22 W
1 0
1 2
15 17 36 WNW 0
0 1
7 13 17 38 NW 0
3 6
5 18 3
35 NNW 0
3 4
10 5
0 22 f
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
{-
TOTAL 5
15 34 68 85 104 311 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0
- Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class
O Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 77
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1995 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND
- i DIRECTION 0.8-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL l
N O
O 1
3 1
0 5
NNE O
O O
O O
O O
. l l
NE O
O O
O O
O O
ENE O
O O
O O
O O
E O
O O
O O
O O
2 ESE O
O O
O O
O O
a SE O
O O
O O
1 1
SSE O
O O
2 2
2 6
S O
O O
O 2
12 14 SSW 0
0 0
4 4
8 16 SW 0
1 7
2 8
17 35 WSW 0
1 2
0 1
1 5
W O
O O
1 5
1 7
WNW 0
1 1
0 9
0 11 NW 1
0 2
1 4
1 9
NNW 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
VARIABLE O
O O
O O
O O
TOTAL 1
3 13 13 37 43 110 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
1 78
r_--_---,____-,--,--__.
APPENDIX III LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES 79
LASALLE LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES Ex pected Collection Sample Typea Location Date Reason MI L-20 01-05-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-20 02-02-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-39 02-02-95 Went out of business in January, 1995.
MI L-20 03-02-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-20 04-06-95 Animal is dry.
AP/I L-13 04-20-95 No Electricity.
MI L-20 05-04-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-20 05-18-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-20 06-01-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-20 06-15-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-20 06-29-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-38 06-29-95 Went out of business in June,1995.
MI L-20 07-13-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-20 07-27-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-20 08-10-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-20 08-23-95 Animal is dry.
AP L-20 08-30-95 Air particulate filter missing from holder. No apparent evidence of tampering.
MI L-20 09-06-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-20 09-20-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-20 10-04-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-41 10-04-95 Animalis being used for breeding purposes.
MI L-20 10-18-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-41 10-18-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-41 11-01-95 Animal is dry.
MI L-41 12-05-95 Animal is dry.
SW L-21 12-12-95 Illinois River is frozen.
SW L-40 12-12-95 Illinois River is frozen.
Air Samoling Variancesb AP/AI L-05 03-02-95 Volume estimated.
AP/AI L-04 03-23-95 Volume estimated.
a AP/I = Air Particulate / Air Iodine.
b Air Sampling Variances are samples which have not been missed but indicate unusual sample results or factors which contribute to sample anomalies.
80
F LASALLE LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES Expected Collection Sample Typea Location Date Reason b
Air Samoling Variances (continued)
AP/AI L-04 08-17-95 Volume low; no discernible reason for low volume.
AP/AI L-04 08-23-95 Volume estimated; installed new timer.
AP/AI L-05 08-23-95 Volume low; no discernible reason for low volume.
AP/AI L-02 08-30-95 Volume low; no electricity; replaced blown fuse.
AP/AI L-06 09-20-95 Volume estimated.
AP/AI L-05 10-11-95 Flowrate outside 10%.
AP/AI L-06 11-21-95 Timer malfunction; estimated AP/AI L-10 12-19-95 Flowrate outside 10%.
a AP/I = Air Particulate / Air Iodine.
g b Air Sampling Variances are samples which have not been missed but indicate unusual 5
sample results or factors which contribute to sample anomalies.
I.
I!
I' 81
m APPENDIX IV MILCH ANIMALS, NEAREST LIVESTOCK, AND NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS I
b 6
82
{
LASALLE MILCH ANIMALS CENSUS,1995 A.
There is only one dairy farm within a 6.5 mile radius of LaSalle County Station.
B.
Sampling Locations
/
7 L-16 Lowery Dairy Farm l
8.2 miles @ 120 Number of cows - 105
(
Diet consists of: ground grain, hay and t.ilage; no pasture f
L-19 Robert Bettenhousen Farm 8.5 miles @ 180
{
Number of cows -50 Diet consists of: 5% or less pasture, ground grain, silage, and hay L-20 Gass Farm 4.6 miles @ 348 Number of cows - 1 Diet consists of: 50% pasture 25% ground grain 25% hay L-41 Burton Farm 7.5 miles @ 359 Number of cows - 1
{
Diet consists of: 50% pasture 50% feed f
I r
L 83 c
I LASALLE MILCH ANIMALS CENSUS,1995 (continued)
I L-38 Ricker Dairy Farma g
8.2 miles @ 213 E
Number of cows - 36 Diet consists of: 50% pasture 25% ground grain 25% hay L-39 Village View Acres Dairyb gl 10.4 miles @ 232*
E' Number of cows - 35 Diet consists of: 50% pasture i
25% ground grain 25% hay a Ricker Dairy Farm went out of business in June,1995. Census data is from 1994 M !ch E
Animals Census.
E b Village View Acres Dairy went out of business in January,1995. Census data is from 194 Milch Animals Census.
Census conducted by J. Benham on August 28,1995.
I I
84
LASALLE NEAREST LIVESTOCK CENSUS,1995 Nearest livestock of the LaSalle Station within a 6.5 mile radius.
Sector Direction Distance
-A N
4.0 miles B-NNE 1.7 miles C
NE 3.5 miles.
D ENE 3.1 miles E'
E None F
ESE None G
SE 4.7 miles H
SSE 4.7 miles
{
J S
None K
SSW None L
SW None M
WSW None N
W 3.0 miles P
WNW 3.0 miles Q
NW 4.0 miles R
NNW 4.6 miles Census conducted by J. Benham on August 28,1995.
r' I
85 f
LASALLE NEAREST RESIDENCE CENSUS,1995 Nearest resident of the LaSalle Station within a 6.5 mile radius.
Sector Direction Distance A
N 3.9 miles B
NNE 1.8 miles C
NE 2.1 miles D
ENE 3.3 nules E
E 3.2 miles F
ESE 1.4 miles G
SE 1.7 miles H
SSE 1.8 miles J
S 1.5 miles K
SSW 0.7 miles i
L SW 1.0 miles i
M WSW 1.5 miles l
N W
0.8 miles P
WNW 0.9 miles Q
NW 1.8 miles R
NNW 1.7 miles gl 5
Census conducted by J. Benham on August 28,1995.
l i
86
i i
1 l
1 APPENDIX V i
INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS l
l l
J i
1 l
87 l
i I
4 Apoendix V Interlaboratorv Comparison Program Results Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest Laboratory (formerly Teledyne Isotopes and Hazelton Environmental Services) has participated in interlaboratory comparison (crosscheck) programs since the formulation of it's quality control program in December 1971. These programs are operated-by agencies which supply environmental type samples (e.g., milk or water) containing concentrations of radionuclides know to the issuing agency but not to participant laboratories. The purpose of such a program is to provide an independent check on the laboratory's analytical procedures and to alert it to any possible problems.
Participant laboratories measure the concentration of specified radionuclides and report them to the Issuing agency. Several months later, the agency reports the known values to the participant laboratories l
and specifies control limits. Results consistently higher or lower than the known values or outside the control limits indicate a need to check the instruments or procedures used.
f The results in Table A-1 were obtained through participation in the environmental sample crosscheck pro 6 ram for milk, water, air filters, and food samples during the current year. This program is conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Intercomparison and Calibration Section, Quality Assurance
{
Branch, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Table A-2 lists results of the analyses on in-house " spiked" samples.
Table A-3 lists results of the in-house " blank" samples.
h Table A-4 lists results of the in-house " duplicate" program.
Out-of-limit results are explained directly below the result.
{
{
l
Table A-1.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's crosscheck program, comparison of EPA and Teledyne Brown a
Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest Laboratory results for various sample media'.
6 Concentration in pCi/L Lab Sample Date EPA Result' Control TBEESML Results Code Type Collected Analysis 1s, N=1 Limits i 2 Sigmad STW 723 Water Jan,1995 St-89 20.015.0 11.3 - 28.7 17.7 i 1.5;2.3 STW-723 Water Jan,1995 Sr-90 15.015.0 6.3 - 23.7 13.7 i 0.6;1.5 STW-724 Water Jan,1995 Gr. Alpha 5.015.0 0.0 - 13.7 4.310.6;0.8 STW 724 Water Jan,1995 Gr. Beta 5.015.0 0.0 - 13.7 4.7 i 0.6;0.9 STW-725 Water Feb,1995 I131 100.0 i 10.0 82.7 - 117.3 99.0 t 4.4;10.8 STW-726 Water Feb,1995 Ra-226 19.112.9 14.1 - 24.1 19.2 i 0.4;2.0 STW-726 Water Feb,1995 Ra-228 20.015.0 11.3 - 28.7 19.2 i 2.0;2.8 STW-726 Water Feb,1995 Uranium 25.513.0 20.3 - 30.7 24.9 i 0.2;2.5 STW-727 Water Mar,1995 H-3 7435.0 i 744.0 6144.2 - 8725.8 7460.0 i 87.2;1018.3 STW-728 Water Mar,1995 Pu-239 11.1 i 1.1 9.2 - 13.0 11.0 i 0.6;1.3 STW-729 Water Apr,1995 Gr. Alpha 47.5 i 11.9 26.9 - 68.1 41.710.6;5.1 STW-729 Water Apr,1995 Ra-226 14.9 i 2.2 11.1 - 18.7 13.410.5;1.4 STW-729 Water Apr,1995 Ra-228 15.8 i 4.0 8.9 - 22.7 13.1 i 2.4;2.8 STW-729 Water Apr,1995 Uranium 10.013.0 4.8 - 15.2 9.5 i 0.6; 1.1 STW-730 Water Apr,1995 Co-60 29.015.0 20.3 - 37.7 29.0 1.7; 4.5 STW-730 Water Apr,1995 Cs-134 20.015.0 11.3 - 28.7 17.311.2;2.7 STW-730 Water Apr,1995 Cs-137 11.015.0 2.3 - 19.7 11.0 i 1.0;1.9 STW-730 Water Apr,1995 Gr. Beta 86.6 i 10.0 69.3 - 103.9 74.8 i 3.2;11.9 STW-730 Water Apr,1995 Sr-89 20.015.0 11.3 - 28.7 17.0 i 0.0;1.7 STW-730 Water Apr,1995 Sr-90 15.015.0 6.3 - 23.7 12.7 1.2;1.7 STW-732 Water Jun,1995 Ra-226 14.8 i 2.2 11.0 - 18.6 14.7 i 0.3;1.5 STW-732 Water Jun,1995 Ra-228 15.0 i 3.8 8.4 - 21.6 11.9 i 0.6;1.4 STW-732 Water Jun,1995 Uranium 15.2 i 3.0 10.0 - 20.4 13.9 i 0.3;1.4 STW-735 Water Jul,1995 Gr. Alpha 27.516.9 15.5 - 39.5 16.4 i 2.4;3.1 STW-735 Water Jul,1995 Gr. Beta 19.4 5.0 10.7 - 28.1 16.8 i 1.0;2.8 STW-736 Wa ter Aug,1995 H-3 4872.0 i 487.0 4027.1 - 5716.9 4773.7 i 49.9;651.1 89
Table A-1.
U.S. Envirr nmental Protection Agency's crosscheck program, comparison of EPA and Teledyne Brown i
Engineeri g Environmental Services, Midwest Laboratory results for various sample media'.
Concentration in pCi/L" Lab Sample Date EPA Result' Control TBEESML Results Code Type Collected Analysis 1s, N=1 Limits 2 Sigmad Results obtained by Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the environmental sample crosscheck program operated by the Intercomparison and Calibration Section, Quality g;
Assurance Branch, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 3
- All results are in pCi/L, except for elemental potassium (K) data in milk, which are in mg/L; air filter samples, which are in pCi/ Filter; and food products, which are in mg/Kg.
- USEPA results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1s,1 determination) and control limits as defined by the EPA.
d Unless otherwise indicated, the TBEESML results are given as the mean i 2 standard deviations for three determinations. The numbers after the semi-colon are the Total Propagated Uncertainty of the result.
I I
1 Table A-2. In-house " spike" samples.
Concentration in pCi/L' Lab Sample Date Accepted Known TBEESML Results Code Type Collected Analysis Reiected Activity Control Limits" 2s, n=1' SPMI-205 Milk Jan,1995 Cs-137 A
49.4 35 4 - 63.4 51.217.5;9.1 SPMI 205 M11k Jan,1995. Sr 89 A
23.1 16.9-29.4 19.4 i 3.4;3.9 SPMI 205 Milk Jan,1995 St-90 A
28.1 22.4 - 33.9 26.2 t 1.3;2.9 SPAP-284 hir Filter Jan,1995 Cs-137 A
1.9 1.5 - 2.3 2.210.0;0.2 SPAP-284 Air Filter Jan,1995 I-131(g)
A 1.9 1.52.3 2.210.0;0.2 SPW-286 Water Jan,1995 H-3 A
40871.0 29852.0- 51890.0 40929.9 5594.5;6931.9 SPW-289 Water Jan,1995 Co-60 A
247.5 194.0- 301.0 250.5 i 14.1;28.7 SPW-289 Water Jan,1995 Cs-134 A
321.3 256.7-385.9 290.5 i 14.4;32.4 SPW-289 Water Jan,1995 Cs-137 A
394.3 310.7-477.9 387.7 1 21.2;44.2 SPAP-408 Air Filter Jan,1995 Gr. Beta A
8.1 6.6 - 9.7 7.510.0;0.7 SPMI-707 Milk Jan,1995 I131
'A 86.0 69.3-102.7 80.3 i 1.4;8.1 SPMI-707 Milk Jan,1995 1-131(g)
A 86.0 64.0- 108.0 84.8 1 10.4;13.4 SPCH-717 Charcoal Jan,1995 1-131(g)
-A 2.5 1.9-3.0 2.9 i 0.1;0.3 Canister SPVE-729 Vegetation Feb,1995 I131(g)
A 1.9 1.5 - 2.3 1.9i0.1:0.2 SPW-1204 Water Feb,1995 Ra-226 A
6.9 5.5 - 8.3 6.9 0.1;0.7 -
SPW-1790 Water Mar,1995 Sr-89 R
42.7 34.5 - 50.9 0.9 i 3.9;3.9 The raw data was reviewed and found to be free of errors. The sample was repeated with similar results.An Investigation was conducted to determine the cause of this deviation. No apparent cause was found for this discrepancy. It was determined the " spike" was prepared improperly. Another " spike" was prepared and analyzed (See SPW-6388). No further action is planned.
SPW-1790 Water Mar,1995 Sr 90 R
39.1 31.6-46.6 31.411.8;3.6 The raw data was reviewed and found to be free of errors. The sample was repeated with similar results.An Investigation was conducted to determine the cause of this deviation. No apparent cause was found for this discrepancy. It was determined the " spike" was prepared improperly. Another " spike" was prepared and analyzed (See SPW-6388). No further action is planned.
SPW-3051 Water Mar,1995 Gr. Alpha A
82.9 65.0- 100.8 88.5 i 3.7;9.6 SPW-3051 Water Mar,1995 Gr. Beta A
87.2 69.9 104.5 83.0 2.3;8.6 SPAP-2513 Air Filter Apr,1995 Gr. Beta A
8.1 6.5 - 9.7 7.510.0;0.8 SPAP-2542 Air Filter Apr,1995 C&l37 A
1.9
-0.3 - 4.2 2.3 2.1;2.1 SPW-2544 Water Apr,1995 H-3 A
9333.0 7391.0- 11275.0 9656.2 291.8;1008.7 SPW-2652 Water Apr,1995 Co-60 A
24.8 18.9-30.7 23.8 i 2.4;3.4 SPW-2652 Water Apr,1995 Cs-134 A
30.8 24.0- 37.6 29.3 i 2.3;3.7 SPW-2652 Water Apr,1995 Cs-137 A
40.9 31.1-50.7 42.3 i 3.9;5.8 SPMI-2988 Milk Apr,1995 Cs-134 A
40.7 32.5-48.9 37.011.8;4.1 SPMI-2988 Milk Apr,1995 Cs-137 A
54.5 42.1-67.0 62.4 i 3.1;7.0 91
Table A-2. In-house " spike" samples.
m Concentration in pCi/L' Lab Sample Date Accepted Known TBEESML Results Code Type Collected Analysis Rejected Activity Control Limits
- 2s, n=1' SPMI-2988 Milk Apr,1995 St-89 A
36.5 28.2-44.8 32.613.3;4.6 SPMI-2988 Milk Apr,1995 Sr-90 A
24.9 19.4-30.4 25.6 t 1.6;3.0 SPW-3051 Water Apt,1995 Gr. Alpha A
82.9 65.0- 100.8 88.0 i 3.8;9.6 SPW-3051 Water Apr,1995 Gr. Beta A
87.2 70.2-104.2 79.6 i 2.3;8.3 SPW-3589 Water May,1995 Fe-55 A
2274.0 1506.6-3041.4 2033.7 1 500.2;540.0 SPF-3708 Fish May,1995 Cs-134 A
0.1 0.1 - 0.2 0.1 i 0.0; 0.0 SPF-370S Fish May,1995 Cs-137 A
0.2 0.1 - 0.2 0.2 i 0.0;0.0 SPW-6008 Water May,1995 Gr. Alpha A
20.7 16.4-25.0 17.311.4;2.2 SPW-6008 Water May,1995 Gr. Beta A
21.8 17.3-26.3 21.2 i 1.0;2.3 SPSO-5130 Soil May,1995 Cs-134 A
0.3 0.2 - 0.3 0.3 i 0.0; 0.0 SPSO-5130 Soil May,1995 Cs-137 A
0.5 0.4 - 0.6 0.5 0.0;0.1 SPW-6388 Water May,1995 Sr-89 A
21.2 16.0- 26.4 18.7 i 2.4;3.0 SPW-6388 Water May,1995 Sr-90 A
23.2 18.5-27.9 21.2i l.1;2.4 SPW-6398 Water May,1995 Sr-89 A
21.2 16.1-26.3 18.7 i 2.4;3.0 SPW-6398 Water May,1995 St-90 A
23.2 18.5-27.9 21.2 i 1.1;2.4 SPW-5608 Water Jun,1995 I-131 A
85.5 68.7-102.3 78.8 2.3; 8.2 SPCH-596 Charcoal Jun,1995 I-131(g)
A 2.3 1.9 - 2.8 2.210.1;0.2 Canister SPW-6005 Water Jun,1995 1-131 A
46.8 36.9-56.7 48.2 i 1.9;5.2 SPVE-6006 Vegetation Jun,1995 I-131(g)
A 0.5 0.4 - 0.7 0.6 0.0; 0.1 g
SPMI-6838 Milk Jun,1995 I-131 A
39.6 31.8-47.4 38.5 i 0.5;3.9 3;
SPW-6839 Water Jun,1995 I-131 A
39.5 32.0- 47.0 34.9 0.5;3.5 SPVE-7190 Vegetation Jul,1995 1-131(g)
A 1.0 0.8 - 1.2 1.1 i 0.0; 0.1 SPMI-7525 Milk Jul,1995 Cs-134 A
34.4 26.9-41.9 31.512.5;4.0 SPMI-7525 Milk Jul,1995 Cs-137 A
43.4 32.7-54.1 50.214.0;6.4 SPMI-7525 Milk Jul,1995 I131(g)
A 45.6 34.1-57.1 44.7 i 5.4;7.0 SPMI-7525 Milk Jul,1995 Sr-90 A
27.9 22.0- 33.8 28.0 1.4 ; 3.1 SPAP 7554 Air Filter Jul,1995 Gr. Beta A
8.1 6.5 - 9.6 7.310.0;0.7 SPAP-7557 Air Filter Jul,1995 Cs-137 A
1.9 1.5 - 2.3 2.310.0;0.2 SPW-7569 Water Jul,1995 H-3 A
26669.0 21382.9-31955.1 25806.9 i 447.7;2619.2 SPW-8179 Water Jul,1995 Fe-55 A
2.1 1.4 - 2.9 2.3 i 0.4 ; 0.5 SPW-9981 Water Sep,1995 Sr-89 A
39.0 29.1 - 48.9 34.6 i 4.9;6.0 SPW-9981 Water Sep,1995 Sr-90 A
20.0 15.6-24.4 20.311.3;2.4 SPMI-1091 Milk Oct,1995 Cs-134 A
27.8 20.2-35.4 27.9 i 3.9;4.8 SPM.I-1091 Milk Oct,1995 Cs-137 A
43.1 30.2-56.1 52.3 6.9; 8.7 SPMI-1091 Milk Oct,1995 I-131 A
73.4 58.9-87.8 70.9 i 0.8;7.1 92
Table A 2. In house " spike" samples.
Concentration in pCi/L' Lab Sample Date Accepted Known TBI'ESML Results Code Type Collected Analysis Rejected Activity Control Limits" 2s, n=1' SPMI-1091 Milk Oct,1995 1-131(g)
A 73.4 55.0- 91.7 77.1 i 7.9;11.0 SPF-10921 Fish Oct,1995 Co-60 A
0.8 0.6 - 0.9 0.7 i 0.0;0.1 SPF-10921 Fish Oct,1995 Cs-134 A
0.6 0.4 - 0.7 0.S i 0.0;0.1 SPF 10921 -
Fish Oct,1995 Cs-137 A
0.9 0.7-1.1 0.9 i 0.1; 0.1 SPCH 112 Charcoal Oct,1995 1 131(g)
A 0.8 0.6 - 1.0 0.8 i 0.0;0.1 Canister SPAP-109 Air Filter Nov,1995 Gr. Beta A
8.0 6.5 - 9.5 7.310.0;0.7 SPW-1207 Water Nov,1995 H-3 A
29315.0 23551.9-35078.1 27963.4 i 445.5;2831.6
{ SPW-1208 Water Nov,1995 Co-60 A
23.0 17.8-28.2 22.0 i l.9;2.9 SPW 1208 Water Nov,1995 Cs-134 A
41.7 33.2-50.2 38.112.0;4.3 SPW-1208 Water Nov,1995 Cs-137 A
24.3 17.8-30.8 27.2 i 3.0;4.0 SPW-1208 Water Nov,1995 Gr. Alpha A
82.8 66.3-99.3 75.3 i 3.2;8.2 SPW-1208 Water Nov,1995 Gr. Beta A
86.3 68.6-104.0 86.9 i 2.5;9.0 SPW-1280 Water Dec,1995 Gr. Alpha A
20.7 15.1-26.3 19.613.0;3.6 SPW-1280 Water Dec,1995 Gr. Beta A
21.6 16.7-26.5 21.011.8;2.8
- All results are in pCi/L, except for elemental potassium (K) data in milk, which are in mg/L.; air filter samples, f
which are in pCi/ Filter; and food products, which are in mg/Kg.
6 Control limits are based on the known value i 10%+TPU (Where all parametric uncertainties, other than counting statistics, are less than 5%).
- All samples are the results of single determinations. The result is reported in the following format:
Activity i Counting Error ; Total Propagated Uncertainty.
NOTE: For fish, Jello is used for the spike matrix. For vegetation, Sawdust is used for the spike matrix.
L
(
93
Table A-3.
In-house " blank" samples.
Concentration pCi/L'.
Teledyne Results Acceptance Lab Sample Sample (4.66 Sigma)
Criteria Code Type Date Analysis LLD Activitv' (4.66 Sigma)
SPM-204 Milk Jan 1995 Co-60
<5.3 0.41 i 3.48;3.48
< 10.0 SPM-204 Milk Jan 1995 Cs-134
<4.4
-0.07 1 2.05;2.05
< 10.0 SPM-204 Milk Jan 1995 Cs-137
<4.3 1.32 12.53;2.54
< 10.0 SPM 204 Milk Jan 1995 1-131
<0.5
-0.03 1 0.22;0.22
<0.5 SPM-204 Mi1k Jan 1995 Sr-89
<0.8 0.14 11.08;1.08
< 5.0 SPM-204 Milk Jan 1995 Sr-90 N/A 1.4610.48;0.50
< 1.0 Low level of Sr-90 concentration in milk (1-5 pCi/L) is not unusual.
SPAP-283 Air Filter Jan 1995 Co-60
<2.7
-0.36 i t.40; 1.40
< 10.0 SPAP-283 Air Filter Jan 1995 Cs-134
<1.5
-0.67 1.33;1.33
< 10.0 SPAP-283 Air Filter Jan 1995 Cs-137
<2.4 0.46 i l.33;1.33
< 10.0 SPW-285 Wa ter Jan 1995 H-3
<165.0
-48.53 1 84.76;85.01
< 200.0 SPCH-287 Charcoal Jan 1995 1-131(g)
<2.3
-1.98 i 3.12;3.13
< 9.6 Canister SPW-288 Water Jan 1995 Co-60
<2.3
-0.11 i 2.02;2.02
< 10.0 SPW-288 Water Jan 1995 Cs-134
<3.5
-0.19 i 2.61;2.61
< 10.0 SPW-288 Water Jan 1995 Cs-137
<4.7 0.98 1 2.54;2.54
< 10.0 SPAP-409 Air Filter Jan 1995 Gr. Beta
< 0. 5 0.02 0.28;0.28
<3.2 SPVE-728 Vegetation Jan 1995 I131(g)
< 12.0 2.33 t 7.54;7.55
< 20.0 SPW-957 Water Feb l995 Co40
< 3. 7
-1.25 3.02;3.03
< 10.0 SPW-957 Water Feb 1995 Cs 134
<5.2 0.76 i2.77;2.77
< 10.0 SPW-957 Water Feb l995 Cs-117
<3.6
-1.38 12.65;2.66
< 10.0 SPW-1106 Water Feb l995 Ni-63
<12.0 0.25 i 6.31;6.31
< 20.0 SPW 3052 Water Mar 1995 Gr. Alpha
<0.6 0.49 i0.43;0.44
< 1.0 SPW-3052 Water Mar 1995 Gr. Beta
< 1.4 3.05 i o.98;1.09
<3.2 SPAP-2514 Air Filter Apr1995 Gr. Beta
<0.3 0.03 i 0.25;0.25
< 3.2 SPAP-2543 Air Filter Apr 1995 Co-60
<4.4 0.39 1 2.20;2.20
< 10.0 SPAP-2543 Air Filter Apr1995 Cs-134
<1.9 0.05 1 2.11;2.11
< 10.0 SPAP-2543 Air Filter Apr1995 Cs-137
<1.1
-1.24 i l.83;1.83
< 10.0 SPW 2545 Water Apr 1995 H-3
<169 97.76 1 88.37;89.36
< 200.0 SPW-2651 Water Apr 1995 Co-60
<3.17
-1.08 i2.45;2.45
< 10.0 SPW 2651 Water Apr1995 Cs-134
<3.32 0.29 2.57;2.57
< 10.0 SPW-2651 Water Apr1995 Cs-137
<3.56
-0.92 i 2.64;2.64
< 10.0 SPMI-2987 Milk Apr 1995 Cs-134
<3.4 0.3711.89;1.89
< 10.0 SPMI-2987 Milk Apr1995 Cs-137
<3.3 1.29 1 1.75;1.76
< 10.0 SPMI-2987 Milk Apr1995 Sr-89
< 0.4 0.06 1 0.62;0.62
< 5.0 94
I Table A 3.
In house " blank" samples.
Concentration pCi/L*.
Teledyne Results Acceptance Lab Sample Sample (4.66 Sigma)
Criteria 6
Code Type Date Analysis LLD Activitv (4.66 Sigma)
SPMI 2987 Milk Apr 1995 Sr-90 N/A 1.47 1 0.38;0.40
< 1.0 Low level of Sr-90 concentration in milk (1-5 pCi/L) is not unusual.
SPW-3052 Water Apr1995 Gr. Alpha
< 0. 7 0.23 10.47;0.47
< 1.0 SPW-3052 Water Apr1995 Gr. Beta
< 1.7
-0.02 i l.09;1.09
<3.2 SPW-3590 Water May 1995 Fe-55
<602.0 0.00 i 365.40;365.40
< 1000.0 SPF-3709 Fish May 1995 Co-60
<8.4 2.21 1 5.97;5.98
< 10.0 SPF-3709 Fish May 1995 Cs-134
<1.3 6.79 1 8.55;8.60
< 10.0 SPF-3709 Fish May1995 Cs-137
< 1.3 3.61 i 7.81;7.83
< 10.0 SPSO-5131 Soil May1995 Cs-134
<0.034 0.01 i 0.01;0.01
< 10.0 SPSO-5131 Soil May 1995 Cs-137
<0.012 0.00 1 0.01;0.01
< 10.0 SPCH-5975 Charcoal Jun1995 I131(g)
<3.0
-0.71 i 2.68;2.69
< 9.6 Canister SPVE-6007 Vegetation Jun1995 I-131(g)
<0.009 0.00 1 0.01:0.01
< 20.0 SPW-6011 Water Jun1995 1-131
<0.4
-0.03 1 0.19;0.19
<0.5 SPVE-7191 Vegetation Jul1995 1-131(g)
<0.005
-0.00 i 0.00;0.00
< 20.0 3PMI-7526 Milk Jul1995 Co-60
<5.8 1.19 i 3.34;3.34
< 10.0 SF MI-7526 Milk Jul1995 Cs-134
<5.1 0.48 1 2.76;2.76
< 10.0 SPMI-7526 Milk Jul1995 Cs-137
<3.7 0.98 i 2.39;2.39
< 10.0 SPMI-7526 Milk Jul1995 I-131
<0.5 0.00 1 0.23;0.23
< 0.5 SPMI-7526 Milk Jul1995 Sr-89
<0.6
-0.19 i 0.82;0.82
< 5.0 SPMI-7526 Milk Jul1995 Sr-90 N/A 1.35 1 0.36;0.39
<1.0 Low level of Sr-90 concentration in milk (1-5 pCi/L) is not unusual.
SPAP-7556 Air Filter Jul1995 Gr. Beta
< 1.0 0.06 t 0.55;0.55
< 3.2 SPAP-7558 Air Filter Jul1995 Co-60
<4.2 0.39i3.003.06
< 10.0 SPAP-7558 Air Filter Jul1995 Co-60
<4.2 0.04 i 3.07;3.07
< 10.0 SPAP-7558 Air Filter Jul1995 Cs-134
<3.0
-1.23 1 2.45;2.45
< 10.0 SPAP-7558 Air Filter Jul1995 Cs-137
<3.5 1.18 1 2.04;2.04
< 10.0 SPW-7570 Water Jul1995 H-3
<164 51.58 i 83.71;84.01
< 200.0 SPW-8180 Water Jul1995 Fe-55
<0.4 0.00 i 0.27;0.27
< 1000.0 SPW-8931 Water Aug1995 Ra-228
< 1.0 0.58 i 0.61;0.61
< 1.0 SPW-9982 Water Sep 1995 Sr-89
<0.8 0.52 1 0.76;0.76
<5.0 SPW-9982 Water Sep 1995 St-90
<0.4 0.21 i 0.21;0.22
< 1.0 SPMI-10920 Milk Oct 1995 Co-60
<3.8
-0.45 15.05;5.05
< 10.0 SPMI-10920 Milk Oct 1995 Cs-134
<3.5
-2.79 i 4.35;4.37
< 10.0 SPMI-10920 Milk Oct 1995 Cs-137
<6.0 1.55 14.13;4.14
< 10.0 95 I
Table' A-3.
In-house " blank" samples.
Concentration pCi/L*,
Teledyne Results Acceptance Lab Sample Sample (4.66 Sigma)
Criteria Code Type Date Analysis LLD Activity" (4.66 Sigma)
SPMI-10920 Milk Oct 1995 I131
<0.4 0.10 1 0.19;0.19
< 0.5 SPF-10922 Fish Oct 1995 Co-60
<5.4 5.74 4.70;4.76
< 10.0 SPF 10922 Fish Oct 1995 Cs-134
<8.9 2.47 i 5.44;5.45
< 10.0 SPF-10922 Fish Oct 1995 Cs-137
<5.4
-2.44 i 5.08;5.09
< 10.0 SPSO-11225 Soil Oct 1995 Cs-134
<0.034 0.00 0.02;0.02
< 10.0 SPSO-11225 Soil Oct 1995 Cs-137
<0.019
-0.00 1 0.01;0.01
< 10.0 4
SPCH-11238 Charcoa1 Oct 1995 I-131(g)
< 1.9
-0.00 1 0.01;0.01
<9.6 Canister SPAP-10968 Air Filter Nov 1995 Gr. Beta
<0.4 0.61 i 0.26;0.26
<3.2 SPW-12080 Water Novi995 H-3
<149 23.01 1 74.94;75.01
< 200.0 SPW-12082 Water Nov i995 Co-60
<2.1 0.62 1 1.13;1.13
< 10.0 l
SPW-12082 Water Novl995 Cs-134
< 1.9 0.02 i l.28;1.28
< 10.0 SPW-12082 Water Nov l995 Cs-137
<2.4 1.53 11.22;1.24
< 10.0 SPW-12082 Water Nov 1995 Gr. Alpha
<0.6 0.19 1 0.43;0.43
< 1.0 SPW-12082 Water Nov 1995 Gr. Beta
< 1.7 0.06 t l.11;1.11
< 3.2 SPW-12808 Water Dec1995 Gr. Alpha
<1.0 0.0810.49;0.49
< 1.0 SPW 12808 Water Dec1995 Gr. Beta
< 1.6
-0.53 1 0.78;0.78-
< 3.2 SPCH-608 Charcoal Feb l996 1-131(g)
<2.7
-0.10 1.63;1.63
<9.6 Canister
- Liquid sample results are reported in pCi/ Liter, air filter sample results are in pCi/ filter, charcoal sample results are in pCi/ charcoal, and solid sample results are in pCi/ kilogram.
- The activity reported is the net activity result.
{
l r
i i
Table A-4.
In house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' l
Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Jan,1995 Gr. Beta Ww-62, 63 A
1.4 i0.4 ; 0.5 1.30.4;0.4 l
Jan,1995 H-3 Ww-62, 63 A
22.6 1 80.9;80.9 18.8 i 80.7;80.8 Jan,1995 Gr. Alpha Ww-41, 42 A
5.112.5;2.6 2.512.2:2.2 Jan,1995 Gr. Beta Ww-41, 42 A
4.710.8;1.1 5.010.9;1.2 Jan,1995 H-3 Ww-41, 42 A
30.1 idl.2;81.3
-47.0 177.8;78.0 Jan,1995 K-40 Ww-41, 42 A
1.410.2;0.2 1.710.3;0.3
.Jan,1995 Sr-89 Ww-41, 42 A
-0.310.6;0.6
-0.110.5;0.5 Jan,1995 Sr 90 Ww-41, 42 A
0.2 i0.3;0.3 0.110.2;0.2 Jan,1995 Be-7 Cf-20, 21 A
0.410.1;0.1 0.510.1;0.1 Jan,1995 Gr. Beta Cf-20, 21 A
2.910.1;0.3 3.0 i0.1 ;0.3 Jan,1995 K-40 Cf-20, 21 A
4.1 i0.3;0.5 3.810.3;0.5 Jan,1995 Sr-89 Cf 20,21 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Jan,1995 Sr-90 Cf-20, 21 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0
)
Jan,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-105,106 A
5.4 il.0; 1.1 6.2 1.0;1.2 Jan,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-105,106 A
0.010.4;0.4 0.l i 0.4;0.4 Jan,1995 Co-60 Mi-83, 84 A
-0.3 i2.5;2.5 0.7 i2.2;2.2 Jan,1995 Cs-137 Mi-83, 84 A
-1.112.3;2.3 0.111.9;1.9 Jan,1995 I-131(G)
Mi-83, 84 A
-1.913.2;3.2 1.512.5;2.5 Jan,1995 I131 Mi-187,188 A
0.1 ::0.3;0.3 0.310.4;0.4 Jan,1995 K-40 Mi-187,188 A
1,573.0 1 138.0;254.6 1,426.0 1177.0;262.6 Jan,1995 H-3 Sw-213, 214 A
5,939.6 1 241.2;843.0 6,091.2 232.8;860.5 Jan,1995 H3 Ww-240, 241 A
39.8 i80.3;80.5 10.0 1 78.9;79.0 Jan,1995 H-3 Ww-316, 317 A
17,618.0 1377.0;2,425.5 17,390.0 i 381.0;2,395.5 Jan,1995 Co-60 Mi-295, 296 A
-1.1 i2.4 ;2.4 0.3 2.8; 2.8 Jan,1995 Cs-134 Mi-295, 296 A
-0.6il.8;1.8 0.8 2.4 ; 2.4 Jan,1995 Cs-137 Mi-295, 296 A
0.511.8;1.8 1.312.7;2.7 Jan,1995 I131 Mi-295, 296 A
0.1 i0.3;0.3 0.2 0.3;0.3 Jan,1995 I131(g)
Mi-295, 296 A
-0.412.4;2.4
-0.0 i4.3; 4.3 Jan,1995 K-40 Mi-295, 296 A
1,449.1 191.2;217.2 1,311.8 i 108.0;208.5 Jan,1995 La-140 Mi-295, 296 A
0.6il.7;1.7
-1.2 2.5;2.5 Jan,1995 Sr-89 Mi-295, 296 A
0.210.8;0.8 0.210.9;0.9 Jan,1995 Sr-90 Mi-295, 296 A
1.4 t 0.4;0.4 1.610.4;0.5 l
Jan,1995 Gr. Beta Lw-609,610 A
2.610.7;0.8 1.7i0.7;0.7 l
Jan,1995 Co-60 Lw-344,345 A
-0.2 1.9;1.9 1.5 i3.1;3.1 l
Jan,1995 Cs-137 Lw-344,345 A
0.411.9;1.9
-0.2 i3.0;3.0 Jan,1995 Gr. Beta Lw-344,345 A
3.310.9;1.1 3.410.9;1.1 97
Il I'
Table A-4.
In-houe.e " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted
- First Second Collected Ane :ysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Jen,1995 1.
Mi-374, 375 A
-0.110.2;0.2
-0.110.3;0.3 I
Jon,1995 K-40 Mi-374, 375 A
1,250.0 1150.0;226.7 1,286.5 1141.0;224.7 Jan,1995 Gr. Beta Sw-463, 464 A
1.9 i0.6;0.7 1.910.6;0.7 Jan,1995 H-3 Sw-463, 464 A
35.6 i80.3;80.5 7.5179.0;79.0 Jan,1995 Gr. Alpha Wwu-860,861 A
0.3 i0.6;0.6 0.2 0.3; 0.3 Jen,1995 Gr. Beta Wwu-860, 861 A
0.8 i l.3; 1.3 1.811.4;1.4 Jan,1995 K-40 Wwu-860,861 A
61.8 t 32.9;33.5 71.0 i 36.2;36.9 Jan,1995 Co-60 Sw-586, 587 A
-2.2 i2.3; 2.3 1.9 2.8; 2.8 Jan,1995 Cs-137 Sw-586, 587 A
0.6 f 2.3;2.3 1.5 2.9; 2.9 Jan,1995 H-3 Ww-547, 548 A
602.6 i102.9;131.6 619.6 1103.6;133.5 Jan,1995 Gr. Beta Swt-715, 716 A
2.310.6;0.7 2.3 0.5;0.6 Feb,1995 Gr. Beta Sw-694, 695 A
3.9 i0.7;1.0 4.2 0.8; 1.0 Feb,1995 H3 Ww-736, 737 A
9,951.9 i284.3;1,383.0 10,200.8 287.5;1,416.8 Feb,1995 H3 Ww-763, 764 A
584.4 101.1;128.6 707.1 1 105.5;142.8 Feb,1995 I-131 Mi-881, 882 A
0.2 i0.3;0.3 0.210.3;0.3 Feb,1995 K-40 Mi-881, 882 A
1,340.4 i164.0;245.2 1,492.0 i101.0;226.7 Feb,1995 Co-60 Mi-838, 839 A
1.0 i2.7; 2.7
-0.513.8;3.8 Feb,1995 Cs-134 Mi-838, 839 A
-0.1 i2.3;2.3
-1.4 i3.1;3.1 Feb,1995 Cs-137 Mi-838, 839 A
-0.4 2.6;2.6
-0.4 3.1 ; 3.1 g
Feb,1995 I-131 Mi-838, 839 A
0.1 0.2;0.2 0.1 i0.2; 0.2 3
Feb,1995 I-131(g)
Mi-838, 839 A
-0.312.6;2.6
-0.613.2;3.2 Feb,1995 K-40 Mi-838, 839 A
1,298.6 199.4;202.7 1,232.5 125.0;209.1 Feb,1995 St-89 Mi-838, 839 A
0.510.6;0.6 0.5 i0.6; 0.6 j
Feb,1995 Sr-90 Mi-838, 839 A
0.810.3;0.3 0.810.3;0.3 Feb,1995 I-131 Mi-937, 938 A
-0.010.2;0.2
-0.0 i0.2;0.2 Feb,1995 K-40 Mi-937, 938 A
1,451.8 i 69.6;209.4 1,456.6 141.0:243.2 Feb,1995 H-3 Sw-904, 905 A
640.3 i104.6;136.1 597.4 103.0;131.2 Feb,1995 I-131 Mi-1216,1217 A
0.3 i0.3;0.3 0.110.3;0.3 Feb,1995 K-40 Mi-1216,1217 A
1,583.0 i131.0;252.0 1,493.6 1174.0;267.5 Feb,1995 H-3 Sw-1237,1238 A
55.4 i97.4;97.7 4.9 95.4;95.4 Feb,1995 H-3 Sw-1264,1265 A
67.l i 81.2;81.7 109.3 i 83.1;84.5 Feb,1995 Be-7 G-1343,1344 A
11.410.3;1.2 11.910.3;1.2 Feb,1995 K-40 G-1343,1344 A
3.0 i 0.2; 0.4 3.0 0.2; 0.4 Feb,1995 Co-60 Sw-1494,1495 A
-2.2 i 4.1;4.1 0.1 3.4; 3.4 Feb,1995 Cs-137 Sw-1494,1495 A
3.5 i 3.7;3.7 0.2 i 3.6; 3.6 Feb,1995 H-3 Sw-1367,1368 A
560.3 103.1;128.2 606.1 104.8;133.3 98
1 Table A-4.
In-house ' duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted
- First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Feb,1995 H-3 WW-1394,1395 A
47.9 i 80.2;80.4
-24.9 76.6;76.7 Feb,1995 Gr. Beta Swt-1515,1516 A
2.410.5;0.6 1.710.5;0.6 I
Mar,1995 Feb,1995 H-3 Ww-1536,1537 A
2,874.3 1167.5;425.3 2,924.l i168.6;431.9 H-3 Ww-1563,1564 A
33.5 182.7;82.8 39.5 i 83.0;83.1 Mar,1995 Co-60 Ww-1618,1619 A
2.811.5;1.6 2.2 i4.6; 4.6 Mar,1995 Cs-137 Ww-1618,1619 A
-0.911.7;1.7
-2.513.2;3.2 Mar,1995 H-3 Ww-1618,1619 A
4,333.0 i 204.0;623.6 4,457.0 1206.0;640.2 Mer,1995 Co-60 Mi-1663,1664 A
2.013.2;3.3
-1.5 i 2.7; 2.7 Mar,1995 Cs-134 Mi-1663,1664 A
0.212.8;2.8
-1.1 2.1 ; 2.1 Mar,1995 Cs-137 Mi-1663,1664 A
-0.112.7;2.7 0.9 2.4 ; 2.4 Mar,1995 I-131 Mi-1663,1664 A
0.110.3;0.3 0.210.3;0.3 Mar,1995 I-131(g)
Mi-1663,1664 A
-0.4 i 3.7; 3.7 0.1 i 3.4 ; 3.4 Mar,1995 K-40 Mi-1663,1664 A
1,592.1 i l24.0;249.5 1,555.6 i 118.0;242.2 I
Mar,1995 La-140 Mi-1663,1664 A
-1.713.1;3.1
-0.212.7;2.7 Mar,1995 Sr-89 Mi-1663,1664 A
0.610.7;0.7 0.610.7;0.7 Mar,1995 Sr-90 Mi-1663,1664 A
1.4 i0.4 ;0.4 1.50.5;0.5 Mar,1995 Gr. Beta Ww-1684,1685 A
4.9 i0.7; 1.1 5.00.7;1.1 Mar,1995 H-3 Ww-1684,1685 A
81.7 i 84.9;85.6 85.7 185.1;85.9 Mar,1995 Co-58 Lw-1707,1708 A
0.4 i3.0;3.0 0.0 2.9; 2.9 Mar,1995 Co-60 Lw-1707,1708 A
1.112.9;2.9 1.512.7;2.7 Mar,1995 Cs-134 Lw-1707,1708 A
-1.913.1;3.1
-1.S i 2.8;2.8 Cs-137 Lw-1707,1708 A
2.613.0;3.0
-1.412.5;2.5 I
Mar,1995 Mar,1995 Fe-59 Lw-1707,1708 A
5.516.2;6.2
-6.716.2;6.2 Mar,1995 Gr. Beta Lw-1707,1708 A
2.010.5;0.6 2.110.5;0.6 Mar,1995 I-131 Lw-1707,1708 A
0.2 i0.3;0.3
-0.110.3;0.3 Mar,1995 I131(g)
Lw-1707,1708 A
-0.716.7;6.7
-0.6 i 6.2 ; 6.2 Mar,1995 K-40 Lw-1707,1708 A
79.3 142.8;43.5 75.3 39.2;39.9 Mar,1995 La-140 Lw-1707,1708 A
-3.615.1;5.1 1.3 i 4.6; 4.6 Mar,1995 Mn-54 Lw-1707,1708 A
-1.9 i3.1; 3.1 0.8 i2.5; 2.5 Mar,1995 Ru-103 Lw-1707,1708 A
-0.1 i 3.3;3.3
-0.8 i 3.0;3.0 I
Mar,1995 Zn-65 Lw-1707,1708 A
-2.716.5;6.5
-1.715.8;5.8 Mar,1995 Zr-Nb-95 Lw-1707,1708 A
-0.313.1;3.1
-3.212.7;2.7 I
. Mar,1995 H-3 Sw-1762,1763 A
104.4 i 89.4;90.5 92.2 88.8;89.7 Mar,1995 Cs-137 So-1861,1862 A
0.3 i0.0;0.0 0.210.0;0.0 l
Mar,1995 K-40 So-1861,1862 A
11.7 i 0.6;1.3 11.310.5;1.2 Mar,1995 Ra-226 So-1861, 1862 A
1.710.4;0.4 1.5 i0.3;0.3 l
99 I
I Table A-4.
In-house " duplicate" prograrn.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted
- First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Mar,1995 H3 Sw-1919,1920 A
-9.1185.2;85.2 66.7 1 88.9;89.3 Mar,1995 H3 Sw-1919,1920 A
-9.1185.2;85.2 66.7 i 88.9;89.3 Mar,1995 Gr. Alpha Wwu-2031,2032 A
2.012.3;2.3 3.012.4;2.5 Mar,1995 Gr. Beta Wwu-2031,2032 A
1.311.9;1.9 2.1 i2.0;2.0 Mar,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-1997,1998 A
2.711.0;1.1 2.3 1.4; 1.4 Mar,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-1997,1998 A
-0.511.0;1.0 0.611.1;1.1 Mar,1995 Co-60 Ap-2784,2785 A
-0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 Mar,1995 Cs-137 Ap-2784,2785 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Mar,1995 I-131 Mi-2083, 2084 A
0.010.2;0.2 0.0 i 0.2;0.2 Mar,1995 K-40 Mi-2083, 2084 A
1,273.9 i 69.7;186.7 1,328.9 59.8;190.4 Mar,1995 Sr-90 Mi-2083, 2084 A
1.610.5;0.5 1.8 i0.6; 0.6 Mar,1995 Gr. Beta Sw-2104, 2105 A
1.710.5;0.6 1.7 0.6; 0.6 Mar,1995 H-3 Sw-2200, 2201 A
33.8 i85.6;85.8 54.0 i 86.6;86.9 Mar,1995 Co-60 Sw-2355, 2356 A
0.611.5;1.5 0.9 i l.6; 1.6 Mar,1995 Cs-137 Sw-2355, 2356 A
2.211.5;1.6 0.111.9;1.9 Mar,1995 Sr-89 Ap-2453,2454 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 Mar,1995 St-90 Ap-2453,2454 A
0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0 0.0; 0.0 Mar,1995 Co-60 Ap-2805,2806 A
-0.00.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Mar,1995 Cs-137 Ap-2805,2806 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Mar,1995 K-40 Sw-2221,2222 A
149.7 i 74.4;75.9 119.4 146.7;48.2 i
Mar,1995 H-3 Pw-2248,2249 A
154.6 191.1;93.5 164.8 i 91.5;94.2 Mar,1995 Co-60 Pw-2271,2272 A
-0.512.0;2.0
-1.212.9;2.9 Mar,1995 Cs-137 Pw-2271,2272 A
1.0 i2.1; 2.1 0.9 i3.5;3.5 Apr,1995 Co-60 Mi-2149, 2150 A
-1.2 i 2.2; 2.2 0.7 i2.7; 2.7 Apr,1995 Cs-137 Mi-2149, 2150 A
0.212.0;2.0 2.3 i 2.2; 2.2 Apr,1995 I-131(G)
Mi 2149,2150 A
0.112.2;2.2 0.3 i2.5; 2.5 Apr,1995 Gr. Beta Ww-2313, 2314 A
0.6 t0.5;0.5 1.010.5;0.5 Apr,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-2401,2402 A
1.Pi l.3; 1.3 3.511.5;1.5 Apr,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-2401,2402 A
Oalil.1;1.1 0.5 il.1 ; 1.1 Apr,1995 K-40 Sl-2567, 2568 A
1.4 i0.4; 0.5 1.710.4;0.4 g
Apr,1995 H-3 Ww-2432, 2433 A
-21.6 182.7;82.8 2.7 83.9;83.9 g
Apr,1995 Gr. Beta Ww-2659, 2660 A
0.S i0.6;0.6 0.410.4;0.4 Apr,1995 H-3 Ww-2659, 2660 A
38.4 187.5;87.6 133.4 91.7;93.5 Apr,1995 I-131 Mi-2713, 2714 A
0.410.5;0.5 0.2 i 0.2;0.2 Apr,1995 K-40 Mi-2713, 2714 A
1,420.9 i 137.0;236.9 1,420.0 i 137.0;236.8 Apr,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-2739,2740 A
13.8 i 2.1;3.0 14.3 i 2.1;3.0 100 l
l
[
Table A-4.
In-house " duplicate" prograrn.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Apr,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-2739,2740 A
5.111.5;1.6 2.3 i 1.3; 1.4
{
Apr,1995 H3 Sw-2686, 2687 A
52.7 187.0;87.3 2.0 i 84.6;84.6 Apr,1995 Gr. Alpha Ww-3447, 3448 A
-0.311.7;1.7
-1.511.6;1.7 Apr,1995 Gr. Beta Ww-3447, 3448 A
1.211.7;1.7 3.2 il.8; 1.9
(
Apt,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-2835,2836 -
A 2.0 il.4 ; 1.4 2.7il.5;1.5 Apr,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-2835,2836 A
0.211.2;1.2 0.8 i t.2; 1.2 Apr,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-2918,2919 A
.5.311.6;1.8 4.3 i l.6; 1.7 Apr,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-2918,2919 A
2.111.3;1.4 0.8 i t.2;1.2 Apr,1995 K-40 F-3552,3553 A
3.1 i0.4;0.5 2.910.2;0.4 Apr,1995 Sr-89 F-3552,3553 A
-0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0;0.0 Apr,1995 Sr-90 F-3552, 3553 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Apr,1995 Gr. Beta Swt-3343, 3344 A
2.310.5;0.6 3.010.5;0.7
(
Apr,1995 K-40 G-3133,3134 A
6.5 i0.2;0.7 6.1 i0.3; 0.7 Apr,1995 H-3 Sw-3403,3404 A
159.6 i 90.6;93.2 72.7 i 86.6;87.2
( _
Apr,1995 H-3 Ww-3424,3425 A
442.5 i116.7;131.3 430.4 i 116.3;130.2 Apr,1995 Gr. Beta Lw-3682,3683 A
2.110.6;0.7 1.510.6;0.6 Apr,1995 Gr. Beta Lw-3682,3683 A
2.110.7;0.7 1.S i0.5;0.6 Apr,1995 H-3 Lw-3682,3683 A
139.9 i91.1;93.1 75.0 88.2;88.8
[
Apr,1995 H-3 Lw-3682,3683 A
75.0 1 88.2;88.8 139.9 1 91.1;93.1 May,1995 Cs-137 So-3531, 3532 A
0.210.0;0.0 0.1 i0.0;0.0
{
~ May,1995 Gr. Alpht.
So-3531,3532 A
6.913.6;3.6 9.2 i3.9;4.0 May,1995 Gr. Beta So-3531, 3532 A
17.113.1;3.5 18.813.1;3.7 May,1995 K-40 So-3531, 3532 A
25.0 i0.8;2.6 23.8 io.7;2.5
[
May,1995 Sr-89 So-3531, 3532 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1995 Sr 90 c '-3531,3532 A
0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.0 0.0;0.0 May,1995 Co-60
-3577, 3578 A
-0.3 i2.2;2.2 0.5 2.6;2.6
[
May,1995 Cs 137
.+3577,3578 A
1.212.2;2.2
-1.612.9;2.9 May,1995 H-3 Ww-3577,3578 A
33.6 191.0;91.1 58.8 92.0;92.4
[-
May,1995 I-131 Mi-3598, 3599 A
0.210.4;0.4 0.2 0.3; 0.3 Msy,1995 K-40 Mi-3598, 3599 A
1,349.0 i 112.0;214.9 1,297.4 i l51.0;232.2 May,1995 Co-60 Mi-3809,3810 A
-0.4 3.0;3.0 0.2 i3.0;3.0
{
May,1995 Cs-137 Mi-3809,3810 A
0.912.5;2.5 0.1 i2.4;2.4 May,1995 1-131 Mi-3809,3810 A
0.l i 0.2;0.2 0.2 i0.2;0.2 May,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-3838,3839 A
2.011.4;1.4 3.4 il.5;1.6
[
May,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-3838,3839 A
-0.7i1.2; 1.2
-1.111.2;1.2 May,1995 Co-60 F-4309, 4310 A
-0.0 i0.0;0.0
-0.00.0;0.0 c
101 L
Table A 4.
In-house " duplicate" prograrn.
Concentration in pCi/l '
Date Lab Accepted
- First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result May,1995 Cs-137 F-4309, 4310 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1995 Co-60 F-4288, 4289 A
0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1995 Cs-137 F-4288, 4289 A
0.0 i 0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1995 Co-60 F-4330, 4331 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1995 Cs-137 F-4330, 4331 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.0 i0.0; 0.0 May,1995 Co-60 Mi-4377, 4378 A
0.911.7;1.7 2.2 2.7;2.7 May,1995 Cs-134 Mi-4377, 4378 A
0.8 i t.5;1.5
-0.212.3;2.3 May,1995 Cs-137 Mi-4377, 4378 A
0.9 i 1.4 ;1.4 0.6 i2.1 ;2.1 May,1995 I-131 Mi-4377, 4378 A
-0.110.1;0.1
-0.010.1;0.1 May,1995 1-131(g)
Mi-4377, 4378 A
0.2 il.3; 1.3
-1.1 2.6;2.6 May,1995 K-40 Mi-4377, 4378 A
1,385.1 1 63.2;198.7 1,344.3 1 92.5;204.9 May,1995 Sr-89 Mi-4377, 4378 A
-0.010.7;0.7 0.011.1;1.1 May,1995 Sr-90 Mi-4377, 4378 A
1.310.4;0.5 1.310.6;0.7 May,1995 I-131 Mi-4544, 4545 A
0.1 i0.3; 0.3 0.1 0.2;0.2 May,1995 K-40 Mi-4544, 4545 A
1,410.0 i 72.3;204.9 1,359.0 1 65.7;196.2 May,1995 Sr-90 Mi-4544, 4545 A
2.110.5;0.6 1.310.4;0.4 May,1995 Be-7 G-4601,4605 A
1.910.4;0.4 1.7 i0.4; 0.4 May,1995 Co-60 G-4604,4605 A
-0.0 i0.0;0.0
-0.0 0.0;0.0 May,1995 Cs-134 G-46G1,4605 A
0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0 i 0.0;0.0 May,1995 Cs-137 G-4604,4605 A
0.110.0;0.0 0.110.0;0.0 May,1995 Gr. Beta G-4604,4605 A
4.0 i 0.1;0.4 4.0 i0.2; 0.4 May,1995 I-131(g)
G-4604,4605 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0; 0.0 May,1995 K-40 G-4601,4605 A
5.110.7;0.8 5.1 i0.7;0.9 May,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-4575,4576 A
2.011.2;1.2 2.8 i l.3; 1.3 May,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-4575,4576 A
-0.2 il.0; 1.0
-0.6 i l.0; 1.0 May,1995 I-131 Mi-4695, 4696 A
0.1i0.2;0.2 0.1 0.2;0.2 May,1995 K-40 Mi-4695, 4696 A
1,568.8 i l14.0;241.9 1,573.1 i S0.1;219.7 El May,1995 Sr-89 Mi-4716, 4717 A
-0.310.8;0.8
-0.010.9;0.9 g;
May,1995 Sr-90 Mi-4716, 4717 A
1.210.4;0.5 1.6 i0.4;0.5 May,1995 Be-7 G-4814,4815 A
0.610.3;0.3 0.6 0.2;0.2 May,1995 K-40 G-4814,4815 A
5.8 0.6;0.8 5.110.5;0.7 May,1995 H-3 Ww-4784, 4785 A
18,665.3 i 390.2;2,568.3 18,274.9 1 386.3;2,515.2 May,1995 H-3 Sw-4759, 4760 A
3,679.8 213.9;544.3 3,817.8 1217.0;562.8 May,1995 Cs-137 So-5178, 5179 A
0.8 i0.1;0.1 0.8 i0.1 ;0.1 May,1995 K-40 So-5178, 5179 A
19.911.1;2.3 22.111.2;2.5 May,1995 Gr. Beta Swu-5663,5664 A
2.510.6;0.7 2.510.6;0.7 102 Il
Table A-4.
In-house " duplicate" prograrn.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted
- Firrt Second Collected Analysis ~
Codes
- Rejected Result Result May,1995 H3 Swu-5663,5664 A
867.2 i1 % 9;157.8 865.5 1104.9;157.6 May,1995 Gr. Beta Bs - 6983,6984 A
7.411.2;1.4 8.0 i t.4;1.6 May,1995 Gr. Beta Bs 6983,6984 A
7.4 1.2; 1.4 8.0 i 1.4; 1.6 May,1995 K-40 Bs - 6983,6984 A
8.3 i0.3;0.9 8.50.1;0.9 May,1995 K-40 Bs - 6983,6984 A
8.310.3;0.9 8.5 i0.1;0.9 May,1995 Cs-137 Bs-6983, 6984 A
0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1995 Gr. Beta Bs-6983, 6984 A
7.4 il.2;1.4 8.0 il.4; 1.6 May,1995 K-40 Bs-6983, 6984 A
8.310.3;0.9 8.510.1;0.9 May,1995 Cs-137 Bs - 5494,5495 A
0.6 i0.0;0.1 U.6 i0.0; 0.1 May,1995 Cs-137 Bs - 5494,5495 A
0.6 i 0.0;0.1 0.610.0;0.1 May,1995 K-40 Bs - 5494,5495 A
21.110.7;2.2 21.310.7;2.2 May,1995 K-40 Bs 5494,5495 A
21.110.7;2.2 21.3 i 0.7;2.2 May,1995 Cs-137 Bs-5494, 5495 A
0.6 i0.0;0.1 0.6 i 0.0;0.1 May,1995 K-40 Bs-5494,5495 A
21 l i0.7;2.2 21.3 i 0.7;2.2 May,1995 Co-60 F-5025, 5026 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1995 Cs-137 F-5025, 5026 A
-0.010.0;0.0
-0.0 i0.0; 0.0 May,1995 K-40 F-5385,5386 A
2.510.3;0.4 2.610.4;0.5 May,1995 Co-60 F-5046, 5047 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 May,1995 Cs-137 F-5046,5047 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 May,1995 H-3 Ww-5244,5245 A
608.4 196.3;127.0 463.6 191.1;110.8 May,1995 Co-60 Sw-6013, 6014 A
0.812.2;2.2 1.513.0;3.0 May,1995 Cs-137 Sw-6013,6014 A
-0.7i2.3;2.3 0.5 i2.3;2.3 May,1995 I131 Mi 5620,5621 A
0.2i0.2;0.2 0.010.2;0.2 May,1995 K-40 Mi-5620,5621 A
1,526.2 i119.0;239.3 1,449.3 162.0;255.1 May,1995 Gr. Alpha Ww - 5642,5643 A
2.3 i2.3;2.3 2.312.3;2.3 May,1995 Gr. Beta Ww - 5642,5643 A
2.313.3;3.3 2.313.3;3.3 May,1995 K-40 Ww - 5642,5643 A
94.4 19.8;21.9 59.0 1 29.5;30.1 May,1995 Gr. Beta Dw-5738,5739 A
2.511.2;1.2 3.6il.2;1.3 May,1995 I131 Dw-5738,5739 A
-0.0 i0.2;0.2
-0.00.1;0.1 May,1995 Gr. Beta Lw-6327,6328 A
6.511.0;1.4 6.6 t l.0;1.5 May,1995 Sr-89 W-6398, 6399 A
15.1 i 3.8;4.1 18.1 t2.7;3.3 May,1995 Sr-90 W-6398, 6399 A
25.1il 9;3.1 24.411.3;2.8 Jun,1995 Gr. Beta Ww-6184, 6185 A
6.011.1:1.4 7.511.4;1.8 Jun,1995 H-3 WW-6184, 6185 A
86.1 1 78.3;79.2 107.0 1 79.3;80.6 Jun,1995 Co-60 Mi-5684, 5685 A
0.113.0;3.0 0.4 4.6;4.6 Jun,1995 Cs-137 Mi-5684, 5685 A
1.8 i2.7; 2.7
-0.9 3.2;3.2 103
l Table A-4.
in house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted
- First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result E'
Jun,1995 I-131 Mi-5684,5685 A
0.110.1;0.1
-0.010.1;0.1 E
Jun,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-5713,5714 A
3.111.4;1.5 3.3 1.4 ; 1.5 Jun,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-5713,5714 A
0.011.5;1.5 0.4 1.5; 1.5 Jun,1995 Co-60 SI-5832, 5833 A
0.0iO.0;0.0 0.110.0;0.0 Jun,1995 Cs-137 SI-5832, 5833 A
0.110.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Jun,1995 Gr. Beta SI-5832, 5833 A
4.7i0.5;0.7 4.710.5;0.7 Jun,1995 K-40 SI-5832, 5833 A
2.910.3;0.4 2.410.3;0.4 Jun,1995 Sr-89 SI-5832, 5833 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 g
Jun,1995 Sr-90 SI-5832, 5833 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 E
Jun,1995 Co-60 Ww-5992, 5993 A
0.411.2;1.2 0.9 i 2.7; 2.7 Jun,1995 Cs-137 Ww-5992, 5993 A
-1.411.4;1.4
-1.413.0;3.0 Jun,1995 H-3 Ww-5992, 5993 A
67.0 1 76.2;76.7 94.0 1 77.3;78.4 Jun,1995 Co-60 SI-6205, 6206 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.0i0.0;0.0 Jun,1995 Cs-134 SI-6205, 6206 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Jun,1995 Cs-137 SI-6205, 6206 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0; 0.0 Jun,1995 Gr. Beta SI-6205, 6206 A
3.310.1;0.3 3.310.1;0.3 jun,1995 1-131(g)
SI-6205, 6206-A
-0.010.0;0.0
-0.0 0.0;0.0 Jun,1995 K-40 SI-6205, 6206 A
3.3 i0.3;0.5 3.3 0.4 ; 0.5 Jun,1995 H-3 Sw-6256, 6257 A
423.9 192.0;108.6 585.0 197.9;126.1 Jun,1995 I-131 Mi-6277, 6278 A
0.l i0.2; 0.2 0.110.2;0.2 Jun,1995 K-40 Mi-6277, 6278 A
1,285.5 1 152.0;231.7 1,355.2 i 114.0;216.7 Jun,1995 H-3 Sw-6232, 6233 A
68.4 179.5;80.0 136.7 182.4;84.5 g
Jun,1995 Gr. Alpha Ve-6348, 6349 A
0.3 i0.1 ;0.1 0.2 i0.1;0.1 E
Jun,1995 Gr. Beta Ve-6348, 6349 A
3.3 t 0.1 ; 0.4 3.410.1;0.4 Jun,1995 K-40 Ve-6348, 6349 A
3.110.3;0.5 3.0 i0.3;0.4 Jun,1995 I-131 Mi-6419, 6420 A
0.110.2;0.2 0.110.2;0.2 Jun,1995 K-40 Mi-6419, 6420 A
1,457.2 il75.0;264.4 1,339.3 1150.0;236.0 Jun,1995 I-131 Mi-6521, 6522 A
0.110.2;0.2 0.00.2;0.2 Jun,1995 K-40 Mi-6521, 6522 A
1,475.4 1123.0;235.4 1,274.6 1160.0;235.9 l
Jun,1995 K-40 SI-6500, 6501 A
1.810.5;0.5 2.2 i0.5;0.6 l
Jun,1995 Co-60 Mi-6446, 6447 A
0.2 i 4.9; 4.9 0.4 22.F;2.8 Jun,1995 Cs-137 Mi-6446, 6447 A
1.313.4;3.4 0.1 2.2; 2.2 Jun,1995 I-131 Mi-6446, 6447 A
-0.0 i0.2; 0.2 0.0 0.2; 0.2
{
Jun,1995 Cr. Beta Cw-6474,6475 A
2.811.4;1.5 3.211.4;1.5 Jun,1995 Cr. Beta Cw-6474,6475 A
0.0 il.2; 1.2
- 0. l i l.2; 1.2 Jun,1995 1-131 Mi-65t4, 6565 A
0.20.3;0.3 0.1 i0.2; 0.2 I'
l 101 I
i
N Table A-4.
In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted
- First Second Collected Analysis Codel Rejected Result Result Jun,1995 Cs 137 Bs-6960, 6961 A
0.110.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Jun,1995 K-40 Bs-6960, 6961 A
17.710.9;2.0 17.011.1;2.0 Jun,1995 H-3 Ww-6861, 6862 A
1,422.4 il28.0;232.0 1,505.1 1130.3;242.6 4
Jun,1995 I-131 Mi-6840, 6841 A
0.210.2;0.2 0.110.2;0.2 Jun,1995 Co-60 Lw-6889,6890 A
-2.413.4;3.4 1.411.7;1.8 Jun,1995 Cs-137 Lw-6889,6890 A
-0.5 i3.0; 3.0 0.1 i2.2; 2.2 Jun,1995 Gr. Beta Lw-6889,6890 A
3.010.8;1.0 3.010.8;1.0 Jun,1995 H-3 Sw 7053,7054 A
73.2 i 75.7;76.3 126.8 1 78.2;80.1 Jun,1995 H-3 Sw-7011, 7012 A
203.6 181.6;86.2 226.8 i 82.6;88.2 Jun,1995 I131 Mi-7032, 7033 A
0.310.3;0.3
-0.110.3;0.3 Jun,1995 K-40 Mi-7032,7033 A
1,577.6 i l27.0;249.3 1,522.8 1164.0;264.2 Jun,1995 Gr. Beta Swu-7101,7102 A
2.0 i0.5; 0.6 2.110.5;0.6 Jun,1995 H-3 Swu-7101,7102 A
118.6 1 85.8;87.3 92.6 1 84.7;85.6 Jun,1995 St-89 Swu - 7828,7829 A
0.610.8;0.8 0.110.7;0.7 Jun,1995 St-90 Swu - 7828,7829 A
0.2i0.3;0.3 0.2 0.3; 0.3 Jun,1995 Sr-90 Swu - 7828,7829 A
0.210.3;0.3 0.2 i0.3;0.3 Jun,1995 St-89 Swu-7828,7829 A
0.610.8;0.8 0.110.7;0.7 Jun,1995 Sr-89 Swu-7828,7829 A
0.6i0.8;0.8 0.1 i0.7;0.7 Jun,1995 Sr 89 Swu-7828,7829 A
0.610.8;0.8 0.1 i0.7; 0.7 Jun,1995 Sr-89 Swu-7828,7829 A
0.6 i0.8;0.8 0.l i 0.7;0.7 Jun,1995 St-90 Swu-7828,7829 A
0.2 i0.3;0.3 0.210.3;0.3 i
Jun,1995 Sr-90 Swu-7828,7829 A
0.2 i0.3; 0.3 0.210.3;0.3 Jun,1995 Sr 90 Swu-7828,7829 A
0.2i0.3;0.3 0.2 i0.3; 0.3 l
Jun,1995 St-90 Swu-7828,7829 A
0.2 i0.3;0.3 0.2 i0.3;0.3 Jun,1995 Co-60 Ap-8111,8112 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Jun,1995 Cs-137 Ap-8111,8112 A
-0.0 i0.0; 0.0 0.0 i0.0; 0.0 Jun,1995 Gr. Beta Sw-7080, 7081 A
2.3 i0.6;0.7 2.710.6;0.7 Jun,1995 K-40 Sw.7080, 7081 A
61.3 i 28.3;29.0 95.4 126.0;27.7 Jun,1995 H-3 Wwt-7122, 7123 A
3.8181.4;81.4
-13.4 i 80.6;80.6 I
Jun,1995 Gr. Beta Lw-7239,7240 A
2.510.1;0.4 2.410.6;0.7 Jun,1995 H3 Ww-7143, 7144 A
539.1 1103.3;126.7 436.4 199.5;115.9
[
Jun,1995 H-3 Pw-7174,7175 A
144.1 1 84.3;86.5 121.4 i 83.3;84.9 l
Jun,1995' H-3 Sw-7216,7217 A
20.4 1 81.4;81.5 63.0 1 83.3;83.8 Jun,1995 Gr. Beta Ww-7281,7282 A
1.810.3;0.4 2.1 i0.6;0.7 Jun,1995 H-3 Ww-7281, 7282 A
-24.3 1 75.2;75.2 10.3 i 76.8;76.8 Jul,1995 Co-60 Sw-7387, 7388 A
1.011.9;1.9 0.2 1.7;1.7 4
105 f
l
I Table A-4.
In-house " duplicate" progrant Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted
- First Second Collected Analysis Codes' Rejected Result Result E
Jul,1995 Cs-137 Sw-7387, 7388 A
0.6 i2.3;2.3
-0.9 2.0; 2.0 E
Jul,1995 Co-60 Ap-8133,8134 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.00.0;0.0 Jul,1995 Cs-137 Ap-8133, 8134 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.00.0;0.0 Jul,1995 Sr-89 Ap-7600,7601 A
0.00.0;0.0 0.00.0;0.0 Jul,1995 Sr-90 Ap-7600, 7601 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.00.0;0.0 Jul,1995 Co-60 Mi-7260, 7261 A
0.3 i2.9;2.9 0.6 i5.2;5.2 Jul,1995 Cs-137 Mi-7260, 7261 A
1.72.6;2.6
-1.5 3.4 ; 3.4 Jul,1995 I131 Mi-7260, 7261 A
0.210.2;0.2 0.110.2;0.2 Jul,1995 H-3 Ww-7454, 7455 A
7,142.8 i 243.6;1,001.5 6,985.4 1241.2;980.2 Jul,1995 K-40 Lw - 7487,7488 A
48.0 114.4;15.2 95.8 39.9;41.0 Jul,1995 K-40 Lw - 7487,7488 A
48.0 14.4;15.2 95.8 39.9;41.0 g
Jul,1995 Co-60 Lw-7487,7488 A
0.4 i 1.1; 1.1 0.413.0;3.0 m
Jul,1995 Cs-134 Lw-7487,7488 A
0.1 i l.1;1.1
-2.4 i 3.0; 3.0 Jul,1995 Cs-137 Lw-7487,7488 A
0.5 i 1.1; 1.1
-2.2 i2.8;2.9 Jul,1995 Gr. Beta Lw-7487, 7488 A
2.l i0.5;0.6 1.9 i0.5; 0.6 Jul,1995 I-131 Lw-7487,7488 A
0.2 i0.3; 0.3
-0.010.3;0.3 Jul,1995 I-131(g)
Lw-7487, 7488 A
0.3 i2.4;2.4 0.9110.5;10.5 Jul,1995 K-40 Lw-7487,7488 A
48.0 14.4;15.2 95.8 i 39.9;41.0 Jul,1995 K-40 Lw-7487,7488 A
48.0 114.4;15.2 95.8 39.9;41.0 Jul,1995 K-40 Lw-7487,7488 A
48.0 i 14.4;15.2 95.8 39.9;41.0 Jul,1995 K-40 Lw-7487,7488 A
48.0 114.4;15.2 95.8 39.9;41.0 Jul,1995 Gr. Beta Sw-7323, 7324 A
2.3 i0.8;0.8 2.6 0.8; 0.9 Jul,1995 H-3 Sw-7323, 7324 A
77.9 1 84.0;84.7 48.4 82.6;82.9 Jul,1995 Co-60 F-7366, 7367 A
0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.00.0;0.0 Jul,1995 Cs-137 F-7366, 7367 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.0 i 0.0; 0.0 Jul,1995 I-131 Mi-7510, 7511 A
0.3i0.4;0.4 0.1 t o.4; 0.4 Jul,1995 Co-60 F-7344,7345 A
0.00.0;0.0
-0.0 i 0.0; 0.0 Jul,1995 Cs-137 F-7344, 7345 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.00.0;0.0 Jul,1995 I-131 Mi 7429,7430 A
-0.210.3;0.3 0.210.2;0.2 Jul,1995 Gr. Beta F-8154, 8155 A
2.3 i0.1;0.2 2.3 i0.1; 0.2 Jul,1995 K-40 F-8154, 8155 A
2.2 i0.3;0.3 2.1 i0.4 ;0.5 Jul,1995 Co-60 Mi-7575, 7576 A
-1.0 i 2.9; 2.9 1.613.2;3.2 Jul,1995 Cs-134 Mi-7575, 7576 A
1.72.4;2.4
-0.6 i2.4; 2.4 Jul,1995 C3-137 Mi-7575, 7576 A
-0.8 i 2.5;2.5 1.312.4;2.4 Jul,1995 I-131 Mi-7575, 7576 A
0.2 i0.2;0.2 0.1 f 0.2;0.2 Jul,1995 1-131(g)
Mi-7575, 7576 A
0.9 i 2.2; 2.2 0.912.4;2.4 106
Table A-4.
In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted
- First Second Collected Analysis Codes" Rejected Result Result Jul,1995 K-40 Mi-7575, 7576 A
1,481.9 i 111.0;230.1 1,398.8 1106.0;217.8 Jul,1995 Sr-89 Mi-7575, 7576 A
0.6 1.0;1.0
-0.5 i 0.9; 0.9 Jul,1995 Sr-90 Mi-7575, 7576 A
1.210.4;0.4 1.8 0.4;0.4 Jul,1995 I-131 Wwt-7621, 7622 A
0.110.2;0.2 0.1 i0.2; 0.2 Jul,1995 Co-60 Mi-7739, 7740 A
0.914.9;4.9
-0.6 4.6;4.6 Jul,1995 Cs-137 Mi-7739, 7740 A
0.913.7;3.7
-0.413.1;3.1 Jul,1995 I-131 Mi-7739, 7740 A
0.210.3;0.3
-0.0 0.2;0.2 Jul,1995 Co-60 G-7805,7806 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.0i0.0;0.0 Jul,1995 Cs-134 G-7805,7806 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.0 0.0;0.0 Jul,1995 Cs-137 G-7805,78%
A 0.0 0.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0;0.0 Jul,1995 Gr. Beta G-7805,7806 A
5.110.2;0.5 5.110.2;0.6 Jul,1995 I-131(g)
G-7805,7806 A
-0.010.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 Jul,1995 K-40 G-7805,7806 A
6.00.6;0.8 5.8 0.5;0.8 Jul,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-7648,7649 A
6.711.7;2.0 6.711.7;2.0 Jul,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-7648,7649 A
0.711.3;1.3 0.2 i l.2; 1.2 Jul,1995 H-3 Cw-7648,7649 A
-64.4 97.5;97.9
-70.2 i 97.2;97.7 Jul,1995 Gr. Beta Ww-7673, 7674 A
14.112.2;3.1 14.212.2;3.1 Jul,1995 H-3 Ww-7673, 7674 A
15.3 1 81.8;81.8 36.4 1 82.7;82.9 Jul,1995 Sr-89 Mi-7896, 7897 A
0.4 i l.0; 1.0 0.2 i0.9;0.9 Jul,1995 Sr-90 Mi-7896, 7897 A
1.7i 0.4;0.5 1.3 i0.4 ; 0.4 Jul,1995 H-3 Ww-7967, 7968 A
109.5 i 84.6;85.9 70.8 i82.8;83.4 JuL 1995 Co-60 Mi-7922, 7923 A
0.6 i3.1; 3.1
- 1. l i4.5; 4.5 Jul,1995 Cs-137 Mi-7922, 7923 A
1.2 i2.9; 2.9
-0.5 3.4 ;3.4 Jul,1995 I-131 Mi-7922, 7923 A
0.1i0.2;0.2 0.0 i0.2;0.2 Jul,1995 Co-60 Lw-7944,7945 A
0.1 i2.2; 2.2 1.3 1.9;1.9 Jul,1995 Cs-137 Lw-7944,7945 A
3.6 i2.2; 2.2
-1.411.8;1.8 Jul,1995 Gr. Beta Lw-7944,7945 A
4.1 0.9;1.1 4.0 0.9; 1.1 Jul,1995 Co-60 Sw-8704, 8705 A
0.2 i2.5; 2.5 1.011.8;1.8 Jul,1995 Cs-137 Sw-8704,8705 A
0.313.5;3.5
-0.7 1.9;1.9 Jul,1995 H-3 Ww-8196, 8197 A
51.4 i 87.9;88.2 176.0 193.4;96.4 Jul,1995 Gr. Beta Swu-8318,8319 A
2.010.5;0.6 1.9 0.5;0.6 Jul,1995 H-3 Swu-8318,8319 A
102.7 1103.7;104.6 35.5 1101.2;101.3 Jul,1995 K-40 Swu-8318,8319 A
93.3 139.7;40.8 99.7 149.1;50.1 Jul,1995 Gr. Alpha Sp-8540, 8541 A
5.2 i 1.3;1.4 3.9 i l.1 ; 1.1 Jul,1995 Sr-89 Sp-8540, 8541 A
1,443.1 i 42.1;150.3 1,419.5 135.3;146.3 Jul,1995 Sr-90 Sp-8540, 8541 A
15.713.8;4.1 19.414.1;4.6 107
i l
l Table A-4.
In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/ L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result l
Jul,1995 Gr. Beta Ve-8090, 8091 A
2.410.1;0.3 2.3 0.1;0.2 Jul,1995 K-40 Ve-8090, 8091 A
2.8i J.1;0.3 2.8 0.1 ;0.3 l
Jul,1995 Gr. Alpha Sw-8175, 8176 A
0.510.6;0.6 0.710.8;0.8 l
Jul,1995 Gr. Beta Sw-8175, 8176 A
0.811.1;1.1 0.811.1;1.1 5'
Jul,1995 K-40 Sw-8175, 8176 A
89.8 i 23.8;25.4 67.4 39.3;39.9 Jul,1995 H-3 Sw-8251, 8252 A
86.8 1 78.9;79.8 44.0 t 76.9;77.2 l
Jul,1995 Co-60 Sw-8606, 8607 A
0.1 il.7;1.7
-0.2 2.6; 2.6 l
Jul,1995 Cs-137 Sw-8606, 8607 A
-1.012.0;2.0
-0.7 2.2; 2.2 Aug,1995 K-40 G - 8272,8273 A
6.710.6;0.9 6.7 1.0;1.2 Aug,1995 Sr-89 G - 8272,8273 A
0.0i0.0;0.0
-0.00.0;0.0 Aug,1995 Sr-90 G - 8272,8273 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.0 0.0;0.0 l
Aug,1995 Gr. Beta G-8272,8273 A
6.210.3;0.7 6.0f0.3;0.6 l
Aug,1995 I-131 Mi-8293, 8294 A
-0.1 0.2; 0.2 0.010.2;0.2 Aug,1995 I-131 Mi-8389, 8390 A
-0.00.1;0.1 0.1 i0.1;0.1 Aug,1995 K-40 Mi-8389, 8390 A
1,543.8 i l20.0;241.8 1,369.6 i162.0;246.9 Aug,1995 Co-60 Mi-8413, 8414 A
0.3 i3.1 ; 3.1
-2.4 i5.2;5.2 Aug,1995 Cs-137 Mi-8413, 8414 A
-0.7i2.9; 2.9
-1.413.3;3.3 Aug,1995 I-131 Mi-8413, 8414 A
0.1i0.2;0.2 0.110.2;0.2 Aug,1995 Co-60 Lw-8440,8441 A
0.l i2.4 ;2.4 1.0 1.8;1.8 Aug,1995 Cs-137 Lw-8440,8441 A
0.82.0;2.0
-0.412.1;2.1 Aug,1995 Gr. Beta Lw-8440,8441 A
3.3 1.1;1.2 4.7 il.2; 1.4 Aug,1995 Co-60 Ww-8518, 8519 A
1.5 i3.1;3.1
-1.8 i 3.0; 3.0 Aug,1995 Cs-137 Ww-8518, 8519 A
1.72.9;2.9 0.4 2.8; 2.8 Aug,1995 H-3 Ww-8518, 8519 A
10.7 74.0;74.1
-19.6 i 72.6;72.6 Aug,1995 Co-60 Ve-8564, 8565 A
0.00.0;0.0 0.00.0;0.0 Aug,1995 Cs-137 Ve-8564, 8565 A
0.0 i0.0; 0.0
-00 0.0;0.0 Aug,1995 Co-60 Mi-8585, 8586 A
-0.514.1;4.1 1.9 2.6; 2.6 Aug,1995 Cs-134 Mi-8585, 8586 A
0.113.5;3.5 0.9 2.3; 2.3 l
Aug,1995 Cs-137 Mi-8585, 8586 A
1.8 i 3.6;3.6 0.2 2.1; 2.1 l
Aug,1995 I-131 Mi-8585, 8586 A
-0.2 i0.2;0.2 0.1 0.2;0.2 Aug,1995 I-131(g)
Mi-8585, 8586 A
0.l i9.0;9.0 2.416.8;6.8 Aug,1995 K-40 Mi-8585, 8586 A
1,454.6 t150.0;248.3 1,478.2 104.0;226.3 l
Aug,1995 Sr-89 Mi-8585, 8586 A
0.1 1.1;1.1
-0.1 0.9;0.9 l
Aug,1995 Sr-90 Mi-8585, 8586 A
1.9 i0.4 ;0.5 1.6 i0.4 ;0.4 Aug,1995 Co-60 Mi-8674, 8675 A
-0.813.2;3.2 0.5 i3.3;3.3 Aug,1995 Cs-137 Mi-8674, 8675 A
0.8 i2.4 ;2.4 0.4 2.4; 2.4 108
I
(
Table A-4.
In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Aug,1995 1-131 Mi-8674, 8675 A
0.1 i0.3; 0.3
-0.110.2;0.2 Aug,1995 H-3 Sw-8648,8649 A
35.6 1 75.1;75.3 21.3 i 74.5;74.5 Aug,1995 Co-60 F-8754, 8755 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Aug,1995 Cs-134 F-8754, 8755 A
-0.0i0.0;0.0
-0.00.0;0.0 Aug,1995 Cs-137 F-8754, 8755 A
0.1i0.0;0.0 0.110.0;0.0 Aug,1995 Gr. Beta F-8754, 8755 A
13.110.3;1.3 12.6 0.3;1.3 Aug,1995 I-131(g)
F-8754, 8755 A
0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0
(
Aug,1995 K-40 F-8754, 8755 A
2.8 i0.4;0.5 3.3 i0.4;0.5 Aug,1995 Gr. Alpha Ve-8946, 8947 A
0.2 i0.1;0.1 0.2 0.1;0.1 Aug,1995 Gr. Beta Ve-8946, 8947 A
4.30.2;0.5 4.310.2;0.5 Aug,1995 K-40 Ve-8946, 8947 A
4.010.3;0.5 4.010.3;0.5 Aug,1995 Sr-89 Ve - 8802,8803 A
-0.0 i0.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 f
Aug,1995 Sr-90 Ve - 8802,8803 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Aug,1995 K-40 Ve-8802, 8803 A
2.3 i0.2;0.3 2.30.3;0.4 Aug,1995 I-131 Mi-8845, 8846 A
0.0 i0.2; 0.2 0.1 i0.2;0.2 f
Aug,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-8873,8874 A
1.9 i l.4 ; 1.4 4.311.6;1.7 Aug,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-8873,8874 A
-0.6 i l.1; 1.1
-0.011.2;1.2 Aug,1995 1-131 Mi-8902, 8903 A
-0.010.2;0.2 0.110.3;0.3 1
k Aug,1995 K-40 Ve 9035,9036 A
2.2 i0.3; 0.4 2.4 i0.3;0.4 Aug,1995 H-3 Sw -9056, 9057 A
140.7 79.6;81.9 55.2 75.7;76.0
{
Aug,1995 I-131 Mi ')113, 9114 A
0.210.3;0.3 0.30.3;0.3 Aug,1995 Co-60 Lv 9079,9080 A
0.8 i2.8;2.8 0.2 3.0;3.0 Aug,1995 Cs-137 Lw-9079,9080 A
0812.8;2.8
-0.512.7;2.7 Aug,1995 Gr. Deta Lw-9079,9080 A
2.800.9;1.0 2.710.9;1.0 Aug,1995 Co-60 Sw-9183, 9184 A
-0.313.G;3.0 2.214.0;4.1 Aug,1995 Cs-137 Sw-9183, 9184 A
0.813.4;3.4 0.3 4.4;4.4 Aug,1995 Gr. Beta Swu-9162, 9163 A
2.510.5;0.6 2.5 i0.5;0.7
.Aug,1995 H-3 Swu-9162,9163 A
152.0 1 88.0;90.4 157.4 83.7;86.4 Aug,1995 H-3 Ww-9276, 9277 A
1,636.0 i 131.0;258.2 1,680.8 i132.2;264.1 Aug,1995 Gr. Beta Ve-9210, 9211 A
4.l i0.2;0.5 4.1 0.2; 0.4 Aug,1995 K-40 Ve-9210, 9211 A
4.6i0.1;0.5 4.610.1;0.5
(
Aug,1995 Gr. Beta Dw-9371,9372 A
5.011.2;1.4 4.5 1.2;1.4 Aug,1995 I-131 Dw-9371,9372 A
0.110.2;0.2 0.1 0.2; 0.2 Aug,1995 I-131 Mi 9297,9298 A
0.010.2;0.2
- 0. l i0.2;0.2
(
Aug,1995 K-40 Mi-9297, 9298 A
1,727.8 i180.0;296.0 1,602.7 1172.0;277.7 Sep,1995 H-3 Ww-9252, 9253 A
530.9 i 98.7;122.3 538.0 i99.0;123.1 r
109
Table A-4.
In-house " duplicate" prograrn.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted
- First Second 6
Collected Analysis Codes Rejected Result Result g
Sep,1995 I-131 Mi-9327, 9328 A
0.1 0.2; 0.2 0.1 0.2;0.2 3
Sep,1995 Co-60 Ww-9396, 9397 A
2.1 i2.5;2.5 0.73.0;3.0 Sep,1995 Cs-137 Ww-9396, 9397 A
2.722.7;2.8 0.812.6;2.6 Sep,1995 Gr. Beta Ww-9396, 9397 A
0.711.4;1.4 1.811.3;1.3 Sep,1995 H-3 Ww-9396, 9397 A
14.9 1 76.6;76.6 48.9 i 78.2;78.5 Sep,1995 H-3 Sw - 10075,10076 A
262.1 i 88.0;94.9 265.7 88.1;95.3 Sep,1995 Sr-89 Sw - 10075,10076 A
-1,111.0;1.0 0.8 1.0;1.0 Sep,1995 Sr-90 Sw - 10075,10076 A
0.610.3;0.3 0.310.2;0.2 Sep,1995 I-131 Mi-9350, 9351 A
-0.110.2;0.2 0.1 i0.2; 0.2 Sep,1995 K-40 Mi-9350, 9351 A
1,335.3 1163.0;244.0 1,521.4 179.0;273.6 Sep,1995 I-131 Mi 9463,9464 A
0.1 0.2;0.2 0.1 i0.2; 0.2 Sep,1995 K-40 Mi-9463, 9464 A
1,814.9 i 139.0;283.3 1,743.1 i180.0;297.7 Sep,1995 K-40 Bs - 9710,9711 A
8.3 i0.4 ;0.9 8.810.3;0.9 Sep,1995 Gr. Beta Cw 9486,9487 A
0.4 i l.2; 1.2
-0.9 i 1.4; 1.4 Sep,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-9486,9487 A
3.221.5;1.6 3.411.6;1.7 Sep,1995 Cs-137 So - 9562,9563 A
0.410.0;0.0 0.50.0;0.1 Sep,1995 K-40 So - 9562,9563 A
15.0 i 0.4;1.6 15.7 i 0.7;1.7 Sep,1995 Co-60 Ve-9515, 9516 A
-0.0 i0.0;0.0
-0.0 i0.0;0.0 Sep,1995 Cs-137 Ve-9515, 9516 A
-0.0 i0.0;0.0
-0.0 i0.0;0.0 g
Sep,1995 I-131 Mi-9611, 9612 A
0.1 i0.2; 0.2 0.110.2;0.2 3
Sep,1995 K-40 Mi-9611, 9612 A
1,463.6 1 163.0;257.3 1,381.6 i 117.0;221.3 Sep,1995 H-3 Sw-9583, 9584 A
191.8 i 84.4;88.3 59.6 i 78.6;79.0 Sep,1995 Gr. Beta Lw - 9632,9633 A
4.9 i0.9; 1.2 4.2 i0.8; 1.0 Sep,1995 Co-60 Lw-9632,9633 A
0.2 i2.5; 2.5 0.711.9;1.9 Sep,1995 Cs-134 Lw-9632,9633 A
-1.0 2.5;2.5 0.3 i 2.3;2.3 Sep,1995 Cs-137 Lw-9632,9633 A
0.7i 2.7; 2.7 2.012.0;2.0 Sep,1995 I-131 Lw-9632,9633 A
-0.0 f 0.2;0.2 0.210.2;0.2 Sep,1995 I-131(g)
Lw-9632,9633 A
-1217.9;7.9
-1.8 6.9;6.9 Sep,1995 K-40 Lw-9632,9633 A
73.2 i 35.1;35.9 84.5 1 38.9;39.8 Sep,1995 I-131 Mi-9677, 9678 A
0.1i0.2;0.2
-0.1 i0.2;0.2 g
Sep,1995 K-40 Mi-9677, 9678 A
1,579.6 i149.0;261.4 1,387.5 1150.0;241.1 E
Sep,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-9654,9655 A
3.9 il.5; 1.6 4.0 il.5;1.6 Sep,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-9654,9655 A
-0.4 il.1 ;1.1 0.2 il.1 ; 1.1 Sep,1995 Co-60 Mi-9758, 9759 A
0.1 i2.3; 2.3
-1.115.6;5.6 Sep,1995 Cs-137 Mi-9758, 9759 A
0.2 i2.1; 2.1 3.314.1;4.2 Sep,1995 I-131 Mi-9758, 9759 A
0.010.1;0.1 0.110.1;0.1 110
Table A-4.
In-house " duplicate" prograrn.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Sep,1995 K-40 Ve-9781, 9782 A
3.710.3;0.5 3.910.4;0.5 Sep,1995 Gr. Alpha Ww - 9917,9918 A
1.011.2;1.2 0.2 1.3; 1.3 1
Sep,1995 Gr. Beta Ww - 9917,9918 A
2.0 il.6; 1.6 1.S i l.5; 1.6 Sep,1995 K-40 Ww - 9917,9918 A
61.6 127.2;27.9 55.5 130.1;30.6 Sep,1995 Gr. Beta Swu - 10054,10055 A
2.910.7;0.8 3.0 0.6;0.8 Sep,1995 H3 Swu - 10054,10055 A
272.2 i 86.6;94.1 186.8 i 83.0;86.8 Sep,1995 Gr. Beta Cw-9848,9849 A
10.1 i2.1;2.6 10.6 2.0;2.6 Sep,1995 Gr. Deta Cw-9848,9849 A
0.6 il.1; 1.1 0.111.1;1.1 Sep,1995 H-3 Cw-9848,9849 A
2.4 i 75.6;75.6
-2.9 i 75.4;75.4 Sep,1995 I-131 Mi-9873, 9874 A
0.1 i0.2;0.2 0.3 i0.3;0.3 Sep,1995 Co-60 Sw - 10174 10175 A
-0.211.9;1.9 0.1 3.3; 3.3 g
Sep,1995 Cs-137 Sw - 10174,10175 A
-0.1 i2.9;2.9
-0.112.9;2.9 Sep,1995 H3 Ww-9988, 9989 A
126.1 i 81.2;83.0 18.3 i 76.3;76.4 Sep,1995 Gr. Beta Swt - 10033,10034 A
1.8 i0.5;0.5 1.910.5;0.5 "sep,1995 H-3 P-10216,10217 A
76.4 1 78.7;79.4 74.7 1 78.6;79.2 Sep,1995 H-3 Sw-10261,10262 A
279.1 i 88.4;96.2 300.6 i 89.3;98.2 Sep,1995 Gr. Beta Ve - 10012,10013 A
5.710.3;0.6 5.010.4;0.7 Sep,1995 I-131 Mi-10120,10121 A
0.1 0.1;0.1 0.010.1;0.1 Sep,1995 K-40 Mi-10120,10121 A
1,446.6 i163.0;255.5 1,300.9 i145.0;228.7 Sep,1995 H-3 Sw-10195,10196 A
-19.6 i 74.7;74.7 103.2 80.3;81.5 Sep,1995 Gr. Beta Cw - 10240,10241 A
2.8 1.4; 1.5 3.711.5;1.6 Sep,1995 Gr. Beta Cw - 10240,10241 A
0.6il.2;1.2 2.4 1.3; 1.3 Sep,1995 H-3 Sw-10150,10151 A
119.1 81.0;82.6 129.8 i 81.5;83.4 Oct.1995 Gr. Beta Sw - 10282,10283 A
2.2 i0.5;0.6 1.9 i 0.5; 0.5 O.t,1995 H-3 Ww - 10349,10350 A
64.9 i 80.2;80.7 47.4 i 79.4;79.7 Oct,1995 Co-60 Ww-10349,10350 A
0.1 i l.2; 1.2 1.5 2.1 ; 2.1 Oct,1995 Cs-137 Ww-10349,10350 A
0.811.2;1.2 0.1 2.2;2.2 Oct,1995 K-40 Ve-10370,10371 A
3.3 i0.5;0.6 3.3 0.5; 0.6 Oct,1995 Co-60 F-10491,10492 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1995 Cs-137 F-10491,10492 A
-0.0 i0.0;0.0
-0.0 0.0;0.0 Oct,1995 Cc>-60 Ap - 10752,10753 A
-0.00.0;0.0
-0.0 0.0; 0.0 Oct,1995 Cs-134 Ap - 10752,10753 A
0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.0 0.0;0.0 Oct,1995 Cs-137 Ap - 10752,10753 A
-0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1995 I-131(g)
Ap - 10752,10753 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.0 i0.0;0.0 Oct,1995 K-40 Ap - 10752,10753 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0;0.0 Oct,1995 Co-60 Ap - 11141,11142 A
0.0 i0.0; 0.0 0.0 i 0.0; 0.0 111
Table A-4.
In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Oct,1995 Cs-137, Ap - 11141,11142 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0;0.0 Oct,1995 Co-60 Mi-10324,10325 A
0.3 i2.2;2.2
-1.013.2;3.2 Oct,1995 Cs-134 Mi-10324,10325 A
1.4 i 1.9; 1.9
-1.0 2.6; 2.6 Oct,1995 Cs-137 Mi-10324,10325 A
0.3 i2.1; 2.1 1.0 i2.6; 2.6 Oct,1995 1-131 Mi-10324,10325 A
0.110.1;0.1 0.1i0.2;0.2 Oct,1995 1-131(g)
Mi-10324,10325 A
-0.9 2.7;2.7 1.213.3;3.3 Oct,1995 K-40 Mi-10324,10325 A
1,440.7 88.9;215.2 1,432.5 120.0;228.8 Oct,1995 Sr-89 Mi-10324,10325 A
-0.510.9;0.9
-1.310.9;0.9 Oct,1995 Sr-90 Mi-10324,10325 A
1.7 i0.4;0.4 1.710.4;0.4 Oct,1995 1-131 Wwu-10392,10393 A
0.010.2;0.2 0.0 0.2; 0.2 Oct,1995 Co-60 F-10470,10471 A
0.0 i0.0; 0.0 0.00.0;0.0 Oct,1995 Cs-137 F-10470,10471 A.
0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1995 H-3 Sw - 10413,10414 A
41.1 i 77.4;77.6 62.3 78.3;78.8 Oct,1995 H-3 Ww-10437,10438 A
81.6 i 78.1;78.9
-10.6 i 73.8;73.9 Oct,1995 I-131 Mi-10512,10513 A
0.1 i0.1;0.1 0.1i0.2;0.2 Oct,1995 Co-60 So - 10577,10578 A
0.0 i0.0; 0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1995 Cs-134 So - 10577,10578 A
0.010.0;0.0 0.00.0;0.0 Oct,1995 Cs-137 So - 10577,10578 A
0.2 i0.0;0.0 0.210.0;0.0 Oct,1995 Gr. Beta So - 10577,10578 A
18.4 i3.0;3.5 20.1 3.0;3.6 Oct,1995 K-40 So - 10577,10578 A
19.0 0.6;2.0 18.5 i 0.6;1.9 Oct,1995 1-131 Mi-10598,10599 A
0.010.2;0.2
-0.110.1;0.1 Oct,1995 Co-60 F - 10666,10667 A
-0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1995 Cs-137 F - 10666,10667 A
0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0; 0.0 Oct,1995 H-3 Ww - 11206,11207 A
144.1 i 82.1;84.4 298.7 i106.1;113.6 Oct,1995 Co-60 F - 10687,10688 A
-0.010.0;0.0 0.00.0;0.0 Oct,1995 Cs-137 F - 10687,10688 A
0.00.0;0.0
-0.0 i 0.0;0.0 Oct,1995 I-131 Mi - 10710,10711 A
-0.1 i0.2;0.2 0.010.2;0.2 Oct,1995 H-3 Ww - 10797,10798 A
255.7 i 88.0;94.6 190.9 i85.4;89.3 Oct,1995 K-40 F - 10882,10883 A
2.410.3;0.4 2.3 i0.5; 0.5 Oct,1995 Gr. Beta Cw - 10826,10827 A
2.011.3;1.4
- 1. l i l.3; 1.3 Oct,1995 Gr. Beta Swu - 10923,10924 A
2.410.6;0.7 2.70.6;0.7 Oct,1995 H-3 Swu - 10923,10924 A
908.5 1108.7;164.6 878.3 1107.7;160.9 Oct,1995 Cs-137 F - 10969,10970 A
0.010.0;00 0.1 0.0;0.0 Oct,1995 Gr. Deta F - 10969,10970 A
2.3 i0.1;0.2 2.210.1;0.2 Oct,1995 K-40 F - 10969,10970 A
2.110.4;0.4 1.9 i0.4 ;0.4 Oct,1995 Gr. Beta Cw - 10773,10774 A
8.411.9;2.3 9.9 i2.0; 2.5 112
Table A-4.
In house " duplicate" program.
l Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Oct,1995 Gr. Beta Cw - 10773,10774 A
-0.3 il.1 ;1.1 0.9 1.1;1.1 Oct,1995 H-3 Cw - 10773,10774 A
51.7 i 77.8;78.1 67.5 178.5;79.0 Oct,1995 Gr. Beta Cw - 10858,10859 A
3.811.5;1.6 5.5 i l.6 ; 1.8 1
Oct,1995 Gr. Beta Cw - 10858,10859 A
0.2 i t.1; 1.1
-0.311.1;1.1 Oct,1995 Cs-137 Bs - 11056,11057 A
0.3 i0.0; 0.0 0.310.0;0.0 I
Oct,1995 K-40 Bs - 11056,11057 A
18.5 i 0.4;1.9 18.3 0.4;1.9 Oct,1995 K-40 F - 11078,11079 A
2.7i0.2;0.3 2.710.1;0.3 Oct,1995 Gr. Beta Cw - 11261,11262 A
3.4 il.5; 1.6 3.8 i 1.5; 1.6 Oct,1995 Gr. Beta Cw - 11261,11262 A
-1.0 i l.0; 1.0
-0.1 1.1;1.1 Oct,1995 1131 Mi-11162,11163 A
0.20.2;0.2 0.1 0.2;0.2 Oct,1995 Co-60 Lw - 11185,11186 A
0.3 i2.0; 2.0 0.113.9;3.9 I
Oct,1995 Cs-137 Lw - 11185,11186 A
1.0 i2.0;2.0 1.413.3;3.3 Oct,1995 Gr. Beta Lw - 11185,11186 A
7.9 il.4; 1.8 6.711.3;1.6 Oct,1995 I-131 Mi-11284,11285 A
0.2 i0.3;0.3 0.2 0.2;0.2 I
Oct,1995 K-40 Mi-11284,11285 A
1,759.4 t 182.0;300.6 1,581.9 i164.0;270.5 Oct,1995 Cr. Beta Dw - 11565,11566 A
2.4 i0.5;0.6 2.6 i0.5; 0.6 Oct,1995 I-131 Dw 11565,11566 A
-0.110.3;0.3 0.2 i0.3;0.3 Oct,1995 Gr. Alpha Sw - 11309,11310 A
0.6 i0.5;0.5 1.2 i0.6; 0.6 Oct,1995 Gr. Beta Sw - 11309,11310 A
3.110.7;0.8 2.6 0.6;0.7 Oct,1995 I-131 Mi-11351,11352 A
0.0 i0.2;0.2 0.010.2;0.2 Oct,1995 K-40 Mi-11351,11352 A
1,492.6 i 166.0,262.2 1,431.8 r 160.0;252.0 Oct,1995 H-3 Sw - 11330,11331 A
83.5 1 77.8;78.6 106.4 i 78.9:80.2 i
Oct,1995 I-131 Mi-11407,11408 A
-0.110.2;0.2 0.110.2;0.2 Nov,1995 I-131 Mi-11433,11434 A
-0.110.2;0.2 0.1 0.1 ; 0.1 1
Nov,1995 K-40 Mi-11433,11434 A
1,446.0 i167.0;258.0 1,450.8 119.0;230.4 Nov,1995 St-89 Mi-11433,11434 A
-0.1 i l.3; 1.3
-0.111.2;1.2 Nov,1995 Sr-90 Mi-11433,11434 A
1.910.5;0.5 1.910.5;0.5 Nov,1995 Gr. Beta Bs - 11453,11454 A
8.3 1.5; 1.7 7.1 i1.4 ; 1.6 Nov,1995 K-40 Bs - 11453,11454 A
13.4 i 0.7;1.5 14.411.0;1.8 Nov,1995 I-131 Mi-11476,11477 A
-0.010.2;0.2 0.1 0.2;0.2 Nov,1995 K-40 Mi-11476,11477 A
1,425.6 il55.0;248.2 1,379.5 i 93.1;209.4 Nov,1995 Sr-89 Mi-11476,11477 A
0.2II.6;1.6 0.711.2;1.2 I
Nov,1995 Sr-90 Mi-11476,11477 A
1.6 i0.6;0.6 0.70.4;0.4 Nov,1995 Gr. Deta Ww - 11657,11658 A
0.4 i0.5;0.5 0.5 0.5; 0.5 Nov,1995 H-3 Ww - 11657,11658 A
110.2 1 79.0;80.4 172.2 181.7;85.0 Nov,1995 H-3 Sw - 11519,11520 A
86.1 i 78.0;78.8 10.3 74.5;74.5 113 m
W
TaNe A-4.
In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second 6
Collected Analysis Codes Rejected Result Result Nov,1995 Co-60 Ww - 11837,11838 A
0.711.5;1.5 0.113.3;3.3 Nov,1995 Cs-137 Ww - 11837,11838 A
0.111.7;1.7
-0.5 i3.0; 3.0 Nov,1995 K-40 Mi-11588,11589 A
1,282.9 1161.0;237.4 1,390.4 1145.0;238.3 Nov,1995 I-131 Mi-11611,11612 A
0.010.2;0.2 0.110.2;0.2 Nov,1995 K-40 Mi-11611,11612 A
1,368.1 1 112.0;217.2 1,291.1 1 158.0;236.2 Nov,1995 Gr. Beta Cw - 11678,11679 A
2.7 i l.5; 1.6 2.1 1.4; 1.4 Nov,1995 I-131 Mi-11786,11787 A
0.1i0.2;0.2
-0.1i0.2;0.2 Nov,1995 K-40 Mi-11786,11787 A
1,493.0 i100.0;226.3 1,459.1 il70.0;261.3 Nov,1995 Gr. Beta Cw - 11865,11866 A
2.0 il.4; 1.4 1.1 1.3;1.4 Nov,1995 Co-60 Lw - 11926,11927 A
-0.7i2.2;2.2
-1.4 3.3;3.3 Nov,1995 Cs-137 Lw - 11926,11927 A
1.412.0;2.0 1.7 i2.7; 2.7 g
Nov,1995 Gr. Beta Lw - 11926,11927 A
3.6 i0.9; 1.1 4.311.0;1.2 g
Nov,1995 Co-60 Pw - 12451,12452 A
0.111.6;1.6 1.612.0;2.0 Nov,1995 Cs-137 Pw - 12451,12452 A
-1.1*1.7;1.7 0.9 t 2.5; 2.5 Nov,1995 H-3 Ww - 12659,12660 A
10,454.1 283.5;1,449.8 10,315.0 i 281.7;1,430.9 Nov,1995 K-40 G - 12184,12185 A
7.1 i0.5;0.9 7.210.6;0.9 Nov,1995 Gr. Beta Dw - 12229,12230 A
1.5 i0.4 ;0.5 1.510.5;0.5 Nov,1995 H-3 Dw - 12229,12230 A
48.4 i 76.6;76.8 70.9 i 77.6;78.2 Dec,1995 Cs-137 So - 12430,12431 A
0.2 i0.1;0.1 0.20.1;0.1 Dec,1995 Gr. Alpha So - 12430,12431 A
15.7 4.5;4.7 10.914.1;4.2 Dec,1995 Gr. Beta So - 12430,12431 A
22.4 i2.9;3.6 23.113.0;3.8 Dec,1995 K-40 So - 12430,12431 A
16.7i t.3;2.1 17.711.4;2.2 Dec,1995 Co-60 Lw - 12152,12153 A
1.413.3;3.3 3.4 2.1; 2.2 Dec,1995 Cs-137 Lw - 12152,12153 A
-0.1 i3.2; 3.2 0.4 i 2.9;2.9 Dec,1995 Gr. Beta Lw - 12152,12153 A
5.2 il.3;1.5 4.9 1.2; 1.4 l
Dec,1995 I-131 Mi-12250,12251 A
0.1 i0.2;0.2 0.2 0.2; 0.2
=
Dec,1995 K-40 Mi-12250,12251 A
1,470.3 1163.0;258.0 1,386.6 126.0;226.8 Dec,1995 Co-60 Ww - 12298,122N A
0.4 i 2.4; 2.4 0.2 i4.1 ; 4.1 Dec,1995 Cs-137 Ww - 12298,12299 A
0.2 i2.1; 2.1 1.512.8;2.8 Dec,1995 H-3 Ww - 12298,12299 A
42.8 178.0;78.2 99.8 80.5;81.7 Dec,1995 Co-60 Lw - 12380,12381 A
1.3 i 2.4 ;2.4 2.2 2.2; 2.3 Dec,1995 Cs-134 Lw - 12380,12381 A
0.512.1;2.1 2.0 i 2.2; 2.2 Dec,1995 Cs-137 Lw - 12380,12381 A
0.812.5;2.5 1.2 2.4 ;2.4 Dec,1995 I-131 Lw - 12380,12381 A
0.110.1;0.1 0.1 i0.2; 0.2 Dec,1995 I-131(g)
Lw - 12380,12381 A
-7.4 i13.8;13.8 4.7 i 13.4;13.4 Dec,1995 K-40 Lw - 12380,12381 A
129.0 i41.2;43.2 133.0 1 34.7;37.2 Ii i
114
Table A-4.
In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Dec,1995 1131 Mi-12325,12326 A
-0.1 0.2;0.2 0.20.2;0.2 Dec,1995 K-40 Mi-12325,12326 A
1,409.0 i l72.0;257.5 1,438.6 i169.0;258.5 Dec,1995 H-3 Ww - 12347,12348 A
77.3 1 78.9;79.6 87.6 1 79.3;80.2 Dec,1995 Co-60 F - 12688,12689 A
0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0;0.0 Dec,1995 Cs-134 F - 12688,12689 A
0.010.0;0.0
-0.0 i0.0;0.0 Dec,1995 Cs-137 F - 12688,12689 A
0.0i0.0;0.0 0.00.0;0.0 Dec,1995 I-131(g)
F - 12688,12689 A
-0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0;0.0 Dec,1995 K-40 F - 12688,12689 A
2.4 i0.3;0.4 2.50.4;0.4 Dec,1995 Co-60 Pw - 12945,12946 A
0.3 i2.8;2.8 1.4 2.0; 2.0 Dec,1995 Cs-137 Pw - 12945,12946 A
1.5 i2.6;2.6 0.1 i 2.2;2.2
- All concentrations are reported in pCi/L, except solid samples, which are reported in pCi/g wet. Results are reported as ActivityiCounting Error; Total Propagated Uncertainty (TPU).
- Lab codes are comprised of the sample media and the sample numbers. Client codes have been eliminated to l
protect client anonymity.
- Acceptance is based on the difference of the two results divided by the pooled standard deviation being less than two, where, the pooled standard deviation is the square root of the sum of the squares of the TPU's.
l l
i i
t 115
APPENDIX VI ERRATA DATA 116
LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1994 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/94 TO 12/31/94 CALCULATED 02/07/96 INFANT RECEPTOR DATABASE CONTAINS DATA THROUGH 12/31/94 IST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 1.23E-03 2.57E-08 3.63E-09 2.50E-09 1.23E-03 (MRAD)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
BETA AIR 4.41E-05 9.24E-10 1.29E-09 1.10E-09 4.41E-05 (MRAD)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
TOT. BODY 9.29E-04 1.93E-08 2.73E-09 1.88E-09 9.29E-04 (MREM)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
SKIN 9.83E-04 2.05E-08 3.28E-09 2.26E-09 9.83E-04 (MREM)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
ORGAN 4.20E-03 1.52E-03 4.31E-03 3.43E-03 1.35E-02 (MREM)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
THYROID LUNG THYROID THYROID THYROID RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1994 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I INFANT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I.
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.01 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.02 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.01 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.05 15.0 0.09 THYROID LUNG THYROID THYROID THYROID RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 117
I I,
LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1994 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/94 TO 12/31/94 CALCULATED 02/07/96 CHILD RECEPTOR DATABASE CONTAINS DATA THROUGH 12/31/94 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL
)
JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 1.23E-03 2.57E-08 3.63E-09 2.50E-09 1.23E-03 (MRAD)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
BETA AIR 4.41E-05 9.24E-10 1.29E-09 1.10E-09 4.41E-05 (MRAD)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
TOT. BCD*
9.29E-04 1.93E-08 2.73E-09 1.88E-09 9.29E-04 (MREM)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
SKIN 9.83E-04 2.05E-08 3.28E-09 2.26E-09 9.83E-04 (MREM)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
ORGAN 3.50E-03 6.81E-03 1.83E-02 1.10E-02 3.96E-02 (MREM)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
THYROID GI_LLI GI_LLI THYROID GI_LLI lll RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 Jar.uary 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1994 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I CHILD RECEPTOR
____________ g op App I, QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.01 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.02 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.01 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.05 0.09 0.24 0.15 15.0 0.26 THYROID GI_LLI GI_LLI THYROID GI_LLI RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I
118
LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1994 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/94 TO 12/31/94 CALCULATED 02/07/96 TEENAGER RECEPTOR DATABASE CONTAINS DATA THROUGH 12/31/94 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 1.23E-03 2.57E-08 3.63E-09 2.50E-09 1.23E-03 (MRAD)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
BETA AIR 4.41E-05 9.24E-10 1.29E-09 1.10E-09 4.41E-05 (MRAD)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
TOT. BODY 9.29E-04 1.93E-08 2.73E-09 1.88E-09 9.29E-04 (MREM)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
SKIN 9.83E-04 2.05E-08 3.28E-09 2.26E-09 9.83E-04 (MREM)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
ORGAN 2.56E-03 4.53E-03 1.26E-02 7.27E-03 2.70E-02 (MREM)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1994 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I TEENAGER RECEPTOR
% OF APP I.
QTRLY IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.01 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.02 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.01 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.03 0.06 0.17 0.10 15.0 0.18 GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January :995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 119
i l
LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1994 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/94 TO 12/31/94 CALCULATED 02/07/96 ADULT RECEPTOR DATABASE CONTAINS DATA THROUGH 12/31/94 IST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 1.23E-03 2.57E-08 3.63E-09 2.50E-09 1.23E-03 (MRAD)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
BETA AIR 4.41E-05 9.24E-10 1.29E-09 1.10E-09 4.41E-05 (MRAD)
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
(ESE )
TOT. BODY 9.29E-04 1.93E-08 2.73E-09 1.88E-09 9.29E-04 (MREM)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
SKIN 9.83E-04 2.05E-08 3.28E-09 2.26E-09 9.83E-04 (MREM)
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
(WSW )
ORGAN 2.89E-03 4.20E-03 1.17E-02 6.89E-03 2.56E-02 (MREM)
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
(NNE )
GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 LASALLE STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1994 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I ADULT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I.
QTRLY IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY
% OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.01 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 l
TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.02 51 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.01 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.04 0.06 0.16 0.09 15.0 0.17 GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI RESULTS BASED UPON:
ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 120