ML20095H780
| ML20095H780 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1991 |
| From: | Diederich G COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Bradley Davis NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9204300236 | |
| Download: ML20095H780 (65) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _.
Commonwealth Edison LaSa~J County Nuclear Staten O*. 2001 N.21st. Ad, Marseilles, luinois 61341 Telephone 81Y'37 6761 April 23, 1992 Mr. Bort Davis Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission Renion III 799 Roosevelt RoJo Glen Ellyn, I t, 60137 Dear Mr. r) avis t Enclosed is Part 3 of the 1991 LaSalle Station Operating Report, Docket Number 50-373 and 50-374. This report contains the results of the Radiological Environmental and Meteorological Monitoring Programs. Part 1, Facility Operating Exporlence, was submitted under separate cover in February, and Part 2, Radioactive Efiluents, in February and August.
Two copies of the report are provided for your use. Two copies will b6 forwarded to the Document Control Desk and one copy to the Resident I>spector.
1 l Sincerely,
& O P G. J. Diederich 7 Station M5 nager LaSalle County Station GJD/JH/djf Enc)osures i
i
.1 Il _ f ZCSTAMGR/481 [
9204300236 911231 /
e, R ADOCK 05000373 PDR - . -
1 i
LASALLE COUNTY STATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT F
t 1991 T
MARCH 1992 s x
~~--.
-1 siec3-to- ---my- , g we gra,wwqy,s-. . w g .g gg - y n , ery % g -.m , -(q,.4 my -g hmwes--py,g,ww z 9 %ftr-e7 hvttt # - ep q 15lWt *g- pp e gy .ep yre r g --'" t Mp h
TABLE Of CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .......................... 1
SUMMARY
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ?
- 1. 0 EF~LUENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1 Gasoous Ef fluents to the Atmosphere. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2 Liquid Released to the lilinois River. . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.0 SOLID RADI0ACilVE. WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.0 DO S E TO M AN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pathways ................. 3 3.2 Liquid Ef fl uent Pathways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3 Assessment of Dose to Member of Public . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.0 SITE METEOROLOGY ........................ 6 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MON 1'10 RING .................... 6 5.1 Gamma Radiatico ...................... 6 5.2 Ai rborne 1-131 and Particulate Radioactivity . . . . . . . . 7 5.3 Terrestrial Radioactivity ................. 7 5.4 Aquatic Radioactivity ................... 7 5.5 Milk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5.6 Sample Colit,tions .............,...... 8 5.7 P rog ram Mod i fi c at i on s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4
6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDUT.ES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 7.0 MILCH ANIMALS AND NEAREST CATTLE CENSUSES . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8.0 NE AREST RESIDE NCES CE NSUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PdOGR41 RESULTS ........... 9 ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS (conti'yed)
Page APPE hDI X 1 - DAT A T ABLES AND F IGURE S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Station Releases Table 1.1-1 Gaseous Ef fluents .................. 11 Table 1.2-1 L i q u i d r. f t l u e n t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Table 2.0-1 Solid Waste Shipped Off site for Burial or Disposal . . 17 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1-4 Isodose and Concentration Conteurs ......... 25 Table 3.1-1 Maximum Doses Resulting f rom Airborne Releases . . . . 29 Table 3.2-1 Maximum Doses Resulting f rom Liquid Discharges . . . . 31 Environmental Monitoring Figure 5.0-1 Fixed Ai r Sampling and TLD Sites . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Figure 5.0-2 Inner Ring TLD Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Figure 5.0-3 Outer Ring TLD Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Figure 5.0-4 Ingestion And Waterborne Exposure Pathway Sample Locations .............. 36 Table 5.0-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Table 5.0-2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Prograa . ... 38 Table 5.0 Table 5.0-6 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Prog ram Qua rte rly Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Table 5.1-1 Gamma Radiation measured in mR by TLDs . . . . . . . . 50
................... 52 APPENDlX 11 - METEOROLOGICAL DAT A 81 APFENDIX 111 - LISTING OF MISSED S AMPLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
APPENDIX IV - MILCH ANIMALS. NEAREST CATTLE. AND NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS .................... 83 88 APPENDIX V - INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS. . . . . . . . .
APPENDIX VI - ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ....-.............. 118 iii
lt4TRODUCT 10fi LaSalle Station, a two-unit BUR plant is located near Marseilles, Illinois, in LaSalle County, 3.5 miles south of the Illinois River. Each reactor is designed to have a capacity of 1078 11W net. Unit tio. I loadea f uel in fiarch 1982. Unit tio. 2 loaded fuel in late December 1983. The plant has been designed to keep releases to the environment at levels below those specified in the regulations.
Liquid effluents from LaSalle County Station are rel eased to the Illinois _
River in controlled batches af ter radioassay of each batch. Gaseous offluents are released to the atmosphere af ter delay to pemit decay of short half-life g as e s . Releases to the atmosphere are calculated on the basis of analyses of routine grab samples of noble gases and continuously collected composite samples of iodine and particulate matter. The results of ef fluent analyses are sumarized on a Itoo t hl y basis and reported to the fluclear Regulatory Comission as required per Te,hnical Specifications. Airborne concentrations of nobl e gases, 1-131 and partic ulate radioactivity in offsite areas are calculated using effluent and meteorological data.
Environmental monitoring is conducted by sampling at indicator and reference (control) locations in the vicinity of the LaSalle County Station to measure changes in radiation or radioactivity levels that may be attributable to plant 1 cperations. If significant changes attributable to LaSalle County Station -
are measured, these changes are correlated with ef fluent releases. External garna radiation exposure from noble gases and 1-131 in milk are the most critical pathways at this site; however, an environmental monitoring program is conducted which includes other pathways of less importance.
1
f j:
L I
l
SUMMARY
Gascous and liquid effluents for the period remained at a f raction of the f Technical Specification -limits. Calculations of environmental concentrations ,
based on effluent, Illinois River flow, and meteorological data for the period indicate that . consumption by the public of radionuclides attributable to the plant are well below the regulatory limits. Radiation exposure from radio- !
nuclIdes released' to the atmosphere represented the critical pathway for the '
period with_ a maxirmm individual total dose estimated to be 2.30E-03 mrem for the year, when a sL,elding and occupancy factor _ of 0.7 is assumed. The asses-sment 'of radiation doses is perfonned in accordance with the Offsite Dose Cal-lation Manual (ODCM). The results of ' analysis confinn that the station is operating in- comrliance with 10CFR50 and 40CFR190.
F i
i 2
. -, u __ _ . _ _ - -- ._ .-_ . ._.-...._ _ _ .._ _ . . _ _
1.0 EFFLUENTS 1.1 Gaseous Ef fluents to the Atmosphere Measured concentrations of noble gases radioiodine, and particulate redicactivity released to the otmosphere during the year, are listed in Tabl e 1.1-1. A total of 1.06E+02 cueles of fission and activa-tion gases was released with a quarterly overage release rate of 3.64 pCi / sec .
A total of 1.74E-03 curies of I-131 was released during the year, wi th aq average release rate of 1.06E-04 pC1/sec for all iodines.
A total of 5.09E-03 curies of beta-gamma emitters were released as ai rbo rne particulate matter, with an average release rate of 1.30E-03 pCi/ sec . Alpha emitting radicnuclides were not measurable.
A total of 6.71E-01 curies of tritium was released, with an average release rate of 1.61E-02 pCi/sec.
1.2 Liquids Released to the Illinois River No liquid radioactive waste was discharged into the lilinois River in 1991.
2.0 SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE Solid radioactive wastes were shipped by truck to Oak Ridge Tennessee; Beatty, Nevada; Waltz Mill, Pennsylvania; and Barnwell, Soutn Carolina.
The record of waste shipments is sunnarized in Table 2.0-1.
3.0 DOSE TO MAN 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pathways Gamma _ pose Rates Ganma air and whole body dose rates of fsite . vere calcolated based c on measured release rates, isotopic composition of the c oble gases, and meterological data f or the period ( T ab'!e 3.1-1 ) . Isodose contours of gemma body dose for the year are shown in Figure 3.1-1, 3
I l
Based on measured effluents and meteorological data, the maximum dose to an individual would be 2.30E-03 mrem for the year, with an occupancy or shielding f actor of 0.7 included. The maximum gamma air dose was 3.95E-03 mrad.
' i I
Beta Air and Skin Rates l
The rant 9f beta particles in air is relatively small (en the order of a few meters or less); consequently, plumes of gaseous ef fluents may be considered " infinite" for- purpose of calculating the dose ,
from beta radiation incident on the skin. However the actual dose - '
to sensitive skin tissues is dif ficult to calculate because this
' depends on the beta particle energies, thickness of inert skin. and clothing covering sensitive tissues. For purposes of - this report i
- the skin is taken to have a thickness of 7 mg/cm2 and an occupancy factor of 1.0 is used. The skin dose f rom bet = and gamma radiation for the year was 3.47E-03 mrem. The maximum .sf fsite beta air dose :
for the year was 4.82E-04 mrad.
The air concentrations of radioactive noble gases at the offsite receptor _ locations are given in figure 3.1-2.
1 I
Radioactive lodine
. The. human thy oid exhibits a significant capacity -to concentrate ingested or inhaled iodine. The radiciodine.1-131, released -i during routine operation of the_ plant, may. be made. available to man ,
thus resulting in a dose to the thyroid. - The principal pathway of interest for this radionuclide is ingestion of radioiodine in milk ;
by an infant. ;
I lodine Concentrations in Air-The- calculated concentration contours for iodine in air. are shown in Figure 3.1-3. Included in these calculations is an _ iodine cloud depletion - f actor which accounts for the phenomenon of el emental iodine deposition on the ground. The maximum offsite concentration is estimated to be 4.30E-04 pCi/m3 for the year. ,
Dose ~ to Infant's Thyroid i
l The hypothetical thyroid dose to an infant living near the plant via ingestion of milk was calculated. - The _radionuclide considered was l-131 and the source of milk was taken to be the nearest dairy ~ fann with the cows pastured from W/ to October. The maximum inf ant's thyroid - dose was 4.91E-03 mrem during the year (Table 3.1-1).
4
_-- m - _._..u_-.. _ _ _ _ . a. _ . . _ . -
I l
1 i
Concentratio_ns of Particulates in Air l Concentration contours of radioective a i rborne pa rtic ul ates are shown in Figare 3.1-4. The maximum of f site level is estimated to be 7.50E-05 pCi/m3, Summary of Doses Table 3.1 surinarizes the doses resulting from releases of airborne radioactivity via the different exposure pathways.
3.2 _Liauid Effluent Pathways The three principal pathways through the aquatic environment for potential doses to man from liquid waste are ingestion of potab1e water, eating aquatic foods, and exposure while wal king on the sho reline . Not all of these pathways are applicable at a given time but a reasonable approximation of the dose can be made by adjusting the dose fomula for season of the year or type and degree of use of the aquatic environment. NRC* developed equations were ,
used to calculate the doses to the whole body, lower G1 tract, thyroid, bone and skin; specific parameters for use in the equations are given in the Commonwealth Edison Offsite Dose Calculation '
Manual. For the year 1991, there were no radioactive liquid rele-ases to the lilinois River, therefore exposure rates from this pathway are not applicable.
3.3. Assessment of Dose 'to Member of Public In section 3/4.11 of the LaSalle Technical Specifications, 40CFR190 calculations of total dose due to the Uranium fuel Cycle are required only when calculated doses from liquid or gaseous releases of radio-activity exceed certain levels. . These levels are twice the following limits:
- The RETS limits =on dose or dose commitment to an .
individual due to radioactive materials in liquid ef fluents f rom each reactor unit (1.5 mrems to the whole body or 5 mrem to any. organ during any calendar tuarter; 3 mrem to the whole body or 10 mrem to any organ during any calendar year).
- Huclear Regulatory Commission. Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Rev.1).
5
- - - - - . . . _ - -. _ . . - - . . - _ - - - . - - - . - . ~ - - - . _ -
o The RETS limits on air dose in noble gases released in gaseous effluents to a member of the public from each reacter unit (5 mrad for gamma radiation or -10 mrads for beta radiation during any calendar quarter; 10 mrads for gamma radiation or 20 mrad for beta radiation during any calendar year).
- The RETS limits on dose to any individual due to iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and reiWc11 des in particul ate fe nn wi th hal f-li ves greater than eight days in gasect.s effluents released from eaca reactor unit (7.5 mrems to any organ during any calendar quarter; 15 mrems to any organ during any calendar year),
During the period January to December.1991. LaSalle County Station i did not exceed these criteria and members of -the public did not exceed these criteria within the restricted area, as indicated by TLD rneasurements in Table 5.1-1 (assuming 100% occupancy).
4.0 , SITE METEOROLOGY A summary c' the site meteoroloaical measurements taken dur each quarter of the year is given in Appendix -11. The data are pres ted as cumulative joint frequency distributions of 375' and 33' level., Data recovery for these measurements was about 98.9%.
5.0. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Table _ 5.0-1 provides an outline of the Radiological Environmental Moni-toring Program as required in the Technical Specifications. Table 5.0-2 !
lists the program's sampling locations, collection frequencies and analyses for all samples collected. Tables 5.0-3 to 5.0-6 summarize data for the year ' Figure 5.0-4 shows the locations of ingestion and water-borne exposure pathway locations. = Except for tables of special interest, tables listing all data are no longer included in the annual report.
All data tables are available for inspection- at the Station or Corporate offices.-
Specific findings for various environmental media are discussed below.
5.1 Gamma Radiation ,
External _ radiation dose from onsite sources and noble gases released ,
to the= atmosphere was measured at ten indicator and four reference I (background) locations using CaSO 4:Tm thennoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). . A comparison of the TLD results for reference stations with onsite and' offsite indicator stations is included in Table 5.1-1. A total: of forty-eight additional TLDs were installed on June 1.1980 .
such that each sector was covered at both five miles and the site bound a ry . Six (6) TLD locations were aaded to the monitoring program on July 1,.1985. These inner and outer ring TLDs are shown in Figures'5.0-2 and 5.0-3.
'6
Quarterly external radiation dose at fourteen air sampling locations averaged 17.7 mR) and was simile to levels measured in 1986 (17.1 mR), 1987 (17.8 mR), 1988 (16.5 mR),1989 (17.6 mR).and 1990 (17.8 '
mR). The differences are not statistically significant.
5.2 Airborne 1-131 and Particulate Radioactivity Locations of the sampl e rs a re shown in Figure 5 . 0-1. Ai rbo rne "
1-131 reir.ained below the LLO of 0.10 pC1/m3 th roughout the year.
Gross beta concentrations ranged from 0.011 to 0.045 pC1/m3 and _
averaged 0.022 'pci/m3 and was slightly lower than in 1985 (0.025 pCi/m3), 1986 (0.027, except for the period f rom liay 16 through June 6 when it was influenced by the nuclear reac or accident at Chernobyl), 1987 (0.027 pCi/m3), _1988 (0.031 pCi/m ),1989 (0.028 pCi/m3) and 1990 (0.024 pCi/m3 ),
Gamma-emitting isotopes were below the LLD level of 0.01 pCi/m3 in all quarterly composites.
No radioactivity attributable to plant operation was detected in any s ampl e .
1* 5.3 Terrestrial Radioactivity Well water was collected quarterly f rom one onsite well and five offsite wells and analyzed for tritium and gamma-emitting isotopes.
All results were below the limi' of detection, indicating that there was no measurable amount of sodioactivity due to the Station's -
rel eases .
G.4 Aquatic Radioactivity Weekly _ surf ace water samples f rom the Illinois ' River at Seneca and LSCS Cooling Lake were -composited monthly and analyzed for gamma-emitting isotopes. Weekly sampl es f rom the same locations were composited quarterly and analyzed for. tritium. None- of the- com-posited samples, indicated the presence of 96mma-emitting isotopes above their respective LLD levels. Tritium was detected in one upstream sample and measured 256 pCi/L. Similar results were ob-tained-in 1988, 1989, and 1990.
Sediment samples . were collected twice a year from one _ indicator d location (downst ream of the Cooling Lake discharge structure) and analyzed for gamma-emitters. Cs-137 was detected in both samples at a concentration of 0.16 pCi/g dry weight. All othe r gamma-emitters were below their respective detection limits in all samples.
No plant ef fect on the environment is indicated.
I l
. - ~ - -
Levels of gamma radioactivity in fish were measured and found in all samples to be below the icwer limits of detection for the program.
5.5 Milk Milk samples were collected monthly f rom November through April and weekly f rom May through Cctober and analyzed for iodine-131 and gamma-emitting isotopes.
1-131 remained below the detection limit of 0.5 pCi/L. !
Cs-134 and Cs-137 were below the LLD level of 5 pCi/L. All other gamma-emitting isotopes, except naturally-occurring K-40, were below their respective LLDs. There was no indication of the effect on the environment due to station operation.
5.6- Sample Collections A', samples were collected as scheduled except those listed in the Listing of Missed Samples, Appendix Ill.
5.7 Program Modifications There were no changes to the program in 1991.
6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Analytical procedures used for analyzing radioactivity in envi ronmental.
samples are presented .in Appendix VI.
7.0 MILCH ANIMALS AND NEAREST CATTLE CENSUSES A census 'of milch animals was conducted within five miles of the station.
The survey was conducted by a " door-to-door" canvas and by infonnation from Illinois . Agr.icultural Agents.. The census was conducted by A. Lewis '
on - August 28, 1991. The nearest cattle census was conducted by A. Lewis.
on. August- 28, 1991. The results of each census are presented in Appen-
-dix IV.
l l
l l
l' 8
L l:.- - - . _ ~ _ . _ . , - _ , , _ _ _ _ , , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , , _ __ ,_ _
8.0 NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS i
A census of the nearest residences within a five (5) mile radius was conducted by A. Lewis on August 28, 1991.
Results of the nearest residence census are presented in Appendix IV. I 9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS Tel edyne 's Interlaboratory Comparison Prog ram results are presented in Appendix V.
Commonwealth Edison's Thermoluminescent Dosimeter (ILD) Program i s accredited by the National Vol unta ry Labo rato ry Acc redi tation P rog ram (NVLAP) which requires biennual review and evaluation. In addition to the biennual ANSI testing requi rement , Commonwealth Edison al so tests to the ANSI standa rd during the non-NVLAP visitation year. Commonwealth Edison additionally has en i nte rnal irradiation program that tests esch of the six nuclear station TLD processors once per qua rte r. The reWits of all TLD perfonnance tests are retained by Conconwealth' Edison's Corporate Radiation Protection Department.
9
--,p,. -,m. - . . , , , _y-__-r , , . - - - - - , , - .g. g_.y- .y --p+ r m.
l N
6 APPENDIX 1 DATA TABLES AND FIGURES w
M 1
10
J-TABLE 1.1-1 LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS ONE AND TWO DOCKZT NUMBERS 50-373 AND 50-374 EFTLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT (1991)
GASEOUS ETTLUENTS-SUMMATION OT ALL RELEASES Tirst Second Quarter Quarter A. Tission and Activation Gases
- 1. Total release Ci 3.57E-01 3.91E+00
- 2. Average release rate for period uC1/sec 1.95E-01 7.95E+00 B. Iodines
- 1. Total lodine-131 C1 3.28E-04 3.91E-04
- 2. Average release rate for period uC1/sec 1.91E-04 1.69E-04 C. Particulates
- 1. Particulates with T1/2 >8 days Ct 3.37E-04 1.29E-03
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/see 2.04E-04 4.76E-03
- 3. Gross alpha radioactivity Ci <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 D. Trit ium
- 1. Total release C1 2.36E-01 6.19E-02
- 2. Average release rate for period uC1/sec 2.79E-02 1.30E-02
- <" indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uci/t.tl 11
l l
-l TABLE 1.1-1 (continued) ,
LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS ONE AND TWO DOCKET NUMBERS-50-373 AND 50-374 EFTLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (19s')
GASEOUS EFTLUDITS-SUMMATICri OF ALL RELEASES Third Tourth QMALtu Quarin A. Tission and Activation Gases
- 1. Total release C1 4.33E+1 5.86E+1
- 2. Average release rate for period uC1/see 2.72E0 3.69E0 B. Iodines
- 1. Total iodine-131 Ci 8.22E-4 2.04E-4
- 2. Average release rate for pet _od uC1/sec 5.16E-5 1.28E-5 C. Particulates
- 1. Particulates with T1/2 >0 days C1 2.20E-3 1.26E-3
- 2. Average release rate for period uC1/sec 1.38E-4 7.93E-5
- 3. Gross alpha radioactivity (estimate) C1 <1.00E-11 <1.00E-11 D. .Tritiwn
- 1. Total release Ci 8.53E-2 2.88E-1
- 2. Average release rate for-period uC1/sec 5.36E-3 1.81E-2
"<" indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uct/ml 12
l TABLE 1.2-1 ETTLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT (19P )
UNIT ONE LIQUID ETTLUENTS-SUMMATION Or ALL RELEASES rirst Second Quarter Qua rt e r A. Tission and Activation Products
- 1. Total release (not in:1uding Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 tritium, gases, alpha)
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A
- 3. Maximum concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A B. Tritium
- 1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A C. Dissolved Noble Gases
- 1. Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released uC1/ml N/A N/A D. Gross Alpha Radioactivity 1, Total release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 _
- 2. Average concentration released uC1/ml N/A N/A E. Volume of Waste Released liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- r. Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
"<" indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/ml i
13 e.. . .
TABLE 1.2-1 (continued)
EFTLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANh"JAL REPORT (1991)
UNIT CHE LIQUID ETTLUENTS-SUMMATICtl Or ALL RELEASES Third Tourth QutLIttI DmLLltr A. rission and Activation Products
- 1. Total release (not including Ci 0.0E0 0.0E0 tritium, gases, alpha)
- 2. Average concentration released uC1/ml N/A N/A
- 3. Maximum concentration released uC1/ml N/A N/A B. Tritium i
- 1. Total release Ci 0.0E0 0.0E0
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A C. Dissolved Noble Gases
- 1. Total release Cl 0.0E0 0.0E0
- 2. Average concentration taleased uC1/ml N/A N/A D. Gross Alpha Radioactivity
- 1. Total release Ci 0.0E0 0.0E0
- 2. Average concentration released uC1/ml N/A N/A E. Volume of Haste Released liters 0.0E0 0.0E0 T. Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.0E0 0.0E0
"<" indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/ml 14
l i
TABLE 1.2-1 (continued) i l
l ErrLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT (1991)
UNIT TWO LIQUID ETTLUENTS-SUte1ATION Of ALL RELEASES First Second Quarter. Quarter 1 A. Fission and Activation' Products l
- 1. Total release (not including Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 tritiwn, gases, alpha) ;
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A l
- 3. Maximuza concentration released uCi/mi N/A N/A B. Tritium
- 1. Total release .
Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released uC1/mi N/A N/A C. Dissolved Noble Gases
- 1. Total release ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/ml_ N/A- - N/A D. Gross Alpha Radioactivity
- 1. Total release C1 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- 2. Average concentration released uOi/mi N/A N/A
-E. Volume of waste Released liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- r. Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
- <" indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uCi/mi l
r 15 ,
. - . . ,- . - - . . ~ . . _ _ . . , _ . . . _ . . . . _..
TABLE 1.2-1 (continued)
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI- ANNUAL REPORT (1991)
UNIT TWO LIOUID EFTLUENTS-SUMMATICN Or ALL RELEASES Third Tourth Chlattn1 QulLLini A. Tission and Activation Products
- 1. Total release (not including C1 0.0E0 0.0E0 tritium, gases, alpha)
- 2. Ave r agit concentration released uC1/ml N/A N/A
- 3. Hazimum concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A 0
B. Tritium
- 1. Total release Ci 0.0E0 0.0E0
- 2. Average concentration released uC1/ml N/A N/A C. Dissolved Noble Gases
- 1. Total release Ci 0.0E0 0.0E0
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A D. Gross Alpha Radioactivity
- 1. Total release Ci 0.0E0 0.0E0
- 2. Average concentration released uCi/ml N/A N/A Volume of Waste Released liters 0.0E0 0.0E0 T. Volume of Dilution Water liters 0.0E0 0.0E0
"<" indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in uC1/m3 16 i
g.
l T ril:LE '.0-1 ETTLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI ANNUAL REh JRT (1991)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OrrSITE FOR BURIAL CR DISPOSAL January February March Tirst Quarter
- 1. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc
- a. Quantity shipped cu.m. 3.90E+01 1.11E+01 2.46E+01 7.47E+01
- b. Total activity Ci 5.78E+02 9.16t+01 1.70E+02 8.40E+02
- c. Major nuclides (e stimate)
Mn-54 % 10 06 02 re-55 % 65 66 85 Co-60 % 24 27 12
- e. Container volume' cu.m. 2.0BE-01 2.0CE-01 2.08E-01 4.20E+00 3.14E-01 4.20E+00 5.03E+00 4.20E+00 4.94E+00 5.83E+00
- f. Solidification agent Cement Ceme.'t Cement
- 2. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu.m. 1.87E+01 1.13E+01 4.25E-01 3.04E+01
- b. Total activity Ci 5.79E-01 5.02E+00 2.47E-01 5.85E+00
- c. Major nuclides (e stimate)
Cr-51 % 14 14 14 Mn-54 % 15 15 15 re-55 % 45 45 45 re-59 % 16 16 16
- e. Container volume eu.m. 2.0BE-01 2.08E-01 2.08E-01 3.14E-01 17
- . - ~ - --
i i
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
ETTLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPCRT (1991)
SOLID WASTE SHIFPED OTTSITE TCR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL January February March First Quarter
- 3. Solid Waste Disposition
- a. Numbez of Shipments 10 05 06 21
- b. Mode of Transportation Truck Truck Truck Number 10 05 06 l
I
- c. Destination Barnwell, SC Barnwell, SC Barnwell, SC Humber 03 00 02 Beatty, NV Beatty, NV Beatty, NV Number 06 04 04 Oak Ridge, TN Oak Ridge, TH Oak Ridge, TN Number 01 01 00 l
l l
18
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
ErrLUENT AND NASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT (1991)
SOLID NASTE SHIPPED OrrSITE FOR BURIAL CR DISPOSAL April May June Second Quarter
- 1. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu.m. 2.45E+01 2.42E401 1.52E+01 6.39E+01
- b. Total activity Ci 3.45E+02 7.9BE+02 2.76E+02 1.42E+03
- c. Major nuclides (e stimat e)
Mn-54 % 10 10 10 re-55 % 64 64 65 Co-60 4 23 23 23
- e. Container volume cu.m. 2.08E-01 2.08E-01 2.00E-01 3.41E+00 3.14E-01 3.14E-01 4.20E+00 3.41E+00 3.41E+00 5.83E+00 4.20E+00 4.20E+00 4.84E+00 4.84E+00 5.83E+00
- f. Solidification agent C4 ment Cement Cement
- 2. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu.m. 7.29E+01 2.82E+01 9.39E+01 1,95E+02
- b. Total activity Ci 1.45E+01 2.03E+00 4.52E+00 2.11E+01
- c. Major nuclides (e s timat e)
Cr-51 . % 14 14 14 Mn-54 % 15 15 15 re-55 % 45 45 45 re-59 % 16 16 16
- e. Container volume c u . m .' 2.08E-01 2.08E-01 2.08E-01 2.7'I+00 2.72E+00 2.72E+00 7.2SE+01 19
TABLt 2.0-1 (continued)
ETTLUENT AND NASTE DISPOSAL Sr.MIANNUAL PIPCRT (1991)
SOLID NASTE SHIPPED OTTSITE TOR BUAIAL OR DISPOSAL April May June Second Qua rt e r
- 3. Solid waste Disposition
- a. Number of Shipments 10 07 07 24
- b. Mode of Transportation Truck Truck Truck Number 10 07 07
- c. Destination Barnwell, SC Barnwell, DC Barnwell, SC Number 02 03 03 Beatty, W Beatty, NV Beatty, NV Number 04 03 02 Oak Ridge, TN Oak Ridge, TN Oak Ridge, TN number 04 01 02 1.
20 r , ,-n-w , , - , , - . , .
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued) 11FFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI- ANNUAL REPORT (1991)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OfrSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL Third July huvu11 EmpitmhtI Quartet
- 1. Spent resins, filter sludg3s, evaporator bottoms, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu.m. 1.98E+1 1.91E+1 6.67E0 2.43E+1
- b. Total activity C1 6.62E+2 2.07E+3 2.47E+1 7.32E+1
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Mn-54 % 9 9 14 re-55 % 62 61 52 Co-60 % 22 22 32
- e. Container volume cu.m. 3.14E-1 4.20E0 2.47E0 4.20E0 4.84E0 4.20E0 5.28E0 5.83E0 5.83E0
- f. Solidification agent Cement Cement Cement
- 2. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu.m. 0.0E0 1.57E+2 1.2BE+2 2.85E+2
- b. Total activity Ci 0.0E0 2.86E0 8.78E0 1.16E+1
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Cr-51 % 0 14 14 Mn-54 % 0 15 15 re-55 % 0 45 45 re-59 % 0 16 16
- e. Container volume cu.m. 0.0E0 2.08E-1 2.08E-1 0.0E0 2.72E0 2.72E0 3.51E41 3.86E0 4.20E0 3.51E+1 21
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
ETTLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1991)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OTTSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOFAL Third July August Septemhc1 Quattu
- 3. Solid Waste Disposition
- a. Number of Shipments 05 09 09 23
- b. Mode of Transportation Truck Truck Truck Hurrbe r 05 09 09
- c. Destination Barnwell, SC Barnwell, SC Barnwell, SC Humber 03 02 01 Beatty, NV Waltzmill, PA Waltzmill, PA Number 02 01 01 Oak Ridge, 7W Oak Ridge, 'IN Humber 04 04 Deatty, NV Beatty, NV Number 02 03 _
l 22
_. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - =- _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _____________ _____ - ______ _ - _ _ - ______ _ - __ - -____ .
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
ErfLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1991)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OTTSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL Tourth Octobtr Honmher Decemhs.I Quarler
- 1. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu.m. 4.04E+1 9.48E0 0.0E0 3.73E+1
- b. Total activity C1 2.40E+1 2.25E+2 0.0E0 1.55E+2
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Mn-54 % 9 P 0 Fe-55 % 62 64 0 Co-60 % 22 23 0
- e. Container volume cu.m. 4.20E0 4.20E0 4.84E0 5.28E0 N/A 5.83E0
- f. Solidification agent Cement Cement N/A
- 2. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipenent, etc.
- a. Quantity shipped cu.m. 7.02E+1 0.0E0 B.35E+1 1.58E42
- b. Total activity C1 4.31E-1 0.0E0 1.85E-1 1.35E+2
- c. Major nuclides (estimate)
Cr-51 % 14 0 14 Mn-54 % 15 0 15 Fe-55 % 45 0 45 Fe-59 % 16 0 16 Co-60 % 0 0 0
- e. Container volume cu.m. 3.51E+1 0.0E0 2.08E-1 3.51E+1 23
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
EFTLUENT AND WASTE DISIOSAL SEH1-ANNUAL REPORT (1991)
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURI AL OR DISPOSAL fourth i Ogtohn November Dummbir QuaLLt1
- 3. Solid Waste Disposition
- a. Number of Shipments 10 02 03 13
- b. Mode of Transportation Truck Truck Truck Number 10 02 03
- c. Destination Barnwell, SC Barnwell, SC Waltzmill, PA Number 06 01 01 Oak Ridge, TN Beatty, NV Oak Ridge, TH Humber 02 01 02 Beatty, NV Number 02 f-24
I flGURE 3.1-1 Estimated Cumulative Gamma Dose (in mrem) /"
from the LaSalle Station for the period January-December 1991 f\ _ _
/ j { l I_s_ofl eth Labe1s 100 '
250 Small figure - multiply by 10-5 % .
Large figure - multiply by 10-5 ~"
yscsI L #
)
3
_ 10 0
}
0 i 2 mi
. A -. - A
/ 10
- N
~
Dev e Ottowo x, .
s.,.co -
Ru ef l tilines SC' g~ / 5
,9 e b $ h6 y n. r vQ00 ~ ~~ Th f ts (I J tro
- y. ..
- _J
- 25 v *[ ,en .. ..,l N==
j me.a a b,StrOctor Ancon.
-- . i
/ < 55 y
f'"
Od elt
--<+ 5 25 0 $ 10 15 20 m>
Hm * ._ _-. - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
1 t!GURE 3.1-2 Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCi/m3) /
of Noble Gases from the LaSalle Station /
!100,/
10 0
-for the Lariod January-December 1991 i
lsooleth labels Small figure - multiply by 10-2 -[ -g 50 Large figure - multiply by 10-2 r w j y .~
_ I _ _._
a 3 . _
- , g 100 ' wWe **
L f,,% - 10 Q '" v '
o i 2 mi
/ 51 -
w .A 25 [
j
~,,,
UV 2 % y
'/
10 ott Trie Vorseslles ,
, Senee litimoes R"
I 100 s 1
, seu _
ga... a. (3W 100 8 1 35 100. j ****
rs ero 50 j
I j -
Eo i e.....
, x g director M
Dwight 81 A n 's 55 Odell
- -- 10 e 26 0 5 10 15 20 mi
__ m-r ^cd-&--t- "<
1 L
FIGJRE 3,1-3 Estimated Total Concentrations (in pC1/m3) of Iodine f rom the LaSalle Statia for f s" 250 h the period January-December 1991 / f l rl~
Isopleth labels , j Small figure - multiply by 10-e '
s w-] 100 - I -
' ' I Large figure - multiply by 10-6
- %/o t 4
n 10 0 " 250
I 300
' l J
O i 2 rni 25 '
L - ' k - ~~ ~ ^ ~ ~'
. ---- u so I/
'De v 'o',
y . -- . : a v Ow0 MC? fit o warseiltes /
"'//o 8 8 M/ _
[ I f swl q ........s 250 x .
ov..... .
rs to I
8o n
j u.....
s i , . . ,,
) Ovight
- a. 55 x 4..n
/
25 v x rs - '
27 0 $ 10 it 2 0 'n.
FIGURE 3.1-4 Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCi/m3) of / \
, Particulate Matter from the LaSalle Station / .e/ _,\_
for the period January-December 1991 f 500j IsoDieth labels l Emall figure - multip V by 10-7 <
sk _ - :
Large figure - multiply by 10-7 3 p p-r L '
j,400 400
\ )
oo 50
/ \ s i 2 nn
- o. a
~tt '
y
~
50
. . .# o
- n. , , , /
ottowo I w o....
uhnois f ;
.27j
-25 9 /
f p 400 y 8
- g I(
00 \ =w 10 0
- 3. . . . . . . . ; )y y a f ca o .. .
l t3 0 *?
E o n ... __
~m 17 V
Deight Ancona 55 Odell l
% "~ - 28 3
\s; o 5 10 15 20 m'
_______._..______________.___.___________t--+-+-+-w-______..______; __ L_ -
TABLE 3.1-1 L ASALLE UN'i5 DNE AND Two 1991 ANNUAL REPORT MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRSORNE R E L EAS ES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/91 TO 12/31/91 LALCU LAT ED 02/26/92 INFANT RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTTR QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-KAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC -_
GAMMA AIR 9.2BE-06 1.22t-04 1.71t-03 2.10E-03 3.95E-03 (MRAD) (ESE ) (Est ) (Est ) (Est ) (Est )
BETA AIR 1.08E-Cf 1.23t-05 2.26E-04 2.42E-04 4.82E-04 (MRAD) (E ) (E ) (E ) (t ) (E )
TCT. BODY 4.92E-06 6.61t-05 1.00E-03 1.232-03 2.30E-03 (MREM) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE )
SRIN 8.04t-06 1.05E-04 1.52t-03 1.84E-03 3.47t-03 (MREM) (ESE I (Est ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE )
ORGAN 3.06t-04 8.13t-04 2.65t-03 1.13t-03 4.91E-03 (MREM) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) 1ESE )
THYROID THYRO 1D THYROID THY 3010 T;1YROID THIS 13 A REPORT FOR THE CAttNDAR YEAR 1991 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CFR 50 APP. 1 INFANT RECEPTOR
% OF APP 1. -----~~-----
QTRLY IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF OBJ J AN- MAR AFR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-NOV OBJ APP.1 GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.04 10.0 0.04 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 -
TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.05 5.0 0.05 SRIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 15.0 0.02 ORGAN (MREM) 1.5 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.02 15.0 0.01 THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID 29
TABLE 3.1-1 (continued)
LASALLE Uhli5 ONE AND ?WO 1991 ANNUAL REPORT KAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIFBLRNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/91 TO 12/31/91 CALCULATED 02/26/92 ADULT RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-S9 OCT-DEC
. GAMMA AIR 9.28E-06 1.22E-04 1.71E-03 2.10E-03 3.95E-03 (MRAD) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ).
BETA A!R. 1.08E-06 . 1.231-05 2.26E-04 2.42E-04 4.82E-04 (MRAD) (E ) (E ) (E ) (E ) (E 1 TOT. BCDY 4.92E-06 6.61E 1.00E-03 1.23E-03 2.30E-03 (MREM) (TSE ) (ESE ) (ESE ). (EEE ) (ESE )
SR2N 8.04E-06 1.0$E-04 1.52E-03 1.84E-03 3.47E-03
( MI.E M ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE-) (ESE ) (ESE )
ORGAN- 2.92E-04 6.16E-04 1.88E-03 1.10E-03 3.89E-03 (MREM) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE ) (ESE )
THYROID THYRO!D THYROID THYROID THYROID THIS 13 A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1991 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CFR 50 APP. I ADULT RECEPTOR
% Or APP 1. ------------
QTRLY IST QTR 2ND OTR .3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY t OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-NOV OBJ APP.I GAMMA AIR (MAAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.04 10.0 0.04 SETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 20.0 0.00 T"'.. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.04 0. 0s - 5.0 0.05 SRIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 15.0 0.02
. ORGAN (MREMI 7.5 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.01 15.0 0.03 THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID l
l 30 i
TABLE 3.2-1 LASALLE UNIT ONE ADULT RECEPTOR 1991 A!!NUAL REPORT KAXIMUM DOSE 3 (MREM) RESULTING FROM LIQUID EFFLUENTS PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/91 TO 12/31/91 CALCULATED 02/26/92 IST 2ND 3RD 4TH QUARTER QUARTER QUARTTR ANNUAL DOSE TYPE QUARTER J AN- MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC 0.00E+0B 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 TOTAL BODY 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Intr.RNAL 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 CRGAN TH1$ IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1991 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CFR 50 APP. I
-- --------- % OF APP 1. ---------- -
2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY t OF QTRLY 1ST QTM OBJ APP.I OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-NOV 1.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.0 0.00 TrTA1. BODY (MREM)
CRIT. ORGAN (MREM) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 1
31
TABLE 3.2-1 (continued) ,
LASALLE UNIT TWO ADUL' RECEPTop 1991 ANNUAL REPOPT KAXIMUM DOSES (MREM) RESULTING FROM LIQUID EFTLUENTS PEPIOD or RELEASE - 01/01/91 TO 12/31/91 CALCULATED 02/26/92 IST 2ND 3RD 4TH DOSE TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL J AN-KAR APR=JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC TOTAL 0.0CE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 BODY INTERNAL. 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 CRGAN THIS !$ A REPOAT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1991
. COMPLI ANCE STATUS - 10 Cra 50 APP. 1
% OF AFP !. ------------
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF CBJ J AN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-NOV OBJ APP.1 TOTAL BODY (MREM) 1.5 0.00 0.J0 0.00 0.00 3.0 0.00 CRIT. ORGAN (MREM) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00- 0.00 10.0 0.00 I
l l
32 e
FIGURE 5.0-1 I
otte.. >
t 9 14 *g l PMarseilles
~
South ottawa it a /
j
- s. -
seneca .
I
$ 2' !
Plant
- s, .s
$ste Property *13 Grand Ridge Verona i
Kinsman 11eRansom l' e12 e i i Kernan l
Streator
~
e 10 Grundy La Salte County . County Livingston County l
= e e i
- L A S ALLE COUN Ty 5Y ATiON 3 ud**
FIXED AIR SAMPGNG AND TL') SITES L41 Nearmu si L42 Neerum #3 l
' L 43 Oasete #3 j L 44 N armw #4 :
L di Onnee #$ -
I L a % ermu #6
, L41 Senem
! L48 Manman
. L40 Grand Rdge r L 10 Serentar
[ L-Il Ranneen i L il Ka,nas L-l) Revue 6 as Gennem Reed L 84 Ouave i
l 33
a *A- v ha FIGURE 5.0-2
- > v . ;-.y -\
c- x . , .
W' l
.,.,s '
i
- g te,-3 gW\"x g [I N 22 " St. j ;, e
.w
...... /,..
'naini
~- .
/
a "*'
g ...,......... - e
' ' Ex cr
'%.\ ,-
, I'E' s
g .
to te
- -s
. 134 a 113-3 e 113 1 119 9 D ' A~# 11 6 % 'nl ~
8 I 147- gyq gg g
,,,...f....- f _, g 3 \
. ., .a .. .. .. ~
1q
- *- e as as e2 ie to em
, i - - - - -
L A S ALLE COUNTY ST ATION INNER 41% T LD t.0CA!!ONS
[
l l
l-t l-- 34 l
l..
t
FIGUttE 5.0-3 Ottawa I
l
(($
di e-a0
, 1" Marseilles uth '"'* 0 's .-.
j -
Seneca i f, '
..,...i.i..._. . _ .
2 S 2 394 3 Mi 1201 a e Je b :
ee en ee se s -
$e a e 3
vaie ea1.
a o.u- 3, e em
,e Ptant l au a . . m. i aia i e a 2e+ 2 Site Property '
l 8 mi Grand Ridge se l'it's ,,., a 30e, a Verona
- * ,s t& a
- "os r I N'r-a ,
,0. i
- os Kinsman Ransom i
t Keman Streator Grundy La Satie County Coun_ty Livingston County e
- a s a s, wa* LA S ALLE COUNT Y STAteoN e
my qq; u-. e
,l OUTER 81'4" 7LD LOCATIC'i5 35 s- __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
FIGURE 5,0-4
, L-1B L-17 6 se Ottswe Marseine, u.a.s
%e,,
- L-Le Senee.e
- go,s 1-35 a
Rt.23 r
Lscse st'stion Mt.178
- L - 16 Ransose t-30*
6 L 19
.6 00$E CALCULATION MANUAL
.[. .
- 1 i e a un= LA SALLE COUNTY STATION INGESTICN ANDWATER8CR4 EXPOSURE L-16 i.owery Dairy .
PATHWAY SAMPLE LCCADONS L 17 Heyer Patterson Dairy L-18 Flatness Dairy L-19 Bettenhausen Dairy t-20 Gass Fann L-21 Illinois River at Seneca L-24 LSCS Cooling Lake near Recreation Area L-27 L5CS Onsite Well L-28 Marseilles Well Water L 29 Seneca Vell Water L-30 Ransom Well Water L-32 111+ncis State Park Well L-34 Cooling Lake Discharge Structure-Ocwnstream L-35 Marsellies Pool of Illinois River 36
1 l
l l
i TABLE 5.0-1 L
W LaSalle Station Radiological Ensironmnital Monitoring e
< c j c
t
- Locations :
a
! t 2
- e s0 -
T O 2 E m a C t 4 s 4 C 2 U *d W U m T
$ Z t 1 N . .s b 6 L C2 o m 3 - .D .c 7 L D o
$$ O$ 1i5s5?$ 5 L 01 Nearsite #1 00.
L 02 Nearsite #2 00 <
L 03 Onsite st3 00.
L 04 Nearsite #4 00, L 05 Onsite #5 00.
L 06 Nearsite #6 00.
L 07 Seneca 00.
L OS Marseilles 00.
L 09 Grand Ridge OO.
L 10 Streator 00. '
L Il Ransom 00.
L 12 Kernan 00. .
L 13 Route 6 at Gonnam Road 00, ,
L 14 Ottawa 00. . .
L i6 Lowery Farm O. .
L l' Hayer-Patterson casty O.
L 18 Boldt Dairy O.
L 19 Bettenhausen Dairy O.
L-20 Gass Fam O.
L 21 litir.ois River at Seneca O. '
L 24 LSCS Cooling Lake near Recreation Area O. O.
L-28 Marseilles Well Water
. O.
L-29 Seneca Well Water . O.
L 30 Ransom Well Water O.
L 31 Ottawa Well Water O.
L-32 tilinois State Park Well . . O.
L 34 Cooling Lake Discharfe Structure - Downstream .
O.
L 35 Marseilles Pool of Illinois River O. .
CENSUS
_ Dairy Residen :e 37
Table 5.0-2 LASALLE COUNTY STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS
- 1. ~~ AIR SAMPLERS Di tance Direction Site Codea Location _ (miles) (*)
L-01 Near-site No. 1 0.5 326 L-02 On-site Station No. 2 0.6 11 L-03 On-site Station No. 3 0.2 56 L-04 Near-site No. 4 1.5 90 --
L-05 On-site Station No. 5 0.3 145 L-06 . Near-site No. 6 0.4 20 L-07 Seneca 5.2 18 L-08 Parseilles 7.0 326 L-09 (C) Grand Ridge 10.4 260 L-10 (C) Streator 13.5 220 L-11 Ranson 6.0 191 <
L-12 (C) (ernan 5.0 214 L-13 Route 6 at Gonnam Road 7.0 100 L-14 (C) Ottawa 12.0 315
- 2. _TLDs
- a. Same as No. 1.
- b. Special TLD Samplers Distance Direction '
Site Code (miles) ()
Inner Ring L-101 1,2 0.5 359 L-102 1,2 0.6 17 L-103-1,2 0.7 46 L-105-1,2 0.7 91
. L-106-1,2 1.4 110 e L-107-1,2 0.8 128 L-109-1,2 0.6 178 i~
L-110-1,2 0.6 205 L-111a-1,2 0.7 217 L-111b-1,2 0.8 230
> L-112-1,2 0.9 244 L 1'3a-1,2 0.8 262 L :13b-1,2 0.8 273 L-114-1,2 0.9 288 Controi (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.
38
.. - - . ~ - . .. . . .. - -- - . .- - - - - . . . - - . . -
F..
. e TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LASALLE-COUNTY STATION '
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS
- 2. 'TLDs
- b. Special TLD Samplers (continued)
. Distance Direction Site Code '(miles) (*)
Outer Ring L-201-1,2 2.0 15 L-202-1,2 2.3 33 -l L-203-1,2 4.0 56 - l L-204-1,2 3.5 78 -'
L-205-1,2 3.5 102 L-206-1,2 4.3 123 L-207-1,2 4.5- 146 L-208-1,2. 4.5 - 170 L-209-1,2 4.0 192- l L-210-1,2 3.3 216 --
L-211-1,2' 4.5 240 L-212-1,2- 4.0 261 L-213-1,2 3.8 283 L-214-1,2 2.0 303
=L-215-1,2 2.0 330 L-216-1,2 1.5 350
- 3. MILK'- -
Diste ce Direction Site Codea -Location (miles) (*)
L-16_ - Lowery Dairy Farm : 8.2 120 L-17 (C) Hayer-Patterson' Dairy Farm 12.3 18 L-18 ~- (C ) -
- Flatness Dairy Farm -12.5 10.
L-19 Bettenhousen Dairy Fam- 8.5 180~
L-20 Gass Farmb 4.6 348' q;
g O Control 1(reference) locations are= denoted by a "C" af ter site code. All-other locations.'are. indicators.
b Additional E farm wasl not' required by- the 00CM but- was included to ensure that the program has at least four milking stations. This is not a comaercial
. dairy.but a farm having milking ccv.s. for personal use.
39
'. . , . , , ,,n.. , , . , .n,<, , . , - . s , --,.m , ---
Tabl a 5.0-2-(cor.tinued)
LtSALLE COUNTY STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPL4NG LOCATIONS
- 4. GROUND /WELL WATER Distance Direction Site Codea Locat_ ion . (miles) (*)_ ,
L-27 Onstte.Well L Marseilles Well 7.0 326-L-29 (C) _
Seneca Well 5.1 18
-L-30 Ranson Well .6.0 191-L Ottawa Well 12.8 304 L-32 -Illinois State Park 6.5 326~
- 5. ; SURFACE' WATER Distance Directi 6-Site Codea Location (miles) ,_ ( * )__
L-21:(C)- Illinois River at 4.0 22 Seneca L-24 LSCS Cooline 'ake 0.3 112
- 6. . FISH, Distance - Directior Site' Codea- Location imiles) _ ('_
-L-24~ Lfi Cooling Lake- 0.3 112 near Recreation- Area--
_L . Marseilles Pool of 6.5- 326 Illinois River
- 7. JSHORELINE SEDIMENTS:
Distance Direction-
' Site Codea Location _(miles) _,( ,), _
~
L;-34'. Downstream of cooling -
At Station lake discharge structure a
Control (reference) locations _ are denoted by -a "C" af ter site code. All other locations are indicators.
40 4
w -.a g - - c- p q
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LA5ALLE C0tniTY STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT AL MONITORING PROGRM4 SAMPLE C0t.LECTION AND ANAOSE5 Type of frequency foilect f on of Analysis Res idr h *,
~~ Locatton ~
frequency An alysis Larple f?edia (swled Tite I Weekiy On all sartples.
Continuous Gross 4+ta On quarterly (orr,rosites f ruu each locat tun.
- 1. Ai r tiov ne a. Onsite and ficar Field operation Garima ' sot Qu ar t er l y parthulates for a week L-1 fiearsite fan. I Garria Isot Weekly if gross beta in a *as+ple esteeds 10X the L-? fle ar si t e No. ? yearly rican of the (ont rol saoples.
L-3 Onsite ho. 3 filter Weekly t-4 hearsite fio. 4 E n t har r.3e L-5 Onsite TA). 5 L-6 hearsite (fo 6
- b. Far field
[./ $Pnec a t-8 ffarsellle t-9 (C) Grand Ridge t-10 (C) Streator t-il Ranson t-17 (C) Kernan t-13 Route 6 at Gunnom Rd, L-14 (C) Ot t awa __.
L.eek l y On all s*>ples.
w Leekly 1-131
?. Ai r t or ne Sane as 1. ..
lodine Uevyk ly Ori all sanplers.
j . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ -- Test and
- 3. Air Sampling Sav'ie as 1. fia mt enance Train 02 art erl y Garvaa I)24tterly two sets at all AP tocations. Ona set Sane as I. read quarterly. Sec.ond set read if
- 4. IL D required by CornNnwealth Edison. At other 1-101-1,7 Inner Ring locations, all sets read gerterly.
102-1,2 f!iniouu of two ILDs per =er .'
103-1,2 105-1,?
106-1,7 101-1,2 149-1,2
!!O-1,?,
tila-l.2,
!!!b-l.2 Il?-1,2b 1134-1,2,
!! 3b-l .2 114-1,7 D _ _ _ _
% 'e. es.
All other locatiov- e'e d Control (ref ererme) locations are denoted by a "C* in this Coluewi.
D new special ilD site for this Spec.
' ~ - ] go "
- m - -
sw .
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued) tASALLE COUNTY STAT!ON RADIOLOGICAL Chv!RONM[NTAL MONITORING D W RAM 5AMott COLLECTION AN3 ANAL UES Collection Type of Frequency location Analysi s of Analysis Rtrae rt s 5ite frequency Sample Media Coded 0':ter Ring
- 4. ILD (continued) L-201 1.2 202-1,2 203-1,2 204-1,2 205-1 ,2 206-1 ,2 201-1,2 208-1,2 209-1,2 21 0- 1 ,2 211-1,2 212-1,2 213-1,2 214-1,2 21 5-1 ,2 3 216-1,2 rv Bi-Weekly On all samples. LLD: 0.5 pCi/L.
Lcwery Dairy Bi-weekly: 1-131 On all samples.
- 5. Milk L -16 May through Gamma Isot. Bi-Week l y L-17(C) Hauer-Pattee son Dairy flatness Dairy October L-18 (C) Bettenhousen Dairy L-19 1-131 Pbnthly On all samples. LLD: 0.5 pCi/L.
Gast Farmb Mont hly: On all samples.
L-20 Novmber Gamma Isot Monthly through April Garirta Isot Quarterly Ott all samples.
Onsite Well Quarterly C>n all samples.
- 6. Ground /Well L-27 Tritium Quarterly Wat er L-28 Nrseilles Well L-29 (C) Seneca Well L-30 Ransom Well i
l L-31 Ottawe Well L-32 Illinois State Park Well Gars'ta Isot Plo sth13- On monthly composites frori cach location.
Illinois River at Wevily On quarterly ctrposites from each
- 7. Surface Water L-21 (") T ri t t urt Qua rt erly Ott awa loc ation .
t-24 L5C5 Cooling Lake Gamma Isot seni-annual On ecible portions only. Two species.
LSC5 Cooling Lake Smi-annual
- 8. Fish L-24 L-35 Marsellies Pool All other locations are irdicators, a Centrol (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" af ter site code. least four dairies.
b An additional dairy was not required by the 00Cr1 but was included to ensure that the program has at
ms. W 5,ga i rai TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
LASALLY COUNTY STATION RADIOLOGICAL EWIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGMat SAMPLE COLLECTION ANC ES Location Collection Type of frequency Sample !!cdia ~ ~2 ode 8 5tte f requency Analysts of Analyses penar6 5
- 9. Shoreline t-34 Downstrean of Sen f -annu al Ganma Isot Semi-annu al Sed iment s cooling la6'
- 10. Detry Census a. Site boundary to 2 miles -- a. Enumeration Annually During greitng season.
by a door-to-door or equive-lent counting technique.
- b. 2 miles to 5 miles -- b. (numeration Annually DJring grariag season, by t. sing referenced information f r<ma (ounty agricultural agents or other reliable sources, a
c.a
- c. At daf ries listed in Iten 4 -- c. Inquire as Annually D.,rir.g grazing season.
to f eed t rrg practices:
- 1. Pasture only.
- 2. Feed ami thop only.
- 3. Pasture and fee 1; if both, ask f amer to est hete f ract ion of food frun pasture:
4251, 25->U1. 50-151 or >151.
- 11. Nearest in all 16 sectors up to 5 miles Annually Res tdence Census
l RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY
SUMMARY
Name of FacilityJjEajl tliucleaJr 'pwgStation Docket No. 54 373. 50-374 location d Facility _ _ LaSalle County. Ilhnois Reporting Perkxi _1st Ouarta IWI (County, State)
Locetion with thghest Control Number d Type and Indicator texations Non-routine Sample locanons OuarelyMen Type Number of y ,,,a M. y ,,,a Results (Units) Analyws LLD Range laathm R87 Range o !
L,OI,Near Site No.1 O u27 (13/137 f*me Grte Beta 77 0 01 O Uh (7//T/)
Air Puticulates (0.011-am) 05 ml0 326' (a017-0.045) 3 (pCi/m ) Mme O Gamma Spec. 6 0.01 <LLD -
C
- None 1-131 7/ 0.10 <LLD -
Airborne lodine 3 0 (rCi/m ) L-OLNear Site No.1 19 (2/2) 17I W/s)
Lamma Background Gamma f>me 28 3o D.7 u0/20) (16-18)
(1620) 0 5 ml @ 326*
(TL[M (mR/Qtr.)
- <LLD 0 1-131 15 05 <LLD -
Milk 15
$ Gamma free.
- <LLD 0 Cs-134 5 <LLD -
- <tLD 0 Cs-137 5 <LLD -
- <llO O Other Gammas 10 <LLD -
Surface Water Gamma 5pec. 6 (pO/L) - <LLD 0 Cs 134 10 <LLD -
- <LLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD -
- <LLD 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD -
<tLD 0 Trittum 2 200 <ttD -
Well Water Gamma tyr. 6 (pCl/L) <LLD 0
<LI.D Cs-134 10
- <LLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD -
- <LLD 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD -
l - <LLD 0 6 200 < LLD -
h Tritium a Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR &JG PROGRAM QUARTERLY
SUMMARY
Name of Fadlity_Lgelie Nuclear Power Station __ Dixket No- 54 254. 50 265 l
Location of Fadlity_ LaSalle County. 1Hinois Reporting Period 2nd Ouarter 1941 (County, State)
Location with liighest Control Number of l Type and Indicator Non-routine Sample ,
.Quaggdy Mean locations Numberof locadons R** D Type Me'm Mean*
(Units) Analyses LLD Mean*
Locatkm Rana Range Range Nme 0 Grme Bets 76 0.0! 0 018 96/76) tag b, NearMte 0.018 (13/13)
Air Particulates (0.012-0 024) l (a011-a024) Station No.1 (pCl/m3) 0.5 mi e 326* O
<LLD
- Nme mmaSpc 6 0.01
- .me 0 I.131 76 0.10 <LLD -
Airborne lodine 3
(pC1/m )
C L-01, Near-site 0 19.0 (20/20) 20 (2/2) la 6(8/8)
A Gamma Background Gamma Dme 28 3.0 Station No.1 (1 20)
- (17-21) 05 m1 @ 326a (TLDs) (mR/Qtr.)
<LLD 0 Milk I-131 29 0.5 <LLD - -
(PG/L)
Gamma Spec. 29
<LLD 0 Cs-124 5 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 Cs-137 5 <LLD -
<LLD 0 Other Gammas 10 <LLD - -
Surface Water Gamma Spec. 6 (pCi/L) <LLD 0 Cs-134 10 <LLD - -
I
<LLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD -
<LLD 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -
<LLD - - <tLD (T Tritium 2 200 l
- Mean and rang = based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
3 bLocations L-01, IAD, L-04, and LA)6 all had identic1 means of 0.018 pC1/m
RADIOLCSICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY
SUMMARY
Name of Facility LasaUe Nudear Power Station Dociet No. 5025L 50-265 location of Facility LaSalle County. Illinois Reportmg Period 2nd Ouarter 1991 (County, State)
Sample Tyy and Indicator Location with liighest Control Num W <d Type Ntanberof locadon4 Ouarterly Mean Locations Non-routine (Units) Analyses LID h s bula ;
Mean* Mean Range hxa6m Range Range Well Water Gamma Sgwc.
6 (pO/L)
Cs-134 10 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 Tritium 6 200 <LLD - -
(LLD 0 3 Bottom Sediments Camma Spec. 1
- (pCl/m )
Cs-134 0.1 <LLD - -
Nme O Cs-137 0.1 0.16 (1/1) 1,34 Down=tream 0.16(1/1) Nme 0 of Cooling take Discharge Other Gammas 02 <LLD - -
None 0 Fish Camma Spec. 8 (pO/g wet)
Cs-134 0.1 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 Cs-137 0.1 <LLD - -
<tLD 0 Other Gammas 0.2 <LLL - -
<LLD 0
- Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY
SUMMARY
Name c4 Fadlity LaSalle Nuclear Power Station Didet No.J373. %374 l Location of Fadbty_12Salle County. IHinois Reporting Permd _ 3rd Ouarter 1991
(
1 (Cour;ty, State)
Control Nominyd Indicator Location with Illghest Sample Type and Locations Non-routine locathms Ouarteriv Mean Type Numberd Mean Mean*
E"I**
(Units) Analysa LLD Mean*
Letkm Ran F Range Range 0.u21 (13/13) Nore o Gros, lieta 77 0 01 0.u21 (76/77) 1,01,Near
- Site #1 Air Partsculata (0.012 0.030) 3 60124031) 05 mi @ 326*
(pC1/m ) 0 l
- Norw Camma Spec. 6 0.01 <LLD .
- None 0 1-131 77 0.10 <LLD -
Alttorne lodine (pCl/m ) 19 (2/2) le .6 (8/ d) 0 10 17.2 uu/2to L-14, Ottawa Gamma iLxiground Gamma Dme 28 (15-20)
(16-18) 12.0 mi @ 315' (18-20)
(~II.Ds) (mR /Qtr.)
- <LLD 0 1-131 32 03 <LLD -
Milk (pCl/L) 3 Camma Sp.t. 32 y
- <LLD 0 Cs-134 5 <LLD -
- <LLD 0 Cs-137 5 <tLD -
- <LLD 0 Other Gammas 10 <LLD -
Surf ace Water Gamma Spec. 6 (pCl/L) - <LLD 0 Cs-134 10 <LLD -
- <LLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD -
<LLD 0
<LLD Other Gamma, 20 256 (1/1) O 2 200 <LLD I 21, Illinois River 256 (1/1)
Tritium at Seneca,4.0 mi C W
Well Water Gamma Spec. 6 (pCi/Li - <LLD 0 Cs-134 10 <LLD --
<LLD 0
<LLD Cs-137 10
- <t.LD 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD -
- Mean and range based on detectable rneasurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.3 b 73y,3 ire, (g,01, LE2, L-03, I.AM, and L-06) all had identical quarterly means (0.021 pCI/m ). Only 1,01 is detailed in this summary.
RADIOLOGICf.L ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PRCURAM QUARTERLY
SUMMARY
Name of Fadlity_._LaSalle Nudear Power Station Dtxiet No. 54254. 54265 Location of Facility ___ lea 11e County. Illinois Reporting Perkx! __ 4th Ouarter 1991 (County, State)
Sample Type and Indicator location with liighest Control Numba of Type Numbaof locations Ouartely Man Locations Non-routine (Units) Analyses LLD Mean* Mean Mean* R:'**3'"
Range Mm Range Range Air Particulates Cross Beta 84 0 01 0 024 (84/84) L-05, Near-site 0.0Z5 (14/14) Nme 0 3 (0.013-0.043) Station No. 5 (0.017-0.043)
(pCl/m )
03mi @ 145' O
Camma Spec. 6 0.01 <LLD - - None Airborne lodine . 1-131 84 0.10b <Lto . - Nme 0 (pC1/mb g Gamma Rackground Gamma Dme 28 3.0 17.2 (20/20)
(15A18.5)
LAll, Near Site 81 0.5 ml @ 326' 18.4 a/2)
(18418.5) 16.9 (8/8)
(15.5-18.3) 0 (TLDs)(mR/Qtr.)
Milk I-131 30 0.5 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 (pCi/L)
Camma Spr. 30 Cs-124 5 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 Cs-137 5 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 Other Gammas 10 <LLD - - <LLD
. 0 Surface Water Gamma Spec. 6 (pO/L)
Cs-134 10 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD - - <LLD 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 Tritium 2 200 <LLD - - <LLD U
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QU ARTERLY
SUMMARY
Name of Facihty LaSaljeJuclear Pown Station Dodet No. SG254. 50 265 location of Fadlity 12Salle County. IUinois Reporting Perbj 4th Ouarter 1991 (County, State)
(
Location with Ilighest Contrni Ntonbn d Type and Indicator locations Non-rwrme Sample dons Omrterty Mean Type Ntsnbaof , go, y ,,,a bula Analyses LLD k (Units) l Well Water Gamma Spec 6 (pO/L) - <LLD 0 Cs-134 10 <LLD -
- <LtD 0 Cs-137 10 <LLD -
- <LLD 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD -
- <LLD 0 Tritium 6 200 <LLD -
ikAtem Sediments Garnma Spec. I 3 0
- - Nme C+134 0.1 <LLD -
Nme 0 0.1 0.16(1/1) !<34, Downstream 0.16(1/1)
Cs-137 of Cooling 12ke l
Discharge
- Nme 0 Other Gammas 0.2 <LLD -
Fish Gamma Spec- 9 (pO/g wet) - <LLD 0 Cs-134 0.1 *D -
- <LLD 0 Cs-137 0.1 <LLD -
<LLD 0
<LLD Other Gammas 01 -
a Mean and s ege bawd on efetectable measurements only. Fradions indicatai3 in parentheses.
b One result for 1-131 exceeded LLD (<0.89) because of very low volume (10 m )
'm
TABLE 5.1-1 Gamma **dialton Measured in mR by TLLs Quarter ! Quarier 2 Quarter ~; overter 4 1991 1%1 1pl 441 On-Si t e and Near-Si t e Indic a t or Loc a t ions Lot-1 NE AR-S1 TE NO .1 16 20 16 18.5 RG 20 18 18.4 Lot-2 NE M-5 i;TE T E NQ . 1 17 19 17 lt .5 LO2-1 NEM-S NO. 2 17 19 17 16.9 L02-2 NEAR-SITE NO. 2 17 18 16 10.1 LO3-1 DN-SITE NO. 3 17 18 16 16.3 LO3-2 ON-SITE NO. 3 17 19 17 10.8 LO4-1 NEAR-SITE NO. 4 17 17.0 1,04-2 NE AR-511E NO . 4 17 18 Ln5-1 DN-S!TE NO. 5 10 19 !? 18.2 Lo5-2 ON-$1TE NO. S IS 21 18 17.7 LO6-1 NE AA-SI T E NO . 6 19 21 17 18.2 18 19 18 17.4 Lob-2 NEAR-SITE NQ . 6 Me an 1 S .D. 16 1 1 19 2 1 17 2 1 17.4 1 0.9 Of f-Sit e Indic ator Locattonstfar Fieldt LO7-1 SENECA 14 19 1E 17.9 LO7-2 SENECA 18 20 18 1E, 19 e0 27.,1 LOG-1 MARSEILLES ie LOS-2 MAFSElLLES 18 19 18 17.5 Lt!-l RANSOM 17 17 16 10.0 15.6 L11-2 RANSON 16 17 15 L13-1 RT. 6 AT GONPeA* ROAL 17 18 17 It .5 L 13- 2 RT. 6 AT 60tmAM ROAD 10 18 17 16.6 Mean i S.D. 18 t 1 19 1 1 17 1 1 17.0 1 0.9 Pac k gr ound Loc at ions LO3-L GAAND &IDGE 17 19 It 1( .7 LO9-2 GRAND R1(GE -17 14 16 17,0 16 .1 L10-1 STREATDb 17 18 16 Lle-2 STEEATOR 87 18 16 16.4 L12-1 kERNAN 16 19 15 16 A-L12-1 DERNAN 17 18 16 15.t Ll4-1 OTTAWA 18 19 20 18.3 L14-2 OTTAWA 18 29 1E 16.3 Mean i S,0. 17 2 1 13 1 1 17 2 2 16.9 3 1.0 i nr.er Ring, Near* Site Ecundary, jndtcator locatnon5 L101-1 NOPTH 19 20 18 18.4 L101-2 NORTH 19 20 13 1E.0 L102-1 NORTH NORTHE AST 20 21 29 14.4 (102-2 W TH NORTHEAST 20 21 au 19.9 Ll63-1 P RTHF AS T 19 19 18 18.0 L103-2 NJ T&{ AST 20 20 19 19.4 L105-1 EAST 29 21 20 20.1 LIOS-2 EAST 20 21 19 1 4 . t.
L 10t - 1 F AS T SOUTHE AST LE 19 17 17.3 L106-2 E AST SOUTHE AST 18 19 IE I?.7 L107-1 SOUT HE AST 19 20 19 10.3 L107-2 SOUTHEAST '9 20 19 18.0 LIOS-1 SOUTH IE 20 14 19.6 L109-2 SOUTH 19 20 20 18.6 50
1 I
TABLE 5.1-1(continued)
Quart e t Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Aarter 4 1991 1991 1991 1991 L110-1 SOUTH SOUTHWEST 19 20 18 17.4 Lilo-2 SOUTH SOUTFWEST 18 19 1B 17.9 LillAl SOUTHWEST . 19 20 18 18.1 L111A2 SOUTHWE ST 18 20 IC 17.7 19 20 18 13,5 LillB1 SOUTHWEST 18 17.S LillB2 SOUTHWE ST 1% 19 Lil2-1 WEST SOUTHWE ST 19 19 17 17.4 Lila-2 WEST SOUTHWEST 19 19 18 17.5 L113At WEST 20 21 19 19.1 Lil3A2 bEST 19 20 19 18.5 Lil3&l WE ST 19 22 19 18.4 L113B2 WEST 20 20 20 18.8 18 El 19 13.y L114-1 WEST NORTHWEST 19.2 L114-2 WEST NORTHWEST 19 20 19 Mears i S.D. 1911 20 1 1 19 ti 13.4 2 0.8 Outer Ring. Near 5 es te Radius. Indncator Loc at t om L2On-1 NORTH NORTHE AST 19 20 18 IS.3 L201-2 M,RTH NORT4 AST 19 20 19 18.7 L D2- 1 NORTH NORTHEAST 18 19 19 18.5 L202-2 NORTH N0nTHE AST 18 19 18 17.2 L203-1 NORTHEAST 18 19 18 17.9 L203-2 NORTHEAST 19 21 19 18.4 18 20 18 13.e-L204-1 EAST NORTHE AST 19 L204-2 EAST NORTHEAST 18 19 IE.2 L205-1 EAST SOUTHEAST 18 20 18 18.9 L205-2 EAST SOUTHEAST 18 19 17 10.1 L206-1-EAST SOUTHEAST 19 20 1B 17.S L206-2 E AST SOUT>E AST 18 20 18 17.3 L207-1 SOUTHEAST 18 20 19 18.5 L207-2 SOUTHEAST 18 19 18 17.6 L208-1. SOUTH IS 19 1* 18.2 19 21 19 I S .t.
L208 2 SOUTH 20 18 18.0 L209-1 SOUTH SOUTHWEST 19 L209-2 SOUTH SOUTHWEST 18 20 18 17.5 L210-1 SOUTHWEST 19 21 19 19.3 L210-2 SOUTHWEST 19 21 19 16.8
'L214-1 WEST SOUTHWEST 19 21 20 20.0 L 2 *.1 -2 WEST SOUTHWEST 20 20 19 19.0 L212-1 WEST 19 20 18 18.4 L2tP-2 WEST 19 21 18 18.3 L213-1 WEST NORTHWEST 19 20 1S 18.4 L213-2 WEST NORTHWLST 19 20 18 18.5 LPl4-1 WEST NORTHWEST 20 21 19 19.6
.L214-2 WEST NORTHWEST 20 22 20 -19.4 L215-1 NORTH NORTHWEST 20 21 20 18.5 L215-2 NORTH NORTHWEST 20 21 20 19.3 1216-1 NORTH 19 2! 24 18.7
.L216-2 NORTH 19 20 19 18.2 .
Mean 2 S.L. 19 1 1 20 1 1 19 i 1 18.5 t 0.6 RESTRICTED AREA MONITORING FrsCORAM L304-1 LEASED FARM LAND 20 21 19 19.9 L395-1 BOAT RArtP 14 20 18 18.5 L310-3 NGET BUILLING 23 25 23 20.S L3 t t.-l LE ASED F ARM LAND ig 20 gg gg,g Pean i S.D. 20 2 2 22 1 2 20 t 2 19.4 1 1.2 51
APPENDIX 11 METEOROLOGICAL. DATA ng 7 - - - - _ - - _ - _
~ - ..- - . .-... - .. . _ . . .
LASALLE NUC8. EAR POWER STATION
?ERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1991 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND W.fND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW C 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 -0 0- 0 -0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE' O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 I
Hours-of calm ~this stability class:' O-Hours of missi,p: wind rneasurements- in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 2 53
LASALLE NUCLE AR POWER ST ATION PEPIO'J OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1991 STABILITY CLAGS - HODERATELY UNSTABLE (PT F TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT :1 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O 0 0 NE O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENE O O O O O O O _ _ .
E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O O O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 3 1 0 0 0 4 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O 0 TOTAL 0 3 1 0 0 10 14 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 2 P
=
1 LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1991
-STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MP!I)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL ,
N O O O O 2 1 3 l NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O j l
E O O O O O O O ;
ESE O O O O O O O SE O J 0 0 0 0 0-SSE O O O O 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S$W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l
SW 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L W 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0. 0 0 2 1 6 9 l- NNW 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 L VARIABLE .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l
TOTAL 0 0- 1 2 4 8 15 Hours of calm in this' stability class: 'O Hours of missing' wind measurements in this stability class: 0
' Hours'of missing stability measurefr3nts in all stibility classes: 2 55
i LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1991 STABIL;1Y CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 1 7 25 45 34 6 118 .
NNE O 4 12 28 18 2 64 NE O 3 16 16 0 0 35 j ENE O O 2 6 6 4 18 E O O 6 8 7 11 32 ESE O 2 2 2 3 9 18 SE O O 6 9 7 2 24 SSE O 1- 3 10 9 13 36 S 2 2 3 6 10 6 29 SSW 1 2 2 7 12 21 45 SW 1 5 6 7 15 15 49 WSW 0 6 3 19 14 10 52 W 0 3 19 12 15 9 58 WNW- 0 4 20 22 27 64 137 NW 1 6 25 32 44 37 145 NNW 1 5 24 40 21 9 100 VARIABLE O O O O O O- 0 TOTAL 7 50 174 269 242 218 960 l- Hours'of' calm in this. stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind-measurements in this stability-class: -108-Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 2 56
.-,z e y v - , - - - r -.-m.<m..-,,w., r- --- -es, -
l LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1991 STAB. ( CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND. WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION- .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL i
N O 3 8 11 4 0 26 .
t NNE O 1 4 5 4 6 20 NE O 4 16 15 2 0 37 ENE 1- 2 7 7 1 0 18
-E O 4 12 10 16 8 50 ESE O 1 2 9 15 25 52 ,
SE 0 0 2 8 7 4 21 SSE O 1 2 4 7 17 31 S 0 1 2 4 7 24 38 SSW 0 1 8 5 11 48 7 .'
SW 0 3 3 5 15 44 70 WSW 0 3 11 7 20 18 59 W 0 2 7 16 25 15 65 WNW- 1 1 4 17 22 19 64 NW 0 5 6 11 '10 7 39
'NNW 0 2 4 11 13 0 30 VARIABLE O 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2 34 98 145 179 235 693 Hours of calm in this stability class: . . O _ _ ._
Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 19 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 2 l
57
_ _ _. . ~ . _ . . . . - . _ .
l LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1991 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF 'EHP 3/5-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 0 1 2 1 2 0 6 NNE O 1 0 2 0 0 3 NE O O 1 1 3 0 5 ENE O O 2 4 3 0 9 E O 0 0 0 3 2 5 ESE O O 1 1 1 6 9 SE O O O 3 3 5 11 SSE O O O 3 3 5 11 S 0 2 2 0 5 10 19 SSW 0 2 2 7 1 25 37 SW 2 0 4 7 7 52 12 WSW 0 0 1 3 12 17 33 W D 1 1 4 8 15 29 WNW 0 0 4 4 6 7 21 NW 0 0 0 3 2 1 6 NNW 0 1 2 2 2 0 7 VARIABLE O O 0 0 0 0 0 ,
TOTAL 2 8 22 45 61 145 283 r Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missin9 stability measurements in all stability classes: 2 l
. _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
l LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JANUARY-MARCH 1991 ]
STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 NE 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O O 3 3 S 0 0 1 1 2 3 7 SSW 0 0 2 1 3 7 13 SW 0 0 0 2 1 14 17 WSW D 0 0 0 1 10 11 W 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 WNW 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 NW 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 NNW 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0
-VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 2 0 4 6 11 42 65 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 2 l
l L 59
__ _ _m _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ __ . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _
I LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORO - APRIL-JUNE 1991
~ STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEl1P 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET LIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
OIRECTION .7 3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 tit 24 TOTAL
.....~....'. . ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I NNE O 1 0 0 0 1 l
NE O 2 4 3 0 0 9 l
ENE O O 5 10 6 1 22 g E -0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ESE O O O O O O O SE- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSE O O O O O O O e S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSW 0 0 0 12 3 0 15 ,
l SW 0 0 2 4 2 0 8 .
WSW 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 W- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,
WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O 0 0 0 0. 0 0
- TOTAL 0 3 11 30 11 1 56 i Hours of calm in this stability-class
- -0 Hours of missing wind measurements in.this stability class: O r Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classos: 1 60
l LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1991 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATEi.Y UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURE 0 AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH) l DIRECTION .7-3 4- T 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL i N O O 1 1 0 0 2 )
NNE O O 3 2 0 0 $
NE O 3 4 0 1 0 8 ENE 0 0 8 6 2 0 16 l E. 0 0 4 0 1 0 5 ESE. 0 3 2 0 0 0 5 SE O 4 2 0 0 0 6
-SSE O 2 0 1 0 0 3 S 'O 1 1 3 0 0 5 SSW 0 1 4 9 6 1 21 SW 0 1 5 5 1 0 12 WSW- 0 0 3 3 0 3 9 ,
d 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 WNW 0 -e 0 0 'O O O NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .
. TOTAL 0 15 37 30 11 5 98' i
Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind neasurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 1 61
i:
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1991 STABILITY CLASS - SLIOHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET {
WIND WIND SJiED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 OT 24 TOTAL N O O 3 1 0 0 4 NNE O 1 1 3 0 0 $
NE O 5 2 0 3 0 10 ENE O 4 9 6 4 2 25 E O 3 2 2 2 3 12 ESE 1 2 1 0 3 0 7 SE O 3 1 0 1 0 5 e
SSE O O 2 2 0 0 4
$ 0 3 3 2 0 0 8 SSW 0 4 5 ? 3 1 15 SW 0 2 5 3 8 2 20 WSW C 2 0 1 0 7 10 W 0 5 2 1 0 3 11 WNW 0 0 3 0 0 3 6 NW 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
, NNW 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 VARIABLE O O O O O O O i.
TOTAL 1 35 40 23 24 21 144 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hourt of missing wind measurements in this stabi:1ty class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 1 62
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1991 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL-N 0 6 14 12 1 0 33 NNE 1 8 14 28 6 0 57 NE 2 11 12 32 11 1 69 ENE 1 3 11 54 57 15 141 E 1 4 8 35 40 26 114 ESE 2 6 10 18 '2
. 12 60 SE 1 3 16 18 6 7 51 SSE O 4 19 10 2 2 37 S 0 6 10 10 10 8 44 SSW 0 3 9 20 13 9 54 SW 0 8 10 15 18 10 61 WSW 0 4 8 23 13 18 66 W 2 2 12 12 4 37 69 WNW 0 7 6 9 1 23 46
-NW 1 3 10 12 13 6 45 NNW 0 2 14 9 2 5 32 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 11 80 183 317 209 179 979
' Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 I Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 7 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classs; 1-l l
l l
63 P
_ __._ _ - ~ __ . . _ _ _ _ ,
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1991 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET I l
WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 E-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O 3 2 1 0 6 NNE O 4 2 2 1 0 9 NE 1 2 1 3 0 0 7 l
ENE O 4 5 11 1 0 21 j E O 3 10 35 13 3 64 ESE 1 3 5 17 17 17 60 SE 1 3 5 9 7 11 39 SSE O 3 3 5 6 9 26 S 1 4 7 12 13 2 39 SSW 1 1 6 19 24 23 74 SW 0 .4 6 10 16 16 52 WSW 0 $ 8 15 14 14 56 W 0 1 5 7 10 4 27 WNW 0 1 4 8 4 6 23 NW 0 4 6 'e 6 4 28 NNW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL $ 42 76 164 133 112 532 i
o Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 12 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 1 64
- . . . ~ - . - _ - - - . - .
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1991 STABILITY PLASS - HODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 NNE 0 2 1 1 0 0 4 NE O O O 2 0 0 2 ENE O O 3 1 0 0 4 E O O 3 7 8 0 18 ESE O 1 1 2 5 2 11 SE 1 3 1 8 8 19 40 SSE O 1 2 9 1 2 15 S 0 3 0 8 5 1 17 SSW 1 1 . 7 10 16 40 SW 0 3 8 14 13 37 75 WSW 1 3 2 14 9 4 33 W 0 1 5 13 5 1 25 WNW 0 0 3 8 $
0 12 4
NW 0 1 2 5 4 0 12 NNW 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 4 20 38 100 69 82 313 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0
- Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 1
\.
e 65
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - APRIL-JUNE 1991 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREHELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNE O O O u O O O NE O O O O O 0 0 ENE O O O O O O O E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O J 0 0 SE O O O 0 0 5 5 SSE O O O 2 0 3 5 0 0 0 3 4 0 7 SSW 0 0 0 3 1 2 b SW 0 0 0 2 3 1 6 WSW 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 W 0 0 0 2 4 1 7 WNW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 NW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 NNW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 YARIABLE O O O O O O O 3
TOTAL 0 0 0 15 15 12 42 4-Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability meast:rements in all stability classes: 1 66
i l
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION l i
PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1991 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 376-33 FT)
WINDS MEAstlED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTIOP .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 0 0 2 2 0 0 4 NNE O O 6 3 0 0 9 NE O 2 3 3 1 0 9 ENE o 0 4 0 4 0 8 ,
i E O O O 2 0 0 2 ESE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O O 1 0 1 S 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 SSW 0 0 9 5 5 1 23 SW 0 1 4 12 6 1 24 WSW 0 0 1- 4 2 1 8 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 3 36 31 24 6 100 1
1 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability-class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stal.lity ci sses: 26-l I
l 67 l
._ . - _ _ .. .. ._ __ l
LASALLt NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEP1 EMBER 1991 STABILITY CLASS - MODERAlELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O 1 7 5 0 0 13 i
NNE O 6 13 2 0 0 21 NE O 2 2 5 0 0 9 ENE O 2 5 3 i 0 11 E O O 1 1 0 0 2 ESE O 2 5 0 0 0 7 i
SE O O O O 0 0 0 SSE O 5 9 1 2 0 17 S 0 4 11 6 0 0 21 SSW 0 9 6 3 2 1 21 SW 0 7 12 11 6 4 40 WSW 0 1 8 6 4 3 22
+ 1 0 0 1 3 1 6 M 0 0 0 3 3 1 7 fu O O O 2 2 2 6 NNW 0 0 4 3 0 2 9 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 1 39 83 52 23 14 212 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 26 68
w LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1991 STABILITY CLASP - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL P O 3 6 2 4 0 15 NNE O 2 10 0 0 0 12 1
NE O 3 1 3 0 0 7 ENE O 1 7 0 0 0 8 E O 2 8 5 0 0 15 ESE O 1 3 1 0 0 5 i
SE O 2 4 2 0 0 8 SSE O 1 3 1 1 0 6 S 0 1 2 2 0 0 5 :
S$W 0 3 2 1 2 0 8 SW 0 2 6 4 1 1 14 l
WSW 0 2 8 4 3 4 21 I W 0 2 6 2 3 2 15 WNW 0 0 2 -5 6 4 17 NW 0 1 1 6 2 1 11 NNW 0 5 6 7 2 1 21 VARIACLE O .0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 31 75 45 24 13 '188 Hours of. calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0.
Hours of missing stability measurements-in all stability claces: 26 l-69
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1991 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 47 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 1 11 23 2 18 0 55 NNE 1 8 7 20 0 0 36 NE 2 10 20 15 1 0 48 ENE 3 4 14 19 13 0 53 __
E 1 5 13 34 10 0 63 ESE O 9 10 20 7 0 46 SE 1 7 10 3 0 0 21 ,
SSE 1 1 10 5 5 0 22 S 1 1 6 5 1 2 16 SSW 0 1 10 3 6 1 21 SW 0 4 7 17 19 2 49 WSW 0 3 12 19 13 2 49 W 0 7 6 10 8 0 31 WNW 0 6 12 8 6 6 33 NW 1 6 7 13 7 5 39 ,
NNW 0 8 9 13 4 0 34 VARIABLE O C 0 0 0 0 0 TOT,.L 12 91 176 206 118 18 621 HoJrs of calm in this stability class: 0
, Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 26 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 26 1
70
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1991 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WI 'OS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION 7-3 4- 7 E-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O 4 5 15 6 0 30 UNE 2 2 8 10 8 0 30 NE 3 3 20 3 1 0 30 ENE 1 2 16 8 0 0 27 E 3 1 16 46 21 1 88 ESE O 1 11 14 19 1 46 SE 1 1 5 10 7 4 28 SSE O O 1 8 6 2 17 S 1 1 2 6 5 2 17 SSW 2 1 3 16 17 16 55 SW 0 1 3 17 25 19 55 WSW 1 2 4 7 10 2 26 W 1 1 8 7 13 0 30 WNW 1 4 4 9 6 1 25 NW 0 4 3 9 8 12 36 NNW 0 3 0 11 3 0 17 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TCTAL 16 31 109 196 155 60 567 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 19 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 26 71
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1991 STABILITY CLASS - HODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 0 1 3 3 2 0 9 NNE O O 4 3 0 0 7 NE 1 8 0 0 0 0 9 ENE O 1 0 0 0 0 i E O 2 6 7 3 1 19 ESE O 1 7 8 3 3 22 SE- 0 6 6 3 6 2 23 SSE O 3 3 4 7 1 18 S 0 5 6 8 7 8 34 SSW 0 2 2 7 22 5 38 SW 1 3 2 15 17 14 52 WSW 0 1 6 6 12 7 32 V O 1 3 5 5 1 15 WNW i 0 1 1 19 14 0 35 l NW 0 4 1 8 15 2 30 NNW 0 0 2 2 1 0 5 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 2 33 52 98 114 44 349 Hours _of-calm lin this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 1 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 26 72 l
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERICD OF RECORD - JULY-SEPTEMBER 1991 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WINO WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O 0 0 0 0 0 NE 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 i
ENE O O O O 0 0 0 l
E O O O O O 0 0 '
l ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O 1 0 0 1 SSE O O 0 6 1 1 8 8 0 0 0 5 1 7 13 SSW 0 0 2 4 8 6 20 SW 0 0 1 7 7 6 21 WSW 0 1 1 5 6 0 13 W 0 0 0 2 4 0 6 WNW 0 2 0 4- 2 0 8 NW G 0 2 5 1 0 8 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O J 4 6 39 30 20 99 TOTAL 1
Hours of calm-in this' stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 26 73
- .. __ -- . - . . - - - _ _ _ ~ . - - . . - . . . . _ _ . - . _ - . - _ . . - . _ .
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1991 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT) l WINDS HEASURED AT 375, FEET l WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O l
NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O 1 0 0 1 ENE O 0. 0 0 0 0 0 E O O O O O O O 1
ESE O O O O O O O SE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSW 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O l
10TAL 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 l
' Hours of calm in thi_s stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of missing stability meas'irements in all stability classes: 65 i
74
-._ _ . _ _ _ , _ ~ . _ . . _ . _ _ - _.-
_ _ _ _ . . ~
l LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD , OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1991 STABILITY CLASS - HODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 NNE O O O 2 0 0 2 NE O O O 2 1 0 3 ENE O 0- 0 0 0 0 0 E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O SSE O 1 0 3 0 0 4 S 0 1 0 3 0 2 6 SSW- 0 2 1 0 4 6 13 SW 1 1 3 2 2 3 12 WSW 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 W- 0 1 0 1 1 2 5 WNW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 1 7 4 20 9 14 55 Hours of calm _in this stability class: 0 Hours of-missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 65 75
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1991 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N 1 0 1 4 3 0 9 NNE O O 3 4 0 0 7 NE O O O 1 0 0 1 ENE O O 0 0 0 0 0 _
E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O 1 0 0 1 -
SSE O O O 4 1 0 5 S 0 0 1 3 2 5 11 i
SSW 0 0 1 0 4 3 8 SW 0 0 3 2 4 1 10 WSW 0 0 0 3 0 1 4 W 0 1 0 9 1 6 17 WNW 0 2 0 5 3 1 11 NW 0 0 0 2 1 2 5 NNW 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 VARIABLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 3 9 38 22 19 92 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 m Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 3 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 6b 76 ,
i ._ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . . _.
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1991 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION 7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O O 13 42 24 5 84 NNE 1 2 19 29 8 0 59 NE 1 4 30 28 6 0 69 ENE 1 1 5 41 30 1 79 E 1 2 1 8 10 11 33 ESE O 1 4 2 2 25 34 SE 1 10 22 8 1 7 49 SSE 1 4 5 11 12 11 44 S 0 5 2 4 9 29 49 SSW 1 1 5 6 12 49 74 SW 0 4 5 11 15 14 49 WSW 2 3 1 16 2 34 58 W 0 5 16 21 15 71 128 WNW 1 3 14 14 21 65 118 NW 0 7 29 16 10 8 70 NNW 1 6 16 24 13 6 66 VARIABLE O O O O 0 0 0 TOTAL 11 58 187 281 190 336 1063 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 42 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 65 77
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1991 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEHP 375-33 FT)
G WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN HPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O 2 7 5 1 20 NNE 1 3 3 2 3 2 14 NE O 7 6 4 0 0 17 ENE 2 2 4 7 1 0 16 E O O 4 2 1 2 9 ESE O 2 3 1 1 14 21 SE O O 5 5 3 11 24 SSE- 0 2 3 6 8 16 35 S 0 2 1 7 9 54 73 SSW 0 2 2 9 6 88 107 SW 0 0 5 14 7 39 65 WSW 0 0 1 5 6 1 13 W 0 1 6 9 15 13 44 WNW 1 1 3 5 31 4 45 NW 0 3 4 12 5 4 28 NNW 0 4 5 11 13 0 33 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 4 31 62 104 114 249 564 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 23 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 65 7
78
LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1991 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
.7-3 4- 7 8-12 13-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL DIRECTION ----- ----- ----- -----
0 2 1 0 5 N i 1 0 1 1 0 4 NNE O 2 O O 1 0 0 1 NE O 0 1 0 0 5 ENE 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 E O O 1 1 1 0 3 ESE O 1 4 3 1 0 9 SE O 1 3 5 6 3 18 SSE O 3 2 7 3 7 22 S 0 0 3 7 14 44 68 SSW 0 0 5 10 30 40 SW 0 1 0
3 11 5 23 WSW 0 0 5 2 4 13 W 0 2 0 4 11 2 17 WNW 0 0 0 4 4 1 10 NW 0 1 3 1 3 0 0 7 NNW 0 O O O O O VARIABLE O O 18 19 G2 65 96 252 TOTAL 2 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 2 i Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class:
65 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes:
I i
79
i LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD - OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1991 STABILIT( CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 375-33 FT)
WINDS HEASURED AT 375 FEET WIND WIND SPEED (IN MPH)
DIRECTION .7-3 4- 7 8-12 i3-18 19-24 GT 24 TOTAL N O 9 0 0 0 0 0 NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O 0 0 0 ENE O O O O O C 0 __
E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O 0 0 0 SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O 1 0 0 1 S 0 0 0 7 1 0 8 SSW 0 0 2 7 5 7 21 SW 0 1 0 2 1 5 9 WSW 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 W 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 2 2 21 8 12 45 k Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 65 80
f U
k I
1 ga APPENDIX 111 LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES 81
LASALLE
} 2.0 LISTING OF MISSEQf 6hiELES Expected Collection Sample Type Location L%te Reason Air Particulate / L-03a 03-15-91 Road not accessible due to snow. _
Air lodine Air Particulate / L-03a 05-24-91 No power at pump site.
Air Iodine Air Particulate / L-03a 05-31-91 No power at pump 31te.
Air Iodine Milk L-20 06-28-91 Cow dry; no milk available.
Milk L-20 07-05-91 Cow dry; no milk available.
Air Particulate / L-03a 07-13-91 No power at pump site.
Air Iodine Milk L-20 07-19-91 Cow dry; no milk available.
L Milk L-20 08-02-91 Cow dry; no milk available.
a The power supply to fixed air sampler L-3 was replaced in December 1991.
82
4 APPENDlX IV Mll CH ANIMAL ~ , NEAREST CATTLE, AND NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUSES-f ',
I-w.s 5
( ~ >
83 -
l e
. _ ~ . ~ . _ . _ . - . - . _ - . - -- . . _ . . - .-.
LASALLE MILCH ANIMALS CENSUS,1991 There are no dairy farms within four miles radius of LaSalle County Station.
Samoling Locations L 19 Robert Bettenhousen Farm 8.5 miles @ 180*
Number of cows - 78 Number of fresh cows - 62 Diet consists of feed and grass.
L-16 Lowery Dairy Farm 8.2 miles @ 120' Number of cows - 105 Number of fresh cows - 80 Diet consists of feed and grass.
. L-17 Earl Hayer - Andrew Patterson Dairy 12.3 miles @ 18' Number of cows - 42 Number of fresh cows - 31 Diet consists of feed end grass.
84
LASALLE
- MILCH ANIMALS CENSUS,1991 (continued)
L-18 Flatness Dairy Farm -
12.5 miles @ 10' Number of cows - 80 Number of fresh cows - 46 Diet consists of feed and mass.
L-20 Gass Farm
' 4.6 miles @ 348'
~ Number of cows - 2 Number of fresh cows - 1 Diet consists of feed and grass.
Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 28,1991, t-5 85
LASALLE NEAREST RESIDENCE CENSUS,1991 Nearest resident of the LaSalle Station within a five (5) mile radius.
Direction Distance N 2.2 miles NNE 1.4 miles NE 1.8 miles ENE 3.4 miles E 3.s miles ESE 1.6 miles SE 1.5 miles SSE 1.1 miles S 2.2 miles SSW 2.0 miles SW 0.7 miles WSW 1.3 miles .
W 0.9 miles WNW 1.0 miles NW 2.6 miles NNW 1.2 niiles Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 28,1991. There was no change fnam 1990.
86
LASALLE NEAREST CATTLE CENSUS,1991 Nearest cattle of the LaSalle Station within a fise (5) mile radius.
Rirection Distance N 4.2 miles NNE 3.0 miles NE 4.6 miles ENE 3.0 miles ,
E- No cattie ESE No cattle
~SE 4.5 mees SSE 4.5 miles S No cattle SSW No cattle SW No cattle WSW No cattle W 3.5 miles WNW .1 miles l
NW No cattle
- ~NNW 5.0 miles L.
Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 28.1991.
87
- 1. .
l J.
APPENDIX V INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS l-L gg.
. - . .. - -.- . --.--. - -- -_ ~. . . - . -
Annendix V Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results
' Teledyne isotcpes Midwest Laboratory (formerly Hazleton Environmental Sciences) has participated in l interlaboratory comparison (crosschs) programs since the formulation of its quality cont rol prograrn in December 1971. These programs are operated by agencies which supply environmental-type samples (a.g.,
milk or water) containing concentrations of radionuclides known to the ssuing agency but not to i participant laboratories. The purpose of such a program is to provide an independent check on the ,
laboratory's analytical procedures and to alert it to any possible problems. i l
Participant laboratories measure the concentratio'i of specified radionuclides and report them to the ,
issuing agency. Several months later, the agency reports the known values to the participant laboratories I and specifies control limits. Results consistently higher or lower than the known values or outside the -I control limits indicate a neen o check the instruments or procedures used.
)
l The results in Table A-1 were obtained through participation in the environmental sample crosscheck program for milk, water, air filters, and food samples during the period January 1988 through November
~
1991. This pregram has been conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Intercomparison ]
and Calibration Section, Quality Assurance Branch, Environmental Monitoring an.d Support Laboratory, l Las Vegas, Nevada.
The results in Table A-2 were obtained for thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) during the period 1976, 1977,1979,1980,1984, and 1985-86 through participation in the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, and.
Eighth International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters under the sponsorships listed in Tabb A-2. Also Teledyne testing results are listed.
Table A-3 lists results of the analyses on in-house spiked samples.
Table A-4 lists results of the analyses on in-house " blank" samples. )
l Attachment B lists acceptance criteria for " spiked" samples. I I
i Addendum to Appendix A provides explanation for out-of-limit resuPs.
l 89
l Toble A 's U.S. Environmentr.1 Protection Agency's crosscheck program, comparison of EPA and Tekdyne l Isoto,r as Midwe<,t Laboratory recults for milk, aater, air filters, and food samples,1988 through !
1991.a l
Concentration in oCi/Lb EPA Resultd lab Sample Date TIML Result Control Code Type Collected Analysis d2cc -
1s, N=1 Limits STW-521 Water Jan 1988 Sr-89 27.315.0 30.015.0 21.3-38.7 Sr-90 15.3il.2 15.011.5 12.4-17.o STW-523 Water Jan 1983 Gr. alpha 2.31.2 4.05.0 0.0-12.7 Cr. beta 7.711.2 8.015.0 0.0-16.7 STF-524 Food Jan 1988 Sr-89 44.014.0 46.0i5.0 37.3-54.7 Sr-90 53.012.0 55.0i2.8 50.2-59.8 I131 102.314.2 102.0ild.2 84.3-119.7 Cs-137 95.716.4 91 015.0 82.3-99.7 K 1011i158 1230162 1124-1336 STW-525 - Water Feb 1988 Co-60 69.312.3 69.015.0 60.3-77.7 Zn-65 99.0i3.4 94.019.4 77.7-110.3 Ru-106 92.7114.4 105.020.5 P' C 423.2 Cs-134 61.718.0 64.015.0 55.3-72.7 Cs 137 99.713.0 94.015.0 85.3-102.7 STW-526 Water Feb l988 H-3 34531103 3327i362 2700-3954 STW-527 Water Feb l988 Uranium 3.0i0.0 3.016.0 0.0-13.4 STM 528 Milk Feb l988 I-131 4.711.2 4.0i0.4 3.3-4.7 STW-529 Water Mar 1988 Ra-226 7.1dD.6 7.611.1 5.6-9.6 Ra-228 nae 7.7il.2 5*T-9.7 STW-530 k'a ter Mar 1988 Gr. alpha 4.311.2 6.Qi5.0 0.0 14.7 Gr. beta 13.311.3 13.015.0 4.3-21.7 STAF-531 Air Filter Mar 1988 Gr. alpha 21.&i'.0 20.015.0 11.3-28.7 Gr. beta 48.0i0.0 50.015.0 41.3-58.7 Sr-90 16.7il.2 17.011.5 14.4-19.6 Cs-137 18.7 1.3 16.015.0 7.3-24.7 STW-532 Water Ap) 1988 I-1 31 9.0i2.0 7.510.8 6.2-8.8 90
Table A-1. (continued)
Concentration in pCi /Lb
_ EPA Resultd l lab Sample Date TIML Result Control l Code Type Collected A: slysis f20C 1s, N=1 Limits 1 STW-533 Water Apr 1988 534 (Blind) 1 I
Sample' A Gr. alpha NDI 46.0i11.0 27.0 65.0 l Ra-226 ND 6.411.0 4.7-8.1 i Ra-228 ND 5.6d0.8 4.2-7.0 Uranfum 6.016.0 6.016.0 0.0-16.4 l Sample B Gr. beta ND SZO15.0 48.3-65.7 !
Sr-89 3311.2 5.0i5.0 0.0-13.7 Sr 90 5311.2 5.011.5 2.4-7.6 Co-60 633113 50.015.0 41.3-58.7 Cs-134 7.711.2 7.015.0 0.0-15.7 Cs-137 8311.2 7.015.0 0.0-15.7 STU-535 Urine Apr 1988 H-3 64831155 62021620 5123-7276 STW.536 Water Apr 1988 Sr-89 14.711 3 20.015.0 11 3-28.7 S -90 20.0+2.0 ' 20.011.5 17.4-22.6 STW-538 Water Jun 1988 Cr-51 331.7i13.0 302.0130.0 250.0-354.0 Co-60 16.0i2.0 15.015.0 6 3-23.7 Zn-65 107.7111.4 101.0110.0 83.7-1183 Ru-106 1913 111.0 195.0 20.0 160.4-229.6 Cs-134 183i4.6 20.015.0 11.3-28.7 Cs-137 263il.2 25.015.0 16.3-33.7 STW-539 Water Jun 1988 H-3 5586 92 55651557 4600-6530 STM-541 - Milk Jun 1988 Sr-89 33.7ill.4 40.015.0 31 3-48.7 c r-90 55315.8 60.013.0 54.8r 65.2 1-131 103.713.1 94.029.0 78.4-109.6 Cs-137 52.713.1 51.015.0 423-59.7 i K 1587i23 1600180 1461-1739 STW-542 Water Jul 1988 Gr. *1pha 8.714.2 15.0i5.0 6 3-23.7 Gr. beta 5311.2 4 015.0 0.0-12.7
! STF-543 Food Jul 1988 ' Sr-89 NDI 33.015.0 24 3-41.7
) Sr-90 ND 34.012.0 30.5-37.5 i I-131 115.0iS3 107.0111.0 88.0-126.0 i
Cs-137 52.7i6.4 49.015.0 40.3-57.7 l K 1190166 1240162 1133-1347 91
~
o Table A 1, (continued)
Concentration in DCi/Lb
' EPA Resultd '~
lab Sample Date TIML Result Control Code Type Collected Analysis - 12cc Is, d=1 Limits
- STW-544 Water Aug 1988 l-131 80.010.0 76.018.0 62.1 89.9 STW-545 Water Aug 1988 Pu-239 11.0 0.2 10.2.11.0 8.5-11.9 STW-546 Water Aug 1988 Uranium 6.0do.0 6.016.0 0.0 16.4 4
STAF-547 Air Filter Aug 1988 Gr. alpha 8.010.0 8.015.0 0.0-16.7 Gr. beta 26.311.2 29.015.0 20.3-37.7 Sr-90 8.0f.2.0 8.011.5 5.4-10 6 Cs-137 13.012.0 ;2.015.0 3.3 20.7 STW-548 Water Sep 1988 Ra-226 9.3f0.5 8.412.6 6.2 10.6 Ra 228 5.80.4 5.411.6 4.0-6.8 STW-549 Water Sep 1988 Gr. alpha 7.012.0 8.0i5.0 0.0-16.7 Gr. beta 11.311.2 10.015.0 1.3-18.7 STW-550 Water Oct 1938 Cr 51 252.0114.0 251.0 25.0 207.7-294.3 Co-60 26.012.0 25.015.0 16.3-33.7 2h-65 158.3110.2 151.0115.0 125.0-177.0 Ru-106 153.0i9.2 152.0 15.0 126.0-178.0 Cs-134 28.715.0 25.015.0 16.3-33.7 Cs-137 16.311.2 15.015.0 6.3-23.7 STW-551 Water Oct 1988 H3 23331127 2316i350 1710 2927 STW-552 W_ter - Oct 1988
. (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha 38.318 0 41.0110.0 23.7 5F 3 Ra-226 4.5 0.5 5.010.8 3.6-6.4 L Ra-228- 4.410.6 5.20.8- 3.6-6.4 Uranium 4.7il.2 5.016.0 0.0-15.4 Sample B Gr. beta 51.313 0 54.015.0 45.3-62.7 Sr-89 3.71.2 11.0i5.0 2.3-19.7 Sr-90 10.711.2 10.0il.5 7.4-12.6 Cs-134 15.312.3 15.015.0 6.3-23.7 Cs-137 16.711.2 15.015.0 6.3-23.7 92
4.; . n. - - - - . - . . =- - . - - - . . .- - -
' 7 Table A-1. (continued)-
Concentration in oCir '.b EPA Resultd lab - Sample ~ Ebte TIML Result Control - 4
- Code 1
-Type Collected Aritysis 12cc Is, N=1 Limits
' STM 554 Milk - - Oct 1988 St-89 40.3i7.0 - 40.015.0 31348.7 Sr 90 51.022.0 60.0i3.0 54.8-65.2 1-131 54.013.4 91.0i9.0 75.4-106.6 Cs-137 45.014.0 50.015.0 41 3-58.7 K 1500i45 1600180 1461 1739
- STU-555 Urine - Nov 1988 H.3 30301209 30251359 2403-3647
~
, STW-556 Water Nov 1988 Gr. alpha 9.0i3.5 9.015.0 0 3-17.7 Gr. beta 9.711.2 9.0i5.0 0 3-17.7 o
, -- STW-557 Water -Dec 1988 I-131 108.713.0 115.0112.0 94.2 135.8 l
L STW-559 ' Wa ter Jan 1989 Sr-89 40.018.7 40.015.0 31.3-48.7 Sr-90 24.313.1 25.011.5 -22.4-27.6 s lSTW-560 - Water ' Jan 1989 Pu-239 5.811.1 4.2i0.4 3.5-4.9 l STW-561- ; Water Jan 1989 Gr. alpha 7311.2 8.015.0 0.0-16.7- -
Gr. beta 5311.2 4.015.0 0.0-12.7 STW-562 Water Feb 1989 Cf51 245146 235124 193.4-276.6 Co.60 10.0 2.0 10.0i5.0 1 3-18.7 Zn-65 170110 159116 139.2 186.7' Ru-106 - 181i7.6 -178118 146.8-2 @.2 Cs-134 9.713.0 10.0 5.0 1 3-18.7-Cs?37 11.7 1.2 10.0i5.0 1.3-18.7 STW-563 Water . Feb 1989 I-131 109.0 4.0 106.0111.0 86.9-125.1 STW-564 : Water - Feb 1989 : H-3 2820i20 27S41356 2137-3371 l STW-565 : Water - Mar 1989 Ra-226 4.210 3 4.9d0.7 3.7-6.1 -
Ra-228 1.9il.0 1.7 03 1.2-2.2 j L STW-566 Wa ter ' Mar 1989 -U 5.00.0 5.016.0 0.0 15.4
' 1STAF-567 Air Filter Mar 1989 21.7i1.2 Gr. alpha 21.015.0; 12.3 29,7-Gr. beta 68.3i4.2 62.015.0 533 70.7- ',
Sr 90 20.012.0 20.011.5 -17.4-22.6-Cs-137 -21311.2 20.0i5.0 113 28.7-93 "t - % e - - - - + - .r- m 4-- - ,m-m- 7-
Tcble A 1. (continued)
Concentration in oCi/Lb EPA Resultd 1.ab Sample Date TIML Result Control Code Tyre Collected Analysis 12cc is, N=1 Limits
=_
STW-568 Wate Apr 1989 569 (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha 22.7123 29.017.0 16.9-41.2 Ra-226 3.60.6 3.530.5 2.644 Ra-228 2.611.0 3.6i0.5 2.7-4.5 U 3.010.0 3.016.0 0.0-13.4 Sample B Gr. beta 52.316.1 57.015.0 43.3-65.7 Sr-89 9.315.4 8.015.0 0.0-16.7 Sr-90 7.010.0 8.011.5 5.4-10.6 Cs-134 21.0 5.2 20.015.0 11 3-28.7 Cs-137 23.012.0 20.0i5.0 11.3-28.7 STM-570 Milk Apr 1989 Sr-89 26.0110.0 39.0 5.0 30 3-47.7 Sr-90 45.714.2 55.013.0 49.8-60.2 Cs-137 54.016.9 50.0i5.0 41.3 58.7 K-40 1521 208 1600180 1461- 0 39 STW 5718 Water May 1989 Sr-89 <0.7 6.015.0 0.0-14.7
' Sr-90 5.011.0 6.011.5 3.4-86 STW 572 Water May 1989 Gr. alpha 24.012.0 30.018.0 16.1-43.9 Gr. beta 493115.6 50.015.0 41 3-58.7 STW 573 Water Jun 1989 Ba-133 50.711.2 49.0i5.0 403 57.7 Co-60 313123 31.015.0 22 3-39.7
, Zn-65 167110 165il7 135.6 194.4 Ra 106 12319.2 128113 105.5-150.5 C3-134 40311.2 3915 30 3-47.7 Cs-137 22.311.2 M 11 3-28.7 STW-574 Water Jun 1989 H-3 45131136 450'D 50 372'r5282 STW-575 Water Jul 1989 Ra-226 16.8i3.1 0./12.7 13.0-E.4 Ra-228 13.813.7 18312.7 13.6-23 0 STW-576 Water _ Jul1989 U 40311.2 41.016.0 30.6151.4 STW-577 Water Aug 1989 l131 84.715.8 83.018.0 69.1 % .9 STAF-579 . Air Filter Aug 1989 Gr. alpha 6.0io.0 6.015.0 0.0-14.7 Cs-137 103123 10.0i5.0 1 3-18.7 I
94
i i
Table A 1. (continued) b Concentration in oCl/L _
EPA Resultd tab Sample Date TIML Result Control Code Type Collected Analysis i2cc Is, N=1 Limits STW-580 Water Sep 1989 Sr-89 14.711.2 14.0ic.0 5.3-22.7 Sr-90 9.711.2 10.011.5 7.4-12.6 STW-581 Water Sep 1989 Gr. alpha 5.0 0.0 4.015.0 0.0-12.7 Gr. beta 8.712.3 6.015.0 0.0-14.7 STW-583 Water Oct 1989 Ba-133 603110.0 59.016.0 48.6-69.4 Cc>-60 29.014.0 30.015.0 21.1-38.7 Zn-65 132.316.0 129.0i13.0 106.5-151.5 Ru-106 155316.1 161.0116.0 1333-188.7 Cs-134 30.716.1 29.015.0 20.3-37.7 Cs-1'7 66.314.6 59.015.0 50 3167.7 STW-584 Water Oct 1989 H-3 34071150 34961364 286614126 STW-585 Water Oct 1989 586 (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha 41.719.4 49.0112.0 28.2-69.8 Ra-226 7.90.4 8.4i1.3 6.2-10.6 Ra-228 4.410.8 4.110.6 3.1-5.1 U 12.0i0.0 12.016.0 1.6-22.4 Sample B Gr. beta 317d2.3 32.015.0 23.3-40.7 Sr-89 13 3 i4.2 15.015.0 6 3-23.7 Sr-90 7.012.0 7.013.0 4.4-9.6 Cs-134 5.0i0.0 5.0i5.0 0.0-13.7 Cs-137 7.010.0 5.0i5.0 0.0-13.7 STW-587 Water Nov 1989 Ra-226 7.910.4 8.7i13- 6.4 11.0 Ra-228 8.9il.2 9.311.2 . 6.9-11.7 STW-588 Water Nov 1989 U 15.0d0.08 15.016.0 4.6-25.4 STW-589 Water Jan 1990 $r-89 22.715.0 25.015.0 16.3-33.7 Sr-90 17.311.2 20.011.5 17.4-22.6 STW-591 Water Jan 150 Gr. alpha 10 3 i3.0 12.015.0 33 20.7 Gr. beta 12.311.2 12.015.0 3 3-20.7 95
Table A 1. (continued)
Concentration in oCi/Lb EPA Resultd lab Sample Da e TIML Result Control Code Type Collected Analysis 12ac Is, N=1 Limits 5TW 592 - Wa ter Jan 1990 Co 60 14.712.3 15 5.0 6.3-23.7 Zn-65 135.0 6.9 139.0114.0 114.8 163 2 Ru 105 1333113.4 139.0114.0 114.8-163.2 Cs-134 17.3.tl .2 18.015.0 9.3-26.7 Cs-137 19.31i.2 18.015.0 9.3-26.7 Ba-133 78.0 0.0 74.0 7.0 61.9-86.1 STW-593 Water Feb l990 H-3 4827183 49761498 4113-5839 STW-594 Water Mar 1990 Ra-226 5.010.2 4.910.7 4.1-5.7 Ra-228 13.510.7 12.711.9 9.4-16.0 STW-595 Water Mar 199C U 4.010.0 4.016.0 0.0-14.4 STAF-596 Air Filter Mar 1990 Gr. alpha 7.311.2 5.015.0 0.0-13.7 Gr. beta 34.010.0 31.0i5.0 22.3-39.7 Sr-90 10.010.0 10.011.5 7.4-12.6 Cs-137 9.311.2 10.0i5.0 1.3-18.7 STW 597 Water Apr 1990 598 (Blind)
Sample A Gr. alpha 81.0i3.5 90.0123.0 50.1 129.9 Ra-226 4.910.4 5.00.8 3.6-6.4 Ra 228 10.6do.3 10.211.5 7.6-12.8 U 18.7 3.0 20.0 6.0 9.6-30.4 Sample B Gr. beta 51.0110.1 52.015.0 ; 43.3-60.7 Sr-89 9.311.2 10.0 5.0 1.3-18.7 Sr-90 10313.1 10.0 1.5 8.3-11.7
' Cs-134 16.0 0.0 15.015.0 6 3-23.7 Cs-137 19.0i2.0 15.0 5.0 6 3-23.7 STM-599 Milk Apr 1990 Sr-89 21.7 3.1 23.0i5.0 14.3-31.7 Sr-90 21.017.0 23.015.0 14.3-31.7 I-131 98.711.2 99.0 10.0 81.7-1163 Cs-137 26.0 6.0 24.025.0 15.3-32.7 K 1300.0169.2 1550.0178.0 1414.7-16853
- STW-600 Water May 1990 Sr-89 6.012.0 7.05.0 0.0-15.7 Sr-90 6.7ill " '11 5.0
. 0.0-15.7 STW-601 Water ~ May 1990 Cr. alpha 11.0i2.0 22.0i6.0 11.6-32.4 Gr. beta 12311.2 15.015.0 6 3-23.7 96
1
. Tcble A' 1. ..(continued)
Concentration in pCi/Lb EPA Resultd Lab j - Sample Date ' TIML Result Control Code ~ Type Collected Analysis f2cc 1s, N=1 Limits
- STW-602 = l Water . Jun 1990 Co 25.3i2.3 24.015.0- 15.3 32.7 ~
Zn 65 155.0i10.6 148.0i15.0 130.6-165.4 ;
Ru 106 202.7117.2 210.0i21.0 173.6 246.4 Cs-134 - 23.711.2 24.015.0 18.2-29.8 Cs-137 27.713.1 25.015.0 16.3-33.7 Ba 133 100.718.1 99.0i10.0 81.7 116.3-STW-603 Water Jun 1990 H-3 292T')6 2933i358 2312-3554 i STW-604 Water Jul1990 Ra-226 11.810.9 12.111.8 9 0-152 Ra-228 4.lil.4 5.1il.3 18-7.4 STW-605 Water Jul1990 U 20.311.7 20.813.0 15.6-26.0 STW-606. ' Water Aug 1990 1-131 43.011.2. 39.016.0 28.6149.4 l
c STW-607: Water . Aug 1990 - Pu-239 10.011.7 9.li0.9 7.5-10.7-STAF-608: . Air Filter Aug 1990 Gr. alpha 14.010.0 10.015.0 1.3-18.7-Gr. beta- 65.311.2 62.0i5.0 53.3-70.7 Sr 90 19.016.9 20.0i5.0 11.3-28.7.-
Cs-137 19.0i2.0 20.015.0 11.3-28.7 STW-609 ' Water Sep 1990 Sr-89 9.012.0 10.0i5.0 1.3-18.7-Sr 9.0i2.0 9.0t5.0 0.3-17.7-
- STW-6D Water -
Sep 1990 Gr. alpha 8.3il.2 10.0 5.0 1.3 18.7-'
Gr. beta 10.311.2 - 10.015.0- 1.3-18.7 STM-611 -- Milk. Sep 1990 Sr-89 11.7 3.1 16.015.0' 7.3-24.7 Sr 15.0 0.0 20.0i5.0- 11.3-28.7 I-131 63.016.0 58.016.0 47.6-68.4 Cs-137- 20.012.0 20.0 5.0 11.3-28.7--
K 1673 3170.2 1700.0185.0 1552 5 1847.5
- S'TW-612 Water - Oct 1990 Co 20.313.1 20.015.0 11.3-28.7 -
Zn-65 '115,3112.2 115.0i12.0 94.2-135.8-Ru-106 152.0dB.0 151.0i15.0 125.0-177.0 Cs-134 11.0i0.0 12.015.0 = 3.3-20.7 Cs-137- 14.012.0 12.015.0- 3.3-20.7 Ba-133 116.719.9 110.0i11.0 90.9-129; STW-613 - Water - Oct 1990 H-3 7167i330 72031720. 5954-8452 97
. , . - .m. ..-an-r-
Table A-1. (continued)-
Concentration in pCi/Lb ,
EPA Resultd lab Sample Date TIML Result Control Code Type Colixted Analysis 12aC 1s, N=1 Limits STW-614 Water Oct 1990
-615 Sample A Cr. alpha 68.717.2 62.0116.0 34.2-89.8 Ra-226 12.9103 13.6i2.0 10.1 17.1 Ra-228 4.210.6 5.0 13 2.7 73 U 10.4i0.6 10.213.0 5.0-15.4 Sample B Gr. beta 55.018.7 53.0i5.0- 44.3-61.7 Sr-89 15.712.9 20.015.0 11.3-28.7 St 90 12.0i2.0 15.015.0 6 3-23.7 Cs-134 9.011.7 7.015.0 0.0-15.7 i-Cs-137 7.7il.2 5.015.0 0.0-13.7
- STW-616 Water Nov 1990 Ra 226 6.811.0 7.4tl.1 5.5-93 Ra-228 5.311.7 7.711.9 4.4-11.0 STW-6178 Water Nov 1990 U 35.010.4 35.5 3.6 29.3141.7 STW-618 Water Jan 1991 Sr-89 4311.2 5.0i5.0 0.0-13.7 Sr-90 4.711.2 5.0i5.0 - 0.0-13.7 STW-619 Water Jan 1991 Pu-239 3.610.2 3310.3 2.8-3.8 STW-620 Water Jan 1991 Gr. alpha 6.713.0 5.015.0 0.0 13.7 Gr. beta 6311.2 5.0t5.0 0.0 13.7 STW-621 Water Feb l991 Co-60 41.318.4 40.0 5.0 31 3-48.7 Zn-65 166.7i19.7 149.0115.0 123.0-175.0 Ru-106 209.7 18.6 186.0i19.0 153.0-219.0 Cs-134 9.012.0 8.0*5.0 0.0-16.7 l Cs-137 9.7il.2 8.015.0 0.0-16.7 Ba-133 85.7i9.2 75.0 8.0 61.1-88.9 STW-622 Water Feb l991 1-131 81316.1 75.0 8.0 61.1-88.9 STW-623 ' Water Feb l991 H-3 4310.01144.2 4418.01442.0 3651.2-51M.8 STW-624 Water Mar 1991 - Ra-226 31.413.2 31.8i4.8 23.5-40.1 Ra-228 NDh 21.1 5.3 11.9-303 STW-625 Water - Mar 1991 U 6.7f0.4 7.6i3.0 2.4-12.8 98 r
Table A-1. (continued)
Concentration in pCi/_Lb EPA Resultd I.ab Sample Date TIML Result Control Code Type Collected Analysis 12aC is, N=1 Limits
) STAF-626 Filter Mar 1991 Gr. alpha 38.711.2 25.016.0 14.6-35.4 Gr. beta 130.014.0 124.016.0 113.6 134.4 Sr-90 35.711.2 40.015.0 31 3-48.7 CS-137 33.7i4.2 40.015.0 313-48.7 STW-627 Water Apr 1991 628 Samp% A Gr. alpha 51.016.0 M.0114.0 297 783 Ra-226 7.010.8 8.011.2 5.9-10.1 Ra-228 9.7t1.9 15.7 3.8 8.6 21.8 U 27.712.4 29.8 3.0 24.6-35.0 Sample B Gr. beta 93.316.4 115.0 17.0 85 5 144.5 Sr-89 21 013.5 28.0i5.0 193 36.7 Sr-90 23.0i0.0 26.015.0 173-34.7 C3-134 27311.2 24.015.0 15 3-32.7 Cs-137 29.011.0 25.015.0 163-33.7 STM-629 Milk Apr 1991 Sr-89 24.018.7 32.0i5.0 23 3-40.7 ,
Sr-90 28.0i2.0 32.015.0 23 3-40.7 I-131 653114.7 60.016.0 49.6-70.4 Cs-137 S4 7*11.0 49.015.0 40357.7 K 1591.71180.1 1650.0 83.0 1506.0-1794.0 STW-630 Water May 1991 Sr-89 40.712.3 39.0i5.0 30 3-47.7 Sr-90 23.711.2 24.0i5.0 153-32.7 STW-631 Water May 1991 Gr. alpha 27.7 5.8 24.016.0 13.6-34.4 Gr. beta 46.0 0.0 46.015.0 373-54.7 STW-632 Water Jun 1991 Co-60 11.3113 10.01J.0 1 3-18.7 Zi 65 1193116.3 108.0 c11.0 88.9-127.1 Ru-iO6 1623119.0 149.0115.0 123.0-175.0 Cs-134 15311.2 15.015.0 6 3-23.7 Cs-137 16311.2 14 015.0 5 3-22.7 Ba-133 74.016.9 62.016.0 51.6-72.4 STW-633 Water Jun 1991 H-3 13470.01385.8 12480.011248.0 10314.8-14645 STW-634 Water Jul 1991 Ra-226 14 910.4 15.912.4 11.7-20.1 Ra-228 17.611.8 16.7i4.2 9.4-24.0 99
-Table 1. (continued)
Concentration in DCl/1,b FPA Resultd lab Sample Date TIML Result Control Code Type Collected Analysis 12aC is, N=1 Limits STW-635 Water Jul 1991 U 12.810.1 14.2 3.0 9.0 19.4 STW-636 Water Aug 1991 1-131 19.311.2 20.016.0 9.6-30.4 STW-637 Water Aug 1991 Pu-239 21.410.5 19.411.9 16.1-22.7 STAF-638 Air Filter Aug 1991 Gr. alpha 33.012.0 25.016.0 14.6-35.4 Gr. beta 88.711.2 92.0i10.0 80.4-103.6 Sr-90 27.014.0 30.015.0 21 3-38.7 Cs-137 26311.2 30.015.0 21.5. 38.7 STW-639 Water Sep 1991 Sr-89 47.0110.4 49.0 6 .0 403 .e7.7 3r-90 24.012.0 25.015.0 163-D.)
STW-640 Water Sep 1991 Cr. alpha 12.014.0 10.0 5.0 1 3-18.7 Cr. beta 20311.2 20.0i5.0 11 3-28.7 STM-6< i Milk Sep 19y1 Sr-f,9 20.315.0 25.015.0 163-33.7 Sr-90 19.7f3.1 25.0 5.0 16 & 33.7 I-131 130.7116.8 108.0111.0 88.9-127.1 Cs-137 33.7i3.2 30.015.0 21 3-38.7 K 1743 31340.8 1740.0187.0 1589.1 1890.9 STW-642 Water Oct 1991 Co-60 29.711.2 29.015.0 20 3-37.7 Zn-65 75.7183 7 E 7.0 60.9-85.1 Ru-106 1963 15.1 199.0120.0 164 3-233.7 Cs-134 9.711.2 10.015.0 1 3-18.7 Cs-137 11.012.0 10.0 5.0 1 3-18.7 Ba-133 94.713.1 98.0i10.0 80.7-1153
, STW-643 Water Oct 1991 H-3 2640.01156.2 2454.01352.0 1843 S 3064.7 STW-644 Water Oct 1991 645 Sample A Gr. alpha 73.0113.1 82.0 21.0 45.6-118.4 Ra-226 20.912 0 22.013 3 16327.7 Ra-228 19.6i23 22.213.6 12.5-31.9 U 13.510.6 13.513.0 83-18.7 Sample B Gr. beta 55.313.1 65.0110.0 47.7-823 Sr-89 9.713.1 10.015.0 13-18.7 Sr-90 8.711.2 10.015.0 1 3-18.7 Co-60 20.3 11.2 20.0 5.0 11 3-26.7 Cs-134 9.0i53 10.015.0 1.5-18.7 Cs-137 14.7i5.0 11.0i5.0 2 3-19.7 100
- Table A 1. (continued)
Concentration in nCi/Lb EPA Resultd lab . Sampla ' Date TIML Result Control Code Type Collected Analysis 2cc 1s, Nel Limits
< STW-646 Water Nov 1991 Ra-226 5 6tl.2 6.511.0 4.8-8.2 Ra-228 9 510.5 8.li2.0 4.6-11.6 STW-647 Water Nov 1991 U 24.712.3 24.9 3.0 '19.7-30.1 a Results obtained by Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the environmental sample cro,scheck program operated by the Intercomparison and Calibration Section, Quality Assurance Branch,
. Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Las Vegas, Nevada, b All results are in pCi/1, except for elemental potassium (K) data m milk, which are in mg/1; air filter samples, which are in pCi/ filter; and food, which is in mg/kg.
c Unless otherwise indicated, the TIML resu!ts are given as the mean i 2 standard deviations for three determinations.
d USEPA results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1s,1 determinatior)
- and control limits as defined by EPA.
e NA = Not analyzed.-
f ND = No data; not analyzed due to relocation of lab.
S Sample was analyzed but the results not submitted to EPA because deadline was missed (all data on file).
h ND = No data; sample lost daring analyses.
1 101
Table A-2 Crosscheck program results, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs),
mR Teledyne Average 12cd lab _ Result Known (All Code TLD Type Measurement 12ca Valuec Participants)
- 2nd International Intercomparisonb
-_ .115 CaF2 :Mn Field 17.011.9 17.1 16.417.7 Bulb Lab 20.814.1 21.3 18.817.6 3rd International Intercomparison e
- 1153 CaF2 :Mn Field 30.713.2 34.914.8 31.513.0 Bulb lab 89.616.4 91.7114.6 86.2124.0 flh International Intercomparisonf
-1154 CaF2 :Mn Field 14.111.1 14.li1.4 16.019.0 Bulb Lab (Low) 9.311.3 12.212.4 12.017.4 Lab (High) 40.411.4 45.819.2 -43.9113.2 5th International Intercomparisong 115-5A CaF2 :Mn - Field 31.4il.8 30.016.0 - 30.2 14.6 Bulb ~
Lab at beginning 77.415.8 75.217.6 75.8140.4 Lab at the end 96.6i5.8 88.418.3 90.7 31.2 115-5B - LIF-100 Field - 30.314.8-- 30.016.0 30.2 14.6 Chips Field at beginning 81 li7.4 75.217.6 75.8i40.4 Lab at the end 85.4111.7 88.418.8 90.7i31.2 L7th International Comparisonh l:
I- 115-7A LiF-100 Field 75.412.6 75.8 6.0 75.li29.8 CEips
- 12b (Co-60) 80.013.5 79.914.0 77.9127.6 Lab (Cs-137) 66.612.5 75.0i3.8 7'.0122.2 102 9
g ,- w ,
Table A-2. Crosscheck program results, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs),
mR Teledyne Average 12cd
. lab. Result Known (All Code TLD Type Measurement 12 sa Valuec Participants) 115-78 CaF2 :Mn Field 71.512.6 75.816.0 75.1129.8 Bulbs I Lab (Co-60) 84.816.4 79.914.0 77.9127.6 Lab (Cs-137) 78.811.6 75.013.8 73.0122.2
- 115-7C M :Dy 4 Field 76.812.7 75.816.0 75.1129.8 ,
Cards Lab (Co-60) 82.513.7 79.914.0 77.9127.6 Lab (Cs-137) 79.013.2 75.013.8 73.0122.2 8th International Intercomparisoni 115-8A LiF-100 Field Site 1 29.511.4 29.711.5 28.9 12.4 Chips Field Sitc 2 11.310.8 10.410.5 10.119.06 Lab (Cs-137) 13.7AO.9 17.210.9 16.216.8 115-8B ' CaF2 :Mn Field Site 1 32.311.2 29,711.5- 28.9112.4 Bulbs Field Site 2 9hil.0 10.4 0.5 '10.119.0 Lab (Cs-137) 15.810.9 17.210.9 16.216.8 115 8C N :Dy 4 Field Site 1 32.210.7 29.7il.5 28.9112.4 Cards .i Field Site 2 10.6i0.6 10.410.5 10.li9.0 l- Lab (Cs-137). 18.110.8 17.210.9 16.216.8 i-h - Teledyne Testine.I
- . l 89-1 LIF-100 -Lab 21.0i0.4 22.4 -
Chips s 89-2 Teledyne Lab 20.911.0 ' 20.3 -
N%4 Cards 103
Table A 2. (continued) mR Teledyne Average 12cd lab Result Known (All Code TLD Type Measurement i2ca ValueC Participants)
Igledyne TestingI 90-1k Teledyne lab 20.6il.4 19.6 -
CaSO 4 Q Cards 90-11 Teledyne 12b 100.814.3 100.0 -
CaSO4 %
Cards 91-1m Teled) Lab 33.412.0 310 -
CaSC Jy 55.214.7 58.8 --
Cards 87.8i6.2 85.5 -
a Lab result given is the mean 12 standard deviations of three determinations.
b Second International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in April of 1976 by the Health and Safety laboratory (HASL), New York, New York, and the School of Public Health of the University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
c Value determined by sponsor of the intercomparison using continuously operated pressurized ion chamber.
d Mean 12 standard deviations of results obtained by all laboratories participating in ,;.e program.
e Third International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in summer of 1977 by Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the School of Public Health of the University of Texas, Houston, Texas.
f Fourth International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in summer of 1979 by the School of Public Health of the University of Texas Houston, Texas.
8 Fifth International Intercomparison of Environmentai Dosimeters conducted in fall of 1980 at Idaho Falls, Idaho and sponsored by the School of Public IIcalth of the University of Texas, Hauston, Texas and Environmental Measurements Laboratory, New York, New York; U.S. Department of Energy.
h Seventh International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in the spring and summer of 1984 at Las Vegas, Nevada, and sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, The U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, end the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
i Eighth International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters conducted in the fall and winter of 1985-1986 at New York, New York, and sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy.
, i Chips were submitted in Septembe.r 1989 and cards were submitted in Ncvember 1989 to Teledyne Isotopes, Inc., Westwood, NJ for irradiation.
k Cards were irradiated by Teledyne Isotopes, Inc., Westwood, NJ or June 19,1990.
I Cards were irradiated by Dosimetry Associates, Inc., Northville, MI on October 30,1990.
m Irradiated cards were provided by Teledyne Isotopes, INC., Westwood, NJ. Irradiated on October 8,1991.
104
Table A-3. In-house spiked sarnples.
Concentration in rCi/L 1.ab Sample Date TIML Expected Code Type Collected Analysis Result Known Precision n=1 Activity 1s, n=l a QC-MI-16 Milk Feb 1988 Sr-89 31.814.7 31.716.0 8.7 Sr-90 25.512.7 27.813.5 5.2 1-131 26.410.5 23.215.0 10.4 Cs-1M 23.812.3 24.216.0 8.7 Cs-137 26.510.8 25.116.0 8.7 QC-MI-17 Milk Feb 1988 I-131 10 611.2 14.311.6 10.4 QC-W-35 Water Feb l988 I-131 9.711.1 11.611.1 10.4 g QC-W-36 Water Mar 1988 1-131 10.511.3 11.611.0 10.4 QC-W-37 Water Mar 1908 Sr-89 17.112.0 19.818.0 8.7 Sr-90 18.710.9 17.315.0 5.2 QC-MI-18 Milk Mar 1988 1-131 33.212.3 26.715.0 10.4 Cs-134 31312.1 30.215.0 8.7 Cs-137 29.911.4 26.215.0 8.7 QC-W-38 Water Apr1988 I-131 17.111.1 14.2 5.0 10.4
- QC-W-39 Water Apr1988 H-3 44W131 4176iS00 724 QC-W-40 Wate- Apr 1988 Co-60 23.710.5 26.114.0 8.7 Cs-134 25.412.6 29.214.5 8.7 Cs-137 26.612.3 26.214.0 8.7 a QC-W-41 Water Jun 1988 Gr. alpha 12.310.4 13.li5.0 8.7 Cr. beta 22.611.0 20.1+5.0 8.7 QC-MI-19 Milk Jul 1988 Sr-89 15.111.6 16.4i5.0 8.7 Sr-90 18.010.6 18.315.0 5.2 I-131 88.414.9 86.618.0 10.4 Cs-137 22.710.8 20.816.0 8.7 QC-W-42 Water Sep 1988 Sr-89 48.5i3.3 50.818.0 8.7 Sr-90 10.911.0 11.413.5 5.2 QC-W-43 Water Oct 1988 Co-60 20.91- 3.2 21.4i3.5 8.7 Cs-134 38.711.6 38.016.0 8.7 Cs-137 19.0i2.4 21.0i3.5 8.7 QC-W-44 Water Oct 1988 1-131 22.2 0.6 23.313.5 10.4 105 r mun damer
i B O d*S!((&k A %V 9[ %)<h*
IMAGE EVAL.U ATION TEST TARGET (MT-3)
</
. f.<A
\/[O/
- q ,//'p,
/
[f <{[gj9 (g l'
4
<>TM}> kr'k b
i%-t r- L 2.2
'g i35 9!r!3rak!
II b U" o
hN lill 1.8 llll_ ._
l.25 l 1.4 j! 1.6 1 a__
4 150mm >
4 6" >
%% ++ . sAo e.;#mf ,4fz 4 ; //fN o% - ;t e# v ,
s' , .
- % ;g g d . .... _. ,,_ _ _ ,.
g>4' g L o
O g+T@ 4+ IMAGE EVALUATION 4
94 b ,/ ,f&g' /g,
t; ( ti#gff' TEST TARGET (MT-3)
////7 9,jp- $) /gspp %
+ s il 1.0 lf M 2 e tu p"2 L i] l l.1 $M o
L8 l'i 1
1.25 1.4 1.6 l d
4 150mm - >
< 6" >
, *h v$p 4% ['4
+gy.3 oy,,gc =
y v93,,Ae 4 of g
~
ja:
k
[, ,
av .
E:. - _ _ . . _ . - . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
~
^
- - - ' - - < - - " ' - -"'**** ...- - . id '>n > 2 ".
ds
.e 19f*# %ods & i /
O f, .
i.c v IMAGE EVAL.U ATION A%
[.j[' g g,
[O[ t G,' 6'F\,' $h9 TEST TARGET (MT-3)
I/
p ::
sf>
- g(/ %g;f,iig I.O it mRn2.2 t-M g Mrs l,l
~
lijj=I.8 l!:,
[ i.25 L l.4 ll _I . 6 11!
1 I
- 150mm >
< 6" >
4 ,,og ek+ 4 4>, ,, 4V v g,2 41 g sp,g,:'g/g gg ._93 o
hp +p{hb (( '
vg>
E5' - .
j, , . 2 :si ,.
Table A 3. In-house spiked samples (continued)
Concentration in pCi/L lab Sample Date TIML Expected Code Type Collected Analysis Result Known Precision
"*I Activity 1s,n=la QC-W-45 Water Oct 1988 H-3 4109143 41531500 724 QC-MI-20 Milk Oct 1988 1-131 39.8109 60 619.0 10.4 Cs-134 49.61'. 8 48.617.5 8.7 Cs-137 23.314.6 24.714.0 8.7 QC-W-46 Water Dec 1988 Gr. alpha 11.512.3 15.215.0 8.7 Gr. beta 26.5i2.0 25.715.0 8.7 QC-MI-21 Milk Jan 1989 Sr-89 25.5110.3 34.0110.0 8.7 St-90 28.313.2 27.1130 5.2 1-131 540113 550120 10.4 Cs-1M 24.512.6 22.615.5 8.7 Cs-137 24.010.6 20.515.0 8.7 QC-W 47 Water Mar 1989 Sr-89 15.213.8 16.115.0 8.7 Sr-90 16.4il.7 16.913.0 5.2 QC-MI-22 Milk Apr 1989 I-131 36.311.1 37.215.0 10.4 Cs-134 20.8i2.8 20.718.0 8.7 Cs-137 22.2 2.4 20.418.0 8.7 QC-W-48 Water Apr 1989 Co-60 23.512.0 25.1 8.0 8.7 Cs-134 24.211.1 25.918 0 8.7 Cs-137 23.611.2 23 018.0 8.7 QC-W-49 Water Apr 1989 l-131 37.213.7 37.215.0 10.4 QC-W-50 Water Apr 1989 H-3 3011 59 30891500 724 QC-W-;l Water Jun 1989 Gr. alpha 13.0 1.8 15.015.0 8.7 Gr. beta 26.0 1.2 25.5i8 9 8.7 QC-P.2-23 Milk Jul 1989 Sr-89 19.416.5 22.0110.0 8.7 Sr-90 27.613.5 28.613.0 5.2 1-131 46.813.2 43.4 5.0 10.4 Cs-134 27.4 1.8 28.316.0 8.7 Cs-137 24.111.8 20.816.0 8.7 QC-MI-24 Milk Aug 1989 Sr-89 25.4f2 7 27.2110.0 8.7 Sr-90 46.011.1 47.819.6 8.3 QC-W-52 Water Sep 1989 I-131 9.610.3 9.711.9 10.4 106
Table A-3. In house spiked samples (continued)
Concentration in oCi/L 1.ab Sample Ebte TIML Expected Code Type Collected Analysis Result Known Precision
""I 1s,n=la Activity
- QC-W-53 Water Sep 1989 l131 19.010.2 20.914.2 10.4 QC-W-54 Water Sep 1989 Sr-89 25.814.6 24.714.0 8.7 Sr 90 26.515.3 29.715.0 5.2 QC-MI-25 Milk Oct 1989 l-131 70.013 3 73.5120.0 10.4 Cs-134 22.112.6 22.618.0 8.7 C3-137 29.411.5 27.513.0 8.7 QC-W-55 Water Oct 1989 l-131 33311.3 353110.0 10.4 QC-W-56 Water Oct 1989 Co-60 15.210.9 17.415.0 8.7 C3-134 22.1 4.4 18.918.0 8.7 C3-137 27.211.2 22.918.0 8.7 QC W-57 M ater Oct 1989 H-3 3334122 33791500 724 QC-W-58 Water Nov 1989 Sr-89 10.911.4d 13,111,od 8.7 Sr-90 10.411.0d 10311.0d 5.2 CC-W-59 Water Nov 1989 Sr-89 101.016.0d 104.1110.5d 17.5 Sr 90 98.0i3 9d 95.0110.0d 17.0 QC-W-60 Water Dec 1989 Cr. alpha lu.811.1 10.614.0 8.7 Gr. beta 11.6i0.5 11.414.0 8.7 QC-hC-26 Milk Jan 1990 Cs-134 19311.0 20.818.0 8.7 Cs-137 25.2 1.2 22.818.0 8.7 QC-MI-27 Milk Feb 1990 Sr 90 18.011.6 18.815.0 5.2 QC-hC-28 Milk Mar 1990 I-131 63.8i2.2 62.6 6.0 63 QC-hu-61 Water Apr 1990 St-89 17,915.5 23.113.; 8.7 Sr-90 19.412.5 23.515.2 5.2 QC-hG29 Milk Apr 1990 I-131 90.719.2 82.518.5 10.4 Cs-1M 18311.0 19.715.0 8.7 Cs-137 20311.0 18.2 5.0 8.7 QC-W-62 Water Apr 1990 Co-60 8.710.4 9.415.0 8.7 Cs-134 20.010.2 19.7t5.0 8.7 Cs-137 28.711.4 22.715.0 8.7 107
- l. , _ ~
Table A 3, in house spiked samples (continued)
Concentration in t<l/L lab Sample Lhte TIML Expected Code Type Collected Analysis Result Known Prwision 3*l Activity 1 s, n=1 a QC W43 Water Apr 1990 1-131 63.518.0 66.016.7 1
6.6 QC.W-64 Water Apr 1940 H-3 19411130 1826.01350.0 724 QC-W-65 Water Jun 1990 Ra-226 6.410.2 6.911 0 ' 1.0 QC-W-66 Water }un 1990 U 6.210.2 6.016.0 6.0 QC hB-30 Milk Jul 1990 St-89 12.810.4 18.4110.0 8.7 Sr-90 18.211.4 18.7 6.0 5.2
! Cs-1M 46.011 3 49.015.0 8.7 Cs-137 27.611.3 25.315.0 8.7 QC-W-68 Water Jun 1990 Gr. alpha 9.810.3 10.616.0 8.7 Gr. beta 11.410.6 11.317.0 8.7 QC-hC-31 Milk Aug 1990 1-131 68.811.6 61.41123 10.4 QC-W-69 Water Sep 1990 St-89 17.711.6 19.2110.0 8.7 Sr-90 13.911.6 17.4110.0 5.2 QC-hD-32 Milk Oct 1990 1-131 34 810.2 32.416.5 8.7 Cs-134 25.811.2 273110.0 8.7 Cs-137 25312.0 22.4 10.0 8.7 QC-W-70 Water Oct 1990 H-3 2355tS9 2276 455 605 QC47-71 Water Oct 1990 1-131 55.9 0.9 51.8110.4 10.4
- QC-W-73 Water Oct 1990 ^o40 18312.7 16.815.0 8.7 Cs-1M 28 3 i2.3 27.015.0 8.7 l Cs-137 22.7 13 22.415.0 8.7 QC-W-74 Water Dec 1990 Gr. alph 21.411.0 26.li6.5 11 3 Gr. beta 25.9 1.0 22315.6 9.7 QC h0-33 Milk jan 1991 Sr-89 20.713 3 21.615.0 5.0 Sr-90 19.011.4 23.013.0 30 Cs-134 22.211.7 19.615.0 5.0
- Cs-137 26.li1.6 22315.0 5.0 L QC-hB-34 Milk Feb 1991 1-131 40.711.8 40.116.0 6.0 QC-W-75 Water Mar 1991 St-89 18.811.5 23315.0 5.0 Sr-90 16.010.8 17.2i3.0 3.0 108
Table A 3. In house spiked samples (continued)
Concentration in rCi/L Lab Sample Date TIML Expected Code Type Collected Analysis Result Known Precision n=1 Activity 15, n= l a QC-W 76 Water Apr 1.991 1-131 56.511.7 59.015.9 5.9 QC-W-77 Water Apr 1991 Co-60 16.412.2 15.715.0 SD C3-134 23.812.5 22.615.0 SD Cs-137 25.012.4 21.115.0 SD QC-W-78 Water Apr 1991 H-3 40271188 40801408 408 QC-MI-35 Milk Apr 1991 1-131 48.01D.8 49.216.0 6D Cs-1M 19.212.0 22.615.0 SD Cs-137 22.812.2 22.115.0 5.0 QC-W-79 Water Jun 1991 Gr. alpha 7.410.7 7.815.0 5.0 Gr. beta 11.010.7 11.015.0 5.0 QC-MI 36 Milk Jul 1991 Sr-89 28.112.1 34.0110.0 10.0 Sr-90 11.610.7 11.5i3.0 3D l-131 14.411.9 18.315.0 SD Cs-137 34.313.0 35.115.0 5D QC-W-80 Water Oct 1991 St-89 27.416.9 24.4f5.0 5.0 Sr-90 11.711.4 14.115.0 5.0 QC-W-81 Water Oct 1991 1-131 19.110.7 20.619.e 4.2 QC-W-82 Water Oct 1991 Co-60 22.612.7 22.115.0 5.0 Cs-134 15.511.8 17.615.0 SD Cs-137 17.512.1 17.6i5.0 5.0 QC W-83 W Ser Oct 1991 H-3 46391137 4382i438 438 QC-MI-37 Milk Oct 1991 1-131 23.613.2 25.8i5.0 5.0 Cs-134 22.712.8 22.115.0 5.0 Cs-137 38.3.13.0 35.115.0 5.0 QC-W-84 Water Dec 1991 Cr. alpha 6_210.6 7.815.0 SD Gr. beta 11.010.7 11.015.0 5.0 .
a n=3 unless noted otherwise.
b n=2 unless noted otherwise.
i C n=1 unless noted otherwise.
d Concentration in pCi/ml.
l 109
l Table A-4. In-house " blank" samples.
Concentration (rCi/L)
Acceptance lab Sample Ebte Results Criteria Ccde Type Collected Analysis (4.66 c) (4.66 o)
SPS-5386 Milk Jan 1988 l-131 <0.1 <1 SPW 5448 " Dead" Water Jan 1988 H-3 <177 (300 SPS-5615 Milk Mar 1988 C3-134 < 2. 4 <10 C3-137 < 2. 5 <10 1-131 <0.3 <1 Sr-89 <0. 4 <5 Sr 90 2.410.5 a <1 SPS-5650 D.I. Water Mar 1988 Th-228 <0.3 <1 Th-230 <0.04 <1 Th-232 <0.05 <1 U-234 <0.03 <1 U-235 <0.03 <1
, U-238 <0.03 <1 Am-241 <0.06 <1 Cm-241 <0.01 <1 Pu-238 <0.08 <1 Pu-240 <0.02 <1 SPS-6090 Milk Jul 1988 Sr-89 <0.5 <1
$r-90 1.810.5 <1 1-131 <0.4 <1 Cs 137 <0.4 <10 SPW-6209 Water Jul 1988 Fe-55 <0.8 <1 SPW-6292 Water Sep 1988 Sr-89 <0.7 <1 St-90 <0.7 <1 SPS-6477 Milk Oct 1988 1-131 <0.2 <1 Cs-134 <6.1 <10 Cs-137 <5.9 <10 i SPW-6478 Water Oct 1988 l-131 <0.2 <1 SPW-6479 Water Oct 1988 Co-60 <5.7 <10 Cs-134 <3.7 <10 Cs-137 <4.3 <10 SPW-6480 Water Oct 1988 H-3 <170 <300
/
110
. . . _ . = .- - -.
Table A-4. In house "blanh" samples'(continued)
~
Concentration (tCi/L)
Acceptance Lab Sample Date Results Criteria Ccde Type Collected . Analysis (4.66 c) (4.65 c)
. SPW-6625 Water Dec 1988 Gr. alpha <0.7 <1 Gr. beta <1.9 <4 SPS4723 Milk Jan 1989 Sr-89 <0. 6 <5 St 90 1.910.5a <3 1131 <0.2 <1 Cs-134 <4.3 <10 Cs 137 <4.4 <10 SFW-6877 Water Mar 1989 Sr-89 <0.4 <5 Sr-90 <0.6 <1 SPS-6963 - Milk Apr 1989 l-131 <0.3 <1 Cs-134 <5.9 <10 Cs-137 <6.2 <10 SFW-7561 Water Apr 1989 H-3 <150 <300 P
SPW-7207 Water lun 1989 Ra-226 <0.2 <1 Ra-228 <0.6 <1 l- SPS-7208 - Milk Jun 1989 Sr-89 <0.6 <5 Sr-90 2.110.5a <3 1-131 <0.3 <1 CS-134 <6.4 <10 Cs-137 <7.2 <10
- SPW-7588 - Water Jun 1989 Gr. alpha <0 ' <1 Gr. beta . < 1.0 <4 l
SPS-7322 Milk Aug 1989 Sr-89 < 1.4 <5 Sr-90 4.811.03 <1 I-131 <0.2 <1 Cs-134 < 6.9 <10 Cs-137 <8.2 <10 SPW-7559 Water Sep 1989 Sr-89 <2.0 <5 Sr-90 <0.7 <1 SPW-7560 Water Oct 1989 I-131 <0.1 - <1 SPW-7562 Water Oct 1989 H-3 <140 <300 111
1
- Table A-4. In house " blank" samples (continued)
Concentration (nCi/1.)
Acceptance lab Sample Date Results Criteria !
Code Type Collected Analysis (4.66 o) (4.66 c) I SPS-7605 - Milk- Nov 1989 l-131 <0.2 <1 Cs-134 <8.6 <10 C3-137 <10 <10 SPW-7971 Water Dec 1989 Cr. alpha <0. 4 <1 Cr. beta <0.8 <4 !
SPW-8039 Wa ter Jan 1990 Ra-226 <0.2 <1 SPS-8040 Milk Jan 1990 >. ^9 <0.8 <5 C -! 0 <1.0 <1 SPS-8208 Milk Jan 1990 Sr-89 <0.8 <.5 Sr-90 1.610.Sa <j Cs-134 <3.6 <10 Cs-137 <4.7 <10 SPS-8312 Milk Feb 1990 Sr-89 <0.3 <5 Sr-90 1.210.3a <j i SPW-8312A Water Feb l990 Sr-89 <0.6 <5 Sr-90 <0.7 <5 SPS-8314 Milk Mar 1990 1-131 <0.3 <1 SPS-8510 Milk May 1990 1-131 <0.2 <1-C&134 < 4. 6 <10 Cs-137 <4.8 <10 SPW-8511 A Water May 1990 H-3 <200 <300 SPS-Sc00 Milk Jul 1990 St-89 <0.8 <5 Sr-90 1.710.6a <j I-131 <0.3 <1 Cs-134 <5.0 <10 Cs-137 < 7.0 <10 SPM-8877 Milk Aug 1990 1-131 <0. 2 <1 SPW-8925 Water Aug 1990 H-3 <200 <300 112
l Table A-4. In house " blank" samples (continued)
Concentration (pCl/L}
Acceptance lab Sample Ebte Results i
Criteria Code Type Collected Analysis (4.66 c) (4.66 c)
SPW-8926 Water - Aug 1990 Gr. alpha <0.3 <1 Cr. beta <0.7 <4 SPW-8927 Water Aug 1990 U 234 <0.01 <1 U-235 <0.02 <1 U 238 <0.01 <1 SPW-8928 Water Aug 1990 Mn 54 <4.0 <5 Co 58 <4.1 <5 Cc4 <2.4 <5 Cs .J. <3.3 <5 Cs-137 <3.7 <5 SPW-8929 Water Aug 1990 Sr-89 < 1.4 <5 Sr 90 <0.6 <1 SPW-69 Water Sep 1990 Sr 89 < 1.8 <5 Sr 90 <0.8 <1 SPW-106 Water Oct 1990 H-3 <180 <300 1-131 <0.3 <1 SPM-107 Milk Oct 1990 1-131 <0.4 <1 C5-134 <3.3 <5 Cs-13~7 <4.3 <5 SPW-370 Water Oct 1990 Mn-54 < 1.7 <5 Co 58 <2.5 <5 Co-60 < 1. 6 <5 C3-134 < 1.7 <5 Cs-137 < 1.8 <5 SPW-372 - Water Dec 1990 Cr. alpha <0.3 <1 Gr. beta <0.8 <4 SPS406 Milk Jan 1991 Sr-89 <0.4 <5 Sr 90 1.810.4 a <j Cs-134 <3.7 <5 Cs-137 <5.2 <5 SPS-421 Mil.k Feb 1991 1-131 <0.3 <1-SPW-451 - Water Feb 1991 Ra-226 <0.1 <1 Ra-228 <0.9 <1 113
Table A-4. In house " blank" samples (continued)
Concentration (oCi/L)
Lab Acceptance Sample Date Results Code Criteria Type Collected Analysis (4.66 o) (4.66 o)
SPW 514 Water Mar 1991 Sr 89 < 1.1 <5 St 90 <0.9 <1 SPW-586 Water Apr 1991 1-131 <0.2 <1 CcH50 <2.5 <3 Cs-1M <2. 4 <5 Cs-137 < 2. 2 <5 SPS-587 Milk Apr 1991 1 131 <0. 2 <1 Cs 134 < 1. 7 <5 Cs-137 < 1.9 <5 SPW-837 Water Jun 1991 Gr. alpha <0. 6 <1 Gr. beta <1.1 <4 SPM-953 Milk Jul 1991 St-89 <0.7 <5 Sr-90 0.410.3 a <3 I131 <0.2 <1 Cs 137 <4.9 <5 SPM-1236 Milk Oct 1991 1 131 <0.2 <1 Cs-1M <3.7 <5 Cs-137 <4.6 <5 SPW-1254 Water Oct 1991 Sr-89 < 2. 8 - <5 Sr-90 <0.7 <1 SPW-1256 Water Oct 1991 1-131 <0.4 <1 CM <3.6 <5 Cs 134 < 4.0 <.5 Cs-137 <3.6 <5 SPW-1259- Water Oct 1991 H-3 <160 <300 SPW-1444 Water Dec 1991 Cr alpha <0.4 <1 Cr. beta <0.8 <4 a Low. level of St-90 concentration in milk (1 - 5 pCi/ L) is not unusual.
114
TIML-BLIND-01 Revision 0,12 29 86 ATTACHMENT B ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR " SPIKED" SAMPLES LABORATORY PRECISION: ONE STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES FOR VARIOUS ANALYSESa One Standard Deviation Analysis Level for Single Determination Gamma Emitters 5 to 100 pCl/ liter or kg 5 pCi/ liter _
>100 pCi/ liter or kg 5% of knowm value Strontium-89b 5 to 50 pCi/ liter or kg 5 pCi/ liter
>50 pCi/ liter or kg 10% of known value Strontium 90b 2 to 30 pCi/ liter or kg 3.0 pCi/ liter
>30 pCi/ liter or kg 10% of known value Potassium >0.1 g/ liter or kg 5% of known value Gross alpha <20 pCi/ liter 5 pCi/ liter
>20 pCi/ liter 25% of known value Cross beta <100 pCi/ liter 5 pCi/ liter
>100 pCi/ liter 5% of known value Tritium <4,000 pCi/ liter is = (pCi/ liter) =
169.85 x (known)E
>4,000 pCi/ liter 10% of knowm value Radium-226, -228 <0.1 pCi/ liter 15% of known value Plutonium 0.1 pCl/ liter, g am, or sample 10% of known value
' Iodine-131, <55 pCi/ liter 6 pCi/ liter Iodine-129b >55 pCi/ liter 10% of known value Uranium-238, <35 pCi/ liter 6 pCi/ liter Nickel-64b, >35 pCi/ liter 15% of known value Technetium.99b '
Iron-55b 50 to 100 pCi/ liter 10 pCi/ liter
>100 pCi/ liter 10% of known value a From EPA publication, " Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program, Fiscal Year,1981-1982, EPA-600/4-81-004, b TIML limit. 3g e
ADDENDUM TO APPENDIX A The following is an explanation of the reasons why certain wnples were outside the controllimit specified by~ the Environmental Protection Agency for the Interlaboratory Comparions Program starting January
-1988.
EPA TIML Control Result Limit lab Code Analysis (pCi/L)a (pCl/L)a Explanation STF-524 K 1010.7 158.5b 1123 5-1336.5b Error in transference of data. Correct data was 1105133 mg/kg. Results in the past have been within the limits and TIML will monitor the situation in the future.
STW-532 1 131 9.012.0 6.2-8.8 Sample recounted after 12 days. The average result was 6.811.7 pCi/L (within EPA control limits). The sample was recounted in order to check the decay.
Results in the past have been within the limits and TIML will continue to monitor the situation in the future.
STW-534 Co.60 63.3t13 41.3-58.7 High level of Co-60 was due to contamination of beaker. Beaker was discarded upon discovery of contamination and sample was recounted.
Recount results were 53.213.6 and 50.9 2.4 pCi/L STM-554 Sr-90 51.012.0- 54.845.2 The cause of low result was due to very high fat content of milk, it should be noted that 63% rf all participants faikd this test. Also, the average for all participants was 54.0 pCi/L before the Gmbb and 55.8 pCi/L after the Grubb.
STW-560 Pu-239 5.811.1 3.5-1.9 The cause of high results is not known though it is suspected that the standard was not properly calibrated by supplier and is under investigation. New Pu-236 standard was obtained and will be used for the next test.
STW-568 Ra-228 2.61.01 2.7-4.5 The cause of low results is not known.
Next EPA cross check results were within the control imits. No further action is planned.
116
ADDENDUhj TO APPENQLu (continued)
EPA TIML Control Result Limit lab Code Analysis (pCi/L)a (pc /L)a Explanation STM 570 Sr-89 26.0110.0 30.3-47.7 The cause of low results was falsely high Sr-90 45.714.2 49.8-60.1 recovery due to suspected incomplete calcium removal. Since EP/ sample was used up, internal spike was n mred and analyzed. The results were wim... control limits (See table A-3, sample QC-MI-24).
No further action is planned.
STW-589 Sr-90 17.311.2 17.4-22.6 Sample was reanalyzed in triplicate; results of reanalyses were 18.811.5 pCl/L No further action is planned.
STM 599 K 1300.0169.2C 1414.7-1685.3C Sample was reanalyzed in triplicate.
)
Results of reanalyses were 1421.7195.3 mg/L. The cause of low results is unknown.
STW-601 Gr. alpha 11.0 2.0 11.6-32.4 Sample was reanalyzed in triplicate.
Results c.f reanaiyses were 13.411.0 pCi/L STAF-626 Gr. alpha 38.711.2 14.6-35.4 The cause of high results is the difference in geometery between standard used in the TIML lab and EPA filter.
STW-632 Ba-133 74.016.9 51.6-72.4 Sample was reanalyzed. Results of the reanalyses were 63.816.9 pCi/L within EPA limit.
STM-641 1-131 130.7116.8 88.9-127.1 The cause of high result is unknown. In-house spike sample was prepared with activity of I-13168.316.8 pCi/L. Result of L the analysis was 69.119.7 pCi/L.
a Reported in pCi/L unless otherwise noted. ,
b Concentrations are reported in mg/kg.
c Concentrations are reported in mg/L.
117
~
APPENDIX VI ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 118
AMLYTICAL PROCEDURES MANUAL TELEDYNE ISOTOPES MIDWEST LABORATORY PREPARED FOR COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Note : Only procedures applicable to the CECO Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program are included in this manual .
/ 't q Campiled by: /O lJ7_b B
, \.hGdob 4b sudervisor, TIML J
Approved by: h f /fl LR y ..
$. G. Huebner
' General Manager, TIML 0 r! $ / /f i Approved by: _ . . .
d
/ J. C. Golden Emergency Preparedness Supervisor, CECO Issued 27 January 1992 Copy No: ft-/
(This information, or any portion thereof, shall not be reproduced in any manner or distributed to any third party without the written permission of Teledyne isotopes Midwest Laboratory.)
Revised 01-27-92 Page 1 of 1 CECO List of Procedures Procedure Revision Revision Number Number Date SP-01 Sample Preparation 0 07-02-86 AP-02 Determination of Gross Alpha and/
or Gross Beta in Air Particulate Filters 1 07-15-91
-AP-03 Procedure for Compositing Air Particulate Filters for Gamma Spectroscopic Analysis 0 '.2-15-89 ,
W(DS)-01~ Determination of' Gross Alpha and/
or Gross Beta in Water (Disschad Solids or Total Residue) 2 05-03-91 W(SS)'-02 Determination of Gross Alpha and/
.or -Gross Beta in Water _ (Suspended Solids ) 0 11-22-85 AB-01 Determination of Gross Alpha and/
or Gross Beta in Solid- Samples 0 08-04-86 GS Determination 'of Gamma Emitters .
by Gamma Spectroscopy 0 07-21-86 l T-02 Determination of Tritium in Water 1 09-27-91 1-131-01
- Determination of- 1-131 in. Milk
, by Anion Exchange (Batch Method) 3 04-10-91 l-1-131-02 Determination of Airborne .1-131 12 in Charcoal Cartridges by Gamma Spectroscopy 0 07-04-86 i
C0iP Procedure for Canpositing ' Water and Mil k Sampies 0 11-07-88 ll l
"vPTELEDYNE ISOTOPES utowl17 LASORATORT 700 LANDwtMR ROAD NORT H8ROOR. tLLlHOfS W 2310 (31h $64 0700 F AA Q1h 964 4517 i
SAMPLE PREPARATION PROCEDURE NO. TIML-SP-01 Prepared by Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory Copy No.
Revision No. Date Pages Prepared by Approved by c 0 07-02-86 _ 11 k 6M k!(LZ[f/44f_.-
'(
~
[/~ ( ./ /
(This procedure, or any portion thereof, shall not be reproduced in any manner or distributed to any third party without the written permission of Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory,)
TIML-SP-01-01
l TIML-SP-01 Revision 0, 07-02-86 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Principle of Method ..................... TIML-SP-01-03 Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TIML-SP-01-03 -
Apparatus .......................... TIML-S P-01-0 3 Procedure for Packing Counting Containers .......... TIML-SP-01-03 A. Vegetables and Fruits .................. TIML-SP-01-04
- 8. Grass and Cattle feed .................. TIML-SP-01-05 C. Fish . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TIML-SP-01-06 D. Waterfowl, Meat, and Wildlife .............. TIML-SP-01-07 E. Eggs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TIML-SF 08 F. Slime and Aquatic Vegetation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TIML-SP-01-09 G. Bottom Sediments and Soil ................ TIML-SP-01-10 H. Drinking (C, ear) Water (EPA Method 900.0) ........ TIML-SP-01-11 TIML-SP-01-02
TIML-SP Revision 0, 07-02-86 SAMPLE PREPARATION Principle of Method
- Different classes of samples require different preparations. In general, f ood products are prepared as for home use, while others are dried aid ashed as-received.
Reagents Formaldehyde Apparatus Balance Blender Ceramic Dishes -
Counting Containers Cutting Board Drying Oven Drying Pans Grinder High Temperature Marking ien Knives Muffle Furnace Plastic ~ Bags Pulverizer Scissors Spatulas-L Procedure for Packing Counting Containers A. 3.51 - Place- 3.51 of water into the ' container. Mark the level and then I' . empty the container. Fill witn the sample to the mark.
B. 500 ml - Fill to the rim of the inside wall, wbh is- 1/4" f rom the top.
C. 4 oz - . Fill .to the 100 ml mark.
Pack the sample tightly. When filling with soil and bottom sediments, make sure it.is level.
TIMI.-SP-01-03
TIML-SP-01 Revision 0, 07-02-86 A. Vegetables and Fruits
- 1. Wash and prepare ~ vegetables and fruits as-for eating.
- 2. - Homogen_ize in a blender.
- 3. Transfer blended sample . to a standard calit. rated container (3.5 1, 500 ml, or 4 oz); use the largest size possible for the amount of sample available. Pecord the wet eight.
~4. Add a few cc of formaldehyde to prevent spoilage.
- 5. Seal with cover. Attaen paper tape on top of the cover and wrt te sample number, net weight, and date and tiroe collecteo.
- 6. Submit to- the counting room for gamma spectroscopic analysis witnout delay or store in a cooler until counting (for short period). l NOTE: If I-131 analysis is rec >;4 red, it is imperative that the sample be prepared and subm..ted to the counting room intnedi-Mark "I-131" on the tape.
~
ately.
- 7. Af ter gama scanning is completed, transfer the sample to a drying pan and dry at 110' C.
NOTES: If only gamma scan is required, skip drying and ashing (Steps 7 through 11). Transfer the sample to a planic bag, seal,
= label, and store in the cooler until disposal.
If there is sufficient quantity, use surplus sample for drying and ashing instead of waiting for gamma scanning tu be completed.
, 8. Cool, weigh, and record dry _ weight. Grind.
- 9. Wei_gh out -accurately in a tarred ceramic dish 100-120 g of the ground sample. Record the weight. (If sample weight is less than 100 g, use two dishes; mark one as "A" end 1.he second one as "G.") Ash in a muf fle -furnace by gradually increasing the temperature to 600* C.
Ash overnight.
NOTE: If ashing is incomplete (black carbon remains), cool the dish. .
crush the ash with spatula, and continue ashing overnight at 600* C. At this stage, it is not necessary to increase the temperature gradually. Set the: temperature at 600* C and turn on the furnace.
- 10. Cool and weigh the asned sample and record the ash weight. Grind to pass a 30 mesh screen. Transfer to 4 oz conta'iner, seal, .and wr.ite sample number, weight, analysis required, and date and-time-of collection. The sample is now ready for analysis.
- 11. Store remaining ground sample in a plastic bag for possible future rechecking.
TIML-SP-01-04
l TIML-SP-01 Revision 0, 07-02-86 B. Grass and Cattle Feed
- 1. Take approximately 1 kg of fresh grass or 2 kg of cattle feed or silage.
P. Cut up grass into approximacely 1" - 2" long stems and pack into a standaru calibrated container (3.5 1 or 500 ml) . Pack cattle feed and silage as is; use 3. 5 1 size if enough sample is available.
Record the wet weight.
- 3. Add a few cc of formaldehyde.
- 4. Seal with cover. Attach paper tape on top of the cover and label -
with sample number, net weight, and date and time collected.
- 5. Submit to the counting room for gamma spectroscopic analysis or store
- in a cooler until counting (for a short period) without delay.
NOTE: If I-131 analysis is required, it is imperative that the sample be prepared anf. submittec to the counting rcen imedi-ately. Mark "I-131" on the tape.
- 6. Af ter gamma sca.nning is completed, transfer the sample to a drying pan and dry at 110' C. m NOTES: If only gamma scan is required, skip drying and ashing (Steps 6 through 10). Trensfer the sample to a plastic bag, seal, label, and stcre in the cooler until disposal.
If there is sufficient quantity, use surplus sample for dryng and ashing instead of waiting for gamma scanning to be completed .
- 7. Cool, weigh, and record dry weight. Grind.
- 8. Weigh out accurately in a tarred ceramic dish 100-120 g. of the ground ,
sample. Record the weight. (If sample weight is less than 100 g, use two dishes; mark one as "A" and the second one as "B.") Ash in a muffle furnace by gradual!y increasing the temperature to 600* C.
Ash overnight.
-- NOTE: If ashing is incomplete (black carbon remains), cool the dish, crush the ash with spatula, and continue ashing overnight at 600* C. At this stage, it is not necessary to increase the temperature gradually. Set the temperature at 600* C and turn
( on the furnace.
, 9. Cool and weigh the ashed sample and record the ash weight. Grind to
, pass a 30 mesh screen. Transf er to 4 oz container, seal, and write sample number, weignt, analyses r equired, and date and time of collection. The sample is now ready for analyses.
- 10. Store the remaining ground sample in a plastic bag for possible future rechecking.
o TIML-SP-01-05
TIML-SP-01, Revision 0, 07-02-86 C. Fish
- 1. Wash the fish.
- 2. Fillet and place the flesh immediately (to prevent moisture loss) in a 500 ml or 4 oz standard calibrated container. Use 500 mi size if enough sample is available. Record the wet weight.
- 3. Add a f ew cc of f ormaldehyde.
4 Seal with cover. Attach pr.per tape on top of the cover and label with sample number, weight, and date and time of collection. _
NOTE: If bones are to be analyzed, boil remaining fish in water f or ,
about 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. Clean the bones. Air dry, weigh, and record as wet weight. Dry at 110* C. Record dry weight. Ash at 800* C, cool, weigh, and record the ash weight. Grind to a nomogeneous sample. The sample is ready for analysis.
- 4. Submit to the counting room for gama spectroscopic analysis without delay or store in a refrigerator until counting.
NOTE: If 1-131 analysis is required, it is imperative that the sample be prepared and submitted to the counting room invnedi ately.
Mark "I-151" on the tape.
- 5. Af ter gamma spectroscopic anal ois is completed, transf er the sample to a drying pan and dry at 110' c.
NOTES: if only gama scan is required, skip drying and ashing (Steps 5 through 9). Transfer tna sample to a plastic bag, seal, _
label, and store in the f reezer until disposal.
If there is sufficient quantity, use surplus flesh for drying and ashing instead of waiting f or gativna scanning to be com-pleted.
- 6. Cool, weigh, and record dry weignt.
- 7. Transfer to a tarred ceramic disn. Record dry weight for ashing.
- 8. Ash in a muffle furnace by gradually increasing the temperature to 450' C. If considerable amount of carbon remains after overnight {
ashing, the sample should be brushed and placed back in the muf fle f urnace until ashing is completed.
- 9. Cool and weigh the ashed sample and record the ash weight. Grind to pass a 30 mesh screen. Transfer to a 4 or container, seal, and write sample number, weight, analyses required, and date and time of collec-tion. The sample is now ready f or analysis.
TIML-SP-0.-06
TIML-SP-01=~
Revision 0, 07 02-86 i
D. Waterfowl, Meat, and Wilditfe
- 1. Skin and clean the animal. Remove a suf ficent amount of flesh to fill i an appropriate standard calibrated container (500 or 4 oz). Weigh without delay (to prevent moisture loss), and record the wet weight.
- 2. Add a f ew cc of f o'maldehyce.
NOTE: If bones are to be analyzed, boil remaining flesh in water for about I hour. Clean the bones. Air _ dry, weigh, and record as wet weight. Dry at 110' C. Record dry weight. Ash at 800* C, cool, weigh, and record the ah weight. Grind to a homogeneous sample. The sample is ready for analysis.
- 3. Seal with the cover. Attach paper tape on top of the cover and label with sample number, wet weight, and date and time of collection.
- 4. Submit to the counting room f or gamma spectroscopic analysis without delay or store in _a ref rigerator until counti.19 (f or short period).
~ NOTE: _ If I-131 analysis is required, it is inperative that the sample be prepared and submitted to the counting room immediately.
Mark "!-131" on the tape.
- 5. - Af ter the ganma scanning is completed, transfer the sample to a drying pan and dry at 110* C.
- 6. Cool, weigh, and record dry weight.
- 7. Transfer to _ a tarred ceramic dish. Record ory weight for ashing.
- 8. Asn in a muffle furnace by gradually increasing the temperature to 450* C. If considerable amounts of carbon emain af ter. overnight ashing, the sample should be brushed and placed back in the muf fle furnace until ashing is completed.
- 9. Cool -and weigh the ashed sample and record the asn weight. Grind to pass a 30. mesh screen. Transf er to a 4 oz contaiimr. Seal and write sample number, weignt, analyses required, and date and time of collac-tion. The sample is now ready for analyses.
TIML-SP-01-07
TIML-SP 01 Revision 0, 07-02-86 E. Em
- 1. Remove the egg shells and mix the eggs with a spatula. Use about one (1) dozen eggs.
- 2. Transfer the mixed eggs to a standard calibrated 500 ml container.
Record the wet weight.
- 3. Add a f ew cc of f ormaldehyde.
- 4. Seal with cover. Attach paper tape cn top of the cover and label with sample number, wet weight, and date and time of collection.
- 5. Submit to the counting room for gamma spectroscopic analysis without delay or store in a ref rigerator until counting (f or short period).
- 6. Af ter gama spectrascopic analysis is completed, tranf er the sample to a plastic bag, seal, label, and store in a freezer until disposal.
NOTE: If only a gamma scan is required, skip Steps 7 through 11.
- 7. Weigh the rest of the sample, record wet weight, and dry in an oven at 110' C.
- 8. Cool, weigh, and record dry weight.
- 9. Weigh out accurately 100-120 g of the sample in a tarred ceramic dish, Record the weight. Ash in a muffle f urnace by gradually increasing the temperature to 550' C. If a considerable amount of carbon remains af ter overnight ashing, the sample should be crushed and placed back in the muf fle f urnace until ashing is completed.
- 10. Cool and weigh the ashed sample and record the weight. Grind to pass a 30 mesh screen. Transfer to a 4 oz container, seal, and write sample number, weight, analyses required, and date and time of collection. The sample is now ready for analysis.
- 11. Store the remaining ground semple in a plastic bag f or possible future rechecking.
TIML-SP-01-08
11ML-SP-01 Revision 0, 07-02-86 F. Slime and Aquatic Vegetation
- 1. Remove foreign uaterials.
- 2. Place the sarrple in a sieve pan and wash until all sand and dirt is removed (turn the sartple over several times.)
- 3. Squeeze out the water by hand.
- 4. Place the sample in a standard calibrated 500 ml or 4 oz container; weign and record wet weight. Use 500 ml container if enough sample is available.
- 5. Add a f ew cc of f ormaldehyde.
- 6. Seal with cover. Attach paper tape Gn top of the cover and label with sample number, weight, and date and time of collection.
- 7. Submit to the counting rcom without delay. Slime decomposes quickly even with f ormaldehyde, if gama scanning must be delayed, freeze.
NOTE: If I-131 analysis is required, it is imperative that the sample be prepared and analyzed immediately. Mark "I-131" on the tape.
- 8. After garvaa scanning is completed, transfer the sample to a drying pan and dry at 110' C.
NOTE: if only gamma scan is required, skip drying and ashing (Steps 8 through 11). Transfer the sample to a plastic bag, seal, label, and store in the freezer until disposal. -
- 9. Cool, weigh, and record dry weight. ,
- 10. Transf er to a tarred ceramic dish, and record dry weight f or asning.
Ash in a muffle furnace by gradually *ncreasing the temperature to 600* C.
NOTE: If ashing is incomplete (black carbon remains), cool the dish, crush the ash with spatula, and continue ashing overnight at 600* C. At this stage, it is not necessary to increase the temperature gradually. Set the temperature at 600' C. and turn on the furnace,
- 11. Cool and weigh the ashed sample and record ash weight. Grind to pass a 30 mesh screen. Transfer to a 4 oz container, seal, and label with sample number, weight, analyses required, and date and time of collection. The sample is now ready for analyses.
TIML-SP-01-09
flML-SP Revision 0, 07-02-86 G.--Bottom Sediments and Soil
- 1. Remove rocks, roots, and any other foreign materials.
- 2. Place approximately 1 kg of sample- on the drying pan and dry at 110* C.
- 3. Seal, label, and save remaining sample,
- 4. Grind or pulverize the dried sample and sieve through a No. 20 mesh screen.
- 5. For gama spectroscopic analysis, transfer sieved sample to a stan-
). dard calibrated 500 mi container or to 4 oz container.
- 6. Seal with cover. Weigh and record dry weight. Attach paper tape on top. of ' the cover and write sample number, weight, and date and time of collection.
- 7. Submit to the counting room for gamma spectroscopic atiolysis without delay.
8; For other analyses, e.g. gross beta, radiostrontium, etc., fill
'. 4 oz coritainer to the top, seal, and- write sample number, types of analyses required, and date and-time of collection.
- 9. Store the remaining sieved sample in a plastic bag for possible future rechecking.
- 10. After the gama scanning is completed, transfer the sample to a plastic bag, seal, label, and store until disposal. -
(
TIML-SP-01-10 5 .. .
i VlML-SP-01 Revision 0, 07-02-86 H. Drinking (Clear) Water (EPA Method 900.0)
A reoresentative sample must be collected f rom a f ree-flowing source of drinking water and should be large enough so that adequate aliquots can be taken to obtain the required sensitivity.
It is recomended that samples be preserved at the time of collection by adding enough it{ HNO3 to the sample to bring it to pH 2 (15 ml IN, HNO3 per liter of sample is usually sufficient). If samples are to be col-lected without preservation, they should be brought to the laboratory within 5 days, then preserved and held in the original container for a minimum of 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> before analysis or transfer of the sample.
The container choice should be plastic over glass to prevent loss due to breakage during transportation and nandling.
If the sample was not acidified at the time of collection, use the follow-ing procec'ere:
Procedute
- 1. Remove 100 ml of sample for tritium analysis and 1 1 f or 1-131 analy-sis, if required.
- 2. At 15 ml of 1:1 HNO3 per 9 11on of sample in the original container. ,
- 3. Hold the sample in the original contair.er f or a minimum of 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> before analysis or transfer of the sample.
- 4. When taking an aliquot f or analysis, take acid addition into account. -
For example:
Sample Volume Volume of Aliquot to Be analyzed Required 200 ml 203 ml 400 ml 406 ml 600 ml 609 ml 800 ml 812 ml 1000 ml 1015 ml 2000 ml 2030 ml 3000 ml 3045 ml 3500 ml 3552 ml For other volumes, adjust aliquots accordingly, at the rate of 1.5 ml per 100 ml of sample.
1 TIML-SP-01-ll
"#TELEDYNE ISOTOPES MlO*tSt LABORATORY 700 L AN0*EMR ROAD NOR7MBkOOR. ILL*0 5 00te2 WO (75 %4 0700 s Aa (706, %4 450 l
1 DETERMINATION Of GROSS ALPHA AND/OR GROSS BETA l l
IN AIR PARTICULATE flLTERS !
I PROCEDURE NO. TIML-AP-02 Prepared by Teledyne . es Midwest Laboratory Copy No.
Revised Revision Pages No. Date Pages Prf. pared by Approved by 0 07-11-86 3 k Owb , k th Fut 2 1 07-15-91 3 h. Nd [Y MLuJbaQ q Q /
__ 'i (This procedure, or any portion thereof, shall not be reproduced in any manner or distributed to any third party without the written permissi'n of Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory.)
TIML-AP-02-01
A m._, - _4s'
+
TIML.AP-02 Revision 1, 07-15-91 DETERMINATION OF GROSS ALPHA AND/OR GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS Principle of Method Air particulate filters are stored for at least 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> to allow for the l 1 decay of short-lived radon and thoron daughters and then counted in the proportional counter.
- Apparatus Forceps Loading Sheet Proportional Counter Stainless Steel Planchets (standard 2" x 1/8")
P'rocedure
- 1. Store the filters for at least 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> from the day of collection. l 1
- 2. . Place filters'on a stainless steel planchet. ,
- 3. Fill out a. sample loading sheet. Fill in the date, counter number, counting time, sample identification number, sample collection date, and initials.
NOTES: When 1oading-- samples in the holder, load - blanks (unexposed filter paper) in positions 1, 12, 23, 34, 45, etc.
If filters from more than one project are loaded, make sure that the appropriate blanks are loaded with each batch. Load the counter blank planchet as a last ' sample.
- 4. -Count in a proporational counter long enough to obtain the required
.LLDs.
5.- Afte- d ling is completed, return the filters to the original envelopes.
6.- Submit t a wanter printout, field collection sheet, and the loading sheet to. the udta clerk for calculations.
1 T IML- AP-02-02
i i
I TIML AP 02 Revision 0, 07-04 86 Calculations Gross alpha (beta) concentration:
, g2 A 2hE!2 3 (pCi/ liter) = t l B x C x 2.22 B x C x 2.22 '
l Where: ;
A = Net alpha (beta) count (cpm)
B = Efficiency f or counting alpha (beta) activity (cpm /dpm) ,
C = Volume of sc [
Esb = Counting error of sample plus background
- Eb = Counting error aof background ,
l s
'I I
e I 1 0
l .TIML AP-02-03 l ..
, _ , . _ _ ..__._._m _ _ . . , _ . - _ _ _ _ , . -
- , . . . - . . , . - . .,-_.___,-m
.,II
i "vPTELEDYNE ISOTOPES W rDWl &T La thkAT Oh*
PT L A NDW L M A P')& 3
%O8ttapuo(* iLL %ois wxe,; mc i
i t'# W O'T F & A 47 3 e44 a g g ,
PROCEDURE FOR COMPOSITlfiG AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS FOR GAMMA SPECTROSCCPlc ANALYSIS PROCEDURE 140. TIML-AP-03 Prepared by Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory IOPY N O __ __ . . . __
Revision No. Date Paaes Prepared by Approved by 0 12-15-89 3 . . . . -
- h. - . h-- _- . g!, (0. k- lut--- -wr.
.(.
meNM *+Ne* D"M'. 4D m *6 8'** +gm .
N Wegr- m e 4 mew .6-% %=Gu eir mie.@"*N (This procedure, or any portion thereof, shall not be reproduced in any canner or distributed to any third party without the written permission of Teledyae isotopes flidwest Laboratory).
TIML-AP-03-01
flML.Ap,03 Revision 0, 12-15-89 PROCEDURE FOR COMPOSIT!NG AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS FOR GAMMA SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYsl5 Principle __of Met _ hod AP filters are placed in a Petrie Dish in chronological order, labeled and submitted i '
to counting room for analysis.-
Materials Forceps (long)
Blank filter paper small Petrie Dish Scotch Tape Procedure-
- 1. Stack APs from-each location in chronological order, with the latest collection date on top.
- 2. Place blank filter paper o the Petrie Dish.
- 3. Starting from the top of the stack, remove each AP_from the envelope and
-place it in the Petrie Dish wf th the deposit. facing up.
- 4. Continue transferring AP's from envelopes to the Petrie Dish until all.ere transferred.
- 5. Place blank filter paper on top.
- 6. Cap the Petrie Dish. Use scotch tape to hold cap in place, if needed.
- 7. Record sample ID (project), sample No., location, last date of collection, collection period and date composited in the Recording Book.
- 8. Write sample 10,' sample No., last date of collection and collection period on the Petrie Dish using black marker.
- 9. Submit the samples to the counting room.
- 10. After counting, return AP's to the original envelopes in reverse order.
Exampie Project: 'BAP:
Location: 2 Sample No.: 1675 Last Collection Date: 08-28-89 l ' Collection period: August, 1989 Samples collected: 8-7, 8-14, 8-21, 8-28 g TIML-AP-03-02 4
TIML-AP 03 Revision 0, 12-15-89 Side View Top View E A F' - / 6 7 5 B1ank AP l 1."* 8-7-80 -
- 14 -b9 U"f #7 e--
1 -e- 8-21-89 l
"-- 8-28-89 Blank AP
'(
TIML-AP.03-03
"veTELEDYNE ISOTOPEP wrtint St Latonat' F30 L ANowism a a NOPf>S8tOOR tt L t.WQ t. . %' { B .J af t*, %d 072 i Aa <*opuss .eu DETERMiliAT10ti 0F GROSS ALPHA AND/OR GROSS BETA Iti WATER (DISSOLVED SDLIDS OR TOTAL RESIDUE)
PROCEDURE fiO. T11:L-W(DS)-01 Prepared by Teledyne isotopes flidwest Laboratory Copy fio.
Revised Revision Pages fio . Date Pages Prepared by Approved by 0 11-25-85 4 /6 O g h h[ // //d 2,3 1 02-28-91 4 $/ M b ,_
[1@ 8p /I ght 3 2 05-03-91 4 N3 hwd' WA/4 u/<M y0 G _
TIML-W-01 Revision 1, 02-28-91 DETERMINA110N Of GROSS ALPHA AND/0R GROSS BEIA IN WATER (Dissolved Solids or Total Residuca ,b)
Principle of Method Water samples containing suspended matter are filtered through a membrane filter and the filtrate is analyzed. The filtered water sample is evaporated and the residue is transferred to a tared pl anchet for counting gross alpha and gross beta activity.
Reagents All chemicals should be of " reagent-grade" or equi v al ent senever they are commercially available.
Lucite: 0.5 mg/mi in acetone Nitric acid, HNO : 16 N (concentrated), 3 N (187 ml of 16 N HNO3 diluted to 1 liter)3,1 N (I2 ml of 16 N, HNO3 diluted to ) liter)
Apparatus filter, Millipore, membrene Type AA, 0.08 Filtration equipnent P1anchets (Standard 2" x 1/8" ringed planchet)
Droportional counter Electric hot plate Drying oven Muffle furnace Procedure
- 1. Filter a volume of sample containing not more than 100 mg of dis-solved solids for alpha assay, or not more than 200 mg of dissolved solids for beta assay.a,b 11 NOTE: For gross alpha and gross beta assay in the same sample, limit the amount of solids to 100 mg.
a For analysis of total residue (for clear water), proceed as described above but do not filter the water. Measure out the appropriate amount and b
proceed to Step 3.
For Duquesne Light Company samples ONLY - Procedure, Step 1: Do NOT filter. Shake well and immediately withdraw required aliquot. Do not allow I solids to settle.
TIML-W-01-02
TIML.W-01 Revision 2, 05-03-91
- 2. Transfer assembly holding filter paper to another filtering flask and war,h the non-filterable solids on the filter paper with D.l. water.
Discard wash wat er. (Save the filters with suspended matter for separate analysis. See procedure No. Tltil-W-02.)
- 3. Evaporate the filtrate to NEAR dryness on a hot plate.
4 Add 25 ml of concentrated hNO3 and evaporate to NE_AR dryness again.
NOTE: If water samples are krown or suspected to contain chloride sal ts , these chloride salts should be converted to nitrate salts before the sample residue is transf erred to a stainless st eel planchet. (Chlorides will attack stainicss steel and increase the sarple solids. No correction can be made for these added solids.) Chloride salts an be converted to nitrate salts by 3dding concentrated HND and evaporating to near dryness.
- 6. With D.I. water and a f ew drops of 3 N HNO 3 , transfer the residue to a 50 ml beater using a rubber policeman to wash the walls.
Evaporate to NEAR dryness.
- 6. Transf er Quantitatively the residue to a T ARED PLANCHET , using an unused pla> tic disposable pipette for each sample, (not more than 1 mL at a time) evaporating each portion to dryness under the lamp.
Spread residue unifornly on the planchet.
NOTE: Non-uniformity of the sample residue in the counting planchet interferes with the accuracy and precision of the method .
- 7. Wash the beaker wi t h a minimun anount of 1N HNO3 several times and combine the washings and the residue in the planchet, using the rubber policeman to wash the walls. Evaporate to dryness.c NOTE: Rinse the rubber policeman with D.l. water between samples.
- 8. Bake in muf fle furnace at 450*C f or 45 minutes, cool and weigh.
- 9. Add a few drops (6 - 7) of the lucite solution and dry under the infrared lamp f or 10 - 20 minutes.
J
- 10. Store the sample in a dessicator until ready to count because vapors
\ from th f- moist residue can damage the detector and the window and can cause erratic measurements.
c For Duquesne Light Ctepany and CH 2 M Hill samples OW.Y - h ocedure, Step 7:
2 00 NOT bake. Proceed directly to Step 9.
IlM L 4'-01 -03 L____ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . __ _ _ _ _ _ . ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . i
r.___________________________ ._
TIML-W-01 Revision 1, 02-28-91
- 11. Count the gross alpha and/or the gross beta activity in a low back-ground proportional counter.
NOTE: If the gas-flow internal proportional counter does not dis-criminate for the higher energy alpha pulses at the beta plateau, the activity must be subtracted f rm the beta plJs al ph a a ct i vi ty . This is pa rt icul a rly utportant for sampl es with high alpha activity.
Sar,ples may te counted for t eta activity inredi at el y af ter baking; alpha counting should be delayed at least 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> (until equilibrium has occurred).
Calculations Gross alpha (t. eta) ectivity:
A 2
b*
(pCi/ liter)= 1 --
B x C x 0 x 2.22 B x C x D x 2.22 Where:
A = Net alpha (beta) count (cpn)
B = Ef ficiency for counting alpha (beta) activity (cpn/dpm)
C = Volume of sample (liters)
D = Correction f actor for self-absorption in the sample Esb = Counting error of sample plus background Eb = Counting error of background
References:
Radioassay Procedures for Environmental Sampl es, U.S. Department of Hecith, Education and Wel f are. Environmental Health Series ,
January 19f>7.
EPA Prescribed Procedures for Measurement of Radioactivity in Drinking Water. August 1980.
TIML-W-01-04
l W TELEDYNE ISOTOPES ut*tli LA 90matcay 700 LANDWIMa A0aD ND8f H6AOok. ILUNot5 tuu 23t0 63'2> W 0700 8 Am 13th
- e617 l
i DETERMINATION OF GROSS ALPHA AND/0R GROSS BETA IN WATER l (SUSPENDED SOLIDS) ,
PROCEDURE NO. TIML-W(SS)-02 Prepared by Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory Copy No.
Revision No. Date Paoes Prepared by Approved by 0 11-22-85 3 L. G. Huebner U zgl
'/
(This procedure, or any portion thereof, shall not be reproduced in any manner or distributed to any third party without the written permis: ion cf Teledyne isotopes Midwest Laboratory.)
- TIML-W(SS)-02-01
l l
ilML-d(SS)-02 Revision 0, 11-22 85 OETERMINATION OF GROSS ALPHA AND/0R GROSS BETA IN WATER (SUSPENDED SOLIDS)
Principle of Method ,
The sample is filtered through a tared membrane filter. The filter containing the solids is transferred to a stainless steel planchet, dried, and fixed to the planchet. The gross alpha and gross beta activities are measured in a low background internal proportional counter, if the sample contains sand, it is ,
placed in the separatory funnel, the sand allowed to settle to the bottom and drained off.
Reagents Acetone Apparatus Filter, Millipore, membrane Type AA 0.08 Filtration equipment Planchets (Standard 2" x 1/8" planchet)
Proportional counter Procedure ,
- 1. Filter one liter of sanple through a TARED membrane filter. Wash the non-filterable solids on the filter with 6.1. water.
Note: If the sample' contains sand, place it in the separatory funnel, allow the sand to settle for 30 minutes, then drain off the sand at the bottom. Shake the funnel and repeat as above two (2) more times.
- 2. Place the filter in a olanchet, placing the ring over it to prevent curling, and air d"y for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
- 3. Dry under the inf ared lan.p for 20-30 minutes. Dessicate to constant weight and weigh.
- 4. Fix the filter to the planchet at four peripheral points using glue. Air dry.
- 5. Count for gross alpha and gross beta activity using a proportional counter.
- 6. Calculate the. activity in pCi/1 using the computer program designed for this analysis.
TIML-W(SS)-02-02
TIML-W(SS)-02 Revision 0, 11-22-85 l Calculations Gross alpha (beta) activity:
2
!2 A Esb + Ef (pCi/ liter) = -- 1 By C x D x 2.22 8 x C x 0 x 2.22 Where:
A = Net alpha (beta) count (cpm)
B = Efficiency for counting alpha (beta) activity (cpm /dpm)
C = Volune of sample (liters)
D = Correction f actor f or self-absorption in the sanple
'Esb = Counting error of samp.e plus background Eb = Counting error of background
References:
Radioassay Procedures for Environmental Samples, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Environmental Health Series, January 1967.
i i
TIML-W(SS)-02-03 l
"RTELEDYNE ISOTOPES
. . 5,u.O.A,0.,
POO LANDWt Mn RO AD NOmiM8mOOF. 6LLINOl5 61eJ 23*O Ota W 0700 9 AA (3th W e$'7 DETERMINATION OF GROSS ALPHA AND/OR GROSS BETA IN SOLIO SAMPLES PROCEDURE NO. TIML-AB-01 Prepared by Teledyne isotopes Midn'est Laboratory Copy No.
Revisian No. Date Pages Prepared by Approved oy 0 08-04-86 5 h.Gd a v v tit- Lbf._
l Q (Tnis procedure, or any portion thereof, shall not be reproduced in any manner or distributed to any third party without the written permission of Teledyne isotopes Midwest Laboratory.)
TIML-AB-01-01
TIML-AB-01 Revision 0, 08-04-86 DETERMINAT10N OF GROSS ALPHA AND/OR GROSS BETA IN SOLID SAMPLES Principle of Method 100 mg to 200 mg of sample is distributed evenly on a 2" ringed planchet, counted in a proportional counter, and concentrations of gross alpha and/or gross beta are calculated.
Reagents #
Lucite: 0.5 mg/mi in acetone Appartus Balance Infrared lamp Planchets (standard 2" x 1/8" ringed planchet)
Proportional counter 4
J TIML-AB-01-02
TIML-AB-01. Revision 0, 08-04-86 A. Gross Alpha and/or Gross Beta in Vegetation Procedure
- 1. Weigh out accurately in a planchet no more than 100 mg of ashed or dried and ground sample for gross alpha assay and no more than 200 mg for gross beta as.ay.
NOTE: If both gross alpha and gross beta analyses are required, do not use more than 100 mg.
- 2. Add a few drops of water and spread uniformly over the area of the planchet. Dry under the Infrared lamp.
- 3. Add 2 - 3 drops of lucite solution in acetone and dry again under the t
infrared lamp.
- 4. -Store the planchets in a desiccator until counting.
- 5. Count the gross alpha and gross beta activity in a It,a background
- proportional counter, Cplculations Gross alpha (beta) concentration:
2 +
A i b b (pCi/o wet)
= -
B x C x D x F x 2.22 B x C x D x F x 2.22
~
Where:-
A = Net alpha (beta) count (cpm)
B = Efficiency for counting alpha (beta) activity (cpm /dpm)
! C = Weight of sample (grams).-ash or dry I
'D = Correction factor for self-absorption in the sample Esb = Counting error of sample plus background Eb = Counting error of background F = Ratio of wet weight to ashed or dry weight
REFERENCE:
Radioassay Procedures for Environmental Samples, U. S. Depart- ,
ment of Health, Education and Welf are. Environmental Health Series, January 1967.
TIML-AB-01-03
_ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - ~ , . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ . - __.
um nuusuumuuu u TIML-AB-01 Revision 0, 08-04 86 B. Gross Alpha and/or Gross Beta in Meat. Fish, and Wildlife Procedure
- 1. Weigh cut accurately in a planchet no more than 100 mg of ashed sample for gross alpha ass 5y and no more than 200 mg f or gross beta assay.
NOTE: If both gross alpha and gross bet a analyses are required, do not use more than 100 mg.
- 2. Add a few drops of water and spread unif ormly over the area of the planchet. Dry under the infrared lamp.
- 3. Add 2 - 3 drops of lucite solution in ace'.one and dry again under the infrared lamp,
- 4. Store the planchets in a desiccator until counting.
- 5. Count the gross alpha and gross beta activity in a low background proportional counter.
Calculations Gross alpha (beta) concentration:
A i 2 l sb
- I (pCi/g wet) =
B x C x D x F x 2.22 B x C x D x F x 2.22 l 1
Where:
A = Net alpha (beta) count (cpm)
B = Ef ficiency for counting alpha (beta) activity (cpm /dpm)
C = Weight of sample (grams), ash D = Correction factor for se'if-absorption in the sample Esb = Counting error of sample plus background
= Counting error of background Eb F = Ratio of wet weight to ashed weight
REFERENCE:
Radioassay Procedures for Environmental Samples, U. S. Depart-ment of riealth, Education and Welf are. Environmental Health Series, January 1967.
TIML-AB-01-04
TIML-AB-01 Revision 0, 08-04-86 C. Gross Alpha and/or Gross Beta in Soil and Bottom Sediments Procedure ,
- 1. Weigh out accurately in a planchet no more than 100 mg of a pulverized .
sample for gross aloha assay and no more than 200 mg for a gross beta i assay. ,
l NOTE: If both gross alpha and gross beta analyses are required. do [
not use more than 100 mg.
- 2. Add a few drops of water and spread uniformly over the area of the i planchet. Dry under the infrared lamp.
t
- 3. . Add 2 - 3 drops of lucite solution in acetone and dry again under the infrared lamp.
4 Store the planchets in a desiccator until counting. L
- 5. Count - the -gross alpha and gross beta activity in a low background proportional counter.
Calculations '
Gross alpha (beta) concentration:
A i 2 E 2
sb
+ E b2 :
(pCi/g dry) =
B x C x D x 2.22 8 C x D x 2.22 j khere:
A. = Net alpha (beta) count (cp ;)
B = Ef ficiency for counting alpha (bet 4) activity (cpm /dpm)
C = Weight of sample (grams) 0 = Correction factor for self-absorption in the sample Esb = Counting error of sample plus background Eb = Counting error of background l
REFERENCE:
Radioassay Procedures for Environmental Samples, U. 5. Depart-ment - of Health, Education and Welf are. Environmental Health Series January 1967. .
TIML-AB-01-05
~
- -- , . . . ~ - . _ _ - . - _ . _ _ . _ _ . . _ . .. _ . _ _ _ . . . _ , . , _ .
"#TELEDYNE ISOTOPES WiDettiLaponatomy
.0D LAND *tHR ROAD 40mtManOOK 6LLINOtt 6142 2310 012) W C700 f u (312, W e6 t?
DETERMINATION OF GAMMA EMITTERS BY GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY (GERMANIUM DETECTORS)
PROCEDURE ND. TIML-GS 01 Prepared by Teledyne isotopes Midwest Laboratory Copy No.
R,evision No. Date Pages Prepared b,y Approved by 0 07-21-86 5 y
Orf,
(
[-
ll czt ' ut<
I (This procedure, or any portion thereof, shall not be reproduced in any manner or distributed to any third party without the written permission of Teledyne isotopes Midwest Laboratory.)
TIML-GS-01-01
T iltL-GS-01 Revision 0, 07-21-86 DETERMINAT10N OF GAMMA EMITTERS BY GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY (GERMANIUM DETECTORS)
Principle of Method The sample is placed in a calibrated container and counted f or a length of time required to reach the required LLD. The results are decay corrected to "
the sampling time, where appropriate, using a dedicated computer .nd sof tware.
App aratus Counting containers Counting Equipment Cylinders Marking Pens Recording Books t
-e i
f TIML-GS-0'-02
.. . . -. - ~ _ - - . - - . .- . -. . . . - . ~ ~ . _ . .
TIMLoGS-01 Revision 0, 07 21-86 t
A. Milk and Water ,
- 1. Measure accurately 3.51 or 500 ml of sample and put it in the cali-brated counting container. Always use larger volume if sample is in sufficient quantity, NOTE: Occasionally the sample size is too large for 500 ml geometry but not sufficient for 3.5 geometry, in such a case, follow the following procedure,
- a. If the sample size is less than 21 use 500 ml geometry,
- b. If the sample size is more than 21, measure the sample _
! accurately and dilute to 3.51 with ceionized water. Use 3.5 1 g?ometry but use actual sample volume when doing the !
calculations. Return the diluted sanple to the original container and mark the volume of the original sample and detonized water used.
- 2. Cover anti attach a gummed label to the cover; write the sample number, volume.., and date and time of collection on the label. Mark "l.131" if 3 analysis f or 1-131 is required by gamma spectroscopy.
3.- Count without delay f or estimated time required to meet LLDs. Record file number, sample identification number, date and time counting started, detector number, geometry, sample size, and date and time of collection.
4 Stop counting; transfer specra to the disc and print out the results.
- 6. Af ter counting is completed, record the date and time counting ended and counting time..
- 7. Return the sample to the original container and mark with a red marker.
i
-TIML-GS-01-03 r - + .er -
, , , - , , - - - ,,-,--.-,m-, . - m - -, m .
l flML-GS 01 Revision 0, 07-21 86 i B. Airborne Particulates
- 1. Place air filters in a filter cup container.
- 2. Place on the detector and count long enough to meet the LLO require. I ments. Record the file number, sam le identificat hn number, date and '
time coun*.ing started, detector number, geometry, sample size, and
. date and time collected.
- 3. Stop counting and transfer spectra to the disc. Print out the results
.and check the- LLDs bef ore taking the sampit , of f. If LLD lovels are ,
not met, continue counting until they do. !
J
- 4. Af ter counting is completed. record the date and time counting ended
,-- and counting time.
- 5. Replace air filters in the original envelopes for storage or f urther analyses. .
f I
l 1
L. .
l-TIML-GS-01-04 ;
-- . _ _ . . _ _ .. _ _ ___-. _ ._ u.__ _ _ _ . _ _ - _ _. - . . . - _ , - . .
TIML-GS-01 Hevision 0, 07 21-86 C. Other Samoles NOTE: Samples , e.g. , soil, vegetation, fish, etc. , are prepared in the prep lab and delivered to the counting room.
- 1. Place the sample on the detector and count long enough to meet LLO requirements. Record the file number, Sanple identification number, date and time counting started, detector number, geometry, sanple size, and date and time of collection.
- 2. Stop counting and transfer spectra to the disc. Print out the results and check the LLDs bef ore taking the sample of f . If LLD levels are _
not met, continue counting until they are. ,
3 Af ter counting is completed, record date and time counting ended and cbuit:ng time. Mark t'ne tontainer with red marker and return to the prep lab for tr ansf er to the plastic bag f or storage or 'arther analyses.
(
O
~
4 TIML-GS-01-05
"#TELEDYNE ISOTOPES u@w t $t ( A 90matome 700LANDwtMmROAD h0Ri>Dh008. ILLINO'S tarWJ 73ie (70s, W4 0?30 f at (Poe %d at17 DETERMINAT10f4 Of iP,lTluti Ifi WATER (OlRECT METHOD)
PROCEDURE fi0. T IML-T-02 Prepared by Teledyne l< : + opes flidwst Laboratory Copy tio.
Revised Pages Revision tio. Date Pages Prepared by Approved by 0 11-22-85 5 _L. G. Huebner 9 R R'l 2,3 09-27-91 4 fridu/[#/1, 1
h t
, (J/m8 (This procedure, or any portion thereof, shall not be reproduced in any manner or distributed to any third party without the written pennission of Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory. )
T lHL -T-02-01
_TIML-V-02 Revision 1, 09-27-91 DElERMINATION OF TRITIUM IN WATER (DIRECT METHOD)
Principle of Method The water sample is purified by distillation, a portion of the distillate is transferred to a counting vial and the scintillation fluid added.
The contents of the vial are thoroughy mixed and counted in a liquid scintillation counter.
Reagents
- Scintillation medium, Insta-Gel scintillator Tritium standard solution Dead-water Ethyl alcohol Apparatus Condenser Distillation flask, 250-ml capacity Liquid scintillation counter Liquid scintillation counting vials Kimwipes Procedure -
All glassware must be dry. Dry it in the drying oven at 100-125*C.
~
NOTE: 11
- 1. Place 60-70 ml of the sample in a 250-mi distillation flask. Add a boiling chip to the flask. Add one NaOH pellet and ca. 0.029 KMn04 Connect a side arm adapter and a condenser to the outlet of the flask.
Place a receptacle at the outlet of the condenser. Set varia; at 70 1 mark. Heat to boiling to distill . Discard the first 5-10 ml of di still at e . Collect next 20-25 ml of distillate for analysis. Do not distill to dryness.
- 2. Mark the vial caps with the sample number and date.
Note : _Use the same- type of vial for the whole batch (samples, back-ground , and standard .
- 3. Mark three (3) vial caps "Bkg 1", "Bkg 2", "Bkg 3", and date.
- 4. Mark three (3) vial caps "St-1", "St-2", "St-3"; standard number, and date.
TIML-T-02-02 m .
TIML-T-02 Revision 1, 09-27-91 f 1
i l
- 5. Dispense 13 ml of sample into marked vials and " dead" water into vials marked Bkg-1,2, and 3. i Note 1: Pipetter is set (and calibrated) to deliver 6.5 m1, so pipette twice into each vial . Use new tip for each sample )
and new tip (one) for three background samples. ;
L
- Not e 2 : Make sure the pipetter has not been reset. If it has been reset, or if you are not sure, do not use it; check i with your supervisor.
Note 3: Make sure the plastic tip is pushed all the way on to the l pipetter and is tight. If it is not, the air will' be drawn l in and the volume withdrawn will not be correct (it will be i smal l e r ) . j i
- 6. Dispense 13 ml (see Notes 1,2, and 3, above) of " dead" water into each vial marked "St-1", "St-2", and "St-3." .
- 7. Take a 0.1 ml (100 ) pipetter and withdraw 0.1 ml of water from each '
of the three standard vials. Discard this 0.1 ml of water.
- 8. Take a_ new 0.1 m1 tip. Dispense 0.1 ml of standard into each of the l three vials marked "St-1", "St-2", and "St-3."
- 9. Take al! vials containing samples, background, and standard to the counting room. .
Note : To avoid spurious counts, scintillator should not be added -
under flourescent light.
- 10. Dispense 10 ml of Insta-Gel into each vial (one at a time), cap tightly, and shake VIGOROUSLY for at least 0.6 minutes. Recheck the cap for tightness.
11 . Wet a Kimwipe-with alcohol and wipe off each vial in the following-order: >
l
Background
Samples Standard
- 12. Load the vials in the following order:
i Bk g ' 1 St-1 '
Sampl es Bkg-2*
St-2*
- Bkgin2the andmiddle St-2 should- be approximatelyl1 of the batch. '
Samples Bkg-3 St-3 TIML-T-02-03
_ .- _ ._ . -. _ . _ _ - __ ___2____-. _
TIML-V-02 Revision 0, 11-22 85 .
- 13. Let the vials dark- and temperature-adapt for about one hour.
Note 1: To check if vials reached counter temperature, inspect one vial (Bkg). The liquid should be transparent. If the temperature is too high (or too low), the liquid will be white and very viscous.
Note 2: The temperature inside the counter should be between 10' and 14' C (check thermometer), in this temperature range, the liquid is transparent.
- 14. Set the counter for 100 min counting time and infinite cycles.
(Follow manuf acturer's procedure for setting the counter.)
- 15. Fill out the loading sheet, being sure to indicate the date ar.d time counting started, and your initials.
Note: Do not count prepared background and standard sets with another batch of samples if p_lastic vials are used. Prepare new backgrounds and standards for each batch.
If glass vials are _used, the prepared background and standard sets can be counted with other batcher up to one (1) month af ter preparation provided they are not taken out of the wunter (not warmed up) and the same vial type from the same manuf acturing batch (the same carton) is used. Af ter one month prapare new sets of backgrounds and standards.
Calculations A -
B A + B
~
t y
t 2 t t 2 1 pCi/l = *
-At3 - At '
2.22 x E x V x e 2.22 x E x V x e -
Where:
A = Total counts, sample B = Total counts, background E = Efficiency (cpm /dpm)'
V = Volume (liter)-
e =__ Base of_ the natural-logorithm = 2.71828
=
A f'-0.05652
' 26 "
t1 = Counting time, sample t2 = Counting time, background t3
- Elapsed time from the time of collection to the time of counting
..(in years)
TIML-T-02 . - . -- _ . _ - - _ _ _ _. - . - - -. .-- .-.
"RTELEDYNE ISOTOPES edtDWi tt ( A DO4 A10M Y 700 LANDW(MR AC AD 40Rf HessOOA ttLiNO'S 60ce2 73'O i ?@ M4 0700 F A a (7"A; %4 45t 7 DETERMlf4AT10h 0F 1-131 lli MILK BY AN10li EXCHAtiGE (BATCH HETHOD)
PROCEDURE NO. T IML-1-131-01 Prepared by Teledyne isotopes Miawest Laboratory Copy No.
Revised Revision Pages tio . Date Pages Prepared by Apfrovedby 0 06-12-85 6 ' dda
. . 44 (Fl 5 1 11-25-85 6 in h) , YY b/dbW 2,3,4,5 2 03-24-89 6 !> k/) hkN/% LI44/7 2,3,5 3 04-10-91 6 hhM _M_
- /
bAm
\\ Q (This procedure, or any portion thereof, shall not be reproduced in any manner or distributed to any third party without the written pennission of Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory.)
T IML-1 -131-01-01
1-131-01 Revision 3, 04-10-91 Determination of 1-131 in Milk by lon Exchange (Batch Method)
Principle of Method After samples have been treated to convert all iodine in the sample to a common oxidation state, the iodine is isolated by solvent extraction or a combination of ion exchange and solvent extraction steps.
i.
lodine, as the iodide, is concentrated by adsorption on an anion resin, Following a Nacl wash, the iodine is eluted with sodium hypochlorite, lodine
- in the iodate fonn is reduced to 12 and the elemental iodine extracted into l CHCl 3, back-extracted into water then finally precipitated as palladium iodide.
Chemical recovery of the added carrier is determined gravimetrically from the Pdl2 precipitate. 1-131 is determined by beta counting the Pdl 2a l
Re, agent s Anion Exchange Resin, Dowex 1-X8 (20-50 mesh) chloride fonn 13
(
Chloroform, CHCl 3 - reagent grade Hydrochloric Acid, hcl, IN, Hydrochloric Acid, hcl, 3N Wash Solution: H2 0 - HNO3 - NH2 0H HCL, 50 mL H2 0 ; 10 mL IM - NH2 0H-hcl; 10 mL conc. HNO3 Hydroxylamine Hydrochloride, NH20H hcl - 1 M Nitric Acid HNO3 - concentrated Palladium Chloride, PdClg, 7.2 mg Pd"/mL (1.2 9 'PdCl 2 /100 mL of 6N hcl) l3
( Sodium Bisulfite, NaHS03 - 1 M_
- Sodium Chloride, Nacl - 2M Sodium jiypechlorite, Na0Cl - 5% (Clorox)
I r
,-m, . - _ , _ . _ . . _ , _ _ _ _
i l_-131-01_
Revision 3, 04-10 91 i
_Special App'aratus Chromatographic Column, 20 cm x 150 rm ; Reliance Glass Cat. AR2725T)
Vacuum Filter Holder, 2.5 ce2 filter area Filter Paper, Whatman 442, 2'. nn Hy?ar h Polyester Gunned Tape, 1/2", Scotch #853 Heat lamp i
Part A lon Exchange Procedure ,
- 1. Transfer 2 liters (if available) of sample to the beaker. Add 1.00 mL of 3. .
standardized iodide carrier to each sample.
- 2. Add a clean magnetic stirring bar to each sample beaker. Stir each sample for 5 minutes or longer on a magnetic stirrer.- Allow sample to equilibrate at least 1/2 hour. If a milk sample is curdled or lumpy, ,
vacuum filter the sample through a Buchner funnel using a cheesecloth ;
filter. Wash the curd thoroughly with deionized water, collecting the j washings with the filtrate.
Pour the filtrate back into the original washed and labeled 4 liter beaker and discard the curd.
~
+
- 3. Add approximately 45 grams of Dowex 1XS (20-50 mesh) anion resin to each sample beaker and stir on a magnetic stirrer for at least I hour. Turn off the stirrer _and allow the resin to sett% for = 10 minutes.
- 4. Gently decant and discard the milk'or water staple taking care to retain as much resin as possible in the beaker. Add approximately I liter of deionized water to rinse the resin, allow to 59t.le 2 minutes, and pour of f the rinse. Repeat rinsing in the casa cf milk samples until all ,
traces of milk are removed from the resin. i l
- 5. . Using a deionized water wash bottle, transfw the resin to the column
~
marked with the sample number. Allow resin to settle 2 minutes and drain !
the standing water. Wash the resin with 100 mL of 2M Nacl .
~
hypochlorite to column in 10-20 mL increments, stirring resin as needed -
to _ eliminate gas bubbles and maintain flow rate of_ 2 mL/ min. Collect eluate in 250 nt beaker and discard the resin. :
e T IML-1 -131 03
_ . - . - - .- . - - - , . - . - + - ~ . . . . _ - -
l-131-01 Revision 2, 03-24-89.
Part B lodine Extraction Procedure
- 1. Acidify the eluate from Step 6 using concentrated HNO3 to make the sample 2-3 ' N in HNO3 and transfer to 250 mL separatory funnel. (Add the acid slowly with stirring until the vigorous reaction subsides.)
Volumn of concentr' ed HNO3 required will depend on eluate volume as >
follows :-
Eluate Volume Concentrated Hh03 (mL) (mL) 50-60 10 60-70 12 L
70-80 14 80-90 16
- 2. Add 50 mL of CHCl3 and 16 mL of 1 M_ hydroxylamine hydrochloride (freshly ,
prepared). Extract iodine into orgar.ic pho;e (about 2 minutes equilibra-tion). Draw off the organic phase (lower phase) into another separatory funnel.-
- 3. Add 25 mL of CHC13 and 5 mL of 1 M hydroxylamine hydrochloride to the first separatory funnel and again equilibrate for 2 minutes.- Cambine the organic phases. Discard the aqueous phase (Upper phase) if no other analyses ' are required. If Pu, U or Sr is required on the. same sample l
aliquot , submit the aqueous phase and data sheet to the approprate laboratory section.
- 4. Add: 20 mL H2 0-HNO 3 -NH 2 0H hcl wash solution to the separatory funnel containing the CHCl4 . Equilibrate 2 minutes. Allow phases to separate and transfer CHCl3 (lower phase) to a clean separatory funnel. Discard the wash solution.
- 5. : Add 25 mL H2 0 and 10 drops of 1 M sodium bisulfite (freshly prepared) to.the-separatory funnel containing the CHC1 Equilibrate for 2 minutes. Discard the organic phase (lower phase)3 Drain aqueous phase (upper phase) into a 100 mL beaker. Proceed to the Precipitation of Pd12-L 5
L
'TIML-1 '31-01-04
, 1-131-01' Revision 3, 04-10-91 Part C Precipitation of Palladiunelodide CAUTION: AMMONIUM HYDROX1DE INTERFERES WITH THIS PROCEDURE
- 1. Add 110 mL of 3 N hcl to the aqueous phase from the iodine extraction
~
procedure in Step 5.
- 2. Place the beaker on a stirrer-hot plate. Using the magnetic stirrer, boil and stic the sample until it evaporates to 30 mL or begins to turn yell ow.
- 3. Turn the heat off. Remove the magnetic stirrer, rinse with deionized w ater.
- 4. Add, dropwise, to the solution, 2.0 mL of palladium chloride.
- 5. Cool the sample to room temperature. Place the beaker with sample on the stainless steel tray and put in the refrigerator overnight.
- 6. Weigh a clean 21 ma Whatman #42 filter which has been dried under a heat
' lamp.
- 7. Place the weighed filter in the filter holder, filter the sample and wash the residue with water and then with absolute alcohol .
- 8. Remove filter from filter holder and place it in the labeled petri dish.
- 9. Dry under the lamp for 5-10 minutes. l3
- 10. Weigh the filter with the precipitate. >
1
- 11. Cut a: 1-1/2" strip of polyester tape and lay it on a clean surface, gummed side ug. Place the filter, precipitate side up, in the center of the tape.
- 12. Cut a 1-1/2" wide piece of mylar. Using a spatula to press it in place, put it directly over the precipitate and seal the edges to the polyester
! tape. Trim to about 5 mm f rom the edge of the filter with scissors.
I L
- 13. _ Mount th'e sample on the plastic disc and write the sample nurber on the back side of the disc.
- 14. _ Count the sample on a proportional beta counter. -
Calculations l; Calculate the sample activity using computer program 1131.
l l
TIML-131-01-05
3 1-131-01 Revision 0, 06-12-85 l
Part C !
l Precipitation of Palladium lodide (continued) !
l-131' concentration: ;
1
\\ 2 2 2
A' Y Esb + Eb
-(pCi/1) = 1 j 2.22 x B x C x 0 2.22 x B x C x 0 j where: j A = Net cpm, sample B = Efficiency for counting beta 1-131 (cpm /dpm)
C = Volume of sample (liters)
D = Correction for' deca'y to the time of collection = e-At .
Exp - 0.693 8.04 -x t )
= e-0.0862t where t = elapsed. time from the time of collection to the counting time (in days)
Esb = Counting error of sample plus background Eb = Counting error of background
Reference:
" Determination of 1-131 by Beta-Gamma coincidence Counting of PdI2 ". Radiological Science Laboratory. Division _of Laboratories and Research, New York State Department of Health, Ma rch .1975, Revised February 1977.
4 9
N TIML-1-131-01-06
W TELECt(NE ISOTOPES MtOWES1 D& ORATORY 100 LANDWLHm ROAD NORTH 6400N ILLtHO15 ea162 2310 (31b 564 0700 F AA dit 564 elt?
DETERMINATION OF AIRBORNE l-131 IN CHARC0AL CARTRIDGES BY GAMMA SPECTRO 5 COPY PROCEDURE NO. TIML-1-131-02 napared by Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory Copy No.
Revision No. Date Pages Prepared by Approved by 0 07-04-86 3 k%6 ( IL y ( F /
(This procedure, or any pc~.' tion thereof, shall not be reproduced in any manner or distributed to any third party without the written permission of Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory.)
TIML-1-131-02-01
t
?!ML-1-131-02 Revision 0, 07-04-86 OETERMINATION OF AIRBORNE l-131 IN CHARC0AL CARTRIDGES BY GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY l
Principle or Method Each charcoal cartridge is placed on the detector and counted. A peak of 0.36 MeV is used to calculate the concentration at counting time. The equilibrium concentration at the end of collection is then calculated. Decay correction between the end - of collection period and the counting time is then made, i-Materials Charcoal Cartridges
, Apparatus Counting Container
. Germanium Detector Plastic Bags Plastic Bag Sealer Paper Tape Scissors Procedure NOTE: Because of the short half-life of I-131, count the samples as soon as possible af ter receipt and no later than 48 h1urs.
j 1. Load the charcoal cartridges in a specially designed holder or -transfer charcoal from each cartridge to individual plastic bags. Seal the bags.
- 2. Label each bag with corresponding project 10, locations ID, and date of collection.
- 3. Place the bags in a standard geometry container, cap the container and secure the cap with a tape.
- 4. Place the holder or container on the detector and count for a period of time that will meet the required Lower Limit of Detection (LLO).
I TIML-I-131-02-02 l
l e - - , - - - , , c e-, --w,- ---w- , . . , , , , -+-i+e-~y,-,er- ,, o- m w e,r. s n--e g - -~w
TIML-1-131-02 Revision 0, 01-04-86 )i i
Calculation:
A Al = 1-131 activity (pCi/ sample)= (at counting time) (1) 2.22 x B Where: ,
I A = Net count rate of I-131 in the 0.36 MeV peak (cpm)
B = Ef ficiency f or the 1-131 in 0.36 MeV peak (cpm /dpm) l Correction for Equilibrium (assuming constant concentration over the sampling period) and Decay:
C = A Al ex t1 (2)
F (1-e'#2)
Where:
C = Equilibrium concentration of I'-131 (pCi/m3) l A1 = Activity of I-131 at the time of counting (pCi/ sample) e = The base of the natural logarithm = 2.71828
- A i 0.693/ half life (days) = 0. 693/8.04 = 0.0862/ day -
t1 = Elapsed time between the end of sampling and mid-counting point (in days) t2 = Duration of colle . tion (in days)
F = m3/ day
Reference:
Radiation Safety Technician Training Course, Argonne National Laboratory, Section 14, pp. -361-364, May .1972.
TIML-I-131-02-03
'/PTELEDYNE ISOTOPES wowest ueonatoav
,e u~ows- acao
{
woamom w ois emaa rve I
n .,. . . . n . , ,
PROCEDURE FOR COMPOSITING WATER AND MILK SAliPLES PROCEDURE NO. TIML-CCMP-01 Prepared by Teledyne isotopes tiidwest Laboratory Copy lio.
Revised Revision Approved by Pages No. Date Pages Prepared by 0 11-07-83 2 fL 28 ft d')qm (ints procedure, or any portion thereof, shall not be reproduced in any rnanner or distributed to any third party without the written permission of Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory.) l I
I TlML-COMP-01
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - _ _ - - ~ ~ '" --~ __
h TIML-COMP-01 Procedure for Compositing Water and Milk Samples
- 1. At the beginning of each composite period, (month, quarter, ser:,i-annual),
prepare a one-gallon cubitainer for a specific location and time-period.
- 2. . Remove an equal aliquot of original sample (for example, one liter) and transfer to prepared cubitainer. Do this for each week, month , etc .
Mark-date of original sample on prepared cubitainer.
- 3. When prepared container is complete , give the sa.iple to the recording clerk for assigning a number.
4.- Av. lyze according to the client requirement.
TIML-COM P-02
~