ML20132B690: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20132B690
| number = ML20132B690
| issue date = 09/09/1985
| issue date = 09/09/1985
| title = Submits Revised Response to NRC 840214 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-327/83-31 & 50-328/83-31.Commitment to Perform cross-check Withdrawn Due to Obsolete Key Card/ Radiation Work Permit
| title = Submits Revised Response to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-327/83-31 & 50-328/83-31.Commitment to Perform cross-check Withdrawn Due to Obsolete Key Card/ Radiation Work Permit
| author name = Domer J
| author name = Domer J
| author affiliation = TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
| author affiliation = TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8509260276
| document report number = NUDOCS 8509260276
| title reference date = 02-14-1984
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
Line 24: Line 25:
==Dear Dr. Grace:==
==Dear Dr. Grace:==


J SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 - NRC-0IE REGION II INSPECTION REPORT 50-327/83-31 AND 50-328/83 REVISED RESPONSE TO VIOLATION Enclosed is our revised response to J. P. O'Reilly's February 14, 1984, letter to H. G. Parris transmitting IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-327/83-31 and 50-328/83-31 for our Sequoyah Nuclear Plant which cited TVA with five Severity Level IV Violations.
J SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 - NRC-0IE REGION II INSPECTION REPORT 50-327/83-31 AND 50-328/83 REVISED RESPONSE TO VIOLATION Enclosed is our revised response to J. P. O'Reilly's {{letter dated|date=February 14, 1984|text=February 14, 1984, letter}} to H. G. Parris transmitting IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-327/83-31 and 50-328/83-31 for our Sequoyah Nuclear Plant which cited TVA with five Severity Level IV Violations.
The radiological conditions inside the plant have been changed. This has                                                                                                        "
The radiological conditions inside the plant have been changed. This has                                                                                                        "
rendered the key card /RWP cross check obsolete and, therefore, this conunitment to perform a cross check is being withdrawn.
rendered the key card /RWP cross check obsolete and, therefore, this conunitment to perform a cross check is being withdrawn.

Latest revision as of 07:22, 10 August 2022

Submits Revised Response to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-327/83-31 & 50-328/83-31.Commitment to Perform cross-check Withdrawn Due to Obsolete Key Card/ Radiation Work Permit
ML20132B690
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/1985
From: Domer J
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
NUDOCS 8509260276
Download: ML20132B690 (3)


Text

. --

i^ %

o "

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 37401 c'a cn 400 Chestnut Street Tower II ,q, 7

September 9, 1985 g U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission o Region II ru ATTN: Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323

Dear Dr. Grace:

J SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 - NRC-0IE REGION II INSPECTION REPORT 50-327/83-31 AND 50-328/83 REVISED RESPONSE TO VIOLATION Enclosed is our revised response to J. P. O'Reilly's February 14, 1984, letter to H. G. Parris transmitting IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-327/83-31 and 50-328/83-31 for our Sequoyah Nuclear Plant which cited TVA with five Severity Level IV Violations.

The radiological conditions inside the plant have been changed. This has "

rendered the key card /RWP cross check obsolete and, therefore, this conunitment to perform a cross check is being withdrawn.

If you have any questions, please get in touch with R. E. Alaup at FTS 858-2725.

To the best.of my knowledge, I declare the statements contained herein are  ;

complete and true.

I r

Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

. d. L

)J.A.Domer, Chief Nuclear Licensing Branch Enclosure i cc: Mr. James Taylor, Director (Enclosure)

Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission Washington,.D.C. 20555 N

8509260276 ADOCM Sgg7 PDR PDR G ,

An Equal Opportunity Employer

.\l i '

i g60)

REVISED RESPONSE - NRC-0IE INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-327/83-31 AND 50-328/83-31 JAMES P. O'REILLY'S LETTER TO H. G. PARRIS-DATED FEBRUARY 14, 1984 Violation 50-327/83-31-01 and 50-328/83-31-01 Technical Specification 6.11 requires that procedures for personnel radiation protection shall be approved, maintained and adhered to for.all operations involving personnel radiation exposure. Radiological Control Instruction RCI-14 " Radiation Work Permit (RWP) Program" requires that each worker entering an RWP area record his name, social security number, date, time and dosimeter reading each time he enters and leaves the area and that he comply with any other instructions of the RWP.

Contrary to the above, procedures for personnel radiation protection were not adhered to in that on December 22, 1983, the inspector noted that key card records for door A-8 to the 2A RHR pump room showed that approximately 200 entries were made into the room between November 19 and December 8, 1983.

Review of RWP 02-2-00831 time sheets 34, 35, 36, and 37 which were in effect for that time period revealed that only 34 entries were logged.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement IV) . This violation applies to units 1 and 2.

1. Admission or Denial of the Alleged Violation TVA admits the violation occurred as stated.
2. Reasons for the Violation if Admitted d

The reason for this violation has been attributed to plant personnel not following plant procedures.

3. Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved A review of radiological postings for accuracy and clarity was performed by the Health Physics Section. Postings that may have promoted an element of confusion to the workers were corrected.
4. Corrective Steps Taken to Avoid Future Violations All the corrective steps identified in the initial response have been completed with the exception of the periodic checking of key card records to RWP records. This check is no longer necessary and his not been performed.

We will no longer perform this portion of the corrective action. Some key carded areas that have required an RWP for entry in the past have been decontaminated, '

and the portion of the room requiring an RWP has either been reduced to the point that visual inspections can be performed without an RWP or the

o.* '

  • I RWP requirement has been eliminated completely. Due to the RWP require-ments changing depending on room conditions, the cross check of key card records to RWP records would not provide any useful information to the Health Physics Staff.
5. Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved The plant is in full compliance.

.