IR 05000266/2012007: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2, EVALUATION S OF CHANGES, TESTS, OR EXPERIMENTS ANDPERMANENT PLANT MODIFICATIONS BASELINE INSPECTION REPORT 05000266/2012007(DRS); 05000301/2012007(DRS)
POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2, EVALUATIONS OF CHANGES, TESTS, OR EXPERIMENTS ANDPERMANENT PLANT MODIFICATIONS BASELINE INSPECTION REPORT 05000266/2012007(DRS);
05000301/2012007(DRS)


==Dear Mr. Meyer:==
==Dear Mr. Meyer:==
On May 3, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications Inspection at your Point Beach Nuclear Plant. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results which were discussed on May 3, 2012 , with you and other members of your staff
On May 3, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications Inspection at your Point Beach Nuclear Plant. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results which were discussed on May 3, 2012, with you and other members of your staff.
. The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
 
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.


The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.


Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified.
. In accordance with Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Section 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any), will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC w ebsite at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
 
In accordance with Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Section 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any), will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).


Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA/
/RA/
Hironori Peterson , Acting Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No s.: 50-266; 50-301 License No s.: DPR-24; DPR-27  
Hironori Peterson, Acting Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 50-266; 50-301 License Nos.: DPR-24; DPR-27


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
Inspection Report 05000 266/20 12 0 07(DRS); 05000301/201 2007(DRS) w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
Inspection Report 05000266/2012007(DRS); 05000301/2012007(DRS)
w/Attachment: Supplemental Information


REGION III Docket No s.: 50-266; 50-301 License No s.: DPR-24; DPR-27 Report No:
REGION III==
05000266/2012007(DRS); 05000301/2012007(DRS)
Docket Nos.: 50-266; 50-301 License Nos.: DPR-24; DPR-27 Report No: 05000266/2012007(DRS); 05000301/2012007(DRS)
Licensee: NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC Facility: Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit s 1 and 2 Location: Two Rivers, WI Dates: April 16, 2012, through May 3, 201 2 Inspectors:
Licensee: NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC Facility: Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Location: Two Rivers, WI Dates: April 16, 2012, through May 3, 2012 Inspectors: Alan Dahbur, Senior Reactor Inspector (Lead)
Alan Dahbur, Senior Reactor Inspector (Lead)
George Hausman, Senior Reactor Inspector Dariusz Szwarc, Reactor Inspector Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Acting Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure
George Hausman , Senior Reactor Inspector Dariusz Szwarc
, Reactor Inspector Approved by:
Hironori Peterson , Acting Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety 1 Enclosure  


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
IR 05000266/201 2007(DRS), 05000301/2012007(DRS)
IR 05000266/2012007(DRS), 05000301/2012007(DRS); 04/16/2012 - 05/03/2012; Point Beach
 
Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications.


; 04/16/2012 - 05/03/2012; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications.
This report covers a two-week announced baseline inspection on evaluations of changes, tests, or experiments and permanent plant modifications. The inspection was conducted by Region III based engineering inspectors. Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process,
Revision 4, dated December 2006.


This report covers a two-week announced baseline inspection on evaluations of changes, tests, or experiments and permanent plant modifications. The inspection was conducted by Region III based engineering inspectors. Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG
===NRC-Identified===
-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 4, dated December 2006. A.
and Self-Revealed Findings


===Cornerstone: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity===
===Cornerstone: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity===


N RC-Identified and Self-Revealed Findings No significance f i n d i n g s were identified.
No significance findings were identified.
 
B. No violations of significance were identified.


===
===Licensee-Identified Violations===
Licensee-Identified Violations===


1. REACTOR SAFETY
No violations of significance were identified.


=REPORT DETAILS=
=REPORT DETAILS=


===Cornerstone:  Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity 1R17 Evaluation===
==REACTOR SAFETY==


s of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications
===Cornerstone: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity===
{{a|1R17}}
==1R17 Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.17}}
===.1 Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments===


===.1 ===
====a. Inspection Scope====
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.17}}
From April 16, 2012, through May 3, 2012, the inspectors reviewed seven safety evaluations performed pursuant to Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Section 59 to determine if the evaluations were adequate and that prior NRC approval was obtained as appropriate. The inspectors also reviewed 16 screenings where licensee personnel had determined that a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation was not necessary.
a. Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments From April 16, 2012, through May 3, 2012, the inspectors reviewed seven safety evaluations performed pursuant to Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Section 59 to determine if the evaluations were adequate and that prior NRC approval was obtained as appropriate. The inspectors also reviewed 1 6 screenings where licensee personnel had determined that a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation was not necessary. The inspectors reviewed these documents to determine if:
 
Inspection Scope the changes, tests, or experiments performed were evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 and that sufficient documentation existed to confirm that a license amendment was not required; the safety issue requiring the change, tests or experiment was resolved; the licensee conclusions for evaluations of changes, tests, or experiments were correct and consistent with 1 0 CFR 50.59; and the design and licensing basis documentation was updated to reflect the change.
The inspectors reviewed these documents to determine if:
* the changes, tests, or experiments performed were evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 and that sufficient documentation existed to confirm that a license amendment was not required;
* the safety issue requiring the change, tests or experiment was resolved;
* the licensee conclusions for evaluations of changes, tests, or experiments were correct and consistent with 10 CFR 50.59; and
* the design and licensing basis documentation was updated to reflect the change.


The inspectors used, in part, Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)96-07, "Guidelines for 10 CFR 50.59 Implementation," Revision 1, to determine acceptability of the completed evaluations, and screenings. The NEI document was endorsed by the NRC in Regulatory Guide 1.187, "Guidance for Implementation of 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments," dated November 2000. The inspectors also consulted Part 9900 of the NRC Inspection Manual, "
The inspectors used, in part, Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 96-07, Guidelines for 10 CFR 50.59 Implementation, Revision 1, to determine acceptability of the completed evaluations, and screenings. The NEI document was endorsed by the NRC in Regulatory Guide 1.187, Guidance for Implementation of 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments, dated November 2000. The inspectors also consulted Part 9900 of the NRC Inspection Manual, 10 CFR Guidance for 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments.
10 CFR Guidance for 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments."


This inspection constituted seven samples of evaluations a nd 1 6 samples of changes as defined in IP 71111.17-04. b. No findings of significance were identified.
This inspection constituted seven samples of evaluations and 16 samples of changes as defined in IP 71111.17-04.


Findings
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified.


===.2 a. Permanent Plant Modifications===
===.2 Permanent Plant Modifications===


From April 16, 2012, through May 3, 2012, the inspectors reviewe d eight permanent plant modifications that had been installed in the plant during the last three years. Inspection Scope
====a. Inspection Scope====
From April 16, 2012, through May 3, 2012, the inspectors reviewed eight permanent plant modifications that had been installed in the plant during the last three years.


3 Enclosure This review included in-plant walkdowns for portions of the emergency diesel generators G-01 and G-02 heat exchanger s replacement modification; the removal of boric acid heat trace equipment; the removal of racks RK
This review included in-plant walkdowns for portions of the emergency diesel generators G-01 and G-02 heat exchangers replacement modification; the removal of boric acid heat trace equipment; the removal of racks RK-52J and RK-52-L and reroute of transformer 1X04 low voltage side power cables modification. The modifications were selected based upon risk-significance, safety significance, and complexity. The inspectors reviewed the modifications selected to determine if:
-52J and RK L and reroute of transformer 1X04 low voltage side power cables modification
* the supporting design and licensing basis documentation was updated;
. The modifications were selected based upon risk
* the changes were in accordance with the specified design requirements;
-significance, safety significance, and complexity. The inspectors reviewed the modifications selected to determine if:
* the procedures and training plans affected by the modification have been adequately updated;
the supporting design and licensing basis documentation was updated; the changes were in accordance with the specified design requirements; the procedures and training plans affected by the modification have been adequately updated; the test documentation as required by the applicable test programs has been updated; and post-modification testing adequately verified system operability and/or functionality.
* the test documentation as required by the applicable test programs has been updated; and
* post-modification testing adequately verified system operability and/or functionality.


The inspectors also used applicable industry standards to evaluate acceptability of the modifications. The list of modifications and other documents reviewed by the inspectors is included as an Attachment to this report.
The inspectors also used applicable industry standards to evaluate acceptability of the modifications. The list of modifications and other documents reviewed by the inspectors is included as an Attachment to this report.


This inspection constitut ed eight permanent plant modification samples as defined in IP 71111.17-04. b. No findings of significance were identified.
This inspection constituted eight permanent plant modification samples as defined in IP 71111.17-04.


Findings
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified.


==OTHER ACTIVITIES==
==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)==
(OA)
{{a|4OA2}}
{{a|4OA2}}
==4OA2 ==
==4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution==
===.1 Problem Identification and Resolution===


a. Routine Review of Condition Reports From April 16, 2012, through May 3, 2012, the inspectors reviewe d various corrective action process documents that identified or were related to 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations and permanent plant modifications. The inspectors reviewed these documents to evaluate the effectiveness of corrective actions related to evaluations of changes, tests, or experiments and permanent p lant modifications. In addition, corrective action documents written on issues identified during the inspection were reviewed to verify adequate problem identification and incorporation of the problems into the corrective action system. The specific corrective action documents that were sampled and reviewed by the inspectors are listed in the Attachment to this report.
===.1 Routine Review of Condition Reports===


Inspection Scope b. No findings of significance were identified.
====a. Inspection Scope====
From April 16, 2012, through May 3, 2012, the inspectors reviewed various corrective action process documents that identified or were related to 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations and permanent plant modifications. The inspectors reviewed these documents to evaluate the effectiveness of corrective actions related to evaluations of changes, tests, or experiments and permanent plant modifications. In addition, corrective action documents written on issues identified during the inspection were reviewed to verify adequate problem identification and incorporation of the problems into the corrective action system. The specific corrective action documents that were sampled and reviewed by the inspectors are listed in the Attachment to this report.


Findings 4 Enclosure
====b. Findings====
{{a|4OA5}}
No findings of significance were identified. {{a|4OA5}}
==4OA5 Power Uprate==
==4OA5 Power Uprate==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71004}}
===.1 Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments (2 Samples)===


===.1 ===
====a. Inspection Scope====
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71004}}
The inspectors reviewed safety evaluations for those implemented for the extended power uprate.
a. Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments (2 Samples) The inspectors reviewed safety evaluations for those implemented for the extended power uprate
* Safety Evaluation 2011-003, Raise EOP Setpoint 0.2 (RWST Level to Stop Spray Pumps) to 17 percent - Radiological Consequences; and
.
* Safety Evaluation 2011-004, Raise EOP Setpoint 0.2 (RWST Level to Stop Spray Pumps) to 17 percent - Ctmt Pressure and Temp.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified.
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Meetings==


Inspection Scope  Safety Evaluation 2011
===.1 Exit Meeting Summary===
-003 , "Raise EOP Setpoint 0.2 (RWST Level to Stop Spray Pumps) to 17 percent
- Radiological Consequences
"; and  Safety Evaluation 2011
-004 , "Raise EOP Setpoint 0.2 (RWST Level to Stop Spray Pumps) to 17 percent
- Ctmt Pressure a n d Temp." b. No findings of significance were identified.


Findings
On May 3, 2012, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. Meyer and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee personnel acknowledged the inspection results presented and did not identify any proprietary content. The inspectors confirmed that all proprietary material reviewed during the inspection was returned to the licensee staff.
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 ==
===.1 Meetings On May 3, 2012, the inspectors presented the inspection results to===


Mr. Meyer and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee personnel acknowledged the inspection results presented and did not identify any proprietary content. The inspectors confirmed that all proprietary material reviewed during the inspection was returned to the licensee staff. Exit Meeting Summary  ATTACHMENT:
ATTACHMENT:  


=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=


Attachment
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION KEY POINTS OF CONTAC
 
T
Licensee
: [[contact::L. Meyer]], Site Vice President
: [[contact::L. Meyer]], Site Vice President
Licensee
: [[contact::C. Trezise]], Engineering Director
: [[contact::C. Trezise]], Engineering Director
: [[contact::P. Wild]], Design Engineering Manager
: [[contact::P. Wild]], Design Engineering Manager
Line 149: Line 158:
: [[contact::C. Ford]], Maintenance Supervisor
: [[contact::C. Ford]], Maintenance Supervisor
: [[contact::J. Niffenegger]], Electrical Design Engineering
: [[contact::J. Niffenegger]], Electrical Design Engineering
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
: [[contact::S. Burton]], Senior Resident Inspector
: [[contact::S. Burton]], Senior Resident Inspector
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSS
ED None.Opened, Closed and Discussed
Attachment
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED The following is a list of documents reviewed during the inspection. Inclusion on this list does not imply that the NRC inspectors reviewed the documents in their entirety, but rather, that selected sections of portions of the documents were evaluated as part of the overall inspection effort. Inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC acceptance of the document or any part of it, unless this is stated in the body of the inspection report.
CFR 50.59 EVALUATIONS
Number Description or Title
2011-003 Date or Revision
Raise EOP Setpoint 0.2 (RWST Level to Stop Spray Pumps) to 17 percent
- Radiological Consequences
May 29, 2011 2011-00 4 Raise EOP Setpoint 0.2 (RWST Level to Stop Spray Pumps) to 17 percent
- Ctmt Pressure & Temp.
May 29, 2011 2009-009 EC 11682, Modifications for Flow Control to Prevent RHR Pump Excessive Flow with Containment Spray Aligned During the Recirculation Phase (Unit 1)
August 20, 2009
2010-003 EC 15413 "Control Room Alternate Cooling"
November 1, 2010
2009-014-02 Use of ECCS Suction Line Vent Valves Within Procedures 1
-TS-ECCS-002 Train A, 1
-TS-ECCS-002 Train B, 2
-TS-ECCS-002 Train A, 2
-TS-ECCS-002 Train B, OI
-128E and OI-129E June 10, 2010
2010-002 Reroute of 1X04 Low Voltage Power Cables to FAÇADE
November 10, 2010
2011-001 1A-01 and 1A-02 Loss of Voltage Relay Setpoint Changes
April 13, 2011
CFR 50.59 SCREENINGS
Number Description or Title
201 0-0 24 3 Date or Revision
NAMS E C 263219 Temporary Re location of the H
Supp l y (formerly
E C-16851) February 1, 2011 2011-0093 AST Related RWST EOP Setpoint
Changes May 28, 2011 2011-0332 Disable FS
-4909 & FS-4910 in Battery Rooms D
-105 & D-I06 December 13, 2011
2010-0169 Change Stated Capacity of Relief Valve RH
-861C From 990 GPM to 1106 GPM in FSAR 9.2 per USAR 1149992
August 4, 2010
2010-0152 Normal Ingress and Egress via HELB Barrier Doors
July 1, 2010
2011-0061 Development of New Limiting Value of Full Stroke Time for 1SC-959 April 9, 2011
2009-0186 Development of New Limiting Value of Full Stroke Time for 2RH-625 October 6, 2009
2008-0163-02 EC 11683 - Modifications for Flow Control to Prevent RHR Pump Excessive Flow with Containment Spray Aligned During the Recirculation Phase
April 29, 2010
2010-0170 Change to 2P
-10A RHR Pump IST Acceptance Criteria Based on Calculation 96
-0229 Revision
August 14, 2010 2010-0228 EC 14350 - Demolition of Boric Acid Heat Trace Circuitry
November 30, 2010
2010-0145-01 Temporary Cooling for Unit 1 and Unit 2 Steam Generator Feed Pump Motors 1(2)P
-028A-M and 1(2)P
-028B-M July 14, 2010
2009-0166 Install Test Switches for 4.16 KV Bus Loss of Voltage Relays
October 09, 2009


==LIST OF ITEMS==
===OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED===
Opened, Closed and
===Discussed===
None.
Attachment
Attachment
CFR 50.59 SCREENINGS
Number Description or Title
2009-0196 Date or Revision
Temporary Power to B
-21 During 2B
-04 / 2B-03 Cross Tie Bus Inspection
October 23, 2009
2011-0085 1/2 SI-860A/C Acceptance Criteria for Stroke Time to Closed Position May 11, 2011
2010-0065 Revise the Pickup and Time Delay Tolerances for the 50D Protective Relays for 1(2) P
-15B Safety Injection Pumps in Calculation 2004
-009 and 1(2)RMP 9329
-2 June 15, 2010
2010-0133 USAR 1167033 Reverse USAR 1145362
June 15, 2010
CALCULATIONS
Number Description or Title
2000-0036 Date or Revision
ph of Post
-LOCA Sump and Containment Spray
May 19, 2011 2000-0036 ph of Post
-LOCA Sump and Containment Spray
May 28, 2011 2010-08891 Tube Freeze Calculation
December 29, 21 10 PBNP-IC-02 RWST Instrument Uncertainty/Setpoint Calculation, Section 8.1.66, Process Error
(PE) 4 WE-000 5-13 Evaluation of Heat Tracing for Appendix R Fire Protection Safe Shutdown
April 6, 1999 M-11165-112-RH.1 Relief Valve 1/2RH
-00861C Setpoint
and Capacity Determination
Revision 0
96-0229 Minimum Allowable IST Acceptance Criteria for RHR Pump Performance
Revision 3
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS ISSUED DURING INSPECTION
Number Description or Title
01762646 Date or Revision
2012 Mod/50.59 Inspection SCR 2010
-0243 Clarification
May 2, 2012 01762041 0-SOP-VNCR-100 Ladder Label
May 1, 2012
01759471 2012 Mod/50.59 Inspection Evaluation 2010
-002 Clarification
May 2, 2012
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Number Description or Title
01328399 Date or Revision
RWST Temp Found High OOS on Logs Temp Found at 105 Degrees by PAB Operator
September 18, 2007 01655745 AST FSAR Update Deficiencies
July 30, 2011 01657526 AST - FSAR Change Request for Final Modification Configuration
May 15, 2012 01687323 Request to Add Ventilation Cross Connect Hoses Used by 0
-SOP-VNCR-100 to the Monthly Inventory
September 17, 2011 01394223 Revision to Calculation 96
-229 Affects IST AC
August 5, 2010
01378236 NRC Inspection: TS Bases
3.8.1 Not Supported by Calculation
December 4, 2009
01671481 Multiple Inadequate 50.59 Screenings for EPU Unit 2 Modifications
July 22, 2011


Attachment
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Number Description or Title
01382670 Date or Revision
AR 01162577 Documents that the 50.59 Used to Support USAR Change 01145362 was Fatally Flawed
February 22, 2010  DRAWINGS Number Description or Title
MCVK000062
Date or Revision
P&ID Chemical & Volume Control Point Beach NP Unit 1
Revision E
L-23944-4 Assembly and Details of 20'
-0" I.D. x 24' High Over Str Shell Condensate Storage Tanks
Revision 6
499B466 Sh.207 4160 Switchgear 2A01, Cub. 18 Bus Tie From 2A
-03 at 2A52-44 Revision 19
MODIFICATIONS
Number Description or Title
EC-263279 Date or Revision
Temporary Relocation of the H
Supply 0 EC 250861 G-01 and G-02 Emergency Diesel Generator Heat Exchanger Replacement (HX
-55A1/A2 and HX 55B1/B2)
June 27, 2007
EC 260778 Modification for Removal of Boric Acid Heat Trace Equipment and the Removal of Racks RK52
-J and RK52
-L for Access to Valves
Revision 0
EC 273685 Add Interposing Relays in the Starting Diesel Governor Pull-in Coil Circuit to Reduce Voltage Drop
September 2, 2011
EC 254337 Repower EDG
-01 Fuel Oil Valve FO
-3930    PROCEDURES
Number Description or Title
0-SOP-VNBI-003 Date or Revision
White/Yellow Battery and Inverter Room Ventilation Normal Operation
ARB C01 B 1-9 PBNPP Alarm Response Procedure
- 1T13 RWST Low Level Alert
ARB C01 B 2-9 PBNPP Alarm Response Procedure
- 1T13 RWST Level
Low 5 ARB C01 B 3-9 PBNPP Alarm Response Procedure
- 1T13 RWST Level
Low-Low 5  REFERENCES
Number Description or Title
DG-I01 Date or Revision
Instrument Setpoint Methodology
Revision 6
Bulletin No.
L-151-B McDonnell No. AF1 Air Flow Switch for Duct Installations
1973
Attachment
WORK ORDERS(WOs) Number Description or Title
25352 Date or Revision
Need to Remove Debris from Bottom of [RWST] Tank
October 16, 1992 930474 In Support of U1R20, U1 RWST Mini
-SU March 26, 1993 9945054 1T-013 [RWST] Repair Weld
October 7, 2002 00267870 2T-013 [RWST] Inspect Tank Internals for Debris
October 30, 2006 00279479 1T-013 [RWST] Inspect Tank Internals for Debris
April 14, 2007 00380254 2T-013 [RWST] Inspect Tank Internals for Debris
March 19, 2011 00387773 1T-013 [RWST] Inspect Tank Internals for Debris
October 18, 2011
Attachment
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED  ADAMS Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
AST Alternate Source Term
ATTN Attention BOP Balance of Plant
CARD Condition Assessment Resolution Document
CCDP Conditional Core Damage Probability
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DRP Division of Reactor Project
DRS Division of Reactor Safety
EC Engineering Change
EDG Emergency Diesel Generator
EOP Emergency Operating Procedure
EPU Extended Power Uprate
EQ Environmental Qualification
FS Flow Switch
GPM Gallons Per Minute
HELB High Energy Line Break
HX Heat Exchanger
IMC Inspection Manual Chapter
IN Information Notice
IP Inspection Procedure
IR Inspection Report
NCV Non-Cited Violation
NEI Nuclear Energy Institute
NGR Neutral Grounding Resistor
NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NSR Non-Safety-Related NUREG NRC Technical Report Designation
OLNC On-Line NobleChem
TM OOS Out-of-Service OPR Operability Recommendation
PARS Public Available Records System
PBNPP Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant
RHR Residual Heat Removal
RWST Refueling Water Storage Tank
SP Surveillance Procedure
TS Technical Specification
USAR Updated Safety Analysis Report
WO Work Order


Mr. Larry Meyer
Senior Vice President
NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC
6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241
SUBJECT: POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2, EVALUATIONS OF CHANGES, TESTS, OR EXPERIMENTS ANDPERMANENT PLANT MODIFICATIONS BASELINE INSPECTION REPORT 05000266/2012007(DRS); 05000301/2012007 (DRS) Dear Mr. Meyer:
On May 3, 2012, the
: [[contact::U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an Evaluations of Changes]], Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications Inspection at your Point Beach Nuclear Plant. The
enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results which were discussed on May 3, 2012, with you and other members of your staff
. The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your
license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified
. In accordance with Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), Part
50, Section
2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any), will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS)
component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,  /RA/ Hironori Peterson, Acting Chief
Engineering Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos.:  50
-266; 50-301 License Nos.:  DPR-24; DPR-27 Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000266/2012007(DRS); 05000301/2012007(DRS)  w/Attachment:  Supplemental Information
cc w/encl:
Distribution via ListServŽ
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:51, 20 December 2019

IR 05000266-12-007, 05000301-12-007; 04/16/2012 05/03/2012; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications
ML12132A221
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/10/2012
From: Hironori Peterson
Engineering Branch 3
To: Meyer L
Point Beach
Alan Dahbur
References
IR-12-007
Download: ML12132A221 (14)


Text

May 10, 2012

SUBJECT:

POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2, EVALUATIONS OF CHANGES, TESTS, OR EXPERIMENTS ANDPERMANENT PLANT MODIFICATIONS BASELINE INSPECTION REPORT 05000266/2012007(DRS);

05000301/2012007(DRS)

Dear Mr. Meyer:

On May 3, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications Inspection at your Point Beach Nuclear Plant. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results which were discussed on May 3, 2012, with you and other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified.

In accordance with Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Section 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any), will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Hironori Peterson, Acting Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 50-266; 50-301 License Nos.: DPR-24; DPR-27

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 05000266/2012007(DRS); 05000301/2012007(DRS)

w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

REGION III==

Docket Nos.: 50-266; 50-301 License Nos.: DPR-24; DPR-27 Report No: 05000266/2012007(DRS); 05000301/2012007(DRS)

Licensee: NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC Facility: Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Location: Two Rivers, WI Dates: April 16, 2012, through May 3, 2012 Inspectors: Alan Dahbur, Senior Reactor Inspector (Lead)

George Hausman, Senior Reactor Inspector Dariusz Szwarc, Reactor Inspector Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Acting Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000266/2012007(DRS), 05000301/2012007(DRS); 04/16/2012 - 05/03/2012; Point Beach

Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications.

This report covers a two-week announced baseline inspection on evaluations of changes, tests, or experiments and permanent plant modifications. The inspection was conducted by Region III based engineering inspectors. Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process,

Revision 4, dated December 2006.

NRC-Identified

and Self-Revealed Findings

Cornerstone: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity

No significance findings were identified.

Licensee-Identified Violations

No violations of significance were identified.

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity

1R17 Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications

.1 Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments

a. Inspection Scope

From April 16, 2012, through May 3, 2012, the inspectors reviewed seven safety evaluations performed pursuant to Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Section 59 to determine if the evaluations were adequate and that prior NRC approval was obtained as appropriate. The inspectors also reviewed 16 screenings where licensee personnel had determined that a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation was not necessary.

The inspectors reviewed these documents to determine if:

  • the changes, tests, or experiments performed were evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 and that sufficient documentation existed to confirm that a license amendment was not required;
  • the safety issue requiring the change, tests or experiment was resolved;
  • the licensee conclusions for evaluations of changes, tests, or experiments were correct and consistent with 10 CFR 50.59; and
  • the design and licensing basis documentation was updated to reflect the change.

The inspectors used, in part, Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 96-07, Guidelines for 10 CFR 50.59 Implementation, Revision 1, to determine acceptability of the completed evaluations, and screenings. The NEI document was endorsed by the NRC in Regulatory Guide 1.187, Guidance for Implementation of 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments, dated November 2000. The inspectors also consulted Part 9900 of the NRC Inspection Manual, 10 CFR Guidance for 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments.

This inspection constituted seven samples of evaluations and 16 samples of changes as defined in IP 71111.17-04.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

.2 Permanent Plant Modifications

a. Inspection Scope

From April 16, 2012, through May 3, 2012, the inspectors reviewed eight permanent plant modifications that had been installed in the plant during the last three years.

This review included in-plant walkdowns for portions of the emergency diesel generators G-01 and G-02 heat exchangers replacement modification; the removal of boric acid heat trace equipment; the removal of racks RK-52J and RK-52-L and reroute of transformer 1X04 low voltage side power cables modification. The modifications were selected based upon risk-significance, safety significance, and complexity. The inspectors reviewed the modifications selected to determine if:

  • the supporting design and licensing basis documentation was updated;
  • the changes were in accordance with the specified design requirements;
  • the procedures and training plans affected by the modification have been adequately updated;
  • the test documentation as required by the applicable test programs has been updated; and
  • post-modification testing adequately verified system operability and/or functionality.

The inspectors also used applicable industry standards to evaluate acceptability of the modifications. The list of modifications and other documents reviewed by the inspectors is included as an Attachment to this report.

This inspection constituted eight permanent plant modification samples as defined in IP 71111.17-04.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution

.1 Routine Review of Condition Reports

a. Inspection Scope

From April 16, 2012, through May 3, 2012, the inspectors reviewed various corrective action process documents that identified or were related to 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations and permanent plant modifications. The inspectors reviewed these documents to evaluate the effectiveness of corrective actions related to evaluations of changes, tests, or experiments and permanent plant modifications. In addition, corrective action documents written on issues identified during the inspection were reviewed to verify adequate problem identification and incorporation of the problems into the corrective action system. The specific corrective action documents that were sampled and reviewed by the inspectors are listed in the Attachment to this report.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

4OA5 Power Uprate

.1 Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments (2 Samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed safety evaluations for those implemented for the extended power uprate.

  • Safety Evaluation 2011-003, Raise EOP Setpoint 0.2 (RWST Level to Stop Spray Pumps) to 17 percent - Radiological Consequences; and
  • Safety Evaluation 2011-004, Raise EOP Setpoint 0.2 (RWST Level to Stop Spray Pumps) to 17 percent - Ctmt Pressure and Temp.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

4OA6 Meetings

.1 Exit Meeting Summary

On May 3, 2012, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. Meyer and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee personnel acknowledged the inspection results presented and did not identify any proprietary content. The inspectors confirmed that all proprietary material reviewed during the inspection was returned to the licensee staff.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee

L. Meyer, Site Vice President
C. Trezise, Engineering Director
P. Wild, Design Engineering Manager
B. Woyak, Design Engineering Supervisor
F. Hennessy, Excellence Manager
B. Scherwinski, Licensing
B. Hennessy, Licensing
V. Kanal, Engineering Supervisor
C. Ford, Maintenance Supervisor
J. Niffenegger, Electrical Design Engineering

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

S. Burton, Senior Resident Inspector

LIST OF ITEMS

OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED

Opened, Closed and

Discussed

None.

Attachment

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED