ML17338A210: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 07/31/1978
| issue date = 07/31/1978
| title = Fifth-yr Surveillance Rept of Containment Structure post- Tensioning Sys.Info Includes Wire Testing & Analysis of Sheath Filter
| title = Fifth-yr Surveillance Rept of Containment Structure post- Tensioning Sys.Info Includes Wire Testing & Analysis of Sheath Filter
| author name = ANDREWS C W
| author name = Andrews C
| author affiliation = BECHTEL GROUP, INC.
| author affiliation = BECHTEL GROUP, INC.
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:FLORIDA PCMER&LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POHER PLANT WIT 4 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE'OST-TENSIONING SYSTEM THIRD-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWDER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July, 1975 Rev.1 Au ust 4, 1975 Rev.2 (age D10)Sept ber 8, 1978 By: Reviewed By: Approved: F.M.Zappan.L.Meye s A.J.Bing Chic Civi Eng eer Gaithersburg Power.Division S l a, TENDON NO.66V29 0 0 OO 0 00000 000 000 00 0 0 000 0 000 P 00 00 p~0+0 0 Og O~OO 000 000 00 00 00 000 000 00 00 0000 0 qG OOOO 0 00000 000 000 0 0 00 0000 0 oooo 000 000 00 00 000 000 000 0+0 0 00 00 0000 00'ND ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6T)END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6B)CORROSION LEVEL WASHER 2 BUTTONHEADS SHIMS 2 BEARING PLATE CORROSION LEVEL WASHER BUTTONHEADS SHIMS 2 BEARING PLATE LEGEND: BUTTONHEADS:
{{#Wiki_filter:FLORIDA PCMER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POHER PLANT WIT 4 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE SYSTEM 'OST-TENSIONING THIRD-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL   POWDER CORPORATION     By:
Q OFF-SIZE BUTTONHEAD BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLITWIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS: TT 1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 42 VISIBLE OXIDATION NO PITTING T.-3 0".(PITTING (0.003" 4'4 0.003" Q PITTING 2 0.006" 45 0.006" Q PITTING~0.010" INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A EN DATE END ANCHORAGE B BA" DATE/.7Q I oi 7 0 I Q'j FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER 84 LIGHT'URI<EY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM THIRD-YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION D-10 HEET 9 OF 8 Rev.2 eptem~er 8, 1978 3f" g I
Gaithersburg, Maryland                         F. M. Zappan July,   1975 Reviewed By:
~~'~0 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION'aithersburg, Maryland July 1978 Rev.1 (Page C<<5)September 8, 1978 CzP+By~~~m~C.W.Andrews Appro ved: 4V 45ld(.D'C.A~J.Arnold Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Division  
Rev. 1
                                                . L.          Meye s Au ust 4,   1975 Approved:
A. J. Bing Rev. 2 ( age D10)                               Chic Civi Eng          eer Sept ber 8, 1978                               Gaithersburg Power. Division


e TABLE OF'CONTENTSSECTION 1 0 2 0 3,0 4'5.0'6 0 TITLE INTRODUCTION
l S
a,
 
TENDON NO.          66V29 0 Og OO 0                              OOOO 0    0000  0 0
00000                                  00000 oooo O~OO 000                000              000                        000 000                    000            000                            000 00 00                      00          0 00  0          +              00 0 00                    00 00          000                              0 00 0 000                    000          000                            00 000                000                000                      0000 P 00 00 00 00 p~    0+00 0000                                  0 0
qG                                  00'ND ANCHORAGE A                      END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6T      )            (CLOSEST BUTTRESS            6B    )
CORROSION LEVEL                        CORROSION LEVEL WASHER          2                      WASHER BUTTONHEADS                            BUTTONHEADS SHIMS          2                      SHIMS            2 BEARING PLATE                          BEARING PLATE LEGEND:
BUTTONHEADS:                            CORROSION LEVELS:
Q    OFF-SIZE BUTTONHEAD                    TT 1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT                  42 VISIBLE OXIDATION NO PITTING WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY                T.-3 0".( PITTING 0.003"(
DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED              4'4 0.003"  Q PITTING 2 0.006" THIS SURVEILLANCE                      45  0.006" Q PITTING ~ 0.010" WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A      EN    DATE END ANCHORAGE B      BA"    DATE FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER      84  LIGHT
                /
POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
                                                                                                'URI<EY UNIT 4
  .7Q I oi 7 0 I Q      'j                                        POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM THIRD-YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION D-10                                HEET 9 OF 8        Rev. 2 eptem~er 8, 1978
 
3f" g I
 
~ ~
      ~
0 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER Maryland CORPORATION'aithersburg, By~~~m    ~
C. W. Andrews July  1978                                              Appro ved: 4V 45ld(.D 'C.
Rev. 1 (Page C<<5)                                                    A~ J. Arnold September 8, 1978                                                    Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power CzP+                                                                Division
 
e                                TABLE OF 'CONTENTS SECTION              TITLE                                    PAGE 1 0     INTRODUCTION 2 0   


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
AND CONCLUSIONS 2 1 Summary 2,2 Conclusions GENERAL SHEATH FILLER AND END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLIES 4.1 Sheath Filler 4.2 End Anchorage Assemblies DETENSIONING AND WIRE INSPECTION 5.1 Tendon Lift-off Forces 5~2 Wire Inspection 5'Discontinuous Wires RETENSIONING AND SHEATH FILLER INSTALLATION PAGE 6,1 Retensioning 6'Sheath Filler Installation 7 0 WIRE TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER 7.1 Wire Testing7~1,1 7olo2 7'~3 7~1.4 Specimen Selection and Preparation Test Procedure Test Equipment Test Results 7,1,4.1 Yield Strength 7,1,4'Ultimate Strength F 1.4'Elongation 7'.4'Fracture Characteristics k 1 l PAGE 7'Analysis of Sheath Filler 7~2.1 7~2~2 7~2~3 Specimen Preparation Test Procedures Test Results APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX H"APPENDIX I APPENDICES SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE FORMULAS FOR NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED FORCES END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS WIRE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS SPECIFICATION FOR TENSILE TESTING OF POST-TENSIONING TENDON WIRE (ASTM-421)
AND CONCLUSIONS 2 1     Summary 2,2     Conclusions 3,0    GENERAL 4 '    SHEATH FILLER AND     END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLIES 4.1   Sheath   Filler 4.2   End Anchorage Assemblies 5.0    DETENSIONING AND WIRE INSPECTION 5.1   Tendon   Lift-off Forces 5~2   Wire Inspection 5 '   Discontinuous Wires
SPECIFICATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING OF SHEATH FILLER (VISCONORUST 2090P)RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING OF WIRE SAMPLES RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER TESTING MACHINE CALIBRATION REPORT A-1 C-1 D-1 E-1 F-1 G-1 H-1 S  
  '6 0    RETENSIONING AND SHEATH FILLER INSTALLATION 6,1     Retensioning 6 '     Sheath   Filler Installation 7 0     WIRE TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER 7.1   Wire Testing 7 ~ 1,1   Specimen  Selection and Preparation 7olo2     Test Procedure 7 ' ~ 3   Test Equipment 7 ~ 1.4   Test Results 7,1,4.1   Yield Strength 7,1,4 '   Ultimate Strength F 1.4 '   Elongation 7 '.4 '   Fracture Characteristics
'LIST OF"FIGURES FIGURE 3.1 5 1 SURVEILLANCE TENDONS LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION DOME TENDON AVERAGE.NORMALIZED WIRE LIFT-OFF FORCE VS TIME PAGE 5,2 5 3 HORIZONTAL TENDON AVERAGE NORMALIZED WIRE LIFT-OFF FORCE VS TDK VERTICAL TENDON AVERAGE NORMALIZED WIRE LIFT-OFF FORCE VS TIME 10 11 b I II  
 
'LIST OF TABLES TABLE 4,1 5 1 5'F 1 70 1 TLTLE
k 1 l
 
PAGE 7 ' Analysis of Sheath Filler 7 ~ 2.1 Specimen  Preparation 7~2~2   Test Procedures 7~2 ~3   Test Results APPENDICES APPENDIX A     SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE                        A-1 APPENDIX B     FORMULAS FOR NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED FORCES APPENDIX C    END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS         C-1 APPENDIX D    WIRE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS                   D-1 APPENDIX E    SPECIFICATION FOR TENSILE TESTING OF POST-TENSIONING TENDON WIRE (ASTM-421)       E-1 APPENDIX F    SPECIFICATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING OF SHEATH FILLER (VISCONORUST 2090P)             F-1 APPENDIX G    RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING OF WIRE SAMPLES G-1 APPENDIX H    RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER                                       H-1 "APPENDIX I    TESTING MACHINE CALIBRATION REPORT
 
S
                        'LIST OF "FIGURES FIGURE                                                 PAGE 3.1 SURVEILLANCE TENDONS LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION 5 1 DOME TENDON AVERAGE. NORMALIZED WIRE LIFT-OFF FORCE VS TIME 5,2 HORIZONTAL TENDON AVERAGE NORMALIZED WIRE         10 LIFT-OFF FORCE VS TDK 5 3 VERTICAL TENDON AVERAGE NORMALIZED WIRE LIFT-OFF 11 FORCE VS TIME
 
I b II
 
                          'LIST OF TABLES TABLE             TLTLE                            PAGE 4,1


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF DATA<<SHEATH FILLER AND END ANCHORAGE ASS&iBLIES
OF DATA <<SHEATH   FILLER AND END     12 ANCHORAGE ASS&iBLIES 5 1 


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF DATA-DETENSIONING AND WIRE INSPECTION NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED TENDON LIFT-OFF FORCES  
OF DATA - DETENSIONING AND WIRE     13 INSPECTION 5 '  NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED TENDON LIFT-OFF a4 FORCES F 1 


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF DATA-RETENSIONING AND SHEATH.FILLER INSTALLATION WIRE TEST RESULTS PAGE 12 13 a4 15 16 S II 1: lm 0 INTRODUCTION The tendon s urveillance program is a systematic means of assessing the continued quality of the post-tensioning system for the con-tainment structure.
OF DATA - RETENSIONING AND SHEATH. 15 FILLER INSTALLATION 70 1 WIRE TEST RESULTS                           16
It provides a measure of confidence in the condition and functional capability of the system, and an opportu-nity for timely corrective actions should adverse-conditions, such as progressive corrosion, be detected.The fifth-year tendon surveillance for the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 4 Containment Structure, consisted of the physical inspection of nine tendons as described in the FSAR Technical Specification, Section 4'.6~These tendons were: 62H38, 42H80, 64H7O>12V29, 34V29,.56V29, 1D28, 2D3, and 3D28.2,0  
 
S II
 
1 : lm 0 INTRODUCTION The tendon s urveillance program       is a systematic means of assessing the continued quality of the post-tensioning system for the con-tainment structure.     It provides a measure of confidence in the condition and functional capability of the system, and an opportu-nity for timely corrective actions should adverse -conditions, such as progressive corrosion, be detected.
The fifth-year tendon surveillance for the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 4 Containment Structure, consisted of the physical inspection of nine tendons as described in the FSAR Technical Specification, Section 4   '.6   ~   These tendons were: 62H38, 42H80, 64H7O> 12V29, 34V29,.56V29, 1D28, 2D3, and 3D28.
2,0


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
AND CONCLUSIONS 2.2~Summa This report covers the fifth-year tendon surveillance for the post-tensioning system of the Unit 4 containment structure at the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant.The surveillance was started in October 1977 and completed in November 1977'he lift-off forces in all surveillance tendons were within the range of the predicted design values, taking into account the losses of prestress due to wire relaxation, concrete creep and shrinkage, and the initial elastic structural deformation.
AND CONCLUSIONS
The load-bearing components of the end anchorage assemblies were found to be in excellent state with no adverse conditions such as progressive corrosion and cracking.In the mechanical testing of the specimens obtained from the removed tendon wires, no change was detected in the physical properties regarding the yield stress, ultimate strength, and percentage of elongation of the wires since the initial accept-ance tests.The minimum ultimate strength requirement was met by all the specimens, No presence of water or abnormal discoloration was observed in the tendon sheath fillers.Laboratory analysis of the filler samples, obtained from each surveillance tendon, showed that the contents of water, chlorides, nitrates, and sulfides were well within the acceptable limits, 2'Conclusions Based on the inspection and tests described herein, it is concluded that the post-tensioning system in the Unit 4 Containment Structure at Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant is performing within the limits set by design criteria and specifications, x I l 3.0 GENEEIIL The fifth-year tendon surveillance of the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 4 Containment Structure Post-Tensioning System, began in October 1977, approximately 2-1/2 years after the completion of the third year surveillance in February 1975.The fifth-year tendon sur-veillance consisted of the following:
: 2. 2 ~Summa This report covers the       fifth-year tendon surveillance for the post-tensioning system of the Unit 4 containment structure at the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant. The surveillance was started in October 1977 and completed in November 1977 lift-off forces   in   all surveillance tendons were within the
1.Visual and laboratory examination of sheath filler.2~Inspecting anchorage assemblies for deleterious conditions, such as corrosion, cracking, missing wires, and split or off-size button>>heads.
                                                                              'he range of the predicted design values, taking into account the losses of prestress due to wire relaxation, concrete creep and shrinkage, and the   initial elastic     structural deformation.
3.Measuring shim dimensions to determine tendon lift-off elongations.
The load-bearing components of the end anchorage assemblies were found to be   in excellent state with no adverse conditions such as progressive corrosion and cracking.
4.Measuring tendon lift-off forces.5.Measuring tendon elongations at 80 percent of the minimum ultimate strength of the wires.6.Detensioning tendons and checking wire continuity by pulling each wire from one end and observing its movement at the opposite end.7.Removing one wire from three preselected tendons for inspection and testing.8.Retensioning tendons to lift-off forces obtained in Item 4 above, and measuring the corresponding elongations.
In the mechanical testing of the specimens obtained from the removed tendon wires, no change was detected in the physical properties regarding the yield stress, ultimate strength, and percentage of elongation of the wires since the initial accept-ance tests. The minimum ultimate strength requirement was met by all the specimens, No presence of water or abnormal discoloration was observed in the tendon sheath fillers. Laboratory analysis of the           filler   samples, obtained from   each surveillance     tendon, showed that the   contents of water, chlorides, nitrates, and sulfides were well within the acceptable limits, 2 '   Conclusions Based on the   inspection and tests described herein,       it   is concluded that the post-tensioning system in the Unit 4 Containment Structure at Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant is performing within the limits set by design criteria and specifications,
9.Visual inspection of removed tendon wires for corrosion, pitting, and other deleterious conditions.
10.Testing of samples obtained from removed tendon wires for yield strength, ultimate strength;and percentage of elongation at ultimate strength.'valuation of surveillance data and test results to assess the general condition of the post-tensioning system, con-sidering the time-dependent factors such as prestress losses and corrosion.
The work was performed in accordance with the"Tendon Surveillance procedure for Containment Structure Post-Tensioning System," dated July 22, 1977 and included in the report as Appendix A.The locations and identifications of the dome, vertical, and horizontal surveillance tendons are shown in Figure 3-1.4.0 SHEATH FILLER AND END ANCHORAGE ASSEESLIES The results of the field inspection and laboratory analysis of the sheath filler, and the visual examination of the end anchorage assem-blies, are summarized in Table 4.1.
1 0 4.1 Sheath Filler Two samples of filler were removed from each of the surveillance tendons and visually examined.All of the samples taken were dark brown in appearance, indicating the lack of water or impurities that may cause discoloration.
4'End Anchora e Assemblies The end anchorage assemblies of the surveillance tendons were examined and found to be in satisfactory condition.
The tendon 1D28 stressing washer, located at buttress 4, received a 120o, 9" long, 3/8" wide, 1/4" deep, tapered scrape along the side of its interior face circumference when it accidentally mated against the left side of the bearing plate during detensioning operations.
The stressing washer was shown to be structurally sound when the tendon was stressed to the full effective force with no observable adverse effect, The lift-off forces were well within the acceptable limitsi The end anchorage inspection data are included in the report as Appendix C, 5,0 DETENSIONING
'AND WIRE INSPECTION Data obtained during detensioning and wire inspection are shown in Table 5', 5~1 Tendon Lift<<Off Forces The lift-off forces obtained from the tendons during detensioning Mdicated that prestress losses had not exceeded the predicted design values.The long term (40<<year duration)predictions of the normalized wire lift-off forces in the surveillance tendons are shown graphically in Figures 5'through'5.3
~These predictions had taken into account the prestress losses due to wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage.
These curves provide only an estimated trend in the prestress losses, and are used as a means for comparison with the trend of the actual average prestress losses, The minimum effective design prestress is the required average force per wire at the end of 40 years;including the effects of wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage.
Calculations for the predicted prestress losses are as follows: Initial wire force (Fi)based on a wire stress of 0'0f: Fi~0,70f x As~0'0 x 240 x 0.049 a 1
~8'5 kips/wire where f=ultimate strength of wire A~Area of wire s Wire force at 40 years (F40)due to wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage:
The prestress loss at the end of 40 years due to wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage, is estimated to be 34.7 ksi (see FSAR Section 5.1.4.4)~This value is applicable to all dome, horizontal, and vertical tendons.F-34.7 x As~34,7 x 0+049~1.70 kips/wire Where F 1=Prestress loss 8 40 years P The minimum effective design prestress is the predicted average wire force after 40 years.F40 Fi-Fpl=8.25-li70~6'5 kips/wire In order to compare the actual average prestress losses with predicted values, it was necessary that the wire lift-off forces, from the surveillance data, be normalized to account for the initial structural deformations (which is a function of the post-tensioning sequences), the deviations of initial lift-off forces from the specified value of 0.70f, and the changes in lift-off forces resulting from tendon surveillance operations, such as reshiming and wire removal.These normalized wire lift-off forces were then superimposed on the appropriate ,curves shown on Figures 5.1 thru 5.3, providing a corn<<parison between the predicted values and the actual forces at the time of tendon surveillance.
For future convenience, the normalizing factors and the normalized lift-off force for each surveillance tendon for the fifth-year tendon surveill'ance are listed in Table 5''ormulas for calculating the normalizing factors are given in Appendix B IL 5'Wire Ins ection The results of inspection of each tendon wire removed for inspec-tion are shown in Appendix D, No physical imperfections were observed on the wires removed from all tendons.5'Discontinuous
'Wires No discontinuous wires were found during this tendon surveillance.
6,0 RETENSIONING AND SHEATH FILLER'INSTALLATION The data obtained during retensioning are shown in Table 6,1.The tendons were retensioned to approximately the same stress level indicated by the lift-off forces obtained during deten-sioning, with allowance made for the tendons where<a wire was removed for physical examination and testing.The retensioning data will be used as input for the next scheduled tendon surveillance.
6'Sheath Filler Installation The volume of grease removed from the tendon prior to detensioning, and the volume replaced after retensioning, are indicated in Table 6.1~7~0 WIRE TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER 7'.1 Specimen Selection and Preparation The locations of the specimens selected from each tendon wire for tensile testing are shown in Appendix D.In general, specimens were obtained from each end and the middle of each tendon wire removed.The specimens were cut to a length of approximately 126 inches.After the specimens were cut from the pulled wires, they were tagged with the following information:
1.Tendon identification number, 2.Location of the specimen;i,e,, middle or end section.3, Containment unit number and the year of surveillance (1977)~
1 1 These tags remained with the specimens through completion of the testing.The remaining portions of the wires, after the specimens had been obtained, were also tagged and retained at the plant site until testing indicated that the tensile strength and elongation of all specimens were in compli-ance with the specification, 7',2 Test Procedure Except for the gage length, the test procedure used was the same as that specified in ASTM Specification A421-65,"Standard Specification for Uncoated Stress-Relieved Wire for Prestressed Concrete." A gage length of one hundred inch'(+1.0)was used instead of the ten>>inch gage length as specified.
The 100-inch-gage-length specimen may indicate a lower ultimate strength and lesser ductility (elongation) than a ten-inch-gage-length specimen.Since failure will occur't the weakest point in the wire, the ultimate strength obtained is equivalent to the lowest value that would be obtained from ten 10-inch specimens, Elongation at failure will also tend to be less due to the distribution of the elongation at the neck-down area over a length of wire ten times that of the nominal ten-inch specimen.7,1,3 Test Equipment The apparatus used for the tensile testing of the specimens was the Tinius Olsen Super"L" Testing machine with a 1,200,000 lbs capacity, of the Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, For machine calibration report, see Appendix I.7',4 Test Results The results of tensile testing on the one hundred-inch-gage-length wire specimens are shown in Appendix G and Table 7,1, 7.1.4.1 Yieeld Strength The yield strength of all wire specimens tested exceeded the specified minimum yield strength of 192 ksi at one percent elongation.
7,1.4'Ultimate Strength The ultimate strength of all wire specimens tested exceeded the specified minimum ultimate strength of 240 ksi as specified by AS&i A421-65.
LS~i F 1;4,3 Elongation Since 100>>inch-gage-length specimens were used in the tensile testing, a lesser percentage of elongation may be expected than from the testing of 10-inch>>gage-length specimens of identical wire, as discussed in Paragraph 7'.2~Previous test data<)indicated that a wire which showed a 4 percent elongation at ultimate strength in a 10-inch-gage-length testing could be expected to exhibit a somewhat lower (no less than 3 percent)elongation at ultimate strength in a 100-inch-gage-length testing.The percentage of elongation of all wire specimens tested met this requirement, 7.1.4'Fracture Characteristics The fracture of all wire specimens was of the cusp-cone shape.7'Anal sis of Sheath'Filler 7~2~1 Specimen Preparation A quart-size sample of the sheath filler was obtained from each end of all surveillance tendons prior to de-tensioning.
Each metal container containing the grease sample was marked with the tendon identification number, One sample from each surveillance tendon was shipped to an independent laboratory for analysis of water content.and water soluble impurities, and the remaining samples were retained at the jobsite.7''Test Procedures Test procedures for water content and chlorides, nitrates, and sulfides concentrations are given in Appendix F.7.2'Test Results The results of laboratory analysis of the sheath filler are shown in Appendix'H, These data indicated that the contents of chlorides, nitrates, and sulfides in the grease were well within the acceptance limits, and that the amount of water present was negligible.
t (1)"Containment Building Past-Tensioning System One-Year Surveillance, Palisades Plant Unit 1," Consumers Power Company, AEC Docket No.50<<255' J
AZ IMUTH I34'UTT RESS I 74'4 314 254 BOTTOM OF I 94~R ING G IR DE R EL I 50-0 42H80 LI45-8~'E L130-2 64H70 I2V2g 62H38 76'-3/e 34V29 56V29 DEVEL'OPED EXTERIOR ELEVATION HOOP AND VERTICAL TENDONS TOP OF BASE SLAB EL l2-6 3I4 BUTTRESS 4,'D28 2 54'UTTRESS 5 l4 BUTTRESS 3 3D28 lg4 BUTTRESS 6 2D3 BUTTRESS I l34 74'UTTRESS 2 PLAN DOME TENDONS FLORIDA POWER&LiGHT COYiPA.'~TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER P7~N".UNiT~POST"TENSIONING SYST" H SURVEILLANCE TENDONS LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION FIGURE 3.1 L~
8.5 8.0 h5 0 0 Pf 7 r.ATA NXS~~OU e r...<<:4 X:.8 0~~Q 0 t5 0 7.0 6.5 Exp ed lo ss CO ectx ve Nxnzmum Eff design prestress)
(6.55)kips/wire) ve P 0.6 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 Time After Initial.Tensioning (years) j
~~~'N 0 r 0 8;5 o I co o e r-0 P rt.0 8'0 ac'o 7-5 O.0 Q g Q r-'.n N 5 0 rt CL r.r.0 r 7<<0'0 8~Expec ted Lo ss CU rv~~0'I 0 I OO'~.6.5 Mxnxmum E fectxve Design Prestress (6.55 kips/wire) n e'1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 Time-After Initial Tensioning
{years)~~
1~0
~~~~~~8.5~Ql 7s'O 8 8 0 I 0 0 M w4Q I d 8~N M e VI Cb Qt 0 rt Vo W Ce I l~0 rt be th Q~,~0&#xc3;~ff~'fsf 0~t5 0 8'.0 0 0 I Vo~I 7+0'.5~~ected Exp CU rve 51inimum Effect:ivci Design Prestres{6.55 ki s/Mixe)~~0.6 1.0 2 0 3.0 4.0 5'10.0 20.0 30.0 40'Time After Xniti.al Tensioning (years)
TABLE 4-1 SBMMARV OF DATA SREATH FILLER ANO ENO ANCRORAGE ACSEMBLIES TENDON flLLCR CDATIHD Accf tTAELC lvfs/No(1ILLC R MAT'L ANCIIORAnf CoattONCNTS Tale PF IDENT.Tvtf LOCA.(ION Fl(LER DUTTDN CA/'l f AD sfnfss WAQI f R co(on SHIMS INO PLATE SAMtaf NO.DUf TOIAICADS conn.NUMEFK OSION 5I'a(IS LEVEL 12 OFF.SIZE I~Sfn(55 TIAQI(n$QDM$CRACKS 15 1$CORNconn.OSION CIIACKS OSION LEVEL LEVEL ef AAINO~LATE 5>>Qcn.Conn.(OR OS(ON CRACKS LEVEL 1$21 fxlfn.IOR 22 DATE Inst(CT.EO REMARKS 20~IV(1 ltvlS I YERT vcnT~/T~/0 t/T 1/0 YCS YCS YC5 YES YCS YES YCS YC5 YCS YCS YES YC5 YCS YCS YC5 YES YES YCS YES YES Ho No NO HO~'I 00 HONE NONC~IONC Ito>>C NON HON NON 1 HONE HOIIC Not/C NONE NONE NO<<t HONC HONE HON C HONE HONC I/ON\II~IPO511 (TOPSTAESSWA5HCAHA51HC FIRST THACAD I DAMAOED AttAOX~Ii THC O>>f SIDE PACE l5DDUOEDAppno/LF/tl xi Lotto.I I+I+It I THE FOPP-5ltteOTTOHHEAOSAAC 104 1.11~SLID>>FLY OVC 15I 1 t.l(V10 VERT~/T~/0 YCS YC$YES YES YE5 YES YCS YES YES YES NO NO~1 NONC HONC HON~1 2 II OH 5~toit C HO<<C NON C Wont NONC 11~101$11 TotSTAC5$,WASHER HASTHE FIA51THACAO DAHAOCD APPROX~0 ID(0 YCS YES YCS YC5 YES YC5 YES YCS YC'5 Yt'5~0 NON C HONC NOH NOH HO<<t NONC HONE NONE NOHC NOHC 01 00~I I Il.t 11 (Slht55 wASHCR AT EUTTAC55 Ho.i HAS A 1/0 CHAHitn F LONO tD10 DON C YCS YCS YES YE5 YCS YCS YCS YCS YES YC5 No No~0~0 NONC NOHC NON NON HOHC HONE NONC NOH C NOH C NONE 10 1$I~Ik 11 I ti evTTDN>>cAD5 conno5IDN LtvcL 2 tot YCS YE5 YCS YES YCS YE5 YES YE5 YES YCS No No NotIC HOII C NON NON HONC HOIIC NOHC HONC NONC NOH C 10 ll 11.1.1~I h(tLACED t I/O" 5HIU5 ISHIN5WCAC
~ENTI~tnti HORI YCS YC5 YC5 YCS YES YC5 YCS YES YCS YES IIO No It I~10 HOHC ttONC NOH NOH C IIONC NON C HONE NOH C NON C I~0 10 10~(HIP Ho hl Y05 YCS YCS YCS YES YC5 YE5 YCS YCS NCS HO NO 1$I~1~NONC NONE NOH NON HO<<C NOHC Holt C HONE HONE NON C I~0$0~0~I 1111~IHI~HOXI YES Y$5 YES YE5 YE5 YC5 YC5 YE5 YCS YE5 NO Ho~1 I~00 I I NONC NON NON NOHC NONC NON C~ION C NONE NONE 11~1 11~1$.11 NOTfsl 1.LOCATION INDICATES'lnf In/TT/ICSSATTWICII THE I(tntotl Ishncllo>>CD/on 1>>f Nf A>>1sT DU(ln(55 lo Ill(.I at(DON IIVA VCR(ICAL 1(HDONQ 1 I Ot e-no(loM l.ANCHORAGE COMtONf NTS*ron sin(ss>>/o WAQ/fn.Tnt.connnstov Lf vc(s tell>>Ala Illa co>>(N(to I'ot etta Sat>>thea W>>f nf INC>>ill lottIIL All ARL'NC>>on(o.e.ton QI,MS.INC con<<OQotl aLvl as INDICATE Tttf I Ht cltnol llott of QIC Atnt ACCS I'(nit no(co(An Io IHC Tanoolta t.CORRUSION I EVfl 5 aavfa I N<VIQI(f DXIDA(lon on LIGHTstoflv DXIDAf(on I (vl a l AtonIVI>>Down(A aon.HOPI(FINO LIV(a'I II(t/IIINI into(" U(t(II I 1vf a~-OUI I'SPII It';I+DIPI4" (f VI Le I'Iv CPIIIINII$
hhl(f'a V(L 1 IS I~I>>PA(f tt(III I I V(as n Io c DURING INSTALLATION.
I IIR<<ovlh/I I I a xclSS Dt (HIS aavf L lvhs U>>hccat Theat AT THE IIM(.Dt>>I'ha(ATION.~EACH 5AHPLC WAS le(NTIPI EO WITH TENOOII IIVHA(n AND CLO5CST il/11<<C55 NVVPCA, II CXvthlon TEHPCAATVAC Dttttx(HCC t5 OUC TO5IEAN DISCHARGE WHICH WAS AD/ACCNF To THE EIIO SHOWINC THC WIENER ICMttnATU<<E 12 TABLE 5.1 SUhlhIAIIY OF DATA DETENSIONINO AND I/IIAE IIEhIOVAL'TENDON ANCIIOAACE LOCA I ION IDCNTISICA'(ION NO.OF ESICCTIVE'WIAC5 OATf DCTKNSIVNKD A I A TCI>>lnntvnf OF III INT.EKT.0 llf TOf F tc//slnw CADI IPS I I%DACE ELONGATION(ll IKS I UHI 0 O.SP, 0 I000 ll/5/WIRE IKNSION f CNSIO/4 IDACC lll I KISS(CACK (IS(I C lOIICATION(ll I IN I FORCE(tl ElONCATIO(4(ll CAC\(KIPSI RN)IPSA NO.CADE NO.TCNSlONINO EOVIPMKNT INIIIAL WIRE LKNCIH (S'l l KND CUT WI~C REMOVAL CORROSION LKVCI,(41 LENGTH NOS/(I tl PREVIOUS~IV2t~/f I/O~I let%.ll%11~I N I I 5 5/I~10 11%4~4~~2 1 5/I~12 11$N~4 15.1 snt 10 I~A@1~22 12VII 2/T<<0~I 1011 11 10~111 tl~10%0 Nl~I I/I~Its~I I~AO I~1 4vt~~It~/0~I 1001 11~I~$1~141 sin 1 Its~40 140~I 0 I III~~I AO I~(~)NA I~IN I IDI~~I Sl~I~I~1$0'I~11 11~1$~1 5/I 5 I/I~Itt~1$~~10 41~4 IH 4 I/I I t 2 1 Il~II~I~I IH~/I~~10~0414 0.1st 2tl 1014~I SI~1 11~II~INI 110 14~1 I/I 2 tH I ttt NIO Ns 045 4 SH 1 5/4 11~ISO~I 10~tint F 40'101 1$(0 Nt 20$~I~I 10$141 54N~It TI~2 I/O 2 I/4 1100 MN~I~tl 4 2 ln 1 I/I~F 40~N tl~0 aint~%41~404 0 140!(sl ttl NA~RSI 42HI~~0 4 I I.S 11~1 10~I I~lt I~41 Nt 101 2 1/I 2 I/O SN0 I IN 045 04~5 II/I~$1/I 110~N~I I Sh 5/I~'Its~400 0.1st 211 (4)HA~4HIO I~.I I 11%00~I~I SI I%~IN Ol~~II 2 1/I 5 5/I 1 IN litt NI~1$1 5/I I~I I/12 Itt It%40~I I/I I~I I/I~~44~~Its ttl DI~I~IHI~~I 11-11~I~11~I SNS 14%~~42%4~2 I/O 5 I/I 1100 SIN~15~4~5 I I/I I~2%Hi III~4t I~~I IH ln~14 1 F 400 0-141 ttl NOTE SI CLONCATION Tl(EClCAA DISTANCE DCIWKCN'INEOUISIDC SACC OF IIIE Uf AAIHC PLATf AND1HE IHUDC f ACC OF IHK Sl ACSS INC WASilf A.A NCCA I IV E NVL'NH R IS INDICAlln 1/HCN IHE SIR(SSINC WAQIIA IS IHSR/E'IHK IRUMPET, FORCE COUALS TOOHSKIPSMULTIPll(DOT THf NVMUIA Of CffCCIIVCWIACS.
FORCE\OVALS 10 1 0KIP5IUL'IlflltOAY
'IIIE NVMCCA OF f f1 CCIIVC Hints.'1~DCHOIC5 TDP 0~DCHDICS 00110M CORROSION Lf V(ls: I.No Vfllolf nxlnATION t.Al IIDISII DAO VN COI OR/NO PIT 1 INC X Da'0<Pll'IR/0 (0001~.0011<1$11INC<0.006 5.0006 CI'IITN/C$001J Pn CVRWS SVRV C I I LANCE 0 4 IHI I IAL CONDITION.
WH ICI ICY f 4 APPLIES, (Cl NA~NDIAVAILAelE (11 CXTCAI01 SCMPC1ATVOC DISSCOCHCC
~CTWCCHTHC T'WD C1 05 l5 DVC 10 STCAM DIICHA10C WHICH WA5 AD/ACCHI SQ IHC CHD SHOWIHG IHC HIGHC 1 1 C M SC 1 A I V 1 C 13 I 0 Table 5'NORlfALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED TENDON LIFT-OFF FORCES Tendon No, Anchorage Location Normalizing
'Factor'''ormalized Lift-off Force/Wire (k)Each end'vera e er wire 1D28 2D3 3D28 42H80 64H70 12V29 34V29 56V29 5-6 0'78 0'29 0'34 0.940 0'01 0'09 0.994 0.976 0.943 1.000 0'57 0.892 0'32 0.902 0'11 7'5 7'0 7,18 7.46'7.29 7.23 7.51 7.62 6'2 7'6 7.31 6.72 7.57 7.57 7.42 7.72 7'2 7.26 7~56 7'4 7'2 7'7 7.57 7.42 W denotes top 14


~NNNN r*TABLE 6.1 SUh(hlARY OF DATA-RETENSIONING ANO SIIEATH FILLER INSTALLATION TENDOH Iof A)IF)CATION ANCHOR ACE LOCATION No OF OATf.EFFECTIVE Rf)fNQDNED WIAES 4 1000 les/WIRE A(A 1 f Mr 2 A 0 (U 4 E~1 Tf NSICN EAT.(I INT f CONGA)ION RNI(ll DACE (rsl I 10 NOW(~I CHANCE(5)l)l 0 0 0 ('Tf NQON CAGE (1511 lVNCAI ION RIO(ll FORCE NOW(~I CHANCEIS)(K l)SI I~12 DL(I)OFF Sul'ATH FILLER FORCE NOW((l Q(ANGELSI I K IFQ TENSION flONCAIIONRNI(ll (Fill(O CAGE ()Q)RAM No.GACf NO.10 I 21 10 15 TENSIONING foul)ME NT VOLVME FILLE R Rfr(AC(o TEMOLRATVRE (GALS)DOV(lff SIV2'I IV)~~/0 2/0~I~I 142$-)7 I&2).)I~IT~\$2 1$4 115 tO~I n 7/0 7/I 1100 7410~$1~tI)tin Isnt 0 lit~)Il~$200 011$110~<<I<<I)sn I~10 IL)I~A@I~I" 1627 I 1001.1 1 42~I 1$10 OAL rouaf o raDM 100 (1%II.11)SIV)$4/1~I~2 11$~I 1010~ts 1 1$/I OI$$~I~/I$4211 100 102'D\~~I~I I 1.1.71~I~1~0~1 11$11$1$~~t IS~I~I 5/I~~$00~t)$1000~I~~$0~ll~il~I<<'I 5 III I In~nl$111$4$~I~II 11~114 11$114 2 I/I~III~1 7/0 1)il~~10~01st 4(0~~$40 O 10$2)1 0.1~I I I 5.77~~1 17 21 21 1 15~2410~I 11$.11~I~1~I 10~I 004 1$0 11~01~I I lnl F 11/I~I 1 tnt Snt)OII 1000 1000)000 00$~il~I~1 snt 2 15/I ln)$104 I~I~150'114)00 140 2 1/I ln 1 ln 2sn ln 2 ln~$01~its OSIER (HII 0.10$Dl~I 211 114.7)I~~1410 11H)~$4 I I 1511 140 110 F 00 1$0 1st~I~I~I S/0~I I/O sn1)nl)I IO 1010 1100 1100~it Ms~$$Oil~)nl s 2)n~1/I.In<<11~14~$104~MI 010~)I~ii 0$$1$/I OI I I 1 5/I~~1 S/I 410~0$0$~$0~tits 211 0 ltl 0 10$I I I~I 11.1$1 II~110 No)fsc (ll fLONGATIDH THECIEAR OISTANCf ef IIII(N (Hf Oul loE fACE OF THE 0(A A INC rl A 1 0 AND I HI.I'is(ol.I ACF 4 I Ill f S I 4 LSIIN 0 WAS(I~(4.A NlCATIVE Nvs)414 IS INC(CA (E DIN ILN Tnf SIR(&INC wAQI(H IS INSIDE THE 1 RUM)ET.FORCE EOUAlS TO I 0 K(1MUL)lrllfo ev THE NVSIOF 4 OF f FFLCTIVE Ill RES.Foncf E CURLS To 0 i)xlrSMULQFQ(o ev THE NUNC(n oF FFIECQVE W le~(S, 7 DCNDTC$TDI'.Df NDICS DDT ID M NOW of No(ES f CONGA)ID'I AT TIME VF Rf Tf NUONIN(h MFASV RE-MLNI AHE 101HE I/(A4LST I/If f1(ANGE IH f I DNCATIOH ASCOMFAR(0 10 FR(V IOUS Mf ASUR(MENT UND(4 ill(Sl'ECIFILD lOAD.(I)rX)f RIOR')turf AATVAC (HOFCRtNCC OflWCCN THC TWD OND5 IS Duf TD 5)CAN DISCHARGE WHICH WAS AD/Af CNI 10 THC CND 5HDWINO TNC HICHf4'ICMICRATVAC 15 I f i TABLE 7,1 WIRE TEST RESULTS-100 IN, GAGE LENGTH Tendon No.Sample Load at Stress at Load at No.1%Ext.1%Ext.Fracture (lbs)(psi)(lbs)(1)Stress at Fracture (psi)Elongation at Fracture Fracture Location (in.)Moving Head (in.)34V29 42H80 2D3.,BeEo 9,850 200,600 M,ST C;E, B;E, M,ST C;Eo 10,650 217j300 10,150 206,300 10,150 206,300 10,300 209,350 100250 208,900 B,E, 9,600 1951500 M,S, 10,150 207,100 CeEe 10 p 050 205 7 100 12,700 259,200 12,700 258,700 12,800 261,200 12~150 246~950 12,200, 247,950 12,200 247,950 12,350 251,500 12,250 249,500 12,350 252,000 4.59 4.87 4.51 4.72 5.42 5.49 5.53 4.92 5.56 37.0 3.0 6.63 3.0 37.5 AT JAW 3.0 9.0 30.25 (1)C,E, denotes cut end of wire B.-E.denotes button head end of wire M,ST denotes middle section of wire 16 I II APPENDIX A TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FOR FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland)Ry Charles W.Andrews June, 1977 Revision 1, July 22, 1977 Revision 2, October 11, 1977 Revision 3, December 14, 1977 Approved: K.P.Buchert Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Divison A-1 l
x I
Revision 3 1 0 PURPOSE The purpose of this survei1.lance is to obtain data for assessing the continued quality and structural pex'formance of the major components of the containment structure post-tensioning system.2 0 SCOPE The surveillance for each tendon shall consist of the following:
l
2 1 Removing and visually inspecting sheath filler, and obtaining samples fox laboratory testing,.2~2 Inspecting anchorage assemblies and measuring the thickness of shims 2 3 Obtaining tendon H.ft-off force and elongation.
: 3. 0 GENEEIIL The  fifth-year  tendon surveillance of the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant, Unit    4 Containment Structure Post-Tensioning System, began in October 1977, approximately 2-1/2 years after the completion of the third year surveillance in February 1975. The fifth-year tendon sur-veillance consisted of the following:
2.4 Detensioning, raring shims, and inspecting wire continuity.
: 1. Visual and laboratory examination of sheath       filler.
2.5 Removing wires where required, for visual ucamination and labora-tory testing.2 6 Retensianing, installing shims, and obtaining tendon lift-off force.2,7 Installing sheath filler.2.8 Testing wire samples pex Attachment E.2 9 Testing sheath filler per Attachment p.2 10 Evaluating survei.llance data and test results to assess the general condition of the post-tensioning system.Temporary protection shall be provided for the tendons and anchorages during surveillance.
2~      Inspecting anchorage assemblies for deleterious conditions, such as corrosion, cracking, missing wires, and split or off-size button>>heads.
The end anchoxs and wires removed shall be pro-tected by applying a coating of Visconorust 1601, Amber aver the surfaces.The elapsed time between removing and replacing sheath filler fram one tendon shall not exceed 2 weeks.Tendon surveillance may be conducted during reactor operation.
: 3. Measuring shim dimensions to determine tendon        lift-off elongations.
3+0 SURVEILLANCE TENDONS Surveillance tendons for the Unit 4 containment structure shall consist of 3 dome tendons, 3 horizontal tendons, and 3'vextical tendons.The identification numbers of these tendons are listed, below: 3 1 Dome tendons: 1D28, 2D3, 3D28 One wire shall be removed from Tendon 2D3.A-2 s l Revision 3 3 2 Horizontal tendons: 62H38, 42H80, 64H70 One wire shall be removed from Tendon 42H80, 3,3 Vertical tendons: 12V29, 34V29, 56V29.One wire shall be removed from Tendon 34V29.4 0 INITIAL INSTALLATION RECORDS AND PREVIOUS SURVEILLANCE DATA Orighzal records of initial tendon installation, aad of subse'quent sur-veil1ances, are maintained by Florida Power&Light Company.The original installation records are ia card form and contain information pertaining to tendon pulliag, button-heading, tensicaing, and sheath filling.The surveillance data coasists of the raw data recorded during surveillances aad the surveillance reports 5 0 SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES 5 1 Remaval and Inspection of Sheath Piller The sheath filler, Visconorust 2090P, may be liquid, gel, or solid~All states may occur at a particular tendon Complete xemoval of the sheath filler is not required, provided that all filler drained or removed during the surveillance is replaced.The sheath fillex shall be removed as follows: 5 1 1 Record air temperature outside the containment near the surveillance tendon and inside the coataixanent.
: 4. Measuring tendon   lift-offforces.
e 5 1 2 Remove the grease caps from both ends of the tendon and allow the filler to flow into containers of known volume.5.1 3 Obtain a cne-quart sample of filler fxgnm each end of the tendon 5.1,4 Record lack of grease coverage on end anchors, if any.5 1 5 Recox'd aay discoloration of sheath fillex oa the Sheath Piller Znepectioc Fore (Figure A-6).(The color of the filler 3 should be dark brown.)5 1.6 Heasure and record the amount of grease removed.5 2 Inspection of Anchorage Components 5 2.1 Thoroughly clean the anchorage components with Viscosity Oil Company's Industrial Solvent No.16 in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
: 5. Measuring tendon elongations at 80 percent of the minimum ultimate strength of the wires.
Chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents shall not be used.5 2 2 Inspect and record the buttonheads for shape and size, using the Go/No&o gage as shown in Figure A-1;cracks;A-3 l3
: 6.     Detensioning tendons and checking wire continuity by pulling each wire from one end and observing its movement at the opposite end.
!
: 7.     Removing one   wire from three preselected    tendons  for inspection and testing.
Revision 3 and corrosion status.Compare the number of buttonhcads with the number at the previ.ous surveillance.
: 8. Retensioning tendons to lift-offforces obtained in Item          4 above, and measuring the corresponding elongations.
Identify missing buttonheads and any buttonhead defects on the end Anchorage Inspection Form as shown in Figure A-3-f3 5,2,3 Inspect and record the stressing washers for corrosion status and cracks.If any cracks are observed, show the locations and sizes on the Anchorage Inspection Form.5+2i4 Inspect and record the shims f or corrosion and cracks.I f cracks are observed, prepare a sketch showing their locations.
: 9. Visual inspection of removed tendon wires for corrosion, pitting, and other deleterious conditions.
5 2 5 Inspect and record the bearing plates at the ccntact sur-faces with the shims for corrosion and cracks.If cracks are observed, prepare a sketch showing their locaef.ons.
: 10. Testing of samples obtained from removed tendon wires for yield strength, ultimate strength; and percentage of elongation at ultimate strength.
5.2 6 Definitions of corrosion levels for the tendon wires andanchorage components for the surveillance are as follows: Corrosion Level Descri tion 1 2 3~4 5 Ho visi.ble corrosion Reddish-brown color;no pitting 0.000<pitting
of surveillance data and test results to assess
<0.003" 0.003<pitting g 0.006" 0.006(pitting g 0.010" The corrosion levels for the surveillance as compared to the criteria used during the field installation are indicated below: Corrosion Level.Surveillance Field Installation Instal.lation 1 2 3,4,5 A~3,C,D,E pk Acceptable Acceptable Unacceptable 5,3 Detensioning and Lift-off Forces 5,3,1 Safety A11 personnel on work platforms during detensioning and reten-sioning operations shall be familiar with, and abide by, , the following safety rules: a Do not stand behind the jacks while they are pressurized.
                                                'valuation the general condition of the post-tensioning system, con-sidering the time-dependent factors such as prestress losses and  corrosion.
b Keep fingers away from the tendons and jacks, except when required to read li.ft>>off forces, and remove or stall shims.*Prescon symbols identifying Corrosion Level (no longer used).A-4 I I I~~~~I Revision 3 5.3.2 Calibration All gages and jacks used for the tendon surveillance shall be calibrated before use.Gages and jacks shall not be recalibrated unless damaged or repaired.Prior to use, gages shall be checked for zero deviation and~ge.5 3,3 Detensioning Tendons 5+3,3,1 Determine the number of effective wi.res for each tendon fran the previous surveillance.
The work was performed     in accordance with the "Tendon Surveillance procedure for Containment Structure Post-Tensioning System," dated July 22, 1977 and included in the report as Appendix A.
5 3 3.2 Calculate and record the jacking forces required to obtain the specified 80 percent minimum ulei~te strength (0.8f's)per wire.These forces are ob-tained by multiplying the number of effective wires by 9.43 kips~Enter these values into the jack calibration chart to obtain the gage readings equivalent to the forces.Note that the applied jacking force for each tendon shall not exceed the value thus determined.
The locations and identifications of the dome, vertical,        and horizontal surveillance tendons are shown in Figure 3-1.
5,3 3.3 Attach the jack to the bearing plate.Note that if the initial stressing was done from both e"ds of a tendon, the surveillance shall be perfo~d in the same manner.5,3 3.4 install the pressure gages to the jack and p~, and record their identification numbers.iheck the gages for zero pressure reading.5 3.3.5 Measure the depth of the existing shims.5,3 3.6 Determine the lift-off force by tensioning the tendon until all shims are loosened.Li t-off is achieved when the sound produced by tapping on shims with a small.hammer changes to indicate release from compression; also, all accessible shims can be moved by tapping with a sra11 hammer Repeat the operation until three measurements of the lift-off forces show a variation of+50 psig, or less..Se3o3+7'.3 3 8 Depressurize the jack until the gages read zero.Pressurize the jack to a force so that the aver-age wire stress is equal to 80 percent of the minimum ultimate strength of the wires, as determined in paragraph 5.3',2.5.3.3.9 Record on the Detensioning/Retensioning Form (Figure A-4)the gage reading and the corres-ponding tendon elongation.
4.0  SHEATH  FILLER  AND END ANCHORAGE ASSEESLIES The results of the field inspection and laboratory analysis of the sheath filler, and the visual examination of the end anchorage assem-blies, are summarized in Table 4.1.
A-5 s l P
~~~~~~~'~Revision 3'5 3.3 10 Remove the shims 5~3 3.11 Depressurize Che jack until the gages read zero.5 3 3 12 Pressurize Che jack to a force equivalent to 1,000 lbs pex wire Si3.3 13 Recox'd on tbe Detensioning/Recensioning Form the gage reading and the corresponding tendon elongations 5 3 3 14 Depressurize the jack until the gages read zero~Detach the gages from Che jack.S 3 3 15 Remove the jack..5 4 Wire Inspection 5.4 1 Inspect each tendon vix'e fox'ontinuity by pulling from one end, one wire at a tf.me, and observing the movement of the buttonhead at the opposite end.The Cool for pull~~the individual wires is shown in Figure A-2.Prior to in-)3 specting the vires, it.is necessary to move the stressing washer away from the butconheads apprcarimately 3 inches This may be accomplished by using a hammer and a wood bufxer block Record any discontinuous wires on Che Anchorage In-spection Form All discontinuous wires shall be removed and mcamined to detexmine the cause of breakage Dis-continuous wires shall not be used for surveys.LLance vix'e test samples.5 4 2 Remove one test vtre frcm each of the following tendons: Dome Tendon: 2D3 Horizontal tendon: 42880 Vertical tendon: 34V29 The locations of the buttonheads of the vires to be re<<mcnred, shall be recorded on the end Anchorage Inspection Form.5,4,3 Pull the test vire at the end to be cut away from the stx'essing washer and notch apprmdmately 2 inches fxom the end Record the end Chat is cut, and the distance from the notch to the outside of the buttonhead within+0.02 inches A-6
'L P Revision 3 5.4.4 Cut the wire between the buttonhead and the notch.Remove the remaining portion of the wire and clean it with solvent, (Viscosity Oil Co.Industrial Solvent llo.16)~5,4 S Inspect the wire and record on the Wire Inspection Form (Figure A-5)the locations of any damages, corrosion, and corrosion levels.5 4,6 Compare the corrosion levels with those of the previous surveillance.
If the corrosion has progressed one or more levels, remove one additional wire at approximately 120o frcm the first wire, repeating paragraph 5.4.3, 5.4.4, and 5.4 5.If the second wire has progressed one or more levels, repeat this procedure for a third wire selected at approximately 120 from the first two.Do not r~e more than three wires from any one tendon during one surveillance period~5,5 Retensioning and Lift-off Forces 5.5.1 Safety The safety rules as specified in paragraph 5.-3.1 shall apply 5.5 2 Retensioning Tendons Retensioning shall be pezformed in a similar manner as detensioning; that is, if detensioning is done from both ends of a tendon, retensioning shall be performed accordingly.
S,5 2,1 Determine the number of effective wires in the tendon for retensioning.
Deduct any discon-tinuous or surveillance test wires removed and recalculate the new jacking forces as outlined in paragraph 5.3.3.2.5,5 2.2 Attach the jack to the bearing plate.5,5 2 3 Install the pressure gages to the jack and pram, and record their identification numbers.Check th'e gages for zero pzessure reading.5,5,2.4 pressurize the jack to a force equivalent to 1,000 lbs per wire.Record the gage reading and the corresponding tendon elongation.
5,5,2 5 Increase the tensioning force so that the average wire stress is equal to 80 percent of the minimum ultimate strength of the wires, as I~S Revisioi 3 5,5,2 6 determined in paragraph 5.5.2.1.Record the gage reading and the corresponding tendon elon-gation Reduce the)eeking force from the equivalent of 80 percent of the, mini~ult&tc strength of the wires, to the initial Lift-off reading es obtained in paragraph 5.3.3.6, Por any discontinuous or test wires removed, deduct 50 psi from the initial lift-off readings.Measure the distance from the bottom of the stressing washer to thc bear~plate and subtract one-eighth inch This di.stance is defined as full shim depth and is the depth of the new shins to be instaLLed.
5,5 2.7 Install shims to the neax'est one-eighth inch of the full shim depth.5,5.2.8 Obtain new Iift-off force.The reading should be equal to or greater than the initiaL lift-off force If.not, repeat the procedures as stated in paragraphs 5.5.2.5 and 5.5.2.6.Install shims and obtain new Lift-off force.5,5.2.9 Measure and record new shim depth.5,5.2.10'etach the)ack and apply a coating of Viscosity Oil Co.2090P or 1601 Amber to the tendon end anchorages.
5,6 Installing Sheath Piller 5,6 1 Reinstall tendon fi.lier caps using new gaskets, copper washers, and teflon nuts as used in the initial installation.
5 6.2 Refill the tendon sheathing with Viscosity Oil Co Vf.scmoxust 2090P, 2090P>>2, or 2090P-4 sheath filler.Th'e temperatuxe of the filler at the filler p~p shall.be approximately 120 P.Do not reuse fiLler that has been x'emoved from the tendons.pumping shall conti.nue from one end of the tendon, until at least 5 gallons of filler, wi.thout any air bubbles or visible foreign substances, flows out of, the outlet at the opposite end of the tendon.5.6.3 Record the temperature of the sheath filler at the drum and at the outlet.Also, record on the Sheath Piller Inspection Porm the volume of sheath filler replaced for each surveillance tendon.5.7 Laboratory Testing of Tendon Wire Samples and Sheath Piller Samples A-8 t 0 li~~Revision 3 5,7~1 Tendon Wire Sample Testing 5.7.1,1 Tensile tests shall be performed on at least three specimens from each surveillance wire removed.Tensile test specimens, each approximately 126 inches long, shall be taken from near the center and each end of the wires.Additional specimens shall be taken from the portions of the wire that appear to have a corrosion rating one or more levels greater than the average des-criptions of the wires.5,7,1,2 Remaining wires not used for testing, shall be protected against corrosion and retained until test results have been finalized.
5,7,1,3 Tensile tests also shall be made on at least one specimen from each discontinuous wi.re removed.The test specimen shall be taken near the break and shall be approximately 126 inches long." 5.7.1.4 All tensile tests shall be performed in accordance with Appendix E,"Specification for Tensile Testing of Post-Tensioning Tendon Wire."[3 5,7,2 Sheath PiLler Sample Testing 5,7 2 1 Analytical testing shall be performed on at least one specimen, each one quart in size, from each surveillance tendon.5.7,2.2 Additional specimen obtained from the sur-veillance tendons, but not used for testing, shall be retained until test results have been finalized.
5 7.2 3 All sheath filler testing shall be performed in accordance with Appendix F,"Specification
)3 for Laboratory Testing of Sheath Piller." 5,8 Report 5.8.1 Data Data obtained during the surveillance shall be sum-marized in a report.The original data and records of the surveillance shall be submitted to Florida Power and Light Company within 90 days of completion of the tendon surveillance at the Turkey Point Plant.A-9
, I'
~~~I Revision 3 5 8.2 Evaluation The surveillance data for each tendon shall be compared with previous records to determine if: a Additional wires have broken since last surveillance.
b The lift-off force for the tendon is below the minimum effective design prestress.
c, Changes in wire corrosion level, or anchorage assembly corrosion Level, have occurred.d.Deterioration of sheath filler has occurred.e, Significant changes in wire elongation, yield, and ultimate strength have occurred.If any of, these conditions exists, the report shall in-clude an evaluation of condition and, where necessary, recommendations for remedial actions.5.8.3 FormulasFormulas for normalizing factors and normalized forces are given in Appendix B..t3 A-10 d 1  
~~I I Revision 3 IDENTIFICATION NUNIBER~o CD CD CD CD+CD CO Cl ill CD CD I 1".+1/8 5/8"+I/16 f BAR 3 fi"+~/s 1"+1/8 NOTES: Hole diameter shall be certified by an independent laboratory.
2.Each gage shall have an identifying number.~Figure A-1 A-11 FLORIDA POWER IIc LIGHT CO.TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT 4 GO/N CNGO GAGE


Revision 3 ST'D NUT WELD TO EYE 6/8" UNC SAW CUT CI C7 I C)+HEAD SEE DETAIL 1 SLEEVE SEE DETAIL~2 1'-0" 1 t+lt NOTES: The nut with the pulling ring welded to it may be replaced with an eye nut.The hardness of this tool shall not exceed Rockwell C40.FIGURE A-2 SHEET 1 OF 2 A-12 FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT CO.TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE Unit 4 WIRE PULLER l I 0
1 0
~~Revision 3~395+008 PIA-.000 REAM TO SUIT BUTTONHEAD Q Q Q Q lA SAN CUT COO OO QQ O Q CV+LA N+Q a CI ca alt.75" 2.12.375.25" 4.06 a.C2+.06..063" J.005 HEAD DETAIL SH;2 Q Q Q O Pl C)F12" ,4&MOVABLE SLEEVE DETAIL SH.-2 FIGURE A-2 SHEET 2 OF 2 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PO'iVER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE Unit 4 WIRE PULLER I~
TENDON NO.Revisic}n 3 LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)0 00 0000 000 Opp 00 p 0 pp 00 000 pppp pPOOP p 0 p00 P 0000 0 0 OOpp 000 ppp 00 Opp 0pp 0 0 000++goop 000 0 0 000'000 000 ppp 00 0 Opp 000 pppppp Oppp 0+00~pp ppp pPPO 00000 00 o 0 000 0 t<o~~oo 000 Opp 00 0 0 END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)END ANCHORAGE B ,(CLOSEST BUTTR ESS)CORROSION LEVEL WASHER BUTTONHEADS SHIMS BEARING PLATE LEGEND: CORROSION LEVEL WASHER BUTTONHEADS SHIMS BEARING PLATE BUTTONHEADS:
0 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD 6 BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLITWIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE
%WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS: 41 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 0'2 VISIBLE OXIDATION NO PITTING 430 (PITTING (0.003" TT 4 0.003" C PITTING E 0.006 4f 5 0.006 4 PITTING (0.010 INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A DATE END ANCHORAGE B DATE A-14 FIGURE A-3 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Unit 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM 5 th.YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE IN SP ECTION SHEET OF I~
I S~,~~~TENDON NO.RAM NO.GAGE NO.BUTTRESS NUM.EFF.WIRES 0 DETENSIONING 0 RETENSIONING iNSPECTED BY DATE EXTERIOR TEMPERATURE INTERIOR TEMPERATURE DESCRIPTION CHECK GAGES (ZERO)OBJECTIVE ACTUAL MEASURED MEASURE SHIMS OBTAIN LIFT.OFF PRESSURIZE TO.Sf'i MEASURE ELONGATION 0.8f'EPRESSURIZE TO ZERO PRESSURIZE TO 1000 LB/WIRE MEASURE ELONGATION
~~DEPRESSURIZE TO ZERO REMOVE RAM REMOVE WIRE WAS THIS END CUT?CHECK CONTINUITY PRESSURIZE AT 1000 LB/WIRE z O CO MEASURE ELONGATION
'~PRESSURIZE TO.Sf'EASURE ELONGATION AT.Sf'q PRESSURE 9 RESHIM A)NEW LIFT-OFF B)NEW SHIMS PRESSURE SHALL NOT DROP BELOW THIS LEVEL AFTER PRESSURIZATION TO.Sf'q ii ELONGATION IS THE DISTANCE FROM THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THE BEARING PLATE TO THE INSIDE FACE OF THE STRESSING WASHER.(THIS WILL BE A NEGATIVE NUMBER IF THE WASHER IS INSIDE THE TRUMPET.)F I GORE A" 4 A-15 Revision 3 I~0 TENDON NO.CLOSEST BUTTRESSES Revision 3 BH END 75'50 TOTAL LENGTH OF WIRE CORROSION LEVEL: Q g1 NO VISIBI.E OXIDATION Q 02 VISIBLE OXIDATION, NO PITTiNG Q 030"<PITTING~0.003" Q 44 0.003<PITTING-0.006" Q 4 5 0.006"<PITTING (0.010" INSPECTED BY DATE BH.-BUTI'ONHEAD A-16 FIGURE A-5 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT~Unit 4 I POST TENSIONING SYSTEM i St11 YEAR SURVEILLANCE
!WIRE INSPECTION h TENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS SHEET OF-l l P t~SHEATHING FILLER INSPECTION Revision 3 TENDON NO.END ANCHORAGE A CLOSEST BUTTRESS END ANCHORAGE B CLOSEST BUTTRESS DETENSIONING:
DETENSIONING:
TEMPERATURE:
OUTSIDE INSIDE GREASE REMOVED COLOR BY: DATE: TEMPERATURE:
OUTSIDE INSIDE GREASE REMOVED COLOR BY: DATE: RETENSIONING:
TEMP E RATUR'E: OUTSIDE INSIDE INLET OUTLET/GREASE REPLACED BY: DATE: RETENSIONING:
TEMPERATURE:.
OUTSIDE INSIDE INLET OUTLET GREASE REPLACED BY: DATE FIGURE A-6 A"17 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Unit 4 POST.TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE SHEET OF 1
APPENDIX B FORMULAS FOR NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED FORCES FOR FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL'POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland June 1977 Revision 1, December 15, 1977 I
Revision 1 1.0 GENERAL In order to provide a common base for comparison, tendon lift-off forces must be normalized to account for elastic stress loss during initial installation (a function of the post-tensioning sequence), the lift-off fqrce deviation from the base value, and the number of effective tendon wires or strands.The base value for evaluating the normalized tendon force is assumed to be the force which produces an average tendon wire or strand stress of 0.7fpu.In cases where the same tendon is subjected to two or more surveillances, the base value for the ith surveillance is the normalized force for the i-1 surveillance.
The normalized force is equal to the measured lift-off forces multi-plied by the normalizing factors.2.0 NORMALIZING FORMULAE 2.1 Normalizin Formulae for First Surveillance i~1 2.1.1 Vertical Tendons 0 N Fl 0.7f u L N-n c-v v-E H (Eq.1)2.1.2 Hoop Tendons NF 1 0.7f N-n v'N EV (Eq 2)2.1.3 Dome Tendons NF N 0.7f (Eq.3)2.2 Normalized Lift-Off Force Per Wire or Strand FN~F x NF (Eq 4)0 B-2
), t P Revision'1 2.3 Normalizin Factor for Subse uent Surveillances (i)1)The following equation is used for vertical-dome, hoop-wall, or hoop-dome tendon: F F (i-1)L (i 1)x N (i 1)3.0 NOMENCLATURE (Eq.5)L~initial lift-off force of surveillance tendon (kips)~lift-off force obtained at the i-1 surveillance (kips)=lift-off force during retensioning at the i-1 surveillance (kips)=number of hoop tendons tensioned prior to tensioning surveillance tendon.h~total number of hoop tendons n v~number of vertical tendons tensioned prior to tensioning surveillance tendon N~total number of vertical tendons in one group nd~number of dome tendons'n one group tensioned prior to tensioning surveillance tendon N d wc~total number of dome tendons'=number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon at initial installation
~number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon at ith surveillance N (i-1)N (i-1)number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon at i-1 surveillance number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon when retensioned during the i-1 surveillance S h total elastic stress loss in hoop tondons during initial tensioning (ksi)=15.3 ksi SE v~total elastic stress loss in vertical tendons during initial tensioning (ksi)6.6 ksi B-3 I~
Revision 1=lift-off force per wire or strand at i surveillance (kips)th F (i-1)N NF~lift-off force per wire or strand after retensioning at the i-1 surveillance (kips)~normalized lift-off force per wire or strand for the i.th surveillance (kips)~normalizing factor for the i surveillance th NF (i-1)~normalizing factor for the i-1 surveillance S E d total elastic loss in dome tendons during initial tensioning (ksi)due to one group~14.7 ksi~Poisson's ratio for concrete~0.16 f pu=minimum specified ultimate strength of tendon wire or strand (ksi)~cross-sectional area of one tendon wire or strand (in)2 B-4 C
APPENDIX C END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE FOR 4 FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland August 1977 I t'
~~8 I~TENDON NO.S LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)6~+oopp g~oop pop oo 0 op ooo ooo o p pp pop opp Qo 0 0+o poo ooo Pp pop 0 popo o,o po Dq o o 4 0 Oooo p 0 0 oooo 4 00 oo opo ooo po po o p+ooo opp ooopo oooo o 0 p~pp Goop poo pp oop o o~oooo'po ooo ooppo pp 0 q0~-END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6)TOP CORROSION LEVEL WASHER 2 SUTTDNHSADS SHOES SEARING PLATE 1 LEGEND: BUTTONHEADS:
8 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD 0 BUTTON H EAD WITH SPUT 0 WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE
%WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6 BOTTOM.CORROSION LEVEL RASHER BUTTONHEADS SHIMS 2 BEARING PLATE CORROSION LEVELS: 41 NO VISIBLE OX)DATION 02 VISIBLE OXIDATION NO PITTING 030 s PlTTING 6 O.OQ3" 0<O.OQ3"<PITTING a OSOe" 45 O.O06 s'ITTING 6 LolOINSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RB DATE 10-25 77 ENOANCHORAGE8 AH DASE C-2 FIGURE FLORIDA POWER IIE LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCI EAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4.POST.TEN SIONIN G SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SHEET>OF 9 TENDON NO.l.OCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)2 000 060 Op 0 0~,oOOP 0 00/p 0 0'g 00 0 0 Og 000 000 000 pp 000 o0 OOo, 00O~~Pp 0 00 000 Opp ppp>z 00000 ppppP 0 C~0 Opppp Opp e ppp Op 00 000 000 Opppp pp 0 O'0 Op 0 0 0 OOOO 0+>000 Opp u 000 (P Op+Op 0 p pp pg~pPPO OpppO 0 END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 2)TOP END ANCHORAGE B.{CLOSEST BUTTRESS 2)BOTTOM.CORROSION LEVEL WASHER 1 SUTTQHHEADS SHINS BEARING PLATE CORROSION LEVEL SUTTQHHEADS SH QSS BEARING PLATE LEGEND: BUTTONHEADS:
0 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD e BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLITWIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE K WIRE REMOVED FOR INSP'ECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS: 41 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 02 VISIBLE OXIDATION NO PITTING 030 E PITTING 5 0.003 4<o.oo3"<PITTING E o~os-Oso.oos" (pITTING 5 o.ohio" INSPECTED BY EHQ AHGHQR*GS A RE DATE 10-26-77 EHD AHQHQRAGE S AH DATE C-3 FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER SL LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TEN SIONIN G SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTlON SHEET2OF 9 1,
TENDON NO.l.OCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)opo OOOOO ooo 0 ooo 00 0 0 000 ppo poop 0 Op oopo ooooo 000 Ooo po ooo+oo poo~PS.OO~gpoopo c o 0 p oo<cy~0 oo0 0 00000 000 pop op o o~OOOO p 0 000 po 00 ooo p op~0~ohio oooo OOO 000 oo+0 poo 0 ppo 0000~Y oooo popo 0 p END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4)TOP END ANCHORAGE B.(CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4)BOTTOM CORROSION LEVEL RASHER 1 BUTTONHEADS SHINS 1 SEARING PLATE LEGEND: CORROSION LEVEL NASHER BUTTONHEAOS SHOAT 2 BEARING PLATE BUTTONHEADS:
0 OFF S1ZE BUTTONHEAD e BUTTONHEAD WITH SPUTN!RE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DlSCONTINUOUS VIIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEII.LANCE K SIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTlON AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS-01 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 4'2 VISIBLE OXIDATION NO PITTING TT.3 0 (PITTING 5 0.003" TEA 0.003 E PITTlNG K OJ)otE ISO.OOS"<PITTING 6 0.010" NSPECTED BV ED NANCHORG AA EEE DATE ENO ANCHORAGE B AR DATE c-4 FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TEN S IONIN G SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SHEET3OF 9 TENDON NO.LOSS LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)o OOoo e OOOO/OPO Opp OP 0 OO~pop z opp+Qp pp c 0 O p POPO pppp ppo po OO OO+0 OOO OOo OOOO QOOOPO 0 v QgOOOI 0 A~END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS<)~~o~bppp 0<Opppp 0OO pp POO 0 O ppp OO WQOO 400 0 O QOOOO OOP O 0 p OOOO PPOOP OO OOO pp+OOO ppp 0 OOP Opp Opppp O ppp 0 END ANCHORAGE B.tCLOSEST 8UTTR ESS 1 l.CORROSION LEVEL BASHER 2 BUTTOIIHSADS SHIIAS BEARIN G PLATE LEGEND: CORROSION LEVEL VSASHER 2 BUTTONHSADS WIMS GEARING PLATE 2 B~ONHEADS:
e OFF SI2E BUTTONHEAD 6 SUTTONHEAD WITH SPLfT~WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DtSCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEI LLAN CE K WlRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND-TESTIN G THIS SUR VEIL LAN CE" CORROSION LEVELS: O4 NO VISIBLE 0"!DATfOTJ 42 VISIBLE OXIDATION NO PI~SNG~30 C P1TTING 6 0.003" Isf 4 0.003 4 PliT!N G K OANg 4'-5 0.006 s PITTING 5 0.010-fNSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RS DATE LL S TT ENDANCHORAGEB AE DATE LL~1-~/s" Rev.1 September 8, 1978l"tGtfRE 3 FLORIDA POWER JE LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4~POST-TEN SIONIN G SYSTEM 5 thYEAR SURVEfl.LANCE END ANCHORAGE IN SP ECTtON A-A C-5 SHEET 4OF 9
\f.P TENDON NO.l.OCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)oooo 0 e popo pop opo opp Op 00~O I5'0'g 0 go~po,oo ppp oop op pop , oo'oo ooo op o p~0 pop o p ppoo opo-opp po opo 0 p~po~opp poop oppo o opo p oo pp opp oooo op p pop p o+opp~pop 0~opp 8 0 p 0 o popo p p END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 3)END ANCHORAGE B.(CLOSESTBUTTRESS 6)CORROSION LEVEL WASHER BUTTOMHEADS
*SHOES BEARING PLATE 1 LEGEND: CORROSION LEVEL NASHER'UTTOMHEADS SHIMS BEARING PLATE BUTTONHEADS:
6 OFF.SIZE BUTTONHEAD e BUTI'ONHEAD WITH SPLITWIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVEO THIS SURVEILLANCE
%llVIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION ANO TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE Wircled Button Heads Indicate Corrosion Level 82 CORROSION LEVELS: 41 NO VISIBLE OX)DATION 02 VlSIBLE OXIDATION NO PITTlNG 030 C PITTING S, 0.003 st 4 0.003 4 PITTING~OA)06 45 0.006 (PITTING 5 L010 INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RB DATE END ANCHORAGE B~Q DATE~~~C-6 FIGURE 3 FI.ORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5 t+YKAR SURVEILLANCE ENO ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SHEET5OF 9
'I~
~~'~~I E TENDON NO.'LOCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)6 6 1 oooo~~oooo 000 000 00 0 0 ooo w 0 o OOO 0O 00 000 0 oooo o 0 Oopp oop ooo oo~Ooo+Op ooo 000 0 OOOO ooo poo 0 oo poo ooo oo o o op 0 p ppp poop ooo o 0 ooooo opp 00 oo oop+op oop ooo 00000 oo ppp pp 0 0~5P 5y9 Q+0 op p'0 pp 0 0 END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6)END ANCHORAGE B.(CLOSEST BUTTR f SS 1)-CORROSION I.EVEL RASHER.2 SUTTONHEADE SHIMS 2 BEARING PLATE 1 LEGEND: CORROSION LEVEL NASHER SUTTONHEADE SHIMS 2 BEARING PLATE 1 BUTTONHEAOS:
0 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAO 0 BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT 8 WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE
%VllRE REMOVEO FOR INSPECTION ANO TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS-41 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 02 VISIBLE OXIDATION NO PITTING TII'3 0 C PlTTING 6 0.003 w i L003,Q PITTING 5 0406 4'6 0.006 C PITTING 5 L010 INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RB DATE END ANCHORAGE S DATE C-7 FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TEN SI ON IN G SYSTEM 5 thYEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SHEET 6OF


TENDON NO.~280 I.OCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)4 6 2'poo p opopo pop ppo 0 o 0 poo poo poo 0popp oooo e p opp p ooo-opoo~(pp c)ppP CeI oooo oooop'~ppoooooo p p TP 3p]pp 0 ooo pp o o o o pop 0 opo poop popop 0 ppoop p p/Q po op ppo p~o oo ooo+ppo ppp 0 poo po pp END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4)END ANCHORAGE B.tCLOSEST 8UTTR ESS 2)CORROSION LEVEL BUITOHHEADS BRIMS SEARING PLATE 1 LEGEND: CORROSION LEVEL RASHER 2 BUTTON HEADS SHIMS BEARING PLATE BUTTONHEADS:
4.1    Sheath  Filler Two  samples of  filler  were removed from each of the surveillance tendons and visually examined. All of the samples taken were dark brown in appearance, indicating the lack of water or impurities that may cause discoloration.
9 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD 0 SUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT e WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE X WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION ANO TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS-g1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 4'2 VISIBLE OXIDATION NO PITTING 430 C PlTTING 6 0.003 TT i 0.003 4 PITTINQ K 0406 4'5 L006 C PITTING 6 0 050 INSPECTED BY EHD ANCHORAGE A~DATE ENOANCHORAGES
4 '   End Anchora e Assemblies The end anchorage assemblies    of the surveillance tendons were examined and found to be in    satisfactory condition. The tendon 1D28 stressing washer, located at buttress 4, received a 120o, 9" long, 3/8" wide, 1/4" deep, tapered scrape along the side of its interior face circumference when it accidentally mated against the left side of the bearing plate during detensioning operations. The stressing washer was shown to be structurally sound when the tendon was stressed to the full effective force with no observable adverse effect, The lift-off forces were well within the acceptable limitsi The end anchorage inspection data are included in the report as Appendix C, 5,0 DETENSIONING 'AND WIRE INSPECTION Data obtained during detensioning and wire inspection are shown Table 5 in 5~1    Tendon  Lift<<Off Forces The  lift-off forces obtained from the tendons during detensioning Mdicated that prestress losses had not exceeded the predicted design values.
~DATE~FIGURE 3 C-8 FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5thYEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SHEET7OF 9
The long term (40<<year duration) predictions of the normalized wire lift-off forces in the surveillance tendons are shown graphically in Figures 5 ' through'5.3 ~ These predictions had taken into account the prestress losses due to wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage.      These curves provide only an estimated trend in the prestress losses, and are used as a means for comparison with the trend of the actual average prestress losses, The minimum  effective design prestress is the required average force per wire at the end of 40 years; including the effects of wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage.
~g TENDON NO.LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)4&6 op 4 Qpp poop<~opo d'po pop ooo+pop.I opooo~o oop op~o o oopp p 0 oppoo~0 op oop op o p ooo ooo 0 poppy I oopp 0 oooo oop oop oo 0 p oop opp p ooo opppp ig oooo (~0 Og PQP p 0 p pp ppo~op oop p p+QOQ~pp ppo popo pp 5 o p'a~END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4)END ANCHORAGE B CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6 CORROSION LEVEI.WASHER 1 8UTTONHEADS BEARING PLATE LEGEND: CORROSION LEVEL NASHER 2 EUTTONHEADS SHIMS 2 BEARING PLATE 1 BUVFONHEADS:
Calculations for the predicted prestress losses are as follows:
0 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD e BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT 0 SIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SUR V EI I.LAN CE X, WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS-TE 1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 02 VISI BLE OXIDATION NO PITTING TT 30 C PITTINQ 6 0.003 44a003" (PITTINQ i 0SOe" 45 0.006 0 PITTINQ 6 LOIO INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A DATE END ANCHORAGE 8 AH DATE C-9 FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PUQET UNIT 4 POST-TENS IONIN G SYSTEM 5 th-YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SHEETSOF 9 VEWOON NO.I.OCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)r F'g~Oppp d Opppp Opp~PO 0 0 OBO OOO 000 pppp poop p 0 ppp Opp o 0opppo~<OOOO~OO OO Opp+Op 0000~000 0 ppp OOOO OOOO 0 OppP~OOO OOOO 0 Opo Op<0 Oppp pppop OOO p Op z o OOOO 0 0 OOP~Opp C Oppu PO~o 0~ppP 0 Opp~pppp~OPOOO 0 p pp 0 END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6)END ANCHORAGE B.(CLOSEST BUTTR ESS)CORROSION LEVEL lVASHER 2 BUTTONHEADS SHIMS 2 BEAR IN G PLATE LEGEND: CORROSION LEVEL VtASHER BUTTONHEADS SHOAT BEARING PLATE BUTTONHEADS:
Initial wire  force (Fi) based  on a wire stress of 0 '0f:
0 OFF SI2E BUTTONHEAD 6 BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT , WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE
Fi  ~ 0,70f x  As
%WIRE REMOVED FOR INSP'ECTlON AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS 4'1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 02 VISIBLE OXIDATION NO PITTINQ 430 C PITTING 6 0.003~4 0.003 4 PITTINQ K OAOtB OS 0.006 C PITTINQ 6 L010 INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RB DATE 11" 15-.77 END ANCHORAGE B AH DATE 11-15-77 C-10 r FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTlON SHEET9OF 9
                      ~ 0 '0 x 240 x 0.049


APPENDIX D WIRE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE FOR FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland November 1977
a 1


~DON NCL 34V29 10'-10" END SAMPLE It1 8'-2" SAm'ZZ 4P2 125 128&#x17d;7" SAM.ZZ N~0 l 4 ll]391 pll]4]I pll 143 l 7 ll SE1 169'-8~1 CORROSION LEVEL gg f1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION Q 42 VNIBLE OXIDATION, NO PITTING 0 ISO"<PITTING S O.au" g faaea-<PITTING<aOO6" 0 45aOOe"<PITTING<aeo" amcrao sr 10-31-77~D-2 RGVRE 5 FLORIDA MYIER 5 LIGHT CO.TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 MST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5 th YEAR SuRVKILLANCE MIRE INSPECTION L TENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS SHEETLOF D I~
    ~ 8 '5          kips/wire where  f=          ultimate strength of wire As          ~ Area  of wire Wire force at 40 years (F40) due to wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage:
TENOON NO.CLOSEST BUTTRESSES 166 10'-10" gg ENO SAMPLE 81 60'-10" SAMPLE<P.87 f 6$ll 9'""ver SmPLZ fP3 TOTAL LEN'rm OF VnRE CORROSION LEVEl01 NO VISIBLE OXIOATION 0 f2 VISIBLE OXIOATlON, NO PITTINQ 0 4i'O"C mnNe5 O.ea" 0 Sca.art C PITnNa<O.OOS" a 45aOO6"<rITnNS<aniO" INSPECTED IY~~OATE 11>>11-78 4" IUTTONHEAO FICURE 5 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE NlRE INSPECTION 4 TENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS SHEETS.OF&
The  prestress loss at the end of 40 years due to            wire relaxation,            and concrete creep and shrinkage, is  estimated to be 34.7 ksi (see FSAR Section 5.1.4.4) ~ This            value is applicable to all dome, horizontal, and vertical              tendons.
f
F    -  34.7 x As
~t~~TENDON NO.CLOSEST BUTTRESSES 2@4 10'10" SAMPLZ 81 7Pt Ptt Supra,/f2 80'-10" 125'29'-7"]40f 3ll~'smrrz N TOTAL LENGTH OF YARE 140'3" CORROSION LEVEL: Q 4'1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION Q" 42.VISIBLE OXIDATION.
    ~ 34,7           x  0+049
NO PITTING Q 0'50<PITTlNG 5 0.003 0 0aaaa"<PITTING<a006-0 f50.006"<PITTING<aa10-twmCrmSV" t.ATE 11-11-77 IH.'.BUTTONHEAD FIGURE 5 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNiT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE HIRE INSPECTION 4 TENSION SAMPLE I.OCATIONS SHEET OF I~P APPENDIX E SPECIFICATION FOR TENSILE TESTING OF POST-TENSIONING TENDON WIRE (ASTM A-421)FOR FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland s,:.-.8 Yd.-.e~..)Charles W.Andrews June, 1977 Revision l., December 15, 1977 Approved: K.P.B chert Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Division E-1 I
    ~ 1.70          kips/wire Where F 1              =  Prestress  loss 8 40  years P
Revision 1 L 0 GENERAL This document specifies the general procedures which shall be used for the tensile testing or the 1/4"-diameter post-tensioning teadoa wires (AS'-421, Type BA).This document does aot relieve the testiag laboratory of the responsibility for conducting the tensile tests in a manner coasistend with the industry standards.
The minimum            effective design prestress is the predicted average wire force              after 40 years.
2 0 WORK INCLUDED Nine (9)L/4"-diameter wire specimens, approximately 10'-6" Long, wi11.be sent to the laboratory for testing in accordance with Section 3.0 Each of these specimens will have an identification tag attached close to one end;this tag will identify the tendon from which the wire was removed and the location of the specimen with resoect to the wire.Specimens shall be disposed of in accordance with Section 4.0 aad a report meeting the requi emeats of Section 5.0 shall be prepared.3 0 TEST DESCRIPTION l Tendon wires shall be tested in accordance with AS'-421-65,"S~a-dard Specification for Uncoated Stress-Relieved Wire for P estressed Concrete",except that the gage length shall be 100 (+1.0)inches, instead of the 10 iaches as specified.
F40    Fi -         Fpl
This test shall inc'uae the f ollowiag: 3~1 Measurement of wire diameter with an accuracy of+0.0005".3,2 Measurement of gage length with an accuracy of+0.05"..3.3 Application or aa initial load corresponding to 29,000 psi.3.4 Applicatf.on of additional load to obtain the force correspondiag to 1.0 percent eWensioa.3,5 Application of additional load and obtaining load at failure and elongation under load at fai1ure (+0.05").4,0 DISPOSAL OP TES~SPELLS A sampLe approximately 6" long oa each side of the break of each specimen shall be bouad and returned as a unit with the idaxtificatioa tag attached.Spec~shall be returned to: Bechtel Power Corporation Post Office Box 607 Gaithersburg,~~land 20760 Atteation:
    = 8.25          - li70
Nr.M.Malcom Pro]ect Eaginee" E-2 t I Revision 1 Thx'ee (3)copies of the report on tendon wire testing shall be submitted to: Bechtel Power Corporation Post Office Box 607 Gaithexsbux'g, Maryland 20760 Attention.
    ~ 6 '5           kips/wire In order to compare the actual average prestress losses with predicted values,             it was necessary that the wire lift-offforces, from the surveillance data, be normalized to account for the initial structural deformations (which is a function of the post-tensioning sequences), the deviations of initial lift-off forces from the specified value of 0.70f, and the changes in lift-off forces resulting from tendon surveillance operations, such as reshiming and wire removal. These normalized wire                lift-off forces were then superimposed on the appropriate
LLr.H.Nalcom Prospect Engineer The report shall contain the follacrLng information:
,curves shown on Figures 5.1 thru 5.3, providing a corn<<
5 1 Testing machine calibration report.5.2 Wire identification.
parison between the predicted values and the actual forces at the time of tendon surveillance.
5,3 Wix'e diameter (+0.0005 inches).5.4 Gage length (+0.05 inches).5.5 Force and, elongation
For future convenience, the normalizing factors and the normalized lift-off force for each surveillance tendon for the fifth-year tendon surveill'ance are listed in Table 5 '
(+0.001 inches)at initial load.5,6 Porce and elongation
for calculating the normalizing factors are given
(+0.01 inches)at 17.extension.
            'ormulas in Appendix            B
5,7 Poxce and elongation under load (+0.05 inches)at failure.5.8 Location ofM.lure relative to the grip in the~g head (+0.005 inches).E-3


APPENDIX F SPECIFICATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING OF SHEATH FILLER (VISCONORUST 2090P)FOR FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland Charles W.Andrews June, 1977 Revision 1, December 15, 1977 Approved: K.P.Buchert Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Division F l r 0 Revision 1 1 i 0 GENERAL This document specifies the procedu es which shall be used for labora-tory testing of sheath filler Visconozust 2090P to determine:
I L
a The amount of water soluble chlorides, nitrates and sulfides which are leached from a given contact area between water and the sheath filler under standzad conditions.
b..The water content of the sheath filler.c The resezve alkalinity of the sheath filler.This document does not relieve the testing laboratory of responsi-b&ity for conducting the necessary laboratory tests in a manner ccasistent with the~industry standards.
2 0 WORK INCLUDED Nine (9)ane-quart test samples will be sent to the laboratory for testing in accordance with Section 3.0.The concentration oz water soluble impurities and water in these samples wi.ll 1Dcely not exceed the follawing:
2 1 Chlorides-10 ppm 2 2 Ni~tes-10 ppm 2 3 Sulfides-10 ppm 2 4 Water (H20)-107.Dry Weight A report meeting the requirements of Section 4.0 shall be prepared.3 0 TEST DESCRY ZIONS, Each sample of sheath filler shall be mixed and then tested as fol.laws: 3 1 Water Soluble Xmpurities A water extraction of each sample of sheath fill.er shall be made and tested as indicated below: 3 1 1 Usi.ng a spatula, coat the inside (baton and sides)of a 1 liter glass beaker with a 1/4-inch layer oz sheath filler.3.l.2 Pill the beaker with distilled water at roam temperature.
3.1 3 Heat the wate to a controlled tempe ature of<00op and maintain for four hours.Do not heat on a, hot plate.Heat either in an oven or by use oz an~ersion heater so that the water wi11 remain clear for tests.F-2 r
'h Revision 1 0 3.1 4 Run a blank on distiLLed water.Xf titrate, use a micro-buret, 1 ml or 5 ml, with 0.01-0.05 ml graduation inter-vals.3 1 5 Decant water and analyze for soluble ions.Test only for salts in leached water.The water analyses shall be as follows: 3.1 5.1 Chlorides (Cl)by ASTM D-512.3~1 5.2 iH.trate+03)by AS~D-992, Bzucine Method or Cadminum Reduction'method by Hach Chemical Co., Ames'owai 3 1 5.3 Sulfides (S)'by APHA (American PubLic Health Association)
Standard method-Nethylene Blue-or the method by Hach Chemical Company, Ames, Xowao 3 2 Vvater Content Mater content (H20 as percent of dzy weight)shall be determined in accordance with ASM D-95.3 3 Neutralization Number Neutralization number shaLL be determined in accordance with ASTM D-664, 4 0 iEPORT Three copies of the report on Laboratory testing of the sheath filler'hall be submitted to: BechteL Power Corporation Post Office Box 607 Gaithersburg,~~Land 20760 Attention:
Hr.H.Nalcom Project Bngineer The report shall contain the zollowing information:
Sample identi cation.4.2 Concentration of water soluble chlorides, nitrates and sulf.'des wi~4 an accuracy oz 0.1 ppm 4.3 Concentration oz water (H20)within an accuracy of 0.1 percent oz dry weight of the filler.4.4 Neutralization number within an accuracy of 0.01 mg reagent per gram of filler.F-3
'V 0
~~APPENDIX G RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING OF WIRE SAPLES FOR FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE t BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1978
~t qS5TINQ (cP,'we+y EF~55 e t'r Z+d~I++CQSAHOGT PSRLI A0T ACT~PC CSTAOLISHCO ISO I 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA.15220 PLEASE REPI-Y TOI P, Oa IOX ldAd PITTSBURGH, P A IStt'S*NUTVAL FROTCCTION TO CLICNT5, THC FVhLIC ANO OVRSCLVCS, AI,L RCFORT5 ARC SVSINTTCO A5 THC CONFIOCHTIAL FROFCRTT OF CLICHTS*HO AUTHORIZATION FOR FVSLICATIOH OF STATCHCNTS, COHCLU5IOHS OR CXTRACTS FROM OR RCOAROIHO OVR RCI'ORT5 IS RCS CRT CO FCHOIHCI OVR INRITTCH A>FROVAL LABORATORY No.AREA COOE A It TELEPHONE Stt.5000 781695 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY cLIENT's No.P,O~No 65121 25833C p E p Q oRDER No.PG-6834 May 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon IAire Report to.Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O.Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn.Mr.Feeney UNIT P4 Spec imen Iden ti 8 ica tion Diameter, Inches Original Area, Sq.Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI Elongation at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1%Extension, Pounds Stress at 1%Extension, PSI, Elongation at 1%Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip in the 2D3 19-'1.2500.0491 14004.21 95600 195,500 1.21 12,250 249,500 4.92 4.92%moving head 9" Samples tested in accordance with order no.65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASSN A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIPT FOR TESTING.PAY-ly~cqp I
20 X 20 TO THE INCH~1 X 10 INCIIKS H E-C IIDIFFEI.a KSSCII CO.saoc a anal.46 1240 I f 1 g5TIHO~~+4<C~O++4 al C~+SAROC FORM AOT ACY, F C PLKA5K RKPL,Y TOI Pe 0, BOX IOAS PI T T 5BU ROH, P A.1525<AS A NUtUAI.FROTCCTIOH tO CLICH'15~THC FUSI,IC AHO OVR5CLYC5, ALI RCI'ORT5 ARC SVSMITTCO AS THC COHFIOCNTIAL FROFCRTT OF CLICHT5,*HO AUTHORIZATION FOR FVSLICATIOH OF STATCHCHTSa COHCLVSIOHS OR CXTRACT5 FRON OR RCCAROIHC OVR RCFORTS IS RCSCRYCO FCNOIHO OVR WRITTCN AFFROYAL, LABORATORY No.781695 ARKA COOK 412 TKLKPHONK 922 4000 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATQRY CSTASLISHCO 1441 850 POPLAR STRKFT, PITTSBURGH, PA.15220 cLIENT's No.P.O~No.65121"25833C R E P O R T oRDER No.PG-6834 May 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Mire Report to: Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O.Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn.Hr.Feeney UN IT Specimen 1dentification, Diame ter', Inches Original Area, Sq.Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches Load at l%%u Extension, Pounds Stress at 1%Extension, PSI Elongation at 1%Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fx'acture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture, Tnches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip PSI 2D3$2.2499.049 1400.18 10,150 207,100 1.18 12,350 2525000 S.56 5.56%in the moving head 303->>Samples tested in accordance with order no.65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and AS''f A421, Stress Stxain Curves are attached.'AHPLES SUBNITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTXNC.G-4 1
20 X 20 TO THE INCH~1 X IO INCIIES C KEUFFEI-0 XSSM CO.aaotausa, 46 1240 c I~
I 0 l ol tt 5TI II p (~c Sa I D IL~I (~SANO'" PORM ADT ACV.P 8 PLK ASK REPt.Y YO: P Oo 8OX ISSS PIT758URQH, P A 1525 AS A HUTVAL tROTCCTIOH TO CLICNTS~THC tVSLIC AHD OURSCLYCS, ALL RCtORT5 ARC SUSHITTCD AS THC COHSIDCNTIAL tAOPCR'TY Dt CLICNTS, AHD AUTHORIZATIOH tOlt tVSLICATIOH Ot 5TATCHCNT5, CONCLUSIONS OR CX'TRACT5 TRON OR RCOARDIHO OVR RCtORTS 15 RCSCRYCD tCNDIHO OUR WRITTCH AttROYAILABORATORY No.AREA COOK SIC TELEPHONE SCZ 4000 781695 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY C5TASLISHCD 1441~050 POPLAR 5TREET.PITTS8URGH, PA.15220 cLlENT's No P.O.No.65121-25833C ORDER No.PG-6834 May 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon!lire Report to: Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O.Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn-Mr.Feeney UNIT 44 Specimen Iden tif ica tion Diameter, Inches Original Area, Sq.Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00.PSI Elongation at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1%Extension, Pounds'tress at 1%Extension, PSI Elongation at 1%Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip in the 2D3 t3.2500.0491 1400.20 10,250 208,900 1.20 12,350 251,500 5.53 5.53%moving head 3" Samples tested in accordance with order no.65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASTiif A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached., E.SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTING.G-6 Il t l 20 X 20 TO THE INCH+7 X l0 INCHCS KCUFFCL a ESSEll CO.~ioccwvsa.
46 1240 0 Uj li l 8 R.ll TO Y1 t)I I Il~g (ted~~I~ii
'
~~qgSTIIIG (IO P'5 CI SI C f I OI i+<rl L+=~+SANO<" FoAM SOT ACT.PC CSTARLISHCD 144 I 850 POPLAR STREET, PlYTSBURGH, PA.15220 Pl EASE REPLY TOI Pe 0 BOX 1040 PITTSBIIRGH, P A, ISIS AS*MUTU*L I'ROTCCTION TO CLICNTS~TNC PUIILIC AHD OUR5CLVCS~*LL RCPORT5 ARC 5USMITTCD A5 TNC CONFIOCNTIAI PROPCRTV OF CI,ICNT5, ANO AUTHORIZATION FOR PVSLICATION OP STATCMCNTS, CONCI.USIONS OR CXTRACT5 FROM OR RCOAROINO OVR RCPORTS I5 RC5CRVCO PCNOIHO OUR WRITTCN*PPROVAL, LA8ORATORY NO.781695 AREA COOK CIA TKI EPHONE 922.4000 PlTTSBURGH TESTING t ABORATORY CLJENT'>No'0~No~65121 25833C p p p Q oRDER No.PG 6834 Nay 15, 1978 Repor t o f:.Tension Test of Post<<Tensioning Tendon Hire Report to.Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O.Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn-Mr.Feeney UNIT~4 Spec imen Iden ti f ica ti on Diameter, Inches Original Area, Sq.Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 Elongation at Initial Load, inches Load at 1%Extension, Pounds Stress at 1%Extension, PSI Elongation at 1%Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip 34V29$1.2499.0491 PSI 1400.20 9,850 200,600 1.20 12,700 258,700 4.87 4.87%in the moving head 3 I I Samples tested in accordance with order no.65121-25833C Attachment I,dated June 1977 and ASTiaf A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.'AMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIPT FOR TESTWiG.G-8


(uT>>20 X 20 TO THE INCH>>2 K IO INCHES f e~~C KEVFFEL 0 ESSEA CO.aiotssusA, 46 1240 I I I)()e gR iCt
5 '  Wire Ins ection The  results of inspection of each tendon wire      removed  for inspec-tion are shown in Appendix D, No  physical imperfections were observed        on the wires removed from all  tendons.
5 '  Discontinuous 'Wires No  discontinuous wires were found during this tendon surveillance.
6,0 RETENSIONING AND SHEATH FILLER'INSTALLATION The  data obtained during retensioning are shown in Table 6,1.
The tendons were      retensioned to approximately the    same  stress level indicated by the lift-off forces obtained during deten-sioning, with allowance made for the tendons where< a wire was removed for physical examination and testing.
The  retensioning data    will be  used as  input for the next scheduled tendon    surveillance.
6 '  Sheath    Filler Installation The volume of grease removed from the tendon prior to detensioning, and the volume replaced after retensioning, are indicated in Table 6.1 ~
7~0 WIRE TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER 7 '.1    Specimen  Selection and Preparation The locations of the specimens selected from each tendon wire for tensile testing are shown in Appendix D. In general, specimens were obtained from each end and the middle of each tendon wire removed. The specimens were cut to a length of approximately 126 inches.
After the specimens were cut from the pulled      wires, they were tagged with the following information:
: 1. Tendon  identification  number,
: 2. Location of the specimen;    i,e,, middle or end section.
3,  Containment  unit number and the year  of surveillance (1977) ~


~~~~~PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY C5TASLISHCD l44l 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBVRGH, PA.I5220 FORLI SOT ACT.iDC Pl KASK RKPLT TOI P 0, BOX I040 PITTSBURGH, PA 13230 CPS ANOC9 AS A NVTUAL RROfCCTION Td CLICNfS TNC FVSLIC AND OVRSCLVCS, ALL RCFORT5*RC SVSNIfftd AS TNC CONIlIOCNTIAL FROFCRTT OI CLICNTS, AND AVTNORIZATION fOR FV4LICATION OI STATCNCNTS, CDNCLVSION5 OR CXTRACTS SROH OR RCOAROINC OUR RCRORTS IS RCSCRVCO FCNOLNO OUR WRITT CN ARFRDVAL LABORATORY NO.ARKA COOK 412 TKLKPHONK 922 4000 781695 cLIENT's No.P 0.No 65121"25833C R E P O RT oRDER No.PQ 6834 lfay 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Mire Report to.Florida Power 6c Light Company P.OS Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn-Mr.Feeney UNIT.4 S pecimen Identification Diameter, Inches Original Area, Sq.Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1%Extension, Pounds Stxess at 1%Extension, PSI Elongation at 1%Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fractux'e Elongation at Fxacture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip PSI 34V29 g2.2498.0490 1400.18 10,650 2173300 1.18 12,800 261,200 4.51 4.51%in the moving head 6,63 Samples tested in accordance with order no.65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASTI(A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIWT FOR TESTING.
1 1


20 X 20 TO TIIC INCH+7 X IO WCIIES f KEUFFEL 0 ESSEII CO.eaoElallSL
These tags remained      with the specimens through completion of the testing.
.461240 i3('Y aP
The remaining portions of the wires, after the specimens had been obtained, were also tagged and retained at the plant site until testing indicated that the tensile strength and elongation of all specimens were in compli-ance with the specification, 7 ',2 Test Procedure Except  for the  gage  length, the test procedure used was  the  same as  that specified in ASTM Specification A421-65, "Standard Specification for Uncoated Stress-Relieved Wire    for Prestressed Concrete." A gage length of one hundred inch '(+1.0) was used instead of the ten>>inch gage length as specified.
'l
The  100-inch-gage-length specimen may indicate a lower ultimate strength and lesser ductility (elongation) than a ten-inch-gage-length specimen.        Since failure will occur't the weakest point in the wire, the ultimate strength obtained is equivalent to the lowest value that would be obtained from ten 10-inch specimens, Elongation at failure will also tend to be less due to the distribution of the elongation at the neck-down area over a length of wire ten times that of the nominal ten-inch specimen.
~~~~gcll I IIS 4+>CI D Gz 4~+SANO C FORM AGT RCV oPO PLKASK RKPLT TOI Po O IIOX 1044 PIYTSSVRGH, PAe ISZ: AS A NUTU*L RROTCCTION
7,1,3 Test Equipment The apparatus used for the      tensile testing of the specimens was the Tinius Olsen Super      "L" Testing machine with a 1,200,000 lbs capacity, of the Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, For machine calibration report, see Appendix  I.
'TO CLICNTS'THC RUSLIC ANO OUR5CLVC5, AI.L REPORTS ARE SUSMITTCO*5 THC CONFIDENTIAL RRORCRTV OR CLIENTS, ANO AVTHORIZATION IVOR RVSLICATION OR STATCNCNT5, GONCLVSION5 OR EXTRACTS TRON OR RCG*ROIHG OUR RfPORTS IS RCSCRVCO tCNOIKC OUR WRITTEN ARRROV*L, LABOR ATORY NO.781 695 ARKA COOK 41C TKLKPHONK 922 4000 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY CSTAdLISHCO
7 ',4 Test Results The  results of tensile testing on the one hundred-inch-gage-length wire specimens are shown in Appendix G and Table 7,1, 7.1.4.1    Yieeld Strength The  yield strength of all wire specimens tested exceeded  the specified minimum yield strength of 192 ksi at one percent elongation.
$44$850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA..I5220 cLIENT's No.P.0~No.65121-25833C Nay 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Hire Report to.Florida Power 6 Light Company P.0.Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn.Mr.Feeney UNIT 84 Specimen Identification Diame ter, Inches Original Area, Sq.Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1%Extension, Pounds Stress at 1%Extension, PSI Elongation at 1%Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip PSI 34V29 Pr3.2498.0490 1400.31 10,050 205,100 1.31 12,700 259,200 4.59 4.59%in the moving head 37.0 Samples tested in accordance with order no.65121-25833C Attachment I'dated'une 1977 and ASTif A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTING.G-12 l
7,1.4 '    Ultimate Strength The  ultimate strength of all wire specimens tested exceeded  the specified minimum ultimate strength of 240 ksi as specified by AS&i A421-65.
20 X 20 TO THE INCII~7 X IO INCIIES f oE-~E KKUFFEI 8r ESSSII CO.IIADCIWIISA 46 1240
 
~g5TIHG VI Sa t+~C sl L+~+SANO<+FORAI SOT ACV.PC CSZASI ISNCD 144~850.POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA.IS220 Pl EASE REPLY'TOI P.Oi 8OX 1444 PIT TS8URG II, P A 15200 AS*HU'TUAL tROTCCTION TO CLICN'f5, TNC I'U41 IC AND OURSCLVCS, ALI, RCFORT5 ARC SUSHITTCD AS THC CONFIDCHTIAL tROFCRTY Ot OLICNTS, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR tUSLICATION Ot STATCHCNTS.
LS
CONCLUSIONS OR CXTRACT5 FROW OR RCCARDIHC OUR RCFORT5 15 RCSCRVCO FCNDINC OUR WRITTCN AttROVAILABORATORY No.781695 AREA CODE 412 TELEPIIONE 022 4000 F'ITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY cLIENT'B No-P.O.No.65121-25833C oRDER No.PG-6834 May 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon t4ire Report to'.Florida Power&Light Company P.O.Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn: Mx'.Feeney UNIT Specimen Identification
  ~
~~~~~Diame tex', Inches Original Area, Sq.'Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1%Extension, Pounds Stress at 1%Extension, PSI Elongation at 1%Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fractuxe Elongation at Fracture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip 42H80 Tll.2502.0492 PS I 1400.19 10,150 206,300 1.19 12,200 247,9SO 5.42 5.42%in the moving head 37.5 Samples tested in accordance with order no.65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASTiaf A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTING.PITTSB GH TES ING LA ORATORY cc.3-client Attn.'Mr.Feeney Earl Gallagher, Manag er Physical Testing Department lcc  
i
 
F  1;4,3 Elongation Since 100>>inch-gage-length    specimens were used in the tensile testing,   a  lesser percentage of elongation  may  be expected than from the testing of 10-inch>>gage-length specimens of identical wire, as discussed in Paragraph 7      '.2 ~  Previous test data < ) indicated that a wire which showed a 4 percent elongation at ultimate strength in a 10-inch-gage-length testing could be expected to exhibit a somewhat lower (no less than 3 percent) elongation at ultimate strength in a 100-inch-gage-length testing.
The percentage  of elongation of    all wire  specimens tested met this requirement, 7.1.4 '    Fracture Characteristics The  fracture of  all wire  specimens  was of the cusp-cone shape.
7 '    Anal sis of Sheath'Filler 7~2~1  Specimen Preparation A  quart-size sample of the sheath      filler  was obtained from each end of all surveillance tendons prior to de-tensioning. Each metal container containing the grease sample was marked with the tendon identification number, One sample from each surveillance tendon was shipped to an independent laboratory for analysis of water content.
and water soluble impurities, and the remaining samples were retained at the jobsite.
7 ' ' Test Procedures Test procedures    for water content and chlorides, nitrates, and  sulfides concentrations are given in Appendix F.
7.2 '  Test Results The  results of laboratory analysis of the sheath        filler are shown    in Appendix'H, These data    indicated that the contents of chlorides, nitrates,    and  sulfides in the grease were well within the acceptance limits, and that the amount of water present was negligible.
t (1)
      "Containment Building Past-Tensioning System One-Year Surveillance, Palisades Plant Unit 1," Consumers Power Company, AEC Docket No. 50<<255            '
 
J RESS 74'4 I
BOTTOM OF R ING G IR DE R I34'UTT AZ IMUTH                                                    314        254          I 94~
EL I 50-0 42H80    LI45-8~  'E L130-2      64H70 I2V2g 56V29 62H38    76'-3 /e 34V29 TOP OF BASE SLAB DEVEL'OPED EXTERIOR ELEVATION EL l2-6 HOOP AND VERTICAL TENDONS 3I4 BUTTRESS        4,'D28 2
l4 554'UTTRESS                                      BUTTRESS 3 3D28 lg4                                                74'UTTRESS 2 BUTTRESS 6 2D3 BUTTRESS  I l34 PLAN DOME TENDONS                        FLORIDA POWER & LiGHT COYiPA.'~
TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER P7 ~N".
UNiT ~
POST"TENSIONING SYST" H SURVEILLANCE TENDONS LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION FIGURE    3.1
 
L
  ~
 
8.5 8.0 h5 0
0 ATA    NXS Pf 7 r.
~ ~
OUr. 7.0                                          Exp    ed loss  CO ve e
    ..<<:4
:.8 X
0
    ~  ~
Q 0      6.5                                        Nxnzmum  Effectx ve t5 0                                                  design prestress)
(6.55) kips/wire) 0.6 1.0  2.0  3.0 4.0 5.0        10.0        20.0 30.0 40.0 P
Time After Initial. Tensioning (years)
 
j
            ~ ~
                                    ~'
N 0
r 0                    8;5 o  I co e r-o 0
P rt.      0 8 '0 ac'O.       o        7-5 0  Q Q
g r-'.n 0
N  5 0 rt CL r        7<<0
: r. r. '08        ~
Expec ted Lo ss  CU rv I    '
~ ~0 OO
        ~
  'I
                        .6.5 Mxnxmum E    fectxve Design Prestress (6.55 kips/wire) 0 n '
e 1.0  2.0  3.0 4.0 5.0      10.0      20.0    30.0 40.0 Time- After Initial Tensioning  {years)
                                                                            ~  ~
 
1
  ~
0
 
                                                                    ~  ~
                                          ~ ~
                                      ~ ~
8.5 7s'O 8
8 0        0 I     0    0
~ Ql w4Qd 8    ~
0 M N M e VI I '.0I Vo I
                                    ~
Cb Qt 0Vo rt W    Ce 7+0 Exp ected      CU rve I  l~
0be rt th Q
    ~,           ~
0
            ~
                ~
                    &#xc3; ff
                                ~
                                  '.5
                                  ~                                                      51inimum  Effect:ivci fsf 0                                                                    Design Prestres
            ~        t5 0                                                                    {6.55 ki s/Mixe) 8
        ~ ~
0.6 1.0      2 0  3.0 4.0  5 '       10.0      20.0  30.0 40 '
Time  After Xniti.al Tensioning (years)
 
TABLE 4-1 SBMMARVOF DATA SREATH FILLER ANO ENO ANCRORAGE ACSEMBLIES flLLCRCDATIHDAccftTAELC lvfs/No(        1ILLCR MAT'L                                        ANCIIORAnfCoattONCNTS                                                    Tale  PF TENDON DUfTOIAICADS                  Sfn(55                QDM$                ef AAINO TIAQI(n$                                      ~ LATE5                          DATE DUTTDN sfnfss                  co(on      SAMtaf                                                                                                                          Inst( CT.
IDENT. Tvtf  LOCA.      CA/'lf Fl(LER AD WAQIf R SHIMS  INO PLATE                NO.                conn.
NUMEFK OSION 5I'a(IS      OFF. CORN OSION conn.
CIIACKS OSION CRACKS Conn.
                                                                                                                                                                                            >>Qcn.
(OR fxlfn.
IOR      EO REMARKS (ION                                                                                                SIZE                                                OS(ON    CRACKS LEVEL                  LEVEL                  LEVEL                LEVEL 12    I~      15                                1$      1$                  21        22                                            20
                ~ /T      YCS        YCS    YCS      YCS    YES    Ho                    ~ 'I            HONE    NON                HONE                  NONE                  HON C
~ IV(1  YERT                                                                                                                                                                                II~                IPO511      (    TOPSTAESSWA5HCAHA51HC FIRST THACAD
                ~ /0      YCS        YES    YCS      YCS    YCS    No                                    NONC    HON                HOIIC                  NO<<t                  HONE I
DAMAOEDAttAOX ~    Ii  THC O>>f SIDE PACE l5DDUOEDAppno/LF/tl    xi  Lotto.
I ltvlS I vcnT    t/T      YC5        YCS    YES      YC5    YES    NO 00
                                                                                                            ~ IONC  NON                Not/C                HONC                  HONC                        I+I+It I          THE FOPP-5ltteOTTOHHEAOSAAC 1/0      YES        YC5    YC5      YES  YES    HO                                    Ito>>C  1                  NONE                  HONE                  I/ON \                      104 1.11    ~
t SLID>>FLY OVC 15I 1 .
l(V10    VERT
                ~ /T      YCS        YES    YE5      YCS    YES    NO
                                                                                          ~1 NONC    HON    ~  1        IIOH 5                HO<< C                  Wont                                          TotSTAC5$ ,WASHER HASTHE FIA51THACAO
                ~ /0                        YES      YES    YES    NO                                    HONC                      ~ toit C 11 ~              101$ 11 YC$        YES                                                                                      2                              NON C                  NONC                                            DAHAOCDAPPROX    ~0 YCS        YCS    YES      YES    YC'5                                          NON C  NOH                HO<<t                  HONE                  NOHC                  00              I ID(0                      YES        YC5    YC5      YCS    Yt'5                          ~0 HONC    NOH                NONC                  NONE                  NOHC 01
                                                                                                                                                                                                          ~I Il.t 11            Slht55  wASHCR AT EUTTAC55 Ho.i HAS A 1/0 CHAHitn F LONO
(
I tD10    DON C YCS YCS YES YE5 YCS YCS YCS YCS YES YC5 No No          ~0
                                                                                          ~0 NONC NOHC NON NON HOHC HONE NONC NOH C NOH C NONE 10 1$
                                                                                                                                                                                                              ~ Ik 11              ti evTTDN>>cAD5 conno5IDN LtvcL2 I
YCS        YCS    YCS      YES    YES    No                                    NotIC  NON                HONC                  NOHC                  NONC                  10                                t h(tLACED I/O" 5HIU5 tot                      YE5        YES    YE5      YE5    YCS    No                                    HOIIC  NON              HOIIC                  HONC                  NOH C                ll  11.1.1  ~
I      ISHIN5WCAC ~ ENTI
~ tnti  HORI YCS        YC5    YES      YCS    YCS    IIO          It      10 HOHC                      NOH C                  NON C                  NOH C I~ 0          10 YC5        YCS    YC5      YES    YES    No          I~                        ttONC  NOH              IIONC                  HONE                  NON C                10
~ (HIP Y05        YCS    YES      YE5    YCS    HO          1$                      NONC    NOH              HO<< C                  HoltC                  HONE                  $0 Ho hl            YCS        YCS    YC5      YCS    NCS    NO          I~
1~
NONE I~ 0              ~ I 1111 NON              NOHC                  HONE                  NON C                ~0 I
YES        YES    YE5      YC5    YCS    NO          ~1                          I    NON              NOHC                  NON C                  NONE                  11
~ IHI~  HOXI            Y$ 5      YE5    YC5      YE5    YE5    Ho          I~      00              NONC    NON              NONC                  ~ ION C                NONE                  ~1 11 ~ 1$ .11 NOTfsl
: 1. LOCATION    INDICATES'lnf In/TT/ICSSATTWICIITHE I( tntotl Ishncllo>>CD/on 1>>f NfA>>1sT          l. ANCHORAGE COMtONfNTS                                            t. CORRUSION I EVfl 5                                                              ~  EACH 5AHPLC WAS le(NTIPI EO WITH DU(ln(55 lo Ill(. I at(DON IIVAVCR(ICAL
* ron  sin(ss>>/o WAQ/fn Tnt. connnstov Lfvc(s tell>> Ala Illa co>>(N(to I'ot etta Sat>>thea W>>f nf                  I (vl  a f
aavfa I N< VIQI( DXIDA(lonon LIGHTstoflvDXIDAf(on l  AtonIVI>>Down(A aon.HOPI(FINO TENOOII IIVHA(nAND CLO5CST il/11<<C55 NVVPCA, 1(HDONQ 1 I Ot                                              INC >>ill lottIILAll    ARL'NC>>on( o.                              LIV(a'I    II(t/IIINIinto(" U(t(II e - no( loM                                      e. ton QI,MS.INC con<<OQotl aLvl as INDICATE Tttf                      I 1vf a ~ -OUI I'SPII It';I + DIPI4" (f VI Le I' Iv CPIIIINII$hhl(f'                                                II CXvthlon TEHPCAATVAC Dttttx(HCC I Ht cltnol llott of QIC Atnt ACCS I'(nit no(co(An                                                                                                    t5 OUC TO5IEAN DISCHARGE WHICH WAS Io IHC Tanoolta                                                      a V(L 1 IS I ~ I>>PA( f tt( III I I V(as n Io c DURING INSTALLATION.              AD/ACCNF To THE EIIO SHOWINC THC I IIR<<ovlh/I I I a xclSS Dt (HIS aavf L lvhs U>>hccat Theat AT THE                  WIENER ICMttnATU<<E IIM(. Dt >>I' ha(ATION.
12
 
TABLE 5.1 SUhlhIAIIYOF DATA DETENSIONINO AND I/IIAE IIEhIOVAL
            'TENDON                NO.
AI A TCI>>lnntvnf 0  llfTOf F                        0 O.SP,                          0  I000 ll/5/WIRE TCNSlONINO EOVIPMKNT    INIIIAL WI ~ C REMOVAL OF              OATf            OF          tc//slnw                      IKNSION                                  fCNSIO/4                                                  WIRE                    CORROSION LKVCI,(41 ESICCTIVE DCTKNSIVNKD                    III                                                                                                                                      LKNCIH IDCNTISICA'(ION ANCIIOAACE
                                  'WIAC5 INT.      EKT.
CADI %DACE ELONGATION(ll CACK FORCE(tl ElONCATIO(4(ll CAC\ IDACC lll C lOIICATION(ll                                        CADE      (S 'l l KND LENGTH LOCAI ION                                                  IPS I I IKS I          UHI    (IS(I  (KIPSI              RN)        IPSA    I KISS(              I IN I      NO.          NO.            CUT NOS/(I  tl  PREVIOUS 10                        ~2          12        N                  15        10                                                        22
    ~ IV2t          ~ /f            ~ I      let%.ll            %11
                                                                          ~ I  NII              5 5/I ~    11%4    ~4 ~          1 5/I ~          11$      ~4            .1  snt        I~          A@1 ~
I/O 12VII          2/T
                                    ~ I      1011 11 10  ~ 111    tl ~                10%0    Nl            ~ I I/I~        Its      ~ I                          I~          AO I ~
                    <<0 1 4vt ~
                    ~ It            ~ I      1001 11                    ~ I  ~$1 ~    141    sin        1 Its    ~ 40                            140      ~ I          0 I III~        ~ I        AO I ~      (~ )      I ~ INI
                    ~ /0 NA I                        Sl        ~ I  ~ 1$ 0    11 ~    1 5/I      ~ Itt    ~ 10          4 IH            t2 1      II            ~ I IH        ~ 10 ~      0.1st IDI~                            ~
                                                                          ~ I  'I ~ 11  1$ ~    5 I/I      ~ 1$ ~  41 ~          4 I/II          Il~      ~ I          ~  /I ~        0414        2tl 1014                              ~ I                        SI
                                                                          ~1 11
                                                                              ~
INI II~    110 14 ~
1 2
I/I tH Ittt NIO Ns 045 4 SH 1 5/4 11 ~
ISO
                                                                                                                                                                ~
10 I
                                                                                                                                                                            ~ tint F 40 101
                                                                                                                                                                                                  '      1$ (
0 Nt I                                  ~ I $ 141      ~ It    2 I/O      1100      I
                                                                                                                      ~ ~            2 ln            F 40      tl            aint            ~ %41      0  140  !    (sl 20$                              ~
10  54N        TI ~    2 I/4      MN      tl4            1 I/I~          ~ N      ~0                            ~ 404      ttl          NA          ~ RSI 42HI ~                            ~0    4 I I.S 11          ~1 10  I~ lt    Nt      2 1/I      SN0      045            5 II/I~        110      ~  I            I Sh        ~ 'Its      0.1st        (4)
                                                                          ~I  I~ 41      101    2 I/O      I IN    04 ~          $ 1/I          ~ N                      5/I          ~ 400      211          HA I ~ .I I 11                ~ I SI I %    Ol ~    2 1/I      1 IN    NI            1 5/I I        Itt      40              I/II          ~ 44 ~      ttl
  ~ 4HIO                                                      %00
                                                                          ~ I ~  IN      ~ II    5 5/I      litt    ~ 1$          ~ I I/12        It%      ~  I          ~ I I/I~        ~ Its      DI ~ I IHI~                                      I  11-11          I~
11  SNS        ~ 42    2 I/O      1100    ~ 15          5 I I/II        III                    ~ I IH          ~ 14 1      0-141
  ~                                          ~                ~
                                                                          ~ I 14% ~      %4 ~    5 I/I      SIN      ~4 ~          ~ 2%Hi          ~ 4t      I~            ln              F 400      ttl NOTE SI CLONCATION Tl(EClCAA DISTANCE DCIWKCN'INEOUISIDCSACC OF IIIE Uf AAIHCPLATf AND1HE                                    CORROSION      LfV(ls:
IHUDC fACC OF IHK Sl ACSS INC WASilfA. A NCCA I IVE NVL'NH R IS INDICAlln1/HCN IHE SIR(SSINC                          I. No VfllolfnxlnATION WAQIIAIS IHSR/E 'IHK IRUMPET,                                                                                        t. AlIIDISIIPll'IR/0 DAO VN COI OR/ NO PIT 1 INC X Da'0 <              (0001 FORCE COUALS TOOHSKIPSMULTIPll(DOT            THf NVMUIAOf CffCCIIVCWIACS.                                            ~ . 0011 < 1$ 11INC < 0.006
: 5. 0006 CI'IITN/C $ 001J FORCE  \OVALS 10  1 0KIP5IUL'IlflltOAY'IIIE NVMCCAOF ff1 CCIIVC Hints.
  '1 ~
Pn CVRWS SVRV C II LANCE 0 4 IHI I IAL CONDITION.WH ICI      ICY  f4 APPLIES, DCHOIC5 TDP (Cl  NA ~ NDIAVAILAelE 0 ~ DCHDICS 00110M (11  CXTCAI01 SCMPC1ATVOC DISSCOCHCC ~ CTWCCHTHC T'WD C1 05 l5 DVC 10 STCAM DIICHA10C WHICH WA5 AD/ACCHI SQ IHC CHD SHOWIHG IHC HIGHC 1 1 C MSC 1 A I V1 C 13
 
I 0
 
Table  5 '
NORlfALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED TENDON LIFT-OFF  FORCES Lift-off Force/Wire (k)
                          'Factor'''ormalized Tendon No, Anchorage Location Normalizing Each end 'vera      e    er wire 1D28                      0 '78                7 '5              7.72 0 '29                7 '0 2D3                        0 '34                7,18              7 '2 5-6          0.940                7.46 3D28                      0 '01              '7.29              7.26 0 '09                7.23 42H80                      0.994                7.51              7 ~ 56 0.976                7.62 0.943                6 '2              7 '4 1.000                7 '6 64H70                      0 '57                7.31              7 '2 0.892                6.72 12V29                      0 '32                7.57              7 '7 34V29                      0.902                7.57              7.57 56V29                      0 '11                7.42              7. 42 W denotes top 14
 
~ NNNN r*
TABLE 6.1 SUh(hlARY OF DATA-RETENSIONING ANO SIIEATH FILLER INSTALLATION A(A                    4 1000  les/WIRE                                      0 0 0 ('                              DL(I)OFF                                                  Sul'ATH FILLER TENDOH                        No                        1 fMr2~A10 (U 4 E      Tf NSICN        f CONGA)ION RNI(ll          TfNQON            lVNCAIION RIO(ll        TENSION    flONCAIIONRNI(ll TENSIONING foul)MENT VOLVME        FILLER OF            OATf.
EFFECTIVE      Rf)fNQDNED DACE              l)l                                                                            FORCE                            RAM      GACf    (Fill(O Rfr(AC(o (GALS)
TEMOLRATVRE DOV(lff WIAES                          INT    EAT. (rsl                    NOW( ~ I CHANCE(5) CAGE FORCE                NOW( ~ I CHANCEIS) CAGE                NOW((l Q(ANGELSI IofA)IF)CATION          ANCHOR ACE LOCATION                                                    (I          I                                      (1511      (K l)SI                        ()Q)    I K IFQ                          No.        NO.
10                    12                    I~      15                            10                    10  I    21 I                      10 OAL
                                                                                                \                                                                        ) tin 1627 I                rouaf o raDM SIV2'                                  ~  I          142$ -)7      ~ IT
                                                                                              ~    1$ 4        tO                              1100      ~$ 1                    Isnt    $ 200      110    ~ <<I      <<I            I~  IL)I ~                    1$
100  (1 %II.11)
                                  ~ /0                                                                                                                                                                                                                    1001.1
                                                                                              $2    115          ~ I        n 7/0        7/I      7410      ~ tI          0  lit              011$              )sn                    10  A@I ~
I
                                                                                                                                                                                    ~ )Il~                                                                1 42 ~
I IV)~                                  ~  I          I&2).)I 2/0
                                                                                                                                                            ~ ts                /I          OI $ $            ~ I 4/1                                                        ~2    11$          ~ I                              1010                    1 1$
                                                                                                                                                                                                                            ~ /I                            $ 4211        100 SIV)$                                  ~  I t                              ~ $ 00      I          ~  I <<'I          $ 111      11 ~    2 I/I~    III~
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    ~ 10 ~    O 10$
                                                        ~  I
                                                                                              ~1    11$          ~                                          ~ ~
                                                                                                                                                                                        ~ nl                                        OSIER I I 5.77      21        1 15 102                                                                                                                                ~ t)$    ~ $0          5  III            $ 4$ ~    114    1 7/0            01st
                                                                                              ~0                IS 11$          ~ I                                        ~ ll                                        11$                      4(0 ~        2)1
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            ~~  1 17      21 I                                                  5/I ~
                    'D\
I          I 1.1.71      ~
                      ~
                                                        ~
                                                                                              ~1    1$ ~        ~ I                                1000 ~    il          I In                I II
                                                                                                                                                                                                  ~      114    1 )il~            ~ $ 40    0.1 ~ I
                                                        ~ I                        ~ I      ~ I  004          01          I lnl                  )OII  00$          1  snt        ln)            150    2 1/I ln      ~ $ 01    0.10$        114.7) le F 11/I ~                1000                                      $ 104    '114    1 ln              ~ its il                                        )00    2sn                          Dl ~ I 10    1$ 0        ~ I          I 1 tnt                1000  ~            2  15/I
                ~ 2410                                                11 $ .11      ~1                                                  Snt                                                                              ln                                            I~
                                                                                              ~I    11 ~                                          )000      I
                                                                                                                                                            ~ ~                              I ~ I~    140    2 ln              (HII          211 F 00                    S/0                    ) I IO ~ it          ~  )nl        .In
                                                                                                                                                                                              ~ 14 ~    010    1 $ /I OI I I 410 ~        211 II I~  I                II~
                ~ 1410                                  $4                          140 WAS(I 1$ 0      ~ I        ~ I I/O                  1010  Ms            s  2)n            $ 104      ~ )I    1 5/I ~ ~          0$ 0$        0  ltl 1st        ~ I          sn1                    1100  ~$$          ~  1/I            ~  MI      ~ ii    1 S/I              ~$0 ~        0  10$
11.1$ 1                  110 11H) ~                                                I I 1511      110                                                  )nl                                              <<11
                                                                                                                  ~ I                                1100    Oil                                          0$ $                      tits No)fsc (ll  fLONGATIDH THECIEAR OISTANCf ef IIII(N(Hf Oul loE fACE OF THE                                            NOW of No(ES f CONGA)ID'I AT TIME VF Rf TfNUONIN(h MFASV RE-0( A  A INC  rl                                        f A 1 0 AND I HI. I'is( ol. I ACF 4 I Ill S I4 LSIIN0        ( 4. A                        MLNI AHE 101HE I/(A4LST I/If NlCATIVENvs)414 IS INC(CA (E DIN ILN Tnf SIR(&INCwAQI(H IS INSIDE THE 1 RUM)ET.                                                                                                        f f1(ANGE IH I DNCATIOH ASCOMFAR( 0 10 FR( VIOUS MfASUR( MENT UND( 4 ill( Sl'ECIFILD lOAD.
FORCE EOUAlS TO        I 0 K(1MUL)lrllfoev        THE NVSIOF 4 OF    fFFLCTIVE                    (I) rX)fRIOR ')turfAATVAC(HOFCRtNCC OflWCCN THC TWD OND5 IS Ill RES.
Duf TD 5)CAN DISCHARGE WHICH WAS AD/AfCNI 10 THC CND Foncf      E CURLS  To 0 i)xlrSMULQFQ(o ev THE NUNC(n oF FFIECQVE W      (S,                                                                                              5HDWINO TNC HICHf4 'ICMICRATVAC 7 DCNDTC$ TDI'
              .Df NDICS DDT IDM 15
 
I f
i
 
TABLE  7,1 WIRE TEST RESULTS    - 100  IN,  GAGE LENGTH Tendon No. Sample    Load  at    Stress at    Load  at Stress at Elongation at Fracture No.      1%  Ext. 1% Ext.      Fracture Fracture  Fracture      Location (lbs )      (psi)        (lbs )  (psi)      (in.)      Moving Head (1)                                                                    (in.)
34V29          CeEe    10 p 050    205 7 100    12,700  259,200  4.59          37.0
              .,BeEo    9,850        200,600      12,700  258,700  4.87          3.0 M,ST      10,650      217j300      12,800  261,200  4.51          6.63 42H80          C;E,    10,150      206,300      12~ 150  246 ~ 950 4.72          3.0 B;E,    10,150      206,300      12,200,  247,950  5.42          37.5 M,ST    10,300      209,350      12,200  247,950  5.49          AT JAW 2D3            C;Eo      100250      208,900      12,350  251,500  5.53          3.0 B,E,    9,600        1951500      12,250  249,500  4.92          9.0 M,S,    10,150      207,100      12,350  252,000  5.56          30.25 (1)  C,E, denotes cut end of wire B.-E. denotes button head end of wire M,ST denotes middle section of wire 16
 
I II
 
APPENDIX A TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE
                                                                          )
BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION                          Ry Gaithersburg, Maryland                                Charles W. Andrews June, 1977                                        Approved:
K. P. Buchert Revision 1, July 22, 1977                            Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Revision 2, October 11, 1977                            Divison Revision 3, December 14, 1977 A-1
 
l Revision  3 1 0 PURPOSE The purpose  of this survei1.lance is to obtain data for assessing the continued quality and structural pex'formance of the major components of the containment structure post-tensioning system.
2 0 SCOPE The  surveillance for each tendon shall consist of the following:
2 1  Removing and visually inspecting sheath    filler, and  obtaining samples fox laboratory testing,.
2~2  Inspecting anchorage assemblies and measuring the thickness of shims 2 3  Obtaining tendon    H.ft-off force  and elongation.
2.4 Detensioning,    raring    shims, and inspecting wire continuity.
2.5  Removing  wires where required, for visual ucamination and labora-tory testing.
2 6  Retensianing,  installing  shims, and obtaining tendon  lift-off force.
2,7  Installing  sheath  filler.
2.8 Testing wire samples pex Attachment E.
2 9  Testing sheath    filler per  Attachment p.
2 10  Evaluating survei.llance data and test results to assess    the general condition of the post-tensioning system.
Temporary  protection shall be provided for the tendons and anchorages during surveillance. The end anchoxs and wires removed shall be pro-tected by applying a coating of Visconorust 1601, Amber aver the surfaces.
The elapsed time between removing and replacing sheath filler fram one tendon shall not exceed 2 weeks.
Tendon  surveillance  may be conducted  during reactor operation.
3+0 SURVEILLANCE TENDONS Surveillance tendons for the Unit 4 containment structure shall consist of 3 dome tendons, 3 horizontal tendons, and 3 'vextical tendons. The identification numbers of these tendons are listed, below:
3 1  Dome  tendons:    1D28, 2D3, 3D28 One  wire shall be  removed from Tendon 2D3.
A-2
 
s l
 
Revision  3 3 2  Horizontal tendons:      62H38, 42H80, 64H70 One wire shall be  removed from Tendon 42H80, 3,3 Vertical tendons:      12V29, 34V29, 56V29    .
One wire shall be  removed from Tendon 34V29.
4 0 INITIAL INSTALLATION RECORDS    AND PREVIOUS SURVEILLANCE DATA Orighzal records of initial tendon installation, aad of subse'quent sur-veil1ances, are maintained by Florida Power & Light Company. The original installation records are ia card form and contain information pertaining to tendon pulliag, button-heading, tensicaing, and sheath filling. The surveillance data coasists of the raw data recorded during surveillances aad the surveillance reports 5 0 SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES 5 1  Remaval and  Inspection of Sheath  Piller The sheath  filler, Visconorust 2090P, may be liquid, gel, or solid ~  All states  may occur at a particular tendon        Complete xemoval  of the sheath filler is not required, provided that all filler drained  or removed during the surveillance is replaced.        The sheath  fillex shall  be removed as  follows:
5 1 1  Record  air temperature outside the containment near the surveillance tendon and inside the coataixanent.
e 5 1 2  Remove  the grease caps from both ends of the tendon and allow the filler to flow into containers of known volume.
5.1 3 Obtain a cne-quart sample of      filler fxgnm each  end  of the tendon 5.1,4 Record lack of grease coverage        on end anchors,  if any.
5 1 5  Recox'd aay discoloration of sheath fillex oa the Sheath Piller Znepectioc Fore (Figure A-6). (The color of the filler              3 should be dark brown.)
5 1.6  Heasure and record the amount      of grease  removed.
5 2  Inspection of Anchorage    Components 5 2.1 Thoroughly clean the anchorage components with Viscosity Oil Company's Industrial Solvent No. 16 in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents shall not be used.
5 2 2  Inspect and record the buttonheads for shape and size, using the Go/No&o gage as shown in Figure A-1; cracks; A-3                                            l3
 
Revision  3 and corrosion    status. Compare the number of buttonhcads with the    number  at the previ.ous surveillance. Identify missing buttonheads and any buttonhead defects on the end Anchorage Inspection Form as shown in Figure A                  f3 5,2,3    Inspect and record the stressing washers for corrosion status and cracks.      If  any cracks are observed, show the locations and sizes on the Anchorage Inspection Form.
5+ 2i4    Inspect                            f and record the shims or corrosion and cracks . I f cracks are observed, prepare a sketch showing their locations.
5 2 5    Inspect and record the bearing plates at the ccntact sur-faces with the shims for corrosion and cracks.
are observed, prepare a sketch showing their locaef.ons.
If cracks 5.2  6    Definitions of corrosion levels for the tendon wires and anchorage components      for the surveillance are as follows:
Corrosion Level                Descri tion 1                Ho  visi.ble corrosion 2                Reddish-brown color; no    pitting 3                0.000<pitting < 0.003"
                      ~
4                0.003<pitting g 0.006" 5                0.006(pitting g 0.010" The  corrosion levels for the surveillance as compared to the criteria    used during the field installation are indicated below:
Corrosion Level.
Surveillance      Field Installation        Instal.lation 1                    A~                Acceptable 2                3,C,D,E                Acceptable 3,4,5                  pk                Unacceptable 5,3 Detensioning and        Lift-offForces 5,3,1 Safety A11 personnel on work      platforms during detensioning and reten-sioning operations shall be familiar with, and abide by,
            ,  the following safety rules:
a    Do  not stand behind the jacks while they are pressurized.
b    Keep  fingers away from the tendons and jacks, except when  required to read li.ft>>off forces, and remove or stall  shims.
*Prescon symbols      identifying Corrosion Level      (no longer used).
A-4
 
I I
          ~
I      ~
    ~ ~
I Revision  3 5.3.2 Calibration All gages          and jacks used for the tendon surveillance shall be        calibrated before use. Gages and jacks shall not be recalibrated unless damaged or repaired. Prior to use, gages shall be checked for zero deviation and ~ge.
5 3,3 Detensioning Tendons 5+3,3,1        Determine the number of effective wi.res      for  each tendon fran the previous surveillance.
5 3 3.2          Calculate and record the jacking forces required to obtain the specified 80 percent minimum ulei~te strength (0.8f's) per wire. These forces are ob-tained by multiplying the number of effective wires by 9.43 kips ~ Enter these values into the jack calibration chart to obtain the gage readings equivalent to the forces. Note that the applied jacking force for each tendon shall not exceed the value thus determined.
5,3 3.3 Attach the jack to the bearing plate. Note that if  the initial stressing was done from both e"ds of a tendon, the surveillance shall be perfo ~d in the same manner.
5,3 3.4          install  the pressure gages to the jack and    p~,
and record their identification numbers.      iheck the gages for zero pressure reading.
5    3.3.5 Measure the depth of the existing shims.
5,3 3.6 Determine the            lift-off  force by tensioning the tendon until all shims are loosened.      Li t-off is achieved when the sound produced by tapping on shims with a small. hammer changes to indicate release from compression; also, all accessible shims can be moved by tapping with a sra11 hammer    Repeat the operation until three measurements of the    lift-off  forces show a variation of + 50 psig, or less..
Se3o3+7'.3 Depressurize the jack    until the  gages read zero.
3 8  Pressurize the jack to a force so that the aver-age wire stress is equal to 80 percent of the minimum ultimate strength of the wires, as determined in paragraph 5.3    ',2.
5.3.3.9          Record on the Detensioning/Retensioning    Form (Figure A-4) the gage reading and the corres-ponding tendon elongation.
A-5
 
s l
P
 
~ ~ '
      ~
        ~
          ~ ~~
              ~                                                      Revision  3
'                          5 3.3 10 5~3 3.11 Remove  the shims Depressurize  Che  jack  until the gages read zero.
5 3 3 12    Pressurize Che jack to a force equivalent to 1,000 lbs pex wire Si3.3  13  Recox'd on tbe Detensioning/Recensioning Form the gage reading and the corresponding tendon elongations 5 3 3 14    Depressurize the jack until the gages read zero~ Detach the gages from Che jack.
S 3 3 15    Remove  the jack..
5 4 Wire Inspection 5.4 1 Inspect each tendon vix'e    fox'ontinuity by pulling from one end, one  wire at a tf.me, and observing the movement of the buttonhead at the opposite end. The Cool for pull~~
the individual wires is shown in Figure A-2. Prior to in-        )3 specting the vires, it. is necessary to move the stressing washer away from the butconheads apprcarimately 3 inches This may be accomplished by using a hammer and a wood bufxer block Record any discontinuous wires on Che Anchorage In-spection Form All discontinuous wires shall be removed and mcamined to detexmine the cause of breakage        Dis-continuous wires shall not be used for surveys.LLance vix'e test samples.
5 4 2  Remove one  test vtre frcm    each  of the following tendons:
Dome Tendon:    2D3 Horizontal tendon:    42880 Vertical tendon:    34V29 The  locations of the buttonheads of the vires to be re<<
mcnred,  shall be recorded on the end Anchorage Inspection Form.
5,4,3 Pull the test vire at the end to be cut away from the stx'essing washer and notch apprmdmately 2 inches fxom the end    Record the end Chat is cut, and the distance from the notch to the outside of the buttonhead within +0.02 inches A-6
 
'L P
 
Revision 3 5.4.4  Cut the    wire between the buttonhead and the notch.
Remove    the remaining portion of the wire and clean        it with solvent, (Viscosity Oil Co. Industrial Solvent llo. 16) ~
5,4 S  Inspect the wire and record on the Wire Inspection Form (Figure A-5) the locations of any damages, corrosion, and corrosion levels.
5 4,6  Compare the      corrosion levels with those of the previous surveillance.      If  the corrosion has progressed one or more levels, remove one additional wire at approximately 120o frcm the first wire, repeating paragraph 5.4.3, 5.4.4, and 5.4 5.
If  the repeat second this wire has progressed one or more levels, procedure    for a third wire selected at approximately      120    from  the first two. Do not    r~e    more than three wires from any one tendon during one surveillance period~
5,5 Retensioning and    Lift-offForces 5.5.1  Safety The  safety rules    as  specified in paragraph 5.-3.1 shall apply 5.5 2 Retensioning Tendons Retensioning shall be pezformed in a similar manner as detensioning; that is,        if  detensioning is done from shall be performed both  ends  of a  tendon,  retensioning accordingly.
S,5 2,1 Determine the number of effective wires in the tendon for retensioning. Deduct any discon-tinuous or surveillance test wires      removed and recalculate the new jacking forces      as outlined in paragraph 5.3.3.2.
5,5 2.2 Attach the jack to the bearing plate.
5,5 2  3  Install    the pressure gages to the jack and pram, and record their identification numbers.        Check th'e gages for zero pzessure reading.
5,5,2.4    pressurize the jack to a force equivalent to 1,000 lbs per wire. Record the gage reading and the corresponding tendon elongation.
5,5,2  5  Increase the tensioning force so that the average wire stress is equal to 80 percent of the minimum ultimate strength of the wires, as
 
I ~
S
 
Revisioi  3 determined in paragraph 5.5.2.1. Record the gage reading and the corresponding tendon elon-gation 5,5,2  6  Reduce the )eeking force from the      equivalent of 80 percent of the,    mini~ ult&tc strength      of the wires, to the    initial Lift-off reading es obtained in paragraph 5.3.3.6, Por any discontinuous or test wires removed, deduct 50 psi from the initial lift-offreadings. Measure the distance from the bottom of the stressing washer to thc bear~
plate and subtract one-eighth inch This di.stance is defined as full shim depth and is the depth of the new shins to be instaLLed.
5,5 2.7    Install  shims  to the neax'est one-eighth inch of the  full shim  depth.
5,5.2.8    Obtain new Iift-offforce. The reading should be equal to or greater than the initiaL lift-offforce      If .not, repeat the procedures as stated in paragraphs 5.5.2.5 and 5.5.2.6.
Install    shims and obtain new  Lift-off force.
5,5.2.9    Measure and record new shim depth.
5,5.2.10  'etach    the )ack and apply a coating of Viscosity Oil    Co. 2090P or 1601 Amber to the tendon end anchorages.
5,6 Installing Sheath    Piller 5,6 1  Reinstall tendon fi.lier caps    using new gaskets, copper washers,  and  teflon nuts  as used  in the initial installation.
5 6.2  Refill the    tendon sheathing with Viscosity Oil Co Vf.scmoxust 2090P, 2090P>>2, or 2090P-4 sheath filler.
Th'e temperatuxe of the    filler  at the filler p~p shall. be approximately 120 P. Do not reuse fiLler that has been x'emoved from the tendons.      pumping shall conti.nue from one end of the tendon, until at least 5 gallons of filler, wi.thout any air bubbles or visible foreign substances, flows out of,the outlet at the opposite end of the tendon.
5.6.3 Record the temperature of the sheath filler at the drum and at the outlet. Also, record on the Sheath Piller Inspection Porm the volume of sheath filler replaced for each surveillance tendon.
5.7 Laboratory Testing of Tendon Wire Samples and Sheath          Piller Samples A-8
 
t 0
 
li
~ ~
Revision  3 5,7 ~ 1 Tendon Wire Sample Testing 5.7.1,1    Tensile tests shall be performed on at least three specimens from each surveillance wire removed. Tensile test specimens, each approximately 126 inches long, shall be taken from near the center and each end of the wires. Additional specimens shall be taken from the portions of the wire that appear to have a corrosion rating one or more levels greater than the average des-criptions of the wires.
5,7,1,2    Remaining wires not used for testing, shall be protected against corrosion and retained until test results have been finalized.
5,7,1,3    Tensile tests also shall be made on at least one specimen from each discontinuous wi.re removed. The test specimen shall be taken near the break and shall be approximately 126 inches long."
5.7.1.4    All tensile tests shall  be performed in accordance with Appendix E, "Specification    [3 for Tensile Testing of Post-Tensioning Tendon  Wire."
5,7,2  Sheath  PiLler  Sample Testing 5,7  2 1  Analytical testing shall be performed on at least one specimen, each one quart in size, from each surveillance tendon.
5.7,2.2    Additional specimen obtained from the sur-veillance tendons, but not used for testing, shall be retained until test results have been  finalized.
5 7.2 3    All sheath filler testing shall  be performed in accordance with Appendix F, "Specification )3 for Laboratory Testing of Sheath Piller."
5,8 Report 5.8.1 Data Data obtained during the surveillance shall be sum-marized in a report. The original data and records of the surveillance shall be submitted to Florida Power and Light Company within 90 days of completion of the tendon surveillance at the Turkey Point Plant.
A-9
 
, I'
      ~
    ~
~ I Revision  3 5  8.2 Evaluation The surveillance data for each tendon shall      be compared with previous records to determine if:
a    Additional wires have broken since last surveillance.
b    The  lift-offforce    for the tendon is below the minimum  effective design prestress.
c,  Changes in wire corrosion level, or anchorage assembly corrosion Level, have occurred.
: d. Deterioration of sheath    filler has  occurred.
e,  Significant changes in wire elongation, yield,    and ultimate strength have occurred.
If  any of, these  conditions exists, the report shall in-clude an  evaluation of condition and, where necessary, recommendations for remedial actions.
: 5. 8. 3 Formulas Formulas  for normalizing factors  and normalized forces are given in Appendix    B..                                t3 A-10
 
d 1
 
~    ~
I I Revision  3 IDENTIFICATION                                ~o NUNIBER                                    CD CD ill 5/8" + I/16  f BAR CD CD CD CD
      +  I CD CO Cl      1".+ 1/8                      3  fi" + ~/s                  1" + 1/8 NOTES:
Hole diameter  shall  be  certified  by an independent laboratory.
: 2. Each gage  shall have  an  identifying  number.
                                                                  ~
Figure A-1 FLORIDA POWER IIc LIGHT CO.
TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT 4 GO/N CNGO GAGE A-11
 
Revision  3 HEAD SEE DETAIL          1 ST'D NUT        SLEEVE SEE DETAIL      ~2 WELD TO EYE CI 6/8" UNC                                              C7 SAW CUT                I C)
                                                            +
1'-0" 1 t+lt NOTES:
The nut with the pulling ring welded to it may be replaced with an eye nut.
The hardness of this tool shall not exceed Rockwell C40.
FIGURE  A-2    SHEET 1 OF 2 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE Unit    4 WIRE PULLER A-12
 
l I
0
 
~
  ~
Revision  3
                    ~ 395  + 008 PIA        REAM TO SUIT
                            .000            BUTTONHEAD COO OO Q
Q QQ O
Q                                                                                Q CV LA
                                                                                    +      Q N
Q                                                                                +
lA                                                                                    a SAN CUT                                                                          CI ca alt 4 .06
                                    .75" 2 .12        .375      .25"
                                                              + .06 a  .C2
                                                              ..063" J .005 HEAD DETAIL SH;2                                    Q Q
Q O
Pl C)
F12"                            ,4&
MOVABLE SLEEVE DETAIL SH.-2 FIGURE  A-2    SHEET 2 OF 2 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.
TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PO'iVER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE Unit 4 WIRE PULLER
 
I ~
Revisic}n  3 TENDON NO.                        LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 0 0000                                        0 000  0 0000                                      0 OOpp        0000 000'000 t<o~~oo 000              000                    000                        000 ppp                Opp                ppp                            Opp 00 0 00 Opp 00 0 p                00 0                              0 00                                    +          00 0pp0                pp                                            ~
pp 0                  000                Opp                            ppp 000              pppp                    000                        pPPO
              ++goop    pPOOP                          pppppp 00000 000p00 p P 0                              Oppp            00 o 0      0 END ANCHORAGE A                            END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS      )                ,(CLOSEST BUTTR ESS                  )
CORROSION LEVEL                          CORROSION LEVEL WASHER                                    WASHER BUTTONHEADS                              BUTTONHEADS SHIMS                                    SHIMS BEARING PLATE                            BEARING PLATE LEGEND:
BUTTONHEADS:                              CORROSION LEVELS:
0  OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD                      41    NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 6  BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT                    0'2 VISIBLE OXIDATION NO PITTING WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY                  430      (  PITTING      (  0.003" DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED                  4 0.003" C PITTING E 0.006 THIS SURVEILLANCE TT 4f 5 0.006 4 PITTING            (  0.010
  %    WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A          DATE END ANCHORAGE B          DATE FIGURE A-3 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Unit 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM 5 th.YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE IN SP ECTION A-14                                        SHEET    OF
 
I ~
I S      ~ ~
  ~,      ~
TENDON NO.                                BUTTRESS                    iNSPECTED BY        DATE RAM NO.                                    NUM. EFF. WIRES            EXTERIOR TEMPERATURE GAGE NO.
0 DETENSIONING INTERIOR TEMPERATURE 0 RETENSIONING DESCRIPTION                                                  OBJECTIVE          ACTUALMEASURED CHECK GAGES (ZERO)
MEASURE SHIMS OBTAIN LIFT.OFF PRESSURIZE TO .Sf'i MEASURE ELONGATION 0
                                          .8f'EPRESSURIZE TO ZERO PRESSURIZE TO 1000 LB/WIRE MEASURE ELONGATION ~~
DEPRESSURIZE TO ZERO REMOVE RAM REMOVE WIRE WAS THIS END CUT?
CHECK CONTINUITY PRESSURIZE AT 1000 LB/WIRE MEASURE ELONGATION '~
zO PRESSURIZE TO CO
                                .Sf'EASURE ELONGATION AT.Sf'q PRESSURE    9 RESHIM A)  NEW LIFT-OFF B)  NEW SHIMS PRESSURE SHALL NOT DROP BELOW THIS LEVEL AFTER PRESSURIZATION TO.Sf'q ii ELONGATION IS THE DISTANCE FROM THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THE BEARING PLATE TO THE INSIDE FACE OF THE STRESSING WASHER. (THIS WILL BE A NEGATIVE NUMBER IF THE WASHER IS INSIDE THE TRUMPET.)
F I GORE  A"4 A-15                      Revision 3
 
I ~
0
 
Revision  3 TENDON NO.                            CLOSEST BUTTRESSES BH END 75'50 TOTAL LENGTH OF WIRE CORROSION LEVEL:
Q  g1  NO VISIBI.E OXIDATION Q  02  VISIBLE OXIDATION,NO PITTiNG Q  030" < PITTING ~ 0.003" Q  44 0.003 < PITTING  0.006" Q  4 5 0.006" < PITTING (  0.010" FIGURE A-5 INSPECTED BY FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.
DATE                                                  TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT  ~
Unit 4            I POST TENSIONING SYSTEM    i St11 YEAR SURVEILLANCE    !
BH. - BUTI'ONHEAD                                                WIRE INSPECTION h TENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS A-16                            SHEET  OF
 
l  l P
 
t ~
Revision  3 SHEATHING FILLER INSPECTION TENDON NO.
END ANCHORAGE A                        END ANCHORAGE B CLOSEST BUTTRESS                      CLOSEST BUTTRESS DETENSIONING:                          DETENSIONING:
TEMPERATURE:                          TEMPERATURE:
OUTSIDE                                OUTSIDE INSIDE                                INSIDE GREASE REMOVED                          GREASE REMOVED COLOR                                  COLOR BY:                                    BY:
DATE:                                  DATE:
RETENSIONING:                          RETENSIONING:
TEMP E RATUR'E:                        TEMPERATURE:.
OUTSIDE                                OUTSIDE INSIDE                                INSIDE INLET                                  INLET OUTLET                                  OUTLET
              /
GREASE REPLACED                        GREASE REPLACED BY:                                  BY:
DATE:                                  DATE FIGURE A-6 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.
TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Unit 4 POST. TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th  YEAR SURVEILLANCE A"17                                SHEET    OF
 
1 APPENDIX B FORMULAS FOR NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED FORCES FOR FLORIDA POWER  &  LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL 'POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland June 1977 Revision 1, December 15, 1977
 
I Revision 1
: 1. 0 GENERAL In order to provide    a common base  for comparison,    tendon lift-off forces must be normalized to account for elastic stress loss during initial installation (a function of the post-tensioning sequence), of the lift-off fqrce deviation from the base value, and the number effective tendon wires or strands. The base value for evaluating the normalized tendon force is assumed to be the force which produces an average tendon wire or strand stress of 0.7fpu. In cases where the same tendon is subjected to two or more surveillances, the base value for the ith surveillance is the normalized force for the i-1 surveillance.
The normalized force is equal to the measured        lift-off forces    multi-plied by the normalizing factors.
2.0  NORMALIZING FORMULAE 2.1    Normalizin Formulae for First Surveillance            i~ 1 2.1.1  Vertical  Tendons 0
N Fl        L c  N v n
0.7f v
u E
H (Eq. 1) 2.1.2  Hoop Tendons 0.7f                                (Eq  2)
NF                                N v
n 1
N          EV 2.1.3    Dome Tendons
: 0. 7f                              (Eq. 3)
NF N
2.2  Normalized    Lift-Off Force  Per Wire or Strand
                  ~ F    x                                                        (Eq 4)
FN            NF 0
B-2
 
),
t P
 
Revision'1 2.3    Normalizin Factor for      Subse    uent Surveillances    (i ) 1)
The following equation is used for vertical-dome, hoop-wall, or hoop-dome tendon:
(Eq. 5)
F    F (i-1)  L (i 1)  x  N (i 1)
: 3. 0 NOMENCLATURE L              ~  initial lift-offforce        of surveillance tendon (kips)
                    ~  lift-off force    obtained at the    i-1 surveillance (kips)
                    =  lift-off force    during retensioning at the i-1 surveillance (kips)
                    = number  of hoop tendons tensioned prior to tensioning surveillance tendon
      .h
                    ~  total  number  of  hoop tendons n
v
                    ~ number  of vertical    tendons tensioned    prior to tensioning surveillance tendon N              ~  total  number  of vertical tendons in      one group nd              ~ number  of dome    tendons'n    one group tensioned    prior to tensioning surveillance tendon N
d
                    ~  total  number  of  dome  tendons
                    '= number of    effective wires or strands in surveillance wc tendon at  initial installation
                    ~ number  of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon at  ith surveillance N                number  of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon (i-1)          at i-1 surveillance N                number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon (i-1)        when retensioned during the i-1 surveillance S                  total elastic stress loss in        hoop tondons  during  initial h              tensioning (ksi) = 15.3 ksi SE
                    ~  total elastic stress loss in vertical        tendons during v              initial tensioning      (ksi)    6.6 ksi B-3
 
I ~
Revision  1
            = lift-off force  per wire or strand at    ith surveillance (kips)
F          ~ lift-off force  per wire or strand after retensioning at (i-1)  the  i-1 surveillance (kips)
N
            ~ normalized  lift-off force surveillance (kips) per wire or strand            i for the .th NF
            ~ normalizing factor for the    ith  surveillance NF
            ~ normalizing factor for the i-1 surveillance (i-1)
S            total elastic loss in  dome  tendons during initial E                                                ~ 14.7 ksi d        tensioning (ksi) due to one group
            ~ Poisson's ratio for concrete    ~  0.16 fpu        = minimum  specified ultimate strength of tendon wire or strand (ksi)
            ~ cross-sectional area of  one tendon    wire or strand (in 2 )
B-4
 
C APPENDIX C END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE FOR FLORIDA POWER  & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland 4 August 1977
 
I t'
      ~ ~
8 I ~
S TENDON NO.                        LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)          6 p~
0 4 0 Oooo    0 p                          oooo 4      pp
                    ~+ oopp          p pp                      00    oo      Goop g~  oop              pop                    opo                  poo pop                opp                  ooo                    pp oop oo                  Qo 0 o0 po 0          +                            pop          +          o o op                  poo                o                  ~    oooo ooo                ooo                  ooo                            'po ooo o              Pp                    opp                ooo pop 0                        ooopo ooppo o,o                                oooo o pp 0 popoo opo                                      0 Dq                                                    q0~
END ANCHORAGE A                          END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6    )                (CLOSEST BUTTRESS        6 TOP                                          BOTTOM.
CORROSION LEVEL                          CORROSION LEVEL
-            WASHER SUTTDNHSADS 2                          RASHER BUTTONHEADS SHOES                                    SHIMS            2 SEARING PLATE    1                      BEARING PLATE LEGEND:
BUTTONHEADS:                              CORROSION LEVELS:
8  OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD                      41  NO VISIBLE OX)DATION 0  BUTTONH EAD WITH SPUT                    02 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING 0  WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y                  030    s PlTTING 6 O.OQ3" DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED                0<O.OQ3"  < PITTING    a  OSOe" THIS SURVEILLANCE WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND 45 O.O06 s'ITTING      6  LolO TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RB      DATE 10-25 77 ENOANCHORAGE8      AH    DASE FIGURE FLORIDA POWER IIE LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCI EAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4.
POST.TEN SIONIN G SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION C-2                                  SHEET>OF 9
 
TENDON NO.                        l.OCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)            2 0
00000600Op C~ 0          0 00 0        0 Og                        Opppp OOOO 0+>000 000                000                    Opp                Opp u 000                  000              e                          000      (P pp
      ~
OOo, Pp o0 00O 0
                                      ~          ppp Op          +
Op Op 0 p 00                  000                    00 000                      pp Opp pg ~
ppp >                  000                pPPO z 00000 ppppP        0 Opppp        OpppO pp0 O'0 Op 0
          ~,oOOP
            /p0'g 0 0 00                                    0 END ANCHORAGE A                          END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS      2 )                .{CLOSEST BUTTRESS        2    )
TOP                                          BOTTOM.
CORROSION LEVEL                            CORROSION LEVEL WASHER          1 SUTTQHHEADS                                SUTTQHHEADS SHINS                                      SH QSS BEARING PLATE                              BEARING PLATE LEGEND:
BUTTONHEADS:                              CORROSION LEVELS:
0  OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD                        41  NO VISIBLE OXIDATION e  BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT                      02 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY                    030    E  PITTING 5 0.003 DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED                  4<o.oo3" < PITTING E o~os-K THIS SURVEILLANCE WIRE REMOVED FOR INSP'ECTION AND Oso.oos"  (  pITTING  5    o.ohio" TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY EHQ AHGHQR*GS A    RE    DATE    10-26-77 EHD AHQHQRAGE S    AH    DATE FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER SL LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TEN SIONIN G SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTlON C-3                                    SHEET2OF      9
 
1, TENDON NO.                        l.OCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) oopo opo                                    oo0 0 ~0 ~
ooooo OOOOO  ooo 0                        00000 ohio      oooo 000                ooo                    000                    OOO Ooo                00 0 0                pop                      000 po                                    o oop                      oo ooo                  000                                +
oo
                      +
                                                ~ OOOO 00 poo poo                  ppo                p 0                      ppo
        ~  PS.OO          poop                    000                  0000
          ~gpoopo                                      po 00 oooo      popo ~Y c  o 0 0        Op                          ooo p 0 cy~  p    oo<
0                                op          p END ANCHORAGE A                            END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4      )                .(CLOSEST BUTTRESS        4  )
TOP                                            BOTTOM CORROSION LEVEL                            CORROSION LEVEL RASHER            1 NASHER BUTTONHEADS                                BUTTONHEAOS SHINS            1                        SHOAT 2
SEARING PLATE                              BEARING PLATE LEGEND:
BUTTONHEADS:                                CORROSION LEVELS-0  OFF S1ZE BUTTONHEAD                        01  NO VISIBLE OXIDATION e  BUTTONHEAD WITH SPUT                      4'2 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING N!RE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY                    TT.3 0  (  PITTING 5 0.003" DlSCONTINUOUS VIIRE REMOVED                TEA 0.003  E  PITTlNG K OJ)otE K
THIS SURVEII.LANCE SIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTlON AND ISO.OOS" < PITTING        6  0.010" TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE NSPECTED BV NANCHORGAA ED            EEE      DATE ENO ANCHORAGE B      AR  DATE FIGURE    3 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TEN S IONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION c-4                                    SHEET3OF 9
 
TENDON NO.        LOSS                  LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) o p                                      ~~ o p OOoo POPO                                  ~bppp 0 OOOO e    OOOO          pppp                      < Opppp PPOOP
        / OPO                    ppo                      0OO                      OO Opp                      po                      pp                      OOO OP                      OO OO POO 0 O                            pp 0            +            0                                    +          OOO OOO ppp                            0 ppp OO                                              OO
        ~pop                        OOo              WQOO                            OOP z+oppQp OOOO                  400        0                Opp c
pp 0 QgOOOI O
QOOOPO          0              O    QOOOO            Opppp ppp 0                                OOP        OO v                                                          0      0 A~
END ANCHORAGE A                                  END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS        < )                  .tCLOSEST 8UTTR ESS            1  l.
CORROSION LEVEL                                CORROSION LEVEL BASHER            2                            VSASHER                2 BUTTOIIHSADS                                    BUTTONHSADS SHIIAS                                          WIMS BEARING PLATE                                  GEARING PLATE          2 LEGEND:
B~ONHEADS:                                    "
CORROSION LEVELS:
e  OFF SI2E BUTTONHEAD                            O4 NO VISIBLE 0"!DATfOTJ 6  SUTTONHEAD WITH SPLfT    ~
42 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PI~SNG WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY                        ~30 C P1TTING 6 0.003" DtSCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED                    Isf 4 0.003  4 PliT!N G K OANg K
THIS SURVEI LLANCE WlRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND-4'-5 0.006  s    PITTING  5  0.010-TESTIN G THIS SUR VEIL LAN CE fNSPECTED BY Rev. 1 END ANCHORAGE A      RS      DATE LL S TT September      8, 1978 ENDANCHORAGEB        AE      DATE LL l"tGtfRE 3
              ~1-~/s" FLORIDA POWER JE LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4
                                                                      ~ POST-TEN SIONIN G SYSTEM 5 thYEAR SURVEfl.LANCE END ANCHORAGE IN SP ECTtON A-A                      C-5                                      SHEET 4OF 9
 
\  f.
P
 
TENDON NO.                              l.OCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 0 0                                          oo        p oooo                                                opp pop o
                                      ~
e popo            go po,oo                                pp op p oooo              ppoo pop                ppp                                              opo-opo                    oop                    pop                      opp opp                      op                      p                        po pop                    o            +          opo Op                                            opp0                        0 p
        ~O 00                  'oo oo
                                                    ~pop  opp
                                                                              ~
po opp      ~
ooo                    ~8                        poop I5'                    op p
o                  0 p 0 oppo p p o opo
                                    ~                    o popo 0'g      0                                                p END ANCHORAGE A                                END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS      3                      .(CLOSESTBUTTRESS          6
                                        )                                                )
CORROSION LEVEL                                CORROSION LEVEL WASHER BUTTOMHEADS
* NASHER'UTTOMHEADS SHOES                                          SHIMS BEARING PLATE    1                            BEARING PLATE LEGEND:
BUTTONHEADS:                                  CORROSION LEVELS:
6  OFF.SIZE BUTTONHEAD                            41  NO VISIBLE OX)DATION e  BUTI'ONHEADWITH SPLIT                          02 VlSIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTlNG WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y                        030 C PITTING S, 0.003 DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVEO                      st 4 0.003  4  PITTING  ~  OA)06 THIS SURVEILLANCE llVIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION ANO 45 0.006    (  PITTING  5  L010 TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE Wircled Button      Heads Indicate Corrosion Level 82 INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A      RB    DATE END ANCHORAGE B    ~Q      DATE    ~~~                                  FIGURE  3 FI.ORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5 t+YKAR SURVEILLANCE ENO ANCHORAGE INSPECTION C-6                                        SHEET5OF 9
 
'I
  ~
 
        ~ ~
  ' ~ ~
I        E TENDON NO.'                        LOCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)        6 6 1 0 o                                    ~ 5P0 5y9 0
oooo      oooo ~~                  Q+ 0 op p'0 ppoo Oopp          oooo                        ooooo          poo 0 oop                000                    opp                  poo ooo                  000                00                        ooo oo                  00 0 0              oo                          oo
                ~  Ooo          +                                        +            o o Op                                      oop                          0 p ooo                  0                    op                      op ooo    w          oop                        ppp 000                                      ooo                  poop 0 OOOO OOOo 0O                            00000 ooo              o ooo00 000 0
oo ppp 0 0pp 0
END ANCHORAGE A                            END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS      6 )                .(CLOSEST BUTTR SS  f        1  )
CORROSION I.EVEL                          CORROSION LEVEL
-              RASHER SUTTONHEADE
                                .2                      NASHER SUTTONHEADE SHIMS            2                      SHIMS                2 BEARING PLATE    1                      BEARING PLATE        1 LEGEND:
BUTTONHEAOS:                              CORROSION LEVELS-0  OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAO                      41    NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 0  BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT                    02 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING 8  WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY                  TII'3 0  C PlTTING 6 0.003 DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED                w i L003,Q      PITTING 5 0406 THIS SURVEILLANCE VllRE REMOVEO FOR INSPECTION ANO 4'6  0.006 C PITTING    5    L010 TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A    RB    DATE END ANCHORAGE S          DATE FIGURE      3 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TEN SI  ON IN G SYSTEM 5 thYEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION C-7                                    SHEET 6OF
 
TENDON NO.    ~280                  I.OCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)        4 6 2 TP      3p]
          'poo    p opopo opp p p
oooo      e Q    po op pp 0
pop              ooo-                      ppo                  ooo ppo                opoo ~                  p~o                    pp o o 0 0o                                          oo (pp c)              ooo            +          o o poo                                        ppo0                      0 poo                ppP        CeI ppp                      pop opo poo              oooo                      poo                  poop 0popp oooop                                  po            popop
          ~  ppoooooo p p pp ppoop p p 0
                                                                    /
END ANCHORAGE A                              END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS    4                      .tCLOSEST 8UTTR ESS      2
                                      )                                              )
CORROSION LEVEL                              CORROSION LEVEL RASHER              2 BUITOHHEADS                                  BUTTON HEADS BRIMS                                        SHIMS SEARING PLATE    1                          BEARING PLATE LEGEND:
BUTTONHEADS:                                CORROSION LEVELS-9  OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD                          g1  NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 0  SUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT                        4'2 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING e  WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY                      430      C PlTTING 6 0.003 DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED                  TT i 0.003  4 PITTINQ K 0406 X
THIS SURVEILLANCE WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION ANO 4'5  L006 C PITTING      6  0 050 TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY
                      ~
EHD ANCHORAGE A ENOANCHORAGES      ~
DATE DATE    ~                                  FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5thYEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION C-8                                        SHEET7OF 9
 
~g TENDON NO.                            LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)          4 &  6 0 pop 4                                    0 PQP  0 oopp                                        oopp oppoo Qpp        poop <~                    oooo            p pp p
      ~ 0 op                    opo                  oop                    ppo    ~
oop                            d'po oop                      op oop o opp                                      oo 0 p              +          p p oopp                        QOQ ooo                        pop                                  ~
pp ooo                      ooo +              opp                      ppo pop .I                ooo                  popo 5 0 poppy opooo ~                            opppp                pp o op                            ig oooo oop        o o                          (~ 0 o p'a~
I
              ~
Og END ANCHORAGE A                              END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS        4 )                CLOSEST BUTTRESS          6 CORROSION LEVEI.                            CORROSION LEVEL WASHER              1                      NASHER              2 8UTTONHEADS                                  EUTTONHEADS SHIMS                2 BEARING PLATE                                BEARING PLATE        1 LEGEND:
BUVFONHEADS:                                CORROSION LEVELS-0  OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD                          TE 1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION e  BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT                        02 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING 0  SIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SUR V EI I.LANCE TT 30 44a003" C
45 0.006 0 PITTINQ 6 0.003
(  PITTINQ PITTINQ i
6 0SOe" LOIO X,  WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A              DATE END ANCHORAGE 8          AH  DATE FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PUQET UNIT 4 POST-TENS  IONIN G SYSTEM 5 th -YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION C-9                                      SHEETSOF 9
 
VEWOON NO.                        I.OCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 0o r F'g~
Opp Oppp                                          0    0 OOOO o OOOO opppo Opppp d                                OppP        0 OOP~
      ~<OOOO                Opp ~                ~    OOO                Opp C
      ~ OO  OO                PO 0 0                      OOOO                  Oppu PO ~
Opp                                            0                      o 0
                      +        OBO                  Opo Op                    OOO                  Op<0              ~
0 ppP 0000                000                                            Opp
      ~  000              pppp                        Oppp              pppp      ~
0 ppp        poop                            pppop        OPOOO OOOO ppp p 0                                    Op p pp OOO      0 p0 z
END ANCHORAGE A                              END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6      )                    .(CLOSEST BUTTR ESS          )
CORROSION LEVEL                              CORROSION LEVEL lVASHER          2                            VtASHER BUTTONHEADS                                  BUTTONHEADS SHIMS            2                          SHOAT BEAR ING PLATE                                BEARING PLATE LEGEND:
BUTTONHEADS:                                  CORROSION LEVELS 0  OFF SI2E BUTTONHEAD                            4'1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 6  BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT                          02 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTINQ
  ,  WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y                      430 C PITTING 6 0.003 DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED                    ~ 4 0.003 4 PITTINQ K OAOtB THIS SURVEILLANCE WIRE REMOVED FOR INSP'ECTlON AND OS 0.006  C  PITTINQ  6  L010 TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A    RB    DATE    11" 15-.77 END ANCHORAGE B    AH    DATE    11-15-77 FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTlON C-10 r                                      SHEET9OF 9
 
APPENDIX D WIRE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE FOR FLORIDA POWER  &  LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland November 1977
 
~DON NCL          34V29 10'-10" END      SAMPLE  It1 8  '-2" SAm'ZZ  4P2 125 128'7"                          ] 391 pll  ]4] I pll 143 l 7 ll SAM.ZZ  N                      SE1
~0 l 4 ll                                                            169'-8~1 CORROSION LEVEL gg  f1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION Q 42 VNIBLEOXIDATION,NO PITTING 0 ISO"< PITTING S O.au" g faaea-<        PITTING < aOO6" 0 45aOOe" <      PITTING < aeo" RGVRE 5 amcrao sr                                                    FLORIDA MYIER 5 LIGHT CO.
10-31-77                                      TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 MST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5 th YEAR SuRVKILLANCE MIRE INSPECTION L TENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS
                            ~ D-2                                    SHEETLOF  D
 
I~
TENOON NO.                          CLOSEST BUTTRESSES 166 10'-10" gg ENO      SAMPLE 81 60'-10" SAMPLE <P.
87 f 6$ ll 9  '""ver SmPLZ  fP3 TOTAL LEN'rm OF VnRE CORROSION LEVEl 01 NO VISIBLE OXIOATION 0 f2  VISIBLE OXIOATlON,NO PITTINQ 0 4i'O"C mnNe5 O.ea" 0 Sca.art C PITnNa < O.OOS" a 45aOO6"< rITnNS < aniO" INSPECTED  IY~~
OATE 11>> 11-78 FICURE 5 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.
TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE 4"  IUTTONHEAO                                              NlRE INSPECTION 4 TENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS SHEETS.OF  &
 
f
~ t
    ~
      ~
TENDON NO.                        CLOSEST BUTTRESSES 2@4 10'10" SAMPLZ 81 7Pt Ptt Supra,/f2 80'-10" 125'29'-7"
                                                  ]40f 3ll
                                                              ~
smrrz N TOTAL LENGTH OF YARE    140'3" CORROSION LEVEL:
Q 4'1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION Q 42.VISIBLE OXIDATION.NO PITTING Q 0'50 < PITTlNG 5 0.003 0 0aaaa" < PITTING < a006-0 f50.006"< PITTING < aa10-FIGURE 5 twmCrmSV      " t.                                    FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.
ATE 11-11-77                                    TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNiT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE IH.'. BUTTONHEAD                                            HIRE INSPECTION 4 TENSION SAMPLE I.OCATIONS SHEET  OF
 
I~
P
 
APPENDIX E SPECIFICATION FOR TENSILE TESTING OF POST-TENSIONING TENDON WIRE (ASTM A-421)
FOR FLORIDA POWER  & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland s,:      .-.8 Charles  W.
Yd .-.e~..)
Andrews June, 1977                                          Approved:
K. P. B chert Revision l., December 15, 1977                          Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Division E-1
 
I Revision 1 L 0  GENERAL This document specifies the general procedures which shall be used for the tensile testing or the 1/4"-diameter post-tensioning teadoa wires (AS'-421, Type BA). This document does aot relieve the testiag laboratory of the responsibility for conducting the tensile tests in a manner coasistend with the industry standards.
2 0  WORK INCLUDED Nine (9) L/4"-diameter wire specimens, approximately 10'-6" Long, wi11. be sent to the laboratory for testing in accordance with Section 3.0 Each of these specimens will have an identification tag attached close to one end; this tag will identify the tendon from which the wire was removed and the location of the specimen with resoect to the wire. Specimens shall be disposed of in accordance with Section 4.0 aad a report meeting the requi emeats of Section 5.0 shall be prepared.
3 0  TEST DESCRIPTION l
Tendon wires    shall be tested in accordance with AS'-421-65, "S~a-dard  Specification  for Uncoated Stress-Relieved Wire for P estressed Concrete",except that the gage length shall be 100 (+ 1.0) inches, instead of the 10 iaches as specified. This test shall inc'uae the followiag:
3~1  Measurement  of wire diameter with  an accuracy of + 0.0005".
3,2 Measurement of gage length with an accuracy of + 0.05"..
3.3 Application or aa    initial load  corresponding to 29,000 psi.
3.4 Applicatf.on of additional load to obtain the force correspondiag to 1.0 percent eWensioa.
3,5 Application of additional load and obtaining load at failure and elongation under load at fai1ure (+ 0.05") .
4,0  DISPOSAL OP  TES~ SPELLS A sampLe approximately 6" long oa each side of the break of each specimen shall be bouad and returned as a unit with the idaxtificatioa tag attached. Spec~    shall be returned to:
Bechtel Power Corporation Post Office Box 607 Gaithersburg, ~~land    20760 Atteation: Nr. M. Malcom Pro]ect Eaginee" E-2
 
t I Revision 1 Thx'ee (3) copies  of the report  on tendon  wire testing shall be submitted to:
Bechtel Power Corporation Post Office Box 607 Gaithexsbux'g, Maryland    20760 Attention. LLr. H. Nalcom Prospect Engineer The  report shall contain the follacrLng information:
5 1  Testing machine calibration report.
5.2 Wire identification.
5,3 Wix'e diameter (+ 0.0005 inches) .
5.4  Gage  length (+ 0.05 inches).
5.5  Force and, elongation (+ 0.001 inches)    at  initial load.
5,6  Porce and elongation (+ 0.01 inches)    at  17. extension.
5,7  Poxce and  elongation under load (+ 0.05 inches) at failure.
5.8  Location ofM.lure relative to the grip in the
(+ 0.005 inches).
                                                          ~g      head E-3
 
APPENDIX F SPECIFICATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING OF SHEATH  FILLER (VISCONORUST 2090P)
FOR FLORIDA POWER  & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland                                Charles  W. Andrews June, 1977                                        Approved:
K. P. Buchert Revision 1, December 15, 1977                          Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Division F  l
 
r 0
 
Revision  1 1 i0    GENERAL This document specifies the procedu es which shall be used for labora-tory testing of sheath filler Visconozust 2090P to determine:
a    The amount of water soluble chlorides, nitrates and sulfides which are leached from a given contact area between water and the sheath filler under standzad conditions.
b.. The water content      of the sheath  filler.
c    The resezve  alkalinity of the    sheath filler.
This document does not relieve the testing laboratory of responsi-b&ity for conducting the necessary laboratory tests in a manner ccasistent with the ~industry standards.
2 0    WORK INCLUDED Nine (9) ane-quart test samples will be sent to the laboratory for testing in accordance with Section 3.0. The concentration oz water soluble impurities and water in these samples wi.ll 1Dcely not exceed the follawing:
2 1    Chlorides - 10    ppm 2 2    Ni~tes -    10 ppm 2 3    Sulfides -  10 ppm 2 4    Water (H20)  -  107. Dry Weight A  report meeting the requirements of Section 4.0 shall        be prepared.
3 0    TEST DESCRY ZIONS
    , Each sample    of sheath    filler shall  be mixed and then tested as fol.laws:
3 1    Water Soluble Xmpurities A water extraction of each sample        of sheath fill.er shall  be made and tested as indicated below:
3 1 1  Usi.ng a  spatula, coat the inside (baton and sides) of a 1  liter  glass beaker with a 1/4-inch layer oz sheath filler.
3.l. 2 Pill the    beaker with  distilled  water at roam temperature.
3.1 3 Heat the wate        to a controlled tempe ature of <00op and maintain for four hours. Do not heat on a, hot plate.
Heat either in an oven or by use oz an ~ersion heater so that the water wi11 remain clear for tests.
F-2
 
r h
Revision  1 0              3.1 4 Run a blank on distiLLed water. Xf titrate, use a micro-buret, 1 ml or 5 ml, with 0.01 - 0.05 ml graduation inter-vals.
3 1 5  Decant water and analyze for soluble ions. Test only for salts in leached water. The water analyses shall be as follows:
3.1 5.1    Chlorides (Cl) by  ASTM  D-512.
3~1  5.2 iH.trate +03) by AS~ D-992, Bzucine Method or Cadminum  Reduction 'method by Hach Chemical Co.,
Ames'owai 3 1  5.3  Sulfides (S) 'by APHA (American PubLic Health Association) Standard method - Nethylene Blue-or the method by Hach Chemical Company, Ames, Xowao 3 2  Vvater Content Mater content (H20 as percent of dzy weight) shall be determined in accordance with ASM D-95.
3 3  Neutralization    Number Neutralization    number shaLL be determined  in  accordance with ASTM  D-664, 4 0 iEPORT Three copies of the report on Laboratory testing of the sheath        filler'hall be submitted  to:
BechteL Power Corporation Post Office Box 607 Gaithersburg, ~~Land      20760 Attention: Hr. H. Nalcom Project Bngineer The report shall contain the zollowing information:
Sample  identi cation.
4.2  Concentration of water soluble chlorides, nitrates and sulf.'des wi~4 an accuracy oz 0.1 ppm 4.3  Concentration oz water (H20) within an accuracy of 0.1 percent oz dry weight of the filler.
4.4 Neutralization number within an accuracy of 0.01 mg reagent per gram  of filler.
F-3
 
'V 0
 
~ ~
APPENDIX  G RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING OF WIRE SAPLES FOR FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 t
POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1978
 
      ~  t PSRLI A0T ACT~ PC qS5TINQ  (
cP,        'we  +y EF~
PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY CSTAOLISHCO ISO I 55                                                                                                PLEASE REPI-Y TOI e        t                    850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA. 15220                                        P, Oa IOX  ldAd
  'r
* NUTVAL FROTCCTION  TO CLICNT5, THC FVhLIC ANO OVRSCLVCS, AI,L RCFORT5            PITTSBURGH,    P A IStt'S d    ~I                    ARC SVSINTTCO A5 THC CONFIOCHTIAL FROFCRTT OF CLICHTS *HO AUTHORIZATION Z+              ++              FOR FVSLICATIOH OF STATCHCNTS, COHCLU5IOHS OR CXTRACTS FROM OR RCOAROIHO CQSAHOGT                                OVR RCI'ORT5 IS RCS CRT CO FCHOIHCI OVR INRITTCH A>FROVAL LABORATORY No.        781695 AREA COOE    A It  TELEPHONE Stt.5000 oRDER No. PG-6834 cLIENT's No.            P,O ~ No    65121 25833C                p  E  pQ May 15, 1978 Report    of:      Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon IAire Report    to. Florida              Power      6  Light      Company P.O. Box 3088 Florida City Florida                        33034 Attn. Mr. Feeney UNIT P4 Spec imen Iden        ti8 ica tion                                                        2D3  19-'1 Diameter, Inches                                                                          .2500 Original Area, Sq. Inches                                                                  .0491 Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI                                                  14004 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches                                                        .21 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds                                                              95600 Stress at 1% Extension, PSI,                                                              195,500 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches                                                        1.21 Load Pounds          at Fracture                                                          12,250 Stress PSI          at Fracture                                                          249,500 Elongation at Fracture, Inches                                                            4. 92 Elongation at Fracture, Percent                                                            4. 92%
Location of Fracture relative to grip in                                      the moving head 9" Samples          tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and                              ASSN A421,          Stress Strain Curves are attached.
SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY                  CLIPT        FOR      TESTING.
PAY    -ly ~cqp
 
I 20 X 20 TO THE INCH ~ 1 X anal.
10 INCIIKS H E-C  IIDIFFEI. a KSSCII CO. saoc a            46 1240
 
I f
 
1 FORM AOT ACY, F C g5TIHO
          ~
            ~+4<                      PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATQRY C ~O                                                      CSTASLISHCO 1441 PLKA5K RKPL,Y TOI 850 POPLAR STRKFT, PITTSBURGH, PA. 15220                                      Pe  0, BOX  IOAS AS A NUtUAI. FROTCCTIOH tO CLICH'15 ~ THC FUSI,IC AHO OVR5CLYC5, ALI RCI'ORT5 PI T T 5BU ROH, P A. 1525<
  ++  4    al                              ARC SVSMITTCO AS THC COHFIOCNTIAL FROFCRTT OF CLICHT5, *HO AUTHORIZATION C                                      FOR FVSLICATIOH OF STATCHCHTSa COHCLVSIOHS OR CXTRACT5 FRON OR RCCAROIHC
    ~+SAROC                                        OVR RCFORTS IS RCSCRYCO FCNOIHO OVR WRITTCN AFFROYAL, LABORATORY No.      781695 ARKA COOK 412        TKLKPHONK 922 4000 cLIENT's No. P.O                        No. 65121 "25833C oRDER No. PG-6834
                                    ~
R EP O R          T May 15, 1978 Report    of:      Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Mire Report    to: Florida              Power        6    Light    Company P.O. Box 3088 Florida City Florida                      33034 Attn . Hr. Feeney UN IT Specimen 1dentification,                                                                            2D3 $ 2 Diame ter', Inches                                                                                    . 2499 Original Area, Sq. Inches                                                                            . 049 Initial                  Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI                                          1400 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches                                                                  .18 Load at                  l%%u  Extension, Pounds                                                    10,150 Stress at 1% Extension, PSI                                                                        207,100 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches                                                                  1.18 Load Pounds                      at Fx'acture                                                        12,350 Stress PSI                      at Fracture                                                          2525000 Elongation at Fracture, Tnches                                                                      S.56 Elongation at Fracture, Percent                                                                    5.56%
Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head                                                          303->>
Samples tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment                      I dated      June 1977 and AS''f A421, Stress                              Stxain Curves are attached.'AHPLES SUBNITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTXNC.
G-4
 
1 20 X 20 TO THE INCH ~ 1 X IO INCIIES C KEUFFEI-0 XSSM CO. aaotausa,        46 1240 I ~
c
 
I 0
l
 
ol PORM ADT ACV. P 8 tt 5TI IIp (
PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY
  ~
I c              SaD                                              C5TASLISHCD 1441 ~
PLK ASK REPt.Y YO:
IL                                      050 POPLAR 5TREET. PITTS8URGH, PA. 15220                                    P Oo 8OX ISSS AS A HUTVAL tROTCCTIOH TO CLICNTS ~ THC tVSLIC AHD OURSCLYCS, ALL RCtORT5 PIT758URQH, P A  1525
              ~I                  ARC SUSHITTCD AS THC COHSIDCNTIAL tAOPCR'TY Dt CLICNTS, AHD AUTHORIZATIOH
(~SANO'"                  tOlt tVSLICATIOH Ot 5TATCHCNT5, CONCLUSIONS OR CX'TRACT5 TRON OR RCOARDIHO OVR RCtORTS 15 RCSCRYCD tCNDIHO OUR WRITTCH AttROYAI LABORATORY No. 781695 AREA COOK SIC          TELEPHONE    SCZ 4000 ORDER No. PG-6834 cLlENT's No          P.O. No. 65121-25833C May 15, 1978 Report      of:      Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon !lire Report      to: Florida                  Power      6  Light      Company P.O. Box 3088 Florida City Florida                            33034 Attn- Mr. Feeney UNIT 44 Specimen Iden        tif    ica tion                                                      2D3  t3
                                                                                                          .2500 Diameter, Inches Original Area, Sq. Inches                                                                    .0491 Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00.PSI                                                  1400 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches                                                          .20 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds                                                                10,250 at 1% Extension, PSI                  'tress 208,900 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches                                                          1.20 Load Pounds        at Fracture                                                            12,350 Stress PSI        at Fracture                                                              251,500 Elongation at Fracture, Inches                                                              5.53 Elongation at Fracture, Percent                                                              5.53%
Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head 3" Samples        tested in accordance with order no.                                      65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and                                ASTiif A421,          Stress Strain Curves are attached.,
E
          . SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTING.
G-6
 
I l
t l
 
20 X 20 TO THE INCH+ 7 X l0 INCHCS KCUFFCL a ESSEll CO. ~ioccwvsa. 46 1240 0
l ll Uj  li      8 R. TO (ted Y1 t    )I I      Il
                                                              ~ g
                                                                    ~ ~
I ~
ii
 
~ ~
FoAM SOT ACT. PC qgSTIIIG
(
IO P' PlTTSBURGH TESTING                                      t  ABORATORY 5 CI CSTARLISHCD 144  I SI                                                                                                        Pl EASE REPLY TOI 850 POPLAR STREET, PlYTSBURGH, PA. 15220                                        0  BOX 1040 If OI                                                                                                          Pe C
AS
* MUTU*L I'ROTCCTION TO CLICNTS ~ TNC PUIILIC AHD OUR5CLVCS ~ *LL RCPORT5 PITTSBIIRGH, P A, ISIS i+  <    rl    L+                            ARC 5USMITTCD A5 TNC CONFIOCNTIAI PROPCRTV OF CI,ICNT5, ANO AUTHORIZATION FOR PVSLICATION OP STATCMCNTS, CONCI.USIONS OR CXTRACT5 FROM OR RCOAROINO
        = ~+SANO<"                                          OVR RCPORTS I5 RC5CRVCO PCNOIHO OUR WRITTCN *PPROVAL, LA8ORATORY NO. 781695 AREA COOK CIA      TKI EPHONE 922.4000 oRDER No. PG  6834 CLJENT'> No'                          0 ~ No ~ 65121 25833C                pppQ Nay 15, 1978 Repor  t  o f:. Tension Test of Post<<Tensioning Tendon Hire Report    to. Florida              Power      6    Light    Company P.O. Box 3088 Florida City Florida                      33034 Attn- Mr. Feeney UNIT ~4 Spec imen Iden fica on              ti        ti                                                      34V29 $1 Diameter, Inches                                                                                        . 2499 Original Area, Sq. Inches                                                                                . 0491 Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI                                                              1400 Elongation at Initial Load, inches                                                                      .20 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds                                                                            9,850 Stress at 1% Extension, PSI                                                                              200,600 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches                                                                      1.20 Load Pounds                        at Fracture                                                          12,700 Stress PSI                        at Fracture                                                          258,700 Elongation at Fracture, Inches                                                                          4.87 Elongation at Fracture, Percent                                                                        4.87%
Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head                                                              3 II Samples                      tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment I,dated June 1977 and                                            ASTiaf    A421, Stress            Strain Curves are attached.'AMPLES SUBMITTED BY          CLIPT      FOR TESTWiG.
G-8
 
20 X 20 TO THE INCH>> 2 K IO INCHES f(uT>>
e~~
C  KEVFFEL 0 ESSEA CO. aiotssusA,    46 1240 gR iCt I
I I  )()e
 
~      ~
          ~  ~  ~
FORLI SOT ACT.iDC PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY C5TASLISHCD l44l                                Pl KASK RKPLT TOI 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBVRGH, PA. I5220                                  P 0, BOX I040 AS A NVTUAL RROfCCTION Td CLICNfS TNC FVSLIC  AND OVRSCLVCS, ALL RCFORT5      PITTSBURGH, PA    13230
                          *RC SVSNIfftd AS TNC CONIlIOCNTIAL FROFCRTT OI  CLICNTS, AND AVTNORIZATION CPS ANOC9            fOR FV4LICATION OI STATCNCNTS, CDNCLVSION5 OR  CXTRACTS SROH OR RCOAROINC OUR RCRORTS IS RCSCRVCO FCNOLNO OUR    WRITTCN ARFRDVAL LABORATORY NO. 781695 ARKA COOK 412      TKLKPHONK 922 4000 oRDER No. PQ 6834 cLIENT's No. P    0. No  65121"25833C              R EP O      RT lfay 15, 1978 Report  of:      Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Mire Report    to. Florida            Power      6c Light      Company P.OS Box 3088 Florida City Florida                      33034 Attn- Mr. Feeney UNIT 4    .
S pecimen    Identification                                                      34V29 g2 Diameter, Inches                                                                  .2498 Original Area,      Sq. Inches                                                    . 0490 Initial    Load,  Pounds      Equivalent 29,00 PSI                              1400 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches                                                .18 Load  at 1% Extension, Pounds                                                    10,650 Stxess at 1% Extension, PSI                                                      2173300 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches                                                1.18 Load Pounds at Fracture                                                          12,800 Stress PSI at Fractux'e                                                            261,200 Elongation at Fxacture, Inches                                                    4.51 Elongation at Fracture, Percent                                                  4.51%
Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head 6,63 Samples    tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment    I dated    June 1977 and ASTI( A421, Stress                          Strain Curves are attached.
SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY          CLIWT FOR TESTING.
 
20 X 20 TO TIIC INCH+ 7 X IO WCIIES .
f KEUFFEL 0 ESSEII CO. eaoElallSL      461240 aP i3('Y
 
'l
      ~        ~  ~
FORM AGT RCV oPO
    ~gcll I IIS 4 +>
PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY CI                                        CSTAdLISHCO $ 44$
D                                                                                          PLKASK RKPLT TOI 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA.. I5220                                Po O IIOX 1044 AS A NUTU*L RROTCCTION 'TO CLICNTS 'THC RUSLIC ANO OUR5CLVC5, AI.L REPORTS PIYTSSVRGH, PAe ISZ:
Gz          4                  ARE SUSMITTCO *5 THC CONFIDENTIAL RRORCRTV OR CLIENTS, ANO AVTHORIZATION IVOR RVSLICATION OR STATCNCNT5, GONCLVSION5 OR EXTRACTS TRON OR RCG*ROIHG
    ~+SANO C                              OUR RfPORTS IS RCSCRVCO tCNOIKC OUR WRITTEN ARRROV*L, LABORATORY NO. 781 695 ARKA COOK 41C    TKLKPHONK 922 4000 cLIENT's No. P          .0 ~ No. 65121 -25833C Nay 15, 1978 Report    of:      Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Hire Report    to. Florida            Power 6 Light Company P  .0. Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn. Mr.            Feeney UNIT 84 Specimen Identification                                                                34V29      Pr3 Diame ter, Inches                                                                      .2498 Original Area, Sq. Inches                                                              . 0490 Initial          Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI                                    1400 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches                                                    .31 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds                                                          10,050 Stress at 1% Extension, PSI                                                            205,100 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches                                                    1.31 Load Pounds at Fracture                                                                12,700 Stress PSI at Fracture                                                                259,200 Elongation at Fracture, Inches                                                        4.59 Elongation at Fracture, Percent                                                        4. 59%
Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head 37.0 Samples          tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment I'dated'une 1977 and ASTif A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.
SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTING.
G-12
 
l 20 X 20 TO THE INCII~ 7 X IO INCIIES f ~E oE- KKUFFEI 8r ESSSII CO. IIADCIWIISA    46 1240
 
FORAI SOT ACV. PC
      ~g5TIHG VI F'ITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY Sa                                          CSZASI ISNCD 144  ~
Pl EASE REPLY 'TOI t                    850.POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA. IS220                                    P. Oi 8OX 1444 AS
* HU'TUAL tROTCCTION TO CLICN'f5, TNC I'U41 IC AND OURSCLVCS, ALI, RCFORT5      PIT TS8URG II, P A  15200 C    sl L+              ARC SUSHITTCD AS THC CONFIDCHTIAL tROFCRTY Ot OLICNTS, AND AUTHORIZATION
  +~                        FOR tUSLICATION Ot STATCHCNTS. CONCLUSIONS OR CXTRACT5 FROW OR RCCARDIHC
    ~+SANO<+                          OUR RCFORT5 15 RCSCRVCO FCNDINC OUR WRITTCN AttROVAI LABORATORY No. 781695 AREA CODE 412      TELEPIIONE 022 4000 oRDER No. PG-6834 cLIENT'B No-      P.O. No. 65121-25833C May 15, 1978 Report    of:      Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon t4ire Report to'.        Florida        Power &          Light    Company P.O. Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn:        Mx'. Feeney UNIT Specimen Identification                                                                    42H80 Tll Diame tex', Inches                                                                          . 2502 Original Area, Sq. 'Inches
                ~
                                                                                                    . 0492 I
                                      ~
Initial      Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PS
                                                  ~
1400 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches
                      ~            ~
                                                                                                    .19 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds                                                                10,150 Stress at 1% Extension, PSI                                                                206,300 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches                                                        1.19 Load Pounds at Fracture                                                                    12,200 Stress PSI at Fractuxe                                                                      247,9SO Elongation at Fracture, Inches                                                            5.42 Elongation at Fracture, Percent                                                            5.42%
Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head 37.5 Samples        tested in accordance with order no.                                65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and                          ASTiaf    A421, Stress            Strain  Curves are attached.
SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTING.
PITTSB          GH TES      ING LA ORATORY Earl Gallagher, Manag er cc.      3- client                                    Physical Testing Department Attn.'Mr.      Feeney lcc
 
X 2D TO THE INCH ~ 7 X        IIICIISS HE 2D KKUFF CI. IS fSSEII CO. <lao<
IO weSA        46 1240 Ie
 
I (,
4 FORD SOT 4 CV,-P C
          ~gSIIIIC ~
f Ch
                          ~
PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY 4n                0                                            C@TASLISHCO I44I 4 CS Sl                                                                                          PI.KASK REPLY TOI 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTS8URGH, PA. 15220                                P O OOX 1440 PIT TSSURCH, P  Aa IS200 AS A NVTUAL tROTCCTION TO CLICNTS, TNC tUSLIC ANO OURSCLVCS, ALL RCtORTS
                      +              ARC SUSHITTCO A5 TNC CONf IOCNTIAL tROtCRTY Of'LICNT5, ANO AUTHORIZATION r      4Ch fPS A>0 C+                                                                          f fOR tUSLICATIOH Ot STATCI4CNT5, COHCLVSIOHS OR CXTRACTS RQII OR RCOAROIHO OVR RCtORTS IS RCSCRVCO tCNOIHO OVR WRITTCN AttROVAL, LASORATORY No. 781695
                                                        *RKA COOK AI2      TELEPHONE 922 4000 QRDER No. PG-6834 cUENT's No              P.O ~ No. 65121-25833C                  pEp~
May 15, 1978 Report      of:      Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Mire Report      to. Florida            Power      6  Light      Company P.OS Box 3088 Florida City F1orida                    33034 Attn: Nt:. Feeney UNIT 84 tification
'            .Specimen Iden Diameter, inches Original Area, Sq. Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI Elongation .at Initial Load, Inches 42H80 $ 2
                                                                                                        .2502
                                                                                                        . 0492 1400
                                                                                                        .19 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds                                                            10,300 Stress at 1% Extensions PSI                                                            209,350 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches                                                      1.19 Load Pounds            at Fracture                                                      12,200 Stress PSI          at Fracture                                                        247,950 Elongation at Fracture', Inches                                                        5'49 Elongation at Fracture, Percent                                                        5.49%
Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head At                                              Jaw
            .Samples          tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment          I dated      June 1977 and ASKS A421, Stress                          Strain Curves are attached.
I SAMPLES SUBNITTED BY                  CLIPT        FOR TESTING.
G-16
 
f 20 X 20 TO TIIE INCH ~ 7 X 10 INCIIES HE
~E KEUFFEL 0 ESSEA CO. >woe w USA.      46 1240 Il<
I Q I
il Hi>/
I~I +
 
r FOAM AQT ACV.+PC gg5TIIIQ
&I r"                    PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY C5TASLI5HCO  f&df PLEASK REPLY TOI 850 POPLAR STREET, PlTTS8URGH, PA. 15220                                    Po 0 BOX f444 t~                        AS
* HUTVAL FROTCCTION  TO CLICHTSi THC FV&LIC AHO OVRSCLVC&o ALI RCFOIIT5 PITTSBUROH, P A IS22
  <r  'C        A'+~          AltC SU&NITTCD AS THC CONFIOCHTI*L FROFCIITY OF CLICNTS, AHO AUTHORIZATION 44SANOO~              FOR Ftl&LICATION OF 5TATCNCNT5, CONCI.USIONS Olt CXTRACTS FROM Olt RCCAItDIHO OUR RCFORTS IS IICSCRYCO FCNOIHC OVlt WRITTCH AFFIIOVAI, L'ASORATORY No. 781695 AREA COOK &12    TELEPHONE 922-&000 oRDaR No. PQ-6834 cuaNT's No            P.O. No. 65121-2S833C May 15, 1978 Report    of- Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon t0ire Report      to. Florida            Power      6  Light      Company P.O. Box 3088 Florida City Florida                      33034 Attn. Mr. Feeney UNIT    Pr4 Specimen Identification                                                            42H80      f3 Diame ter; Inches                                                                  .2504 Original Area, Sq. Inches                                                          . 0492 Initial    Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PS                        I            1400 Elongati.on at    Initial Load,              Inches                                .21 Load    at 1% Extension, Pounds                                                  10,150 Stress at 1% Extension, PSI                                                        206,300 Elongation at,1% Extension, Inches                                                1.21 Load Pounds at Fracture                                                            12,150 Stress PSI at Fracture                                                            246,950 Elongation at Fracture, Inches                                                      4. 72 Elongation at Fracture, Percent                                                    4. 72%
Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head                                          3 II Samples    tested in accordance with order no- 65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and                      ASTN A421,            Stress Strain Curves are attached.
SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY            CLIPT        FOR    TESTING.
G-18
 
I f(+M 20 X 20 TO THE INCH ~ 2 X IO INCIIES C KEUFFCL A ESSElt CO. saaocwvta.      46 1240 P


HE 2D X 2D TO THE INCH~7 X IO IIICIISS KKUF F CI.IS f SSEII CO.<lao<w e S A 46 1240 Ie I (,
4~gSIIIIC~Ch 4n f 0~4 CS Sl 4Ch+r fPS A>0 C+FORD SOT 4 CV,-P C PI.KASK REPLY TOI P O OOX 1440 PIT TSSURCH, P Aa IS200 AS A NVTUAL tROTCCTION TO CLICNTS, TNC tUSLIC ANO OURSCLVCS, ALL RCtORTS ARC SUSHITTCO A5 TNC CONf IOCNTIAL tROtCRTY Of'LICNT5, ANO AUTHORIZATION fOR tUSLICATIOH Ot STATCI4CNT5, COHCLVSIOHS OR CXTRACTS f RQII OR RCOAROIHO OVR RCtORTS IS RCSCRVCO tCNOIHO OVR WRITTCN AttROVAL, LASORATORY No.781695*RKA COOK AI2 TELEPHONE 922 4000 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY C@TASLISHCO I44I 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTS8URGH, PA.15220 cUENT's No P.O~No.65121-25833C p E p~QRDER No.PG-6834 May 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Mire Report to.Florida Power 6 Light Company P.OS Box 3088 Florida City F1orida 33034 Attn: Nt:.Feeney UNIT 84'.Specimen Iden tif ication Diameter, inches Original Area, Sq.Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI Elongation.at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1%Extension, Pounds Stress at 1%Extensions PSI Elongation at 1%Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture', Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip in the 42H80$2.2502.0492 1400.19 10,300 209,350 1.19 12,200 247,950 5'49 5.49%moving head At Jaw.Samples tested in accordance with order no.65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASKS A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.I SAMPLES SUBNITTED BY CLIPT FOR TESTING.G-16 f
20 X 20 TO TIIE INCH~7 X 10 INCIIES HE~E KEUFFEL 0 ESSEA CO.>woe w USA.46 1240Il<I Q I il Hi>/I~I+
r gg5TIIIQ&I r" t~<r'C A'+~44SANOO~FOAM AQT ACV.+PC PLEASK REPLY TOI Po 0 BOX f444 PITTSBUROH, P A IS22 AS*HUTVAL FROTCCTION TO CLICHTSi THC FV&LIC AHO OVRSCLVC&o ALI RCFOIIT5 AltC SU&NITTCD AS THC CONFIOCHTI*L FROFCIITY OF CLICNTS, AHO AUTHORIZATION FOR Ftl&LICATION OF 5TATCNCNT5, CONCI.USIONS Olt CXTRACTS FROM Olt RCCAItDIHO OUR RCFORTS IS IICSCRYCO FCNOIHC OVlt WRITTCH AFFIIOVAI, L'ASORATORY No.AREA COOK&12 TELEPHONE 922-&000 781695 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY C5TASLI5HCO f&df 850 POPLAR STREET, PlTTS8URGH, PA.15220 cuaNT's No P.O.No.65121-2S833C oRDaR No.PQ-6834 May 15, 1978 Report of-Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon t0ire Report to.Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O.Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn.Mr.Feeney UNIT Pr4 Specimen Identification Diame ter;Inches Original Area, Sq.Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 Elongati.on at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1%Extension, Pounds Stress at 1%Extension, PSI Elongation at,1%Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip 42H80 f3.2504.0492 PS I 1400.21 10,150 206,300 1.21 12,150 246,950 4.72 4.72%in the moving head 3 II Samples tested in accordance with order no-65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASTN A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIPT FOR TESTING.G-18 I
f(+M 20 X 20 TO THE INCH~2 X IO INCIIES C KEUFFCL A ESSElt CO.saaocwvta.
46 1240 P
(~
(~
APPENDIX H RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER FOR FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT-COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTHf FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1978 I  
APPENDIX H RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATH   FILLER FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT-COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTHf FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1978
~qf el~gg'y~'~Cgg l I Sr CLIENT's No.P~0~65121-25833C REPORT December 16, 1977 ORDER No.FlTT'S BURGH T~STIIIC~LAB&RA.TORY CSTASI ISHCO I 44 I 850 POPLAR STREET.PITTSBURGH
 
~PA.$5220 AS A HU'TUAL I'ROT CCTIOH TO CLICHTS~THC~LlULIC AIIO OIIRSC'LVCS ALL RCI'ORTS ARC SUSillf'ICO AS THC CONfihfNTIAL I'RORCAff OR CLICI TS, AHO AUTHORITA'TION f OR RUSLICATIOH Of TAICHLNT<.
I Foliil AOT ACV  IiC
CONCLUSIONS OR LXTRACTS TROD Oh RCC AROINO OUR RCfORTS IS RCSCRVCO PCHOINI'UR WNITTCN Al'll\OVAL LABORATORY AREA COOE A l2 TELEPHONE 922-4000 Foliil AOT ACV IiC PLEASE PEPI./TO P.O.eor WCS PITTSOVPGH.
  'y~qf el~gg
PA.IS200 78167$to 781682 PG-683LAnal ys i s,of".Specification:
  ~
G'R EASE r Attachment iX-Specification For LaboIatory Toatin~of.heath Filler (Visco loru~st 2090P)For 3'"'oI ida)o'fleir 6.Ligihl i'om a!1" Turkey Vo int Nu clear Plant Unit+Post-'Tensicning System Fifth-Year Survei'lance SubMittod by: Reported to: Florida Power Ec LiEbt Company Florida Po!-er 8: Light Cor!pany Cons ruct on:earshot 3e P;0~Pox 30GG Florida City, Flcrj.da 3303l~l.'ater Soluble Chloride'(D-512)
            '~Cgg FlTT'S BURGH T~STIIIC~ LAB&RA.TORY l                                                            CSTASI ISHCO I 44 I I                                                                                                                  PLEASE PEPI.    / TO Sr                                  850 POPLAR STREET. PITTSBURGH PA.                     ~      $ 5220           P. O. eor    WCS AS A HU'TUAL I'ROT CCTIOH TO CLICHTS ~ THC ~ LlULIC AIIO OIIRSC'LVCS ALL RCI'ORTS PITTSOVPGH. PA. IS200 ARC SUSillf'ICO AS THC CONfihfNTIAL I'RORCAff OR CLICI TS, AHO AUTHORITA'TION f OR RUSLICATIOH Of TAICHLNT<. CONCLUSIONS OR LXTRACTS TROD Oh RCC AROINO OUR RCfORTS IS RCSCRVCO PCHOINI'UR WNITTCN Al'll\OVAL                         78167$ to LABORATORY   781682 AREA COOE   A l2       TELEPHONE 922-4000 ORDER No.      PG-683L CLIENT's No. P ~ 0 ~    65121 -25833C                      REPORT December 16, 1977 Anal ys s,of".i                                  G'R EASE Specification:                                    Attachment iX - Specification For r
Spe cifi cation Requiremonts 1D-28 ,2D<<3 3D-28 62H38 lgHSO 6h.l7o 12V29 34V29 56V29 r Loss Less Less Less Les Les" Le.s Loss Less Than Than Than Than Than Than Than Than Than~5 ppm l 5 PPi"1~5 ppm~Q PPIQ~5 ppm~5 ppm~5 ppm~5 PPI!1 l5 ppm 10 hax, 10 Hax.10 Hax.10?lax, 10 hax.10 A~ia.x, 10 Pox 10 Hax, 10 Yax..Vater Soluble Nitrate (D-992)1D-28 2D-3 3D-28 62H38$8<80 6JPr7o~12V29 3LV29 56V29 Less Less Les Less Less Le..s Lt ss Less Le s Than Than Th an Than Than Than Than'!"nan Than.2 ppm~2 pram.2 ppm>~2 ppm~2 ppll1~-ppm~2 Q Tm~ppm~2 ppm 10 Y.ax.10 Hax.10 llax.10 lfax.10 lfax.10 l ax.10 I~lax.10 ltaz.10 Yiax.H-2 I I 0 gesTING (-(e e er~F r, V (+SARO<" cIJENT's No.P~0~65121-258330 AREA COOE 412 TELEPHONE 922 4000 REPORT December 16, 1977 LABORATORY ORDER No.PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY CSTASLI4H CO I~41 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTS8URGH, PA.15220 AS A elUTUAL FROTCCTION TO CLICHTS, THC FUSLIC ANU OURSCLVCS, ALL RCFORTS ARC SUSHITTI'0 AS THC CONFIOCNTIAL I'ROI'I'RTV Ol'LICHTS, AHO AUTHORIZATION FOR I'U4LICATION OF STATCHCHTS, CONCLUSIONS OR CAIRACTS FROM OR HCCAROINC OUII RCFORTS IS RCSCRVLU FCHOINC OUR WRITTCN AFI'ROYAL, POSM AOT 1CV rPO PLEASE REPLY Tol p.o.nox Ieie PITTSOURGH.
LaboIatory Toatin~ of .heath Filler           (Visco loru~st 2090P)
P A.15220 78167'o No.781682 Pa-683/Mater Soluble Sulf'ice (ApA)Specie'i ca tion~Re ninemenes ID-28 2D w3 3D-28 62H38'll270 12V29 5)v29 Less Less Less Less Less Leis Less Less Less Than Than Than Than Than Than Than Than Than~1 ppm~1 ppm.1 ppm~1 ppm 1 ppm~1 pplll~1 p pI7I~1 ppm~1 ppm 10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.ID-28 2D-3 3D-28 62H38 2H80 1Pi70 12V29 5(v29 ID-28 2D-3 3D-28 62238)4H70 12V29 5tv29 Mater (D95)Less Than.1+0 Less Than Less Than.l.;0 Less Than..lg Less Than.1'f~Less Than, lg Less Than.lg Less Than.1;0 Less Than.3.fo Neutralization
For     3'"   'oI ida ) o'fleir 6. Ligihli'om a!1" Turkey Vo int Nu clear Plant Unit +
~~(D-66).07 mg/KOH/q.03 mg/KOH/g ,.03 mg/KOH/g t.lo mg/KOH/g~11 mg/KOH/g.15 mg/KOH/g.25 mg/KoH/g~11 mg/KOH,'g.11 mg/KOH/g 10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.10 Max.  
Post-'Tensicning System Fifth-Year Survei'lance SubMittod by:                                     Florida Power LiEbt Company Ec Reported to:                                      Florida Po!-er 8: Light Cor!pany Cons ruct on:earshot 3e P; 0 Pox 30GG
                                                                ~
Florida City, Flcrj.da 3303l~
l.'ater Soluble Chloride'(D-512)
Spe   cification Requiremonts 1D-28                       Loss      Than 5 ppm  ~                                10  hax,
                ,2D<<3                       Less       Than l 5 PPi"1                               10  Hax.
3D-28                        Less      Than 5 ppm   ~                                 10  Hax.
62H38                      Less      Than Q PPIQ ~                                 10  ?lax, lgHSO                      Les      Than 5 ppm   ~                                 10   hax.
6h.l7o                      Les"      Than 5 ppm  ~                                  10   A~ia.x, 12V29                        Le. s    Than 5 ppm  ~                                10   Pox 34V29                        Loss      Than 5 PPI!1 ~                                10   Hax, 56V29 r
Less      Than l5 ppm                                    10   Yax..
Vater Soluble Nitrate         (D-992) 1D-28                       Less Than .2 ppm                                        10  Y.ax.
2D-3                         Less Than 2 pram      ~                                  10  Hax.
3D-28                       Les       Th an       .2     ppm>                        10  llax.
62H38                        Less      Than      ~   2 ppm                           10  lfax.
                $ 8<80                      Less      Than        ~   2 ppll1                       10   lfax.
6JPr7o                      Le..s    Than        ~    - ppm                        10   l ax.
              ~
12V29                        Lt ss    Than        ~  2 Q Tm                        10   I~lax.
3LV29                        Less      '!"nan ~ ppm                                  10   ltaz.
56V29                        Le s Than ~ 2 ppm                                        10   Yiax.
H-2
 
I I
 
0 gesTING                                                                                                           POSM AOT 1CV rPO
(
PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY
-(e                                                                 CSTASLI4H CO I ~ 41 PLEASE REPLY Tol e
850 POPLAR STREET, PITTS8URGH, PA. 15220                                 p. o. nox Ieie er                              AS A elUTUAL FROTCCTION TO CLICHTS, THC FUSLIC ANU OURSCLVCS, ALL RCFORTS PITTSOURGH. P A. 15220 r,                  ARC SUSHITTI'0 AS THC CONFIOCNTIAL I'ROI'I'RTV Ol'LICHTS, AHO AUTHORIZATION 78167'o
        ~F V
(+SARO<"                      FOR I'U4LICATION OF STATCHCHTS, CONCLUSIONS OR CAIRACTS FROM OR HCCAROINC OUII RCFORTS IS RCSCRVLU FCHOINC OUR WRITTCN AFI'ROYAL, LABORATORY No. 781682 AREA COOE 412    TELEPHONE 922 4000 cIJENT's No. P ~ 0 ~            65121-258330 ORDER No.     Pa-683/
REPORT December 16, 1977 Mater Soluble                                 Specie'i ca tion Sulf'ice       (ApA)                         ~Re   ninemenes ID-28                           Less     Than 1 ppm
                                                                        ~                             10  Max.
2D w3                          Less    Than 1 ppm~                             10   Max.
3D-28                            Less    Than .1 ppm                              10   Max.
Less    Than ~ 1 ppm                            10   Max.
62H38'll270                    Less    Than 1 ppm                              10   Max.
Leis Than 1 pplll  ~                              10   Max.
12V29                            Less Than 1 p pI7I ~                              10   Max.
Less Than 1 ppm    ~                              10   Max.
5)v29                            Less Than 1 ppm  ~                              10   Max.
Mater (D95)
ID-28                           Less     Than .1+0                               10 Max.
2D-3                            Less     Than                                     10 Max.
3D-28                            Less     Than .l.;0                               10 Max.
62H38                            Less     Than..lg                                 10 Max.
2H80                        Less     Than .1'f~                               10 Max.
1Pi70                        Less     Than, lg                                 10 Max.
12V29                            Less     Than .lg                                 10 Max.
Less     Than .1;0                               10 Max.
5(v29                          Less     Than .3.fo                               10 Max.
Neutralization               ~~   (D-66   )
ID-28                            .07 mg/KOH/q 2D-3                            .03 mg/KOH/g 3D-28                          ,.03 mg/KOH/g 62238                          t.lo     mg/KOH/g
                                                    ~ 11 mg/KOH/g
                    )4H70                            .15 mg/KOH/g 12V29                            .25 mg/KoH/g
                                                    ~ 11 mg/KOH,'g 5tv29                            .11 mg/KOH/g
 
FORLI SOT RCV. ff 0 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY      CSTASLISHCD ISSI PLEASE REPLY TOI 850 POPLAR STREET,.PITTSBURGH, PA. 15220                                    Po Oo TIOX  l606 PIT TSDURGH, P A. ISZ00 AS A %IVTUAI I'ROTCCTIOH TO CLICHTS, THC PVSLIC AHD OVRSCLVCS, ALL RCI'ORTS ARC SVSNITTCD AS THC CONf IDCNTIAI I'ROf CRTT OF CLICHTS, AHD AUTMORIXATIOH f
fOR FUSLICATION Of STATCNCNTS, CUHCLVSIOHS OR CXTRACTS NOH OR RCOARDIHO OVR RCfORTS IS NCSCRVCD FCNDINC OUII WRITTCH    AftROVAL, LABoRAToRY No. f 010  ILf. Uo ARKA CODE SIC      TEI EPHONK 022-1000 oROER No.
CLIENT's No. P 0 ~ 65121 -25833C                                                                          PG 6831 REPORT December 16, 1977 The above samples          comply'with the specif'ication requirements.
The above r'eported values f.'or water soluble ions are correct jn that no chloride, nitrate or sulf'fi.te werehave                          f'ound. Had these ions been questionable been present the analytical accuracy                          would duc to the crude leachinp procedure                        requirement            by the speciAication.
PXTTSBUHGH Ti.STING +BOBCAT Ro ert J King
                                              .Manager~'chemi                1  Department 2-Client Attn:    H. L. Blocker 1-P TL-Tampa pd 0
H-4
 
7 0                                      APPENDIX I TESTING MACHINE CALIBRATION REPORT FOR FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1978
 
t S
      ~  ~
S'        \  ~
PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY qgsTltrs                                            SSTASC ISN'Sl  lOll PITTSBURGH. PA.
AS A MUTUAL SeROTCCTSON TO Ct.ICNTS, TNC FVSt.lC ANQ OURSSLertse ALL RtteORTS ARC SUSMITTSD AS TNC CONI IDCNT)AL FROFCRTT OR CLISNTSe ANO AVTNORIZATlCN    FILE Hoe Fait FUSt,lCATlON OF STATSMCNTS CQNCt.VSIONO Olt CXTRACTS FROM Olt ItSCAROIN4 OVlt RCFORTS IS RSSSRVSO FCNDINC OUlt WRITTKN AFFROVALe CLIENT'5 Ho.
rp c AS Aitu C~
TESTING MACHINE CALIBRATION REPQ PT DATE      Nov. 25, 1977 MACHINE IDENTlF1CAT1 ON OWNERs                PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORA 0 Y l.OCAT IOHs 1IANUFACTURERs Tinius olsen                                            SFRIAL NULIBER,  69069    PTL S/N 217 TYPEs                  Hydraulic CALIBRAT1ON APPARATUS DATA Method, of verification is in accordance with "Methods of Yerification of Testing Machines" A.S.Thl. Specification E447T.
TYPE OF APPARATUS USEDs Proving Rings IAHUF ACTUR ER s                    Morehouse APPARATUS VERIFIED BYs                National Standards Laborato APPARATUS VERIFIED IH ACCORDAHCE WITHs SERIAL NUMBER                              LOADING RAHGE                              VER IF ICATION DATE 3258                                                          10,000                      ll/18/76 10 000              100 000                        11/17/76 4656                                  100,000      -    1,000,000                        5/7/75 R  ESULTS MACHINE RANGE                                              LOADING RANGE WITHIH            PERCENT 0- 60,000                                                            1,000    60,000 0-  600 000 lOO,OOO  l,OOO,OOO The aboTO wrlftcatton shows this mochine compiles with the ro~cemonts of the specifications within the Ioatflng tangos shown aboTee TI 2        PITTS  'H Respectfully submitted, T T          LABO      TORY
 
0
    ~                                                                                                                          Form 60 8 PITTSBLJRGH TESTING LABORATORY
          ~
        ~    >>      I I                    ~
EST    III' "S    E9+
CSTASLISHCD ISO I PITTSBURGH, PA.
ORDER NO, AS
* HVTVAL SkOTtCTION TO CLItHTSI THC SUSLIC AND DUNS CLYCS ALL kCPOkTS AkC SUSHITTCO AS THC COHPIOCNTIAL fkoktkTT OI>> CLICHTS, AND AUTHOCIZATION
                                  /Ok SUULICATION Ok STATCHCHTS, CONCLUSIONS Oll CXTkACTS fkOH Oll kCO*kDIHO S                    OUk ktkokTS IS kCSCNVCD SCNDINO OVII WklTTCN AkkkOVAl L>>                                                                                        CLIENT'S No.
E~SAHOCT TESTI NG MACHI NE CALIB RATI ON DATA MANUFACT UR ER                          CAPACITY                    SERIAL NO.                    DATE Tinius Olsen                      1,200,000              Ib. 69069 PTL      S/i'17          11/25/77 LOCATION Pittsbur    h  Testin      Laboratory 850  Poplar Street Pittsburgh,    PA    15220 MACHINE                  PROVING RING                MACHINE ERROR READ ING                    READING                                                              REMARKS lb.                      lb.                  lb.
1 000                                                                            60,000 Pound Range 5  028.5              -28.5          -0. 5 10 000 15 000                14    24                +76            +0.51 30,000                                        +208            +0.70 45 000                44 788                                  +0.47 60,000                59 749                                  +0.42 120 000 Pound Ran e 10,000                10,084                                  -0.83
  "--3 000                        29,961                  +39            +0. 13
--50            000            49 956                  +44            +0. 09
            -70  000              70 116                  -116            -0.17 90 000                90,509                  -509            -0.56
  .    -99 000                    99 654                  -654            -0.66 600 000 Pound        R 50,000                50 337                  -337            -0. 67 100,000                        830                +170            +0. 17 200,000                                          +1097          +0.55 0                299 495                                  +0. 17 400,000                399,480                                  +0. 13 497 506                  +2494          +0. 50 00              5 991                +4009              ~  7 OI IRGH ~il'.4C
                                                                                                                ~n L.A  RATOB.Y
 
t r
          ~  iA5    .    'a.
PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY qIQTIIIC (                                                    CSTASLISHCO ISS'I OROER HO.
                                                              ~
P!TTSBURGH, PA.
AS A IIUTVAI, ~ IIOTCCTIOH TO CLICNTS ~ TNC WSI IC AHO OUSSCLVCS, ALL IICSOIITS 5  O        AIIC SVSHITTCO AS TNC COHflOCNTIAL fIIOfCIITT Of CLICNTS, AHO AUTHOlllZATIOK 1 OH WSLICATION Of STATCNCNTS, COHCI USIOHS Oll CXTIIACTS flIOH Oll lltCASDINO
$1                    ~V  +l                                              f                      f OVII IICfOIITS IS IICSClIVCO CNOINO OUII WIIITTCN Af IIOVAL Wp
  <i  '+C          Lt aS'+~
4l                                                                                          CI.IEHT'5 HO.
r 45AHOC TES Tl N 0          PAACH N E    1        CA L1B RAT10 8 DATA QAXUFACTURER                                  CAPACITY                    SERIAL HO.                      DATE Tinius Olse'n                                        15200,000                      69069      PTL S/N 21            11/25/77 I  OCATIOH PTTTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY 850 POPLAR STREET PITTSBURGH, PA 15220 MACHINE                  PROVING RING                  MACHINE ERROR REAO IXG                    REAOIHG                                                                    REMARKS lb.                        lb.                    lb.
1,200,000 Pound Range 100,000                      99,910                  +90            +0.09 300,000                      298,266                  +1734          +0.58 500 000                      498 302                  +1698          +0.34 00,000                    699 466                  +534            +0. 08 900,000                      896,991                  +3009          +0.34 1,000,000                        995,984                    +4106          +0.41


PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY CSTASLISHCD ISSI 850 POPLAR STREET,.PITTSBURGH, PA.15220 AS A%IVTUAI I'ROTCCTIOH TO CLICHTS, THC PVSLIC AHD OVRSCLVCS, ALL RCI'ORTS ARC SVSNITTCD AS THC CONf IDCNTIAI I'ROf CRTT OF CLICHTS, AHD AUTMORIXATIOH fOR FUSLICATION Of STATCNCNTS, CUHCLVSIOHS OR CXTRACTS f NOH OR RCOARDIHO FORLI SOT RCV.ff 0 PLEASE REPLY TOI Po Oo TIOX l606 PIT TSDURGH, P A.ISZ00 CLIENT's No.P 0~65121-25833C REPORT December 16, 1977 OVR RCfORTS IS NCSCRVCD FCNDINC OUII WRITTCH Aft ROVAL, LABoRAToRY No.f 010 ILf.Uo ARKA CODE SIC TEI EPHONK 022-1000 oROER No.PG 6831 The above samples comply'with the specif'ication requirements.
II 1
The above r'eported values f.'or water soluble ions are correct jn that no chloride, nitrate or sulf'fi.te were f'ound.Had these ions been present the analytical accuracy would have been questionable duc to the crude leachinp procedure requirement by the speciAication.
I
PXTTSBUHGH Ti.STING+BOBCAT Ro ert J King.Manager~'chemi 1 Department 2-Client Attn: H.L.Blocker 1-P TL-Tampa pd 0 H-4 7
          '4I, l'
0 APPENDIX I TESTING MACHINE CALIBRATION REPORT FOR FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1978 t S
p' ki sf)}}
~~S'\~qgsTltrs<rp c AS Aitu C~PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY SSTASC ISN'Sl lOll PITTSBURGH.
PA.AS A MUTUAL SeROTCCTSON TO Ct.ICNTS, TNC FVSt.lC ANQ OURSSLertse ALL RtteORTS ARC SUSMITTSD AS TNC CONI IDCNT)AL FROFCRTT OR CLISNTSe ANO AVTNORIZATlCN FILE Hoe Fait FUSt,lCATlON OF STATSMCNTS CQNCt.VSIONO Olt CXTRACTS FROM Olt ItSCAROIN4 OVlt RCFORTS IS RSSSRVSO FCNDINC OUlt WRITTKN AFFROVALe CLIENT'5 Ho.TESTING MACHINE CALIB RATION REPQ PT DATE Nov.25, 1977 OWNERs MACHINE IDENTlF 1CAT1 ON PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORA 0 Y l.OCAT IOHs 1IANUFACTURERs Tinius olsen SFRIAL NULIBER, 69069 PTL S/N 217 TYPEs Hydraulic TYPE OF APPARATUS USEDs IAH UF ACT UR ER s APPARATUS VERIFIED BYs Morehouse National Standards Laborato APPARATUS VERIFIED IH ACCORDAHCE WITHs CALIBRAT1ON APPARATUS DATA Method, of verification is in accordance with"Methods of Yerification of Testing Machines" A.S.Thl.Specification E447T.Proving Rings SERIAL NUMBER 3258 4656 LOADING RAHGE 10,000 10 000 100 000 100,000-1,000,000 VER IF ICATION DATE ll/18/76 11/17/76 5/7/75 R ESULTS MACHINE RANGE 0-60,000 LOADING RANGE WITHIH 1,000-60,000 PERCENT 0-600 000 lOO,OOO-l,OOO,OOO The aboTO wrlftcatton shows this mochine compiles with the ro~cemonts of the specifications within the Ioatflng tangos shown aboTee Respectfully submitted, TI 2 PITTS'H T T LABO TORY 0
~~~>>I I~PITTSBLJRGH TESTING LABORATORY Form 60 8 EST III'"S E9+S L>>E~SAHOCT CSTASLISHCD ISO I PITTSBURGH, PA.AS*HVTVAL SkOTtCTION TO CLItHTSI THC SUSLIC AND DUNS CLYCS ALL kCPOkTS AkC SUSHITTCO AS THC COHPIOCNTIAL fkoktkTT OI>>CLICHTS, AND AUTHOCIZATION
/Ok SUULICATION Ok STATCHCHTS, CONCLUSIONS Oll CXTkACTS fkOH Oll kCO*kDIHO OUk ktkokTS IS kCSCNVCD SCNDINO OVII WklTTCN AkkkOVAl TESTI NG MACH I NE CALI B RATI ON DATA ORDER NO, CLIENT'S No.LOCATION MANUF ACT UR ER Tinius Olsen CAPACITY 1,200,000 Ib.SERIAL NO.69069 PTL S/i'17 DATE 11/25/77 Pittsbur h Testin Laboratory MACHINE READ ING lb.1 000 850 Poplar Street Pittsburgh, PA 15220 PROVING RING READING lb.MACHINE ERROR lb.REMARKS 60,000 Pound Range 15 000 30,000 45 000 60,000 10,000"--3 000--50 000-70 000 90 000.-99 000 50,000 100,000 200,000 0 400,000 00 5 028.5 10 000 14 24 44 788 59 749 10,084 29,961 49 956 70 116 90,509 99 654 50 337 830 299 495 399,480 497 506 5 991-28.5+76+208+39+44-116-509-654-337+170+1097+2494+4009-0.5+0.51+0.70+0.47+0.42-0.83+0.13+0.09-0.17-0.56-0.66-0.67+0.17+0.55+0.17+0.13+0.50~7 120 000 Pound Ran e 600 000 Pound R OI IRGH~il'.4C L.A RATOB.Y~n t
r~iA5.'a.PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY qIQTIIIC (5 O$1~V+l Wp Lt 4l<i'+C aS'+~r 45AHOC CSTASLISHCO ISS'I~P!TTSBURGH, PA.AS A IIUTVAI,~IIOTCCTIOH TO CLICNTS~TNC WSI IC AHO OUSSCLVCS, ALL IICSOIITS AIIC SVSHITTCO AS TNC COHflOCNTIAL fIIOfCIITT Of CLICNTS, AHO AUTHOlllZATIOK 1 OH WSLICATION Of STATCNCNTS, COHCI USIOHS Oll CXTIIACTS flIOH Oll lltCASDINO OVII IICf OIITS IS IICSClIVCO f CNOINO OUII WIIITTCN Af f IIOVAL TES Tl N 0 PAACH 1 N E CA L1B RAT10 8 DATA OROER HO.CI.IEHT'5 HO.QAXUFACTURER Tinius Olse'n I OCATIOH CAPACITY 15200,000 SERIAL HO.69069 PTL S/N 21 DATE 11/25/77 PTTTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY 850 POPLAR STREET PITTSBURGH, PA 15220 MACHINE REAO IXG lb.PROVING RING REAOIHG lb.MACHINE ERROR lb.REMARKS 1,200,000 Pound Range 100,000 99,910+90+0.09 300,000 500 000 298,266 498 302+1734+0.58+1698+0.34 00,000 699 466+534+0.08 900,000 1,000,000 896,991 995,984+3009+0.34+4106+0.41 II1 I'4I, l'p'ki sf)}}

Latest revision as of 23:28, 3 February 2020

Fifth-yr Surveillance Rept of Containment Structure post- Tensioning Sys.Info Includes Wire Testing & Analysis of Sheath Filter
ML17338A210
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/31/1978
From: Andrews C
BECHTEL GROUP, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML17338A209 List:
References
NUDOCS 7810170194
Download: ML17338A210 (175)
v • d • e


Text

FLORIDA PCMER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POHER PLANT WIT 4 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE SYSTEM 'OST-TENSIONING THIRD-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWDER CORPORATION By:

Gaithersburg, Maryland F. M. Zappan July, 1975 Reviewed By:

Rev. 1

. L. Meye s Au ust 4, 1975 Approved:

A. J. Bing Rev. 2 ( age D10) Chic Civi Eng eer Sept ber 8, 1978 Gaithersburg Power. Division

l S

a,

TENDON NO. 66V29 0 Og OO 0 OOOO 0 0000 0 0

00000 00000 oooo O~OO 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 00 00 00 0 00 0 + 00 0 00 00 00 000 0 00 0 000 000 000 00 000 000 000 0000 P 00 00 00 00 p~ 0+00 0000 0 0

qG 00'ND ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6T ) (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6B )

CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL WASHER 2 WASHER BUTTONHEADS BUTTONHEADS SHIMS 2 SHIMS 2 BEARING PLATE BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

BUTTONHEADS: CORROSION LEVELS:

Q OFF-SIZE BUTTONHEAD TT 1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT 42 VISIBLE OXIDATION NO PITTING WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY T.-3 0".( PITTING 0.003"(

DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED 4'4 0.003" Q PITTING 2 0.006" THIS SURVEILLANCE 45 0.006" Q PITTING ~ 0.010" WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A EN DATE END ANCHORAGE B BA" DATE FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER 84 LIGHT

/

POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

'URI<EY UNIT 4

.7Q I oi 7 0 I Q 'j POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM THIRD-YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION D-10 HEET 9 OF 8 Rev. 2 eptem~er 8, 1978

3f" g I

~ ~

~

0 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER Maryland CORPORATION'aithersburg, By~~~m ~

C. W. Andrews July 1978 Appro ved: 4V 45ld(.D 'C.

Rev. 1 (Page C<<5) A~ J. Arnold September 8, 1978 Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power CzP+ Division

e TABLE OF 'CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1 0 INTRODUCTION 2 0

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS 2 1 Summary 2,2 Conclusions 3,0 GENERAL 4 ' SHEATH FILLER AND END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLIES 4.1 Sheath Filler 4.2 End Anchorage Assemblies 5.0 DETENSIONING AND WIRE INSPECTION 5.1 Tendon Lift-off Forces 5~2 Wire Inspection 5 ' Discontinuous Wires

'6 0 RETENSIONING AND SHEATH FILLER INSTALLATION 6,1 Retensioning 6 ' Sheath Filler Installation 7 0 WIRE TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER 7.1 Wire Testing 7 ~ 1,1 Specimen Selection and Preparation 7olo2 Test Procedure 7 ' ~ 3 Test Equipment 7 ~ 1.4 Test Results 7,1,4.1 Yield Strength 7,1,4 ' Ultimate Strength F 1.4 ' Elongation 7 '.4 ' Fracture Characteristics

k 1 l

PAGE 7 ' Analysis of Sheath Filler 7 ~ 2.1 Specimen Preparation 7~2~2 Test Procedures 7~2 ~3 Test Results APPENDICES APPENDIX A SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE A-1 APPENDIX B FORMULAS FOR NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED FORCES APPENDIX C END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS C-1 APPENDIX D WIRE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS D-1 APPENDIX E SPECIFICATION FOR TENSILE TESTING OF POST-TENSIONING TENDON WIRE (ASTM-421) E-1 APPENDIX F SPECIFICATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING OF SHEATH FILLER (VISCONORUST 2090P) F-1 APPENDIX G RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING OF WIRE SAMPLES G-1 APPENDIX H RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER H-1 "APPENDIX I TESTING MACHINE CALIBRATION REPORT

S

'LIST OF "FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 3.1 SURVEILLANCE TENDONS LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION 5 1 DOME TENDON AVERAGE. NORMALIZED WIRE LIFT-OFF FORCE VS TIME 5,2 HORIZONTAL TENDON AVERAGE NORMALIZED WIRE 10 LIFT-OFF FORCE VS TDK 5 3 VERTICAL TENDON AVERAGE NORMALIZED WIRE LIFT-OFF 11 FORCE VS TIME

I b II

'LIST OF TABLES TABLE TLTLE PAGE 4,1

SUMMARY

OF DATA <<SHEATH FILLER AND END 12 ANCHORAGE ASS&iBLIES 5 1

SUMMARY

OF DATA - DETENSIONING AND WIRE 13 INSPECTION 5 ' NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED TENDON LIFT-OFF a4 FORCES F 1

SUMMARY

OF DATA - RETENSIONING AND SHEATH. 15 FILLER INSTALLATION 70 1 WIRE TEST RESULTS 16

S II

1 : lm 0 INTRODUCTION The tendon s urveillance program is a systematic means of assessing the continued quality of the post-tensioning system for the con-tainment structure. It provides a measure of confidence in the condition and functional capability of the system, and an opportu-nity for timely corrective actions should adverse -conditions, such as progressive corrosion, be detected.

The fifth-year tendon surveillance for the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 4 Containment Structure, consisted of the physical inspection of nine tendons as described in the FSAR Technical Specification, Section 4 '.6 ~ These tendons were: 62H38, 42H80, 64H7O> 12V29, 34V29,.56V29, 1D28, 2D3, and 3D28.

2,0

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS

2. 2 ~Summa This report covers the fifth-year tendon surveillance for the post-tensioning system of the Unit 4 containment structure at the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant. The surveillance was started in October 1977 and completed in November 1977 lift-off forces in all surveillance tendons were within the

'he range of the predicted design values, taking into account the losses of prestress due to wire relaxation, concrete creep and shrinkage, and the initial elastic structural deformation.

The load-bearing components of the end anchorage assemblies were found to be in excellent state with no adverse conditions such as progressive corrosion and cracking.

In the mechanical testing of the specimens obtained from the removed tendon wires, no change was detected in the physical properties regarding the yield stress, ultimate strength, and percentage of elongation of the wires since the initial accept-ance tests. The minimum ultimate strength requirement was met by all the specimens, No presence of water or abnormal discoloration was observed in the tendon sheath fillers. Laboratory analysis of the filler samples, obtained from each surveillance tendon, showed that the contents of water, chlorides, nitrates, and sulfides were well within the acceptable limits, 2 ' Conclusions Based on the inspection and tests described herein, it is concluded that the post-tensioning system in the Unit 4 Containment Structure at Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant is performing within the limits set by design criteria and specifications,

x I

l

3. 0 GENEEIIL The fifth-year tendon surveillance of the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 4 Containment Structure Post-Tensioning System, began in October 1977, approximately 2-1/2 years after the completion of the third year surveillance in February 1975. The fifth-year tendon sur-veillance consisted of the following:
1. Visual and laboratory examination of sheath filler.

2~ Inspecting anchorage assemblies for deleterious conditions, such as corrosion, cracking, missing wires, and split or off-size button>>heads.

3. Measuring shim dimensions to determine tendon lift-off elongations.
4. Measuring tendon lift-offforces.
5. Measuring tendon elongations at 80 percent of the minimum ultimate strength of the wires.
6. Detensioning tendons and checking wire continuity by pulling each wire from one end and observing its movement at the opposite end.
7. Removing one wire from three preselected tendons for inspection and testing.
8. Retensioning tendons to lift-offforces obtained in Item 4 above, and measuring the corresponding elongations.
9. Visual inspection of removed tendon wires for corrosion, pitting, and other deleterious conditions.
10. Testing of samples obtained from removed tendon wires for yield strength, ultimate strength; and percentage of elongation at ultimate strength.

of surveillance data and test results to assess

'valuation the general condition of the post-tensioning system, con-sidering the time-dependent factors such as prestress losses and corrosion.

The work was performed in accordance with the "Tendon Surveillance procedure for Containment Structure Post-Tensioning System," dated July 22, 1977 and included in the report as Appendix A.

The locations and identifications of the dome, vertical, and horizontal surveillance tendons are shown in Figure 3-1.

4.0 SHEATH FILLER AND END ANCHORAGE ASSEESLIES The results of the field inspection and laboratory analysis of the sheath filler, and the visual examination of the end anchorage assem-blies, are summarized in Table 4.1.

1 0

4.1 Sheath Filler Two samples of filler were removed from each of the surveillance tendons and visually examined. All of the samples taken were dark brown in appearance, indicating the lack of water or impurities that may cause discoloration.

4 ' End Anchora e Assemblies The end anchorage assemblies of the surveillance tendons were examined and found to be in satisfactory condition. The tendon 1D28 stressing washer, located at buttress 4, received a 120o, 9" long, 3/8" wide, 1/4" deep, tapered scrape along the side of its interior face circumference when it accidentally mated against the left side of the bearing plate during detensioning operations. The stressing washer was shown to be structurally sound when the tendon was stressed to the full effective force with no observable adverse effect, The lift-off forces were well within the acceptable limitsi The end anchorage inspection data are included in the report as Appendix C, 5,0 DETENSIONING 'AND WIRE INSPECTION Data obtained during detensioning and wire inspection are shown Table 5 in 5~1 Tendon Lift<<Off Forces The lift-off forces obtained from the tendons during detensioning Mdicated that prestress losses had not exceeded the predicted design values.

The long term (40<<year duration) predictions of the normalized wire lift-off forces in the surveillance tendons are shown graphically in Figures 5 ' through'5.3 ~ These predictions had taken into account the prestress losses due to wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage. These curves provide only an estimated trend in the prestress losses, and are used as a means for comparison with the trend of the actual average prestress losses, The minimum effective design prestress is the required average force per wire at the end of 40 years; including the effects of wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage.

Calculations for the predicted prestress losses are as follows:

Initial wire force (Fi) based on a wire stress of 0 '0f:

Fi ~ 0,70f x As

~ 0 '0 x 240 x 0.049

a 1

~ 8 '5 kips/wire where f= ultimate strength of wire As ~ Area of wire Wire force at 40 years (F40) due to wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage:

The prestress loss at the end of 40 years due to wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage, is estimated to be 34.7 ksi (see FSAR Section 5.1.4.4) ~ This value is applicable to all dome, horizontal, and vertical tendons.

F - 34.7 x As

~ 34,7 x 0+049

~ 1.70 kips/wire Where F 1 = Prestress loss 8 40 years P

The minimum effective design prestress is the predicted average wire force after 40 years.

F40 Fi - Fpl

= 8.25 - li70

~ 6 '5 kips/wire In order to compare the actual average prestress losses with predicted values, it was necessary that the wire lift-offforces, from the surveillance data, be normalized to account for the initial structural deformations (which is a function of the post-tensioning sequences), the deviations of initial lift-off forces from the specified value of 0.70f, and the changes in lift-off forces resulting from tendon surveillance operations, such as reshiming and wire removal. These normalized wire lift-off forces were then superimposed on the appropriate

,curves shown on Figures 5.1 thru 5.3, providing a corn<<

parison between the predicted values and the actual forces at the time of tendon surveillance.

For future convenience, the normalizing factors and the normalized lift-off force for each surveillance tendon for the fifth-year tendon surveill'ance are listed in Table 5 '

for calculating the normalizing factors are given

'ormulas in Appendix B

I L

5 ' Wire Ins ection The results of inspection of each tendon wire removed for inspec-tion are shown in Appendix D, No physical imperfections were observed on the wires removed from all tendons.

5 ' Discontinuous 'Wires No discontinuous wires were found during this tendon surveillance.

6,0 RETENSIONING AND SHEATH FILLER'INSTALLATION The data obtained during retensioning are shown in Table 6,1.

The tendons were retensioned to approximately the same stress level indicated by the lift-off forces obtained during deten-sioning, with allowance made for the tendons where< a wire was removed for physical examination and testing.

The retensioning data will be used as input for the next scheduled tendon surveillance.

6 ' Sheath Filler Installation The volume of grease removed from the tendon prior to detensioning, and the volume replaced after retensioning, are indicated in Table 6.1 ~

7~0 WIRE TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER 7 '.1 Specimen Selection and Preparation The locations of the specimens selected from each tendon wire for tensile testing are shown in Appendix D. In general, specimens were obtained from each end and the middle of each tendon wire removed. The specimens were cut to a length of approximately 126 inches.

After the specimens were cut from the pulled wires, they were tagged with the following information:

1. Tendon identification number,
2. Location of the specimen; i,e,, middle or end section.

3, Containment unit number and the year of surveillance (1977) ~

1 1

These tags remained with the specimens through completion of the testing.

The remaining portions of the wires, after the specimens had been obtained, were also tagged and retained at the plant site until testing indicated that the tensile strength and elongation of all specimens were in compli-ance with the specification, 7 ',2 Test Procedure Except for the gage length, the test procedure used was the same as that specified in ASTM Specification A421-65, "Standard Specification for Uncoated Stress-Relieved Wire for Prestressed Concrete." A gage length of one hundred inch '(+1.0) was used instead of the ten>>inch gage length as specified.

The 100-inch-gage-length specimen may indicate a lower ultimate strength and lesser ductility (elongation) than a ten-inch-gage-length specimen. Since failure will occur't the weakest point in the wire, the ultimate strength obtained is equivalent to the lowest value that would be obtained from ten 10-inch specimens, Elongation at failure will also tend to be less due to the distribution of the elongation at the neck-down area over a length of wire ten times that of the nominal ten-inch specimen.

7,1,3 Test Equipment The apparatus used for the tensile testing of the specimens was the Tinius Olsen Super "L" Testing machine with a 1,200,000 lbs capacity, of the Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, For machine calibration report, see Appendix I.

7 ',4 Test Results The results of tensile testing on the one hundred-inch-gage-length wire specimens are shown in Appendix G and Table 7,1, 7.1.4.1 Yieeld Strength The yield strength of all wire specimens tested exceeded the specified minimum yield strength of 192 ksi at one percent elongation.

7,1.4 ' Ultimate Strength The ultimate strength of all wire specimens tested exceeded the specified minimum ultimate strength of 240 ksi as specified by AS&i A421-65.

LS

~

i

F 1;4,3 Elongation Since 100>>inch-gage-length specimens were used in the tensile testing, a lesser percentage of elongation may be expected than from the testing of 10-inch>>gage-length specimens of identical wire, as discussed in Paragraph 7 '.2 ~ Previous test data < ) indicated that a wire which showed a 4 percent elongation at ultimate strength in a 10-inch-gage-length testing could be expected to exhibit a somewhat lower (no less than 3 percent) elongation at ultimate strength in a 100-inch-gage-length testing.

The percentage of elongation of all wire specimens tested met this requirement, 7.1.4 ' Fracture Characteristics The fracture of all wire specimens was of the cusp-cone shape.

7 ' Anal sis of Sheath'Filler 7~2~1 Specimen Preparation A quart-size sample of the sheath filler was obtained from each end of all surveillance tendons prior to de-tensioning. Each metal container containing the grease sample was marked with the tendon identification number, One sample from each surveillance tendon was shipped to an independent laboratory for analysis of water content.

and water soluble impurities, and the remaining samples were retained at the jobsite.

7 ' ' Test Procedures Test procedures for water content and chlorides, nitrates, and sulfides concentrations are given in Appendix F.

7.2 ' Test Results The results of laboratory analysis of the sheath filler are shown in Appendix'H, These data indicated that the contents of chlorides, nitrates, and sulfides in the grease were well within the acceptance limits, and that the amount of water present was negligible.

t (1)

"Containment Building Past-Tensioning System One-Year Surveillance, Palisades Plant Unit 1," Consumers Power Company, AEC Docket No. 50<<255 '

J RESS 74'4 I

BOTTOM OF R ING G IR DE R I34'UTT AZ IMUTH 314 254 I 94~

EL I 50-0 42H80 LI45-8~ 'E L130-2 64H70 I2V2g 56V29 62H38 76'-3 /e 34V29 TOP OF BASE SLAB DEVEL'OPED EXTERIOR ELEVATION EL l2-6 HOOP AND VERTICAL TENDONS 3I4 BUTTRESS 4,'D28 2

l4 554'UTTRESS BUTTRESS 3 3D28 lg4 74'UTTRESS 2 BUTTRESS 6 2D3 BUTTRESS I l34 PLAN DOME TENDONS FLORIDA POWER & LiGHT COYiPA.'~

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER P7 ~N".

UNiT ~

POST"TENSIONING SYST" H SURVEILLANCE TENDONS LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION FIGURE 3.1

L

~

8.5 8.0 h5 0

0 ATA NXS Pf 7 r.

~ ~

OUr. 7.0 Exp ed loss CO ve e

..<<:4

.8 X

0

~ ~

Q 0 6.5 Nxnzmum Effectx ve t5 0 design prestress)

(6.55) kips/wire) 0.6 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 P

Time After Initial. Tensioning (years)

j

~ ~

~'

N 0

r 0 8;5 o I co e r-o 0

P rt. 0 8 '0 ac'O. o 7-5 0 Q Q

g r-'.n 0

N 5 0 rt CL r 7<<0

r. r. '08 ~

Expec ted Lo ss CU rv I '

~ ~0 OO

~

'I

.6.5 Mxnxmum E fectxve Design Prestress (6.55 kips/wire) 0 n '

e 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 Time- After Initial Tensioning {years)

~ ~

1

~

0

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

8.5 7s'O 8

8 0 0 I 0 0

~ Ql w4Qd 8 ~

0 M N M e VI I '.0I Vo I

~

Cb Qt 0Vo rt W Ce 7+0 Exp ected CU rve I l~

0be rt th Q

~, ~

0

~

~

à ff

~

'.5

~ 51inimum Effect:ivci fsf 0 Design Prestres

~ t5 0 {6.55 ki s/Mixe) 8

~ ~

0.6 1.0 2 0 3.0 4.0 5 ' 10.0 20.0 30.0 40 '

Time After Xniti.al Tensioning (years)

TABLE 4-1 SBMMARVOF DATA SREATH FILLER ANO ENO ANCRORAGE ACSEMBLIES flLLCRCDATIHDAccftTAELC lvfs/No( 1ILLCR MAT'L ANCIIORAnfCoattONCNTS Tale PF TENDON DUfTOIAICADS Sfn(55 QDM$ ef AAINO TIAQI(n$ ~ LATE5 DATE DUTTDN sfnfss co(on SAMtaf Inst( CT.

IDENT. Tvtf LOCA. CA/'lf Fl(LER AD WAQIf R SHIMS INO PLATE NO. conn.

NUMEFK OSION 5I'a(IS OFF. CORN OSION conn.

CIIACKS OSION CRACKS Conn.

>>Qcn.

(OR fxlfn.

IOR EO REMARKS (ION SIZE OS(ON CRACKS LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL 12 I~ 15 1$ 1$ 21 22 20

~ /T YCS YCS YCS YCS YES Ho ~ 'I HONE NON HONE NONE HON C

~ IV(1 YERT II~ IPO511 ( TOPSTAESSWA5HCAHA51HC FIRST THACAD

~ /0 YCS YES YCS YCS YCS No NONC HON HOIIC NO<<t HONE I

DAMAOEDAttAOX ~ Ii THC O>>f SIDE PACE l5DDUOEDAppno/LF/tl xi Lotto.

I ltvlS I vcnT t/T YC5 YCS YES YC5 YES NO 00

~ IONC NON Not/C HONC HONC I+I+It I THE FOPP-5ltteOTTOHHEAOSAAC 1/0 YES YC5 YC5 YES YES HO Ito>>C 1 NONE HONE I/ON \ 104 1.11 ~

t SLID>>FLY OVC 15I 1 .

l(V10 VERT

~ /T YCS YES YE5 YCS YES NO

~1 NONC HON ~ 1 IIOH 5 HO<< C Wont TotSTAC5$ ,WASHER HASTHE FIA51THACAO

~ /0 YES YES YES NO HONC ~ toit C 11 ~ 101$ 11 YC$ YES 2 NON C NONC DAHAOCDAPPROX ~0 YCS YCS YES YES YC'5 NON C NOH HO<<t HONE NOHC 00 I ID(0 YES YC5 YC5 YCS Yt'5 ~0 HONC NOH NONC NONE NOHC 01

~I Il.t 11 Slht55 wASHCR AT EUTTAC55 Ho.i HAS A 1/0 CHAHitn F LONO

(

I tD10 DON C YCS YCS YES YE5 YCS YCS YCS YCS YES YC5 No No ~0

~0 NONC NOHC NON NON HOHC HONE NONC NOH C NOH C NONE 10 1$

~ Ik 11 ti evTTDN>>cAD5 conno5IDN LtvcL2 I

YCS YCS YCS YES YES No NotIC NON HONC NOHC NONC 10 t h(tLACED I/O" 5HIU5 tot YE5 YES YE5 YE5 YCS No HOIIC NON HOIIC HONC NOH C ll 11.1.1 ~

I ISHIN5WCAC ~ ENTI

~ tnti HORI YCS YC5 YES YCS YCS IIO It 10 HOHC NOH C NON C NOH C I~ 0 10 YC5 YCS YC5 YES YES No I~ ttONC NOH IIONC HONE NON C 10

~ (HIP Y05 YCS YES YE5 YCS HO 1$ NONC NOH HO<< C HoltC HONE $0 Ho hl YCS YCS YC5 YCS NCS NO I~

1~

NONE I~ 0 ~ I 1111 NON NOHC HONE NON C ~0 I

YES YES YE5 YC5 YCS NO ~1 I NON NOHC NON C NONE 11

~ IHI~ HOXI Y$ 5 YE5 YC5 YE5 YE5 Ho I~ 00 NONC NON NONC ~ ION C NONE ~1 11 ~ 1$ .11 NOTfsl

1. LOCATION INDICATES'lnf In/TT/ICSSATTWICIITHE I( tntotl Ishncllo>>CD/on 1>>f NfA>>1sT l. ANCHORAGE COMtONfNTS t. CORRUSION I EVfl 5 ~ EACH 5AHPLC WAS le(NTIPI EO WITH DU(ln(55 lo Ill(. I at(DON IIVAVCR(ICAL
  • ron sin(ss>>/o WAQ/fn Tnt. connnstov Lfvc(s tell>> Ala Illa co>>(N(to I'ot etta Sat>>thea W>>f nf I (vl a f

aavfa I N< VIQI( DXIDA(lonon LIGHTstoflvDXIDAf(on l AtonIVI>>Down(A aon.HOPI(FINO TENOOII IIVHA(nAND CLO5CST il/11<<C55 NVVPCA, 1(HDONQ 1 I Ot INC >>ill lottIILAll ARL'NC>>on( o. LIV(a'I II(t/IIINIinto(" U(t(II e - no( loM e. ton QI,MS.INC con<<OQotl aLvl as INDICATE Tttf I 1vf a ~ -OUI I'SPII It';I + DIPI4" (f VI Le I' Iv CPIIIINII$hhl(f' II CXvthlon TEHPCAATVAC Dttttx(HCC I Ht cltnol llott of QIC Atnt ACCS I'(nit no(co(An t5 OUC TO5IEAN DISCHARGE WHICH WAS Io IHC Tanoolta a V(L 1 IS I ~ I>>PA( f tt( III I I V(as n Io c DURING INSTALLATION. AD/ACCNF To THE EIIO SHOWINC THC I IIR<<ovlh/I I I a xclSS Dt (HIS aavf L lvhs U>>hccat Theat AT THE WIENER ICMttnATU<<E IIM(. Dt >>I' ha(ATION.

12

TABLE 5.1 SUhlhIAIIYOF DATA DETENSIONINO AND I/IIAE IIEhIOVAL

'TENDON NO.

AI A TCI>>lnntvnf 0 llfTOf F 0 O.SP, 0 I000 ll/5/WIRE TCNSlONINO EOVIPMKNT INIIIAL WI ~ C REMOVAL OF OATf OF tc//slnw IKNSION fCNSIO/4 WIRE CORROSION LKVCI,(41 ESICCTIVE DCTKNSIVNKD III LKNCIH IDCNTISICA'(ION ANCIIOAACE

'WIAC5 INT. EKT.

CADI %DACE ELONGATION(ll CACK FORCE(tl ElONCATIO(4(ll CAC\ IDACC lll C lOIICATION(ll CADE (S 'l l KND LENGTH LOCAI ION IPS I I IKS I UHI (IS(I (KIPSI RN) IPSA I KISS( I IN I NO. NO. CUT NOS/(I tl PREVIOUS 10 ~2 12 N 15 10 22

~ IV2t ~ /f ~ I let%.ll %11

~ I NII 5 5/I ~ 11%4 ~4 ~ 1 5/I ~ 11$ ~4 .1 snt I~ A@1 ~

I/O 12VII 2/T

~ I 1011 11 10 ~ 111 tl ~ 10%0 Nl ~ I I/I~ Its ~ I I~ AO I ~

<<0 1 4vt ~

~ It ~ I 1001 11 ~ I ~$1 ~ 141 sin 1 Its ~ 40 140 ~ I 0 I III~ ~ I AO I ~ (~ ) I ~ INI

~ /0 NA I Sl ~ I ~ 1$ 0 11 ~ 1 5/I ~ Itt ~ 10 4 IH t2 1 II ~ I IH ~ 10 ~ 0.1st IDI~ ~

~ I 'I ~ 11 1$ ~ 5 I/I ~ 1$ ~ 41 ~ 4 I/II Il~ ~ I ~ /I ~ 0414 2tl 1014 ~ I SI

~1 11

~

INI II~ 110 14 ~

1 2

I/I tH Ittt NIO Ns 045 4 SH 1 5/4 11 ~

ISO

~

10 I

~ tint F 40 101

' 1$ (

0 Nt I ~ I $ 141 ~ It 2 I/O 1100 I

~ ~ 2 ln F 40 tl aint ~ %41 0 140  ! (sl 20$ ~

10 54N TI ~ 2 I/4 MN tl4 1 I/I~ ~ N ~0 ~ 404 ttl NA ~ RSI 42HI ~ ~0 4 I I.S 11 ~1 10 I~ lt Nt 2 1/I SN0 045 5 II/I~ 110 ~ I I Sh ~ 'Its 0.1st (4)

~I I~ 41 101 2 I/O I IN 04 ~ $ 1/I ~ N 5/I ~ 400 211 HA I ~ .I I 11 ~ I SI I % Ol ~ 2 1/I 1 IN NI 1 5/I I Itt 40 I/II ~ 44 ~ ttl

~ 4HIO %00

~ I ~ IN ~ II 5 5/I litt ~ 1$ ~ I I/12 It% ~ I ~ I I/I~ ~ Its DI ~ I IHI~ I 11-11 I~

11 SNS ~ 42 2 I/O 1100 ~ 15 5 I I/II III ~ I IH ~ 14 1 0-141

~ ~ ~

~ I 14% ~ %4 ~ 5 I/I SIN ~4 ~ ~ 2%Hi ~ 4t I~ ln F 400 ttl NOTE SI CLONCATION Tl(EClCAA DISTANCE DCIWKCN'INEOUISIDCSACC OF IIIE Uf AAIHCPLATf AND1HE CORROSION LfV(ls:

IHUDC fACC OF IHK Sl ACSS INC WASilfA. A NCCA I IVE NVL'NH R IS INDICAlln1/HCN IHE SIR(SSINC I. No VfllolfnxlnATION WAQIIAIS IHSR/E 'IHK IRUMPET, t. AlIIDISIIPll'IR/0 DAO VN COI OR/ NO PIT 1 INC X Da'0 < (0001 FORCE COUALS TOOHSKIPSMULTIPll(DOT THf NVMUIAOf CffCCIIVCWIACS. ~ . 0011 < 1$ 11INC < 0.006

5. 0006 CI'IITN/C $ 001J FORCE \OVALS 10 1 0KIP5IUL'IlflltOAY'IIIE NVMCCAOF ff1 CCIIVC Hints.

'1 ~

Pn CVRWS SVRV C II LANCE 0 4 IHI I IAL CONDITION.WH ICI ICY f4 APPLIES, DCHOIC5 TDP (Cl NA ~ NDIAVAILAelE 0 ~ DCHDICS 00110M (11 CXTCAI01 SCMPC1ATVOC DISSCOCHCC ~ CTWCCHTHC T'WD C1 05 l5 DVC 10 STCAM DIICHA10C WHICH WA5 AD/ACCHI SQ IHC CHD SHOWIHG IHC HIGHC 1 1 C MSC 1 A I V1 C 13

I 0

Table 5 '

NORlfALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED TENDON LIFT-OFF FORCES Lift-off Force/Wire (k)

'Factorormalized Tendon No, Anchorage Location Normalizing Each end 'vera e er wire 1D28 0 '78 7 '5 7.72 0 '29 7 '0 2D3 0 '34 7,18 7 '2 5-6 0.940 7.46 3D28 0 '01 '7.29 7.26 0 '09 7.23 42H80 0.994 7.51 7 ~ 56 0.976 7.62 0.943 6 '2 7 '4 1.000 7 '6 64H70 0 '57 7.31 7 '2 0.892 6.72 12V29 0 '32 7.57 7 '7 34V29 0.902 7.57 7.57 56V29 0 '11 7.42 7. 42 W denotes top 14

~ NNNN r*

TABLE 6.1 SUh(hlARY OF DATA-RETENSIONING ANO SIIEATH FILLER INSTALLATION A(A 4 1000 les/WIRE 0 0 0 (' DL(I)OFF Sul'ATH FILLER TENDOH No 1 fMr2~A10 (U 4 E Tf NSICN f CONGA)ION RNI(ll TfNQON lVNCAIION RIO(ll TENSION flONCAIIONRNI(ll TENSIONING foul)MENT VOLVME FILLER OF OATf.

EFFECTIVE Rf)fNQDNED DACE l)l FORCE RAM GACf (Fill(O Rfr(AC(o (GALS)

TEMOLRATVRE DOV(lff WIAES INT EAT. (rsl NOW( ~ I CHANCE(5) CAGE FORCE NOW( ~ I CHANCEIS) CAGE NOW((l Q(ANGELSI IofA)IF)CATION ANCHOR ACE LOCATION (I I (1511 (K l)SI ()Q) I K IFQ No. NO.

10 12 I~ 15 10 10 I 21 I 10 OAL

\ ) tin 1627 I rouaf o raDM SIV2' ~ I 142$ -)7 ~ IT

~ 1$ 4 tO 1100 ~$ 1 Isnt $ 200 110 ~ <<I <<I I~ IL)I ~ 1$

100 (1 %II.11)

~ /0 1001.1

$2 115 ~ I n 7/0 7/I 7410 ~ tI 0 lit 011$ )sn 10 A@I ~

I

~ )Il~ 1 42 ~

I IV)~ ~ I I&2).)I 2/0

~ ts /I OI $ $ ~ I 4/1 ~2 11$ ~ I 1010 1 1$

~ /I $ 4211 100 SIV)$ ~ I t ~ $ 00 I ~ I <<'I $ 111 11 ~ 2 I/I~ III~

~ 10 ~ O 10$

~ I

~1 11$ ~ ~ ~

~ nl OSIER I I 5.77 21 1 15 102 ~ t)$ ~ $0 5 III $ 4$ ~ 114 1 7/0 01st

~0 IS 11$ ~ I ~ ll 11$ 4(0 ~ 2)1

~~ 1 17 21 I 5/I ~

'D\

I I 1.1.71 ~

~

~

~1 1$ ~ ~ I 1000 ~ il I In I II

~ 114 1 )il~ ~ $ 40 0.1 ~ I

~ I ~ I ~ I 004 01 I lnl )OII 00$ 1 snt ln) 150 2 1/I ln ~ $ 01 0.10$ 114.7) le F 11/I ~ 1000 $ 104 '114 1 ln ~ its il )00 2sn Dl ~ I 10 1$ 0 ~ I I 1 tnt 1000 ~ 2 15/I

~ 2410 11 $ .11 ~1 Snt ln I~

~I 11 ~ )000 I

~ ~ I ~ I~ 140 2 ln (HII 211 F 00 S/0 ) I IO ~ it ~ )nl .In

~ 14 ~ 010 1 $ /I OI I I 410 ~ 211 II I~ I II~

~ 1410 $4 140 WAS(I 1$ 0 ~ I ~ I I/O 1010 Ms s 2)n $ 104 ~ )I 1 5/I ~ ~ 0$ 0$ 0 ltl 1st ~ I sn1 1100 ~$$ ~ 1/I ~ MI ~ ii 1 S/I ~$0 ~ 0 10$

11.1$ 1 110 11H) ~ I I 1511 110 )nl <<11

~ I 1100 Oil 0$ $ tits No)fsc (ll fLONGATIDH THECIEAR OISTANCf ef IIII(N(Hf Oul loE fACE OF THE NOW of No(ES f CONGA)ID'I AT TIME VF Rf TfNUONIN(h MFASV RE-0( A A INC rl f A 1 0 AND I HI. I'is( ol. I ACF 4 I Ill S I4 LSIIN0 ( 4. A MLNI AHE 101HE I/(A4LST I/If NlCATIVENvs)414 IS INC(CA (E DIN ILN Tnf SIR(&INCwAQI(H IS INSIDE THE 1 RUM)ET. f f1(ANGE IH I DNCATIOH ASCOMFAR( 0 10 FR( VIOUS MfASUR( MENT UND( 4 ill( Sl'ECIFILD lOAD.

FORCE EOUAlS TO I 0 K(1MUL)lrllfoev THE NVSIOF 4 OF fFFLCTIVE (I) rX)fRIOR ')turfAATVAC(HOFCRtNCC OflWCCN THC TWD OND5 IS Ill RES.

Duf TD 5)CAN DISCHARGE WHICH WAS AD/AfCNI 10 THC CND Foncf E CURLS To 0 i)xlrSMULQFQ(o ev THE NUNC(n oF FFIECQVE W (S, 5HDWINO TNC HICHf4 'ICMICRATVAC 7 DCNDTC$ TDI'

.Df NDICS DDT IDM 15

I f

i

TABLE 7,1 WIRE TEST RESULTS - 100 IN, GAGE LENGTH Tendon No. Sample Load at Stress at Load at Stress at Elongation at Fracture No. 1% Ext. 1% Ext. Fracture Fracture Fracture Location (lbs ) (psi) (lbs ) (psi) (in.) Moving Head (1) (in.)

34V29 CeEe 10 p 050 205 7 100 12,700 259,200 4.59 37.0

.,BeEo 9,850 200,600 12,700 258,700 4.87 3.0 M,ST 10,650 217j300 12,800 261,200 4.51 6.63 42H80 C;E, 10,150 206,300 12~ 150 246 ~ 950 4.72 3.0 B;E, 10,150 206,300 12,200, 247,950 5.42 37.5 M,ST 10,300 209,350 12,200 247,950 5.49 AT JAW 2D3 C;Eo 100250 208,900 12,350 251,500 5.53 3.0 B,E, 9,600 1951500 12,250 249,500 4.92 9.0 M,S, 10,150 207,100 12,350 252,000 5.56 30.25 (1) C,E, denotes cut end of wire B.-E. denotes button head end of wire M,ST denotes middle section of wire 16

I II

APPENDIX A TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE

)

BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Ry Gaithersburg, Maryland Charles W. Andrews June, 1977 Approved:

K. P. Buchert Revision 1, July 22, 1977 Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Revision 2, October 11, 1977 Divison Revision 3, December 14, 1977 A-1

l Revision 3 1 0 PURPOSE The purpose of this survei1.lance is to obtain data for assessing the continued quality and structural pex'formance of the major components of the containment structure post-tensioning system.

2 0 SCOPE The surveillance for each tendon shall consist of the following:

2 1 Removing and visually inspecting sheath filler, and obtaining samples fox laboratory testing,.

2~2 Inspecting anchorage assemblies and measuring the thickness of shims 2 3 Obtaining tendon H.ft-off force and elongation.

2.4 Detensioning, raring shims, and inspecting wire continuity.

2.5 Removing wires where required, for visual ucamination and labora-tory testing.

2 6 Retensianing, installing shims, and obtaining tendon lift-off force.

2,7 Installing sheath filler.

2.8 Testing wire samples pex Attachment E.

2 9 Testing sheath filler per Attachment p.

2 10 Evaluating survei.llance data and test results to assess the general condition of the post-tensioning system.

Temporary protection shall be provided for the tendons and anchorages during surveillance. The end anchoxs and wires removed shall be pro-tected by applying a coating of Visconorust 1601, Amber aver the surfaces.

The elapsed time between removing and replacing sheath filler fram one tendon shall not exceed 2 weeks.

Tendon surveillance may be conducted during reactor operation.

3+0 SURVEILLANCE TENDONS Surveillance tendons for the Unit 4 containment structure shall consist of 3 dome tendons, 3 horizontal tendons, and 3 'vextical tendons. The identification numbers of these tendons are listed, below:

3 1 Dome tendons: 1D28, 2D3, 3D28 One wire shall be removed from Tendon 2D3.

A-2

s l

Revision 3 3 2 Horizontal tendons: 62H38, 42H80, 64H70 One wire shall be removed from Tendon 42H80, 3,3 Vertical tendons: 12V29, 34V29, 56V29 .

One wire shall be removed from Tendon 34V29.

4 0 INITIAL INSTALLATION RECORDS AND PREVIOUS SURVEILLANCE DATA Orighzal records of initial tendon installation, aad of subse'quent sur-veil1ances, are maintained by Florida Power & Light Company. The original installation records are ia card form and contain information pertaining to tendon pulliag, button-heading, tensicaing, and sheath filling. The surveillance data coasists of the raw data recorded during surveillances aad the surveillance reports 5 0 SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES 5 1 Remaval and Inspection of Sheath Piller The sheath filler, Visconorust 2090P, may be liquid, gel, or solid ~ All states may occur at a particular tendon Complete xemoval of the sheath filler is not required, provided that all filler drained or removed during the surveillance is replaced. The sheath fillex shall be removed as follows:

5 1 1 Record air temperature outside the containment near the surveillance tendon and inside the coataixanent.

e 5 1 2 Remove the grease caps from both ends of the tendon and allow the filler to flow into containers of known volume.

5.1 3 Obtain a cne-quart sample of filler fxgnm each end of the tendon 5.1,4 Record lack of grease coverage on end anchors, if any.

5 1 5 Recox'd aay discoloration of sheath fillex oa the Sheath Piller Znepectioc Fore (Figure A-6). (The color of the filler 3 should be dark brown.)

5 1.6 Heasure and record the amount of grease removed.

5 2 Inspection of Anchorage Components 5 2.1 Thoroughly clean the anchorage components with Viscosity Oil Company's Industrial Solvent No. 16 in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents shall not be used.

5 2 2 Inspect and record the buttonheads for shape and size, using the Go/No&o gage as shown in Figure A-1; cracks; A-3 l3

Revision 3 and corrosion status. Compare the number of buttonhcads with the number at the previ.ous surveillance. Identify missing buttonheads and any buttonhead defects on the end Anchorage Inspection Form as shown in Figure A f3 5,2,3 Inspect and record the stressing washers for corrosion status and cracks. If any cracks are observed, show the locations and sizes on the Anchorage Inspection Form.

5+ 2i4 Inspect f and record the shims or corrosion and cracks . I f cracks are observed, prepare a sketch showing their locations.

5 2 5 Inspect and record the bearing plates at the ccntact sur-faces with the shims for corrosion and cracks.

are observed, prepare a sketch showing their locaef.ons.

If cracks 5.2 6 Definitions of corrosion levels for the tendon wires and anchorage components for the surveillance are as follows:

Corrosion Level Descri tion 1 Ho visi.ble corrosion 2 Reddish-brown color; no pitting 3 0.000<pitting < 0.003"

~

4 0.003<pitting g 0.006" 5 0.006(pitting g 0.010" The corrosion levels for the surveillance as compared to the criteria used during the field installation are indicated below:

Corrosion Level.

Surveillance Field Installation Instal.lation 1 A~ Acceptable 2 3,C,D,E Acceptable 3,4,5 pk Unacceptable 5,3 Detensioning and Lift-offForces 5,3,1 Safety A11 personnel on work platforms during detensioning and reten-sioning operations shall be familiar with, and abide by,

, the following safety rules:

a Do not stand behind the jacks while they are pressurized.

b Keep fingers away from the tendons and jacks, except when required to read li.ft>>off forces, and remove or stall shims.

  • Prescon symbols identifying Corrosion Level (no longer used).

A-4

I I

~

I ~

~ ~

I Revision 3 5.3.2 Calibration All gages and jacks used for the tendon surveillance shall be calibrated before use. Gages and jacks shall not be recalibrated unless damaged or repaired. Prior to use, gages shall be checked for zero deviation and ~ge.

5 3,3 Detensioning Tendons 5+3,3,1 Determine the number of effective wi.res for each tendon fran the previous surveillance.

5 3 3.2 Calculate and record the jacking forces required to obtain the specified 80 percent minimum ulei~te strength (0.8f's) per wire. These forces are ob-tained by multiplying the number of effective wires by 9.43 kips ~ Enter these values into the jack calibration chart to obtain the gage readings equivalent to the forces. Note that the applied jacking force for each tendon shall not exceed the value thus determined.

5,3 3.3 Attach the jack to the bearing plate. Note that if the initial stressing was done from both e"ds of a tendon, the surveillance shall be perfo ~d in the same manner.

5,3 3.4 install the pressure gages to the jack and p~,

and record their identification numbers. iheck the gages for zero pressure reading.

5 3.3.5 Measure the depth of the existing shims.

5,3 3.6 Determine the lift-off force by tensioning the tendon until all shims are loosened. Li t-off is achieved when the sound produced by tapping on shims with a small. hammer changes to indicate release from compression; also, all accessible shims can be moved by tapping with a sra11 hammer Repeat the operation until three measurements of the lift-off forces show a variation of + 50 psig, or less..

Se3o3+7'.3 Depressurize the jack until the gages read zero.

3 8 Pressurize the jack to a force so that the aver-age wire stress is equal to 80 percent of the minimum ultimate strength of the wires, as determined in paragraph 5.3 ',2.

5.3.3.9 Record on the Detensioning/Retensioning Form (Figure A-4) the gage reading and the corres-ponding tendon elongation.

A-5

s l

P

~ ~ '

~

~

~ ~~

~ Revision 3

' 5 3.3 10 5~3 3.11 Remove the shims Depressurize Che jack until the gages read zero.

5 3 3 12 Pressurize Che jack to a force equivalent to 1,000 lbs pex wire Si3.3 13 Recox'd on tbe Detensioning/Recensioning Form the gage reading and the corresponding tendon elongations 5 3 3 14 Depressurize the jack until the gages read zero~ Detach the gages from Che jack.

S 3 3 15 Remove the jack..

5 4 Wire Inspection 5.4 1 Inspect each tendon vix'e fox'ontinuity by pulling from one end, one wire at a tf.me, and observing the movement of the buttonhead at the opposite end. The Cool for pull~~

the individual wires is shown in Figure A-2. Prior to in- )3 specting the vires, it. is necessary to move the stressing washer away from the butconheads apprcarimately 3 inches This may be accomplished by using a hammer and a wood bufxer block Record any discontinuous wires on Che Anchorage In-spection Form All discontinuous wires shall be removed and mcamined to detexmine the cause of breakage Dis-continuous wires shall not be used for surveys.LLance vix'e test samples.

5 4 2 Remove one test vtre frcm each of the following tendons:

Dome Tendon: 2D3 Horizontal tendon: 42880 Vertical tendon: 34V29 The locations of the buttonheads of the vires to be re<<

mcnred, shall be recorded on the end Anchorage Inspection Form.

5,4,3 Pull the test vire at the end to be cut away from the stx'essing washer and notch apprmdmately 2 inches fxom the end Record the end Chat is cut, and the distance from the notch to the outside of the buttonhead within +0.02 inches A-6

'L P

Revision 3 5.4.4 Cut the wire between the buttonhead and the notch.

Remove the remaining portion of the wire and clean it with solvent, (Viscosity Oil Co. Industrial Solvent llo. 16) ~

5,4 S Inspect the wire and record on the Wire Inspection Form (Figure A-5) the locations of any damages, corrosion, and corrosion levels.

5 4,6 Compare the corrosion levels with those of the previous surveillance. If the corrosion has progressed one or more levels, remove one additional wire at approximately 120o frcm the first wire, repeating paragraph 5.4.3, 5.4.4, and 5.4 5.

If the repeat second this wire has progressed one or more levels, procedure for a third wire selected at approximately 120 from the first two. Do not r~e more than three wires from any one tendon during one surveillance period~

5,5 Retensioning and Lift-offForces 5.5.1 Safety The safety rules as specified in paragraph 5.-3.1 shall apply 5.5 2 Retensioning Tendons Retensioning shall be pezformed in a similar manner as detensioning; that is, if detensioning is done from shall be performed both ends of a tendon, retensioning accordingly.

S,5 2,1 Determine the number of effective wires in the tendon for retensioning. Deduct any discon-tinuous or surveillance test wires removed and recalculate the new jacking forces as outlined in paragraph 5.3.3.2.

5,5 2.2 Attach the jack to the bearing plate.

5,5 2 3 Install the pressure gages to the jack and pram, and record their identification numbers. Check th'e gages for zero pzessure reading.

5,5,2.4 pressurize the jack to a force equivalent to 1,000 lbs per wire. Record the gage reading and the corresponding tendon elongation.

5,5,2 5 Increase the tensioning force so that the average wire stress is equal to 80 percent of the minimum ultimate strength of the wires, as

I ~

S

Revisioi 3 determined in paragraph 5.5.2.1. Record the gage reading and the corresponding tendon elon-gation 5,5,2 6 Reduce the )eeking force from the equivalent of 80 percent of the, mini~ ult&tc strength of the wires, to the initial Lift-off reading es obtained in paragraph 5.3.3.6, Por any discontinuous or test wires removed, deduct 50 psi from the initial lift-offreadings. Measure the distance from the bottom of the stressing washer to thc bear~

plate and subtract one-eighth inch This di.stance is defined as full shim depth and is the depth of the new shins to be instaLLed.

5,5 2.7 Install shims to the neax'est one-eighth inch of the full shim depth.

5,5.2.8 Obtain new Iift-offforce. The reading should be equal to or greater than the initiaL lift-offforce If .not, repeat the procedures as stated in paragraphs 5.5.2.5 and 5.5.2.6.

Install shims and obtain new Lift-off force.

5,5.2.9 Measure and record new shim depth.

5,5.2.10 'etach the )ack and apply a coating of Viscosity Oil Co. 2090P or 1601 Amber to the tendon end anchorages.

5,6 Installing Sheath Piller 5,6 1 Reinstall tendon fi.lier caps using new gaskets, copper washers, and teflon nuts as used in the initial installation.

5 6.2 Refill the tendon sheathing with Viscosity Oil Co Vf.scmoxust 2090P, 2090P>>2, or 2090P-4 sheath filler.

Th'e temperatuxe of the filler at the filler p~p shall. be approximately 120 P. Do not reuse fiLler that has been x'emoved from the tendons. pumping shall conti.nue from one end of the tendon, until at least 5 gallons of filler, wi.thout any air bubbles or visible foreign substances, flows out of,the outlet at the opposite end of the tendon.

5.6.3 Record the temperature of the sheath filler at the drum and at the outlet. Also, record on the Sheath Piller Inspection Porm the volume of sheath filler replaced for each surveillance tendon.

5.7 Laboratory Testing of Tendon Wire Samples and Sheath Piller Samples A-8

t 0

li

~ ~

Revision 3 5,7 ~ 1 Tendon Wire Sample Testing 5.7.1,1 Tensile tests shall be performed on at least three specimens from each surveillance wire removed. Tensile test specimens, each approximately 126 inches long, shall be taken from near the center and each end of the wires. Additional specimens shall be taken from the portions of the wire that appear to have a corrosion rating one or more levels greater than the average des-criptions of the wires.

5,7,1,2 Remaining wires not used for testing, shall be protected against corrosion and retained until test results have been finalized.

5,7,1,3 Tensile tests also shall be made on at least one specimen from each discontinuous wi.re removed. The test specimen shall be taken near the break and shall be approximately 126 inches long."

5.7.1.4 All tensile tests shall be performed in accordance with Appendix E, "Specification [3 for Tensile Testing of Post-Tensioning Tendon Wire."

5,7,2 Sheath PiLler Sample Testing 5,7 2 1 Analytical testing shall be performed on at least one specimen, each one quart in size, from each surveillance tendon.

5.7,2.2 Additional specimen obtained from the sur-veillance tendons, but not used for testing, shall be retained until test results have been finalized.

5 7.2 3 All sheath filler testing shall be performed in accordance with Appendix F, "Specification )3 for Laboratory Testing of Sheath Piller."

5,8 Report 5.8.1 Data Data obtained during the surveillance shall be sum-marized in a report. The original data and records of the surveillance shall be submitted to Florida Power and Light Company within 90 days of completion of the tendon surveillance at the Turkey Point Plant.

A-9

, I'

~

~

~ I Revision 3 5 8.2 Evaluation The surveillance data for each tendon shall be compared with previous records to determine if:

a Additional wires have broken since last surveillance.

b The lift-offforce for the tendon is below the minimum effective design prestress.

c, Changes in wire corrosion level, or anchorage assembly corrosion Level, have occurred.

d. Deterioration of sheath filler has occurred.

e, Significant changes in wire elongation, yield, and ultimate strength have occurred.

If any of, these conditions exists, the report shall in-clude an evaluation of condition and, where necessary, recommendations for remedial actions.

5. 8. 3 Formulas Formulas for normalizing factors and normalized forces are given in Appendix B.. t3 A-10

d 1

~ ~

I I Revision 3 IDENTIFICATION ~o NUNIBER CD CD ill 5/8" + I/16 f BAR CD CD CD CD

+ I CD CO Cl 1".+ 1/8 3 fi" + ~/s 1" + 1/8 NOTES:

Hole diameter shall be certified by an independent laboratory.

2. Each gage shall have an identifying number.

~

Figure A-1 FLORIDA POWER IIc LIGHT CO.

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT 4 GO/N CNGO GAGE A-11

Revision 3 HEAD SEE DETAIL 1 ST'D NUT SLEEVE SEE DETAIL ~2 WELD TO EYE CI 6/8" UNC C7 SAW CUT I C)

+

1'-0" 1 t+lt NOTES:

The nut with the pulling ring welded to it may be replaced with an eye nut.

The hardness of this tool shall not exceed Rockwell C40.

FIGURE A-2 SHEET 1 OF 2 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE Unit 4 WIRE PULLER A-12

l I

0

~

~

Revision 3

~ 395 + 008 PIA REAM TO SUIT

.000 BUTTONHEAD COO OO Q

Q QQ O

Q Q CV LA

+ Q N

Q +

lA a SAN CUT CI ca alt 4 .06

.75" 2 .12 .375 .25"

+ .06 a .C2

..063" J .005 HEAD DETAIL SH;2 Q Q

Q O

Pl C)

F12" ,4&

MOVABLE SLEEVE DETAIL SH.-2 FIGURE A-2 SHEET 2 OF 2 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PO'iVER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE Unit 4 WIRE PULLER

I ~

Revisic}n 3 TENDON NO. LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 0 0000 0 000 0 0000 0 OOpp 0000 000'000 t<o~~oo 000 000 000 000 ppp Opp ppp Opp 00 0 00 Opp 00 0 p 00 0 0 00 + 00 0pp0 pp ~

pp 0 000 Opp ppp 000 pppp 000 pPPO

++goop pPOOP pppppp 00000 000p00 p P 0 Oppp 00 o 0 0 END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS ) ,(CLOSEST BUTTR ESS )

CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL WASHER WASHER BUTTONHEADS BUTTONHEADS SHIMS SHIMS BEARING PLATE BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

BUTTONHEADS: CORROSION LEVELS:

0 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD 41 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 6 BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT 0'2 VISIBLE OXIDATION NO PITTING WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY 430 ( PITTING ( 0.003" DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED 4 0.003" C PITTING E 0.006 THIS SURVEILLANCE TT 4f 5 0.006 4 PITTING ( 0.010

% WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A DATE END ANCHORAGE B DATE FIGURE A-3 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Unit 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM 5 th.YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE IN SP ECTION A-14 SHEET OF

I ~

I S ~ ~

~, ~

TENDON NO. BUTTRESS iNSPECTED BY DATE RAM NO. NUM. EFF. WIRES EXTERIOR TEMPERATURE GAGE NO.

0 DETENSIONING INTERIOR TEMPERATURE 0 RETENSIONING DESCRIPTION OBJECTIVE ACTUALMEASURED CHECK GAGES (ZERO)

MEASURE SHIMS OBTAIN LIFT.OFF PRESSURIZE TO .Sf'i MEASURE ELONGATION 0

.8f'EPRESSURIZE TO ZERO PRESSURIZE TO 1000 LB/WIRE MEASURE ELONGATION ~~

DEPRESSURIZE TO ZERO REMOVE RAM REMOVE WIRE WAS THIS END CUT?

CHECK CONTINUITY PRESSURIZE AT 1000 LB/WIRE MEASURE ELONGATION '~

zO PRESSURIZE TO CO

.Sf'EASURE ELONGATION AT.Sf'q PRESSURE 9 RESHIM A) NEW LIFT-OFF B) NEW SHIMS PRESSURE SHALL NOT DROP BELOW THIS LEVEL AFTER PRESSURIZATION TO.Sf'q ii ELONGATION IS THE DISTANCE FROM THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THE BEARING PLATE TO THE INSIDE FACE OF THE STRESSING WASHER. (THIS WILL BE A NEGATIVE NUMBER IF THE WASHER IS INSIDE THE TRUMPET.)

F I GORE A"4 A-15 Revision 3

I ~

0

Revision 3 TENDON NO. CLOSEST BUTTRESSES BH END 75'50 TOTAL LENGTH OF WIRE CORROSION LEVEL:

Q g1 NO VISIBI.E OXIDATION Q 02 VISIBLE OXIDATION,NO PITTiNG Q 030" < PITTING ~ 0.003" Q 44 0.003 < PITTING 0.006" Q 4 5 0.006" < PITTING ( 0.010" FIGURE A-5 INSPECTED BY FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.

DATE TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ~

Unit 4 I POST TENSIONING SYSTEM i St11 YEAR SURVEILLANCE  !

BH. - BUTI'ONHEAD WIRE INSPECTION h TENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS A-16 SHEET OF

l l P

t ~

Revision 3 SHEATHING FILLER INSPECTION TENDON NO.

END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B CLOSEST BUTTRESS CLOSEST BUTTRESS DETENSIONING: DETENSIONING:

TEMPERATURE: TEMPERATURE:

OUTSIDE OUTSIDE INSIDE INSIDE GREASE REMOVED GREASE REMOVED COLOR COLOR BY: BY:

DATE: DATE:

RETENSIONING: RETENSIONING:

TEMP E RATUR'E: TEMPERATURE:.

OUTSIDE OUTSIDE INSIDE INSIDE INLET INLET OUTLET OUTLET

/

GREASE REPLACED GREASE REPLACED BY: BY:

DATE: DATE FIGURE A-6 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Unit 4 POST. TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE A"17 SHEET OF

1 APPENDIX B FORMULAS FOR NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED FORCES FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL 'POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland June 1977 Revision 1, December 15, 1977

I Revision 1

1. 0 GENERAL In order to provide a common base for comparison, tendon lift-off forces must be normalized to account for elastic stress loss during initial installation (a function of the post-tensioning sequence), of the lift-off fqrce deviation from the base value, and the number effective tendon wires or strands. The base value for evaluating the normalized tendon force is assumed to be the force which produces an average tendon wire or strand stress of 0.7fpu. In cases where the same tendon is subjected to two or more surveillances, the base value for the ith surveillance is the normalized force for the i-1 surveillance.

The normalized force is equal to the measured lift-off forces multi-plied by the normalizing factors.

2.0 NORMALIZING FORMULAE 2.1 Normalizin Formulae for First Surveillance i~ 1 2.1.1 Vertical Tendons 0

N Fl L c N v n

0.7f v

u E

H (Eq. 1) 2.1.2 Hoop Tendons 0.7f (Eq 2)

NF N v

n 1

N EV 2.1.3 Dome Tendons

0. 7f (Eq. 3)

NF N

2.2 Normalized Lift-Off Force Per Wire or Strand

~ F x (Eq 4)

FN NF 0

B-2

),

t P

Revision'1 2.3 Normalizin Factor for Subse uent Surveillances (i ) 1)

The following equation is used for vertical-dome, hoop-wall, or hoop-dome tendon:

(Eq. 5)

F F (i-1) L (i 1) x N (i 1)

3. 0 NOMENCLATURE L ~ initial lift-offforce of surveillance tendon (kips)

~ lift-off force obtained at the i-1 surveillance (kips)

= lift-off force during retensioning at the i-1 surveillance (kips)

= number of hoop tendons tensioned prior to tensioning surveillance tendon

.h

~ total number of hoop tendons n

v

~ number of vertical tendons tensioned prior to tensioning surveillance tendon N ~ total number of vertical tendons in one group nd ~ number of dome tendons'n one group tensioned prior to tensioning surveillance tendon N

d

~ total number of dome tendons

'= number of effective wires or strands in surveillance wc tendon at initial installation

~ number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon at ith surveillance N number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon (i-1) at i-1 surveillance N number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon (i-1) when retensioned during the i-1 surveillance S total elastic stress loss in hoop tondons during initial h tensioning (ksi) = 15.3 ksi SE

~ total elastic stress loss in vertical tendons during v initial tensioning (ksi) 6.6 ksi B-3

I ~

Revision 1

= lift-off force per wire or strand at ith surveillance (kips)

F ~ lift-off force per wire or strand after retensioning at (i-1) the i-1 surveillance (kips)

N

~ normalized lift-off force surveillance (kips) per wire or strand i for the .th NF

~ normalizing factor for the ith surveillance NF

~ normalizing factor for the i-1 surveillance (i-1)

S total elastic loss in dome tendons during initial E ~ 14.7 ksi d tensioning (ksi) due to one group

~ Poisson's ratio for concrete ~ 0.16 fpu = minimum specified ultimate strength of tendon wire or strand (ksi)

~ cross-sectional area of one tendon wire or strand (in 2 )

B-4

C APPENDIX C END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland 4 August 1977

I t'

~ ~

8 I ~

S TENDON NO. LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 6 p~

0 4 0 Oooo 0 p oooo 4 pp

~+ oopp p pp 00 oo Goop g~ oop pop opo poo pop opp ooo pp oop oo Qo 0 o0 po 0 + pop + o o op poo o ~ oooo ooo ooo ooo 'po ooo o Pp opp ooo pop 0 ooopo ooppo o,o oooo o pp 0 popoo opo 0 Dq q0~

END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6 ) (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6 TOP BOTTOM.

CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL

- WASHER SUTTDNHSADS 2 RASHER BUTTONHEADS SHOES SHIMS 2 SEARING PLATE 1 BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

BUTTONHEADS: CORROSION LEVELS:

8 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD 41 NO VISIBLE OX)DATION 0 BUTTONH EAD WITH SPUT 02 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING 0 WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y 030 s PlTTING 6 O.OQ3" DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED 0<O.OQ3" < PITTING a OSOe" THIS SURVEILLANCE WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND 45 O.O06 s'ITTING 6 LolO TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RB DATE 10-25 77 ENOANCHORAGE8 AH DASE FIGURE FLORIDA POWER IIE LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCI EAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4.

POST.TEN SIONIN G SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION C-2 SHEET>OF 9

TENDON NO. l.OCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 2 0

00000600Op C~ 0 0 00 0 0 Og Opppp OOOO 0+>000 000 000 Opp Opp u 000 000 e 000 (P pp

~

OOo, Pp o0 00O 0

~ ppp Op +

Op Op 0 p 00 000 00 000 pp Opp pg ~

ppp > 000 pPPO z 00000 ppppP 0 Opppp OpppO pp0 O'0 Op 0

~,oOOP

/p0'g 0 0 00 0 END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 2 ) .{CLOSEST BUTTRESS 2 )

TOP BOTTOM.

CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL WASHER 1 SUTTQHHEADS SUTTQHHEADS SHINS SH QSS BEARING PLATE BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

BUTTONHEADS: CORROSION LEVELS:

0 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD 41 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION e BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT 02 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY 030 E PITTING 5 0.003 DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED 4<o.oo3" < PITTING E o~os-K THIS SURVEILLANCE WIRE REMOVED FOR INSP'ECTION AND Oso.oos" ( pITTING 5 o.ohio" TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY EHQ AHGHQR*GS A RE DATE 10-26-77 EHD AHQHQRAGE S AH DATE FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER SL LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TEN SIONIN G SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTlON C-3 SHEET2OF 9

1, TENDON NO. l.OCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) oopo opo oo0 0 ~0 ~

ooooo OOOOO ooo 0 00000 ohio oooo 000 ooo 000 OOO Ooo 00 0 0 pop 000 po o oop oo ooo 000 +

oo

+

~ OOOO 00 poo poo ppo p 0 ppo

~ PS.OO poop 000 0000

~gpoopo po 00 oooo popo ~Y c o 0 0 Op ooo p 0 cy~ p oo<

0 op p END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4 ) .(CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4 )

TOP BOTTOM CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL RASHER 1 NASHER BUTTONHEADS BUTTONHEAOS SHINS 1 SHOAT 2

SEARING PLATE BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

BUTTONHEADS: CORROSION LEVELS-0 OFF S1ZE BUTTONHEAD 01 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION e BUTTONHEAD WITH SPUT 4'2 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING N!RE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY TT.3 0 ( PITTING 5 0.003" DlSCONTINUOUS VIIRE REMOVED TEA 0.003 E PITTlNG K OJ)otE K

THIS SURVEII.LANCE SIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTlON AND ISO.OOS" < PITTING 6 0.010" TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE NSPECTED BV NANCHORGAA ED EEE DATE ENO ANCHORAGE B AR DATE FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TEN S IONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION c-4 SHEET3OF 9

TENDON NO. LOSS LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) o p ~~ o p OOoo POPO ~bppp 0 OOOO e OOOO pppp < Opppp PPOOP

/ OPO ppo 0OO OO Opp po pp OOO OP OO OO POO 0 O pp 0 + 0 + OOO OOO ppp 0 ppp OO OO

~pop OOo WQOO OOP z+oppQp OOOO 400 0 Opp c

pp 0 QgOOOI O

QOOOPO 0 O QOOOO Opppp ppp 0 OOP OO v 0 0 A~

END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS < ) .tCLOSEST 8UTTR ESS 1 l.

CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL BASHER 2 VSASHER 2 BUTTOIIHSADS BUTTONHSADS SHIIAS WIMS BEARING PLATE GEARING PLATE 2 LEGEND:

B~ONHEADS: "

CORROSION LEVELS:

e OFF SI2E BUTTONHEAD O4 NO VISIBLE 0"!DATfOTJ 6 SUTTONHEAD WITH SPLfT ~

42 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PI~SNG WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY ~30 C P1TTING 6 0.003" DtSCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED Isf 4 0.003 4 PliT!N G K OANg K

THIS SURVEI LLANCE WlRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND-4'-5 0.006 s PITTING 5 0.010-TESTIN G THIS SUR VEIL LAN CE fNSPECTED BY Rev. 1 END ANCHORAGE A RS DATE LL S TT September 8, 1978 ENDANCHORAGEB AE DATE LL l"tGtfRE 3

~1-~/s" FLORIDA POWER JE LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4

~ POST-TEN SIONIN G SYSTEM 5 thYEAR SURVEfl.LANCE END ANCHORAGE IN SP ECTtON A-A C-5 SHEET 4OF 9

\ f.

P

TENDON NO. l.OCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 0 0 oo p oooo opp pop o

~

e popo go po,oo pp op p oooo ppoo pop ppp opo-opo oop pop opp opp op p po pop o + opo Op opp0 0 p

~O 00 'oo oo

~pop opp

~

po opp ~

ooo ~8 poop I5' op p

o 0 p 0 oppo p p o opo

~ o popo 0'g 0 p END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 3 .(CLOSESTBUTTRESS 6

) )

CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL WASHER BUTTOMHEADS

  • NASHER'UTTOMHEADS SHOES SHIMS BEARING PLATE 1 BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

BUTTONHEADS: CORROSION LEVELS:

6 OFF.SIZE BUTTONHEAD 41 NO VISIBLE OX)DATION e BUTI'ONHEADWITH SPLIT 02 VlSIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTlNG WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y 030 C PITTING S, 0.003 DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVEO st 4 0.003 4 PITTING ~ OA)06 THIS SURVEILLANCE llVIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION ANO 45 0.006 ( PITTING 5 L010 TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE Wircled Button Heads Indicate Corrosion Level 82 INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RB DATE END ANCHORAGE B ~Q DATE ~~~ FIGURE 3 FI.ORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5 t+YKAR SURVEILLANCE ENO ANCHORAGE INSPECTION C-6 SHEET5OF 9

'I

~

~ ~

' ~ ~

I E TENDON NO.' LOCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 6 6 1 0 o ~ 5P0 5y9 0

oooo oooo ~~ Q+ 0 op p'0 ppoo Oopp oooo ooooo poo 0 oop 000 opp poo ooo 000 00 ooo oo 00 0 0 oo oo

~ Ooo + + o o Op oop 0 p ooo 0 op op ooo w oop ppp 000 ooo poop 0 OOOO OOOo 0O 00000 ooo o ooo00 000 0

oo ppp 0 0pp 0

END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6 ) .(CLOSEST BUTTR SS f 1 )

CORROSION I.EVEL CORROSION LEVEL

- RASHER SUTTONHEADE

.2 NASHER SUTTONHEADE SHIMS 2 SHIMS 2 BEARING PLATE 1 BEARING PLATE 1 LEGEND:

BUTTONHEAOS: CORROSION LEVELS-0 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAO 41 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 0 BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT 02 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING 8 WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY TII'3 0 C PlTTING 6 0.003 DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED w i L003,Q PITTING 5 0406 THIS SURVEILLANCE VllRE REMOVEO FOR INSPECTION ANO 4'6 0.006 C PITTING 5 L010 TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RB DATE END ANCHORAGE S DATE FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TEN SI ON IN G SYSTEM 5 thYEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION C-7 SHEET 6OF

TENDON NO. ~280 I.OCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 4 6 2 TP 3p]

'poo p opopo opp p p

oooo e Q po op pp 0

pop ooo- ppo ooo ppo opoo ~ p~o pp o o 0 0o oo (pp c) ooo + o o poo ppo0 0 poo ppP CeI ppp pop opo poo oooo poo poop 0popp oooop po popop

~ ppoooooo p p pp ppoop p p 0

/

END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4 .tCLOSEST 8UTTR ESS 2

) )

CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL RASHER 2 BUITOHHEADS BUTTON HEADS BRIMS SHIMS SEARING PLATE 1 BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

BUTTONHEADS: CORROSION LEVELS-9 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD g1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 0 SUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT 4'2 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING e WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY 430 C PlTTING 6 0.003 DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED TT i 0.003 4 PITTINQ K 0406 X

THIS SURVEILLANCE WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION ANO 4'5 L006 C PITTING 6 0 050 TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY

~

EHD ANCHORAGE A ENOANCHORAGES ~

DATE DATE ~ FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5thYEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION C-8 SHEET7OF 9

~g TENDON NO. LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 4 & 6 0 pop 4 0 PQP 0 oopp oopp oppoo Qpp poop <~ oooo p pp p

~ 0 op opo oop ppo ~

oop d'po oop op oop o opp oo 0 p + p p oopp QOQ ooo pop ~

pp ooo ooo + opp ppo pop .I ooo popo 5 0 poppy opooo ~ opppp pp o op ig oooo oop o o (~ 0 o p'a~

I

~

Og END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4 ) CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6 CORROSION LEVEI. CORROSION LEVEL WASHER 1 NASHER 2 8UTTONHEADS EUTTONHEADS SHIMS 2 BEARING PLATE BEARING PLATE 1 LEGEND:

BUVFONHEADS: CORROSION LEVELS-0 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD TE 1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION e BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT 02 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING 0 SIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SUR V EI I.LANCE TT 30 44a003" C

45 0.006 0 PITTINQ 6 0.003

( PITTINQ PITTINQ i

6 0SOe" LOIO X, WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A DATE END ANCHORAGE 8 AH DATE FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PUQET UNIT 4 POST-TENS IONIN G SYSTEM 5 th -YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION C-9 SHEETSOF 9

VEWOON NO. I.OCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 0o r F'g~

Opp Oppp 0 0 OOOO o OOOO opppo Opppp d OppP 0 OOP~

~<OOOO Opp ~ ~ OOO Opp C

~ OO OO PO 0 0 OOOO Oppu PO ~

Opp 0 o 0

+ OBO Opo Op OOO Op<0 ~

0 ppP 0000 000 Opp

~ 000 pppp Oppp pppp ~

0 ppp poop pppop OPOOO OOOO ppp p 0 Op p pp OOO 0 p0 z

END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6 ) .(CLOSEST BUTTR ESS )

CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL lVASHER 2 VtASHER BUTTONHEADS BUTTONHEADS SHIMS 2 SHOAT BEAR ING PLATE BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

BUTTONHEADS: CORROSION LEVELS 0 OFF SI2E BUTTONHEAD 4'1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 6 BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT 02 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTINQ

, WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y 430 C PITTING 6 0.003 DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED ~ 4 0.003 4 PITTINQ K OAOtB THIS SURVEILLANCE WIRE REMOVED FOR INSP'ECTlON AND OS 0.006 C PITTINQ 6 L010 TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RB DATE 11" 15-.77 END ANCHORAGE B AH DATE 11-15-77 FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTlON C-10 r SHEET9OF 9

APPENDIX D WIRE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland November 1977

~DON NCL 34V29 10'-10" END SAMPLE It1 8 '-2" SAm'ZZ 4P2 125 128'7" ] 391 pll ]4] I pll 143 l 7 ll SAM.ZZ N SE1

~0 l 4 ll 169'-8~1 CORROSION LEVEL gg f1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION Q 42 VNIBLEOXIDATION,NO PITTING 0 ISO"< PITTING S O.au" g faaea-< PITTING < aOO6" 0 45aOOe" < PITTING < aeo" RGVRE 5 amcrao sr FLORIDA MYIER 5 LIGHT CO.

10-31-77 TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 MST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5 th YEAR SuRVKILLANCE MIRE INSPECTION L TENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS

~ D-2 SHEETLOF D

I~

TENOON NO. CLOSEST BUTTRESSES 166 10'-10" gg ENO SAMPLE 81 60'-10" SAMPLE <P.

87 f 6$ ll 9 '""ver SmPLZ fP3 TOTAL LEN'rm OF VnRE CORROSION LEVEl 01 NO VISIBLE OXIOATION 0 f2 VISIBLE OXIOATlON,NO PITTINQ 0 4i'O"C mnNe5 O.ea" 0 Sca.art C PITnNa < O.OOS" a 45aOO6"< rITnNS < aniO" INSPECTED IY~~

OATE 11>> 11-78 FICURE 5 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE 4" IUTTONHEAO NlRE INSPECTION 4 TENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS SHEETS.OF &

f

~ t

~

~

TENDON NO. CLOSEST BUTTRESSES 2@4 10'10" SAMPLZ 81 7Pt Ptt Supra,/f2 80'-10" 125'29'-7"

]40f 3ll

~

smrrz N TOTAL LENGTH OF YARE 140'3" CORROSION LEVEL:

Q 4'1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION Q 42.VISIBLE OXIDATION.NO PITTING Q 0'50 < PITTlNG 5 0.003 0 0aaaa" < PITTING < a006-0 f50.006"< PITTING < aa10-FIGURE 5 twmCrmSV " t. FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.

ATE 11-11-77 TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNiT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE IH.'. BUTTONHEAD HIRE INSPECTION 4 TENSION SAMPLE I.OCATIONS SHEET OF

I~

P

APPENDIX E SPECIFICATION FOR TENSILE TESTING OF POST-TENSIONING TENDON WIRE (ASTM A-421)

FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland s,: .-.8 Charles W.

Yd .-.e~..)

Andrews June, 1977 Approved:

K. P. B chert Revision l., December 15, 1977 Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Division E-1

I Revision 1 L 0 GENERAL This document specifies the general procedures which shall be used for the tensile testing or the 1/4"-diameter post-tensioning teadoa wires (AS'-421, Type BA). This document does aot relieve the testiag laboratory of the responsibility for conducting the tensile tests in a manner coasistend with the industry standards.

2 0 WORK INCLUDED Nine (9) L/4"-diameter wire specimens, approximately 10'-6" Long, wi11. be sent to the laboratory for testing in accordance with Section 3.0 Each of these specimens will have an identification tag attached close to one end; this tag will identify the tendon from which the wire was removed and the location of the specimen with resoect to the wire. Specimens shall be disposed of in accordance with Section 4.0 aad a report meeting the requi emeats of Section 5.0 shall be prepared.

3 0 TEST DESCRIPTION l

Tendon wires shall be tested in accordance with AS'-421-65, "S~a-dard Specification for Uncoated Stress-Relieved Wire for P estressed Concrete",except that the gage length shall be 100 (+ 1.0) inches, instead of the 10 iaches as specified. This test shall inc'uae the followiag:

3~1 Measurement of wire diameter with an accuracy of + 0.0005".

3,2 Measurement of gage length with an accuracy of + 0.05"..

3.3 Application or aa initial load corresponding to 29,000 psi.

3.4 Applicatf.on of additional load to obtain the force correspondiag to 1.0 percent eWensioa.

3,5 Application of additional load and obtaining load at failure and elongation under load at fai1ure (+ 0.05") .

4,0 DISPOSAL OP TES~ SPELLS A sampLe approximately 6" long oa each side of the break of each specimen shall be bouad and returned as a unit with the idaxtificatioa tag attached. Spec~ shall be returned to:

Bechtel Power Corporation Post Office Box 607 Gaithersburg, ~~land 20760 Atteation: Nr. M. Malcom Pro]ect Eaginee" E-2

t I Revision 1 Thx'ee (3) copies of the report on tendon wire testing shall be submitted to:

Bechtel Power Corporation Post Office Box 607 Gaithexsbux'g, Maryland 20760 Attention. LLr. H. Nalcom Prospect Engineer The report shall contain the follacrLng information:

5 1 Testing machine calibration report.

5.2 Wire identification.

5,3 Wix'e diameter (+ 0.0005 inches) .

5.4 Gage length (+ 0.05 inches).

5.5 Force and, elongation (+ 0.001 inches) at initial load.

5,6 Porce and elongation (+ 0.01 inches) at 17. extension.

5,7 Poxce and elongation under load (+ 0.05 inches) at failure.

5.8 Location ofM.lure relative to the grip in the

(+ 0.005 inches).

~g head E-3

APPENDIX F SPECIFICATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING OF SHEATH FILLER (VISCONORUST 2090P)

FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland Charles W. Andrews June, 1977 Approved:

K. P. Buchert Revision 1, December 15, 1977 Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Division F l

r 0

Revision 1 1 i0 GENERAL This document specifies the procedu es which shall be used for labora-tory testing of sheath filler Visconozust 2090P to determine:

a The amount of water soluble chlorides, nitrates and sulfides which are leached from a given contact area between water and the sheath filler under standzad conditions.

b.. The water content of the sheath filler.

c The resezve alkalinity of the sheath filler.

This document does not relieve the testing laboratory of responsi-b&ity for conducting the necessary laboratory tests in a manner ccasistent with the ~industry standards.

2 0 WORK INCLUDED Nine (9) ane-quart test samples will be sent to the laboratory for testing in accordance with Section 3.0. The concentration oz water soluble impurities and water in these samples wi.ll 1Dcely not exceed the follawing:

2 1 Chlorides - 10 ppm 2 2 Ni~tes - 10 ppm 2 3 Sulfides - 10 ppm 2 4 Water (H20) - 107. Dry Weight A report meeting the requirements of Section 4.0 shall be prepared.

3 0 TEST DESCRY ZIONS

, Each sample of sheath filler shall be mixed and then tested as fol.laws:

3 1 Water Soluble Xmpurities A water extraction of each sample of sheath fill.er shall be made and tested as indicated below:

3 1 1 Usi.ng a spatula, coat the inside (baton and sides) of a 1 liter glass beaker with a 1/4-inch layer oz sheath filler.

3.l. 2 Pill the beaker with distilled water at roam temperature.

3.1 3 Heat the wate to a controlled tempe ature of <00op and maintain for four hours. Do not heat on a, hot plate.

Heat either in an oven or by use oz an ~ersion heater so that the water wi11 remain clear for tests.

F-2

r h

Revision 1 0 3.1 4 Run a blank on distiLLed water. Xf titrate, use a micro-buret, 1 ml or 5 ml, with 0.01 - 0.05 ml graduation inter-vals.

3 1 5 Decant water and analyze for soluble ions. Test only for salts in leached water. The water analyses shall be as follows:

3.1 5.1 Chlorides (Cl) by ASTM D-512.

3~1 5.2 iH.trate +03) by AS~ D-992, Bzucine Method or Cadminum Reduction 'method by Hach Chemical Co.,

Ames'owai 3 1 5.3 Sulfides (S) 'by APHA (American PubLic Health Association) Standard method - Nethylene Blue-or the method by Hach Chemical Company, Ames, Xowao 3 2 Vvater Content Mater content (H20 as percent of dzy weight) shall be determined in accordance with ASM D-95.

3 3 Neutralization Number Neutralization number shaLL be determined in accordance with ASTM D-664, 4 0 iEPORT Three copies of the report on Laboratory testing of the sheath filler'hall be submitted to:

BechteL Power Corporation Post Office Box 607 Gaithersburg, ~~Land 20760 Attention: Hr. H. Nalcom Project Bngineer The report shall contain the zollowing information:

Sample identi cation.

4.2 Concentration of water soluble chlorides, nitrates and sulf.'des wi~4 an accuracy oz 0.1 ppm 4.3 Concentration oz water (H20) within an accuracy of 0.1 percent oz dry weight of the filler.

4.4 Neutralization number within an accuracy of 0.01 mg reagent per gram of filler.

F-3

'V 0

~ ~

APPENDIX G RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING OF WIRE SAPLES FOR FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 t

POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1978

~ t PSRLI A0T ACT~ PC qS5TINQ (

cP, 'we +y EF~

PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY CSTAOLISHCO ISO I 55 PLEASE REPI-Y TOI e t 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA. 15220 P, Oa IOX ldAd

'r

  • NUTVAL FROTCCTION TO CLICNT5, THC FVhLIC ANO OVRSCLVCS, AI,L RCFORT5 PITTSBURGH, P A IStt'S d ~I ARC SVSINTTCO A5 THC CONFIOCHTIAL FROFCRTT OF CLICHTS *HO AUTHORIZATION Z+ ++ FOR FVSLICATIOH OF STATCHCNTS, COHCLU5IOHS OR CXTRACTS FROM OR RCOAROIHO CQSAHOGT OVR RCI'ORT5 IS RCS CRT CO FCHOIHCI OVR INRITTCH A>FROVAL LABORATORY No. 781695 AREA COOE A It TELEPHONE Stt.5000 oRDER No. PG-6834 cLIENT's No. P,O ~ No 65121 25833C p E pQ May 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon IAire Report to. Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O. Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn. Mr. Feeney UNIT P4 Spec imen Iden ti8 ica tion 2D3 19-'1 Diameter, Inches .2500 Original Area, Sq. Inches .0491 Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI 14004 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches .21 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds 95600 Stress at 1% Extension, PSI, 195,500 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches 1.21 Load Pounds at Fracture 12,250 Stress PSI at Fracture 249,500 Elongation at Fracture, Inches 4. 92 Elongation at Fracture, Percent 4. 92%

Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head 9" Samples tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASSN A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.

SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIPT FOR TESTING.

PAY -ly ~cqp

I 20 X 20 TO THE INCH ~ 1 X anal.

10 INCIIKS H E-C IIDIFFEI. a KSSCII CO. saoc a 46 1240

I f

1 FORM AOT ACY, F C g5TIHO

~

~+4< PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATQRY C ~O CSTASLISHCO 1441 PLKA5K RKPL,Y TOI 850 POPLAR STRKFT, PITTSBURGH, PA. 15220 Pe 0, BOX IOAS AS A NUtUAI. FROTCCTIOH tO CLICH'15 ~ THC FUSI,IC AHO OVR5CLYC5, ALI RCI'ORT5 PI T T 5BU ROH, P A. 1525<

++ 4 al ARC SVSMITTCO AS THC COHFIOCNTIAL FROFCRTT OF CLICHT5, *HO AUTHORIZATION C FOR FVSLICATIOH OF STATCHCHTSa COHCLVSIOHS OR CXTRACT5 FRON OR RCCAROIHC

~+SAROC OVR RCFORTS IS RCSCRYCO FCNOIHO OVR WRITTCN AFFROYAL, LABORATORY No. 781695 ARKA COOK 412 TKLKPHONK 922 4000 cLIENT's No. P.O No. 65121 "25833C oRDER No. PG-6834

~

R EP O R T May 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Mire Report to: Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O. Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn . Hr. Feeney UN IT Specimen 1dentification, 2D3 $ 2 Diame ter', Inches . 2499 Original Area, Sq. Inches . 049 Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI 1400 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches .18 Load at l%%u Extension, Pounds 10,150 Stress at 1% Extension, PSI 207,100 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches 1.18 Load Pounds at Fx'acture 12,350 Stress PSI at Fracture 2525000 Elongation at Fracture, Tnches S.56 Elongation at Fracture, Percent 5.56%

Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head 303->>

Samples tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASf A421, Stress Stxain Curves are attached.'AHPLES SUBNITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTXNC.

G-4

1 20 X 20 TO THE INCH ~ 1 X IO INCIIES C KEUFFEI-0 XSSM CO. aaotausa, 46 1240 I ~

c

I 0

l

ol PORM ADT ACV. P 8 tt 5TI IIp (

PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY

~

I c SaD C5TASLISHCD 1441 ~

PLK ASK REPt.Y YO:

IL 050 POPLAR 5TREET. PITTS8URGH, PA. 15220 P Oo 8OX ISSS AS A HUTVAL tROTCCTIOH TO CLICNTS ~ THC tVSLIC AHD OURSCLYCS, ALL RCtORT5 PIT758URQH, P A 1525

~I ARC SUSHITTCD AS THC COHSIDCNTIAL tAOPCR'TY Dt CLICNTS, AHD AUTHORIZATIOH

(~SANO'" tOlt tVSLICATIOH Ot 5TATCHCNT5, CONCLUSIONS OR CX'TRACT5 TRON OR RCOARDIHO OVR RCtORTS 15 RCSCRYCD tCNDIHO OUR WRITTCH AttROYAI LABORATORY No. 781695 AREA COOK SIC TELEPHONE SCZ 4000 ORDER No. PG-6834 cLlENT's No P.O. No. 65121-25833C May 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon !lire Report to: Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O. Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn- Mr. Feeney UNIT 44 Specimen Iden tif ica tion 2D3 t3

.2500 Diameter, Inches Original Area, Sq. Inches .0491 Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00.PSI 1400 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches .20 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds 10,250 at 1% Extension, PSI 'tress 208,900 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches 1.20 Load Pounds at Fracture 12,350 Stress PSI at Fracture 251,500 Elongation at Fracture, Inches 5.53 Elongation at Fracture, Percent 5.53%

Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head 3" Samples tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASTiif A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.,

E

. SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTING.

G-6

I l

t l

20 X 20 TO THE INCH+ 7 X l0 INCHCS KCUFFCL a ESSEll CO. ~ioccwvsa. 46 1240 0

l ll Uj li 8 R. TO (ted Y1 t )I I Il

~ g

~ ~

I ~

ii

~ ~

FoAM SOT ACT. PC qgSTIIIG

(

IO P' PlTTSBURGH TESTING t ABORATORY 5 CI CSTARLISHCD 144 I SI Pl EASE REPLY TOI 850 POPLAR STREET, PlYTSBURGH, PA. 15220 0 BOX 1040 If OI Pe C

AS

  • MUTU*L I'ROTCCTION TO CLICNTS ~ TNC PUIILIC AHD OUR5CLVCS ~ *LL RCPORT5 PITTSBIIRGH, P A, ISIS i+ < rl L+ ARC 5USMITTCD A5 TNC CONFIOCNTIAI PROPCRTV OF CI,ICNT5, ANO AUTHORIZATION FOR PVSLICATION OP STATCMCNTS, CONCI.USIONS OR CXTRACT5 FROM OR RCOAROINO

= ~+SANO<" OVR RCPORTS I5 RC5CRVCO PCNOIHO OUR WRITTCN *PPROVAL, LA8ORATORY NO. 781695 AREA COOK CIA TKI EPHONE 922.4000 oRDER No. PG 6834 CLJENT'> No' 0 ~ No ~ 65121 25833C pppQ Nay 15, 1978 Repor t o f:. Tension Test of Post<<Tensioning Tendon Hire Report to. Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O. Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn- Mr. Feeney UNIT ~4 Spec imen Iden fica on ti ti 34V29 $1 Diameter, Inches . 2499 Original Area, Sq. Inches . 0491 Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI 1400 Elongation at Initial Load, inches .20 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds 9,850 Stress at 1% Extension, PSI 200,600 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches 1.20 Load Pounds at Fracture 12,700 Stress PSI at Fracture 258,700 Elongation at Fracture, Inches 4.87 Elongation at Fracture, Percent 4.87%

Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head 3 II Samples tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment I,dated June 1977 and ASTiaf A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.'AMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIPT FOR TESTWiG.

G-8

20 X 20 TO THE INCH>> 2 K IO INCHES f(uT>>

e~~

C KEVFFEL 0 ESSEA CO. aiotssusA, 46 1240 gR iCt I

I I )()e

~ ~

~ ~ ~

FORLI SOT ACT.iDC PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY C5TASLISHCD l44l Pl KASK RKPLT TOI 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBVRGH, PA. I5220 P 0, BOX I040 AS A NVTUAL RROfCCTION Td CLICNfS TNC FVSLIC AND OVRSCLVCS, ALL RCFORT5 PITTSBURGH, PA 13230

  • RC SVSNIfftd AS TNC CONIlIOCNTIAL FROFCRTT OI CLICNTS, AND AVTNORIZATION CPS ANOC9 fOR FV4LICATION OI STATCNCNTS, CDNCLVSION5 OR CXTRACTS SROH OR RCOAROINC OUR RCRORTS IS RCSCRVCO FCNOLNO OUR WRITTCN ARFRDVAL LABORATORY NO. 781695 ARKA COOK 412 TKLKPHONK 922 4000 oRDER No. PQ 6834 cLIENT's No. P 0. No 65121"25833C R EP O RT lfay 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Mire Report to. Florida Power 6c Light Company P.OS Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn- Mr. Feeney UNIT 4 .

S pecimen Identification 34V29 g2 Diameter, Inches .2498 Original Area, Sq. Inches . 0490 Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI 1400 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches .18 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds 10,650 Stxess at 1% Extension, PSI 2173300 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches 1.18 Load Pounds at Fracture 12,800 Stress PSI at Fractux'e 261,200 Elongation at Fxacture, Inches 4.51 Elongation at Fracture, Percent 4.51%

Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head 6,63 Samples tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASTI( A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.

SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIWT FOR TESTING.

20 X 20 TO TIIC INCH+ 7 X IO WCIIES .

f KEUFFEL 0 ESSEII CO. eaoElallSL 461240 aP i3('Y

'l

~ ~ ~

FORM AGT RCV oPO

~gcll I IIS 4 +>

PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY CI CSTAdLISHCO $ 44$

D PLKASK RKPLT TOI 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA.. I5220 Po O IIOX 1044 AS A NUTU*L RROTCCTION 'TO CLICNTS 'THC RUSLIC ANO OUR5CLVC5, AI.L REPORTS PIYTSSVRGH, PAe ISZ:

Gz 4 ARE SUSMITTCO *5 THC CONFIDENTIAL RRORCRTV OR CLIENTS, ANO AVTHORIZATION IVOR RVSLICATION OR STATCNCNT5, GONCLVSION5 OR EXTRACTS TRON OR RCG*ROIHG

~+SANO C OUR RfPORTS IS RCSCRVCO tCNOIKC OUR WRITTEN ARRROV*L, LABORATORY NO. 781 695 ARKA COOK 41C TKLKPHONK 922 4000 cLIENT's No. P .0 ~ No. 65121 -25833C Nay 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Hire Report to. Florida Power 6 Light Company P .0. Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn. Mr. Feeney UNIT 84 Specimen Identification 34V29 Pr3 Diame ter, Inches .2498 Original Area, Sq. Inches . 0490 Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI 1400 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches .31 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds 10,050 Stress at 1% Extension, PSI 205,100 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches 1.31 Load Pounds at Fracture 12,700 Stress PSI at Fracture 259,200 Elongation at Fracture, Inches 4.59 Elongation at Fracture, Percent 4. 59%

Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head 37.0 Samples tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment I'dated'une 1977 and ASTif A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.

SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTING.

G-12

l 20 X 20 TO THE INCII~ 7 X IO INCIIES f ~E oE- KKUFFEI 8r ESSSII CO. IIADCIWIISA 46 1240

FORAI SOT ACV. PC

~g5TIHG VI F'ITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY Sa CSZASI ISNCD 144 ~

Pl EASE REPLY 'TOI t 850.POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA. IS220 P. Oi 8OX 1444 AS

  • HU'TUAL tROTCCTION TO CLICN'f5, TNC I'U41 IC AND OURSCLVCS, ALI, RCFORT5 PIT TS8URG II, P A 15200 C sl L+ ARC SUSHITTCD AS THC CONFIDCHTIAL tROFCRTY Ot OLICNTS, AND AUTHORIZATION

+~ FOR tUSLICATION Ot STATCHCNTS. CONCLUSIONS OR CXTRACT5 FROW OR RCCARDIHC

~+SANO<+ OUR RCFORT5 15 RCSCRVCO FCNDINC OUR WRITTCN AttROVAI LABORATORY No. 781695 AREA CODE 412 TELEPIIONE 022 4000 oRDER No. PG-6834 cLIENT'B No- P.O. No. 65121-25833C May 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon t4ire Report to'. Florida Power & Light Company P.O. Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn: Mx'. Feeney UNIT Specimen Identification 42H80 Tll Diame tex', Inches . 2502 Original Area, Sq. 'Inches

~

. 0492 I

~

Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PS

~

1400 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches

~ ~

.19 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds 10,150 Stress at 1% Extension, PSI 206,300 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches 1.19 Load Pounds at Fracture 12,200 Stress PSI at Fractuxe 247,9SO Elongation at Fracture, Inches 5.42 Elongation at Fracture, Percent 5.42%

Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head 37.5 Samples tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASTiaf A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.

SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTING.

PITTSB GH TES ING LA ORATORY Earl Gallagher, Manag er cc. 3- client Physical Testing Department Attn.'Mr. Feeney lcc

X 2D TO THE INCH ~ 7 X IIICIISS HE 2D KKUFF CI. IS fSSEII CO. <lao<

IO weSA 46 1240 Ie

I (,

4 FORD SOT 4 CV,-P C

~gSIIIIC ~

f Ch

~

PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY 4n 0 C@TASLISHCO I44I 4 CS Sl PI.KASK REPLY TOI 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTS8URGH, PA. 15220 P O OOX 1440 PIT TSSURCH, P Aa IS200 AS A NVTUAL tROTCCTION TO CLICNTS, TNC tUSLIC ANO OURSCLVCS, ALL RCtORTS

+ ARC SUSHITTCO A5 TNC CONf IOCNTIAL tROtCRTY Of'LICNT5, ANO AUTHORIZATION r 4Ch fPS A>0 C+ f fOR tUSLICATIOH Ot STATCI4CNT5, COHCLVSIOHS OR CXTRACTS RQII OR RCOAROIHO OVR RCtORTS IS RCSCRVCO tCNOIHO OVR WRITTCN AttROVAL, LASORATORY No. 781695

  • RKA COOK AI2 TELEPHONE 922 4000 QRDER No. PG-6834 cUENT's No P.O ~ No. 65121-25833C pEp~

May 15, 1978 Report of: Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Mire Report to. Florida Power 6 Light Company P.OS Box 3088 Florida City F1orida 33034 Attn: Nt:. Feeney UNIT 84 tification

' .Specimen Iden Diameter, inches Original Area, Sq. Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI Elongation .at Initial Load, Inches 42H80 $ 2

.2502

. 0492 1400

.19 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds 10,300 Stress at 1% Extensions PSI 209,350 Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches 1.19 Load Pounds at Fracture 12,200 Stress PSI at Fracture 247,950 Elongation at Fracture', Inches 5'49 Elongation at Fracture, Percent 5.49%

Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head At Jaw

.Samples tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASKS A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.

I SAMPLES SUBNITTED BY CLIPT FOR TESTING.

G-16

f 20 X 20 TO TIIE INCH ~ 7 X 10 INCIIES HE

~E KEUFFEL 0 ESSEA CO. >woe w USA. 46 1240 Il<

I Q I

il Hi>/

I~I +

r FOAM AQT ACV.+PC gg5TIIIQ

&I r" PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY C5TASLI5HCO f&df PLEASK REPLY TOI 850 POPLAR STREET, PlTTS8URGH, PA. 15220 Po 0 BOX f444 t~ AS

  • HUTVAL FROTCCTION TO CLICHTSi THC FV&LIC AHO OVRSCLVC&o ALI RCFOIIT5 PITTSBUROH, P A IS22

<r 'C A'+~ AltC SU&NITTCD AS THC CONFIOCHTI*L FROFCIITY OF CLICNTS, AHO AUTHORIZATION 44SANOO~ FOR Ftl&LICATION OF 5TATCNCNT5, CONCI.USIONS Olt CXTRACTS FROM Olt RCCAItDIHO OUR RCFORTS IS IICSCRYCO FCNOIHC OVlt WRITTCH AFFIIOVAI, L'ASORATORY No. 781695 AREA COOK &12 TELEPHONE 922-&000 oRDaR No. PQ-6834 cuaNT's No P.O. No. 65121-2S833C May 15, 1978 Report of- Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon t0ire Report to. Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O. Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn. Mr. Feeney UNIT Pr4 Specimen Identification 42H80 f3 Diame ter; Inches .2504 Original Area, Sq. Inches . 0492 Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PS I 1400 Elongati.on at Initial Load, Inches .21 Load at 1% Extension, Pounds 10,150 Stress at 1% Extension, PSI 206,300 Elongation at,1% Extension, Inches 1.21 Load Pounds at Fracture 12,150 Stress PSI at Fracture 246,950 Elongation at Fracture, Inches 4. 72 Elongation at Fracture, Percent 4. 72%

Location of Fracture relative to grip in the moving head 3 II Samples tested in accordance with order no- 65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASTN A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.

SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIPT FOR TESTING.

G-18

I f(+M 20 X 20 TO THE INCH ~ 2 X IO INCIIES C KEUFFCL A ESSElt CO. saaocwvta. 46 1240 P

(~

APPENDIX H RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT-COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTHf FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1978

I Foliil AOT ACV IiC

'y~qf el~gg

~

'~Cgg FlTT'S BURGH T~STIIIC~ LAB&RA.TORY l CSTASI ISHCO I 44 I I PLEASE PEPI. / TO Sr 850 POPLAR STREET. PITTSBURGH PA. ~ $ 5220 P. O. eor WCS AS A HU'TUAL I'ROT CCTIOH TO CLICHTS ~ THC ~ LlULIC AIIO OIIRSC'LVCS ALL RCI'ORTS PITTSOVPGH. PA. IS200 ARC SUSillf'ICO AS THC CONfihfNTIAL I'RORCAff OR CLICI TS, AHO AUTHORITA'TION f OR RUSLICATIOH Of TAICHLNT<. CONCLUSIONS OR LXTRACTS TROD Oh RCC AROINO OUR RCfORTS IS RCSCRVCO PCHOINI'UR WNITTCN Al'll\OVAL 78167$ to LABORATORY 781682 AREA COOE A l2 TELEPHONE 922-4000 ORDER No. PG-683L CLIENT's No. P ~ 0 ~ 65121 -25833C REPORT December 16, 1977 Anal ys s,of".i G'R EASE Specification: Attachment iX - Specification For r

LaboIatory Toatin~ of .heath Filler (Visco loru~st 2090P)

For 3'" 'oI ida ) o'fleir 6. Ligihli'om a!1" Turkey Vo int Nu clear Plant Unit +

Post-'Tensicning System Fifth-Year Survei'lance SubMittod by: Florida Power LiEbt Company Ec Reported to: Florida Po!-er 8: Light Cor!pany Cons ruct on:earshot 3e P; 0 Pox 30GG

~

Florida City, Flcrj.da 3303l~

l.'ater Soluble Chloride'(D-512)

Spe cification Requiremonts 1D-28 Loss Than 5 ppm ~ 10 hax,

,2D<<3 Less Than l 5 PPi"1 10 Hax.

3D-28 Less Than 5 ppm ~ 10 Hax.

62H38 Less Than Q PPIQ ~ 10 ?lax, lgHSO Les Than 5 ppm ~ 10 hax.

6h.l7o Les" Than 5 ppm ~ 10 A~ia.x, 12V29 Le. s Than 5 ppm ~ 10 Pox 34V29 Loss Than 5 PPI!1 ~ 10 Hax, 56V29 r

Less Than l5 ppm 10 Yax..

Vater Soluble Nitrate (D-992) 1D-28 Less Than .2 ppm 10 Y.ax.

2D-3 Less Than 2 pram ~ 10 Hax.

3D-28 Les Th an .2 ppm> 10 llax.

62H38 Less Than ~ 2 ppm 10 lfax.

$ 8<80 Less Than ~ 2 ppll1 10 lfax.

6JPr7o Le..s Than ~ - ppm 10 l ax.

~

12V29 Lt ss Than ~ 2 Q Tm 10 I~lax.

3LV29 Less '!"nan ~ ppm 10 ltaz.

56V29 Le s Than ~ 2 ppm 10 Yiax.

H-2

I I

0 gesTING POSM AOT 1CV rPO

(

PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY

-(e CSTASLI4H CO I ~ 41 PLEASE REPLY Tol e

850 POPLAR STREET, PITTS8URGH, PA. 15220 p. o. nox Ieie er AS A elUTUAL FROTCCTION TO CLICHTS, THC FUSLIC ANU OURSCLVCS, ALL RCFORTS PITTSOURGH. P A. 15220 r, ARC SUSHITTI'0 AS THC CONFIOCNTIAL I'ROI'I'RTV Ol'LICHTS, AHO AUTHORIZATION 78167'o

~F V

(+SARO<" FOR I'U4LICATION OF STATCHCHTS, CONCLUSIONS OR CAIRACTS FROM OR HCCAROINC OUII RCFORTS IS RCSCRVLU FCHOINC OUR WRITTCN AFI'ROYAL, LABORATORY No. 781682 AREA COOE 412 TELEPHONE 922 4000 cIJENT's No. P ~ 0 ~ 65121-258330 ORDER No. Pa-683/

REPORT December 16, 1977 Mater Soluble Specie'i ca tion Sulf'ice (ApA) ~Re ninemenes ID-28 Less Than 1 ppm

~ 10 Max.

2D w3 Less Than 1 ppm~ 10 Max.

3D-28 Less Than .1 ppm 10 Max.

Less Than ~ 1 ppm 10 Max.

62H38'll270 Less Than 1 ppm 10 Max.

Leis Than 1 pplll ~ 10 Max.

12V29 Less Than 1 p pI7I ~ 10 Max.

Less Than 1 ppm ~ 10 Max.

5)v29 Less Than 1 ppm ~ 10 Max.

Mater (D95)

ID-28 Less Than .1+0 10 Max.

2D-3 Less Than 10 Max.

3D-28 Less Than .l.;0 10 Max.

62H38 Less Than..lg 10 Max.

2H80 Less Than .1'f~ 10 Max.

1Pi70 Less Than, lg 10 Max.

12V29 Less Than .lg 10 Max.

Less Than .1;0 10 Max.

5(v29 Less Than .3.fo 10 Max.

Neutralization ~~ (D-66 )

ID-28 .07 mg/KOH/q 2D-3 .03 mg/KOH/g 3D-28 ,.03 mg/KOH/g 62238 t.lo mg/KOH/g

~ 11 mg/KOH/g

)4H70 .15 mg/KOH/g 12V29 .25 mg/KoH/g

~ 11 mg/KOH,'g 5tv29 .11 mg/KOH/g

FORLI SOT RCV. ff 0 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY CSTASLISHCD ISSI PLEASE REPLY TOI 850 POPLAR STREET,.PITTSBURGH, PA. 15220 Po Oo TIOX l606 PIT TSDURGH, P A. ISZ00 AS A %IVTUAI I'ROTCCTIOH TO CLICHTS, THC PVSLIC AHD OVRSCLVCS, ALL RCI'ORTS ARC SVSNITTCD AS THC CONf IDCNTIAI I'ROf CRTT OF CLICHTS, AHD AUTMORIXATIOH f

fOR FUSLICATION Of STATCNCNTS, CUHCLVSIOHS OR CXTRACTS NOH OR RCOARDIHO OVR RCfORTS IS NCSCRVCD FCNDINC OUII WRITTCH AftROVAL, LABoRAToRY No. f 010 ILf. Uo ARKA CODE SIC TEI EPHONK 022-1000 oROER No.

CLIENT's No. P 0 ~ 65121 -25833C PG 6831 REPORT December 16, 1977 The above samples comply'with the specif'ication requirements.

The above r'eported values f.'or water soluble ions are correct jn that no chloride, nitrate or sulf'fi.te werehave f'ound. Had these ions been questionable been present the analytical accuracy would duc to the crude leachinp procedure requirement by the speciAication.

PXTTSBUHGH Ti.STING +BOBCAT Ro ert J King

.Manager~'chemi 1 Department 2-Client Attn: H. L. Blocker 1-P TL-Tampa pd 0

H-4

7 0 APPENDIX I TESTING MACHINE CALIBRATION REPORT FOR FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1978

t S

~ ~

S' \ ~

PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY qgsTltrs SSTASC ISN'Sl lOll PITTSBURGH. PA.

AS A MUTUAL SeROTCCTSON TO Ct.ICNTS, TNC FVSt.lC ANQ OURSSLertse ALL RtteORTS ARC SUSMITTSD AS TNC CONI IDCNT)AL FROFCRTT OR CLISNTSe ANO AVTNORIZATlCN FILE Hoe Fait FUSt,lCATlON OF STATSMCNTS CQNCt.VSIONO Olt CXTRACTS FROM Olt ItSCAROIN4 OVlt RCFORTS IS RSSSRVSO FCNDINC OUlt WRITTKN AFFROVALe CLIENT'5 Ho.

rp c AS Aitu C~

TESTING MACHINE CALIBRATION REPQ PT DATE Nov. 25, 1977 MACHINE IDENTlF1CAT1 ON OWNERs PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORA 0 Y l.OCAT IOHs 1IANUFACTURERs Tinius olsen SFRIAL NULIBER, 69069 PTL S/N 217 TYPEs Hydraulic CALIBRAT1ON APPARATUS DATA Method, of verification is in accordance with "Methods of Yerification of Testing Machines" A.S.Thl. Specification E447T.

TYPE OF APPARATUS USEDs Proving Rings IAHUF ACTUR ER s Morehouse APPARATUS VERIFIED BYs National Standards Laborato APPARATUS VERIFIED IH ACCORDAHCE WITHs SERIAL NUMBER LOADING RAHGE VER IF ICATION DATE 3258 10,000 ll/18/76 10 000 100 000 11/17/76 4656 100,000 - 1,000,000 5/7/75 R ESULTS MACHINE RANGE LOADING RANGE WITHIH PERCENT 0- 60,000 1,000 60,000 0- 600 000 lOO,OOO l,OOO,OOO The aboTO wrlftcatton shows this mochine compiles with the ro~cemonts of the specifications within the Ioatflng tangos shown aboTee TI 2 PITTS 'H Respectfully submitted, T T LABO TORY

0

~ Form 60 8 PITTSBLJRGH TESTING LABORATORY

~

~ >> I I ~

EST III' "S E9+

CSTASLISHCD ISO I PITTSBURGH, PA.

ORDER NO, AS

  • HVTVAL SkOTtCTION TO CLItHTSI THC SUSLIC AND DUNS CLYCS ALL kCPOkTS AkC SUSHITTCO AS THC COHPIOCNTIAL fkoktkTT OI>> CLICHTS, AND AUTHOCIZATION

/Ok SUULICATION Ok STATCHCHTS, CONCLUSIONS Oll CXTkACTS fkOH Oll kCO*kDIHO S OUk ktkokTS IS kCSCNVCD SCNDINO OVII WklTTCN AkkkOVAl L>> CLIENT'S No.

E~SAHOCT TESTI NG MACHI NE CALIB RATI ON DATA MANUFACT UR ER CAPACITY SERIAL NO. DATE Tinius Olsen 1,200,000 Ib. 69069 PTL S/i'17 11/25/77 LOCATION Pittsbur h Testin Laboratory 850 Poplar Street Pittsburgh, PA 15220 MACHINE PROVING RING MACHINE ERROR READ ING READING REMARKS lb. lb. lb.

1 000 60,000 Pound Range 5 028.5 -28.5 -0. 5 10 000 15 000 14 24 +76 +0.51 30,000 +208 +0.70 45 000 44 788 +0.47 60,000 59 749 +0.42 120 000 Pound Ran e 10,000 10,084 -0.83

"--3 000 29,961 +39 +0. 13

--50 000 49 956 +44 +0. 09

-70 000 70 116 -116 -0.17 90 000 90,509 -509 -0.56

. -99 000 99 654 -654 -0.66 600 000 Pound R 50,000 50 337 -337 -0. 67 100,000 830 +170 +0. 17 200,000 +1097 +0.55 0 299 495 +0. 17 400,000 399,480 +0. 13 497 506 +2494 +0. 50 00 5 991 +4009 ~ 7 OI IRGH ~il'.4C

~n L.A RATOB.Y

t r

~ iA5 . 'a.

PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY qIQTIIIC ( CSTASLISHCO ISS'I OROER HO.

~

P!TTSBURGH, PA.

AS A IIUTVAI, ~ IIOTCCTIOH TO CLICNTS ~ TNC WSI IC AHO OUSSCLVCS, ALL IICSOIITS 5 O AIIC SVSHITTCO AS TNC COHflOCNTIAL fIIOfCIITT Of CLICNTS, AHO AUTHOlllZATIOK 1 OH WSLICATION Of STATCNCNTS, COHCI USIOHS Oll CXTIIACTS flIOH Oll lltCASDINO

$1 ~V +l f f OVII IICfOIITS IS IICSClIVCO CNOINO OUII WIIITTCN Af IIOVAL Wp

<i '+C Lt aS'+~

4l CI.IEHT'5 HO.

r 45AHOC TES Tl N 0 PAACH N E 1 CA L1B RAT10 8 DATA QAXUFACTURER CAPACITY SERIAL HO. DATE Tinius Olse'n 15200,000 69069 PTL S/N 21 11/25/77 I OCATIOH PTTTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY 850 POPLAR STREET PITTSBURGH, PA 15220 MACHINE PROVING RING MACHINE ERROR REAO IXG REAOIHG REMARKS lb. lb. lb.

1,200,000 Pound Range 100,000 99,910 +90 +0.09 300,000 298,266 +1734 +0.58 500 000 498 302 +1698 +0.34 00,000 699 466 +534 +0. 08 900,000 896,991 +3009 +0.34 1,000,000 995,984 +4106 +0.41

II 1

I

'4I, l'

p' ki sf)

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17338A210&oldid=2424802"