ML17338A210

Fifth-yr Surveillance Rept of Containment Structure post- Tensioning Sys.Info Includes Wire Testing & Analysis of Sheath Filter

ML17338A210
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	07/31/1978
From:	Andrews C BECHTEL GROUP, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML17338A209	List: L-78-332, Forwards fifth-yr Surveillance Rept Re Containment Structure post-tensioning Sys.Minor Error in third-yr Surveillance Rept,Submitted by ,Corrected ML17338A210
References
NUDOCS 7810170194
Download: ML17338A210 (175)

Text

FLORIDA PCMER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POHER PLANT WIT 4 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE

'OST-TENSIONING SYSTEM THIRD-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWDER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland

July, 1975 Rev.

1 Au ust 4, 1975 Rev.

2 ( age D10)

Sept ber 8, 1978 By:

Reviewed By:

Approved:

F. M. Zappan

. L. Meye s

A. J.

Bing Chic Civi Eng eer Gaithersburg Power. Division

S l a,

TENDON NO.

66V29 0

0 OO 0 00000 000 000 00 0 0 0000 000 P 00 00 p~ 0+00 Og O~OO000 000 00 00 00 000 000 00 00 0000 0

qG OOOO 0

00000 000 000 0 0 00 0000 0

oooo 000 000 0000 000 000 000 0

+

0 0 00 00 0000 00'ND ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6T

)

END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6B

)

CORROSION LEVEL WASHER 2

BUTTONHEADS SHIMS 2

BEARING PLATE CORROSION LEVEL WASHER BUTTONHEADS SHIMS 2

BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

BUTTONHEADS:

Q OFF-SIZE BUTTONHEAD BUTTONHEADWITH SPLIT WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS:

TT 1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 42 VISIBLEOXIDATIONNO PITTING T.-3 0".( PITTING ( 0.003" 4'4 0.003" Q PITTING 2 0.006" 45 0.006" Q PITTING ~ 0.010" INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A EN DATE END ANCHORAGE B BA" DATE

/

.7Q I oi7 0 I Q 'j FIGURE 3 FLORIDA POWER 84 LIGHT

'URI<EY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM THIRD-YEARSURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION D-10 HEET 9 OF 8 Rev.

2 eptem~er 8,

1978

3f" g

I

~

~

~ 0 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION'aithersburg, Maryland July 1978 Rev.

1 (Page C<<5)

September 8,

1978 CzP+

By~~~m ~

C.

W. Andrews Approved: 4V 45ld(.D

'C.

A~ J. Arnold Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Division

e TABLE OF 'CONTENTS SECTION 1 0 2 0 3,0 4'

5.0

'6 0 TITLE INTRODUCTION

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS 2 1 Summary 2,2 Conclusions GENERAL SHEATH FILLER AND END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLIES 4.1 Sheath Filler 4.2 End Anchorage Assemblies DETENSIONING AND WIRE INSPECTION 5.1 Tendon Lift-offForces 5 ~ 2 Wire Inspection 5'

Discontinuous Wires RETENSIONING AND SHEATH FILLER INSTALLATION PAGE 6,1 Retensioning 6'

Sheath Filler Installation 7 0 WIRE TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER 7.1 Wire Testing 7 ~ 1,1 7olo2 7'

~ 3 7 ~ 1.4 Specimen Selection and Preparation Test Procedure Test Equipment Test Results 7,1,4.1 Yield Strength 7,1,4 '

Ultimate Strength F 1.4 '

Elongation 7'.4 '

Fracture Characteristics

k 1

l

PAGE 7'

Analysis of Sheath Filler 7 ~ 2.1 7 ~ 2 ~ 2 7 ~ 2 ~ 3 Specimen Preparation Test Procedures Test Results APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX H "APPENDIX I APPENDICES SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE FORMULAS FOR NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED FORCES END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS WIRE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS SPECIFICATION FOR TENSILE TESTING OF POST-TENSIONING TENDON WIRE (ASTM-421)

SPECIFICATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING OF SHEATH FILLER (VISCONORUST 2090P)

RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING OF WIRE SAMPLES RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER TESTING MACHINE CALIBRATION REPORT A-1 C-1 D-1 E-1 F-1 G-1 H-1

S

'LIST OF "FIGURES FIGURE 3.1 5 1 SURVEILLANCE TENDONS LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION DOME TENDON AVERAGE. NORMALIZED WIRE LIFT-OFF FORCE VS TIME PAGE 5,2 5 3 HORIZONTAL TENDON AVERAGE NORMALIZED WIRE LIFT-OFF FORCE VS TDK VERTICAL TENDON AVERAGE NORMALIZED WIRE LIFT-OFF FORCE VS TIME 10 11

b I

II

'LIST OF TABLES TABLE 4,1 5 1 5'

F 1 70 1 TLTLE

SUMMARY

OF DATA <<SHEATH FILLER AND END ANCHORAGE ASS&iBLIES

SUMMARY

OF DATA - DETENSIONING AND WIRE INSPECTION NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED TENDON LIFT-OFF FORCES

SUMMARY

OF DATA - RETENSIONING AND SHEATH.

FILLER INSTALLATION WIRE TEST RESULTS PAGE 12 13 a4 15 16

S II

1

lm0 INTRODUCTION The tendon surveillance program is a systematic means of assessing the continued quality of the post-tensioning system for the con-tainment structure.

It provides a measure of confidence in the condition and functional capability of the system, and an opportu-nity for timely corrective actions should adverse -conditions, such as progressive corrosion, be detected.

The fifth-year tendon surveillance for the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 4 Containment Structure, consisted of the physical inspection of nine tendons as described in the FSAR Technical Specification, Section 4'.6 ~

These tendons were:

62H38, 42H80, 64H7O>

12V29, 34V29,.56V29,

1D28, 2D3, and 3D28.

2,0

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS

2. 2

~Summa This report covers the fifth-year tendon surveillance for the post-tensioning system of the Unit 4 containment structure at the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant.

The surveillance was started in October 1977 and completed in November 1977

'he lift-offforces in all surveillance tendons were within the range of the predicted design values, taking into account the losses of prestress due to wire relaxation, concrete creep and shrinkage, and the initial elastic structural deformation.

The load-bearing components of the end anchorage assemblies were found to be in excellent state with no adverse conditions such as progressive corrosion and cracking.

In the mechanical testing of the specimens obtained from the removed tendon wires, no change was detected in the physical properties regarding the yield stress, ultimate strength, and percentage of elongation of the wires since the initial accept-ance tests.

The minimum ultimate strength requirement was met by all the specimens, No presence of water or abnormal discoloration was observed in the tendon sheath fillers.

Laboratory analysis of the filler samples, obtained from each surveillance

tendon, showed that the contents of water, chlorides, nitrates, and sulfides were well within the acceptable limits, 2'

Conclusions Based on the inspection and tests described herein, it is concluded that the post-tensioning system in the Unit 4 Containment Structure at Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant is performing within the limits set by design criteria and specifications,

x I

l

3. 0 GENEEIIL The fifth-year tendon surveillance of the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 4 Containment Structure Post-Tensioning

System, began in October 1977, approximately 2-1/2 years after the completion of the third year surveillance in February 1975.

The fifth-year tendon sur-veillance consisted of the following:

1.

Visual and laboratory examination of sheath filler.

2 ~

Inspecting anchorage assemblies for deleterious conditions, such as corrosion, cracking, missing wires, and split or off-size button>>heads.

3.

Measuring shim dimensions to determine tendon lift-off elongations.

4.

Measuring tendon lift-offforces.

5.

Measuring tendon elongations at 80 percent of the minimum ultimate strength of the wires.

6.

Detensioning tendons and checking wire continuity by pulling each wire from one end and observing its movement at the opposite end.

7.

Removing one wire from three preselected tendons for inspection and testing.

8.

Retensioning tendons to lift-offforces obtained in Item 4

above, and measuring the corresponding elongations.

9.

Visual inspection of removed tendon wires for corrosion, pitting, and other deleterious conditions.

10.

Testing of samples obtained from removed tendon wires for yield strength, ultimate strength; and percentage of elongation at ultimate strength.

'valuation of surveillance data and test results to assess the general condition of the post-tensioning

system, con-sidering the time-dependent factors such as prestress losses and corrosion.

The work was performed in accordance with the "Tendon Surveillance procedure for Containment Structure Post-Tensioning System," dated July 22, 1977 and included in the report as Appendix A.

The locations and identifications of the dome, vertical, and horizontal surveillance tendons are shown in Figure 3-1.

4.0 SHEATH FILLER AND END ANCHORAGE ASSEESLIES The results of the field inspection and laboratory analysis of the sheath filler, and the visual examination of the end anchorage assem-blies, are summarized in Table 4.1.

1 0

4.1 Sheath Filler Two samples of filler were removed from each of the surveillance tendons and visually examined.

All of the samples taken were dark brown in appearance, indicating the lack of water or impurities that may cause discoloration.

4' End Anchora e Assemblies The end anchorage assemblies of the surveillance tendons were examined and found to be in satisfactory condition.

The tendon 1D28 stressing

washer, located at buttress 4, received a 120o, 9" long, 3/8" wide, 1/4" deep, tapered scrape along the side of its interior face circumference when it accidentally mated against the left side of the bearing plate during detensioning operations.

The stressing washer was shown to be structurally sound when the tendon was stressed to the full effective force with no observable adverse

effect, The lift-offforces were well within the acceptable limitsi The end anchorage inspection data are included in the report as Appendix C, 5,0 DETENSIONING

'AND WIRE INSPECTION Data obtained during detensioning and wire inspection are shown in Table 5',

5 ~ 1 Tendon Lift<<Off Forces The lift-offforces obtained from the tendons during detensioning Mdicated that prestress losses had not exceeded the predicted design values.

The long term (40<<year duration) predictions of the normalized wire lift-offforces in the surveillance tendons are shown graphically in Figures 5'

through'5.3

~

These predictions had taken into account the prestress losses due to wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage.

These curves provide only an estimated trend in the prestress

losses, and are used as a means for comparison with the trend of the actual average prestress

losses, The minimum effective design prestress is the required average force per wire at the end of 40 years; including the effects of wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage.

Calculations for the predicted prestress losses are as follows:

Initial wire force (Fi) based on a wire stress of 0'0f:

Fi ~ 0,70f x As

~ 0'0 x 240 x 0.049

a 1

~ 8'5 kips/wire where f = ultimate strength of wire A

~ Area of wire s

Wire force at 40 years (F40) due to wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage:

The prestress loss at the end of 40 years due to wire relaxation, and concrete creep and shrinkage, is estimated to be 34.7 ksi (see FSAR Section 5.1.4.4)

~

This value is applicable to all dome, horizontal, and vertical tendons.

F

- 34.7 x As

~ 34,7 x 0+049

~ 1.70 kips/wire Where F 1

= Prestress loss 8 40 years P

The minimum effective design prestress is the predicted average wire force after 40 years.

F40 Fi - Fpl

= 8.25 - li70

~ 6'5 kips/wire In order to compare the actual average prestress losses with predicted values, it was necessary that the wire lift-offforces, from the surveillance data, be normalized to account for the initial structural deformations (which is a function of the post-tensioning sequences),

the deviations of initial lift-offforces from the specified value of 0.70f, and the changes in lift-offforces resulting from tendon surveillance operations, such as reshiming and wire removal.

These normalized wire lift-off forces were then superimposed on the appropriate

,curves shown on Figures 5.1 thru 5.3, providing a corn<<

parison between the predicted values and the actual forces at the time of tendon surveillance.

For future convenience, the normalizing factors and the normalized lift-offforce for each surveillance tendon for the fifth-year tendon surveill'ance are listed in Table 5'

'ormulasfor calculating the normalizing factors are given in Appendix B

I L

5' Wire Ins ection The results of inspection of each tendon wire removed for inspec-tion are shown in Appendix D, No physical imperfections were observed on the wires removed from all tendons.

5' Discontinuous 'Wires No discontinuous wires were found during this tendon surveillance.

6,0 RETENSIONING AND SHEATH FILLER'INSTALLATION The data obtained during retensioning are shown in Table 6,1.

The tendons were retensioned to approximately the same stress level indicated by the lift-offforces obtained during deten-sioning, with allowance made for the tendons where< a wire was removed for physical examination and testing.

The retensioning data will be used as input for the next scheduled tendon surveillance.

6' Sheath Filler Installation The volume of grease removed from the tendon prior to detensioning, and the volume replaced after retensioning, are indicated in Table 6.1 ~

7 ~ 0 WIRE TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER 7'.1 Specimen Selection and Preparation The locations of the specimens selected from each tendon wire for tensile testing are shown in Appendix D.

In

general, specimens were obtained from each end and the middle of each tendon wire removed.

The specimens were cut to a length of approximately 126 inches.

After the specimens were cut from the pulled wires, they were tagged with the following information:

1.

Tendon identification number, 2.

Location of the specimen; i,e,, middle or end section.

3, Containment unit number and the year of surveillance (1977) ~

1 1

These tags remained with the specimens through completion of the testing.

The remaining portions of the wires, after the specimens had been obtained, were also tagged and retained at the plant site until testing indicated that the tensile strength and elongation of all specimens were in compli-ance with the specification, 7',2 Test Procedure Except for the gage length, the test procedure used was the same as that specified in ASTM Specification A421-65, "Standard Specification for Uncoated Stress-Relieved Wire for Prestressed Concrete."

A gage length of one hundred inch '(+1.0) was used instead of the ten>>inch gage length as specified.

The 100-inch-gage-length specimen may indicate a lower ultimate strength and lesser ductility (elongation) than a ten-inch-gage-length specimen.

Since failure will occur't the weakest point in the wire, the ultimate strength obtained is equivalent to the lowest value that would be obtained from ten 10-inch specimens, Elongation at failure will also tend to be less due to the distribution of the elongation at the neck-down area over a length of wire ten times that of the nominal ten-inch specimen.

7,1,3 Test Equipment The apparatus used for the tensile testing of the specimens was the Tinius Olsen Super "L" Testing machine with a 1,200,000 lbs capacity, of the Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, For machine calibration report, see Appendix I.

7',4 Test Results The results of tensile testing on the one hundred-inch-gage-length wire specimens are shown in Appendix G and Table 7,1, 7.1.4.1 Yieeld Strength The yield strength of all wire specimens tested exceeded the specified minimum yield strength of 192 ksi at one percent elongation.

7,1.4 '

Ultimate Strength The ultimate strength of all wire specimens tested exceeded the specified minimum ultimate strength of 240 ksi as specified by AS&i A421-65.

LS

~

i

F 1;4,3 Elongation Since 100>>inch-gage-length specimens were used in the tensile testing, a lesser percentage of elongation may be expected than from the testing of 10-inch>>gage-length specimens of identical wire, as discussed in Paragraph 7'.2 ~

Previous test data

< ) indicated that a wire which showed a 4 percent elongation at ultimate strength in a 10-inch-gage-length testing could be expected to exhibit a somewhat lower (no less than 3

percent) elongation at ultimate strength in a 100-inch-gage-length testing.

The percentage of elongation of all wire specimens tested met this requirement, 7.1.4 '

Fracture Characteristics The fracture of all wire specimens was of the cusp-cone shape.

7' Anal sis of Sheath'Filler 7 ~ 2 ~ 1 Specimen Preparation A quart-size sample of the sheath filler was obtained from each end of all surveillance tendons prior to de-tensioning.

Each metal container containing the grease sample was marked with the tendon identification number, One sample from each surveillance tendon was shipped to an independent laboratory for analysis of water content.

and water soluble impurities, and the remaining samples were retained at the jobsite.

7' '

Test Procedures Test procedures for water content and chlorides, nitrates, and sulfides concentrations are given in Appendix F.

7.2 '

Test Results The results of laboratory analysis of the sheath filler are shown in Appendix'H, These data indicated that the contents of chlorides,

nitrates, and sulfides in the grease were well within the acceptance limits, and that the amount of water present was negligible.

t (1) "Containment Building Past-Tensioning System One-Year Surveillance, Palisades Plant Unit 1," Consumers Power Company, AEC Docket No. 50<<255 '

J

AZ IMUTH I34'UTT RESS I

74'4 314 254 BOTTOM OF I 94~ R ING G IR DE R EL I 50-0 42H80 LI45-8~ 'E L130-2 64H70 I2V2g 62H38 76'-3 /e 34V29 56V29 DEVEL'OPED EXTERIOR ELEVATION HOOP AND VERTICAL TENDONS TOP OF BASE SLAB EL l2-6 3I4 BUTTRESS 4,'D28 2

54'UTTRESS 5

l4 BUTTRESS 3 3D28 lg4 BUTTRESS 6 2D3 BUTTRESS I

l34 74'UTTRESS 2

PLAN DOME TENDONS FLORIDA POWER & LiGHT COYiPA.'~

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER P7 ~N".

UNiT ~

POST"TENSIONING SYST" H SURVEILLANCE TENDONS LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION FIGURE 3.1

L

~

8.5 8.0 h50 0

Pf 7

r.

ATA NXS

~

~

OU e r.

..<<:4 X

.8 0

~

~ Q 0

t50 7.0 6.5 Exp ed loss CO ectx ve Nxnzmum Eff design prestress)

(6.55) kips/wire) ve P

0.6 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 Time After Initial. Tensioning (years)

j

~ ~

~ '

N0r 0

8;5 o I co o

e r-0 P rt.

0 8 '0 ac' o

7-5 O.

0 Q g

Q r-'.n N 5 0 rt CL

r. r.

0 r

7<<0

'08

~

Expec ted Loss CUrv

~

~ 0'I 0

IOO '

~

.6.5 Mxnxmum E fectxve Design Prestress (6.55 kips/wire) ne 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 Time-After Initial Tensioning

{years)

~

~

1

~

0

~

~

~

~

~

~

8.5

~ Ql 7s'O 8

8 0I 0 0 M w4Q I d

8

~

N M e VI Cb Qt 0 rt Vo W Ce I l~

0 rt beth Q

~,

~

0

Ã

~ ff

~ '

fsf0

~

t508

'.0 0

0 I

Vo

~

I 7+0

'.5

~

~

ected Exp CUrve 51inimum Effect:ivci Design Prestres

{6.55 ki s/Mixe)

~

~

0.6 1.0 2

0 3.0 4.0 5 '

10.0 20.0 30.0 40 '

Time After Xniti.al Tensioning (years)

TABLE4-1 SBMMARVOF DATA SREATH FILLER ANO ENO ANCRORAGE ACSEMBLIES TENDON flLLCRCDATIHDAccftTAELC lvfs/No(

1ILLCR MAT'L ANCIIORAnfCoattONCNTS Tale PF IDENT. Tvtf LOCA.

(ION Fl(LER DUTTDN CA/'lfAD sfnfss WAQIfR co(on SHIMS INO PLATE SAMtaf NO.

DUfTOIAICADS conn.

NUMEFK OSION 5I'a(IS LEVEL 12 OFF.

SIZE I~

Sfn(55 TIAQI(n$

QDM$

CRACKS 15 1$

CORN conn.

OSION CIIACKS OSION LEVEL LEVEL ef AAINO

~LATE5

>>Qcn.

Conn.

(OR OS(ON CRACKS LEVEL 1$

21 fxlfn.

IOR 22 DATE Inst( CT.

EO REMARKS 20

~IV(1 ltvlS I YERT vcnT

~/T

~/0 t/T 1/0 YCS YCS YC5 YES YCS YES YCS YC5 YCS YCS YES YC5 YCS YCS YC5 YES YES YCS YES YES Ho No NO HO

~'I 00 HONE NONC

~IONC Ito>>C NON HON NON 1

HONE HOIIC Not/C NONE NONE NO<<t HONC HONE HONC HONE HONC I/ON\\

II~

IPO511

(

TOPSTAESSWA5HCAHA51HC FIRST THACAD I

DAMAOEDAttAOX ~Ii THC O>>fSIDE PACE l5DDUOEDAppno/LF/tl xi Lotto.

I I+I+ItI THE FOPP-5ltteOTTOHHEAOSAAC 104 1.11

~

SLID>>FLY OVC15I 1t.

l(V10 VERT

~/T

~/0 YCS YC$

YES YES YE5 YES YCS YES YES YES NO NO

~ 1 NONC HONC HON

~ 1 2

IIOH5

~toitC HO<< C NONC Wont NONC 11 ~

101$ 11 TotSTAC5$,WASHER HASTHE FIA51THACAO DAHAOCDAPPROX

~ 0 ID(0 YCS YES YCS YC5 YES YC5 YES YCS YC'5 Yt'5

~ 0 NON C HONC NOH NOH HO<<t NONC HONE NONE NOHC NOHC 01 00

~ I I

Il.t11

(

Slht55 wASHCR AT EUTTAC55 Ho.i HAS A 1/0 CHAHitnF LONO tD10 DON C YCS YCS YES YE5 YCS YCS YCS YCS YES YC5 No No

~ 0

~ 0 NONC NOHC NON NON HOHC HONE NONC NOHC NOH C NONE 10 1$

I

~Ik 11 I

tievTTDN>>cAD5 conno5IDN LtvcL2 tot YCS YE5 YCS YES YCS YE5 YES YE5 YES YCS No No NotIC HOIIC NON NON HONC HOIIC NOHC HONC NONC NOHC 10ll 11.1.1 ~ I h(tLACEDt I/O"5HIU5 ISHIN5WCAC ~ ENTI

~tnti HORI YCS YC5 YC5 YCS YES YC5 YCS YES YCS YES IIO No It I~

10 HOHC ttONC NOH NOHC IIONC NON C HONE NOHC NONC I~ 0 10 10

~(HIP Hohl Y05 YCS YCS YCS YES YC5 YE5 YCS YCS NCS HO NO 1$

I~

1 ~

NONC NONE NOH NON HO<< C NOHC HoltC HONE HONE NONC I~ 0

$0

~0

~ I 1111

~IHI~

HOXI YES Y$5 YES YE5 YE5 YC5 YC5 YE5 YCS YE5 NO Ho

~ 1I ~

00 II NONC NON NON NOHC NONC NONC

~IONC NONE NONE 11

~ 1 11 ~1$.11 NOTfsl

1. LOCATION INDICATES'lnfIn/TT/ICSSATTWICIITHE I(tntotl Ishncllo>>CD/on 1>>f NfA>>1sT DU(ln(55 lo Ill(.Iat(DON IIVAVCR(ICAL 1(HDONQ 1

IOt e - no( loM

l. ANCHORAGE COMtONfNTS

• ron sin(ss>>/o WAQ/fn. Tnt. connnstov Lfvc(s tell>> Ala Illa co>>(N(to I'ot etta Sat>>thea W>>fnf INC >>illlottIILAll ARL'NC>>on(o.

e. ton QI,MS.INC con<<OQotl aLvl as INDICATETttf IHt cltnolllottof QIC AtntACCS I'(nitno(co(An Io IHC Tanoolta

t. CORRUSION IEVfl5 aavfa I N< VIQI(f DXIDA(lonon LIGHTstoflvDXIDAf(on I (vl a l AtonIVI>>Down(A aon.HOPI(FINO LIV(a'I II(t/IIINIinto("U(t(II I 1vf a ~ -OUI I'SPII It';I + DIPI4" (fVI Le I' Iv CPIIIINII$hhl(f' a V(L 1 IS I ~ I>>PA( ftt( IIII I V(as n Io c DURING INSTALLATION.

I IIR<<ovlh/II I a xclSS Dt (HIS aavf L lvhs U>>hccat Theat AT THE IIM(.Dt >>I' ha(ATION.

~

EACH 5AHPLC WAS le(NTIPIEO WITH TENOOIIIIVHA(nANDCLO5CST il/11<<C55 NVVPCA, II CXvthlon TEHPCAATVACDttttx(HCC t5 OUC TO5IEAN DISCHARGE WHICH WAS AD/ACCNF To THE EIIO SHOWINC THC WIENER ICMttnATU<<E 12

TABLE5.1 SUhlhIAIIYOF DATADETENSIONINO ANDI/IIAEIIEhIOVAL

'TENDON ANCIIOAACE LOCAIION IDCNTISICA'(ION NO.

OF ESICCTIVE

'WIAC5 OATf DCTKNSIVNKD AIA TCI>>lnntvnf OF III INT.

EKT.

0 llfTOf F tc//slnw CADI IPS II

%DACE ELONGATION(ll IKS I UHI 0 O.SP, 0 I000 ll/5/WIRE IKNSION fCNSIO/4 IDACClll I KISS(

CACK (IS(I ClOIICATION(ll IINI FORCE(tl ElONCATIO(4(ll CAC\\

(KIPSI RN)

IPSA NO.

CADE NO.

TCNSlONINO EOVIPMKNT INIIIAL WIRE LKNCIH (S 'll KND CUT WI~ C REMOVAL CORROSION LKVCI,(41 LENGTH NOS/(Itl PREVIOUS

~IV2t

~/f I/O

~I let%.ll

%11

~I NII 5 5/I ~

10 11%4

~4 ~

~ 2 1 5/I ~

12 11$

N

~4 15

.1 snt 10 I~

A@1 ~

22 12VII 2/T

<<0

~I 1011 11 10

~ 111 tl~

10%0 Nl

~ II/I~

Its

~I I~

AO I~

14vt ~

~It

~/0

~I 1001 11

~I

~ $ 1 ~

141 sin 1 Its

~40 140

~I 0 IIII~

~I AOI~

(~)

NA I~INI IDI~

~I Sl

~I

~I

~ 1$ 0

'I~ 11 11 ~

1$ ~

1 5/I 5 I/I

~Itt

~ 1$ ~

~ 10 41 ~

4 IH 4 I/II t2 1Il~

II

~I

~I IH

~/I~

~10 ~

0414 0.1st 2tl 1014

~I SI

~ 1 11

~II~

INI 110 14 ~

1 I/I 2 tH Ittt NIO Ns 045 4 SH 1 5/4 11 ~

ISO

~I 10

~tint F40' 101 1$ (

0 Nt 20$

~I

~I 10

$ 141 54N

~It TI~

2 I/O 2 I/4 1100 MN

~I~

tl4 2 ln 1 I/I~

F40

~N tl

~0 aint

~%41

~404 0 140 (sl ttl NA

~RSI 42HI~

~ 0 4 II.S 11

~1 10

~ I I~lt I~ 41 Nt 101 2 1/I 2 I/O SN0 IIN 045 04 ~

5 II/I~

$ 1/I 110

~N

~I I Sh 5/I

~'Its

~400 0.1st 211 (4)

HA

~4HIO I~.II 11

%00

~I

~I SII%

~IN Ol~

~II 2 1/I 5 5/I 1IN litt NI

~ 1$

1 5/II

~ II/12 Itt It%

40

~I I/II

~I I/I~

~44 ~

~Its ttl DI~I

~IHI~

~ I 11-11

~ I~

11

~I SNS 14% ~

~42

%4 ~

2 I/O 5 I/I 1100 SIN

~ 15

~4 ~

5 II/II

~ 2%Hi III

~4t I~

~I IH ln

~14 1 F400 0-141 ttl NOTESI CLONCATION Tl(EClCAADISTANCE DCIWKCN'INEOUISIDCSACC OF IIIEUfAAIHCPLATfAND1HE IHUDCfACC OF IHKSl ACSS INCWASilfA. A NCCAIIVE NVL'NHR IS INDICAlln1/HCN IHE SIR(SSINC WAQIIAIS IHSR/E 'IHK IRUMPET, FORCE COUALS TOOHSKIPSMULTIPll(DOT THf NVMUIAOf CffCCIIVCWIACS.

FORCE \\OVALS10 1 0KIP5IUL'IlflltOAY'IIIENVMCCAOF ff1CCIIVCHints.

'1 ~ DCHOIC5 TDP 0 ~ DCHDICS 00110M CORROSION LfV(ls:

I. NoVfllolfnxlnATION

t. AlIIDISIIDAOVNCOI OR/ NO PIT 1 INC X Da'0 < Pll'IR/0 (0001

~. 0011 < 1$ 11INC < 0.006

5. 0006 CI'IITN/C$ 001J Pn CVRWS SVRVC II LANCE0 4 IHIIIALCONDITION.WHICI ICYf4 APPLIES, (Cl NA~ NDIAVAILAelE (11 CXTCAI01 SCMPC1ATVOC DISSCOCHCC ~ CTWCCHTHC T'WD C1 05 l5 DVC10 STCAM DIICHA10C WHICHWA5 AD/ACCHISQ IHC CHD SHOWIHG IHC HIGHC1 1 CMSC 1 AIV1 C 13

I 0

Table 5'

NORlfALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED TENDON LIFT-OFF FORCES Tendon No, Anchorage Location Normalizing

'Factorormalized Lift-offForce/Wire (k)

Each end 'vera e

er wire 1D28 2D3 3D28 42H80 64H70 12V29 34V29 56V29 5-6 0'78 0'29 0'34 0.940 0'01 0'09 0.994 0.976 0.943 1.000 0'57 0.892 0'32 0.902 0'11 7'5 7'0 7,18 7.46

'7.29 7.23 7.51 7.62 6'2 7'6 7.31 6.72 7.57 7.57 7.42 7.72 7'2 7.26 7 ~ 56 7'4 7'2 7'7 7.57

7. 42 W denotes top 14

~NNNN r

• TABLE 6.1 SUh(hlARY OF DATA-RETENSIONINGANO SIIEATH FILLER INSTALLATION TENDOH IofA)IF)CATION ANCHOR ACE LOCATION No OF OATf.

EFFECTIVE Rf)fNQDNED WIAES 4 1000 les/WIRE A(A 1fMr2A0(U4 E

~1 TfNSICN EAT.

(I INT fCONGA)ION RNI(ll DACE (rslI 10 NOW(~I CHANCE(5) l)l 0 0 0 ('

TfNQON CAGE (1511 lVNCAIION RIO(ll FORCE NOW(~I CHANCEIS)

(Kl)SI I~

12 DL(I)OFF Sul'ATH FILLER FORCE NOW((l Q(ANGELSI IKIFQ TENSION flONCAIIONRNI(ll (Fill(O CAGE

()Q)

RAM No.

GACf NO.

10 I

21 10 15 TENSIONING foul)MENT VOLVME FILLER Rfr(AC(o TEMOLRATVRE (GALS)

DOV(lff SIV2' IIV)~

~/0 2/0

~I

~I 142$ -)7 I&2).)I

~ IT

~\\

$ 2 1$ 4 115 tO

~I n 7/0 7/I 1100 7410

~ $ 1

~tI

) tin Isnt 0 lit

~)Il~

$ 200 011$

110

~ <<I

<<I

)sn I~

10 IL)I~

A@I ~

I

" 1627 I 1001.1 142 ~ I 1$

10 OAL rouaf o raDM 100 (1 %II.11)

SIV)$

4/1

~I

~ 2 11$

~I 1010

~ts 1 1$/I OI$$

~ I

~/I

$4211 100 102

'D\\

~

~I

~I I1.1.71

~I

~1

~0

~ 1 11$

11$

1$ ~

~t IS

~I

~I 5/I ~

~ $ 00

~ t)$

1000

~I~

~ $0

~ll

~il

~ I<<'I 5 III I In

~nl

$111

$4$ ~

I~II 11 ~

114 11$

114 2 I/I~

III~

1 7/0 1 )il~

~10 ~

01st 4(0 ~

~$ 40 O 10$

2)1 0.1 ~I II 5.77

~ ~ 1 17 21 21 1 15

~ 2410

~I 11 $.11

~I

~ 1

~I 10

~ I 004 1$ 0 11 ~

01

~I Ilnl F11/I ~

I 1tnt Snt

)OII 1000 1000

)000 00$

~il

~I~

1 snt 2 15/I ln)

$104 I~I~

150

'114

)00 140 2 1/I ln 1 ln 2sn ln 2 ln

~$01

~its OSIER (HII 0.10$

Dl~I 211 114.7)

I~

~1410 11H) ~

$4 II 1511 140 110 F00 1$0 1st

~I

~I

~I S/0

~I I/O sn1

)nl

) IIO 1010 1100 1100

~it Ms

~ $$

Oil

~ )nl s 2)n

~ 1/I

.In

<<11

~ 14 ~

$ 104

~MI 010

~)I

~ii 0$ $

1 $/I OIII 1 5/I ~

~

1 S/I 410 ~

0$ 0$

~$0 ~

tits 211 0 ltl 0 10$

II I ~ I 11.1$ 1 II~

110 No)fsc (ll fLONGATIDH THECIEAR OISTANCf ef IIII(N(HfOul loE fACE OF THE 0( A A INCrlA1 0 AND IHI. I'is(ol. IACF 4I Illf SI4 LSIIN0 WAS(I

( 4. A NlCATIVENvs)414 IS INC(CA (E DIN ILN Tnf SIR(&INCwAQI(HIS INSIDE THE 1 RUM)ET.

FORCE EOUAlS TO I 0 K(1MUL)lrllfoev THE NVSIOF4 OF fFFLCTIVE IllRES.

Foncf E CURLS To 0 i)xlrSMULQFQ(oev THE NUNC(n oF FFIECQVE W

le

(S, 7 DCNDTC$ TDI'

.DfNDICS DDTIDM NOW ofNo(ES fCONGA)ID'IAT TIME VF RfTfNUONIN(hMFASVRE-MLNI AHE 101HE I/(A4LST I/If f1(ANGE IHfI DNCATIOHASCOMFAR(0 10 FR( VIOUS MfASUR(MENT UND(4 ill( Sl'ECIFILD lOAD.

(I) rX)fRIOR ')turfAATVAC(HOFCRtNCC OflWCCN THC TWD OND5 IS Duf TD 5)CAN DISCHARGE WHICHWAS AD/AfCNI 10 THC CND 5HDWINO TNC HICHf4'ICMICRATVAC 15

I f

i

TABLE 7,1 WIRE TEST RESULTS - 100 IN, GAGE LENGTH Tendon No.

Sample Load at Stress at Load at No.

1% Ext.

1% Ext.

Fracture (lbs )

(psi)

(lbs )

(1)

Stress at Fracture (psi)

Elongation at Fracture Fracture Location (in.)

Moving Head (in.)

34V29 42H80 2D3

.,BeEo 9,850 200,600 M,ST C;E, B;E, M,ST C;Eo 10,650 217j300 10,150 206,300 10,150 206,300 10,300 209,350 100250 208,900 B,E, 9,600 1951500 M,S, 10,150 207,100 CeEe 10 p 050 205 7 100 12,700 259,200 12,700 258,700 12,800 261,200 12~ 150 246 ~ 950 12,200, 247,950 12,200 247,950 12,350 251,500 12,250 249,500 12,350 252,000 4.59 4.87 4.51 4.72 5.42 5.49 5.53 4.92 5.56 37.0 3.0 6.63 3.0 37.5 AT JAW 3.0 9.0 30.25 (1)

C,E, denotes cut end of wire B.-E. denotes button head end of wire M,ST denotes middle section of wire 16

I II

APPENDIX A TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FOR FLORIDA POWER

& LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland

)

Ry Charles W. Andrews

June, 1977 Revision 1, July 22, 1977 Revision 2, October 11, 1977 Revision 3, December 14, 1977 Approved:

K. P. Buchert Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Divison A-1

l

Revision 3

1 0 PURPOSE The purpose of this survei1.lance is to obtain data for assessing the continued quality and structural pex'formance of the major components of the containment structure post-tensioning system.

2 0 SCOPE The surveillance for each tendon shall consist of the following:

2 1 Removing and visually inspecting sheath filler, and obtaining samples fox laboratory testing,.

2~2 Inspecting anchorage assemblies and measuring the thickness of shims 2 3 Obtaining tendon H.ft-off force and elongation.

2.4 Detensioning, raring shims, and inspecting wire continuity.

2.5 Removing wires where required, for visual ucamination and labora-tory testing.

2 6 Retensianing, installing shims, and obtaining tendon lift-off force.

2,7 Installing sheath filler.

2.8 Testing wire samples pex Attachment E.

2 9 Testing sheath filler per Attachment p.

2 10 Evaluating survei.llance data and test results to assess the general condition of the post-tensioning system.

Temporary protection shall be provided for the tendons and anchorages during surveillance.

The end anchoxs and wires removed shall be pro-tected by applying a coating of Visconorust 1601, Amber aver the surfaces.

The elapsed time between removing and replacing sheath filler fram one tendon shall not exceed 2 weeks.

Tendon surveillance may be conducted during reactor operation.

3+0 SURVEILLANCE TENDONS Surveillance tendons for the Unit 4 containment structure shall consist of 3 dome tendons, 3 horizontal tendons, and 3 'vextical tendons.

The identification numbers of these tendons are listed, below:

3 1 Dome tendons:

1D28, 2D3, 3D28 One wire shall be removed from Tendon 2D3.

A-2

s l

Revision 3

3 2 Horizontal tendons:

62H38, 42H80, 64H70 One wire shall be removed from Tendon

42H80, 3,3 Vertical tendons:

12V29, 34V29, 56V29 One wire shall be removed from Tendon 34V29.

4 0 INITIALINSTALLATIONRECORDS AND PREVIOUS SURVEILLANCE DATA Orighzal records of initial tendon installation, aad of subse'quent sur-veil1ances, are maintained by Florida Power & Light Company.

The original installation records are ia card form and contain information pertaining to tendon pulliag, button-heading, tensicaing, and sheath filling.

The surveillance data coasists of the raw data recorded during surveillances aad the surveillance reports 5 0 SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES 5 1 Remaval and Inspection of Sheath Piller The sheath filler, Visconorust 2090P, may be liquid, gel, or solid ~ All states may occur at a particular tendon Complete xemoval of the sheath filler is not required, provided that all filler drained or removed during the surveillance is replaced.

The sheath fillex shall be removed as follows:

5 1 1 Record air temperature outside the containment near the surveillance tendon and inside the coataixanent.

e 5 1 2 Remove the grease caps from both ends of the tendon and allow the filler to flow into containers of known volume.

5.1 3 Obtain a cne-quart sample of filler fxgnm each end of the tendon 5.1,4 Record lack of grease coverage on end anchors, if any.

5 1 5 Recox'd aay discoloration of sheath fillex oa the Sheath Piller Znepectioc Fore (Figure A-6).

(The color of the filler 3

should be dark brown.)

5 1.6 Heasure and record the amount of grease removed.

5 2 Inspection of Anchorage Components 5 2.1 Thoroughly clean the anchorage components with Viscosity Oil Company's Industrial Solvent No. 16 in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

Chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents shall not be used.

5 2 2 Inspect and record the buttonheads for shape and size, using the Go/No&o gage as shown in Figure A-1; cracks; A-3 l3

Revision 3 and corrosion status.

Compare the number of buttonhcads with the number at the previ.ous surveillance.

Identify missing buttonheads and any buttonhead defects on the end Anchorage Inspection Form as shown in Figure A f3 5,2,3 Inspect and record the stressing washers for corrosion status and cracks. If any cracks are observed, show the locations and sizes on the Anchorage Inspection Form.

5+2i4 Inspect and record the shims for corrosion and cracks. If cracks are observed, prepare a sketch showing their locations.

5 2 5 Inspect and record the bearing plates at the ccntact sur-faces with the shims for corrosion and cracks. If cracks are observed, prepare a sketch showing their locaef.ons.

5.2 6

Definitions of corrosion levels for the tendon wires and anchorage components for the surveillance are as follows:

Corrosion Level Descri tion 1

2 3

~4 5

Ho visi.ble corrosion Reddish-brown color; no pitting 0.000<pitting < 0.003" 0.003<pitting g 0.006" 0.006(pitting g 0.010" The corrosion levels for the surveillance as compared to the criteria used during the field installation are indicated below:

Corrosion Level.

Surveillance Field Installation Instal.lation 1

2 3,4,5 A~

3,C,D,E pk Acceptable Acceptable Unacceptable 5,3 Detensioning and Lift-offForces 5,3,1 Safety A11 personnel on work platforms during detensioning and reten-sioning operations shall be familiar with, and abide by,

, the following safety rules:

a Do not stand behind the jacks while they are pressurized.

b Keep fingers away from the tendons and jacks, except when required to read li.ft>>off forces, and remove or stall shims.

• Prescon symbols identifying Corrosion Level (no longer used).

A-4

I I

I

~

~

~

~

I Revision 3

5.3.2 Calibration All gages and jacks used for the tendon surveillance shall be calibrated before use.

Gages and jacks shall not be recalibrated unless damaged or repaired.

Prior to use, gages shall be checked for zero deviation and ~ge.

5 3,3 Detensioning Tendons 5+3,3,1 Determine the number of effective wi.res for each tendon fran the previous surveillance.

5 3 3.2 Calculate and record the jacking forces required to obtain the specified 80 percent minimum ulei~te strength (0.8f's) per wire.

These forces are ob-tained by multiplying the number of effective wires by 9.43 kips ~

Enter these values into the jack calibration chart to obtain the gage readings equivalent to the forces.

Note that the applied jacking force for each tendon shall not exceed the value thus determined.

5,3 3.3 Attach the jack to the bearing plate.

Note that if the initial stressing was done from both e"ds of a tendon, the surveillance shall be perfo ~d in the same manner.

5,3 3.4 install the pressure gages to the jack and p~,

and record their identification numbers.

iheck the gages for zero pressure reading.

5 3.3.5 Measure the depth of the existing shims.

5,3 3.6 Determine the lift-offforce by tensioning the tendon until all shims are loosened.

Li t-off is achieved when the sound produced by tapping on shims with a small. hammer changes to indicate release from compression; also, all accessible shims can be moved by tapping with a sra11 hammer Repeat the operation until three measurements of the lift-offforces show a variation of + 50 psig, or less..

Se3o3+7'.3 3 8 Depressurize the jack until the gages read zero.

Pressurize the jack to a force so that the aver-age wire stress is equal to 80 percent of the minimum ultimate strength of the wires, as determined in paragraph 5.3',2.

5.3.3.9 Record on the Detensioning/Retensioning Form (Figure A-4) the gage reading and the corres-ponding tendon elongation.

A-5

s l

P

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

Revision 3

5 3.3 10 Remove the shims 5~3 3.11 Depressurize Che jack until the gages read zero.

5 3 3 12 Pressurize Che jack to a force equivalent to 1,000 lbs pex wire Si3.3 13 Recox'd on tbe Detensioning/Recensioning Form the gage reading and the corresponding tendon elongations 5 3 3 14 Depressurize the jack until the gages read zero~

Detach the gages from Che jack.

S 3 3 15 Remove the jack..

5 4 Wire Inspection 5.4 1 Inspect each tendon vix'e fox'ontinuity by pulling from one end, one wire at a tf.me, and observing the movement of the buttonhead at the opposite end.

The Cool for pull~~

the individual wires is shown in Figure A-2.

Prior to in-

)3 specting the vires, it.is necessary to move the stressing washer away from the butconheads apprcarimately 3 inches This may be accomplished by using a hammer and a wood bufxer block Record any discontinuous wires on Che Anchorage In-spection Form All discontinuous wires shall be removed and mcamined to detexmine the cause of breakage Dis-continuous wires shall not be used for surveys.LLance vix'e test samples.

5 4 2 Remove one test vtre frcm each of the following tendons:

Dome Tendon:

2D3 Horizontal tendon:

42880 Vertical tendon:

34V29 The locations of the buttonheads of the vires to be re<<

mcnred, shall be recorded on the end Anchorage Inspection Form.

5,4,3 Pull the test vire at the end to be cut away from the stx'essing washer and notch apprmdmately 2 inches fxom the end Record the end Chat is cut, and the distance from the notch to the outside of the buttonhead within +0.02 inches A-6

'L P

Revision 3

5.4.4 Cut the wire between the buttonhead and the notch.

Remove the remaining portion of the wire and clean it with

solvent, (Viscosity Oil Co. Industrial Solvent llo. 16) ~

5,4 S Inspect the wire and record on the Wire Inspection Form (Figure A-5) the locations of any damages, corrosion, and corrosion levels.

5 4,6 Compare the corrosion levels with those of the previous surveillance. If the corrosion has progressed one or more

levels, remove one additional wire at approximately 120o frcm the first wire, repeating paragraph 5.4.3, 5.4.4, and 5.4 5.

If the second wire has progressed one or more levels, repeat this procedure for a third wire selected at approximately 120 from the first two.

Do not r~e more than three wires from any one tendon during one surveillance period~

5,5 Retensioning and Lift-offForces 5.5.1 Safety The safety rules as specified in paragraph 5.-3.1 shall apply 5.5 2 Retensioning Tendons Retensioning shall be pezformed in a similar manner as detensioning; that is, if detensioning is done from both ends of a tendon, retensioning shall be performed accordingly.

S,5 2,1 Determine the number of effective wires in the tendon for retensioning.

Deduct any discon-tinuous or surveillance test wires removed and recalculate the new jacking forces as outlined in paragraph 5.3.3.2.

5,5 2.2 Attach the jack to the bearing plate.

5,5 2 3 Install the pressure gages to the jack and pram, and record their identification numbers.

Check th'e gages for zero pzessure reading.

5,5,2.4 pressurize the jack to a force equivalent to 1,000 lbs per wire.

Record the gage reading and the corresponding tendon elongation.

5,5,2 5 Increase the tensioning force so that the average wire stress is equal to 80 percent of the minimum ultimate strength of the wires, as

I

~

S

Revisioi 3

5,5,2 6

determined in paragraph 5.5.2.1.

Record the gage reading and the corresponding tendon elon-gation Reduce the )eeking force from the equivalent of 80 percent of the, mini~ ult&tc strength of the wires, to the initial Lift-offreading es obtained in paragraph 5.3.3.6, Por any discontinuous or test wires removed, deduct 50 psi from the initial lift-offreadings.

Measure the distance from the bottom of the stressing washer to thc bear~

plate and subtract one-eighth inch This di.stance is defined as full shim depth and is the depth of the new shins to be instaLLed.

5,5 2.7 Install shims to the neax'est one-eighth inch of the full shim depth.

5,5.2.8 Obtain new Iift-offforce.

The reading should be equal to or greater than the initiaL lift-offforce If.not, repeat the procedures as stated in paragraphs 5.5.2.5 and 5.5.2.6.

Install shims and obtain new Lift-offforce.

5,5.2.9 Measure and record new shim depth.

5,5.2.10 'etach the )ack and apply a coating of Viscosity Oil Co.

2090P or 1601 Amber to the tendon end anchorages.

5,6 Installing Sheath Piller 5,6 1 Reinstall tendon fi.lier caps using new gaskets, copper

washers, and teflon nuts as used in the initial installation.

5 6.2 Refill the tendon sheathing with Viscosity Oil Co Vf.scmoxust 2090P, 2090P>>2, or 2090P-4 sheath filler.

Th'e temperatuxe of the filler at the filler p~p shall. be approximately 120 P.

Do not reuse fiLler that has been x'emoved from the tendons.

pumping shall conti.nue from one end of the tendon, until at least 5 gallons of filler, wi.thout any air bubbles or visible foreign substances, flows out of,the outlet at the opposite end of the tendon.

5.6.3 Record the temperature of the sheath filler at the drum and at the outlet.

Also, record on the Sheath Piller Inspection Porm the volume of sheath filler replaced for each surveillance tendon.

5.7 Laboratory Testing of Tendon Wire Samples and Sheath Piller Samples A-8

t 0

li

~ ~

Revision 3

5,7 ~ 1 Tendon Wire Sample Testing 5.7.1,1 Tensile tests shall be performed on at least three specimens from each surveillance wire removed.

Tensile test specimens, each approximately 126 inches long, shall be taken from near the center and each end of the wires.

Additional specimens shall be taken from the portions of the wire that appear to have a corrosion rating one or more levels greater than the average des-criptions of the wires.

5,7,1,2 Remaining wires not used for testing, shall be protected against corrosion and retained until test results have been finalized.

5,7,1,3 Tensile tests also shall be made on at least one specimen from each discontinuous wi.re removed.

The test specimen shall be taken near the break and shall be approximately 126 inches long."

5.7.1.4 All tensile tests shall be performed in accordance with Appendix E, "Specification for Tensile Testing of Post-Tensioning Tendon Wire."

[3 5,7,2 Sheath PiLler Sample Testing 5,7 2 1 Analytical testing shall be performed on at least one specimen, each one quart in size, from each surveillance tendon.

5.7,2.2 Additional specimen obtained from the sur-veillance tendons, but not used for testing, shall be retained until test results have been finalized.

5 7.2 3 All sheath filler testing shall be performed in accordance with Appendix F, "Specification

)3 for Laboratory Testing of Sheath Piller."

5,8 Report 5.8.1 Data Data obtained during the surveillance shall be sum-marized in a report.

The original data and records of the surveillance shall be submitted to Florida Power and Light Company within 90 days of completion of the tendon surveillance at the Turkey Point Plant.

A-9

I'

~

~

~ I Revision 3

5 8.2 Evaluation The surveillance data for each tendon shall be compared with previous records to determine if:

a Additional wires have broken since last surveillance.

b The lift-offforce for the tendon is below the minimum effective design prestress.

c, Changes in wire corrosion level, or anchorage assembly corrosion Level, have occurred.

d. Deterioration of sheath filler has occurred.

e, Significant changes in wire elongation, yield, and ultimate strength have occurred.

If any of, these conditions exists, the report shall in-clude an evaluation of condition and, where necessary, recommendations for remedial actions.

5. 8. 3 Formulas Formulas for normalizing factors and normalized forces are given in Appendix B..

t3 A-10

d 1

~

~

I I

Revision 3

IDENTIFICATION NUNIBER

~o CD CD CD CD

+

CD CO Cl ill CD CD I

1".+ 1/8 5/8" + I/16 f BAR 3 fi"+ ~/s 1" + 1/8 NOTES:

Hole diameter shall be certified by an independent laboratory.

2.

Each gage shall have an identifying number.

~

Figure A-1 A-11 FLORIDAPOWER IIc LIGHTCO.

TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT4 GO/NCNGO GAGE

Revision 3

ST'D NUT WELD TO EYE 6/8" UNC SAW CUT CI C7 I

C)

+

HEAD SEE DETAIL 1

SLEEVE SEE DETAIL ~2 1'-0" 1t+lt NOTES:

The nut with the pulling ring welded to it may be replaced with an eye nut.

The hardness of this tool shall not exceed Rockwell C40.

FIGURE A-2 SHEET 1 OF 2 A-12 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE Unit 4 WIRE PULLER

l I

0

~

~

Revision 3

~395

+ 008 PIA

.000 REAM TO SUIT BUTTONHEAD QQ Q

Q lA SAN CUT COO OO QQ O

Q CV +

LAN

+

Q a

CI ca alt

.75" 2.12

.375

.25" 4.06 a.C2

+.06

..063" J.005 HEAD DETAIL SH;2 QQQ O

Pl C)

F12"

,4&

MOVABLE SLEEVE DETAIL SH.-2 FIGURE A-2 SHEET 2 OF 2 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PO'iVER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE Unit 4 WIRE PULLER

I

~

TENDON NO.

Revisic}n 3 LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 000 0000 000 Opp 00 p 0 pp00 000 pppp pPOOP p 0 p00 P

0000 0 0

OOpp 000 ppp 00 Opp 0pp 0 0 000

++goop 000 0

0 000'000 000 ppp 00 0 Opp 000 pppppp Oppp 0

+

00

~

pp ppp pPPO 00000 00 o

0 000 0

t<o~~oo 000 Opp 00 0 0 END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS

)

END ANCHORAGE B

,(CLOSEST BUTTRESS

)

CORROSION LEVEL WASHER BUTTONHEADS SHIMS BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

CORROSION LEVEL WASHER BUTTONHEADS SHIMS BEARING PLATE BUTTONHEADS:

0 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD 6

BUTTONHEADWITH SPLIT WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE

% WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS:

41 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 0'2 VISIBLEOXIDATIONNO PITTING 430 (

PITTING ( 0.003" TT 4 0.003" C PITTING E 0.006 4f5 0.006 4

PITTING (

0.010 INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A DATE END ANCHORAGE B DATE A-14 FIGURE A-3 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Unit 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM 5 th.YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSP ECTION SHEET OF

I

~

I S ~,

~

~

~

TENDON NO.

RAM NO.

GAGE NO.

BUTTRESS NUM. EFF. WIRES 0 DETENSIONING 0 RETENSIONING iNSPECTED BY DATE EXTERIOR TEMPERATURE INTERIOR TEMPERATURE DESCRIPTION CHECK GAGES (ZERO)

OBJECTIVE ACTUALMEASURED MEASURE SHIMS OBTAIN LIFT.OFF PRESSURIZE TO.Sf'i MEASURE ELONGATION0

.8f'EPRESSURIZE TO ZERO PRESSURIZE TO 1000 LB/WIRE MEASURE ELONGATION ~~

DEPRESSURIZE TO ZERO REMOVE RAM REMOVE WIRE WAS THIS END CUT?

CHECK CONTINUITY PRESSURIZE AT 1000 LB/WIRE zO CO MEASURE ELONGATION '~

PRESSURIZE TO

.Sf'EASURE ELONGATION AT.Sf'q PRESSURE 9 RESHIM A)

NEW LIFT-OFF B)

NEW SHIMS PRESSURE SHALLNOT DROP BELOW THIS LEVELAFTER PRESSURIZATION TO.Sf'q iiELONGATION IS THE DISTANCE FROM THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THE BEARING PLATE TO THE INSIDE FACE OF THE STRESSING WASHER. (THIS WILLBE A NEGATIVE NUMBER IF THE WASHER IS INSIDE THE TRUMPET.)

F IGORE A"4 A-15 Revision 3

I

~

0

TENDON NO.

CLOSEST BUTTRESSES Revision 3

BH END 75'50 TOTALLENGTH OF WIRE CORROSION LEVEL:

Q g1 NO VISIBI.E OXIDATION Q 02 VISIBLEOXIDATION,NO PITTiNG Q 030" < PITTING ~ 0.003" Q 44 0.003

< PITTING 0.006" Q

4 5 0.006" < PITTING (

0.010" INSPECTED BY DATE BH. - BUTI'ONHEAD A-16 FIGURE A-5 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.

TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

~

Unit 4 I

POST TENSIONING SYSTEM i

St11 YEAR SURVEILLANCE WIRE INSPECTION h TENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS SHEET OF

l l

P

t

~

SHEATHING FILLER INSPECTION Revision 3

TENDON NO.

END ANCHORAGE A CLOSEST BUTTRESS END ANCHORAGE B CLOSEST BUTTRESS DETENSIONING:

DETENSIONING:

TEMPERATURE:

OUTSIDE INSIDE GREASE REMOVED COLOR BY:

DATE:

TEMPERATURE:

OUTSIDE INSIDE GREASE REMOVED COLOR BY:

DATE:

RETENSIONING:

TEMPE RATUR'E:

OUTSIDE INSIDE INLET OUTLET

/

GREASE REPLACED BY:

DATE:

RETENSIONING:

TEMPERATURE:.

OUTSIDE INSIDE INLET OUTLET GREASE REPLACED BY:

DATE FIGURE A-6 A"17 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHTCO.

TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Unit 4 POST.TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE SHEET OF

1

APPENDIX B FORMULAS FOR NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED FORCES FOR FLORIDA POWER

& LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL 'POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland June 1977 Revision 1, December 15, 1977

I

Revision 1

1. 0 GENERAL In order to provide a common base for comparison, tendon lift-off forces must be normalized to account for elastic stress loss during initial installation (a function of the post-tensioning sequence),

the lift-offfqrce deviation from the base value, and the number of effective tendon wires or strands.

The base value for evaluating the normalized tendon force is assumed to be the force which produces an average tendon wire or strand stress of 0.7fpu.

In cases where the same tendon is subjected to two or more surveillances, the base value for the ith surveillance is the normalized force for the i-1 surveillance.

The normalized force is equal to the measured lift-offforces multi-plied by the normalizing factors.

2.0 NORMALIZING FORMULAE 2.1 Normalizin Formulae for First Surveillance i ~ 1 2.1.1 Vertical Tendons 0

NFl 0.7f u L

N n

c v

v E

H (Eq. 1) 2.1.2 Hoop Tendons NF 1

0.7f N - n v

N EV (Eq 2) 2.1.3 Dome Tendons NF N

0. 7f (Eq.

3) 2.2 Normalized Lift-OffForce Per Wire or Strand FN

~ F x NF (Eq 4) 0 B-2

),

t P

Revision'1 2.3 Normalizin Factor for Subse uent Surveillances (i) 1)

The following equation is used for vertical-dome, hoop-wall, or hoop-dome tendon:

F F(i-1)

L (i 1) x N (i 1)

3. 0 NOMENCLATURE (Eq.

5)

L

~ initial lift-offforce of surveillance tendon (kips)

~ lift-offforce obtained at the i-1 surveillance (kips)

= lift-offforce during retensioning at the i-1 surveillance (kips)

= number of hoop tendons tensioned prior to tensioning surveillance tendon

.h

~ total number of hoop tendons nv

~ number of vertical tendons tensioned prior to tensioning surveillance tendon N

~ total number of vertical tendons in one group nd

~ number of dome tendons'n one group tensioned prior to tensioning surveillance tendon N d wc

~ total number of dome tendons

'= number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon at initial installation

~ number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon at ith surveillance N (i-1)

N (i-1) number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon at i-1 surveillance number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon when retensioned during the i-1 surveillance S

h total elastic stress loss in hoop tondons during initial tensioning (ksi) = 15.3 ksi SEv

~ total elastic stress loss in vertical tendons during initial tensioning (ksi) 6.6 ksi B-3

I

~

Revision 1

= lift-offforce per wire or strand at i surveillance (kips) th F

(i-1)

N NF

~ lift-offforce per wire or strand after retensioning at the i-1 surveillance (kips)

~ normalized lift-offforce per wire or strand for the i.th surveillance (kips)

~ normalizing factor for the i surveillance th NF(i-1)

~ normalizing factor for the i-1 surveillance S E d total elastic loss in dome tendons during initial tensioning (ksi) due to one group

~ 14.7 ksi

~ Poisson's ratio for concrete

~ 0.16 fpu

= minimum specified ultimate strength of tendon wire or strand (ksi)

~ cross-sectional area of one tendon wire or strand (in )

2 B-4

C

APPENDIX C END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE FOR 4

FLORIDA POWER

& LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland August 1977

I t'

~ ~

8 I

~

TENDON NO.

S LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 6

~+ oopp g~ oop pop oo0 opooo ooo o

p pp pop opp Qo 0 0

+

o poo ooo Pp pop 0

popo o,o po Dqo o

4 0 Oooo p

0 0

oooo 4

00 oo opo ooo po po o p

+

ooo opp ooopo oooo o 0

p~

pp Goop poo pp oop o o

~

oooo

'po ooo ooppo pp 0

q0~

END ANCHORAGEA (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6

)

TOP CORROSION LEVEL WASHER 2

SUTTDNHSADS SHOES SEARING PLATE 1

LEGEND:

BUTTONHEADS:

8 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD 0

BUTTONHEAD WITH SPUT 0

WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE

% WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6

BOTTOM.

CORROSION LEVEL RASHER BUTTONHEADS SHIMS 2

BEARING PLATE CORROSION LEVELS:

41 NO VISIBLEOX)DATION 02 VISIBLEOXIDATIONNO PITTING 030 s

PlTTING 6 O.OQ3" 0<O.OQ3" <

PITTING a OSOe" 45 O.O06 s'ITTING 6 LolO INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RB DATE 10-25 77 ENOANCHORAGE8 AH DASE C-2 FIGURE FLORIDA POWER IIE LIGHT TURKEYPOINT NUCI EAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4.

POST.TEN SIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SHEET>OF 9

TENDON NO.

l.OCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 2 000 060 Op 0

0

~,oOOP 0 00

/p 0

0'g 00 0 0 Og 000 000 000 pp 000 o0

OOo, 00O

~

~ Pp 0

00 000 Opp ppp >

z 00000 ppppP 0

C~ 0 Opppp Opp e

ppp Op 00 000 000 Opppp pp0 O'0 Op 0

0 0

OOOO 0+>

000 Opp u 000 (P Op

+

Op 0 p pp pg

~

pPPO OpppO 0

END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 2

)

TOP END ANCHORAGE B

.{CLOSEST BUTTRESS 2

)

BOTTOM.

CORROSION LEVEL WASHER 1

SUTTQHHEADS SHINS BEARING PLATE CORROSION LEVEL SUTTQHHEADS SH QSS BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

BUTTONHEADS:

0 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD e

BUTTONHEADWITHSPLIT WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE K WIRE REMOVED FOR INSP'ECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS:

41 NO VISIBLEOXIDATION 02 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING 030 E

PITTING 5 0.003 4<o.oo3" <

PITTING E o~os-Oso.oos" (

pITTING 5 o.ohio" INSPECTED BY EHQ AHGHQR*GS A RE DATE 10-26-77 EHD AHQHQRAGE S AH DATE C-3 FIGURE 3

FLORIDAPOWER SL LIGHT TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTlON SHEET2OF 9

1,

TENDON NO.

l.OCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) opo OOOOO ooo 0 ooo 000 0 000 ppo poop 0

Op oopo ooooo 000 Ooo po ooo

+

oopoo

~ PS.OO

~gpoopo c

o 0p oo<

cy~

0 oo0 0

00000 000 pop op o o

~

OOOO p 0 000 po 00 ooo p op

~0 ~

ohio oooo OOO 000 oo

+

0 poo 0

ppo 0000 ~Y oooo popo 0

p END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4

)

TOP END ANCHORAGE B

.(CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4

)

BOTTOM CORROSION LEVEL RASHER 1

BUTTONHEADS SHINS 1

SEARING PLATE LEGEND:

CORROSION LEVEL NASHER BUTTONHEAOS SHOAT 2

BEARING PLATE BUTTONHEADS:

0 OFF S1ZE BUTTONHEAD e

BUTTONHEADWITHSPUT N!RE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DlSCONTINUOUS VIIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEII.LANCE K SIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTlON AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS-01 NO VISIBLEOXIDATION 4'2 VISIBLEOXIDATIONNO PITTING TT.3 0 (

PITTING 5 0.003" TEA 0.003 E

PITTlNG K OJ)otE ISO.OOS" <

PITTING 6 0.010" NSPECTED BV EDNANCHORGAAEEE DATE ENO ANCHORAGE B AR DATE c-4 FIGURE 3

FLORIDAPOWER 5 LIGHT TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENS IONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SHEET3OF 9

TENDON NO.

LOSS LOCATION(CLOSEST BUTTRESS) o OOoo e

OOOO

/

OPO Opp OP 0

OO

~pop z opp

+ Qp pp c

0 O

p POPO pppp ppo po OO OO

+

0 OOO OOo OOOO QOOOPO 0

v QgOOOI 0 A~

END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS

< )

~~ o

~bppp 0

< Opppp 0OO pp POO 0

O ppp OO WQOO 400 0 O QOOOO OOP O 0

p OOOO PPOOP OO OOO pp

+

OOO ppp 0

OOP Opp Opppp O ppp 0

END ANCHORAGE B

.tCLOSEST 8UTTR ESS 1

l.

CORROSION LEVEL BASHER 2

BUTTOIIHSADS SHIIAS BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

CORROSION LEVEL VSASHER 2

BUTTONHSADS WIMS GEARING PLATE 2

B~ONHEADS:

e OFF SI2E BUTTONHEAD 6

SUTTONHEAD WITH SPLfT

~

WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DtSCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEI LLANCE K WlRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND-TESTING THIS SUR VEIL LAN CE

" CORROSION LEVELS:

O4 NO VISIBLE0"!DATfOTJ 42 VISIBLEOXIDATIONNO PI~SNG

~30 C

P1TTING 6 0.003" Isf4 0.003 4

PliT!NG K OANg 4'-5 0.006 s

PITTING 5 0.010-fNSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RS DATE LL S TT ENDANCHORAGEB AE DATE LL

~1-~/s" Rev.

1 September 8,

1978 l"tGtfRE 3 FLORIDAPOWER JE LIGHT TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4

~ POST-TEN SIONING SYSTEM 5 thYEAR SURVEfl.LANCE END ANCHORAGE INSP ECTtON A-A C-5 SHEET 4OF 9

\\

f.

P

TENDON NO.

l.OCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) oooo 0

e popo pop opo opp Op00

~O I5' 0'g 0go

~

po,oo ppp oop op pop

, oo

'oo ooo op o

p ~

0 pop o p

ppoo opo-opp po opo 0 p

~

po

~

opp poop oppo o opo p

oo pp opp oooo op p pop po

+

opp

~pop0

~ opp 8 0 p 0 o

popo p p

END ANCHORAGEA (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 3

)

END ANCHORAGE B

.(CLOSESTBUTTRESS 6

)

CORROSION LEVEL WASHER BUTTOMHEADS SHOES BEARING PLATE 1

LEGEND:

CORROSION LEVEL NASHER'UTTOMHEADS SHIMS BEARING PLATE BUTTONHEADS:

6 OFF.SIZE BUTTONHEAD e

BUTI'ONHEADWITH SPLIT WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVEO THIS SURVEILLANCE

% llVIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION ANO TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE Wircled Button Heads Indicate Corrosion Level 82 CORROSION LEVELS:

41 NO VISIBLEOX)DATION 02 VlSIBLEOXIDATIONNO PITTlNG 030 C

PITTING S, 0.003 st 4 0.003 4

PITTING ~

OA)06 45 0.006 (

PITTING 5 L010 INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGEA RB DATE END ANCHORAGE B ~Q DATE~~~

C-6 FIGURE 3

FI.ORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5 t+YKARSURVEILLANCE ENO ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SHEET5OF 9

'I

~

~

~

~

~

I E

TENDON NO.'

LOCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 6 6

1 oooo ~~

oooo 000 000 00 0 0 ooo w 0

o OOO 0O 00 000 0

oooo o 0

Oopp oop ooo oo

~ Ooo

+

Opooo 000 0

OOOO ooo poo 0 oo poo ooo oo o o op 0 p ppp poop ooo o 0

ooooo opp 00 oo oop

+

op oop ooo 00000 ooppp pp 0

0

~ 5P 5y9 Q+ 0 op p'0 pp 0

0 END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6 )

END ANCHORAGE B

.(CLOSEST BUTTRfSS 1

)

CORROSION I.EVEL RASHER

.2 SUTTONHEADE SHIMS 2

BEARING PLATE 1

LEGEND:

CORROSION LEVEL NASHER SUTTONHEADE SHIMS 2

BEARING PLATE 1

BUTTONHEAOS:

0 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAO 0

BUTTONHEADWITH SPLIT 8

WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE

% VllRE REMOVEO FOR INSPECTION ANO TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS-41 NO VISIBLEOXIDATION 02 VISIBLEOXIDATIONNO PITTING TII'3 0 C

PlTTING 6 0.003 wi L003,Q PITTING 5 0406 4'6 0.006 C

PITTING 5 L010 INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RB DATE END ANCHORAGE S DATE C-7 FIGURE 3

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TEN SI ON ING SYSTEM 5 thYEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SHEET 6OF

TENDON NO. ~280 I.OCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 4 6 2

'poop opopo pop ppo 0 o 0

poo poo poo 0popp oooo e

p opp p ooo-opoo ~

(pp c) ppP CeI oooo oooop

~ ppoooooo p

p TP 3p]

pp 0 ooo ppo o o o pop 0

opo poop popop 0

ppoop p

p

/

Q po op ppo p~o oo ooo

+

ppo ppp0 poo popp END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4

)

END ANCHORAGE B

.tCLOSEST 8UTTR ESS 2

)

CORROSION LEVEL BUITOHHEADS BRIMS SEARING PLATE 1

LEGEND:

CORROSION LEVEL RASHER 2

BUTTON HEADS SHIMS BEARING PLATE BUTTONHEADS:

9 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD 0

SUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT e

WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE X WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION ANO TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS-g1 NO VISIBLEOXIDATION 4'2 VISIBLEOXIDATIONNO PITTING 430 C

PlTTING 6 0.003 TTi 0.003 4

PITTINQ K 0406 4'5 L006 C

PITTING 6 0 050 INSPECTED BY EHD ANCHORAGE A ~

DATE ENOANCHORAGES ~

DATE~

FIGURE 3 C-8 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5thYEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SHEET7OF 9

~ g

TENDON NO.

LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 4 & 6 op 4

Qpp poop <~

opo d'po pop ooo +

pop

.I opooo ~

o oop op

~

o o

oopp p 0

oppoo

~ 0 op oop op o p ooo ooo 0poppy I

oopp 0

oooo oop oop oo 0 p

oop oppp ooo opppp ig oooo

(~ 0 Og PQP p 0

p pp ppo

~

op oop p p

+

QOQ

~

pp ppo popo pp 5 o p'a~

END ANCHORAGEA (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4 )

END ANCHORAGE B CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6

CORROSION LEVEI.

WASHER 1

8UTTONHEADS BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

CORROSION LEVEL NASHER 2

EUTTONHEADS SHIMS 2

BEARING PLATE 1

BUVFONHEADS:

0 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD e

BUTTONHEADWITH SPLIT 0

SIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SUR VEII.LANCE X, WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS-TE 1 NO VISIBLEOXIDATION 02 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTING TT 30 C

PITTINQ 6 0.003 44a003" (

PITTINQ i 0SOe" 45 0.006 0

PITTINQ 6 LOIO INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A DATE END ANCHORAGE 8 AH DATE C-9 FIGURE 3

FLORIDAPOWER & LIGHT TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PUQET UNIT 4 POST-TENS IONING SYSTEM 5th -YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SHEETSOF 9

VEWOON NO.

I.OCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) rF'g~

Oppp d

Opppp Opp

~

PO0 0 OBO OOO 000 pppp poop p 0 ppp Opp o 0

opppo

~<OOOO

~

OO OO Opp

+

Op 0000

~ 000 0 ppp OOOO OOOO 0

OppP

~

OOO OOOO 0

Opo Op<0 Oppp pppop OOO p Op z

o OOOO 0

0 OOP~

Opp C Oppu PO ~

o 0

~

ppP 0

Opp

~

pppp

~

OPOOO 0

p pp 0

END ANCHORAGE A (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6

)

END ANCHORAGE B

.(CLOSEST BUTTRESS

)

CORROSION LEVEL lVASHER 2

BUTTONHEADS SHIMS 2

BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

CORROSION LEVEL VtASHER BUTTONHEADS SHOAT BEARING PLATE BUTTONHEADS:

0 OFF SI2E BUTTONHEAD 6

BUTTONHEADWITH SPLIT WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE

% WIRE REMOVED FOR INSP'ECTlON AND TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE CORROSION LEVELS 4'1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 02 VISIBLE OXIDATIONNO PITTINQ 430 C

PITTING 6 0.003

~ 4 0.003 4

PITTINQ K OAOtB OS 0.006 C

PITTINQ 6 L010 INSPECTED BY END ANCHORAGE A RB DATE 11" 15-.77 END ANCHORAGE B AH DATE 11-15-77 C-10 r FIGURE 3

FLORIDAPOWER & LIGHT TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTlON SHEET9OF 9

APPENDIX D WIRE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE FOR FLORIDA POWER

& LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland November 1977

~DON NCL 34V29 10'-10" END SAMPLE It1 8 '-2" SAm'ZZ 4P2 125 128'7" SAM.ZZ N

~0 l 4 ll

] 391 pll

]4] I pll 143 l 7 ll SE1 169'-8~1 CORROSION LEVEL gg f1 NO VISIBLEOXIDATION Q 42 VNIBLEOXIDATION,NO PITTING 0 ISO"< PITTING S O.au" g faaea-<

PITTING <

aOO6" 0

45aOOe" < PITTING < aeo" amcrao sr 10-31-77

~ D-2 RGVRE 5

FLORIDAMYIER5 LIGHTCO.

TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 MST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5 thYEAR SuRVKILLANCE MIRE INSPECTION LTENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS SHEETLOF D

I ~

TENOON NO.

CLOSEST BUTTRESSES 166 10'-10" gg ENO SAMPLE 81 60'-10" SAMPLE

<P.

87 f 6$ ll 9 '""ver SmPLZ fP3 TOTALLEN'rm OF VnRE CORROSION LEVEl 01 NO VISIBLEOXIOATION 0 f2 VISIBLEOXIOATlON,NO PITTINQ 0 4i'O"C mnNe5 O.ea" 0 Sca.art C PITnNa O.OOS" a

45aOO6"< rITnNS

< aniO" INSPECTED IY~~

OATE 11>> 11-78 4"

IUTTONHEAO FICURE 5

FLORIDAPOWER 5 LIGHTCO.

TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE NlRE INSPECTION 4 TENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS SHEETS.OF &

f

~ t

~

~

TENDON NO.

CLOSEST BUTTRESSES 2@4 10'10" SAMPLZ 81 7Pt Ptt Supra,/f2 80'-10" 125'29'-7"

]40f 3ll

~

smrrz N TOTALLENGTH OF YARE 140'3" CORROSION LEVEL:

Q 4'1 NO VISIBLEOXIDATION Q

" 42.VISIBLEOXIDATION.NO PITTING Q 0'50 < PITTlNG 5 0.003 0 0aaaa" < PITTING <

a006-0 f50.006"< PITTING < aa10-twmCrmSV " t.

ATE 11-11-77 IH.'. BUTTONHEAD FIGURE 5 FLORIDAPOWER 5 LIGHTCO.

TURKEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNiT 4 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM 5th YEAR SURVEILLANCE HIRE INSPECTION 4 TENSION SAMPLE I.OCATIONS SHEET OF

I ~

P

APPENDIX E SPECIFICATION FOR TENSILE TESTING OF POST-TENSIONING TENDON WIRE (ASTM A-421)

FOR FLORIDA POWER

& LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland s,:

.-.8 Yd.-.e~..)

Charles W. Andrews

June, 1977 Revision l., December 15, 1977 Approved:

K. P.

B chert Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Division E-1

I

Revision 1

L 0 GENERAL This document specifies the general procedures which shall be used for the tensile testing or the 1/4"-diameter post-tensioning teadoa wires (AS'-421, Type BA).

This document does aot relieve the testiag laboratory of the responsibility for conducting the tensile tests in a manner coasistend with the industry standards.

2 0 WORK INCLUDED Nine (9) L/4"-diameter wire specimens, approximately 10'-6" Long, wi11. be sent to the laboratory for testing in accordance with Section 3.0 Each of these specimens willhave an identification tag attached close to one end; this tag will identify the tendon from which the wire was removed and the location of the specimen with resoect to the wire.

Specimens shall be disposed of in accordance with Section 4.0 aad a report meeting the requi emeats of Section 5.0 shall be prepared.

3 0 TEST DESCRIPTION l

Tendon wires shall be tested in accordance with AS'-421-65, "S~a-dard Specification for Uncoated Stress-Relieved Wire for P estressed Concrete",except that the gage length shall be 100 (+ 1.0) inches, instead of the 10 iaches as specified.

This test shall inc'uae the followiag:

3 ~ 1 Measurement of wire diameter with an accuracy of + 0.0005".

3,2 Measurement of gage length with an accuracy of + 0.05"..

3.3 Application or aa initial load corresponding to 29,000 psi.

3.4 Applicatf.on of additional load to obtain the force correspondiag to 1.0 percent eWensioa.

3,5 Application of additional load and obtaining load at failure and elongation under load at fai1ure (+ 0.05").

4,0 DISPOSAL OP TES~ SPELLS A sampLe approximately 6" long oa each side of the break of each specimen shall be bouad and returned as a unit with the idaxtificatioa tag attached.

Spec~

shall be returned to:

Bechtel Power Corporation Post Office Box 607 Gaithersburg, ~~land 20760 Atteation:

Nr. M. Malcom Pro]ect Eaginee" E-2

t I

Revision 1 Thx'ee (3) copies of the report on tendon wire testing shall be submitted to:

Bechtel Power Corporation Post Office Box 607 Gaithexsbux'g, Maryland 20760 Attention.

LLr. H. Nalcom Prospect Engineer The report shall contain the follacrLng information:

5 1 Testing machine calibration report.

5.2 Wire identification.

5,3 Wix'e diameter

(+ 0.0005 inches).

5.4 Gage length (+ 0.05 inches).

5.5 Force and, elongation

(+ 0.001 inches) at initial load.

5,6 Porce and elongation

(+ 0.01 inches) at

17. extension.

5,7 Poxce and elongation under load (+ 0.05 inches) at failure.

5.8 Location ofM.lure relative to the grip in the ~g head

(+ 0.005 inches).

E-3

APPENDIX F SPECIFICATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING OF SHEATH FILLER (VISCONORUST 2090P)

FOR FLORIDA POWER

& LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland Charles W. Andrews

June, 1977 Revision 1, December 15, 1977 Approved:

K. P. Buchert Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Division F l

r 0

Revision 1

1i0 GENERAL This document specifies the procedu es which shall be used for labora-tory testing of sheath filler Visconozust 2090P to determine:

a The amount of water soluble chlorides, nitrates and sulfides which are leached from a given contact area between water and the sheath filler under standzad conditions.

b..

The water content of the sheath filler.

c The resezve alkalinity of the sheath filler.

This document does not relieve the testing laboratory of responsi-b&ity for conducting the necessary laboratory tests in a manner ccasistent with the ~industry standards.

2 0 WORK INCLUDED Nine (9) ane-quart test samples will be sent to the laboratory for testing in accordance with Section 3.0.

The concentration oz water soluble impurities and water in these samples wi.ll 1Dcely not exceed the follawing:

2 1 Chlorides - 10 ppm 2 2 Ni~tes - 10 ppm 2 3 Sulfides - 10 ppm 2 4 Water (H20) - 107. Dry Weight A report meeting the requirements of Section 4.0 shall be prepared.

3 0 TEST DESCRY ZIONS

, Each sample of sheath filler shall be mixed and then tested as fol.laws:

3 1 Water Soluble Xmpurities A water extraction of each sample of sheath fill.er shall be made and tested as indicated below:

3 1 1 Usi.ng a spatula, coat the inside (baton and sides) of a 1 liter glass beaker with a 1/4-inch layer oz sheath filler.

3.l. 2 Pill the beaker with distilled water at roam temperature.

3.1 3 Heat the wate to a controlled tempe ature of <00op and maintain for four hours.

Do not heat on a, hot plate.

Heat either in an oven or by use oz an ~ersion heater so that the water wi11 remain clear for tests.

F-2

r

h Revision 1

0 3.1 4 Run a blank on distiLLed water.

Xf titrate, use a micro-

buret, 1 ml or 5 ml, with 0.01 - 0.05 ml graduation inter-vals.

3 1 5 Decant water and analyze for soluble ions.

Test only for salts in leached water.

The water analyses shall be as follows:

3.1 5.1 Chlorides (Cl) by ASTM D-512.

3~1 5.2 iH.trate +03) by AS~ D-992, Bzucine Method or Cadminum Reduction 'method by Hach Chemical Co.,

Ames'owai 3 1 5.3 Sulfides (S) 'by APHA (American PubLic Health Association)

Standard method - Nethylene Blue-or the method by Hach Chemical

Company, Ames, Xowao 3 2 Vvater Content Mater content (H20 as percent of dzy weight) shall be determined in accordance with ASM D-95.

3 3 Neutralization Number Neutralization number shaLL be determined in accordance with ASTM D-664, 4 0 iEPORT Three copies of the report on Laboratory testing of the sheath filler'hall be submitted to:

BechteL Power Corporation Post Office Box 607 Gaithersburg,

~~Land 20760 Attention:

Hr. H. Nalcom Project Bngineer The report shall contain the zollowing information:

Sample identi cation.

4.2 Concentration of water soluble chlorides, nitrates and sulf.'des wi~4 an accuracy oz 0.1 ppm 4.3 Concentration oz water (H20) within an accuracy of 0.1 percent oz dry weight of the filler.

4.4 Neutralization number within an accuracy of 0.01 mg reagent per gram of filler.

F-3

'V 0

~ ~

APPENDIX G RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING OF WIRE SAPLES FOR FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE t

BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1978

~ t qS5TINQ (

cP,

'we +y EF~

55 e

t

'r Z+

d

~ I

++

CQSAHOGT PSRLI A0T ACT~ PC CSTAOLISHCO ISO I 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA. 15220 PLEASE REPI-Y TOI P, Oa IOX ldAd PITTSBURGH, P A IStt'S

• NUTVAL FROTCCTION TO CLICNT5, THC FVhLIC ANO OVRSCLVCS, AI,L RCFORT5 ARC SVSINTTCO A5 THC CONFIOCHTIAL FROFCRTT OF CLICHTS

• HO AUTHORIZATION FOR FVSLICATIOH OF STATCHCNTS, COHCLU5IOHS OR CXTRACTS FROM OR RCOAROIHO OVR RCI'ORT5 IS RCS CRT CO FCHOIHCI OVR INRITTCH A>FROVAL LABORATORY No.

AREA COOE AIt TELEPHONE Stt.5000 781695 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY cLIENT's No. P,O ~ No 65121 25833C p E p Q oRDER No. PG-6834 May 15, 1978 Report of:

Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon IAire Report to.

Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O.

Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn.

Mr. Feeney UNIT P4 Spec imen Iden ti8ica tion

Diameter, Inches Original Area, Sq. Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI Elongation at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1% Extension, Pounds Stress at 1% Extension,

PSI, Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip in the 2D3 19-'1

.2500

.0491 14004

.21 95600 195,500 1.21 12,250 249,500

4. 92

4. 92%

moving head 9"

Samples tested in accordance with order no.

65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASSN A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.

SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIPT FOR TESTING.

PAY -ly ~cqp

I

20 X 20 TO THE INCH ~ 1 X 10 INCIIKS H E-C IIDIFFEI.a KSSCII CO.

saoc a anal.

46 1240

I f

1 g5TIHO

~~+4<

C

~O

++

4 al C~+SAROC FORM AOT ACY, F C PLKA5K RKPL,Y TOI Pe 0, BOX IOAS PI T T 5BU ROH, P A.

1525<

AS A NUtUAI. FROTCCTIOH tO CLICH'15 ~ THC FUSI,IC AHO OVR5CLYC5, ALI RCI'ORT5 ARC SVSMITTCO AS THC COHFIOCNTIAL FROFCRTT OF CLICHT5, *HO AUTHORIZATION FOR FVSLICATIOH OF STATCHCHTSa COHCLVSIOHS OR CXTRACT5 FRON OR RCCAROIHC OVR RCFORTS IS RCSCRYCO FCNOIHO OVR WRITTCN AFFROYAL, LABORATORY No.

781695 ARKA COOK 412 TKLKPHONK922 4000 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATQRY CSTASLISHCO 1441 850 POPLAR STRKFT, PITTSBURGH, PA. 15220 cLIENT's No.

P.O

~ No.

65121 "25833C R E P O R T oRDER No. PG-6834 May 15, 1978 Report of:

Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Mire Report to:

Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O.

Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn.

Hr. Feeney UNIT Specimen 1dentification, Diame ter', Inches Original Area, Sq. Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches Load at l%%u Extension, Pounds Stress at 1% Extension, PSI Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fx'acture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture, Tnches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip PSI 2D3 $2

. 2499

. 049 1400

.18 10,150 207,100 1.18 12,350 2525000 S.56 5.56%

in the moving head 303->>

Samples tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASf A421, Stress Stxain Curves are attached.'AHPLES SUBNITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTXNC.

G-4

1

20 X 20 TO THE INCH ~ 1 X IO INCIIES C

KEUFFEI-0 XSSM CO. aaotausa, 46 1240 c

I

~

I 0

l

ol tt 5TIIIp (

~ c Sa I

D IL

~I

(~SANO'"

PORM ADT ACV. P 8 PLKASK REPt.Y YO:

P Oo 8OX ISSS PIT758URQH, P A 1525 AS A HUTVAL tROTCCTIOH TO CLICNTS ~ THC tVSLIC AHD OURSCLYCS, ALL RCtORT5 ARC SUSHITTCD AS THC COHSIDCNTIAL tAOPCR'TY Dt CLICNTS, AHD AUTHORIZATIOH tOlt tVSLICATIOHOt 5TATCHCNT5, CONCLUSIONS OR CX'TRACT5 TRON OR RCOARDIHO OVR RCtORTS 15 RCSCRYCD tCNDIHO OUR WRITTCH AttROYAI LABORATORY No.

AREA COOK SIC TELEPHONE SCZ 4000 781695 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY C5TASLISHCD 1441 ~

050 POPLAR 5TREET. PITTS8URGH, PA. 15220 cLlENT's No P.O.

No. 65121-25833C ORDER No. PG-6834 May 15, 1978 Report of:

Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon !lire Report to:

Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O.

Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn-Mr. Feeney UNIT 44 Specimen Identifica tion

Diameter, Inches Original Area, Sq. Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00.PSI Elongation at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1% Extension, Pounds

'tress at 1% Extension, PSI Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip in the 2D3 t3

.2500

.0491 1400

.20 10,250 208,900 1.20 12,350 251,500 5.53 5.53%

moving head 3"

Samples tested in accordance with order no.

65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASTiif A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.,

E

. SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTING.

G-6

I l

t l

20 X 20 TO THE INCH+ 7 X l0 INCHCS KCUFFCL a ESSEll CO. ~ioccwvsa.

46 1240 0

Uj li l

8 R.

ll TO Y1 t

)I I Il

~ g (ted

~

~

I ~

ii

~

~

qgSTIIIG (

IO P' 5 CI SI C

fI OI i+

rl L+

= ~+SANO<"

FoAM SOT ACT. PC CSTARLISHCD 144 I 850 POPLAR STREET, PlYTSBURGH, PA. 15220 Pl EASE REPLY TOI Pe 0 BOX 1040 PITTSBIIRGH, P A, ISIS AS

• MUTU*LI'ROTCCTION TO CLICNTS ~ TNC PUIILIC AHD OUR5CLVCS ~ *LL RCPORT5 ARC 5USMITTCD A5 TNC CONFIOCNTIAI PROPCRTV OF CI,ICNT5, ANO AUTHORIZATION FOR PVSLICATION OP STATCMCNTS, CONCI.USIONS OR CXTRACT5 FROM OR RCOAROINO OVR RCPORTS I5 RC5CRVCO PCNOIHO OUR WRITTCN *PPROVAL, LA8ORATORY NO.

781695 AREA COOK CIA TKI EPHONE 922.4000 PlTTSBURGH TESTING t ABORATORY CLJENT'> No' 0 ~ No ~

65121 25833C p p p Q oRDER No. PG 6834 Nay 15, 1978 Repor t of:.

Tension Test of Post<<Tensioning Tendon Hire Report to.

Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O.

Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn-Mr. Feeney UNIT ~4 Spec imen Iden tification

Diameter, Inches Original Area, Sq. Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 Elongation at Initial Load, inches Load at 1% Extension, Pounds Stress at 1% Extension, PSI Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip 34V29 $1

. 2499

. 0491 PSI 1400

.20 9,850 200,600 1.20 12,700 258,700 4.87 4.87%

in the moving head 3 II Samples tested in accordance with order no.

65121-25833C Attachment I,dated June 1977 and ASTiaf A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.'AMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIPT FOR TESTWiG.

G-8

(uT>>

20 X 20 TO THE INCH>> 2 K IO INCHES f e~~

C KEVFFEL 0 ESSEA CO. aiotssusA, 46 1240 I

I I

)()e gR iCt

~

~

~

~

~

PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY C5TASLISHCD l44l 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBVRGH, PA. I5220 FORLI SOT ACT.iDC Pl KASK RKPLT TOI P 0, BOX I040 PITTSBURGH, PA 13230 CPS ANOC9 AS A NVTUAL RROfCCTION Td CLICNfS TNC FVSLIC AND OVRSCLVCS, ALL RCFORT5

• RC SVSNIfftd AS TNC CONIlIOCNTIAL FROFCRTT OI CLICNTS, AND AVTNORIZATION fOR FV4LICATIONOI STATCNCNTS, CDNCLVSION5 OR CXTRACTS SROH OR RCOAROINC OUR RCRORTS IS RCSCRVCO FCNOLNO OUR WRITTCN ARFRDVAL LABORATORY NO.

ARKA COOK 412 TKLKPHONK922 4000 781695 cLIENT's No.

P 0. No 65121"25833C R E P O RT oRDER No. PQ 6834 lfay 15, 1978 Report of:

Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Mire Report to.

Florida Power 6c Light Company P.OS Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn-Mr. Feeney UNIT

. 4 Specimen Identification

Diameter, Inches Original Area, Sq. Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1% Extension, Pounds Stxess at 1% Extension, PSI Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fractux'e Elongation at Fxacture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip PSI 34V29 g2

.2498

. 0490 1400

.18 10,650 2173300 1.18 12,800 261,200 4.51 4.51%

in the moving head 6,63 Samples tested in accordance with order no.

65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASTI( A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.

SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIWT FOR TESTING.

20 X 20 TO TIIC INCH+ 7 X IO WCIIES f

KEUFFEL 0 ESSEII CO. eaoElallSL

. 461240 i3('Y aP

'l

~

~

~

~gcllIIIS 4 +>

CID Gz 4

~+SANO C FORM AGT RCV oPO PLKASK RKPLT TOI Po O IIOX 1044 PIYTSSVRGH, PAe ISZ:

AS A NUTU*L RROTCCTION 'TO CLICNTS

'THC RUSLIC ANO OUR5CLVC5, AI.L REPORTS ARE SUSMITTCO *5 THC CONFIDENTIAL RRORCRTV OR CLIENTS, ANO AVTHORIZATION IVOR RVSLICATION OR STATCNCNT5, GONCLVSION5 OR EXTRACTS TRON OR RCG*ROIHG OUR RfPORTS IS RCSCRVCO tCNOIKC OUR WRITTEN ARRROV*L, LABORATORY NO.

781 695 ARKA COOK 41C TKLKPHONK922 4000 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY CSTAdLISHCO

$ 44$

850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA.. I5220 cLIENT's No.

P.0 ~ No.

65121 -25833C Nay 15, 1978 Report of:

Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Hire Report to.

Florida Power 6 Light Company P.0. Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn.

Mr. Feeney UNIT 84 Specimen Identification Diame ter, Inches Original Area, Sq. Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1% Extension, Pounds Stress at 1% Extension, PSI Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip PSI 34V29 Pr3

.2498

. 0490 1400

.31 10,050 205,100 1.31 12,700 259,200 4.59

4. 59%

in the moving head 37.0 Samples tested in accordance with order no. 65121-25833C Attachment I'dated'une 1977 and ASTif A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.

SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTING.

G-12

l

20 X 20 TO THE INCII~ 7 X IO INCIIES f oE-

~E KKUFFEI 8r ESSSII CO.

IIADCIWIISA 46 1240

~g5TIHG VI Sa t

+~

C sl L+

~+SANO<+

FORAI SOT ACV. PC CSZASI ISNCD 144 ~

850.POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA. IS220 Pl EASE REPLY 'TOI P. Oi 8OX 1444 PIT TS8URG II, P A 15200 AS

• HU'TUAL tROTCCTION TO CLICN'f5, TNC I'U41 IC AND OURSCLVCS, ALI, RCFORT5 ARC SUSHITTCD AS THC CONFIDCHTIAL tROFCRTY Ot OLICNTS, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR tUSLICATION Ot STATCHCNTS. CONCLUSIONS OR CXTRACT5 FROW OR RCCARDIHC OUR RCFORT5 15 RCSCRVCO FCNDINC OUR WRITTCN AttROVAI LABORATORY No.

781695 AREA CODE 412 TELEPIIONE 022 4000 F'ITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY cLIENT'B No-P.O.

No. 65121-25833C oRDER No. PG-6834 May 15, 1978 Report of:

Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon t4ire Report to'.

Florida Power

& Light Company P.O.

Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn:

Mx'. Feeney UNIT Specimen Identification

~

~

~

~

~

Diame tex', Inches Original Area, Sq. 'Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 Elongation at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1% Extension, Pounds Stress at 1% Extension, PSI Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fractuxe Elongation at Fracture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip 42H80 Tll

. 2502

. 0492 PS I 1400

.19 10,150 206,300 1.19 12,200 247,9SO 5.42 5.42%

in the moving head 37.5 Samples tested in accordance with order no.

65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASTiaf A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.

SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIENT FOR TESTING.

PITTSB GH TES ING LA ORATORY cc.

3-client Attn.'Mr. Feeney Earl Gallagher, Manag er Physical Testing Department lcc

HE 2D X 2D TO THE INCH ~ 7 X IO IIICIISS KKUFF CI. IS fSSEII CO.

<lao< w e S A 46 1240 Ie

I

(,

4

~gSIIIIC ~Ch 4n f 0 ~

4 CSSl 4Ch +

rfPS A>0 C+

FORD SOT 4 CV,-P C PI.KASK REPLY TOI P

O OOX 1440 PIT TSSURCH, P Aa IS200 AS A NVTUAL tROTCCTION TO CLICNTS, TNC tUSLIC ANO OURSCLVCS, ALL RCtORTS ARC SUSHITTCO A5 TNC CONfIOCNTIAL tROtCRTY Of'LICNT5, ANO AUTHORIZATION fOR tUSLICATIOH Ot STATCI4CNT5, COHCLVSIOHS OR CXTRACTS fRQII OR RCOAROIHO OVR RCtORTS IS RCSCRVCO tCNOIHO OVR WRITTCN AttROVAL, LASORATORY No.

781695

• RKA COOK AI2 TELEPHONE 922 4000 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY C@TASLISHCO I44I 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTS8URGH, PA. 15220 cUENT's No P.O ~ No. 65121-25833C p E p ~

QRDER No. PG-6834 May 15, 1978 Report of:

Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon Mire Report to.

Florida Power 6 Light Company P.OS Box 3088 Florida City F1orida 33034 Attn:

Nt:. Feeney UNIT 84

.Specimen Identification Diameter, inches Original Area, Sq. Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 PSI Elongation.at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1% Extension, Pounds Stress at 1% Extensions PSI Elongation at 1% Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture',

Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip in the 42H80 $2

.2502

. 0492 1400

.19 10,300 209,350 1.19 12,200 247,950 5'49 5.49%

moving head At Jaw

.Samples tested in accordance with order no.

65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASKS A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.

I SAMPLES SUBNITTED BY CLIPT FOR TESTING.

G-16

f

20 X 20 TO TIIE INCH ~ 7 X 10 INCIIES HE

~E KEUFFEL 0 ESSEA CO.

>woe w USA.

46 1240 Il<

I Q

I il Hi>/

I~I +

r

gg5TIIIQ

&I r" t~

<r 'C A'+~

44SANOO~

FOAM AQT ACV.+PC PLEASK REPLY TOI Po 0 BOX f444 PITTSBUROH, P A IS22 AS

• HUTVAL FROTCCTION TO CLICHTSi THC FV&LIC AHO OVRSCLVC&o ALI RCFOIIT5 AltC SU&NITTCD AS THC CONFIOCHTI*L FROFCIITY OF CLICNTS, AHO AUTHORIZATION FOR Ftl&LICATIONOF 5TATCNCNT5, CONCI.USIONS Olt CXTRACTS FROM Olt RCCAItDIHO OUR RCFORTS IS IICSCRYCO FCNOIHC OVlt WRITTCH AFFIIOVAI, L'ASORATORY No.

AREA COOK &12 TELEPHONE 922-&000 781695 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY C5TASLI5HCO f&df 850 POPLAR STREET, PlTTS8URGH, PA. 15220 cuaNT's No P.O.

No. 65121-2S833C oRDaR No. PQ-6834 May 15, 1978 Report of-Tension Test of Post-Tensioning Tendon t0ire Report to.

Florida Power 6 Light Company P.O.

Box 3088 Florida City Florida 33034 Attn.

Mr. Feeney UNIT Pr4 Specimen Identification Diame ter; Inches Original Area, Sq. Inches Initial Load, Pounds Equivalent 29,00 Elongati.on at Initial Load, Inches Load at 1% Extension, Pounds Stress at 1% Extension, PSI Elongation at,1% Extension, Inches Load Pounds at Fracture Stress PSI at Fracture Elongation at Fracture, Inches Elongation at Fracture, Percent Location of Fracture relative to grip 42H80 f3

.2504

. 0492 PS I 1400

.21 10,150 206,300 1.21 12,150 246,950

4. 72

4. 72%

in the moving head 3 II Samples tested in accordance with order no-65121-25833C Attachment I dated June 1977 and ASTN A421, Stress Strain Curves are attached.

SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY CLIPT FOR TESTING.

G-18

I

f(+M 20 X 20 TO THE INCH ~ 2 X IO INCIIES C

KEUFFCL A ESSElt CO. saaocwvta.

46 1240 P

(~

APPENDIX H RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER FOR FLORIDA POWER

& LIGHT-COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTHf FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1978

I

~

qfel~gg

'y~

'~Cgg lI Sr CLIENT's No. P ~ 0 ~

65121 -25833C REPORT December 16, 1977 ORDER No.

FlTT'S BURGH T~STIIIC~ LAB&RA.TORY CSTASI ISHCO I44 I 850 POPLAR STREET. PITTSBURGH ~ PA.

$ 5220 AS A HU'TUAL I'ROT CCTIOH TO CLICHTS ~ THC ~ LlULIC AIIO OIIRSC'LVCS ALL RCI'ORTS ARC SUSillf'ICO AS THC CONfihfNTIALI'RORCAff OR CLICI TS, AHO AUTHORITA'TION f OR RUSLICATIOH Of TAICHLNT<. CONCLUSIONS OR LXTRACTS TROD Oh RCC AROINO OUR RCfORTS IS RCSCRVCO PCHOINI'UR WNITTCN Al'll\\OVAL LABORATORY AREA COOE A l2 TELEPHONE 922-4000 Foliil AOT ACV IiC PLEASE PEPI. / TO P. O. eor WCS PITTSOVPGH. PA.

IS200 78167$ to 781682 PG-683L Analysis,of".

Specification:

G'R EASE r

Attachment iX - Specification For LaboIatory Toatin~ of

.heath Filler (Visco loru~st 2090P)

For 3'" 'oI ida

) o'fleir 6. Ligihli'om a!1" Turkey Voint Nu clear Plant Unit +

Post-'Tensicning System Fifth-Year Survei'lance SubMittod by:

Reported to:

Florida Power Ec LiEbt Company Florida Po!-er 8: Light Cor!pany Cons ruct on:earshot 3e P;

0 ~ Pox 30GG Florida City, Flcrj.da 3303l~

l.'ater Soluble Chloride'(D-512)

Spe cification Requiremonts 1D-28

,2D<<3 3D-28 62H38 lgHSO 6h.l7o 12V29 34V29 56V29 r

Loss Less Less Less Les Les" Le. s Loss Less Than Than Than Than Than Than Than Than Than

~ 5 ppm l 5 PPi"1

~ 5 ppm

~ Q PPIQ

~ 5 ppm

~ 5 ppm

~ 5 ppm

~ 5 PPI!1 l5 ppm 10 hax, 10 Hax.

10 Hax.

10 ?lax, 10 hax.

10 A~ia.x, 10 Pox 10 Hax, 10 Yax..

Vater Soluble Nitrate (D-992) 1D-28 2D-3 3D-28 62H38

$8<80 6JPr7o

~ 12V29 3LV29 56V29 Less Less Les Less Less Le..s Lt ss Less Le s

Than Than Than Than Than Than Than

'!"nan Than

.2 ppm

~ 2 pram

.2 ppm>

~ 2 ppm

~ 2 ppll1

~ - ppm

~ 2 Q Tm

~

ppm

~ 2 ppm 10 Y.ax.

10 Hax.

10 llax.

10 lfax.

10 lfax.

10 l ax.

10 I~lax.

10 ltaz.

10 Yiax.

H-2

I I

0 gesTING (

-(e e

er

~F r,

V

(+SARO<"

cIJENT's No. P ~ 0 ~ 65121-258330 AREA COOE 412 TELEPHONE 922 4000 REPORT December 16, 1977 LABORATORY ORDER No.

PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY CSTASLI4H CO I ~ 41 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTS8URGH, PA. 15220 AS A elUTUAL FROTCCTION TO CLICHTS, THC FUSLIC ANU OURSCLVCS, ALL RCFORTS ARC SUSHITTI'0 AS THC CONFIOCNTIAL I'ROI'I'RTV Ol'LICHTS, AHO AUTHORIZATION FOR I'U4LICATION OF STATCHCHTS, CONCLUSIONS OR CAIRACTS FROM OR HCCAROINC OUII RCFORTS IS RCSCRVLU FCHOINC OUR WRITTCN AFI'ROYAL, POSM AOT 1CV rPO PLEASE REPLY Tol

p. o. nox Ieie PITTSOURGH. P A.

15220 78167'o No. 781682 Pa-683/

Mater Soluble Sulf'ice (ApA)

Specie'i ca tion

~Re ninemenes ID-28 2Dw3 3D-28 62H38'll270 12V29 5)v29 Less Less Less Less Less Leis Less Less Less Than Than Than Than Than Than Than Than Than

~ 1 ppm

~ 1 ppm

.1 ppm

~ 1 ppm 1 ppm

~ 1 pplll

~ 1 p pI7I

~ 1 ppm

~ 1 ppm 10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

ID-28 2D-3 3D-28 62H38 2H80 1Pi70 12V29 5(v29 ID-28 2D-3 3D-28 62238

)4H70 12V29 5tv29 Mater (D95)

Less Than

.1+0 Less Than Less Than

.l.;0 Less Than..lg Less Than

.1'f~

Less Than, lg Less Than.lg Less Than

.1;0 Less Than

.3.fo Neutralization

~~ (D-66

)

.07 mg/KOH/q

.03 mg/KOH/g

,.03 mg/KOH/g t.lo mg/KOH/g

~ 11 mg/KOH/g

.15 mg/KOH/g

.25 mg/KoH/g

~ 11 mg/KOH,'g

.11 mg/KOH/g 10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

10 Max.

PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY CSTASLISHCD ISSI 850 POPLAR STREET,.PITTSBURGH, PA. 15220 AS A %IVTUAI I'ROTCCTIOH TO CLICHTS, THC PVSLIC AHD OVRSCLVCS, ALL RCI'ORTS ARC SVSNITTCD AS THC CONfIDCNTIAI I'ROfCRTT OF CLICHTS, AHD AUTMORIXATIOH fOR FUSLICATION Of STATCNCNTS, CUHCLVSIOHS OR CXTRACTS fNOH OR RCOARDIHO FORLI SOT RCV. ff0 PLEASE REPLY TOI Po Oo TIOX l606 PIT TSDURGH, P A. ISZ00 CLIENT's No. P 0 ~ 65121 -25833C REPORT December 16, 1977 OVR RCfORTS IS NCSCRVCD FCNDINC OUII WRITTCH AftROVAL, LABoRAToRY No. f010 ILf. Uo ARKA CODE SIC TEI EPHONK 022-1000 oROER No.

PG 6831 The above samples comply'with the specif'ication requirements.

The above r'eported values f.'or water soluble ions are correct jn that no chloride, nitrate or sulf'fi.te were f'ound.

Had these ions been present the analytical accuracy would have been questionable duc to the crude leachinp procedure requirement by the speciAication.

PXTTSBUHGH Ti.STING +BOBCAT Ro ert J King

.Manager~'chemi 1 Department 2-Client Attn:

H. L. Blocker 1-P TL-Tampa pd 0

H-4

7

0 APPENDIX I TESTING MACHINE CALIBRATION REPORT FOR FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 4 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM FIFTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1978

t S

~

~

S'

\\

~

qgsTltrs <

rp c

AS Aitu C~

PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY SSTASC ISN'Sl lOll PITTSBURGH. PA.

AS A MUTUAL SeROTCCTSON TO Ct.ICNTS, TNC FVSt.lC ANQ OURSSLertse ALL RtteORTS ARC SUSMITTSD AS TNC CONI IDCNT)AL FROFCRTT OR CLISNTSe ANO AVTNORIZATlCN FILE Hoe Fait FUSt,lCATlON OF STATSMCNTS CQNCt.VSIONO Olt CXTRACTS FROM Olt ItSCAROIN4 OVlt RCFORTS IS RSSSRVSO FCNDINC OUlt WRITTKN AFFROVALe CLIENT'5 Ho.

TESTING MACHINE CALIBRATION REPQ PT DATE Nov. 25, 1977 OWNERs MACHINE IDENTlF1CAT1ON PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORA 0 Y l.OCATIOHs 1IANUFACTURERs Tinius olsen SFRIAL NULIBER, 69069 PTL S/N 217 TYPEs Hydraulic TYPE OF APPARATUS USEDs IAHUFACTUR ER s APPARATUS VERIFIED BYs Morehouse National Standards Laborato APPARATUS VERIFIED IH ACCORDAHCE WITHs CALIBRAT1ONAPPARATUS DATA Method, of verification is in accordance with "Methods of Yerification of Testing Machines" A.S.Thl. Specification E447T.

Proving Rings SERIAL NUMBER 3258 4656 LOADINGRAHGE 10,000 10 000 100 000 100,000 -

1,000,000 VERIF ICATIONDATE ll/18/76 11/17/76 5/7/75 R ESULTS MACHINE RANGE 0- 60,000 LOADING RANGE WITHIH 1,000 60,000 PERCENT 0- 600 000 lOO,OOO l,OOO,OOO The aboTO wrlftcatton shows this mochine compiles with the ro~cemonts of the specifications within the Ioatflng tangos shown aboTee Respectfully submitted, TI 2 PITTS 'H T T

LABO TORY

0

~

~

~

I I

~ PITTSBLJRGH TESTING LABORATORY Form 60 8 EST III' "S

E9+

S L>>

E~SAHOCT CSTASLISHCD ISO I PITTSBURGH, PA.

AS

• HVTVAL SkOTtCTION TO CLItHTSI THC SUSLIC AND DUNS CLYCS ALL kCPOkTS AkC SUSHITTCO AS THC COHPIOCNTIAL fkoktkTT OI>> CLICHTS, AND AUTHOCIZATION

/Ok SUULICATION Ok STATCHCHTS, CONCLUSIONS Oll CXTkACTS fkOH Oll kCO*kDIHO OUk ktkokTS IS kCSCNVCD SCNDINO OVII WklTTCN AkkkOVAl TESTI NG MACHINE CALIB RATION DATA ORDER NO, CLIENT'S No.

LOCATION MANUFACTUR ER Tinius Olsen CAPACITY 1,200,000 Ib.

SERIAL NO.

69069 PTL S/i'17 DATE 11/25/77 Pittsbur h Testin Laboratory MACHINE READ ING lb.

1 000 850 Poplar Street Pittsburgh, PA 15220 PROVING RING READING lb.

MACHINE ERROR lb.

REMARKS 60,000 Pound Range 15 000 30,000 45 000 60,000 10,000

"--3 000

--50 000

-70 000 90 000

. -99 000 50,000 100,000 200,000 0

400,000 00 5 028.5 10 000 14 24 44 788 59 749 10,084 29,961 49 956 70 116 90,509 99 654 50 337 830 299 495 399,480 497 506 5 991

-28.5

+76

+208

+39

+44

-116

-509

-654

-337

+170

+1097

+2494

+4009

-0. 5

+0.51

+0.70

+0.47

+0.42

-0.83

+0. 13

+0. 09

-0.17

-0.56

-0.66

-0. 67

+0. 17

+0.55

+0. 17

+0. 13

+0. 50

~

7 120 000 Pound Ran e

600 000 Pound R

OI IRGH~il'.4C L.A RATOB.Y

~n

t

r

~ iA5

'a.

PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY qIQTIIIC(

5 O

$1

~V +l Wp Lt 4l

<i '+C aS'+~

r 45AHOC CSTASLISHCO ISS'I

~ P!TTSBURGH, PA.

AS A IIUTVAI, ~ IIOTCCTIOH TO CLICNTS ~ TNC WSI IC AHO OUSSCLVCS, ALL IICSOIITS AIIC SVSHITTCO AS TNC COHflOCNTIAL fIIOfCIITTOf CLICNTS, AHO AUTHOlllZATIOK 1OH WSLICATION Of STATCNCNTS, COHCI USIOHS Oll CXTIIACTS flIOH Oll lltCASDINO OVII IICfOIITS IS IICSClIVCO fCNOINO OUII WIIITTCN AffIIOVAL TES TlN0 PAACH 1 N E CA L1BRAT108 DATA OROER HO.

CI.IEHT'5 HO.

QAXUFACTURER Tinius Olse'n I OCATIOH CAPACITY 15200,000 SERIAL HO.

69069 PTL S/N 21 DATE 11/25/77 PTTTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY 850 POPLAR STREET PITTSBURGH, PA 15220 MACHINE REAO IXG lb.

PROVING RING REAOIHG lb.

MACHINE ERROR lb.

REMARKS 1,200,000 Pound Range 100,000 99,910

+90

+0.09 300,000 500 000 298,266 498 302

+1734

+0.58

+1698

+0.34 00,000 699 466

+534

+0. 08 900,000 1,000,000 896,991 995,984

+3009

+0.34

+4106

+0.41

II 1

I

'4I, l'

p ki sf)