IR 05000277/2023001: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
If you contest the violations or the significance or severity of the violations documented in this inspection report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: | If you contest the violations or the significance or severity of the violations documented in this inspection report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: | ||
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3. | Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555- 0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3. | ||
If you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3. This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding. | If you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3. This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding. | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, Sarah H. Elkhiamy, Chief Projects Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Safety | ||
Sarah H. Elkhiamy, Chief Projects Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 05000277 and 05000278 License Nos. DPR-44 and DPR-56 | |||
Docket Nos. 05000277 and 05000278 License Nos. DPR-44 and DPR-56 | |||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
| Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
==Inspection Report== | ==Inspection Report== | ||
Docket Numbers: 05000277 and 05000278 License Numbers: DPR-44 and DPR-56 Report Numbers: 05000277/2023001 and 05000278/2023001 Enterprise Identifier: I-2023-001-0046 Licensee: Constellation Energy Generation, LLC Facility: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Location: Delta, PA Inspection Dates: January 1, 2023 to March 31, 2023 Inspectors: S. Rutenkroger, Senior Resident Inspector C. Dukehart, Resident Inspector J. Ambrosini, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector S. Elkhiamy, Branch Chief T. Fish, Senior Operations Engineer M. Hardgrove, Senior Project Engineer J. Kepley, Operations Engineer K. Murphy, Operations Engineer Approved By: Sarah H. Elkhiamy, Chief Projects Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Safety Enclosure | Docket Numbers: 05000277 and 05000278 | ||
License Numbers: DPR-44 and DPR-56 | |||
Report Numbers: 05000277/2023001 and 05000278/2023001 | |||
Enterprise Identifier: I-2023-001- 0046 | |||
Licensee: Constellation Energy Generation, LLC | |||
Facility: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 | |||
Location: Delta, PA | |||
Inspection Dates: January 1, 2023 to March 31, 2023 | |||
Inspectors: S. Rutenkroger, Senior Resident Inspector C. Dukehart, Resident Inspector J. Ambrosini, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector S. Elkhiamy, Branch Chief T. Fish, Senior Operations Engineer M. Hardgrove, Senior Project Engineer J. Kepley, Operations Engineer K. Murphy, Operations Engineer | |||
Approved By: Sarah H. Elkhiamy, Chief Projects Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Safety | |||
Enclosure | |||
=SUMMARY= | =SUMMARY= | ||
| Line 48: | Line 69: | ||
===List of Findings and Violations=== | ===List of Findings and Violations=== | ||
Failure to Assess Internal Cell Resistance Test Results and Conduct Performance Testing of the Hardened Containment Vent System Battery Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Report Aspect Section Mitigating Green [H.6] - Design 71111.24 Systems NCV 05000277,05000278/2023001- 01 Margins Open/Closed The inspectors identified a Green finding and associated non-cited violation (NCV) of NRC Order EA-13-109 because Constellation did not perform a battery performance test (or cell replacement or other corrective action) when the hardened containment vent system (HCVS)battery cell internal ohmic resistance measurements significantly changed by greater than 50 percent above baseline. Specifically, the battery annual surveillance procedure lacked acceptance criteria for cell resistance, and no trending of cell resistances was performed. | |||
Failure to Assess Internal Cell Resistance Test Results and Conduct Performance Testing of the Hardened Containment Vent System Battery Cornerstone | |||
Therefore, when the measurements increased by a significant amount above baseline no actions were taken in response. | Therefore, when the measurements increased by a significant amount above baseline no actions were taken in response. | ||
Inadequate Corrective Actions for Safety/Relief Valve-71B Following Filter Plug Leakage Cornerstone | Inadequate Corrective Actions for Safety/Relief Valve-71B Following Filter Plug Leakage Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Report Aspect Section Mitigating Green [P.2] - 71153 Systems NCV 05000277/2023001-02 Evaluation Open/Closed A Green self-revealing finding and associated NCV of 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) | ||
Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Actions, was identified when Constellation did not ensure a condition adverse to quality (CAQ) associated with the degraded filter plug for the 71B safety/relief valve (SRV) was promptly identified and corrected. Specifically, | Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Actions, was identified when Constellation did not ensure a condition adverse to quality (CAQ) associated with the degraded filter plug for the 71B safety/relief valve (SRV) was promptly identified and corrected. Specifically, | ||
Constellation documented a small leak identified on SRV-71B in an incident report but did not correct the condition. Consequently, SRV-71B was discovered to be inoperable during the P2R24 refueling outage (RFO) due to a water | Constellation documented a small leak identified on SRV - 71B in an incident report but did not correct the condition. Consequently, SRV - 71B was discovered to be inoperable during the P2R24 refueling outage (RFO) due to a water lea k on October 17, 2022. | ||
===Additional Tracking Items=== | ===Additional Tracking Items=== | ||
Type | Type Issue Number Title Report Section Status LER 05000277/2022-002-00 LER 2022-002-00 for Peach 71153 Closed Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS) Unit 2 Automatic Depressurization System (ADS) SRV Actuator Diaphragm Degraded | ||
=PLANT STATUS= | =PLANT STATUS= | ||
| Line 67: | Line 87: | ||
==INSPECTION SCOPES== | ==INSPECTION SCOPES== | ||
Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors performed activities described in IMC 2515, Appendix D, Plant Status, observed | Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors performed activities described in IMC 2515, Appendix D, Plant Status, observed r isk significant activities, and completed on -site portions of IPs. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess licensee performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards. | ||
==REACTOR SAFETY== | ==REACTOR SAFETY== | ||
==71111.01 - Adverse Weather Protection== | ==71111.01 - Adverse Weather Protection== | ||
===Seasonal Extreme Weather (IP Section 03.01) (1 Sample)=== | ===Seasonal Extreme Weather (IP Section 03.01) (1 Sample)=== | ||
: (1) The inspectors evaluated readiness for seasonal extreme weather conditions in the Unit 2 and Unit 3 reactor building and control building general areas with a focus on standby liquid control systems, the cable spreading room, 4 kV switchgear rooms, and the station batteries on January 3, 2023 | : (1) The inspectors evaluated readiness for seasonal extreme weather conditions in the Unit 2 and Unit 3 reactor building and control building general areas with a focus on standby liquid control systems, the cable spreading room, 4 kV switchgear rooms, and the station batteries on January 3, 2023 | ||
==71111.04 - Equipment Alignment== | ==71111.04 - Equipment Alignment== | ||
===Partial Walkdown (IP Section 03.01) (4 Samples)=== | ===Partial Walkdown (IP Section 03.01) (4 Samples)=== | ||
The inspectors evaluated system configurations during partial walkdowns of the following systems/trains: | The inspectors evaluated system configurations during partial walkdowns of the following systems/trains: | ||
| Line 86: | Line 103: | ||
==71111.05 - Fire Protection== | ==71111.05 - Fire Protection== | ||
===Fire Area Walkdown and Inspection (IP Section 03.01) (5 Samples)=== | ===Fire Area Walkdown and Inspection (IP Section 03.01) (5 Samples)=== | ||
The inspectors evaluated the implementation of the fire protection program by conducting a walkdown and performing a review to verify program compliance, equipment functionality, material condition, and operational readiness of the following fire areas: | The inspectors evaluated the implementation of the fire protection program by conducting a walkdown and performing a review to verify program compliance, equipment functionality, material condition, and operational readiness of the following fire areas: | ||
| Line 96: | Line 112: | ||
===Fire Brigade Drill Performance (IP Section 03.02) (1 Sample)=== | ===Fire Brigade Drill Performance (IP Section 03.02) (1 Sample)=== | ||
: (1) The inspectors evaluated the onsite fire brigade training and performance during an | : (1) The inspectors evaluated the onsite fire brigade training and performance during an unannounced fire drill on March 7, 2023 | ||
==71111.11A - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance== | ==71111.11A - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance== | ||
Requalification Examination Results (IP Section 03.03) (1 Sample) | |||
: (1) The inspectors reviewed and evaluated the Unit 2 and Unit 3 licensed operator examination failure rates for the requalification annual operating exams administered February through March 2023 | : (1) The inspectors reviewed and evaluated the Unit 2 and Unit 3 licensed operator examination failure rates for the requalification annual operating exams administered February through March 2023 | ||
==71111.11B - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance== | ==71111.11B - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance== | ||
===Licensed Operator Requalification Program (IP Section 03.04) (1 Sample)=== | |||
: (1) Biennial Requalification Written Examinations | |||
The inspectors evaluated the quality of the Unit 2 and Unit 3 licensed operator biennial requalification written examinations previously administered March through April 2022 | |||
Annual Requalification Operating Tests | |||
The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of the facility licensees 2023 annual requalification operating tests | |||
Administration of an Annual Requalification Operating Test | |||
The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of the facility licensee in administering the 2023 requalification operating tests required by 10 CFR 55.59(a)(2) and that the facility licensee is effectively evaluating their licensed operators for mastery of training objectives | |||
Requalification Examination Security | |||
The inspectors evaluated the ability of the facility licensee to safeguard examination material, such that the examination is not compromised | |||
Remedial Training and Re-examinations | |||
The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of remedial training conducted by the licensee, and reviewed the adequacy of re-examinations for licensed operators who did not pass a required requalification examination | |||
Operator License Conditions | |||
The inspectors evaluated the licensees program for ensuring that licensed operators meet the conditions of their licenses | |||
Control Room Simulator | |||
The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of the facility licensees control room simulator in modeling the actual plant, and for meeting the requirements contained in 10 CFR 55.46 | |||
Problem Identification and Resolution | |||
The inspectors evaluated the licensees ability to identify and resolve problems associated with licensed operator performance | |||
==71111.11Q - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance== | ==71111.11Q - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance== | ||
Licensed Operator Performance in the Actual Plant/Main Control Room (IP Section 03.01) (1 Sample) | |||
Licensed Operator Performance in the Actual Plant/Main Control Room (IP Section 03.01) | |||
(1 Sample) | |||
: (1) The inspectors observed and evaluated licensed operator performance in the control room during the Unit 3 power ascension and restoration of the 3A reactor feedwater pump on January 11, 2023 | : (1) The inspectors observed and evaluated licensed operator performance in the control room during the Unit 3 power ascension and restoration of the 3A reactor feedwater pump on January 11, 2023 | ||
===Licensed Operator Requalification Training/Examinations (IP Section 03.02) (1 Sample)=== | ===Licensed Operator Requalification Training/Examinations (IP Section 03.02) (1 Sample)=== | ||
: (1) The inspectors observed and evaluated licensed operator requalification training in | : (1) The inspectors observed and evaluated licensed operator requalification training in the simulator on January 9, 2023 | ||
==71111.12 - Maintenance Effectiveness== | ==71111.12 - Maintenance Effectiveness== | ||
===Maintenance Effectiveness (IP Section 03.01) (1 Sample)=== | ===Maintenance Effectiveness (IP Section 03.01) (1 Sample)=== | ||
The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of maintenance to ensure the following structures, systems, and components (SSCs) remain capable of performing their intended function: | The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of maintenance to ensure the following structures, systems, and components (SSCs) remain capable of performing their intended function: | ||
| Line 124: | Line 165: | ||
==71111.13 - Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control== | ==71111.13 - Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control== | ||
Risk Assessment and Management (IP Section 03.01) (4 Samples) | |||
The inspectors evaluated the accuracy and completeness of risk assessments for the following planned and emergent work activities to ensure configuration changes and appropriate work controls were addressed: | The inspectors evaluated the accuracy and completeness of risk assessments for the following planned and emergent work activities to ensure configuration changes and appropriate work controls were addressed: | ||
: (1) Unit 2, HPCI planned maintenance on January 10, 2023 | : (1) Unit 2, HPCI planned maintenance on January 10, 2023 | ||
| Line 133: | Line 174: | ||
==71111.15 - Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments== | ==71111.15 - Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments== | ||
===Operability Determination or Functionality Assessment (IP Section 03.01) (6 Samples)=== | ===Operability Determination or Functionality Assessment (IP Section 03.01) (6 Samples)=== | ||
The inspectors evaluated the licensee's justifications and actions associated with the following operability determinations and functionality assessments: | The inspectors evaluated the licensee's justifications and actions associated with the following operability determinations and functionality assessments: | ||
| Line 144: | Line 184: | ||
==71111.18 - Plant Modifications== | ==71111.18 - Plant Modifications== | ||
Temporary Modifications and/or Permanent Modifications (IP Section 03.01 and/or 03.02) (2 Samples) | |||
The inspectors evaluated the following temporary or permanent modifications: | The inspectors evaluated the following temporary or permanent modifications: | ||
: (1) Units 2 and 3, permanent modification to containment atmospheric control systems to included backup nitrogen supply cylinders on February 13, 2023 | : (1) Units 2 and 3, permanent modification to containment atmospheric control systems to included backup nitrogen supply cylinders on February 13, 2023 | ||
: (2) Unit 3, reactor feedwater pump turbine (RFPT) trip vulnerability mitigation temporary modification on February 14, 2023 | : (2) Unit 3, reactor feedwater pump turbine (RFPT) trip vulnerability mitigation temporary modification on February 14, 2023 | ||
==71111.24 - Testing and Maintenance of Equipment Important to Risk== | ==71111.24 - Testing and Maintenance of Equipment Important to Risk== | ||
The inspectors evaluated the following testing and maintenance activities to verify system operability and/or functionality: | |||
===Post-Maintenance Testing (IP Section 03.01) (5 Samples)=== | |||
=== | |||
: (1) Unit 2, 'C' HPSW pump check valve testing following packing modification and replacement on January 3, 2023 | : (1) Unit 2, 'C' HPSW pump check valve testing following packing modification and replacement on January 3, 2023 | ||
: (2) Unit 2, HPCI lube oil system testing following maintenance on January 10, 2023 | : (2) Unit 2, HPCI lube oil system testing following maintenance on January 10, 2023 | ||
: (3) Unit common, 'E-2' EDG testing following a system outage window on January 27, 2023 | : (3) Unit common, 'E-2' EDG testing following a system outage window on January 27, 2023 | ||
: (4) Unit 2, B RHR relay 2-10A-K0168 testing following replacement on March 1, 2023 | : (4) Unit 2, B RHR relay 2-10A-K0168 testing following replacement on March 1, 2023 | ||
: (5) Unit common, 'A' standby gas treatment (SBGT) testing following maintenance on instrument air solenoids associated with the fan inlet and outlet dampers on | : (5) Unit common, 'A' standby gas treatment (SBGT) testing following maintenance on instrument air solenoids associated with the fan inlet and outlet dampers on March 22, 2023 | ||
=== | ===Surveillance Testing (IP Section 03.01) (6 Samples)=== | ||
: (1) Unit 2, 'C' RHR room cooler heat transfer test on February 17, 2023 | : (1) Unit 2, 'C' RHR room cooler heat transfer test on February 17, 2023 | ||
: (2) Unit 3, E43 4 kV undervoltage relays functional testing on March 7, 2023 | : (2) Unit 3, E43 4 kV undervoltage relays functional testing on March 7, 2023 | ||
| Line 168: | Line 206: | ||
: (4) Unit 2, 'A' channel of automatic depressurization system logic system functional test, on March 15, 2023 | : (4) Unit 2, 'A' channel of automatic depressurization system logic system functional test, on March 15, 2023 | ||
: (5) Unit 2, 'A' RHR loop logic system functional test on January 5, 2023 | : (5) Unit 2, 'A' RHR loop logic system functional test on January 5, 2023 | ||
: (6) Units 2 and 3, hardened containment vent emergency battery annual inspection on | : (6) Units 2 and 3, hardened containment vent emergency battery annual inspection on February 17, 2023 | ||
=== | ===Inservice Testing (IST) (IP Section 03.01) (1 Sample)=== | ||
: (1) Unit 3, reactor building torus vacuum breakers functional testing and breakaway force testing on March 13, 2023 | : (1) Unit 3, reactor building torus vacuum breakers functional testing and breakaway force testing on March 13, 2023 | ||
| Line 177: | Line 215: | ||
==71114.02 - Alert and Notification System Testing== | ==71114.02 - Alert and Notification System Testing== | ||
===Inspection Review (IP Section 02.01-02.04) (1 Sample)=== | ===Inspection Review (IP Section 02.01-02.04) (1 Sample)=== | ||
: (1) The inspectors evaluated Constellation's maintenance and testing of the Alert and Notification System on February 27 through March 2, 2023, for the period of February 2021 through January 2023 | : (1) The inspectors evaluated Constellation's maintenance and testing of the Alert and Notification System on February 27 through March 2, 2023, for the period of February 2021 through January 2023 | ||
==71114.03 - Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Augmentation System== | ==71114.03 - Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Augmentation System== | ||
===Inspection Review (IP Section 02.01-02.02) (1 Sample)=== | ===Inspection Review (IP Section 02.01-02.02) (1 Sample)=== | ||
: (1) The inspectors evaluated the readiness of the Constellation's Emergency | : (1) The inspectors evaluated the readiness of the Constellation's Emergency Preparedness Organization on February 27 through March 2, 2023 | ||
==71114.04 - Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes== | ==71114.04 - Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes== | ||
===Inspection Review (IP Section 02.01-02.03) (1 Sample)=== | ===Inspection Review (IP Section 02.01-02.03) (1 Sample)=== | ||
: (1) The inspectors evaluated the following submitted Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan changes: | : (1) The inspectors evaluated the following submitted Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan changes: | ||
* 22-23, EP-AA-120-1006, "EP Reportability - Loss of Emergency Preparedness Capabilities," Revision 007 This evaluation does not constitute NRC approval. | * 22-23, EP-AA-120- 1006, "EP Reportability - Loss of Emergency Preparedness Capabilities," Revision 007 | ||
This evaluation does not constitute NRC approval. | |||
==71114.05 - Maintenance of Emergency Preparedness== | ==71114.05 - Maintenance of Emergency Preparedness== | ||
===Inspection Review (IP Section 02.01 - 02.11) (1 Sample)=== | ===Inspection Review (IP Section 02.01 - 02.11) (1 Sample)=== | ||
: (1) The inspectors evaluated Constellation's maintenance and testing of the emergency preparedness program on February 27 through March 2, 2023, for the period of February 2021 through January | : (1) The inspectors evaluated Constellation's maintenance and testing of the emergency preparedness program on February 27 through March 2, 2023, for the period of February 2021 through January | ||
==OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE== | ==OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE== | ||
===71151 - Performance Indicator Verification | |||
The inspectors verified licensee performance indicators submittals listed below: | |||
IE01: Unplanned Scrams per 7000 Critical Hours Sample (IP Section 02.01)=== | |||
IE01: Unplanned Scrams per 7000 Critical Hours Sample (IP Section 02.01) === | |||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71151|count=2}} | {{IP sample|IP=IP 71151|count=2}} | ||
: (1) Unit 2 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 | : (1) Unit 2 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 | ||
: (2) Unit 3 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 IE03: Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours Sample (IP Section 02.02) (2 Samples) | : (2) Unit 3 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 | ||
IE03: Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours Sample (IP Section 02.02) (2 Samples) | |||
: (1) Unit 2 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 | : (1) Unit 2 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 | ||
: (2) Unit 3 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 | : (2) Unit 3 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 | ||
IE04: Unplanned Scrams with Complications Sample (IP Section 02.03) (1 Sample) | |||
: (1) Unit 3 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 | : (1) Unit 3 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 | ||
===EP01: Drill/Exercise Performance Sample (IP Section 02.12) (1 Sample)=== | ===EP01: Drill/Exercise Performance Sample (IP Section 02.12) (1 Sample)=== | ||
: (1) January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 | : (1) January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 | ||
EP02: Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation (IP Section 02.13) (1 Sample) | |||
: (1) January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 EP03: Alert and Notification System Reliability (IP Section 02.14) (1 Sample) | |||
: (1) January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 | : (1) January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 | ||
===71152A - Annual Follow-up Problem Identification and Resolution Annual Follow-up of Selected Issues (Section 03.03) === | ===71152A - Annual Follow-up Problem Identification and Resolution Annual Follow-up of Selected Issues (Section 03.03)=== | ||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71152|count=1}} | {{IP sample|IP=IP 71152|count=1}} | ||
: (1) Units 2 and Unit 3 review of corrective actions and extent of condition as a result of non-conservative off rated power dependent thermal limits associated with issue report (IR) 04524984 | : (1) Units 2 and Unit 3 review of corrective actions and extent of condition as a result of non-conservative off rated power dependent thermal limits associated with issue report (IR) 04524984 | ||
===71153 - Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion Event Report (IP Section 03.02) === | ===71153 - Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion Event Report (IP Section 03.02)=== | ||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71153|count=1}} | {{IP sample|IP=IP 71153|count=1}} | ||
The inspectors evaluated the following licensee event report (LER): | The inspectors evaluated the following licensee event report (LER): | ||
: (1) LER 05000277/2022-002-00 for PBAPS, Unit 2, "ADS SRV Actuator Diaphragm Degraded, on March 6, 2023, (ADAMS Accession No. ML22349A084) | : (1) LER 05000277/2022-002-00 for PBAPS, Unit 2, "ADS SRV Actuator Diaphragm Degraded, on March 6, 2023, (ADAMS Accession No. ML22349A084) | ||
The inspectors conclusions associated with this LER are documented in this report under Inspection Results Section, NCV 05000277/2023001-01. This LER is Closed. | The inspectors conclusions associated with this LER are documented in this report under Inspection Results Section, NCV 05000277/2023001-01. This LER is Closed. | ||
==INSPECTION RESULTS== | ==INSPECTION RESULTS== | ||
Failure to Assess Internal Cell Resistance Test Results and Conduct Performance Testing of the Hardened Containment Vent System Battery Cornerstone | Failure to Assess Internal Cell Resistance Test Results and Conduct Performance Testing of the Hardened Containment Vent System Battery Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Report Aspect Section Mitigating Green [H.6] - Design 71111.24 Systems NCV 05000277,05000278/2023001- 01 Margins Open/Closed The inspectors identified a Green finding and associated NCV of NRC Order EA-13 -109 because Constellation did not perform a battery performance test (or cell replacement or other corrective action) when the HCVS battery cell internal ohmic resistance measurements significantly changed by greater than 50 percent above baseline. Specifically, the battery annual surveillance procedure lacked acceptance criteria for cell resistance, and no trending of cell resistances was performed. Therefore, when the measurements increased by a significant amount above baseline no actions were taken in response. | ||
=====Description:===== | =====Description:===== | ||
PBAPS was required by NRC Order EA-13-109 to have a reliable, severe accident capable HCVS. Phase 1 of the order required upgraded the venting capabilities from the containment wetwell to provide a reliable, severe accident capable hardened vent to assist in preventing core damage and, if necessary, to provide venting capability during severe accident conditions. PBAPS achieved Phase 1 compliance in November 2016 for Unit 2 and in November 2017 for Unit 3. Constellation submitted a Final Integrated Plan (ML18271A008) to the NRC to address all the elements of NRC Order EA-13-109 utilizing the endorsed (with some clarifications and exceptions) guidance in Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)13-02, Revision 1, and the related endorsed HCVS-Frequently Asked Questions and HCVS-White Papers documents. In addition, Constellations PBAPS response to NRC Order EA-12-049 addressed an extended loss of AC power with injection. In such an event, the HCVS wetwell vent will be opened to protect the containment from overpressure. The required operator actions and timing of those actions to perform this function under extended loss of alternating current power conditions were evaluated as part of the response to NRC Order EA-12-049. | PBAPS was required by NRC Order EA -13 -109 to have a reliable, severe accident capable HCVS. Phase 1 of the order required upgraded the venting capabilities from the containment wetwell to provide a reliable, severe accident capable hardened vent to assist in preventing core damage and, if necessary, to provide venting capability during severe accident conditions. PBAPS achieved Phase 1 compliance in November 2016 for Unit 2 and in November 2017 for Unit 3. Constellation submitted a Final Integrated Plan (ML18271A008) to the NRC to address all the elements of NRC Order EA - 13-109 utilizing the endorsed (with some clarifications and exceptions) guidance in Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)13-02, Revision 1, and the related endorsed HCVS-Frequently Asked Questions and HCVS-White Papers documents. In addition, Constellations PBAPS response to NRC Order EA-12- 049 addressed an extended loss of AC power with injection. In such an event, the HCVS wetwell vent will be opened to protect the containment from overpressure. The required operator actions and timing of those actions to perform this function under extended loss of alternating current power conditions were evaluated as part of the response to NRC Order EA-12-049. | ||
PBAPS modified the existing hardened wetwell vent path that was installed in response to NRC Generic Letter 89-16 to comply with NRC Order EA-13-109. The EA-13-109 compliant HCVS system added a dedicated 125 Vdc battery, nitrogen motive gas source, and argon purge system to the existing GL-89-16 wetwell hardened vent system. In addition, new HCVS radiation monitoring and temperature sensors and new control switches were added. The dedicated HCVS 125 Vdc battery supplies power to the actuating solenoid for inner primary containment isolation valves (PCIV) AO-2(3)511 (Unit 2 and Unit 3, respectively) and primary containment outboard barrier valves AO-8(9)0290 (Unit 2 and Unit 3, respectively). This battery also powers the new HCVS instrumentation. During an extended loss of AC power, electric power to operate the vent valves will be provided by the battery with a capacity to supply required loads for at least the first 24 hours. Before the battery is depleted, the FLEX generator will repower the battery charger to supplement the required power and recharge the 125 Vdc battery to support operation of the vent valves and instrumentation. Calculation PE-0308 demonstrated that the 125 Vdc battery capacity is sufficient to supply HCVS wetwell venting components for the 24 hours. | PBAPS modified the existing hardened wetwell vent path that was installed in response to NRC Generic Letter 89-16 to comply with NRC Order EA-13-109. The EA-13-109 compliant HCVS system added a dedicated 125 Vdc battery, nitrogen motive gas source, and argon purge system to the existing GL-89-16 wetwell hardened vent system. In addition, new HCVS radiation monitoring and temperature sensors and new control switches were added. The dedicated HCVS 125 Vdc battery supplies power to the actuating solenoid for inner primary containment isolation valves (PCIV) AO-2(3)511 (Unit 2 and Unit 3, respectively) and primary containment outboard barrier valves AO-8(9)0290 (Unit 2 and Unit 3, respectively). This battery also powers the new HCVS instrumentation. During an extended loss of AC power, electric power to operate the vent valves will be provided by the battery with a capacity to supply required loads for at least the first 24 hours. Before the battery is depleted, the FLEX generator will repower the battery charger to supplement the required power and recharge the 125 Vdc battery to support operation of the vent valves and instrumentation. Calculation PE- 0308 demonstrated that the 125 Vdc battery capacity is sufficient to supply HCVS wetwell venting components for the 24 hours. | ||
NEI 13-02 states that FLEX equipment that directly performs a FLEX mitigation strategy for the core, containment, or spent fuel pool should be subject to maintenance and testing guidance provided in Institute of Nuclear Power Operations AP 913, "Equipment Reliability Process," to verify proper function. NEI 13-02 also states that site-specific bases will be developed to define specific testing, including that periodic testing and frequency should be done to verify design requirements, and the basis for the testing should be documented and deviations from vendor recommendations and applicable standards should be justified. | NEI 13-02 states that FLEX equipment that directly performs a FLEX mitigation strategy for the core, containment, or spent fuel pool should be subject to maintenance and testing guidance provided in Institute of Nuclear Power Operations AP 913, "Equipment Reliability Process," to verify proper function. NEI 13- 02 also states that site-specific bases will be developed to define specific testing, including that periodic testing and frequency should be done to verify design requirements, and the basis for the testing should be documented and deviations from vendor recommendations and applicable standards should be justified. | ||
On February 17, 2023, the inspectors observed Constellation personnel performing the annual inspection of the containment emergency battery. The inspectors noted that the inspection measured and recorded the internal resistance of the battery cells. However, the procedure did not provide acceptance criteria for internal resistance and cell voltage, nor did it describe providing the data to engineering personnel for evaluation. The inspectors requested further information from engineering personnel and questioned the lack of acceptance criteria. Engineering determined that the cell resistance check is performed for trending as described in associated vendor guidance and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 1188-2005, IEEE Recommended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Valve-Regulated Lead-Acid (VRLA) Batteries for Stationary Applications. | On February 17, 2023, the inspectors observed Constellation personnel performing the annual inspection of the containment emergency battery. The inspectors noted that the inspection measured and recorded the internal resistance of the battery cells. However, the procedure did not provide acceptance criteria for internal resistance and cell voltage, nor did it describe providing the data to engineering personnel for evaluation. The inspectors requested further information from engineering personnel and questioned the lack of acceptance criteria. Engineering determined that the cell resistance check is performed for trending as described in associated vendor guidance and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 1188-2005, IEEE Recommended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Valve-Regulated Lead-Acid (VRLA) Batteries for Stationary Applications. | ||
| Line 260: | Line 301: | ||
Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using IMC 0609 Appendix A, The Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power. The finding screened as of very low safety significance (Green) because it did not involve equipment, training, procedures, and/or other programmatic aspects credited in any Phase 1 or 2 FLEX strategy such that any FLEX function (such as extended HPCI/RCIC/auxiliary feedwater operation, providing FLEX DC power, FLEX AC power, or FLEX RCS feed) could not be completed in accordance with existing plant procedures within the time allotted for an exposure period of greater than 21 days. Specifically, the inspectors determined that a reasonable best estimate of battery capacity given the initial margin established by design and observed battery conditions would reasonably result in the FLEX generator supplementing and recharging the battery to support operation of the vent valves before the battery was depleted. | Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using IMC 0609 Appendix A, The Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power. The finding screened as of very low safety significance (Green) because it did not involve equipment, training, procedures, and/or other programmatic aspects credited in any Phase 1 or 2 FLEX strategy such that any FLEX function (such as extended HPCI/RCIC/auxiliary feedwater operation, providing FLEX DC power, FLEX AC power, or FLEX RCS feed) could not be completed in accordance with existing plant procedures within the time allotted for an exposure period of greater than 21 days. Specifically, the inspectors determined that a reasonable best estimate of battery capacity given the initial margin established by design and observed battery conditions would reasonably result in the FLEX generator supplementing and recharging the battery to support operation of the vent valves before the battery was depleted. | ||
Cross-Cutting Aspect: H.6 - Design Margins: The organization operates and maintains equipment within design margins. Margins are carefully guarded and changed only through a systematic and rigorous process. Special attention is placed on maintaining fission product barriers, defense-in-depth, and safety-related equipment. (WP.2). A factor described in NUREG-2165, Safety Culture Common Language, WP.2, is that safety-related equipment is operated and maintained well within design requirements. The testing procedures and monitoring that were established and being performed did not carefully guard and maintain the design margins of the HCVS battery well within design requirements. | Cross-Cutting Aspect: H.6 - Design Margins: The organization operates and maintains equipment within design margins. Margins are carefully guarded and changed only through a systematic and rigorous process. Special attention is placed on maintaining fission product barriers, defense-in-depth, and safety-related equipment. (WP.2). A factor described in NUREG-2165, Safety Culture Common Language, WP.2, is that safety -related equipment is operated and maintained well within design requirements. The testing procedures and monitoring that were established and being performed did not carefully guard and maintain the design margins of the HCVS battery well within design requirements. | ||
=====Enforcement:===== | =====Enforcement:===== | ||
Violation: NRC Order EA-13-109 is only applicable to operating boiling-water reactors (BWRs) with Mark I and Mark II containments. Constellation received NRC Order EA-13-09 for PBAPS because the reactors at PBAPS are General Electric BWRs with Mark I containments. NRC Order EA-13-109, Attachment 2, Section 1.2.13, states, in part, the HCVS shall include features and provisions for testing, inspection and maintenance adequate to ensure that reliable function and capability are maintained. | Violation: NRC Order EA-13-109 is only applicable to operating boiling-water reactors (BWRs) with Mark I and Mark II containments. Constellation received NRC Order EA -13- 09 for PBAPS because the reactors at PBAPS are General Electric BWRs with Mark I containments. NRC Order EA-13-109, Attachment 2, Section 1.2.13, states, in part, the HCVS shall include features and provisions for testing, inspection and maintenance adequate to ensure that reliable function and capability are maintained. | ||
Constellation program documents CC-AA-118, Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX), SFPI, and HCVS Program Document, Revision 9, and CC-PB-118-1004, HCVS Final Integrated Plan, Revision 2, describe the compliance of PBAPS with NRC Order 13-109 and state that compliance with NRC Order 13-109 utilizes the endorsed guidance in NEI 13-02, Revision 1, and the related endorsed HCVS-Frequently Asked Questions and HCVS-White Papers documents. The NRC endorsed the guidance in JLD-ISG-2015-01, Compliance with Phase 2 of Order EA-13-109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Performing under Severe Accident Conditions. NEI 13-02, Revision 1, states, in part, that periodic testing and frequency should be determined based on equipment type and expected use and that testing should be done to verify design requirements and/or basis, and the basis should be documented and deviations from vendor recommendations and applicable standards should be justified. In addition, CC-AA-118, Attachment 3, lists preventive maintenance requirements and bases for FLEX, SFPI, and HCVS equipment and includes a quarterly cell inspection and annual detailed cell inspection for VRLA batteries. The vendor guidance and IEEE 1188-2005 describe the cell inspections listed in CC-AA-118 that include cell internal ohmic resistance measurements and describe that a significant change from baseline values (50 percent per vendor) warrants a performance (discharge) test (or cell replacement or other corrective action). | Constellation program documents CC-AA-118, Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX), SFPI, and HCVS Program Document, Revision 9, and CC-PB-118-1004, HCVS Final Integrated Plan, Revision 2, describe the compliance of PBAPS with NRC Order 13-109 and state that compliance with NRC Order 13-109 utilizes the endorsed guidance in NEI 13- 02, Revision 1, and the related endorsed HCVS-Frequently Asked Questions and HCVS - | ||
White Papers documents. The NRC endorsed the guidance in JLD-ISG-2015- 01, Compliance with Phase 2 of Order EA-13-109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Performing under Severe Accident Conditions. NEI 13 -02, Revision 1, states, in part, that periodic testing and frequency should be determined based on equipment type and expected use and that testing should be done to verify design requirements and/or basis, and the basis should be documented and deviations from vendor recommendations and applicable standards should be justified. In addition, CC-AA-118, Attachment 3, lists preventive maintenance requirements and bases for FLEX, SFPI, and HCVS equipment and includes a quarterly cell inspection and annual detailed cell inspection for VRLA batteries. The vendor guidance and IEEE 1188-2005 describe the cell inspections listed in CC-AA-118 that include cell internal ohmic resistance measurements and describe that a significant change from baseline values (50 percent per vendor) warrants a performance (discharge) test (or cell replacement or other corrective action). | |||
Contrary to this, since January 21, 2020, Constellation did not provide provisions for testing, inspection, and maintenance adequate to ensure that the reliable function and capability of the HCVS battery were maintained. Constellation did not determine periodic testing and frequency based on equipment type and expected use, did not perform testing to verify design requirements and/or basis, and did not document the basis for deviations from vendor recommendations and applicable standards. Specifically, the HCVS battery inspections deviated from the vendor recommendations and the applicable standard, IEEE 1188-2005, when the measured HCVS battery internal cell resistances significantly changed from baseline by more than 50 percent, and Constellation did not conduct a performance test, cell replacement, or other corrective action, and did not evaluate and justify the deviation. | Contrary to this, since January 21, 2020, Constellation did not provide provisions for testing, inspection, and maintenance adequate to ensure that the reliable function and capability of the HCVS battery were maintained. Constellation did not determine periodic testing and frequency based on equipment type and expected use, did not perform testing to verify design requirements and/or basis, and did not document the basis for deviations from vendor recommendations and applicable standards. Specifically, the HCVS battery inspections deviated from the vendor recommendations and the applicable standard, IEEE 1188-2005, when the measured HCVS battery internal cell resistances significantly changed from baseline by more than 50 percent, and Constellation did not conduct a performance test, cell replacement, or other corrective action, and did not evaluate and justify the deviation. | ||
| Line 271: | Line 313: | ||
Enforcement Action: This violation is being treated as a NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy. | Enforcement Action: This violation is being treated as a NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy. | ||
Observation: Annual Review of Corrective Actions and Extent of Condition of | Observation: Annual Review of Corrective Actions and Extent of Condition of 71152A Review as a Result of Non-Conservative Off Rated Power Dependent Thermal Limits The inspectors reviewed Constellations evaluation and corrective actions associated with non-conservative off rated power dependent thermal limits for both Units 2 and 3. Specifically, inspectors focused on the corrective action program (CAP) evaluation associated with issue report 04524984. | ||
The inspectors reviewed the extent of condition, both the station and corporate procedures, standing orders, relevant condition reports, engineering and design calculations, core operating limits reports, power history and associated plant guidance, and interviewed the licensee subject matter expert on the topic. | The inspectors reviewed the extent of condition, both the station and corporate procedures, standing orders, relevant condition reports, engineering and design calculations, core operating limits reports, power history and associated plant guidance, and interviewed the licensee subject matter expert on the topic. | ||
| Line 277: | Line 319: | ||
Based on the documents reviewed and discussions with personnel, the NRC inspectors noted that corrective actions were timely and appropriate. | Based on the documents reviewed and discussions with personnel, the NRC inspectors noted that corrective actions were timely and appropriate. | ||
Inadequate Corrective Actions for Safety/Relief Valve-71B Following Filter Plug Leakage Cornerstone | Inadequate Corrective Actions for Safety/Relief Valve-71B Following Filter Plug Leakage Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Report Aspect Section Mitigating Green [P.2] - 71153 Systems NCV 05000277/2023001 - 02 Evaluation Open/Closed A Green self-revealing finding and associated NCV of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Actions, was identified when Constellation did not ensure a CAQ associated with the degraded filter plug for the 71B SRV was promptly identified and corrected. | ||
Specifically, Constellation documented a small leak identified on SRV-71B in an IR but did not correct the condition. Consequently, SRV-71B was discovered to be inoperable during the P2R24 RFO due to a water leak on October 17, 2022. | Specifically, Constellation documented a small leak identified on SRV-71B in an IR but did not correct the condition. Consequently, SRV - 71B was discovered to be inoperable during the P2R24 RFO due to a water leak on October 17, 2022. | ||
=====Description:===== | =====Description:===== | ||
PBAPS has eleven 3-stage Target Rock SRVs per unit. An SRV provides a pressure relief function or system depressurization at full rated flow with a set pressure range of 900 - 1100 psig. Additionally, five of the eleven SRVs are ADS valves. The purpose of ADS valves is to rapidly depressurize the reactor pressure vessel to allow low pressure emergency core cooling system to provide core cooling. | PBAPS has eleven 3 -stage Target Rock SRVs per unit. An SRV provides a pressure relief function or system depressurization at full rated flow with a set pressure range of 900 - 1100 psig. Additionally, five of the eleven SRVs are ADS valves. The purpose of ADS valves is to rapidly depressurize the reactor pressure vessel to allow low pressure emergency core cooling system to provide core cooling. | ||
On May 18, 2021, a drywell entry was performed to repair a nitrogen leak on SRV-71K. | On May 18, 2021, a drywell entry was performed to repair a nitrogen leak on SRV-71K. | ||
Maintenance personnel performed inspections of all other SRVs as a result of hose fretting leakage found on SRV-71K. Subsequently, IR 04424264 was written, and screened as N-CAP, for a small water leak identified on SRV-71B via rust spot at the pilot filter port plug. | Maintenance personnel performed inspections of all other SRVs as a result of hose fretting leakage found on SRV-71K. Subsequently, IR 04424264 was written, and screened as N-CAP, for a small water leak identified on SRV -71B via rust spot at the pilot filter port plug. | ||
Work order (WO) 5186520 was generated to perform an inspection of SRV-71B during the next RFO, P2R24, in October 2022. | Work order (WO) 5186520 was generated to perform an inspection of SRV-71B during the next RFO, P2R24, in October 2022. | ||
| Line 300: | Line 342: | ||
The inspectors reviewed Constellations WGE, WOs, maintenance, and CAP procedures in response to the SRV-71B failure in October 2022. As discussed above, IR 04424264, dated May 18, 2021, captured a small leak and a rust spot at the pilot filter port plug on SRV-71B. | The inspectors reviewed Constellations WGE, WOs, maintenance, and CAP procedures in response to the SRV-71B failure in October 2022. As discussed above, IR 04424264, dated May 18, 2021, captured a small leak and a rust spot at the pilot filter port plug on SRV-71B. | ||
Constellation screened this IR as N-CAP; however, the inspectors determined that it should have been screened as a CAQ, per Constellation procedures. Specifically, Constellation procedure PI-AA-120, Issue Identification and Screening Process, Revision 13, Attachment 2 provides a listing of CAQs that Constellation has determined require specific management screening to ensure the issues are addressed. Attachment 2, "Significance Level 3 Guidance," section "Asset Management-Equipment Reliability," bullet "yy" states the following: "CAQ: a degraded condition or non-conformance affecting the safety-related function of a SSC." | Constellation screened this IR as N-CAP; however, the inspectors determined that it should have been screened as a CAQ, per Constellation procedures. Specifically, Constellation procedure PI-AA-120, Issue Identification and Screening Process, Revision 13, Attachment 2 provides a listing of CAQs that Constellation has determined require specific management screening to ensure the issues are addressed. Attachment 2, "Significance Level 3 Guidance," section "Asset Management-Equipment Reliability," bullet "yy" states the following: "CAQ: a degraded condition or non -conformance affecting the safety-related function of a SSC." | ||
Given the PBAPS operating experience demonstrating that filter plug water leakage can lead to SRV inoperability, the inspectors determined that Constellation reasonably should have screened IR 04424264 as a CAQ. In accordance with PI-AA-125, CAP Procedure, Revision 8, step 4.5.2, classifying IR 04424264 as a CAQ would have led Constellation to create a corrective action or fleet-wide corrective action and associated passport model template (AR34) in the computer program for any planned action necessary to restore a CAQ. | Given the PBAPS operating experience demonstrating that filter plug water leakage can lead to SRV inoperability, the inspectors determined that Constellation reasonably should have screened IR 04424264 as a CAQ. In accordance with PI-AA-125, CAP Procedure, Revision 8, step 4.5.2, classifying IR 04424264 as a CAQ would have led Constellation to create a corrective action or fleet-wide corrective action and associated passport model template (AR34) in the computer program for any planned action necessary to restore a CAQ. | ||
| Line 315: | Line 357: | ||
Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor because it was associated with the Equipment Performance attribute of the Mitigating Systems cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. Specifically, Constellation did not correct the SRV-71B filter plug water leakage when it was identified following a drywell walkdown on May 18, 2021. Because this water leakage was not corrected, from time of identification to the RFO on October 17, 2022, the water leakage led to embrittlement of the air operator diaphragm of SRV-71B. Thus, SRV-71B was found to be inoperable during as-found testing during P2R24. | Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor because it was associated with the Equipment Performance attribute of the Mitigating Systems cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. Specifically, Constellation did not correct the SRV-71B filter plug water leakage when it was identified following a drywell walkdown on May 18, 2021. Because this water leakage was not corrected, from time of identification to the RFO on October 17, 2022, the water leakage led to embrittlement of the air operator diaphragm of SRV-71B. Thus, SRV-71B was found to be inoperable during as-found testing during P2R24. | ||
Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using IMC 0609 Appendix A, The SDP for Findings At-Power. Exhibit 2 - Mitigating System Screening Questions, Section A for Mitigating SSCs and | Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using IMC 0609 Appendix A, The SDP for Findings At-Power. Exhibit 2 - Mitigating System Screening Questions, Section A for Mitigating SSCs and pro babilistic risk analysis (PRA) Functionality, screened the finding to Green, very low safety significance, because there was no degraded condition representing a loss of PRA functionality, design, or qualification of the system. | ||
Specifically, although the function of SRV-71B was lost for a time, the PRA function of ADS was not lost with four remaining ADS SRVs and six remaining non-ADS SRVs. Therefore, the degraded condition did not represent a loss of the PRA function for a train or a system and screens to Green. | Specifically, although the function of SRV-71B was lost for a time, the PRA function of ADS was not lost with four remaining ADS SRVs and six remaining non-ADS SRVs. Therefore, the degraded condition did not represent a loss of the PRA function for a train or a system and screens to Green. | ||
| Line 331: | Line 373: | ||
The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report. | The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report. | ||
* On March 2, 2023, the inspectors presented the Emergency Preparedness program inspection results to David Henry, Site Vice President, and other members of the licensee staff. | * On March 2, 2023, the inspectors presented the Emergency Preparedness program inspection results to David Henry, Site Vice President, and other members of the licensee staff. | ||
* On May 4, 2023, the inspectors presented the integrated | * On May 4, 2023, the inspectors presented the integrated inspectionresults to Ryan Stiltner, Director Site Operations, and other members of the licensee staff. | ||
=DOCUMENTS REVIEWED= | =DOCUMENTS REVIEWED= | ||
Inspection Type | Inspection Type Designation Description or Title Revision or | ||
Procedure | Procedure Date | ||
71111.01 | 71111.01 Corrective Action IR 04545974 | ||
Documents | Documents | ||
71111.04 | 71111.04 Corrective Action 04359916 | ||
Documents | Documents IR 04546595 | ||
Miscellaneous | Miscellaneous E-71 Electrical Schematic Diag Emergency, Aux Revision 31 | ||
E-8 | E-8 Single Line Meter and Relay Diagram Standby Diesel Gens Revision 26 | ||
and 4160 Volt Emergency Power System, Unit 2 | and 4160 Volt Emergency Power System, Unit 2 | ||
PS-0028 | PS-0028 Design Cart to Transport and Support Temp Batteries Revision 3 | ||
Procedures | Procedures M-057-013 125 Volt Station Battery Replacement During Shutdown or Revision 15 | ||
At Power | At Power | ||
M-360 | M-360 P & I Diagram RCIC Pump Turbine Details Revision 55 | ||
ST-O-013-350-3 RCIC Valve Alignment and Filled and Vented Verification | ST-O-013-350-3 RCIC Valve Alignment and Filled and Vented Verification Revision 5 | ||
Work Orders | Work Orders 04897365 | ||
71111.05 | 71111.05 Procedures PF-117 Unit 3 Turbine Building, Emergency Battery SWGR Rooms, Revision 11 | ||
Elevation 135'-0" | Elevation 135'-0" | ||
PF-127 | PF-127 Unit 2 Turbine Building, Emergency Battery SWGR Rooms, Revision 11 | ||
Elevation 135-0 | Elevation 135-0 | ||
PF-132 | PF-132 Diesel Generator Building, General Area, Elevation 127''-0" Revision 9 | ||
PF-62 | PF-62 Unit 3 Reactor Building; HPCI Room, Elevation 88-0 Revision 7 | ||
PF-78H | PF-78H Turbine Building Common, Cable Spreading and Computer Revision 9 | ||
Rooms - Elevation 150-0 | Rooms - Elevation 150-0 | ||
71111.11Q Work Orders | 71111.11Q Work Orders WR 1531501 | ||
71111.12 | 71111.12 Corrective Action 04530826 | ||
Documents | Documents | ||
Procedures | Procedures ER-AA-400-1000 SRV Testing, Tracking, and Trending Revision 3 | ||
Work Orders | Work Orders 04529976 | ||
258110 | 258110 | ||
05302201 | 05302201 | ||
71111.13 | 71111.13 Work Orders 05249852 | ||
71111.15 | 71111.15 Corrective Action 04534311 | ||
Documents | Documents 04538668 | ||
04548645 | 04548645 | ||
Inspection Type | Inspection Type Designation Description or Title Revision or | ||
Procedure | Procedure Date | ||
04546657 | 04546657 | ||
04553119 | 04553119 | ||
| Line 377: | Line 419: | ||
04562695 | 04562695 | ||
04564470 | 04564470 | ||
Miscellaneous | Miscellaneous PS-0028 Design Cart to Transport and Support Temp Batteries Revision 3 | ||
SFCP-U2 | SFCP-U2 Surveillance Frequency Control Program List of Surveillance Revision 50 | ||
Frequencies | Frequencies | ||
Procedures | Procedures M-057-013 125 Volt Station Battery Replacement During Shutdown or Revision 15 | ||
At Power | At Power | ||
OP-PB-108-103-2 Locked Valve List - PBAPS Unit 2 | OP-PB-108-103-2 Locked Valve List - PBAPS Unit 2 Revision 15 | ||
RT-O-100-560-2 | RT-O-100-560-2 Unit 2 Locked Equipment Log Sheet Revision 4 | ||
SO 52A.8.A | SO 52A.8.A Diesel Generator Daily Shutdown Inspection Revision 66 | ||
ST-I-010-100-2 | ST-I-010-100-2 RHR Loop A Logic System Functional Test Revision 23 | ||
ST-I-010-105-2 | ST-I-010-105-2 RHR Loop B Logic System Functional Test Revision 25 | ||
ST-O-010-350-2 | ST-O-010-350-2 RHR Loop A and Crosstie Valve Position and Filled and Revision 14 | ||
Vented Verification | Vented Verification | ||
ST-O-052G-975- | ST-O-052G-975-Diesel Generator Lube Oil Inventory Verification Revision 16 | ||
Work Orders | Work Orders 01532968 | ||
04840732 | 04840732 | ||
04897365 | 04897365 | ||
04897365 | 04897365 | ||
05337084 | 05337084 | ||
71111.18 | 71111.18 Miscellaneous EC 618424 Installation of CAC PCIV Nitrogen Supply Cylinders Revision 2 | ||
TCCP 638277 | TCCP 638277 '3A' (B) (C) RFPT Trip Vulnerability Mitigation Revision 0 | ||
Work Orders | Work Orders 5327042 | ||
71111.24 | 71111.24 Corrective Action 04561599 | ||
Documents | Documents | ||
04559029 | 04559029 | ||
04666491 | 04666491 | ||
Inspection Type | |||
Procedure | Inspection Type Designation Description or Title Revision or | ||
Miscellaneous CC-AA-118 | Procedure Date | ||
Miscellaneous CC-AA-118 Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX), SFPI, and Revision 9 | |||
HCVS Program Document | HCVS Program Document | ||
CC-PB-118-1004 HCVS Order EA-13-109 for PBAPS, Units 2 and 3 | CC-PB-118-1004 HCVS Order EA-13-109 for PBAPS, Units 2 and 3 Revision 2 | ||
PMC-19-118-118 Replace HCVS 125V DC Battery Every 7 Years | PMC-19-118-118 Replace HCVS 125V DC Battery Every 7 Years | ||
Procedures | Procedures RT-I-033-631-2 RHR Room Cooler Emergency Service Water Heat Transfer Revision 15 | ||
Test | Test | ||
RT-M-57P-700-2 Containment Emergency Battery Annual Inspection | RT-M-57P-700-2 Containment Emergency Battery Annual Inspection Revision 4 | ||
RT-O-052-252-2 E-2 Diesel Generator Inspection Post-Maintenance | RT-O-052-252-2 E-2 Diesel Generator Inspection Post-Maintenance Revision 46 | ||
Functional Test | Functional Test | ||
RT-O-052-750-2 E-2 Diesel Alternative Shutdown Control Functional | RT-O-052-750-2 E-2 Diesel Alternative Shutdown Control Functional Revision 12 | ||
RT-O-23A-450-2 HPCI Lube Oil System Setup and Functional | RT-O-23A-450-2 HPCI Lube Oil System Setup and Functional Revision 13 | ||
RT-O-57P-746-2 Containment Emergency Vent Battery Quarterly Inspection | RT-O-57P-746-2 Containment Emergency Vent Battery Quarterly Inspection Revision 4 | ||
SI3K-54-E43- | SI3K-54-E43-Functional Test of E-43 4kV Undervoltage Relays Revision 2 | ||
XXFQ | XXFQ | ||
SO 39.1.B | SO 39.1.B Diesel Driven Portable FLEX Pump Startup and Shutdown Revision 5 | ||
SO 9A.1.B | SO 9A.1.B SBGT System Manual Startup Revision 9 | ||
ST-I-010-100-2 RHR Loop 'A' Logic System Functional Test | ST-I-010-100-2 RHR Loop 'A' Logic System Functional Test Revision 23 | ||
ST-I-010-105-5 RHR Loop B Logic System Functional Test | ST-I-010-105-5 RHR Loop B Logic System Functional Test Revision 25 | ||
ST-I-01G-100-2 ADS Channel 'A' Logic System Functional Test | ST-I-01G-100-2 ADS Channel 'A' Logic System Functional Test Revision 9 | ||
ST-M-07B-400-3 Functional Test and Breakaway Force Test of RB-Torus | ST-M-07B-400-3 Functional Test and Breakaway Force Test of RB-Torus Revision 6 | ||
Vacuum Breakers (VBV-3-07B-26A and VBV-3-07B-26B) | Vacuum Breakers (VBV-3-07B-26A and VBV-3-07B-26B) | ||
ST-O-32-301-2 | ST-O-32-301-2 HPSW Pump, Valve, and Flow Functional and in-Service Revision 44 | ||
Test | Test | ||
Work Orders | Work Orders 04267985 | ||
04724978 | 04724978 | ||
04878668 | 04878668 | ||
| Line 437: | Line 480: | ||
05105739 | 05105739 | ||
05160980 | 05160980 | ||
Inspection Type | |||
Procedure | Inspection Type Designation Description or Title Revision or | ||
Procedure Date | |||
05176131 | 05176131 | ||
05185169 | 05185169 | ||
| Line 445: | Line 489: | ||
05337079 | 05337079 | ||
05301065 | 05301065 | ||
71114.02 | 71114.02 Corrective Action 04557928 | ||
Documents | Documents | ||
Resulting from | Resulting from | ||
Inspection | Inspection | ||
Miscellaneous | Miscellaneous PBAPS Public Alert and Notification System Design Report Revision 1 | ||
71114.05 | 71114.05 Miscellaneous EP-AA-1000 Exelon Nuclear Standardized Radiological Emergency Plan Revision 33 | ||
EP-AA-1007 | EP-AA-1007 Exelon Nuclear Radiological Emergency Plan Annex for Revision 35 | ||
PBAPS | PBAPS | ||
71153 | 71153 Corrective Action 01411727 | ||
Documents | Documents 04424264 | ||
04500201 | 04500201 | ||
04529976 | 04529976 | ||
04530826 | 04530826 | ||
Procedures | Procedures CC-AA-309-101 Engineering Technical Evaluations Revision 16 | ||
PI-AA-120 | PI-AA-120 Issue Identification and Screening Process Revision 13 | ||
PI-AA-125 | PI-AA-125 CAP Procedure Revision 8 | ||
Work Orders | Work Orders 04529976 | ||
258110 | 258110 | ||
01421109 | 01421109 | ||
20 | 20 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:36, 14 November 2024
| ML23128A135 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 05/08/2023 |
| From: | Sarah Elkhiamy NRC/RGN-I/DORS |
| To: | Rhoades D Constellation Energy Generation, Constellation Nuclear |
| References | |
| IR 2023001 | |
| Download: ML23128A135 (1) | |
Text
May 8, 2023
SUBJECT:
PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 -
INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000277/2023001 AND 05000278/2023001
Dear David Rhoades:
On March 31, 2023, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3. On May 4, 2023, the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Ryan Stiltner, Director Site Operations, and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report.
Two findings of very low safety significance (Green) are documented in this report. The findings involved violations of NRC requirements. We are treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.
If you contest the violations or the significance or severity of the violations documented in this inspection report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555- 0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3.
If you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3. This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
Sincerely, Sarah H. Elkhiamy, Chief Projects Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 05000277 and 05000278 License Nos. DPR-44 and DPR-56
Enclosure:
As stated
Inspection Report
Docket Numbers: 05000277 and 05000278
License Numbers: DPR-44 and DPR-56
Report Numbers: 05000277/2023001 and 05000278/2023001
Enterprise Identifier: I-2023-001- 0046
Licensee: Constellation Energy Generation, LLC
Facility: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3
Location: Delta, PA
Inspection Dates: January 1, 2023 to March 31, 2023
Inspectors: S. Rutenkroger, Senior Resident Inspector C. Dukehart, Resident Inspector J. Ambrosini, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector S. Elkhiamy, Branch Chief T. Fish, Senior Operations Engineer M. Hardgrove, Senior Project Engineer J. Kepley, Operations Engineer K. Murphy, Operations Engineer
Approved By: Sarah H. Elkhiamy, Chief Projects Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Safety
Enclosure
SUMMARY
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring the licensees performance by conducting an integrated inspection at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station,
Units 2 and 3, in accordance with the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process is the NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. Refer to https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information.
List of Findings and Violations
Failure to Assess Internal Cell Resistance Test Results and Conduct Performance Testing of the Hardened Containment Vent System Battery Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Report Aspect Section Mitigating Green [H.6] - Design 71111.24 Systems NCV 05000277,05000278/2023001- 01 Margins Open/Closed The inspectors identified a Green finding and associated non-cited violation (NCV) of NRC Order EA-13-109 because Constellation did not perform a battery performance test (or cell replacement or other corrective action) when the hardened containment vent system (HCVS)battery cell internal ohmic resistance measurements significantly changed by greater than 50 percent above baseline. Specifically, the battery annual surveillance procedure lacked acceptance criteria for cell resistance, and no trending of cell resistances was performed.
Therefore, when the measurements increased by a significant amount above baseline no actions were taken in response.
Inadequate Corrective Actions for Safety/Relief Valve-71B Following Filter Plug Leakage Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Report Aspect Section Mitigating Green [P.2] - 71153 Systems NCV 05000277/2023001-02 Evaluation Open/Closed A Green self-revealing finding and associated NCV of 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Actions, was identified when Constellation did not ensure a condition adverse to quality (CAQ) associated with the degraded filter plug for the 71B safety/relief valve (SRV) was promptly identified and corrected. Specifically,
Constellation documented a small leak identified on SRV - 71B in an incident report but did not correct the condition. Consequently, SRV - 71B was discovered to be inoperable during the P2R24 refueling outage (RFO) due to a water lea k on October 17, 2022.
Additional Tracking Items
Type Issue Number Title Report Section Status LER 05000277/2022-002-00 LER 2022-002-00 for Peach 71153 Closed Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS) Unit 2 Automatic Depressurization System (ADS) SRV Actuator Diaphragm Degraded
PLANT STATUS
Unit 2 began the inspection period at rated thermal power (RTP). On March 3, 2023, the unit was down powered to 64 percent for a control rod sequence exchange and main turbine valve exercising and testing. The unit was returned to RTP the following day and remained at or near RTP for the remainder of the inspection period.
Unit 3 began the inspection period at RTP. On January 10, 2023, the unit experienced a recirculation pump runback with a corresponding power reduction to 60 percent due to an unplanned trip of a reactor feedwater pump caused by a cable fault. The unit was then down powered to 40 percent. Following maintenance and restoration of the pump, the unit was returned to RTP the following day. On February 10, the unit was down powered to 58 percent for planned reactor feedwater pump circuit modifications and cable replacements, main turbine valve exercising and testing, and a control rod pattern adjustment. The unit was returned to RTP the same day and remained at or near RTP for the remainder of the inspection period.
INSPECTION SCOPES
Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors performed activities described in IMC 2515, Appendix D, Plant Status, observed r isk significant activities, and completed on -site portions of IPs. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess licensee performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards.
REACTOR SAFETY
71111.01 - Adverse Weather Protection
Seasonal Extreme Weather (IP Section 03.01) (1 Sample)
- (1) The inspectors evaluated readiness for seasonal extreme weather conditions in the Unit 2 and Unit 3 reactor building and control building general areas with a focus on standby liquid control systems, the cable spreading room, 4 kV switchgear rooms, and the station batteries on January 3, 2023
71111.04 - Equipment Alignment
Partial Walkdown (IP Section 03.01) (4 Samples)
The inspectors evaluated system configurations during partial walkdowns of the following systems/trains:
- (1) Unit 3, reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) on February 16, 2023
- (2) Unit 2, station battery '2BD001' during cell replacements and use of temporary cells on February 28, 2023
- (3) Unit common, 4kV electrical switchgear during '3EA' transformer outage on March 21, 2023
- (4) Unit common, 'E-4' emergency diesel generator (EDG) during '34SU' transformer maintenance on March 28, 2023
71111.05 - Fire Protection
Fire Area Walkdown and Inspection (IP Section 03.01) (5 Samples)
The inspectors evaluated the implementation of the fire protection program by conducting a walkdown and performing a review to verify program compliance, equipment functionality, material condition, and operational readiness of the following fire areas:
- (1) Unit 3, high-pressure coolant injection (HPCI) room, PF-62, on February 7, 2023
- (2) Unit 2, emergency battery and switchgear rooms, PF-127, on March 14, 2023
- (3) Unit common, cable spreading and computer rooms, PF-78H, on March 15, 2023
- (4) Unit common, diesel generator building general area, PF-132, on March 28, 2023
- (5) Unit 3, emergency battery and switchgear rooms, PF-117, on March 29, 2023
Fire Brigade Drill Performance (IP Section 03.02) (1 Sample)
- (1) The inspectors evaluated the onsite fire brigade training and performance during an unannounced fire drill on March 7, 2023
71111.11A - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance
Requalification Examination Results (IP Section 03.03) (1 Sample)
- (1) The inspectors reviewed and evaluated the Unit 2 and Unit 3 licensed operator examination failure rates for the requalification annual operating exams administered February through March 2023
71111.11B - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance
Licensed Operator Requalification Program (IP Section 03.04) (1 Sample)
- (1) Biennial Requalification Written Examinations
The inspectors evaluated the quality of the Unit 2 and Unit 3 licensed operator biennial requalification written examinations previously administered March through April 2022
Annual Requalification Operating Tests
The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of the facility licensees 2023 annual requalification operating tests
Administration of an Annual Requalification Operating Test
The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of the facility licensee in administering the 2023 requalification operating tests required by 10 CFR 55.59(a)(2) and that the facility licensee is effectively evaluating their licensed operators for mastery of training objectives
Requalification Examination Security
The inspectors evaluated the ability of the facility licensee to safeguard examination material, such that the examination is not compromised
Remedial Training and Re-examinations
The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of remedial training conducted by the licensee, and reviewed the adequacy of re-examinations for licensed operators who did not pass a required requalification examination
Operator License Conditions
The inspectors evaluated the licensees program for ensuring that licensed operators meet the conditions of their licenses
Control Room Simulator
The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of the facility licensees control room simulator in modeling the actual plant, and for meeting the requirements contained in 10 CFR 55.46
Problem Identification and Resolution
The inspectors evaluated the licensees ability to identify and resolve problems associated with licensed operator performance
71111.11Q - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance
Licensed Operator Performance in the Actual Plant/Main Control Room (IP Section 03.01) (1 Sample)
- (1) The inspectors observed and evaluated licensed operator performance in the control room during the Unit 3 power ascension and restoration of the 3A reactor feedwater pump on January 11, 2023
Licensed Operator Requalification Training/Examinations (IP Section 03.02) (1 Sample)
- (1) The inspectors observed and evaluated licensed operator requalification training in the simulator on January 9, 2023
71111.12 - Maintenance Effectiveness
Maintenance Effectiveness (IP Section 03.01) (1 Sample)
The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of maintenance to ensure the following structures, systems, and components (SSCs) remain capable of performing their intended function:
- (1) Unit 2, main steam safety relief valve 'RV-71B' through March 7, 2023
71111.13 - Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control
Risk Assessment and Management (IP Section 03.01) (4 Samples)
The inspectors evaluated the accuracy and completeness of risk assessments for the following planned and emergent work activities to ensure configuration changes and appropriate work controls were addressed:
- (1) Unit 2, HPCI planned maintenance on January 10, 2023
- (2) Unit 2, '2B' high-pressure service water (HPSW) ventilation out of service for maintenance on March 7, 2023
- (3) Unit 2, HPCI power supply replacement on March 13, 2023
- (4) Unit common, '3EA' transformer planned maintenance on March 20, 2023
71111.15 - Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments
Operability Determination or Functionality Assessment (IP Section 03.01) (6 Samples)
The inspectors evaluated the licensee's justifications and actions associated with the following operability determinations and functionality assessments:
- (1) Unit 2, D air compressor time delay relay 2-36-6TR did not perform as required during testing on January 5, 2023
- (2) Unit 2, relay '2-10A-K016B' was found deenergized on February 7, 2023
- (3) Unit common, E-4 EDG trip on high crankcase pressure during a slow start on January 16, 2023, and subsequent replacement of the crankcase vacuum orifice on February 21, 2023
- (4) Unit 2, 'A' residual heat removal (RHR) system with the heat exchanger outlet block valve 'HV-2-10-28A' unlocked on February 17, 2023
- (5) Unit 2, 'B' station battery temporary cells not positively restrained on February 28, 2023
71111.18 - Plant Modifications
Temporary Modifications and/or Permanent Modifications (IP Section 03.01 and/or 03.02) (2 Samples)
The inspectors evaluated the following temporary or permanent modifications:
- (1) Units 2 and 3, permanent modification to containment atmospheric control systems to included backup nitrogen supply cylinders on February 13, 2023
- (2) Unit 3, reactor feedwater pump turbine (RFPT) trip vulnerability mitigation temporary modification on February 14, 2023
71111.24 - Testing and Maintenance of Equipment Important to Risk
The inspectors evaluated the following testing and maintenance activities to verify system operability and/or functionality:
Post-Maintenance Testing (IP Section 03.01) (5 Samples)
- (1) Unit 2, 'C' HPSW pump check valve testing following packing modification and replacement on January 3, 2023
- (3) Unit common, 'E-2' EDG testing following a system outage window on January 27, 2023
- (4) Unit 2, B RHR relay 2-10A-K0168 testing following replacement on March 1, 2023
- (5) Unit common, 'A' standby gas treatment (SBGT) testing following maintenance on instrument air solenoids associated with the fan inlet and outlet dampers on March 22, 2023
Surveillance Testing (IP Section 03.01) (6 Samples)
- (1) Unit 2, 'C' RHR room cooler heat transfer test on February 17, 2023
- (2) Unit 3, E43 4 kV undervoltage relays functional testing on March 7, 2023
- (3) Unit common, 'E-2' EDG alternative shutdown control functional test and loaded run on March 8, 2023
- (4) Unit 2, 'A' channel of automatic depressurization system logic system functional test, on March 15, 2023
- (5) Unit 2, 'A' RHR loop logic system functional test on January 5, 2023
- (6) Units 2 and 3, hardened containment vent emergency battery annual inspection on February 17, 2023
Inservice Testing (IST) (IP Section 03.01) (1 Sample)
- (1) Unit 3, reactor building torus vacuum breakers functional testing and breakaway force testing on March 13, 2023
Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) Testing (IP Section 03.02) (1 Sample)
- (1) Unit common, diesel driven flex pump '00P441' dry run test on January 17, 2023
71114.02 - Alert and Notification System Testing
Inspection Review (IP Section 02.01-02.04) (1 Sample)
- (1) The inspectors evaluated Constellation's maintenance and testing of the Alert and Notification System on February 27 through March 2, 2023, for the period of February 2021 through January 2023
71114.03 - Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Augmentation System
Inspection Review (IP Section 02.01-02.02) (1 Sample)
- (1) The inspectors evaluated the readiness of the Constellation's Emergency Preparedness Organization on February 27 through March 2, 2023
71114.04 - Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes
Inspection Review (IP Section 02.01-02.03) (1 Sample)
- (1) The inspectors evaluated the following submitted Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan changes:
- 22-23, EP-AA-120- 1006, "EP Reportability - Loss of Emergency Preparedness Capabilities," Revision 007
This evaluation does not constitute NRC approval.
71114.05 - Maintenance of Emergency Preparedness
Inspection Review (IP Section 02.01 - 02.11) (1 Sample)
- (1) The inspectors evaluated Constellation's maintenance and testing of the emergency preparedness program on February 27 through March 2, 2023, for the period of February 2021 through January
OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE
===71151 - Performance Indicator Verification
The inspectors verified licensee performance indicators submittals listed below:
IE01: Unplanned Scrams per 7000 Critical Hours Sample (IP Section 02.01)===
- (1) Unit 2 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022
- (2) Unit 3 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022
IE03: Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours Sample (IP Section 02.02) (2 Samples)
- (1) Unit 2 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022
- (2) Unit 3 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022
IE04: Unplanned Scrams with Complications Sample (IP Section 02.03) (1 Sample)
- (1) Unit 3 for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022
EP01: Drill/Exercise Performance Sample (IP Section 02.12) (1 Sample)
- (1) January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022
EP02: Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation (IP Section 02.13) (1 Sample)
- (1) January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 EP03: Alert and Notification System Reliability (IP Section 02.14) (1 Sample)
- (1) January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022
71152A - Annual Follow-up Problem Identification and Resolution Annual Follow-up of Selected Issues (Section 03.03)
- (1) Units 2 and Unit 3 review of corrective actions and extent of condition as a result of non-conservative off rated power dependent thermal limits associated with issue report (IR) 04524984
71153 - Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion Event Report (IP Section 03.02)
The inspectors evaluated the following licensee event report (LER):
- (1) LER 05000277/2022-002-00 for PBAPS, Unit 2, "ADS SRV Actuator Diaphragm Degraded, on March 6, 2023, (ADAMS Accession No. ML22349A084)
The inspectors conclusions associated with this LER are documented in this report under Inspection Results Section, NCV 05000277/2023001-01. This LER is Closed.
INSPECTION RESULTS
Failure to Assess Internal Cell Resistance Test Results and Conduct Performance Testing of the Hardened Containment Vent System Battery Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Report Aspect Section Mitigating Green [H.6] - Design 71111.24 Systems NCV 05000277,05000278/2023001- 01 Margins Open/Closed The inspectors identified a Green finding and associated NCV of NRC Order EA-13 -109 because Constellation did not perform a battery performance test (or cell replacement or other corrective action) when the HCVS battery cell internal ohmic resistance measurements significantly changed by greater than 50 percent above baseline. Specifically, the battery annual surveillance procedure lacked acceptance criteria for cell resistance, and no trending of cell resistances was performed. Therefore, when the measurements increased by a significant amount above baseline no actions were taken in response.
Description:
PBAPS was required by NRC Order EA -13 -109 to have a reliable, severe accident capable HCVS. Phase 1 of the order required upgraded the venting capabilities from the containment wetwell to provide a reliable, severe accident capable hardened vent to assist in preventing core damage and, if necessary, to provide venting capability during severe accident conditions. PBAPS achieved Phase 1 compliance in November 2016 for Unit 2 and in November 2017 for Unit 3. Constellation submitted a Final Integrated Plan (ML18271A008) to the NRC to address all the elements of NRC Order EA - 13-109 utilizing the endorsed (with some clarifications and exceptions) guidance in Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)13-02, Revision 1, and the related endorsed HCVS-Frequently Asked Questions and HCVS-White Papers documents. In addition, Constellations PBAPS response to NRC Order EA-12- 049 addressed an extended loss of AC power with injection. In such an event, the HCVS wetwell vent will be opened to protect the containment from overpressure. The required operator actions and timing of those actions to perform this function under extended loss of alternating current power conditions were evaluated as part of the response to NRC Order EA-12-049.
PBAPS modified the existing hardened wetwell vent path that was installed in response to NRC Generic Letter 89-16 to comply with NRC Order EA-13-109. The EA-13-109 compliant HCVS system added a dedicated 125 Vdc battery, nitrogen motive gas source, and argon purge system to the existing GL-89-16 wetwell hardened vent system. In addition, new HCVS radiation monitoring and temperature sensors and new control switches were added. The dedicated HCVS 125 Vdc battery supplies power to the actuating solenoid for inner primary containment isolation valves (PCIV) AO-2(3)511 (Unit 2 and Unit 3, respectively) and primary containment outboard barrier valves AO-8(9)0290 (Unit 2 and Unit 3, respectively). This battery also powers the new HCVS instrumentation. During an extended loss of AC power, electric power to operate the vent valves will be provided by the battery with a capacity to supply required loads for at least the first 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. Before the battery is depleted, the FLEX generator will repower the battery charger to supplement the required power and recharge the 125 Vdc battery to support operation of the vent valves and instrumentation. Calculation PE- 0308 demonstrated that the 125 Vdc battery capacity is sufficient to supply HCVS wetwell venting components for the 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
NEI 13-02 states that FLEX equipment that directly performs a FLEX mitigation strategy for the core, containment, or spent fuel pool should be subject to maintenance and testing guidance provided in Institute of Nuclear Power Operations AP 913, "Equipment Reliability Process," to verify proper function. NEI 13- 02 also states that site-specific bases will be developed to define specific testing, including that periodic testing and frequency should be done to verify design requirements, and the basis for the testing should be documented and deviations from vendor recommendations and applicable standards should be justified.
On February 17, 2023, the inspectors observed Constellation personnel performing the annual inspection of the containment emergency battery. The inspectors noted that the inspection measured and recorded the internal resistance of the battery cells. However, the procedure did not provide acceptance criteria for internal resistance and cell voltage, nor did it describe providing the data to engineering personnel for evaluation. The inspectors requested further information from engineering personnel and questioned the lack of acceptance criteria. Engineering determined that the cell resistance check is performed for trending as described in associated vendor guidance and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 1188-2005, IEEE Recommended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Valve-Regulated Lead-Acid (VRLA) Batteries for Stationary Applications.
Engineering checked with the battery vendor and determined that an increase of 50 percent from the initial baseline internal cell resistance when new should prompt further scrutiny of battery function, typically provided via performance testing (i.e., a battery discharge test). The HCVS battery average cell resistance first exceeded 50 percent of baseline when the measurements were taken on January 21, 2020. The average cell internal ohmic resistances were determined to be 86 percent above baseline in the most recent test performed on February 17, 2023.
The inspectors noted that CC-AA-118, Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX),
Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (SFPI), and HCVS Program Document, Attachment 3, FLEX / SFPI / HCVS Equipment Preventative Maintenance (PM) Requirements, lists required PMs tasks for FLEX, SFPI, and HCVS equipment. The listed PMs for VRLA batteries include a three-month cell inspection and one-year detailed cell inspection, with bases listed as PCM templates, Vendor Recommendations and Battery SME. The PCM template lists both a quarterly cell inspection and annual detailed cell inspection that include measuring cell internal ohmic values. The annual detailed cell inspection also states to compare to previous values. In addition, the vendor guidance and IEEE 1188-2005 both describe performing such cell inspections, including the taking of cell internal ohmic resistance measurements and trending/comparing these measurements to baseline values, and describe that a significant change from baseline values (50 percent per vendor) warrants a performance test (or cell replacement or other corrective action). Notably, the battery inspection procedures, which are used to perform the PMs required by CC-AA-118, list IEEE 1188-2005 as a governing commitment for performing such inspections.
Engineering determined that no trending/comparing of cell internal ohmic resistance measurements had been performed, and no performance test had ever been performed on the HCVS battery, which was installed in 2016. IEEE 1188-2005 states that a performance test of the battery capacity should be made upon installation and that batteries should undergo additional performance tests periodically. Further, when establishing the interval between tests, factors such as design life and operating temperature should be considered and it is recommended that the performance test interval should not be greater than 25 percent of the expected service life or two years, whichever is less. A routine performance test was not required by CC-AA-118. However, given that no routine performance testing was being performed, when the internal cell ohmic resistance measurements changed by more than 50 percent above baseline and Constellation did not perform a reactive performance test (or cell replacement or other corrective action), there was no battery discharge testing to credit for meeting PM requirements.
Corrective Actions: As a result of the inspectors questions, Constellation determined that a performance test was required, as described by the vendor and IEEE 1188-2005, to accurately assess the HCVS battery health due to the change in internal cell resistances.
Constellation initiated an issue report based on the inspectors questions and created actions to revise the annual inspection with acceptance criteria and create and implement a battery performance test procedure as soon as practical within the work scheduling process.
Corrective Action References: IR 04559029
Performance Assessment:
Performance Deficiency: The inspectors identified a Green finding and associated NCV because Constellation did not perform a battery performance test (or cell replacement or other corrective action) when the HCVS battery cell internal ohmic resistance measurements significantly changed by greater than 50 percent above baseline.
Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor because it was associated with the Equipment Performance attribute of the Mitigating Systems cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. Specifically, since Constellation had not conducted a performance test of the HCVS battery from installation in 2016 and the battery cell internal resistances did exhibit significant deviation from baseline values, as defined by the vendor, there was reasonable doubt that the equipment maintained the capability to perform within sufficient margin to meet the electrical requirements of the associated FLEX strategies (i.e.,
that no portable equipment should be required to operate the HCVS within the first 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />).
Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using IMC 0609 Appendix A, The Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power. The finding screened as of very low safety significance (Green) because it did not involve equipment, training, procedures, and/or other programmatic aspects credited in any Phase 1 or 2 FLEX strategy such that any FLEX function (such as extended HPCI/RCIC/auxiliary feedwater operation, providing FLEX DC power, FLEX AC power, or FLEX RCS feed) could not be completed in accordance with existing plant procedures within the time allotted for an exposure period of greater than 21 days. Specifically, the inspectors determined that a reasonable best estimate of battery capacity given the initial margin established by design and observed battery conditions would reasonably result in the FLEX generator supplementing and recharging the battery to support operation of the vent valves before the battery was depleted.
Cross-Cutting Aspect: H.6 - Design Margins: The organization operates and maintains equipment within design margins. Margins are carefully guarded and changed only through a systematic and rigorous process. Special attention is placed on maintaining fission product barriers, defense-in-depth, and safety-related equipment. (WP.2). A factor described in NUREG-2165, Safety Culture Common Language, WP.2, is that safety -related equipment is operated and maintained well within design requirements. The testing procedures and monitoring that were established and being performed did not carefully guard and maintain the design margins of the HCVS battery well within design requirements.
Enforcement:
Violation: NRC Order EA-13-109 is only applicable to operating boiling-water reactors (BWRs) with Mark I and Mark II containments. Constellation received NRC Order EA -13- 09 for PBAPS because the reactors at PBAPS are General Electric BWRs with Mark I containments. NRC Order EA-13-109, Attachment 2, Section 1.2.13, states, in part, the HCVS shall include features and provisions for testing, inspection and maintenance adequate to ensure that reliable function and capability are maintained.
Constellation program documents CC-AA-118, Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX), SFPI, and HCVS Program Document, Revision 9, and CC-PB-118-1004, HCVS Final Integrated Plan, Revision 2, describe the compliance of PBAPS with NRC Order 13-109 and state that compliance with NRC Order 13-109 utilizes the endorsed guidance in NEI 13- 02, Revision 1, and the related endorsed HCVS-Frequently Asked Questions and HCVS -
White Papers documents. The NRC endorsed the guidance in JLD-ISG-2015- 01, Compliance with Phase 2 of Order EA-13-109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Performing under Severe Accident Conditions. NEI 13 -02, Revision 1, states, in part, that periodic testing and frequency should be determined based on equipment type and expected use and that testing should be done to verify design requirements and/or basis, and the basis should be documented and deviations from vendor recommendations and applicable standards should be justified. In addition, CC-AA-118, Attachment 3, lists preventive maintenance requirements and bases for FLEX, SFPI, and HCVS equipment and includes a quarterly cell inspection and annual detailed cell inspection for VRLA batteries. The vendor guidance and IEEE 1188-2005 describe the cell inspections listed in CC-AA-118 that include cell internal ohmic resistance measurements and describe that a significant change from baseline values (50 percent per vendor) warrants a performance (discharge) test (or cell replacement or other corrective action).
Contrary to this, since January 21, 2020, Constellation did not provide provisions for testing, inspection, and maintenance adequate to ensure that the reliable function and capability of the HCVS battery were maintained. Constellation did not determine periodic testing and frequency based on equipment type and expected use, did not perform testing to verify design requirements and/or basis, and did not document the basis for deviations from vendor recommendations and applicable standards. Specifically, the HCVS battery inspections deviated from the vendor recommendations and the applicable standard, IEEE 1188-2005, when the measured HCVS battery internal cell resistances significantly changed from baseline by more than 50 percent, and Constellation did not conduct a performance test, cell replacement, or other corrective action, and did not evaluate and justify the deviation.
Enforcement Action: This violation is being treated as a NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.
Observation: Annual Review of Corrective Actions and Extent of Condition of 71152A Review as a Result of Non-Conservative Off Rated Power Dependent Thermal Limits The inspectors reviewed Constellations evaluation and corrective actions associated with non-conservative off rated power dependent thermal limits for both Units 2 and 3. Specifically, inspectors focused on the corrective action program (CAP) evaluation associated with issue report 04524984.
The inspectors reviewed the extent of condition, both the station and corporate procedures, standing orders, relevant condition reports, engineering and design calculations, core operating limits reports, power history and associated plant guidance, and interviewed the licensee subject matter expert on the topic.
Based on the documents reviewed and discussions with personnel, the NRC inspectors noted that corrective actions were timely and appropriate.
Inadequate Corrective Actions for Safety/Relief Valve-71B Following Filter Plug Leakage Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Report Aspect Section Mitigating Green [P.2] - 71153 Systems NCV 05000277/2023001 - 02 Evaluation Open/Closed A Green self-revealing finding and associated NCV of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Actions, was identified when Constellation did not ensure a CAQ associated with the degraded filter plug for the 71B SRV was promptly identified and corrected.
Specifically, Constellation documented a small leak identified on SRV-71B in an IR but did not correct the condition. Consequently, SRV - 71B was discovered to be inoperable during the P2R24 RFO due to a water leak on October 17, 2022.
Description:
PBAPS has eleven 3 -stage Target Rock SRVs per unit. An SRV provides a pressure relief function or system depressurization at full rated flow with a set pressure range of 900 - 1100 psig. Additionally, five of the eleven SRVs are ADS valves. The purpose of ADS valves is to rapidly depressurize the reactor pressure vessel to allow low pressure emergency core cooling system to provide core cooling.
On May 18, 2021, a drywell entry was performed to repair a nitrogen leak on SRV-71K.
Maintenance personnel performed inspections of all other SRVs as a result of hose fretting leakage found on SRV-71K. Subsequently, IR 04424264 was written, and screened as N-CAP, for a small water leak identified on SRV -71B via rust spot at the pilot filter port plug.
Work order (WO) 5186520 was generated to perform an inspection of SRV-71B during the next RFO, P2R24, in October 2022.
On October 17, 2022, during the P2R24 RFO, IR 4529976 was written for water that was identified leaking from the fastener on the SRV-71B body. The cause of the leak was due to steam cutting around the O-ring area of the pilot filter plug. The leakage was determined to be active and wetting the insulation surrounding the valve. The location was determined to be from the pilot filter plug threaded connection and not a through-wall pressure boundary location.
Vendor testing of the SRV air operator identified substantial leakage, such that the ADS function of SRV-71B was not functional. Examination of the air operator showed that the diaphragm elastomer had embrittled, and other soft parts were disintegrated. The vendor testing determined that the air operator likely failed because of wet steam heating.
PBAPS had previously experienced SRV pilot filter plug leakage. Apparent Causal Report 1421109 documented that, on September 24, 2012, during the P2R19 RFO, SRV-71E and SRV-71H failed to actuate during as-found testing. Inspection of the air operator revealed that the diaphragm exhibited a loss of resiliency and was hardened. Constellation determined that the apparent cause of the manual lift failures for SRV-71E and SRV-71H was related to filter plug leakage. In addition, a SRV-71J diaphragm failure in 2PR17 RFO was attributed to the leaking filter plug. The two probable degradation mechanisms were that
- (1) leakage from the plug induced a chimney effect through the insulation such that high energy steam impinged on the air operator leading to accelerated degradation of the diaphragm, or
- (2) steam leakage resulted in sufficient wetting of the installed insulation, degrading its insulating capabilities and enabling process steam heat from the SRV to cause accelerated degradation of the diaphragm.
The inspectors reviewed Constellations WGE, WOs, maintenance, and CAP procedures in response to the SRV-71B failure in October 2022. As discussed above, IR 04424264, dated May 18, 2021, captured a small leak and a rust spot at the pilot filter port plug on SRV-71B.
Constellation screened this IR as N-CAP; however, the inspectors determined that it should have been screened as a CAQ, per Constellation procedures. Specifically, Constellation procedure PI-AA-120, Issue Identification and Screening Process, Revision 13, Attachment 2 provides a listing of CAQs that Constellation has determined require specific management screening to ensure the issues are addressed. Attachment 2, "Significance Level 3 Guidance," section "Asset Management-Equipment Reliability," bullet "yy" states the following: "CAQ: a degraded condition or non -conformance affecting the safety-related function of a SSC."
Given the PBAPS operating experience demonstrating that filter plug water leakage can lead to SRV inoperability, the inspectors determined that Constellation reasonably should have screened IR 04424264 as a CAQ. In accordance with PI-AA-125, CAP Procedure, Revision 8, step 4.5.2, classifying IR 04424264 as a CAQ would have led Constellation to create a corrective action or fleet-wide corrective action and associated passport model template (AR34) in the computer program for any planned action necessary to restore a CAQ.
Based on the information above, the inspectors determined that Constellation did not identify and did not promptly address a CAQ associated with a non-conforming condition on SRV-71B. Specifically, the non-conforming condition of a small water leak on SRV-71B was noted on May 18, 2021, and was documented under IR 04424264. which was not classified as a CAQ. As a result, the non-conforming condition was not promptly addressed, and subsequently SRV-71B failed as-found testing during RFO P2R24.
Corrective Actions: Constellations corrective actions involved a WGE and replacement of the SRV-71B during RFO P2R24.
Corrective Action References: IR 4529976
Performance Assessment:
Performance Deficiency: The inspectors determined that Constellation did not ensure a CAQ was promptly identified and corrected as required by PI-AA-120, Revision 13, Attachment 2, which was a performance deficiency that was within their ability to foresee and correct, and which should have been prevented.
Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor because it was associated with the Equipment Performance attribute of the Mitigating Systems cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. Specifically, Constellation did not correct the SRV-71B filter plug water leakage when it was identified following a drywell walkdown on May 18, 2021. Because this water leakage was not corrected, from time of identification to the RFO on October 17, 2022, the water leakage led to embrittlement of the air operator diaphragm of SRV-71B. Thus, SRV-71B was found to be inoperable during as-found testing during P2R24.
Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using IMC 0609 Appendix A, The SDP for Findings At-Power. Exhibit 2 - Mitigating System Screening Questions, Section A for Mitigating SSCs and pro babilistic risk analysis (PRA) Functionality, screened the finding to Green, very low safety significance, because there was no degraded condition representing a loss of PRA functionality, design, or qualification of the system.
Specifically, although the function of SRV-71B was lost for a time, the PRA function of ADS was not lost with four remaining ADS SRVs and six remaining non-ADS SRVs. Therefore, the degraded condition did not represent a loss of the PRA function for a train or a system and screens to Green.
Cross-Cutting Aspect: P.2 - Evaluation: The organization thoroughly evaluates issues to ensure that resolutions address causes and extent of conditions commensurate with their safety significance. The organization thoroughly evaluates issues to ensure that resolutions address causes and extent of conditions commensurate with their safety significance. The inspectors determined that this finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution, Evaluation, because Constellation did not thoroughly evaluate issues to ensure that resolutions address causes and extent of conditions commensurate with their safety significance. Specifically, Constellation did not apply previous PBAPS operating experience identified in a 2012 apparent cause evaluation related to water leakage from the filter plug on SRVs to an identified leak on May 18, 2021. Subsequently, SRV-71B was declared inoperable on October 17, 2022, following water leakage from the filter plug. [P.2]
Enforcement:
Violation: 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Actions, requires, in part, that measures shall be established to ensure that CAQs, such as deviations and non-conformances, are promptly identified and corrected.
Contrary to the above, between May 18, 2021, and October 17, 2022, Constellation did not ensure that a CAQ associated with a non-conforming condition of SRV-71B was promptly identified and corrected. Specifically, a small water leak was identified on SRV-71B on May 18, 2021, following a drywell walkdown. As a result, SRV-71B failed its as-found testing during RFO P2R24 and was declared inoperable on October 17, 2022.
Enforcement Action: This violation is being treated as a NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.
EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS
The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report.
- On March 2, 2023, the inspectors presented the Emergency Preparedness program inspection results to David Henry, Site Vice President, and other members of the licensee staff.
- On May 4, 2023, the inspectors presented the integrated inspectionresults to Ryan Stiltner, Director Site Operations, and other members of the licensee staff.
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Inspection Type Designation Description or Title Revision or
Procedure Date
71111.01 Corrective Action IR 04545974
Documents
71111.04 Corrective Action 04359916
Documents IR 04546595
Miscellaneous E-71 Electrical Schematic Diag Emergency, Aux Revision 31
E-8 Single Line Meter and Relay Diagram Standby Diesel Gens Revision 26
and 4160 Volt Emergency Power System, Unit 2
PS-0028 Design Cart to Transport and Support Temp Batteries Revision 3
Procedures M-057-013 125 Volt Station Battery Replacement During Shutdown or Revision 15
At Power
M-360 P & I Diagram RCIC Pump Turbine Details Revision 55
ST-O-013-350-3 RCIC Valve Alignment and Filled and Vented Verification Revision 5
Work Orders 04897365
71111.05 Procedures PF-117 Unit 3 Turbine Building, Emergency Battery SWGR Rooms, Revision 11
Elevation 135'-0"
PF-127 Unit 2 Turbine Building, Emergency Battery SWGR Rooms, Revision 11
Elevation 135-0
PF-132 Diesel Generator Building, General Area, Elevation 127-0" Revision 9
PF-62 Unit 3 Reactor Building; HPCI Room, Elevation 88-0 Revision 7
PF-78H Turbine Building Common, Cable Spreading and Computer Revision 9
Rooms - Elevation 150-0
71111.11Q Work Orders WR 1531501
71111.12 Corrective Action 04530826
Documents
Procedures ER-AA-400-1000 SRV Testing, Tracking, and Trending Revision 3
Work Orders 04529976
258110
05302201
71111.13 Work Orders 05249852
71111.15 Corrective Action 04534311
Documents 04538668
04548645
Inspection Type Designation Description or Title Revision or
Procedure Date
04546657
04553119
04553104
04555318
04562695
04564470
Miscellaneous PS-0028 Design Cart to Transport and Support Temp Batteries Revision 3
SFCP-U2 Surveillance Frequency Control Program List of Surveillance Revision 50
Frequencies
Procedures M-057-013 125 Volt Station Battery Replacement During Shutdown or Revision 15
At Power
OP-PB-108-103-2 Locked Valve List - PBAPS Unit 2 Revision 15
RT-O-100-560-2 Unit 2 Locked Equipment Log Sheet Revision 4
SO 52A.8.A Diesel Generator Daily Shutdown Inspection Revision 66
ST-I-010-100-2 RHR Loop A Logic System Functional Test Revision 23
ST-I-010-105-2 RHR Loop B Logic System Functional Test Revision 25
ST-O-010-350-2 RHR Loop A and Crosstie Valve Position and Filled and Revision 14
Vented Verification
ST-O-052G-975-Diesel Generator Lube Oil Inventory Verification Revision 16
Work Orders 01532968
04840732
04897365
04897365
05337084
71111.18 Miscellaneous EC 618424 Installation of CAC PCIV Nitrogen Supply Cylinders Revision 2
TCCP 638277 '3A' (B) (C) RFPT Trip Vulnerability Mitigation Revision 0
Work Orders 5327042
71111.24 Corrective Action 04561599
Documents
04559029
04666491
Inspection Type Designation Description or Title Revision or
Procedure Date
Miscellaneous CC-AA-118 Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX), SFPI, and Revision 9
HCVS Program Document
CC-PB-118-1004 HCVS Order EA-13-109 for PBAPS, Units 2 and 3 Revision 2
PMC-19-118-118 Replace HCVS 125V DC Battery Every 7 Years
Procedures RT-I-033-631-2 RHR Room Cooler Emergency Service Water Heat Transfer Revision 15
Test
RT-M-57P-700-2 Containment Emergency Battery Annual Inspection Revision 4
RT-O-052-252-2 E-2 Diesel Generator Inspection Post-Maintenance Revision 46
Functional Test
RT-O-052-750-2 E-2 Diesel Alternative Shutdown Control Functional Revision 12
RT-O-23A-450-2 HPCI Lube Oil System Setup and Functional Revision 13
RT-O-57P-746-2 Containment Emergency Vent Battery Quarterly Inspection Revision 4
SI3K-54-E43-Functional Test of E-43 4kV Undervoltage Relays Revision 2
XXFQ
SO 39.1.B Diesel Driven Portable FLEX Pump Startup and Shutdown Revision 5
SO 9A.1.B SBGT System Manual Startup Revision 9
ST-I-010-100-2 RHR Loop 'A' Logic System Functional Test Revision 23
ST-I-010-105-5 RHR Loop B Logic System Functional Test Revision 25
ST-I-01G-100-2 ADS Channel 'A' Logic System Functional Test Revision 9
ST-M-07B-400-3 Functional Test and Breakaway Force Test of RB-Torus Revision 6
Vacuum Breakers (VBV-3-07B-26A and VBV-3-07B-26B)
ST-O-32-301-2 HPSW Pump, Valve, and Flow Functional and in-Service Revision 44
Test
Work Orders 04267985
04724978
04878668
05001465
05116760
232905
04840732
04888804
05105739
05160980
Inspection Type Designation Description or Title Revision or
Procedure Date
05176131
05185169
293054
05311763
05337079
05301065
71114.02 Corrective Action 04557928
Documents
Resulting from
Inspection
Miscellaneous PBAPS Public Alert and Notification System Design Report Revision 1
71114.05 Miscellaneous EP-AA-1000 Exelon Nuclear Standardized Radiological Emergency Plan Revision 33
EP-AA-1007 Exelon Nuclear Radiological Emergency Plan Annex for Revision 35
71153 Corrective Action 01411727
Documents 04424264
04500201
04529976
04530826
Procedures CC-AA-309-101 Engineering Technical Evaluations Revision 16
PI-AA-120 Issue Identification and Screening Process Revision 13
PI-AA-125 CAP Procedure Revision 8
Work Orders 04529976
258110
01421109
20