ML19339C542: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 20: Line 20:
T21cetpicd 11-11-80 i
T21cetpicd 11-11-80 i
d Carolina Power & Light Company E*_                ..  ....N Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 10429                                          -
d Carolina Power & Light Company E*_                ..  ....N Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 10429                                          -
Southport, NC 28461 November 11, 1980
Southport, NC 28461 November 11, 1980 FILE: B09-13516 SERIAL: BSEP/80-1844 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II, Suite 3100 101 Marietta Street N.W.
                                                            '
FILE: B09-13516 SERIAL: BSEP/80-1844
                                                                                            '
                                                                                                    -
.
Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II, Suite 3100 101 Marietta Street N.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303 BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 & 2 LICENSE NO. DPR-71 and DPR-62 DOCKET No. 50-325 and 50-324 Confirmation Facsimile for an Immediately Reportable Event (2-80-83)
Atlanta, GA 30303 BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 & 2 LICENSE NO. DPR-71 and DPR-62 DOCKET No. 50-325 and 50-324 Confirmation Facsimile for an Immediately Reportable Event (2-80-83)


Line 34: Line 28:
During a normal routine inspection on October 17, 1980, a pipinr aupport on the Unit No. 2 HPCI discharge line outside the drywell was found to have a cracked weld. This support was evaluated by Plant Engineering on October 17 as not affecting the operability of the system due to the small loading in-volved. United Engineers and Constructors (UE&C) were instructed to perform an analysis of this support failure to verify system operability.                      On November 10, 1980, UE&C reported that ' the failed support would, in fact, make the EPCI System inoperable due to revised loading calculations during a design basis seismic event.
During a normal routine inspection on October 17, 1980, a pipinr aupport on the Unit No. 2 HPCI discharge line outside the drywell was found to have a cracked weld. This support was evaluated by Plant Engineering on October 17 as not affecting the operability of the system due to the small loading in-volved. United Engineers and Constructors (UE&C) were instructed to perform an analysis of this support failure to verify system operability.                      On November 10, 1980, UE&C reported that ' the failed support would, in fact, make the EPCI System inoperable due to revised loading calculations during a design basis seismic event.
Initial evaluations of the failed support indicates that the failure was a result of a lack of fusion at the weld point. The support was repaired and strengthened on October 17, 1980.      The same support on Unit No. I was inspected and found to be satisfactory.
Initial evaluations of the failed support indicates that the failure was a result of a lack of fusion at the weld point. The support was repaired and strengthened on October 17, 1980.      The same support on Unit No. I was inspected and found to be satisfactory.
Very truly yours,
Very truly yours, A. C. Tolliso , Jr., General Manager Brunswick Steam Electric Plant RMP/oeg                                                                                                        l l
                                                              .
A. C. Tolliso , Jr., General Manager Brunswick Steam Electric Plant RMP/oeg                                                                                                        l l
cc:  Mr. R. A. Hartfield                                                              474b Mr. V. Stello, Jr.                                                              5//                      1 8 011180 };']P'4f}}
cc:  Mr. R. A. Hartfield                                                              474b Mr. V. Stello, Jr.                                                              5//                      1 8 011180 };']P'4f}}

Latest revision as of 11:08, 31 January 2020

RO 2-80-83:on 801017,piping Support on Unit 2 HPCI Discharge Lines Outside Drywell Was Found to Have Cracked Weld.Caused by Lack of Fusion at Weld Point.Support Repaired & Strengthened.Unit 1 Found Satisfactory
ML19339C542
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/11/1980
From: Tollison A
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
BSEP-80-1844, RO-2-80-83, NUDOCS 8011180574
Download: ML19339C542 (1)


Text

_ _ - _ . -- _ _ _ _ _ .__ - . _ - ._

l l

T21cetpicd 11-11-80 i

d Carolina Power & Light Company E*_ .. ....N Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 10429 -

Southport, NC 28461 November 11, 1980 FILE: B09-13516 SERIAL: BSEP/80-1844 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II, Suite 3100 101 Marietta Street N.W.

Atlanta, GA 30303 BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 & 2 LICENSE NO. DPR-71 and DPR-62 DOCKET No. 50-325 and 50-324 Confirmation Facsimile for an Immediately Reportable Event (2-80-83)

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

This facsimile confirms 2he conversation between Mr. E. A. Bishop, Project Engineer, and Mr. Austin Hardin of your office at 1600 on November 10, 1980.

During a normal routine inspection on October 17, 1980, a pipinr aupport on the Unit No. 2 HPCI discharge line outside the drywell was found to have a cracked weld. This support was evaluated by Plant Engineering on October 17 as not affecting the operability of the system due to the small loading in-volved. United Engineers and Constructors (UE&C) were instructed to perform an analysis of this support failure to verify system operability. On November 10, 1980, UE&C reported that ' the failed support would, in fact, make the EPCI System inoperable due to revised loading calculations during a design basis seismic event.

Initial evaluations of the failed support indicates that the failure was a result of a lack of fusion at the weld point. The support was repaired and strengthened on October 17, 1980. The same support on Unit No. I was inspected and found to be satisfactory.

Very truly yours, A. C. Tolliso , Jr., General Manager Brunswick Steam Electric Plant RMP/oeg l l

cc: Mr. R. A. Hartfield 474b Mr. V. Stello, Jr. 5// 1 8 011180 };']P'4f