ML080530067: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:February 28, 2008  
{{#Wiki_filter:February 28, 2008 Mr. Terry Garrett Vice President, Engineering Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839
 
Mr. Terry Garrett Vice President, Engineering  
 
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION  
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION


==Dear Mr. Garrett:==
==Dear Mr. Garrett:==


By letter dated September 27, 2006, Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC) submitted an application pursuant to 10 CFR Part 54, to renew the operating license NPF-42 for Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1 for review by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff). The staff is reviewing the information contained in the license renewal application and has identified, in the enclosure, areas where additional information is needed to complete the review. Further requests for additional information may be issued in the future.  
By letter dated September 27, 2006, Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC) submitted an application pursuant to 10 CFR Part 54, to renew the operating license NPF-42 for Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1 for review by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff). The staff is reviewing the information contained in the license renewal application and has identified, in the enclosure, areas where additional information is needed to complete the review. Further requests for additional information may be issued in the future.
 
Items in the enclosure were discussed with Ms. Lorrie Bell; and a mutually agreeable date for the response is within 30 days from the date of this letter or no later than April 1, 2008. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3617 or by e-mail at TXT1@nrc.gov.
Items in the enclosure were discussed with Ms. Lorrie Bell; and a mutually agreeable date for the response is within 30 days from the date of this letter or no later than April 1, 2008. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3617 or by e-mail at TXT1@nrc.gov. Sincerely,       /RA/ Tam Tran, Project Manager Project Branch 1 Division of License Renewal     Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-482  
Sincerely,
                                              /RA/
Tam Tran, Project Manager Project Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-482


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==


As Stated  
As Stated cc w/encl: See next page


cc w/encl:  See next page 
ML080530067 OFFICE    LA:DLR                  PM:RPB1:DLR          BC:RPB1:DLR NAME      YEdmonds                T. Tran              L. Lund DATE      02/27/08                02/27/08              02/28/08


ML080530067 OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR BC:RPB1:DLR NAME YEdmonds T. Tran L. Lund DATE 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/28/08 WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Metal Fatigue Analyses  
WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Metal Fatigue Analyses Follow-up RAI for 4.3-1 The applicants responses provided in letters dated October 3, and 17, 2007, did not address the staffs concerns as stated in RAI 4.3-1. The October 3, 2007, letter stated that 1D transfer functions were developed for HL surge line nozzle and the charging nozzles in the vicinity of the nozzle to pipe welds. It went on to state that the development of the transfer functions takes full advantage of the local geometry and symmetry. However, the staff finds no axis of symmetry at the nozzle corners. Further, at the nozzle to pipe welds, the loading is not symmetric if thermal stratification is present. Therefore, the validity of transfer functions developed by using 1-D peak stress is not applicable at these locations. In order to enable the staff to make a determination on this issue, the applicant is requested to perform an environmentally-assisted fatigue analysis and provide results to the NRC Staff of a 3-D finite element analysis using an industry-accepted computer code, such as ANSYS. The analysis should cover nozzle corners with geometrical discontinuities and at locations where thermal stratification loading is significant. This analysis shall follow the rules of American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Subsection NB-3200, requiring the use of six stress components to define the stress state and determine the alternating stress intensities.
 
Follow-up RAI for 4.3-3 Wolf Creek Generating Stations (WCGS) commitment closure letter (ET 08-007), dated January 25, 2008, does not address the following commitments on Page 14 of the October 3, 2007, letter (ET 07-0046):
Follow-up RAI for 4.3-1 The applicant's responses provided in letters dated October 3, and 17, 2007, did not address the staff's concerns as stated in RAI 4.3-1. The October 3, 2007, letter stated that 1D transfer functions were developed for HL surge line nozzle and the charging nozzles in the vicinity of the nozzle to pipe welds. It went on to state that the development of the transfer functions takes full advantage of the local geometry and symmetry. However, the staff finds no axis of symmetry at the nozzle corners. Further, at the nozzle to pipe welds, the loading is not symmetric if thermal stratification is present. Therefore, the validity of transfer functions developed by using "1-D peak stress" is not applicable at these locations. In order to enable the staff to make a  
(1) Since WCGS implemented the modified operating procedure (MOP) prior to 1995, it is reasonable to suspect that heat-ups during PERIOD1 would have more insurge/outsurge cycles than PERIOD2. WCNOC agrees with this assertion, and will commit to updating the baseline to account for this factor. The baseline will be increased based on the expected number of additional insurge/outsurge cycles that would be accumulated in a pre-MOP environment.
 
(2) In a follow-up discussion, the reviewers further noted that the cumulative usage factors back-projection did not consider the relative severity of charging and letdown transients.
determination on this issue, the applicant is requested to perform an environmentally-assisted fatigue analysis and provide results to the NRC Staff of a 3-D finite element analysis using an industry-accepted computer code, such as ANSYS. The analysis should cover nozzle corners with geometrical discontinuities and at locations where thermal stratification loading is significant. This analysis shall follow the rules of American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Subsection NB-3200, requiring the use of six stress components to define the stress state and determine the alternating stress intensities.  
However, in the revised baseline, Wolf Creek will explicitly consider the differential contribution of fatigue for each category of charging event.
The January 25, 2008, letter did not close commitments made by WCGS in the October 3, 2007, letter as quoted above. Please provide additional calculations and discussions to address the committed actions regarding the additional insurge/outsurge cycles and the differential contribution of fatigue for each category of charging event.


Follow-up RAI for 4.3-3
Letter to Wolf Creek from T. Tran, dated February 28, 2008 DISTRIBUTION:
 
Wolf Creek Generating Station's (WCGS) commitment closure letter (ET 08-007), dated January 25, 2008, does not address the following commitments on Page 14 of the October 3, 2007, letter (ET 07-0046):
(1) Since WCGS implemented the modified operating procedure (MOP) prior to 1995, it is reasonable to suspect that heat-ups during PERIOD1 would have more insurge/outsurge cycles than PERIOD2. WCNOC agrees with this assertion, and will commit to updating the baseline to account for this factor. The baseline will be increased based on the expected number of additional insurge/outsurge cycles that would be accumulated in a pre-MOP environment.
(2) In a follow-up discussion, the reviewers further noted that the cumulative usage factors back-projection did not consider the relative severity of charging and letdown transients.            - However, in the revised baseline, Wolf Creek will explicitly consider the differential                          contribution of fatigue for each category of charging event.
The January 25, 2008, letter did not close commitments made by WCGS in the October 3, 2007, letter as quoted above. Please provide additional calculations and discussions to address the committed actions regarding the additional insurge/outsurge cycles and the differential contribution of fatigue for each category of charging event.
Letter to Wolf Creek from T. Tran, dated February 28, 2008 DISTRIBUTION
:


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION HARD COPY: DLR R/F E-MAIL: PUBLIC SSmith (srs3)  
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION HARD COPY:
 
DLR R/F E-MAIL:
SDuraiswamy RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRlra  
PUBLIC SSmith (srs3)
 
SDuraiswamy RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRlra RidsNrrDlrRlrb RidsNrrDlrRlrc RidsNrrDlrReba RidsNrrDlrRebb RidsNrrDci RidsNrrDra RidsNrrDe RidsNrrDeEemb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDss RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrAdes
RidsNrrDlrRlrb  
-------------
 
JDonohew GPick, RIV SCochrum, RIV CLong, RIV SRay VGoel
RidsNrrDlrRlrc  
 
RidsNrrDlrReba RidsNrrDlrRebb RidsNrrDci RidsNrrDra RidsNrrDe  
 
RidsNrrDeEemb  
 
RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDss RidsOgcMailCenter  
 
RidsNrrAdes  
 
-------------  
 
JDonohew GPick, RIV SCochrum, RIV  
 
CLong, RIV  
 
SRay VGoel Wolf Creek Generating Station
 
cc:  Jay Silberg, Esq.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP
 
2300 N Street, NW Washington, DC  20037
 
Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX  76011-7005
 
Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission PO Box 311 Burlington, KS  66839
 
Chief Engineer, Utilities Division Kansas Corporation Commission 1500 SW Arrowhead Road
 
Topeka, KS  66604-4027
 
Office of the Governor State of Kansas Topeka, KS  66612
 
Attorney General
 
120 S.W. 10 th Avenue, 2nd Floor Topeka, KS  66612-1597
 
County Clerk Coffey County Courthouse
 
110 South 6 th Street Burlington, KS  66839 Thomas A. Conley, Section Chief Radiation and Asbestos Control Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation 1000 SW Jackson, Suite 310
 
Topeka, KS  66612-1366
 
Vice President Operations/Plant Manager
 
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation PO Box 411 Burlington, KS  66839
 
Supervisor Licensing
 
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation PO Box 411 Burlington, KS  66839
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspectors Office/Callaway Plant 8201 NRC Road Steedman, MO  65077-1032
 
Kevin J. Moles, Manager Regulatory Affairs
 
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation PO Box 411 Burlington, KS  66839 Lorrie I. Bell, Project Manager
 
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation PO Box 411 Burlington, KS  66839 Mr. Gordon A. Clefton Nuclear Energy Institute


1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006-3708}}
Wolf Creek Generating Station cc:
Jay Silberg, Esq.                        Supervisor Licensing Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP    Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation 2300 N Street, NW                        PO Box 411 Washington, DC 20037                    Burlington, KS 66839 Regional Administrator, Region IV        U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission      Resident Inspectors Office/Callaway Plant 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400          8201 NRC Road Arlington, TX 76011-7005                Steedman, MO 65077-1032 Senior Resident Inspector                Kevin J. Moles, Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission      Regulatory Affairs PO Box 311                              Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Burlington, KS 66839                    PO Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839 Chief Engineer, Utilities Division Kansas Corporation Commission            Lorrie I. Bell, Project Manager 1500 SW Arrowhead Road                  Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Topeka, KS 66604-4027                    PO Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839 Office of the Governor State of Kansas                          Mr. Gordon A. Clefton Topeka, KS 66612                        Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Attorney General                        Washington, DC 20006-3708 120 S.W. 10th Avenue, 2nd Floor Topeka, KS 66612-1597 County Clerk Coffey County Courthouse 110 South 6th Street Burlington, KS 66839 Thomas A. Conley, Section Chief Radiation and Asbestos Control Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation 1000 SW Jackson, Suite 310 Topeka, KS 66612-1366 Vice President Operations/Plant Manager Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation PO Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839}}

Latest revision as of 19:14, 14 November 2019

Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Wolf Creek Generating Station (Wcgs), License Renewal Application
ML080530067
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 02/28/2008
From: Tam Tran
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR
To: Garrett T
Wolf Creek
Tran T, NRR/RPB2, 415-3617
References
Download: ML080530067 (5)
v • d • e


Text

February 28, 2008 Mr. Terry Garrett Vice President, Engineering Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION

Dear Mr. Garrett:

By letter dated September 27, 2006, Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC) submitted an application pursuant to 10 CFR Part 54, to renew the operating license NPF-42 for Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1 for review by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff). The staff is reviewing the information contained in the license renewal application and has identified, in the enclosure, areas where additional information is needed to complete the review. Further requests for additional information may be issued in the future.

Items in the enclosure were discussed with Ms. Lorrie Bell; and a mutually agreeable date for the response is within 30 days from the date of this letter or no later than April 1, 2008. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3617 or by e-mail at TXT1@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Tam Tran, Project Manager Project Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-482

Enclosure:

As Stated cc w/encl: See next page

ML080530067 OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR BC:RPB1:DLR NAME YEdmonds T. Tran L. Lund DATE 02/27/08 02/27/08 02/28/08

WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Metal Fatigue Analyses Follow-up RAI for 4.3-1 The applicants responses provided in letters dated October 3, and 17, 2007, did not address the staffs concerns as stated in RAI 4.3-1. The October 3, 2007, letter stated that 1D transfer functions were developed for HL surge line nozzle and the charging nozzles in the vicinity of the nozzle to pipe welds. It went on to state that the development of the transfer functions takes full advantage of the local geometry and symmetry. However, the staff finds no axis of symmetry at the nozzle corners. Further, at the nozzle to pipe welds, the loading is not symmetric if thermal stratification is present. Therefore, the validity of transfer functions developed by using 1-D peak stress is not applicable at these locations. In order to enable the staff to make a determination on this issue, the applicant is requested to perform an environmentally-assisted fatigue analysis and provide results to the NRC Staff of a 3-D finite element analysis using an industry-accepted computer code, such as ANSYS. The analysis should cover nozzle corners with geometrical discontinuities and at locations where thermal stratification loading is significant. This analysis shall follow the rules of American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Subsection NB-3200, requiring the use of six stress components to define the stress state and determine the alternating stress intensities.

Follow-up RAI for 4.3-3 Wolf Creek Generating Stations (WCGS) commitment closure letter (ET 08-007), dated January 25, 2008, does not address the following commitments on Page 14 of the October 3, 2007, letter (ET 07-0046):

(1) Since WCGS implemented the modified operating procedure (MOP) prior to 1995, it is reasonable to suspect that heat-ups during PERIOD1 would have more insurge/outsurge cycles than PERIOD2. WCNOC agrees with this assertion, and will commit to updating the baseline to account for this factor. The baseline will be increased based on the expected number of additional insurge/outsurge cycles that would be accumulated in a pre-MOP environment.

(2) In a follow-up discussion, the reviewers further noted that the cumulative usage factors back-projection did not consider the relative severity of charging and letdown transients.

However, in the revised baseline, Wolf Creek will explicitly consider the differential contribution of fatigue for each category of charging event.

The January 25, 2008, letter did not close commitments made by WCGS in the October 3, 2007, letter as quoted above. Please provide additional calculations and discussions to address the committed actions regarding the additional insurge/outsurge cycles and the differential contribution of fatigue for each category of charging event.

Letter to Wolf Creek from T. Tran, dated February 28, 2008 DISTRIBUTION:

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION HARD COPY:

DLR R/F E-MAIL:

PUBLIC SSmith (srs3)

SDuraiswamy RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRlra RidsNrrDlrRlrb RidsNrrDlrRlrc RidsNrrDlrReba RidsNrrDlrRebb RidsNrrDci RidsNrrDra RidsNrrDe RidsNrrDeEemb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDss RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrAdes

JDonohew GPick, RIV SCochrum, RIV CLong, RIV SRay VGoel

Wolf Creek Generating Station cc:

Jay Silberg, Esq. Supervisor Licensing Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation 2300 N Street, NW PO Box 411 Washington, DC 20037 Burlington, KS 66839 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspectors Office/Callaway Plant 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 8201 NRC Road Arlington, TX 76011-7005 Steedman, MO 65077-1032 Senior Resident Inspector Kevin J. Moles, Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Affairs PO Box 311 Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Burlington, KS 66839 PO Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839 Chief Engineer, Utilities Division Kansas Corporation Commission Lorrie I. Bell, Project Manager 1500 SW Arrowhead Road Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Topeka, KS 66604-4027 PO Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839 Office of the Governor State of Kansas Mr. Gordon A. Clefton Topeka, KS 66612 Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Attorney General Washington, DC 20006-3708 120 S.W. 10th Avenue, 2nd Floor Topeka, KS 66612-1597 County Clerk Coffey County Courthouse 110 South 6th Street Burlington, KS 66839 Thomas A. Conley, Section Chief Radiation and Asbestos Control Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation 1000 SW Jackson, Suite 310 Topeka, KS 66612-1366 Vice President Operations/Plant Manager Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation PO Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML080530067&oldid=2160203"