IR 05000254/2011006: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:September 1, 2011
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES ber 1, 2011


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
MID-CYCLE LETTER FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; 05000254/2011-00 6; 05000265/2011-00 6
MID-CYCLE LETTER FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; 05000254/2011-006; 05000265/2011-006


Dear Mr. Pacilio
==Dear Mr. Pacilio:==
: On August 10, 2011, the NRC completed its mid-cycle performance review of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and The NRC reviewed the most recent quarterly performance indicators (PIs) in addition to inspection results and enforcement actions from July 1, 20 10 , through June 30, 20 1 This letter informs you of the NRC's assessment of your facility during this period and its plans for future inspections at your facilit This performance review and enclosed inspection plan do not include security informatio A separate letter will include the NRC's assessment of your performance in the Security Cornerstone and its securit y-related inspection pla The NRC determined the performance at Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2, during the most recent quarter was within the Licensee Response Column of the NRC
On August 10, 2011, the NRC completed its mid-cycle performance review of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The NRC reviewed the most recent quarterly performance indicators (PIs) in addition to inspection results and enforcement actions from July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011. This letter informs you of the NRCs assessment of your facility during this period and its plans for future inspections at your facility. This performance review and enclosed inspection plan do not include security information. A separate letter will include the NRCs assessment of your performance in the Security Cornerstone and its security-related inspection plan.
's Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) Action Matrix because all inspection findings had very low (i.e., Green) safety significance, and all PIs indicated that your performance was within the nominal, expected range (i.e., green). Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct ROP baseline inspections at your facility
. Some inspections planned include Temporary Instruction 2515/177, "Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems,"
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Inspection Procedure (IP)
60855.1, "Operation of an ISFSI at Operating Plants," IP 71003, "Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal," IP 71111.21, "Component Design Bases Inspection,"
IP 71111.05T, "Fire Protection (Triennial)," and IP 71152B, "Problem Identification and Resolution" (Biennial).


The enclosed inspection plan lists the inspections scheduled through December 31, 20 1 Routine inspections performed by resident inspectors are not included in the inspection pla The inspections listed during the last nine months of the inspection plan are tentative and may be revised at the en d-of-cycle performance revie The NRC provides the inspection plan to allow for the resolution of any scheduling conflicts and personnel availability issue The NRC will contact you as soon as possible to discuss changes to the inspection plan should circumstances warrant any change M. Pacilio-2- In the days following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident in Japan, the Commission directed the staff to establish a senior-level agency task force to conduct a methodical and systematic review of the NRC's processes and regulations to determine whether the agency should make additional improvements to its regulatory syste The NRC has since completed Temporary Instruction (TI) 183, "Follow-up to Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Station Fuel Damage Event," and TI-184, "Availability and Readiness Inspection of Severe Accident Management Guidelines (SAMGs)" at your facilit Results of these inspections can be found here:
The NRC determined the performance at Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2, during the most recent quarter was within the Licensee Response Column of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) Action Matrix because all inspection findings had very low (i.e., Green) safety significance, and all PIs indicated that your performance was within the nominal, expected range (i.e., green). Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct ROP baseline inspections at your facility. Some inspections planned include Temporary Instruction 2515/177, Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Inspection Procedure (IP) 60855.1, Operation of an ISFSI at Operating Plants, IP 71003, Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal, IP 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection, IP 71111.05T, Fire Protection (Triennial), and IP 71152B, Problem Identification and Resolution (Biennial).
http://www.nrc.gov/japan/japan-activities.htm Additionally, on May 11, 2011, the agency issued NRC Bulletin 2011-01, "Mitigating Strategies," to confirm compliance with Order EA-02-026, subsequently imposed license conditions, and 10 CFR 50.54(hh)(2), and to determine the status of licensee mitigating strategies program On July 12, 2011, the NRC's Task Force made its recommendations to the Commission in its report, "Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21 st Century: The Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident."


The NRC is currently reviewing the Task Force's recommendations to determine wh at additional actions may be warrante In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC
The enclosed inspection plan lists the inspections scheduled through December 31, 2012.
=s ARules of Practice,@ a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).


Please contact me at (630) 829-9703 with any questions you have regarding this lette
Routine inspections performed by resident inspectors are not included in the inspection plan.
 
The inspections listed during the last nine months of the inspection plan are tentative and may be revised at the end-of-cycle performance review. The NRC provides the inspection plan to allow for the resolution of any scheduling conflicts and personnel availability issues. The NRC will contact you as soon as possible to discuss changes to the inspection plan should circumstances warrant any changes. In the days following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident in Japan, the Commission directed the staff to establish a senior-level agency task force to conduct a methodical and systematic review of the NRCs processes and regulations to determine whether the agency should make additional improvements to its regulatory system. The NRC has since completed Temporary Instruction (TI) 183, Follow-up to Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Station Fuel Damage Event, and TI-184, Availability and Readiness Inspection of Severe Accident Management Guidelines (SAMGs) at your facility. Results of these inspections can be found here:
http://www.nrc.gov/japan/japan-activities.html. Additionally, on May 11, 2011, the agency issued NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies, to confirm compliance with Order EA-02-026, subsequently imposed license conditions, and 10 CFR 50.54(hh)(2), and to determine the status of licensee mitigating strategies programs. On July 12, 2011, the NRCs Task Force made its recommendations to the Commission in its report, Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: The Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident. The NRC is currently reviewing the Task Forces recommendations to determine what additional actions may be warranted.
 
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC=s ARules of Practice,@ a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS).
 
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
 
Please contact me at (630) 829-9703 with any questions you have regarding this letter.


Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA/ Mark Ring, Chief Branch 1 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-254; 50-265; 72-053 License Nos. DPR-29; DPR-30 Enclosure: Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Inspection/Activity Plan cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServe
/RA/
Mark Ring, Chief Branch 1 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-254; 50-265; 72-053 License Nos. DPR-29; DPR-30 Enclosure: Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Inspection/Activity Plan cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServe
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 15:18, 12 November 2019

Mid-Cycle Letter for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2; 05000254/2011-006; 05000265/2011-006
ML11244A011
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/01/2011
From: Ring M
NRC/RGN-III/DRP/B1
To: Pacilio M
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
References
IR-11-006
Download: ML11244A011 (6)
v • d • e


Text

UNITED STATES ber 1, 2011

SUBJECT:

MID-CYCLE LETTER FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; 05000254/2011-006; 05000265/2011-006

Dear Mr. Pacilio:

On August 10, 2011, the NRC completed its mid-cycle performance review of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The NRC reviewed the most recent quarterly performance indicators (PIs) in addition to inspection results and enforcement actions from July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011. This letter informs you of the NRCs assessment of your facility during this period and its plans for future inspections at your facility. This performance review and enclosed inspection plan do not include security information. A separate letter will include the NRCs assessment of your performance in the Security Cornerstone and its security-related inspection plan.

The NRC determined the performance at Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2, during the most recent quarter was within the Licensee Response Column of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) Action Matrix because all inspection findings had very low (i.e., Green) safety significance, and all PIs indicated that your performance was within the nominal, expected range (i.e., green). Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct ROP baseline inspections at your facility. Some inspections planned include Temporary Instruction 2515/177, Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Inspection Procedure (IP) 60855.1, Operation of an ISFSI at Operating Plants, IP 71003, Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal, IP 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection, IP 71111.05T, Fire Protection (Triennial), and IP 71152B, Problem Identification and Resolution (Biennial).

The enclosed inspection plan lists the inspections scheduled through December 31, 2012.

Routine inspections performed by resident inspectors are not included in the inspection plan.

The inspections listed during the last nine months of the inspection plan are tentative and may be revised at the end-of-cycle performance review. The NRC provides the inspection plan to allow for the resolution of any scheduling conflicts and personnel availability issues. The NRC will contact you as soon as possible to discuss changes to the inspection plan should circumstances warrant any changes. In the days following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident in Japan, the Commission directed the staff to establish a senior-level agency task force to conduct a methodical and systematic review of the NRCs processes and regulations to determine whether the agency should make additional improvements to its regulatory system. The NRC has since completed Temporary Instruction (TI) 183, Follow-up to Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Station Fuel Damage Event, and TI-184, Availability and Readiness Inspection of Severe Accident Management Guidelines (SAMGs) at your facility. Results of these inspections can be found here:

http://www.nrc.gov/japan/japan-activities.html. Additionally, on May 11, 2011, the agency issued NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies, to confirm compliance with Order EA-02-026, subsequently imposed license conditions, and 10 CFR 50.54(hh)(2), and to determine the status of licensee mitigating strategies programs. On July 12, 2011, the NRCs Task Force made its recommendations to the Commission in its report, Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: The Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident. The NRC is currently reviewing the Task Forces recommendations to determine what additional actions may be warranted.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC=s ARules of Practice,@ a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Please contact me at (630) 829-9703 with any questions you have regarding this letter.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Mark Ring, Chief Branch 1 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-254; 50-265;72-053 License Nos. DPR-29; DPR-30 Enclosure: Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Inspection/Activity Plan cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServe

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000254/2011006&oldid=2113176"