ML20266G354

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notification of NRC Request for Information for Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal-Phase IV; Inspection Report 05000254/2020012; 05000265/2020012
ML20266G354
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/22/2020
From: Matthew Domke
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB1
To: Bryan Hanson
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
References
IR 2020012
Download: ML20266G354 (6)


See also: IR 05000254/2020012

Text

September 22, 2020

Mr. Bryan C. Hanson

Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC

President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear

4300 Winfield Road

Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT: QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATIONNOTIFICATION OF

NRC REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR POST-APPROVAL SITE

INSPECTION FOR LICENSE RENEWALPHASE IV; INSPECTION

REPORT 05000254/2020012; 05000265/2020012

Dear Mr. Hanson:

On November 16, 2020, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin an

inspection in accordance with Inspection Procedure 71003 Section 02.02.d. (Phase IV). This

onsite inspection is scheduled to be performed November 16, 2020, through November 20,

2020.

The purpose of the inspection is to review the implementation of The Aging Management

Program (AMP) elements during the Period of Extended Operation (PEO). The inspection team

will select for review a sample of the sites AMPs.

This Request for Information is separated into three Sections (A, B and C). Section A

information will be used to facilitate the AMP sample selections. The team leader will make

AMP selections and inform the licensee. Based on these selections, the licensee will provide

the additional information requested under Section B. This information will be used as part of

the inspection preparation and implementation. Requests under Section C should be available

to the inspectors during the on-site week of inspection. See the table below for specific dates:

Requested Action: Date:

Section A Information October 20, 2020

Section B Information November 2, 2020

Section C Information November 16, 2020

Experience has shown that this inspection is resource intensive both for the NRC inspector and

your staff. In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources, and to ensure a productive

inspection for both sides, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this inspection.

It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date, and complete, in order to minimize the

number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portion of

the inspection.

B. Hanson -2-

We understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Mr. R. Swart of your

organization. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please

contact the lead inspector Matthew Domke at 630-829-9562.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control

Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control

Number.

This letter and its enclosure will be made available for public inspection and copying at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in

accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 2.390, Public Inspections,

Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Matthew Domke, Reactor Inspector

Engineering Branch 1

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-254, 50-265

License Nos. DPR-29, DPR-30

Enclosure:

Document Request for License Renewal

Phase IV Inspection

cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

B. Hanson -3-

Letter to Bryan C. Hanson from Matthew Domke dated September 22, 2020.

SUBJECT: QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATIONNOTIFICATION OF

NRC REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR POST-APPROVAL SITE

INSPECTION FOR LICENSE RENEWALPHASE IV; INSPECTION

REPORT 05000254/2020012; 05000265/2020012

DISTRIBUTION:

Jessie Quichocho

Elise Burket

RidsNrrDorlLpl3

RidsNrrPMQuadCities Resource

RidsNrrDroIrib Resource

John Giessner

Kenneth OBrien

Jamnes Cameron

Allan Barker

DRPIII

DRSIII

ADAMS Accession Number: ML20266G354

Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive

OFFICE RIII

NAME MDomke:mb

via e-mail

DATE 09/22/2020

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Inspection Report: 05000254/2020012; 05000265/2020012

Inspection Dates: November 16, 2020 (Onsite)

Inspection Procedure: 71003, Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal

(Phase IV)

Lead Inspector: Matthew Domke, Reactor Inspector

Please provide the following information in electronic format to lead inspector by requested

dates.

A. Information Requested to Facilitate Aging Management Program (AMP) Sample

Selection

(1) Provide a list of all site AMPs.

(2) Provide copies of corporate and/or site-specific program document/procedure related to

overall aging management program.

(3) Provide list of AMPs that were new or enhanced in the License Renewal Application

(LRA).

(4) Provide list of AMPs that had commitment changes since entering the PEO.

(5) Provide list of AMPs that have incorporated newly identified SSCs since entering the PEO.

List or describe which SSCs were incorporated.

(6) Provide list of AMPs that have incorporated components from One-Time Inspection

activities since entering the PEO.

(7) Provide any self-assessments and/or audits related to license renewal program

implementation and/or AMP effectiveness.

(8) Provide a list of corrective action documents that were initiated as result of license renewal

activities, self-assessments, and/or audits (since entering the PEO).

(9) Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications,

Technical Specifications Bases, Technical Requirements Manual, and Individual Plant

Examination of External Events (IPEEE).

(10) Site-specific responses and/or evaluations for NRC generic communications associated

with license renewal that were issued after entering the PEO.

Enclosure

(11) Risk-ranking of top 250 basic events from your internal and external events site specific

probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) sorted by Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth,

Risk-Achievement Worth, and Fussell-Vesely (Provide in Excel format). Please include

basic event names/description.

(12) Provide a list of the top 10 risk important systems for the internal events model and

external events model.

B. Information Requested for each AMP Selected for Review (As Applicable)

(1) Program basis documents and administrative procedures describing key program

attributes such as program objectives, scope, detection and monitoring methods,

administrative controls, acceptance criteria, corrective actions, and scope expansion

requirements.

(2) Provide a summary document listing which implementing procedures are included in the

selected AMP and what are their required performance frequency.

(3) Copies of implementing procedures for program activities (e.g. visual examination

procedures, ultrasonic examination procedures, maintenance procedures, system

walkdowns, etc.)

(4) Completed Work Orders (WOs) for the most recent aging management activities

performed, including associated inspection and testing reports, as applicable. This

request is limited to the last two completed activities (per procedure). If this request

becomes too onerous based on the number of WO reach out to the lead inspector for

additional scope clarification.

(5) Copies of aging related corrective actions documents associated with the selected AMP,

and SSCs under its purview (for the last three years). A search of corrective actions

documents should include keywords such as: aging, age management, degradation,

wear, delamination, peeling, crazing, chipping, leak, crack, corrosion, rust,

leaching, embrittlement, fatigue, blister, spalling, oxidation, loss of function,

failed acceptance criteria, flow-accelerated, or other site specific terms/codes used in

aging monitoring as appropriate.

(6) Updated license renewal scoping drawings showing the SSCs within the scope of the

AMP.

(7) Any gap analyses performed to assess the differences between the current AMP and the

recommendations in the latest revision of NUREG-1801, Generic Aging Lessons Learned

(GALL), and subsequent Interim Staff Guidance.

(8) Copy of evaluations performed for applicable external and internal operating experience

(OE) issues associated with license renewal. This request is limited to OE items issued

after entering the PEO.

(9) Description of instances where examination scope expansion was required based on the

examination of an SSC in accordance with the AMP. Please describe the logic to select

the scope expansion, and any resulting changes to the AMP. (This request is limited to

work performed in the PEO.)

2

(10) Description of instances where AMP examinations/inspections were eliminated or

deferred. (This request is limited to work performed in the PEO.)

(11) Description of instances where examination/inspection scope changes were required

based on limitations encountered during the examination. (This request is limited to work

performed in the PEO.)

C. Information Requested to be available during the onsite week of inspection

(1) Provide a brief presentation (informal) to the inspection team regarding aging

management at the site. Topics to be covered:

a. How are aging related issue identified, documented and evaluated within the

corrective action program and/or other aging tracking software/program.

b. Describe which individuals and/or organizations are responsible for identifying

and evaluating aging related issues.

c. Describe the responsibilities regarding age management, if any, of the following:

i. System/Strategic Engineers

ii. AMP Owners

iii. Corporate office

This information presented Monday or Tuesday of the inspection week is preferred.

(2) Copy of simplified system drawings (a.k.a. Horse Notes or Training Notes).

(3) A computer with network access to the sites corrective action program.

3