ML20266G354
| ML20266G354 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities |
| Issue date: | 09/22/2020 |
| From: | Matthew Domke NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB1 |
| To: | Bryan Hanson Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
| References | |
| IR 2020012 | |
| Download: ML20266G354 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000254/2020012
Text
September 22, 2020
Mr. Bryan C. Hanson
Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC
President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear
4300 Winfield Road
Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT: QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATIONNOTIFICATION OF
NRC REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR POST-APPROVAL SITE
INSPECTION FOR LICENSE RENEWALPHASE IV; INSPECTION
REPORT 05000254/2020012; 05000265/2020012
Dear Mr. Hanson:
On November 16, 2020, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin an
inspection in accordance with Inspection Procedure 71003 Section 02.02.d. (Phase IV). This
onsite inspection is scheduled to be performed November 16, 2020, through November 20,
2020.
The purpose of the inspection is to review the implementation of The Aging Management
Program (AMP) elements during the Period of Extended Operation (PEO). The inspection team
will select for review a sample of the sites AMPs.
This Request for Information is separated into three Sections (A, B and C). Section A
information will be used to facilitate the AMP sample selections. The team leader will make
AMP selections and inform the licensee. Based on these selections, the licensee will provide
the additional information requested under Section B. This information will be used as part of
the inspection preparation and implementation. Requests under Section C should be available
to the inspectors during the on-site week of inspection. See the table below for specific dates:
Requested Action:
Date:
Section A Information
October 20, 2020
Section B Information
November 2, 2020
Section C Information
November 16, 2020
Experience has shown that this inspection is resource intensive both for the NRC inspector and
your staff. In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources, and to ensure a productive
inspection for both sides, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this inspection.
It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date, and complete, in order to minimize the
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portion of
the inspection.
B. Hanson
-2-
We understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Mr. R. Swart of your
organization. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please
contact the lead inspector Matthew Domke at 630-829-9562.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control
Number.
This letter and its enclosure will be made available for public inspection and copying at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in
accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 2.390, Public Inspections,
Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Matthew Domke, Reactor Inspector
Engineering Branch 1
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-254, 50-265
Enclosure:
Document Request for License Renewal
Phase IV Inspection
cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
B. Hanson
-3-
Letter to Bryan C. Hanson from Matthew Domke dated September 22, 2020.
SUBJECT: QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATIONNOTIFICATION OF
NRC REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR POST-APPROVAL SITE
INSPECTION FOR LICENSE RENEWALPHASE IV; INSPECTION
REPORT 05000254/2020012; 05000265/2020012
DISTRIBUTION:
RidsNrrDorlLpl3
RidsNrrPMQuadCities Resource
RidsNrrDroIrib Resource
Kenneth OBrien
DRPIII
DRSIII
ADAMS Accession Number: ML20266G354
Publicly Available
Non-Publicly Available
Sensitive
Non-Sensitive
OFFICE
RIII
NAME
MDomke:mb
via e-mail
DATE
09/22/2020
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Enclosure
Inspection Report: 05000254/2020012; 05000265/2020012
Inspection Dates:
November 16, 2020 (Onsite)
Inspection Procedure:
71003, Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal
(Phase IV)
Lead Inspector:
Matthew Domke, Reactor Inspector
Please provide the following information in electronic format to lead inspector by requested
dates.
A.
Information Requested to Facilitate Aging Management Program (AMP) Sample
Selection
(1)
Provide a list of all site AMPs.
(2)
Provide copies of corporate and/or site-specific program document/procedure related to
overall aging management program.
(3)
Provide list of AMPs that were new or enhanced in the License Renewal Application
(LRA).
(4)
Provide list of AMPs that had commitment changes since entering the PEO.
(5)
Provide list of AMPs that have incorporated newly identified SSCs since entering the PEO.
List or describe which SSCs were incorporated.
(6)
Provide list of AMPs that have incorporated components from One-Time Inspection
activities since entering the PEO.
(7)
Provide any self-assessments and/or audits related to license renewal program
implementation and/or AMP effectiveness.
(8)
Provide a list of corrective action documents that were initiated as result of license renewal
activities, self-assessments, and/or audits (since entering the PEO).
(9)
Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications,
Technical Specifications Bases, Technical Requirements Manual, and Individual Plant
Examination of External Events (IPEEE).
(10) Site-specific responses and/or evaluations for NRC generic communications associated
with license renewal that were issued after entering the PEO.
2
(11) Risk-ranking of top 250 basic events from your internal and external events site specific
probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) sorted by Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth,
Risk-Achievement Worth, and Fussell-Vesely (Provide in Excel format). Please include
basic event names/description.
(12) Provide a list of the top 10 risk important systems for the internal events model and
external events model.
B.
Information Requested for each AMP Selected for Review (As Applicable)
(1)
Program basis documents and administrative procedures describing key program
attributes such as program objectives, scope, detection and monitoring methods,
administrative controls, acceptance criteria, corrective actions, and scope expansion
requirements.
(2)
Provide a summary document listing which implementing procedures are included in the
selected AMP and what are their required performance frequency.
(3)
Copies of implementing procedures for program activities (e.g. visual examination
procedures, ultrasonic examination procedures, maintenance procedures, system
walkdowns, etc.)
(4)
Completed Work Orders (WOs) for the most recent aging management activities
performed, including associated inspection and testing reports, as applicable. This
request is limited to the last two completed activities (per procedure). If this request
becomes too onerous based on the number of WO reach out to the lead inspector for
additional scope clarification.
(5)
Copies of aging related corrective actions documents associated with the selected AMP,
and SSCs under its purview (for the last three years). A search of corrective actions
documents should include keywords such as: aging, age management, degradation,
wear, delamination, peeling, crazing, chipping, leak, crack, corrosion, rust,
leaching, embrittlement, fatigue, blister, spalling, oxidation, loss of function,
failed acceptance criteria, flow-accelerated, or other site specific terms/codes used in
aging monitoring as appropriate.
(6)
Updated license renewal scoping drawings showing the SSCs within the scope of the
AMP.
(7)
Any gap analyses performed to assess the differences between the current AMP and the
recommendations in the latest revision of NUREG-1801, Generic Aging Lessons Learned
(GALL), and subsequent Interim Staff Guidance.
(8)
Copy of evaluations performed for applicable external and internal operating experience
(OE) issues associated with license renewal. This request is limited to OE items issued
after entering the PEO.
(9)
Description of instances where examination scope expansion was required based on the
examination of an SSC in accordance with the AMP. Please describe the logic to select
the scope expansion, and any resulting changes to the AMP. (This request is limited to
work performed in the PEO.)
3
(10) Description of instances where AMP examinations/inspections were eliminated or
deferred. (This request is limited to work performed in the PEO.)
(11) Description of instances where examination/inspection scope changes were required
based on limitations encountered during the examination. (This request is limited to work
performed in the PEO.)
C.
Information Requested to be available during the onsite week of inspection
(1)
Provide a brief presentation (informal) to the inspection team regarding aging
management at the site. Topics to be covered:
a. How are aging related issue identified, documented and evaluated within the
corrective action program and/or other aging tracking software/program.
b. Describe which individuals and/or organizations are responsible for identifying
and evaluating aging related issues.
c. Describe the responsibilities regarding age management, if any, of the following:
i. System/Strategic Engineers
ii. AMP Owners
iii. Corporate office
This information presented Monday or Tuesday of the inspection week is preferred.
(2)
Copy of simplified system drawings (a.k.a. Horse Notes or Training Notes).
(3)
A computer with network access to the sites corrective action program.