IR 05000395/2017502: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES ovember 29, 2017 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
==Dear Mr. Lippard:== | ==Dear Mr. Lippard:== | ||
On November 3, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station. The enclosed inspection report (IR) documents the inspection results that were discussed on November 3, 2017, with you and members of your staff. | On November 3, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station. The enclosed inspection report (IR) | ||
documents the inspection results that were discussed on November 3, 2017, with you and members of your staff. | |||
The NRC inspectors did not identify any findings or violations of more than minor significance. | The NRC inspectors did not identify any findings or violations of more than minor significance. | ||
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection | This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding. | ||
and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, | |||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ Eugene F. Guthrie, Chief Operator Licensing Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-395 License Nos. NPF-12 | /RA/ | ||
Eugene F. Guthrie, Chief Operator Licensing Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-395 License Nos. NPF-12 | |||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
NRC IR 05000395/2017502 w/Attachment: Supplementary Information | NRC IR 05000395/2017502 w/Attachment: Supplementary Information | ||
REGION II== | REGION II== | ||
Docket Nos: 05000395 | Docket Nos: 05000395 License No: NPF-12 Report No: 05000395/2017502 Licensee: South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCE&G) Company Facility: Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Location: Jenkinsville, SC Dates: October 30 through November 3, 2017 Inspectors: Steven P. Sanchez, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector Christopher A. Fontana, Emergency Preparedness Inspector John D. Hickman, Emergency Preparedness Inspector Carey Read, Resident Inspector (Surry) | ||
Approved by: Eugene Guthrie, Chief Operator Licensing Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure | |||
License No: NPF-12 | |||
Report No: 05000395/2017502 | |||
Licensee: South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCE&G) Company | |||
Facility: Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station | |||
Location: Jenkinsville, SC | |||
Dates: October 30 through November 3, 2017 | |||
Inspectors: Steven P. Sanchez, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector Christopher A. Fontana, Emergency Preparedness Inspector John D. Hickman, Emergency Preparedness Inspector Carey Read, Resident Inspector (Surry) | |||
Approved by: Eugene Guthrie, Chief Operator Licensing Branch 2 | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
=SUMMARY= | =SUMMARY= | ||
Inspection Report (IR) 05000395/2017502; 10/30/2017 - 11/03/2017; Virgil C. Summer Nuclear | Inspection Report (IR) 05000395/2017502; 10/30/2017 - 11/03/2017; Virgil C. Summer Nuclear | ||
This report covers an inspection by three emergency preparedness and one resident inspector. | Station; Exercise and Baseline Inspection This report covers an inspection by three emergency preparedness and one resident inspector. | ||
No findings of significance were identified. The | No findings of significance were identified. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 6. | ||
=REPORT DETAILS= | =REPORT DETAILS= | ||
===1. === | |||
==REACTOR SAFETY== | ==REACTOR SAFETY== | ||
===Cornerstone: | ===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | ||
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation | 1EP1 Exercise Evaluation | ||
| Line 76: | Line 60: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment: | The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment: | ||
* The adequacy of the | * The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on October 31, 2017, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk Significant Planning Standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4), (5), (9), and (10); which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively. | ||
* The overall adequacy of the | * The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities, and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Technical Support Center, Operations Support Center, and the Emergency Operations Facility. | ||
* Other performance areas, such as the emergency response | * Other performance areas, such as the emergency response organizations (ERO)recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, intra- and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures. | ||
* Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). | * Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). | ||
* The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on November 2, 2017, to evaluate the | * The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on November 2, 2017, to evaluate the licensees self-assessment of its ERO performance during the exercise, and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g. | ||
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment. The inspectors also attended the FEMA-sponsored public meeting on November 2, 2017. | The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment. The inspectors also attended the FEMA-sponsored public meeting on November 2, 2017. | ||
This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01, | This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01, Exercise Evaluation. This inspection activity satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis as defined in IP 71151, Performance Indicator Verification. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 92: | Line 76: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, one revision to the emergency plan, one revision to the emergency action levels, and several revisions to emergency plan implementing procedures had been made. The licensee determined that, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), the emergency plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The inspectors reviewed the revisions, and sampled implementing procedure changes to evaluate potential reductions in the effectiveness of the plan. As this review was not documented in a Safety Evaluation Report, and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes, these changes remain subject to | Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, one revision to the emergency plan, one revision to the emergency action levels, and several revisions to emergency plan implementing procedures had been made. The licensee determined that, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), the emergency plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The inspectors reviewed the revisions, and sampled implementing procedure changes to evaluate potential reductions in the effectiveness of the plan. As this review was not documented in a Safety Evaluation Report, and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes, these changes remain subject to future NRC inspection in their entirety. | ||
The inspection was conducted in | The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure (IP)71114, Attachment 04, Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes. The applicable planning standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and its related requirements in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, were used as reference criteria. The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the emergency action level and emergency plan changes on an annual basis. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 102: | Line 86: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, | Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis. | ||
Evaluation - Scenario Review, | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
===4. === | |||
==OTHER ACTIVITIES== | ==OTHER ACTIVITIES== | ||
{{a|4OA1}} | {{a|4OA1}} | ||
| Line 114: | Line 97: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PIs) listed below for the period July 1, 2016, through September 30, 2017. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, | The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PIs)listed below for the period July 1, 2016, through September 30, 2017. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element. | ||
Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone | Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone | ||
* Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP) | * Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP) | ||
* Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Readiness | * Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Readiness | ||
* Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PIs for ERO and DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the | * Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PIs for ERO and DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests. The inspectors also interviewed the licensee personnel who were responsible for collecting and evaluating the PI data. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area, are listed in the | ||
. This inspection satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01, | . This inspection satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01, Exercise Evaluation & This inspection activity satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis as defined in IP 71151, Performance Indicator Verification. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 128: | Line 111: | ||
==4OA6 Meetings== | ==4OA6 Meetings== | ||
On November 3, 2017, the inspection team presented the inspection results to Mr. G. Lippard and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that no | On November 3, 2017, the inspection team presented the inspection results to Mr. G. Lippard and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that no proprietary information was provided. | ||
proprietary information was provided. | |||
ATTACHMENT: | ATTACHMENT: Supplementary Information | ||
=SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION= | =SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION= | ||
| Line 139: | Line 120: | ||
===Licensee personnel=== | ===Licensee personnel=== | ||
: [[contact::M. Cekovsky]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist | : [[contact::M. Cekovsky]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist | ||
: [[contact::B. Dalick]], Supervisor, Licensing | : [[contact::B. Dalick]], Supervisor, Licensing | ||
: [[contact::R. Haselden]], General Manager, Organizational / Development Effectiveness | : [[contact::R. Haselden]], General Manager, Organizational / Development Effectiveness | ||
: [[contact::R. Justice]], General Manager, Nuclear Plant Operations | : [[contact::R. Justice]], General Manager, Nuclear Plant Operations | ||
: [[contact::H. Kirkland]], Licensing Engineer | : [[contact::H. Kirkland]], Licensing Engineer | ||
: [[contact::G. Lindamood]], Santee Cooper | : [[contact::G. Lindamood]], Santee Cooper | ||
: [[contact::G. Lippard]], Vice President, Nuclear Operations | : [[contact::G. Lippard]], Vice President, Nuclear Operations | ||
: [[contact::M. Moore]], Supervisor, Nuclear Licensing | : [[contact::M. Moore]], Supervisor, Nuclear Licensing | ||
: [[contact::W. Stuart]], General Manager, Engineering Services | : [[contact::W. Stuart]], General Manager, Engineering Services | ||
: [[contact::T. Tharp]], Supervisor, Emergency Preparedness | : [[contact::T. Tharp]], Supervisor, Emergency Preparedness | ||
: [[contact::B. Thompson]], Manager, Nuclear Licensing | : [[contact::B. Thompson]], Manager, Nuclear Licensing | ||
: [[contact::R. Williamson]], Manager, Emergency Preparedness | : [[contact::R. Williamson]], Manager, Emergency Preparedness | ||
: [[contact::S. Zarandi]], General Manager, Nuclear Support Services | : [[contact::S. Zarandi]], General Manager, Nuclear Support Services | ||
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED== | ==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED== | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 13:14, 22 October 2019
| ML17333A558 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 11/29/2017 |
| From: | Eugene Guthrie Division of Reactor Safety II |
| To: | Lippard G South Carolina Electric & Gas Co |
| References | |
| IR 2017502 | |
| Download: ML17333A558 (11) | |
Text
UNITED STATES ovember 29, 2017
SUBJECT:
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT 05000395/2017502
Dear Mr. Lippard:
On November 3, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station. The enclosed inspection report (IR)
documents the inspection results that were discussed on November 3, 2017, with you and members of your staff.
The NRC inspectors did not identify any findings or violations of more than minor significance.
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Eugene F. Guthrie, Chief Operator Licensing Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-395 License Nos. NPF-12
Enclosure:
NRC IR 05000395/2017502 w/Attachment: Supplementary Information
REGION II==
Docket Nos: 05000395 License No: NPF-12 Report No: 05000395/2017502 Licensee: South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCE&G) Company Facility: Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Location: Jenkinsville, SC Dates: October 30 through November 3, 2017 Inspectors: Steven P. Sanchez, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector Christopher A. Fontana, Emergency Preparedness Inspector John D. Hickman, Emergency Preparedness Inspector Carey Read, Resident Inspector (Surry)
Approved by: Eugene Guthrie, Chief Operator Licensing Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure
SUMMARY
Inspection Report (IR) 05000395/2017502; 10/30/2017 - 11/03/2017; Virgil C. Summer Nuclear
Station; Exercise and Baseline Inspection This report covers an inspection by three emergency preparedness and one resident inspector.
No findings of significance were identified. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 6.
REPORT DETAILS
1.
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation
a. Inspection Scope
The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment:
- The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on October 31, 2017, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk Significant Planning Standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4), (5), (9), and (10); which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively.
- The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities, and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Technical Support Center, Operations Support Center, and the Emergency Operations Facility.
- Other performance areas, such as the emergency response organizations (ERO)recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, intra- and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.
- Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
- The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on November 2, 2017, to evaluate the licensees self-assessment of its ERO performance during the exercise, and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g.
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment. The inspectors also attended the FEMA-sponsored public meeting on November 2, 2017.
This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01, Exercise Evaluation. This inspection activity satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis as defined in IP 71151, Performance Indicator Verification.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes
a. Inspection Scope
Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, one revision to the emergency plan, one revision to the emergency action levels, and several revisions to emergency plan implementing procedures had been made. The licensee determined that, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), the emergency plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The inspectors reviewed the revisions, and sampled implementing procedure changes to evaluate potential reductions in the effectiveness of the plan. As this review was not documented in a Safety Evaluation Report, and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes, these changes remain subject to future NRC inspection in their entirety.
The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure (IP)71114, Attachment 04, Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes. The applicable planning standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and its related requirements in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, were used as reference criteria. The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the emergency action level and emergency plan changes on an annual basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review
a. Inspection Scope
Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PIs)listed below for the period July 1, 2016, through September 30, 2017. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element.
Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone
- Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)
- Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Readiness
- Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PIs for ERO and DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests. The inspectors also interviewed the licensee personnel who were responsible for collecting and evaluating the PI data. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area, are listed in the
. This inspection satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01, Exercise Evaluation & This inspection activity satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis as defined in IP 71151, Performance Indicator Verification.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Meetings
On November 3, 2017, the inspection team presented the inspection results to Mr. G. Lippard and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that no proprietary information was provided.
ATTACHMENT: Supplementary Information
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee personnel
- M. Cekovsky, Emergency Preparedness Specialist
- B. Dalick, Supervisor, Licensing
- R. Haselden, General Manager, Organizational / Development Effectiveness
- R. Justice, General Manager, Nuclear Plant Operations
- H. Kirkland, Licensing Engineer
- G. Lindamood, Santee Cooper
- G. Lippard, Vice President, Nuclear Operations
- M. Moore, Supervisor, Nuclear Licensing
- W. Stuart, General Manager, Engineering Services
- T. Tharp, Supervisor, Emergency Preparedness
- B. Thompson, Manager, Nuclear Licensing
- R. Williamson, Manager, Emergency Preparedness
- S. Zarandi, General Manager, Nuclear Support Services