ML060120145

License Amendment 272 and 154 Applicability of Westinghouse Topical Report WCAP-12945-O-A, Volume 1 (Revision 2) 1996 and Volume 2-5 (Revision 1), 'Code Qualification Document for Best Estimate LOCA (Beloca)..

ML060120145
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	02/06/2006
From:	Colburn T Plant Licensing Branch III-2
To:	Lash J FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Colburn T, NRR/DLPM, 415-1402
References
TAC MC4647, TAC MC4648, WCAP-12945-0-A
Download: ML060120145 (15)

Text

February 6, 2006Mr. James H. LashVice President FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Beaver Valley Power Station

P. O. Box 4 Shippingport, PA 15077

SUBJECT:

BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 (BVPS-1 AND 2) -ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE: APPLICABILITY OF WESTINGHOUSE TOPICAL REPORT WCAP-12945-O-A, "VOLUME 1 (REVISION 2) 1996 AND VOLUME 2-5 (REVISION 1), 'CODE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT FOR BEST ESTIMATE LOCA [BELOCA] ANALYSIS' MARCH 1998" (TAC NOS. MC4647AND MC4648)

Dear Mr. Lash:

The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 272 to Facility Operating LicenseNo. DPR-66 and Amendment No. 154 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-73 for BVPS-1and 2. These amendments consist of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated October 4, 2004, as supplemented July 8, and November 14, 2005.These amendments approve application of the Westinghouse best-estimate loss-of-coolantaccident (BELOCA) analysis methodology to BVPS-1 and 2 large-break LOCA analyses.A copy of our safety evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in theCommission's biweekly Federal Register notice.Sincerely,/RA/Timothy G. Colburn, Senior Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos. 50-334 and 50-412

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 272 to DPR-66 2. Amendment No. 154 to NPF-73 3. Safety Evaluationcc w/encls: See next page February 6, 2006Mr. James H. Lash Vice President FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Beaver Valley Power Station

P. O. Box 4 Shippingport, PA 15077

SUBJECT:

BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 (BVPS-1 AND 2) -ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE: APPLICABILITY OF WESTINGHOUSE TOPICAL REPORT WCAP-12945-O-A, "VOLUME 1 (REVISION 2) 1996 AND VOLUME 2-5 (REVISION 1), 'CODE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT FOR BEST ESTIMATE LOCA [BELOCA] ANALYSIS' MARCH 1998" (TAC NOS. MC4647AND MC4648)

Dear Mr. Lash:

The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 272 to Facility Operating LicenseNo. DPR-66 and Amendment No. 154 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-73 for BVPS-1and 2. These amendments consist of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated October 4, 2004, as supplemented July 8, and November 14, 2005.These amendments approve application of the Westinghouse best-estimate loss-of-coolantaccident (BELOCA) analysis methodology to BVPS-1 and 2 large-break LOCA analyses.A copy of our safety evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in theCommission's biweekly Federal Register notice.Sincerely,/RA/Timothy G. Colburn, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos. 50-334 and 50-412

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 272 to DPR-66 2. Amendment No. 154 to NPF-73

3. Safety Evaluationcc w/encls: See next page DISTRIBUTION

PUBLICLPLI-1 R/FRLauferTColburnSLittle OGCACRSGHill(4)TBoyceFOrr RBellamy, RIDORL DPRJNakoskiACCESSION NO. ML060120145*SE input provided. No substantive changes made.OFFICELPLI-1/PMLPLI-1/LASPWB/BCLPLI-1/BCOGCNAMETColburnSLittleJNakoski*RLauferJLongo DATE1/20/061/20/0612/19/20051/30/061/30/06OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 cc:

Gary R. LeidichPresident and Chief Nuclear Officer FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Mail Stop A-GO-19 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308Joseph J. HaganSenior Vice Presdient of Operations and Chief Operating Officer FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Mail Stop A-GO-14 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308Danny L. PaceSenior Vice President, Fleet Engineering FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Mail Stop A-GO-14 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308Jeannie M. RinckelVice President, Fleet Oversight FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Mail Stop A-GO-14 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308David W. Jenkins, AttorneyFirstEnergy Corporation Mail Stop A-GO-18 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308Manager, Fleet LicensingFirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Mail Stop A-GHE-107 395 Ghent Road Akron, OH 44333James H. LashVice President FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Beaver Valley Power Station Mail Stop A-BV-SEB1 P.O. Box 4, Route 168 Shippingport, PA 15077Lew W. MyersExecutive Vice President, Special Projects FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Beaver Valley Power Station Mail Stop A-BV-SGRP P.O. Box 4, Route 168 Shippingport, PA 15077Manager, Site Regulatory ComplianceFirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Beaver Valley Power Station Mail Stop A-BV-A P.O. Box 4, Route 168 Shippingport, PA 15077Commissioner James R. LewisWest Virginia Division of Labor 749-B, Building No. 6 Capitol Complex Charleston, WV 25305Director, Utilities DepartmentPublic Utilities Commission 180 East Broad Street Columbus, OH 43266-0573Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency 2605 Interstate Dr.

Harrisburg, PA 17110-9364Ohio EPA-DERRATTN: Zack A. Clayton P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, OH 43266-0149 Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (continued) cc:

Dr. Judith JohnsrudEnvironmental Coalition on Nuclear Power Sierra Club 433 Orlando Avenue State College, PA 16803DirectorBureau of Radiation Protection Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building P.O. Box 8469 Harrisburg, PA 17105-8469Mayor of the Borough of Shippingport P.O. Box 3 Shippingport, PA 15077Regional Administrator, Region IU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406Resident InspectorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

P.O. Box 298 Shippingport, PA 15077

FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANYFIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR GENERATION CORP.DOCKET NO. 50-334BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEAmendment No. 272License No. DPR-661.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:A.The application for amendment by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, etal. (the licensee), dated October 4, 2004, as supplemented July 8, and November 14, 2005, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;B.The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of theAct, and the rules and regulations of the Commission;C.There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by thisamendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations;D.The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense andsecurity or to the health and safety of the public; andE.The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of theCommission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. 2.Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications asindicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of FacilityOperating License No. DPR-66 is hereby amended to read as follows:(2)Technical SpecificationsThe Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised throughAmendment No. 272, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.3.This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance and shall beimplemented prior to Mode 4 entry during startup from 1R17 which begins on or about February 10, 2006.FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/Richard J. Laufer, ChiefPlant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical SpecificationsDate of Issuance: February 6, 2006 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 272FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-66DOCKET NO. 50-334Replace the following page of Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revisedpage. The revised page is identified by amendment number and contains marginal lines indicating the areas of change. RemoveInsert6-196-19 FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR GENERATION CORP.OHIO EDISON COMPANYTHE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANYDOCKET NO. 50-412BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNIT 2AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEAmendment No. 154 License No. NPF-731.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:A.The application for amendment by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, etal. (the licensee), dated October 4, 2004, as supplemented July 8, and November 14, 2005, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;B.The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of theAct, and the rules and regulations of the Commission;C.There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by thisamendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations;D.The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense andsecurity or to the health and safety of the public; andE.The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of theCommission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. 2.Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications asindicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of FacilityOperating License No. NPF-73 is hereby amended to read as follows:(2)Technical SpecificationsThe Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised throughAmendment No. 154, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, both of which are attached hereto are hereby incorporated in the license. FENOC shall operate the facility in accordance with the TechnicalSpecifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.3.This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance and shall beimplemented prior to Mode 4 entry during startup from 2R12 which begins October

2006.FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/Richard J. Laufer, ChiefPlant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical SpecificationsDate of Issuance: February 6, 2006 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 154FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-73DOCKET NO. 50-412Replace the following page of Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revisedpage. The revised page is identified by amendment number and contains marginal lines indicating the areas of change. RemoveInsert6-206-20 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONRELATED TO AMENDMENT NOS. 272 AND 154 TO FACILITY OPERATINGLICENSE NOS. DPR-66 AND NPF-73FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANYFIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR GENERATION CORP.OHIO EDISON COMPANYTHE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANYBEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 (BVPS-1 AND 2)DOCKET NOS. 50-334 AND 50-41

21.0 INTRODUCTION

By application dated October 4, 2004, as supplemented July 8, and November 14, 2005,Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos.

ML042920300, ML051940575, ML051940582, ML051940583, and ML053220241, the FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC, the licensee), requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for BVPS-1 and 2. The supplements dated July 8, and November 14, 2005, provided additional information that clarified the application, did notexpand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the NuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC) staff's original proposed no significant hazards considerationdetermination as published in the Federal Register on December 7, 2004 (69 FR 70718). The proposed changes requested application of the NRC-approved Westinghouse best-estimate large-break loss-of-coolant accident (BELOCA) analysis methodology described in Topical Report WCAP-12945-P-A, Volume 1 (Revision 2) 1996 and Volumes 2 through 5 (Revision 1), "Code Qualification Document for Best Estimate LOCA Analysis, March 1998" (CQD methodology) to BVPS-1 and 2. The NRC has approved the CQD for performinglicensing basis large-break LOCA (LBLOCA) analyses for all Westinghouse 3- and 4-loop nuclear plants of Westinghouse design.The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's emergency core cooling system (ECCS) performanceanalyses for BVPS-1 and 2 done in accordance with the CQD methodology, operating at about 108 percent of its current licensed power of 2697 MWt (the analyses were conducted at the uprated power of 2900 MWt plus 0.6 percent measurement uncertainty or 2917.4 MWt). For both BVPS-1 and 2, the BELOCA analyses were conducted assuming the units used Westinghouse 17 x 17 Robust Fuel Assemblies (RFAs). The analyses were performed at the higher power level in order to support the pending license amendment requests for approval ofBVPS-1 and 2 operation at extended power uprate (EPU) conditions. Further, the licensee's analyses supporting the BELOCA amendment requests assumed NRC approval of the pendinglicense amendment requests for conversion of the BVPS-1 and 2 containments from subatmospheric to atmospheric operating conditions. The analyses were also done to support

NRC approval of the pending BVPS-1 steam generator (SG) replacement amendment request scheduled to be completed to support the February 2006 refueling outage.

2.0 REGULATORY ANALYSIS

The BELOCA analyses were performed to demonstrate that the system design would providesufficient ECCS flow to transfer the heat from the reactor core following an LBLOCA at a rate such that (1) fuel and clad damage that could interfere with continued effective core cooling would be prevented, and (2) the clad metal-water reaction would be limited to negligible amounts. The NRC staff reviewed the analyses to assure they reflected suitable redundancy incomponents and features; and suitable interconnections, leak detection, isolation, and containment capabilities were available such that the safety functions could be accomplis hed,assuming a single failure, for LBLOCAs considering the availability of onsite and offsite electricpower (assuming offsite electric power is not available, with onsite electric power available; or assuming onsite electric power is not available, with offsite electric power available). The acceptance criteria for ECCS performance are provided in Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations (10 CFR), Section 50.46 and were used by the NRC staff in assessing theacceptability of the Westinghouse CQD methodology for BVPS-1 and 2.The NRC staff considered that both BVPS-1 and 2 are 3-loop nuclear plants of Westinghousedesign. The NRC staff also reviewed the limitations and conditions stated in its safetyevaluation (SE) supporting approval of the Westinghouse CQD methodology and considered the range of parameters described in the CQD topical report in its assessment of the acceptability of the methodology for BVPS-1 and 2.

3.0 TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

In its submittal, dated October 4, 2004, the licensee stated, "[b]oth FENOC and its analysisvendor Westinghouse have ongoing processes in place that assure that analysis input values for peak cladding temperature-sensitive parameters bound their as-operated plant values." In response to an NRC staff's request for additional information (RAI), the licensee further stated,". . . Beaver Valley plant-specific LOCA analyses are based on Beaver Valley specific models."

These statements, together with the NRC staff's review of the results of the BELOCA analyses,as discussed further in this SE, provided reasonable assurance that the licensee implements appropriate processes to support properly application of the CQD methodology, and that the methodology is acceptable for use at BVPS-1 and 2.In its submittal, the licensee provided the results for the BVPS-1 and 2 BELOCA analyses at2917.4 MWt (about 108 percent of the current licensed power of 2697 MWt) performed in accordance with the CQD methodology. The licensee's results for the calculated peak cladding temperatures (PCTs), the maximum cladding oxidation (local), and the maximum core-wide cladding oxidation are provided in the following table along with the acceptance criteria of 10 CFR 50.46(b). TABLE 1: LBLOCA ANALYSIS RESULTSParametersCQD Results10 CFR 50.46 LimitsBVPS-1BVPS-2Limiting Break Size/LocationDEG/PDDEG/PDN/A Cladding MaterialZircaloyZircaloyZircaloy Peak Clad Temperature2144 oF1976 oF2200 oF (10 CFR 50.46(b)(1))Maximum Local Oxidation8.77%6.70%17.0% (10 CFR 50.46(b)(2))

Maximum Total Core-WideOxidation (All Fuel)0.985%0.91%1.0% (10 CFR 50.46(b)(3))DEG/PD is a double-ended guillotine break at the pump discharge.In its analyses, the licensee also addressed the concern that zircaloy fuel may have pre-existingoxidation that must be considered in its LOCA analyses. In its response to an NRC staff'srequest for additional information, the licensee indicated that it considered that the zircaloy cladfuel has both pre-existing oxidation and oxidation resulting from the LOCA (pre- and post-LOCAoxidation both on the inside and outside cladding surfaces). The licensee also noted that thefuel with the highest LOCA oxidation will likely not be the same fuel that has the highest pre-LOCA oxidation. The licensee indicated that when the calculated pre-LOCA oxidation wasfactored into the licensee's BELOCA analyses for the zircaloy clad fuel, consistent with the Westinghouse CQD methodology, that even during a fuel pin's final cycle in the core, the sumof the calculated pre- and post-LOCA oxidation was sufficiently small that the total localoxidation remained less than the 17% acceptance criterion of 10 CFR 50.46(b)(2) as notedabove. The NRC staff finds this acceptably addressed the issue with pre-LOCA oxidation.The concern with core-wide oxidation relates to the amount of hydrogen generated during aLOCA. Because hydrogen that may have been generated pre-LOCA (during normal operation)will be removed from the reactor coolant system throughout the operati ng cycl e, the NRC staffnoted that pre-existing oxidation does not contribute to the amount of hydrogen generated post-LOCA and therefore it does not need to be addressed when determining whether the calculatedtotal core-wide oxidation meets the 1.0% criterion of 10 CFR 50.46(b)(3).As discussed previously, FENOC had Westinghouse conduct the BELOCA analyses forBVPS-1 and 2 at about 108 percent of the current licensed power level of 2697 MWt using an

NRC-approved Westinghouse methodology (CQD methodology). In part, because of thesignificant margin provided by the assumed power level (2917.4 MWt), the NRC staff concl udedthat the results of these analyses (see Table 1) demonstrated compliance with 10 CFR 50.46(b)(1) through (b)(3) for the current licensed power level of 2697 MWt. Meeting these criteria provides reasonable assurance that at the current licensed power level the BVPS-1 and 2 cores will be amenable to cooling as required by 10 CFR 50.46(b)(4). Thecapability of BVPS-1 and 2 to satisfy the long-term cooling requirements of 10 CFR 50.46(b)(5)were reviewed as part of FENOC's license amendment request to convert the containments from sub-atmospheric to atmospheric operating conditions. The BELOCA license amendments request cannot be approved as currently submitted unless and until the containment conversionamendments request is approved because of the analysis assumptions previously discussed.Based on its review as discussed above, the NRC staff concluded that the Westinghouse CQDmethodology, as described in WCAP-12945-P-A, is acceptable for use for BVPS-1 and 2 in demonstrating compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46(b) with atmospheric containments. In part, the NRC staff's conclusion was based on the assumed thermal power (2917.4 MWt) used in the BELOCA analyses conservatively bounded the current licensed power level (2697 MWt) of BVPS-1 and 2.The licensee submitted license amendment requests for the SG replacement at BVPS-1, andconversion to atmospheric containments and EPUs for both BVPS-1 and 2. The NRC-approved Westinghouse CQD methodology was found acceptable for performing LBLOCA analyses for BVPS-1 and 2 and can be used to support the requested BELOCA license amendment requests. However, the NRC staff's review of the acceptability of the CQDmethodology for BVPS-1 and 2 focused on assuring that the BVPS-1 and 2 specific input parameters or bounding values and ranges were used to conduct the analyses, that the analyses were conducted within the conditions and limitations of the NRC-approvedWestinghouse CQD methodology, and that the results satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46(b), based on the current licensed power level of 2697 MWt. With regard to the SG replacement, the NRC staff will assure that the analyses appropriately considered theresulting plant changes as part of its review of the SG replacement license amendment request.

While the NRC staff considers that the BVPS-1 and 2 BELOCA analyses conducted with theWestinghouse CQD methodology likely bound the licensee's request to increase the licensed power level to 2900 MWt, the NRC staff will confirm that these analyses support the operationat the EPU conditions as part of its review of those license amendment requests.This SE addresses only the acceptability of the Westinghouse BELOCA methodology foranalyzing LBLOCAs at BVPS-1 and 2 with atmospheric containments, BVPS-1 with replacement SGs, and EPU conditions for both units. This review also has confirmed the specific application of the Westinghouse BELOCA methodology for analyzing LBLOCAs at BVPS-1 and 2 with atmospheric containments, and BVPS-1 with replacement SGs. This methodology does not apply to small-break (SB) LOCAs. However, there may be issues identified in the NRC staff's review of the SBLOCA that may affect the findings and conclusionsreached in this SE. The specific application of the Westinghouse BELOCA methodology to EPU conditions for both units will be included in a review dedicated to the EPU amendmentrequests. Should issues be identified during the review of the SBLOCA analyses performed by the licensee for the EPU that may affect the NRC staff's findings and conclusions in this SE, theNRC staff will address the issues within the EPU SE.

4.0 STATE CONSULTATION

In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Pennsylvania State official was notified ofthe proposed issuance of the amendments. The State official had no comments.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

The amendments change a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facilitycomponent located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 and change surveillance requirements. The NRC staff has determined that the amendments involve nosignificant increase in the amounts and no significant change in the types of any effluents thatmay be released offsite and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendments involve no significant hazards consideration, and there has been nopublic comment on such finding (69 FR 70718). Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need beprepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.

6.0 CONCLUSION

The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) thereis reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered byoperation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to thecommon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.Principal Contributor: F. Orr Date: February 6, 2005