ML112850131: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/12/2011
| issue date = 10/12/2011
| title = E-mail, Miller to Gropp, Oyster Creek Schedular Exemption Acceptance Review
| title = E-mail, Miller to Gropp, Oyster Creek Schedular Exemption Acceptance Review
| author name = Miller G E
| author name = Miller G
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| addressee name = Gropp R
| addressee name = Gropp R

Revision as of 08:20, 29 June 2019

E-mail, Miller to Gropp, Oyster Creek Schedular Exemption Acceptance Review
ML112850131
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 10/12/2011
From: Geoffrey Miller
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Gropp R
Exelon Corp
Miller G, NRR/DORL/LPL1-2, 415-2481
References
Download: ML112850131 (1)


Text

From: Miller, Ed Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 9:52 AM To: 'Richard.Gropp@exeloncorp.com' Cc: 'david.helker@exeloncorp.com'

Subject:

Oyster Creek Schedular Exemption Acceptance Review Rick, By letter dated September 30, 2011, Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a request for an exemption for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. The proposed exemption would allow delay of the biennial emergency preparedness exercise to June 2012.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide you with the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and protection of public health and safety and the environment.

If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2481.

G. Edward Miller Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation