Letter Sequence Acceptance Review |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML16152A1332016-06-24024 June 2016
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Change Technical Specification Section 6.0, Administrative Controls, for Permanently Defueled Condition
Project stage: Acceptance Review
2016-06-24
[Table View] |
|
|---|
Category:Acceptance Review Letter
MONTHYEARML21162A1172021-06-11011 June 2021
E-mail to HDI: Acceptance Review - FOF Exemption
ML21113A0742021-04-23023 April 2021
Acceptance Review Email - April 20, 2021 Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from 10 CFR Part 73 Requirements Due to Covid
ML21064A2432021-03-0505 March 2021
Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review_ Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme
ML21011A1062021-01-12012 January 2021
Decommissioning International: Review and Acceptance of the Holtec Decommissioning International Fleet Decommisioning Quality Assurance Program
ML20332A1472020-11-24024 November 2020
Acceptance Review: November 20 2020 Exemption Request from 10 CFR Part 73 Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek
ML20266G4032020-09-22022 September 2020
Acceptance Review Email - Request for Approval of HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, Revision 0
ML17096A4022017-04-24024 April 2017
Acceptance Review Letter, License Amendment Request to Revise Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule for Milestone 8 and Associated License Condition
ML17067A3742017-03-16016 March 2017
Acceptance Review Letter, Amendment Request to Revise the Site Emergency Plan for On-Shift and Emergency Response Organization Staffing for Permanently Defueled Condition
ML17052A3062017-02-27027 February 2017
Acceptance Review Letter - License Amendment Request to Delete Decommissioning Trust Provisions from the Renewed Facility Operating License
ML16231A3902016-09-0606 September 2016
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Request for Exemption Related to Security Measures in an Emergency or During Severe Weather (CAC MF8275 - MF8278)
ML16217A2312016-08-30030 August 2016
Unit 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Change Technical Specification to Reduce Steam Dome Pressure
ML16152A1332016-06-24024 June 2016
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Change Technical Specification Section 6.0, Administrative Controls, for Permanently Defueled Condition
ML16036A1692016-02-0808 February 2016
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Regarding Certified Fuel Handler Training Program
ML14149A0752014-06-16016 June 2014
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Revise Snubber Surveillance Requirements (Tac No. MF4124)
ML14072A1002014-03-24024 March 2014
Acceptance Letter Regarding License Amendment Request to Reactor Building Vital Area Access Control
ML13354B6762014-01-0707 January 2014
Acceptance Letter Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-522, Revise Ventilation System Surveillance Requirements to Operate 10 Hours Per Month, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement..
ML1134301022011-12-16016 December 2011
Acceptance Letter Regarding Relief Requests PR-01, VR-01, and VR-02 for Fifth Inservice Testing Interval
ML1128501312011-10-12012 October 2011
E-mail, Miller to Gropp, Oyster Creek Schedular Exemption Acceptance Review
ML1116804112011-06-17017 June 2011
Acceptance Review for Exelon Threshold Determination Request (TAC ME6269 - ME6287)
ML1023100842010-08-19019 August 2010
E-mail Acceptance Review for Proposed Revision to Appendix B Environmental TSs LAR
ML1008800852010-07-21021 July 2010
Fleet - Acceptance Review Implementation of Emergency Action Level Schemes Developed from NEI 99-01m Rev. 5
ML1020401092010-07-21021 July 2010
E-mail, Miller to Mascitelli, Acceptance Review: Inoperable EDG Action Statement Requirements
ML1008200062010-03-23023 March 2010
E-mail, Miller, NRR, to Gropp, Exelon, Acceptance Review for Trunion Room LAR
ML0907710512009-03-18018 March 2009
E-mail, Miller, NRR, to Stewart, Exelon, Acceptance Review for ME0756
2021-06-11
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 24, 2016 Mr. Bryan C. Hanson President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Generation Company, LLC Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT:
OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION-ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO CHANGE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECTION 6.0, "ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS," FOR PERMANENTLY DEFUELED CONDITION (CAC NO. MF8005)
Dear Mr. Hanson:
By letter dated May 17, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16138A129), Exelon Generation Company, LLC requested an amendment to the technical specifications (TSs), of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16, for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (OCNGS). The proposed amendment would revise OCNGS TS Section 6.0, Administrative Controls," for permanently defueled condition.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50. 90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations ( 10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
B. Hanson If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3100 or via e-mail at John.Lamb@nrc.gov.
nG.Lamb.S!7~
nt Licensing IV-2 and Decommissioning ransition Branch ivision of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-219 cc: Distribution via Listserv
ML16152A133 OFFICE NRR/DORL/LPL4-2/PM NRR/DORL/LPL4-2/LA NRR/DORL/LPL4-2/BC(A) NRR/DORL/LPL4-2/PM NAME Jlamb PBlechman SAnderson Jlamb DATE 6/22/2016 6/01/2016 6/24/2016 6/24/2016