ML20211F257

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Suppl to SER Input Re Resolution of Followup Actions Resulting from Idvp.Addl Action Required to Confirm Completion of Certain Items
ML20211F257
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Diablo Canyon
Issue date: 01/04/1983
From: Rubenstein L
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Novak T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20209B094 List: ... further results
References
NUDOCS 8702250024
Download: ML20211F257 (2)


Text

7:

I, 1

  • V' '

4

[?. j%

[

+

o UNITED STATES g

i..,

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c

gg cy WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20555

, E83 q.,, j c

4 y z]

  • ME!10RANDUM FOR:

Thomas it. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing, Division of Licensing

  • FR0!i:

L. S. Rubenstein, Assistant Director for Core and Plant Systens, Division of Systems Integration

SUBJECT:

SilPPLEMENTAL' SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT INPUT, FINAL IDVP RESOLUTION - DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, UNITS 1 AfiD 2 i

Enclosed is the-input to the Diablo Canyon Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report (SSER) regarding final resolution of the followup actions resulting from the IDVP. This input consists of Auxiliary Systems Branch (ASB), Power Systems Branch (PSB), and Equipment Qualifications Branch (EQB) resolution of the 15 followup items identified in Table C.8.3 of Diablo Canyon SER, ilUREG-0675, Supplement No. 19.

Responsibility for the SSER input on these items is as follows: ASB, Iten Nos. 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11,13 and 15; PSB, Item No. 3; E')B, Iten Nos'. 4, 5,12, and 14.

The licensee has provided satisfactory responses to all the above items in their December 6,1983 letter and in sub-sequent subnittals.

However, Item No. 5 requires additional staff (EQB) review prior to Step 3 (full power operation).

He therefore consider our effort regarding the IDVP to be compiete except as noted.

It should also be noted that other additional action is required to confirm completion of certain of the above items.

Items 1, 2 and 9 require some field verification by Region V to complete. This has been discusse<f and agreed upon as documented in Darrell Eisenhut's memorandum to John B. tiartin, Region V dated December 6, 1983.

In addition, the licensee's December 13, 1983 letter in response to Item 11 indicates that completion of one modification (installation of redundant Class 1 isolation controls and instrumentatiFn~for the CVCS letdown line and auxiliary steam line) required as a result of the reanalysis of tenperature/ pressure environments resulting from postulated pipe breaks outside containment will be accomplished prior to Mode 4, or justification for operation in " ode 4 will be provided.

We consider this to be acceptable.

b.

L. S. Rubenstein, Assistant Directne for Core end Plant Systems Division of Systens Integration

Enclosure:

,As Stated cc w/ enclosure:

See next page

Contact:

J. Nermiel X29463 Q

npood *

.tr/ > i e'

-cu

.z.

-.g_,'

s s

4(-_

2-cc w/ enclosure:

R. Mattson

.R. Vollmer:

D.-Eisenhut-J. P. Knight O. Parr-M. Srinivasan G. Knighton-V. Noonan'.

H. Schierling'

~

't J. Knox -

H. Walker J. Wermiel m

4 I

h I.

l e

t

+

.0 i

i e,

,-s

,,-w-

~..... -,,

v... -. -. - -, -,,,. -...,,, nan __.-,, _

--.,-.,-n-.-

... _, _, _.,. -., _. - _ _ -.. _ -,, -.. ~.. -,, -. - - - - - -