ML20209B642

Responds to Util Submitting QA Program Description for Integrated Project Organization to Bring Facility to Commercial Operation.Qa Program Acceptable

ML20209B642
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	09/01/1982
From:	Johnston W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Novak T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20209B094	List: CLI-81-30, Forwards Ltr to Util Re Approval of Teledyne Engineering Svcs 820402 Plan for Phase I of Independent Design Verification Program Per Commission Order CLI-81-30 & Request for Addl Info DD-82-10, Advises That Commission (W/O Commissioner Gilinsky) Has Agreed Not to Review DD-82-10 ML20209B088 ML20209B108 ML20209B121 ML20209B128 ML20209B163 ML20209B182 ML20209B189 ML20209B195 ML20209B200 ML20209B230 ML20209B236 ML20209B240 ML20209B252 ML20209B259 ML20209B324 ML20209B341 ML20209B345 ML20209B351 ML20209B360 ML20209B427 ML20209B433 ML20209B439 ML20209B498 ML20209B507 ML20209B533 ML20209B551 ML20209B566 ML20209B585 ML20209B591 ML20209B618 ML20209B630 ML20209B638 ML20209B642 ML20209B665 ML20209B669 ML20209B676 ML20209B690 ML20209B703 ML20209B780 ML20209B787 ML20209B794 ML20209B805 ML20209B818 ML20209B828 ML20209B832 ML20209B837 ML20209B841 ML20209B850 ... further results
References
NUDOCS 8209210455
Download: ML20209B642 (1)

Text

/

UNITED STATES

[ ' ', r,

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[

WASHING TON, D. C. 20555

%.,',', /

V..

f SEP O1 yp Docket Nos.

50-275 h

50-323 a

hD MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas Novak, Assis t Director Division of Licens ' g FROM:

William V. Johnston, Assistant Director Materials & Qualifications Engineering

SUBJECT:

ACCEPTABILITY OF QA PROGRAM FOR DIABLO CANYO,1 (PG&E-BECHTEL)

By letter of August 13, 1982, PG&E submitted the quality assurance (QA) program description for the integrated project organization to bring Diablo Canyon Units No.1 and 2 to commercial operation.

The submittal included the response to our request for additional infonnation of August 2,1982, concerning a similar submittal made on June 18, 1982.

It also included a revised program description which clarified the scope of the project regarding the construction and preoperational testing activities.

We have rev.iewed the PG&E submittal of August 13, 1982 and find that it describes an acceptable QA program for the design engineering services, procurement services, and construction completion management services it covers.

Our review verified that the QA program described for the services covered has controls equivalent to the controls previously found acceptable in Bechtel's topical report on QA, "Bechtel Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear Power Plants,"

BQ-TOP-1, Revision 3A, October 1980.

For activities to be conducted by PG&E, the quality assurance program for operations as described in the FSAR will be u ti li zed.

We also find this acceptable.

PG&E should be informed of the acceptability of the August 13, 1982 QA program description.

\\A/A{ b h William V. Johnston, Assistant Director Materials & Qualifications Engineering Division of Engineering cc:

B. Buckley H. Schierling F. Miraglia 1

y

- - - -