ML20209B259
Text
+..
2 m,
g e
4 Y
5 e
.1 ',..
DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File LB#3 File RTedesco FEB 2 1982
',{a1ia Docket No.: 50-275 CMi es JLee TERA MEMORANDUM FOR: Pat Sullivan, Chief Administration Branch Office of the Secretary FROM:
Hans Schierling, Project Manager Reverification Program, Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
REQUEST TRANSCRIPT OF MEETING TO BE HELD JANUAR 19, 1982 - DIABLO CANYON This is to request that a reporter prepare a transcript of a meeting to be held on Wednesday February 3,1982, with Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) regarding the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (See the enclosed meeting notice for details of the meeting). We need the transcript two or. three days following the meeting so that we can make copies for our internal use as well as for the parties to this proceeding. We anticipate attendance of approximately 100 people.
Please contact me (X28423) or Jean Lee (X28413) if you need additional infor: nation.
ki inal sigaec zys B
Hans Schierling, Project Manager Reverification Program Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Meeting Notice dated February 3, 1982 1
x _.
,J n Lf gL lll O Q h b g)
/
\\r Dgl.3#3 Y i.B#3 errics >
a==FJ
' ph HSchierlin em).'2/f.../5b h...T..."..'./52
~ " " "
~ " " " " "
=c rea a re ne ee ocu c24o OFFICIAL RECOF.D COPY m e-r~
77,
,g (BZiWLO sVATEs
.,s. a p,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f.(, ~.
.g.
waswinciou, o. c. 20sss
\\f?
}
JAN 2 81982 Docket Nos.:
50-275 MEMORANDUM FOR:
F. J. Miraglia, Chief, Licensing Branch No. 3, DL FROM:
H. E. Schierling, Project Manager, Licensing Branch No. 3, DL
SUBJECT:
RENOTIFICATION OF MEETING WITH PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY - DIABLO CANYON, UNIT 1, REGARDING PG&E SUBMITTAL
_ -. -.J.~~.7 DATED DECEMBER 4,1981
- DATE & TIME:
Wednesday, February. 3, 1982 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
LOCATION:
Room P-118 Phillips Building Bethesda, Md.
PURPOSE:
To discuss issues based on staff review of PG&E submittal
.of December 4,1981 as listed in attachment and the concerns identified in a letter of M. Furbush, PG&E from D. Eis.enhut, NRC dated January 28, 1982.
PARTICIPANTS:
NRC PG&E H. Denton G. Maneatis R. DeYoung
, D. Brand, et.al.
D. Eisenhut PG&E Consultants R. Vollmer E. Jordan R. Tedesco F. Miraglia H. Schierling Region V J22#
Hans E. S tefiin, Project Manager g licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing cc: See next page.
- This meeting was originally noticed on January 8,1982 and scheduled for January 19, 1982.
&7.c2*ttf6u NOTE g\\
TE~
4Al
nmn.a nuwevwvweew
. Vice -President '- Gen 3ral Counsel
' PaEific' Gas & Elec tric Cuapany -
H -P.O.* Box 7442 '
San Trancisco, Ca11fornia 94120 -
cc:
Phi 11p A. Crane, Jr., Esq.
Pacific Gas & Electric Company P.O. Box 7442 San Francisco, ' California 94120 Janice E. Kerr, Esq.
California Public Utilities Cor. mission 350 ItAllister Street San Francisco ~, California 94102 Mr. Frederick Eissler,' President
,5cenic Shore 1ine Preservation Conference, Inc.
4623 More Mesa Drive Santa Barbara, California -93105 Hs. Elizabeth Apfelberg 1415 Cozadero San luis Obispo, California 93401 Mr. Gordon A. Siiver
- Ms. Sandra A. Silver 1760 Alisal Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Harry M. Willis, Esq.
Seymour & Willis 601 California Street, Suite 2100 San Francisco, California 94108 Mr. Richard Hubbard HHB Technical Associates l Suite K 1723 Hamil ton. Avenue San Jose, California 95125 Mr. John Marrs, Managing Editor San Luis Obispo County Telegram-Tribune 1321 Johnson Avenue
' P. O. Box 112 San Luis Obispo, Caiifornia 93406 4
0 e
6
'-W**
sem,. maim. s.
w w + speogi A
.,-+m..
w.
_y
~~.
.cc:' Resident inspector /Diablo Canyon NPS
'c/o U. 5. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0. Box.369 Avila Beach, California 93424-Ms. Raye ^ Fl ening.
1920 Mattie Road Shell Beach, California 93440 n.
John' R. Phillips, Esq.
Simon Klevansky, Esq.-
Margaret Bl odgett,.Esq.
Marion P. Johnston, Esq.
Joel Reynol ds,. Esq.
Center for Law in the Public Interest 10203 Santa Monica Boulevard Los-Angeles, California 90067 Paul C. Val entine, Esq.
321 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, California 94302 Mr. Byron S. Georgiov legal Affairs Secrettry Governor's Office State Capitol
. Sacramento, California 95814 Herbert H. Brown, 'Esq.
Hill, Christopher & Pnillips, P.C.
1900 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 Mr. Richard E. Blankenburg, Co-Publisher Mr. Wayne A. Soroyan, News Reporter South County Publishing Company.
P. O. Box 460 Arroyo Grande, California 93420 Mr. James 0. Schuyler
_ Vice President - Nuclear Generation Department Pacific Gas & Electric. Company P.O. Box 7442
-San Francisco, California. 94120
. Bruce Norton,. Esq.
~'
Suite 202 3216 North 3rd Street
. Phoenix, Arizona 89012
.--.u__,~
-- - - - - ~ -
- ~ ~ ~ -
~
~
m ov a no w.?lr w v:J W '
- 3 g
,.:..^
.. ~
~..
~
~Iir. W._ C. Gangloff 1
',tes tin 3 house Electric Corporation P. 0..Cox 355 Pitt: burgh, Pennsylvania 15230
- Dsvid F. Fleischai.er, f.sq.
~
- P. O. Box 1178 OI;lat.caa City, Okithcr.a 73101 O
W M
e s
O s
E O
g 9
O 4
9 e
u.
9 e
g e.
e 4p a
b 45 e
e 1
4 0
e O
4 e
e 3
- ~ ~ ~ ~ - -
^*~
i A,
a Attachment,
M:
- M-Agenda Items Meeting with PGtE January 19, 1982-
. M B.
Seismic Reverification Program N-
__w.
j 1
4
- )
4 t.
I.
Scope and Technical Aspects of Plan II. Sample Criteria
'i t\\
E -
III. Benchmarking,0f Results
{
u '
+
a lY. -QA Audit Methods V N s
Y.
Size and Technical Qualifications of Review Team VI. Contractual and Financial Qualifications of Review Team 4
f f
l s
l
' \\.
d
/.
+
i
\\
F I
w
\\
1
- A iv l
w.
,,.- %%g.a
.-,w+,,
e w ww m b--
~
%'w
-^w e wy
-w w--
w
-w
- .--m
?
r9
~e e
rr-?
w--
e--m-e p-eag
-y--p 9
41.r vw w
wy
<gr y
2y
g_
37, k h.kh,
' (5.
i Scopa and Techn~ical Aspects of Pla'n tc
\\
j
- 1.1 Basis-for selection of. building $) /nd spucture(s) i J
for seismic requalif.ication.
1
, \\
94 J T 2.
liodels for piping p~roblems, including isometric h,
drawings based on }a,s built" conditions k 3. sYerification of input ~and seismic locds,for piping g
g and support analysis C
N, 3
i L "1
\\
A 4.
Verification of design specificationsF, hsign s~
+
%IT rep 6fts and design documents with fespec:t to#'
x p' "as' bull t" conditions
\\ N ','
v.*
q; x
,M
. g?,
,y 3s
- t. -
N s b,'r5e Acceptance a(M rejec lon criteria, for piping C v
J u -
and",sjspports ;. %
f '
4-
-,s mN t-
,1
y s
g' 5
g,
~
f i-6.
Supports for large, components (tanky heat exchyger, q
f pumps,vesselsl
'y, l
w 5
7.
Application of Reg. Guide 1.lbud5eismic Qu$iification of Electric Equipment for fluclhar(Poser Plants) \\,
Y to conduit ar$wcable tray supports,g,Td, equipment
\\
,,.. 4 t
,r y
~
- 8. - Adequacy of seig.mic input forreq' ilament 'qualifichtion, d
- c interpretation qhyertical ground ' motion, effects-4,
of torsion and[ building re.sponse characteristics s
g Q
p..
og g s:N; 9.
' Equipment procurement"ans
-(contrac%f obligations,\\lqualDibgtion procdss nodifications to acSount for Hosgri' earthquake, commitments'made durinlj J
4 ','
s licensing activTties) a.
X.,
?3 3
l y./. y
- 10. Procedure and basis for determining er rs yk }, d p [d fVig seismic qualifications A.
E o
- - x
$1 Independent development of dynamic model for ~
\\ _
t w
L T
.,,f 4 auxiliary building
~
~ "
1 v
NJi k A
e
-&l2.
Criteria for acceptance of fundamental mode hA
(**
i,
- frequency, mode shapes and selectiy'e floor
_ response spectra i
. - +.
a Lg'
- 13. Seismic feverification of burieftank -and a,
.s
,a 7-..
. ouddcr. water storage tank N
g 41 g
i
'InIfependent field verificatio'n prior to requalihc' 14.
U 3
a-
~ ' '
tion; consideration of IE Bulletin 79-14 in 7jndependent field verifdcaty
}k
~,
y,,
[
I k
t
'b t._
~t
'),
. j,4}.
, i
'Y; l
a su
~
Q
-k N
s c
,n
_ Sc -.,,-
1.
.~-%l 77, L' '-., -
~: -
~
'~'
s
.a.
c.
ca.
l' n.
L
' 15. Seismic service contract activities -within I
program scope
- .16. Details for analysis of PG8E internal interfaces 117.- Definitions for (a).significant deficiency or error and (b) insignificant deficiency or error 318.. Guidelines for _ determining appropriateness.
~
of_ design ~ methods considering change in " state of; the art" technology III Sample Criteria
{
}'
- 1.. Criteria for selection of. sample calculation and h,
.for expansion of sample. size if needed 2.
Statistical basis for sample size and proceoure 4
in case of failure
' ~
~
[
3.
Equipment sample from safe shutdown and cooldown systems
[
- 4.. Adequacy.of design process and quality assurance; reporting on basis of sample cases 5.
Criteria for sample checks and. independent calculations
_6.
~ Application of current evaluation tecnniques to independent sample calculations in analysis of r
structures and components.
~
Ill Benchmarking of Results
- 1. - Benchmarking ~to NRC problems, of computer code for piping analysis IYj ~QA Audit Methods a
_1.
Reporting procedure for R. F.. Reedy to R. L. Cloud
+c.-.
and PG&E' 2.
Scope of QA review (procurement documentation cointrol;
'f instructions,~ procedures and drawings; document control; i
" auditing) 2
'3.
Review of operational QA program (post 1978) with respect to implementation of corrective actions 1 4
. Consideration of applicable QA criteria (10 CFR 50 App. B) 1
- .+
Y
'"*'*:,i*=>--we,ww_
.g__
____T__"'~_
_n-
i 3-
- y.
Size.and Technical Qualifications of Review Team 1.
Identification ~ and qualifications of individuals
- performing QA review i
2.
Expertise of incividuals in civil-structural design and analysis 3.
Expertise in seismic analysis of structures
- 4. ' Assignment of individuals with appropriate-expertise oto specific tasks VI. Contractual and financial Qualifications of Review Team 1.
Previous involvement of companies and individuals in Diablo Canyon activities now under their independent review' scope.
2.. Previous involvement of companies or individuals in Diablo Canyon Seismic design work 3.
Previous _ employment by PG8E of individuals now participating in independent review
- 4. ~ 0wnership or control of PG8E stock by incividuals participating in independent review 5.
Employment by PG8E of relatives or memF--s of present household of individuals parti.cipatin; i.t review, and position if appropriate.
I i
t -
l l
L l
l l
4 4
g 6
e
.
- e me =
..a
_c
~,.em-e.
g._,.
m,
,.,. w m w.p
+..
.m,#
4 **
MEETING NOTICE DISTRIBUTION Dockat File 50-275 I&E Region I NRC PDR I&E Region II.
=
_ Local PDR I&E Region III NSIC I&E Region IV TERA I&E Region V LBf3 Files NRC Participants E. Case D. Eisenhut H. Denton R. Purple R.'DeYoung L
R. Tedesco D. Eisenhut B. J. Youngblood RVollmer A. Schwencer E. Jordan F. Miraglia R. Tedesco E. Adensam FMiraglia J. Miller H. Schierling R,V Ma ttsor, R
G. Lainas T. Ippolito T. Speis a
B. Russell.
M. Srinivasan D. Crutchfield O. Parr T. Novak F. Rosa S. Varga B. Sheron, Acting D. Valsallo L. G. Hulman R. Clark.
R. Houston J. Stolz W. Gammill R. Vollmer.
F. Congel J. Knight L. Rubenstein R. Bosnak W. Butler F. Schauer C. Berlinger R. Jackson G. Lear F. Schroeder K, Kniel Attorney, OELD D. Skovholt OIE (3)
G. Knighton ACRS (16)
M. Ernst OSD (7)
A. Thadant J. LeDoux, I&E - -
W. Minners B. Grimes,-I&E S. Hanauer Mi Willi'ams, DL H. Thompson
.W. Johnston D. Vassallo S. PawlicRi P. Collins V. Benaroya D. Ziemann Z. Rosztoczy V. Moore W. Haass
- D. Muller Regional Administrator R. H. Encelken bcc: Applicant Service usc R. Ballard W. Regan Branch LB#3 A. Toalston Project Manager. H. Schierlinn Licensing Assistant J. Lee -
e e
O e
sw.. : < i.,,..
.. n
.~,n e-
---~w~~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' "
~ " ~ ~
'^~
,g
]
M[
i D R R IL L.
1 V
[(h-9 Docket No.: 50-275 O
MEMORANDUM FOR:
F. J. Miraglia, Chief, Licensing Branch No. 3. DL FROM:
B. C. Buckley, Project Manager, Licen' sing Branch No. 3. DL
~
SUBJECT:
MEETING WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF GOVERt10R BROWN OF CALIFORNIA AND THE JOINT INTERVENORS REGARDI SUBMITTAL DATED DECE tBER 4,1931 ON THE DIABLO CANYON UNIT 1 SEISMIC R EVERIFICATION, PROGRAft - PHASE I DATE & TIME:
Wednesday, February 17, 1982 1:30 p.m.
LOCATION:
Plaza Ball West Hyatt on Union Square 345 Stocktori Street San Francisc,o, Ca.
PURPOSE:
To discuss with representatives of Governor Brown's and Joint Intervenors PG&E's submittal dated December 4.
1981.
PARTICIPANTS:
NRC State of Ca.
Joint Intervenors H. Denton B. Georgiou J. Reynolds R. DeYoung H. Brown
- c. Fleischaker R. Vollmer ^
R. Engelken
J. Crews ts M
R. Faulkenberry' m
P. tiorrill B. Buckley si c
g.
j@Q og n
o
.~ ::
~._,
N Bartholcmew C. Buckley, Projact Mandd'er Licensing Branch flo. 3 Division of Licensing cc: See next page.
A
',... D.b.'
..,0, r,',,,,,
j,
. DCBuck.Iey:Jb....F&t ra.gLi.a 3
. 2,(, ] Ql,8?,,,,,,,,2,(,,g8,2,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
O
. ns no eciucu or.no OFFIC!AL RECOFiD COPY
' e "
07 7( g
-)
57f
-'~
l
l7
+
t i
2 f_0.R,,NRC,,%RSOMXL PROPOSED DISCUSSION / QUESTION ITEMS Februa,ry 17,.1982.
Y 1.
Introduction Observe that NRC15taff had many of the.same criticisms and ideas as the State and Intervenors. 1 2.
'D,1,scussion.
10-30-81 Leet,e,r,',LC,al i. f,o,rn.i.a)
-What would be the purpose, scope, authority, and responsibility of the S.teering. Comittee?
~
How should'the severity of errors be determined?
Are the Consultants listed still acceptable? How.about Teledyne as represented by Dr. Cooper?
1 1 8_1,L_e tte,r, _(,C_a l i fo rni a,_),
What purpose.would be served by stopping PG&E's or Cloud's work?
11-16-81 Letter (Californi,aj In what specific areas dces the State believe that Cloud.and Reedy are not meeting the NRC order and letter of 11-19-817; What is the basis for bringing up Construction QA?
Have the parties-seen R. F. Reedy's audit plans? Are these acceptable por the coments on QA audit shortcomings in the 12-04-81 plan.
3
- .Q3 n.
i i
' AGENDA e
Meeting with Representatives of Governor Brown of California and the Joint Intervenors Regarding PG&E's Submittal dated December 4,1981 'on the Diablo Canyon, Unit l' Seismic Reverification Program - Phase I 1.
February 17. 1982
~l-
+
1.?
Introduct_f.o.n - H. Denton (NRC) 1:30-1:45 p.m.-
Purpose.and Scope of Present Meeting Criteria for Independence (hand out) 2.:
Introductory Connents - State of California 1:45-1:55 p.m.
3.;
Introductory C_ongten,t.s - Joint Intervenors 1:55-2:05 p.m.
4.{ D._iscussions with.NRC" Staff Personnel 2:05-3:00 p.m.
5.
Break 3:00-3:15 p.m.
6.
_ Discussions with NRC' Staff Personnel 3:15-4:15 p.m..
7.
Concludi.ns, Comme,nty - H. Denton (NRC) 4:i5-4:30p.m.
f l
l 4
I j
W 4
r e
4 e+e a. w ar-+
8*=e'e-em
-we e.
J'h e > %
NM*WmnP r
TJ 1'.
a.
.g.
a 1,2,1,7-Al,J.etter (Caltifornia)-
How does the State believe current and future drafts should be handled over and cbove the agreements reached at the February 3,1982 meeting in Bethesda?'
12-21-81 Letter (Intervenors)
What is the basis of questioning Cloud's, Reedy's, or Teledyne's competence?
What was Cloud's specific envolvement with UR3/Blume per sunnelf Hun does this genera.te a. conflict of interest?
What is the basis for stating that the revised report was more favorable to PG&E?
i j
How did PG&E' mislead the Congress?
11,23-81 Letter (Intervenors) 1-15-82 Letter (Cal:ifornial L
Contains a repeat of the 11-07-81 letter with a set of comments on
[
the 12-04-81 PG&E subnittal.
What sampling criteria is recommended by the State? What is the basis for this recommenlation? Why does the state believe statistical methods are applicable?'
What significant. areas have not been covered by the Generic samples?
In light of the NRC letter of 1-28-82 and the progress of the program to date (as reflected in the progress reports), which specific items does the State believe need to be retained as criticisms? Reference to Order? List of items identified? QA progren elements? Sampling criteria?
q7 p
4
-ww m-
r;,
i
} [ r;
- '.I
.a v,
gf
,e, s-
, o i
1-15-82 Letter _(, Continued.1 Does the State f' eel that the nonconformance reports written as a result of the PG&E June 29, 1979 audit of URS/Blume failed to address the concerns raised by the auditors? If not, why not? What does the State believe should be done at this time?
2_,0,3-82..Le,tt_ey,_(,Ca11fornia Befor$r the NRC raised the. issue of independence, would one reasonably expect-PG&E to treat-R. L. Cloud as a completely independent auditor?
Is the State aware that Cloud's contractural reporting requirements.
changed after the 11-03-81 meeting (wherein the independence issue was raised?
i e
l 2-05-82 Lettey,,(Inter tenors,),
J l