ML20087A749

Discusses Visit Made to Facility on 700106-08 for Purpose of Reviewing Results of Full Power Startup Tests & to Review Corrective Action Taken by Licensee on Previously Identified Items of Noncompliance

ML20087A749
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	01/21/1970
From:	Dodds R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Robert Carlson US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20086U000	List: ML20086U112 ML20086U115 ML20086U121 ML20086U134 ML20086U140 ML20086U146 ML20086U150 ML20086U163 ML20086U169 ML20086U171 ML20087A013 ML20087A017 ML20087A033 ML20087A036 ML20087A050 ML20087A057 ML20087A095 ML20087A099 ML20087A104 ML20087A108 ML20087A120 ML20087A164 ML20087A168 ML20087A174 ML20087A181 ML20087A185 ML20087A198 ML20087A206 ML20087A211 ML20087A215 ML20087A220 ML20087A229 ML20087A242 ML20087A251 ML20087A257 ML20087A269 ML20087A287 ML20087A296 ML20087A319 ML20087A484 ML20087A519 ML20087A556 ML20087A566 ML20087A578 ML20087A597 ML20087A600 ML20087A609 ML20087A620 ML20087A622 ML20087A628 ... further results
References
FOIA-95-36 NUDOCS 9508070156
Download: ML20087A749 (1)

Text

.

y.

,g, in i

h-UNITED STATES

[

j.1 ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

.j

. [(~/( ) @p g

DIVISION OF COMPLIANCE r

REGION V

%j

1. 4115 5 2111 DANCHOFT WAY BERKcLEY. CALIFORNIA 94704 Twiam, au-sm En. 658 January 21, 1970 R. T. Carlson, Senior Reactor Inspector DivisionofCompiance,RegionI JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGilT COMPANY (0YSTER CREEK)

{

. oc1ET n-su-m -C.o 12.e.cowr-uQo --g A routine visit was made to the subject facility on January 6-8, 1970 for the purpose of reviewing the results of the full power startup tests and to review corrective action taken by the licensee on previously identified items of noncompliance. No_significant safetyJ roblems were identified during the inspection. However, two items of noncompfiance and an item of nonconformance with a DRL request were noted.

In view of JC's history of noncompliance and nonconformance, I recomend that CO Headquarters communicate directly with the licensee regarding these. items.

I believe GE's responsibility regarding the violation of secondary containment should be clearly established.

If they were the responsible party, they should be made to respond accordingly since GE retained certain responsibilities to the Commission in accordance with Amendment 52.

I believe that the licensee will continue to be plagued with containment problems in the reactor building until a better personnel door interlock arrangement has been devised.

Considering the new people that have been hired by JC and the GE stayers, it appears that there should be sufficient on-site capability to handle the day-to-day operation and routine operating problems. It should be recognized that immediate support from GPU and GE is only a telephone call away.

My review of the results of the full power startup tests did not disclose

~

any anomalics. The results of " tuning up" of the various control systems became evident during the latest transient tests. These tests demonstrated the stability of the reactor control and feedback systems. We have a copy of all the full power test results including strip charts that can be made i

available for review on a need-to-know basis. Ilowever, where appropriate, j

significant charts have been included in Section S. of the report.

j.

,)0lbTOG.

R. T. Dodds Reactor Inspector i

9500070156 950227 PDR FOIA DEKOK95-36 PDR

.