ML20076K318
| ML20076K318 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 04/29/1983 |
| From: | Baskin K SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO., SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | Martin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8307080392 | |
| Download: ML20076K318 (195) | |
Text
- .. __ -
ANNUAL OPERATING REPORT 0F
.. .. SAN ON0FRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT 2 For 1982 N
RADl0 LOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING EVALUATION
~
n N/
1 p..
F L
l 9 Southern California Edison Company i*E V G San Diego Gas and Electric Company e
'd '
Docket No. 50 361 4 License No. NPF-10
. >;e APRIL 29,1983 i ,
, lSA72$8SEoSS8$${j
Yo ANNUAL OPERATING REPORT SAN ONOFRE NOCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT 2 FOR 1982 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL M041TORING EVALUATION
'y Prepared by:
i i
l Southern California Edison Company San Diego Gas and Electric Company l
j Docket No. 50-361 License No. NPF-10 i
i*
i i
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Li st of Ta bl es ( Appendi x A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii Li st of Tables ( Appendi x H) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv g,, List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi I. INTRODUCTION A. The Program . ..................... 1 B. Objectives ...................... 1 C. Sample Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 D. Sampl e Ana lys i s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 II. RESULTS AND DISCUSS 10t!
A. Assessment of Radiological Impact of Plant
, Operation on the Environment ............. 4 k 4
, 1. Ai rborne Radiciodine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
s)
- 2. Ai rborne Particulates Activity . . . . . . . . . . 4
- 3. Di rect Ra di ati on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
- 4. Drinking Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
- 5. Ocean Water ................... 7
- 6. Shoreline Sediment (Beach Sand) ......... 7
- 7. Ocean Botton Sediment .............. 7
- 8. Local Crops ................... 8 e
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont.)
Page II. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (Cont.)
4
- 9. Soil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
~.
- 10. Jack Rabbit ................... 9
- 11. Kelp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
- 12. Marine Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 B. Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 C. References ...................... 13 Ill. APPENDICES A. Progran Data Summa ry. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 ,
B. Sample Type and Sampling Location . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 C. Measurements Exceeding Twice Background Level . . . . . C-1 D. Summary of Interlaboratory Comparisons ........ D-1 y
E. Comparison of Operational Data with Preoperational Da ta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-1 A. External Radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-1 B. Drinking Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-2
- 1. Drinking Water Filtrate ............. E-2
- 2. Drinking Water Solids .............. E-3 C. Ocean Water ................... E-4 D. Ocean Bottom Sediments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-4 E. Marine Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-S F. Ai r Parti cul ates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-6 G. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-7
- Table E-la ........................ E-8 ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont.)
Page F. Correlation of Environaental Concentration with Effluent Release . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-I A. SONGS 1 and 2 Effluents and Marine Species . . . . F-1 e 1. SONGS 1 Species ................. F-1
- 2. SONGS 2 Species ................. F-2 B. Ocean Bottom Sediments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-6 C. Conclusions ................... F-6 G. Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G-1 H-1 H. Data Tables (Raw Data) ................
- 1. SONGS 2 Land Use Census . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 A. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 B. Finding by use Category ............. 1-1
- 1. ftilk Animals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1
- 2. Vegetable Gardens ................ 1-1
- 3. Residents .................... I-2 C. Findings by Section ............... 1-3 D. Summary of Nearest Uses ............. I-5 Table I-la ...................... I-6 s
e e
iii
I i
LIST OF TABLES (APPENDIX A)
Table Number Page la Quarterly Gamma Exposure A-1 lb Annual Ganna Exposure A-2 2 Weekly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity A-3 o
3 Weekly Radioiodine I-131 Activity A-4 4a Quarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gamma A-5 Spectral Analysis 4c Quarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gross Alpha and A-7 Strontium Activities 5 Monthly Ocean Water Gamma Spectral Analysis A-8 6 Bi-Monthly Ocean Water Gross Beta Activity A-10 7 Quarterly Composite Ocean Water Tritium Activity A-11 9a Monthly Drinking Water Analysis A-12 9b Monthly Drinking Water Solids Gross Alpha and Gross A-14 Beta Activities 9c Monthly Drinking Water Filtrate Gross Alpha and Gross A-15
- Beta Activities t
s 9d Quarterly Composite Drinking Water Solids Gross Alpha A-16 and Gross Beta Activities 9e Quarterly Composite Drinking Water Filtrate Analysis A-17 10 Semi-Annual Shoreline Sediment Gamma Spectral Analysis A-19 11 Semi-Annual Ocean Botton Sediment Gamma Spectral Analysis A-22 12a Quarterly Non-Migratory Marine Animals Analysis (Flesh) A-25
. 12b Quarterly Non-Migratory Marine Animals Analysis (Bone) A-39 13a Semi-Annual Local Crops Gamma Spectral Analysis A-50
- 13b Semi-Annual Local Crops Tritium and Strontium Activities A-56 14 Annual Soil Analysis A-58 15 Semi-Annual Kelp Analysis A-60 iv
l LIST OF TABLES (APPENDIX H)
Table Number Page 1a Quarterly Gamma Exposure H-1 lb Annual Ganna Exposure H-2 2 Weekly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity H-3 3 Weekly Radioiodine I-131 Activity H-6 4a Quarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gamma H-9 Spectral Analysis 4c Quarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gross Alpha and H-11 Strontium Activities 5 Monthly Ocean Water Ganna Spectral Analysis H-12 6 Bi-Monthly Ocean Water Gross Beta Activity H-16 7 Quarterly Composite Ocean Water Tritium Activity H-17 8 Ocean Water Strontium Action Level Analysis H-18 9a Monthly Drinking Water Analysis H-19 9b Monthly Drinking Water Solids Gross Alpha and Gross H-21 Beta Activities 9c Monthly Drinking Water Filtrate Gross Alpha and Gross H-22 Beta Activities 9d Quarterly Composite Drinking Water Solids Gross Alpha H-23 and Gross Beta Activities 9e Quarterly Composite Drinking Water Filtrate Analysis H-24 9f Drinking Water Strontiun Action Level Analysis H-25
. 10 Semi-Annual Shorelirie Sediment Ganna Spectral Analysis H-26 11 Semi-Annual Ocean Bottom Sediment Gamma Spectral Analysis H-27 v
1 i
LIST OF TABLES (Cont.)
i (APPENDIX H)
Page o 12a Quarterly Non-Migratory Marine Animals Analysis (Flesh) H-28 s
12b Quarterly Non-Migratory Marine Animals Analysis (Bone) H-34
^-
13a Semi-Annual Local Crops Ganna Spectral Analysis H-40 13b Seni-Annual Local Crops Tritium and Strontium Activities H-41
- 14 Annual Soil Analysis H-42 IS Semi-Annual Kelp Analysis H-43 i
1 i
a.
\
i 1
d l
Q 1
9 2
l vi
LIST OF FIGURES (APPENDIX G)
Figure Page 1 Monthly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity (All Locations) ...................... G-1 a 2 Monthly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity San Clemente . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G-2 3 Monthly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity Camp Pendleton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G-3 4 Monthly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity Visitor Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G-4 5 Monthly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity Units 2/3 Switchyard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G-5 6 Monthly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity Tri-Cities Municipal District Reservoir .......... G-6 7 Monthly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity Huntington Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... G-7 8 Comparison of Preoperational Data with Operational Data (Quarterly TLD Results) .................. G-8 9 Comparison of Preoperational Data with Operational Data (Monthly Gross Beta Activity in Drinking Water Filtrate .. G-9 10 Comparison of Preoperational Data with Operational Data (Monthly Gross Beta Activity in Drinking Water Solids) . . . G-10 11 Comparison of Preoperational Data with Operational Data (Bi-Monthly Gross Beta Activity in Ocean Water) ...... G-11 12 Comparison of Preoperational Data with Operational Data (Semi-Annual Co-60 Activity in Ocean Botton Sediments) . . . G-12 l 13 Comparison of Preoperational Data with Operational Data
- (Semi-Annual Cs-137 Activity in Ocean Bottom l Sediments) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G-13 l 14 Comparison of Preoperational Data with Operational Data (Quarterly Co-60, Ag-110m, and Cs-137 in Spiny Lobster) .. G-14 15 Comparison of Preoperational Data with Operational Data
( Average Monthly Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulates . . G-15 vii
LIST OF FIGURES (Cont.)
(APPENDIX G)
Figure Page 16 Cobalt-60 and Cesium-137 Effluent Monthly Release (1982) . . G-16 3, 17 Quarterly Evaluation of Co-60 in Marine Species of
. SONGS 2/3 (1981-1982) ................... G-17 18 Cobalt-60 and Cesiun-137 Effluent Monthly Release (1981) . . G-18 19 Quarterly Evaluation of Cs-137 in Marine Species of SONGS 2/3 (1981-1982) ................... G-19 20 Monthly Tritium Activity (C1) in Liquid Effluent Released at SONGS 1 Outfall (1981-1982) .......... G-20 21 Quarterly Tritium Activity (nCi/kg wet) in Marine Species of SONGS 1, SONGS 2&3 and Newport Beach Control .. G-21 22 Meteorological Section Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G-22 k
viii
I. INTRODUCTION During the period January 1 to December 31, 1982, an Operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program was conducted by San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS). This program was designed to
- identify and quantify concentrations of radioactivity in various environmental media and to quantify ambient radiation levels in the environs of SONGS. Unit 2 became critical on July 26, 1982 and began f ascension testing. The power level of Unit 2 did not exceed 50% of rated full thernal powar (Appendix F, Table 1F).
During the operational phase, the program monitors the operations of SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3, as required by SONGS Technical Specifications.
This report presents the results of thermoluminescent dosimetry and radiochemical analyses of environmental samples collected during 1982.
A large number of analyses were performed on different environnental samples during the period covered by this report. Samples of air particulates, air iodine, drinking water, sediment, beach sand, kelp, fish, crustaceans, ocean water, local crops, soil, and jackrabbit were collected and -analyzed. Thermoluninescent dosimeters (TLD) were used to measure the external radiation levels. A variety of radionuclides, Doth naturally-occurring and man-made, were detected in the above samples.
Results at indicator stations compared favorably to control stations.
It was concluded that the radiological characteristics of the environment around SONGS were not affected by the operation of SONGS Unit 2 during 1982.
,, A. The Progran In the operational phase of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP), the program was conducted in accordance
- with Section 3/4.12.1 of SONGS Unit 2 Technical Specifications (TS). Radioanalytical data were also analyzed to detect the presence and trends of any radioactivity in environmental samples.
Correlation of liquid and gaseous effluent activity levels was nade with the environmental activity levels in order to study the station impact, it any, on the environment.
B. Objectives The objectives of the operational REMP are:
- 1. To fulfill the obligation for radiological surveillance required by SONGS TS.
- 2. To determine whether any significant increase occurs in the concentration of radionuclides in critical pathways.
M
_2
- 3. To detect any change in ambient gamma radiation levels.
- 4. To verify that SONGS operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environnent.
- Sample Collection C.
In order to meet the stated requirements (objectives), an appropriate operational REMP was developed for SONGS. Samples of various media were selected to obtain data for the evaluation of the radiation dose to man and other organisms. The selection of sample types was based on established critical pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through the environment to man, experience gained during the preoperational phase, and evaluation of the data during the operatiur,al phase. Sampling locations were determined from site meteorology, local demography, and land uses (land use census).
Sampling locations were divided into two classes - indicator and control. Indicator stations are those which are expected to manifest station ef fects, if any exist; control samples are collected at locations which are believed to be unaffected by station operations. Fluctuations in the levels of radionuclides and direct radiation at indicator stations are evaluated with respect to analogous fluctuations at control stations, which are unaffected by the station operations. Indicator- and control-station data are also evaluated relative to preoperational data whenever possible.
D. Sample Analysis '
The environmental samples are collected at different locations around SONGS and then submitted to a contracted radiological laboratory (CRL). An analysis of the mean values and ranges reported by our contract radiological laboratory during its participation in the EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Program has been performed. Some 15" of the values fall outside of the control limits specified by EPA-600 for mean values and all the normalized range values (1007.) are within permissible control limits. An investigation to determine the cause for those deviations and neea for corrective actions is being conducted.
~
The analytical methods utilized in this program are described in that lab's procedures manual may be obtained from the laboratory.
A portion of Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is also
, devoted to quality control, including process quality control, instrument quality control, inter-laboratory cross-check analysis, and comprehensive data review. Results of the EPA inter-laboratory comparison program appear in Appendix D. It should be mentioned that the EPA diet samples (food slurry) cross-check analysis was not performed by the contractor lab. Therefore, the food medium
was not included in the EPA cross-check data (Apendix D) since no data were available. The food analysis cross-check progran will be initiated by the lab after April 1983 and the results will be -
reported in the 1983 AUR. Within the data tables (Appendix H), an approximate 95% (+27) confidence interval is supplied for those data points above the lower limit of detection (LLO). These intervals represent the range of values into which, 95% of analytical results would fall. Results of each type of sample are grouped according to the analysis performed. Means, ranges, and
'a standard deviations are calculated using standard statistical methods in the format specified in Regulatory Guide 4.8 (Appendix A). Sample type and sampling location are listed in Appendix B. These tables have been obtained from the SONGS Unit 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (0DCM). Appendix C lists all the radionuclides whose activities exceed twice the activity of the background level, i.e., the control locations. For TLD results, any value greater than 1.25 times the control location will be cited. In instances when the control location reported value is less than LLD, indicator values will be cited whenever reported activity exceeds twice the control location LLD. These LLD values can be obtained from Appendix A. Correlation of ef fluent release with environmental concentration of specific radionuclides is also made in order to evaluate the release impact of the plant operation on the environment (Appendix F). Appendix E indicates the comparison between different locations (control and indicator) and also compares the operational data with preoperational, whenever possi ble. Appendix H lists data obtained for each individual sample (raw data).
~
e e
II. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The radioanalytical results of the 1982 REMP samples are divided into categories based on exposure pathways such as airborne, direct radiation, water, aquatic, and ingestion. For comparison of the environmental concentrations with the reporting levels, Unit 2 reporting level values of the ETS were used.
A. Assessment of Radiological Impact of Plant Operation on the Environment
- 1. Airborne Radioiodine Iodine in air was sampled by adsorption on charcoal catridges. The weekly samples collected on charcoal air filters showed no detectable iodine. All results for I-131 were below the LLD. Tne LLD was 0.04 pCi/m3 of air collected on the charcoal filter. A total of 312 charcoal filters were analyzed. It is concluded that the radiciodine release at the station has no impact on this medium.
- 2. Airborne Particulates Activity Airborne particulate samples were collected on co-polymer fiber filters (cropor type AN-800) with an air sampler. A total of 312 filters were analyzed throughout 1982. Air sample volumes were measured with calibrated dry-gas neters corrected to (200C) and standard pressure. The air particulate filters were collected on a weekly basis for gross
. beta analysis at five sampling indicator locations and one control station (Huntington Beach).
Weekly gross beta analyses showed concentrations raking fron O.003 to 0.063 pCi/m3 for all indicator locations. The gross beta activity averaged 0.020 pCi/m 3. The lower limit of detection was 0.001 pCi/m3 (Appendix A).
No significant change in gross beta activity occurred as seen in Figure 1, altnough there was some significant fluctuation throughout the year. As is seen in Figures 1 and 2, the gross beta activity in San Clemente had a peak in March (0.12 pCi/m3 ). This activity may be attributable to tne environmental or seasonal factors and is not plant related
~
since other inoicator stations do not show any unusual levels. Measured gross beta activity between the other indicator (Figures 2, 3, 4, S, and 6) and the control locations (Figure 7), showed no major differences, thus
. indicating no contribution from the plant release. Gamma spectral analysis of quarterly composite samples showed the presence of cosmogenic Be-7 with a range of 0.034 to 0.188 pCi/m3 . Cesium-137 on air filter composites was not
detected at any locations (LLD = 0.001 pCi/m3 ). The Sr-89 and Sr-90 analyses were also performed on the composited samples. No significant activity was noted so the plant effect is minimal.
~
Weekly filters were composited quarterly and were analyzed for gross alpha, Sr-89, and Sr-90. A Ge(Li) scan was also perforned on composites for specific gamma emitters. The range of gross alpha activity in all locations was 0.0010 to 3, 0.0045 pC1/m3 with an average standard deviation of 0.0002 pCi/m3 . The average gross alpha activity of all the indicator locations was 0.0025 pCi/m3 where in Huntington Beach Control location it was 0.0024 pCi/m3, not significantly different. Therefore, it is concluded that this activity is not plant related and may be due to otner environmental factors.
- 3. Direct Radiation Gamma exposure measurenents were made quarterly and annually at 59 locations. Dosimeters were located at a number of onsite locations as well as at outer locations. Each packet contained four dosimeters for a total of 1180 analyses. For the quarterly analyses, calcium sulpnate (CaSO4) TLD's were used where for the annual analysis, lithium fluoride (LiF) dosimeters were used. All TLD results presented in this report have been normalized to a standard quarter to eliminate the apparent difference caused by variations in exposure period. A comparison of the direct radiation data for 1981 shows the same average monthly dose as 1982 for both indicator and control stations. The data for 1982 exhibit no significant difference between the offsite and onsite
, locations, thus indicating no offsite effects from plant operations. The control station in Huntington Beach averaged 27.9 millirem over four quarters while the visitor center and the south southwest boundary averaged 22.7 and 23.2 milliren respectively. Annual TLD's measured an average of 109.4 millirem in the Huntington Beach control location.
- 4. Drinking Water Monthly drinking water samples were collected at a local reservoir, a local well, and at a control station (Huntington
. Beach). Gross alpha and gross beta analyses were performed on both the solids and filtrate. Drinking water samples were composited quarterly and the composited solids and filtrate were again analyzed for gross alpha and gross beta activities. The composite filtrate was also analyzed for tri ti uu. No samples were found to contain strontium or ganna emitters equal to its action levels (action levels in Appendix H). The control location in Huntington Beach was
consistently 20 to 25% lower than the Iscal stations. This difference is attributable to the variations in the levels of naturally-occurring potassiun-40, a beta enitter. The ganna spectral analysis did not show the presence of any specific radionuclides. liost of the gross beta activity in the water samples was found in the filtrate (nostly K-40). In general,
- the activity concentrations in the filtrate were an order of magnitude higher than the activity in the suspended solids.
The gross beta activity of the filtrate and the solids were averaged for each locatin over 12 months and are as below:
)*
Gross Beta Activity Filtrate (pCi/l) Solids (pCi/1) location Mean + 1 Range Mean + 1 Range Tri-Cities Municipal Reservoir 14.5 + 4.2 8 - 21 1.1 + 0.4 0.6 - 2.0 San Clenente Well 13.1 + 3.4 10 - 19 0.8 + 0.3 0.6 - 1.5 Huntington Beach (Control) 9.6 + 4.2 5 - 21 1.0 + 0.3 0.6 - 1.4 Statistical analysis of the above data indicates no significant difference between the control and indicator stations. Comparison of the 1982 data with the previous four year's data (1978-1981) did not reveal any statistically-significant differences except normal seasonal variations.
The gross alpha activity of the drinking water filtrate and solids were less than LLD (3 pCi/l for the filtrate and 0.2 pCi/l for solids) except in two locations. Tri-Cities Municipal Reservoir was reported to have a gross alpha activity of 0.4 + 0.1 pCi/l in solids and a sample from the Huntington Beach control station that had a gross alpha activity of 3 + 1 pCi/l in the filtrate. These values are within the range of 2.0 to 6.0 pCi/l over the 4-year period (1978-1981). This positive activity was observed in 5 samples out of 48 total.
No detectable concentrations of tritium were observed in any of the samples except one sample from Tri-Cities Municipal Water Reservoir, where the tritium activity of the filtrate was 200 pCi/1 in the month of June 1982. This tritiun activity is 100 times snaller than ETS value (reporting level
- 20,000 pCi/1) for tritium in drinking water, and does not exceed the twice LLD of the control location (100 pCi/l). No other samples contained tritiun activity in excess of the LLD for tritiun (100 pCi/l). No radionuclides were detected by
. garxia spectral analysis in any of the samples analyzed.
Iodine-131 was not observed in any of the water samples and
( its lower limit of detection was 2 pCi/l. It is concluded that the plant had no negative impact on the drinking water in the environnent.
l l
It should be mentioned that quarterly (June) tritium analysis and monthly tritium analysis and Ge(Li) scan were not perforned on drinking water samples in March and April 1982.
The anount of sample received was not sufficient to perforn Ge(Li) scan and I-131 analyses. The missing analyses will not
, have any significant impact on the sampling program since Unit 2 criticality was in July.
- 5. Ocean Water 3*
Ocean water was collected monthly at three locations directly over Units 1, and 2/3 outfall and at one control station.
Gross beta analysis was performed on the bimonthly samples and tritiun analysis was performed on quarterly-composite samples. All samples analyzed showed no detectable level of cesiun-137 or tritium. Monthly gamma spectral analysis did not detect the presence of any specific radionuclides except naturally-occurring potassium-40. The range of gross beta activity (mostly K-40) in ocean water was from 640 to 1010 pCi/1. The LLD for both Cs-134 and Cs-137 was 6 pCi/1, Quarterly composites did not show any detectable tritium and its lower limit of detection was 100 pCi/1. It should be mentioned that ocean water samples for the nonth of February 1982 were not collected and therefore no results for Ge(Li) scan were available. The impact of the missed analysis is minor since Unit 2 operation started in July 1982.
- 6. Shoreline Sediment (Beach Sand)
Beach sand samples were collected semi-annually at four locations and gamma spectral analysis was performed. Tne
. analysis showed the presence of naturally-occurring radionuclides in the uranium (4n + 2) and thorium (4n) decay series. No nan-made radionuclides were observed. The gamna spectral analysis showea the presence of naturally-occurring K-40 in the range of 13 to 20 pCi/g dry-weight basis and radiun-226 in the range of 0.14 to 1.27 pCi/g dry. Gamma spectral analyses idenfied no other detectable radionuclides.
No contribution from the plant was observed in this mediun.
- 7. Ocean Botton Sedinent
- Ocean bottom sediment was collected semi-annually at five locations, including one control station. Gamma spectral analysis was performed on all samples. The presence of small quantities of cobalt-60 and cesium-137 were detected. The highest measured value for Co-60 was 0.58 nC1/kg dry at Unit 1 outfall (up coast) in the month of June 1982. In December, the Co-60 activities were 0.13 nCi/kg dry at Unit 1 outfall (up coast) and 0.15 nCi/kg dry at Unit 1 outfall (down coast) respectively.
-8 The highest Co-60 activity is approximately 20 times less than the reporting level and the highest Cs-137 activity is lower than the reporting level. The potassium-40 activity measured by ganna spectrometry ranged from 14-17 nCi/kg dry weight.
Natural radium-226 and thoriun-228 were also found in the sediment with naxinum activities of 0.67 and 0.66 nCi/kg dry
- weight. In conclusion, the station impact is considered minimal.
- 8. Local Crops Local crops collected semi-annually at harvest time, were analyzed for tritium, strontium and underwent gamma spectral analyses. All measurements were below the lower limits of detection levels except for very small quantities of strontiun-90 observed at a control location (south southeast of Oceanside). Kale analyzed from this location had an activity level of 0.27 nCi/kg wet in the nonth nf June.
December analysis showed Sr-90 activity of 0.014 nCi/kg wet for SSE of Oceanside (control) and 0.007 nCi/kg wet in cauliflower taken from San Clemente Ranch. The Sr-90 activity can be attributed to fallout and is not a result of plant operations.
The cosmically-produced Be-7 was observed in the above-descrioed sanples. The activities were 0.07 and 0.06 nCi/kg ret for kale from SSE of Oceanside and tomato fron San Clenente Ranch respectively. The potassium-40 level was 1.6 to 1.8 nCi/kg wet in all samples. The results show that
- the plant operation has minimal effect on this environnent.
- 9. Soil
- Soil was sanpled at five locations annually. Gamma spectral and strontium analyses were performed on all samples. The analyses showed small levels of cesium-137 in 3 of 5 sanples (0.02 nCi/kg dry at Camp San Onofre, 0.03 nCi/kg dry at old Route 101 South East, and 0.12 nCi/kg dry for Huntington Beach control). These cesium-137 activity levels were much lower than the reporting level. Small levels of Sr-90 were observed in all 5 sanples (0.02-0.05) nCi/kg dry, probably the resultt, of fallout. The range of the naturally-occurring K-40 was 7-23 nCi/kg dry. The maximum activities of naturally-occurring Ra-226 and Th-228 were 0.76 and 1.37 nCi/kg dry respectively. The results showed no significant difference in the levels of Cs-137 at the control and indicator stations, therefore indicating no plant effect. It is felt that there is no plant effect on the soil in the environment.
-g-
- 10. Jackrabbit Rabbits were caught north and northeast of the site during the year and analyzed by ganna spectrometry. Spectral analysis .
was perf^rmed on the flesh portion. Radiciodine analysis was conductt.J on the thyroid glands and Sr-89 and Sr-90 analyses were performed on the fenur. No detectable levels of radioiodine, Sr-89, Sr-90, or Cs-137 were observed in any of
, the above organs, thus indicating no plant effect. The LLD o for Cs-137 was 0.06 pCi/g flesh. The LLD for I-131 was 0.05 pCi/g in flesh.
- 11. Kelp Kelp samples were collected semi-aonually at three indicator stations and one control stations. Gama spectral and tritiun analyses were performed. No neasurable activities were detected in all samples. Tritium analysis, bound and aqueous, yielded no detectable activity in any of the samples. Ganna spectral analysis did show the presence of K-40 in the range of 2.1 to 5.S nCi/kg wet. For I-131, Cs-58, Cs-60, Ag-110n, and Cs-137, a radiochemical method was also used for verification of the presence of these radionuclides. The results showed no positive values. It is concluded that tnere are no detectable effects in kelp due to operation of San Onofre.
- 12. Marine Species Edible marine species (sheepshead, black perch, spiny lobster, giant keyhole, bay mussel, and sea hare) were collected by the Ocean Science Laboratories of the Lockheed Corporation, and submitted to EAL Corporation for analysis. Radionuclides, such as Co-58, Co-60, Cs-134, Cs-137, and Ag-110m were observed in small quantities in a few species.
Naturally-occurring K-40 ranged from 1.0 to 3.7 nCi/kg wet in flesh portion of the species. All the analyses meet the LLO requirenents of the Environmental Technical Specifications (Appendix A). Cesium-137 level in different marine species varied from 0.003 to 0.012 nCi/kg wet weight basis. The highest value of 0.021 was found in spiny lobster caught around the SONGS Unit 1 outfall in the month of March. Tnis value is approximately one percent of the ETS value (reporting a level for Cs-137 is 2 nCi/kg wet). No detectable Cs-137 was observed in the shell or cartilage (bone) of the marine species ar alyzed. Cobalt-60 level in the marine species varied from 0.006 to 0.086 nCi/kg wet. The highest value of 0.086 was found in black perch caugnt around SONGS Unit 1 outfall in June 1982. This value is less than one percent of tne ETS value (reporting level for Co-60 is 10 nCi/kg wet).
The shell fraction of spiny lobster caught around SONGS 1 s
outfall showed maximum Co-60 concentration of 0.35 nCi/kg wet which is one percent of the reporting level. Co-58 was found in the shell of one of the spiny lobster species caught at SONGS 1 outfall at a level of 0.019 nCi/kg which does not exceed the twice background (control) value of 0.014 nCi/kg
~
wet weight. Tnis value is less tnan 0.05 percent of the ETS reporting level (reporting level for Co-58 is 30 nCi/kg wet).
One spiny lobster species caught at SONGS 2 outfall in August 7
contained 0.018 nCi/kg wet of Co-58 in flesh and 0.019 nCi/'g
- wet in the shell. Sea hare caught at SONGS 1 outfall also contained 0.033 and 0.015 nCi/kg wet in June and August respectively. All SONGS 2 outfall species showed no activity in detectable level and were reported as zero. The maximum Co-58 activity of 0.033 nCi/kg wet is 0.11% of Unit 2 ETS reporting level. During the preoperational period, the concentration range of Co-58 was 0.04 to 0.27 nCi/kg wet in SONGS 2 outfall species and most of the species analyzed during the preoperational time perico had activities below the LLO and were reported as zero. The maximun value of 0.27 nCi/kg wet was observed in December 1979 and is 17. of the ETS reporting level for Co-58 (30 nCi/kg wet). The preoperational data also indicate that sea hare and bay mussel contained various levels of Co-58 in their flesh. Most of the species had activities less than LLD. Highest Co-58 activity in sea hare was found to be 0.39 nCi/kg wet and for bay mussel, 0.026 nCi/kg wet during the preoperational phase of Unit 2. The activities of these radionuclides were all below LLD during the operational period. The maximun activity of 0.39 nCi/kg wet observed in sea hare in September 1979 is 1% of the reporting level for Co-58. In conclusion, no accumulation pattern has been observed in these species up to date.
Radiosilver-110m was found in some species and crustaceans (spiny lobster) in detectable level. The concentration level of Ag-110m ranged fron 0.003 to 0.062 nCi/kg wet. The highest value of 0.062 was found in spiny lobster flesh caught around SONGS 1 outfall in the month of August. This value is less than one percent of the ETS value (reporting level for Ag-110n is 8 nCi/kg wet). Silver-110n in bone and shell fraction varied from 0.016 to 0.064 nCi/kg wet. The maximum value of 0.064 was observed in spiny lobster shell caught around SONGS 1 outfall in the month of March, where the control location sample showed an activity of 0.014 nCi/kg wet. There were no other ganna emitters detected.
The bone fraction of the marine species did not contain any detectable Sr-90 activity. The lower limit of detection was 0.04 nCi/kg dry weight.
l l
l t
.~. _. -
The marine species were analyzed for both aqueous and bound tritium. The two false positive values observed for bound tritium in black perch caught at SONGS 1 and 2/3 outfalls, in March, are believed to be attributable to chemical bioluminescence. The analytical method for measurement of bound tritium was changed partially and applied to subsequent analysis of marine species. None of the marine samples snowed any positive activity after this modification. Aqueous tritium in the wet flesh of sheepshead varied from 0.08 to 5 0.14 nCi/kg. Black perch had an activity in the range 0.10 to
- 0.35 nCi/kg and in spiny lobster, it varied from 0.07 to 0.18 nCi/kg. Sea hare and bay mussel had 0.05 and 0.13 nCi/kg of aqueous tritium respectively. The maximum value found for aqueous tritium was 0.35 nCi/kg wet which is 0.01% of the ETS value (reporting level for tritium is 4,400 nCi/kg wet). It is concluded that the plant had minor impact on the marine environment and no significant difference was noted between the control and the indicator stations.
B. Conclusions The variability of the levels of radioactivity in environtental media depend on many factors. These factors include site release rates; meteorology; number, lccation, and size of nuclear weapons testing; seasonal variability of fallout; soil conditions; local terrain; and variability in the natural environment.
Radiological environmental data, collected throughout 1982 have been evaluated to determine the environmental significance, if any, of San Onofre Operations. The following methods of evaluation were employed:
Compilation and verification of all data. A special listing
, and review were made of all data determined to be two times greater as compared to the background levels (control samples).
Graphical display and examination of time-dependent variations of the various pertinent radioisotopes and sample species throughout the year.
Graphical comparison of gross beta radioactivity and specific long-lived gamma emmiters in various media in 1982 against the levels and annual variation in the pre-operational years 1978 through 1982.
Comparison of data against reportability levels contained in the plant Technical Specifications.
. . - . . . . , - - - . .~ ... -
, - + - -..e- , -
1 l
I The question of the environmental significance of the radiological environmental findings is addressed by considering not only the existence and concentration of specific radionuclides in the various sample media, but also any evidence which would indicate that a buildup is in progress which could lead to future environmentally- significant levels.
By consideration of the findings relative to the conservatively-defined linits of the facility operating license, it is concluded 9 that the radiological environmental impact of San Onofre Unit 2 Operations through 1982 has been negligible. In addition, no evidence indicating a pattern of significant buildup due to long-term operations was found.
o 6
b o
\ J
REFERENCES (1) SONGS Unit 1 Radiological Environnental Monitoring Prograa, Annual Operating Reports (1978-1982)
(2) SONGS Unit 1 Annual Effluent Report (January 1981 - December 1982)
(3) Land Use Census for SONGS Unit 2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring
- Program, November 1982 (4) SONGS Unit 2 Seni-Annual Radioactive Effluent Reports (1982)
(5) SONGS Unit 1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Progran, Supplement to the Annual Operating Report 1981 (6) Draft ODCM, "Of fsite Cose Calculation Manual for SONGS Unit 2,"
August 1982 (7) USNRC Draft Regulatory Guide 4.8, " Standard Format and Principal Content of Environmental Technical Specifications," December 1975 (8) USNRC Regulatory Guide 4.13, " Performance, Testing, and Procedural Specifications for Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - Environmental Applications," 1977 (9) USNRC Regulatory Guide 4.15, " Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs," Rev.1, February 1979 (10) SONGS Unit 2 Operating License, NPF-10, Appendix A, Section 3/4.12.1, June 1977 m (11) Environmental Monitoring Program Plan and Procedures Manuai (EMPP) for SONGS, Rev. 2, 1982 (12) " Drinking Water," SCE Tecnqical Reports, Nuclear Analysis, NA1, 2, anc 3, EM-01, September 1982 (13) EAL Technical Procedures Manual, EAL Corporation, 1982 (14) Study of Recent Trends of Cs-137 and Co-60 in Ocean Bottom Sediments in San Onofre Vicinity, SCE Technical Reports, Nuclear Analysis, NA1, EM-02, February 1983 (15) Report to SCE on "FurtSer Analysis Releated to Thermal Discharges at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, by R. C. Y. Koh and E. J. List, September 1, 1974 (16) "Trition in the Environment," National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, NCRP Report No. 62, March 1979 k
(17) " Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Progran," EPA-600/4-81-004, February 1981 (18) " Introduction to Biostatistics," R. R. Sokal and J. J. Rohlf, W. H. Freeman and Company, p.p.128 and 316,1973 (19) "The Verification of a Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban," L. R. Sykes and J. F. Evernden, Scientific American, Volume 247, No. 4, P. 47,1982.
?
I o
O 4
i
m 4
1 I
e t
i APPENDIX A PROGRAM DATA
SUMMARY
.i
'9 6
O I
- l 1
I 1
l l
l
(
t
a s ( e
- e 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 1 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County California Reporting period: January 01. 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Lccation with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Nighest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled tunit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name. Distance Meantfl Meantfl Reported of Measuremonti Performed (LLDI Range and Direction Range Range itcasurements Table la Direct Radiation Quarterly Composite Emillfreal Gamma Exposure 236 5.0000 22.725(232/2321 San onofre State 34.825t 4/ 41 27.925t 4/ 41 0 (13.700-38.2003 Beach tunit il (30.100-38.2001 (25.600-29.6001 0.2 mi. W i
j i
. O J
7 m
a . , e ,
- e
! 25APRS3 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL HONITORING PROGRAN SUNNARY Page 1 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location ulth Number of
< Hedium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Nean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled tunit of Analyses Detection Meanif) Hame. Distance Nean(f) Meantfl Reported of Haasurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Ranse Neasurements Table Ib Direct Radiation Annual Composite taillirem)
'l
! Gamma Exposure 59 5.0000 88.4788 58/ 58) San onofre State 117.7( 1/ 11 109.4t 1/ 11 0 4
f (63.700- 117.7) Beach (Unit 13 ( 117.7- 117.7) ( 109.4- 109.4) 0.2 ml. W l
s
)
r e
S W
b 9
s s I
(
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 1 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting Period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Ty's and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Hean Control Locations Nonroutine Srepled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanffl Name Distance Meantf1 Heantfl Reported cf Heasurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Hcasurements Table 2 Airborne p;ekly composite (PCl/cu. ml Gross Beta 312 0.0010 0.0198(258/2601 Units 2/3 0.0226( 52/ 52) 0.0217f 51/ 521 0 t 0.003- 0.0633 suitchyard ( 0.010- 0.0631 ( 0.005- 0.0641 0.13 me. ESE i
4 I
=
y w
f
e , e . . . .
I 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIDLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUNNARY Page 1 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reportins Period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Nean(f) Name. Distance Meantfl Meantfl Reported of Heasurement) Performed (LLDI Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 3 Airborne Weekly Ccmposite (pci/cu. m) 1-131 312 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/260) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 52) 0 t
o 4
e I"
u F
e , . . e . .
i I
25APR83 ENVIRrHMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 1 SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GEHERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 i
San Diego County, California Reporting Period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Louer Limit All Indicator Location With .
Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name Distance Mean(f) Meantfl Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 4a Airborne Guarterly Composite (PCl/cu. m)
As-110m 24 0.0020 <LLD ( 0/ 20) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 Be-7 24 0.0060 0.0828( 20/ 20) Units 2/3 0.1025( 4/ 43 0.0642( 4/ 43 0 I ( 0.055- 0.188) Suitchyard ( 0.061- 0.188) ( 0.034- 0.085) 0.13 ml. ESE Ce-141 24 0.0040 <LLL ( 0/ 20) PLL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/. 43 0 i
Co-144 24 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 20) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 l Co-58 24 0.0020 (LLD ( 0/ 20) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 i
Co-60 24 0.0020 (LLD ( 0/ 20) ALL (LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ 41 0 Cs-134 24 0.0010 <LLD ( 0/ 20) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0
, Cs-137 24 0.0010 <LLD ( 0/ 20) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 K-40 24 0.0200 <LLD ( 0/ 20) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 43 0 v,
j '
- a e o e e B
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 2 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County. California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Hur.ber of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name. Distance Mean(f) Meantfl Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Ranse Measurements Table 4a Airborne Quarterly Composite (PCl/cu. ml Ru-103 24 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 20) ALL (LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ 43 0 Zr(Nbl-95 24 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 20) ALL <LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 4) ,
0 I
l 7
m
e e s . *
- I i
i 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
page 1 j SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION i
' Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reportin5 Period: January 91. 1982 to December 31, 1982
]
! Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location With Number of Medium or Pathuay Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine 9
tampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLDI Range and Direction Range Range Measurements J
Table 4c Airborne Guarterly Composite (pci/cu. m1 Gross A1Pha 24 0.0003 0.0025( 20/ 201 Units 2/3 0.0030( 4/ 43 0.0024( 4/ 41 0
( 0.001- 0.004) Suitchyard ( 0.002- 0.004) ( 0.001- 0.0041 0.13 ml. ESE Sr-90 24 0.0010 (LLD ( 0/ 20) ALL (LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ 43 0 i
I i
e
~
. 2,
! la 1
s , e . e ,
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUM"ARY Page 1 S AN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENER ATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting Period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location uith Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Hean Control Locations Nonroutine Reported Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Mean(f) Neantfl of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 5 Ocean Water Monthly Composite (PCl/11 As-110m 44 10 <LLD ( 0/ 33) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ ll) O Ce-141 44 15 (LLD ( 0/ 33) ALL <LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ 11) 0 i Ce-144 44 20 <LLD ( 0/ 33) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 11) 0 Co-57 44 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 33) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11) 0 Co-58 44 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 33) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11) 0 Co-60 44 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 33) ALL (LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ 111 0 Cs-134 44 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 33) ALL <LLO -----
<LLD ( 0/ ll) 0 Cs-137 44 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 33) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 111 0 Fe-59 44 20 (LLD E 0/ 33) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 111 0
- y=
m
e e * ,
- s I
i j 25APRS3 ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN SUNNARY Pase 2 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California J Reporting Period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 I Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Humber of l Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame Distance Mean(f) Henn(f ) Reported of Measuremant) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Heasurer.ents Table 5 Ocean Water Monthly Composite (PCi/11 K-40 44 20 361.85( 27/ 331 380( 9/ ll) 345.56( 9/ 11) 0
, ( 280- 5403 Dutfall - Unit 2 ( 320- 490) ( 280- 5101 0.7 mi. Su Mn-54 44 6.0000 (LLD E 0/ 331 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 111 0 Mo(Tcl-99m 44 2000 (LLD f 0/ 331 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 111 0 Ra-226 44 15 (LLD ( 0/ 33) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 111 0 4
Ru-103 44 15 <LLD ( 0/ 33) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11) 0 Ru-106 44 30 (LLD ( 0/ 331 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 111 0 i
Th-228 44 20 (LLD ( 0/ 331 ALL (LLD '
<LLD ( 0/ 111 0 1
Zn-65 44 20 (LLD ( 0/ 33) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11) 0 Zr(Hb1-95 44 15 (LLD ( 0/ 33) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 111 0
~
i d I
d)
. , e , e ,
I t
I 25APR83 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN SUNHARY Page 1 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
- Docket No. 50-361
. San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Nean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanif) Name Distance Nean(f) Neantfl Reported of Neasurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Heasurements Table 6 Ocean Water Bi-Monthly Composite (PCl/11
. Gross Beta 24 100 786.11( 18/ 181 841.67[ 6/ 63 841.67( 6/ 63 0 i ( 640- 990) Nepport Beach ( 710- 1010) ( 710- 10101 1
30 mi. NW a
l 1
e
- E
e , e , , ,
I 25APR83 ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN
SUMMARY
Page 1 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATI0tl Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name. Distance Nean(f) Meantfl Reported 6 of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Hensurements 4
Table 7 j Ocean Water 4 Quarterly Composite
, (PCl/11 i
Tritium 12 100 (LLD ( 0/ 91 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 3) 0 l
i
)
f
)
1
=
3
e , e , e .
I 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 1 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDM Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California i Reporting period: January 01, 1932 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Rcrorted of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 9a Drinking Water Monthly Composite (PCl/1)
As-110m 24 10 <LLD ( 0/ 16) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 81 0 se-7 24 50 <LLD ( 0/ 16) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 8) 0 Ce-141 24 15 <LLD ( 0/ 16) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 81 0 Ce-144 24 20 <LLD ( 0/ 16) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 83 0 Co-58 24 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 16) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 8) 0 Co-60 24 6.0000 <LLD ( 0/ 16) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 8) 0 Cs-134 24 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 16) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 8) 0 Cs-137 24 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 16) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 83 0 H-3 24 100 200( 1/ 16) Tri-Cities Munic. 200( 1/ 81 (LLD ( 0/ 81 0
( 200- 200) Water Dist. Res. ( 200- 2003 8.7 mi. NW 7
M
e e e , e r -
t l 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Papa 2 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location uith Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Nighest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Hean(f) Heantfl Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLDI Range and Direction Range Range Heasurements Table 9a Drinking Water Monthly Composite (pci/11 Ru-103 24 15 (LLD ( 0/ 16) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 81 0 ZrtNbl-95 24 15 (LLD ( 0/ 16) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 83 0 t
I l
4 1
O p
W e
e e , e , -
e 8
J .
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN SUNNARY Page 1 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 1
Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location With Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Nean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name. Distance Hean(f) Neantfl Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 9b Drinking Water Monthly Composite (pCl/11 Gross Alpha 36 0.2000 0.4000( 1/ 241 Tri-Cities Munic. 0.4000( 1/ 121 (LLD ( 0/ 123 0
, ( 0.400- 0.4001 Water Dist. Res. ( 0.400- 0.4001 8.7 mi. NW Gross seta 36 0.1000 0.9917( 24/ 241 Tri-Cities Munic. 1.1333( 12/ 121 1.0250( 12/ 123 0
( 0.600- 2.000) Water Dist. Res. ( 0.600- 2.000) ( 0.600- 1.4001 8.7 mi. NW l
a e
7
a e * , e ,
I 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN SUNNARY Page 1 SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GEHERAT1HG STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Hean Control Locations Nonroutine Detection Name, Distance 1
4 Sampled (Unit of Analyses Mean(fl Neantf) Mean(f) Reported cf Neasurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 9c Erinking Mater
!, Monthly (pci/1) Composite Gross Alpha 36 3.0000 <LLD ( 0/ 24) 3.0000( 1/ 12) 3.0000( 1/ 123 0
' Huntington Beach ( 3.000- 3.0003 ( 3.000- 3.000) 37 mi. NW i Gross Beta 36 0.5000 13.792( 24/ 24) Tel-cities Munic. 14.5( 12/ 121 9.5833t 12/ 123 0
( 7.000-21.0001 Water Dist. Res. ( 8.000-21.000) ( 5.000-21.000) 8.7 mi. NW e
7 m
l
a e e e e e B
! 25APR83 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMNARY Page 1 j SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361
' San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of
, Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine
' Sample 1 (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name Distance Mean(f) Meantfl Reported l of Measurement) Parformed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 9d Drinking Water cuarterly Composite (pct /1, Cross Alpha 12 0.2000 (LLD,( 0/ 81 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 Gross Seta 12 0.1000 0.9625( 8/ 81 Tri-Cities Munic. 1.3000( 4/ 41 0.9750( 4/ 4) 0
( 0.500- 2.4001 Mater Dist. Res. ( 0.500- 2.4005 ( 0.800- 1.5001 8.7 mi. NW i
4 i
h I
O 4
19
a , t , e ,
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 1 SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location utlh Number of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name. Destance Mean(f) Meantfl Reported i of Measurement) Performed (LLDI Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 9e Drinking Water QuarterIy Composite (PCl/11 As-110m 12 15 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 8e-7 12 100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 Co-141 12 60 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 Ce-144 12 20 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 Co-58 12 10 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4J 0 co-60 12 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 Cs-134 12 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLO ( 0/ 43 0 l
Cs-137 12 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 Gross Alpha 12 3.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 z.
N e
. . e . . ,
I f
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NONITORING PROGRAM SUNNARY Page 2 SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATI0tl Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location w"th Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Hean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name, Distance Nean(f) Meantfl Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Neasurements Table 9e Drinking Water Quarterly Composite (PCl/11 i
Gross Beta 12 0.5000 14.75( S/ S1 Tel-Cities Munic. 15.75( 4/ 41 9.7500( 4/ 41 0 (11.000-20.000) Mater Dist. Res. (12.000-20.000) ( 7.000-12.0001 8.7 ml. NW H-3 12 100 <LLD ( 0/ S) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 Ru-103 12 25 (LLO ( 0/ SI ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 Zr(Hb)-95 12 30 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 43 0 i
l
~
P 5;
- . e e I
i.
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN SUNNARY Page 1 SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GEHERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location inith Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Samp?ed (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame. Distance Nean(f) Neanif) Reported i of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements i
Table 10 Shoreline Sediment Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/31 As-110m 8 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 61 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 l
Ce-141 8 0.1000 <LLD ( 0/ 63 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 l
Ce-144 8 0.2000 <LLD ( 0/ 61 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 co-57 5 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 63 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ El 0 i
t 4
Co-58 8 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 61 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 i
l Co-60 8 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 Cs-134 8 0.0500 (LLD { 0/ 63 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD L 0/ 2) 0 i
, Cs-137 8 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 63 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 Fe-59 8 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 61 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 y
G
, 4 . e e E
t 25APRS3 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 2 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION i
Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 ta December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Nean(f) Mean(f) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements
! Table 10 l Shoreline Sediment i
Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/5) A i
1 I-131 8 0.5000 (LLD f 0/ 6) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0, 2) 0 i
K-40 8 2.0000 15.667f 6/ 61 Newport Beach 17.5( 2/ 2! 17.5( 2/ 2) 0 (13.000-18.000) (North End) (15.000-20.000) (15.000-20.000)
. 30 mi. NW i Mn-54 8 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0# 2) 0 i
j Mo(Tc)-99m 8 300 <LLD ( 0/ 63 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 21 0 Ra-226 8 0.1000 0.2800( 6/ 6) Newport Seach 0.9050( 2/ 21 0.9050( 2/ 21 0
( 0.140- 0.570) (North Endl ( 0.540- 1.270) ( 0.540- 1.270) 30 ml. NW j Ru-103 8 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ El 0 Ru-106 8 0.3000 (LLD E 0/ 6) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 23 0 Th-228 8 0.1000 0.3067( 6/ 61 Newport Beach 2.6650( 2/ 21 2.6650( 2/ 2) 0
( 0.120- 0.870) (North Endl ( 1.530- 3.8003 ( 1.530- 3.800) 30 ml. NW Zn-65 8 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 z,
8
8 e I
s ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN SUNHARY page 3 25APR83 SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GEHERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31. 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location uith Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean control Locations Nonroutine Reported Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Neantfl Name. Distance Neanffl Meanffl of Hensurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 10
- Shoreline Sediment Semi-Annual Composite
( PC,i /S I 2r(Hb)-95 3 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 61 ALL (LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ El 0 I
t
?"
S
- e s . e e t
5 2 SAPR 83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 1 SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California RePortins Period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name, Distance Nean(f) Mean(f) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLDI Range and Direction Range Ranse Measurements Table 11 Ocean Bottom Sediments Semi-Annual Composite (pCl/53 As-110m 10 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) O Ce-141 10 0.0800 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 Co-144 10 0.1500 (LLD ( 0/ El ALL (LLD -----
(LLD E 0/ 23 0 Co-57 10 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 21 0 Co-58 10 0.0400 0.0900( 1/ 81 0.0903t 1/ 21 (LLD ( 0/ 2) 0
( 0.090- 0.0901 Unit 2 Outfall ( 0.090- 0.0901 0.8 mi. SSW Co-60 10 0.0400 0.2867( 3/ 81 0.3550( 2/ El (LLD ( 0/ 2) 0
( 0.130- 0.580) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.130- 0.580) 0.5 mi. H Cs-134 10 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 23 0 Cs-137 10 0.0400 0.0833t 3/ 83 0.1000( 2/ 23 (LLD ( 0/ 23 0
( 0.050- 0.130) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.070- 0.130) 0.5 mi. W Fe-59 10 0.1500 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ El 0
),
l3
a a e e i ,
1
( \
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 2 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 1
, Docket No. 50-361 l San Diego County. California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 i Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location With Number of i Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine i SarPled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported i of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 11 Ocean Bottom Sediments Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/53 I-131 10 0.4000 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL (LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 23 0 K-40 10 1.5000 15.125( 8/ 81 16.5( 2/ 23 15( 2/ El 0 i (14.000-19.0001 Unit 1 Outfall (14.000-19.000) (13.000-17.000)
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 Mo(Tcl-99m 10 230 (LLD ( 0/ 83 ALL <LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 21 0 Ra-226 10 0.0800 0.3500( 8/ 81 0.5150( 2/ El 0.2850( 2/ 21 0
( 0.130- 0.6701 Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.450- 0.550) ( 0.160- 0.4101 0.5 mi. H l
Ru-103 10 0.0800 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 23 0 l
Ru-106 10 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ El 0
~
l Th-228 10 0.0800 0.4075( 8/ 83 0.5650( 2/ El 0.4300( 2/ 23 0
( 0.190- 0.8103 Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.480- 0.650) ( 0.200- 0.6603 0.5 mi. W Zn-65 10 1.5000 <LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0
~
2, m
I i
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL HONITORING PRC3 RAM
SUMMARY
Page 3 S AN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENES.'ATING ST ATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting periodt January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Humoer of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Noncoutine Sampled I t'n i t of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Mean(f) Hean(f) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 11 Ocean Bottom Sediments Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/93
, Zr(Nbl-95 10 0.0800 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 i
W
I 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SudHARY Page 1 SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County. California Reportin5 Period: January 01, 1982 to December 31. 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Nean control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Neantf) Heantfl Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Neasurements Table 12a Non-Migratory Marine Cuarterly Composite (PCi/3) (flesh typal bay mussel As-110m 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Ce-141 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Ce-144 4 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 41 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 i
bay mussel Co-57 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Co-58 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Co-60 4 0.0070 0.0133( 3/ 41 0.0133( 3/ 43 <LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.007- 0.021) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.007- 0.021) 0.7 mi. SSW hay mussel Cs-134 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 41 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 l
l bay mussel Cs-137 4 0.0030 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 bay mussel Fe-59 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 z,
M
- . e .
i i
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 2 SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California ReportinS Period January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 TYPE and Lower Limit All Indicator Location uith Number of Medium or Pathway Total ptumber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name Distance Meanif) Mean(f) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range RanSe Measurements Table 12a 4 Non-Higratory Marine Cuarterly Composite (pci/s) (flesh type) bay mussel H-3 Aqueous 4 0.0500 0.1300( 1/ 41 0.1300( 1/ 41 (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.130- 0.1303 Units 2/3 Dutfall ( 0.130- 0.130) 0.7 mi. SSH bay mussel H-3 Bound 4 3.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 43 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 bay mussel 1-131 4 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel K-40 4 0.2000 1.5667( 3/ 43 1.5667( 3/ 43 (LLD ( 0/ 0) 0
( 1.400- 1.900) Units 2/3 Dutfall ( 1.400- 1.9001 0.7 mi. SSH bay mussel Mn-54 4- 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD ----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Mo(Tc)-99m 4 10 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 03 0 bay mussel Ra-226 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 bay mussel Ru-103 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 bay mussel Ru-106 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 y
W
a .
- i = .
1 I
25APR83 ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NONITORING PROGRAN SUNNARY page 3 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Hith Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name, Distt9Cc Neantf) Heantfl Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLDI Range and Direction Range Range Neasurements Table 12a Hon-Migratory Marine Cuarterly Composite (PCl/gl (flesh type) bay mussel Th-228 4 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Zn-65 4 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 43 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 bay mussel Zr(Nbl-95 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 black perch As-110m 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Ce-141 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Ce-144 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch co-57 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch co-58 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Co-60 12 0.0070 0.0070( 1/ 81 0.0070( 1/ 41 (LLD ( 0/ 41 0 t 0.007- 0.0071 Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.007- 0.0071 0.6 mi. HSH p U
- .
- e e ,
t 25APR83 . ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NONITORING PROGRAN
SUMMARY
Page 4 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 san Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Louer Limit All Indicator Location Hilh Number of NIdium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Hean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Neantfl Name, Distance Neantfl Mean(f) Reported cf Neasurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Haasurements TEble 12a Non-Nigratory Marine Quarterly Composite (pci/s) (flesh typel black perch Cs-134 12 0 0100 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 black perch Cs-137 12 0.0030 0.0070( 8/ 81 0.00721 4/ 41 0.0062( 4/ 41 0 t 0.003- 0.013) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.003- 0.013) t 0.004- 0.008) 0.7 mi. SSW black Perch Fe-59 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 black perch H-3 Aqueous 12 0.0500 0.19671 3/ SI 0.2250( 2/ 41 0.1100( 1/ 43 0 t 0.100- 0.3503 Units 2/3 Outfall I 0.100- 0.350) t 0.110- 0.1101 0.7 mi. SSW black perch H-3 Bound 12 3.0000 75t 2/ 81 80t 1/ 41 (LLD ( 0/ 41 0 (70.000-80.000) Unit 1 Outfall (80.000-80.0001 0.6 mi. WSW black perch I-131 12 0.2000 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD t 0/ 41 0 black perch K-40 12 0.2000 2.9833( 6/ 81 3.0333( 3/ 41 2.7333t 3/ 41 0 i t 2.500- 3.5001 Units 2/3 Outfall i 2.500- 3.5001 ( 2.500- 2.9001 0.7 mi. SSW t
black perth Hn-54 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch No(Tcl-99m 12 10 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <tLD -----
(LLD I 0/ 41 0 p
D3 l .
l_ - ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- . = ,
8
,m
( >
25APR83 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN SUNNARY Page 5 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GEHERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reportin5 Period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Niehest Annual Hean control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Nean(f) Hame, Distance Neanif) Hean(f) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Neasurements Table 12a Non-Histatory Marine quarterly Composite (pci/s) (flesh typel black perch Ra-226 12 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Ru-103 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 black perch Ru-106 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Th-Er3 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Zn-65 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Zr(Nbl-95 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 k2yhole limpet As-110m 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 ksyhole limpet Ce-141 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <tLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 keyhole limpet Ce-144 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <tLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 3,
0;
- , e . = ,
I
(
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 6 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Midlum or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Nean Control Locations Honroutine S mpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name, Distance Mean(f) Meantfl Reported cf Measurerent) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Ran3e Measurements 7tble 12a HIn-Migratory Marine Cuarterly Composite (PCl/sl (flesh typel ksyhole limpet Co-57 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 ksyhole limpet Co-58 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 ksyhole limpet Co-60 4 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 k;yhole limpet Cs-134 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 k2yhola tim 9et Cs-137 4 0.0030 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 ksyhole limpet Fe-59 4 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 kayhole ilmpet H-3 Aqueous 4 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 l
kayhole limpet H-3 Sound 4 3.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 kryhole limpet I-131 4 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 z.
a
- . a .
I '
i 25APRE3 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUt1 MARY Page 7 SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Dochet No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting periodt January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Wilh Number of'--
Midium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Hean control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name Distance Mean(f) Neantfl Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Ranse Range Measurements T&ble 12a Non-Migratory Marine Guarterly Composite (PCf/s) (ficsh typel kayhole limpet K-40 4 0.2000 <LLD ( 0/ 0) 1.0667f 3/ 41 1.0667f 3/ 41 0 Hepport Beach ( 1,000- 1.2001 1 1.000- 1.1001 30 mi. Nu kayhole Ilmpet Mn-5% 4 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 kayhole limpet Mo(Tc)-99m 4 10 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 43 0 kayhole Ilmpet Ra-226 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD E 0/ 43 0 k;yhole limpet Ru-103 4 0.0300 (LLD E 0/ Of ALL <LLD -----
(LLD E 0/ 41 0 ksyhole Ilmpet Ru-106 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ Of ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 t
kayhole limpet Th-228 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 kgyhole limpet zn-65 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 ksyhole limpet ZrlHbl-95 4 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 03 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 3,
e , e , s , -
I 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SilMMARY Page 8 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reportins period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Rame Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Neasurements Table 12a Non-Migratory Marine (uarterly Composite (PCi/s) (ficsh type) tea hare As-110m 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 tea hara Ce-141 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cea hare Ce-144 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 03 0 cea hara Co-57 4 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 i
tea hara Co-58 4 0.0100 0.0230f 2/ 4) 0.0230( 2/ 41 (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.015- 0.031) Unit 1 Cutfall ( 0.015- 0.031) 0.6 mi. HSW gem hare Co-60 4 0.0070 0.0745( 4/ 4) 0.0745( 4/ 4) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.067- 0.091) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.067- 0.091) 0.6 mi. HSW esa hare Cs-134 4 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 een hare Cs-137 4 0.0030 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sea hare Fe-59 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 7
k;
- .
- e * .
G I
s
(
25APR83 ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLDGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN
SUMMARY
Page 9 SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting Period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Louer Limit All Indicator Location with Number of N;dlum or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(fl Name, Distance Nean(f) Neantfl Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Ran3e Ncasurements Table 12a Hin-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PCl/gl (flesh typel tsa hare H-3 Aqueous 4 0.0500 0.0500( 1/ 41 0.0500( 1/ 41 <LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.050- 0.050) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.050- 0.0501 0.6 mi. WSW csa here H-3 Bound 4 3.0000 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 esa here I-131 4 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sia hare K-40 4 0.2000 1.5000( 3/ 41 1.5000( 3/ 4) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 1.200- 1.700) Unit 1 Outfall ( 1.200- 1.7001 0.6 mi. WSW sca hare Mn-54 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 41 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 S2a hare Ho(Tcl-99m 4 10 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD E 0/ 01 0 ssa hare Ra-226 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sia hare Ru-103 4 0.0300 (LLD E 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 saa hare Ru-106 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 D
l . .
I i
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN
SUMMARY
Page 10 SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION .
{
Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 I Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Nishest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name Distance Mean(f) Meantf) Reported I cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Ranse Measurements i
Table 12a N n-Migratory Marine
, Quarterly Composite
(LLD E 0/ 01 0 i
esa hare Zn-65 4 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 41 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 esa hare ZrtNb)-95 4 0.0300 (LLD E 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 t
theepshead As-110m 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 theepshead Ce-141 12 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 cheepshead Ce-144 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 sheepshead co-57 12 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 theepshead co-58 12 0.0100 (LLD E 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 i
theepshead Co-60 12 0.0070 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 3
e
- .
- e e .
(
25APR83 ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NOHITORING PROGRAN SUNNARY Page 11 SAN OHOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January Ole 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Humber of
, N;dlum or Pathuay Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Srspled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame. Distance Meantf) Heantfl Reported cf Neasurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Neasurements Ttble 12a Hin-Nigratory Marine Cuarterly Composite (PCl/3) (flesh type) theepshead Cs-134 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 theepshead Cs-137 12 0.0030 0.0081( 8/ 81 0.0090( 4/ 41 0.0060( 4/ 41 0
( 0.006- 0.011) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.008- 0.011) ( 0.005- 0.007) 0.7 mi. SSH theepshead Fe-59 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 theepshead H-3 Aqueous 12 0.0500 0.0800( 1/ SI 0.1250( 2/ 41 0.1250( 2/ 41 0
( 0.080- 0.080) Newport Beach ( 0.110- 0.140) ( 0.110- 0.140) 30 mi. NH theepshead H-3 Bound 12 3.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -*---
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0
' theepshead I-131 12 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 sheePshead K-40 12 0.2000 3.3333( 6/ 81 3.4667( 3/ 41 3.0333( 3/ 41 0
( 3.100- 3.7001 Units 2/3 Outfall ( 3.300- 3.700) ( 2.800- 3.3001 0.7 mi. SSH sheepshead Nn-54 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 thcepshead No(Tc)-99m 12 10 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 43 0 y
a I
- . e . e i B
25APR83 ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN SUM?iARY Page 12 SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Louer Limit All Indicator Location Hilf? Humber of Midlum or Pathuay Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean control Locations Nonroutine S mpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame, Distance Meanif) Neantfl Reported of Neasurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Ttble 12a Hsn-Nigratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PCl/gl (flesh typel theepshead Ra-226 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 sheepshead Ru-103 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 83 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 theepshead Ru-106 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 theepshead Th-228 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 theepshead Zn-65 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 theepshead Zr(Hbl-95 12 C.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 rpiny lobster Ai-110m 12 0.0700 0.1150( 1/ 81 0.1150( 1/ 41 (LLD ( 0/ 41 0
- ( 0.115- 0.1151 Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.115- 0.1151 0.7 mi. SSW spiny lobster Ce-141 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD i 0/ 43 0 spiny lobster Ce-144 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL (llD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 p
a
. . . . e ,
I 25APR83 ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN
SUMMARY
Page 13 SAH OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Hilh Number of MIdlum or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Nean Control Locations Honroutine Serpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name, Distance Mean(f) Nean(f) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Ranse and Direction Range Range Heasurements Tchle 12a Non-Migratory Marine Cuarterly Composite (pcl/51 (flesh typel tpiny lobster Co-57 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 epiny lobster Co-58 12 0.0100 0.0180( 1/ 81 0.0180( 1/ 41 (LLD ( 0/ 41 0
( 0.018- 0.0181 Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.018- 0.018) 0.6 mi. usu epiny lobster Co-60 12 0.0070 0.0199( 8/ 81 0.0247( 4/ 4) (LLD ( 0/ 41 0
( 0.007- 0.0501 Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.012- 0.0501 0.6 ml. WSW fpiny lobster Cs-134 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 epiny lobster Cs-137 12 '0.0030 0.0076! 5/ 81 0.0100( 1/ 43 0.0100( 1/ 41 0
( 0.004- 0.0121 Neuport Beach ( 0.010- 0.0101 ( 0.010- 0.0101 30 ml. HW rpiny lobster Fe-59 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 spiny lobster H-3 Aqueous 12 0.0500 0.0850( 2/ 81 0.1800( 1/ 41 0.1800( 1/ 41 0
. ( 0.070- 0.100) Newport Beach ( 0.180- 0.180) ( 0.180- 0.180) 30 mi. NW spiny lobster H-3 Bound 12 3.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL <tLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 EPiny lobster I-131 12 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 7
0 m.
- e
- e e ,
8
.- -s 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Pase 14 SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California i Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 l Type and Louer Limit All Indicator Location with Number of MIdlue or Pathuay Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine SImpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Mean(f) Me3ntfl Reported l of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurcrents a
Ttble 12a N*n-Migratory liarine l quarterly Composite (pcl/s) (flesh type) rpiny lobster K-40 12 0.2000 3.0833( 6/ 81 3.1000( 3/ 41 3.0000( 3/ 41 0
( 2.600- 3.600) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 2.600- 3.600) ( 2.800- 3.1001 0.7 mi. SSM spiny lobster Mn-54 12 0.0100 (LLD I 0/ 83 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 rpiny lobster Mo(Tc)-99m 12 10 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD ----- <LLD ( .0/ 43 0 rpiny lobster Ra-226 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 cpiny lobster Ru-103 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 epiny lobster Ru-106 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 spiny lobster Th-228 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 spiny lobster Zn-65 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 4) O spiny lobster Zr(Nb)-95 12 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 83 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 i
l .
- e 5 e e ,
B 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 1 SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GEHERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01. 1982 to December 31, 1982
. Type and Louer Limit All Indicator Location with Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Srmpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame. Distance Meanif) Mean(f) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Tchle 12b NIn-Migratory Marine Cuarterly Composite (PCl/s) (bone typel bry mussel As-110m 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 1
bry mussel Ce-141 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 b:y mussel Ce-144 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 03 0 2
b:y mussel Co-57 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Co-58 4 0.0200 (LLD I 0/ 4) ALL (LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bry mussel Co-60 4 0.0100 (LLD E 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 03 0 t bay mussel Cs-134 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bry mussel Cs-137 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD E 0/ 01 0 b:y mussel re-59 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 7,
a
a 1
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Pase 2 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 4
Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Louer Limit All Indicator Location Wilh Hunber of M;dium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Scmpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name, Distance Neantfl Meantfl Reported of Heasurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Neasurements Tchle 12b Hon-Misratory Marine cuarterly composite IPCl/s) (bone typel i
bry mussel I-131 4 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 bry mussel K-40 4 0.2000 0.2500f 2/ 4) 0.2500( 2/ 4) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.200- 0.300) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.200- 0.3001 0.7 mi. SSW bry mussel Mn-54 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bly mussel Mo(Tc1-99m 4 60 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD ------
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bry mussel Ra-226 4 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 43 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 hay mussel Ru-103 4 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Ru-106 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Th-228 4 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 41 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 bry mussel Zn-65 4 0.1000 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 h
. 4 e s ,
8
,s 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL kADI0 LOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUf1 MARY page 3 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of M dium or Pathway Total Number of Loca t ions- Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine stepled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name, Distance Meanif) Meantfl Reported of Neasurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Ran9e Range Measurements Tchte 12b NIn-Nisratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PCl/3) (bone typel b2y mussel Zr(Nbl-95 4 0.0600 (LLD I 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 black perch As-110m 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Ce-141 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0
- black perch Ce-144 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 t
black perch co-57 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch co-58 12 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch co-60 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Cs-134 12 0.0300 <tLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Cs-137 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 y
B 9
- e b r *
- 1 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLDGICAL MONITORINO PROGRAM
SUMMARY
page 4 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATIs4 STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, Californis Reportins Period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Sarpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanif) Name, Distance Meanff) Meanif) Reported of Measurement) performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Ran3e Measurements Table 12b Non-Migratory Marine Cuarterly Composite (PCl/s) (bone typel black perch Fe-59 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch I-131 12 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 black perch K-40 12 0.2000 0.8167( 6/ S1 0.9667( 3/ 41 0.9667( 3/ 43 0
( 0.500- 1.1001 Newport Beach ( 0.600- 1.6001 ( 0.600- 1.6001
) 30 mi. NW black perch Mn-54 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0
?
black perch Mo(Tc)-99m 12 60 <LLD ( 0/ S) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Ra-226 12 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 black perch Ru-103 12 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 black perch Ru-106 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <tLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Th-228 12 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ El ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 7
R; l .
I
- e s e e ,
- E 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLDGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUNNARY Page 5 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01. 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location saith Number of M;dlum or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine SEmPled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantf) Hams. Distance Neantf) Meantfl Reported i of Measurement) Performed ILLD) Range and Direction Range RanSe Neasurements TEble 12b Non-Nigratory Marine cuarterly Composite (PCl/s) (bone typel I black perch Zn-65 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) C black perch ZrtNb)-95 12 0.0600 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 ksyhole limpet As-110m 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 kryhole limpet Ce-141 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 43 0 kIyhole Ilmpet Ce-144 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 kIyhole Ilmpet. Co-57 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ Of ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 klyhole Ilmpet Co-58 4 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 kryhole limpet Co-60 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 kayhole limpet Cs-13% 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 4) 0
?"
W
. . ~
~
e , e o a .
25APR83 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL HONITORItlG PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 6 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GEHERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Dieso County, California Reporting Period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 TyFe and Lower Limit All Indicator Location ::Tth Number of Midlum or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Stnpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Neantfl Name, Distance Meantfl Neantfl Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Ran9e Measurements Tchle 12b H;n-Migratory Marine Cuarterly Composite (PCl/3) (bone type) kgyhole limpet Cs-137 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 ksyhole limpet Fe-59 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 ksyhole limpet I-131 4 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ Of ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 kiyhole Ilmpet K-40 4 0.2000 (LLD I 0/ 01 0.3000( 1/ 41 0.3000( 1/ 41 0 Netaport Beach ( 0.300- 0.3001 ( 0.300- 0.3003 30 mi. NH l k2yhole limpet Mn-54 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ Of ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 l kayhole limpet Mo(Tcl-99m 4 60 (LLD ( 0/ Of ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 k;yhole limpet Ra-226 4 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ Of ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 l
i I kayhole limpet Ru-103 4 0.0500 (LLD I 0/ Of ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 kayhole limpet Ru-106 4 0.1000 <LLD I 0/ Of ALL <LLD -----
(LLD I 0/ 41 0
~
i l I" l 2 l
l
e , e a * ,
3 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGTAM
SUMMARY
Page 7 S AM ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING ST ATION Docket No. 50-361 San Die 90 County, California Reportins period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location HIth Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Hiahest y Annual Mean control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection MeAn(f) Name, Distance Mean(f) Meantfl Reported of Measuremant) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12b Non-Misratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PCl/3) (bone typel keyhole limpet Th-228 4 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 i
j keyhole limpet Zn-65 4 0.1000 <LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
<tLD ( 0/ 43 0 keyhole limpet Zr(Hbl-95 4 0.0600 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 theepshead As-110m 12 0.0100 <tLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 cheepshead Ce-141 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 theePshead Ce-144 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 theepshead Co-57 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 sheepshead Co-58 12 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 theepshead Co-60 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <tLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 I"
e
- , o e s .
I w
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM Sut1 MARY Page 8 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01. 1982 to December 31. 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Simpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Mean(f) Meantfl Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range Ond Direction Fange Range Measurements TEble 12b NIn-Migratory Marine (uarterly Composite (PCl/gl (bone typel i
l sh;epshead Cs-134 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 i
theepshead Cs-137 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 theepshead Fe-59 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0
)
theepshead I-131 12 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 th;epshead K-40 12 0.2000 0.8333( 6/ SI 1.0333( 3/ 41 0.8000( 3/ 41 0
( 0.400- 1.2003 Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.900- 1.2001 ( 0.500- 1.0001 0.7 al. SSW theepshead Mn-54 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 83 ALL <LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 4} p 6
shlepshead Mo(Tcl-99m 12 60 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 shIepshead Ra-226 12 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 sheepshead Ru-103 12 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 43 0
?"
u (D
9
e e e e e e I
s 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 9 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATICH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January Ole 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Wilh -
Numbar of ~~
Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled tunit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name. Distance Meantf) Heantfl Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Wange Range Measurements 4
Table 12b Mon-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PCl/gl thone type) theepshead Ru-106 12 0.1000 (LLD t 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD i 0/ 4) 0 theepshead Th-225 12 0.0500 (LLD I 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD t 0/ 4) 0 theepshead Zn-65 12 0.1000 (LLD t 0/ 81 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD i 0/ 41 0 theepshead ZrtNb)-95 12 0.0600 (LLD i 0/ SI ALL (LLD -----
<LLD I 0/ 43 0 rpiny lobster As-110m 12 0.0100 0.0542t 8/ 8) 0.0630t 4/ 4) (LLD t 0/ 41 0 1 0.025- 0.2003 Units 2/3 Dutfall ( 0.034- 0.1001 0.7 ml. ssW rpiny lobster Ce-141 12 0.1000 (LLD I 0/ SI ALL (LLD -----
(LLD t 0/ 43 0 spiny lobster Ca-144 12 0.1000 (LLD t 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD t 0/ 41 0 l
CPiny lobster Co-57 12 0.0300 (LLD E 0/ al ALL <LLD -----
<LLD i 0/ 41 0 i
EPiny lobster Co-58 12 0.0200 (LLD t 0/ SI ALL (LLD -----
(LLD t 0/ 43 0
~
i T.
)
e , e , : ,
1 25APR83 ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL N0HITORING PROGRAN SUNNARY Page 10 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reportins Period: January 01. 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Nean Control Locations Honroutine Strpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantf) Hame. Distance Meantfl Mean(fl Reported cf Neasurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Neasurements TEble 12b Non-Nigra*ory Marine (uarte.-ly Composite (PCl/93 (bone typel tpinf lobster Co-60 12 0.0100 0.0240( 6/ 81 0.0247( 3/ 41 (LLD ( 0/ 41 0
( 0.015- 0.040) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.015- 0.0401 0.6 ml. NSW spiny lobster Cs-134 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL (LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ 43 0 1
rpiny lobster Cs-137 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 83 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 cpiny lobster Fe-59 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL <tLD -----
<tLD ( 0/ 41 0 (ptny 1chster 1-131 12 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 CPiny lobster K-40 12 0.2000 2.2667( 6/ 81 2.3333t 3/ 41 2.0000( 3/ 43 0
( 1.700- 2.8001 Unit 1 Outfall ( 2.100- 2.7005 ( 1.500- 2.3001 0.6 ml. NSW EPiny lobster Mn-54 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 Epiny lobster Mo(Tcl-99m 12 60 <LLD ( 0/ SI ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 spiny lobster Ra-226 12 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 7
R
- O D e e .
I ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLDGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Page 11 25APR83 i SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket Ho. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reportin5 Period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Midlum or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Reported Stepled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame Distance Meanffl Meantfl of Neasurement) Performed ILLD) Range and Olrection Range Range Neasurerents Tchte 12h N!n-M19ratory Marine Cuarterly Composite (PCl/5) thone typel spiny lobster Ru-103 12 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 83 ALL <LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ 41 0 spiny lobster Re-106 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ 41 0
{
l l
7 piny lobster Th-225 12 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL <LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 41 0 epiny lobster Zn-65 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL <tLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 41 0 fPiny lobster Zr(Nb)-95 12 0.0600 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0
)
l 4
~
i f
i i
4 ta
- 4 1 , s .
I 25APR83 ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUNNARY Page 1 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California ReportinS Period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Tyse and Lower Limit All Indicator Location uith Number of M;dlum or Pathway 70tul Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Scepted (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name. Distance Meant?) Neantf3 Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Tchle 13a Lccal Crops Semi-Annual Ccmposite (PCl/3) cruliflower As-110m 1 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ II ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 c uliflower Be-7 1 0.0400 0.0600( 1/ 11 0.0600( 1/ II (LLD ( 0/ 03 0
( 0.060- 0.060) San Mateo Canyon ( 0.060* 0.060) 2.6 mi. NW ctuliflower Ce-141 1 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ II ALL (LLD ---+- (LLD ( 0/ 01 0 c:uliflower Ce-144 1 0.0200 (LLD ; 0/ 11 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cruliflower Co-58 1 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ n) 0 cculiflower Co-60 1 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 ctuliflower Cs-134 1 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 1
cruliflower Cs-137 1 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 ceuliflower I-131 1 0.0030 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0
)%
i l
I 25APR83 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAK
SUMMARY
PG9e 2 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting per!od: January 01, 1782 to December 31, 1982 1
Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Hilh Number of MIdlum or Pathway Total Numbe* of Locations Highest Annual Nean Control Locations Nonroutine Simpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Neantfl Meantfl Reported of Neasurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements T&ble 13a Lccal Crops simi-Annual Composite IPCl/31 cauliflower K-40 1 0.0700 2.8000( 1/ 1) 2.8000( 1/ Il (LLD ( 0/ 03 0
( 2.800- 2.800) San Mateo Canyon ( 2.800- 2.8001 2.6 mi. NW cauliflower Ru-103 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 i
caullflower ZrtNb)-95 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cucumber As-110m 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD E 0/ 01 0 cucumber Be-7 1 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL <LLD ----* <LLD ( 0/ 01 0 l cucumber Ce-141 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ II ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cucumber Ce-144 1 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cucumber Co-58 1 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cucumber Co-60 1 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ II ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 03 0 3,
E
I i
25APR83 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NONITORING PROGRAN SUNNARY Pa9e 3 SAN Ott0FRE HUCLEAR GENERATING ETATION Docket No. 50-361 ,
San Diego County. California Reporting period: January 01. 1982 to December 31. 1982
) Type and Louer Limit All Indicator Location uith Number of Midium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Nean Control Locations Honroutine Sarpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Neantfl Name. Distance Neantfl Neantfl Reported of Neasurement) Performed (LLDI Ran9e and Direction Ran9e Range Neasurements TEble 13a Lccal Crops Simi-Annual Composite (pcl/gl cucumber Cs-134 1 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cucumber Cs-137 1 0.0053 (LLD ( 0/ II ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cucumber I-131 1 0.0030 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 I
I cucumber K-40 1 0.0700 1.8000( 1/ 13 1.8000( 1/ Il <LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 1.800- 1.800) San Mateo Canyon ( 1.800- 1.8001 2.6 mi. Itu cucumber Ru-103 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cucumber ZrtNbl-95 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 kale Ag-110m 2 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ El 0 kcle Be-7 2 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/ 01 0.0700( 1/ 21 0.0700( 1/ 21 0 SE of Oceanside ( 0.070- 0.0701 ( 0.070- 0.070) 22 mi. SE kale Ce-141 2 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 21 0
- TD
e e e , e ,
( '
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NOHITORING PROSRAN
SUMMARY
Page 4 SAN OHOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Die 30 county, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 19R2 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Humber of NIdlum or Pathuay Total Numbes- of Locations Hlahcst Annual Mean control Locations Honroutine SEmpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name. Distance Nean(f) Nean(f) Reported cf Neasurer.cnt) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Ran9e Range Measurcncnts Tchle 13a Local Crops SImi-Annual Composite IPCl/3) kcle Ce-144 2 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 kele Co-58 2 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 kale co-60 2 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 kale Cs-134 2 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 kcle Cs-137 2 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ El 0 kale I-131 2 0.0030 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 21 0 kale K-40 2 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 01 1.8500( 2/ 21 1.8500( 2/ 2) 0
- SE of Oceanside ( 1.600- 2.1001 ( 1.600- 2.1001 22 ml. SE kale Ru-103 2 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ Ol ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 kale 'Zr(Hbl-95 2 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 23 0 YD
. . e i i , .
t 25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLDGICAL MONITORING PRCORAM SUHHARY Page 5 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to Decemoer 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Mith Humber of Midlum or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Hean Contr31 Locations Nonroutine Stepled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Hams, Distance Meanffl Meanff) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 13a Lccal Crops S!mi-Annual Composite (PCl/91 t mato As-110m 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ El ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 21 0 tamato Be-7 4 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/ 21 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 treato Ce-141 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ El ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 trmato Ce-144 4 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 21 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ El 0 W
treato Co-58 4 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ El ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ El 0 temato Co-60 4 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 21 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD E 0/ 23 0 tomato Cs-134 4 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ El ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 trmato Cs-137 4 0.0050 <LLD ( 0/ 21 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 tomato I-131 4 0.0030 (LLD ( 0/ 21 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 p
4 Y:
4 -
1 I
25APR83 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUt1NAR Y Page 6 S AN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENER ATING ST AT1014 Docket No. 50-361
! San Diego County, California Rerorting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Louer Limit All Indicator Location HIth Number of-MIdium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Nighest Annual Nean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Name, Distance Meantfl Mean(f) Reported af Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range N:2asurements i Table 13a Lccal Crops Semi-Annual Composite (PCi/s) trmato K-40 4 0.0700 2.1500( 2/ 21 2.1500( 2/ 21 1.8500( 2/ 21 0
( 2.100- 2.2001 San Mateo Canyon ( 2.100- 2.2005 ( 1.800- 1.900) 2.6 mi. Ntt ttmato Ru-103 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 21 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 21 0
+
tomato ZrtNbl-95 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 21 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 l
1 W
- , * *
- e I
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL N0HITORING PROGR AN SU" DRY Page 1 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GEHERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to De .aber 31. 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator location wilh Number of MIdium or Pathway Total Number of Locations HihhestAnnualHean Control Locations Honroutine SErpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantfl Namt. Distance Neantf) Meantfl Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Neasurements TEble 13b Local Crops Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/gl cruliflower H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 caullflower H-3 Bound 1 0.5000 (LLD ( 0/ II ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cruliflower Sr-90 1 0.0040 0.0070( 1/ 13 0.0076( 1/ 13 <LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.007- 0.007) San Mateo Cariyon ( 0.007- 0.007) 2.6 ml. NW cucumber H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cucumber H-J Bound 1 0.5000 <tLD ( 0/ 11 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cucumber Sr-90 1 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ II ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 kale H-3 Aqueous 2 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 kale H-3 Bound 2 0.5000 <LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 kale Sr-90 2 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 01 0.0205( 2/ 27 0.0205( 2/ 21 0 SE of oceanside ( 0.014- 0.027) ( 0.014- 0.0271
- 22 ml. SE 7
e * * *
. e I
\
25APR83 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NDHITORING PROGRAN SUf1 NARY Page 2 SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01. 1982 to December 31. 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location NTth Number of N;dlum or Pathuay Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine SErpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanff) Name. Distance Neanff) Nean(f) Reported cf Neasurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Neasurements TEble 13b Local Crops Simi-Annual Composite (PCl/S) temato H-3 Aqueous 4 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 2) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ El 0 t:mato H-3 Bound 4 0.5000 <LLD ( 0/ El ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 21 0 temato Sr-90 4 0.0040 (LLD E 0/ El ALL (LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 e
- . * .
- e I
25APR83 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN SUNNARY Page 1 SAN DNOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Hilh Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Hlahest Annual Hean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Neantfl Name. Distance Nean(f) Hean(f) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Directlen Range Range Measurements l
Table 14 soll Samples Annual Composite j (pCf/gl As-110m 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 41 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 Be-7 4 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 41 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 Ce-141 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 41 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 ce-144 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 Co-58 4 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 43 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 co-60 4 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 41 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0
! I-131 4 0.5000 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 9# 03 0 K-40 4 2.0000 14.375( 4/ 41 Camp San onofre 23( 1/ Il (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 7.000-23,0001 NCB CANPEN (23.000-23.000) 2.5 mi. NE Ru-103 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 41 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 l'
iC
I 23APR83 ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLD31 CAL NONITORING PROGRAN
SUMMARY
Page Z SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California i
Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location HIlh Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Hi9 hest Annual Nean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled tuntt of Analyses Detection Neantfl Name Distance Neantfl Neantfl Reported of Neasurement) Performed (LLDI Range and Direction Range Range Neasurements Table 14 Soll Samples Annual Composite (PCl/s)
SP-90 4 0.0100 0.0325t 4/ 43 0.0500t 1/ Il (LLD I 0/ 01 0 t 0.020- 0.0501 Old Route 101 SE f 0,050- 0.950) 3.0 mi. SE ZrtNbl-95 4 0.1000 <LLD I 0/ 41 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD I 0/ 01 0 I
~
_ d h
3
t ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MOHITORIt!G PROGRAM Sbt1 NARY Page 1 25APR83 SAN OHOFRE fluCLEAR GEHERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine 5 mpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name Distance Nean(f) Meaniff Reported (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Mcasurements of Measurement) Performed Table 15 rolp semi-Annual Composite (PCl/93 nacrocystis p. As-110m 8 0.0050 <LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ El 0 accrocystis p. Ce-141 8 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ 21 0 stcrocystis p. Ce-144 8 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 61 ALL (LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ 21 0 c:crocystis p. Co-57 8 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ 21 0 cccrocystis p. Co-58 8 0.0040 <LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL <LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 21 0 G:crocystis P. Co-60 8 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 E1crocystis P. Cs-134 8 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 63 ALL <LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 nacrocystis p. Cs-137 8 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 21 0 macrocystis P. Fe-59 8 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 61 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ El 0
- p 8
= . e e
- e 1
25APR83 ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL HONITORING PROGRAN SUNNARY Page 2 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego county, California Reporting period: January 01, 1982 to December 31, 1982 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location uith Number of~-~
Nedium or Pathuay Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Nean(f) Name. Distance Neanff) Mean(f) Reported of Neasurem?nt) Performed (LLDI Range and Direction Range Range Ncasurements
= . -
Table 15 Kelp Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/31 cicrocystis p. H-3 Aqueous 8 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 63 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD 1 0/ 23 0 c:crocystis P. H-3 Bound 8 0.5000 (LLD ( 0/ 61 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 23 0 sacrocystis p. I-131 8 0.0100 < .. iD ( 0/ 6) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 cacrocystis p. K-40 8 0.0400 4.18331 6/ 6) San Onofre 5.3500( 2/ El 3.5500( 2/ 21 0
( 2.100- 5.5001 Kelp Bed ( 5.200- 5.5001 ( 2.400- 4.7001 1.5 mi. S macrocystis p. Nn-54 8 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 61 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 Eacrocystis P. No(Tcl-99m 8 2.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 63 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD E 0/ 21 0 picrocystis p. Ra-226 8 0.0090 (LLD E 0/ 61 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 23 0 s:crocystis p. Ru-103 8 0.0090 (LLD ( 0/ 63 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 pacrocystis p. Ru-106 8 0.0200 <LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL <LLD ----- (LLD ( 0/ El 0 1
e a w e
- e 25APR83 ENVIROHt1ENT AL R ADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGR AM 5 tit 1M*,RY page 3 SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GEHERATING STATICH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period
- January 01, 1982 to December 11, 1982 Type and Loner Limit All Indicator Locaffon esiTh Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Mean(f) Heantfl Reported cf Measurem'nt) Performed (LLD) Range and Directicn Range R2nge Measurements Table 15 Kelp Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/gl tacrocystis p. Th-228 8 0.0090 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 cacrocystis p. Zn-65 8 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 tacrocystis p. Zr(Hb)-95 8 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 O
R
1 i
a i
l
'i i
i APPENDIX B SAMPLE TYPE AtlD LOCATI0rl l
l
- l l
1 i
e O
l t
i e
I e
~
8-I TABLE 5-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRON *. ENTAL MONITORING SA".?LE LOCAi!OriS Distance
- Tyoe of Sample and Sampling Location (Miles) Direction" Direct Radiation
. 1 City of San Clemente (SDG&E Uffices) 5.6 tu 2 Camp San Mateo 3.5 h 3 Camp Sar. Onofre 2.6 NE 4 Camp Horno 4.5 E 5 Camp Las Pulgas 8. 5 ESE 6 Old Route 101 - ESE 3.0 ESE 7 Old Route 101 - ESE 0.5 ESE E Nor. commissioned Officers Beach Club 1.2 t;W 9 Basilone Road /I-5 Freeway Offramp 2.0 rei 10 Bluff 0.8 N4 11 Visitors Center 0.2 N.'iE 12 South Edge of Switchyard 0.2 NE
= 13 Site Soundary 0.13 SE Huntington Beacn Generating Station 37 tid 14 15 ESE Site Boundary 0.2 ESE i
16 East Site Boundary 0.5 E 17 Transit Dose 18 Transit Dose l 19 San Clemente Higniands 5.0 Niid 20 San Clemente Pier 5.0 N4
- Distance (miles) and direction (sector) are measured relative to Units 2a3
! mi cpoi n t . Di.ection is determined from degrees true north.
5-2 TABLE 5-1 (cont.)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS Distance
- Tvoe of Sample and Sacclina Location (Mi) Direction
- 21 Concordia Elementary School - San Clemente 3.5 NW
, 22 Coast Guard Statier. - San Mateo Point 2.7 WNJ 23 San Clemente Ganeral Hospital 8.2 NW 24 San Clemente High School 6.0 NW 25 Convalescent Home - San Clemente 8.0 NW 25 Cana Hills High School 11.0 NJ 2,7 U.S. Post Office - Dana Point 10.5 NW
- 2E Doheny Fire Station - Capistrano Beacn 9.5 NW 29 San Juan Capistrano Fire Station 10.8 NW 4 30 Laguna Beach Fire Station 17.5 NW 31 Aurora Park Mission Viejo 18.6 NNW 1
i 32 Santa Ana Police Department 32.0 NW 33 Camp Talega 5.7 N i = 34 San Onofre School 1.7 N4 1
35 Range 312 (Marine Corps Base, 4.7 NNE Camp Pendleton) 36 Range 208C (Marine Corps Base, 4.0 NE Camp Pendleton) 37 Laguna Niguel Fire Station 13.5 NW
! 38 San Onofre State Beach Park 3.6 SE Basilone Road Trailer Farx 1. 4 NNJ
- 39
. 40 SCE Training Center - Japanese Mesa 0.8 NW I
- Distance (miles) and direction (sector) are measurec relative to Units 243 midpoint. Direction is determined from degrees true north.
i l
w- - y im-m- --v. -- . ,-..e- , - - ., .,. %--yc-, , ,.--y-..- ,1,- , ,..w,.,- ,y,. _ . ..e-e--mr.-. .r -
e-,-,. - - --- ----,m. , ,-*-,-a,-- c .v----
B-3 TA5LE 5-1 (cont.)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MJNITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS Distance *
. TyDe of Sample and Samplino Location (Mi ) Directice' 41 Old Route 101 - East 0.3 E 42 Horno Canyon 4.6 E 43 Edson Range (Marine Ccrps Base, 10.6 SE Camp Pendleton) 4 Fallbrook Fire Station 18.0 E ,
45 Interstate 5 Weign Station 2.L ESE 46 San Onofre State Beach Park 1.4 SE 47 Camp Las Flores 8.6 SE 48 Mainsice (Marine Corps Base, 15.0 ESE Camp Pendleton) 49 Camp Chappo 12.8 CdE 50 Oceanside Fire Station 15.5 SE 51 Carlsbad Fire Station 16.6 SE 52 Vista Fire Station 21 ESE 53 San Diego County Operations Center 45 SE 54 Escondido Fire Station 32 ESE 55 San Onofre State Beach (Unit 1) 0.2 W 56 San Onofre State Beach (Unit 1) 0.1 W 57 San Onofre State Beach (Unit 2) 0.1 SSW 58 San Onofre State Beach (Unit 3) 0.1 S 1
- 59 SONGS Meteorological Tower 0.3 N.i 1
i
- Distance (miles) and direction (sector) are measured relative to Units 233 micpoint. Direction is ceterminec from degrees true nortn.
B-4 TABLE 5-1 (ccnt. )
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS Distance
- Tyce of Sam:le and Sampling Location (Mi) Direction
- Airborne 1 City of San Clemente (SDL&E Offices) 5.5 NW 2 Camp Sar, Onof re 1.8 NE 3 Mantington Beach Generating Station 37 NW 4 Northeast Site Ecundary 0.2 NNE 6 Units 2&3 Switchyard 0.13 ESE 6 SONGS Meteorological Tower 0.3 NW Soil Samples 1 Camp San Onofre 2. 5 NE 2 Old Route 101 - SE 3.0 SE i
3 Basilone Road /1-5 Freeway Offramp 2. 0 NW 4 Huntincton Beach Generating Station 37 NW i
i i 5 East Site Boundary 0.2 NNW i
Ocean Water l
Station Discharge Outfall - Unit 1 0. 5 SW A
- S Outfali - Unit 2 0.7 SW Outfail - Unit 3 0.7 SW C
l 30 NW D Newpor: Beach
' Distance (miles) and direction (sector) are measured . elative to Units 243 midpoint. Direction is determinec from degrees true nortt.
B-5 TASLE 5-1 (cont.)
l P"010 LOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS Distance
- Tyoe of Sample and Samplina Location (Mi) Direction
- Drinking Water I
1 Tri-Cities Municipal Water District 8.7 Ng Reservoir 2 San Clemente Golf Course Well 3.5 tex ,
t 3 Huntington Beach 37 NW i
i Sediment frcm Shoreline (Beach Sand) 1 San Onofre State Beach 0.6 Si 0.9 Ng
. 2 San Onofre Surfing Beach s
3 San Onofre State Beach 3.5 Si 1.
Newport Beach (North End) 30 NW
!, 4 i
Local Crops 1 San Mateo Canyon 2.6 N4 22 SE 2 Southeast of Oceansice
- Distance (miles) anc direction (sector) c 2cer ".:ec are measured f c. degrees true nort' relative
. to Units 213 mi cpoi nt. Directia.n i .c
B-5 TABLE 5-1 (cont.)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORlhG SAMPLE LOCATIONS Distance *
- Type of Sample and Sampling Location (Mi) Di re:ti er
- Non-Migratory Marine Animals
! A Unit 1 Outfall 0.6 WS'
< B Units 283 Outfall 0.7 SSW C Nesport Beach 30 N4 Kelp A San Onofre Kelp Bed 1.5 S B San Mateo Kelp Bed 3.5 WN4 C Barn Kelp Bed 6.6 SSE 30 NJ D Newport Beach I
~
1 l Ocean Bottom Sediments 1
(
t i A Unit 1 Outfall 0.5 W B Unit 1 Outfall 0.6 W l C Unit 2 Outfall 0.8 554 O Unit 3 Outfall 0.9 5 E Newport Beach 30 He 1 Jack Raboit 0.5 E 2 Jack Ratti: 0.6 Na
- Distance (miles) and direction (sector) are measured relative to Units 253
- c. ' n- Directior. is determined f rom degrees true north.
B-7 TASLE 5-2 i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATION 5 Distance
- Pressurized Ion Chambers (Miles) Direction /Sec cr*
i c S1 San Onofre Beach -W 0.40 W P i
S2 Visitors Center - NW 0.35 N'a Q
- NNW 0.44 NNW R S3 Japanese Mesa j
0.44 N A 54 MCB - Camp Pendleton - N 55 MCS - Camp Pandleton - NNE 0.41 NNE B 55 MCS - Camp Pendleton - NE 0.36 NE C 57 MCS - Camp Pendleton - ENE 0.35 ENE D SS M B - Camp Pendleton - E 0.44 E E 59 San Onofre State Beacn - ESE 0.39 ESE F I
i t
l l
\
l l
l l
4 l
l I*
i
=
l
- Distance (miles) and direction (sector) are measured relacive to Units 25 m;dpoint. Direction is determinec from degrees true nar:n.
l l
l l
l l
B-E TABLE 5-3 SECTOR AND DIRECTION DESIGNATION FOR RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATION MAP Degrees True North from SONGS 2&3 Mid-Point 22.50 Nomenclature Sector Center Sector Limit Line Limit Sector
- Direction 0
, 348.75 0 & 360 11.25 A N 11.25 22.5 33.75 B NNE 33.75 45 56.25 C NE 56.25 67.5 78.75 0 ENE 78.75 90 101.25 E E 101.25 112 123.75 F ESE 123.75 135 145.25 G SE 146.25 157 168.75 H SSE ,
168.75 180 191.25 J S 191.25 202.5 213.75 K SSW 213.75 225 235.25 L SW l 236.25 247.5 258.75 M WSW 258.75 270 281.25 N W
, 281.25 292.5 303.75 P WN'd 303.75 315 326.25 Q NJ 326.25 337.5 348.75 R NNW i .
- The letters I and 0 nave been omitted from tnese sector designators so as to eliminate possible confusion between numbers and letters.
4 w
APPENDIX C TWICE-BACKGROUND TABLES 9
l l
1 l
l p_.-,._. . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ , _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ ._ ._ _ . . _ ._, _ _ _
- _ _ , . ,- ---- --.,,-,--, , . , - - . - - - . . . ~ . - - - - - .~ + -
APPENDIX C NEASUREMENTS EXCEEDING TWICE BACKGROUNil LEVEL i
Analysis oato of Medi un Performed Location Collection Indicator Control (d)
Quarterly Composite Be-7(b) Visitor Center 1/1/82 0.146 0.115 Air Filter (pCi/m 3)
Be-7 Units 2/3 Switchyard 1/1/82 0.188 0.115 Gross Alpha Units 2/3 Switchyard 12/28/82 0.0045 0.0038 Monthly Drinking Water Gross Beta Tri-Cities finnicipal Reservoir 9///82 21 20 Filtrate (pCi/1)
Ocean Botton Sediment Ra-226(b) Unit 1 Outfall Upcoast 11/6/82 0.58 U.S/
(nCi/kg dry)
Ra-226 Unit 1 Outfall Downcoast 11/6/82 0.67 0.57 Co-58 Unit 2 Outfall 10/26/82 0.09 0.03 Co-60 Unit 1 Upcoast 6/10/82 0.58 0.08 Co-60 Unit 1 Upcoast 11/6/82 0.13 0.08 Co-60 Unit 1 Downcoast 11/6/82 0.15 0.08 Cs-137 Unit 2 10/26/82 0.13 0.08 Soil Sr-90 Old liighway 101 12/8/82 0.0S 0.04 (nCi/kg dry)
Marine Animals Co-60 Units 2/3 Outfall (Spiny Lobster) 3/4/82 0.024 0.014 (nCi/kg wet)
Co-60 Unit 1 (Spiny Lobster) 3/8/82 0.021 0.014 Co-60 Unit 1 (Sea Hare) J/5/82 0.0/1 0.014
e
- 4 # '
Analysis Oate of Medi um Performed Location Collection Indicator Control (a)
Marine Animals Co-60 Units 2/3 (Bay Mussel) 3/4/82 0.021 0.014 (nCi/kg wet)
H-3 (bound) Un it 1 (Black Perch) 3/8/82 23(c) 6 H-3 (bound) Units 2/3 (Black Perch) 3/4/82 18(C) 6 Co-60 Unit 1 (Spiny Lobster) 6/9/82 0.016 0.014 H-3 (aqueous) Units 2/3 (Black Perch) 6/9/82 0.35 0.11 Cs-137 Units 2/3 (Spiny Lobster) 6/10/82 0.011 0.010 Co-60 Unit 1 (Sea liare) S/26/82 0.091 0.014 Co-60 Unit 1 (Spiny Lobster) 8/5/82 0.050 0.014 Co-60 Units 2/3 (Spiny Lobster) 8/6/82 0.017 0.014 Co-60 Unit 1 (Sea Hare) 8/6/82 0.069 0.014 Co-60 Unit 1 (Sea liare) 11/31/82 0.067 0.014 H-3 (aqueous) Unit 1 (Black Perch) 10/26/82 0.14 0.10 H-3 (aqueous) Units 2/3 (Bay Mussel) 10/26/82 0.13 0.10 (a) Control values are average values of all individual measureuents. For bases, please see part I.D of the report.
(b) Cosmogenic Be-7 and Ra-226 are naturally-occurring radionuclides.
(c) These values for bound tritium may be false due to chemical bioluminescence. Please see part II.A.12 of the report.
MG:7494
APPEl4'IX J D
SUMMARY
OF l'!TEELABORATORY COMPARISONS I
l e
O
D-1 APPENDIX D RESULTS OF INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS (l)
ALL (2&3)
SAMPLE ANALYSIS EAL EPA PARTICIPA;TS DATE TYPE TYPE MEANS + s.d MEANS + s.d MEANS + s.d
~
Mar. 1981 Water Gross Alpha 27 + 4 19 + 5 18 + 5 May 1981 Water Gross Alpha 15 + 2 28 + 7 25 + 7 July 1981 Water Gross Alpha 26 + 2 22 + 6 18 + 5 Sept. 1931 Water Gross Alpha 34 + 2 33 + 3 23 4 8 Nov. 1931 Water Gross Alpha 26 + 2 21 + 5 20 + 5 July 1982 Water Gross Alpha 19 + 2 16 + 5 15 + 5 Sept. 1982 Water Gross Alpha 33 + 3 29 + 7 26 + 6 Nov. 1982 Weter Gross Alpha 15 + 3 19 + 5 17 + 4 June 1979 Air Filter Gross Alpha 10 + 1 9+5 10 + 2 Mar. 1930 Air Filter Gross Alpha 20 + 1 15 + 5 18 + 4 June 1980 Air Filter Gross Alpha 30 + 2 24 + 6 28 + 5 Mar. 1981 Air Filter Gross Alpha 33 + 1 30 + 8
-. 32_+ 5_
June 1981 Air Filter Gross Alpha 40 + 2 28 + 7 32 + 6 l Mar. 1982 Air Filter Gross Alpha 20 + 1 27 + 7 26 ; 4 Sept. 1982 Air Filter Gross Alpha 28 + 2 32 + 8 20 +6
, Ma r. 1981 Water Gross Beta 25 + 4 19 + 5 20 + 4_
May 1931 Water Gross Beta 21 + 1 14 + 5 16 + 4 l July 1931 Water Gross Beta 24 + 3 15 + 5 17 + 4 i
Sept. 1981 Water Gross Beta 36 + 1 26 + 6 ---
l Nov. 1981 Water Gross Beta 34 + 1 23 + 5 ---
July 1982 Water Bross Beta 20 + 2 23 + 5 21 + 5 Nov. 1982 Water Gross Beta 27 + 1 24 + 5 24 + 3 i, Mar. 1982 Air Filter Gross Beta 70 + 3 55 + b 59 + 6 Sept. 1982 Air Filter Gross Beta 66 + 5 67 + 5 61 + 8
, Jan. 1979 Water Sr-89 13 + 1 14 + 5 13 + 4
- i. May 1979 Water Sr-89 19 + 2 23 + 5 22 + 5 Sept. 1979 Water Sr-89 <3 3+5_
6+3 ,
, Jan. 1980 Water Sr-89 9+1 _
10 + 5
_ 923 i
APPENDIX D (cont.) 0-2 ALL SAMPLE ANALYSIS EAL EPA PARTICIPANTS DATE TYPE TYPE r1EANS + s.d MEANS + s.d MEANS + s.d May 1981 Water Sr-89 34 + 2, 36 + 5 32 + 10 _
Sept. 1981 Water Sr-89 21 + 1 23 + 5 22 + 3 Jan. 1982 Water Sr-89 22 + 1 21 + 5 20 + 4
. May 1982 Water Sr-89 21 + 1 22 + 5 22 + 5 Jan. 1979 Water Sr-90 5+1 6+2 6+2 May 1979 Water Sr-90 26 + 0 30 + 1 28 + 4 Sept. 1979 Water Sr-90 24 + 1 28 + 2 25 + 4 Jan. 1980 Water Sr-90 19 + 1 20 + 2 18 + 4 Jan. 1981 Water Sr-90 39 + 1 34 + 2 32 + 5 May 1981 Water Sr-90 22 + 2 22 + 2 22 + 6 Sept. 1981 Water Sr-90 10 + 1 11 + 2 11 + 2 Jan. 1982 Water Sr-90 13 + 0 12 + 2 11 + 2 May 1932 Water Sr-90 13 + 1 13 + 2 12 + 2 Sept. 1982 Water Sr-90 15 + 1 15 + 2 ---
Aug. 1981 Water H-3 2670 + 44 2630 + 354 2616 + 361 Oct. 1981 Water H-3 2080 + 66 2210 1 340 2133 + 214
. Dec. 1981 Water H-3 2560 + 90 2700 + 355 2676 + 224 Apr. 1981 Water H-3 2960 + 60 2860 + 360 ---
l May 1932 Water H-3 1470 + 6 1330 + 332 1348 + 296 l - Aug. 1982 Water H-3 2517 + 50 2890 + 360 2847 + 270 l Aug. 1980 Water I-131 36 + 3 36 + 5 35 + 6 Dec. 1980 Water I-131 17 + 0 22 + 6 21 + 4 July 1981 Water I-131 68 + 4 73 + 7 72 t 7 Dec. 1981 Water I-131 77 + 2 76 + 8 69 + 10 l Apr. 1982 Water I-131 55 + 3 62 + 6 63 + 8 Aug. 1982 Water I-131 92 + 4 87 + 9 86 + 10 Ma r. 1978 Air Filter Sr-90 4+1 8+2 7+2 Jan. 1979 Air Filter Sr-90 6+0 6+2 6+1 ,
June 1979 Air Filter Sr-90 10 + 1 10 + 2 10 + 2 Ma r. 1980 Air Filter Sr-90 10 + 0 10 + 2 10 + 2 June 1980 Air Filter Sr-90 8+1 8+2 8+1 Ma r. 1981 Air Filter Sr-90 18 + 1 18 + 2 17 + 3_
APPENDIX D (cont.) 0-3 ALL SAMPLE ANALYSIS EAL EPA PARTICIPANTS DATE TYPE TYPE MEANS _+ s.d_MEANS _+ s.d MEANS _+ s.d June 1981 Air Filter Sr-90 19 j; 1 19j;2 19 j;3 Mar. 1982 Air Filter Sr-9! 16 + 0 16 + 1 16 + 3 June 1980 Water Cr-51 <40 13 + 5 21 + 20 Feb. 1981 Water Cr-51 <35 0 49 + 11 Oct. 1982 Water Cr-51 36 + 2 34 + 5 36 + 9 Feo. 1982 Water Cr-51 <30 0 5 y; 9 June 1982 Water Cr-51 23 + 1 23 + 5 26 + 13 June 1978 Water Co-60 24 j; O 22 j; 5 22 2, 3 Oct. 1978 Water Co-60 24 + 1 23 + 5 23 + 4 '
June 1979 Water Co-60 43 + 1 47 + 5 47 + 6 June 1980 Water Co-60 7+1 5+5 6+3 Feb. 1981 Water Co-60 24 + 2 25 + 5 25 + 4 June 1981 Water Co-60 12 + 1 17 + 5 17 + 3 Oct. 1981 Water Co-60 23 + 1 22 + 5 23 + 3 Feb. 1982 Water Co-60 20 + 1 20 + 5 20 + 5 June 1982 Water Co-60 30 + 1 29 + 5 31 + 4
, June 1980 Water Zn-65 25 + 1 23 + 5 24 + 6 Feb. 1981 Water Zn-65 87 + 1 85 + 5 89 + 1 Oct. 1991 Water Zn-65 21 + 1 24 + 5 24 + 4
, Feb. 1982 Water Zn-65 17 + 1 15 + 5 15 + 4 June 1982 Water Zn-65 32 + 2 26 + 5 27 + 6 June 1978 Water Cs-134 24 + 3 22 + 5 21 + 4 Oct. 1978 Water Cs-134 22 + 1 25 + 5 25 + 4 June 1979 Water Cs-134 61 + 3 71 + 5 68 + 7 June 1980 Water Cs-134 10 + 1 11 + 5 11 + 3 Feb. 1981 Water Cs-134 34 + 1 36 + 5 33 + 5 June 1981 Water Cs-134 19j;1 21 j; 1 21 j; 5 Oct. 1981 Water Cs-134 20 + 1 21 + 5 20 + 4 Feb. 1982 Water Cs-134 22 + 1 22 + 5 21 + 3 June 1982 Water Cs-134 31 + 1 35 + 5 34 + 4 June 1978 Water Cs-137 33 + 2 30 + 5 32 + 4 Oct. 1978 Water Cs-137 144j;2 125 j; 6 127 ;; 11
APPENDIX D (cont.) 0-4 ALL SAMPLE ANALYSIS EAL EPA PARTICIPANTS DATE TYPE TYPE MEANS + s.d MEANS + s.d MEANS + s.d June 1979 Water Cs-137 <4 0 ---
. June 1980 Water Cs-137 18 + 1 17 + 5 17 + 3 Feb. 1981 Water Cs-137 <5 4+5 5+2 June 1981 Water Cs-137 30 + 1 31 + 5 31 + b Oct. 1981 Water Cs-137 34 + 1 32 + 5 33 + 4 Feb. 1982 Water Cs-137 24 + 2 23 + 5 24 + 4 June 1982 Water Cs-137 26 + 1 25 + 5 27 + 4 Dec. 1977 Air Filter Cs-137 84 + 5 67 + 5 70 + 14 Ma r. 1978 Air Filter Cs-137 30 + 2 22 + 5 23 + 5 Jan. 1979 Air Filter Cs-137 10 + 1 6+5_
8+2 _
June 1979 Air Filter Cs-137 21 + 1 10 + 5 12 + 4 Mar. 1980 Air filter Cs-137 30 + 2 20 + 5 23 + 5 June 1980 Air Filter Cs-137 14 + 1 12 + 5 14 3 3 Ma r. 1981 Air Filter Cs-137 17 + 1 14 + 5 16 + 4 June 1981 Air Filter Cs-137 19 + 2 16 + 5 20 + 5 Ma r. 1982 Air filter Cs-137 37 + 1 23 + 5 27 + 6 June 1980 Water Ru-106 <50 37 + 5 35 + 6 June 1981 Water Ru-106 <15 15 + 6 12 + 9 Feb. 1982 Water Ru-106 <20 20 + 5 19 + 8 l , Aug. 1979 Water U-235 34 + 1 33 + 4 32 + 7 Oct. 1980 Water U-235 25 + 2 27 + 3 26 + 3 Feb. 1982 Water U-235 34 + 2 35 + 6 33 + 8 Aug. 1982 Water U-235 24 + 1 23 + 6 23 + 4 (1) All the units are in pCi/l for water analysis and pCi/ filter for air filter analysis.
l (2) Food was not analyzed by EAL.
(3) Strontium 89, Sr-90, I-131, Cs-137, Ba-140, and potassium results are not reported since milk is not produced in the vicinity of SONGS.
-. _ _ _ _. __ _ __ _ _ ~
a .a L - - -
c O
I e
APPENDIX E COMPARIS0N OF OPERATIONAL DATA WITH PREOPERATIONAL DATA O
N l
l 1 -
l l
E-1 APPENDIX E COMPARISON OF OPERATIONAL DATA <
WITH PRE 0PERAT10NAL
~
For comparison of operational data with the preoperational data, all the measurements from January 1978 to June 1981 are used for preoperational phase of SONGS Unit 2. These preoperational data are the actual operational data
. obtained from the radiological environmental monitoring program for SONGS Unit 1. Unit 1 became critical in 1968 and was in operation until February 2, 1982. Due to seismic modification backfits, Unit I did not operate during the period between February 3, and December 31, 1982.
A variety of environmental samples were analyzed and the radioanlytical results (1978-1982) were compared with the 1982 operational data obtained for SONGS Unit 2. The operational period and the power level of Unit 2 have been sunnarized in Table E-la. The data show that the highest power criticality for Unit 2 has been 50% of the full rated thermal power. During the period November 30 to December 13, 1982 the reactor power level was 1695 megawatts (full thermal power of Unit 2 is 3390 megawatts).
The following media were evaluated and compared with tne operational data nf SONGS 2:
- 1. External Radiation
- 2. Drinking Water
- 3. Ocean Water
~ 4. Ocean Bottom Sediments
- 5. fiarine Species l
- 6. Air Particulates A. External Radiation Direct radiation measurements were made both quarterly and annually at 59
! different locations. Dosimeters were collected at a number of onsite as well as at outer locations. In order to evaluate the variation in external radiation exposure, a plot was nade of direct radiation exposure in mr, obtained from thermoluminescent dosimeters, versus time for six different locations, including Huntington Beach control. The plot
, (Figure 8) compares all the locations and also shows the time variation l of radiation level during both preoperational (January 1978 - June 1982) and operational periods of July 1982 to December 1982. Figure 8 shows a decreasing trend in external radiation during its period from 1978 to 1982. The major outlier is the Huntington Beach control station with an average exposure of 32.7 millirem and a standard deviation of 5.4 millirem for the preoperational period. This value is 24% higher than
. all other indicator stations for the same time period. In the 1982 operational year for Unit 2, all the indicator stations averaged to 22.0 millirem with a standard deviation of 1.7 millirem where the Huntington Beach location averaged 29.0 millirem with a standard deviation of 0.8 milliren.
I
E-2 The Huntington Beach control station was also higher (32%) during tne operational phase of Unit 2 as it was higher during the preoperational period. From these oDservations, it seems that the environmental radiation levels of the control station are higner than the indicator station. It may be concluded that the Unit 2 operation has not posed any impact on the environment and the atmosphere.
A regression analysis using all the data values was performed and it yielded a slope of -0.23 millirem per quarter with a negative correlation
, (r = -0.66) and a P < 0.001. This analysis is indicative of the decreasing trend in radiation level with time (1978 to 1982).
The external radiation level was higher in the years 1978 through 1980.
This is reflected in the deeper slope in this region. The presence of the larger peaks in this region may be attributed to the atmospheric weapons testing of Fiarch 14, 1978, and October 15, 1980. The volcanic erruption of Mount Saint Helens in May 1980 has been one of the contributors to the environmental radiation levels. The dispersion of the volcanic plume and the subsequent eruptions raised the environmental levels throughout the country. The residual activities from the previous years weapons testing could also contribute and add to the environmental levels of 1978 through 1980. For example, September 17, 1977 atnospheric testing contributed to the 1978 environmental radiation levels. The smaller slope observed af ter 1980 through 1982 is probably due to tne curtailment of tha atmo::phering nuclear weapons testing. Other factors, such as meteorolos/, geographic locations, and statistical and seasonal fluctuations may also describe the difference in various environmental levels observed in all the stations studied.
The reduction of environmental factors, such as nuclear weapons testing, has also reduced the natural radiation levels of the environment.
Comparison of indicator station's data with those of the control station's show that there has not been any reasonable external radiation
, impact of SONGS 2 on the environment.
B. Drinking Water
- 1. Filtrate I ,
The gross beta activity of drinking water filtrate data were plotted against time and the results are shown in figure 9. The graph includes all the indicator as well as the Huntington Beach control locations. The variation in gross beta activity during a five-year period is small for all the locations and no increasing trend in the operational period is observed.
The activity level in all indicator locations ranged from 4 pCi/l to 21 pCi/l and averaged (11.9 + 3.4) pCi/l during preoperational time of January 1978 to June 19827 The gross beta activity range of Huntington Beach drinking water was 4 to 21 pCi/l during the same preoperational time period and the mean was (7.9 + 2.8) pCi/1. To evaluate the difference between the preoperationaT and operational l
l l
[
E-3 values, a t-distribution test using all the indicator location values was performed and resulted in (0.10 > p > 0.05) and a t value of 1.770. Applying the standard criteria for significance, it is seen that this value of t is insufficient for declaring the operational mean to be significantly different from the
, preoperational mean. The mean gross beta activity of all the indicator locations during the operational period for Unit P was (14.3 + 4.0) pCi/l and in Huntington Beach control station it was (10.0 7 1.8) pCi/1. The difference in gross beta activity level of a the control and indicator stations may be due to the different origins of the water samples in all three locations. Figure 9 also demonstrates that Tri-Cities reservoir activity levels are slightly higher than the other two stations. The higher levels observed in certain months of each year may be attributable to the fallout contribution from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing of the previous years and their effects on the Tri-Cities municipal water reservoi r. The radioactive fallout would tend to affect tne reservoir more than the other water supplies, such as San Clemente well water and Huntington Beach tap water because the reservoir is open to the air with only a floating cover, whereas the other water supplies are essentially solidly covered. All the statistical and seasonal fluctuations plus the various natural radioactivity levels (such as K-40) of each type of water sample do contribute to the various gross beta activity levels of the drinking water samples.
Comparison between the three stations is therefore complicated due to the presence of different environmental factors. Since tap water, well water, and reservoir water samples have different origins, a high gross beta activity at the Tri-cities reservoir, due
, to fallout, would not show up at the Huntington Beach control station (tap water). This contributien of fallout to gross beta activity during the preoperational study prevents useful and accurate comparison with the operational data. However, ganna spectral analysis will be more useful in evaluating the results.
The Ge(Li) scan performed on drinking water, did not show the presence of any of the plant-specific radionuclides in detectaDle j level s.
- 2. Solids Gross beta activity in drinking water solids was plotted versus time and the graph is presented in Figure 10. The activity ranged from 0.3 to 2.7 pCi/l in all indicator locations fron January 1978 to June 1982. The activity range in Huntington Beach control was 0.6 to 2.2 pCi/l during the same time period. Figure 10 also shows the gross beta variation in all three locations. The highest activity i observed during the preoperational time was in July 1978 (2.6 pCi/l) j in Tri-cities Municipal Reservoir, in general, no increasing trend l
. was observed during the five year preoperational and operational periods and all fluctuations are within the statistical deviations of the data points and also due to seasonal and otner environmental phenomena.
I l The average gross beta activity during t.he preoperational phase was l (1.1 + 0.5) pCi/l for all the indicator locations where in i
Huntington Beach control it was (1.0 _+ 0.3) pCi/1.
During the
E-4 operational period, the mean activity level of solids in all indicator locations was (1.0 + 0.4) pCi/1, not significantly different from 1.1 pCi/l value of the preoperational period. In conclusion, the plant's operations has had no detectable effect on this medium.
C. Ocean Water l
The gross beta activity of ocean water during the preoperational period and the operational period were plotted against time (Figure 11) for all
- locations, three indicator and one control station. The gross beta variation is mainly due to variation in the level of naturally-occurring potassium-40. During 1979 and 1980, the average activity of all 3 locations seemed to be slightly higher, probably due to the radioactive fallout contribution of the atmospheric nuclear weapons testing in the previous years, i.e., 1977 and 1978. Tne maximum gross beta activity measured during the preoperational phase was 1340 pCi/l compared to 1010 pCi/l of the operational time. Maximum gross beta activity minus K-40 was 22 pCi/l which indicates most of the gross beta activity of the ocean water is due to the naturally-occurring K-40 and the variation in activity levels of ocean water is mostly due to variation in the level of K-40. All the other fluctuations are seasonal and within the frame work of normal statistical deviations.
D. Ocean Botton Sediments The variation in activity of the ocean bottom sediments versus time is shown in Figures 12 and 13. During the preoperational time, a number of
. samples were analyzed semiannually to determine the plant-specific 4 radionuclides, if any. Radionuclides such as Co-58, Co-60, Ag-110m and Cs-137 were found in a few samoles. The activity range for Co-60 was 0.02 to 10.50 nCi/Ag dry sedinent. Cs-137 level was 0.024 to 0.230 nCi/kg dry. The Co-60 activity in the sediment samples of the operational period was 0.13 nC1/kg dry at north of SONGS 1 outfall and 0.15 nCi/kg dry at south of SONGS 1 outfall. The SONGS 2 outfall sediment samples did not show any detectable Co-60 activity and their values were reported as zero. The Cs-137 at locations north and south of SONGS 1 outfall had an activity of 0.07 and 0.05 nC1/kg dry respectively where SONGS 2 outfall sediment samples showed no detectable activity.
The comparison of sediments activity with the preoperational values is difficult due to small number of samples analyzed. Although Co-58, Co-60, Ag-110m and Co-137 are normally associated with nuclear power operations, a five-year preoperational study reveals no accumulation
~
trend for these radionuclides and no increase in levels for these radionuclides was detected during the operational period. It is not l
concluded that SONGS 2 cperation has had any impact upon this protion of the environment.
)
E-5 E. Marine Species Different types of marine species were caught during the preoperational period and the operational time. Species, such as sheepshead, olack perch, and spiny lobster were collected four times a year and were analyzed for a number of radionuclides, most plant-specific ones. Co-58,
- Co-60, Ag-110m, and Cs-137 activity levels were determined by ganna-ray spectrometry. Figure 14 illustrates the variation in concentration of Co-60, Ag-110m and Cs-137 in spiny lobster species caught at 50iiGS 2 outfall during the preoperational and operational phases. Cobalt-60 level in spiny lobster ranged from 0.Q1 to 0.200 nCi/kg wet during the preoperational time period (January 1978 - June 1982). During the operational period, the spiny lobster concentration range was 0.007-0.017 nCi/kg wet. Cobalt-58 level was below the detection limit (LLD = 0.01 nCi/kg wet). One spiny lobster species caught at SONGS 2 outfall in August 1982, contained 0.018 nCi/kg wet of Co-58 in flesh and 0.019 nCi/kg wet in the shell. Sea hare caught at SONGS 1 outfall also contained 0.033 and 0.015 nCi/kg wet in June and August respectively.
All SONGS 2 outfall species showed no activity in detectable level and were reported as zero. The maximum Co-68 activity of 0.033 nCi/kg wet is 0.11% of Unit 2 TS reporting level. During the preoperational period, the concentration range of Co-58 was 0.04 to 0.27 nCi/kg wet. SONGS 2 outfall species and most of the species analyzed during the preoperational time period had activities below the LLD and were reported as zero. The maximum value of 0.27 nCi/kg wet was observed in Decencer, 1979 and is 1% of the TS reporting level for Co-58 (30 nCi/kg wet). The preoperational data also indicate that sea hare and bay mussel contained various levels of Co-58 in their flesh. Most of the species had activities less than LLD. Highest Co-58 activity in sea hare was found
- to be 0.39 nCi/kg wet and for bay mussel, 0.026 nCi/kg wet during the preoperational phase of Unit 2. The activities of these radionuclides were all below LLD during the operational period. The maximum activity of 0.39 nCi/kg wet observed in sea hare in September 1979 is 1% of tne
. reporting level for Co-58. In conclusion, no accumulation pattern has been observed in these species up to date. Silver-110m level ranged froa 0.026 to 0.14 nCi/kg wet during the preoperational period while its range was 0.028 to 0.044 nCi/kg wet in the operational period. Cs-137 range during the preoperational phase was 0.065 to 0.013 and in the operational period, its level was 0.11 nC1/kg wet in August and 0.005 nCi/kg wet in November respectively. In most of the samples analyzed, 9 out of 13 spiny lobster species showed activity level less than the detection limit (LLD = 0.003 nCi/kg wet). The highest cobalt-60 activity measured in spiny lobster during operational period was 0.017. This is approximately 0.2% of the reporting level (10 nCi/kg wet) established by Unit 2 l
t l
i l
E-6 technical specifications. Also, Ag-110m maximum activity of 0.044 during operational period is 0.55% of the Unit 1 environmental technical specifications reporting level of 8 nC1/kg wet. The Unit 2 tecnnical specifications do not provide a reporting level for Ag-110n. For Cs-137, the highest activity level during the operational period was 0.011 nCi/kg wet which is 0.6", of the technical specification level of 2 nCi/Kg wet.
All other species caught in the vicinity of the SONGS 2 outfall had values less than LLO and were reported as zero.
. In conclusion, it is seen that the operational levels are not different than the preoperational levels, and no trend of accunulation of radionuclides in marine species was observed. The plant's operation therefore has had no significant impact on the marine environment.
F. Air Particulates In order to provide the preoperational data for SONGS, a number of studies were conducted from 1978 to 1982. These preoperational data for SONGS Unit 2 are operational data for SONGS Unit 1 operation. One of the studies involved measurement of gross beta activity in air particulates.
Air samples from different locations near the plant were collected on a weekly basis and analyzed. Figure 15 presents the monthly variation in the gross beta activity of the air particulates in all six locations and compares the gross beta activity levels of all the different locations during the preoperational and operational periods. (January 19/8 to December 1982.) The operational period is from July 1982 to December 1982. As it is seen from the graph, in most of the time span, the environmental levels of gross beta remained the same for all the locations. The minor variations observed are of statistical or seasonal nature depending on the geographical location of each station. The presence of the first major group of peaks observed during February to July 1978 of the preoperational period may be attributed to Chinese atmospheric nuclear weapons testing of March 14, 1978 and the residual
< fallout activity from the previous atmosphering testing of September 17, 1977. Volcanic activities and other environmental phenomena can attribute to this increase in gross beta level. During this time period (Febraury to July 1978), the Huntington Beacn control station was i affected as well as the other locations. Since all the locations were affected equally, it may be concluded that the rise in gross beta l
activity was not plant related. The decrease in gross beta activity level after July 1978 might be ascribed to the curtailment of nuclear l
weapons testing in the atmosphere. The rise in gross beta activity observed after October 1980 is thought to be the fallout contribution
. from the Chinese atmospheric nuclear weapons testing of October 15, j 1980. The presence of the large group of peaks, observed in the region of October 1980 to August 1981, is attributed to the October 15, 1980 atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and also to the volcanic eruption of Mount Saint Helens located in Washington State. The Chinese testing of October 1980 deposited a large amount of radioactivity to California and raised the background level. During this period, highest gross beta activity was observed in Huntington Beach Control station l
I E-7 (0.400 pCi/m3 ) in May 1981. The Hay 1980 eruption of the Mount Saint Helen and the subsequent volcanic activities also contributed to the elevation of tne natural background levels in the environment. The dispersion of the radioactive plume and its travel throughout the country affected the environmental levels at the locations being studied. All the locations, more or less, were affected simultaneously Dy these environmental factors (Figure 15). All the other minor peaks observed have little significance and their presence is attributed to the statistical deviation of the data points and also seasonal variation and
. fluctuations in all the locations. Figure 15 also compares the operational data for SONGS 2, obtained during July to December 1982, with the preoperational data of January 1978 to July 1982. These data suggest that there is no plant-related activity released to the environment since the operational levels are not significantly different from the preoperational activity levels. A comparison between the control location (Huntington Beach) and the indicator locations did not reveal any significant difference in activity levels. The average activity in all the indicator locations was found to be (0.0200 + 0.0056) pCi/m3 where in Huntington Beach Centrol location it was (070218 + 0.0058) pCi/n3 during the operational period of July to Decenber IV82. In order to evaluate the difference between the activity levels, a t-distribution test was performed and yielded a t = 1.734 with a probability (0.10 > P > 0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that the rise in gross beta activity is not the result of plant operation and is the result of other environmental phenomena. It should be mentioned that the presence of activity due to atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and other environmental phenomena, such as volcanic &ctivities, make the comparison difficult since the background level is affected.
~
G. Conclusions This assessment indicates that the variation of radioactivity level in environmental media will be affected by several sources. Meteorology, e atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, fallout frequency, terrestrial conditions, coal and fuel processing plants, and the occurrence of earthquake and volcanic activities are among the factors which nay affect, and lead to the elevation of the natural background levels in the environment. All activities noted during the operational phase are either at or below activity attributable to these natural sources.
The result indicate that the plant's effect on the environnent is minimal.
i
E-8 TABLE E-la SONGS UNIT 2 POWER HISTORY
. Days HFP(l) MWT(2)
- 1. 12 5.6% 189.84
- 2. 31 0% 0
- 3. 23 20% 678.0
- 4. 3 40% 1356.0
- 5. 5 0% 0
- 6. 4 25% 847.50
- 7. 3 0% 0
- 8. 14 50% 1695.0
- 9. 17 0% 0
- 10. 4 20% 678.0
- 11. 1 0% 0
- 12. 11 50% 1695.0
- (1) Hot Full Power (2) 100". Hot Full Power = 3390 MWT e
I APPENDIX F CORRELATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCENTRATION WITH EFFLUENT RELEASE O
e I
l
F-1 APPENDIX F CORRELATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCENTRATION WITH LIQUID EFFLUENT RELEASE A. SONGS 1 AND 2 EFFLUENTS AND MARINE SPECIES
- 1. SONGS 1 Species The effect of SONGS 1 effluent on SONGS 1 marine species nas been studied and the results were described in 1982 annual operating report for Unit 1. SONGS 2 effluent stream is downcoast and Unit 1 outfall is farther north (upcoast). The current flow is usually downcoast, i.e., fron SONGS 1 to SONGS 2. Some of tne SONGS 1 species may travel to SONGS 2 outfall so it is necessary to study the uptake pattern of plant-specific radionuclides on the marine species and the effect of S0dGS 2 liquid effluent on marine species found at Unit 1 outfall. The following radionuclides are investigated:
Co-58: SONGS 1 effluent Co-58 activity was highest in April 1982 (175.0 mC1). The total Co-58 effluent release in the second quarter was 346.5 mci. The sea hare, a bottom dweller, caught at SONGS 1 outfall had an activity of 0.033 nCi/kg wet. Spiny lobster did not show any Co-58 activity in June but in the third quarter, it had 0.018 nCi/kg wet in the flesh. It seems that these bottom dwellers have had a tendency towards uptake. The levels are still 0.1*.' of the Co-58 reporting level. C0balt-58 was released in the third quarter with an activity of 9.60 mci and in the fourth quarter 120 l mci at SONGS Unit 2 outfall. The Co-58 activity level in most of the narine species of SONGS 1 was below LLD (0.01 nCi/kg wet).
Spiny lobster species caught at SONGS 1 outfall in August, nad 0.018
. nCi/kg wet of Co-58 in the flesh and sea hare nad 0.033 and 0.015 nCi/kg wet of Co-58 in June and August respectively.
Co-60: The highest Co-60 activity released at SONGS 1 outfall was 232.0 mci in the month of May 1982 (Figure 16). The highest Co-60 activity observed in marine species was 0.086 nCi/kg wet in sea nare caught at SONGS 1 outfall in June 1982. The sea hare species all had a concentration range of 0.068-0.086 nCi/kg wet throughout tne year. The highest Co-60 activity found in spiny lobster was 0.052 nCi/kg wet. Sheepsnead and black perch did not show any detectable l . Co-60 activity in May and June whereas the Co-60 activity in effluent reached its maximum.
l Sea hare caught at SONGS 1 outfall had a Co-60 activity of 1.8 l nCi/kg wet in March 1981 and 2.0 nCi/kg wet in June 1981. The highest Co-60 activity was observed in June 1981, 1110 mci l (Figure 18). In general, a decreasing trend in Co-60 activity among the species was noted from 1981 to 1982. For example, highest Co-60
- level found in sea hare in 1982 was 0.085 compared with 2.0 nC.i/kg i
F-2 wet for 1981. Concentration range of all species was 0.006-0.086 nCi/kg wet in 1982. No correlation was observed between the liquid ef fluent Co-60 activity and the Co-60 level in the marine species.
Cobalt-60 activity of SONGS 2 liquid effluent was 0.143 mci (143 uC1) in the tnird quarter and 4.2 mci in the fourth quarter.
The Co-60 activity released was much lower than the activity released in the third quarter by Unit 1 (145.4 mci by SONGS Unit 1 versus 0.143 mci by SONGS 2) so most of the low level activity
, observed in marine species may be releated to SONGS 1 effluent. In the fourth quarter, Unit 1 total Co-60 activity was 48.7 mci versus 4.2 nCi for Unit 2. Consequently, Unit 2 effluent will have a mucn lower contribution to any activities observed in marine organisms.
All the activities observed in the species are many times below the reporting level of the TS.
Cs-137: The highest Cs-137 activity in SONGS 2 effluent was observed in September 1982 (298.0 nCi). The comparison between the Cs-137 activity in the liquid effluent (Figure 16) and Cs-137 in the marine species indicated the presence of some activity in the flesh portion (0.003-0021 nCi/kg wet). The Cs-137 activity in the effluent peaked 298.0 nCi in September and 58.0 nCi in October, whereas the marine species of SONGS 1 showed a low and steady level of Cs-137. Spiny lobster had the highest Cs-137 level (0.021 nCi/kg wet) in March with a decreasing trend thrughout the year. All other species showed zero activity or very low levels. The highest Cs-137 activity of 0.021 nCi/kg is one percent of the reporting level (2 nCi/kg wet). No direct correlation could be observed between the liquid effluent release and the concentration levels in the above medi um.
Unit 2 liquid effluent had a Cs-137 activity of S.8 x 10-4 nCi or
- 0.58 uCi in the fourth quarter. The third quarter Cs-137 activity
. in the liquid effluent was below the LLD salue. The total Cs-137 activity of the SONGS 1 liquid effluent was 82.5 FCi in the fourth quarter whereas the total Cs-137 activity of SONGS Unit 2 ef fluent was 5.8 x 10-4 mci. It is concluded that the Unit 2 contribution to radioactivity level in the marine species analyzed is much smaller than the Unit 1 effluent.
. current is primarily downcoast with a few exceptions. Thus SONGS 1 effluent can reach and affect SONGS 2 outfall region. Therefore, the effect of Unit 1 effluent on SONGS 2 outfall species should be considered. The following observations were made on the narine species of SONGS 2&3 outfall region.
{
l l
r-3 Co-58: Cobalt-58 activity of the SONGS 1 liquid effluent reached l its maximum in April 1982 (175.0 mci) where Co-58 activity of most 1 of the marine species analyzed was below LLD during all the four quarters of 1982. Spiny lobster did not show any detectable ;
activity throughout the year and during the operational time of Unit ? so did bay mussel caught at SONGS 2 outfall. The Co-58 activ.'.j in SONGS 2 effluent was 9.60 mci in the third quarter and 120 mci in the fourth quarter. Tne total activity released by 50!iGS 1 effluent in the fourth quarter was 11.3 mci since Unit 1 did not operate dfter February 2, 1982. No particular trend or specific accumulation pattern was observed in any of the species studied.
Co-60: Sheepshead and black perch showed no detectable level of Co-60, where bay r'ussel and spiny lobster showed Co-60 in their flesh. Tne highest Co-60 activity observed in spiny lobster was 0.024 nCi/kg wet in March, decreasing through December. There seems to be no direct correlation with the Unit 1 effluent Co-60 activity since it was highest in June. The bay mussel also had highest Co-60 activity in March 0.021 nCi/kg wet, decreasing through the year (0.006 nCi/kg wet in December 1982, (Figure 17). The 1981 data (Figure 17) show the presence of Co-60 in some species. Bay aussel had the highest Co-60 activity in June (0.400 nCi/kg wet) and spiny lobster had 0.033 nCi/kg wet in March. Tha Co-60 levels are beloa the reporting level 10 nCi/kg wet. Concentration range of all species was 0.006-0.024 wet in 1982 and the highest Co-60 activity in 1982 was lower than the 1981 maximum activity, i.e., 0.024 compared with 0.40 nCi/kg wet. The results show no direct correlation between the effluent release and the environmental levels in the marine species.
SONGS 2 ef fluent had Co-60 activity of 0.143 mci in the third quarter and 4.2 mci in the fourth quarter of 1982. These activities are much smaller than the Unit 1 effluent Co-60 activity. Unit 1
. had a Co-60 activity of 145.4 mci in the third quarter and 48.7 nCi in the fourth quarter. As it is seen, the levels are nuch lower for Unit 2 so the contribution of Unit 2 effluent to the environnental levels is much smaller.
Cs-137: A comparison between the Cs-137 activity in the Unit I liquid effluent and the marine s;n .ies did not show any direct l correlation with the release. M i the species had an activity range j of 0.004-0.013 nCi/kg wet. The highest value of 0.013 was found in sheepshead, spiny lobster and black perch (Figure 19). The highest
, Cs-137 activity in the liquic effluent was 298.0 mci in September where the species had low anc steady levels of Cs-137. In general, no correlation between the ef fluent release and the environmental levels was observed.
l l
l l
F-4 The Cs-137 activity in Unit 2 liquid effluent was 5.8 x 10-4 mci, so small that its contribution to the levels in marine organisms is negligible. Unit 1 effluent total Cs-137 activity in the fourth quarter of 1982 was 82.5 mC1. Tnerefore, it is concluded that the Unit 2 effluent has not had any negative effect on the marine
. environment.
Ag-110m: One of the marine species of SOfiGS 2 outfall (spiny lobster) contained detectable levels of Ag-110n (0.044 nCi/kg wet) in August 1982 and in December it had 0.028 nCi/kg wet of Ag-110n in its flesh. Other species had levels below the LLD for Ag-110m (0.07 nCi/kg wet). ?!o correlation could be made between the Ag-110m activity level and the effluent Ag-110m activity because its release activity was below the LLD of 9.7 x 10-3 Ci. It should be mentioned that the observed activity levels in the above species are much lower than the reporting level of 8 nCi/kg wet for this radionuclide (less than 0.6% of the TS reporting level). The activity range of Ag-110n in tt e spiny lobster caugnt at SONGS 1 outfall was 0.030 to 0.062 nCi/kg wet throughout the year. The maximum Ag-110m activity is 0.8% of the reporting level. Unit 2 did not release a detectable amount of Ao-110m, and no accumulation pattern has yet been observed in any of the species studied. flore samples and a longer tine are required to further investigate and study the uptake pattern of plant-specific radionuclides by the marine organisms.
Tritium (H-3): The effect of tritiun released by SONGS 1 liquid effluent was studied. A plot of the SONGS 1 effluent monthly
, release of tritium is shown in figure 20. No correlation between the SONGS 1 effluent release of tritium and 1981 marine species tritium level could be nade because the aqueous tritiuu was not deternined and bound tritium values were zero with some false positive results. Starting in second quarter of 1932, an aqueous tritium analysis program was initiated and the results were as
- follows
- nost of the marine species did not contain any detectable l activities of either bound or aqueous tritium. Most of the SONGS 1 l species had activities below LLD in the first three quarters of 1982, both aqueous and bound. In October, black perch had 0.14 nCi/kg wet, spiny lobster 0.10 nCi/kg wet, and sea hare 0.05 nCi/kg wet of aqueous tritium (Figure 21) where the maximum tritiun activity released to the ocean through SONGS 1 outfall was 289.0 in March. From April to November, the range was 0.96 to 24.8 Ci in the SONGS 1 effluent (Figure 20). The tritiun activity in the effluent was less than LLD in December 1982. The lower tritium activity can be attributed to the fact that Unit I was not in operation after I
l l
i i
t
F-5 February 2,1982. The maximun tritium activity observed in black perch in October (0.14 nCi/kg wet) is 0.003*.' of the reporting level (4400 nCi/kg wet). An interesting observation is that tritiun activity in the marine species of Newport Beach control location was in the range of 0.11 to 0.18 nCi/kg wet. Spiny lobster had 0.11 nCi/kg wet in June, and 0.18 nCi/kg wet in October. Sheepshead and
, black perch had 0.14 and 0.11 nCi/kg wet respectively. The other narine species had levels less than the LLD (0.05 nCi/kg wet for aqueous tritium). The effect of SONGS 1 effluent on marine species of SONGS 2&3 was also studied. Most of the species had tritiun
- levels less than the LLD during the first three quarters except black perch that had 0.35 nCi/kg wet in June. In October, black perch had 0.10 nCi/kg wet, sheepshead 0.08 nC1/kg wet, bay mussel 0.13 nCi/kg wet, and spiny lobster 0.07 nCi/kg wet. The trend observed was very similar to SONGS 1 outfall species and activity levels of SONGS 2 species were not very different from the Newport Beach control location species. There seems to be no direct correlation between the tritiun release and its uptake by narine species (Figure 21).
Unit 2 effluent also contained tritiun in the third quarter (534 nCi) and in the fourth quarter (8,387 mci). The total H-3 activity of Unit 1 effluent was 28,300 mci in the third quarter and 6,000 mci in the fourth quarter of 1982. It may be possible to conclude that the levels observed in SONGS 2 species are the results of tne effluent release but the fact that the Newport Beach control species also contained some tritium activity comparable to the indicator species, makes such a conclusion premature. It may be possible to assume that marine species of the control location
, migrate a small distance (17-20 miles) to SONGS outfalls region or drift current direction has an effect. At times during tne sunner, the current reverses suddenly for periods of several days. The nean up and downcoast currents appear to rapidly reverse directions at times with a peridicity of several days. If none of the above occur then these aqueous tritium levels found in Newport Beach control locations might have a different origin. It might be mentioned that of most concern is the bound tritium ratner than aqueous tritium.
The transfer of tritium to organic compounds following intake of tritiated water occurs largely by excnange of tritiun from body water with the hydrogen of organic fractions. Carbon-bound hydrogen is very stable and without sone enzynatic assistance there is normally little exchange with hydrogen of the body water. Of most interest is the biological half life of bound tritiun relative to aqueous tritium. The biological half life of bound tritium varies with the age of the species, or the tissue or organ under conside ra tion. In marine animals, vertebrate and non-vertebrate, the loss of organically-bound tritiun from chronically exposed animals ranges from 110 to 290 days. Slow uptake is logically associated with long retention. The bound tritium, therefore, is not as easily exchangeable as aqueous tritium and has longer biological nalf life but there is no evidence for a significant concentration process for tritium in plants or animals. Most of tne tritium is in the form of aqueous whicn is in the form of tritiated water and is easily lost and retrieved as free water.
F-6 No direct correlation was observed. All bound tritium values determined in marine species were below LLD of 3 nCi/kg wet weight basis and were reported as zero.
B. OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENT Buildup of radionuclides in the ocean botton sediment was studied to investigate the effect of the plant operation, if any, on the marine species. The measurement of sediment activity is not considered to be of
. major importance as a critical pathway to man. However, a potential exists for long-term buildup of radionuclides such as Cs-137 and Co-60 in the sediment. Figures 12 and 13 show the Co-60 and Cs-137 levels in the sedinents and their variation with time (1978-1982). The results of the 5-year study show no accumulation time (1978-1982). The results of the 5-year study show no accumulation pattern for these radionuclides in the sediments. Species such as sea hare and spiny lobster (botton dwellers) showed sone very low levels of these radionuclides in their flesh, but no accunulation pattern was observed either in the sediments or in the species and all the activity levels are many times below the reporting level (Parts II.A-7 and A-12).
C. CONCLUSIONS Even though, higher-than twice background activity levels of radionuclides such as Co-60 and Cs-137 may be attributable to the effluent release of these radionuclides to the ocean and deposition to the botton sediments, no direct positive correlation has been observed, to date, between the high effluent values, the botton sedinents, and the marine biota.
It should be noted that the presence of Co-60 or Cs-137 in the Dotton sediments may not necessarily affect the marine species since the accunulation or uptake of tnese radionuclides depends on many factors.
Type or age of species, biological half life of the radionuclides in different species, dvailability to the species, solubility of the radionuclides and their chemical forms in ocean water and the digestive fluids of the organisms, uptake rate, and the presence of other substances that could affect the uptake rate will all contribute to the accumulation nechanism. It should be noted tnat the Co-60 and Cs-137, and H-3 activities of the liquid effluent were much lower than the technical specifications requirements and are shown below:
SONGS 1 (1982) 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4tn Quarter Particulates <4.05x10-l% <1.68x10-6% <3.65% <5.92x10-l%
Tritium <4.03% <1.37x10-6% <6.63x10-l% <1.46x10-l%
F-7 SONGS 2 (1982) 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
. Particulates * * <1.52x10-l% 9.07x10-l%
Tritium * * <5.43x10-3g 4.69x10-l%
- Unit 2 did not become critical until late July, therefore, no effluent values for the first and second quarters exist. The first liquid effluent release was in September in 1982.
No correlation between the gaseous effluent release and the environmental activity levels was observed. No plant-specific radionuclides in the gaseous effluent such as tritium, iodine-131, particulates, fission and activation gases were observed in any of the environnental samples and their concentration activities were below the limits of detection and were reported as zero. The effect of tritiun and particulates in the liquid effluent is of more importance as a signficant ingestion pathway.
It is concluded that the effluent release has minor impact on the environment.
O e
9 i
. _ . _ . -- 2 , a a- .a -. -.a- 1__- - - _ _- . ~ _2--A
_.r_. ._a.A A.. . . - _2. - _ _ - - _u._-- . .Am___ - _ B.4. _ au__._._a a _ ____ _
4 I
e L
1 APPENDIX G FIGURES l
o l
l i
i I
MONTHIX AIRBORNE PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ACTIVITY 0.12 f
0.10-0.08-E
-i g 0.06 -
R 0.04- / Legend u
\ f
[.., ,.......,
,,- q a son ciern nt.
x camp een_
l ~~.[ .. $.- ,,
_. ; O Huntington Beh A-- " M
_r:
f """"
S Visitor Center
. n 2g,s,-!!en,r5:
X Reservoir 0.00 . , , , ,
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHS 1982 Figure 1
[
MONTHLY AIRBORNE PARTICULNI'ES GROSS BETA ACTIVITY SAN CLEMENTE O.12 O.10 -
0.08-E
-i g 0.06 -
R 0.04-0.02 I 0.00- , , , , ,
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC l MONTHS 1982 Figure 2 y l
MONTHLY AIRBORNE PARTICULATES
, GROSS BETA ACTIVITY CAMP PENDELTON 0.12 0.10-0.08-E 0.06-s 0.04-0.02! _ _
0.00- , , ,
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHS 1982 Figure 3 y
i MONTHIX AIRBORNE PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ACTIVITY VISITOR CENTER o.12 0.10-I o.os -
E 0.06-s o.04-0.02- '
o.co - , , , , ,
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHS 1982 Figure 4 y
e # $ 8 e
MONTHLY AIRBORNE PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ACTIVITY UNITS 2/3 SWITCHYARD 0.12 -
0.10 --
0.08-E d 0.0s-s 0.04-0.02-s 0.00 , , , . . . . . , .
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHS 1982 rigure s y
MONTHLY AIRBORNE PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ACTIVITY RESEVOIR 0.12 0.10-0.08-E
-i g 0.06- ;
R 0.04-0.02-i 0.00 , , , , , , , ,
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHS 1982 Figure 6 y 1
MONTHLY AIRBORNE PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ACTIVITY HUNTINGTON BEACH 0.12 o.10-0.08-E
-i g 0.Os-R 0.04-l
/ I 0.02- - i JAN FNB MER APR MkY JUN JUL ANG SdP ObT NbV DEC l MONTHS 1982 i Figure 7 l
. o . .
Quart < riy Tin hwuns I a
~l l\
t I\ -
- \
i '.
.g .I \.
. i .
I \
i i\
- \
l \
\
l \.
/ \ /.
ol i
\
\ ./ l A
\ ! 'v' I c .y\'
.I' jl K
/._ G\/ /
\ \ , , Unit 2 Criticality
^
t.
U 4-l ( !
l lj\ \ \. \ j\ i 1 % \ \ l
.I l \ 'y/. l
/\ ! '\. \
} \'
t x / .
es / \ / \ ^
j
-llI / \ / '\g
\ )/'\. \/ .j \ /\
s
\ / s} \. .
.j s/ \/ s / .\ \ \ _ . -
~ll
'L-,^
g
\ lyjN \/ \ ,
.l V-^h s \ ,/V h\
/\
\ // p(L\ /
> \\- ,
\ / (f \ j/
,,i - \' x >/ \
( f:Q,/ i -4 %_
.i L,\ "],//
, \\\ l// /
\// /
- -;=-
- ~~
\
\l \'
_...2... _ . . . . . . . . . . . _ . _ . _ . . . . _..,._...-_......__..-..:.....
Figure 8 [
G9 tjl l{o!lII) a di
. i:
O p*. s
., .e
,s# .
,5 d -
' %m
.- ~ n,,a. ,a r
M"~
- ..me" j
% .. ' p 1'."_,.._.._._......--w -- 3
- . . , . g !
_"----...~..._,,_ **
p j
~~.4~~ 3- 1 a~ s...% .
.g
- B '
i s
s -Il
-c:.". ,_ i
'~~, ( I c > i N f.. .-
I 2
4
%g 7'..- f
% g '. . , N e s w
% w ,, % . '#" % .g I,e#p.s_,... l
- ./"' .g
~-
I m,~, ..s hh
= ,p
_s ' g
- s. .
s"
.2 [ a s -
}
.' a
. 'N..,
. (N
/ .y %\ ! cb w e 7 ** T
~%'+%) ,d xi a j $
- ..g
~x
" 4 .=3g L o ~
2f
/ # .s ., s.
~-
l
/j _
s, ~N...N.
x , . .
y - f E j- -
R- s %_ t p
,c'3 , . }-
h' . l
~ N . I c t
- ~~ ~%...% .
% =ye - = - _
S 3
'*~% .
M ., -
- s. ~
/
l
.g
?./ .{
~
- - g N }-
x - s .gr*
e %
( ...s-
" i q '%,
5 . .?
<:*a w
O % % . ., N a e
%y..**
/ / ;
~ .. s. . g' \ l
, .,s"*"" '
g p--, ~ s. _ . _, . _ _ _N _ -;; .- .-*
- - ~ -a - - -a ~;- -
jy
, .
- s l
l e
7 G 10 i
1 ,1 a
e f.
I!
t e i'!ll
. m ,
O & 4 l
l ..-7= / ""aI m a a
2 s g
\~~%" .9 -l
_~ ~
'.wi O. 'E" s N
, ., . . . -/ -j .f a
m_. .'% . %s*% *w 3
..N. 'h
... h
-=; _ _ _ _I
- _______. '%m '
- .E
-~s
- %g*%'s .g
.l N ,- e
\ 'P
- N
- S
\' ..~ .,,
_... J, "- *
.g en
%..,'% x ,
- 'I e
gN
% % ."35
.f,
/
's%
p %
- - - 1
~
> %~s -
,z
.]w i
- ~?
.m.
.sr
- m% g%C". g O.
v
-,,, - a
-_=
KE$
.- "N %
a I
O y
.m P
- f l A
.9 I
- l .g
= __i . - -
~).
b
~
d '______ -- -
j F , I
= a- '
.-%.,~s..d* If t,- m t <,m=~-,% '%%
- ~
7 F-- - J f
-c % i
'%%%%m% ,%
I ,%. r
/ s
< y .i
% ,,' y n e
^,
y s 4 ,. # -
j %....%..'%, y,
[
' ,e
%,h%
'**'% .._,%=.,% /
I
.7.,. '_ ;; _%_ y .it-t w =: '-~%~~ _ __ __ _ ~ _ _ . "' ...
w z
%""'%,,,N%'~%\ [
' * . . N .
m p
i
/ .:
6 ,...# _-
~ ,%.. f
, 6 y> %
- I s ~,, 3 r
l
- -a. ,#
. - - u - ,y
-~ -
y
G-11 t)C.h -
\s .s{,T,5 1 -
t 9
, Y ,, #
. .- - l #*
g
- 4. ./ f /,- a y o N.~%. -
~ -1
. s
./
/ \
l
.l/ / / .s
/
( r ? 4
~~~ '%...
~ .~
- m. %
es
..f,s. /Q-
%. s
- %, ~-
l D'**%+..%,,,
%p
7 7%. /p.-...
' i
\ ~____
~~
- s. =- ,n
' i n s
~ ' " f .
" " ./ .
./ g ' ~%
5 %;, N Ei .
G 5 g N, .I E
\
- p' '\ .?
j gh ' N a
- L y 7
-- g
__ 2[C _~_ _ . _ -
K N
i 5
e .C -
_]/ ' \ 1 k
1 i
y-Y
, ../,I.s' .- -
- .-.s
. ,/
p.W' 6 -#.-_ ,./* \
. ._._. , s./hY- ,
,g',". e y _.
/ '\
- =
%. /
/ \
V'/ a
\
i
/ [-.t(h at
\
/ ; \'
g-p X ,
s f g - ;
x , s .
? ' -
/ ,
1
/ ,/ .
/- '
8
/./#p O ,/N' , \
\
/ ;
\
\
s' I
, - - ,s ,'
.A-l.l ,n - _ -gt 1 t I 1
- 1 =
1 , . I- - - - - - - $
1 , 'I'
- .c i i
n \
1 1
P COBAlll'-60 ACTIVITY IN OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENT 12 10 -
8 --
o 6-E 5
2 4-2-
Legend
/ A 0.Sm. N. of SONGS 1 g; ;
/ --
\ -
- ; x o.3m. s. of SONGS i ,
O O.5m. N,of SONGS,2,&J ta o.sm. s. of SONGS 2,&J H N,o,r,1,h,,C,gg[r,gl,,,,,,,,,,
- 1
- 16
- 19'
- 19'
- @# W@ @@ W &@
MONTH / YEAR 9 Figure 12 -
G
CESIUM-137 Activity in Ocean Bottom Sediment 0.25 0.20-l 1
0.15 --
O
\
G 0.10 --
y o '
/
C 4
0.051
\A -
s*.
[ .,
lH% \ , N ./ ,
N -
\ f
,*,, 5 ._/ 'N s ,.[ .
\ _ \/ ..
[0!5mSN.of sONosi
, >( 0.5m. S. of SONGS 1, i
f3 0.5m. Njf SONG,243 S 0.5m. S. of SONGS 2&3 E PP.5]P.F.qNJ,R,g[,,,,,,,
-0 05 916 c 16' 9 1T c1 4 g# c# pgB N c BN gBT c B1 MONTH / YEAR 9 Figure 13 5
G 14 a Fj'
, hs .I I. .
- i S $
I
/ / ,i e
j i r i 5 l \ $
i 1 '
' .! j 1
\ s
,i
./
./ I .
(
\ \ .!
l
\ > '
- )
\
/*\ \
\.
z
/ i
' s
/ l 4
,'N-.. f
'~..s,%...
[
f
/
b
. / I e T ' 8 l
- / i i 4
/..-
- ::: 4 M ., . - ,
s i
'N s i
f x.~~ N. 1
'I_ N i 2 a
% v.
/.- l l
7
. . m h
.9 8
l, A,
- a O
X . . - " . . ~ . -,'t , -f' - . g j I w ..,,...---
v . l a
l 7 .- ' ' . . . *
- ;:t v
y**^ 1 -
~ s i :, t
- i
[
i +
.\. = t I !
l l t i e
L . .. >
l
- -~... O
,,~~~..._..*%e+.w,, *
- h.,,
"*-~..._,"-%... !
[FF
,-%...q t
I h
t i
l ?
I i l
l'
3 G 15 }
,} !' i : Is
- s stii e , ? ; i, '
Li !!,.i ii . ,.
I
-a 1
I
,p i t
fi 5
\
9 .)
1 y
-""- {
i
,3
+
ew
- It . 'g \
I t I 5' /
\
%... a *I, \
'/ ' E s- 8
.ti
<!.%]f aI g
yt *
\
-.j[ \ i
,4.# . . ,/s ','/ '.
/ l
, '5
~ ~p-#~
- ~_~_'::_.. ._...- =;GW-. .
..e:: r ;I
._..._,Z...._..._......_..._..._..._..._..._
m r~
5..~. . N,%,
/
rI \
, , _ . . . #*'*^' _ _ !! l
'. .x~'..-...-
.:e
- -.wr &
t*
\;,
7'. . .. -
p ,
"s- .
"\ #
I y
l-a-
}k Y. . i. y e
[ ) ). \{ I t.
e ;
-.e .
o {
J .= v
- .h h
" : .) l 4
_n _
- (; A 1
). l'
= P < p) p! _
\
.- f,, 1I
- b
- {
) $
- (\'/f 4 .,
i b
\, i:
i
//
}E i
{c/ i- l
+1 A\
ss
{!
i ('
N\ !.!
i 1
j li 7 / ' e, N- ,
1
/ \,' i'
/.
-- +::
6 .8
+YU -
t A. .~. ~ w .% g % % , _ _ _- j,i, g
- r. i- ,
3 $ : : ,
= ,
,a e
- i 7. - -
i
- g ! . '
.ws $
MONTHLY LIQUID EFFLUENT RELEASES SONGS 1 1200-1000-c
] 800-E E
600-F M
400-W A
l 200- /\
/ \ Legend
\N Co-601982
[
7 7% % p% % Cs-137 198 0- , , , , , , , , , ,
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHS 1982 O
Figure 16 1 m
l ll g4 r
d e a h t s
l e
e c r b s dh e o_ s np s P L_ u k y M e ee c a
n y gh l ip o eS B S B L
AXOS C
0 l
E D
,P E E S
~
~
0 6 ,N
- I U J
o C -
2 F 8 O S ~
9 1
N E ,AR 1 -
O I
C3 E M89 7 l
1 E/ 1 1
N P 2 '
/r e
u U. n S S S ig A iEN NG l
R F e V O CE E
I xA ,E T RS DR A
X A U
_~
I R
E M
\ ~
Q
- T P R ,E U
A ', , \ u S
Q
/, ,
' N C iU J
. * ~
~
R ob d
A 5
1 5 O 5. M 2 0
. 1 0 bS $ hoc
_. Og 1
_ 1 8 8 9 9 1
_ d 1 7
_ n0 6 3 e
g o-1 s
eC C L
C E
_ D V
,O
_ N S -
E _
T S _
_ ,C
_. A _
O
_ E _
L _ P E ,SE R %
T % ,U G
N A E -
U 1 L
1 8
9 L S ,JU1 8 FG
_ 1 F N'- S er H
N \ T g u
e EO o NNi
,U O F
DS I j' J M
_. U / Y Q ,A O _
I L / M Y p ,PR L A H N T \ ,R N A M
O / .
M 7
_. B g .
,E F
N
- - - - - - - A e
0 0 0 0 0 0 0J
_. 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 6 4 2 1 1
$cg2E
- 1
>hiN "y8i" c
- l: , i l j
- ll : li; 'fii ; ,l
~
Og r
d e a h t s
l c e e r b s dh e o, s_
np s P L_ u k y M
. e ee c n y gh la ip a eS B S B
. L AXOM C
E D
= P
~
~
2 ,E S
-~ 7
~
~
3 N 1
- 0 ,U J
s C
F 2 8
O S 9 N E 1
,AR 1 -
I O C3 Z
~
I E/ M8
~
T 9 9 A P 2 1 1 e
UnSS / ru
=
lie A
G -
Si g V NON CE R F C
I
,E E RS DR T
Y A A L M U
- R Q
~- E T
{ P i
O ,E A S
. U Q
,N O U J
~
R A
2 5 3 5 0 5. M 1 0 0 3: h50C
- ;l
. ,.li i
M m-. - . O 4 ~ - -
G-20 1
t
]
4
.x 0 "
5
=
I N
Q t
4 7
l (f
r
\sg\ N.
l, O
t.
v o
A" <- h - [
/.-
e
.p= 5
,/ -
=> 5- - \~
s A
o, n
. E, n?c.ch
, - C
.g s.
a, l
.=
~
~ % e 5
r- *
$ l l
'e -
a i, j
= ,
~
N Q
. a O
/l '
f.
\ I i
t ,
i x
1 , ,x. #
\
'N
\s :
N, l of o o o o e o e o ca o e o o o o o o
m CO m
@ v m
N o CO c v N om C3 O W N .
t\ e N N e e e m I
i I
\ font lily Trilium A< livitv
,Ill
.\1arine S xvie:,
i g .
I. . . Unit 2 Criticality G
E e= .
b i .. ,f n
4 I e
f . is g 4
e up
" Il se H
. ee ,
3 4 aga894 me.. == e senes*
Sun * % 90tt444 ON t c'+ e W "emuses
! grume astwe =em.se t %MunsW 1
. ~ . ,'90
.- m l
. ei v. G G
. See4 Mass ep sewtj Gog'e 49 8 tugID'-
gp g .- . - =
]
WAN 3% '4P N{
Q4 IARif F.
Figure 21 6
- - - - - . _ _ . - - . . . _ . - - _ . - _ . - ~ _ . . _ . - - . ~ _ . ._ ~
G.22 I
Meteorological section Mac
=
.,-Q,'.,, ,
e' ' ~ yd --
.s ,, j%.-' fx
, \
l o' w n, ~
,o' p' f.-l
~m . s , -
s -
4
,Y* ^- ~,
g .~-
- 8 ,
,'s, j *
,\;\ -
a, .
/ sJ, '
,s
,. g. -u ,
.- ,s; i, g
0,.-
s*
N 4
. , . x, . g; x .,
v
_ , , . .s. . \
t V
\
'~ w , ,-f..\
.C , .
/
f._. y 11I
/ -
' ' - - . ,~~ ' . .
/
- 5. / ' '
/ , ..
g
, dw, J + ,.('
,/ % .
g
- (((g <g g /
','/, t. h ~1 ,
- gr
.-7'}]kg;*.Isi, d %
./w,)4,,s.e ,
a -
N s '. - _
s,, .
/ e N' s .
+j,
,s '.'..):
' E' k, ,' N.
/
Y% .
.. :p/ N. ~,
'. /
s.f,
', n I*
/ *
~c. . -w
.6 , ,
., ,y b c1 .
,, N .,... ... a w ,.. x ,s 3 . ' -- ' e.
Z
, ' ], ,
~.
~,:: '
\
- r. ' ' 'As g / -
h f.
,./ , . f,'.!{ f& .V ' ~
~
S
~ . .. ...... ..
,y, ,. 94V .
n xN. . ... (7s . j-' ~
n'/
l 5.=c :
( 'j
, s'$/
,\- /
s
- %), p.
A.
l l
l l
l t
1 O
APPENDIX H DATA TABLES n
S
=
H-0 ACTION LEVELS The following ETS action levels are used as guidelines for further analysis requirements:
Air Particulates - If gross beta in the indicator sample is equal or greater than 1.0 pCi/m , then gamma spectral analysis must be performed.
Ocean Water - If Cesium-137 in the indicator sample is greater than twice the background level (control), then strontium analysis must be performed.
Drinking Water - If Cesium-137 in the indicator sample is equal or greater than 200 pCi/l, then strontium analysis must be performed.
, If gross beta in composite filtrate is equal or greater than 30 pCi/1, then gamna spectral analysis must be performed.
Marine Species - If Cesium-137 is equal or greater than 6 nCi/kg wet weight of the edible tissue, then strontium analysis must be performed.
o
., -_ _ . - . . , . . .- -~_ -#
e
- 2 o .
13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1983 1 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Honitorins Program Database Listings Verified by: ' bnt7 [W E IS . I b D
- Date: khNb Table IAt Guarterly Gamma (wposur e Control Location: #14 Cbservation CalendarLocation Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Humber Date #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 1 03/31/82 21.9 26.4 23.4 24.0 26.6 19.2 24 9 23.7 25.6 23.9 20.2 21.5 2 06/30/82 20.7 27.2 23.8 27.0 27.6 21.0 22.4 21.0 26.4 24.2 22.7 21.3 3 09/30/82 21.7 27.2 25.3 27.1 22.1 19.4 23.8 25.0 24.7 22.6 22.7 20.6 4 12/31/82 21.7 31.2 25.6 26.8 24.0 20.2 24.0 24.8 24.6 25.6 25.2 22.4 Ebservation CalendarLocation Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Number Date #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 C21 #22 #23 524 1 03/31/82 19.8 25.6 23.1 21.4 15.7 16.1 24.0 23.1 23.9 21.0 25.2 23.7
! 2 06/30/82 19.8 28.1 26.5 22.2 14.2 14.2 24.5 23.9 22.6 24.2 25.5 25.2 3 09/30/82 19.3 28.4 20.0 22.4 13.7 14.1 25.8 23.8 21.5 22.9 26.0 27.0 4 12/31/82 22.1 29.6 23.0 22.2 14.9 14.6 27.0 25.6 25.1 23.6 23.4 24.1 Observation CalendarLocation Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Humber Date #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 G36 1 03/31/82 23.0 23.2 20.9 23.6 23.5 20.9 20.6 21.9 21.7 20.5 21.4 23.8 2 06/30/82 24.9 22.9 20.7 23.9 24.0 22.0 22.9 23.8 23.5 21.5 23.4 26.1 3 09/30/82 23.9 24.5 21.2 24.4 24.6 22.1 24.7 24.7 25.5 23.9 24.4 26.5 4 12/31/82 25.1 25.0 23.6 26.5 25.9 23.0 25.5 24.8 24.9 23.9 23.4 26.5 Observation CalendarLocation Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Humber Date #37 #38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 247 #48 1 03/31/82 23.2 17.8 22.1 20.7 21.3 23.7 21.4 20.6 20.6 18.0 19.1 21.3 2 06/30/82 26.6 16.4 22.3 20.5 20.6 25.9 18.3 19.6 21.0 17.S 20.3 20.7 3 09/30/82 26.4 17.2 23.5 22.4 22.6 30.4 21.2 19.8 20.7 16.8 20.0 21.8 4 12/31/82 26.4 18.0 24.3 23.2 22.5 28.5 21.8 21.8 22.1 19.4 22.4 22.E Observation Calendar Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Number Date #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 G56 #57 #53 t,59 1 03/31/82 20.0 20.2 19.7 20.5 19.8 21.0 30.1 25.8 19.4 19.9 22.2
- 2 06/30/82 21.0 19.3 18.8 21.2 21.1 20.6 36.7 26.7 18.5 18.5 24.3 3 09/30/82 22.1 19.6 20.1 19.9 19.5 22.2 34.3 26.7 18.9 19.5 24.5 4 12/31/82 23.3 20.7 19.4 21.7 21.3 23.0 38.2 27.8 19.7 20.5 25.2 N:4 i
x L
- * =
l 8
13:59 MONDAY. APRIL 25, 1983 2 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings
( Verified by: b% bM m f L PL.h. Date: MJ5/f3 Table 1b: Annual Gamma Exposure Control Location: #14 Ebservation CalendarLocation Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Number Date #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 29 #10 011 #12 1 12/31/82 86.2 107 97.8 95 97.2 75.8 86.7 92.8 100.5 95.3 92.2 91.9 Obrervation CalendarLocation Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location I.ocation Number Date #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 U24 1 12/31/82 80.8 109.4 90.7 82.4 64.6 63.7 95.3 94.9 89.8 89.2 102.6 93.8 Obzervation CalendarLocation Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Number Date #25 #26 527 #28 #29 #30 #31 N32 833 #34 #35 C36 1 12/31/82 90.3 88.7 83.2 95 95.2 91.7 88.9 85.5 86.8 87.3 87 96.7 Observation CalendarLocation Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Locatf7n Location Number Date #37 #38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 246 447 #43 1 12/31/82 100.5 74.3 93.1 84 86.6 105.7 80.5 80.7 83.6 70.4 79.3 86.3 Observation Calendar Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Number Date #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 #56 #57 #58 059 1 12/31/82 84.4 81.7 80.4 80.6 78.2 88.5 117.7 101 76.7 80.4 93.6 N:1 7
m
M H-3 M 1 a0 M M 4
. as sa a e e m C F1 C40COOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOO C f5 e4 N N .-e ee ee ee e e ee ee m m e-e .-e eg ,.s e-, N M e N OG M O M @ esM M ese4 M f M N M N oeN M ee M N OG 00000000000000000000 OOOOoOOOOOOOCOOOOOoO J ===
&=== m OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO **=Wo 4.'l *
- e * * *
- e * * * * *
- e e e e eie fg W 00000000o.0000o0o00000 e e e e e e e e e o e e e e e e e fg W OOOOOOOOOOCOOOOCOOOO eg Uw OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Uw me O O 4 *J J e
e s e >
at O
2 W M e 4 O M o O ,
E C 0e00000000000000000000
@ N @ h e0
- ed es e0 N+ c, N M Lin e m o C a0
= C 60 4 M W it1 h Ltl O O W h c N O N M s-* M N h m C
@ u O N O 4LtlO O O O N e4 M ed e M N e<e N N M N O N M N ee M m ee N o-e C ee N M s-e M M N o-e N ee
, m W = Co0000o00000000000000 =
e e o e e e e e e e e e e o e o e e e e e M g OOO000o0000000000000 e e o e e e e e o e e e e e e o e e e e ee .e. 4 M .J f5 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 88 0C000000000000000000 ee U U S O O W eJ .J M
N
- e M N Lil A as a
SB a
E C f5 es e4 N o-e ee ee e s e4 N e* N M ee M ee we re e-e e s pe ce C (5 N M N M ee ee s e es N o e N e4 M e4 N o e N M ee et N fg OE C00000000000000000000 0O C00000000000000000000
=O Co0oo0000o00000000000 L
m +==
W e= Me e 9oo00000000o00.Qo00000 o e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e &= e o e o e e o e o e e e e e e e f5 W OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO e e o O rs W OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO L Uw Uw Go ** O O W J .J F M C 85
= Q L
O e N Lt1
==. % M o SB C & eB C
- C 6 4 e0 @ ee t h @ttic e0 N h e0Ltte*Lticc h N M C d e4 N N O N @ M 4 L/I M itt @ @ M N M M Lt1 Lt1 N E > ee O M N N ee r* ** d o M M s-e ** ee c -e M M = * ** e4 N O e4 N M N N M M M f9 M N M N ee N o-s @ N N M N
= C = 000000000000000000000 = 00000000000000000o000
- OW *
- e * *
- e e e e o e e e e e * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
- e e
- e e e sr U = f5 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 4 000000000000000000000 W -
4 & O U Ct n O u
O s .J .J I a.'
O )
h W
se O
.J L
=
> Q 'WW ==e D e4 L o O
C O & a a W L C C #5 M es N e* ==e rg eo ce ed e4 f es N o-e N s'4 ce s s ee s-e N C r5 N e-e N e-e e-e N ev e4 N M N eg N M M ,4 N ew eie M N
@ O OE C00000o00000000000000 0G C00000000000000000000
> 0 =M =m Oo0oo000000000o000000 C W em RW 0000000000000.o0000000 e e e e e e e e e o e OOO000000000000000000 e e e e e o e em e e e e o e e e NW C00000000000000000000 e e o e e e e e e SE 09 g J w Uw Uw a Q N O O O .a J Oeg -
e4 3
U C =
0
- W L
= .. fg es @
V > Qe eB o WD W C NitlO f o ttt@ M O M m N e0 N N N e0LilN N + C 80 N f N d h ee s e N @ O tt1 M M N W ee O e4 00 N 4 V C O N N M e-e s=4 N M M O M M *4 M O N c* M e o N ee N O ce N M N ew s-e ne s-e M s=ie N c4 M e* N ed e N N e e N
W L = 000000000000000000000
0e 0 0 0 eoo0e 0* 0* 0e 0 C ==. O W * *
- e e e e = * *
- e *
- e = w e o0 eoe0e 0e 0 e0e 0 e o o. 0. C.
L > D N OOO000000000000000000 f8 000000000000000000000 O = L U U w L = 0 O
=== 9 *C .J eJ i
.4 >
S h
( O M at i t' W L NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN i
sie W #s e0808080e0es80et80es808080 sees 80seaoe000a0 #5 80ene0seega080e08000e0e0e0008083c000COe4eQ l 9 3 VW %%%NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN VW NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN%NN
,C Ce f es e0 Lti m e0 @ M N O 4 M O d M o h @ es e$ tti Cw f ed e0 Lit me e0 @ M N O 4 M C 4 M C h e ec co L/I e ein se Wg O ce s4 N o o -e N O O M N M O s-e N N o ce M N W f5 O -eeeN O O M N o c e*N M O M N N O .-eM N 3 N e4 A %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%NN *=e n %%%%%%%%%NNNN%%%%%N\N O 4 esespeceN N N N M M M M M e e f *L#ttt1Ltintt 85 e* es pe ce N N N N M M M M M # # @ f it1 Lti ttl at) es W O @@@@Oo00000000000o000 O 9o00000000o0000000eO0 se O
4
- =
C C O O
, =L =L WG *W SA
- Lil@ h 80 & O e4 N M ettl@ b e0 @ cs=4 N M + SR
- Ltl @ h e0 & O ce N M @ Lfl @ h co @ O ce N M e
! >E mmmmmm@@@@@@@@@@hhhhh >E mmmmmme@44444@@@hhhhh L3 L3 WZ WZ W W
( D D
( O O I
l
, e.
. - _ . . -_ =
- e
- n o ,
l i
i 13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1983 4 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings
- Verified by
- Mb bbl b.D. Date: J5/83 f Table 28 Meekly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity Control Location: 83 i
Observation calendar Location 81 Location 81 Location 82 Location 82 Location 83 Location 83 Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sisma) i 75 06/01/82 0.012 0.001 0.016 0.001 0.022 0.001 76 06/08/82 0.025 0.002 0.018 0.001 0.022 0.001 77 06/15/82 0.015 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.018 0.001 78 06/22/82 0.009 0.001 0.009 0.001 0.014 0.001 1 79 06/29/82 0.013 0.001 0.013 0.001 0.013 0.001 1 80 07/06/82 0.012 0.001 0.015 0.001 0.013 0.001 0.001
~
81 07/13/82 0.012 0.012 0.001 0.012 0.001
] 82 07/20/82 0.016 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.017 0.001 4
83 07/27/82 0.014 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.017 0.001 i 84 08/03/82 0.018 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.017 0.001 85 08/10/82 0.012 0.001 0.014 0.001 0.016 0.001 86 08/17/82 0.013 0.001 0.013 0.001 0.017 0.001 1 87 08/24/82 0.015 0.001 0.003 0.001 0.011 0.001 88 08/31/82 0.019 0.001 0.016 0.001 0.020 0.001 89 09/07/82 0.020 0.002 0.014 0.001 0.020 0.002 90 09/14/82 0.023 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.018 0.001 91 09/21/82 0.013 0.001 0.011 0.001 0.016 0.001 92 09/28/82 0.026 0.002 0.021 0.001 0.037 0.002 93 10/05/82 0.015 0.001 0.006 0.001 0.013 0.001 j 94 10/12/82 0.024 0.002 0.022 0.002 0.036 0.003 4 95 10/19/82 0.023 0.003 0.021 0.002 0.028 0.003 1
.. Observation Calendar Location 84 Location 84 Location 85 Location 85 Locat10n 86 Location 86 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigua)
)
! 75 06/01/82 0.022 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.020 0.001 76 06/08/82 0.025 0.002 0.025 0.002
- 0.015 0.001 77 06/15/82 0.019 0.001 0.019 0.001 0.019 0.001 78 06/22/82 0.009 0.001 0.010 0.001 0.008 0.001 79 06/29/82 0.016 0.001 0.015 0.001 0.014 0.001 80 07/06/82 0.014 0.001 0.014 0.001 0.012 0.001 81 07/13/82 0.015 0.001 0.010 0.001 0.016 0.001 i 82 07/20/82 0.018 0.001 0.022 0.002 0.016 0.001 1
- 83 07/27/82 0.017 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.017 0.001 84 08/03/82 0.017 0.001 0.021 0.001 0.021 0.001 85 08/10/82 0.013 0.001 0.015 0.001 0.019 0.001 86 08/17/82 0.014 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.016 0.001 4 87 08/24/82 0.018 0.001 0.015 0.001 0.019 0.001 1 88 08/31/82 0.018 0.001 0.024 0.001 0.021 0.001
! 89 09/07/82 0.020 0.002 0.018 0.001 0.023 0.002 j 90 09/14/82 0.021 0.002 0.022 0.001 0.021 0.001 91 09/21/82 0.016 0.001 0.010 0.001 0.013 0.001 i ! 92 09/28/82 0.028 0.002 0.043 0.003 0.026 0.002 m 4
j 93 94 10/05/82 10/12/82 0.014 0.027 0.001 0.002 0.013 0.037 0.001 0.003 0.020 0.018 0.001 0.001 L
l 95 10/19/82 0.046 0.002 0.036 0.002 0.052 0.000 i
l
- e
- e . ,
13:59 MONDAY. APRIL 25, 1983 5 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Verified by: M iw. Cee.Jn.ss, Ph.b - Date: 6@Slh
! Table 2: Weekly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity Control Location: #3 Observation Calendar Location el Location el Location #2 Location #2 Location #3 Location 83
! Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) 96 10/26/32 0.021 0.001 0.021 0.002 0.029 0.002 i 97 11/02/82 0.016 0.001 0.013 0.001 0.016 0.001 98 11/09/82 0.033 0.002 0.027 0.002 0.045 0.002 99 11/16/82 0.014 0.001 0.012 0.001 0.013 0.001 100 11/23/82 0.030 0.002 0.031 0.002 0.064 0.004 101 11/30/82 0.010 0.001 0.023 0.001 0.014 0.001 102 12/07/82 0.010 0.001 0.015 0.001 0.013 0.001 103 12/14/82 0.017 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.013 0.001
, 104 12/21/82 0.021 0.002 0.024 0.001 0.050 0.007 105 12/28/82 0.01% 0.001 0.009 0.001 0.009 0.001 1 Observation Calendar Location 84 Location 84 Location SS Location #5 Location #6 Location #6
- Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) 96 10/26/82 0.025 0.002 0.046 0.003 0.030 0.002
- 97 11/02/82 0.021 0.002 0.016 0.001 0.021 0.003 98 11/09/82 0.039 0.002 0.043 0.002 0.039 0.002 l 99 11/16/82 0.017 0.001 0.020 0.001 0.013 0.001 100 , 11/23/82 0.031 0.002 0.063 0.005 0.045 0.003 101 11/30/82 0.021 0.002 0.018 0.002 0.029 0.002 102 12/07/82 0.013 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.018 0.001 103 12/14/82 0.018 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.020 0.001 104 12/21/82 0.025 0.002 0.032 0.003 0.022 0.002 j 105 12/28/82 0.010 0.001 0.010 0.001 0.004 0.001 j N
- 52 i
I
]
1 0
- x u,
H-6 M
EO ee M 4
. "a CM "m
Cn al)
N OG 944499944444t*****444 03 ded4444dd**d4444&dede Q ==e OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
.J ===.s=
W OOOOO.
e e e OOC.OOOOO.OOOOOOOO e e e e e e e e o e a y ,51 e e e e e e o e e o e e e e e e e e e o e
- =e f3 W OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO r3 0 000000000000000000000 g Ow Uw ce O O 4 .J .J 9 m
>=
at O
Z W M @
O C1 e #
E C C
=== C e @ w O O til W .s= OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO - COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ee = y &
M .J N N M U U G O O W .J .J N
A N@
N M a .Nm =m E Cm CM 93 OQ d4444&d@4444944444dd4 OG d44dd@@d444&#dddddd&&
L === U1 OOOOOOCOOOCOOOOOOOCCO *s= U1 OOCCCOOOOOOOOCCOOOOOO Q1 uw e e e e o e e o e o e e e o e o e e o e e M *e= e e e o e e o e e e e e e e e e e e e e e O fB W OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC@OCO fe W C0000000000000000000C L Uw Uw De .* O O Of .J .J m
- C N
=== Q L
O w N It)
- M S OB C #
0 C C E ** O O C .a= OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO === OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ee o e M fB 4
- 4
& & O U C N O O g %n ga
.s a
C O
L E =4
=1l
> h O ee L S
+
W l m C y e ==
W I
- C C4 CN
> O OS 4t+t++++++++9944d++49 O5 +4944t+ddedeeddete444
> =s=
0 as=
W =s 01e OOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOCCOO e e e e e e e e e e o e e e e o e e e e *== W es=01 O.OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO e e e o e e e e e e e e e e e e C
4 U SW OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO fle W OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
& aC Uw Uw E O O Oe ** .J .J e O M pe C 1 0 >e W e
e. g e-o V > C S OB WA s
V C C n V O O O
- b s= = OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO as= OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO C === 0 M &
L 9= *== S r0 0 = V U U 9= L fB O O
'== W W .J .J
=4 >
m h O s=e
.1d C S L NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN L 9 4 80 80 80 se es so so se e0 80 80 80 e0 e0 e0 es a0 80 se so 80 r5 a0 se es 80 se to es og so c0 00 80 80 ce se e0 so c0 e0 c3 a3
. W 2 VW NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN VW NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN E Ce f es et ett e e s0 @ M N O @ M O @ M O b e co m att Cw e m e0Litese0 4 M N @ g M O J M O b e w o3Lt)
W ee 9m O M s-eN O O M N O Cs-eN M o reN N oseM N Of #8 O m ee N C O s-e N C O ve N M O M N N o s=e s=e N 3 M e=e Q NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Me NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN O e M ee M ee N N N N M M M M M + t e @ Lt1 Lit at1 Ltl e M M e e ne N N N N M M ri M M f @ f @ W L/1 Lf1 L/1 en E U CO0000000000000000000 U 000000000000000000000 a=e O
R
>=
C C e o O
=== L
=== L MG MG WA @ Ltl@ N e0 O O ceN M tit)4 N e0 @ O pen M P SD
- Lit 4 h e0 O os-eN M et/14 Ne0 & O pe N M e
>E tl Lt1 Lil 6tlit1 @ @ d @ d @ @ 4 @ @ h h h & N >E til sti nt) nti at) Ltt e e e e e o @ 4 4 4 & N & & N L3 L3
$Z WZ W W D D C O e ae
b H-7 M
cc C*
M M 4 S 38 s n=e om m C f5 C r1 N O5 deeddedededed4*dedade OG deedd**ded*dded&&dded eJ M
=== C1 W a= C.00000000000000000000 e e o e NW COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO e e e e e e e
- s=
p .s=
41 C.0000000000000000000c e o e e e e e e e o e e
- 3 W C00000000000000000000 e e e e e K Uw Uw D. O O 4 ea .J 4 .
4 A
- m M 4 O m # #
I: C
=== C C O e o .o W w OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO .= OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO m.
e === & W M a f5 f3 M U U W D D W J J
- WI a%
a w
f5 N m A # a
- =e m E C se C re to O2 deddedededededededded O5 #dedededdeddeded&&dde L -D C00000000000000000000 **= C1 CO0000000000000000000 m e= == e e e e e e e e e e e o e e e e e w- e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e O f5 W C0000000C0000C0000000 f' m C00000000000000000000 L Uw Uw sk ee O O W J .J 81 W C 4
- A L
O e N m
- M S se C a O C C 2; . e* O O C === OOOOOOOOOCCOOOOOOOOOO = CC0000000000000000000 M O e e n = C3 98 eK e U u Ca W
= 0 U
O eq .J f E O C W1 .J O 4
=L $
M
- 0 M e
> h L S S C e +e o m W = C C #5 C rs
> O OE ded&ded&dededddddedde OG d******deddeddededded h =s= 0 === 51 - 51 C & &=== 0e0e0e 0e 0e O OeCe O o e OeO C O.O. O Ce 0e 0e eC O.O.
e e W se Oe Oe eOe O e O e eOe O e O O O.O.O.O.O.O Oe O OeOe O e e e O M U RF COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 99 @ COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Q. 4 Uw Uw E d O O e ug O M M
a a M
C 8 O M W
s= e. O M e V > c SB as W a -
U C C M D O O O
== W === === OOOCOOOCOOOOOOOOOOOOO == OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO C == O M M L 9e === m m O = M U U 9 L 4 0 0
=== W. EK -J a M >
4 h o M
.hf C W L NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN L W W E0808080808080ogEO8000see0aoe0aoe0aoao8083 f5 80 80 80 80 80 ce c0 so ce c0 to c4 co co e0 c0 co c0 o3 ce c3 e W 2 VW NNN%\\NNNNN\%%%%%NNNN VW NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN a CW M eO W N @ @ M O N M o h
- M b e w ee m N @ CW MesmN@@MohMObdMbeme0mNO-
- ** WW C C M N N O M N N Oe=ee-eN M O M N N O M M Si fr O O M N N O e=e N N O M ese N M O M N N O M a'4 3 PD MQ %%%%%%%%NNNNNNNNNNNNN Ma sssssssssssss%%%%%%NN O e @ @ e e d N N b b ecc0egacce @ @ @ @ O O O #s e 4 4 4 e b b h h oc ce so so co @ O @ @ O O O E0 W Q OOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOCMe=eN O O O O O O O O OO O O O COO O OO Me=sm i
M l n n
>=
C C O O
== L -L
\ MW WW I S2 W 4 N e0 @ O M N M e m 4 N e0 p O M N M e m r5 a m 4 5 e0 @ C o e N M d m 4 h e0 @ O M N M 4 L9
>E h h h h b eg eo ss ag e0 ee se e0 ce s0 @ @ @ @ @ @ >E h h h h h eo co co ce co co co co co co @ @ @ @ @ @
i
, L3 L3 I hZ WZ l 8 m 1 a 2 O O e ee
- , e e e e 13:59 N0tIDAY. APRIL 25, 1933 3 Southcen California Edison Company Environt. ental Monitoring Program Database Listings verified by: Mino be us , Ph. b . Date: %(.Ls/ts Table 31 Weekly Radiolodine I-131 Activity Control Location: #3 Observation Calendar Location #1 Location #1 Location #2 Location #2 Location 83 Location #3 Humber Date (sigma) (sigua) (sigma) 96 10/26/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 97 11/02/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 98 11/09/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 99 11/16/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 100 11/23/82 0 0.04 0 a.04 0 0.04 101 11/30/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 102 12/07/82 . 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 103 12/14/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 104 12/21/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 105 12/28/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 Observation Calendar Location 34 Location 84 Location 85 Location SS Location 86 Location 86 Number Date (sigma) (sisma) (sism3) 96 10/26/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 97 11/02/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 98 11/09/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 99 11/16/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 100 11/23/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 101 11/30/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 102 12/07/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 103 12/14/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 104 12/2) 82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 105 12/28/82 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 N:52 G
in
@ H-9
,~ mmmmmmmmmmmmmme en oooooooooouOooo Mm M N g -w ****** o*o* o* o* o* *o eo eo o.o.O.c.o. O.oe M M cp C0o0000000000o0
@ M Uw M e CO00000000000000000o0 M
m U 9 m 4 N
N
- 9 ******O0000000000o000 J Mm ff@@@@@@ff@@ff@ G A CG COOOOOOOOOoCoCo O g MD o0000ooo0000000 g p= ****** e e *
- e e e e e e e e e e a 4 3@ C00000000000000 m gw m s ME
- > Mm *********************
( 4 M M=
Q O I m I = p M
- COOOOOOOOOOOOOO Mw O m 9 E C 3
= g a
@ W M m W M *********************
ee = a i f
M J m M i M E
! c on ********************* a
@ tw m I m m NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN D Mw OE ooooooooooococO y
m % @
@m p= ****** oooooooooooooo.o.
e o e a e e e e e e e e e m ' @= O DO C0000000000000o Q 4 Uw Y % e *********************
E M W m m O L - C @
m , ( a e ******O00000000000000 0 *m MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM O L M MN C0oo0000000o00o 0 4 ** 5 Mm CooooooooooooOO g L tw ****** e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e m & & WQ COOOOOOOOOOOOOO a C 4 U ow Hm 4444t@dette&#de
- A e eH OooooooOoooooOC L & Mm Ooooooooooooooo O W e i= ****** * *
- e * * * * *
- e *
- e e W M G@ COOOOOOOOOOOOOo
= m M M Uw C C # B ******O00000000000000 O L~ @
E m ** U M
=
0 C 4 M
N Q . @ =
O m
M l ******OoooOOOOOOOOOoo V j G W @* G C e 4 8 m 999999449eddett U e4 E M m U aE o DD COOooCoccooCooO ooooooooooooooo C 9 3 J Z~ ******
- e
- e e
- e e e e e e *
- e Ea OM U we 00000000o00oo0C om L w = M Lw ME
- W D N Mm *********************
> L L sw
- C N & m@
W d & C m (w 0 @
> G U a
8 E
C C m L D ******C0000000000000O O E O Z M E D = M ************w********
O L L 8
, . U e- = N m l C O G
- W W m @@MM@@Me+4mmMe@mmmeem a
= ** = E coOoooooOoooooooooooo m NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN V % W Nm oo000000oo0000o00o0oo ME oooooooooCoOOoo W D O I= *
- e e
- e
- e *
- e e e e e e e e e e e mm ooooooooooooooo 1 WW OOooCoCocooOOOOOOOOOO I= ****** e * * *
- e * *
- e * * * *
- m V E mw Om C00000000000000
= GG Uw C = U L w Noe@M*MNmMMNmNMcM&OMm O = h N @hMfM4Meh&Mem4444mMNM M w L M f
= g L W Ce oe eoeMe M o c.o.c eo eceoe ce oe O* *oe oe o e o
- o O mI ******C00000000000000 M >
- W m OOOoCOOOOoCoOOOOoOOOO O N O U L R C C 3 O a L & = Nm MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM G W ME COoooOOOoooooooCoocoo e D w
3
=
e 4
m U
O MNMfmeMNMfmeMNMem4MNM Mm g= o.oooooooooooooooooooo e e e e e e e e e e o e e e e e e a e em 0000000oo000000000o00 0 J ow M S M
D L NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 4 4 MWWW4MMM44WMemM44mMMM m MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM M VW NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN\\ VW NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN CW MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM Cw MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM W4 00000000000000o0o0000 cm C0000o00oooo000000000
- MQ %%%%%\\\\\\\\NNNNNNNN MQ \\\\NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 4 MMMMMMffe#@eNNNNNNOOO m MMMMMwegeeceNNNNNhoco U OOOOOOOOOoooOOOOOOMMM U OOOOOOOOooOOOOOOOOMMM C C O O
-L -L MU MU ND ND DE MNMem@hM@OMNMemdNM&OM >E MNMfm4NM@oMNMemdNM@cM L3 MMMMMMMMMMNN L3 MMMMMMMMMMNN WZ WZ O @
D D O O
, ee
- e
- e ,
4
(
13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1983 10 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Verified by: M SOL b d tL Ph.D. Date: M/45/83 Table 4a: Quarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gamma Spectral Analysis Control Location: #3 Cbservation Calendar Location Be-7 Be-7 ZrtNbl-95 Zr(Nbi-95 Cs-134 Cs-134 K-40 K-40 Ru-103 Ru-103 Cs-137 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (signal (sigma) (sicra) 22 10/01/82 4 0.090 0.004 0 0.004 0 0.001 m M 0 0.004 0 23 10/01/82 5 0.078 0.006 0 0.004 0 0.001 m M 0 0.004 0 24 10/01/82 6 0.093 0.005 0 0.004 0 0.001 m
- 0 0.004 0 Dbzervation Calendar Cs-137 Co-58 Co-58 Ag-110m As-110m Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-60 co-60 I-131 1-131 cc-144 Cc-144 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigmal (sigma) (sigmal (sigma) ( s i ge,1 )
22 10/01/82 0.001 0 0.002 m u 0 0.004 0 0.002 m
- 0 0.005 23 10/01/82 0.001 0 0.002 W W 0 0.004 0 0.002 M N 0 0.005 24 10/01/82 0.001 0 0.002 *
- 0 0.004 0 0.002
- w 0 0.005 N:24 f
I r l
- e , e ,
l 13:59 MONDAY, APRaw 25. 1933 11 1 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Verffled by: Miu Ge.kro R.h. Date: WMh3 Table 4c: Quarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gross Alpha and strontium Activities Control Location: 83 ObIervation Calendar Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 2 Location 2 Location 2 Number Date Sr-89 Sr-89(sigma) Sr-90 Sr-90(sigma) Gross Alpha Gross Alpha Sr-89 Sr-89(sigma) Sr-90 (sismal 1 01/01/82 N N 0 0.001 0.0021 0.0002 m M 0 2 04/01/82 m M 0 0.001 0.0024 0.0002 m u 0 3 07/01/82 m
- 0 0.001 0.0016 0.0001 M N 0 4 10/01/82 N N 0 0.001 0.0038 0.0006 M M 0 Ob:ervation Calendar Location P Location 2 Location 2 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Number Date Sr-90(signal Gross Alpha Gross Alpha Sr-89 Sr-89(sigma) Sr-90 Sr-90(sigmal Gross Alpha Gross Alpha (sigma) (sigma) 1 01/01/82 0.001 0.0022 0.0002 m u 0 0.001 0.0010 0.0001 2 04/01/82 0.001 0.0021 0.0001 M N 0 0.001 0.0026 0.0001 3 07/01/82 0.001 0.0015 0.0001 M N 0 0.001 0.0021 0.0001 4 10/01/82 0.001 0.0018 0.0001 M
- 0 0.001 0.0040 0.0002 Obzervation Calendar Location 4 Location 4 Location 4 Location 4 Location 4 Location 4 Location 5 Location 5 Location 5 Number Date Sr-89 Sr-89(sigma) Sr-90 Sr-90(sigma) Gross Alpha Gross A1Pha Sr-89 Sr-89(signal Sr-90 (sigma) 1 01/01/82 N N 0 0.001 0.0023 0.0003 m u 0 2 04/01/82 M M 0 0.001 0.0028 0.0001 M M 0 3 07/01/82 N u 0 0.001 0.0018 0.0001 M M 0 4 10/01/82 N N 0 0.001 0.0025 0.0002 M
- 0 i Observation Calendar Location 5 Location 5 Location 5 Location 6 Location 6 Location 6 Location 6 Location 6 Location 6 Number Date Sr-90(sigma) Gross Alpha Gross Alpha Sr-89 Sr-89(sigma) Sr-90 SP-90(sigma) Gross Alpha Gross Alpha i (sigma) (sigmal 1 01/01/82 0.001 0.0021 0.0003 m u 0 0.001 0.0018 0.0004 2 04/01/82 0.001 0.0030 0.0001 M u 0 0.001 0.0030 0.0001 3 07/01/82 0.001 0.0023 0.0001 M W 0 0.001 0.0033 0.0001 4 10/01/82 0.001 0.0045 0.0002 M N 0 0.001 0.0022 0.0002
, N:4 z
4 13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1933 12 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Prograa Database Listings Verified by: NW\ol. b a fL b . b. Date: k N 8b !
k Table 5: Monthly Ocean Water Camma spectral Analysis Control Location: D Chzcrvation CalendarLocation K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Mn-54 Zr(Hbl-95 Zr(Nb)-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigual 1 01/05/82 D w M *
- M M N N *
- 0 2 2 01/14/82 A N M M M M M M M M M 0 4 3 01/14/82 3 M w w w M M M N
- M 0 3 4 01/14/82 C M N N N w M M N N N 0 3 5 03/01/82 D u u M M M N N N N
- 0 3 6 03/08/82 A N N N N 5 W M M N
- 0 3 7 03/08/82 B M h M M M w M M M W 0 3 8 03/08/82 C M w
- w w w w w w w 0 4 9 04/23/82 A 490 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 10 09/23/82 B 470 50 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 11 04/23/82 C 410 60 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 12 04/26/82 D 510 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 Obzirvation Calendarco-57 Co-57 Mo(Tc)-99 No(Tcl-99 Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-58 Co-58 Ru-103 Ru-103 Ce-144 Ce-144 Fe-59 Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) 1 01/05/82 N W W W u w w u
- N N N M 2 01/14/82 m M w
- w w w w * * * *
- 3 01/14/82 M N N * * * * .* * * *
- u 4 01/14/82 m
- w * *
- w w' N *
- w w 5 03/01/82 m M *
- M M M M N M W w
- 6 03/08/82 m w u a w w
- w u u * *
- 7 03/08/82 M M w w w a * *
- m * *
- 8 03/08/82 N W w w w * * * * * * *
- 9 04/23/82 0 6 0 20000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 10 04/23/82 0 6 0 20000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 11 04/23/82 0 6 0 20000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 12 C ',/ 26/ 82 0 6 0 9000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 Ebzcrvation Calendar Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60 As-110m As-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 I-131 Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) ( s i g:.ta l 1 01/05/82 N w w w w w w *
- m n *
- 2 01/14/82 * * * * *
- M N
- M * *
- 3 01/14/82 W u u * * * * *
- M * *
- 4 01/14/82 * *
- w M M * *
- M i *
- 5 03/01/82 * *
- u u *
- y u A w *
- 6 03/08/82 w w M w w w w w M M M w
- 7 03/08/82 * * * * * * * , - f-
- w
- w w
- 8 03/08/82 * *
- u w a w u * *
- u
- 9 04/23/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 *
- 10 04/23/82 20 0 30 0 15 0
- 6 0 10 0 20 *
- 11 04/23/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 C 20
- A 2
12 04/26/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 *
- e e
- e
- e * ,
13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1983 13 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings verified by: MACL bM NN D- Date: /22
/ 5/f3 Table 5: Monthly Ocean Water Gamma Spectral Analysis Control Location: D EbZsrvation CalendarLocation K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Mn-54 Zr(Nb)-95 Zr(Nb)-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Number Date (sigma) (sigmal (sigma) (sigma) (signal (sigma) 13 05/03/82 D 390 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 14 05/05/82 A 410 40 0 20 0 6 0 -6 0 15 0 6 15 05/05/82 B 490 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 16 05/05/82 C 540 50 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 17 06/01/82 A 320 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 18 06/01/82 3 400 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 19 06/01/82 C 290 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 20 06/02/82 D 340 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 21 07/09/82 A 300 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 22 07/09/82 B 320 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 23 07/09/82 C 300 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 24 07/09/82 D 310 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 Chanrvation Calendarco-57 Co-57 Mo(Tc)-99 Mo(Tc)-99 Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-58 Co-58 Ru-103 Ru-103 Ce-144 Cc-144 Fe-59 Number Date (sigmal (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) isigm3) (sism3) 13 05/03/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 14 05/05/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 15 05/05/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 16 05/05/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 17 06/01/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 18 06/01/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 19 06/01/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 20 06/02/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 21 07/09/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 j 22 07/09/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 23 07/09/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 24 07/09/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 l
Obztrvation Calendar Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60 As-110m As-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 1-131 Humber Date (sigmal (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigm3) (sigma) 13 05/03/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 m *
, , 14 05/05/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 M m i 15 05/05/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 16 05/05/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20
- a 17 06/01/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 M
- 18 06/01/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 h
- 19 06/01/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 *
- 20 06/02/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 21 07/09/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 * *
, 22 07/09/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 M *
. 23 07/09/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 * * =c 24 07/09/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20
- w I
i Je
- e i ,
i 1
l I k 13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25. 1983 14 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings verified by: INCL (MdEls. Ph.D. Date: 4dlS/f4 Table St Monthly Ocean Mater Gamma Spectral Analysis I control Location: D i Ebrervation CalendarLocation K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Pn-54 Zr(Nbl-95 Ze(Hbl-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sisma) (sigma) (sigmal
. 25 08/05/82 A 360 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 26 08/05/82 8 330 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6
.i 27 08/05/82 C 280 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 l 28 08/05/82 D 320 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 ;
i 29 09/01/82 A 320 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6
]' 30 09/01/82 8 360 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 31 09/01/82 C 330 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 32 09/07/82 D 300 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 33 10/04/82 D 280 50 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 34 10/08/82 A 400 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 35 10/08/82 8 370 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 i
36 10/08/82 C 330 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 'O 15 0 6 cbrervation Calendarco-57 Co-57 Mo(Tc)-99 Mo(Tcl-99 Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-58 Co-58 Ru-103 Ru-103 Ce-144 Ce-144 Fe-59 4 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sisma) l 25 08/05/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 1 26 08/05/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 1 27 08/05/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0
! 28 08/05/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0
! 29 09/01/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 30 09/01/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 2 31 09/01/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0
! 32 09/07/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 j 33 10/04/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 i
34 10/08/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 35 10/08/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 36 10/08/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 f Obzervation Calendar Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 co-60 As-110m As-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 2-131
, Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) 25 08/05/82 20 0 30 4 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 m
- 26 08/05/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 m M 27 08/05/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 28 08/05/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 m
- 29 09/01/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 W u 30 09/01/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 lo 0 20 *
- 31 09/01/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 N
- 32 09/07/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 *
- i 33 10/04/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 *
- j
- 34 10/08/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 * *
< 35 10/08/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 m a =g i
36 10/03/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 *
- e, u
/
- *
- e e ,
i 13:59 MONDAY, APR A;. 25, 1933 15 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Verified by: M iot(w ),re_.PL.h. Date: #45h_3 Table 5: Monthly Ocean Water Gamma Spectral Analysis Control Location: D ob3crvation CalendarLocation K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Mn-54 Zr(Hb)-95 ZrtNbl-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) 37 11/03/82 D 340 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 38 11/06/82 A 350 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 39 11/06/82 B 350 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 40 11/06/82 C 290 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 41 12/07/82 D 320 20 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 42 12/10/82 A 280 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 43 12/10/82 3 330 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 44 12/10/82 C 350 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 15 0 6 Dbzirvation calendarco-57 Co-57 Mo(Tc)-99 Mo(Tc)-99 Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-58 Co-53 Ru-103 Ru-103 Cc-144 Cc-144 Fe-59 Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sisaa) 37 11/03/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 38 11/06/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 39 11/06/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 40 11/06/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 41 12/07/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 42 12/10/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 43 12/10/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 44 12/10/82 0 6 0 2000 0 15 0 6 0 15 0 20 0 Ob2irvation Calendar Fe-59 Ru-306 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60 As-110m As-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 I-131 Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (slDma) (sigual (sigma) 37 11/03/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 38 11/06/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20
- u 39 11/06/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 *
- 40 11/06/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20
- u 41 12/07/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 m
- 42 12/10/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 43 12/10/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20
- u 44 12/10/82 20 0 30 0 15 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u
,H:44
- =
5:
l
e e . .
13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1983 16 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings
' Verifled by: Mia 6ders. PL.D. Date: #A2eM3 Table 6: Bi-Monthly Ocean Water Gross Beta Activity Control Location 81 Cbservation Calendar Location #1 Location #1 Location 82 Location 82 Location #3 Location #3 Location 84 Location 84 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (stSma) 1 01/14/82 780 60 740 50 720 70 700 50 2 03/08/82 930 80 960 90 900 80 800 80 3 05/05/82 860 70 810 80 810 70 720 70 4 07/09/82 760 70 770 70 770 70 720 70 5 09/01/82 1010 80 990 90 770 70 820 90 6 11/06/82 710 70 750 70 640 60 760 70 N:6 G
- e
- e . .
13:59 ttCNDAY, APRIL 25, 1983 17 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings verified by: Mie Mrn 4.B. Date: 9A25#3 Table 7: Quarterly composite occan Water Tritium Activity Control Location: #1 CbIervation Calendar Location 81 Location #1 Location 82 Location #2 Location 53 Location 83 Location #4 Location 24 Number Date (sisma) (sisma) (sisma) (sisual 1 06/01/82 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 2 09/01/82 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 3 12/10/82 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 N:3 1
i . ,
o Z b
e , a . . .
13:59 MONDAY, APRaL 25, 1983 18 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings verified by: % Nut L b. D. Date: k/A$ff3 Table 8: Ocean Water Strontium Action Level Analysis Control Location: D Observation Calendar Location Cs-137 Cs-137 Sr-89 Sr-89 sr-90 sr-90 Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) 1 01/05/82 D 0 2 w w w w 2 01/14/82 A 0 4 m u u u 3 01/14/82 B 0 3 * *
- w 4 01/14/82 C 0 3 m N *
- 5 03/01/82 D 0 3 m u u u 6 03/08/82 A 0 3 W w w a 7 03/08/82 B 0 3 m * *
- 8 03/08/82 C 0 3
- w w w 9 04/23/82 A 0 6 w w *
- 10 04/23/82 B 0 6 m * *
- 11 04/23/82 C 0 6 m u *
- 12 04/26/82 D 0 6 m u m u 13 05/03/82 D 0 6 m u u u 14 05/05/82 A 0 6
- w w w 15 05/05/82 B 0 6 m * *
- 16 05/05/82 C 0 6 * * *
- 17 06/01/82 A 0 6 m a *
- 18 06/01/82 B 0 6 m * *
- 19 06/01/82 C 0 6 * * *
- 20 06/02/82 D 0 6 * * *
- 21 07/09/82 A 0 6 m u w w 22 07/09/82 B 0 6 m * *
- 23 07/09/82 C 0 6 w w w w 24 07/09/82 D 0 6 * * *
- 25 08/05/82 A 0 6 m u u
- 26 08/05/82 8 0 6 m
- w w 27 08/05/82 C 0 6 w * *
- 28 09/01/82 A 0 6 m M M M 29 09/01/82 B 0 6 w w *
- 30 09/01/82 C 0 6
- w w w 31 09/07/82 D 0 6 m * *
- 32 10/04/82 D 0 6 m * *
- 33 10/08/82 A 0 6 m *
- w 34 10/08/82 8 0 6 m u u u l 35 10/08/82 C 0 6 * * *
- 36 6 u u 11/03/82 D 0 m m 37 11/06/82 A 0 6 * *
- K 38 11/06/82 B 0 6 m u
- w 39 11/06/82 C 0 6
- w w w 40 12/07/82 D 0 6 m * *
- 41 12/10/82 A 0 6 w w *
- 42 12/10/82 B 0 6 m * * *
. 43 12/10/82 C 0 6 m * *
- x N:43 h
I e . e , e .
13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25. 1983 19 l Southern California Edison Company Envircrzental Monitoring Program Database Listings Verifled by: Mit%CL M. Ek h. Date df/e75[8%
Table 9a: Monthly Drinking Water Analysis control Location: 83 Observation Calendar l ocation Be-7 Be-7 Zr(Nbl-95 Zr(Nbl-95 Cs-134 Cs-134 K-40 K-40 Ru-103 Ru-103 Cs-137 Cs-137 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (signal (signal 1 05/06/82 1 0 50 0 15 0 6 m
- 0 15 0 6 2 05/06/82 2 0 50 0 15 0 6
- M 0 15 0 6 3 05/06/82 3 0 50 0 15 0 6 m u 0 15 0 6 4 06/09/82 1 0 50 0 15 0 6 M M 0 15 0 6 5 06/09/82 2 0 50 0 15 0 6
- u 0 15 0 6 6 06/09/82 3 0 50 0 15 0 6 w w 0 15 0 6 7 07/06/82 1 0 50 0 15 0 6 m u 0 15 0 6 8 07/06/82 2 0 50 0 15 0 6 m
- 0 15 0 6 9 07/06/82 3 0 50 0 15 0 6
- w 0 15 0 6 10 08/10/82 1 0 50 0 15 0 6 m u 0 15 0 6 11 08/10/82 2 0 50 0 15 0 6
- M 0 15 0 6 12 08/10/82 3 0 50 0 15 0 6 m u 0 15 0 6 13 09/07/82 1 0 50 0 15 0 6 m M 0 15 0 6 14 09/07/82 2 0 50 0 15 0 6
- M 0 15 0 6 15 09/07/82 3 0 50 0 15 0 6 *
- 0 15 0 6 16 10/05/82 1 0 50 0 15 0 6 m W 0 15 0 6 17 10/05/82 2 0 50 0 15 0 6 m u 0 15 0 6 18 10/05/82 3 0 50 0 15 0 6 w W 0 15 0 6 19 11/02/82 1 0 50 0 15 0 6
- u 0 15 0 6 20 11/02/82 2 0 50 0 15 0 6
- w 0 15 0 6 21 11/02/82 3 0 50 0 15 0 6 *
- 0 15 0 6 Observation Calendar Co-58 Co-58 As-110m As-110m Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-60 co-60 I-131 1-131 Ce-144 Ce-144 H-3 H-3 Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (signal (signal (sigma) 1 05/06/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 2 05/06/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 3 05/06/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 4 06/09/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 200 100 5 06/09/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 3 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 6 06/09/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 1 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 7 07/06/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 S 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 8 07/06/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 9 07/06/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 10 08/10/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 11 08/10/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 12 08/10/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 13 09/07/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 14 09/07/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 15 09/07/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 16 10/05/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100
- 17 10/05/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100
. 18 10/05/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 x 19 11/02/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100
- 20 11/02/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 G$
21 11/02/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100
. s * .
1 r
I, 13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1983 20 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings verified by: MknR bne rf 2 Ph.h. Date: M[M M Table 9a: Monthly Drinking Water Analysis Control Location: 83 Observation Calendar Location Be-7 Be-7 ZrtNbl-95 Zr(Nb)-95 Cs-134 Cs-134 K-40 K-40 Ru-103 Ru-103 Cs-137 Cs-137 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) 22 12/07/82 1 0 50 0 15 0 6 m u 0 15 0 6 23 12/07/82 2 0 50 0 15 0 6 w n 0 15 0 6 24 12/07/82 3 0 50 0 15 0 6 m
- 0 15 0 6 Observation Calendar Co-58 Co-58 As-110m Ag-110m Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-60 Co-60 I-131 I-131 Ce-144 Cc-144 H-3 H-3 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (signal (signal (sigma) 22 12/07/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 23 12/07/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 24 12/07/82 0 6 0 10 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 N:24 I
e * .
I 13:59 MONDAY, APk. 25. 1983 21 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings verified by: %$M b H.d M A.b. Date:kMSM3 Table 9h* Monthly Drinking Mater Solids Grass Alpha and Gross Beta Activities control Location: 81 Observation calendar Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 2 Location 2 Humber Date Gross Alpha Gross Alpha Gross Beta Gross Beta Gross Alpha Gross Alpha (sismal (sismal Isigual 13 01/01/82 0 0.1 1.2 0.1 0.4 0.1 14 02/01/82 0 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.1 15 03/01/82 0 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 16 04/01/82 0 0.1 1.4 0.2 0.0 0.1 17 05/06/82 0 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 18 06/09/82 0 0.2 1.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 19 07/06/82 0 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.2 20 08/10/82 0 0.1 1.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 21 09/07/82 0 0.1 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.2 22 10/05/82 0 0.2 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 23 11/02/82 0 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.1 24 12/08/82 0 0.2 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 Observation Calendar Location 2 Location 2 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Humber Date Grcss Beta Gross Beta Gross Alpha Gross Alpha Gross Beta Gross Bata (sismal (siscal (sigual 13 01/01/82 1.0 0.1 0 0.1 0.6 0.1 14 02/01/82 1.1 0.1 0 0.1 0.6 0.1 15 03/01/82 1.1 0.2 0 0.2 0.6 0.1 16 04/01/82 1.2 0.2 0 0.1 1.0 0.1 17 05/06/82 1.2 0.2 0 0.1 0.9 0.1 18 06/09/82 1.7 0.2 0 0.2 0.9 0.1 19 07/06/82 0.6 0.1 0 0.2 1.5 0.2 20 08/10/82 2.0 0.2 0 0.1 1.1 0.2 21 09/07/82 1.2 0.2 0 0.1 0.8 0.1 22 10/05/82 1.0 0.2 0 0.1 0.8 0.1 23 11/02/82 0.7 0.1 0 0.1 0.8 0.1 24 12/08/82 0.8 0.1 0 0.1 0.6 0.1 N:12
~
9 m
. e
, , e .
13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1983 22
! Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Progran Database Listings verified by: M b tMeEL @h.h. Date M/el(/f3 Table 9c: Monthly Drinking Water Filtrate Gross A1Pha and Gross Beta Activities Control Location: 81 Observation Calendar Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 2 Location 2 Number Date Gross Alpha Gross Alpha Gross Beta Gross Beta Gross Alpha Gross Alpha (sisma) (sigma) (signal 13 01/01/82 0 2 7 1 0 5 14 02/01/82 0 2 5 1 0 2 15 03/01/82 0 1 7 1 0 2 16 04/01/82 0 1 7 1 0 2 17 05/06/82 3 1 8 1 0 3 18 06/09/82 0 4 21 2 0 5 19 07/06/82 0 2 9 1 0 2 20 08/10/82 0 3 11 1 0 2 l' 21 09/07/82 0 3 13 1 0 2 22 10/05/82 0 2 9 1 0 2 23 11/02/82 0 1 8 1 0 2 24 12/08/82 0 1 10 1 0 1 Observation Calendar Location 2 Location 2 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Number Date Gross Beta Gross Beta Gross Alpha Gross Alpha Gross Beta Gross Beta (sigma) (sisma) (sismal 13 01/01/82 14 1 0 2 13 1 14 02/01/82 11 1 0 1 12 1 i 15 03/01/82 13 1 0 1 10 1 16 04/01/82 10 1 0 1 7 1 17 05/06/82 15 1 0 2 16 1 18 06/09/82 19 1 0 2 19 2 19 07/06/82 17 2 0 3 16 1 20 08/10/82 20 1 0 3 16 1 21 09/07/82 21 1 0 2 10 1 22 10/05/82 15 1 0 2 15 1 23 11/02/82 11 1 0 1 13 1 24 12/08/82 8 1 0 1 10 1 N:12 l
O M
t
e e e ,
13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25. 1983 23
! Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Verified by: Mb bNerg. Dkb. Date: M3LMlf4 4 Table 9d: Quarterly Composite Drinking Water Solids Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Activities t
control Location: 81 Observation Calendar Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 2 Location 2 Humber Data Gross Alpha Gross Alpha Gross Beta Gross Beta Gross Alpha Gross Alpha (signal (sigmal (sigmal 5 01/01/82 0 0.1 0.8 0.1 0 0.3 6 04/01/82 0 0.2 1.5 0.2 0 0.2 7 07/01/82 0 0.1 0.8 0.1 0 0.2 8 10/01/82 0 0.1 0.8 0.1 0 0.1 Observation Calendar Location 2 Location 2 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Humber Date Gross Beta Gross Beta Gross Alpha Gross Alpha Gross Beta Gross Beta (sigmal (sigmal (signal
' 5 01/01/82 1.0 0.1 0 0.1 0.6 0.1 6 04/01/82 1.3 0.2 0 0.2 0.7 0.1 7 07/01/82 2.4 0.2 0 0.1 0.6 0.1 8 10/01/82 0.5 0.2 0 0.1 0.6 0.1 N:4 l
I .
I O!
l a
e
- e
- e 13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1983 24 -
Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitorins Program Database Listinss Verified by: M $ndL b od b 5 s Ph.p . Date: M/s1 Slh Table 9e: Quarterly Composite Drinking Water Filtrate Analysis Control Location: 83 Cb:ervation Calendar Location Be-7 Be-7 Zr(Hb)-95 ZrtNb)-95 Cs-134 Cs-134 K-40 K-40 Ru-103 Ru-103 Humber Date (sigma) (sigmal (sisma) (sigmal (sicma) 13 03/31/82 1 m u
- w w w w w w w 14 03/31/82 2 * * *
- w w w * *
- 15 03/31/82 3 * *
- w *
- w w w w 16 06/30/82 1 m w w *
- w w
- w w 17 06/30/82 2 m
- w w w w w w * *
. 18 06/30/82 3
- w w w w w w w W W
] 19 09/30/82 1 m
- w w w w w
- w w 20 09/30/82 2 m
- w w w w w w w w 21 09/30/82 3 m w w w w w w w w w 22 12/07/82 1 W M w w w w w w w w 23 12/07/82 2 m M w w w w w w w w 24 12/07/82 3 m u u
- w * * * *
- Ebservation Calendar Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-58 Co-58 As-110m As-110m Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-60 Co-60 I-131 Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigmal (sigma) (sigma) 13 03/31/82 m u u u a u
- w w w w 14 03/31/82 * *
- w
- w w w * *
- 15 03/31/82 m u *
- w w
- w w w w 16 06/30/82 m u u u w w w w
- w w 17 06/30/82
- w w w -
M w w w w w w 18 06/30/82
- w w w w w w w w w w 19 09/30/82 m u u u u u
- w w n
- 20 09/30/82 w w w w w w * * * *
- 21 09/30/82 M w w w w a w w * *
- 22 12/07/82 * *
- w w w
- W W w w 23 12/07/82 m * * * * *
- w w w w 24 12/07/82 m w w w w w w w w u u observation Calendar I-131 Ce-144 Ce-144 Gross Alpha Gross Alpha Gross Beta Gross Beta H-3 H-3 i Eumber Date (sisma) (sigma) (sigma) (sisma) (sigma) 13 03/31/82 * *
- 0 4 13 1 0 200 14 03/31/82 w w w 0 2 13 1 0 200 15 03/31/82 m w w 0 2 7 1 0 200 16 06/30/82
- w w 0 2 18 2 *
- 17 06/30/82 m *
- O 2 16 1 *
- 18 06/30/82 * *
- O 3 10 1 *
- 19 09/30/82
- w
- 0 2 20 1 0 100 20 09/30/82 * *
- 0 2 15 1 0 100 21 09/30/82 * *
- O 2 12 1 0 100 22 12/07/82 * *
- O 1 12 1 0 100 23 12/07/82 * *
- 0 1 11 1 0 100 2 24 12/07/82 * *
- 0 2 10 1 0 100 e N:12
. * .
- e
(,
13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1933 25 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings verified by: MkMA. bddf_T m k.D. Date: MML6/f3 Table 9f: Drinking pater Strontium Action Level Analysis Control Location: 83 Observation Calendar Location Cs-137 Cs-137 Sr-89 Sr-89 Sr-90 Se-90 Humber Date (sismal (sigma) (sigma) 1 05/06/82 1 0 6 m
- w w 2 05/06/82 2 0 6 m
- w w 3 05/06/82 3 0 6
- w w
- 4 06/09/82 1 0 6
- M N
- 5 06/09/82 2 0 6 m u u w 6 06/09/82 3 0 6 *
- w w 7 07/06/82 1 0 6 w w w w 8 07/06/82 2 0 6
- w w w 9 07/06/82 3 0 6 * * *
- 10 08/10/82 1 0 6 * * *
- 11 08/10/82 2 0 6 4
- w w 12 08/10/82 3 0 6 = m u u 13 09/07/82 1 0 6 M M
- M 14 09/07/82 2 0 6
- M M M 15 09/07/82 3 0 6 * * *
- 16 10/05/82 1 0 6 * * *
- 17 10/05/82 2 0 6 m * *
- 18 10/05/82 3 0 6 m u *
- 19 11/02/82 1 0 6 m u *
- 20 11/02/82 2 0 6
- w *
- 21 11/02/82 3 0 6 m a *
- 22 12/07/82 1 0 6 M * *
- 23 12/07/82 2 0 6 m * *
- 24 12/07/82 3 3 6 * * *
- N:24 b
6 2 )
a Ih 1m 55555555 3g 3 1i 00000000 3 s 9 I(
1
. 1 5 3 2 ) 1 00000000 7a 9 -
L 3u 55555555 5 I I 1g 00000000 - 00000000 R i e )
P ss 00000000 F A C( 8a l 2m 55580211
. 7 4a 2g 00002000
, Y 3 4m 22222222 i A 1 1g hs 000000C0 D - 00000000 i 00000000 T(
N s s es O g C C(
M n 4 8
2 87230304 i 5 9 t 9) 4 2 18158321
. 5 s a 1 - .
- i lm 11111111 - 00000000 h 00013000 3 L bg e T 1 Hi 00000000 C e ( s ml s r( )
a Z 3a 0a b 0m 11111111 1 t. 11111111 a \ _ 5 1g 1g .
ta/ P 9
- us i 00000000 ss i 00000000 D ) A(
r b 00000000 R(
ma r
H
(
r 3
0 1 0 m
aW g
o r
P :
Z
)
a u
R
- 00000000 1 1
9 00000000 g t e s i 4m 55555555 5g 00000000 l
a A
n i D y a s i ns 00000000 5g 00000000 8n 55555555 l r l M( i a o a os 00000000 0u 55555555 t n 4 c( 6g 00000000 i A 4 5 i n 8 - 00000000 8 os 00000000 o .
l n 5 C(
t t a : M - 00000000 r n o l
- h. t o ) C 0 a c i 4a
)
6
- 00000000 t e t 3m 55555555 eA n
m S
p a 1g 00000000 1a c i o ss 00000000 1g 4m 11111111 0
0 n . a i 00000000 o
r s m m
L l
C(
4 es C( 6a
)
a o 3 2m 55556211 e
id v
n E t G
n r
t n s o C 1
- 00000000 4 1
1 e
- 00000000 2g 00000000 i
as 00000000 R(
y%
n a i e
m C
)
a C
6 p d 5m 22222222 9 2 87447586 m e 6g 9) 2 15152411 C
o i
m s e
ns Z(
i 00000000 l m a
cg 55555555 R a
00001000 n n oMi s
i : e l
5 6
- 00000000 N Ti (s
o( 6a
)
_ d y r n 0m 33333333 E b o Z 9 1g i 00000000 h 9 a d S ) - us i e a l R(
n i l m c 00000000 r f a 0g 11111111 T o i u 4i ( 6 f r n s o 0 i e n K( M 1 l V A - 00000000 a - 0 ) u C i 4 87505356 a R m - 11121111 7m 55555555 n e K 5g 00000000
)
r S i e n os 00000000 a
. h : o C( 9m 22222222 5g t 0 i u 1 t 7 es i 00000000 o a 12344123 5 S e c - 00000000 F(
l o o b L c 22222222 a r 22222222 r 22222222 r T a 88888888 a 88888888 a 88888838 de //////// de //////// de ////////
_ nt 99995666 nt 99995666 nt 99995666ea 00000000
- ea 00000000 ea 00000000
_ lD //////// lD //////// lD ////////
a 44440000 a 44440000 a 44440000 C 00001111 C 00001111 C 00001111 n n n o o o ir ir ir te te te ab ab ab vm 12345678 vm 12345678 vm 12345678ru ru ru eH eN eH s s s 8 b b b :
O O O N.
- e , ,
1 13:59 MONDAY APR1L 25, 1983 27 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitorin5 Program Database Listings Verified by: MinCL b E2bPh.D. Date: 4/015#3 Table 11: Semi-Annual Ocean Bottom Sediment Gamma Spectral Analysis Control Location: E Cbscrvation CalendarLocation K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Mn-54 ZrtNb]-95 ZrtNb]-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Number Date (sigma) (signal (sigma) (sigma) (sigmal (sigua) 1 06/10/82 A 15 1 0 0.2 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.13 0.05 2 06/10/82 8 19 1 0 0.2 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 3 06/10/82 C 16 1 0 0.2 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 4 06/10/82 D 15 1 0 0.2 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 5 06/10/82 E 13 1 0 0.2 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 6 10/26/82 C 14 1 0 0.2 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 7 10/26/82 D 14 1 0 0.2 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 8 10/27/82 E 17 1 0 0.2 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 9 11/06/82 A 14 1 0 0.2 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.07 0.05 10 11/06/82 B 14 1 0 0.2 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.05 0.05 Obsirvation Calendarco-57 Co-57 Mo(Tcl-99 Mo(Tci-99 Co-141 Co-141 Co-58 Co-58 Ru-103 Ru-103 Ce-144 Ce-144 Fe-59 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) 1 06/10/82 0 0.05 0 200 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 2 06/10/82 0 0.05 0 100 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 3 06/10/82 0 0.05 0 100 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 4 06/10/82 0 0.05 0 200. 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 5 06/10/82 0 0.05 0 200 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 6 10/26/82 0 0.05 0 300 0 0.1 0.09 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 7 10/26/82 0 0.05 0 300 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 8 10/27/82 0 0.05 0 400 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 9 11/06/82 0 0.05 0 200 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 10 11/06/82 0 0.05 0 200 0 0.1 0.00 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 Obrirvation Calendar Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60 A9-110m Ag-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 I-131 Humber Date (sigmal (sigma) (sigma) (sigmal (sigma) (sisma) (signa) 1 06/10/82 0.2 0 0.3 0.45 0.05 0.58 0.05 0 0.07 0.48 0.05 0 0.5 2 06/10/82 0.2 0 0.3 0.13 0.05 0.00 0.05 0 0.07 0.19 0.05 0 0.5 3 06/10/82 0.2 0 0.3 0.16 0.05 0.00 0.05 0 0.07 0.20 0.05 0 0.5 4 06/10/82 0.2 0 0.3 0.25 0.05 0.00 0.05 0 0.07 0.26 0.05 0 0.5 5 06/10/82 0.2 0 0.3 0.16 0.05 0.00 0.05 0 0.07 0.20 0.05 0 0.5 6 10/26/82 0.2 0 0.3 0.33 0.05 0.00 0.05 0 0.07 0.34 0.05 0 0.5 7 10/26/82 0.2 0 0.3 0.23 0.05 0.00 0.05 0 0.07 0.33 0.05 0 0.5 8 10/27/82 0.2 0 0.3 0.41 0.05 0.00 0.05 0 0.07 0.66 0.05 0 0.5 9 11/06/82 C.2 0 0.3 0.58 0.05 0.13 0.05 0 0.07 0.65 0.05 0 0.5 10 11/06/82 0.2 0 0.3 0.67 0.05 0.15 0.05 0 0.07 0.81 0.05 0 0.5 N:10
~
z b}
e e ,
i 13:59 MONDAY. APRIL 25, 1983 28 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings verified by: Nf1 bdirn N.D.. Date: k N 6/ O Table 12a: Quarterly Non-Migratory Marine Animals paalysis (Flesh Type)
Control location: C Obzervation Calendar Sample Type Location K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Mn-54 Zr(Nb)-95 Number Date (slural Isigma) (sigma) (sigma) 1 03/03/82 sheepshead C M w u w
- w w w w 2 03/03/82 black perch C M M * * *
- w
- u 3 03/03/82 spiny lobster C w W M M M *
- u u 4 03/03/82 keyhole limpet C
- N
- N * *
- M u 5 03/04/82 shccpshead B w w w w w w w u
- 6 03/04/82 black perch B w a w m m *
- u w 7 03/04/82 spiny lobster B W W W M M M M w w 8 03/04/82 bay mussel B u
- u m * * * *
- Obrervation Calendar ZrtNb)-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-57 Mo(Tc)-99 Mo(Tc)-99 Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-58 Co-53 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (signal (signa) 1 03/03/82 m 0.006 0.003 m N *
- M N 0.000 0.004 2 03/03/82 m 0.008 0.002 *
- W *
- W 0.000 0.005 3 03/03/82 N 0.000 0.007 m * * *
- u 0.000 0.003 4 03/03/82 N 0.000 0.003 M M M M N M 0.000 0.002 5 03/04/82 M 0.009 0.002 m * *
- N
- 0.000 0.006 6 03/04/82
- 0.013 0.003
- N * *
- M 0.000 0.006 7 03/04/82 N 0.000 3.010 m u
- N N N 0.000 0.009 8 03/04/82 M 0.000 0.002 m M M N M N 0.000 0.003 Chrervation Calendar Ru-103 Ru-103 Ce-144 cc-144 Fe-59 Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) 1 03/03/82 m w a u u * *
- u u 0.000 0.005 2 03/03/82 m m u 4 m * *
- M M 0.000 0.005 3 03/03/82 M M u u w w N N N M 0.000 0.008 4 03/03/82 M M 0.02 0.008 * *
- N *
- 0.000 0.003 5 03/04/82 N * *
- w * * * *
- 0.000 0.006 6 03/04/82 M M M M N * *
- m M 0.000 0.006 7 03/04/82 *
- N * * * * * *
- 0.024 0.005 8 03/04/82 m u * * * * * * *
- 0.021 0.003
- Observation Calendar As-110m As-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 I-131 Bound H-3 Bound H-3 Aqueous H-3 Aqucous H-3 Number Date (sigmal (sigmal (sigmal (sigma) (sigual 1 03/03/82 0.000 0.003 m * *
- 0 5.0 *
- 2 03/03/82 0.000 0.004 * * *
- 0 5.0 W w 3 03/03/82 0.000 0.006 * * *
- 0 5.0 *
- 4 03/03/82 0.005 0.002 * * *
- 0 10.0 *
- 5 03/04/82 0.000 0.006 * * *
- O 4.0 *
- 6 03/04/82 0.000 0.006 * * *
- 70 10.0 m
- l 7 03/04/SP 0.115 0.006 * * *
- O 2.0 *
- x 8 03/04/82 0.000 0.002 * * *
- 0 9.0 *
- g, co
9 )
2 3m a 53554887 00000000 x'
5g 00000000 i
3 os 00000000 3 C(
9 1
, 5 8 00001000 3 5 9 5 00003000 ) -
2 - - 00000000 a 42335555 Hl
) o 0m 00000000 a L b MNMM0000 C 00000000 6g 00000000 su ug 8645 I N i 0000 R t os 00000000 oi WMMM P r C( es 0000 A Z ) u(
q 1a
, 4m 2555 0 10611000 A Y ) 1g 0000 6 70029000 A a 4000 i MMMM - 00000000 D 4m 0111 es 0000 o N s 5g 0000 C( C 00000000 3 O g i MNMM -
M n ns 0000
)
H i H( 0100 9 t 1 6a 7000 s 0100
- 5 s 4 2m 0222 u mMMM .
- i 4 1 2g 0000 o 0000 3 L 5 - MMWM0000 i MMMM c 1 - MNMM0000 e as 0000 u e n C R( q s M A a
b 6 a 9 2 3 t
a/
M 4a 3c l
4000 0111 9l a
2
- MMMM0000 Ha
-)
D 6 1s 0000 ) m a m 00007000 i MNMM cg MMWM2505 R dg mO ) ss 0000 Ti 2 ni 13040122 aM e C( ( s us 1 1 r p o( ) o(
g y M 6a B o T 4 0m 2555 r 3 1g 0000 P : h 1 i MMMM e s - MNMM0000 9 us 0000 3 g t e s 9 R( -
n a l C )
- H i D F 00000000 r ( c MM*M0000 6 d 3 o ) T 0 n t s a ( 1 u i i 5m 2555 o - MMMM0000 o n s C 6g 0000 N u B o y i MNMM R H l : ns 0000 a n Z( )
l n o ) ) a t
a h. A i t 5 7m a 40Q0 0111 9m a
2555 3g 1m 5000 0111 nh e 9 l s a 6 c - MNMM0000 5g i MM*M 0000 5g i MMMM 0000 1i s
MMMM . ..
0000 m a o n os 0000 es 0000 I(
n % m L Z C( F(
o i r n l 1
- i A o ) 9 3 MMMM0000 e v r a 0000 7 5 1 n e t m 0000 5 -
e MMMM0000 -
E n n 0g 1111 -
o MMMM0000 I y
i o 4i MNM* F r C s 0000 C n a K( ) 8a
)
7000 a M p L 4a 2m 0222 mC y 0 ) 4m 2555 2g 0000 o W r 4 2858 7a 00000000 1g 0000 i MMMM C o - NNM* 3m 52332113 i MMMM hs 0000
' t K 1222 1g 00000000 es 0000 T(
n a i 00000000 C(
_ o r ss s g n C( 00000000 8 i : i o 4 4
2 2
- d y M i E b - t 1 - MMMM0000 n a AAAAACCC 7 00000000 -
e MMMM0000 h a d o c 3 00600560 T
_ i e H o 1 01000000 C n i y
L -
s 00000000 m) r f o i l C 00000000 ) 0a 22431555 f r r 3a 7000 1m 00000000 i e e r r 0m 0222 1g 00000000 l v t e e 1g 0000 i a r e ht ht 5 i MMMM ss 00000000 C a p dcs dcs 9) us 0000 A(
u y arb arb a R(
n Q T eeeoeeeo lm rhplrhpl bg 1332 0000 m r
e : e as as Ni MMWM 3 0 00098000
_ . h a l h pk yh pk y t s 0000 0 1 30051000
_ t 2 p ecn ecn r( 1 1 00000000
_ u 1 m aeaiaeai Z u
- MMMM0000 -
00000000 o a ehlpehlp 9 S
l e S ssbsssbs R A b
a r 22222222 r 22222222 r 22222222 r 22222222 T a 88888888 a 88888888 a 88888888 a 88888888 de //////// de //////// de //////// do ////////
nt 58886777 nt 58886777 nt 58886777 nt 58886777
- ea 00002000 ea 00002000 ea 00002000 ea 00002000 lD //////// lD //////// lD //////// lD ////////
a 33335666 a 33335666 a 33335666 a 33335666 I,
C 00000000 C 00000000 C 00000000 C 00000000 n n n n o o o o ir ir ir ir te te te te ab ab ab ab vm 90123456 vm 90123456 vm 90123456 vm 90123456
_ ru 1111111 ru 1111111 ru 1111111 ru 1111111 eN eH eN eH
. s s s s
_ b b b b o O O O*
- o a M a ****aaae H-30 N3 Gooooooo mM 000000o0 0* * * * * * *
- M OW 00000000 M Uw M
a m n OOoCocco M m @ m Cooooooo a 8 N O 8 90oo0000 m @@@NmmNN Za m a O e e e e
- 30 00o00000 4 w OW 00000000 O* e e
- e = * * *
& L Uw UW OOooOOOO 4 N a Dw MS V e s #3 9444mmmt O DOO4cOtm 4
> a Mm O0000o00 4 OcoMooMo 4 N NOOOOOOn E=
- e e e e e e e e OOOOQOOO O @E OMMMMMMO WW OOOOOOOO O = * * * * * *
- 2 W mm 900C0000 Ow O OOOOOOOO M O m e == * * * * * * *
- 8 K C CW OOOOOOOO Z
= Ew a OOOOomco e @ M M em W Oe Oe o. C. o.Me o o m W ~
t NS MNNNNNNN 3 e
- ee = @ M Nm D0000000 0 OOOOOOOO M J m i OOOOOOOO sw * * * * * * *
- O M S OOOOOOOO W SW OOOOOOOO 3 W C O Mw F W =E 4 m 1 D @) 4 1 4 a @ N M W > +m NOOOOOOn @a N la 4 , ME OMMMMMMO B 4 I OOOOOOOO Em 0.o. 0 0**0 e0 *0*0um au m Q b, Mm E s= f444meme g Um Oe Oe O e *o o. oe o. o.
E a WW OOOOOOcc >= C= NNMNNNMM e W Ow wW 3W l L & Ow a Ow j m4 '
> E em a j O T4 > + OG +444mmme i L M 00000000 e, se & M M.m e= e o e e e e e e i
WW e 00000000 @ 3W C0000000 M m & W W @ gw a C n M U
=
8 Z \
= Q h L = U OOOOOOOO 4 V OOOoOOoo O a > o C
& W 4 w M 3
= = ME +444mmme O e OOOOOOOO O I C W O em Doo00000 E 3 m <
0 > I= * * * * * *
- a ,
E
- M ** CW OOOOOcco a j
N C Nw M C O a a m l n 4 = n hooOOOOn n MG COOOOOoo ,
w w m NE OMMMMMMO @E e444mmme MA MMMMMMMM l C W N 4 ti m OOOOOOOO mm o0000000 M= * * * * * *
- g
- M U e OOOOOOOO f= e e e o e e e e t- e o e o e e *
- I m OOOooooO a N O C OW 00000000 WW 00000000 Mw C E J N Uw kw O F' =
l L b C M M
, = 9 % O a @ M OOOOOOOO N m i
9 W
>N C
i l
W C
L C O MOOOOOOO M ONMNNMMM e OOOOOOOO e
W OOOOOOOO M
M n'
OOOOOOOO i = 0 e- * * * *
- e e
- O h
! > L Q 3 W 00000000 O a
i C 4 Mw L
M E a @m OOOoNNNO
& fm NE MNNNoooN E h O a *E f444mmme Nm C00o0000 O L
- MMndemet be Oc000000 Mm OOooOOOO p- e e e e e
- O *= O s * * * * * * *
- ME MMMMMMNN 1- *
- e * * * *
- CW COCOoOOo D & W MMNMMNNM Mm OOccoOOO WW OOOOOOOO ww C 4 i= Qw O L WW O= O* O O Oe O.O.O.
W m C Uw 00000000 m
= *e - O @ N V > E - e N m D e
- M e 00000000 C n U444mmma > OOccOOoo 8 0000000o C 4 V O O M O4henMMO W >
= W Z O M OOOOOOMO U C = J 9 L w h
- O* O.O.O.O.OeOe O. Ea O = m O GOOOOOOO a Om e44mmmNM w L L & Mm HE coccocco
- e
- e *
- 4 L W m CW CW m I= *
- e * * *
- e mW OOOOoCoo l O 4 & =VUWVUMM @" 3W OOOOOOOO gw
(=
r 3 h MNLDNLDW 8 M l C & b WWOWWOW af NMMMNMNN l L WC&MLEMW Dm COOOOOOO E
. W *e W MW W 3 Z= e e e e e e
- M o Oco@como C S M O EM h&M h5 wW OOOOOOOO O M OOomoomo
- N & CWUCOUC Lw M M OOcoOooo 3 m E hem-We=> N e OOOOOOOO e
- e e e e e e e O N WCHELMLN 3 m D000o000 n W n MWDWWDWD E 4 M
D e L NNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNN
> N nnnnnnnn N nnnnennn e annnnnnn n ennnnHHH VW NNNNNNNN DW NNNNNNNN VW NNNNNNNN VG %%%%NNNN
, CW >@@@@@@@ CW h@@@@@OO CW >@@@@@CO Cp h@@@@@Co WS OOOOOOMM WS OOOOOOMM Sm OOOOOOMM Wm COooooMM MQ \\\%%%\\ MQ NNNNNNNN MQ \%%%NNNN MQ %%%%%%%\
' N 44444444 R 44444444 M 44444444 M 44444444 O OOOOOOOO U OOOOOOOO Q OOOOOOOO O 0o00000O E E E -
E
=L -L -L -L MG MW *W WW SD RD ND nD DE bn@@MNMe >E Mn@oMNMe >G >@@eMNMe >E hn@OMNMe L3 'MMMNNNNN L3 MMMNNNNN L3 MMMNNNNN L3 MMMNNNNN WZ WZ WZ WZ W W W W D D D D O O O O, ,,
l\ ,ll; lll 1 )
3 3 77053934 !
8u 00100000 x*h 5g 00000000 i
3 os 00000000 8 C(
9 1
, 5 8 00000085 3 9 5 00000011 ) -
5 2 - - 00000000 a 58636333 H) l o 0m 00000000 3 L b 00000000 C 00000000 6g 00000000 sm 55555555 ug 00000000 A N - i oi 2 ( os 00000000 P r C( cs 00000000 A Z ) u(
q 1a
, 4m 55635653 0 00000709 A
, Y ) 1g 00000000 6 00000056 A a 00060006 - i - 00000000 D 4m 11101110 cs 00000000 o N s 5g 00000000 C( C 00000000 3 O g i -
M n ns 00000000 H i M( ) 00000000 9 t 1 6a s 00000000 e 5 s 9 2m 22312221 u
- i 4 1 2g 00000000 o 00000000 3 L 5 - 00000000 i e 1 - 00000000 c as 00000000 u q
e n c R(
A s M b
t a
a a/
g )
4a 00060006 3m 11101110 9
9) a 6
2 2
- 00000000 Ha 3
-)
1g 00000000 im a m 00000000 D
m1
% )
i ss 00000000 cg 55636653 R Ti dg ni 22412312 e (s us aN r
g P
y C(
M o(
63
) o(
B o MT 4 0m 55636653 r 3 1s 00000000 P : h 1 i e s - 00000000 9 us 00000000 3 g t e s 9 R( -
n a l C - H l
i D F r ( c 00000000 6 d 00000000 o ) T 0 n t s a ( 1 u i i 5m 55636653 o -
0'O000000 o n s y
C 6g 00000000 M u B o i R M l : ns 00000000 a n Z( )
l b n o l l a a e A i a 00080006 a 1m 00080006 t t 5 7m 11101110 9m 55636653 3g 11201110 nb e
m l
s a
a 6 c -
o n 00000000 5g 00000000 5g 00000000 i
os 00000000 i
es 00000000 1i I(
s 00000000 n m L Z C( F(
o L i r f n l 1 i A o ) 9 3 v r a 00000000 7 5 1 00000000 e n e t m 00050008 5 - 00000000 -
E L n n 0g 22102120 - 00000000 e I y 8 i o 4i o F r C s 00000000 C )
a nb a
p M
K(
4a
) 8a 00002220 2m 22310001 m y 4 ) 4m 55636653 2g 00000000 o r 4 01902737 7a 00000000 1g 00000000 i C M
'l t o
K 33213231 1g 00000000 3m 18221163 i es 00000000 hs 00000000 T(
oba n
s i : i r
g n o
ss C(
i 00000000 00000000 C(
4 8
2 d y M i 4 2 E b - t 1 - 00000000 n a CCCCAAAA 7 00000000 - 00000000 h a d o c 3 60407700 e T i e N o 1 00000000 C n l L - 00000000 r f y s m) 0a 52616632 o i l C 00000000 )
f r r t 3a 1m 00000000 i e e r e r 0m 22312221 1g 00000000 l V t e p e 1g 00000000 i a r e thm ht 5 i ss 00000000 C a p dscldcs 9) us 00000000 A(
u y abrIarb a R(
n q T eoe eeoe lm 22313332 r hlpehplr bg 00000000 m e : e s ls a Ni 3 0 00040084
- h a l p yk o pk yh (s 00000000 0 1 00000051 t 2 p enchecn r( 1 1 00000000 u 1 m eiayeaia Z - 00000000 -
o a h pl ehl p e u s 00000000 S e S ssbksbss R A l
b a r 22222222 r 22222222 r 22222222 r 22222222 T a 88888888 a 88888888 a 88888888 a 88888838 de //////// de //////// de //////// de ////////
nt 44445555 nt 44445555 nt 44445555 nt 44445555
' ea 00000000 ea 00000000 ea 00000000 ea 00000000 lD //////// lD //////// lD //////// lD ////////
/\
a 88888888 a 88888888 a 8888888J a 88888888 C 00000000 C 00000000 C 00000000 C 00000000 n n n n o o o o ir ir i r ir te te te te ab ab ab ab vm 56789012 vm 56789012 vm 56789012 vm 56789012 ru 22222333 ru 22222333 ru 22222333 ru 22222333 eH eN eN eH s s s s b b .
b b O O O O* :
lj llll
2 )
3 a 80703798 x ,tu 8m 01010000 5g 00000000 i
3 os 00000000 8 C(
9 1
, 5 8 3 9 5 ) -
5 2 - - 00000000 a 57235263 Hl
) o 0m 00000000 a L b 00000000 C 6s 00000000 sm 55555555 I N i ug 00000000 R t os 00000000 oi P r c( cs 00000000 A Z ) u(
q 12
. e 4m 57565565 0 00520200 A Y ) 1g 00000000 6 00110100 A a 00000000 i - 00000000 D 4m 11111111 cs 00000000 o N s 5g 00000000 c( C 00000000 3 O g i -
M n ns 00000000 )
H i M( 00000043 a 9 t 1 6a s 00000110 5 s 4 2m 23232222 u .
- i 4 1 2g 00000000 o 00000000 3 L 5 - 00000000 i e 1 - 00000000 e as 00000000 u q
e n C R(
A s M a 3 6 b f ) 9 2 3 t a/ 4a 00000000 9l 2 - )
D a 6 3m 11111111 1g 00000000 a
)cgm57565565 a
- 00000000 Ha dg m 00000000 2 i R aI m
r
)ep ss 00000000 C(
Ti
( s o( )
ni 22121122 us o(
g o M T y
4 M 6a 0m 57565565 B
r 3 1g 00000000 P : h 1 i e s - 00000000 9 us 00000000 3 g t a s 9 R( -
n a l C - H
)
i D F r ( c 00000000 6 d 00000000 o ) T 0 n t s a ( 1 u i i 5m 57565565 o - 00000000 o n y s C 6g 00000000 M u B o i R M l : ns 00000000 a n Z( )
n o ) ) a l
t ah A i t 5 7m a 00000000 11111111 a
9m 57565565 3g 12121111 1m 00000000 ek n
m n ,
l s
a m
a 6 c -
o n L Z 00000000 5g 00000000 5g 00000000 i
os 00000000 C( F(
i es 00000000 1i I(
- s 00000000 o t i r n ib l 1 A o ) 9 3 e v r a 00000000 7 5 1 00000000 n e t m 00000000 5 - 00000000 -
n n 0g 22212122 - 00000000 e I
_ y i o 4i o F r C s 00000000 C Eb n
a p L M
a K(
4a
) 8a
)
2m 23232222 m 0 y 0 ) 4m 57565565 2g 00000000 o \ r 4 71693833 7a 00000000 1g 00000000 - i o - 3m 12141111 i hs 00000000
' t K 33313233 1g 00000000 es 00000000 T(
n Cb o
s a
r g n ss C(
i 00000000 00000000 C(
8 i : i o 4 2 d y M i 4 2 E b - t 1 - 00000000 n a BBBBAAAB 7 00000000 -
c 00000000 h a d o c 3 18206578 T i e N o 1 10100000 C n l L - 00000000 r f y s m) o i l C 00000000 ) 0a 57265265 f r r 3a 1m 00000000 e e r r
_ i 0m 23232222 1g 00000000 l V t e e 1g 00000000 - i a r e ht th 5 i ss 00000000 C a P dcsldscd 9) us 00000000 A(
u Y arbeabra a R(
_ n Q T eeoseoee ) m 33233233 r hplshlph bg 00000000 m
. e : e s us s Ni 3 0 00400200 h a l pk y s p yk p ( s 00000000 0 1 00400300 t 2 p ecn ence r( 1 1 00000000 u 1 m e ai yei a e Z - 00000000 -
o a hlpahplh u s 00000000 S e S sbsbssbs R A
_ l b
a r 22222222 r 22222222 r 22222222 r 22222222 T a 88888888 a 88888888 a 88888888 a 88883888 de //////// de //////// de //////// de ////////
nt 55696666 nt 55696666 nt 55696666 nt 55696666 ea 00002222 ea 00002222 ea 00002222 ea 00002222 lD //////// lD //////// lD //////// lD ////////
a 88880000 a 88880000 a 888S0000 a 88880000 C 00001111 C 00001111 C 00001111 C 00001111 n n n n
_ o o o ir o
i r ir ir te te te te ab ab ab ab
_ vm 34567890 vm 34567890 vM 34567890 vm 34567890
. ru 33333334 ru 33333334 ru 33333334 ru 33333334 eN eN eN eN
_ s s s s b b b b O O o O
l M =
M a O*omo*** H-33 NG McNOMooo mm oo000000 gw *
- e e e M OW OoocooOO N Uw M
- m n M M @ m a 0 N I I 0000o000 m NNnmmNNM Za a O OG oooooooo n i D 00000000 Q em Oooooooo MM mmmmmmmm j t Z Im e * * * * * *
- 3m 2 w OW OccOOOOO O= o*o* o* o.o.oe oe o.
& L Ow GW C000000o
< N a 3=
M ra F
- O
- fR NfdmmemM O ObooOJbb (
> a Mm OOccocco @ Oooooood 4 4 ONOOOSOm I= e *
- e * * *
- e O0000000 Q fM MoMMMomo WW OOOOooOO O * * * * * * *
- Z W mm o0000000 Ow Q OOOOOOOO M O m e- * *e *
- e *
- 8 E C CW 00000000 3
- Ew a OMenMohm
- @ w M @m W m W f NG MNmNNMNM 3 MMMM.Mooo
- .
- e
- e
- *
- M Nm o000000o O OOOOOOOO M J m E OOOOOOOO se sp OOoOOOOO e
- e e o e e e U M e OOOOOOOO W 3 W C U m= F W E 4 D
N Vl
- 5 a @ N M w em OHOOObem Oa N la e i MH MoMMMoMo ee s OOOOOOOO Em G Mm OOOOoooo aG n 5
-
- e
- e
- Um OfomefmM g Vm O O* O e eOeoe@ c.e*
E a WW 00000000 >= M N C= NNNMMoMo G W Ow wm DW L 6 & Ow a Ow m , h E @m n O W f CD bemmmemM L M Mm CoccoCoo
& e. E M ew
- e * *
- e e
- W W I OOOOOOOO @ 3W OOOOOoCo M mW W W @ Ew 8 C S M O 8 Z
= m A a L w U OOOOOOOO e V CoOOOoCo O a > o C w W 4 w M 3
- - MG bemmmtmM O s O0000000 0 C W Q @m CoooOOOO E 3 H O > sw * * * * *e e
- g E M ** CW 00000000 e m C Nw a a a
Mm C O N NQ , 4 = N OnOOOhom N MC 00000@O4 w w m NE MOMMMoMo @E NemmmemM Mm NMMMMcMo C W 4 4 mm o0000000 mm OOOOOooo M= * * * * *
- e
- M U e OOOOOOOO tw * *
- e e = *
- l- * * * * * * *
- I W OoocoOOo 8 4 O C OW OOOoCoOO WW 00000000 Mw C E J N Uw 6w 0 9 -
L C M M I
g = 4 O a @ M
> b 4 ONOOOOOO N m M 00000000 C W W E OOOOO@On m 0 OOOOOOOO I W C C Om NONNNONO i OOOOOOOO W M
= O t- * *** * * *
- e O 4 h L Q 1 W OOOOOOOO O a C 4 Mw e E a Hm
& WS NE MNmNNNNM a > O a fE beemmemM Nm C0000000 e-0 L f mfMMnMM4 b4 00000004 Mm C0000000 * * * * * * * *
. U** O 8 *
- e * = e *
- ME NMMNMNMO 8= * * * * * * *
- CW OOOOOcoO
- W MMMMNMMM Mm CocoOoco WW 00000000 >=
C 4 B* OOOOOOOO Ow l 0 L WW e
- e e e e e e W D C Uw 00000000 n I - *e - O f N l V h E = f N WD e w M e 00000000 C e NHOOOOH4 h OOOOOooh e O000000o g 5 V O U M mobabotN W H
= W Z O M OCOMooCo o C e J I OOococco L w h W e e e *
- e e
- Em O - M Q OoOOOOOO a om Nf4mmN4M W L L w Mm ME cocococo
= W W L WL OE MNNNNMNM Mm cocoooco M > w W &W MM CocoooOO t= * * * *
- e e
- N L 9 2 WCEw m Ew
- e e o e e *
- mm OoOOoCoo U N & UMVWU-W @a 3W 00000000 gw
<w 3 h LWmDLMD 0 4 C & W WWWOW OW as MNMNNNNM L E e W ** W &WEM&WHL Em M e DmZ= 0 0* 0.o *oo 0.oo 0e M o ococoenM C 4 M M m E AM o hr =W OOOOOOOO o M cococoNM w N 6 U WCUCC L= M M 00000000 3 M E S h W- N >m W N 5 OOOOOOOO I * *
- e * * *
- O 4 McEEMWEW 3 m OOOOOOOO O
M W
- DDWWDMWW N 4 D
e L NNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNN
> N nnnHHHHH M nnnnnnnn N HnNHnnne n NNNnnnn@
VW NNNNNNNN VW NNNNNNNN VW NNNNNNNN VW NNNNNNNN
. CW deWNbMMM CW 44NSSNMM WW NNNNNNMO WS NNNNNNMo WM NNNNNNMO gm NNNNNNMo Cw @dN56NMM Cu 44NmWNMM l
r MQ NNNNNNNN MQ NNNNNNNN MQ NNNNNNNN MQ NNNNNNNN N DOOooOOM N DOOOOOOM N CooOOOOM N CooOccoM o o o MMMMMMMM MMMMMMMM MMMMMMMM Q MMMMMMMM 1 C C C C
! O O O O
=L -L -L -L WW WW WW WW ND ND ND nD
>E MNMemdbH >E MNMem4Nn >E MNMfmebn >E MNMem4NN L3 ffffffff L3 fffffffe L3 fffteeff L3 ffffffff WZ WZ WZ WZ n W W W W f D D D D te O O O Q, ,, Z
e , e o e s.
13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1983 34 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Verified by: N M b afL b.b. Date: MMLk/M Table 12b: Quarterly Non-Migratory Marine Animals Analysis (Bone Type)
Control Location: C Chrarvation Calendar Sample Type Location K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Mn-54 Zr(Nbl-95 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) 1 03/04/82 sheepshead 3 m u u u u u u u u 2 03/04/82 black perch a a u u a m
- w a u 3 03/04/82 spiny lobster B m m a
- u
- u u
- 4 03/04/82 bay mussel B N N N * *
- u u u 5 03/04/82 sheepshead C u u u u u u u u u 6 03/04/82 black perch C m u u m u u u u u 7 03/04/82 spiny lobster C M M M M N M N u w 8 03/04/82 keyhole limpet C M M N N w m u u u Ob31rvation Calendar ZrtNb)-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-57 Mo(Tc)-99 Mo(Tcl-99 Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-58 co-58 Humber Date (sigma) (sigmal (sigmal (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) 1 03/04/82 N N N w
- w w M N 0.000 0.020 2 03/04/82 W M M M M M M M N 0.000 0.020 3 03/04/82 N N N N M M M M N 0.000 0.010 4 03/04/82 m a u m w n u M M 0.000 0.010 5 03/04/82 m u m u u * *
- M 0.000 0.020 6 03/04/82 *
- M M N
- M M M 0.000 0.020 7 03/04/82 M N N N * * *
- u 0.000 0.007 8 03/04/82 M M N u u
- N *
- 0.000 0.020 Observation Calendar Ru-103 Ru-103 Ce-144 Ce-144 Fe-59 Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60 Humber Date (sigmal (sigma) (sigma) (signal (sigmal (sigmal 1 03/04/82 N u u
- m M w w w
- 0.000 0.010 2 03/04/82
- M N
- u u * *
- K 0.000 0.030 3 03/04/82 M M M N M M M
- u u 0.019 0.005 4 03/04/82 M M M M u m M M M M 0.000 0.020 5 03/04/82 N N N N N N N M M
- 0.000 0.020 6 03/04/82 M N *
- M M *
- M M 0.000 0.020 7 03/04/82 M M
- M
- M u u M
- 0.000 0.007 8 03/04/82 M *
- M M M M M M M 0.000 0.020
- Obstrvation Calendar As-110m As-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 1-131 Bound H-3 Bound H-3 Aqucous H-3 Aqucous H-3 Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sistaa l (sigmal (siscal 1 03/04/82 0.000 0.020 M N N N N N N N 2 03/04/82 0.000 0.020 m M N
- a m M
- 3 03/04/82 0.100 0.010 * * * *
- M *
- 4 03/04/82 0.000 0.010 * * * * * * *
- 5 03/04/82 0.000 0.020 * *
- w w * *
- 6 03/04/S2 0.000 0.010 M N *
- w a w w 7 03/04/82 0.000 0.007 m a * *
- u
- M z 8 03/04/82 0.000 0.010 m M m * * * *
- 8
. f a * *
\
13:59 MONDAY. APRIL 25, 1933 35 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Verified by: bkML TL b.bn Date: h /83 Table 12b: Quarterly Non-Migratory Harine Animals Analysis (Bone Typel Control Location: C Cb;crvation Calendar Sample Type Location K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Mn-54 ZrtNbl-95 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigmal 9 03/08/82 sheepshead A M M M M M M M M M 10 03/08/82 black perch A N N N N M M N N M 11 03/08/82 spiny lobster A N * *
- M M M M M 12 06/07/82 sheepshead C 0.50 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 13 06/07/82 black perch C 0.70 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 14 06/07/82 keyhole limpet C 0.14 0.03 0 0.10 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 15 06/09/82 shccpshead B 0.90 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 16 06/09/82 black perch B 0.60 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 CbIsrvation Calendar Zr(Hbl-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-57 Mo(Tc)-99 Mo(Tcl-99 Ce-141 Cc-141 Co-58 Co-58 Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigmal (sisma) (sigma) 9 03/08/82 M M M M M M M N M 0.000 0.020 10 03/08/82 M N
- W M M M W M 0.000 0.020 11 03/08/82 M M
- M M M M M M 0.000 0.005 12 06/07/82 0.05 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 lo 0 0.10 0.000 0.010 13 06/07/82 0.05 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 100 0 0.10 0.000 0.020 14 06/07/82 0.05 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 10 0 0.10 0.000 0.020 15 06/09/82 0.06 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 10 0 0.10 0.000 0.020 16 06/09/82 0.06 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 80 0 0.10 0.000 0.020 Obstrvation Calendar Ru-103 Ru-103 Ce-144 Ce-144 Fe-59 Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60 Number Date (sigmal (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigmal (sigma) 9 03/08/82 M M M w M M M M M M 0.000 0.010 10 03/08/82 M N N N N N *
- M N 0.000 0.030 11 03/08/82 M M
- M M M M N M M 0.019 0.003 32 06/07/82 0 0.04 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.04 0.000 0.010 13 06/07/82 0 0.04 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.04 0.000 0.020 14 06/07/82 0 0.04 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.04 0.000 0.010 15 06/09/82 0 0.05 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.05 0.000 0.020 16 06/09/82 0 0.05 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.05 0.000 0.020 "Obs2rvation Calendar As-110m As-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 I-131 Bound H-3 Bound H-3 Aqucous H-3 Aqueous H-3 Humber Date (sigmal (sigma) (sigma) (sigmal (sigmal 9 03/08/82 0.000 0.010 * * * * * * *
- 10 03/08/82 0.000 0.020 * * * * * * *
- 11 03/08/82 0.064 0.004 M *
- M u
- M
- 12 06/07/82 0.000 0.010 0 0.04 0 0.20 *
- M
- 13 06/07/82 0.000 0.010 0 0.04 0 0.30 * *
- M
- 14 06/07/82 0.000 0.010 0 0.04 0 0.20
- M N
- 15 06/09/82 0.000 0.010 0 0.05 0 0.30 M
- M
- r 16 06/09/82 0.000 0.010 0 0.05 0 0.30 M * *
- 6 )
3 3m a 00000200 12211032 z
5g 00000000 i
3 os 00000000 3 C(
9 1
, 5 8 00000000 3 5 9 5 00000000 ) -
2 - - 00000000 a 80006200 Hl 1 o 0m 01220032 a L b 00000000 C 00000000 6g 00000000 su ug I H i ax*M****
R ( os 00000000 oi P r c( cs A Z ) u(
q 1a
. , 4m 80008000 0 00001000 A Y ) 6 00003000 A a 1s 0 1 1 1.C.1.1.1.
i . - 00000000 D 4M 22222232 es 00000000 o N sg 5D 00000000 C( C 00000000 3 O - l -
M n ns 00000000 )
H i MI e 9 t 1 6a s 5 s 4 2m 34533454 u u*****M*
- i 4 1 2s 00000000 o 3 L 5 - 00000000 i e 1 - 00000000 e as 00000000 u e n C R( q s M A a
b 6 a 3 l 9 2 3
-)
t P 4a 9) 2 a/ 3m 22222232 a - 00000000 H3 D 19 00000000 l m a m m6 C(
1 s5 00000000 cg 80098000 R Ti (s
17 211 ds ni us
- w**w*
r e o( l o(
a@l g
o r
P :
T p
y 4 3
1 M 6a 0c 80008000 1s 01110121 i . . .
B e e - 00000000 9 us 00000000 3 s t n s 9 R( -
n a o C )
- H i D B
_ r ( c 00000000 6 d ********
o ) T 0 n t s a ( 1 u o
i i 5m 80098000 o - 00000000
_ n s y
C 6g 01100111 M u B o i . R
_ M . l : ns 00000000 a n Z( l l
a
- b. A n o )
a
)
a 1m a
00001000 nh i
t t 5 7m 22222232 9m 80098000 39 22322233 s a 6 5s 00000000 5s 01100111 11 e l c - 00000000 i i . . . s 00000000 m ; a o n os 00000000 es 00000000 I(
n 5 m L Z C( F(
o i r n l 1 i A o ) 9 3 s v r a 7 5 1 00000000 n e t m 00000400 5 - 00000000 -
n n 0g 11111042 - 00000000 e I i o 4i . . o F Eb y
n a M r
a C
K(
s 00000000 C
) 8a
)
p ,
4a 2:n 34533454 m X y 0 00000600 ) 4m 80008000 2g 00000000 o r 4 54727106 7a 1g 01110111 i
_ i C N t o
K 10021011 1g 00000000 3m 22222232 i es 00000000
. . . hs 00000000 T(
n i
sok s i a
r g n o
C(
i ss 00000000 C(
4 8
2 d y M i 4 2 E b - t 1 - 00000000 n a CAAABBCC 7 - 00000000 h a d o c 3 e T
_ i e N o 1 C
_ n i y
L - 00000000 r f s m) o i l C ) 0a 80046200 f r r 3a 1m 01200022 i e e r rr 0m 34533454 1g 00000000 v
l t e ee 1g 00000000 i
. a r e t htt h 5 i ss 00000000 C a p sdcssldc 9) us 00000000 A(
u y barbbear a R(
n Q T oeeoosee 1m 45644565 r lhpllshP bg 00000000 m
_ e e : e s ypk yym pk us Ni 3 0 00082000
_ h b l ts 00000000 0 1 00037000 t
u 2
1 p
m necnn ec i e aii ye a Z r( 1 1 00000000
_ 00000000 -
S o
e a phl p p a h l u s 00000000
_ S ssbssbsb R A
_ l b
a r 22222222 r 22222222 r 22222222 r 22222222 T a 88888888 a 88888888 a 88888888 a 88888888 de //////// de //////// de //////// de ////////
nt 90000044 nt 90000044 nt 90000044 nt 90000044 ea 01111100 ea 01111100 ea 01111100 ea 01111100
_ lD //////// lD //////// lD //////// lD ////////
a 66666688 a 66666688 a 66666688 a 66666588 C 00000000 C 00000000 C 00000000 C 00000000 n
n n n o o o o ir ir ir ir te te te te ab ab ab ab vm 78901234 vm 78901234 vm 78901234 vm 78901234 rL 11122222 ru 11122222 ru 11122222 ru 11122222 eN eH eN eN s s s s b b b b O O O O
N n N 0000"=OC M3 MMMNONMM H-37 M,M 00000000 e e
- e e e e M OW OOOOOOOO M Uw M
= m M OOOO@ COO M m OOOOMCOO a I M @
N I e COOOOOOO M MOOOmOOM Za a O * * *
- e e *
- CU ONMMONMO O j J D OOOOOOOO Q OOOOOOOO em O0000000 L13 M 2 i= e e e e * * *
- 3m ********
g = OW C0000000 O* ,
L L Uw QW l 4 N = Dw I d NN F l
- s du @@COHOO@ O C0000000 4 1
> a MM OCMMOMMO @ OCOO@OON i 4 N I= * * * * * * *
- O OOOOOOOO O @G NNMNNNMN WW 00000000 O e e * = = * *
- W mm O0000000 Uw O OOOOOOOO M e 5" m e- *
- e * * *
- 2 E CW 00000000 a e .C Ew W
@ +* M 44 W W t NE MedmMmmM 3 ********
- =
- M Nm C0000000 O M J M I OOOOOOOO I += * * * * * * *
- O M I OOOOOOOO W NW OOOOOOOO 3 W C U Ew F W E <
N DN Y\ O s a @ N M M 9N @a N 9" N ME NNMNNNNN I N I OOOOOOOO 24 Q MM C0000000 *E N E I= *
- e e e e e e Um MSOOWOOM M Vm ********
E WW OOOOOOOO >= MM MM C=
4 a Ow we a 3W Ow L W Ow m
L E dm m l O > f OE MCCCOOOM L M M OMMNMMNO L e. H M.m e- * =
- e e e e e i WW 8 OOOOOOOO @ 3M OOOOOOOO M WW C W @ Mw Z
8 I
C 4 O O a s
= Qm L w a
u OOOOOOOO 4 O
V C
O 5 w W N w M 3
- - mu WSOOwCOW O e OOOOOOOO O C W O dm OOMMOMMO E 3 m O > B- * * * * * * *
- W E ,
M ** CW OOOOOOOO a N C Nw M C O a a N N
\
( = N N ME COOMOOOO i wJ.
- m NE NNNNNNNN @E M&OOMOOH Mm NNMONMMN C W N d Mm C0000000 mm OOMMOMMC * * * *
- e Me e e e e e * *e I
h'MN u e O C OOOOOOOO sw e e * * * * *
- OW OOOOOOOO B*
WW OOOOOOOO e e Mw I W OOOOOOOO C E J N uw L=
0 =
M L C M =
M 0 = 4 O a @
> L M N m M OOOOOOOO C W W E MMMMNMNN m e O000000O I I W C C Om a e = * * * *
- e OOOOOOOO W M
= O t= 00000000 O L
> L U hW U a C N Mw N E a WM L *N NE M@mmMmmM E > O a #E HOOOMOOH Nm O0000000 O L e NMN@hNmW SN Mm CONMcMMC s- e e * * * * * *
- Oe O I e * * * * * *
- ME NNMMNNNN B- * * * * * * *
- CW C0000000
& W NOOONMON OOOOOOOO WW C0000000 kw C N M.m 3 e e o e e e e e Ow O L WW OOOOOOOO W m C Uw n
= *e - O + N D > E *
- N WD e w M e C0000000 C 4 OO444Mmm 5 8 OOOOOOOO C S V O u M W H
= W =Z O M u C J B OOOOOOOO L & > W Ea O = M u a ON COccecce
- L L & MN ME MNMNONNO
= W W LW L L OE M@mmOmmM Mm OCOOOOOO M > W WL W W Mm COQQMOOO p- e e e e e e e e N L W FE CW CW m i= e = * * * * *
- mW OOOOOOOO O N L W-Vuptue ma SW OOOOOOOO <w 3 > DMNLDNLD eN Kw e C W 5 O WWOWWO a5 emhefede e L M WC SMC LM DE 00000000 E W ** W MW W Zw e o e = *
- e e M C OOOOmOO@
C D M > O LM > LM > we OOOOOOOO O M CoComoOe w N & CCWuCWuc Lw M M 00000000 3 M E =>WN=WN= N I OOOCOOOO e * * *
- e e = =
0 N L WCH ERM L 3 m OOOOOOOO
@ W n enWDWWDW N 4 M
N L NNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNN 5 N nnNMenn@ N nn@@NNN@ N nn@NMann N nnnnMMMM DW NNNNNNNN VW NNNNNNNN DW NNNNNNNN VW NNNNNNNN
- CW ffmmmmmm CW f@mmmmmm CW @@mmmmmm CW @@mmmmmm WN 00000000 WN 00000000 WN 0000000C WN 00000000 MQ NNNNNNNN MQ NNNNNNNN MQ NNNNNNNN MQ NNNNNNNN N NHHHHHHH N HHMMMMMM N MHHHHMHH N MMMMMMMM r~. U OOOOOOOO O 90000000 U C0000000 0 0000000O C C C C O O O
-L -L -L .O L MW WW MG WW ND ND ND ND DE mehe@OMN DE me5WOOMN DE M45MOOMN >g memg@oMN L3 NNNNNMMM L3 NNNNNMMM L3 NNNNNMMM L3 NNNNNMMM WZ WZ WZ WZ W W W W D D D D O O O O, ,,
, -~ _ -
' e s ,
13:59 MONDAY. AFRIL 25, 1933 38 Scuthern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings verified by: NN1 ; U.D . Date: %4L{/g3 Table 12b: Quarterly Non-Migratory Marine Animals Analysis (Bone Typel Control Location: C Cb!ervation Calendar Sample Type Location K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Mn-54 ZrtNbl-95 Number Date (sigma) (signal (sigma) (sigma) 33 08/09/82 bay mussel B 0.3 0.1 0 0.09 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 34 10/26/82 sheepshead A 0.8 0.1 0 0.10 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 35 10/26/82 black perch A 1.1 0.2 0 0.10 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 36 10/26/82 spiny lobster A 2.1 0.1 0 0.09 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 37 10/26/82 sheepshead B 1.0 0.1 0 0.10 0 0.03 0 0.03 0 38 10/F6/82 black perch B 1.1 0.1 0 0.10 0 0.03 0 0.02 0 39 10/26/82 spiny lobster B 2.1 0.1 0 0.09 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 40 10/26/82 bay mussel B 0.2 0.1 0 0.09 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 Obzervation Calendar Zr(Nbl-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-57 Mo(Tc)-99 Mo(Tcl-99 Ce-141 Cc-141 Co-58 Co-58 Humber Date (sigma) (sista) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (signa) 33 08/09/82 0.05 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 10 0 0.09 0 0.03 34 10/26/82 0.06 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 10 0 0.10 0 0.02 35 10/26/82 0.06 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 10 0 0.10 0 0.03 36 10/26/82 0.05 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 9 0 0.09 0 0.01 37 10/26/82 0.07 0 0.03 0 0.03 0 30 0 0.10 0 0.03 38 10/26/82 0.05 0 0.03 0 0.02 0 40 0 0.10 0 0.01 39 10/26/82 0.04 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 8 0 0.09 0 0.01 40 10/26/82 0.05 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 10 0 0.09 0 0.03 ObIervation Calendar Ru-103 Ru-103 Ce-144 Ce-144 Fe-59 Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 co-60 Humbcr Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (signal 33 08/09/82 0 0.04 0 0.09 0 0.09 0 0.09 0 0.04 0.000 0.020 34 10/26/32 0 0.05 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.05 0.000 0.020 35 10/26/82 0 0.05 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.20 0 0.05 0.000 0.020 36 10/26/82 0 0.04 0 0.09 0 0.09 0 0.09 0 0.04 0.015 0.005 37 10/26/82 0 0.05 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.05 0.000 0.030 38 10/26/82 0 0.04 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.04 0.000 0.010 39 10/26/82 0 0.03 0 0.09 0 0.09 0 0.09 0 0.03 0.009 0.004 40 10/26/82 0 0.04 0 0.09 0 0.09 0 0.09 0 0.04 0.000 0.020
- Observation Calendar As-110m As-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 I-131 Bound H-3 Bound H-3 Aqueous H-3 Aqucous H-3 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigm3) (sigma) 33 08/09/82 0.000 0.020 0 0.04 0 0.2 * * *
- 34 10/26/82 0.000 0.020 0 0.05 0 0.3 * * *
- 35 10/26/82 0.000 0.020 0 0.05 0 0.3 * * *
- 36 10/26/82 0.025 0.005 0 0.04 0 0.2 * * *
- 37 10/26/82 0.000 0.020 0 0.05 0 0.3 * * *
- 38 10/P6/82 0.000 0.010 0 0.04 0 0.3 * *
- w
! 39 10/26/82 0.034 0.004 0 0.03 0 0.4 * * *
- x 40 10/26/22 0.000 0.020 0 0.04 0 0.2 * *
- I co 4
- e ' -
l l
13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1983 39 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings verified by: N L bOC
- b._h_ . Date: 2 2 d _3 Table 12b: Guarterly Non-Migratory Marine Animals Analysis (Bone Type)
Control Location: C i
i Dbscrvation Calendar Sample Type Location K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Mn-54 Zr(Nbl-95 i Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) i 41 10/27/82 sheepshead C 0.9 0.1 0 0.10 0 0.03 0 0.03 0 l 42 10/27/82 black perch C 0.6 0.1 0 0.10 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 1 43 10/27/82 spiny lobster C 2.3 0.1 0 0.08 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 1 44 10/27/82 keyhole limpet C 0.0 0.1 0 0.10 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 Cbscrvation Calendar ZrtNbl-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-57 Mo(Tcl-99 Mo(Tcl-99 Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-58 Co-58 Humber Date (sigma) (sigmal (sigma) (sigma) (signa l (sigual l 41 10/27/82 0.06 0 0.03 0 0.03 0 60 0 0.10 0 0.02
! 42 10/27/82 0.05 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 40 0 0.10 0 0.01 l 43 10/27/82 0.04 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 8 0 0.08 0 0.01 1 44 10/27/82 0.05 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 10 0 0.10 0 0.03 i
Obscrvation Calendar Ru-103 Ru-103 Ce-144 Ce-144 Fe-59 Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60
! Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) ( si st.ta )
41 10/27/82 0 0.05 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.05 0 0.020 42 10/27/82 0 0.04 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.04 0 0.010 43 10/27/82 0 0.03 0 0.08 0 0.08 0 0.08 0 0.03 0 0.003 44 10/27/82 0 0.04 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.04 0 0.020
$ Dbssrvation Calendar A3 110m As-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 I-131 Bound H-3 Bound H-3 Aqueous H-3 Aquecus H-3 Number Date (sigmal (sigmal (sigmal (sigma) (sicca) 4 41 10/27/82 0 0.010 0 0.05 0 0.3
- u u u 42 10/27/82 0 0.010 0 0.04 0 0.2 m a u m 43 10/27/82 0 0.008 0 0.03 0 0.2 w a u
- 44 10/27/82 0 0.020 0 0.04 0 0.2 m u *
- H:44 4
l i
4 i : = ,
l $
T l
O
@ m H-40 Ma **moonmo cc OOOMOOOM OOOOOOOO M M.=m p e o e o e e e e n 3d OOOOOOOO
@ Em M m a M d4 ONOOOOOM M O #3 MOMNONOC e N M Mm OOOOOOOO e OOOOOOOO I= ********
J 3 WW OOOOOOOO M N Uw
< a N N 4
a E MMMMMMMM I OOOOOOOO
> Om e e e o e o e e g
, 4 *= OOOOOOOO O 2 O I W W ww a N NNMOMMMt m MS OOOMOOOO C
l g
- O MR 90000000 O &
- Nenen eM*Men @*@.
Me e e e W G IW OOOOOOOO
- m.
- W NMMNNNMM Mw
' M J I M M W m M e #4 NNNmNfNN M OOOOOOOO I N MS OOOOOOOO I l D MS OOOOOOOO M g g; p= e e e e o e o e m
- O@ OOOOOOOD e Uw e NNNmN@NM G OE 00000000 sA
' @m ge OOOOOOOO E 4 @ e e e e e e e e
! 4 M OW OOOOOOOO L M Uw m I OOOOOOOO i
I O @ O l L U @
& *. e OOOOOOOO W O a e m U C e @m a
- A em etMe@ nmo L "E OOOMOOOM Me efmO4OOOMOOOM nmo O Dm OOOOOOOO 9E W W 2- e * * * * * *
- MmtwO O.O.O.O.O.O O
= = N we OOOOOOOO e e C W G Lw WW OOOOOOOO i'
g O e M
> ee N Uw
,l n C M M e c Om e eJ' 4 =@ M M A'
- 8 9 OOOOOOOO M N m 9
- N U D OOOOOOOO U L O E L 4
( ,w9 U a
M w
N L
Em 04 MMmomemo MS OOOMODOM P ~7 & O Mm s o- OOOOOOOO.
> e L F# OOOOOOOO e e o e o e e C e ~
W m C 4 (w
' E O E MMMMMMMe m l E u nm p= O.O.O.O.O.O.Oe Oe E
C e O N J O WW OOOOOOOO M q
- mm M 9
OOOOOOOO p m I m & .
. O o" O b OOOOO4ch 4 L 8 OOOOOOOO C u e e o e o e e e e m n NNNmNON>
O a OOOOOOOO e M HE OOOOOOOO
= *e n mm OOOOOOOu C i= * * *
- e V > U W D D O On OOOOOOOO J = Qw S e W )
l = W M N MMNNMMNN n l
! c - = U m u v O e OOOOOOOO O - E J O )
- L e u ,
- W 4 a M > I L Mg NNNmNdNN e - 5 MS OOcheOOO O E $
9 m MS OOOOOOOO C n > L g= e e o e e e o e i
L W M WW OOOOOOOO
- 9 ** O ODO OsO Uw
& n M *Ed ***
- M & SSSSMmW b ~
3 M E usME3EM M O 4 30eomOm M n 0 0 9U030U93 9 OOOOOOOO M O =
A U n NNNNNNNN
> b NNNNNNNN L i
M nennnnnn n nnnnnnnn
- . we ssssssss we CW ssssssss OOOOMMee CW OOOOMMff 94 MMMMMMMM 94 MMMMMMMM -
i MA sssssssN MO ssssssss 4444NNNN +
" S de@@NNNN m OOOOMMMM U OOOOMMMM Q E !
E I
=L =L WW WW -
RD WD DE MNMfmehn >E MNMemdhn e i
i L3 L" '
e2 of
. n 1
. D se D
O O E , ee I
__ _- __---- _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . . . , _ _ , , _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ .._ _ _ __ _ _ . .-. . ~ . . _ _ _ . . _ __
' a f e , ,
$ i 1 13:59 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1983 41 I Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings verifiedNy: Minan b
- IL b.h. Date: M/JI/l1 Table 13t: Semi-Annual Local Crops Tritium and Strontium Activities control Lccation: 82 Cbse.avation Calendar Sample Type Location Sr-89 Sr-89 Sr-90 Sr-90 Bouna H-3 Sound H-3 Aqueous H-3 Arueous H-3 Humber Date (sigma) (sigma) (signal (signa) 1 06/30/82 tomato 1 m u 0.000 0.002 0 0.4 0 0.05 2 06/30/82 cucumber 1 M u 0.000 0.001 0 0.3 0 0.04 3 06/30/82 ton?,to 2
- M 0.000 0.002 0 0.5 0 0.03 4 06/30/82 kale 2
- u 0.027 0.004 0 0.8 0 0.05 5 12/13/82 tomato s 1
- u 0.000 0.002 0 0.3 0 0.06 6 12/13/82 cauliflower 1
- u 0.007 0.003 0 0.5 0 0.05 7 12/14/82 tomato 2 m u 0.000 0.002 0 0.3 0 0.05 8 12/14/82 kale 2
- u 0.014 0.006 0 0.9 0 0.05 H:8
( ,
i 5
1 i
b
e , e '
s e i-t i
13:59 MONDAY, APR46 25, 1933 42 Southern California Edison Compan Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Verified by: b bCE Js Eb . b. Date: k/AE/f3 Table 14: t,n ms
- Soll Analysis Control Location: #re Ebzervation Calendar Location Y. 7 Seal Zr(Nb)-95 Zr(Nbl-95 Cs-134 Cs-134 K-40 K-40 Ru-103 Ru-103 Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-58 Number Date ' N @a) (sigma) (sigma) (sigma) (signal (sigma)
' 2 12/08/82 1 0 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.05 23.0 1.0 0 0.1 0.02 0.01 0 3 12/08/82 2 0 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.05 7.0 0.3 0 0.1 0.03 0.01 0 4 12/08/82 3 0 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.05 16.2 0.8 0 0.1 0.00 0.01 0 l 5 12/08/82 5 0 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.05 11.3 0.6 0 0.1 0.00 0.01 0 ObIervation Calendar Co-58 As-110m As-110m Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-60 Co-60 1-131 1-131 Ce-144 Ce-144 SP-89 Sr-89 Sr-90 Sr-90 Number Date (sigma) (sigma) (sigmal (sigma) (signal (sigma) (sigma) (sisaa) 2 12/08/82 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.05 0 0.5 0 0.2 M
- 0.04 0.01 3 12/08/82 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.05 0 0.5 0 0.2 *
- 0.05 0.01 4 12/05'82 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.05 0 0.5 0 0.2 N N 0.02 0.01 5 12/0s/32 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.05 0 0.5 0 0.2 M M 0.02 0.01 N:4 a
b
^
M, * *mNNM"NN H-43 na Oooooooo mm Cooooooo t- e o e e e e e e M Om 0000000o n Uw M
m n M
=
- m @ m n @ M N rJ M N M fJ Za 8
N e I COOOoooo n a O OU o0000000 D 00000000 O we Cooooooo Li N nhhbe@me J 8* * *
- e * *
- 30 ocococco d 2 Om OooooCoo O~ e e e e e e e e u w LB W CocoCoco Ow a L N a Dw 4 Mn U 3 = eE NMMMNNNN O (
a m *MNNm@MM Mm le 00o.00000 e e e e CooOOcco Q eG 00000000 CW OccooOOc Q
W MU 00000000 Uw U M p- e e e e e e e a e o p CW OOOOOOOO Z E C a
- Ew M e @M neem @@44 W
@ w f NG Co000000 3 occococo W W # M Nu ocooocco O m e OOOOOOoo a- e e e e e e e e eb M J 00000000 W mm oOOooooo 3 M e Ew F C C O <
W Z D
- Y e N M e a @ ta
& em fMNNm@MM pa N MG OoooCoco ae Coooocco Z r1 mM' Hm aE s
m G O.h.me 4e O c ce oo Q v I= C o.c.o ec* c* oe o Um NMMMNNNN E We Vm Ce MocoCMoo e e E WW OOOOOOOO wW DW N Uw a Ow L , Ow N m E 4M O # oE NMMMNNNN L M MD 00000o00
& ** M se e e e e o e W 3 OOOOOOOO @ 3W OccocoOO M W @ gw 0 MM Z C N O a 9
- Q V coooooco L U OOOOOcco e C O a 6 o
& N w M 3
= ME NMMMNNNN O I cocoOOco O C Q em E 3 m O e- c.o.c.o.o.C.oe oe g E * *. CW OoOcoOOO a C Nw a a m Ohmooooo M Q m ME MoooMMMM N = m @MNNmeMM
- # M NE Cooooooo OE NMMMNNNN Mm oooooooo M= e e e e
- C N @ WQ C0000o0c mm coOoocco e a e e e o e e e e e e e e t W Oooooooo W U OOOOOOOO De= t-(-
e E 9 O C Om CoOOOooO cm coOOooCo Mw C M J N Ow 6=
0 . M M L @ M
= 0 a
- > b
- b m M OoOOOOOO C W E MNMMMNNN m I OcOOOcOO s W%
a C OM e e e o e e e e 9 OOOOOooo W M O m C to O0000000
> U 8W U a C Mw
- MP de M *n nmea r.se
- ro DC 3n L
E -
M O a @G NMaMNNNN st2 . a ,I og ;ooooo
- e O W e NNfMmehh hm fMNNm@MM Mm B-COGoooor 4- e . e e Cocoooco Q > I e e * * * * *
- MG Oooooooo WW CoCoOOoo* * * *p * * - O .f1 C
- M m
W mfNNmtMt MmtwO C eoe ce eoe ce c.o. Ow O C WW o0000000 W 4 C Ow
= a O e N.
a e
V > & - e WD M & M ocoCocco W 4 (nOO4mOQ h I CoCoCoco 2 N D W U M W M
= W= O M U C M J t O0000000 ca L & 4 W a o e. S m M e N oe ;J N O = 3 O Mm neem @@@@ MO ocooceco
& L C e e e a e o e e
- W C &&&&&&&& OE Co000000 MO I- oe c.o.c.o.c c* *o M > < W Mm Oooooooo 4 & WWWWWWWW m I* e * * * * * *
- MW o00000o0 (w
Q w 6
> --w-e-w= pa 3W C0000000 E N WMuydeMM 8 m Ohm 4 Cone Nw C S WWWWWWWW -E MOOOMMoo E L
W n M W >>>>>>>> DM O.Ooooooo U0000000 Z=
=W C000000o o e e e e e
- e M o M
D a &
a 00000000 LLLLLLLL Lw M M COowocco
& M 8 OccCOOOO I 3 M e UUuuuuuu N 3 m O n ecommnas E 4 n W EEEEEEEE M
D NNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNN e
N L
N nnnnnnnn N annH@nnn N nennnnnn m UC nennnnnn NNNNNNNN NNNNNNNN DW NNNNNNNN UG NNNNNNNN VW CW NNheedde Cw emh&4444 CW Whb@ecca CuW@
WG ocooNNNN hhh@@e4e COooNNNN
- WM OOOoNNNN NNNNNNNN MQ GM OOOONNNN NNNNNNNN MQ NNNNNNNN MQ NNNNNNNN MQ n eeeaOcoO n saaeoooo n asecoooo n enacocco coooHMa"
\- u GoooMMMM o CoooMMMM o ocooMMMM o C C C C O O O O -L -L
-L -L MW uW MW MU nD ND ND ND >E MNMem@hn >E MNMemehn
>E MNMem@hn DE L3 MNMemdhn L3 L3 L3 WZ WZ WZ WZ W W M W W D D H D D Z O Q C C, ,,
I h
e APPEl4 DIX I
! SONGS 2 LAND USE CENSUS RESULTS e
I-1 APPENDIX I FINDINGS 4 A. INTRUDUCTION The results of the 1982 SONGS 2 Land Use Census are presented in this part of the report. Findings are summarized here in two ways.
First, to give a general overview of the uses represented in the study area, findings are reported by each of the three use categories: milk animals, vegetables, and residents.
Second, uses are identified on a section by section basis. For each section, all uses including nearest uses are indicated. The section analysis concludes with a sunmary of nearest uses indicated in Table I-1.
B. FINDINGS BY USE CATEGORY
- 1. Milk Animals San Clemente. There are no instances of milk animals (cows, goats) in San Clemente. such animals are prohibited by law in San Clemente.
Camp Pendleton. Milk animals are also prohibited on Camp Pendleton, where the only animals to be found are herds of sheep which graze the i Santa Margarita Hills January through May. Grazing rights are obtained
. through a leasing arrangement with the Camp.
- 2. Vegetable Gardens j San Clemente. There is no land explicitly devoted to agricultural use in I . the City of San Clemente. There are also no " community gerdens" like those found in sone other cities. Most residential lots, particularly in the flatlands of the city, are small enough to preclude large (500+
square foot) gardens.
Only one garden was found and it is located on the vacant lot adjacent to 103 Esplanade (south of El Camino Real Boulevard). This garden falls in Section Q and measures approximately 20 feet by 100 feet. Since there were no vegetables growing at the time this plot was seen, it could not be determined what type of vegetables are grown there.
Camp Pendleton: The most prominent agricultural area is on Cang Pendleton and is known as the San Clemente Ranch, a private business
! under a long-term lease of the land from the Camp. The San Clemente Ranch produces so-called " fleshy" vegetables -- tomatoes, cucumbers,
- sweet corn and cauliflower.
l l
I I-2 Aside from the San Clemente Ranch, there are no other vegetaole gardens or farns on the Base. " Victory gardens" are presently being proposed for use by families on the base, but do not exist as of the writing of this report.
o 3. Residents San Clemente. Primarily a residential community, the City of San Clemente has a population of about 30,000, most of whom live within the I
SONGS 2 study area (in Sections P, Q, and R).
Camp Pendleton: The military population of Camp Pendleton is centralized in Base Housing and camps. Five residential areas fall in the SONGS 2 study area. These are described in detail below.
- 1. San Onofre Housing Subdivision (family / permanent residents)
~
Sections Q and R Approximately 2 niles from SONGS 2; contains 600 housing units total population is 2,100
- 2. San Onofre Mooile Home Park (family / permanent residents)
Section H and A Approximately 1.25 miles from SONGS 2; contains 150 trailers and a population of approximately 525.
- 3. Camp San Mateo (nilitary only/ transient residents)
- Section A Approxinately 3.75 miles from SONGS 2; total population is 2,500-3,000.
- 4. Camp San Onofre (military only/ transient residents) o Sections C and D Approximately 2.6 niles fron SONGS 2; total population is 2,500-3,000.
- 5. Canp Horno (nilitary only/ transient residents)
Section E Approximately 4.2 miles from SONGS 2; total population is 2,500-3,000.
, 6. San Onofre Beach 12-15 temporary use mobile homes for military use (seasonal)
Section Q Approximately 0.48 miles from SONGS 2; peak season use is 45 to 60 persons.
U. S. Coast Guard Loran Tracking Station, San Mateo Point (Sections P and Q).
I-3 San Onofre State Park. Lying in Section R, on the road tnat leads to Surf Beach, two nobile home trailers house personnel of the State Park.
The two idividuals living in these trailers are a Park Range and a Maintenance Supervisor.
, In conversations with tne Area Manager of San Onofre State Park, it was learned that peak seasonal use of the park is 6,279 people (based on July 4,1982). The peak use is broken down as follows: l t Surf Beach auto visitors: 500 cars x 3 persons / car 1,500 Tressies Beach auto visitors: 2000 people 2,000 Campers (Bluffs Area): 214 campers x 3.5 persons / camper 843 Day use auto visitors: 612 x 3 persons / car 1,8.36 Day use walk in visitors: 100 6,279 San Clemente State Park: Located in Section Q, San Clemente State Park has no permanent residents. Peak seasonal use at this park is 4,039 people, again based on July 4,1982.
The peak use is broken down as follows:
Campers: 157 campers x 3.5 persons / camper 549' Calafia Street day use: 250 autos x 3 persons / auto 750 Free day use: 838 autos x 3 persons / auto 2,514 Day use/ walk in visitors: 215
" Bike 'n Hike" users: 11 4,0,$ 9 u
C. FINDINGS BY SECTION Proceeding clockwise from Section P, each of the 16 meteorological sections in the study area are discussed below (Figure 22).
v Section P (West Northwest) is mainly the Pacific Ocean but includes a sliver of land containing San Onofre Beach (military), San Onofre State Beach (public), the U. S. Coast Guard Loran Tracking Station at San Mateo Point, and the westernmost tip of San Clenente.
Section P contains no milk animals or vegetaole gardens.
l l
The nearest residents in Section P are located at the U. S. Coast Guard Loran Tracking Station. Presently, there are four adults and two children residing at the station.
Section Q (Northwest) is the most populous secton, including most of San Clemente, San Clemente State Park, the San Clemente Ranch, and military residential areas of Camp Pendleton.
There are no milk animals in Section Q.
I-4 One vegetable garden producing leafy vegetables was identified. It is located on the vacant lot adjacent to 103 Esplanade, south of El Camino Real Boulevard. The San Clemente Ranch is also located in Section Q.
The San Clemente Ranch produces tomatoes, sweet corn, cucunbers, and cauliflower seasonally.
The preliminary census identified nobile home trailers in this sector at a distance of 0.38 miles belonging to two San Onofre State Park Rangers.
g At the utility's request the individuals removed the trailers tn established residentia'l areas of San Clemente. Consequently, the final census findings do not identify this location as a permanent residence.
Additional residents are located in San Onofre Housing, a 600-unit subdivision housing military personnel and their families. This subdivision is located just north of the intersection of Basilone Road and the San Diego Freeway.
Other residents in Section Q are located in the City of San Clemente.
There are no permanent residents on the San Clemente Ranch.
Section R (North Northwest) includes the hilly portion of San Clemente, San Onofre State Park and Camp Pendleton.
Section R includes the San Clemente Ranch, but no nilk animals.
The nearest residents in Section R reside on Camp Pendleton, at the San Onofre Mobile Home Park. Additional residents live in the San Onofre Housing Subdivision (mentioned under Section Q) and in the San Clemente hills.
Section A (North) falls entirely within Camp Pendleton.
There are no milk animals or vegetable gardens in Section A.
- The nearest residents in Section A resi6e in Camp San Mateo, a military base camp approximately 3.75 miles from SONGS 2, providing temporary housing for 2,500-3,000 military personnel.
Section B (North Northeast) falls entire in Camp Pendleton and contains no nilk animals, vegetable gardens, or residents.
Sections C and D (Northeast, East Northeast) fall entirely in Camp Phndleton and contain no milk animals or vegetable gardens.
Residents in Sections C and D are located only in one area, Camp San Onofre, a military base camp approximately 2.6 miles from SONGS 2, providing temporary housing for approximately 2,500-3,000 milita ry personnel.
e-Section E (East) falls entirely in Camp Pendleton and contains no milk animals or vegetable gardens. Residents of Section E are located only in one area, Camp Horno, a military base canp approximately 4.2 miles from SONGS 2, providing temporary housing for approximately 2,500-3,000 military personnel.
I-5 Sections F and G (East Soutneast, Southeast) fall mainly in Camp Pendleton and include a small portion of San Onofre State Beach. Tnere are no milk animals, vegetable gardens, or permanent residents located in ,
these Sections. As discussed earlier, however, there are temporary residents who camp at the San Onore State Park along the coastline. In
- no cases do visitors to the park stay longer than 7-10 days.
Sections H, J, K, L, M, and N are entirely at sea and, hence, contain g
none of the specified uses.
D.
SUMMARY
OF NEAREST USES To conclude this report on findings, all nearest uses by section are summarized in Table I-la.
.1 o
d Q
t
T j 1 r. u Bh C
l '
9.
l {
,I .
j B 3,
n u, 1
s e_
u a-(c, ,-
. MT-
=. e 2
=. no u
o L-8 s e j 9
1 N A 2, , , v 1
Ea-I r j ei t
t m n e
v e
e c
n /<j g i N
o e e
R a
eM W
- e e s
e t!
n *
[MM 0*Y4 %
" a . e, e 4 v
e en _ mM e
e 6
=
6
- e. ,
s, _
l Ce*._E 4 e
e s n e
~
e e
w au SG D ie l
w ) e
- e. )a'? s e m _(' ie es aL n e
rD S m^ g I
s
=
d*t r
- i
- t 3 e e u on ea *i. e. n t na t
a r ga ah u s
s.
" u - n e .n fr .n . t t e
c t
a.
t*
oeo. . S S Gnn i
. Mt n a ' .
Ou(nim.. *u Y e o e e tSe ' .
u E
V o.
e s n..
a, i.
nan.rc n. r t r sLt a
ono t
R e Sp a P a p o p on ._ on* f n L U pn S>S n H, p .,
O- Oh CwO
.L
$ n p - " n.
m ,. m=Pm na m. n a- m m_ S. tan a m G cr ar ae ar Sa '-
t C* Cr_Cr S N
I UsS _
. R ly.
, I O
. SU L .
A =.
N T =.
. E N =.. -
CE e n _.
V EM o W
e.
e SN _ l a
R
- m. DIU O e NV I
y A N L E e L
A n
e l
b e C e
.e a
I
= T G .
s e ss O e
, e. a, ee L
e s ll O
en a i e D
I s. 6 e
mm t A .m i s
- . e, R
s e
e 0W 2
2(
k r
a
. w kP r
. I ae
_( )aL (
Pt
.t a
rS S
i rt e
n e sa de sl eC
- * * *
- s s s st e s s s n e s e e , g e t s t t e
s e , E n n e l snt lis m.
m e
e.
l i
m
, 1 g 17 l
i m
l i
m l
i m
d nNo nNo gNo o N
dl a i m a
r i
d e S 76 o a_
i e 9 s1 t
s .
Q 5 6 e 3 9 7 6 0 7 7 2 e d 9 1 0 r oe 7 5
- J 2 1 1 tws k 3 2 2 4 1 I t s u ne el s s dr sre l na3 a 8i e.
s r r e t
- r. t m
s s ue rm e ef
- e. t ad W
O e
e s
p e
e t
u H)
I ca ii ee sl n 8 e e 4 .
e 1 D u t
d vt e
v ne e u
rt u e e. l u
a
~
s o
- InRlet s e g
se s
4 K,
n,.
L
( . * .
es
, w e. u -
m _ nt w o
=.
ro e
s se m
c e
i te h us e
b' L m
a
- k I
N I ._~ e.
m h
g m e e r M "
mf u ne 6 ro e
r s>e e t
es e
t hh S a
h ee w he t N *
- e
n..&6 e Southern California Edison Company
- P. O. B OX 8 00 2 244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE RO S E M E A D_ C ALIFO R NI A 917 70 K. P. B AS KIN T E L E P*4 0 N E
""*""U".".'A'"cC.'~~5"
,, Apri1 29,1983 " " ' " " '
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596-5368 Attention: Mr. J. B. Martin, Director Docket No. 50-361 San Onofre Unit 2 4
Dear Sir:
Enclosed are three copies of the radiological environmental monitoring related report entitled,
" Annual Operating Report for 1982 - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Evaluation" This report provides detailed environmental impact analyses and data and is sub.?itted in accordance with the requirements of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2 Operating License No. NPF-10, Appendix A, Section 6.9.1.6.
Please contact me if you have any questions concerning this report.
i i Very truly yours, l
i Enclosures cc: Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (17)
A. E. Chaffee (NRC Resident Inspector)
- H. T. Sipe, California Public Utilities Commission l California Regional Water Quality Control Board - San Diego Region i
i J. W. Ward, California Department of Health Services h[d cofics +MLD gwkerik, cio6*%*G cePH Fkm )
a&en ,s 6**
I