ML19309F684

Consolidated Description QA Program.

ML19309F684
Person / Time
Site:	Marble Hill
Issue date:	04/28/1980
From:	PSI ENERGY, INC. A/K/A PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF INDIANA
To:
Shared Package
ML19309F683	List: ML19309F682 ML19309F684
References
NUDOCS 8004300350
Download: ML19309F684 (96)

Text

IO soo43oo3fo I

HOW TO USE THE " DESCRIPTION" 0F THE PSI MARBLE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE I PROGRAM I This document combines commitments made, relative to Quality Assurance, in the Marble Hill Project Preliminary Safety Analysis Report; PSI's response to the NRC Confirming Order of August 15, 1979; the March 6, 1980, PSI I letter to Mr. Denton of'the NRC, relative to Quality Assurance; responses to 22 specific questions raised by the NRC in March, 1980, relative to the I letter to Mr. Denton; and 15 additional questions raised by the NRC in April, 1980.

PSI has intended to address each NRC request in this combined commitments document. Portions of the Quality Assurance Program Description which were revised from the PSAR are indicated with a single vertical change bar in the margin. Additions of new material requested by the NRC are indicated with double vertical change bars.

Because some of the material which was requested to be included would have I been redundant if included exactly as submitted in the Confirming Order response, this material was reworded, relocated, or combined with material from the PSAR to provide better structure and clarity.

I I

I I

I .

I I

I I

I

I TABLE OF CONTENTS I SECTION PAGE INTRODUCTION. .............................. 1

1. Quality Assurance During Design, Procurement and Construction . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 Organization (PSI) . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 1.1.1 PSI Company Structure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1.1.1 Director-Purchasing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1.1.2 Project Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 I 1.1.1.3 1.1.1.4 1.1.1.5 Quality Assurance Organization . . . . . . . . . .

Licensing Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Nuclear Fuels Organization . . . . . . . . . . . .

6 10 10 I 1.1.1.6 1.1.1.7 Nuclear Operations Organization. . . . . . . . . .

Staffing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11 11 1.1.2 Delegation of Quality Assurance Authority. . . . . . . . . . 13 1.2 Quality Program . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 1.2.1 Program Compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 1.2.2 Program Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 5 1.2.3 Program Development and Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . 15 1.2.4 Program Documentation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 1.2.4.1 Description of PSI ASME Code Program . . . . . . . 20 8 1.2.5 Quality Assurance Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 1.2.5.1 Project Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Quality Assurance Training . . . . . . . . . . .

I 24 1.2.5.2 .

1. '; . 5 . 3 Description of System of Indoctrination. . . . . . 25 1.2.6 Personnel Qualification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 1.2.7 Control of Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 1.2.8 Management Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 1.3 Design Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 I 1.3.1 Regulatory Requirements And Standards 1.3.2 1.3.3 Application Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Design Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . 28 29 29 I

1.3.4 Design Verification and Checking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 1.3.5 Design Interrace Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 1.3.6 Design Change Control. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 I 1.4 Procurement Document Control (PSI) . .

1.4.1 Procurement Document Control . .

1.4.2 Procurement Document Control Responsibilities.

31 31

. . . . . . . 32 1.4.3 Supplier Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 1.5 Instructions, Procedures and Drawings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 1.5.1 Documentation and Implementation .

t l

i I 1.5.2 Acceptance Criteria . . . . . . . .

33 33 I

I . - -

1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.6 Document Control (PSI) 34 I

1.6.1 Control Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 1.6.2 Review and Approval. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 I 1.7 Control of Purchased Material, Equipment and S(rvices (PSI).

1.7.1 Conformance Assurance 1.7.2 Audits and Surveillance

. . . 34 35 37 1.8 Identification and 'ontrol of Materials, Parts and Components. . . 38 1.9 Control of Special Processes . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 1.10 Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 1.10.1 Inspection Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 1.11 Test Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 1.11.1 Test Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 1.11.2 Test Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 I 1.11.3 Test Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 1.12 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 1.13 Handling, Storage and Shipping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 1.14 Inspection Test and Operating Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 1.15 Nonconforming Materials, Parts or Components . . . . . . . . . . . 46 48 Io 1.15.1 Identification of Construction Deficiencies by PSI. .

1.15.2 Evaluations of Construction Deficiencies and Conflicts.

1.15.3 Processing of Nonconformance Reports , Corrective Action

. . 48 Requests and Field Change Requests. . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 1.16 Corrective Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 1.16.L Identification or Adverse Condition . . . . . . . . . . . 50 1.16.2 Corrective Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 1.16.2.1 System for An3uring Management Awareness Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 I 1.16.2.2 1.16.2.3 1.16.2.4 Description of System to Halt Construction .

System for Defining Unacceptable Work.

Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . S1 52 53 1.17 Quality Assurance Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 1.17.1 Records Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 1.17.2 Retrievability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 1.17.3 Storage Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 1.18 Audits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 1.18.1 PSI Audit Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

~

I ii I

I TABLE OF CONTENTS I Figure Figure Figure 1-1 1-2 1-3 Overall Marble Hill Project Organization Project Engineering Organization Project Construction Organization Figure 1-4 Project Control Organization I Figure 1-5 Figure 1-6 Project Administration Organization Project Quality Assurance Organization Table 1-1 Quality Assurance Manual Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B Table 1-2 Project Management Procedure Correlation with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B .

Appendix A Classification Criteria of Structures, Systems and Components CC-ME-01-MH l

I I

I I .

g 1 I I

I I -

l iii

I QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION I PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF INDIANA, INC.

MARBLE HILL NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 APRIL, 1980 I

INTRODUCTION This document provides a summary of the Quality Assurance Programs being employed in the design, procureme nt , construction and construction phase testing of safety-related components, systems and structures of the Marble Hill Nuclear I Generating Station. It describes the interfaces between Public Service Company of Indiana, Inc. (PSI), Sargent and Lundy, and Westinghouse. Section 1 of this document describes the PSI Quality Assurance Program and supersedes all earlier I PSI Program descriptions or portions thereof. WCAP-8370, Revision 9, Westinghouse Electric Corporation Water Reactor Divisions Quality Assurance Plan describes the quality assurance program of Westinghouse as Designer and Supplier of the Nuclear Steam Supply System. The Sargent and Lundy Quality Assurance I Program Topical Report, SL-TR-1A, Revision 5 of October 31, 1977 describes the quality assurance program being implemented by Sargent and Lundy Engineers (S&L) as the architect-engineer. PSI will notify the Nuclear Regulatory Commission of substantial changes to its Quality Assurance Program as " described herein, prior I to implementation of such changes. PSI shall also notify the NRC of organizational changes which alter the organizations as described herein within thirty days after implementing succ changes. Up-to-date programs are available I at the respective corporate of fices for review and audit.

1. QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN, PROCUREMENT AND CONSTRUCTION 1.1 Organization (PSI) 1.1.1 PSI Company Structure The PSI executive management organization described in the Marble Hill Project Quality Assurance Manual deals specifically with management of quality related I engineering, design, procurement, construction, testing, preoperation, and quality assurance activities associated with nuclear power plants. .

I The executive management structure is shown in Figure 1-1. The President and Chief Executive Officer is responsible to the Board of Directors for overall management of company operations. He establishes the PSI company policy I

regarding quality assurance for nur. lear plants and has overall responsibility I and authority for all aspects of nuclear plant design, construction, operation, and quality assurance.

vice president level.

The first major division of responsibility occurs at the The Vice President-Electric System is responsible for all design, construction, and oparations. The Vice President-Electric System, who reports to the Chief I

Executive Officer, is responsible for the development, implementation, maintenance, and evaluation of the effectiveness of the PSI Quality Assurance Pro gram.

I ,

I I

The key positions of the organization are the Project Director, Quality Assurance Manager, Construction Manager, Project Control Manager, Project Engineering Manager, and Project Administrator.

I The Project Director will coordinate the varied aspects of the project except for Quality Assurance and will report directly to the Vice President-Electric System. The Quality Assurance Manager directs the Quality Assurance Program and also reports directly to the Vice President-Electric System.

It is Public Service Indiana's intention to name a Chief Operating Officer who will report to the Chief Executive Officer. The PSI Officer who has full I authority and responsibility with respect to the Marble Hill Project will report to the Chief Operating Officer when that individual is identified. The Marble Hill Project Director and the Quality Assurance Manager will continue to report I to the PSI Of ficer who has full authority and responsibility for the Marble Hill Project.

The functions of the above positions and their respective organizations as well I as those of the Director of Purchasing, are discussed in the following subsections.

1.1.1.1 Dire c tor-Pu rch asing The Director-Purchasing, who reports to the Senior Vice President Finance, is responsible for control of approved procurement documents and issuance to PSI

, contractors and suppliers. The responsibilities of the Director Purchasing include preparation of purchase orders for nuclear safety related mace.ials, equipment and services based on purchase requisitions prepared and reviewed by the Project Engineering Department and reviewed and approved by the Quality I As surance Department.

1.1.1.2 Project Organization 1.1.1.2.1 Project Director I "

The Project Director reports to the Vice President-Electric System and is delegated responsibility for Marble Hill Station design, construction, project management, and licensing. Reporting to the Project Director are the Project Engineering Manager, the Construction Manager, and the Project Administrator.

The Project Director directs and coordinates the work of the NSSS vendor, the a rchite c t-e ngine er , the Prcject Engineering Manager, the Construction Manager, consultants, and other associated compa'ny functions as required to provide a I sa.a, reliable facility. His responsibilities include the implementation and execution of effective design reviews both within the Project Engineering Section and in the architect-engineer's staf f, the analysis of bids, purchase recommendations, budgetary analysis, schedule preparation, progress reports, and I .

licensing contacts with the NRC Project Manager. The Project Director will designate appropriate site management personnel to assume his duties in the event of his absence.

I I l I .

l 1

I l 1.1.1.2.2 Project Engineering Organization The Project Engineering function has been reorganized as shown on Figure 1-2 and I has been relocated to the site. This new organization provides improved support to the Construction Management organization, improved methods of handling design changes, and additional numbers of people to support the project.

i i

he Project Engineering organization is headed by the Project Engineering Manager who reports to the Project Director. The Project Engineering organizatica has overall responsibility for coordination of design activities I and performs reviews of technical documents as well as assuring that technical reviews are accomplished by other af fected PSI organizations. The Project Engineering organization is also responsible for assuring control of design The Project Engineering I changes and consistency with PSAR/FSAR commitments.

Administrator, who reports to the Project Engineering Manager, is responsible for the control of those design documents prepared by PSI or its Design Contractors, which detail final design and define technical requirements at the Marble Hill site, and for the maintenance of a Document Control Center.

The S&L Engineering organization provides an on-site group from the design I organization to review, evaluate, and approve design changes which arise from construction interfaces. This on-site group can be further supplemented by the architect-engineer as the needs arise and is supported by the architect-engic.eer's staf f by normal communications channels.

We Nuclear Design Engineering organization is responsible for the design overview within PSI for the project. This group's responsibilities include interfacing with S&L, and review and approval of design change documents.

The Nuclear Safety and Licensing organization provides licensing support for Project Engineering. This includes preparation and coordination of Safety I Analysis Reports, coordinating architect-engineer efforts relative to licensing and acting as the primary contact with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission project management.

The Project Engineering Administration organization develops Project Management Procedures related to Project Engineering, and admini,sters site document control.

The Material Procurement Manager is responsible for coordinating the procurement of permanent plant equipment as well as reviewing Procurement Specifications.

He also monitors progress of equipment Suppliers and expedites delivery.

he Special Projects Manager is responsible for resolving generic Engineering l problems as they apply to the construction of Marble Hill which arise during the l l g construction of other plants, maintaining a laison organization with the I C mm nwea th Edison Byron Station, coordinating resources required to solve )

5 Engineering problems encountered during construction which cannot be routinely '

solved by other sections within Project Engineering, and interfaces with the

, l B

Project Control organization to assure proper input to the control programs with respect to Engineering status.

1 iI l

l l l

(

1 I 1 l

The Principal Engineer Special Processes is responsible for providing technical I assistance in aspects of welding and thermal heat treatment processes for the Marble Hill project.

I l

1.1.1.2.3 Construction Management The Const.uction Management organization is headed by the Construction Manager, who reports to the Project Director.

The Construction Management organization has been reorganized as shown on Figure l-1 to incorporate the area concept of management and contract admministration.

I This separation of construction management and contract administration allows the construction engineers to devote their efforts to preplan the work with the contractors and identify and resolve potential problems.

The Construction Manager is responsible for the following:

a. Overall responsibility for coordination of the Marble Hill site I construction and fabrication.

b. Monitoring Contractor performance to commitments and schedules.

c. Coordination of Contractor interfaces.

I d. Direction of the Construction Test program at the site to assure tests required to verify the integrity of the construction work are performed.

e. PSI contractual acceptance of structures and systems from construction I Contrac tor s.

I The Assistant Construction Manager reports to the Construction Manager. The Assistant Construction Manager directs the Area Construction Managers reporting to him and each is assigned one of these specific areas: turbine building, auxiliary building, reactor building and general facilities.

The Area Construction Managers are responsible for day-to-day coordination of site construction activities within their respective areas. Within their areas, they are also responsible for:

a. Coordination of Construction Contractor access to work areas,

b. Reporting progress to the Assistant Construction Manager.

c. Assuring Contractors take action on nonconformances from specified I requirements identified by the Quality Assurance Department or other PSI organizations.

The Resident Field Engineering Group is provided to give support, by discipline I to the Area Managers. This group will receive and process contractor change requests and other field generated engineering 'related documents, disallow those j which are inappropriate, and coordinate the balance with Project Engineering.  ;

I '

I

I .

The Contract Administration function has been instituted as a part of the I Construction Management organization. This function will include: direction of administration, monitoring, and auditing of architect-engineer and Contractor activities for contract performance.

The Systems Turnover Group will manage construction testing, master completion list and system turnover to operations.

The Systems Turnover Manager reports to the Construction Manager and has the following responsibilities:

a. Authorizing issuance and use of construction test procedures prepared by either construction Contractors or PSI.

I b. Coordinating construction Contractor participation in the Construction Test Program including test performance, notifications to PSI, and performance of necessary repairs or correction of deficiencies.

c. Coordinating acceptance of completed systems, structures, and components from Construction Contractors following successful completion of applicable construction testing,

d. Coordinating the distribution, review and comment activities of Construction Testing Program documents.

e. Directing and coordinating support personnel and others during performance of Construction Tests including appropriate interface with Station operators.

The Construction Staff Manager will assist the Construction Manager in the administrative functions, such as staff coordination, staff augmentation, contractor prepared procedure review and correspondence control.

The Instrumentation and Control Manager reports to the Construction Manager and is responsible for coordinating instrument and control Contractor's work, and I assuring the calibration of station instrument and control equipment prior to turnover to Operations.

1.1.1.2.4 Project Controls The Project Controls Manager reports to the Project Director and is responsible for developing a system of cost analysis which will allow PSI to effectively control and predict cost of the project. He will develop, with the appropriate organizations and personnel, the overall project Critical Path Method schedule and will input project data to that schedule for updates and amendments.

The Project Controls organization, as shown on Figure 1-4, is comprised of three (3) main sections: Planning / Scheduling / Cost / Estimating, Area Control, and Material Management.

I I

I .

I The Project Planning / Scheduling / Cost / Estimating organization is charged with the I responsibility of providing project planning, control and cost / management systems.

I Re Area Controi A .i'on is organized by major construction areas, (i.e.,

auxiliary building, reactor building, turbine building, and general _acilities) and is comprised of both cost engineers and construction scl.adulers. These I groups are charged with the responsibility of providing the PSI Area Construction Managers with cost and schedule support.

The Material Management Section has the basic objectives of providing an organization and system to monitor, review, and modify all planned activity on a component or item to make certain that material and equipment is properly stored and maintained. In addition, this section provides material control support to the project.

The Material Management Manager reports to the Project Controls Manager and has the following responsibilities:

a. Assuring storage instructions are obtained for PSI and Contractor-stored items purchased by PSI;

b. Maintaining records of materials, parts and components stored by PSI;

c. Protecting, maintaining and preserving items stored by PSI;

d. Maintaining records of items released by PSI; and I ,

e. Assuring that suppliers and contractors provide prompt disposition and corrective action for nonconformances relating to receipt and storage of items and materials.

I 1.1.1.2.5 Project Administration The Project Administration function, as shown on Figure 1-5, provides assistance I to the project in the areas of procedural supporc, facilities support, personnel support and general administrative support. ,

Quality Assurance Organization l.1.1.3 he functions of Quality Assurance and Quality Control organizations have been reunited under one department manager and relocated to the site.

h l The Quality Assurance Manager who reports directly to the Vice l President-Electric System is responsible for the Quality Assurance Program. He

,E 8upervises and provides technical direction to the Quality Assurance 3 De partment. We Quality Assurance Deprtment is divided into the Ouality Systems Section, the Quality Engineering Section and the Inspection Section as shown in Figure 1-6. All of the PSI Quality Assurance organizations are located l

at the Marble Hill site. The Quality Assurance Department has unrestricted l authority to identify quality problems and to initiate action to cause their correction. ,

,I I

I I The Quality Assurance Manager has the authority and responsibility to implement the necessary controls to assure that the Marble Hill Project Quality Assurance Program meets all NRC requirements.

1.1.1.3.1 Quality Assurance Manager The Quality As surance Manager is responsible for:

a. Managing and directing the Quality Assurance Program.

b. The 2dequacy of the Quality Assurance Program, interpretation of I Quality Assurance requirements and effectiveness of the program's impl ementation.

I c. The use of appropriate techniques to assure conformance of all activities af fecting quality to the program's requirements.

d. Assuring the adequacy, clarity and appropriateness of all PSI Quality I Assurance oriented communications and commitments directed to Regulatory Agencies, Contractors and Suppliers.

I e. Assuring that actions such as Quality Assurance ' Program review, surveillance and audits are taken to require Contractors and Suppliers to comply with applicable Quality Assurance commitments.

f. Appropriately exercising the authority vested in the Quality Assurance Organization to cause the acceptance or rejection of work, materials and equipment based on conformance to engineering requirements or failure to meet procurement requirements.

g. Apprising the Vice President-Electric System and Project Director of I

the project quality status by periodic reporting on quality activities, trends and problems through implementation of a corrective action system.

I h. Coordinating applicable activities of Regulatory Agencies such as audits, inspections or investigations with the affected organization manager (s). '

i. Appropriately exercising authority to stop nonconforming work.

Developing and maintaining current the PSI Project and ASMC Quality I

j.

Assurance Programs and Manuals (PQAM and AQAM).

k. Ebintaining a staf f of a sufficient size and qualification to support required audit, surveillance and program development activities.

1. Contacting the NRC on Quality Assurance matters.

I lI 1 ,

o I

I 1.1.1.3.2 Quality Systems organization The Quality Systems Section is responsible for:

a. Development, preparation, implementation, and maintenance of the PSI Quality Assurance Manuals and development of related Project Management Procedures.

b. Development of Chapter 17 of the Safety Analysis Report.

c. Training of PSI personnel in quality assurance concepts and methods.

d. Maintaining the program of Certification of PSI inspectors and auditors.

e. Scheduling, planning and coordinating PSI audits of the Architect-Engineer, the NSSS Supplier, PSI Contractors and internal audits of PSI organizations.

f. Follow-up action as the result of audit findings.

I g. Reviewing and maintaining quality assurance records at the Marble Hill Project Site.

h. The tracking and trending of nonconformances. l l

The Quality Assurance Operations Group reports to the Superintendent-Quality Systems. It is responsible for the quality assurance of preoperational and I startup testing and operations activities and maintenance of the Quality Assurance Records associated with the preoperational and startup testing and commercial operation. This is accomplished by the review of procedures and I records, the witnessing of selected test points, and the surveillance of testing activities. It is planned at a later point, that this group will report directly to the PSI Quality Assurance Managt ;.

1.1.1.3.3 Quality Engineering Organization The Manager of Quality Engineering reports to the Quality Assurance Manager and is responsible for:.

a. Supervising and directing Quality Engineering Superintendents in the Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, Welding, Nondestructive Examination disciplines, and the Superintendent of Procurement Quality Assurance,

b. Maintaining communication and coordination between the various I '

discipline Superintendents Quality Engineering and other PSI and Contractor organizations for Quality Assurance matters within the responsibilities of the Quality Engineering Section.

The Quality Engineering Section is responsible for:

a. Reviewing quality requirements.

I [

I

I

b. Evaluating changes to the quality assurance programs of the AE, NSSS l and other major contractors.

c. Identifying characteristics to be verified.

d. Prescribing verification methods and quantities to be verified.

e. Preparing PSI surveillance plans and inspection checklists.

f. Identifying documentation methods and records requirements.

g. Assuring adequate definition of accept / reject criteria in documents through review and comment on contractor procedures and specifications.

h. Approving dispositions of nonconformances identified by PSI or those identified by suppliers and contractors which are dispositioned "u se-a s-i s" o r "r e pa ir" .

i. Verifying the causes of nonconformances and determining the need for corrective action.

j. Reviewing and approving PSI generated procurement docum.ats..

k. Maintaining an approved supplier and contractor list.

1. Reviewing supplier / contractor quality trends and recommending corrective action.

1.1.1.3.4 Inspection Organization Using surveillance plans and inspection checklists provided by Quality I Engineering, the Superintendent Inspection is responsible for:

a. Source surveillance of safety-related PSI procured equipment at supplier's facilities.

b. Receipt inspection of PSI procured safety-related items received at the construction site.

I c. Surveillance and inspection of contractor storage conditions and construction activities at the job site.

d. Documenting inspection and surveillance activities and nonconforming conditions. -

e. Stopping further processing of unacceptable work.

f. Controlling subsequent processing of material found nonconforming  !

through PSI inspection and surveillance.

g. Establishing and maintaining control of PSI measuring and testing equipment during construction.

I I O

I I The PSI Quality Assurance Department is assigned responsibility for checking, auditing, inspecting, or otherwise verifying that quality-related activities are correctly performed. As shown on Figure 1-6, the Quality Assurance Department I

l is directed by the Quality Assurance Manager. He is the individual responsible I 8 for managing the PSI Quality Assurance Program and for directing and controlling the PSI's conformance to quality requirements. The Project Quality Assurance Manual (PQAM) designates specific quality assurance functions to be accomplished I by the Quality Assurance Department and thereby, delegates corporate authority for performance of these functions. Specific quality assurance functions include:

a. identifying quality problems;

b. initiating, recommending, or providing solutions; and

c. verifying implementation of solutions The PSI executive management structure (Figure 1-1) is such that the Quality I Assurance Manager reports to the Vice President-Electric System. This reporting level is the same as that of the highest line manager directly responsible for performance of quality-ahecting activities ('Ihe Project Director, Vice I President-Engineering, Vice President-Construction, and the Vice Pre s ident-Po wer) . The Quality Assurance Department is, there fore , independent of undue influences and responsibilities for schedules and costs ar.d has I sufficient organizational freedom to perform quality assurance functions. The reporting structura also affords direct quality assurance access to PSI executive management, which assures the availability of support as required to carry out quality assurance responsibilities.

The Quality Assurance organization has full authority to stop further processing of items or materials by PSI, its suppliers or contractors which are not being I performed in accordance with applicable specifications, drawings, or standards.

In addition, the Quality Assurance Manager has the authority to stop all of the contractor's work if deemed necmssary, to obtain corrective action relative to quality performance.

I The minimum qualification requirements for the Quality Assurance Manager position are as specified in Subsection 1.2.6.

,,,  ! 1.1,A ' i cen .ing De par tment The PSI Licensing Manager reports to the Vice President-Electric System, and is I responsible for the review of licensing material prior to transmittal to the regulatory agencies. He is also responsible for analyzing current licensing trends and will advise the Project Director as to possible effects on the l

licensing of the Marble Hill Station.

l 1.1.1.5 Nuclear Fuels Organization The Nuclear Fuel Section is directed by the Manager-Nuclear Fuel, who reports to the Vice President-Power, and is responsible for fuel procurement, enrichment, fuel fabrication, and fuel cycle data analysis.

I I .

I 1.1.1.6 Nuclear Operations Organization '

i The Nuclear Operations Manager who reports to the Director Power Production, is responsible for the review of the Technical Specifications, selection and I training of plant personnel, and the review of the preoperational and startup tests as well as providing equipment and operating personnel for those tests.

He is also responsible for inservice inspection, operation, maintenance, repair, I and refueling of the Marble Hill Station.

directed by the Marble Hill Station Manager.

The Marble Hill Station Staff is The function of these groups is further described in Chapter 13.0 of the Safety I Analysis Report for the Marble Hill Project. The Nuclear Operations Manager is the Engineer in charge as described in ANSI N18.1.

I Individuals and groups within PSI maintain open and direct communications with the principal contractors for the Marble Hill Project. Communications with the principal contractors' quality assurance organizations will be directed through, but not limited to, each organization's project manager for the Marble Hill I Nuclear Project. The principal contractors' project managers shall ensure sufficient, direct communications between each organization's quality assurance sections to adequately resolve any quality assurance problems. l I 1.1.1.7 Staffing I PSI's approach to increasing experience level of the project management and Quality Assurance staf fs is as follows:

a. Reassignment of Personnel Quality Assurance personnel experience has been reviewed against required training and experience levels needed for qualification; only I - persons qualified in accordance with ANSI N45.2.6 will be placed in those positions performing verification of quality. In functions not covered by ANSI N45.2.6, PSI has reviewed personnel qualifications and has reassigned personnel to positions commensurate with their I experience. Where appropriate, other personnel will be trained to qualify for positions in the overall Marble Hill organization or reassigned to other positions within PSI.

b. Hiring of New PSI Personnel Recruiting of additional personnel is being accomplished through the I use of personnel placement services, PSI personnel recruiters, executive search firms and media advet tisements.

c. Use of Contract Personnel PSI has upgraded its current level of experience through the use of contract personnel. Selected positions have been staffed with I qualified Management Analysis Corporation (MAC) personnel who are managing certain key functions and the recruiting, hiring, and training of qualified PSI counterparts. The key positions in project I management and Quality Assurance are being staffed with qualified MAC and PSI employees.

I s

I I It is planned that during the term of MAC's involvement on the project, the PSI counterpart in each of these positions will be indoctrinated to assume the project responsibilities. Specific plans l for implementing this transition will be developed. The NRC and ANI I will be notified prior to release of such contract personnel at supervisory levels.

I Contract personnel will be used in other areas of the project to supplement existing staff as needed.

d. Description of Planning For Adequate Inspection Staf fing n e ability to perform timely inspections is a direct function of the availability of inspectors. Work to be done can be matched with I available inspection manpower resources on both a short and long term basis.

1 g For short term inspection planning, specific work packages consisting 5 of discrete schedulable activities shall be developed by Project Control and evaluated by Quality Assurance for inspection manpower requirements. Construction schedules shall be revised to make optimum I use of available human and equipment resources. Construction work shall not be scheduled beyond the capability to verify quality.

Ef fectiveness of the program will be assured by Quality Assurance I participation in the work planning, by PSI surve'illance and audit, and by the enhanced authority ef the PSI Inspectors and Quality Assurance Manager to stop processes where it appears that quality may be j eopard ized.

Long term matching of inspection resources with work will be accomplished by Quality Assurance review of projected work forces of I PSI and its contractors. This review will permit recruiting and training activities to be carried out in such a manner as to provide trained Quality Assurance personnel necessary to assure the quality of the work.

I As a part of the revised PSI Quality Assurance Program, inspectors shall be provided with approved inspection procedures, instructions, I and checklists prior to performing inspection operations., These documents shall contain identification of characteristics to be inspected, identification of personnel or groups performing the inspection, a description of the method of inspection, accept / reject I criteria, verification of completion of inspection, and a record of the results of the inspections.

I To further assure that inspections are done in a timely manner, PSI will identify specific hold points be established in et.e contractor's planning and make provisions for notification on " hold" points. This program, coupled with having the work effort managed on at. "a rea" basis, with inspectors assigned to each area, will assure timely inspections.

I 1

I 1.1.2 Delegation of Quality Assurance Authority PSI requires each contracting organization performing activities affecting quality to have an adequate and implemented quality assurance program complying I with the applicable criteria of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B. Specific quality assurance requirements are incorporated into contract documents or purchase j

orders, and principal contractor quality assurance plans, procedures, and I instructions are reviewed and approved by PSI to assure compliance with contract requirement s.

PSI has taken the position that each contracting organization performing work I af fecting quality on the Marble Hill project shall be responsible for establishing, implementing, and monitoring its own quality assurance program.

Subsequent to acceptance of principal contractors' written plans, procedures, I and instructions, PSI assures proper implementation and verifies the ef fectiveness of the quality assurance programs through comprehensive audits and surveillance of facilities, activities and records. The principal contractors as used in this section are the architect-engineer and NSSS supplier.

The principal contractors participating in the design and construction of the Marble Hill Station who have been delegated Quality Assurance functions are:

a. Sargent & Lundy - architect-engineer.

I b. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Nuclear Energy Systems (NES) -

designer and supplier of the nuclear steam supply system and nuclear fuel.

I Sargent & Lundy provides architect-engineering services for the Marble Hill Station. These services include:

I a. Overall design of the station, integrating the nuclear steam supply systema and turbine generators with the complete balance-of plant items.

b. Responsibility for identification and coordination of design interfaces among the principal contractors.

I c. Procurement services for balance-of plant items and construction services and preparing of procuremant specifications, analyzing proposals and making purchase recommendations, reviewing supplier QA programs and implementing procedures.

I d. Performing source inspection of matecial and equipment of supplier of balance-of plant safety-related items and Westinghouse NES Manufacturing Divisions as requested by PSI.

Westinghouse Electric Corporation provides the Nuclear Steam Supply System and nuclear fuel, and is responsi'sle for performing all design, procurement, I fabrication, and quality asrurance activities associated with their scope of supply.

I

1.2 Quality Assurance Program (PSI) 1.2.1. Program Compliance I PSI requires that the design, procurement, construction, and installation of the station be carried out in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B. The Quality Assurance Program for the Marble Hill Project is described in two Quality Assurance Manuals. Each relates directly to the eighteen criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, for Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. One manual has been prepared in relation to Public Service Indiana's responsibilities as Owner of the Marble Hill facility. The other has been I arranged directly to requirements of an N-Certificate Holder for piping systems of Section III, Division 1 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code; both manuals are implemented through Project Management Procedures wherever additional detail is required. Changes to either manual are coordinated to assure that basic requirements and methodology are functioning in parallel.

Tables 1-1 and 1-2 designate the Project Quality Assurance Manual (PQAM) sections and PSI Project Management Procedures which provide compliance with each 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, criterion.

I Design of Marble Hill Units 1 and 2 replicates to the maximum extent possible, I the design of Commonwealth Edison Company Byron Station design. The replication concept does not affect the PSI quality assurance policy to control those activities needed to provide assurance that quality objectives are achieved during design and procurement.

The ISI Quality Assurance Program complies with the applicable criteria established in the following publications:

a. Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During Design and Precorement Phase of Nuclear Power Plants (Gray Book), Rev. 1.

b. Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants (Green Book), Rev. 0; and

. NRC regulatory guides which provide guidance on acceptable methods of implementing portions of the QA Program.

d. NRC Policy and Procedures for the Replication of Custom Plant Designs

- July 1974.

PSI requires that its principal contractors comply with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B I and other published guidelines from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as they apply to activities affecting quality. The 13I Quality AJsurance organization is responsible for verifying compliance with these requirements.

For replicate items, the Quality Assurance Plans and Procedures utilized for the Byron Station by the base plant owner, Sargent & Lundy, and Westinghouse in formulating and verifying the design, design bases, and procurement specifications of the base plant items are considered adequate to meet the Quality Assurance requirements for replicated structures, systems and components.

I .

I 1.2.2 Program Applicability The CC-ME-01-MH, " Classification Criteria of Structures Systems and Components" )

identifies the safety-related. structures, systems, and components to be governed {

by the PSI Quality Assurance Program. Through reviews performed by Project Engineering and Quality Assurance, PSI assures that such items are properly classified as to Safety, ASME Code, Seismic Category and Electrical I - Classification. CC-ME-01-MR includes referen-It is a controlled dccument requiring approv to Reg. Guides 1.26 and 1.29.

of the PSI Project Director, the PSI Project Engineer and the PSI Quality Assuranca Manager. This listing is subject to revision. Changes require equivalent approvals to the original. The I issue current as of the date of submittal 'f this document is included as Appendix A.

1.2.3 Program Development and Implementation PSI began the development and implementation of a Quality Assurance Program in March, 1974, when PSI established a corporate commitment to quality assurance.

I The following policy statement is formally issued with the PSI Project Quality Assurance Manual: l I The Public Service Company of Indiana policy is to ensure the highest feasible degree of functional integrity and reliability of those systems, equipment, and structures of its nuclear power generating stations that are essential to the prevention of nuclear incidents which could affect adversely the health and safety of the public and PSI employees or 1. the mitigation of the consequences of such incidents in t.he unlikely event they should occur.

The Vice President-Electric System is assigned the authority and j responsibility within PSI for all activities associated with the design, i procurement, construction, startup, operation, maintenance, and quality assurance of the Marble Hill Project. To ensure that all of these activities are performed in a manner consistent with the policy set forth in this Manual, the Company has established a Quality Assurance Program to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B. The Quality Assurance Manager has been delegated responsibility for the implementation and maintenance of the Program as well as evaluating its effectiveness.

All personnel performing duties affecting quality including PSI employees as well as those of its contractors, suppliers, and any other organization I

performing quality activities associated with the nuclear project are responsible for compliance with the directives established within the i Quality Assurance Program. Each individual shall be familiar with the l policies, requirements and procedures set forth in the Quality Assurance j ,

Program and shall implement those elements of the Program for which he is l responsible. .

All personnel performing Quality Assurance functions are responsible for I and have the authority and organizational freedom to identify quality probleas; initiate, recommend or provide solutions; verify implementation l

I of solutions, and limit or control further processing or installation of an ll 0

item until proper dispositioning of the nonconformances or unsatisfactory l condition has occurred.

Any conflicts that cannot be resolved within the requirements of the Manual shall be brought to the attention of the Vice President-Electric System for final resolution. All resolutions shall meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.

The policy statement is signed by the Company President. In addition to the formulation of quality assurance policy, PSI has established the following quality assurance objectives:

I PSI Quality Assurance Objectives PSI has established the folowing goals and objectives related to-Quality Assurance:

a. PSI will establish and implement an effective Quality Assurance Program.

b. PSI shall assure the established Quality Assurance Program complies with egulatory commitments.

c. The scope of the Quality Assurance Program shall include all applicable activities which may affect the quaslity of nuclear safety-related materials, items, or services.

Further, the Company's objective is to comply with the applicable quality control criteria, guides, codes, and standards. Specifically, PSI intends to achieve this goal through compliance with the following as interpreted and understood by PSI:

Quality As surance Program Commitments to Regulatory Guides and Endorsed Codes and Standards l NRC Regulations and Guides:

Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, ' Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Plants ' .

' Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During Design and Procurement Phase of Nuclear Power Plants' (Gray Book).

' Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants' (Green Book).

' Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Operations Phase of Nuclear Power Plants' (Orange Book).

l 'NRC Policy and Procedures for Replication of Custom Plant Designs' - July 1974.

l l

1

'NRC Guidelines for Quality Assurance Controls for Fire Protection, BTP ASB 9.5.1 Position C Quality Assurance Program' .

Industry Standards and Associated Regulatory Guides:

REGULATORY CUIDE ENDORSED STANDARD 1.28 " Quality Assurance Program Requirements .

(Design and Construction)" (Rev.0, 6/7/72) ANSI N45.2-1971 1.30 " Quality Assurance Requirements for the Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Instrumentation and Electric Equipment" (8/11/72) ANS' N45.2.4-1971 -

I 1.37 " Quality Assurance Requirements for Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Associated Components of Water-Cooled Nucle r F7wer Plants" (3/16/73) ANSI N45.2.1-1973 1.38 " Quality Assurance Pequirements for Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of I Items for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants" (3/16/73) ANSI N45.2.2-1972 1.'30 " Housekeeping Requirements for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants" (3/16/73) ANSI,N45.2.3-1973 /

1.54 " Quality Assurance Requirements for .,

Protective Coatings Applied to Water-Cocied Nuclear Power Plants" (6/73) ANSI N101.4-l?72 1.58 " Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel" (8/73) ANSI N45.2.6-1973 1.64 " Quality Assurance Requirements for the ANSI N45.2.11 Design of Nuclear Power Plants" (10/73) Draft 3, Rev. 1 1.74 " Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions" (2/74) ANSI N45.2.10-1973 1.88 " Collection, Storage, and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plant Quality Assurance Records" (8/74) ANSI N45.2.9-1974

" Quality As surance Requirements for Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Structural Concrete and Structural Steel During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants" ANSI N45.2.5-1974 (From WASH-1309, 5/10/74) Draft 3, Rev.1 I

" Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Mechanical Equipment ANSI N45.2.8-1974 and Systems" (From WASH-1309, 5/10/74) Draft 3, Rev.3

" Quality Assurance Requirements for Control of ANSI N45.2.13-Procurement of Items and services for Nuclear 1974, Draft 2, Power Plants" (From WASH-1309, 5/10/74) Rev.4

" Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During Design and Procurement for Auditing of ANSI N45.2.12-Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power 1974, Draft 3, Plants" (From WASH-1283, 5/74) Rev.4 CODE COMMITMENT ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section III, Division 1 Note: At the time of submittal of the PSAR, four of these standards were in draft form. For future work instead of the draf ts, PSI will meet the intent of the approved standards in place of these draf ts, endorsed by regulating guides current as of the date of this document.

I Included are:

Regulatory Guide 1.94, Rev.1; " Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation and Testing of Structural Concrete and Structural Steel During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants", and ANSI N4 5. 2. 5-19 74.

Regulatory Guide 1.116, Rev. 0-R, " Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection and Testing of Mechanical Equipment and Sys tems" cnd ANSI N45.2.8.

PSI will also meet the intent of ANSI N45.2.23, " Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants" in qualification of its auditors as described in Section 17 of this report.

The PSI quality assurance policy and objectives were promulgated in written form and utilized as the basis for development of Project Quality Assurance Manual and implementing Procedures as well as performance of initial quality-related activities. The corporate quality assurance policy preface each copy of the Project Quality Assurance Manual originally issued October 7, 1974, and revised l January 22, 1980. The Project Quality Assurance Manual has been distributed to all levels of management and all organizations concerned with quality related activities for the Marble Hill Project.

Activities af fecting quality initiated prior to the submission of the PSAR include:

a. selections of architect-engineer, NSSS supplier, and fuel manufacturer (initial core and first reload);

l b. development of the PSAR; lI I

c, establishment of design basis criteria; and

d. meteorological, geotechnical, and geological site surveys.

Prior to October 7,1974, these activities were surveyed for compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, and Gray Book requirements. After October 7, 1974, all I

quality-related activities were controlled utilizing the provisions of the Quality Assurance Program Manual. Prior to the issuance of the Quality Assurance Program Manual, the quality of the activities performed was verified to be in conformance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B and the Gray Book by review and audit. This included:

a. reviewing the audits, surveillance, and quality assurance programs of .

contractors conducting quality-related activities.

b. reviewing prospective principal contractors' quality assurance program descriptions for adequacy and compliance with pertinent regulations, standards and guidelines.

c. auditing of on going quality-related activities based on draf t quality I assurance procedures and experience with assistance provided by a consultant.

The PSI Quality Assurance Program Manual content was initially defined utilizing the projected PSI scope of involvement in project quality-affecting activities.

All draf ts of the Quality Assurance Program Manual and procedures were reviewed l by PSI corporate managers, project personnel, and quality assurance personnel to assure consistency with PSI policies and objectives.

The Project Quality Assurance hanual was reviewed and approved by the Vice President-Electric System prior to issuance. The distribution of the Project Quality Assurance Manuals is controlled by assigning unique copy numbers to each manual and requiring written acknowledgement of receipt by receiving organizations. Changes to manuals require the prior approval of the Quality I Assurance Manager, the Project Director and the Vice President-Electric System.

Changes to Project Management Procedures require approval by the Quality Assurance Manager and the Project Director. If the requested Quality Program change requires a SAR amendment, the Quality Systems Section is responsible for I drafting the proposed amendment. Project Management Procedures will describe the review, approval and distribution controls for SAR amendments.

PSI requires that all principal contractors have an implemented quality assurance program that satisfies the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B. PSI t annually revien and approves the quality assurance programs of its principai l contractors ans contractors providing items or services purchased by PSI. PSI l- requires that iti principal contractors and contractors reviaw and approve the quality assurance programs of their subcontractors and pass on applicable quality assurance requirements to subtiers.

l

I 1.2.4 Program Documentation The PSI Quality Assurance Program is described by the PSI Project Quality I Assurance Manual and the ASME Quality Assurance Manual and is implemeted by the PSI Project Management Procedures. We Project Quality Assurance Manual details the PSI organizational structure as it relates to quality assurance; identifies the functions, duties, and responsibilities of key departments and individuals; describes interrelationships and interfaces among internal and external organizations; delineates Program requirements; and outlines methods of implementation.

The Project Management Procedures provide detailed direction for implementation of the Program requirements and methods addressed by the Project Quality Assurance Manual and the ASME Quality As surance Manual.

Table 1-2 provides a listing of the Project Management Procedures. The listing l is divided into categories covering the major quality-related activities such as I project management, design control, procurement control, construction management, and construction testing. h is listing also identifies the Project Management Procedures which comply with each 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, criterion.

1.2.4.1 Description of PSI ASME Co.de Program L ne PSI Project Quality Assurance Manual has been developed to address PSI's I responsibilities as an Owner as defined by the ASME Code, and to address non-ASME Code activities for safety-related construction.

he PSI ASME Quality Assurance Program has been developed to assure that PSI I responsibilities as an N-Certificate holder for piping systems comply with ASME Code requirements and to ensure achievement of the highest feasible degree of functional int.egrity of piping systems. De program was approved and issued on I January 2,1980 and became effective for implementation on February 8,1980. An interim letter of authorization has been issued by the ASME.

In addition, the concerns raised by the National and Indiana Boiler and Pressure Vessel Boards have been addressed.

a. General Responsibilities of PSI as Owner

1. R e Project Quality Assurance Manual defines PSI's responsibility as an Owner under the applicable rules of NCA 3200 of the ASME Code.

2. PSI has obtained an Owner's Certificate of Authorization as required by the ASME Code.

= 3. PSI will certify and file the Owner's Data Report as required by NCA 3270 of the ASME Code.

4. PSI or its designee will assure that overpressure protection requirements are designated for each component or system. ,

l 1

i l

i

I i I 5. PSI has obtained a written agreement with an Authori:ed i Inspection Agency.

6. Preparation of Design Specifications is performed by PSI or its I Design Subcontractor. The Design Specifications are reviewed by the PSI Project Engineering Manager to assure that ASME Code requirements are met. The Design Specifications are certified by PSI or its designee in accordance with ASME Code requirements.

7. Review and release of Design Specifications is performed by PSI Project Engineering and Quality Assurance to assure inclusion of I ASME Code requirements.

8. Review of component manufacturers' Quality Assurance Programs ar ASME Code authorizations is performed by PSI Quality Assurance.

9. Periodic surveillance at the component manufacturers' facilities is perfonned by PSI Quality Assurance to determine compliance I with their approved ASME Quality Assurance Programs.

10. PSI Project Engineering reviews technical changes to the Design Specification to assure compliance with ASME Code.

11. PSI Project Engineering or its qualified Design Subcontractor reviews and certifies the review of Component Design Reports.

12. Physical receipt inspection and review of documentation is performed by PSI Quality Assurance upon delivery of the component I b.

to the project site.

General Responsibilities of PSI as an N-Certificate Holder

1. The Quality Assurance Manager, under authority from the Vice President-Electric System, has been delegated responsibility and authority for implementation and maintenance of the ASME Quality I Assurance Program as well as evaluating its effectiveness.

The PSI Project Engineering Manager is responsible for design 2.

activities associated with the Marble Hill Project.

3. Sargent & Lundy Engineers have been retained by PSI as the Design ,

Subcontractor for all ASME Code piping systems except for reactor I

coolant piping systems for the Marble Hill Project.

4. Westinghouse has been selected by PSI as the Design Subcontractor for reactor coolant piping systems.

5. The Design Subcontractors are responsible for: ,

i. Reviewing the requirements of the Certified Design Specifications.

I

I ii. Performing stress analysis calculations.

iii. Preparing drawings and specifications.

iv. Preparing Design Reports or Load Capacity Data Sheets as applicable.

I v. Certification of the Design Report or Load Capacity Data Sheet, when required by the Code.

I vi. Reconciliation of changes to specifications and drawings with the Design Report.

vii. Assuring that applicable requirements of the Certified I Design Specification and of the Code are correctly translated into specifications and drawings.

I a. PSI's Technical Responsibility for Design Efforts (N-Certificate Holder)

1. D e Project Engineering Manager reviews the Owner's Certified I Design Specifications.

2. D e Project Engineering Manager subcontracts design work to the I Design Subcontractors in accordance with the ASME Quality Assurance Program. De Design Subcontractors prepare and certify the Design Reports.

3. The Project Engineering Manager reviews the Design Reports to assure that they conform to applicable Code requirements and the Owner's Certified Design Specifications.

I 4. De Design Subcontractors pravide PSI with engineering and construction drawings for piping systems. The drawings are 1

reviewed by PSI Project Engineering.

5. Engineering and technical documents are controlled in accordance with the document control provisions of the ASME Quality As surance Program. '

d. Acquisition of "N" Stamp

l. PSI will arrange for an ASME implementation survey of the Marble Hill Project timed so that the survey will start the same date the NRC Confirming Order is lif ted with respect to Code work on piping systems.

2. To assure that the program for Code activities progresses I satisfactorily and is being implemented properly, the following actions are being taken:

3. PSI has retained an independent consultant (NUTECH) to:

1 I l

I I i. Provide development of training programs for PSI personnel on Code requirements and the ASME Quality Assurance Program.

Provide assistance to PSI in developing detailed I ii.

implementing procedures.

iii. Perform periodic reviews at the job site to assure that the program is being properly implemented.

iv. Perform an audit of Code activities by PSI shortly af ter commencement of Code activities.

1.2.5 Quality Assurance Training 1.2.5.1 Project Training An integral part of the PSI Quality Assurance Program is its provision for the I training and indoctrination of project personnel and quality assurance personnel in the techniques of quality assurance. The training program is established under the administrative supervision of the Vice President-Electric System.

Implementation of the training program is the responsibility of the Project I Training Manager.

The training program applies to all PSI personnel who perform project-related I activities affecting quality. Participation in the program is mandatory. The selection of participants and the degree of required participation is determined by the responsible Section Manager. We training program is conducted through l the use of the following techniques:

a. lec ture s ,

b. seminars,

c. demonstrations,

d. industry committee participation,

e. workshops, and ,

f. field trips.

PSI is developing a comprehensive training program. This program is intended to supplement the technical expertise of project personnel in specific areas, to provide familiarization in project procedures, and to indoctrinate project personnel it site rules. The program will also provide documentation of training.

PSI nov has an on-site Training Manager. The Training Manager reports directly I to the Project Personnel Director who reports to the Vice President-Electric System. The Training Manager is also supported I

I

I I by an educator on contract to PSI for assistance in the development of the training program. It is anticipated that the training function will be reassigned to Project Administration at a future date.

I The first level of training will consist of indoctrination for all site personnel. This aspect of the program will cover such typical topics as:

a. Importance of Quality,

b. Nonrecrimination aspects of reporting.

The second level of training will consist of training and indoctrination for PSI project and Quality As surance pe-sonnel. This portion of the training progra'm will include the following:

a. Teaching programs for individuals who will instruct other project individuals.

b. Indoctrination in Project Management Procedures.

c. Indoctrination in the PSI Quality Assurance Program.

The third level of training will consist of job specific training for appropriate groups within the project. This portion of the training program will include the following typical topics:

a. Construct i on practices.

b. Quality Assurance inspection procedures.

c. ASME Code requirements.

This training program will be updated periodically as the project proceeds to meet specific needs which have been identified. Training in some areas, such as Quality Assurance inspection procedures, has begun. The training necessary to I support specific activities will be in place prior to the start of those ac tivities . ,

1.2.5.2 Quality Assurance Training The Quality As surance Manager is responsible for the quality assurance training I and indoctrination program. His responsibilities include the development and approval of the training program outlines, lesson plans, and schedules. The' quality " surance training program is divided into three separate areas:

a. ' raining of quality assurance staff,

b. . raining of project personnel, and

c. indoctrination of executive management personnel.

I lI -

I

I All personnel responsible for performing quality related activities are i instructed as to the purpose, scope, and implementation of the Project Quality Assurance Manual and Procedures.

The training of the quality assurance staff is structured to provide the details and instructions necessary to perform the activities required of the staff, such as reviewing documents, surveillance of activities, audits, and record retention.

The training of project personnel is structured to provide necessary background in quality assurance and instructions regarding their performance of activities affecting quality, including document development, verification, and retention.

The quality assurance training program is implemented through a PSI Project ,

Management Procedure which formalizes the training program, details and I responsibilities, and provides for documentation attendant to the program.

PSI requires that its principal contractors and subcontractors have an effective I training program and that they provide documented evidence of the training conducted.

PSI has used, and will probably continue to use, contract personnel for interim I periods to augment its staff with qualified personnel with nuclear experience and to assist in training its on-site staff. Such contract personnel shall meet qualification requirements for positions assigned. Contract personnel will be displaced as qualified personnel are hired by PSI to requisite staffing levels.

1.2.5.3 Description of System of Indoctrination PSI will implement indoctrination of its site personnel as a part of the training program described in Sections 1.2.5.1 and 1.2.5.2 above. Additionally, PSI will provide material to the contractors, who will indoctrinate craft personnel as they are assigned to the project.

1.2.5.3.1 content An audio-visual presentation is currently being produced to be presented to construction personnel. This presentation will be used as an orientation program for new construction personnel and is designed to address the uniqueness I of building a nuclear power plant. The presentation strongly emphasizes the need for quality work and further addresses the issue of reporting without recrimination. This presentation was made available for use about March 1980.

Indoctrination for site personnel will include the requirements of 10 CFR 21.

In addition to the posters required by 10 CFR 21, each employee is given a handbook, outlining the provisions of 10 CFR 21, for personal reference. This ,

booklet stresses that recrimination is not associated wich any such reporting.

1.2.5.3.2 Implementation )

The indoctrination program ic being developed in modular form. This program will be presented to current employees and to each new employee upon arrival at the job site.

I 1I .

1 I  !

1.2.5.3.3 Records Records will be maintained identifying each employees' participation in the indoctrination program.

1.2.5.3.4 Other I In addition to the above, PSI is developing posters and other materials that will be prominently displayed on the job site as a reminder of PSI's concern and commitment to quality and its policy of no recrimination for reporting.

1.2.6 Personnel Qualification To ensure that the PSI Quality Assurance Manager is able to perform his duties I adequately, a set of minimum qualification requirements has been designated as follows:

Quality Assurance Manager:

The Quality Assurance Manager shall have a broad background and working knowledge of power plant construction, operation and maintenance. In addition, the Manager shall have the ability to establish internal and external channels of communication to successfully achieve company goals and objectives.

Educational requirements include as a minimum, a baccalaureate degree in I engineering or science plus a minimum of five years experience in a responsible position in engineering or quality assurance, or high school diploma plus a minimum of fif teen years in engineering or technical activities, at least five I

of which must be in quality assurance or quality control. Two years of the experience should be associated with nuclear facilities.

1.2.7 Control of Ac tivities I .

The PSI Quality Assurance Program requires that all quality-related activities be conducted using approved procedures. These procedures specify the necessary conditions, appropriate equipmant, suitable environment, and necessary I prerequisites for conducting activities. 1 PSI requ#res that its principal contractors exercise the same type of controls over all of their quality-related activities.

PSI QA responsibilities under the Quality Assurance Program include the

)

I following:

a. reviewing safety-related design base criteria documents;

b. reviewing non-replicate design output documents; changes to replicate I- design documents and replicate documents relating to significant licensing issues, complex interfaces, new regul tory requirements and product experience;

c. preparing quality assurance specifications for principal contrcetors; I

~

l I I

I I d. evaluating non-replicate procurement specifications, and changes from replication in replicate specifications; conducting pre-award surveys of prospective contractors, as I

e.

appropriate;

f. reviewing proposals from prospective contractors;

g. reviewing and approving contractor quality assurance programs against the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B;

h. c ,nducting surveillance of construction contractors;

i. conducting system and structure quality verification record review;

j. conducting surveillance of preoperational and startup testing activities;

k. performing internal PSI audits and external audits of principal contractors and selected subcontractors;

1. approve control deviationa and nonconformance dispositions;

m. monitoring and performing trend analysis of deviation and nonconformance control measures;

n. training and indoctrinating personnel performing quality related activities;

o. controlling and maintaining the Project and ASME Quality Assurance Manual and Project Management Procedures; and

p. retaining and filing quality verification documents.

Resolution of differences of opinion between QA personnel and ather department I

1 or organization personnel is accomplished through discussion and mutual agreement between participants, culminating at the Vice President-Electric System. PSI will provide notification to the NRC prior to any substantive changes to the PSI and NRC approved Quality Program Description and will notify the NRC of significant changes in organization structure as related to the Marble Hill Project within thirty days of their announcement.

1.2.8 Management Review The Vice President-Electric System is responsible for reviewing and evaluating I

l the status and effectiveness of the PSI Quality Assurance Program. The primary elements of management participation are by review of Quality Assurance reports, ,

and establishment of a Quality Assurance Review Committee. This committee is  !

chaired by the Vice President-Electric System and includes six other Company I

i l Officers, the Project Director, the Licensing Manager, the Quality Assurance 1 l Manager, and the Director of Purchasing who reports to the Senior Vice 1 l Presiden t-Finance. The Committee meets at least every two months, reviews reports and evaluates actions relative to significant events. An annual i

I I

I I independent audit shall be performed at the direction of the Vice President-Electric System which assesses the scope, implementation, and effectiveness of the Quality Assurance Program to assure that the program is meaningful, I effectively complies with applicable codes, standards and regulatory guides and ef fectively implements all elements of the Quality Assurance Program as stated in the PQAM. Reports containing the results of the audit shall be reviewed and appropriate action taken as directed by the Vice President-Electric System.

Quality assurance programs of principal contractors are also evaluated and monitored. Prospective principal contractors were qualified by evaluation of I historical quality data and/or conduct of quality assurance surveys (audits) by PSI personnel. Subsequent to contract award, PSI initiates planned and periodic audits of principal contractors' facilities, records, and activities to assure implementation of, and compliance with, documented plans and procedures. All of I the review, evaluation and auditing activities are prescribed by PSI Project Management Procedures.

l I

1.3 Design Control (PSI) 1.3.1 Regulatory Requirements and Standards PSI has delegated primary responsibility for development of design base criteria  ;

(including regulatory requirements, design bases, and quality standards) to Sargent & Lundy (S&L) and Westinghouse. Design of Marble Hill Units 1 and 2 l

I replicate to the maximum extent practicable, the design of Commonwealth Edison Company Byron Station. The replication concept does not affect the PSI QA policy to control those activities necessary to assure that quality objectives l

are achieved during design and procurement. PSI project and quality assurance organizations review and approve classification of structures, systems, and components assigned by S&L and Westinghouse. Approval of classification of I Westinghouse supplied equipment shall be made against ANSI N18.2-1973.

Subsequent to approval of structure, system, and component classifications, PSI reviews and approves non-replicate design base criteria and any necessary changes to replicate design base criteria developed by S&L and Westinghouse for safety-related items.

The design process, that of translating applicable design base criteria into ,

' specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions, is the prime I responsibility of S&L and Westinghouse. Design of Marble Hill Units 1 and 2 is based upon duplicating to the maximum extent practicable, the Byron Station design. Replicate designs may be modified because of unique site related l

I features, econsmic considerations, licensing requirements, and reliability improvements. The S&L and Westinghouse design control program for Marble Hill is devised to handle both replicate and non-replicate design documents. The PSI i

internal design review system is devised to handle both replicate and non-replicate design specifications and drawings. PSI shall review design ,

procedures and instructions of these organizations and ensure that provisions l I

are incorporated for correct performance of design activities. including l I specifying appropriate quality standards in design documents and identifying, I documenting, and controlling deviations from such standards and subsequent corrective actions. While most design verification is completed prior to procurement , certain analyses such as piping stress reports require verification I

I I '

1

I after installation . This verification will be completed prior to fuel load. ,i Documentation will be such that unverified portions are appropriately identified and controlled. PSI shall verify proper implementation of approved procedures I and instructions through audit of principal contractor design activities, and records as well as through review of resulting design output documents.

l 1.3.2 Application Review Review and selection for application suitability of materials, parts, equipment, processes, and "off-the-shelf" items that are essential to safety-related I equipment shall be conducted by principal contractors. The measures PSI will employ to assure the adequacy of such application reviews are as follows:

review principal contractors' practices to assure the correctness and I

a.

adequacy of methods;

b. audit and surveillance of principal contractors ' activities, I facilities, and records to verify implementation of procedures and instructions; and monitoring of deviations and nonconformances and directing appropriate I c.

disposition and corrective action as necessary.

Since design reviews were performed during the Byron Station design, it will not I be required that they be performed again except in the case where the design is not duplicated. Selection of materials, parts, equipment, and processes must include the use of valid industry standards and specifications, material and I prototype hardware testing programs, and design reviews.

1.3.3 Design Control Application of replicate and non-replicate design control measures to such aspects of design as reactor physics; seismic, stress, thermal, hydraulic, radiation, and accident analysis; materials compatibility; and accessibility for .

I maintenance, inservice inspection, and repair shall be formulated and presented as written procedures and instructions by cognizant design contractors. The design contractors shall also delineate acceptance criteria for inspections and

)

l tests of structures, systems, and components under their design I responsibili"~es. PSI ensures the adequacy of design control measures and acceptance criteria utilizing the basic methods outlined in Subsection 1.3.2.

l I

Design changes, modifications or new design features of the replicate design shall have design reviews and centrols equivalent to the original lesign.

Design and procurement documents are controlled to assure replicate and -

l g non-replicate identification. In addition, PSI shall review procurement 8pecificati n8 and Safety-re ated 8e ected de8ign utput documents based on E complexity, licensing issues, experience with similar designs, and new regulating requirements, and perform comprehensive design reviews of selected l system interrelationships to further develop confidence in the effectiveness of 5 design control methods. No change is authorized for construction until the design change is approved to assure that designs are kept current with as-built configurations. PSI Project Management Procedures require that approved

,I l

drawings and specifications be updated to incorporate approved changes after a fixed number of changes or a designated time period, whichever is soone:r.

1 I

I 1.3.4 Design Verification and Checking Provisions for verifying or checking design adequacy under the most adverse I

conditions, including the identification of positions or organizations responsible, shall be established by the cognizant design contractors. During review of safety-related suppliers / contractors' written procedures and l instructions, PSI will assure that measures such as design reviews, use of I alternative calculational methods, or qualification testing are prescribed and that the verifying or checking process is performed by authorized individuals or groups other than those who performed the original design or the designer's immediate supervisor. The Quality Assurance Program requires that computer I codes used for design verification and analysis shall be documented and qualified by testing or other calculational means and approved for a particular use prior to use. Audits of contractors ' activities , facilities , and records I and review of selected safety-related design documents by PSI ensure compliance with written procedures for design verification of non-replicate designs and proper inclusion of replicate requirements in design documents.

1.3.5 Design Interface control S&L is responsible for verifying replicate and non-replicate features and I identifying the external design interfaces on Marble Hill Project. Each individual design organization is responsible for controlling interfaces between internal groups and positions.

External design interface control measures include review, approval, release, distribution, collection, and storage of design documents and changes thereto.

Design documents shall also be controlled to prevent inadvertent use of superseded design information. These control measures are prescribed by S&L procedures and instructions, reviewed and approved by PSI, and verified through audit and review of design output documents.

1.3.6 Design Change Control Design changes and field changes for the Marble Hill Project shall be reviewed, I approved, released, and distributed by the design organization responsible for the original design. The cognizant design organization shall utilize written procedures and instructions acceptable to PSI for controlling design changes and I field changes. The PSI Marble Hill Project organization will utilize written procedures for screening, handling, and controlling field change requests. PSI Project Engineering Section will exercise final approval for change requests, design changes, and field changes which affect PSAR commitments or design I

criteria.

The design change process shall be monitored through audit and surveillance of l l design organizations and construction management groups by PSI quality assurance W personnel. Audits and surveillance also ensure that design documents and l l reviews, records, and changes thereto are collected, stored, and maintained in a systematic and controlled manner in accordance with written procedures.

I I

I

I ^

l 1.4 Procurement Document Control (PSI) 1.4.1 Procurement Document Control Non-replicate procurement documents (contracts and specifications) prepared by S&L for the Marble Hill Project shall be reviewed by PSI Project Engineering and Quality Assurance personnel prior to issuance.

Changes to replicate procurement documents shall be given the came review and control ts non-replicate procurement documents, including quality assurance I

review and approval. Methods and responsibilities for the PSI review are prescribed by a PSI Project Management Procedure governing the procurement document review process. A technical review of safety-related specifications by the PSI Project Engineering Section shall ensure that procurement documents contain or reference the following technical requirements:

a. regulatory requirements;

b. components and equipment identification requirements;

c. drawings;

d. specifications;

e. codes a1.3 industrial standards;

f. test and inspection requirements and

g. special process instructions for such activities as welding, heat treating, nondestructive examination, and cleaning.

I A review of safety-related specifications by the PSI Quality Assurance Department shall ensure that procurement documents contain the following:

a. identification of the applicable 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, requirements which must be complied with and described in the supplier's QA program;

b. identification of th'e documentation (e.g., drawings, specifications, I procedures, inspection and as-built drawings, inspection and test records, personnel and p,rocedure qualifications, an<' material, chemical, and physical test results) to be prepared, maintained, and submitted, as applicable, to the purchaser for review and approval;

c. identification of those records which shall be retained, controlled, l maintained, or delivered to the purchaser prior to use or installation of the hardware;

d. requirements for the purchaser's right of access to supplier's facilities and applicable records for source inspection, surveillance, i

I or audit; and

e. provision for supplier reporting and disposition of nonconformances from procurement requirements. 4 l  !

l I

I Procurement documents developed for PSI by Sargent & Lundy for replicate designs I may be accepted af ter review and issuance of a certificate of conformance to replicate criteria by Sargent & Lundy, and where applicable, for financial and legal reviews afforded all procurement documenth. PSI reviews of procurement I documents shall be documented as specified in PSI Project Management Procedures and retained as quality verification records.

l 1.4.2 Procurement Document Control Responsibilities Westinghouse has been delegated control responsibility for preparation, review, approval, and issuance of procurement documents and changes or revisions thereto I associated with the NSSS. Sargent & Lundy has been delegated control responsibility for preparation and review of procurement specifications and changes or revisions thereto associated with the Balance of Plant. PSI will l

approve and issue Sargent & Lundy prepared procurement documents to bidders.

PSI requires S&L and Westinghouse to submit to PSI written quality assurance procedures or instructions governing these activities. PSI reviews and accepts such procedures or instructions in accordance with written PSI review I procedures. The PSI review ensures that the following aspects are included:

Procurement document control responsibilities are clearly delineated.

a.

b. Action sequences for preparation, review, approval, and issuance of procurement documents are specified.

c. Internal reviews of procurement documents are conducted by qualified personnel.

I d. Internal reviews of procurement documents determine that quality requirements are correctly stated, inspectable, and controllable; there are adequate acceptance and rejection criteria; and the document has been prepared in accordance with QA program requirements.

e. Changes or revisions to procurement documents era subject to the same review and approval requirements as the original documents.

The PSI audit program of principal contractors shall be utilized to confirm and _

verify implementation of procedures or instructions accepted by PSI.

1.4.3 Suppliar Requirements The quality assurance specification prepared and issued by PSI to principal I contractors and contractors includes requirements to pass on applicable quality assurance requirements to subtier contractors or suppliers. Therefore, it is incumbent upon contractors to prepare procurement documents for suppliers which l

I require an established and implemented supplier quality assurance program for

. purchased materials, equipment, and services to an extent consistent with their importance to safety. PSI confirms through audits or review that procurement documents include quality assurance program requirements for suppliers.

l l

l

\

I

I PSI evaluates recommendations of suppliers for award of contracts or issuance of I purchase orders. Through routine audits, PSI shall coafirm that S&L and Westinghouse had adequate 1" evaluated the recommended supplier to assure that the supplier can meet the procurement requirements.

PSI shall evaluate the quality assurance program of its contractors prior to award of contracts or issuance of purchase orders. PSI shall also require that its principal contractors and contractors evaluate the quality assurance I programs of their subcontractors to assure these subcontractors meet the PSI quality assurance requirements te wr to award of contracts or pur' chase orders.

I The measures employed by PSI for control of procurement documents as described above are independent of whether the purchase of items, materials, or services is for original equipment or spare or replacement items. Therefore, controls for spares or replacements are equivalent to those used for original equipment.

1.5 Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings (PSI) 1.5.1 Documentation and Implementation Table 1-2 provides a listing of PSI Project Management Procedures which l I prescribe methods and responsibilities for conduct of activities affecting quality in compliance with the 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, criteria. PSI activities include project management, design control, procurement control, construction management, preoperational and startup testing, and quality assurance.

I Responsibility for functional activities affecting quality such as design and engineering, procurement, manufacturing, fabrication, construction, erection, installation, testing, and inspection have been delegated to principal I contractors and subtier contractors. PSI requires each contracting organization to develop an implement written instructions, procedures, or drawings for performance of all quality-related activities, including quality assurance or quality control audits of internal and external functions. Clear delineation of I the sequence of actions to be accomplished in the preparation, review and control of instructions, procedures,.and drawings is provided by PSI Project Management Procedures and is required of all PSI contractors.

I 4

l PSI shall verify the existence and satisfactory implementation of required instructions, procedures, and drawings through its audit and surveillance programs (internal and external).

1.5.2 Acceptance Criteria l

I For activities where specific qualitative or quantitative standards exist, itemized acceptance criteria shall be included in the instructions, procedures, or drawings governing the activity. Inclusion of appropriate acceptance I

criteria shall be assured during review and approval of specifications, procedures, or drawings. Reviewers and approval authorities are designated in applicable PSI Project Management Procedures. l I

I i

I

I 1.6 Document Control (PSI) 1.6.1 Control Procedures I PSI has established Project Management Procedures to ensure that PSI-originated documents such as drawings, procedures, and specifications, including changes thereto, are reviewed for adequacy and approved for release by authorized PSI personnel. These procedures also prescribe methods for distribution and receipt I acknowledgement of document requiring updating at the location where the prescribed activity is performed. PSI Project Management Procedures identify the individual or groups responsible for reviewing and issuing these documents including the approval by the Quality Assurance Manager. l PSI procedures establish requirements for document control which include the following:

a. Documents, and changes thereto, are reviewed prior to release to assure that the quality requirements are sufficiently, clearly, and accurately state, and authorized.

b. Individuals or groups responsible for reviewing, approvng, and issuing documents and revisions thereto are identified.

c. Changes are reviewed and approved by the same individuals whe performed the original review and approval unless other qualified individuals are designated in writing.

d. Approved changes to instructions, procedures, drawings, and other appropriate documents are promptly issued.

e. A document register distributed monthly containing listings of current revisions and changes to all instructions, procedures, specifications, I drawings, and procurement documents is established to' assure that obsolete or superseded documents are purged from the system and not used. Superseded documents which are retained for reference purposes shall be marked or identified as " Superseded".

~

f. Documents are distributed promptly to ensure availability prior to commencement of work for which they are needed.

g. Document copies which are microfilmed and retained for reference purposes shall have their use controlled'by Project Management I Procedures which require controls similar to "e" above, or verification of proper revision against the master status lists and the list of effective pages, if applicable, prior to use in activities

, affecting quality 1.6.2 Review and Approval Documents which are safety-related, and changes thereto, shall be reviewed and l approved by the same organizations who performed the original review and approval unless other qualified organizations are designated in writing to perform these functions. Types of documents which are controlled include:

I I

I Design Documents, such as Design Contractor-Prepared Drawings, Field I a.

Change Requests and Engineering Change Notices.

l I

b. Procurement Specifications.

c. Manufacturing Documents, such as Technical Manuals.

d. Installation-Construction Documents, such as Contractor Procedures.

e. Receiving and Storage Documents, such as Storage Proceduces.

f. Quality Assurance Manuals and Project Management Procedures.

g. Preoperational and Startup Test Records.

h. Test Procedures, and i 1

i. PSAR and related Design Criteria Documents.

PSI requires that principal contractors and suppliers establish procedures for document control which comply with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, and PSI requirements.

I PSI shall review and accept these procedures and subsequencly confirm proper implementation and verify their effectiveness through audit or surveillance or facilities, activities, and records.

1.7 Control of Purchased Material, Equipment, and Services (PSI) 1.7.1 Conformance Assurance PSI assures that material, equipment, and services procured by or for PSI conform to procurement document requirements. Measures empa. ;d by PSI include evaluation and selection of suppliers; surveillance of suppliers' facilities; inspection of procured items at the source of supply or upon receipt; and examination, acceptance, and retention at the plant site of documentary evidence of conformance to procurement requirements. PSI delegates responsibility for implementation of some of these measures to principal contractors or consultants but controls these organizations through review, audit, or surveillance.

PSI has conducted evaluations of the S&L and Westinghouse organizations to I assess their capability to provide acceptable quality services and products.

~

The evaluations were accomplished utilizing PSI management, engineering, and quality assurance personnel. S&L and Westinghouse were judged acceptable based I upon the following:

a. capability to comply with the elements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B;

~

b. historical evidence of providing quality items and services;~ and facilities, personnel, and quality assurance programs capable of I

c.

l meeting design, manufacturing, and quality requirements (based upon l

surveys by PSI).

I I

I I Prior to bid award, Quality Assurance participates in evaluation of the bid, assures there are no unresolved exceptions to quality requirements and that the supplier / contractor has been evaluated for adequacy of its Quality Assurance Program and for Quality Assurance capability. The Quality Assurance Department I maintains an approved supplier and contractor list.

PSI Quality Assurance has overall responsibility for the establishment and direction of the surveillance program of its contractors. PSI may delegate responsibility for performance of surveillances at its contractors facilities to its architect-engineer or other qualified agents. PSI Quality Assurance may select personnel to participate in the surveillance program from other I departments or organizations within PSI based on the experience, background, and qualification of these personnel. S,urveillances of PSI contractors, whether conducted by PSI or its agents, shall be performed by qualified personnel and I conducted in accordance with written procedures to verify compliance with quality requirements.

S&L, Westinghouse, and contractors are responsible for performing surveillance at the subcontractors facilities in accordance with written quality assurance procedures to verify compliance with quality requirements. PSI shall review and accept written quality assurance procedures as well as source surveillance I and test plans of the principal contractors. PSI shall select surveillance and tests for which PSI will accompany principal contractors or contractors during their surveillance af suppliers. PSI also requires the principal contractors and contractors to notify PSI prior to performance of these selected surveillance points. During review and acceptance of surveillance procedures, PSI shall ensure that the procedures provide for:

a. instructions that specify the characteristics or processes to be witnessed, inspected, or verified, and accepted; the method of surveillance and the extent of documentation required; and those responsible for implementing these instructions (including qualification requirements for surveillance personnel); and

b. audits and surveillance which assure that the supplier complies with I all quality requirements. Surveillance should be performed on those items where verification of procurement requirements cannot be verified upon receipt.

Where required, S&L, Westinghouse, and/or designated agents shall provide source inspectors to ensure quality compliance at suppliers' facilities. PSI Quality  ;

Engineering determines the extent to which purchased items will be verified by l

l I PSI at sources. Source Surveillance and Receipt Inspection is conducted by the PSI Inspection Section in accordance with approved plans and checklists.

l l

j Receipt inspections at the construction site shall be performed by the PSI i Inspection Section for material procured by Westinghouse or PSI (owner furnished )

l material) and by the construction contractor for material which is contractor i I

procured. Inspections shall be performed in accordance with written procedures, I

reviewed and accepted by PSI, which include the following provisions:

1

a. Materials, equipment, or components are properly identified and correspond with associated documentation.

I ,

I l

l I b. Specific inspection instructions and acceptance criteria are delineated. l

c. Inspections are performed and materials, equipment, components, and acceptance records are judged acceptable prior to installation or use.

1

d. Inspection records or quality release forms (certificates) of conformance attesting to the acceptance of materials, equipment, and components are completed and made available at the power plant site prior to installation or use.

e. Items accepted or released are' identified as to their inspection status prior to forwarding them to a controlled storage area or releasing them for installation or further work.

f. Nonconforming items are segregated, controlled, and clearly identified until proper disposition is made.

In addition to inspection records or quality release forms completed by the source or receipt inspector, suppliers of items affecting the quality of the nuclear plant sh'all be required to furnish the following records:

a. Quality release forms that specifically identify (e.g., by purchase l order number, specifictions and revisions, component or equipment identification) the purchased material or equipment and the specific procurement requirements (codes, standards, specifications, and revisions) met by the items; and

b. Quality release forms that identify any procurement requirements which j have not been met together with a description of those deviations with -

approved disposition of "use-as-is" or " repair."

These qual'ity rele'ase forms shall be reviewed during receipt inspection by the PSI Quality Assurance Inspection Section. PSI shall insure that the Quality l Release Form review is performed by a qualified individual through review of qualification records and surveillance of receipt activities.

1.7.2 Audits and Surveillance PSI shall verify adherence to procedures and instructions for control of purchased material, equipment and services through audits of principa.1 contractors and selected suppliers and contractors as described in Subsection l 1.18 of this document. l PSI Inspection Section performs surveillance of construction contractors and i subcontractors. This surveillance effort includes the following:

i

! a. frequent surveillance planning meetings between a PSI Inspection l

! Section representative and the construction contractor's QA/QC 1 l supervisors to coordinate and establish common direction in l

" surveillance,

b. assignment of personnel and performance of surveillance, 1

I I l l

0

c. formalized written reporting of surveillance activities and results based on data and' comments recorded during surveillance, (

d. retention of surveillance reports as quality verification records, and

e. controlling deviatfins identified as the result of surveillance and insuring corrective action is implemented.

1.8 Identification and Control of Materials, Parts, and Components VSI requires that principal contractors and contractors identify and control materials, parts, and components in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, and applicable codes and standards, and that these requirements be passed on to subtier contractors or suppliers as appropriate. PSI will maintain cognizance I of and responsibility for the identification process by reviewing and accepting (or designating an agent to do so) contractors' and suppliers' written procedures or instructions governing this activity. The review shall ensure that the following elements are incorporated into procedures 'and instructions:

a. Procedures and instructions govern identification and control of materials, parts, and components including partially fabricated subassemblies,

b. Identification requirements are determined during initial planning stages.

f c. Mechanisms for traceability of identifications of materials and parts to the appropriate documentation (drawings, specifications, purchase orders, manufacturing and test documents, deviation reports, and physical and chemical mill test reports) are delineated.

d. Locations and methods of identification are selected so as not to affect the function or quality of the item.

e. Effective measures for verification of correct identification are prescribed including documentation of verification prior to release for fabrication, assembling, shipping, or installation.

f l f. Consumable materials which impact safety, such as weld filler, metgls, grout, preservatives, coating materials, and certain lubricants are identified, stored and controlled to protect quality.

Pil will verify adherence to procedures and instructions for identification and l control of materials, parts and components through audits of principal contractors, contractors, subcontractors and suppliers of safety-related items as described in Subsection 1.18 of this document.

PSI shall verify adherence to procedures and instructions by construction contractors for identification and control of materials, parts and components through surveillance as described in Subsection 1.7 of this document.

I 1.9 Control of Special Proc.sssa (PSI)

There are certain processes the quality of which cannot be verified by direct inspection of the product. Such proresses have been classified "special processes". PSI requires that the principal contractors and contractors provide controls to assure qualification of procedures and personnel required to perform special processes, including welding, heat treating, painting, electrochemical machining, coating, cleaning and flushing, and nondestructive examination, and that these requirements be passed on to applicable subtier contractors or suppliers. Quality Engineering, based on review of drawings and specifications, is responsible for identifying those processes requiring special controls and the methods for qualifying or certifying equipment, procedures or personnel necessary to their performance.

PSI requires that contractors and suppliers establish measures for the control of special processes, which include the following:

a. Adequate performance and control of special processes such as welding, heat treating, and nondestructive testing. I

b. Procedures, equipment, and personnel connected with special processes are qualified in accordance with codes, standards, and specifications, l or, when necessary, supplementary procedures.

c. Accomplishment of special processes performed by qualified personnel are documented by written process sheets, shop procedures, checklists, travelers, or equivalent, to provide for recording evidence of verification and, if applicable, inspection and process results.

An active file is maintained and kept current on qualification records I

d.

of all special process procedures, equipment, and personnel performing special processes.

PSI will verify adherence to procedures and instructions for control of special processes through audits of principal contractors, contractors and suppliers of safer.y-related items as described in Subsection 1.18 of this document. l PSI will verify adherence to procedures and instructions by construction contractors for control of special processes through surveillance as described in Subsection 1.7 of this document.

l l 1.10 Inspection (PSI) 1.10.1 Inspection Program Inspection programs shall be established and implemented by or for contractors or suppliers performing activities affecting the quality of safety-related products or materials. Inspection methods and responsibilities shall be prescribed by written procedures and instructions within each organization performing these activities. All such procedures and instructions will be reviewed and approved by PSI or a designated principal contractor. The reviews ensure that the following provisions are included:

O I a. Inspection personnel are identified and appropriately qualified in accordance with applicable codes, standards, and company training I programs and are independent of the individual or groups performing the activity being inspected. Except for nondestructive examiners, who are required to be qualified to SNT-TC-1A, inspection and test personnel are required to be trained, qualified and certified to ANSI j N45.2.6-1973.

b. Indirect control by monitoring processing methods, equipment, and )

personnel is used if direct inspection of processed material or products is impossible or disadvantageous.

1

c. Both inspection and process monitoring are used when control is l inadequate without both. I I d. Inspection procedures and instructions are made available with necessary drawings and specifications for use prior to performing inspections. Procedures, instructions, and checklists contain the following: -

1. identification of characteristics to be inspected, I 2. identification of the individuals or groups responsible for performing the inspection operation,

3. acceptance and rejection criteria,

4. a description of the method of inspection,

5. verification of completion and certification of inspection,

6. a record of the results of the inspection operations,

7. specification of inspection methods to achieve the requit=d accuracy.

e. Inspectors' qualifications and certificatio'ns are kept current.

f. Replaced or reworked items are inspected in accordance with appropriate inspection requirements.

g. Modified or repaired items are inspected by methods which are equivalent to the original inspection method.

Receipt inspection of owner furnished materials will be conducted by the PSI Inspection Section.

l l

PSP shall verify adherence to procedures and instructions for inspection through audits of principal contractors, contractors and selected subcontractors and suppliers as described in Subsection 1.18 of the document.

I .

I PSI shall verify adherence to procedures and instructions by construction I contractors for inspection through surveillance as described in Subsection 1.7 of this document.

The PSI Quality Assurance Inspection Section will monitor quality-related I activities of the PSI Marble Hill Project organization and contractors at the Marble Hill site. Schedules of construction, erection, and installation l

activities shall be provided to PSI in advance of performance of these activities. PSI specifies mandatory inspection hold points at significant l points in the process.

Inspection staffing is planned in relation to short and long range schedules that identify manpower needs. In addition, the Superintendent Inspection participates in regular project meetings that address specific schedule and work assignments. Work will not be allowed to proceed that is not adequately staffed by qualified inspectors from the Contractors and PSI.

Contractors shall be required to obtain documentation by PSI or its designated representatives of the witnessing or inspection of hold points or obtain a waiver of the inspection by PSI in order to continue work progress beyond the designated hold point. Any waivers shall be documented by follow-up correspondence.

In a similar manner, Westinghouse is the designated PSI representative for surveillance of NSSS manufacturing and fabrication subcontractors and is responsible for developing systems whereby mandatory inspection hold points are specified. These systems will be reviewed and approved by PSI as well as the resulting hold point / inspection schedule. PSI maintains the option to accompany Westinghouse personnel during witnessing or inspection at predetermined hold or I notification points.

1.11 Test 'ontrol (PSI) 1.11.1 Test Program  !

l The PSI testing program described in Chapter 14.0 of the PSAR governs I preoperational and startup testing activities. Preoperational testing consists of those tests conducted subsequent to construction inspections and tests but prior to fuel loading. Startup testing includes fuel loading tests, precritical l l tests, low power tests (including criticality), and power ascension tests. The M testing program will be administered and controlled by a preoperational test organization reporting to the Licensing Manager and reviewed by a Joint Test Group comprised of PSI Operations, Construction, and Project Engineering as well I as a representative of Westinghouse.

l The formation of the Joint Test Group facilitates control of management and

technical interfaces between PSI Operations, Construction Management, i Engineering Contractors as well as Sargent & Lundy and Westinghouse. The i Station Manager or his designee will be chairman of the Joint Test Group.

l I

I

I I Written test procedu es will be prepared by a preoperational test organization (as described in Chapter 14.0 of the FSAR) and will include purpose, scope, prerequisites, system initial conditions, special precautions, procedures, acceptacce criteria, and reference documents. Plant operational and technical I personnel shall be appropriately qualified and trained as described in Sections 13.1 and 13.2 of Chapter 13.0 of the PSAR.

I PSI preeperational and startup testing activities are governed by documented procedures reviewed and concurred in by the Quality Assurance Department.

1.11.2 Test Procedures PSI test procedures include the following provisions:

I a. Prerequisites - those items of work which must be completed prior to establishing initial conditions for the test, including:

1. calibrated instrumentation;

2. adequate and appropriate equipment;

3. preparation, condition, and completeness of the item to be tested;

4. suitable environmental conditions, if applicable; and

5. data sheets

b. Trained Personnel -- trained, qualified or certified personnel conduct testing.

c. System Initial Conditions -- component / equipment status prior to I active testing.

applicable.

Special environmental conditions are stated if

d. Special Precautions - items needed for safety of personnel or I equipment. Special situations where caution or extraordinary attentiveness to operational circumstances is required.

E e. Procedure Sequence -- steps required by design or procurement g documents to conduct the test, observations to be made, instrumentation and test equipment needed, data to be scorded, nonstandard system conditions, and use of administrative control documents

f. Inspection Hold Points -- mandatory inspection hold points for witness by Quality Assurance Operations Group.

g. Acceptance Criteria -- design or procurement docuuent criteria against which success or failure of the test can be determined.

I h. References -- documents and sources of information used in test preparation indicating effective revision utilized as applicable.

I I 4

I PSI requires principal contractor, contractors and suppliers performing I fabrication and construction testing to develop procedures to conform with these requirements as applicable.

PSI will verify adherence to procedures and instructions for test control through audits of principal contractors and selected contractors and suppliers as described in Subsection 1.18 of this document.

PSI will verify adherence to procedures and instructions by construction contractors for test control through surveillance as described in Subsection 1.7 of this document.

J 1.11.3 Test Results I Written PSI test procedures incorporate test performance and data sheets for recording equipment serial numbers and test results. Data sheets will be distributed to designated data recorders, operators, or supervisors prior to commencement of testing, and personnel will be briefed to ensure all necessary

' I information is properly recorded. When tests have been completed, data sheets will be collected and assembled to form a test records package. Packages will be analyzed and evaluated against pre-established acceptance criteria. l I Additionally, the Joint Test Group will review and concur with test results. As required by individual tests, principal contractors will review results. Final acceptance or rejection of system performance is the responsibility of the I

Station Manager. The complete test package, including the test procedure, completed data sheets, evaluation reports, and final disposition, shall be retained as a quality verification record per PSI Project Management Procedures. l 1.12 'ontrol of Measuring and Test Equipment The PSI quality assurance specification requires that contracting organizations i E performing qual,ity-related activities requiring use of measuring and test g equipment establish measures to assure that tools, gauges, instruments, and other measuring and testing devices are of the proper type, range and accuracy for their application. To assure accuracy, the measuring devices are properly I untrolled, calibrated, and adjusted at specified periods or prior to use.

or its designated agent shall review the resulting procedures or instructions prepared by applicable contractors to v'erify inclusion of the following PSI j provisions:

a. description of the calibration te~chnique, calibration frequency, and

~

maintenance and centrol of all measuring and test instruments, tools, I gauges, fixtures, reference standards, transfer standards and nondestructive test equipment which is to be used in the measurement, inspection, and monitoring of safety-related components, systems, and structures;

b. provisions for unique identification of measuring and test equipment l and for correlation between calibration test data and the equipment to I which it applies; I

~

E

I

c. provisions for determination of calibration frequency requirements for equipment based on the required accurancy, purpose, degree of usage, I stability characteristics, and other conditions affecting the measurements;

d. requirements for use of calibrating standards which have known relationships to nationally recognized standards, or if no national standards exist, the basis for calibration is accurately documented.

The error of the calibration standard must be less than de error of I production measuring and test equipment;

e. provisions for recording and maintaining records indicating the complete status of all items under the calibration system and I

f. provisions for conducting investigations to determine the validity of I previous inspections performed when measuring and test equipment is found to be out of calibration.

I The Superintendent-Inspection has the responsibility for maintaining the calibration program. PSI shall require that measuring and test equipment have an uncertainty (error) of no more than 1/4 of the tolerance of the parameter being measured as established by the functional design requirement: , unless limited by the practical limits of the state of one art. When the uncertainty I. of the measuring and test equipment is exactly equal to 1/4 of the tolerance of the parameter being measured, calibration standards used to calibrate the I measuring and test equipment shall have an uncertainty of no more than 1/4 of the tolerance of the equipment being calibrated, unless limited by the practical limits of the state of the art. When the uncertainty of the measuring and test equipment is less than 1/4 of the tolerance of the parameter being measured, the I following requirements shall apply unless limited by the practical limits of the state of the art:

I a. The combined uncertainty (error) of the measuring and test equipment (M&TE) and calibration standard shall be equal to or less than the total uncertainty which would result from use of M&TE with uncertainty equal to 1/4 of the tolerance of the parameter being measured, and which is calibrated by a standard with an uncertainty equal to 1/4 of that M&TE uncertainty. ,

I b. The uncertainty of the calibration standards shall be equal to or less thant the tolerance of the equipment being calibrated.

PSI shall verify adherence to procedures and instructions for control of measuring and test equipment through audits of principal contractors and selected contractors and suppliers as described in Subsection 1.18 of this document.

I PSI shall verify adherence to procedure and instructions by construction l contractors for control of measuring and test equipment through surveillance as described in Subsection 1.7 of this document.

I I

l8 .

'I

I 1.13 Handling, Storage, and Shipping PSI Project Quality Assurance Manual includes procedures governing the handling and storage of owner furnished materials at 'he construction site. Instructions I will be developed by the PSI Merble Hill Project organization to supplement special procedures and requirements issued by the suppliers and principal contractors.

These instructions will be reviewed by PSI Quality Assurance to assure that the l following provisions are included:

a. Procedures and instructions accurately reflect and comply with design and specification requirements.

b. Special handling, preservation, storage, cleaning, packaging, and I. shipping requirements are delineated.

Activities are accomplished by appropriately trained and experienced I

c.

individuals.

d. Special protective environments such as inert gas atmosphere, specific moisture content levels, and temperature levels are specified when I necessary for particular products.

I PSI has delegated responsibility for specifying handling, storage, shipping, cleaning, and preservation of material and equipment requirements to its principal contractors and contractors. The PSI quality assurance specification governing principal contractors and contractors provides for passing applicable I requirements on to their subcontractors and suppliers as appropriate. In any case, the organization performing handling, storage, or chipping activities shall develop predetermined work and inspection instructions and procedures for I accomplishing these activities. Instructions and procedures so developed by contractors shall be reviewed and accepted by PSI er its designated agent (i.e.,

principal contractors).

I I PSI shall verify adherence to procedures and instructions for handling, storage and shipping through audits of principal contractors, contractors and selected subcontractors and suppliers as decribed in Subsection 1.18 of this documeat.

PSI shall verify adherence to procedures and instructions by construction l

. contractors for handling, storage and shipping through surveillance as described in Subsection 1.7 of this document.

1.14 Inspection, Test, and Operating Status

+

4 I The PSI Quality Assurance Program requires that principal contractors and contractors establish measures to indicate, by use of stamps, tags, labels, routing cards, or other suitable means, the status of inspections and tests performed on structures, systems, or components. These measures provide for the I identification of items which have satisfactorily passed required inspecions and tests, and provisions to preclude inadvertent bypassing of such inspections and tests.

I l l l

L I

9 I

PSI requires that principal cor'ractors and contractors establish measures which include the following:

a. that measures be established and documented to identify the I inspection, test, and operating status of structures, systems, and components throughout manufacturing and installation; I that measures be established to control the use of inspection and I

b.

welding stamps and status indicators including the authority for application and removal of tags, marking, labels, and stamps; ,

. 1 I c. that the bypassing of required inspections, tests, and other critical operations be controlled through documented measures under the cognizance of the QA organization; and j

d. that the status of nonconforming, inoperative, or malfunctioning structures, systems, or components is clearly identified to prevent I inadvertent use.

The written quality assurance procedures or instructions developed by principal contractors or contractors to fulfill the control requirements will be reviewed B and accepted by PSI. The written quality assurance procedures or instructions g developed by contractors shall be reviewed and accepted by PSI or PSI's designated representative (i.e., principal contractors).

! l PSI shall verify adherence to procedures and instructions for control of M inspection, test and operating status through audits of principal contractors, contractors and selected subcontractors and suppliers as described in Subsection 1.18 of this document.

I PSI shall verify adherence to procedures and instructions by construction I contractors for control of inspection, test and operating status through surveillance as described in Subsection 1.7 of this document.

PSI is responsible for identifying and controlli'ig the test and operating status I of systems and components under preoperational and startup testing. PSI,will establish procedures for tagging systems under test to indicate custody and operating status. Tags shall be utilized to prevent incorrect or inadvertent operation of equipment under test and to prevent damage to equipment or danger l l

to personnel. Application anJ removal of tags shall be strictly controlled ,

, through utilization of tag control logs, designation of individuals authorized I l to apply or remove tags, and use of signatures to indicate responsibility for l g actions. Surveillance of testing activities by PSI Quality Assurance Operations l E croup to control bypassing of tests or critical operations will be performed in i accordance with PSI Project -Management Procedures. I 1.15 Nonconforming Materials, Parts, or Components During the design / procurement / construction phase of the Marble Hill Project, I nonconformances in materials, parts, or components may be discovered through review, inspection or testing during manufacture or fabrication, or through functional testing. The PSI Quality Assurance Program provides for control of I I .

I .

I I nonconforming items discovered by PSI. The following provisions are necessary for acceptance of principal contractor and contractor quality assurance programs by PSI:

a. Control of the identification, documentation, segregation, review, disposition, and notification of affected organization of nonconformance of materials, parts, components, or services.

I b. Documentation identifies the nonconforming items; describes the nonconformance, the disposition of the nonconformance, and the '

l inspection used to uncover the nonconformance; and include signature I approval of the disposition.

l

c. Identification of the responsible individual for determining and approving the disposition of nonconforming items.

d. Acceptability of rework / repair of items is verified by reinspecting I the item as originally inspected or by a method which is at least equal to the original inspection method and that rework and repair inspection procedures are documented.

1

e. Interface nonconformances concerning departures from design j specifications, and drawing requirements which are dispositioned '

"use-as-is" and " repair," are formally reported to PSI.

f. The nonconformance reports dispositioned "use-as-is" or " repair" are made part of the inspection records and forwarded with the hardware to the construction site.

I g. Periodic analysis of these reports is performed and forwarded to management to show quality trends.

h. Provisions for passing the nonconformance control requirements on to subtier contractors.

Methods prescribed by PSI to implement these provisions include tagging or marking of nonconforming items; physical separation of items to prevent inadvertent use ; nonconformance reporting, review, and disposition procedures ;

I maintenance of status logs to ensure complete followup on each nonconformance; review and approval of dispositions and corrective actions effected by contractors; and detailed cause-and-effect analysis where necessary to preclude I

recurrence. During review of dispositions and corrective actions, PSI shall assure that:

r

a. Applicable requirements and interfacing items are reviewed.

b. Determination is made whether the problem is an isolated case or a symptom of more far-reaching problems.

c. Applicable portions of the QA Program are reviewed to determine if upgrading is required to preclude recurrence.

I I

I

E I d. Cause of problems are determined and appropriate preventive measures are proposed.

In addition to imposing requirements on contractors, PSI ensures procedural compliance by reviewing and approving principal contractors' nonconformance I~ control procedures or instructions.

PSI shall verify adherence to procedures and instructions for control of I nonconforming materisl, parts or components through audits of principal contractors, contractors and selected subcontractors and suppliers as described in Subsection 1.18 of this document.

PSI shall verify adherence to procedures and instructions by construction contractors for control of nonconforming material, parts or components through surveillance as described in Subsection 1.7 of this document.

1.15.1 Identification of Construction Deficiencies by PSI

a. Construction deficiencies representing departures from design requirements that are detected by PSI Quality Assurance personnel performing inspections on items in PSI custody (i.e., first line inspections) shall be documented on a Nonconformance Report.

b. Construction deficiencies representing departures from design

, g requirements that are detected by PSI personnel performing I

E surveillance in89ection8 (i e not fir 8C line in8pection) shall be documented on a Corrective Action Request.

I c. Deficiencies that are of a programmatic nature which have been detected either by inspections, surveillances, or audits shall be documented on a Corrective Action Request.

d. Where conflicts occur between drawings, specifications, standards and procedures, the conflict and recommended action shall be documented by PSI or contractor's personnel on a Field Change Request.

e. The responsibilities and methods to be used by PSI personnel to identify and document deficiencies and conflicts on technical g requirements are defined in the PSI Marble Hill Project Quality  ;

Assurance Manual.

.E

f. The contractors' quality assurance programs are being revised to standardize forms and methods for identifying deficiencies and conflicts as much as practicable.

1 I 1.15.2.

a.

Evaluations of Construction Deficiencies and 'onflicts Nonconformance Reports and Corrective Action Requests shall be I

initially evaluated by the cognizant PSI Superintendent Quality I Engineering to verify information recorded and to determine if the deficiency is a " Potential NRC Reportable Item". If it is a I

I I

t I " Potential NRC Reportable Item", it is submitted to the Marble Hill Safety Review Committee for evaluation and subsequent reporting, if applicable.

b. Evaluation and disposition of PSI Nonconformance Reports shall be done by the PSI Project Engineering Manager and approved by the Manager Quality Engineering and the architect-engineer if the disposition is

" Repair" or "Use-As-Is".

c. The PSI Quality Assurance Manager is responsible for evaluation and followup for Corrective Action Requests that are written as a result of repetitive deficiencies, lack of response to previous Corrective I Action Requests, or for problems that cannot be resolved at the PSI Manager Quality Engineering level.

The PSI Manager Quality Engineering is responsible for evaluation and resolution on all other Corrective Action Requests.

d. Field Change Requests are evaluated and approved by the same design organization that approved the original document (s) which the Field Change Request af fects.

In addition, Engineering Change Notices may be used by the design organization to make changes to drawings and specifications,

e. The responsibilities and methods for evaluation of construction deficiencies and conflicts is delegated and defined in the PSI Project

Quality Assurance Manual.

f. The upgrad :d staff, the relocation of the project staff to the site to improve communication among the project groups, and the intensified I training program being implemented, along with the programmatic controls described above, will provide more timely identification of problems in the future.

1.15.3. Processing of Nonconformance Reports, Corrective Action Requests, and Field Change Requests I a. Project Management Procedures provide time limits and flow paths for the evaluation and disposition of Nonconformance Reports and Corrective Action Requests.

b. Provisions have been made in the administrative procedures to provide timely evaluation and resolution of Nonconformance Reports, Corrective l Action Requests, and Field Change Requests. These provisions are i briefly described as follows: ,

(1) The number of forms to be used for reporting nonconformin'g conditions and for obtaining approval for design changes has l

I been reduced, and the use of these systems simplified. To the maximum extent possible, these standardized forms and procedures have been established to be used by PSI and the site contractors l

I

t to avoid confusion and dual reporting that had occurred I* previously.

(2) As part of the computertzed tracking and trending program, ten I (10) day and thirty (30) day overdue reports will be used, sorted by responsible organization, on outstanding Nonconformance Remrts and Corrective Action Requests. These reports will provide visibility to the appropriate levels of I management to take necessary action to maintain timely evaluation and disposition.

1.16 Corrective Action 1.16.1 Identification of Adverse Conditions

~onditions adverse to quality may be identified through PSI review of documents, conduct of surveillance, performance of audits, and conduct of preoperational and startup testing. Failures , malfunctions , deficiencies , deviations ,

I defective materials and equipment, and nonconformances identified by PSI shall be documented on PSI deviation control records by the cognizant PSI reviewer, auditor, or inspector. PSI informs the principle contractors and contractors of I conditions adverse to quality and requires these conditions be controlled in accordance with Subsection 1.15.

1.16.2 Corrective Action PSI requires the responsible individual, grou'p, or organization to reply to PSI-identified nonconformance by submitting proposed dispositions and corrective actions to PSI for approval. PSI shall review and evaluate the reply in I. accordance with written procedures to confirm that the cause(s) of the condition has been determined and that appropriate corrective action is planned. PSI may I elect to require more comprehensive corrective action if deemed appropriate.

Subsequent to approval of PSI proposed dispositions and corrective actions, PSI shall be notified of completion of the disposition action and corrective action carried out by the responsible organization, and the date corrective action was placed in effect. PSI Quality Assurance shall maintain logs indicating the current status of each documented nonconformance identified by PSI to ensure initiation of prompt corrective action to preclude recurrence. PSI Quality I Assurance shall include reviews of corrective actions during audit or surveillance of the responsible organization's facilities. Summary reports of the status of deviation dispositions and corrective actions are contained in the monthly activity report to the Vice President-Electric System and Quality Assurance Review Committee.

1.16.2.1 System for Assuring Management Awareness of Problem

a. A program nas been established for recording and tracking trends on quality problems identified on Nonconformance Reports and Corrective Action Requests. The PSI Quality Assurance Manager shall conduct a I trend analysis review of nonconformances and deficiencies of PSI and its contractors. The Quality Assurance Manager is responsible to take actions to resolve unsatisfactory quality trends.

1 I I ,

t .

In addition, the Quality Assurance Manager is responsible to report the results of his review to the Vice President-Electric System in writing. This report is also reviewed by the corporate Quality Assurance Review Committee.

b. Involvement of senior PSI management in site problems and input into correction of those problems occurs in two ways.

Monthly site progress meetings have been instituted and are now being held. Attendance includes key site personnel, such as the Project Director and the Construction, Quality Assurance, Project Control, and I Project Engineering Managers or their delegates, and the Chief Executive Officer and Vice President-Electric System of PSI. These meetings are intended to provide both a project status to corporate management and to obtain management direction and solution of site I problems.

Site problems or action items are identified to management on a status I list and reviewed at the meeting. This list typically includes such items as staffing progress, development of programmatic controls, or site problems requiring management review or input. This list is I revised using management input subsequent to each meeting; items which are not dispositioned are carried forward to future meetings.

I The responsibility for the Quality Assurance Program rests with the Vice President-Electric System, who is accountable to the President.

There is a need, however, to disseminate important information relative to the necessity for and effectiveness of the Quality Assurance Program to other areas of corporate management. Therefore, the Quality Assurance Review Committee has been reatructured and is chaired by the Vice President-Electric System. The Committee will not l set policy or initiate action since these responsibilities are clearly 5 delegated to the respective line organizations as defined in the Project Quality Assurance Manual. This Committee will meet no less frequently than every two months and more often as project activities I 1.16.2.2 require.

Description of System to Halt Construction 1.16.2.2.1 System for PSI to Halt Construction PSI Quality Assurance surveillance, inspection, and audit personnel I

a.

are authorized and assigned the responsibility to stop further processing of unacceptable items or materials by its suppliers and j contractors.

l' The PSI Quality Assurance surveillance, inspection, and audit l

' personnel are responsible for notifying cognizant PSI personnel, the organization being stopped, and are responsible for documenting th'e unacceptable condition.

I I

I .

E I b. The PSI Quality Assurs.nce Kanager is fully authorized to stop work of any PSI, contractor, or supplier organization which, in his judgment, must be stopped to correct poor quality trends or performance.

This Stop Work authority is of a broader scope than stopping a single process and may include such things as all design activities of an organization, all installation activities of a contractor, or all fabrication or processing of PSI purchased materials or items.

Upon receipt of the Stop Work order, the PSI Project Director is required to take those actions necessary to assure that the work is stopped

.I j

promptly.

j If the activity is ASME Code related, the PSI Quality Assurance Manager shall notify the Authorized Nuclear Inspector.

1.16.2.2.2 Contractor's Systems to Halt Construction

a. To provide assurance that unacceptable work is stopped, qualified PSI Quality Assurance personnel are reviewing the quality assurance programs of site contractors to determine if adequate authority, responsibility I and systems are delegated and defined to the contractor's quality assurance personnel, and are acceptable. The criteria used in this review shall be in consonance with the authorities, responsibilities and methods to be used by PSI, i.e. that the contractor's quality assurance I personnel have full authority and responsibility to stop unacceptable work, either of a regular item or process nature, or in a broader sense such as stopping all quality related activities of a contractor as a I result of unacceptable conditions or quality trends; and that the methods for notification and documenting the stop work are clearly defined.

I b. Where the contractors' quality assurance programs are found to be B inadequate as a result of this PSI review, the programs are to be revised to an acceptable condition prior to start or restart of activities by that contractor.

1.16.2.3 System for Defining Unacceptable Work I a. The criteria for defining acceptable work is established by engineering drawings, design specifications, and applicable codes and standards.

Process controls established in approved work procedures necessary to meet the requirements of the engineering drawings and specifications are I also criteria for defining acceptable and unacceptable work.

Criteria for defining acceptable programmatic administrative controls are I defined by codes, Federal regulations, ANSI standard, and regulatory guides.

I

I I

I

lI t

l b. Inspection procedures and instructions are to be used by PSI Quality ll5 Assurance personnel when conducting surveillance and inspections. As

! a minimum, these procedures and instructions shall contain: (a) g identification of characteristics to be inspected, (b) accept / reject l5 criteria, (c) individuals or groups responsible for the inspection, (d) method of inspection, (e) verification and certification of inspection and, (f) provision for re.ccrding the results of the inspections.

Quality Assurance personnel are required to determine acceptable / unacceptable work based upon the accept / reject criteria I established by the Engineering drawings, design specification applicable codes and standards, and are not authorized to permit deviations from these criteria. Where conflicts occur between these criteria documents or in interpretation of the criteria, these l

e conflicts are to be documented on a Field Change Request and resolved by the cognizant design organization.

c. Work control procedures and inspection procedures and instructions are l

to be prepared by and used by PSI contractors in performance of their construction and inspection activities. These work control procedures I and inspection procedures are to be reviewed and approved by PSI Quality Assurance for assurance that qualitative and quantitative accept / reject criteria are adequately defined.

d. PSI and contractors' procedures and instructions which had been approved by PSI Quality Assurance prior to the Confirming Order will

! be reviewed again and revised as necessary to assure that these documents contain the necessary accept / reject criteria and meet the requirements of the PSI Project Quality Assurance Manual prior to resumption of each type of activity by PSI and the contractors.

e. Pre-planning meetings will be scheduled prior to start of critical or new types of construction activity to review the construction procedures and accept / reject criteria. PSI Construction Management and contractor management are attendees at these meetings. These I meetings will resolve procedural conflicts and differences in interpretation of accept / reject criteria prior to commencement of the l , work.

1.16.2.4 Training To provide assurance that the responsibility to exercise stop work authority l when unacceptable conditions are observed and to assure the proper understanding and interpretation of the accept / reject criteria, training programs will be I initiated to train construction and inspection personnel. The training program for the Marble Hill Projec.. is described in Section 1.2.5 of this report.

1 I

l I I I

1 l

I 1.17 Quality Assurance Records (PSI) 1.17.1 Records Maintenance I The Manager Quality Engineering is responsible for the designation of quality assurance records to be retained. Project quality assurance records retention is an assigned responsibility of the Superintendent Quality Systems. The records system is primarily based on the retention and availability of I microfiche copies at the site and at PSI General Headquarters. In addition, except for radiographs, hard copies of most records are maintained at the site.

Radiographs will be stored in a fireproof facility at the General Headquarters location until facilities with similar capabilities are available at the site.

PSI has established Project Management Procedures for control of quality l I verification records and storage of these records at PSI General Headquarters and at the Marble Hill Station site. These procedures were developed utilizing ANSI N45.2.9 for guidance and the PSI procedures comply with its requirements.

The PSI quality assurance procedures specify documents to be retained as quality I verification records. The following is a list of the types of documents to be retained:

a. operating logs;

b. results of reviews, inspections, tests, audits, and material analyses;

c. monitoring of work performance;

d. qualification of personnel, procedures, and equipment;

e. drawings;

f. specifications;

g. procurement documents;

h. calibration procedures and reports ; and

i. Nonconformance reports dispositioned "use-as-is" or " repair".

Requirements for submission of required records from principal contractors, contractors, and suppliers shall be included in quality assurance specitications which are part of the contract or procurement documents. Requirements for

,I record submission, retention, and maintenance subsequent to completion of work shall be consistent with applicable codes and standards. Where the code i requires record retention by the supplier for stated periods, the PSI Quality l3 Assurance Manager shall assure that required verification records are obtained, maintained and retained in accordance with requirements of ANSI N45.2.9.

l5 I

The content and completeness of quality records will be the responsibility of I

I the originating individual, group, or organization. Content requirements for PSI-originated records are specified by the applicable PSI Project Management Procedure. PSI shall ensure compliance with content requirements from principal l

'I

, I

I I contractors, contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers through review and acceptance of procedures and instructions covering the generation of documents which will be retained as quality verification records. Basic content requirements of inspection and test records applicable to all organizations are k

o as follows:

a. a description of the type of observation;

b. evidence of completing and s icifying a manufacturing, inspection, or test operation;

c. the date and results of the inspection or test;

d. information related to nonconformances;

e. inspector or data recorder identification;

f. a statement as to the acceptability of the results and

g. records shall provide sufficient information to permit identification of the record with the item (s) or -tivity to which it applies.

1.17.2 Retrievability g PSI will establish a system for filing quality verification records so as to (g preserve their identity and ensure retrievability at a future date. Computer l

coding may be used to assign unique numbers to each record and allow for rapid reference to records in storage. The filing system will be used for all quality I verification records retained by PSI at the Company General Headquarters and at the Marble Hill Station site.

1.17.3 Storage Facilities Methods for receipt, screening, classification, and storage of PSI quality records are prescribed by written procedures. In addition, idelines for I establishing permanent storage facilities and the associate ecurity system are also provided in these procedures. ANSI N45.2.9 formed the tramework of these procedures and facilities will be established in compliance with its I requirements. Records w#11 be maintained at the Marble Hill Site. Except for radiographs, microfiche copies are also maintained at PSI's headquarters.

Stringent measures will be taken to assure adequate protection of records.

1.18 Audits 1.18.1 PSI Audit Program PSI utilizes a comprehensive system of planned and periodic audits to verify all aspects of tha PSI C aality Assurance Program and assess its effectiveness.

l g Audits of facilities records, and activities affecting the quality of g safety-related items tre c % ucted by PSI Quality Assurance personnnel, consultants retained :o -.s s is t in auditing, or other recognized and designated PSI representatives appropriate. Organizations performing activities af fecting quality sula .:ct to audit directly by PSI include the following:

I I .

l I

a. PSI project, construction, operations, or support organizations;

b. S&L organizations, groups, or individuals:

c. Westinghouse organizations, groups, or individuals (including all support divisions);

d. PSI co tractors;

e. selected subtier contractors;

f. construction contractors; and

g. PSI consultants The Project Quality Assurance Manual includes procedures governing the following aspects of the audit system:

a. scheduling and planning of audits ;

b. performance of audits;

c. audit follow-up; and

d. training, qualification, and certification.

PSI audit planning entails identifications of all activities affecting the quality of safety-related structures, systems, and components during design, I procurement, manufacturing, construction and installation, inspection, and testing. The following activities are included as a minimum:

I a. the determination of site features which affect plant safety (e.g.,

core sampling, site preparation, and metrology);

b. the preparation, review, approval, and control of the PSAR, design criteria, specificationes, procurement documents, instructions, procedures and drawings; ,

c. request for proposals and evaluation of bids; I

d. indoctrination and training programs; and

e. other applicable 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, criteria.

1 l Planning also identifies the organizations, disciplines, and work groups performing each activity. Audit scheduling utilizes work schedules provided by the various organizations to determine the necessary points in the work process l for auditing to be accomplished. Criteria for determining dates and frequency l of audits are as follows:

i

a. Quality related activities shall be audited at least once within the lI lifetime of the activity. ,

i I

i 1

1

,g b. Audits shall be initiated early enough to assure effective quality l3 l

assurance during the activity.

c. Audits shall be conducted at least annually for activities with lifetimes longer than 1 year. l I  !

1

d. Re-audits shall be promptly scheduled to verify ' corrective actions. i

! The PSI procedure for conduct of audits prescribes methods and responsibilities for selection of an audit team which is free of direct responsibility for

g activities to be audited; notification of the organization to be audited; l g oriantation of the audit team; praparation, review, and approval of individual

audit plans and detailed checklists; conduct of the audit, including evaluation

! of work areas, activities, processes, and items, and the review of documents and I records, processes, and items, and the review of documents and records, review of audit results with cognizant management; and preparation and submission of the audit report. Individual audit checklists are prepared to ensure that an objective evaluation is conducted of quality-related practices, procedures, and I instructions; of the effectiveness of implementation; and of the conformance with policy directives.

I Audit follow-up measures include communication with responsible management of the audited organization to resolve difficulties and assure timely response to the audit report, review and approval of proposed corrective actions for cited nonconformances, communication with the audited organization to resolve I difficulties regarding implementation of corrective measures and to keep abreast of progress in corrective action, and scheduling re-audits as appropriate to verify the ef fectiveness of corrective actions. An Audit Control Log is utilized to assist in maintaining current status of follow-up activities.

The PSI training and qualification procedures delineates requirements to assure l

I adequate training and qualification of audit team members. Audit team leaders are trained in accordance with ANSI N45.2.12 and qualified in accordance with ANSI N45.2.23.

l Quality trends evidenced by audit data are analyzed and presented to ?SI l executive management as described in Subsection 1.2.8. -

t lI l

l lI I

I I

I

W M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M PRESIDENT AND

. CllIEF EXECUTIVE

, OFFICER-I VICE PRESIDENT SENIOR VICE ELECTRIC PRESIDENT SYSTEM FINANCE I l l VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT POWER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING DIRECTOR TEST PROJECT PROJECT QUALITY LICENSING DIRECTOR POWER AND STARTUP PERSONNEL PRODUCTION ENGINEER DIRECTOR MANAGER MANAGER PURCllASING DIRECTOR I

NUCLEAR TRAINING OPERATIONS MANAGER MANAGER NUCLEAR SAFETY & FIRE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT PROJECT FUELS PREVENTION PROJECT CONTROL ENGINEERING MANAGER COORDINATOR MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER ADMINISTRATOR i

l WERAll MARBLE 11111 l PUBLIC E EG M IMTIm l SERVIC$

j -

INDIANA FIGURE 1-1 AS OF 4-80 i

M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M PROJECT ENGINEERING MGR.

PRINCIPAL ENGINEER STAFF SPECIAL PROCESSES ASSISTANT NUCLEAR DESIGN SARGENT & LUNDY NUCLEAR SAFETY & PROJECT ENGR'G. MATERIAL ENGINEERING LICS'G MANAGER ADMINISTRATOR PROCUREMENT MGR.

MANAGER CHIEF MECHANICAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL PROCUREMENT NUCLEAR PROCUREMENT ELECTRICAL PROCUREMENT i SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR . SUPERVISOR CHIEF ELECTRICAL ENGINEER i

I I I STRUCTURAL ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL CHIEF CIVIL

' ENGINEER PRCUECT ENGIKERING SPECIAL PROJECTS PUBLIC GUNII2dlIdl MANAGER SERVICE INDIANA FIGURE l-2 AS OF 4-80 f

. M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CONSTRUCTION STAFF MANAGER INSTRUMENTATION CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANT SYSTEMS AND RESIDENT CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION TURNOVER CONTROL MANAGER MANAGER ENGINEER MANAGER

_ MANAGER AREA CONSTRUCTION AREA CONSTRUCTION AREA CONSTRUCTION AREA CONSTRUCTION MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER TURBINE BLDG. AUXILIARY BLDG. REACTOR BLDG. GEN. FACILITIES 1

f l

l PROJECT CWSMETIm l

PUBLIC ORGANIZATIm

,- SERVICE l lNDIANA FIGURE l-3 AS OF 4-80 i

i e i

l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ --

M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 4

PROJECT CONTROL MANAGER MCR. PLANNING, MATERIAL MANAGEMENT AREA CONTROL SCHED., & COST MGR.

SUPV. STORAGE SUPV. MANAGEMENT SUPERVISOR & MAINTENANCE INFORMATION DATA MANAGDIENT SUPERVISOR PROJECT PLANNING CONSTRUCTION AND SCl!EDULING STOREKEEPER SUPERVISOR PROJECT COST l

PRajECT l CONTROL

, PUBLic ORGlWIZATIQi sesvice INDIANA FIGURE l-4 AS OF 4-80

M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M

- PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR STENO-CLERK STENO-CLERK I I NUCLEAR PROJECT HAINTENANCE ACCOUNTING ADMINISTRATOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR ANALYST BUILDINGS NUCLEAR NUCLEAR WORD CONSTRUCTION --

CONSTRUCTION CLERK - - --

1 OM PROCESSING ANALYST ANALYST SENIOR SENIOR PROJECT ACCOUNTING - -

ACCOUNTING OFFICE ASSISTANT ASSISTANT ASSISTANT SENIOR SENIOR ACCOUNTING - -

ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT ASSISTANT CLERKS - -

CLERKS SENIOR ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT PRajECT ADMINISTRATIW PUBLic WGANIZATIm SERVICE INDIANA FIGURE 1-5 AS OF 4-80

m ,e m m m m m m m m m m m M e m M QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGER l I SUPERINTENDENT MANAGER QUALITY SUPERINTENDENT INSPECTION ENGINEERING QUALITY SYSTEMS SOURCE QUALITY INSPECTION SUPERINTENDENT ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDENT MECHANICAL ASSURANCE SUPERVISOR QUALITY ENGINEERING QUALITY ENGINEERING SU E I OR RECEIPT QUALITY INSPECTION . -

SUPERVISOR 0 ONS' PUPERVISOR SUPT. WELDING /NDE _. __ SUPERINTENDENT CIVIL QUALITY ENGINEERING QUALITY ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM INSPECTION SUPPORT SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPT. PROCURDfENT ._

QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT COORDINATOR i

PIUJECT WALITY ASSUPME ORGMIZATim PUBLIC  ;;

SERVICE INDIANA FIGURE 1- 6 AS OF 4-80

I TABLE 1-1 l

i I QUALITl ASSURANCE MANUAL COMPLIANCE WITH 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX B Quality Assurance Manual Sections 10 CFR 50, Appendix B Criterion I PQAM, AQAM i i Table of Contents ii Glossary of Definitions & Abbreviations l

Sec. 1.0 Sec. 1.0 Organization I Sec. 2.0 Sec. 2.0 9': lity Assurance Program II E Sec. 3.0 Sec. 3.0 Design Centrol III Sec. 4.0 Sec. 4.0 Procurement Document Control IV Sec. 5.0 Sec. 5.0 Instructions, Procedures and Drawings V Sec. 6.0 Sec. 6.0 Document Control VI Sec. 7". 0 -

Sec. 7.0 Control of Purchased Material VII Sec. 8.0 Sec. 8.0 Identification and Control of Items and Material VIII

, Sec. 9.0 Sec. 9.0 control of Special Processes IX Sec. 10.0 Sec. 10.0 Inspection X Sec. 11.0 Sec . 11.0 Test XI Sec. 12.0 Sec. 12.0 Control of Measuring and Test I Sec. 13.0 Sec. 13.0 Equipment Handling, Storage and Housekeeping XII XIII l Sec. 14.0 Sec. 14.0 Inspection, Test and Operating ' Status XIV 1

l Sec. 15.0 Sec. 15.0 Nonconforming Materials and Items XV Sde. 16.0 Sec. 16.0 Corrective Action XVI Sec. 17.0 Sec. 17.0 Records XVII Sec. 18.0 Sec. 18.0 Audits XVIII Sec. 19.0 Authorized Nuclear Inspection iii Exhibits I

I -

_ l I TABLE 1-2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE CORRELATION WITH 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX B I

I SECTION NO.

PMP NO. SECTION/PMP TITLE 10 CFR 50, APP.B CRITERION 1.0 GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 1.00 Organization and Responsibilities I 1.01 Preparation and Control of Project Project Management Procedu re s II, V 1.02 Project Correspondence 1.03 Project Files XVII 1.04 Training II 1.05 Project Directives V 1.06 Project Action Plan 1.07 Nonconformance Control XV, VIII 1.08 Security 1.09 Safety and Fire Protection Surveillance 2.0 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES 2.00 Organization and Responsibilities I 2.01 Coordination of Contractor's Activities l

lI 2.02 2.03 Construction Housekeeping Review of Contractor-Prepared Procedures V j 2.04 Field Design Change Control III 2.05 Construction Status Reporting 2.06 Halting Construction Processes XVI 2.07 Constmetion Contract Documents IV 2.08 Award of Construction Contracts VII lg 2.09 Contractor Performance and Reporting VII 1g 2.10 Contract Payments

l

I TABLE 1-2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE CORRELATION WITH 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX B I I l

SECTION PMP 10 CFR 50, APP.B l No. NO. SECTION/PMP TITLE CRITERION '

2.11 IV I

Construction Contract Changes 2.12 Contractor Relationships j I

2.13 Construction Acceptance of Systems and Structures X, XI 3.0 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE 3.00 Organication and Responsibilities I 3.01 Qualification and Certification of Quality Assurance Personnel II 3.02 Supplier and Contractor Qualification VII 3.03 Control of Quality Assurance Correspondence VI 3.04 Handling of NRC Inspection Reports VI 3.05 Control of Inspection / Surveillance Plans X, XI 3.06 Supplier Inspection and Surveillance ,

X 3.07 Receipt Inspection X, VII, VIII I 3.08 Site Construction Inspection and Surveillance X 3.09 Review and Approval of Supplier Procedures V 3.10 Stop Wotic Order XVI I 3.11 Project Quality Trending and Corrective Action XVI

. 3.12 Quality Verification Records XVII 3.13 Audits XVIII 1 I 3.14 Control of PSI Measuring and Test Equipment XII l

I

~

g -2 I l

I TABLE 1-2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE CORRELATION WITH 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX B SECTION PMP 10 CFR 50, APP.B NO. NO. SECTION/PMP TITLE CRITERION 3.15 Control and Use of Code Symbols 3.16 Qualification and Certification of NDE Personnel IX 3.17 A.I.A. Interfaces 3.18 File Control and Maintenance of PDPs and CDPs VI 3.19 Quality Assurance Training II 3.20 Follow-up Action on NCRs and CARS XVI I 4.0 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURES 4.00 Organization and Responsibilities I t

4. 01 Word Processing 4.02 Processing of Invoices 4.03 Extra Work Authorizations IV 4.04 Request for Local Purchases IV 5.0 PROJECT ENGINEERING i

5.00 Organization and Responsibilities I -

i 5.01 Design Control I :I 5.02 Document Control VI 5.03 Preparation and Control of Procurement Documents IV 5.04 Administration of Procurement Contracts IV, VII 5.03 Design Activities "N"-Certificate Holder III I

5.06 Design Ac tivities As An Owner III l

I 5.07 Preparation and Review of Certified Design Specifications III j

l l

l g

+-

I TABLE 1-2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE CORRELATION WITH 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX B SECTION PMP 10 CFR 50, APP.B NO. NO. SECTION/PMP TITLE CRITERION I 5.08 Preparation, Review and Approval of Design Reports III 5.09 Engineering Action Item Tracking III, XV, XVI 5.10 Review of NRC Inspection and Enforcement Bulletins II 5.11 Preparation and Revision of the FSAR II 5.12 Project Engineering Status Reporting 5.13 Field Job Orders IV 5.14 Preparation of the Environmental Report 5.15 Engineering Disposition of Nonconformance Repo rts XV 5.16 Special Process Procedures 5.17 Technical Manual Review 6.0 PROJECT CONTROLS PROCEDURES 6.00 Organization and Responsibilities II 6.01 Material Management Program XIII 6.02 Receiving of PSI-Purchased Material VII l l 6.03 Storage, Handling and Maintenance of l 3 PSI Stored Material XIII 6.04 Unassigned 6.05 Material Management Information System XIII .

1 6.06 Project Planning and Scheduling 6.07 Contractor Planning and Scheduling II 1

I I .

I TABLE 1-2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE CORRELATION WITH 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX B l

SECTION PMP 10 CFR 50, APP.B l

NO. NO. SECTION/PMP TITLE CRITERION 6.08 Area Controls Support 6.09 Budget Preparation and Forecasting 6.10 Cash Flow 6.11 Change Ortier Estimating 6.12 Data Entry 6.13 Final Cost Report 7.0 CONSTRUCTION TEST 7.00 Organization and Responsibilities II 7.01 System Turnover X 7.02 Area Turnover X 7.03 Master Punch List XV 7.04 Control of Construction Test Procedures VI 7.05 Test Execution and Completion XI 7.06 Construction Work Request IV 7.07 Scoping 7.08 Construction Test and beartup Plans XI 7.09 Construction Test Schedules and Reports XI 7.10 Test Instrument Calibration and Control XII 7.11 System Cleanliness IX 7.12 Qualification of Construction Test Personnel II I

I l l 1

____..____l

W TABLE l-2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE CORRELATION WITH 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX B SECTION PMP 10 CFR 50, APP.B NO. NO. SECTION/PMP TITLE CRITERION 7.13 Hold, Caution, and Test Status Tagging XIV, VIII 7.14 Quality Assurance During Construction Testing XI 7.15 Control of Systems During Construction Testing XI, VIII, XIV 7.16 Coordination of Vendor Serviceman VII 7.17 Control of Jumpers and Lifted Leads XIV I

I I

I . . .

i;.-l4- .

4

\g , PUBLIC SERVIC2 INDIANA MARBLE HILL NUCLFAR GENERATING STATION I( UNITS 1 & 2 PROJECT NO'S. 4808/4923 Clasilficatidn Criteria of Structures, Systems and Components CC-ME-01-MH l 2 ?Y Prepared by

/ Da'te -

R. J.,Suslick, Project Manager I 'Ra%)aWk Approved by i/ehr Date I P. L. Wattelet, Mechanical Project Engineer

, l. .  % Lev /k /I Approved by 'v l / /Date i C. M.- Chiappetta, ,

Senior Electrical Project Engineer gu l l0 W -

' Approved by ,

Date I G. A. Chauvin, Senior Structural Project Engineer

[ f Authorized by Date R. J. Suslick, Project Manager ISSUE

SUMMARY

Revision Reason Prepar'ed Approved Authorized

, Number Date For Issue by by by 0 1/8/75 Replace .[ )h .

I

///[f DC-ME-01-MH 'f t - 4 7 -W 2 e gym <,, - / t S'- 75

[I.M/ NS -7f ,

Revision Reason Prepared Reviewed Approved Number Date For Issue By , _ Ay By A 1 4/21 /75 - For Use 'I M M IS

~

(SW/rff '!l7 3 ll75 I oa 7 9-t.1%

hAUS S 1S~ Q hisy 5.I.7f .

7J

.o o )]. m i of iii

i

. l 4

l. '

r _PUBLIC SERVICE INDIANA MARBLE T1.J.1, NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION g WNS l&2 g PROJECT NO'S. 4808/4923 R _ Classification Criteria of Structures, Systems and Components CC-ME-01-MH I

ISSUE

SUMMARY

(CONT'D.)

Reason Revision For Prepared Reviewed Approvei Number Date Issue By hJy By i 2 6-13-75 For Use k I. O d 8 .

I .1 e Pages 11thru . -

16 are Rev.2 4 -/6 -/I' dit /7s-h.l .h & Reason Revision For - Pages Prepared Reviewed Approved Number Date Issue Revised By By By I [ g, W&Q [Q ' 3 5-3-76 Add proj. i,ii,iii, no.& title; 1 g.3,7f (W-76 . list pg's. ,k ,g j4 revised. p- - g_g_74 (CAR-16)

                                                                 -:'No     & &: g l                                                       u -r'                o n .,g t.

I 4 8-11-76 Update 4,6,9, f*g,$ M f for use 10,12,13, F/n/74 [* " 76 , 15,16 c, , w g ,ff_ 7 g

                                                                                 .)

II Y D/* 3 K:2 [2 IUL - 11 o, m i

CC-ME-01-MH

         ,         >                                            Revision 3 May 3, 1976 RI                                 PUBLIC SERVICE INDIANA b                             MARBLE HILL NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 I                                      PROJECT NO'S. 4808/4923 Classification Criteria of Structures, Systems and Components CC-ME-01-MH J                               TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I                   1.0  SCOPE                                      1

2.0 REFERENCES

1 3.0 DEFINITIONS 1-2  ! 4.0 FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMEN" o 3  ! l 5.0 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 3-4 l 6.0 SAFETY CLASSIFICATION 4 ] 7.0 TABLES 4 k~

1. Relation Between Quality Group

• 5 and Safety Cat. Classifications

2. Safety Category and Quality 6-16 l Group Classifications for 1 Structures and Components I

l

3. Code Requirements for Components 17  ;

and Systems I

                                                                                        )

4. Cross Refcrence From Westing- 18 house RESAR (ANS) System of Safety Classification to Marble Hill Safety Classification System '

l I 'It - I g mem

              ~*

CC-ME-01-MH

         .,                                                        Rsvicion 3 May 3, 1976 g Rl              CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA OF STRUCTURES , SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS 1.0 SCOPE - The purpose of this Criteria is to establish the scheme by which structures, systems and components are classified in relation to their importance to safety. This criteria also sets the general classi-I                              fication .of the major structures, systems and components and is to be used as the basis for establishing the more detailed classification required in project documents such as Design Criteria, I                              PSAR, Equipment, Valve and Piping Lists and Cable Tabulation.

I

2.0 REFERENCES

l I 2.1 2.2 2.3 Appendix A, 10 CFR 50 Regulatory Guide 1.29 Appendix B, 10 CFR 50 I 2.4 2.5 Regulatory Guide 1.26 Byron /Braidwood PSAR, Chapter 3 l 2.6 Regulatory Guide 1.32 (Augus t, 1972) and IEEE standard i I 2.7 308-1971 RESAR, Chapter 3 g( . 2.8 DC-RN-01-MH, Design Criteria for Replication 3.0 DEFINITIONS

               .       3.1  Safety Classification - Structures, systems and components are classified for design purposes as either Safety I '

Category I or Safety Category II. Systems and Components are further classified by the appropriate Quality Group (See 3.4 below) or Class lE designation (See 3.5 below) I as applicable. The safety classification of Duplicate Features is identical to that of the Base Plant as defined in Reference 2.8. 3.2 Safety Category I structures, systems, and components are those necessary to assure: (a) the integrity of the I reactor coolant pressure boundary, (b) the capability to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a. safe shutdown condition, or (c) the capability to prevent or  ! I mitigate the consequences of accidents which could result in potential off-site exposures comparable to the guideline exposures of 10 CFR 100, in the postulated events of the safe shutdown earthquake (SSE) and other Ik design basis events including tornado, probable maxiatum l l flood, operating basis earthquake (OBE) , missile impact, or accident internal to the plant. l Page 1 of 18 I I

CC-ME-01-MH Rsvision 2 Juno 13, 1975 I( - 3.3 Safety category II - Those structures, systems, and components which are not designated as Safety Category I I are designated as Safety Category II. This category has no public health or safety implication. 3.4 Quality Group Classification - The quality group classification system defined in Regulatory Guide 1.26 (Ref. 2.4), established for water, steam, or radioactive I material - containing components important to safety, is directly applicable. 3.5 Class lE - Electric Systems - The systems that provide the electric power used to shut down the reactor and limit the release of radioactive material following a I design basis event. 3.6 Single Failure - A' single failure is an occurrence which results in the loss of capability of a component to I perform its intended safety functions when called upon. Multiple failures resulting from a single occurrence I are ccasidered to be a single failure. Fluid and electrical systems are considered to be designed against I( an assumed single failure if neither (1) a single failure of any active component (assuming passive components function properly); nor (2) a single failure of a passive component (assuming act ive components ( I function properly) results in a loss of the safety function to the nuclear steam electric generating unit. 3.7 Active Failure - An active failure is the failure of a powered component such as a piece of methanical equipment, component of the electrical supply syster or instrumentation I and control equipment to act on command to perform its design function. (Ref. 2.7) 3.8 Passive Failure - A passive failure is the structural failure of a static component which limits the component's effectiveness in carrying out its design function. (Ref. 2.7) I 3.9 Design Basis Event - A design basis event is a natural phenomenon or failure of a system, component or structure I which is postulated to provide the basis for designing the safety-related aspects of the plant. Examples are I safe shutdown earthquake (SSE) , wind and tornadoes, i probable maximum flood, missiles and loss of coolant

k. accident (LOCA) .

I Page 2 of 18

CC-ME-01-MH I ,'. . Revision 2 June 13, 1975 Ic 4.0 FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Safety Category I structures, systems and components shall perform their intended safety functions in the event of the safe shutdown earthquake (SSE) and other I design basis events. l 4.2 Safety Category I structures, systems and components shall retain their own integrity and/or shall not constitute a hazard to other Safety Category I structures, systems or components during the safe shutdown earthquake and other design basis events. 4.3 Safety Category I systems and components shall perform I their intended safety functions assuming a single failure and loss of off-site power. 4.4 The plant design shall ensure that Safety Category II structures, systems or components do not constitute a hazard to Safety Category I structures, systems or components during the safe shutdown earthquake and other ( design basis events. 5.0 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Safety Category I systes and components shall not be located in Safety Category II structures. 5.2 Systems or portions of systems which are designated Safety Category I shall be identified as appropriate in the various design documents associated with that system. I 5.3 The division between Safety Category I and II portions of systems shall be in accordance with the intent of Regulatory Guide 1.29. The seismic design of Safety category I items is in accordance with the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.29. I 5.4 Quality Assurance Requirements for Safety Category I systems or portionn of systems and components shall meet the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50. IL

I Page 3 of 18 I .

CC-ME-01-MH asvicion 4 I August 11, 1976 ( 5.5 Safety Category II structures, systems and components need not be specifically designed for dynamic operating-basis-earthquake loadings; however, a reasonable margin of safety shall be considered in the design as dictated by local requirements, such as the Uniform Building Code. I 5.6 Safety Category II systems or portions of systems and components need not follow the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50; however, the Quality Assurance standards for these systems and components shall follow normal industrial standards and any other requirements deemed necessary by the owner. 6.0 SAFETY CLASSIFICATION

• 6.1 Table 1 indicates the overall correspondence between safety categories and Quality Groups and the general boundaries of systems to be considered part of each quality group. ,

6.2 Table 2 lists all major plant structures and components which shall be designated as Safety Category I and ( their respective Quality Group / Electrical classifications. Table 2 also lists the major plant structures and several components which shall be designated as Safety Category II. The safety classification of all piping, valves and in-strumentation within each system in Table 2 is not feasible R within this classification criteria document. The Scope section of this document references sources containing detailed classifications of piping, valves and instru-mentation. 6.3 Table 3 identifies the applicable codes and standards to be used for each quality group. 6.4 Table 4 gives a cross-reference which can be used to translate from the Westinghouse (RESAR or ANS) safety classification system to the classification system established in this document when utilizing more detailed Westinghouse documents such as the NSSS Systems Standard Design Criteria. I 7.0 TABLES It I Page 4 of 18

      .                                                  CC-ME-01-MH Revision 2 June 13, 1975 I                TABLE 1. Relation Between Quality Group and Safety Category Classifications I      QUALITY GROUP      SAFETY CATEGORY      GENERAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION A                      I           Reactor coolant pressure boundary and extensions thereo f B                      I           Emergency core cooling, post-I                                              LOCA heat removal and cleanup, safe reactor shutdown and heat removal, portions of main I                                              steam anri feedwater associated with cor.tainment isolation I f-C                      I           Systems required to support those in Quality Group B, spent fuel cooling, radioactive waste systems which normally I(                                             contain a high level of radio-active material C                   II             Parts or portions of systems which contain or may contain I                                              radioactive material, which have been upgraded to Quality Group C to meet NRC requirements     ,

D II Parts or portions of systems I which contain or may contain radioactive material I I i I t i !I Page 5 of 18 I

        ~"

g - CC-ME-01-MH 3 *. Rsvision 4 August 11, 1976 ( TABLE 2 SAFETY CLASSIFICATION OF STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS I- QUALITY GROUP SAFETY I COMPONENT or ELECTRICAL CLASS CATEGORY Reactor Coolant System Reactor Vessel A I Steam Generator Tube Side A I Rl Shell Side B I Reactor Coolant Loop Stop Valves A I Pressurizer A I Pressurizer Relief Tank D II Reactor Coolant Pumps A I R l Motors - II Chemical and Volume Control System Regenerative Heat Exchangers B - I l I Letdown Heat Exchangers Tube Side Shell Side B C I I Seal Water Heat Exchangers Tube Side B I l g Shell Side C I i 3 Excess Letdown Heat Exchangers I Tube Side Shell Side B C I I Volume Control Tank B I ik Reciprocating Charging. Pumps B I Centrifugal Charging Pumps B I Mixed Bed Demineralizers C I Page 6 of 18

    ~~

CC-ME-01-MH l Rsvicion 2 June 13, 1975 TABLE 2 (Ccm tinued) QUALITY GROUP or SAFETY COMPONENT ELECTRICAL CLASS CATEGORY Cation Bed Demineralizers C I Resin Fill Tank D II I Chemical Mixing Tank D II Moderating Feat Exchanger Tube Side C I Shell Side C I Letdown Chiller Heat Exchanger Tube Side C I I Shell Side D II Chiller Pumps D II I( Chiller Surge Tank D II Letdown Reheat Heat Exchanger Tube Side B I Shell Side C I I Thermal Regeneration Demineralizers C I Boric Acid Tanks C I Boric Acid Batching Tank D II Boric Acid Transfer Pumps C I Reactor Coolant Filter B I Seal Water Injection Filter B I Seal Water Return Filter B I l Boric Acid Filter C I Boric Acid Blender C I Page 7 of 18

l CC-ME-01-MH 6- , R vision 2 June 13, 1975 I TABLE 2 (Continued) QUALITY GROUP  ; or SAFETY l I COMPONENT ELECTRICAL CLASS CATEGORY Boron Recycle System l Recycle Evaporator Feed Demineralizers C I I Recycle Hold-Up Tanks C I { i l Recycle Evaporator Feed Pumps C I Recycle Evaporator C* I Recycle Monitor Tr.nks D II Monitor Tank Pumps D II l Recycle Evaporator Condensate Demineralizer D II { Recycle Evaporator Feed Filter C I Recycle Evano ator Concentrates Filter D II I I ~ Recycle Evaporator Condensate Filter D II Reactor Makeup Water Storage Tank D II** I Safety Iniection System Refueling Water Storage Tank B I Accumulators I Boron Injection Tank B B I I Safety Injection Pumps B I Boron Injection Surge Tank C I Boron Injection Recirculation Pumps C I I k. The steam side of the evaporator is Quality Group D. Only Those portions containing radioactive liquid are designated I-C. Designed to Safety Category I seismic requirements. n, . o -c io

t-CC-ME-01-MH I( TABLE 2 (Continued) Revision 4 QUALITY GROUP or SAFETY COMPONENT ELECTRICAL CLASS CATEGORY Residual Heat Removal System Residual Heat Removal Pumps B I I Residual Heat Exchangers Tube Side Shell Side B I C I containment Spray System Containment Spray Pumps B I Spray Additive Tanks B I Spray Eductors D I ( Comoonent Cooling System Component Cooling Heat Exchangers C I Component Cooling Pumps C I Component Cooling Suttge Tai.ks C , I i Essential Service Watesr System i Essential Service dater Pumps C I Essential Service Water Strainers C I R I Spent Fuel Pit Cooling System l 5 Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger C I Spent Fuel Pit Pump C I t Skimmer Pump D II E Spent Fuel Pit Filter D II l Page 9 of 18

g .'

• CC-ME-01-MH m .

     ;                                                             Revision 4 August 11, 1976 I                                       TABLE 2 (Continued)

OUALITY GROUP I COMPONENT or ELECTRICAL CLASS SAFETY CATEGORY Spent Fuel Pit Cooling System (Continued) Spent Fuel Pit Demineralizer D II C I Refueling Water Purification Pump I R} Motor - II Reactor Coolant Drain Svstem Reactor Coolant Drain Tank D II Reactor Coolant Drain Pumps D II Gaseous Radwaste System

                                                         ~

Waste Gas Compressor C I ( Gas Decay Tanks C I Gas Ana'.yzer C II Nuclear Sampling System I Sample Heat Exchanger Tube Side Shell Side C C I I Auxiliary Feedwater System Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps C I I R l Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Diesels - I Diesel Oil Sys tem Diesel Oil Storace Tanks C I Diesel Oil Transfer Pumps C I I I t I I _ . _ - .

E CC-ME-01-MH

         .                                                     Revision 2 E                                                            aune la, 975 5   .

TABLE 2 (Continued) ( QUALITY GROUP or SAFETY I COMPONENT Liquid Radwaste Syste.a ELECTRICAL CLASS CATEGORY l l Blowdown Condenser D II Blowdown Condenser Pump D II Blowdown Demineralizers D II Blowdown Prefilters D II Blowdown Monitor Tanks D II Blowdown Monitor Tank Pumps ' D II Blowdown Evaporator D II Auxiliary Building Floor and I( Equipment Drain Tanks D II I Turbine Building Floor and Equipment Drain Tanks D II Spent Resin Storage Tank C I Liquid Radwaste Pumps D II Laundry Drain Tanks D II Release Tank D II

       .         Liquid Radwaste Filters                      D               II Radwaste Evaporator                          D               II Waste Evaporator Monitor Tanks               D               II Chemical Drain Tank                          D               II t

l I Page 11 of 18

CC-ME-01-MH I Rsvicion 4 Auguot 11, 1976 TABLE 2 (Continued) i QUALITY GROUP or SAFETY COMPONENT ELECTRICAL CLASS CATEGORY Instrument Air System Instrument Air Compressors - II I Instrument Air Receivers - II R Instrument Air Af terfilters - II Instrument Air Dryers - II I Instrument Air Prefilters - II Containment Ventilation and Purge System Reactor Containment Fan Coolers NAw I j I Hydrogen Recombiners NA* I

                                                                       ~

Control Room HVAC System Makeup, Supply and Return Fans and Motors - I Cooling Coils C I Filters - I Fire Protection System I Centrifugal Pumps D IJ Piping R Turbine' Building D TT i Auxiliary Building 1 Quality measures equivalent in intent to those in Quality Group B will be applied.

             ** Quality measures equivalent in intent to those in Quality

( Group C will be applied. I Page 12 of 18

CC-ME-01-MH I Rsvision 4 August 11, 1976 TABLE 2 (Continued) QUALITY GROUP I COMPONENT or ELECTRICAL CLASS SAFETY CATEGORY Main Steam and Feedwater Systems Piping from Steam Generators Out to I R and Including First Stop Valves Outside Containment B I Main Steam Safety Valves B I Main Steam Relief Valves B I Miscellaneous Components New Fuel Storage Racks NA** I Spent Fuel Storage Racks NA** I Containment Building Crane NA** I Fuel Handling Building Crane NA** I I I I I I lI It ** Quality measures equivalent in intent to those in Quality Group C will be applied. Page 13 of 18

I

       ..                                                  CC-ME-Ol-MH            l R: vision 2           l
     '                                                     June 13, 1975 TABLE 2 (Continued)                           )

c-QUALITY GROUP or SAFETY C9fiPOl{ll!{T P.LECTRICAL CLASS CATEGORY Engineered Safety Features (ESP) Electrical Components 4160 V ESF Buses lE*** I 480 V ESF Buses lE*** I Diesel Generators, ESF lE*** I 12SV d-c Buses, ESP lE*** I 125V d-c Batteries & Chargers, ESF lE*** I 120V a-c Instrument Buses, ESF lE*** I 120V a-c Inverters, ESF lE*** I 480V a-c Motor Control Centers fed from I( 480 V ESF Buses lE*** I Electrical Penetrations 1E*** I Containment Cooling Fan Motors lE*** I Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Motors lE*** I Containment Spray Pump Motors lE*** I Essential Cooling Tower Fan Motors lE*** I Cen trifugal Charging Pump Motors 1E*** I Residual Heat Removal Pump Motors lE*** I Safety Injection Pump Motors lE*** I Essential Service Water Pump Motors lE*** I I *** Electrical Class per IEEE-308 endorsed in RG-1.32. I Page 14 of 18

I CC-ME-01-MH s Revision 4 ( TABLE 2 (Con tinued) i I QUALITY GROUP l or SAFETY COMPONENTS ELECTRICAL CLASS CATEGORY Engineered Safety Features (ESM Electrical Components (Continued) Component Cooling Pump Motors lE*** I Diesel Generator Room Fan Motors lE*** I I Interconnecting cables between Safety Category I Electrical Equipment lE*** I Non-ESF Electrical Systems and Components ---- II STRUCTURES Solid Radwaste Storage Building NA II Service Building , NA II Essential Service Cooling Towers & Basins NA I Circulating Water Cooling Towers NA I II R Circulating Water Pumphouses NA II Main Steam Tunnels NA I Auxiliary Feedwater Tunnels NA I River Pumphouse NA II R Reactor Containment Structures NA I I Auxiliary Building NA I Fuel Handling Building NA I l k Turbine Building NA II Electrical Class per IEEE-308 endorsed in RG-1.32. , Page 15 of 18

CC-ME-01-Md I Ravicion 4 August 11, 1976 TABLE 2 (Continued) QUALITY GROUP or SAFETY l COMPONENTS ELECTRICAL CLASS CATEGORY Blowdown Discharge Structure NA II I R Switchyard Structures Water Well Structures NA NA II II l All Site Development Civil Works NA II

, I                                                                                                    l I                                        -

l l I i i lc . I - I . i I I I I It i I - I *-

                                     " ee e

• 8

m m e e m m M M M M M M M M M M M M c n

• 3 TABLE 3 CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPONENTS AND ST$TEMS CUALITY CEOUP COMPONENT OR SYSTEM AII) 8(3) C(3) D, Pressure Vessets ASME Setter and Pressure ASME Sotter and Pressure ASME So!!ar and Pressure ASME Setter and Pressure Wessel Code. Section*111 = Vessel Code, Section !!! - Vessel Code Section III - Vesset Code Section VIII, 1974. Class 1 1974. Class 2 1974. Class 3 Div. 1 - 1974 h Piping ASME So!!ar and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III =

ASME Setter and Pressure ASME Setter and Pressure ANSI S31.1.0 - 1973. Code 4 Vesset Code, Section III . Vesset Code. Sectlen 111 for Pressure Piping g 1974. Class 1 1974. Class 2 1974, Class 3 P Pumps and Valves ASME Setter and Pressure ASME Soller and Pressure 4 ASME Sotter and Pressure AN$1831.1.0 - 1973(2), Code Vessel Code, Section III - Vessel Code, Section III - Vesset Code, Section III = for Pressure Piping O 1974..,Ctass 1 1974. Class 2 1974. Ctssa 3 ' M Low-Pressure Tanks .-. ASME Soller and Pressure A$ME So!!er and Pressure American Petroleum Institute, g Vessel Code. Section !!! - Vesset Code. Section Ill - Secommended Rules for Design and g 1974, Cines 2 1974. Class 3 Construction of Large Welded Low-Pressure Storage Tanks, API 620,

                                                                                                                        .                            .1973 edittaa Atmospheric Storage                                     ==

ASME Sotter and Pressure Tanks ASME Sotter and Pressure American Waterworks Association, Vessel Code, Section 111 - Vessel Code, Section 111 - Standard for Steel Tanks, Standpipes. 1974, Class 2 1974. Class 3 Beservoirs and Elevated tanks for Water Storage. AW4-D100,1973 edition! or Welded steet Tanks for 011 Storage. API-650, 1973 editionger AN51 896.3 1973 edition for aluminum tanks Heat Enchangers ASME Soller and Pressure ASME Soller and Pressure ASME Sotter and Pressure ASME Setter and Pressure Wessel Cade, Vessel Code. Section 111 - Vessel Code. Section 111 - Vos, set CoJa, Section III = 1974. Class 1 1974 Class 2 sectina VIII. Div.1. L9741 and Tubular 1974. Class 3 Enchanger Manufacturers Association (TEMA) Class C (1) Containment vessel excluded 4WOf 3 O (2) Por Pumps operating above 150 pet and 212'F ASME Section VIII Div. I, shall be used as a guide for calculating thickness of 4 4 G H- % pressure rotatning parts and in sising cover bottings below 150 pet and 212'F. manufacturer *a standards for service intended vf et be used. IO p, (3) Code and addenda dates per 10 CFR 30.53e yhOg i H Q PJ @ W J Ut

CC-ME-Ol-MH Rsvision 2 I . June 13, 1975 { . TABLE 4 CROSS REFERENCE FROM WESTINGHOUSE RESAR (ANS) SYSTEM OF SAFETY CLASSIFICATION TO MARBLE HILL SAFETI CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

• l I l WESTINGHOUSE MARBLE HILL RESAR-3 (ANS) QUALITY GROUP SAFETY CATEGORY l A I 2 B I  ;

I 3 C I NNS D- 1I 1 !I I C  ! 1

• The following exceptions to the above cross-reference are noted; in these cases the Marble Hill Safety Classification is to be used: Refueling Water Purification Pump, Spray Additive Tanks, Excess Letdown Heat Exchangers - Shell Side.

I 'I I I< I """ " '

• I}}