ML20134B183
| ML20134B183 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Marble Hill |
| Issue date: | 10/22/1982 |
| From: | PSI ENERGY, INC. A/K/A PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF INDIANA |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20132B505 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-293 NUDOCS 8508150539 | |
| Download: ML20134B183 (100) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:* Section No. l Rev. O Page of .o PUBLIC SERVICE INDIANA WOf, W k -/ V-S*t. MAR 3LE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL - -ouanty Ass;'anaceA ' . A vel ate
Title:
- 9 b V'** * # "*'
- ORGANIZATION g
Sr. V.P. Nuclear Divis,on A'porova'l Date 1.1 PURPOSE 1.1.1 This Section describes Public Service Company of Indiana's (PSI's) organizational responsibilities for implementing the Marble Hill Project Quality Assurance Program defined by Title 10, Part 50, Appendix B of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 50, Appendix B) for design, procurement, and construction. 1.1.1.1 NOTE: k'henever individual titles are used, the named individual has authority to designate another qualified individual within the department, section or group, in writing or in appropriate implementing procedures, but retains ultimate responsibility for implementing the requirement. If an individual or group is designated in writing, a copy of the written designation shall be distributed to the Records Management Manager for retention. 1.1.2 For title changes that occur within an organization and for which responsibilities and reporting lines do not change, the next subsequent revision to the Manual (or in a maximum of six months) shall incorporate the title changes. In the interim, the Quality Assurance Officer shall issue a letter to all Manual Holders indicating the title changes, effective date, and instructions to insert the letter in front of the Manual. - 1.2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1.2.1 The Senior Vice President Nuclear Division has the overall responsibility for the Program through the organizational structure set forth in Attachment A. The Senior Vice President Nuclear Division is also responsible for assuring that Management Audits are performed to determine the effectiveness of the Quality Assurance Program. 1 2.2 The Quality Assurance Officer reports directly to the Senior Vice President Nuclear Division and is organizational 1y independent of the Vice President Nuclear Services to provide the necessary independence from cost and schedule considerations. g 850610 h/d*h-N 850Blh39 A ppR a b t b nosa-2'3 4w n.n
MkRBLE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL g Title Page 2 of 21 ORGANIZATION
/
I. ( } 1 2.3 The Quality Assurance Officer is assigned the authority and responsibility for the necessary controls to assure that the Program is fully implemented and to represent PSI on all matters associated with the implementation of the Program as they relate to Regulatory requirements, Contractors and Suppliers. 1.2.4 The Vice President Nuclear Services reports to the Senior Vice President Nuclear Division and is delegated responsibility for Marble Hill Station DesiF n, Construction, Project Management and Licensing. 1.2.5 The Executive Director Nuclear Operations reports to the Senior Vice President Nuclear Division and is delegated responsibility for test and operations for the Marble Hill Station. 1.3 IMPLEMENTATION 1.3.1 Ouality Asrurance Officer The Quality Assurance Officer is responsible for:
- a. Managing and directing the Quality Assurance Department as depicted by Attachment B.
- b. The approval of the Program, interpretation of Quality ('( i Assurance requirements and, implemehtation of applicable portions of the Quality Assurance program through l implementing procedures. I
- c. Apprising the Senior Vice President Nuclear Division, Vice President Nuclear Services, and Executive Director Nuclear Operations of the effectiveness of the Program by periodic reporting on quality activities, trends and problems.
- d. Appropriately exercising authority to stop nonconforming work.
- e. Coordinating applicable activities with regulatory agencies such as audits, inspections or investigations with the affected organization manager (s).
- f. Assuring conformance of activities affecting quality to the Program's requirements. l
- g. Appropriately exercising the authority vested in the Quality Assurance Department to cause the acceptance or rejection of work, materials and equipment based on conformance to engineering requirer.ents or failure to meet procurement requirements.
7 c j 4\g 8 5
= .
(2 11
-. _ . - ~ . _ . . - ._ . - _ _ - _ - _ _ _
t ' MARBLE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL s.aion No. Rev. No. g 1
' Title P 3 of 23
. : ORGANI."ATION I
- h. Certification of Quality Assurance Personnel.
4 i. Coordinating follow-up on NRC inspection activities to assure correct resolution and prompt closecut of inspection findings. j
- j. Assuring the adequacy, clarity and appropriateness of PSI Quality Assurance communications and commitments directed to l regulatory agencies, Contractors cad Suppliers.
- k. Contacting the NRC on Quality Assurance matters.
- 1. Maintaining a staff of sufficient size and qualifications to support required audit, surveillance and program development activities.
- m. Determining documents which are to be generated, completed, and retained as Quality Assurance Records.
1.3.2 Quality Engineering Mana2er The Quality Engineering Manager provides quality engineering direction, reports to the Quality Assurance Officer. and is responsible for the following: l
.ef'birecting the activities of Discipline Quality Engineering Managers / Specialist and the Quality Re~ cords Verification Supervisor. l 1 b. Coordinating efferts to assure consistent application of PSI ;
Quality Engineering requirements and commitments for
. Contractors and Suppliers.
l
.c. Maintaining communication and coordination between the Discipline Quality Engir.eering Managers /Specialis't and other
- departments / sections / groups within PSI, Contractors and
- Suppliers.
d.' Managing the Site Construction Surveillance Program, the Civil l Inspection and Testing Services Program, Material Control Surveillance Program and Receipt Inspection activity. l
, e. Evaluating potential adverse quality trends MetteFE3:19=ehe Q;;11., Ao lu.. ..;ien " ;;rri;.. -oe recommending necessary corrective action to the Quality Assurance Officer. l 1
1 l 3t m es g 7 i 6
~
(2 1)
MARBLE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL 3,c,,, g,, y g ,,, g,, g Tiu. Pg. 4 e 23 ORGANIZATION _-
\. s, 1 3 2.1 Discipline Quality Engineerine Manacers/ Specialist l The Electrical, Mechanical, Civil, Materials (Discipline)
Quality Engineering Managers and Welding /NDE Quality Engineering Specialist report to the Quality Engineering Manager and are responsible for:
- a. Evaluating and approving the Quality Assurance Programs of the Contractors and Suppliers and changes thereto.
- b. Approving PSI construction surveillance, receipt l inspection, pre-award survey, source surveillance and Procurement and Construction Data Package Review
- checklists.
/ AN,. gig -and approving Contractor procedures.
W ' Reviewing dispositions of Nonconformance Reports and responses to Corrective Action Requests.
- e. Assuring Quality Assurance Record requirements are identified in Procurement Documents.
- f. Assuring Mandatory Hold Points are determined for Contractors and Suppliers and provided to the Audit '
Manager and Quality Engineering Construction Surveillance Supervisors.
- g. Identifying the causes of nonconformances and determining the need for corrective action.
- h. Reviewing Safety-Related design criteria documents.
- i. Evaluating Procurement Specifications and changes thereto, and preparing Quality Assurance requirements l to be included in Procurement Specifications.
- j. Performing the Civil Inspection and Testing Services and Quality Engineering Survey Services activities.
- k. Reviewing and concurring with Contractors and Suppliers l corrective action responses to PSI audit findings.
- 1. Approving checklints and reports of construction testing activities.
- m. Supervising the Discipline Quality Engineering Construction Surveillance, Storage and Maintenance Surveillance, Civil Inspection Testing Services and Receipt Inspection Supervisors. l E
m . 4 t n.n
l MARBLE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL Senen No. 1 Rw. No. 8 Dre p, g 5 ., 23
- -- ORGANIZATION 4 .
- n. Surveillance of construction activities, storage l conditions of material and items, and of maintenance and handling of items performed by Contractors and PSI.
i o. Determining the completeness and acceptability of l construction data packages (CDPs) prepared by Site Contractors.
- p. Review and approval of Procurement Documents. l I
- q. Review of structure, system, and component l classification criteria documents. I 1.3.2.1.1 Discipline Quality Engineering Surveillance Supervisors The Discipline Quality Engineering Surveil- i lance Supervisors report to the Discipline Quality Engineering Managers and are l responsible for implementation of the
; construction surveillance program as follows:
- a. Surveillance of Contractor construction and
, storage and maintenance activities. I t b. Documenting construction surveillance activities and nonconforming conditions. t
- c. Stopping further processing of unacceptable work.
i
- d. Assuring that construction surveillance activities are performed by trained and
, qualified personnel. .
- e. Reviewing and concurring with completed.
construction surveillance reports. l 1.3.2.1.2 Civil Inspection and Testing Services Supervisor The Civil In:pection and Testing Services Supervisor, reports to the Civil Quality Engineering Manager, and is responsible for: l t J 4 .t g
- t (2 0
f l l I' MARBLE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL Meh I h.k 8 Tios mg. 6 w 23 ORGANIZATION () I
- a. Preparation, approval, and control of implementing procedures and all necessary functions to assure compliance of the Civil ,
Inspection and Testing Services group with ! PSI Quality Assurance Program requirements. l
- b. Supervision of Senior Field and Laboratory Inspectors.
1.3.2.1.3 Receipt Inspection Supervisor The Receipt Inspection Supervisor reports to the Materials Quality Engineering Manager and j f is responsible for:
- a. Performing receipt inspection of PSI-procured Safety-Related items received l at the site. I
- b. Maintenance and concrol of PSI Heasuring and Test equipment'used.during receipt inspection.
- c. Status tagging of PSI procured material and ,
. items. "/
- d. Reviewing and approving completed receipt l inspection checklists.
1.3.2.3 Ouality Records Verification Supervisor ' The Quality Records Verificatio'n Supervisor reports to the Quality Engineering Manager and is responsible for the reviet: and acceptance of Procurement Data Packeges using checklists approved by the Discipline Quality
; Engineering Manager.
1.3.3 Audit Manager l The Audit Manager reports to the Quality Assurance Officer and is
- responsible for
- a. Directing the activities of the Site Audit Supervisor and i Supplier Audit Supervisor.
- b. Coordination of efforts to assure consistent application of the PSI Audit Section requirements and commitments to Contractors and Suppliers.
3 I 8 _ (7
- 1I
MIRBLE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL g, 1 %, %, 8 Tith 7 23 ORGANIZATION
- d
- c. Assuring communication and coordination between the Audit Supervisors and other departments / sections / groups within PSI, and Contractors and Suppliers.
- d. Managing the Audit and Source Surveillance Programs.
.e. Evaluating potential adverse quality trends identified by the Quality Administration Supervisor and recommending necessary
. corrective action to the Quality Assurance Officer. 1.3.3.1 Site Audit Supervisor
. The Site Audit Supervisor reports to the Audit Manager and is responsible for:
- a. Scheduling, coordinating, and assuring the performance of audits by audit personnel in order to verify the implementation and determine the effectiveness of Contractors', Design Contractors' and internal PSI Quality Assurance Programs.
- b. Stopping Further Processing of unacceptable work.
- c. Performing pre-award surveys of Design Contractors and Site Contractors.
- d. Assurir.g that audit and pre-a' ward survey activities
.are performed by trained and qualified personnel.
- e. Reviewing and approving completed audit reports and pre-award surveys.
1.3.3.2 Supplier Audit Supervisor The Supplier Audit Supervisor reports to the Audit Manager and is responsible for:
- a. Scheduling, coordinating and assuring the performance of audits and source surveillance activities by audit personnel in order to verify the implementation and determine the effectiveness of Suppliers' Quality Assurance Programs.
- b. Stopping Further Processing of unacceptable work.
- c. Performing pre-award surveys of Suppliers.
- d. Assuring that audit, source surveillance, and pre-award survey activities are performed by trained and qualified personnel.
5 a .
< .h M
- 1)
MARBLE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL 3,,,,, 3,, 1 n ,, go, 8 Titie 8 23 ORGANIZATION * *'
- e. Reviewing and approving completed audit reports, pre award surveys, and source survetilance reports.
- f. Implementing Mandatory Hold Points established by the Quality Engineering Manager.
- g. Reviewing and accepting Quality Assurance Records at Suppliers' facilities when directed by the Quality Engineering Manager.
1.3.4 operations Ouality Assurance Supervisor The Operations Quality Assurance Supervisor reports to the Quality Assurance Officer and is responsible for:
- a. Development and implementation of the Operations Quality Assurance Program by the Operations Quality Assurance Sta*f.
- b. Storage and Maintenance Surveillance of equipmeat released for l installation, or installed equipment.
1 3.5 Ouality Administration Supervisor l The Quality Administration Supervisor reports to the Quality l Assurance Officer and is responsible for: ,
- s. Development, preparation and maintenance of this Manual and the ASME Quality Assurance Manual.
- b. Reviewing PSI site procedures that implement the requirements of this Manual and the AQAM Manual to assure compatability.
- c. Reviewing and approving Quality Assurance Department training plans and lesson plans.
- d. Preparing Quarterly Trend Reports.
c.' Supervising Quality Administration Personnel. 1.3.6 Nuclear Regulations and Affairs Manager The Nuclear Regulations and Affairs Manager re.perts to the Senior Vice President Nuclear Division and is responsible for: l
- a. Assuring any new or revised regulatory requirements are routed to affected PSI organizations for review, comment and determination of applicability.
- b. Overall coordination and contact for NRC licensing activities above the NRC's Project Manager level.
, I ( e L 4 (2
- 1)
MARBLE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL g 1 %,g 8 l D'" 9 23
'"' l
, ORGANIZATION
- c. Review of NRC correspondence including responses to NRC l bulletins and tequests for information, and coordination of !
responses in non-Project PSI organizations. , s
- d. Emergency planning.
1 3.7 Vice President Nuclear Services l j The Vice President Nuclear Services reports to the Senior Vice President Nuclear Division and is delegated responsibility for
- Marble Hill Statien Design, Construction, Project Management, and l Licensing. Reporting to the Vice President Nuclear Services is the Assistant Project Director, the Construction Manager, and I. Project Purchasing Manager. The Vice President Nuclear Services
!, directs and coordinates the work of the NSSS Supplier, the Architect-Engineer, and other functions as required to provide a safe, reliable facility. The Vice President Nuclear Services' responsibilities include the implementation and execution of effective design reviews both within the Project Engineering Section and in the Architect-Engineer's staff, the analysis of bids, purchase recommendations, budgetary analysis, schedule
, preparation, progress reports, nonconformance tracking activities, j and licensing contacts with the NRC Project Manager.
1.3.8 Construction Manager The Construction Manager reports to the Vice President Nuclear Services and is responsible for the following activities as shown in Attachment F: . L l a. Coordination of all project construction activities to assure Contractor compliance with project commitments and establish project milestones.
- b. Coordination of PS1 contractural acceptance of structures and systems from the Contractors.
- c. Supervision of the Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, Composite, Materials Project Contract Managers and Systems Construction
!> Completion Manager. l
- d. Supervision of the Safety and Fire Prevention Supervisor who 4
monitors Contractors' compliance with their established safety I programs.
- 1.3.9 Project Contract Managers The Project Contract Managers report to the Construction Manager .
i i and are responsible for the following: Y 31 . e i 8 1 : t2. n
. - _ _ ~ . . . _ , . , , . _ - . _ . . . , _ _ . _ . , . . , _ . . ...-m___ _.
l
. E MAR 8LE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL ,,, 1 ,,,,,,, 8 ORGANIZATION """ #
. i
- a. Ensuring that Contractor work is performed in conformance with
- drawing, specification, and contract requirements.
i j b. Coordinating Marble Hill construction and fabrication.
- c. Receiving items and material.
l
- d. Maintaining records and accountability of items and material stored by PSI.
- e. Handling, storing, preserving, protecting and maintaining items
! and material stored by PSI until release to the Contractor. ! f. Providing construction status and performance reports and ensuring that construction-related communications and information flow properly.
4 3. Scheduling of construction activities. r
- h. Negotiating Change Orders, Extra Work Authorizations, and backcharges for Contractors.
1 3 9.1 Construction Engineerina Supervisor The Construction Engineering Supervisor reports to the Project Contract Manager or Assi.stant Contract Manager, [~ s i ] as applicable, and is responsible for the following ) a. Determining the schedule of construction activities.
- b. Monitoring Cont'ractor work to ensure conformance with j drawing, specification, and contract requirements.
I 1.3.9.2 Contract Administration Supervisor j The Contract Administration Supervisor reports to the Project Contract Manager and is responsible for preparing l l or reviewing Extra Work Authorizations, Change Orders, j and backcharges for Contractors. I t 1 3.9.3 Se,niori Planning and Scheduling Engineer !- The Senior Planning and Scheduling Engineer reports 4 functionally to the Project Contract Manager and is responsible for the following i , l a. Reporting work progress and status of Contractors. ! N k i e i t ! C e ll l l l _ . . . . . . _ , .. _ _ ..-. . _ . . _ - . . . _ . . - _ _ _ _ _ _ . ,, _ , _ , _ _ _ . . _ _ . ,. _ _ . . , _ _ _ _ . . . _ . _ ~
MARBLE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL 9,,, 3,, 1 no, no, 8 ORGANIZATION a-
- b. Providing scheduling information to the Project Controls Organization.
- c. Assisting Contract Managers with the planning of Contractors construction activities and providing analysis of Contractor progress relative to the Project schedule.
1.3.9.4 Assistant Contract Manager The Assistant Contract Manager reports to the Project Contract Manager and is responsible for managing the field construction of the assigned contract and represents the Project Contract Manager for the specific contract. 1.3.10 System Construction Completion Manager The System Construction Completion Manager reports to the Construction Manager, and when each system reaches approximately 95 percent completion is responsible for punch lists, establishing priorities for all activities to complete the system and/or determining which system is to be completed first. When construction and Phase I testing is complete, he will coordinate with the Test Administration manager to turnover the system and supporting documentation to Operations. . 1 3.11 Project Purchasing Manager The Project Purchasing Manager reports functionally to the Vice President Nuclear Services and interfaces with Project personnel relative to procurement activities and is responsible for the preparation and transmittal of Purchase Orders, approved Change Orders to Suppliera and Contractors, and maintenance of the Approved Supplier / Contractor List. These activities shall conform to the requirements identified within this Manual and ASME Quality Assurance Manual, Project Management Manual, and other approved related Project Procedures. The Project Purchasing Manager shall report in an administrative capacity to the Director of Purchasing . The Project Purchasing Manager is the prime contact l with Suppliers for procurement related activities. 1 3.12 Assistant Project Director The Assistant Project Director reports to the Vice President Nuclear Services and is responsible for directing the activities of the Project Engineering Manager and Project Controls Manager. 1 J G t t (2 11
MARBLE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL 3,,,,, g,, I p.,, no, 8 P.,. 12 o, 23 ORGANIZATION , ( 1 3.12 1 Project Engineering Manager The Project Engineering organization is depicted in l Attachment C. The Project Engineering Manager reports tc the Assistant Project Director and is assigned the following responsibilities:
- a. Coordination of design activities.
l
- b. Assuring technical reviews are accomplished by affected PSI organizations, including Quality Engineering reviews of Procurement Specifications.
- c. Assuring control of design changes and consistency with SAE commitments including resolution of Field Change Requests (FCRs) and Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) with the SAR.
- d. Assuring Safety-Related items are properly identified by the designer on Design Documents.
- e. Assuring the current approved design configuration can be readily determined.
- f. Coordinating and draf ting responses to NRC regulatory bulletins and requests for information related to Project activities.
- g. Preliminary technical selection of those Suppliers and Contractors found acceptable by Quality Assurance.
- h. Preparation, coordination, review and approval of Project Management Procedures.
- 1. Design activities required by PSI as Owner & "N" Certificate Holder.
- j. Preparation, review, and approval of Storage and Main-tenance Instructions.
1.3.12.1.1 Chief Discipline Engineers The Chief Discipline Engineers report to the Project Engineering Manager and are responsible for assuring the technical adequacy of the Project design. While design activities may be subcontracted, the Chief Discipline Engineers retain responsibility for the design and have the authority to effect ;
. 1 t .
t ' n.n
MARBLE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL g, 1 %, no, 8 ORGANIZATION design changes as necessary. The Resident Engineers report to the Chief Discipline Engineers. Specific responsibilities include:
- a. Assuming Owner and "N" Certificate Holder engineering responsibilities for ASME Code Piping Systems.
- b. Reviewing and approving the Engineering Design Documents and design changes thereto.
- c. Providing release authority for drawings, Procurement Specifications and Special Process Procedures (SPPs), and providing technical review of Construction Specifications.
- d. Dispositioning PSI generated NCRs.
- e. Reviewing and approving Contractor NCRs dispositioned "Use-As-Is" or " Repair".
- f. Assuring proper approval of Supplier "Use-As-Is" and " Repair" nonconformance documents by the Architect-Engineer.
- g. Controlling replication changes on the basis of formalized replication guidelines.
- h. Reviewing and approving Design Specif1-cations and Design Reports.
- 1. Performing Design Reviews of the l Architect-Engineer's engineering activities for tae Project.
1.3 12.1.2 Resident Engineers, Resident Engineers are members of Project Engineering matrixed by the Chief Dis.:1pline l Engineers to Project Contract Managers to
. provide close technical support of th e construction effort. The matrixed Reaident Engineers report directly to the Chie!
Discipline Engineer for technical and administrative matters. They report to the Project Contract Manager functionally providing technical support, as required. The Resident Engineers are responsible for the
, following:
E m s w (2 11
I WlARELE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL ,,,,,,,y,, ,,,,3,, g 1 I T6th r mg. 14 w 23 ORGANIZATION i
- a. Initiating Field Change Requests.
. ( ;
1
- b. Approving dispositions of Contractor "Use-As-Is" and " Repair" NCRs.
- c. Reviewing Contractor procedures for
- compliance to technical requirements.
1
- d. Providing technical support for construction activities. ?
1.3.12.1.3 Nuclear Safety and Licensing Manager f 1 The Nuclear Safety and Licensing Manager j reports to the Project Engineering Manager and > j is responsible for: )
- a. Coordinating licensing effort s including j preparation and coordination of Safety
- Analysis Reports (PSAR and FSAR) and Amendments. I i
j b. Acting as the primary contact with the ' Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Office of l Nuclear Reactor Regulation) for Project- ' related licensing matters. '
- c. Assuring all licensing commitments relating to 10CFR50 Appendix B, are coordinated with [
the Quality Assurance Organization. , l d. Chairing Safety Review Committee activities. f 3 - ] 1.3.12 1.4 Engineerina Administrative Services Supervisor The Engineering Administrative Services i Supervisor reports to the Project Engineering l l Manager and is responsible fort
- a. Administering the Noncon'formance Report program.
., b. Supervising the activities of the Procedure i Review Board Chairman. . I i-i i 3 I e (. I I i e. j (2 19 1
1 MARBLE HILL PROJECT OUALl1Y ASSURANCE MANUAL Secten No. 3 Rev. No. p ritte PMp TM of 97
- ORCANIZATION 1.3.12.1.4.1 Procedure Review Board Chairman The Procedure Review Board Chairman reports to the Engineering Administrative Services Supervisor and is responsible for coordinating the review and approval of Contractor procedures; and for the preparation and coord-ination of the review and approval of Project Management Procedues and Special Project l Procedures 1.3.13 Nuclear Division Administration Manager The Nuclear Division Administration Manager, as shown in Attachment D, reports to the Senior Vice President Nuclear Divison i and is responsible fort
- a. Directing the activities of the Administrative Services Manager, and Records Management Manager.
- b. Assuring the adequacy of the document control system and Records Management system. [
- c. Assuring the adequacy of the storage and retrieval of Quality Assurance Records.
1.3 13.1 Admini stra tive Services Manager The Administrative Services Manager reports to the Nuclear Division Administration Manager and is responsible for:
- a. Maintaining a Site Document Control Center to control and distribute safety-related documents.
- b. Supervising the Document Control Manager.
1.3 13 1.1 Document Control Manager The Document Control Manager reports to the Administrative Services Manager and is responsible fort
- a. Control and distribution of safety-related documents.
.1 4
G s . t er. n
MARBLE HILL PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL 3,m ,,,, g,, y p.,, u,, g p.,, 16 g 23 ORGANIZATION
- b. Supervision of document control personnel. l 1.3.13.2 , Record s Management Manager The Records Management Manager reports to the Nuclear Division Administration Manager and is responsible fort
- a. Maintaining the Quality Assurance Records File Room to issure procar storage of Quality Assurance Records.
- 1. Preparing and approving the Quality Assurance Records File Index and assuring the retrievability of Qur.lity Assurance Records.
1.3.14 Executive Director Nuclear Operations The Executive Director Nuclear Operations trports to the Senior' Vice President Nuclear Division and is responsible fort
- a. Test and Startup of the Marble Hill Station.
- b. Operations of the Marble Hill Station.
- c. Control and distribution of Supplier Technical Manuals.
r'
- d. Directing the activities of the Station staff.
j 1 3 14.1 Test Director The Test Organization for the Marble 11111 Project is set forth in Attachment E. The Test Director reports to the l Executive Director Nuclear Operations and is assigned the following functional responsibilities: '
- a. Directing the Construction Test Program.
- b. Compiling a PSI Turnover package and providing it to the Station Production Manager for review and acceptance.
- c. Coordinating with the Station to obtait. Operations support for the test program.
- d. Coordinating with Project Contract Management l personnel to ensure that construction completion is integrated into testing.
- e. Providing overall scheduling and personnel support for the test program.
I 31 Ci (b s (2 11
MARBLE HILL PRCUECT OUAll1Y ASSURANCE MANUAL ,,,,,g,, y p ,, 3,, g Title eg. 17 .# 23
- ORGANIZATION I .
- f. Certification of the Construction Test Manager and l Test Administration Manager.
1.3.14.1.1 Construction Test Mananer The Construction Test Manager reports to the Test Director and is responsible for supervision and control of PSI construction verification testing, certification of test personnel reporting to him, approving PSI construction test procedures, and coordinating overall PSI construction test activities. , 1.3.14.1.2 Test Administration Manager ! The Test Administration Hanager reports to the Test Director and is responsible for supervision and control of the Marble Hill Test and Startup Section administrative duties. This includes administrative procedure preparation, collecting and collating turnover documentation, control of the Master Completion List, and planning and scheduling. The Test Administration Manager is also responsible for certification of test personnel who report to him. 1.3.15 Division Personnel Manager The Division Personnel Manager reports to the Senior Vice President Nuclear Division and is responsible for providing the Division Training and Development Manager with the responsibility and authority to properly execute assigned duties. 1 3 15.1 Division Training and Development Manager The Division Training and Development Manager reports to the Division Personnel Manager and is responsible for establishing and administering the training of Division personnel and for coordinating the certification of PSI inspection, test, and audit personnel. Reporting to the
- Division Training and Development Manager are the designated department training coordinators.
L i i C t (2 11
l MARBLE HILL PROACT GJALITY A ,UR/ NCE MANUAL ;, I N' ORGA'lI ZA TIO*: 18 23 I .e 3. 1 .- ATTACHttE :T A j OVERu . MARBLE HILL 3ROJ'CT UGANIZATION . ,
, i 1
l - l' , . _ _ _ _ _ . , i 1 j i -l l i i '-, , .., i!j
!i 1 i
, ! ___. I,i t.J j "
i i _,l rill ! I el'p
'l I I o ..j u,i-a t. t
'f -
I h I ' j i I, ~'. i , -- I i il ! I fi kl ,l
~~'
t o_
!{ d I I m I
-l g.j [
- , ; I .
l
, i t, -l; 3-llli-ilg !
'6, i ,l I
-..fJ -li'- p; i,
I i l' i miL_j t_! mil -
! .l l I ,_,,,J
("
! *: l' lf ]
' ji , ji ll f-~
l G
- i ,- I
-I.l !
g * -
~
I j:
,1 : l ii! r--
-- - E" -- "
; l. l ._ , .
l' i i i i i ij ~~- l
}' l'l l l l i.' i-- ,
l llt' i
,i -
1 li!! l . i ;
"I M -
-I h til8lt;' i l pl;il, 'I lR l l' I L J __. __J L L: ;
, 1 l
7 T i
--~ I "l, .
g . ' I J,i l t c i L _ q!!iu a, , 1:
;i i! i ..,(>
.;i
! - yli 1, . li '
g , l}
- i}
Acting l ** See Attachr Quali' Engr. g3 .
~
C. G. Beckham NCR Coordinator Secretary M. Macy P. O'Neal Y. Caldwell clerica V.Teanue Ot) S. Morgan D. Cam'pbell _ c - Elec. QE Mgr. ' , Mech. QE Mgr. Civil QE Mgr. Mtis. QE Mgr. g8{p"{*) e QVR Supv. H. Curry F. Carchedi 'J. Parks
- 5. Sallee , J. Parks L. Worley Sr. Qlty. Engrs. Sr. Qlty. Engrs. Sr. Ol ty. Engrs. Sr. Qlty. Engrs. Sr. Qlty. Engrs. Sr. Doc. Insp.
D. Albright - J. Barbara J. Davenport -.- T. Black-SAI D. Jones J. Stivers C. Kleier D. McCarty F. Brautigan G. Fisher . F. Rubio P. Heideman T. Warnick G. Cashwell E. Carmichael " D. Shuter ' E' S Doc. Insp. Q1ty. Engr. k f,*,p*sj{ QE Const. Sury. QE S&M Supv. R. Bickel Supv. V. Berlin S. Ellegood J. Huffman Qlty. Engr. K. Tyger QESS 5. Graves CE Const. Sury. E' "I""iC" QECS R. Lee u ot Supv. QE Const. Sury. M. Bright M. Brown , K. Rafferty Supv. D. Downs 82 0841 D. M erran QECS l' "*98 "- '#II"9 ~ W. Brczelton A. KennMy B 5o M. Dugan QECS R. Austin Rec. Insp. Supv. El-O//S W. F;icklin J. Hamler h* h"f D. Harmon R. Hagood S. Fcrd C. Hedrick Rec. Insp. *
- S' R. Heron -
g g . o R. Berry J. Snead-Inter. Admin. Spec. K. Spence Civil Test Lab R. Marshall J. Griffith D. Lafever G. Obermeyer W. Stephens-Butler T. Gey::an-Supv. . M. Robbins
- 5 l T. gy_gogg 82 g ts Pf. ._Zipen-Rector - N. Smith M. Boaz l
D. Ponke-Butler P. Dicus
- h- o rig D. Gayle Sur - ei v<vey Pty. - B. Turner '
D. tiontgomery-Chf. . Temp. k G. Zollman-Chn./ Rodman R. Hurry-Kelly
- N J. Borchert-Svy. Instr.
e i . I
4
- Contract Personnel G. Davis COI M. R11ev CDI J. Rossitor SAI J. May SAI e
. 4 i
l
fgv Octcbsr 8, 1982
. .* q
.. . i pA- AY
& u.,,s v MARBLE HILL ,
. DOCUMENT CONTROL ,
i e Document Control Organization (attachment 1) 1 l The three functional elements of Document Control aret A. Reproduction / Distribution - This group is responsible for dis- ! tribution of Design Documents to "ontractors, Suppliers, Control Stations and individuals. ] B. Design Documents - This group is responsibis for verification j of Design Documents to assuret that they meet the requirements for release; proper revision sequences, proper approvals, and
- change incorporation. _.
C. Control Section - This group is responsible for controlling design ,- documents at various locations at Marble Hill. J Implementing Procedures for Document Control aret 3 A. PMP 5.02 - Document Control B. MH-12-DI-00-012 - Handling of Vendor Technical / Instruction Manuals e Design Document Flow (attachment 2) 1 All Design Documents flow through the Site Document Control Center prior to distribution and use. The flow is as follows: 1 A. Receipt - Documents are received; logged and reviewed by PSI Engineering. B. Verification - Documents are verified as to revision notations,
! proper approvals, and to ensure that the transmittal agrees with -
the documents. . C. Index - All documents are then posted in the Design Document i Inforastion System. l l I i D. Release - The transmittal is approved for distribution. ! FoIA -s4-213 ' i KHO
' DpQg acument Flow October 8. 1982 i (cete nt 2) - '
j (c ntinued) E. Distribution - Required copies are made and status stamps applied. - j Transmittals are tracked to assure receipt ac'mowledgement. i < i ' i F. Controlled Files - Control Stations receive documents, destroy I superceded copies, and acknowledge transmittals. i L I ! l e Desian Document Information System 1 i I The heart of the Document Control program at Marble Hill is the Design ! ] Document Information System (DDIS). DDIS has been in operation at ' i Marble Hill since resumption of safety related work and is presently ' f being used to display information about design documents. DDIS is an ,
.on-line interactive data system which, when queried, will display ;
information about design documents. Typical of the information dis- . played are , ! A. Document Number and Sheet Number
- S. Document Type !
l i C. Transmittal Number j D. Applicable Specifications j E. Title , Y. Revision and Revision Date f )I ! G. Status t H. Applicable Plant Unit I. Design Changes l J. Design Change Status l ! { j DDIS will be loaded by the AE as new or revised documents are approved, t ' thus providing the AE with internal document status information. When ' the documents are approved for use at Marble Hill, the DDIS record is , updated and the documents are transmitted. When the documents are i { received at Marble Hill, they are verified to the transmittal and to j DDIS. DDIS is updated to show distribution at the site. When design , i changes are approved, they are input to DDIS by the Site Document ' I Control Center. I i 1 d 1 : N l l f
. . T A
~ -
l N . S O. I . R NE R E RL T La O OtOS OR I UO DR A . RI TT V I TO AR ET l Cl Z l NA R TT OO I . OT E 8N RC N CD U P O C P h A S G ~ R O H L . E R O OW E XR E TA T R L E L 1 R NNu EA
! - N N O
E S L O D L NO T N T . MMaJ; O I MV I R I
.R E
M l N U L C SUR ECE T 4 rT TN O O l O AO C O A D R, DOP U C DC T T A C TD N ~ D S O T C N E M. l N " U- i t 4I OO R OR I E 'E C I I T TS O TL CL ' O, C UI UO ' O U V DR D I DID R OT l O HE Hi PO O E R TP 'C PISU EC T I
, ED S H
R S ~
m ATTACl! MENT 2 DESIGN DOCUMENT FLOW
- 16w u ,ar e m.w me.j m m i r ur- --
4 i HECEIVE (- ? VEnlFY > INDEX m CONTROL LOG E REVISION HOTATIONS u POST DDIS DATA N REVIEW REQUIREMENTS W APPROVALS w FCRIECH INCORPORATION u TRACK REVIEWS u TRANSuliTAL DATA N FCH/ECH POSilNG w w e c'N Mw4w arm m c.armr4-T
= DISTRIBUTE > ""
y DELEASE Fl ES u DETERMetE DISTRIBUTION N MAKE COPIES N COilTROL & 8 ATELLITE u APPLY STATUS STAMP 8 ST ATIOtiS a PREPARE TRANSMITTAL M BUPERSEDED COPIES u TRACK TRAN8MITTAL a FCRIECN FILE u ACKNOWLEDGE TRANS-MIITALS h
%0/n2
.- rw- om o, ,mE.
INDIVIDUAL REQUIRED READING NOTIFICATION (Instructions for completion of this form are listed on the reverse side) ATTENTION: SECTION: 4 / / /' /MN DEPARTMENT: A0 You are imnies to read tne followang cosument(s) and retum tnis form completed to Civenon Treening my . R EV.
- REV.
COCUMENT A EA0 00CUMENT REAO (#9mSteh /(Gv8) e f 519 M 5ec/./0 ( d u 9) 9
$te/. B Wer.9)' 9 J/Ch/7{& 8) g
$lCh & (&v.9) 9 9 0). 7 (kh'8)l 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT My signature below indicates I have reso the document (s) on the date(s) indicated above and I am aware of the contents of tne material contained in the document (t!.
*!!GNATURE: N' 'DATE: !8
' EMPLOYEE NO.: / N
- COMPANY NAME:
- SCC!AL SECURITY NO.: / N /0
'Information to to filled in by individual cerforming recuired reading.
Puede serves Instene g LP 81992 R 8/82 i , , 87 29 e
^
?
~ c4re c7 issue. !b INDIVIDUAL REQUIRED READING NOTIFICATION (Instructions for completion of this form are listed on the reverse side)
ATTENTION: SECTICN: * ! CE?ARTMENT: N ~ y au n. n e r. in e., % .,,,,,,, ,, ,,, ,, ,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,, ,, e ,,,,,, 7,,,,,, ,y kgp n ev. Rev. cocusest arao occuusur asao ; f/7]Pn?9 (fu'0) o ff]P /6 3 W i'0) l c \ \ PS)D 8-3 (ftv 6) o 9/??P/7-/ (fwo) \ ' n R7/P6-/(fw.0) lo \ R779/O-/ (BV.0) \ o \ l ( ACKNOWLEDGEMENT My signature below indicates I have read the document (s) on the date(s) indicated above and I am aware of the contents of the material contained in the document (sl. '
*::CNATURE: _
%t *0 ATE.
~
'/ /
- EMPLOYEE No.: !' ' COMPANY NAME:
- scc AL sEcVRIT/ NO.: '/ k #N t
*fnformation to ce filled in by incivicual cerforming reowred reading.
Pwaste ferwice Indians L.F $1132 R 6/82 017t
1
~ OATe c8 is:ve ! M[84 INDIVIDUAL )i REQUIRED READING NOTIFICATION i (Instructions for completion .of this form are listed on the reverse sidel I
'l ATTENT!CN: SECTICN: ! '
CEPARTMENT: Yau ar avii.e to r..a m. tonow , eo um.atti ana r a m m. vorm comoi.e.a to civiima Trs.o.a, av l m av. nev. I cocuueNT READ CCCUMENT AeAO l h((}h('f./ (hy./0) l /o &f/)hff./0[h/-{j)l (s l
$bh fkY' T h/f'b l W hY-l0)l /0' Ctch & Carto) u l \
9 eh 7 ( B r'.//) I it l ACXNOWLEDGEMENT My signature below indicates I have read the document (s) on the date(s) indicated aeove ar'd I am aware of the contents of the material contained in the document (s).
'!!CNATURE: N 'CATE: /
'EMPLCYEE NC.: *CCMPANY NAME: '
' SCC!AL SECURITY NC.: / N ~Id
'Intermation to ce filled in by individual cerforming reouired reading.
Puotte serv.ee snaisas t.P st.192 M 6/82
#7 2t
7-
, MAR 8LE HILL PROJECT
. TRAINING ASSIGNMENT WORKSHEET t?
NAME sim O. Harris DATE 10-13-82 EMPLOYEE NO. 13800 SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 421-42-1078
- PROJECT SECTION Trainina & Development POSITION /JOS CLASSIFICATION Division Training & Development Manager '
TRAINING ASSIGNMENT APPROVED B 1 / W EF-t a._
. SECTidN MANAGER DATE TRAINING ASSIGNED COMPLETION SIGN ATURE* DATE
- 1. Initial Required Reading (Record Attached) ,
- 2. QA Indoctrinetsn Training Level B Training b
- 3. Procedure Training (List PMP Number and/or Lesson Plan Number) h val A Trainine ^^^-- k '
U-
- \ / \ / \' /
\ / \ / \ /
c '
\ / \ / \ /
\ / \ / \/
\ / \/ \/
\/ V \/
/\ /\ /\
/ \ / \ / \
/ \ / \ <\
/ : N /
\
/ \ / \ .
\
/ \ / \ / \
- 4. Functional Training (List Course and/or Lesson Plan Number,or attach OJT Training Form)
TRAINING ASSIGNED COMPLETION S 1 NATURE
- DATE N / \ / \ /
/
Y N- / W Y N/N s.,.... . -
~~
l c l l
- INITIAL REQUIRED READING RECORD 1
i 4 NAME Sim O'. heris l POSITION / Joe CLALSIFICATION Division fraining & Development Manager i PmOJEcT stcTiON Training & Devoirpoent s ] I i DOCUMENT MEVISION DOCUMENT REVISION READ READ READ READ + l PnAM he.4 = 1 1 PMP 3.10 Y j i PnAM hecim 2 N PMP 3.32 / l PGAM Section 6 8 PMP 4.00 / i ! PQAM Section 7 7 PMP 5.00 S , r ) i PQAM Sectiod 10 9 PMF 6.00 # > I PGAM Section 17 7 PHP 8.00 4 \ j AQAM Section 1 Y TPAP 1.01 0
.- ee_ 2 g \ ./ \ / l
- -so. 6 s \ / \ l
\ . - . . . . . , o \ / \ l t ! .- ._ . < _ 10 s- \ / \/ l 40 M -1 17 9 \/ \/
,- g x 1
! - 1.01 s / \ li :
- 1. , s / \ /i i ~ 2.x e / \ I \
PMr 3.00 9 [ \ f t l M 3.01 9 [ \/ , f i i l - ie r.w v iN.s .,w e e. e. d tw' - /6/bMa. i
/
i TnAinEE sioNArunE Are La ei m m sis: ,2 2, ,
October 20,1982 m, - cut off date October 27,1982
$) volume I number 16 W
r
-- -.y
, , g-
. . . . . . . U monon as podle. the trnmediate super.
966068 to the Career Opportunity Admin- visor shculd route parts L 2 and 3 of the op his program covers vacant positions in tstrator. Personnel Department GR within pbconon through proper supervision for rimtmutrative/technicci and manage- seven days of this newsletter. comments, sent/ professional position c1= tea .ons. D D the practico of Public Service 2 Complete the oppucants section by 4 After completion of the supervisor's sec-ndiana to promote from wtthin the or- matching your relevant experiences and bon, the imtnediate supervuor should re-Janization-hiring from the outside on- background to the quothcotons uste<1 An tain Part 3 and send Ports i and 2 to the y when necessary qualifications are appbcant must meet the minimum r+ Career Opportuntry Admmistrator. Person-lot available intomally. Public Service quuements for the position sought and if nel Department GiCL 11ciana will be consistent with equal you've been in your current position for 2pportunity, affirmative action and less than 9 months. receive your S Appbconts will receive Part 4 of the op other developmental programa Current supervisor s approvat pbcaton by retum mall ventying recetpt of Job status will not be affected by your the completed appucaton when both op f participation in the Career Opportunity 3 Upon comp;etion the oppucant should pecant and supervisory sections are e Progrant send Part 4 of the appucation to the Career receiveci Ooporturuty Adtrurustrator. Personnel De-indructionat portment GiQ Then forward Parts L 2 and A Foottson Description may bu obtained 3 to your immed; ate supervisor for comple- br more data 11 about each position usted I !! you on interested and quanted for a bcn of the immawa einarvtsors secbort hara Contact Mary Hu!! man, extens.on In order to have as much pertinent Infor. ke6 at GN kn a FMtion Description. posthon hsted here you should suttnit a "Carnt Opportunny Appucation" SF App 5 cations wit be accepted from fur-time Company employees on8y. APPLICANTS, PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR EMPLOYEE NUMBER ON APPLICATION IN THE SPACE JUST ABOVE YOUR LAST NAME AND SPELL OUT YOUR LOCATION AS COMPLETELY AS POSSIB'E. IT WOULD ALSO BE HELPFUL IF EACH IMMEDIATE A/T 06 SUPERVISOR WOULD ADD THEIR LOCATIONVACANT JUST GHQ LOCATION POSITION Claim SoecialistREQUEST NO. Ot94 BEL,LW THEIR SIGNATURE. THANK YOU FOR MINJMAX. $14,768/920.592 TITLE Hesith Clems Supervesor 14EPORTS TO J. R. Harlan YOUR COOPERATION. DIVA 0EPT. AcetJPsyton Benehte POSITION RESPONS181UTIES AND DUTIES V ACANT POSITION Enocutive SecretaryREQUESTalt NO.080196 Responsible for ad;udicating clasne on a deity basis and paymg LOCATION Executive-GHQ MIN l MAX. 617.056 923.920 benefits e accordance wrth Comprehensive H REPORTS TO H A. Barter Short Term Disabdity benefets in accordance wrth Plan provraions; TITLE Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Prepares Benefit Payment Schedules. summenses benefits fo DIV.sDEPT. Enecutrve date storage, contacts proveers and claimants f or ctanficatio PO3 TION RESPONSl81UTIES AND DUTIES information, and prepares count for dady work flow; Fontow up on Organize and prioritse ecomeg weekly mail; Schesuie Propere moetegs and appomtmente. enclLdsng stinerery, mcludeg pendmg claims seeming additenal anformati toecial reports: Schedule travel arr angement s, menstrators, Determines f without dady morutoring) which claims u:0 of Company hekcopter and IEA planes; Ishorth and!spe Perform ed. should be researched mth supenore. s:cretorial duties, includeng drctorion Company MINIMUM QU ALIFICATIONS writegn, typmg. fding; Handles activities related to proceouros, practices and pohcies applic able to depart. High Schoot or equivalent plus 2 4 years M mentet activities and Company organization. Medical & Dents' Termmology, Coordestion of Benefits pro-tiNiMUM QU ALIFICA TiONS and retention of conf 4en. cedures & Medicere P ogram Benefite; Demonstrated unders 0:monstrated organaation aptymdependens and discretion; ludgment mg of Cahf omia Reistive Values Studies & International & Cla ti:hty: Demonstrated erutiative and tact m wormmg withboth others, tion of 0$ eases. Demonstrated understendog of Provider biiting Demonstrated to communicate effectively v or. policies, Demonstrated communicanon ski'le r eeded in a pro D;monstrated abdity d ea- goal orented enveor ment for prompt. ef fcont eteens edyscarr;n belly and written; Associate Degree plus 2 4 years relate DESIR ABLE QU AllFIC A flONS per-ence of which et least 13 years must be as a Secretary.6 Two veers 8 years heelthrelateJ es. clame esperience with Pubhc Service indene O'l Hign School or equevaient plut Comprehensive Health Plan clasmo; Esponence m computer p;rience of which at least 13 years must be as e Secretary.includmg budgets. manuale Gyer al Company bacsground speedwriteg. put, output in mactemog check (ontrols, ch and organisational structure. Shorthand or production oriented, seit starteg indevidust able to function un 0:monstrated accu r acy and speed in tygmg and ietter difficult situatinns. compos > tion DATE NEEDED Immediately DATE NEEDEO November 1,1982 WORKING HOURS 8 00 a.m.-5 00 p m. WORKING HOURS 8 00 a m. - 5 00 g m. NEW POSITION REPt, ACING POSITION OF Gladys McQueeney Liggett. FOR FURTHER INFORM ATION CONT ACT Jim Horten, GHQ FOR FURTHfR INFORMATION CONTACT Jerry W hrsonnet-GMO. ent+nsion 147 2 NOT APPROVED TO PAY RELOCATION EXPfNSES on equal opporturuty employer tenesun 2051 NOT APPROVED TO pay RELOCATION EXPENSES y .g Fw M W
-~ eief="
l l ON Construction Protect Engmeer M/P 05 (CANT POSITI REQUEST NO.1261 ICATION MeroleNdi AMAX. 425,992/837,416 TITLE ConstructionSupwvisor APPLICANTS, PLEASE INCLUOE YOUR EM
- EPORTSTO RobertSchtmot IV./DGPT. 64uclear Divisaon/Merbie He NUMBER ON APPLICATION IN THE osmON he Individuelle RESPONSeeluTIES capone.b6e ANO forlDUTIES the s in coordeatmg ABOVE of YOUR work LAST NAME AND SP ectivities lnd timely resolution of intwforence wedend wouenemo LOCATIONprob em AS COMPLETELY AS P heer ores of responsibdity on second and/or Aechanical Contract Group; TNs individual we be reou to WOULD trwrd sNft ALSO for the BE HELPFUL IF EAC Nork without direct supwvision, Jract specifications, codes and stendeds l
eil applicable ufety and ouekty standards whie pr omotes an SUPERVISOR WOULD A to meure that appuc ede con. we met and to enforce YOUR COOPERATION. brderly progress #on of scheduled work activities. MINIMUM QUAUFICATlONS1S. Degree quivalent plus 57 in Mechemce) Engineereg plus 2 5 years construc. ,4 tion cupenence; OR High Schooience. diplorra or e years drectly reisted construction expon l t d; DESIRABLE 2 3 years ofQUAUPICAT10NS the constructson exponence l n;in. be nuclear re a e Knowledge and eaperience in Must bothbep>peable to and hanger instal atio Cas. j dividual must have good commumcation skdis: POSITIONS l'nM.D THROUGH COPSenior C make decisions on tve/ber own. * "" DATE NEEDED November 1,198230 p.m.-12:30 a.m. " *"I WORKING HOURS 4:
- R INFORMATION CONTACT W. A. Muensterman, **
McRELL 1 applican'ts,2' interviewed. JOHN OR F R A OV d T P REL ATION EXPENSES Production Engmeer, No.1193, Fosed Power Produc CAOE,8 apphcents, drect offer, HQ: Shareholder flocords Supervisor, No.1124, S STEVE PlZAREK,11 spokcants, deoct offer.GHO; Senior intemel Auditor, No. 1185, e intemel Auditing OREGORY PATCHETT, 4 spolicants,N 'l16interview ep. i M,P 06 VACANT POSITIONREQUESTNO. information0302 Systems Speceakst Audit Manager, No. 09f!5, Marbte Hdl; BRIAN MO LOCATION 827,624/840,056 Marble Ndi Manage, phcants,1 interviewed. HARRY MIN./ MAX. REPORTS TO O.L Walker TITLE Informatiott Systems Engineer.Materiais, No. 0268, Marble HW: Protect OlV./ DEPT. Information Systems he LUKINS,2 applicants,1 intervewed. TIMOTHY POSITION The personRESPONS181uTIES in tNs posaten wdl beAND OUTIESforNuclear responsible f om. workingSafety with tSupemsor, No. 0266, Marble Hdl; Nuclear Divisson users in the development The informateon and support oc Ofte,6 applicants,3 nterv:ewed. Hdi, putented and menwel informat>on f b hty studies. hcations to systems; OE Survedlance SpecisFst-Mechamcel, No. the Systems Specialist must provide 091 TERRY SHEETS,2 app'icants,1 interviewed. puter technology; TNs person wdl perform ossi egenerd and dotaded des 7 suppcrt the Nuclear Diviseon. data Electrical Supervisor, No. 0941, Marble Hdl; M6N4 MUM QUAUFICATIONS mmg and 'spohcants, dvect off er. 8 A. or 8.S. m related discipline; 3 5 years of progrenive processmg emper onceThis in busmeos must have sophcetton Operations instrument 8. Control CA Eaigin program analysis; persort ffective. systems dessen and ad planmng H4; TOM ROSERTSON. 2 spolcants, drect ctfer. demonstrated once6 lent commumcation skills, m abdify to e ly use problem analyses techniques, orgerwistion tion s Operations QA Engmeer>Mechancsi, No. skes, creativity and innovettveness irt the utdisation of syste desigrt concepts, and systems implementation andDOYLE coofdma SCHW ARTZ, 2 sopiscents, deoct offer. Marble Hm; NO skills. n as. OE Survedlance Specishst Cfvd, No. 0240 OESIRASLE QUAUFICATIONS A good general knowledge of the Pubhc ti d elopeg and Ser#,e Indians orga i NAMES SUSMff7EO. HM; NO tion: Functions and objectives will be beneficia t st n ev No. 0271, Marble Engmeer Mater sis, supportmg the systems for constructing cellent and operateg Residenta nuc e QUAUFIED IN HOUSE CAND'OATES,6 epphesnts. genersteg station; Requires thetruction abdefy effort to develop an en workeg repoort with users supporting a mesor cons Senior Protect Engineer, No. 0272, Marbl in a dynamte environment.16,1982 HOUSE CANOIDATES,1 sophcant. ED IN. CATE NEEDED OctoberWORKING HUURS Marble 7:30 a.m,Peceipt 4.00 p.m. inspector, No. Ovid, Marble Hdl; NO NEW POSITIONFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Gary Walker, HOUSE CANDIDATES,6 apphesnts. H4, entension 1410 APPROVED TO PAY RELOCAflON EXPENSES , i *n
S l : 02 10 _~-_ SASS M"h t, y )0j !! e a.8 ; a, Esu!.!!. _ a E R" 1 E 158i3
'-*=a s
g ,_
;~m AdadJ - ugdh
( - I$$ ggw E i Szes - U 12
= =
t < E : 5 - :. - g
- _s_e _e _:
uc ! - g *E 15-c55 x3E fw = gr-E -t idJ.
^
w 5 *E' a , F55 3 g8: *s 5 h5E a 5 r
;; M e "t 2
h .ss!se$ u,..,...n a
=c 5 a 5-
_ _- n - EE5 2 - 5 est*
- E E
" 5'l
-E,: "2 05-
* =
p ,_3 5: 3 g4 $ t: J 4d. M $ , Em~ _8 t h - 0" 5 E 3
. g
- r" 3 t: h 5 mie a
=
- e . t:2:==g;a
- ,es
{g- sg._ m _
.r.
Y wW
= s.
. E. 6_ .E 4 <8,
.1 2.
8 =2== E _. . N 2 $ Cca n p. s.t
,g a g I ** J s
Z l g u2 N i 28 E L,-
- i l
00 l # o< t.
!- i t
=
e,5 E. . i Ei
e RECORDS MANAGEMENT Document Flow Chart .
.tw-Co sme.LL.tk V =tD. Nil,lE D
.. E..THDN. ..Co.D. .. 0.CEDU. . o.-.Ets.wSDs.CCE,ftD
. seose.o e .LLT*tDE NT,,IE D
...Ce.D.U 1 I 4 ir 4 RECORDS MANAGEMENT RECEpPT UNIT
. .act,vg . Los e..u. ..ocs.. com,.06 60s)
.N . .u.en t. . 68 C.UNT. B TC.
.. D,0.w..D t o thCODet umt.
. He-Comme W..
. ..o.e.. ctD..ecamTw,50 . ..oct D .qD.utret0
. ,0,oCD,e non-o. e I I 4 4 OA RECORDS ENCOOlNG UNIT ADM#esSTRATION RECORDS ENC 00fNQ UNIT
. cv..o , compostems..it..ee6,tv cm.ca .cu..o., cou,6s,a ns..it t e .Tv cm.ca NC ..mC.OD.DToDoCW w uf P...iD.T..mt.y .,0..D.E.D w To D CUw.NT ... 10 1. .uT.T . , o, t .. Wm Uutt. 8.scoo.se . .wcoDuse ,0.u. .guCoDme ,o.m.
.o,c.cu wt ..mcoDwee
.,Docu 0 . tw stat. se) (v.m ) (v.u..) 0 u. twene) iP di O AT A E NTRY UNIT
. .uT. .tv..tv D.T .
.,y w..D..coDm. , ....... .e. . y,g;,.,,,,,,,,,,
. . ....D....... . . . . . , . . .
DOCUMENT PREP UNIT 8, ",'",'g'g*g",
, g
. ... 00 ...,.. e. .
. . w . .D , . .D.
. . .. ., , o 1
MICROFILM UNIT
.......... .. ... ..o ..,.
. ...w..D ,o . o,.... . , .
. Doc.o
. e.C Desse .... . W. ......ID.,...
M..D.. l0ENER AL NE ADOUARTERS (GNO)
...o....,,.e.,..
. ........D,., ,,..... .
VERIFIC ATION UNIT . ...w..D To v. .W.C.160m
.M.D m. 0 Co,v D.Cvu.NT.
...C.e ENSo.
..................,.osto.
.,v.
.D.
.. ,0.
w D . . .. D .oo_c... . . . . ...Dco., 1P FILES MANAGEMENT & RETRIEV AL UNIT
........D.......,,,....
.....,,..o.
. ...... 60..
........c
.... ,... ..o.............
. o. ..,
. . . lN.01,.
. . . . t Liv.f
. . . .V .. .e4. . . .s. f .10C.
. ._- _ . _ __ _ . _ _ _ _ =__
r l l
""U E* "E "C' "EV' "O*
! ifj'1.IE DMS10N E'ORDS lWWi:'BII PWUE
! ! III'*!
- RMP 3.01 1 i
PREPAFATION OT THE h"JCLEAR DIVISION PLAhi DAII O l i DOCDIENT INDEI SYSTD: ENCODING FORM 8-27-82 7 25 l l . l ATTACHMEhT 1 PLANT DOCUMEhi INDEX SYSTEM i LIST OF FIELDS I e f
- I Ng"..las Div!st0N som_ *.AN* DC;JWIN* INDE A SY5"lW ;
l 6s s' er a es: US* 08 88103 t;t.: esAA # stet l' A E m:.c.ts sit,3 naut gem:t= se:I.Tel 8tt' .D hasst 68= t. { t I a sm: cote 3 1' 50uments+ = unset e it f I DC Want A'* **** ' s 9" colnatiows 80ustsent seussete is l I : um" 4 1:* tytttw CDat t . i l l : *a pasit* A** ' 17' stastustwytsw i t a c::vist e natt i u* wmosco:t a e st yrsion 3 tg. yC03. kuuset 8 il 4 S00.Jestc avestt# E t t' taaku8 & ty*I'1 st a.A. atueest e s:
. gae
- t ** poen nusset s it
, wtD.a t it' Jtsat:= hunsets is
. 8sJ C338 *: it' esatta A.sgot:togATID= nuestI* t!
Cis*aer* 0= % sJia" = 2:' aanst C. Ass ! l
- -- eIeiea4:1 tot:t*t At:06 * ;*
- Suce Deeta muestt e
! :!' steletw:t*vacmasadapte e ::' enespe=c esamisst* ngeset s t:
.... .ea,I-o. t ::. .t.f.0 et . .sou. sos, ,,
it- :o an ,se:, uart o.t: I n- sau vru..ta mu. set. *: tw
- tN3'vtpwa.eegy 3 pt
- e agtt a esstag ula* seveset s *:
vN P ritua. *: !! 2t
- prospavte 3 l Or* 8.4Jt:*
- 08 18 f*
- me ttate:8 -
I et* esatt nia, eseDt:ATD*
*rt.*te.1Iv*** sit.Dt 8
i \ I f 1 s e 0 , I l _ _ . _ . _. , . . - . _ _ _ ,c-- _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . , , _ . , _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ , . . . , . . . . . _ , , , . . _ , _ , . , . . . . _ _ , . . . , _ . . , . _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ . _ , _ __
4 i s i i i Pno:tount wo. nev. No. i N'JQ EAi! DIVISim iECORDS iWAGM t% Nut. TITLt RMP 3.01 1 { . PREPARATIONOFTHENUC1.EARDIVISION'PIRgi DATs PAGE OF
' 0'I 0',
2 DOODENT INDEI SYSm ENCODING FORM g 95 . t AC ACHMENT 1 (Cont'd.) { i- PIRC DOCDEC INDEX SYSTD1 j ENCODING PORM l 1, feuCLEAR DivtS30h *
' PLANT DOCUMSWT INDtx SysTtu yy**'** SeeCCDmG 9 anen
- 1
, _.m, ,
O j -
@ , -., b .
N 1 I - I 6 8 l gg,gggy, .6
< n
..s_ . @
.' B88959s* WedP
.l n .~
~
p .
.. , n-
. . _ i @ >
h$$
; at e=o view **
g l ,
.mu S- @_
s,.., h,
,, e..-.ie.g s. .. -
#it.!
i 4 a..ee esse.an. teen tais gesum r.9,eg I (23.' tMOW9m .38 i { i C .e* C 4 9 'if. Ctoe.48 C 3.F.t* awes,tt t e b.fi
) )
i A ] "
.I ,
J PROCEDURE NO. REV. NO. l NJCLEG DMSHN ECORDS IW4AEENT MWJAL TITLE RMP 3.01 1 , DATE PAGE OF' PREPARATION OF TE NUCLEAR DIVISION PLANT . 8-2,7-82 10 25 ~ Doctwh7 TNDEY CYSTEW ENCODING FORM l 1 ATTACEMENT 1 (Cont'd) INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE PLANT DOCUMI (I INDEX SYSTEM ENCODING FORM
- 1. DOCUMENT SEOUENCE NUMBER No action (form previously stamped by Receipt Clerk).
- 2. ENCODER Print initials.
- 3. DOCUMENT TYPE Record the appropriate document type code from Table XI, " Nuclear Document Type Codes."
- 4. UNIT (S) Record the unit number (s) to which the document applies.
- 5. PROPRIETARY Record an "S" if the document has been designated a Security or Safeguards Information document. Record a "C" if the
, document is a Security Clearance. Record a "Y" if the document meets the definition of Proprietary as discussed in Figure 1. Record an "L" if the document has been designated a Legal document.
- 6. DOCUENT DATE Record the date'(year, month, day) the document was originated, received (if origination date unaveilable), or as designated in the Encoding Guideline.
- 7. REV. Record the document rzvision identifier, as applicable (right justify).
- 8. DOCUMENT NO. Record the docywrt identification number.
Examples: Alpha numeric letter numbers, purchase order numbers, specification numbers, NCR numbers, CAR numbers, etc. (left justify).
- 9. QAR Record a "Q" if the document is designated a Quality Assurance Record. Record a "C" if the document is a non-Quality Assurance Record.
- 10. MEDIA Record the retention media as listed in Figure 2.
- 11. FILE CODE Record the file code number in which the hard copy resides. For Quality Assurance Records, record the QAR File Index number.
9 . g
PROCEDURE NO. REV. NO. l OCLAR DlVTSION RECOES MMEN 1%NUAL - TITLE RMP 3.01 1 PREPARATION OF THE NUCLEAR DIVISION P 'T DATE PAGE 11 OF 23 DOCUMENT INDEI SYSTEM ENCCDING FORM 6-27-82 ATTACHMENT 1 (Cont'd) INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE PLANT DOCUMENT INDEX SYSTEM ENCODINC FORM
- 12. DESCRIPTION / SUBJECT Record information that describes the subject matter of the document. For correspondence, record the exact Subject if available in addition to key words, phrases, or sentences from the body of the letter.
No abbreviations shall be used.
- 13. SPECIFICATION Record the referenced specification number if applicable as listed in Table V.
" Specification Authority Code Table."
- 14. PURCHASE ORDER Record the referenced purchase order number as applicable.
- 15. COMPANY / ORGANIZATION FROM Record the originating company or organization code from Table IV, " Company.-
Originator Abbreviations Table."
- 16. COMPANY / ORGANIZATION TO Record the receiving company or organization code from Table IV, " Company - Originator Abbreviations Table."
- 17. INDIVIDUAL FROM Record originating individual as applicable in the format of last name first, space,
,first initial (Example: SMITH J). Do not use commas.
- 18. INDIVIDUAL TO Record receiving individual as applicable in the format of last name first, space, first initial. Do not use commas.
- 19. SUEJECT CODE Record the abbreviation cede for the subject (s) of the document as listed in Table III, " Nuclear Subject Abbreviations Table," as applicable.
- 20. MATERIAL IND.
a) Station Encoding Clerk Leave blank (to be completed by designated reviewers). b) Records Management If applicable record the material indicator Encoding Clerk code in accordance with Figure 3. 0 0 , w w a < ~ - - , - - , e - >
i PROCEDURE NO. REV. NO. 102BE DMSIm RECORDS MWEENT MUL RMP 3.01 1 1 T,.. , PREPARATION OF TE NUCII.AR DIVISION PLANT DATE PAgg 12 op za DOCUENT INDEX SYSTEM ENCODING FORM - 8-27-82 1
. ATTACHENT 1 (Cont'd)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE PLANT DOCUENT INDEX SYSTEM ENCODING FORM
- 11. EQUIPENT NO.
a) Station Encoding Clerk Leave blank (to be completed by designated i reviewers). b) Records Management If applicable record the S&L configured Encoding Clerk equipment number in accordance with the applicable Material Identification Standard.
- 22. OPERATIONS EQUIPENT NO.
a) Station Encoding Clerk Leave blank (to be completed by designated reviewers). b) Records Management If applicable record the Operations Encoding Clark configured equipment number. The following fields, though not physically on the Encoding Form, are also available. These fields are encoded using the " ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THIS DOCUENT TYPE" section or the Continuation Form. The " ADDITIONAL INFORMATION" section and the Continuation Form can also be used to record multiple entries (i.e., specifications, purchase orders, description).
- 23. SYS m Record the applicable system code (s) from Table I, " Nuclear System Codes Table."
- 24. S ARTUP SYSTEM Record the applicable startup system identifier (s).
- 25. NPPIS CODE If applicable record the appropriate NPRDS ,
code (s) from Table IV, 'tompany - Originator Abbreviations Table."
- 26. MODEL NUMBER If applicable record the model number (s).
- 27. MANUTACIURER'S SERIAL If applicable record the manufacturer's NUMBER serial number (s).
- 28. SPIN NUMBER If applicable record the Westinghouse spin i number (s) in accordance with the applicable I Material Identification Standard.
i r (
. . a
- - - - - . - . - , - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - . e,-.n -, a , , , , , e . . - -,< e,- , ,~ , . , _ . . , - -, -,,,,,y e,-,w--__--,---
y g ggg gg pggg g;g PROCEDURE NO. REV. NO. TITLE RMP 3.01 1 DATE PAGE 0F PREPARATION OF TE NUCLEAR DIVISION PLANT 8-27-82 13 25 DOCUENT INDEX SYSTEM ENCODING FORM
; ATIACEMENT 1 (Cont'd)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE i PLANT DOCUMENT INDEX SYSTEM ENCODING FORM
- 29. LOT / BATCH NUMBER If applicable record the lot or batch number (s) in accordance with the applicable Material Identificatiot. Standard.
- 30. MATERIAL / SPECIFICATION If applicable record the material type or NUMSER specification identifier (s).
- 31. ASME CLASS If applicable record the ASME Class identifier (1, 2, 3, MC, or NF).
- 32. SHOP ORDER NUMBER If applicable record the shop order number (s).
- 33. SHIPPING MANIFEST NUMBER If applicable record the shipping manifest number (s).
- 34. REFERENCE DRAWING NUMBER If applicable record any drawing number (s) that are referenced on the document.
- 35. BASE ETAL EAT NUMBER If applicable record the base metal heat number (s).
- 36. FILLER ETAL EAT NUMBER If applicable record the filler metal heat number (s).
- 37. PERFORMER If applicable record the performer (s) name(s) that accomplished the task.
- 38. REFERENCE Record any additional information that will further enhance the retrievability of the document.
Upon completion of the encoding, record an "X" in the "NEW" block at the bottom of the Encoding Form. l l w -- ~ v , -,-~-c------ ---e r , , , , - - e , , ,.--r -en
NOVEMBER 8, 1982 NEWS
SUMMARY
0FFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS Full-page advertisements placed in the Washington Post and the New York Times today by Edison Electric Institute and the Atomic Industrial Forum say "most of the stories" on the recent Sandia laboratory study of siting nuclear power plants "were wrong. . . The ' worst-case' projectionswere totallydiscounted and were not included in the report to the NRC. Even so, the frightening projections were leaked to some news organizations resulting in a spate of stories describing the potential of a fearful toll from an accident with a one-in-a-billion chance of occurring." In a letter to the editor of the Washington Post today, Edison Electric Institute's John J. Kearney writes that
" reporter Milton R. Benjamin fell for one of the oldest ploys in the dogeared book of anti-nuclear scare tactics: the ' worst-case' scenario. . .' Worst-case' scenarios for nuclear power plants assume a wildly exaggerated series of 'what ifs' that result in incredibly unrealistic damage figures," In an op-ed article in the Post 11/6, G. A Keyworth II, science adviser to President Reagan, comments on the Post article on the Sandia study on 11/1. "The study clearly states that the results presented in the report do not in any way represent the real risks associated with nuclear acci-dents. Unfortunately, the article misuses background information from the study to provide a list of possible consequences of an accident at every nuclear site in the country. . ."
WASHINGTON--President Reagan appointed Interior Undersecretary Donald P. Hodel as the new Secretary of Energy, drawing praise from several energy industry spokesmen and rage from environmentalists. Both sides said Hodel's appointment signals a continued push for development of nuclear power. Hodel was chief of the Bonneville Power Administration under the Nixon and Ford administrations. Washington Post.,11/6 and Wall Street Journal, 11/8. ERUSSELS--About 13,000 gallons of lightly radioactive water spilled inside the - Tihance nuclear power plant and a small amount of radioactive gas escaped into the
, atmoschere when a compressor pump malfunctioned.
New York Times,11/6. (
' NEW YORK--Mcody's Investors Service lowered its rating on bonds and preferred stock of Public Service Co. of Indiana to single-A-3 from single-A-2 because of "long-term concern" over the utility's 83% stake in development of the Marble Hill nuclear power plant. .cody said the " magnitude of expenditures required to complete Marble Hill is expected to strain the company's cash flow" and undermine its financial strength.
Wall Street Journal, 11/8. ' Michael Ver"eulen writes in Parade Magazine,11/7, about the hard times and why towns are welconing nuclear dumps and prisons. He says the 800 citizens of Naturita, Colorado ~"are nolding their breath in rapt hopes of attracting a nuclear waste dump and, so they think, rescuing themselves from economic disaster." Chem-Nuclear Systems is testing about 1000 acres outside the town for development of a dumping site. Jerry Knight of the Washington Post writes that American Uranium Co. hat just opened To get around NRC
- ne nation's first retail market in uranium in Washington, D.C.
regulation that radioactive material can only be stored in a Federally licensed The actual nuclear uranium, storage facility, American Uranium sells uranium certificates. Jack Edlow explains, stays in his licensed nuclear warehouse in East St. Louis, IL. F:r storine the uranium he sells, Edlow charges 10 cents a pound for six months. 11/8. In a letter to the editor of the New York Times, Consumer Power Company's Walter Boris wrices that the real objective of the nuclear industry in advocating a quota on imported uranium "is to assure an adequate and reliably supply of uranium for our public utilities. We view this as a safeguard in the event foreign producers form a cartel to dictate prices and supplies for our nuclear industry." 11/6. Foi A -N -2A3
%M
NUCLEAR DIVISION NOVEMBER 12, 1982 [ -
/ocation: dat;; $"vis subject; QUALITY TREND REPORT - THIRD QUARTER 1982 INDMNA attention: S. W. SHIELDS The Trend Analysis (attached) accomplished in the attached graphs and Investigation Reports indicates the following:
A. The number of NCR's written per month is continuing to increase, but the rate of increase continues to decrease as expected with the completion of SPP-17 activities. B. We continue to close NCR's at a significantly faster rate than the rate of issuance. C. The rate of issuing CAR's is decreasing for the first time. D. The rate of closing CAR's; however, is not nearly as fast as our rate of issuance. Steps have been taken with Quality Engineering to turn this trend around. E. The rate of issuing AFR's continues to be nearly flat, with the rate of closure continuing to be significantly faster than the rate of issuance after corrective action was taken as a result of the Second Quarter Trend Analysis. F. Conditional Releases (CR's) have been trended for the first time. The rate of issuance is increasing at a very slow and acceptable rate, however, the rate of closure is totally unacceptable and steps to assure corrective action have been initiated within Quality Engineering. The larger percentage of open CR's is the result of documentation problems with NSSS components. Corrective action includes the involvement of Westinghouse. G. Construction Surveillance Reports (CSR's) have been analyzed for the first time as an indicator of the adequacy of the contractor's first line inspection. This analysis resulted in completing four Suspected Trend Investigation Reports (STIR's, attached). The F'c1A-19-293 $196-7102 R 3169 kW
4 MEMO T0: S. W. SHIELDS page two NOVEMBER 12, 1982 contractors affected were J. L. Manta, Bechtel, Pullman Sheet Metal and Newberg. Trend investigation revealed that although adverse trends did exist within each of tnose organizations, previous corrective action has now reversed the trend. Each will continue to be closely monitored to assure continued effectiveness of the corrective action. H. Analysis of AFR's and CAR's indicated a potential adverse quality trend within Newberg related to the areas of handling, housekeeping, storage and mainte-nance. Upon investigation, each appears to have adequate and effective corrective action taken. In addition, no heavy concentration of deficiencies existed within any one of the related areas. Surveillances in these areas will be increased during this quarter to provide added monitoring. I. An adverse quality trend was indicated within PSI Quality Engineering, related to inspection control. Investi-gation indicated a problem existed in the fourth quarter 1981 and the first quarter 1982. Intensive training conducted in April, 1982, corrected and reversed this trend. J. AFR and CAR analysis indicated a potential adverse quality trend in the area of storage, handling and maintenance of PSI procured items and materials. Investigation revealed that the transfer of the re-sponsibility for these activities to Bechtel appears to have corrected this trend. Bechtel now has a staff of seven QA/QC personnel onboard, and the quality of these activities is significantly improving. PSI will, however, increase surveillances in these areas during the next quarter to provide added monitoring. K. A potentially adverse quality trend was indicated within Project Engineering, related to inadequate procedures to control their responsibilities related to design and procurement document control. _Inves-tigation has revealed the problems were identified in late 1981 and early 1982, with a significant decrease in identified problems thereafter. No corrective
.w L. .
. 1
'MEM0 T0: S. W. SHIELDS page three NOVEMBER 12, 1982 !
action is deemed necessary at this time; however, increased audits will be scheduled for the first quarter 1984, to provide added assurance that the adverse trend continues to have.been effectively corrected. No Corrective Action Requests.or Management Corrective Action Reports have been initiated as a result of this Third Quarter 1982 Trend Analysis. If you have questions, or a need for further information, please contact me. h( L. O. RAMSETT f QUALITY ASSURANCE OFFICER LOR /RPK/lmw Attachments cc: W. Petro J. Thomas N. Reichel C. Beckham . T. Burns B. Morrison R. Keele J. Roberts M. Linn W. Muensterman R. Hughes R.-Borchert S. Sallee H. Curry F. Carchedi J. Parks J. Harrison
s NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS ISSUED 3rd Quarter 1982 Report 600- see 8 0-47i 4es x 459 462 400_ as4 p 402 H 371 - p 352
;2; 300-D 287 3
200_ 100_ O , , , , , , , , , , , , , , OCTI81 NOV DEC JAN/82 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2nd QUARTER TREND = + 21 / MONTH 3rd QUARTER TREND = +11 / MONTH o
l - l NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS REMAINING OPEN 3rd Quarter 1982 Report 1300_ 1250_ 33, 1236 1201 1200 1200_ l 1176
! H 1867 Z 1150_ Itse x
1133 '188 O 11G0- 1099 9ggg 1 1050_ 1058 1000 - , , , , , , , , , , , , , OCT/s1 NOV DEC JAN/82 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG BEP OCT NOV DEC 2nd QUARTER TREND = - 24 / MONTH 3rd QU ARTER TREND =-10.5 / MONTH i I i
~ '
I CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTS 3rd Quarter 1982 Report 30_ r 27 27 25-24 23 22 2O_ # D ^ sa ta P sr g 15_
<C x D
g 13
, 10_
4 9 5_ i i 0 OCT/81 NOV DEC JAN182 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT HOV DEC 2nd QUARTER TREND =io.15 / MONTH 3rd QUARTER TREND =-0.34 / MONTH s I i l
r i . CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTS REMAINING OPEN j 3rd Qatarter 1982 Report 100_ 100 95 _ 93 % 90 _ b a7 H
~
H Z 85 _ es 84
<C as 84 D
O' 80 _ 79 77 75_
--'-~. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OCT/s : ilOV DEC JAN/82 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2nd O. ItTER TREND = -2 / MONTH 3rd QU ARTER TREND =-11.07/ MONTH
AUDIT FINDING REPORTS ISSUED 3rd Quarter 1982 Report 50_ G - 60_ 40_ 37 - b H Z .30-27 28
<C D
O' 2, 22
~
= x x
,, / 20 to is is
\
10 _ 12 0 ( OCTi81 NOV DEC JANt82 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2nd OU ARTER TREND = -0.34 / MONTH 3rd OU ARTER TREND = +0.24 / MONTH
l p AUDIT FINDING REPORTS REMAINING OPEN 3rd Quarter 1982 Report 140 _ 135 132 , 130_ 129 120 _ 121
> -III _ 117 H
g 113 Z 110 _ D i O 100 _ 97 92 94 92 9 0 _. t t 3 l 3 3 g 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 OCT/81 NOV lit:G JAN182 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2nd OUARTEll l lIU N D = -1.3 8 / MONTH 3rd QUARTER TREND = -3.7 / MONTH
s i 3rd Quarter 1982 Report CONDITIONAL RELEASES (CRs) NUMBER OF CRs ISSUED
.... NUMBER OF ITEMS AFFECTED 400.
375 350. 325 300.
, 275.
250. CR TREND: + .56/ MONTH 225 ITEM TREND = + .631/ MONTH 200. lI il 175 i II g li 150. I I l k 8 l 125. ' . g l I I I I 100. ,I I
! 90. f I 80 l
,I t 7
70 . i I g g I 4 I 80 . 8 i l I t\ R I 50 s l ' '\ I -g g g ;y s o' \ i g SI \ * ! 40 . g
\, ,
,, sj} g I \l si
%- \ l l \
- l Y 30 l' \
s , l 1 i , l\ \ s l y
\ g i i 20 . g l \
s, 'e * * ' % I
\ l \,,o \'
10 X g
^
0
. . . . . . i . . . .
. . . . . . . . i i . i i O/80 N D J/81 F M A M J J A S O N D J/82 F M A M J J A S O e - - _ _
-m--, - _ - - - - - , , _ - . - _ . - - _ , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ . - - - , . - - , , _ , , _ - -
a i 3rd Quarter 1982 Report CONDITIONAL RELEASES (CRs) REMAINING OPEN NUMBER OF CHs REMAINING OPEN
--- NUMBER OF ITEMS AFFECTED -
400. ,a 375 [g I 350. I g Y 325 g k 300 ,' '
, , *-% 7
, i - N A /
, 275. g s / s y 250. I I \ I f f \ gs' '% V
/
i I/ 225 #
/
200. /
/
f 175. p
, ~
150. I 125. ' r* l y
/
100. i
/
- 90. 4 80 4 ,
5
- 70. g 60 ,'
l { 50- I l
~
g CR TREND = + 6.71/ MONTH 80- ,"~' ITEM TREND = +11.87 / MONTH
/
- 20. /
+
10 0 . . . . . . 4 i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O/00 N D J/81 F M A M J J A S O N D J/82 F M A M J J A S O l l
CHERNE - 3.s . 3rd Quarter 1982 3.4 - 3.3 . , 3.2 . 3.1 . 3.0 . 2.9 .. 2.8 . 2.7 2.e . 2.6 2.4 . i 2.3 - 2.2 2.1. 2.0 lOF 1.s . 1.s 1.7 .
- 1. s .
' 1.5 1.4 -
- 1. 3 ..
- 1. 2 _
1.1 . < 1.0 . p
.9 <
O
. a ..
.7 F z
- .6. m
.8. ,
U
.4_ g 1
.3 _ u.
.2.
f-N I- . . . _ _f z
, , , i JN MkR APR Mky J N Jht AbG SEP OCT NOV DEC IQF = INSPECTION OUALITY FACTOR = # DEFICIENCIES INDIC ATES Tile ADEQUACY OF THE
+8URVEILLANCES CONTRACTORS 1st LINE INSPECTION
CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON : 3.8 3rd Qttarter 1982 3.4 3.3 . 3.2 3.1 . 3.0 n.o . 2.a . 2.7 2.e . 2.5 2.4 . 2.3 . 2.2 2.1.
- 2. 0 .
lOF 1. s .
- 1. s .
- 1. 7 .
t.e -
- 1. 6 _
- 1. 4 .
- 1. 3 .
1.2 1.1 1.0 .
.9
. 8 ..
, .T.
.e .
j; .6 i
.4 .
.3
.t.
-; - N , ., , , , . . . - - -
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV UEC IQF = INSPECTION QUALITY FACTOR = # DEFICIENCIES INDICATES Tile ADEQUACY OF Tile
+8URVEILLANCES CONTRACTon0 ist LINE INSPECTION
l l i l NISCO 3.6 3rd Quarter 1982 3.4 3.3 . 3.2 . 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.a . 2.1 t.e . 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 IQF 1.9 1.s .
- 1. 7 .
1.8 1.5 1.4 _ 1.3 . 1.2 1.1 1.0 . 9
.a . .
- .T.
.8
.6.
.4 3.
.2.
.1.
0 = - JAN FEB MR APR MkY JUN Jhl AbG SEP OCT tlO V DEC IQF = INSPECTION QU ALITY F ACTOR = # DEFICIENCIES INDICATES Ti1E ADEOUACY OF Tile
+SURVEILLANCES CONTRACTORS 1at LlHE INSPECTION
J.L. MANTA , 3.6 . 3rd Quarter 1982 3.4 3.3 . 3.2 . 3.1 3.0 . 2.o . 2.a . 2.7 2.6
- 2. 6 ..
2.4 . 2.3 . I
- 2. 2 ..
2.1 2.0 - IQF 1.s . 1.s . , 1.1. t.e
- 1. s .
1.4 1.3 1.2 4 1.1 t.o .
.9
.8
.7_
.e . l
.S.
q 4 1 .3 _ i
.2 .
.1 .
O
, , . i i JAN FE8 MAR APR MkY JbN JbL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC i
IQF = INSPECTION QUALITY F ACTOR = # DEFICIENCIES INDICATES Tile ADEQUACY OF Tile l #SURVEILLANCES CONTRACTonS 1st LINE INSPECTION l i
PULLMAN SHEET METAL 3.8 _ 3rd Quarter 1982
- 3. 4 ,
3.3 . 3.2 3.1.
- 3.0 _
2.9 2.a . 2.1 . 2.0 2.6
- 2. 4 ..
2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 . IOF t.o .
- 1. s .
1.1_ t .e .. j 1. s _ -
- 1.4 _
l 1.3 . i.2 _ t .1 .. 1.0 .
.e _
.8
.1 q .s .
. .s .
. .4
.3 j .2 1 .t. ,
0 - JA MAR APR MAY JbN JbL AbG SbP ObT NbV DEC
# DEFICIENCIES INDIC ATES Tile ADEQUACY OF Tile IQF = INSPECTION QUALITY FACTOR =
+SURVEILLANCES CONTRACTORS 1st LINE INSPECTIOtt
NEWBERG
~
- 3. 5 _
3rd Quarter 1982 3.4 3.3 . 3.2 .
- 3.1 3.0 2.0 2.8 .
2.1 2.6 2.5 2.4 . 2.3 2.2 2.1. 2.0 . IOF t.o . 1.s .
- 1.1.
i.e . s.s . l .4 . 1.3 1.2 1.1 < t-
.s . g
. 7 .. _
z
.e . , uJ
.s . 6
.4 E
.3 . 1
.2.
3 m
.1 Z 0-
, , , , . . . . . . i JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
# DEFICIENCIES INDICATES Tile ADEOUACY OF Tile lOF = INSPECTION OUALITY FACTOR =
f SURVEILL ANCES CONTRACTORS 1st LINE IflSPECTION 1
COMMONWEALTH - LORD JV 3rd Quarter 1982 3.4 3.3 . 3.2
; 3.1 3.0 2.0 2.a .
2.1 2.e . 2.s . 2.4 2.3 2 . 2 .. I 2.1 2.0 IQF 1.s _ 1.s . 1.1 ) 1.s .
- 1. s ..
- 1. 4 _
- 1. 3 .
- 1.2 1.1 1.0 .
9_
.s .
. r ..
.e .
.s .
4
.3
.2
.1 .
O JAN FEB MkR APR MkV JdN Jbt AbG SEP ObT NOV DEC f IQF = INSPECTION QUALITY FACTOR =
+ 8URVElLL ANCE S b
y
' ^
C'"ONTRACTORS
" ^ "^ "
t:1 LINE INSPECTI 1
BECHTEL 3.s .
... 4.. 3rd Quarter 1982 A a 3.4 y y
- 3. 3 .
3.2 . 3.1 3.0 . 2.9 2.a . 2.1 > 2.e . 2.8 2.4 . 2.3 , 2.2 2.1 2.0 . IQF 1. s .. 1.s . 1.7 1.8 _ 1.5
- 1. 4 .
- 1. 3 _
- 1. 2 ..
1.1 _ 1.o _ <
.S . O
.s _ p
.1 z
. s .. W
.e . o
.4_ u.
11.
.3 3
. 2 .. tt)
.1 _ Z JAN FEB MAR ,
APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP ') C T NOV DEC i f DEFICIENCIES INDICATES Tile ADEOUACY OF Tile IQF = INSPECTION QUALITY FACTOR =
+8URVEILLANCES CONTRACTORS 1st LINE INSPECTION =
i l 3rd Quarter 1982 Report ; t CAR & AFR ORGANIZATION DISTRIBUTION 1 NOTE: 12 Months Data CONTRACTORS PSI (CARS & AFRs) (CARS & AFRs) QUALITY 51 l ENGIN 82 - 30.7% l 39.2% CONTRACT MANAGEMENT S&L MATERIALS - 39
.31 - 23.5 %
14.8% CLJV PROJECT 27 - , 12.9% ENGINEERING - 34 20.5% 25 - CHERNE 12.0% i ALL l
" l i OTHERS (6) - 42 44 - 25.3%
21.1% 20s Total 188 Total
..--.----,....--.n.. ---- .- - - .- . - - . - - - , - - , - - , , - . - . . - . . . , , - - - - . . , . - . -- --- ---.---_n---.,. - - - - . - - - - _ , . , . _ -
i 1 , 3rd Quarter 1982 Report l NEWBERG i DEFICIENCY & CAUSE DISTRIBUTION (AFRs & CARS) CAUSE "A" CAUSE "B" NOT COVERED NOT IMPLEMENTING IN APPROVED APPROVED PROGRAM / PROCEDURE PROGRAM / PROCEDURE INSTRUCTIONS , INSPECTION PROCEDURES, 20 26.7% 3 & DRAWINGS 42.8% CTORAGE ,1 e 21.3% DESIGN
- 2 CONTROL IDENTIF CATION 28.6% 10.7%
NONCONFORM. ~6 ICONTROL 8.0% 1_ INSPECTION 14.3% ALL OTHERS 25 33.3% 1- INSPECTION STATUS 14.3% Total 7 75 Total 8.5 % CAUSE'A' 91.5% CAUSE*B" TOTAL DEFICIENCIES -82
N S e 4 e y ee b.- N o 7' C. - g m. *a g e
}t ~--
5 1
't I y iI.w- ee N
C=
~ ,
2 " 7. C r :- $ em f) w
- - ~ d' W
ry . - 1 l '~~ l c.: } L:~~ i \j c.
- i o-W t E we m,Zj ., ~ ~
L
\~t
*1 we, e.
g~a
"= N
- t - i P' pas p #e *#
F - b I M"""="- ~ J i A r.
- t_f I
*1 n
$~ m
~~e
-Dw&w ,* h
'g I ---
e-eo, y w e.
- # l . e "e
.t
** 6 N.
3 - E . 3 ! w-a - -
.J ,
e 1 e e D
- L n ',
mem m M p WI
, eM 4
e 1- -- ,_.,__.t.---- , e' - I 3 t
% r.'. S M e
O e Og, e h g N : w w m me me sammusammen
& .e
~ ,
r. l c~ e N
=
c I r N
=
~ .
w'
+ w
.-~ %
*O !
g h 6
.\
x-r q .
~.! -{
- 4 L:
~N j ,A , '! -
D
~
- e %
l \
-os y.
U
- y. .*
%- * ~
w* n. r l c. e,* s. . hN en*w l
- L*_ ) .
N
$ 8 g
<%= ~ '
~
**** -. N
-h+ %e
** N m
%e 4
e ~" %. e t t.: .' 2. . 2 . Me
-- .N
~
N ~ me N C q
- y
. A es -
.e--
s
- =w- ,[ 'N*- , -
.u n
~ . .._t % -
o GunA [**l N &f
. . 1 3rd Quarter 1982 Report
\
PSI QUALITY ENGINEERING DEFICIENCY & CAUSE DISTRIBUTION (AFRs & CARS) l
)
CAUSE "A" CAUSE "B" NOT COVERED NOT IMPLEMENTING IN APPROVED APPROVED ' PROGRAM / PROCEDURE PROGRAM / PROCEDURE l lNSPECTIONS 2_ & PROCEDURES 33.3% INSPECTION 44.5% RECEIPT I 6 INSPECTION l 11.0% i ALL OTHERS 66.7% - - -
; ALL OTHERS _ 20 44.5%
6 m. Total 45 Total 11.8% CAUSE 'A' 88.2% C AUSE 'B'
e PSI OUALITY ENGINEERING Jo__ AFR'_S & CAR'S RELATED TO INSPECTION g .__ 6-- ' I; -- 2---
. I s l 1 1 ! l I -
l l -t= 4 10/81 11/81 12/81 1/82 2/82 3/82 4/82 5/82 6/82 7/82 8/82 9/82 TREND = .269/ MONTH
3rd Quarter 1982 Report PSI CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MATERIALS DEFICIENCY & CAUSE DISTRIBUTION (AFRs & CARS) CAUSE "A" CAUSE "B" NOT COVERED NOT IMPLEMENTING IN APPROVED APPROVED PROGRAM / PROCEDURE PR O GR AM/ PROCEDURE IN AD EOU ATE
" TORAGE u ENA"A I E
_ 14 2- PROCEDURES 40.0% 50.0% ' INSTRUCTIONS
& PROCEDURES 4 11.4%
NON IDENTIFICATION CONFORMANCE CONTROL 4 1_ CONTROL 11.4% 25.0% CONTROL lIMPLEME NONCONFORM DISPOSITION ATION _4 OF MATERIAL ALL OTHERS ~g l 1- RELEASE 25.8% l 25.0% ; l Total 4 _ ss Total 10.2% CAUSE*A* 89.8% CAUSE*B' l I l
. , - . .a,..-..-_-_..---. . -_. - -
CAR'S & AFR'S , f > RELATED TO STORAGE
' 5 --
4-- i 4 3__ t - 2- -
- 1__ .
i i 1 I i i l ! f-- [ t l l 10/81 '11/81 12/81 1/82 2/82 3/82 4/82 5/82 6/82 7/82 8/82 9/82 l TREND = ,042/ MONTH i i i
! I t'
i 3rd Quarter 1982 Report l PSI PROJECT ENGINEERING DEFICIENCY & CAUSE DISTRIBUTION (AFRs & CARS) CAUSE "A" CAUSE "B" ; NOT COVERED NOT IMPLEMENTING IN APPROVED APPROVED PROGRAM / PROCEDURE PROGRAM / PROCEDURE j i 5 CONTROL 5-INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, lDOCUMENT20.8% INSTRUCTIONS,
& DRAWINGS PROCEDURES, 4 50.0% ^
16.7% IDENTIFICATION OF RECORDS 4 16.7% l PROCUREMENT 4 DOCUMENT i CONTROL ALL OTHERS
~
40.0% 45.8% DESIGN I 1- CONTROL 10.0% Total 10 24 Total 29.4% CAUSE 'A' 70.6% C AUSE 'B'
PSI PROJECT ENGINEERING AFR'S F, CAR'S RELATED TO LACK OF PROGRAM / PROCEDURE COVERAGE 10 -- I g_ 4 i , 6- - 4__ 2-_
~ ~. .
- ~~ _ __
W I i i i i l l 1 l- r l .
10/81 11/81 12/81 1/82 2/82 3/82 4/82 5/82 6/82 7/82 8/82 9/82 TREND = .084/ MONTH - i
-. _ . . - . , . _ _ - n . . -
NS l** / SEAVICE OUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTT.iENT l- INDIANA SUSPECTED TREND INVESTIGATIO*1 REPORT 3 TO; 1.F 81733 R 10/32 PAGE 1 OF Mg QA SECTION: REPORT NO. : DATE: B. Morrison Ifs 2/M - Audits STIR-014 10/26/82 RESPONSi8LE ORG: REP 3 Quality Engineering 3r RTQUARTEdR o7, U yg,, g SUSPE CTED TR END: Adequacy and effectiveness of Inspection Control. Reference the attached PSI AFR's and CAR's.
/> ,o * ,
f * *. /*- 'dd ' '-/ b ATTACHMENT (S) N. I" ' "*^ '' QUALITY ADMIN:STRATION SUPERVISOR DATE INVESTIGATION PROCESS AND METHODS USED: ilNCLUDED OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE REVIEWED) A review of the' CARS and AFRs included on Attachment #1 has been performed. The results of this review are documented on ; Attachment "A". 8 c 5 s 0 E o 5 a 9: 5 0 b ATTACHMENT (Si /d f b RISPONS18LE IN VESTIG ATOR DATE IS CONDITION ADVERSE TO QUALITY? YES O NOR MCAR/ CAR NO. COMMENTS E Based on Attachment "A", it is evident that the CARS and AFRs
$ issued were effective and a Trend does not exist within the Quality h Engineering Section t e area of Inspection Contr CA DEFT. SECTION EAA'NAGE'M DATE t is.21 l
Attachment #1 STIR-014 , SU3PECTED TREND: AFR's CAR's IPSI 20N01 281 PSIOl80 1 PSI 20N02 281 PSIO187 IPSI 20NO3 281 PSIO203 1PS!20N04 281 PSIO226 IPSI 23NO3 282PSIOOO7 2PSIO9N02 282PSIOO30 282PSIOO31 282PSIOO34 282 PSI 0035 282 PSI 0036 282 PSI 0044 282PSIOO58 282PSIOO67 . 282PSIO119 9
l B ATTACHMENT "A" The AFR's and CAR's referenced on Attachment 1 were accumulated and reviewed to determine if a possible trend exists. The results of this review at e:
- 1) Of the twenty (20) AFR's and CAR's identified on this STIR; a) four (4) AFR's and two (2) CAR's were issued in 10/81; b) one (1) AFR and one (1) CAR were issued in 11/81; i
c) one (1) CAR was issued in 12/81; .j d) one (1) CAR was issued in 1/82;
- e) six (6) CAR's were issued in 2/82; f) two (2) CAR's were issued in 3/82; g) one (1) AFR was issued in 5/82; h) one (1) CAR was issued in 6/1/82.
1 Graphically, this represents a positive downward trend in the number of deficiencies noted in Q.E. in the area of Inspection Control. a
% ~
kiti 2/8L pjgs, ] 2) Of the twenty (20) AFR's and CAR's identified in this STIR. ten (10) CAR's were issued concerning activities of the Civil Inspection & Testing Services Group. All of these CAR's were issued between 11/81 through 3/82 except for one (1) which was issued in 6/82. The CAR's issued between 11/81 and 3/82 required training of appropriate personnel to prevent recurrence of a similar deficiency. , The CAR issued in 6/82 was not caused by inadequate inspection, but ' rather due to a breakdown of equipment. Therefore since no CAR's or AFR's have been issued since 3/82 that identify inadequate inspection, the training conducted as action to prevent recurrence appears to be effective. 9 e s , & ! .. i ) J
( *
, g.h , A' A LITY M J .A' .E :~.PART*ENT ; , 4/ ,c: 4 6A SUSF*c 'd.TED TREND INVESTIGATION REPORT I
LF St 733 R 10'82 ' AGE 1 OF 3 v TO: CA SECTION: Materials n ucaT NO.: ':; ATE: 2 S. Sallee Quality Engineering STIR-013 3 '; ]10/26/82
. , c a r y. t u 3 a .
! j l is>2N PSI : ALE c=G. Management - Materials Contract l3rd_ ;;n ,1982 y 23 S
- r.ar s :T sa Ta ENo:
Adequacy and effectiveness of storage activities. Reference the attached PSI AFR's and CAR's.
) -
-9 , . .
i
@ ATTa0-VENT!S) . d't
^
**I
- OU ALITY A0 .**N'$7F ATION S*.PL A V:SOR DATE
. 15 7: , AT' O'. :AXIES ANO v!Tw::S usfo: o ,Cf.UGi3 C3JECTIVE EVIDENCE D; VIE.*.20)
[ g1 l , 1
.c A review of the CARS and AFRs included on Attachment #1 has been performed. The results of this review are documented on Attachment "A".
z 9 E e Oi s o 2 9 4 h 5 C f i . 4 t t } f i . I t j k ATTACHMENT (S) / ' U~
; RESPONSIBLE INVESTIQkTOR DATE IS CONDtitON ADVERSE TO QUAUTY7 YESl) NOh MCAR/ CAR NO.
3 COYMENTS i y Based on Attachment "A", it is evident that the CARS and AFRs issued
?,
were effective and a Trend does not exist within the Quality Engineering l E Section in the area of segge a,cejvf tgs gp a n g4 j CA CEPT. SECTION M AN AGER DATE 3 116 2)
- CAF's i
..3 i r 3 :I!*.'Cl 281PSIOl9E 1DSI25NCE 281PS1022:
I?5104P02 282 PSI 000! 262PSIOO2C 282PSIOO25 282 PSI 0033 282PS10039 222P510068 282PSIOO78
, 232PSIO146 i 262 PSI 0l62 l 282PS10179 282PSIOl81
.i I i. 4 t i 4 1 t i I
.. -- - - _=_____. - . .- . _ ---- - _ _ _ _ - - - . _ . . . . . . -
- , . STIR - 014 i
ATTACHMENT "A" J i i The AFR's and CAP's referenced on Attachment 1 were accumulated and reviewed to determine if a possible trend exists. The results of this review are:
- 1. Of the Sixteen (16) AFR's & CAR's identified on this STIR:
- a. One CAR issued 11/81 (
- b. One CAR, 2 AFR's issued 12/81 '
( c. Two CAR's issued 1/82 [ l
- d. Two CAR's, and One AFR 2/82 j 4 issued
- e. One CAR issued 3/82
- f. One CAR issued 4/82
- g. One CAR issued 8/82
- h. Three CAR's issued 9/82 1
This is graphically represented below: i b h I 4 I A
,_, t \,
%.c , ,
, 't, *a
*%. Tas ll"4c% ini, %.% % % %
i 2. Of the sixteen reports referenced, if coded under the present cause and deficiency coding system per PMP 16-2, twelve (12) CAR's identify a deficiencies related to storage. Of these twelve (12) reports, two identify deficient storage buildings (warehouses); two identify ]' improperly drained or flooding areas, four identify Level A storage exceeding allowable humidity levels or inopperative measuring equipment; three identify material not capped, stacked, or supported properly; I , and one identifies Level D storspe deficiencies not corrected in a ! timely manner. L i Graphically, the last two months shows another increase in identified '
; deficiencies. But, ,considering the number of surveillances in the last j quarter (66) by Storage & Maintenance surveillance group, it does
! not appear to be a significant trend. Nevertheless, surveillances of storage will be increased during the next quarter to assure ident- ! ification and required correction if a trend is developing. i 3. The remaining four (4) reports are shown with the cause an4 deficiency code per PMP 16-2 shown in bracketst 1. ATR81 PSI 25NC11051-5};
- 2. AFR 82 PSI 04 PD2
[051-A,081-5];4.AFR 81PSI CAR 281 PSI 25 NC8 [951-A, 081-A] ;[3.162-B]. 0195 i e l
o *
/ ' F .'S UC
- CUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT
' SERVICE INDIANA SUSPECTED TREND INVESTIGATION REPORT LF 61733 R 10/82 PAGE 1 OF j TO: QA SECTION: R EPORT NO. . DATE:
g B. Morrison Audits STIR-012 10-26-82
; RESPONSIBLE ORG.
REPORT QUARTER: y Project Engineering 3rd orn 1982 YEAR 5 "*"'# '"'" The existance or adequacy of documented procedures covering Instructions, Procedures and Drawings and Procument Document Control. Reference the attached PSI AFR's and CAR's.
, i '
b ATTACHMENT (S) - OUALITY ADMINISTR ATION SUPERVISOR DATE IN% ESTIGATICN PROCESS AND METHOCS USED: (INCLUDED OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE REVIEWED) Based on the information depicted on Attachment 1, there is a downward trend in the nu.% er of AFRs and CARS issued related to the lack of program / procedures coverage. However, to ensure that the downward trend is maintained, the Audit frequency will be increased in the subject area during the First Quarter, 1983. z
- O Z
5 cvs E Ei c 5 o
/'
d ATTACHMENTIS) NW % -[ t/ a b'V SPh$l8LE IN'VESTIG ATOR DATE IS CON 0lTICN ADVERSE TO QUAUTY? YES O NOM MCAR/ CAR NO COMMENTS a
$ )
- 0 ATTACHMENTf I)!d h -ll st 21/ L g
"OAp,T wECT,0~ MA~AcER jag (16 71
SUSPECTED TREh0: AFR's CAR's IPSI 24P02 281PSIO219 1 PSI 24P03 281 PSIO229 1 PSI 24PO4 2PSIO8P01 2PSIO9P02 2PSIO9PO4 2PSIllP01 f l 1 s
nrtwmera n PSI PROJECT ENGltlEERlllG stilt-012 AFR'S F. CAR'S
~
RELATEDTOLACKUFPROGRAM/PROCEDURECOVERAGE 10 - - 8-- 6 -- 4__ . 2_ _ i . > ' I i s T i i T i i I I- T i 10/81 11/81 12/81 1/32 2/82 3/82 4/82 5/82 6/82 7/82 8/82 9/82 TREND = .084/M0f1Tli -
e ATTACHMENT "A"
! STIR-012 The AFR's and CAR's identified on Attachment 1 were reviewed to determine if a negative trend exists as noted under the heading " Suspect Trend".
Suspected Trend in " Procurement Document Control". AUDIT REPORT AFR#/ CAR # FINDING INVESTIGATION 81-PSI-24 PD-2 PMP 1.11 does not A valid finding. However require a Bid Spec, it should not be considered to be reviewed by in this trend investigation QA prior to since this was a new require-issuance. ment of ANSI N45.2.13 (1976) that PSI had just recently endorsed prior to this finding being issued in Dec.1981. This finding identifies a problem in ensuring PSI commitments are adequately covered in implementing procedures. N/A 281PSIO229 Purchase Requisition Not a valid CAR. being issued prior CAR was issued in error. to review by QA. N/A 281PSIO219 Design Changes not This is a " major" CAR being contracturally that was determined to l imposed on Suppliers be considered reportable and Contractors via to the NRC. PO Change Orders. Based on the investigations noted above a condition adverse te quality does exist. This conclusion is based on the fact that ene (1) detunent listed above (CAR 281PSIO219) is significant in nature. However, it is recenrended not to triciate another CAR cr a MCAR until such time that the corrective action to CAR 281PSIO219 (SPP-34) is evaluated for effectiveness. ]
E
" Instructions, Procedures and Drawings" AL'DIT REPORT AFR # FINDING INVESTICATION 81-PSI-24 PD-3 Procedures do not A valid finding.
require review by QA of conformed specs. prior to issuing to ensure they agree with bid evaluations and negotiations. 81-PSI-24 PD-4 Procedures do not A valid finding. define actions required for conforming PSI prepared specifications. 82-PSI-03 PD-1 PMP 5.01 requires A valid finding. review documentation to be a QA Verification Record. PMP 1.11 did not require review documentation for PSI prepared specs. to be - sent to QA Records for retention. 82-PSI-09 PD-2 . PMP organization charts Not a valid finding. do not address the (See response to AFR). Supervising Engineer-ASME Piping. 82-PSI-09 PD-4 PMP's do not require A valid finding-ERA's to be marked PMP did not have
" Safety-Related" as correct ERA form required by AQAM. attached. Proj.
Engineering was using ERA form in AQAM which has a block for marking safety category. 82-PSI-ll PD-1 " Notification of A valid finding. Contested FCR" form in S&L's PI-MH-017 is not procedurally addressed in PHP.
- 'I
! , , J;. ' $ ?. '. A u i r ; c :.;,.c2 _ _ A8,7 ENT J U ' IA
.- SUSPECTED TREND INVESTIG ATION REPCRT 1
l- t; e.':: p ..a: 4sE OF 3
; 70- CA sECTTCN. Ciyil ' E PORT NO. [ ATE:
J. Parks Quality Engineering STIR-011 10/26/82
- l_.
lgyai.,..,,_gg. 3 l = =Newberg j_ - : . < = i. - N o. 3rd_ 7n 1982 vgAa g swi.rt: w.o Adequacy and effectiveness of storage activities. Reference the attached PSI AFR's and CAR's. r, , e
, ,. / _s ,/
/ GU A LITY ACr.* 6'.'ST:ia b A TT sC-YE'.?!S) ..
'? -
~
ATiCN SL ? - V'C 3R_ DATE
,c. : -. i : , , - .-ss A o VET-Oos i.sso; ii . i.ucs: ca.EcrivE E .icm:: ar.oc..so A review of the documents listed on page two (2) has not revealed any trend.
There are two (2) that come close to the same type of violation, tut no discernable pattern exists. The twelve (12) CAR's are a combination of individual violations with no definite trend. i 2 o 9 3 5 E h E
=
5 m 3 r -
] /
h ATTAC'4 MENT (S) / j AESPONSIBLE INVESTIGATOR O'ATE IS CONotTtCN AOVE ASE TO QUALITY? YES b NO M AR/ CAR NO a COYvENTS I C
=
U
=
0 ATTACMMENTfS) 4" UA //- / / S E OA DIPT SECTION MANAGE A OATE f16 2)
-. . . _ . . ~-. . _ . - . . .. . . ._ - . . . - _ - - -.
- o- ...
4 SUSPECTED TREND: Adequacy and effectiveness of storage activities. Reference the following
- PSI AFR's and CAR's:
) AFR's CAR's CAR's 2NMH0lNC5 281 PSIOl81 282PSIOO78 , 2NMH0lN06 281PSIO225 282PSIO109 2NMH04N10 282 PSI 0001 282PSIOl30 2NMH04N12 282 PSI 0015 282PSIO144 282PSIOO45 282PSIO148 282PSIOO71 282PSIO159 j 5 e T l i i I 1 ) f i 6 i i
04 4 . = C. 1 I h i _ - N l i, lN l s. t,--a
=
O \.I N b-C M, i C
=
am ., p ,N c h k.
~
c . w
-t I N LU ' -
i T
=I e
- m g
~ ; N
~ *a .
l D-y %
>! % g
. es 0
t , ,. 1
* - s
! E q I
< ~
". ==. = .e
=
h k. eum 2* Q n I ~ts w~ d L.- g b> 4 l= s s b~ h m
- b O h
#f f
N
~
,~;
h
~ ~ . . _ .]. . . ~~~~..~~~-u..,
r 8'**, f' g 5 C i CN m 9
i
, Cun....~ . C r_ T /s. ', NT ' / .c r.,s A SUSPECTED TREND ;NVESTIG ATICN REPORT j l
- L: : * .22 % 10 3; ' AGE / OF Q TO CA SECT 60N. Cjyj} WORT NO. C ATE:
gl. J. Parks Quality Engineering 67za- m 10-22-82 5 :. . .r ur :4c.
; ,_ _ J . L . f!a n ta T cu ja ag:
- __ ___ aTa vran Ta:No: Adequacy and effectiveness of contractors first-Tiile Inspection.
5 l: .- ::::: Suspected trend is based on analysis of PSI construction surveillance reports for 1982.
,-~ ,
A TT A C V NT(S) ' ~ i OU A LITY 1.r' J.:5' :A T10 '. SLT ~ ri v M OR C ATE
. . ::Te:*. 7 20 0E S$ ANO VET mCOS USED. U N CL L'D E D O S.' E C18 v E E'. . 2 N O: " E vi E .v5 DI Reported deficiencies against Inspection (Deficiency Code 10) show 2 instances against P. Ullrich, 2 instances against R. Rubbens, and 2 instances (shared) ,
against D. Weiss and C. Peappies. No instances were against K. Rung. i C. Ueiss is now transferred to Production Foreman R. Rubbens is now transferred off-site. K. Rung is now transferred off-site. I Other deficiencies from surveillance reports were mostly single incidents with , the exception of it&TE, Nonconformance, and Special Process violations (2 instances each)(Deficiency Codes 12,15, and 09 respectively). The period of most deficiencies represents the peak activity period including the coating of Unit #1 containment and full operation of the blast shop. Examined Surveillance Reports itANTA JL-02-00Cl to
; 82-0050 (January - September 1982). Quality' Engineer feels that no trends were 3 established and that proper surveillance conducted by PSI Civil Surveillance Group j has resulted in a Q.F. of 0 for September.
3 Quality Engineering has the feeling that more attention is required to the J. L. t Manta trending operation and to this end we have written letter NQA-1293-82 to [- O J. L. fianta and intend to more closely watch their response and actions. 5 3: b c b ATT ACHMENT($) ' I [/ AESPON$1BNVESTIG ATOR 'OATE 15 CONDITION A0 /E 45E TO OL' A LITY) YES NO MOAaicAA NO
' COMYENTs \
0 A rTAc . .E,.T,s> 6h a m e w% 0.A ":!PT SECTiON M AN AGE R
' ' b # M-CATE
- - - . . . - _ . .. "*7'
J.L. MANTA 3.8 3rd Quarter 1982 3.4 ' 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.0 .* 2.9 2.n . 2.7 2.o . 2.5 2.4 2.3 . 2.2 2.1 2.0 IOF 1.o . 1.n . 1.7 1.e .. 1.8 1.4
- 1. 3 . '
1.2 1.1 1.0 .
.n .
.8
.r.
.e .
.S.
4
.3 i . 2 .,
.1.
U -L i . i i i . . . . . . JAN FED MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
.- IOF = INSPECTION OUALITY FACTOR = + DEFICIENCIES '
INDICATES Tile ADEQUACY OF TIIE
+ SURVEILL AtlCE S CONTRACTORS 18t LillE INGPECTION
~
* ~
j ,d :hyg NO ANA CUAUTr ASSURANCE CEPARP.* INT SUSPECTED TREND INVESTIGATION REPORT L: S' 723 R ICiS; PAGE 1 OF 2 TO: QA SECTION: Materials R E PCRT NO.
- DATE:
! 5. Sallee Ouality Enoineering STIR-009 10-22-82
= ass >C ;sisLE osc:
seaosT cV RTEs:
$ Materials Contractor IPd .QTR 19E2 YEAR
'O 5 ** "'"; Adequacy and effectiveness of Contractor's first-line inspection; suspected trend is based on analysis of PSI Surveil-lance Reports for 1982.
b AT"TACHMENT($1 W N [8 *.77-T2 DUALITY ADVINISTl/ATION $UPEstvlSOR DATE 1*4veSTiGATr0N PAC Iss ANO t.tETHoCS USED: UNCLUDED OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE REVIEWED) Surveillance of materials handling for 1982 does indicate a deficiency in the adequacy of controls over material handling, storage and maintenance. However, PSI was directly responsible for administering these activities. Recently, Bechtel Power Corporation was given a contract to administer these activities. The timing of that contract award coincides with the marked improvement identified in the attached chart. Bechtel now has seven QA/QC personnel onboard and the recent improvement is expected to continue, such that an acceptable IQF should be achieved before the end of the next quarter. No further corrective action is deemed necessary at this time. z . l s 2 e 3 5 5 o 5
=
k 5 vi c 0 a n 4c vE NTi$i &%SaA0% R E SPoNSIB LE IN VE STIC AToR
'Ils /9 a OATE l$ CO'.o6TICN ADVERSE To C'.lALITY7 YES C No b MCAR/Ct R No N/A C0YMENTS U
3 A rTA c v EuT<si -MAQ Ah % 8'le/rt CA oEPT. SECTioN MANAGER cATE _t?6 2: , _
BECHTEL 3.s _ e.e 4.s 3rd Quarter 1982 3.4 In 3.3 . l 3.2 .
- 3.1 ,
3.0 2.D . 2.o . 2.7 . 2.e . 2.6 2.4 . 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 . IOF 1.o . i.e . 1.7 1.o _ 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 4 1.0 .' F
.e .
.8
\1 o F
.i z
.o . "'
.s . '
o 4 E u. 3 .l 3
.2. U)
.1. 2 O_ .
. . . . . . . . . . i JAtt fen t.t A n APR LI A Y J Utd J ul. AUG SEP P40 V DEC 4
# DEFICIENCIES INDIC ATES Tile - QUACY OF Tile
- BOF = INSPECTION OUAt.lTY FACTOR =
# SUllVEILL A NCE S CONTRACTORS 1 i ' If1E IflSPECTIOff O
A= = = -'e-+ ~ - ~ r--A --+- '~-A ~J A- -- - * -,L+~a a A-nM-m- A w ,r---- 4 _ _ , _ w - - , , - , - c g i j i.,, f,d' :CANA { QUAUTY ASSURANCE OEPARTMENT l SUSPECTED TREND INVESTIGATION REPORT LF $1723 R 10i32 OF P TO: PAGE / l CA SE CTION: Electrical REPORT NO. . DATE: H. Curry S g 3 ME5'0*5:!LE 09G. Quality Engineering 6/7[ (M 10-22-82 AEPGRT CV A ATER: 5 0
$ Pullman Sheet Metal 3 oTR 1982 YEAR 5
St.13Pi."~EO TREND: j Adequacy and effectiveness of contractors first line inspection. Suspected trend 's based on analysis of PSI construction surveillance reports for 1982. I 4 b ATTACHMENT (S) % // - M - 7. .' l CUALITY ADutNtSTR AT10N SUPERVISOR OATE It.VEITICATION P40 CESS AND METHOCS USED: IINCLUDED OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE REVIEWEDI ) Following items reviewed: j 1. Pullman surveillance reports from July 1982 through October 1982.
- 2. PSI issued CAR's to Pullman since July 1982.
- 3. Pullman's NCR's from July through October 1982.
Evaluation results: During the effected quarter there have been two (2) different surveillance i processes conducted. Prior to the middle of August, PSI hold points were , placed on each Pullman inspection attribute. This resulted in surveillances it for hold points only. In the middle of August, all hold points were removed 5 by PSI and surveillances were conducted based upon a programmatic viewpoint 3 instead of a hold point material approach. This resulted in locating more 5 deficiencies, which showed a dramatic trend change. l
}: .It is true Pullman has definite problems as shown by the deficiencies identified by our surveillances, CAR's, and the number of Pullman NCR's initiated because i
o of deficiencies identified by PSI surveillance deficiencies Pul'Iman had failed
! to identify. In the past two (2) months, Pullman has hired an experienced QA 1 ? Manager for the site, a QC supervisor, and ten (10) additional inspectors.
1
- g They have also totally revised their QA Manual and a few implementing procedures.
j $
Conclusion:
Although seven (7) of the last eight (8) surveillances were satisfactory, it is ' ! too early to determine the actual effectiveness of the changes which occurred. , ! Therefore, I do not consider a Corrective Action Request is necessary at this i
! time.
Further action should be delayed until it is determined if Pullman's inspection j force is truly ineffective. i r J i j O ATTAc MENT si ,_ M A*Mk RESPoN$18LE fNVESTIQMfoR oATE
- s cof.DITION ADVERSE To QUALITY? YEs C No McARf:Am No COMMENTS
?
0 1 l
~
C ATTACMMENTist b E= M * - ff*/O 9 1 CA DEPT. $f CTioN MA% AGER CUE _- . - _ _0 G10-- _
. .-_ _ - _- -. - - - - - _ . __. - = - - _ - .- . - . .
PULLMAN SHEET METAL 3rd Quarter 1982 3.4 3.3
- 3. 2 .
3.1 . ( 3.0 , 2.9 2.0
- 2. T .
l 2.0 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.8 2.0 . IOF .o .
- 1. n .
- 1. T .
1.6
- 1. s .
1.4 1.3 . 1.2 1.1 1.0 . ' 0
.B. ,
.7 8
.s.
4
.3 .
.2 O 'L____--- -
JA EI uAn APn M1Y JbH JbL AbG :. e - l' Obi NOV D F. C ICi- = lilGPECTIOil OUALITY FACTOI1 = + D E FICIEilCIE S INDIC Alliti allE ADEQUACY OF Tile
+ 8URVEILL Af4CES CONTII A8; 6 0143 1st LillE IllSPECTIOli
~
. . . . .. . .s a, -'
. . . ....:., e..r t.., i 3 i...s.
. . s.,
.. . . v c d i t.. .e. .. . . :. v s..
..I
;. :: z. .. 5: nGE l CF Q 80' . a Sacte rN. Cjyj] = I 2'0 ;T No.
- ,
- S hality Ercineering
'J
- -; .......du..
r' -rf,--- , n 7 ]': AIC-22
-:.mi T E:
O'. +..A 82
<.- .s ..
. . . ,c
. :. 0
.1. . . c. . p
. 1.030v.
. v---
v.
- -
- 3 tad Ef f+:ti.6.ess of cer. tractors first-line inspection. Sus.:+cted trend is httd :n 1 alysis of PSI ccrstruction surveillance reports for 1952.
i b ; ~~ 1 ;- Y E *.T f S) ,, ' r_, J '
"h// /
2._* I - l .# E - < '~I ""
- C '.' A l. 6 T Y a ; 9 . !!,7 : '. " . 4 :OR ! :. 7 E
.a: c at:; : -:.; :: .:. n -((I .r 2 0 u sct.v:ED cs !:TivE cvi:9ec: a r . :t..!31 A review of surveillance data back to, and including April, has not revealed a trend.
April percentage (IQF) was high because work activity was at its peak and thus surveillances were more numerous. However, the uniqueness of our surveillance system does not give a true picture. We may issue only I one (1) surveillance report per week or bi-weekly with several deficiencies yet the surveillance activity was high. This would tend to show up as a higher Inspection Quality Factor (IQF) and be misleading. Again, my review
, of surveillance reports does not reveal any adverse trends.
2 -
=
e-e a 2-2 0 E. C wt C ( . , CA-Ac t N iis t I lI
. Atsr:Nsiet t tNvestecat on
_.t: it t " ' '. ;ii . .*. a ; .1: s t T O T ii' 6T f 7 va! C NO **:AP/caA NO i 7 , . .,. ., 7 3 '
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " " ' ' "" .e.
d n
=
0 e.i Ac .t NT,si h__ A - & W/(/ Pt -
- .5 O t e r t t ciec 9 'm. A S s n cart
.e,
c _ s li _ D E! 1 iO l _ T I T FC V OE - a 0 P - 3 1 YSl Ci l A UE T ON I e C E L O D . t A n I E l i S P TR
< gztu o11";Z iE S O S T EC T A A R G CT D N I
eU A J N O I C 2 l f . G9 I eU 1 J R r S S E e E E I C B t r N C N N A Wiat iU J E L I CI E L E Q I F V N d Y E l l r A D u
". M + S
+
=
R R aP O A T C A F R Y A M T I
/ L A
U i l O E ! t F O I T C E 3
- 1 l
i t P
. I.' . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......I . . .i AJ S
t f
- r. <. :. ?. " .
l
. t. P. n.7 n. fm 4321 0. o.
3333! 327?22 22222t 1 1 f 1 I 1 t 1 t
. f. 7. f. 54 3 2. t 0 0. R. 7. n. s. 4. '-
.I 0 f I
=
F .- I O I O I
( MARBLE HILL SUBTEAM REPORT Subteam W. D. Altman, NRC Headquarters L. D. Kubicek, EG&G Idaho, Inc. Dates / Places of Fieldwork November 15, 1982 - NRC Region III Office, Chicago (Glen Ellyn), Illinois November 16-19, 1982 - Public Service Indiana, Marble Hill Nuclear Facility, New Washington, Indiana Persons Contacted NRC Reaion III Office: D. H. Danielson W. D. Shaffer Chief, Materials and NRC Region III Processes Section Chief, Midland Section R. A. Haasse T. M. Tambling NRC, Region III NRC, Region III Management Program Section Chief, Program Support Section J. J. Harrison R. F. Warnick NRC, Region III NRC, Region III Senior Resident Inspector Director, Office of Marble Hill Special Cases D. R. Hunter H. M. Wescott NRC, Region III NRC, Project Inspector Chief, Zimmer Section Escott Company F. J. Jablonski C. E. Williams NRC, Region III NRC, Region III , Inspector, Project Section 1B Chief, Plant Systems Section NitC Region I I I ~ ~ Project Section Chief i
~
4 Marble Hill Nuclear Facility: E. D. Aimone Nuclear Division Personnel Manager PSI
; C. Beckham Quality Engineering Manager PSI J. V. Bott .
Nuclear Regulations and Affairs Manager , PSI J. Friend - Site Audit Supervisor PSI T. Gross Records Management Manager PSI S. O. Harris
- Division Manager of Training & Development PSI J. J. Harrison '
Senior Resident Inspector USNRC D. Herold Design Document Control PSI D. V. Menscer President & Chief Operating Officer PSI M. L. Morris Division Administration Manager l PSI
- B. Morrison l Audit Manager PSI W. M. Petro Vice President of Nuclear Services PSI
. 1 4 l 2
l
. . ___ _ _ . _ _ . - . . _ = - . .
Marble Hill Nuclear Facility (continued): L. O. Ramsett Quality Assurance Officer PSI J. Roberts 1 Contract Manager - Materials PSI : 1 G. Rosier Quality Assurance Manager Cherne
' R. S. Sallee Materials Quality Engineering Manager PSI S. W. Shields Senior Vice President - Nuclear PSI D. L. Shuter Civil Senior Quality Engineer PSI R. Simmons Operations Quality Assurance Supervisor PSI J. P. Thomas Assistant Project Director PSI W. A. Wogsland ~
Executive Director - Nuclear Operations PSI 4 4 3
_ - . ~ . - - _ - - - -. - - . - -- - . = - . - . . . l l i Literature Reviewed in Conjunction with Assessment
- 1. D. M. Hunnicutt, Construction and Engineering Support Branch, flRC Region ,
III, letter to H. D. Thornburg, Office of Inspection and Enforcement,
.E/15'/UMti:y Meeting - Suba: anti::e CA Findinga, August 12, 1975.
- 2. Chapter 17, Quality Assurance, Marble Hill Preliminary Safety Assessment Report, through Amendment 18, May 1977.
1 4 I
- 3. R. S. Boyd, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, letter to Dr. J. Coughlin, Public Service of Indiana, Inc., Issuance of Construction Per ries for Marble ;
; Eitt Nuclear Generating Station, April 4,- 1978.
i ! 4. Order Confinning Suspension of Construction, Docket Nos. 50-546, 50-547, . August 15, 1979. i 5. Management Analysis Company Report, Public Sergios conpany of Indiana, Inc., P Marble Ei!I Project Diagnostic, October 2,1979.
- 6. J. G. Keppler, NRC Region III, letter to S. W. Shields, Publice Service of Indiana, transmitting IE Inspection Reports and Notice of Violation, Octo.ier 4,1979.
- 7. Construction Problems at Marble Hill Nuclear Facit
- y: Nuclear Regulatory. ;
- conrnission Oversight, proceedings of hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, November 27-28, 1
1979. 4
- 8. S. W. Shields, Public Service of Indiana, letter to V. Stello, USNRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement, transmitting a description of Licensee Activities Addressing Order Confirming Suspension of Construction, February 28, 1980.
- 9. Quality Assurance Program Description, Public Service Company of Indiana, Inc., Marble Hill Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, April 1980, j
- 10. L. S. Rubenstein, Acting Chief, Light Water Reactors, Branch No. 4, letter to S. W. Shields, Public Service of Indiana, Marble Eill Quality Assurance l
Progrer, April 28, 1980.
- 11. J. G. Keppler memorandum to N. C. Mosely, SALP Board Results for Marble Eilt Ruclear Generating Station Units i and 2, December 1980.
- 12. M. H. Schwarts, Attorney at Law, Bedford, Kentucky, letter to G. M. Snyder, Member of Congress, concerning Report on Concrete Assessment, April 21, 1981.
4 13. H. J. Wong, Division of-Resident and Regional Reactor Inspection, letter to J. H. Snf ezek, Director of RRRI, Sterurg of Januarj 8, ISSI Mesting uith Public Service Company of Indiana, Inc., February 9,1981. i
- 14. W. J. Dircks, Executive Director for Operations, letter to the Honorable G. M. Snyder, House of Representatives, concerning Resumption of Concrete Work at Marble Hill, June 25, 1981.
5
7-i- ,. 4 15. J. G. Keppler, NRC Region III, letter to S. W. Shields, Public Service of i Indiana, transmitting report on the Revieu of the Evaluation of Concrete at Harble Hill Nuclear Generating Staticn Unite i c.d 2, Report No. IE-124, i July 1, 1981.
- 16. SALP-1, Details on "Below Average" Facilities in NUREG 0834, prepared for EDO and Comission Briefing in September 1981.
~
- 17. C. E. Norelius, Division of Engineering, RIII, memorandum to. J. H. Sniezek, Division of Resident and Regional Reactor Inspection Program Staff, NarbIs Eiit-Bradford/Dircks Nemo of October 23, 1981, November 18, 1981.
4 l
, 12. Special Management Report by Public Service Indiana, Marble Hill Nuclear i
Project, January 1982. l
- 19. J. J. Harrison, Senior Resident Inspector, Congressional Briefing far Narble Hill Nuclear Generating Station, February 25, 1982.
- 20. J. G. Keppler, NRC Region III, letter to S. W. Shields, Public Service of Indiana, Transmittal of Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performnce (SAIP) Report, July 20, 1982.
- 21. Transcript of Public Meeting, Briefing on Quality Assurance, SECY-82-352,
~
September 29, 1982. 6
. _ - . . . _ . . . ..- _ . . ~ . . - .. .....-
, t 2 1
- 22. Transcript of Remarks by Comissioner J. K. Asselstine, USNRC, to ANS Executive Conference on Government and Self-Regulation of Nuclear Power j Plants, Williamsburg, Virginia, October 18, 1982.
N i i i i i f k 4 5 1 l . i t i 1 I 4 I ? .I . I I i i l i i 1 7 l l f , ,v.-, .- ,,_,,%... ___s _e. 3.___., , m, ,,.y_. . ._, , , _.v.,y __.y - y-, , ,, ,-..y. ,,,,_p.e
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS During the spring of 1979, recurrent problems with the placement and repair of concrete for safety related structures were being experienced which led ) to questioning of the effectiveness of the overall quality assurance program 1
- at the Marble Hill Nuclear Facility. Subsequent investigations by the NRC Region III office confirmed that the problems in the quality assurance pro-1 gram, which earlier had been identified as pertaining to concrete construction i
t activities, extended to other areas as well. Pursuant to this finding, Public Service of Indiana (PSI) issued a stop work order on August 7,1979 which was later confirmed by the NRC on August 15, 1979. Based upon the results cf the assessment process, the primary root cause of ! the breakdown of quality assurance at Marble Hill Facility is attributed to j the utility's inexperience with a nuclear project. Derivation of this root { cause is based upon the utility's failure to recognize the complexity of a nuclear project at the outset, use of techniques and organizational structures which had served well for construction of fossil type plants.but were inap-I propriate for nuclear work, excessive dependency and reliance on the experience of the prime contractors, and misunderstanding of the NRC's role in the con-struction process. Secondary causes which contributed to the QA program failure can be summarized as management's . lack of understanding of the merit of an institutionalized quality program, failure to manage the project from the outset, and reliance j on a false sense of security through dependency.on contractors, the NRC, and the replication process to avoid trouble. 4 8
I l Problems within the NRC are also seen to be contributing causes in that the licensing process is too oriented to technical issues. The presence of NRC inspectors is untimely (irregular presence of inspection teams, assignment of resident inspector too late in construction cycle) and ineffective communications exist within the NRC such that messages from i the field do not get through for action in a timely fashion. As a result of the shutdown order, PSI underwent extensive rework of their quality assurance program which finally resulted in approval by the NRC in March 1981 for the resumption of safety related work. Of cardinal importance to the dramatic turnaround was PSI management's recognition there was a serious problem, and a conscious decision to face it openly and substantively. As a result:
- 1) PSI has gone to great lengths to obtain, retain, and further train highly qualified managerial and technical people.
- 2) Extensive reorganization has taken place including relocation of upper management at the construction site.
- 3) A complete and very positive attitude change towards quality asserance (both as a technical program management philosopy and as a specific organization) has taken place which is rooted in top management and endorsed throughout all levels of the organization.
9
t 't
- 4) Emphasis is placed on doing the job right the first time ,.
and making the necessary resources available to cause thi-s to happen.
- 5) PSI now very firmly manages all aspects of the nuclear construction process going on at Marble Hill.
, Specific Findings /0bservations
- 1) A constant theme echoed by both the NRC and the utility was fossil plant
" cookbook" type construction, most of which could be left to contractors, was inappropriate for nuclear work. With this approach, the fossil plant construction mind-set manifested itself and led all concerned into trouble because this approach was simply not up to controlling the complexities and rigorous documentation aspects required in the nuclear industry.
- 2) QA/QA is too new of a concept for most utility management to readily accept. It appears that management's attitude towards QA is like a self- >
fullfilling prophecy. If recognition of quality assurance as a management tool and a positive attitude is not there, adequate resources will not be provided and the QA organization itself will be hamstrung with too many controls to be effective. i
- 3) Conuranications within the NRC, from field offices to headquarters, are !
not effective. Problems and suggested resolutions are identified and l escalated, but it appears as though not much of anything happens as a result., 1 l 10
/
- 4) Both utility and the NRC field office were in agreement that a competent resident inspector should be assigned at the start of con-struction. Under current policy, the utility's ways are too set at the 15 percent mark and bringing about needed changes can prove to be extremely difficult. It was also recognized that the NRC is probably too pressed for manpower now to be able to instigate this kind of program and have it be effective.
- 5) There is not any one indicator that can be looked at to determine whether a QA program is effective or not. PSI had methods for measuring perfor-mance prior to the shutdown, but they were cruce and a good picture on performance could not be formulated. Problems were treated as individual entities into themselves. It was only after the problems kept repeating that trends were looked at and further investigations conducted that the program was recognized as being ineffective and existing primarily on paper. .
- 6) Prior to the shutdown, there was no one individual who could be pointed to, and the statement made, "He is the one with the ultimate responsibility for quality assurance." Responsibilities were too spread out and no one could really be held accountable. Problem areas were escalated and resulted in a high level stalemate, such that nothing really effective was done to get at the root problem.
- 7) The existence of a QA program on paper and the utility's verbal sales-manship to the NRC are not sufficient to demonstrate the adequacy of i
11-
/
- 11) The QA manual that existed before the shutdown had essentially the same requirements as are now contained in the various company manuals. The implication that may be drawn from this is that management understanding, attitude, and commitment are keys to a successful QA program.
- 12) Progressive attitudes toward quality assurance are very visible through the company's Hi-Q program; there is a strong' team spirit and a seemingly low level of adversative relationships at the managerial / supervisory positions . PSI also stresses employees are to be open about problems and that there will be no recrimination.
- 13) Replication of design was generally seen to be a good philosophy. If it is managed appropriately it can lead to significant cost savings, to follow replication blindly though is asking for trouble.
- 14) Subcontractors perceive overkill with respect to procedures and docu-mentation requirements, but are encouraged that PSI is taking a firm approach to management.
- 15) There is a perceived difference of how'NRC regions interface with the utilities. These vibrations, real or perceived, could affect how utilities do things.
- 16) A perception offered by senior management likened the current QA program of the NRC to the one that existed at Marble Hill prior to i 12
the shutdown order. Basically, the program is not seen as very , mature or effective for reasons of:
- a. The organization is too fractionated;
- b. is subject to too many controls; i
- c. does not report high enough in the management chain;
- d. suffers fron lack of good inspection personnel and other resources t.) do an adequate job; -
; e. inconsistency between inspecto'rs because of no real guidance coming from headquarters.
1 i
)
l 5 1 . .13 m-. --. . .- - -r . . - . - . _ , _. --,...c- . - - 3 ,--- , . - -.3 -----:.~,
progress
~
november 16,1982 9 delayed compliance order granted this has not been great." None of the pieces The Indiano Air Pollution Control Board op- which require additional radiographs has proved a deioyed compliance order that been installed in the plant. allows the company until 1984 to complete a 450-foot stock and associated ductwork be- 9 765 kv line progressing Ninety-t.hree per-ing built to handle flue gas from all six units at cent of the foundations for the company's Wobosh River station. The stock itself is now 67 40-mile 765 kv line, which will run from Co-percent complete, says Vice President, Con- lumbus to the Marble Hill substation, are com-struction LLOYD A. CREWS. Considerable work plete. Fifty-three percent of the structures are remains to connect the six units into the stock. Up, according to CO Construction Field The new stock is designed to reduce the con- Engineer STANLEY L. ADAMS. "The line is com-centration of su: fur dioxide at ground level in pletely erected from Marble Hill to near U.S. the vicinity of the plant without increasing con- 50, just east of Seymour," he said. Conductor centrations forther away. The delayed com- stringing operations are tentatively scheduled pliance order was needed because a two- to begin in May 1983 with the entire line com-year delay in approval by the Environmental pleted in 1984. Protection Agency made it impossible for the company to complete the stock by Dec. 31, S CO open house near Now that the new 1982. addition is in use and the remodeling of the older sections is complete at Corporate Of-9 Moody's lowers company rating fices, the company has planned on informal Moody's investors Service has lowered the open house for all employees, retirees and company's rating on first-mortgage bonos, their families. The open house will be Sunday, preferred stock and secured pollution-control Nov. 21 from 1 to 4 p.m. and will consist of self-revenue bonds to single-A-3 from sing!e-A-2. conducted tours, refreshments, "Mr. Conduc-Moody's said it lowered the rotings because of tor" shows and videotapes. Each department financing concerns over the company's 83 will have o representative on hand to answer percent stake in Marble Hill. Moody's said it ex- questions and give directions. Because of I pects "nchceable deterioration" in the com- potential traffic through the various creos, it is pony's financial condition through 1986. The suggested that valuables be secured and rate change is equivalent to the company's desks and cabinets locked. For more specific "7" roting from Duff & Phelps and higher than details about parking, entrance to the the BBB+ roting issued by Standard & Poors. building or the open house in generol, see the posters on all company bulletin boards or call 8 radiograph review complete The CO Manager, Employee Information DAVID Nuclear Regulatory Commission-ordered VINCENT, at extension 1313. review of radiographs supplied by ITT-Grinnell for Marble Hill piping systems is now complete except for o few welds. Of the 69,027 films of G Acton named state candidate SHARON K. ACTON, CO manager, Conservo-welds reviewed,130 have been identified as tion Services, hos been selected as Indiano's being citered, which is in keeping with the " Business Home Economist of the Year." The twotenths-of-one-percent rate predicted by award is given by the Home Economists in the supplier. "Of these 130, 34 have been Business. She will go on to compete in national determined to require further evoluotion," competition in Milwaukee next June. Con-says Marble Hill station Quality Assurance Of- didates will be judged on individual achieve-ficer LORREN O. RAMSETT. "The impact of all ment and contributions to their profession. PotA-gipat3
% po
~
O company sponsors seminar The com- 9 stock market pony sponsored a two-day economic Puole servce incono common stock development seminor in Indianapolis lost for the ween enced Ncv 12,1982 week where o number of Community develop- Hgh: 26 1/2 Low: 24 7/8 ment experts lectured and answered ques- y -cot tions. The business and community leaders ot- g,gh: 27 1/4 Low 20 il4 tending the seminor learned a variety of com-munity development techniques, including O system load ways to encourage growth through creative Week of Nov. 7.1982. financing and tax packages. They were also P"" *oc-
- 2. 5m shown how to use this information to create in- gee fv oa dividualized development plans for their com- 350.926 megawatt-hours.
munities. " Hoosier economic recovery won't cown 5 89 percent from lost year happen without help" said CO Community year-to-cate oca-Develocment Suoervisor RICHARD D. ZIMMER. 16.721.208 megawatt-hours.
* " 09 P**""
- D5' ** '
MAN. " Community growth takes dedicated people and careful planning. We're taking Record ceak ioacs: positive action to help community leaders winter: 3.923 megawatts (1/11/82) stimulate economic growth." Summer: 3.942 megawatts (7/13/81) O company modifications save money ,,,,,, ,c, ,n, cnc,,,cy, c,,,, ny cc,,c,c,, ccm. Through modifications and improvements cf municatons. Direct ouesnons, comments ano sugges-equipment of Gibson station alone, the com- tons to employee informaton coorcinator. CO. exten-pony has produced operational savings of s'en 1915. obout S745,000. Examples are changes to the make-up demineralizer system and instrument air compressors. Company-engineered design modificatlons on precipitators at Coyugo and Wobosh River stations have resulted in the recovery of 113 megawatts of generating capacity. Replacement of this copocity at today's cost of $700 per kilowatt would have cost in excess of $80 million. O up the ladder CHARLES R. sCHMITT. from sucsta. ton moin*enance mechanc "c" to "b7 Columeus. CHERYL J. HAYES. from c'erk "b" to "o.' Accounts PUBUC Pcycole. CO. and BOBBY R. MULLINS. from suestoten SERVICE mainter.cnce mechcnc "b" to "c." Columbus. INDIANA l i i l}}